Strange Recon - Strange Aviation Thursday 19OCT23 - Strange Recon Radio

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
What's going on Recon. I hopeyou're well. It's yours truly, Jeff
White Bear Kingsbury, Welcome back toanother episode of Strange Recon right here on
YouTube. I have some strange technicaldifficulties right now. For some reason,
the light that I own, thering light, is dying and making crazy
noises. It only works in onemode, and I'm now an orange person.

(00:26):
The color of my sweatshirt and hathas now changed the entire image.
And if I lean too close tothe camera, oh, it's not doing
it anymore. Okay, well Ichanged the ISO it a little bit there.
If I lean to it close tothe camera, it literally just malfunctions
the entire thing, or just shutsthe entire thing down. Everyone in the
weird wide world out there. Itis Strange Aviation Thursday. You know the

(00:49):
deal. We're gonna go over someweird stuff that's in the sky. Does
that mean we're talking about aliens orspaceships from other worlds? No, of
course you have to learn about theweird stuff that we do. So one
of the things we're gonna cover todayis drones that hunt and kill other drones,
drone hunting drones, drone that hunt. Drones are my enemy, but

(01:21):
drones that all right, this wasgonna die right away and the joke's gonna
fail. Folks. We're also gonnachat a little bit about missile defense,
because we've chat We've talked about itquite a bit in the last month or
two, trying to get us aswell informed as possible before we start hearing
all the lies. If you knowwhat I'm saying, we've already been hearing

(01:41):
quite a bit. But also notjust missile defense and you know, boost
phase intercept and stuff like that,and which countries it would be best to
use these types of tools on.But also I think it's important to talk
about some things are happening in latetwo thousand and fifth at sixteen that have
something to do with aviation. Anannouncement from the world that basically put a

(02:07):
lot of people intoto a position wherethey might start coming up with it,
like they might say things like this, everyone else is making money off of
this. They might say things likethat to themselves to justify the context in
which the content they deliver is ineveryone else is making money off this.

(02:30):
We'll get into another motive for whypeople in the UAP disclosure field would find
it, you know, morally andethically okay to try to make a dollar
off of a very real problem,as long as part of their plan is
kind of being a solution to thatproblem. But you know, I think

(02:51):
we could debate if they're actually asolution or not, or if they're just
making people go crazy. Ladies andguns, boys and girls, cats and
kittens, you know the deal.Help support strain ricon click the links below.
We certainly need your help. Thisis free programming for you, not
for me. I pay for it. I pay to talk to you.
That's right, because I love you. So help support Strange Racon, and
of course, leave a comment below. Share the show if you've got the

(03:13):
nerve. I understand how I am, what I look like, the words
I say. I get it.I know the risk you take. But
if you got the bulls, ladiesand gents, boys and girls, let's
get the show going. Stick aroundRacon. Well, I hope that's still

(04:30):
streaming because I just saw my ownbutt on camera, and now that happened,
I am wearing pants, I promise, trust me. But I did
just happen to see when I stoodup and walked away and came back.
So does it as that delayed rightnow on YouTube? I don't know.
I guess I have to go checkit out. Let's go pop over on
the YouTube side to see if,in fact I'm still frozen with my butt
facing the camera. Nope, itlooks like I'm living good, although it

(04:54):
did warn me that I'm using anAD blocker and I am in big trouble
YouTube YouTube All right, friends,click the links below. Thank you Lord
Ludacris. I appreciate you spreading theword on that you can also help support
the show by using cash app orPayPal to make sure the show gets more
of the money than the YouTube cut. Thank you very much for Lord Lucas

(05:15):
for putting that out there, andof course is true YouTube takes a big
cut of the money you guys putup. I'm having a real lighting problem
right now and it's driving me crazy. My desk is over here. What's
going on? Yeah, that's evenworse. What has happened to the lights?
If you don't know, there's alittle studio magic here? I'm using
what this? So there's this magicalnew device the Ukrainians are using to avoid

(05:40):
drones. That's called a green screen. I think that's what it's called.
They're calling an invisibility cloak. It'sactually a green screen. I don't know
if any of this is true,but since I'm an idiot, I just
will say whatever I want. No, not literally, but here if you
don't believe me, here's a alittle alternative view for you. Don't worry.

(06:00):
I am fact wearing pants. Recon. You can tell hello, why
are you in my room? Whoinvited you? Oh? Get out of
here? See there you go,Hollywood magic. But there's this massive gap

(06:23):
in the screen. I don't knowwhat's going on here. Maybe if I
just throw this the other way.Oh god, whatever, dude, cheaper
Norman stand there, Okay, there'snorm. Oh right, ladies and gentlemen.
I don't know what's going on here. Something's up with the lighting.

(06:43):
Something on this thing. Als allbeeping really loud. So if the Lakers
office starts beeping and I apologize,let's get this today. Let's get today's
episode going here. That's right.I'm trying to keep up with all the
folks that out of second camera YouTubegives you tips. They said, hey,
Recon, we noticed that your watchhours on your program is really good.
The interactions are really low. Thewatch time is roughly thirty seven minutes

(07:06):
on my show, so I'm makingit to the thirty seven ish minute mark.
I appreciate Ricon for sticking it outand making it that far out of
a two hour long show. That'sactually pretty good analytically speaking for what happens
on YouTube, believe it or not. But having said that, they said,
the things you're not doing you're notshowing any photographs, or you're not
holding up any cool toys. Thebackground of your show sucks. You change

(07:30):
the set too much. They alsosaid, of course, that I don't
have two camera angles. Well shutthe fuck up, you jo damn it.
Say there we go. I justlost about ten subscribers. Okay,
let's fix that one. Let's justgot reel that back in the algorithm got

(07:57):
me Ladies and gentlemen, boys andgirls. On today's episode, as I
said, we're gonna be talking aboutdrones that hunt drones. First things up,
let's go over to Fordham Technologies.Now, if you're like me,
I thought it said for Ian,but it didn't. It said Fordham.
So back it up, precon calmit down. Let's watch this little video

(08:20):
together and get a copyright strike targetis large fixed wing uavy defense mot activated
drop nets selected drone hunter. Thedrone doesn't actually talk like that. Just

(08:45):
so you know, CAPO, lookat that thing freaking size that airplane flying
at that Seriously, CAPA caught youwith a net. It puts a pair
shoot on the aircraft. Can youimagine that? How crappy. The reason

(09:05):
why we're talking about this during strangeaviation is, of course this is weird.
One of the places these things arebeing implemented. Sorry, I just
mashed them like being implemented right nowis of course power structures throughout the Ukraine.
If everyone got a good look atthat. Sorry audio side you can't
see it because audio is audio.You don't have a video, so please
come on over to YouTube and clickthat likeness described and joined the team over

(09:26):
here and join the YouTube chat.This technology is being implemented throughout Ukraine and
other places that have infrastructure. Oncewe talk about constantly here transport infrastructure.
You ain't be disclosure anyways that havelots of infrastructure like power and all this

(09:46):
stuff that can be extremely vulnerable toairborne small aircraft with little radar cross sections
and there's no major you know,missile or a or airborne defense in the
area or anything like that. Atbes have radar, and we talked about
that quite often on here. Dowe not Do we not speak about the
fact that the United States is fullof places that need to be secure,

(10:11):
And we often and I joke aroundand say, a chain link fence can't
stop a drone swarm. We've seendirect energy systems, we've seen kinetic systems,
We've seen all types of stuff tostop the drone. But have we
considered the classic human issue of youmake a missile, I make a missile,

(10:33):
you make a fast missile. Imake an interset missile. You make
a drone that does this. Imake a droll in that doses. It's
just freaking tech for tech bat titfor TAT, I think it is is
the word is the expression, anduh and here we go. American infrastructure
is next. The UAS will beon quite a few locations. But do
you know what's way more cost effectivetethered autonomous systems that work together with other

(11:01):
systems That really made their debut tothe world a lot earlier, of course
in concept of what they do,but together in one package. In twenty
fifteen, a few British companies toldthe world, Hey, we've got your
drone solution problems. You've got roguetoys, ague toy aircraft flying all over
your airfields, flying into aircraft carriers, flying into your military operations. We've

(11:24):
got the sweet little product called Cuas. But it wasn't called that back then,
of course, it was called somethingvery different. But here taking a
look at this beauty, the DroneHunter F seven hundred, which will chase
down a drone that's there to doyour infrastructure, harm net it and make
it so it's a lot easier foryou to figure out who sent it and

(11:48):
what it was up to. Ofcourse there are drawbacks, but as the
faster and more agile of the adversaryisr tool or weapons system or whatever in
the form of a drone, auas these things upgrade. Just recently,
the F seven hundred has taken amajor upgrade. I believe it's something like
longer arms with bigger blades, biggertwo blade rotor systems to make it so

(12:15):
it's a little faster and more agile, but it's increased speed is quite ridiculous.
When it takes off off the groundafter a drone. It essentially leaps
off the ground, just like anelectric car leaps off the start line.
I know a lot of people outthere, like you know, muscle,
you know car people are like,I'll never drive an electric car, but
they are all about speed, right, And the second they get into an

(12:37):
electric you know car and sport modeor something, as it takes off the
line, they're like, oh,I actually I like electric cars. I've
always liked electric cars. The Fseven hundred is one of many, or

(12:58):
one of a few, to befair, that is out there on the
field today doing its job, andyou can watch it in real time.
Uh, if you're a Ukrainian soldierprotecting Ukrainian structure, it will literally chase
down a series of drones and netthem. And obviously you know cuas.
But we're gonna talk. We're tryingto segue here into the early early claims
of it. But it's there's there'slike that cross you know that graph,

(13:22):
right we're looking at it. Imaginea graph in your mind of cost effectiveness
of the CUA S versus the drone. Turns out, the drone that shoots
a net, the drone that canrelay a signal is more cost effective and
easier to produce, uh than thethan some of the other systems out there.
Obviously, that's that's going away.But as you know, as you

(13:45):
know, we constantly look for relatedthings now to confirm our bias of course
kidding, uh, but that thatare related to this topic that we we
think gives motive to those that havepushed the UAP thing the most, especially
when they've you know, ambiguously pushedinformation on drones like the swarming of Navy
ships and infrastruct our nuclear or nuclearreactors and things like that. They've they've

(14:07):
you know, really walked a lineof context and the information they've given on
human forsaic mundane answers. They butbecause it's like a new issue that the
government is dealing with so often thatthey've managed to really, in my opinion,
make leeway when it comes to whatUAP. You know what the issue

(14:30):
with UAP and obviously if you stickaround and want stranger crund enough, you
know what we're talking about there.But it certainly is an alien bothering our
pilots. Though if that's ever happenedin the past, who am I to
say? I'm just saying the evidencethey presented is nowhere near that, and
it actually makes them look like effingliars. But in twenty fifteen we heard
about signal scrambling products coming out ofthe UK that were, you know,

(14:52):
early twenty fifteen that were basically abunch of different systems all in one.
They didn't call the thing cuas thenthey called it the anti au V U
a V the anti ua V.It took the initialism of or the acronym
of ODDS A U d S andit's uh. You know. One company

(15:16):
was called Brighter Surveillance Systems that reallykind of went viral in the sense that
they challenged at a trade show Boeingand Lockheed and and others, raytheon and
stuff. They were producing energy weaponsor kinetic weapons to do the same thing
they said. They said, Look, we can freeze a drone in the

(15:37):
air. Sorry, I was meantto bring up this photo and I never
did. I apologize. We canfreeze a drone in the air. We
can make a drone stay frozen inthe air until it runs out of battery.
You have to shoot this thing down. We can lower it down,
we can put it into a net. We we can have a second device
that we can put the drone into, like literally sprabbing it out of the

(15:58):
air with invisible hand, instead ofshooting a net add instead of shooting a
round at it, instead of shootinga laser at it. We're gonna scramble
it with RF signals, taking advantageof typical and most commonly use frequencies or
most commonly use is it the isit most commonly commercial frequencies? But DGI

(16:25):
isn't that one, wouldn't it?Don't They have some sort of proprietary encryption
on their devices now at some points, and they can't be used as weapons.
I don't know anyways, but thisthis company went pretty viral by challenging
people at trade shows and suggesting thatthey can do something in late twenty fourteen
or twenty fifteen that they were stillworking on. Now. If you know
anything about lasers and direct energy systems, this isn't a new endeavor. This

(16:47):
is from the sixties and they've changedfrom CO two to freaking RF QUEF whatever
the hell they're doing now, Andit's all it's always been about. Damn,
we can produce this mega laser,but it's super you know, it's
not super expensive and whatnot. Andso in the same spirit of looking for
an alternative measure in the non visiblespectrum, we find ourselves with a product

(17:11):
that was going to make a tonof money. And sure enough, if
you look at the contracts going outtoday, you should know countering drones or
UAP is extremely profitable. It's thenew Internet of Things. Every company that

(17:33):
can afford to get into the spaceis getting into the space. They're licensing
proprietary software from other companies and producingother products that do the same thing.
They take a massive hit by saying, I'll give you twenty million dollars for
that software that does exactly what yourproduct does, but we're going to put

(17:56):
it inside of a golf cart andyou get to drive the golf card around
and knock the drone out of thesky track, the very agile balloon track.
You know, whatever it is theyexploded. Is it quitdincidental that at
the same time the CUS market orat this time, of course it was
not CUS, it was anti UAVdefense systems. So if you're looking it

(18:21):
up, make sure you look upanti UAV defense systems. These acronism initialisms
change dramatically year to year. Sometimesit's almost absurd, and it can be
useful when it comes to making ithard for people to kind of staying on
top of exactly what you're doing.But on classified documents come out, it's
like two years later, it's likesomething that was you know, PSCC is
now like ps C C y Tt G d W one two. It's

(18:45):
like, what the hell are youdoing? Guys, who the hell's coming
up with this shit? But thesethings, of course, the au DS,
the anti UAV defense system that wasproduced back then, Suddenly people weren't
just seeing, hey, an alternativeweapons system, but what about alternative tracking
systems? Heck if you if wecan make an alternative tracking systems, that's

(19:06):
the real heart of it. AndI'm just gonna now I'm a dummy,
so don't listen to me here,but I'm gonna give you a little outside,
inside of perspective on a few thingswhen it comes to the military industrial
complex. Here. One of thethings is, of course, when you
look at a drone and say Iwant to make money off drones, your
first, your first you know,attempt would might be to invest into the

(19:30):
company that produces the drone, althoughby the time you get there, the
individual shares are like, you know, four hundred bucks a pop or some
crazy shit or whatever. I don'tknow, you know, I don't know
hire or lower. And you're like, well, geez, I can only
afford a few shares. You'll noticethat maybe you think one step further,
I'll actually just invest in the hardwarethat DGI or whoever buys from and whatever.

(19:53):
And though these shares are a lotcheaper, the hardware over the course
of just a few years and afew dips in the market, changes dramatic.
You're like, well, I investedin hardware a twenty twenty three,
Why in twenty twenty five is BCDand E the popular one? Because hardware
changes dramatically. You want to getinto where the real meat and potatoes money

(20:14):
is. Turn to what doctor Kirkpatrickwas saying the other day and what people
were talking about UAP. The realmoney is in software. Software that has
the overhead of computers and a fewemployees, rather than you know that you
can do in a garage. Thesoftware for these things offers many things.
The software to track, the softwareto solve errors on the go, the

(20:38):
software to replicate and make things asuser friendly as possible for someone on you
know, human to deal with aviationclutter on the level we had fifty years
ago with of course, you know, the air traffic control, but with
drones. You just saw digital tagging. Digital IDs came out for drones.

(20:59):
All new drones over a certain weightwill always have to have a certain ID.
They possess enough kinetic energy and theycan they can lift enough toys and
devices that they make basically any hobbyistinto a potential adversary. So all drones
now have to be digitally tagged becausethey cannot keep having issues where you know,
some soldier at a nuclear weapons siteis sitting there smoking a cigarette on

(21:22):
guard and they're like, did youjust see that freaking drone come flying through
the woods to take off? Andthey have no way to track where it
went. There's no system in place. It's got too small of a cross
section. There's you know, nono you know, quick response, that's
that procedure that's backed up by somesort of technology they can support the mission.
There's nothing like that in a lotof cases, you know, And

(21:42):
we have just going back real quick, we have too many loose sends.
And I started the show kind ofby saying that some people would suggest,
hey, like, you know,there's money to be made off this topic.
Everyone else is making money off thistopic. I think that's what a
lot of these people are doing andhave been doing, and they try to

(22:03):
gain helpport for free. Why wouldyou pay for someone to make you an
app that takes the metadata from yourphone while tracking a strange looking device near
a government infrastructure on repeat or something. Why would they pay for that?
If they can make it seem likeyou're app helping solve a mystery of the
universe rather than a national security problem. You got literal people, I mean

(22:26):
people literally calling these people up,being like, I want to help you
for free. I would like todesign for you an app that takes the
metadata off people's phones in a giantspinny quantum cloud produces a product for the
government or the defense of our countrythat's very profitable. It's a good product.
It's worth a lot. Let meknow. If you can't keep up,

(22:52):
folks, put the crayons down.Come on, stop chasing the butterfly.
You should know what I'm saying here. People have been saying don't mess
with the money and ufology for along time. How many times are I
had to quote Jim Semivan telling GrantCameron that Grant Cameron loved that story.
I thought it was hilarious that hedidn't see it in the perspective that I
saw, which was, this isthe person that's giving you a little bit

(23:15):
of information, but it's basically tellingyou, don't mess, don't create too
many waves, don't mess with themoney. We're almost there. And then
you see who and what they've investedtheir time in. And sure they've got
crystals on their forehead and the landon the floor, and they're trying to
do the weird stuff. Sure,weird, cool fun I don't care.
But they're also clearly involved with otherendeavors, some of which seem awfully like

(23:38):
awful lot, like techno scams andstuff so and others seem like data aggregators
in the New Age that use AIto produce a product for someone in the
form of a report statistical analysis onthe go, where and when, which
infrastructures are in danger, how tomitigate, how to track, how to
turn every single cell phone tower andcell phone into a device that helps you

(23:59):
to target a moving adversarial aircraft thatis utilizing or reduced signature and stealth,
if there's stealth and stuff, youknow, alter blah blah blah. Come
on, folks, I mean,am I am I way off target?
Here? You let me know?You let me know. We're about the
green light? Here? Am Iway off? Seems like I'm kind of
accurate, but that just could bemy bias. I don't know. You

(24:22):
tell me. I always like lookfor these kind of nuanced perspectives of like
were their motives at the time,regardless of what this person is claiming.
I'm not going after their individual claims. I'm saying, genuinely speaking, is
there a reason for someone to startshouting these things? Start shouting fire so

(24:45):
much a year before we see anygoddamn fire, And of course you start
finding all these little things well aheadof time to suggest any day now someone
was gonna be yelling fire. Andwhat do we see In twenty sixteen,
eighteen and eighteen, we saw anexplosion of people yelling uap uap uap They're
coming, They're here, y'all Lookat the like Carolyn, y'all, look

(25:11):
at the well. They weren't here. You know what was here? Yes,
uap In the sense that if youtake a freaking video of a drone
and you put your hand in frontof the video and like make a little
crack so you can barely see andyou can't identify the object anymore. Well,
there you go. You've created yourselfa device that makes uap on the

(25:32):
go. The advanced mints and IRsensors and other things like that are to
the point where the fidelity is sounbelievably real, with the support of AI
filling in the blanks, making thingslook like how they're supposed to look instead
of the blurry piece of shit thatpresents itself on a military gun camera,

(25:52):
weapons system, viewfind or whatever itis. Modern IR sensors make the things
like the knimits and look like apiece of trap that alleged video from what's
his nuts there that whoever took thevideo. I mean, I'm guessing truly
it's actually Graves and we all justkind of got lied to, but mine,

(26:12):
that's just my own count of belief. But either way, not Graves
Fravor, but the the new sensorsand I are and all these other things
have increased so dramatically, especially withthe support of AI, that that they
make these older systems look like ajoke. So therefore you can't use the
two thousand and four to twenty seventeenUAP blurry, ambiguous, high contrast things

(26:36):
is evidence in the future because thesystems are too good. Those systems are
going to be everywhere. You can'tkeep producing UAP in the same fashion.
Will UFOs exist to the public,Yes, But how the f can a
modern high resolution, true fidelity IRsystem produced only for certain military aviators at

(26:59):
home and intel just gathering people?How can they take a video of a
goddamn ultroid aircraft and see what theysee through these things in modern day systems
and actually try to produce So someoneused that as evidence of UAP that it's
just absurd, and so it's it'sunbelievable. We have a we have a
lineage of of where these things arecoming from, the advancements to people shouting,

(27:22):
hey, any day now we're gonnahave an IR system that is ever
gonna see these freaking UAP up close. They weren't calling them UAP, they
were calling them drones and walloons.Now that there's this massive uapre problem though,
and the evidence is presented as ablurry, high contrast piece of craft
that no one wants to look at. Do you think they're gonna get better
quality instruments in order to solve thisproblem? Now? Oh oh, oh,

(27:52):
must be nice? Oh hey,oh sorry, come in in spicy
on today's Strange Aviation Thursday. Iknow everyone whoever liked the show is pretty
much abandoned ship. It hates myguts now. But guess what, friends,
I don't bother pandering. I justwant to help people with their curiosity

(28:18):
in understanding the realities we face ratherthan what we hope to escape to.
I would love for aliens to bethe answer. But because the evidence that
has been presented of aliens has notbeen aliens and human stuff and the people
that are far more credentialed and privateinformation that I'm not suggest that it was
aliens, they have been moved intothe I'm a fucking liar category. I'm

(28:41):
a dirty, fucking liar. I'ma dirty liar, and I'm trying to
achieve political agendas. I'm trying toget my own coffers filled. Because everyone
else is making money off this,why not me? I'll tell you one

(29:07):
thing for sure. Every single optimisticthought that pops in my head about well,
technically speaking, raising awareness about somethingthat is so ridiculously off mark which
they're suggesting will obviously be corrected.But will it be corrected in the sense

(29:30):
that they achieved good for our nation, our security and ourselves and ourselves or
did they just lie in push andomit so much information that it was able
for them to achieve something out ofit and I and I get torn all
the time of has has Elzando actuallychanged anything for the better in the sense

(29:52):
that do you think Melon and Elizondoat any fluent any influence on that balloon
being shot down that was called theuap Do you think Melon or Alexander had
any influence on having the Navy goblackout anytime drones fly near them? Do
you think three years before, twoyears before the UAPTF, that Alexander and

(30:15):
Melon had influenced the Air Force inorder to start spreading awareness on this this
ever growing threat that is becoming sohard to kind of mitigate that it's almost
like, you know, do ordie. We got a couple, we
got a couple of weeks to figureout how to slow down the use of
toys in order to spy and hurtand kill and steal and all that so,

(30:38):
you know, how is it possible? Was Lou? Oh so when
Lou was actually working, Okay,I figured it out. Lou's a time
traveler. When Lou also said he'slike a really modest guy, he said
that no one in the government hastaken this seriously. What he really meant

(31:00):
was, holy shit, they're takingit so seriously. They're starting to pay
billions of dollars for countermeasures for allthree of the things I listed as being
the biggest issues. When it turnsin terms of UAP, I I how
optimistic can you stay? I usedto give I get you know, I
still give luels On a hard timeall the time. Whenever I can,
I bring it up, but notlike it's my job. But I mean,
like literally, it's like it's justtoo easy to I'm still sitting here

(31:23):
at least once in a while beinglike well technically speaking, I mean,
some of these dipshit politicians and theirstaffers probably couldn't care less about this,
and the second they recognized they could, maybe you know, win some voters
impress their boss. Maybe the protege, their protege to their mentors was soon
to be out of politics. They'vebeen trying to do something for so long,
maybe they woke up to the problem. But when you look at it,

(31:45):
you look at all the evidence,what is the answer? The answer
is someone else was working on thislong before this fucking guy ever was.
Therefore, he's not doing it foryour greater good. He's doing it because
everyone else is making money off ofthis, So why not him. You
want to talk about a strange timein aviation history. We have people given

(32:09):
main stream legacy media time on repeatfor years, and then when they weren't
doing that, they did endless podcastappearances, all suggesting that in our airspace
was dangerous aliens and the government secretlyis panicking about it. But when you

(32:30):
look it seems like they're having ahard time achieving the funding they need to
stop boost phase missiles talking about nopolitician is brave enough to say the military
complex needs more money for something.I mean, I wouldn't. Could you
fucking imagine? Could you fucking imaginethe military complex being like, holy shit,

(32:52):
the planet literally surrounded by you know, demon aliens from out of space
with lasers that could kill us allwe need money to stop. But you
don't think they would take that route. Why didn't they? Why did this
one guy come out and start poppingoff about this? And why is it
seemingly the only people gaining attention,time, and and and hype over these
claims are the group of people thathave first made them. It's not the

(33:15):
case. The government isn't spending billionsof dollars on something they can't even get
mine in this fucking counter North Koreanboring ass rockets because they're like everyone else
already knows, we have billions ofdollars too much in our audit. We're
not gonna get They're not gonna evenmore for you. It doesn't make any
sense. We're living in a madworld. Strange aviation Thursday. What's stranger

(33:37):
than that? We literally literally livein a time. We were told our
navy was under attack. When thenavy was asked, we're like, they're
like, yeah, we swear it'strue. Can we get someone official spokesperson
to say it? No, Yo, comp what's going on? Man?
Thank you very much for sporting theshow. Comp Uh sent me some stuff

(34:00):
we're gonna do when we come whenwe bring back recon reports. We don't
want to get many recon reports,and we'll actually I have received a few
recon reports. I haven't posted any, and I just I don't know,
I just do the show has beentaking a different direction, especially since there's
been more hype on everwhere the grushthing and this other stuff, and Kirkpatrick
just spoke about things that uh h. And since Kirkpatrick has been speaking about

(34:22):
the UAP topic, you know,it kind of revitalized the very idea that
UAP are not what one party andall of their little mania you know,
sell it like followers say it isas much as I'm on timing insulting,
I'm just saying, for Christ's sakes, if like if everything everyone is saying
and doing and working on the topicsays it's not that, but only one
person says it is that. Theperson's own paperwork says it's not what he's

(34:45):
claiming. How far can you believethis person? I mean literally, could
you imagine finding like like you likefind your your husband or your wife on
top of someone else banging them andthey're like, it's not what it looks
like. It's not what it lookslike. I swear UAP SCX is something

(35:10):
else. It's not what I'm doing. That's a bad example. I know,
I'm a pessimistic old jerk made itinto a Grant Cameron book over my
UFO sighting and my desire to getmore into the UFO topic as an adult,

(35:32):
because I spent most of my time, of course on the national scale
or international scale, because most ofmy time, of course, in the
Bridgewater Triangle, and though I've traveledaround done many things, that's my main
focus. My entire life has been, of course, the place that I
grew up, the weird place thateveryone misrepresented, even the people that lived
here, the Bridgewater Triangle. NowI find myself applying those same skills to

(35:53):
the same topic, but on theinternational scale, our stage, and it's
just as much. It's just justdisappointing. And who's willing to take your
beloved topic and twist it and destroyit and turn it into something that makes
their desires come to fruition? Andusually that has only ever been done by

(36:16):
some fucking liar author. Now we'reseeing it done on a way that's like
Donald key O, Eat your heartout, dude, Jesus Christ, you
what could you imagine? I spokea little bit earlier, of course,

(36:40):
about the rise and increase in valueor in sensors like I our senses and
other things, acoustic sensors and stuff. The the the the value of these
sensors in the ability of them isno different or the I'm sorry, the

(37:00):
physical physical space they offer by realestate they occupy in a system like a
computer. Can anyone for a firstsecond, imagine a computer that you have
in your home or something and openit up the side and look at the
parts in there. Maybe you knowa thing or two about computers, and
you know what those parts are.Well, just like your home computer.
Over the course of twenty years,super semiconducting material used in these sensors has

(37:23):
shrunken and found different purposes and differentmanufacturing processes fabrication processes has made purer semiconductors
in these things and made it sothese sensors are so unbelievably good compared to
what they were exponentially leaping you know, or you know, exponential leaps of

(37:44):
in tech due to basically, youknow, three entities working together. There's
you, there's the hardware, andthere's the software that's being run almost entirely
now of course by very helpful,very fast computing AI. And so some
of these sensors have have become absolutelyunbelievable, and it gives me a chance

(38:06):
to keep kind of trying to inspirea little curiosity and something that makes the
news and the UAP topic all ofthe time, and that's long range interception
of intercontinental ballistic missiles, hypersonic boostgliders, and of course we have a
very short range surprise like attacks ofmissiles that also need to be countered that

(38:29):
are much faster and have a shorterlife I'm sorry, much smaller, much
more maneuverable, but have a launchshorter distance. And in the the CSIS
has put out multiple works over theyears talking about the state of our missile
defense system or our deterrence against ouradversaries, and so many things he's hitting
on are the damn words you hearright in the UAP conversation all the time.

(38:52):
It's insane. You know, ourearly warning systems pick up things going
past or whatever that are just youknow that that are in a category that
are they automatically assume that our anadversary, nations like made it to a
level that we haven't quite you know, anticipated or prepared for. And not
to suggest that we can't stop it, because if you're doing your due diligence,

(39:14):
you'll see that there is evidence thatolder missiles can in fact intercept faster
missiles. It just depends on whenthey are launched, where they're launched from,
and of course understand the trajectory andthe and the moves the missiles gonna
make in order to avoid your countermeasure. But the advanced sensors and things like
that which I talked about, whichare you know, have gone to the

(39:36):
point now where the AI running thesesystems will literally give images of what it
sees. And it's not simply zerosand ones, if you know what I
mean. It literally produces like theviewpoint of this non human intelligence that is
traveling, you know at fourteen youknow, mock fourteen and uh, and

(40:00):
it's doing all types of weird shitat its last final phase of flight,
all on its own to avoid threatsinto whatever. And it's like insane to
hear what they're what they're saying,But they did just put out this thing
recently that that showed that there isstill need allegedly for a layer of defense
that we do don't have yet.And it's long kind of been held as

(40:22):
impossible because whenever you're talking about counteringit. You're talking about finding something that
is able to go faster and hand be in places that simply, you
know, other stuff can't be.I posted a document yesterday on Twitter called
from Astronomy UFO dot com. Nope, nope, nope, I apologize,
I apologize, apologize. That's fromthe uh from the Robert's case we're going

(40:46):
to cover next week on you ifa hump week. I'm talking of course
about Oh my god, where thehell is my freaking document here? Sorry,
guys, one second, I'm anidiot, you know that. Why

(41:21):
don't we first just so we geta little, a little you know,
catching up understand boost to send,mid phase, and terminal. We speak
often about about the three phases offlight. Some of these things fly in
well, of course, some ofthem have four phases of phases of flight
technically, which is boost phase asit launched off the ground. It's a
send phase as as it heads towardsits objective in space, where it of

(41:43):
course will then depart separate and spreadyou know, decoys and other penetration aids
and whatnot, and other countermeasures orother defensive measures. It will then go
into its mid phase flight where it'scruising towards the objective which most of our
deterrence today is focused on mid phaseflight, which is just as ridiculous as

(42:05):
creating drones and stop drones, becauseall we did was like, all right,
you want to create a bunch ofstuff in the sky to confuse us,
We'll create a lot of stuff inthe sky that destroys your stuff.
It's like, just shoot it outof the air beforehand. But in the
last one since its terminal phase wherethe thing goes down and some missiles get
very erratic. Some missiles go rightto their target. Some missiles are coming
from space, so they you know, it's their last phase of flight before

(42:27):
they hit their target. When we'retalking about that, there's something important to
kind of you know, there's somethingworth What is the open up? Oh
you can scroll down? Duh,okay, here we go. Sorry I
didn't have that open It wasn't realizingit. Here's a quick little picture,
a little graphic you can look athere if you can see that, right.

(42:51):
Yeah, here's a little graphic agencyhere from our missile defense which shows
to some degree, you know,these four phases of flight and what the
missile is actually doing in those fourphase phases of flight. As you see
at the launch phase. We've coveredthis before in the past, and I'm
only do this just remind the peoplethat are here listening that forgot but stage

(43:15):
one separation of the nose cone andrelease stage two separation, you'll see the
booster from the actual the warheads itself, the warheads and countermeasures begin to release.
There's more than just one in there, and that's during a sen phase.
At mid court phase, there's athreat cloud full of decoys, full
of weapons, full of strange shapedobjects that come up on radar really good,
some stuff that goes slower than otherstuff, some stuff that goes faster

(43:37):
than other stuff. And then ofcourse there's the atmospheric reentry of the in
the terminal phase of the actual weaponssystems. By the time they get there,
most of the cloud has been destroyedby multi kill vehicles and things.
You've seen those mkts, those thingsyou've seen flying around on the test videos.
But that's basically what you have here. Now, let me show you
a video real quick that just isgoing to kind of give you a an

(44:00):
understanding of what boost Glide is doingand why boost Glide is not the same
thing and offers a different threat.And by the time we furnished that,
we'll describe why I'm sorry gliders,hypersonic gliders are threat. But after that
we'll discuss why catching something in boostphase was once thought impossible because we had
to create something that went unbelievably fastand was big, unbelievably fast, like

(44:28):
tic taking counter style fast. Andwe recognized the cost effectiveness, you know,
was a big deal, you know, and always changed things. We
never tried to solve boost phase interceptbecause it was ridiculously expensive and huge.
You're creating a huge rocket. Iposted a pdf I was trying to find
it. I couldn't find it rightnow of a twenty five year old document

(44:51):
about the future of interceptors and whyit's important that we shouldn't give up on
BPIs, and I want twenty fiveyears later, I'm watching a video or
whatever, it's twenty three years later. I'm watching a video, you know,
today of them talking about I thinkit's time to start looking into BPIs
again because there are certain nations outthere that we don't have the ability to
be near safely, and we knowthey're reaching the point now where they only

(45:17):
have a handful of these things,and so we could still research countering them.
It ain't gonna work against China andRussia. What good is it to
stop something in boost phase If theycan produce so many missiles that you literally
need like thousands and thousands of systemsnear their country in order to launch it,
it doesn't make any sense. SoI'll try to find that PDF.

(45:37):
But let's get into this a littlebit here. Bring up a little graphics.
You can see what I'm talking about. You know, I talked real
fast. I'm sorry. I'm tryingto keep this going so enough to play
the show in double time. Butlet's open this up, right shmiyah whoa
screen to swim black? A littlebehind the scenes? What are you doing
in my room? Okay? YouTubetold me I have to do that once

(46:01):
in a while in order to gainfollowers. Please hit the like and subscribe.
As you see, I have legssiewhear pants during the show. Here
we go. Let's open this videotogether. And before I actually play the
video, it's gonna say it toyou, I would like just show you
real fast the screenshot of it,so you know what the heck we're looking

(46:22):
for. So you're armed up beforewe even get there. You know what
I'm saying. Prepare you to belike, that's what we're talking about.
Okay, So we know what ballisticmissiles fly through the air, and anti
ballistic missiles try to catch them ata certain phase of flight. Other kind
of measures try to catch them directenergy weapons a certain phase of flight,
usually mid phase. But now youhave, of course HGV launch hypersonic glider

(46:45):
vehicles launching. Let's take a lookat this together and see a graphic here
is that You see how the ageousdestroyer radar and tracking system is looking in
the sky where the intercontinental ballistic missilewould traditionally fly through. But what happens
if at a much lower altitude.Don't be fool. That's still like sixty
thousand feet right there. You insteadof going instead of it, it keeps

(47:08):
going up. It drops its boosterlike sixty thousand feet and starts sending this
frickin' a little bit higher than that. Sometime, start sending this some glider
rapid course making maneuvers. It's slowingdown, but it's still going quite rapid
under the system. You see.Seven twenty fifteen, everyone became aware of

(47:29):
it. Hey, they're working onthese hypersonic tunnels. Something's up here.
What's up with this? This isn'tjust a regular system. Twenty sixteen and
seventeen, everyone in the intelligence community, Warrior Maven and all these other websites
started hosting The war Zone started hostingpictures of Chinese hypersonic gliders that, once
detached from their booster, are essentiallygoing to be something with no visible propulsion,

(47:51):
no visible flaps, and the abilityto go from next to zero to
fucking fast as fuck and maneuverable beforeanyone could stop it because they're going under
our methods to stop them. Ofcourse, there have been decades of looking
into the future of these things,because we've worked on hypersonic gliders, we've
worked on those lifting bodies, sothere's always a countermeasure. But we're not

(48:12):
talking about this. We're gonna playa video, but we're gonna get past
this and talk about bp i's ina second, which are weirder than hell.
If you think about what would berequired or how people would to try
to solve that mission fifty years ago. You got to get to China in
like two minutes. You want tofly near it and launch something. No,
we want to launch something fucking huge, faster than you can imagine from
across this FLA. All right,here we go watch this video together real

(48:36):
quick. And uh, I'm sorryfor swearing so much. I didn't swear,
I mean YouTube, nice tray.Can we open this up here?
Can we open this up here?You know what, I'm just gonna play

(49:01):
the GPI video because I actually canput that. One GPI video has all
that information all on it. Sowe'll play the whole thing together right here.
Uh, you know, let's look, let's look at this. The

(49:23):
United States continues to pace advancements inballistic missile defense to track and intercept ballistic
missiles. The ground based mid CourseDefense IIS Ballistic Missile Defense and THAD systems
can detect, track, and interceptballistic missiles. In this example, the

(49:44):
EGIS Destroyer tracks a ballistic missile inspace, launches the SM three missile,
and intercepts the ballistic missile before itre enters the atmosphere, traveling at velocities
greater than MOCK five. Hypersonic glidevehicles fly at lower altitudes and are more
maneuverable than ballistic missiles, allowing themto maneuver after launch in a way that

(50:07):
evades radar tracking and intercept. TheDoD US, government agencies and Congress consider
hypersonic glide vehicles and ballistic missiles possessedby potential adversaries as a significant threat to
national and regional security. For thetwenty seventeen and DAA, the Director of
the Missile Defense Agency shall serve asthe executive agent for the Department of Defense

(50:30):
to counter hypersonic threats that may beemployed against the United States deployed forces and
allies. What year was that?Damn there was a lot happening with hypersonic
extremely fast aJile flapless RF signature leavingbehind Chinese assets. They were messing with

(50:51):
our navy and putting our navy indanger. There was a lot of stuff
going on to that man, theydid you know, the Alazono crew just
got all I'm lucky launching their UAPmovement at the same time. Sorry,
my eyes just almost fucking rolled outof my head hit the floor. Responding
to the regional hypersonic threat, theUS Missile Defense Agency has risen to the

(51:13):
challenge developing a concept that utilizes amulti layered solution to defend against the next
generation of hypersonic glide vehicles. Thisanimation will highlight a series of intercepts that
occur throughout the trajectory of the hypersonicglide vehicle. The glide phase intercept will
engage the hypersonic glide vehicle during theglide phase of the trajectory using three methods.

(51:36):
The standard Missile six will engage thehypersonic glide vehicle during the terminal phase
of the trajectory. This concept providesmultiple opportunities to engage hypersonic glide vehicles and
provides a layered defensive strategy. Inthis example scenario, the HBTSS detects the
threat launch and communicates to Boa.Boa processes HBTSS detection data and C two

(52:00):
BMC integrates additional sensor data. Thespace communications layer relays messages and data.
The IGS destroyer provides tracking and interceptsupport. The EGS Destroyer launches the glide
phase interceptor to intercept the hypersonic glidevehicle during the glide phase. The e

(52:20):
JUST Destroyer launches the SM six tointercept the hypersonic glide vehicle during the terminal
phase, and the aircraft carrier isthe high value asset to be protected.
These assets will be integrated to providea layered regional defense against hypersonic glide vehicles.
For hypersonic glide vehicle launches occur insuccession, the HBTSS detects the initial

(52:45):
launch and the first, second,and third stages of separation. By the
way, friends, this is alllisten closely in the context in which this
is delivered. This is not speakingin the context of hey, could they

(53:06):
just start launching these things from balloons? And so the tracking systems and communication
relays that we have today in orderto precisely target these based on their boost
phase is rather wasted because they're notgoing to use a traditional platform in order
to get these off, maybe evenmaybe not use any boost system whatever.
The boost only gets the object inthe air to glide. What if a

(53:30):
balloon brings the object into the air. The HBTSS data is continuously relayed to
Boa. MOA uses real time datafrom HBTSS to create a track of the

(53:55):
hypersonic live vehicle. AEGIS receives HBTSStrack data on the hypersonic glide vehicle from
Boa and C two BMC via satellitecommunication. The HBTSS detects and provides fire

(54:17):
control quality track of the hypersonic glidevehicle. After being released, positioning and
tracking data are continuously captured and sentthrough the HBTSS to BOA, then is
sent through the space communication layer tothe EGES Destroyer. The EGES destroyer uses

(54:40):
remote tracking information from the HBTSS toplan and engage on remote Cleared for the
engage on remote defense, the EGSdestroyer launches the Glide Phase Interceptor. A
glide phase interceptor or GPI is capableof engaging hypersonic glide vehicles in the glide
portion of flight and overmatching the speedand agility of hypersonic threats. As the

(55:05):
EGIS radar is out of the rangeof the hypersonic glyde vehicle, the GPI
obtains tracking data from the HBTSS relayedthrough the AEGIS. The GPI intercepts the
hypersonic glide vehicle during the glide phase. As the second hypersonic glide vehicle is
progressing into the glide phase, theEGIST destroyer continues to receive tracking data from

(55:27):
the HBTSS. The EGIS Destroyer executesa launch on remote defense, launching the
GPI. When the hypersonic glide vehicleis within the EGIS destroyer's radar, the
GPI receives tracking information from the EGISTradar. The GPI intercepts the hypersonic glide

(55:55):
vehicle. Alternatively, a forward basedLIGIS destroyer can acquire and track the HGV
During glide phase. The forward basedAGENS destroyer communicates to another EGIS destroyer to

(56:16):
perform a launch on remote defense.The launching AGUS destroyer relays the remote track
to the GPI until the threat isacquired by its radar. The launching AGES
destroyer uses its radar to complete theengagement. The third hypersonic glide vehicle is

(56:37):
attempting to evade the AGIS destroyer's radarrange. The EGIS radar is queued from
the HBTSS tracks and acquires the threaton its radar system. During this cued
organic defense, the EGIS destroyer plansthe engage, launches the glide phase interceptor,

(57:01):
and completes the intercept using radar tracksfrom the EGIS radar system. The
last and fourth hypersonic glide vehicle isapproaching the High Value asset, attempting to
avoid the EIS radar system. TheEIS Destroyer receives tracking data from the HBTSS.

(57:27):
The hypersonic glide vehicle enters the EGISradar during the terminal phase of the
trajectory, and the AEGIS starts toplan acute organic defense using the SM six
interceptor. The EIS Destroyer launches theSM six to intercept the hypersonic glide vehicle
before it reaches the high value asset. This scenario exams ample showed a regional

(58:00):
defense concept for defending against hypersonic glidevehicles using an integrated architecture of space and
surface sensors working together to engage hypersonicglide vehicles in both the glide and terminal
phases of flight to provide a multilayer defense against hypersonic threats. You Don't

(58:42):
tell Me YouTube. In the fallof two thousand and nine, a Delta
two rocket launched off Florida's east coastcarrying two Missile Defense Agency Space Tracking and
Surveillance system for STSS. Hold ona second, Jesus, what is this
okay? Missile Defense Indmonstrations satellites designto last four years. The STSS satellites

(59:04):
operated for over twelve years, demonstratingbirth to death, ballistic missile tracking and
missile defense system fire. I'm playingthis not to bore the living crap out
of you and military stuff. Ifyou hear for other parts of the topic
and maybe you're just completely sick andtired of me talking about it, I'm
just you got to understand that withthe advancements of the actual weapon, you

(59:27):
know, you might think it's allabout going higher and faster, but maybe
it's about better sensing. Maybe it'sabout not creating a more powerful weapon,
but making the weapon more accurate andable to be far more precise and agile,
you know, alternative methods to solvethe solution. Everyone talks about how

(59:49):
bad the military complexes, where they'respending and stuff, But I have watched
over my lifetime multiple times where peoplehave been, like I'm sorry, where
there have been opportunities for these individualsto just suggest we need the endless amount
of money because this is like doomsdaystyle. But we'll literally say, well,
there's only one country using this onetype of sensor, so at most
we need something, you know,a quarter the size to defend against it,

(01:00:13):
because you know, we don't haveanything there. But like, like
literally it's the the advanced censored apartmentof our missile defense systems has saved our
government in the world a lot oftime and money. To the point,
and also where these are scientific tools, so they're used elsewhere as well.
We're hearing a lot of you know, astrobiology stuff being applied with some of
these advanced sensors. But these thingsare a part of the story. They're

(01:00:37):
just not typically spoken about because it'snot really that interesting. But if I
said something like UFOs come here andthey're like AI that is so intelligent that
they're able to kind of, youknow, pull all the data that's around
them, almost like you know,sourcing consciousness from every conscious mind in the
area, as well as reading allbiosignificant text signatures. Knows when you have

(01:01:00):
your camera pointed out at it andwhatnot. Well, all that really would
be is advanced sensors. That's it. That's literally just advanced sensors in areas
that we've never really applied them on. And the fact that that is one
major department of the United States missiledefense and our allies, it's one that
we should discuss and know better becauseit's you know, it applies of course

(01:01:22):
to this topic in many ways,especially what's been alleged, and if you
can't see that, I'm trying mybest to at least go it. Control
quality data as a test bed tostudy new ways to improve ballistic missile tracking
from space. Did I say ifyou can't see that? I meant to
say, if you can't understand that. I don't know what I'm saying here
today that I mentioned I'm an idiot. STSS data informs the development of future

(01:01:46):
missile defense sensor capabilities, such asthose on board the Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking
Space Sensor or HBTSS. How doballistic missiles differ from hypersonic missile threats?
Ballistic missiles fly a predictable path andspend most of the time in space.
Hypersonic glide vehicles or HGVs, whichcan fly an excess of three thy eight

(01:02:10):
hundred miles per hour, can changedirection and altitude and vary their speed in
flight within the atmosphere, posing asevere challenge to today's missile defense system.
Powerful radars on Earth can view inflight objects only as far as the horizon
allows, and only within specific corridors. A global constellation of HBTSS tracking satellites

(01:02:32):
will ensure continuous access to missile threatsfrom launch to re entry. While pause,
hold on, where have we justheard about? Constellation of satellites or
pseudo satellites. If one layer goesdown, the other ones up. If
a unit commander or someone on abattlefield or near battlespace wants to can literally

(01:02:54):
call not in space satellites, butcall a contallation of smart, intelligent balloon
entities that have rudders and propellers onthem and cool fancy equipment way up near
space to go hover over a nationand watch their missiles go off so we

(01:03:16):
know exactly where they're gonna be applyingthe sensors that would be traditionally only used
in space assets. But of course, if you go back to eufology,
a lot of this topic is directlyrelated to advance Spying on advance isr the
crossroads of intelligence gathering intelligence and thenhaving to physically mail bags of intelligence to

(01:03:40):
people like literally film paperwork, mailit or fly it yourself. You have
to fly it to someone and handit to them. Here's the intelligence,
ma'am to today, real time,my fidelity, insanely clear type of intelligence.
Like if they can't see through yourroof, they'll see through your fucking
wireless router type of intelligence. Likeif they can't see through your house,

(01:04:08):
they'll let cosmic fucking rays that alreadygo through your fucking material anyways, and
they'll just use that to map whatthey're looking at because they don't want to
walk into a trap. Real timeintelligence with predictive models, so it's not
even real time. It's basically likepredicting the fatting future solutions. They're turning

(01:04:31):
real life into a turn based strategyvideo game. Are you kidding me?
Mind blown fighting? Fire control trackingto the missile defense system. Since tracking
satellites offer a glipe, I'll tellyou you can't support the show anymore than
coverage from missile launch determination of flight. The two HBTSS prototype space vehicles will

(01:04:54):
work in tandem with radars based onland and at sea and recently deployed space
Force tracking satellites to demonstrate and studyhow they can track hypersonic threats and provide
targeting data for intercept. This demonstrationwill inform the future Proliferated Warfare Space Architecture
PWSA for the Missile Warning Tracking Defensemission. Following these successful demonstrations. HBTSS

(01:05:20):
will be part of a critical constellationof space sensors proliferated and operated by the
Space Force. It will provide increasedcapability to track, target, and intercept
hypersonic threats. As missile threats evolved, The Missile Defense Agency will continue leading
efforts to improve the nation's defense capabilities. All Right, as we were talking

(01:05:50):
about the Advancing Sensors advance and directenergy weapons, the advance and drones in
it quickly touch on those things.When it comes to these strategic ways to
stop or at least involve themselves inthe terrens for these things. You have

(01:06:12):
space launches that have become so goddamncheap that when you're writing a report of
the cost effectiveness of creating this Nikemissile whatever, and how it just doesn't
make any sense keep producing it becauseit's so expensive whatever, all of that
is basically gone because the government canlaunch stuff all day every day. Space

(01:06:34):
launches has become dirt cheap. Launchinga missile to go ninety miles up in
the air is even cheaper. Butthe problem is with the reduction of space
launch cost is that means that everymother liquor out there and their sister has
a goddamn space organization that is launchingtheir fassets into space there you know,

(01:07:00):
anti satellite weapons, possibly they're whatever, if they're if they're space based or
something. You know that they're isSR tools, they're jamming there whatever.
You know, it is allowed thatto happen. And because of that,
that means adversaries that would be possiblefor us to counter getting into ICBMs with

(01:07:21):
nuclear weapons on top of them,makes it worthwhile for us to go getting
into you know, one of thethings I want to bring up when I
say like that, say that again. I tried to explain it early.
If I want to make sure Itouch that again, consider the fact that
a North Korean ICBM productive ICBM,you know, operation developing weapons and go

(01:07:51):
long range that can hurt people.They're in such a slow mode with no
economy and nothing else in the backthis up. It's just all guns of
blazon, you know, glass cannonstyle. They that that. It makes
it so it's worthwhile for the UnitedStates to at least try to look into

(01:08:12):
terrences to an returnance to this typeof thing by getting into boost face having
something that is taking off and wehave so many drones in the area carrying
a weapon. We have so manysatellites like balloons dangling over their country because
they can't stop them, that wecan actually see something glow. It's taking

(01:08:32):
off, It's going to be takingoff for the next sixty seconds, and
suddenly within sixty seconds you see thatvery awesome video from again at and T
archive that you like, a tictac like thing goes through the frame so
fast that they have to stop itso you can actually see it, you
know, thing comes and blast itout of the sky. You cannot do

(01:08:53):
that with China. You cannot dothat with Russia. They can produce too
many of those weapons. What goodis it if you you know, if
they can launch them from all over, So it's it's only worthwhile in a
small scale. Having said that,you can, you know, you can
you know, treat it like they'retreating Ukraine. It's a soft market.
You can kind of develop your toolsand get better. So you're kind of

(01:09:14):
seeing that with countries like North Koreaand Iran and their tools, like they're
producing Kamakazi drones and other stuff likethat. So anyways, but as I
said earlier, you have a directenergy weapons again, and you have the
the cost of space launches and dronesgetting so cheap. And I say drones,
like I consider what else has changedin drones when it comes to a
strange world, A single long rangeoh my god, global hawk, I

(01:09:44):
have notes Global Hawk. A singleGlobal Hawk can be replaced by a swarm
of drones upwards of like fifty dronesright now. I mean, I'm not
seeing them implemented. But the capabilityis that because those semiconductors have shrunk and
so drastic in a weapon system.If there's one hundred pound weapon on under

(01:10:05):
a Global Hawk, by chance,if they can't if it's carrying something like
that, that weapon broken down onepound apiece into the swarm of probably more
than that, because you want toactually more swarm than you need. Broken
down, you can carry the samelevel of kinetic damage. And that's weird
to think about a Global Hawk flyingon the edge of a battle space super
dangerous, right, a Global hawk, you know that they can do a

(01:10:27):
bunch of stuff, including electronic stuff, you know, so they you're talking
about taking something that is very easilyshot down. It is old in the
tooth, if you know what Imean, Like like Global Hawks and their
ability to kind of skirt along enemybattlespace or over a controlled battle space is

(01:10:51):
is they're old soul. So insteadof an adversary shooting something like that out
of the air carrying one hundred poundbomb, they have to deal or whatever
all the other assets they carry.They have to deal with a swarm of
drones that can't be shot down witha single weapon that is all carrying the
equivalent in ratio to its size.So instead of there being one hundred pounds

(01:11:14):
bomb, there's fifty drones. Howmany pounds is each bomb on the drone
that if it was the equivalent tothe same energy of the one hundred pounder,
well that's you know, an energyon hundred pounds. I'm not I
guess I'm saying that backwards. Whenyou see what I'm saying, they can
split it down. They can everythingcan be reduced and put into the size
of this tiny little platform that isimpossible to target and shoot. So uas

(01:11:39):
has become so cost effective that justin the time of the Global Hawk's life,
instead of producing a more elite versionof the Global Hawk, they turned
it into like fifty different drones atonce. What are you gonna do.
They all can relay comms, theyall can help penetrate, they all have
a weapon, they all have electroniccountermars. They all pull ISR and give
it back real time. It's nolonger the one big bird that you're falling

(01:12:02):
around with your jet. Look whatcrossed into our battlespace? Boss, delay
delay delay, No, it's it'sholy shit. There's a swarm of bees
and all of them have a littlemissile on it like it's pretty freaking crazy.
Hey colp again, dude, Iappreciate it, man, the people
sporting the show, thank you verymuch big time giving that strangery gun.

(01:12:23):
I know it's very corny, butI gotta do it. Thank you very
thank you very much. I reallyappreciate it. He says, uh labored
jef life. I don't know.I don't know how to speak any other
language other than Western Elf, whichis American English if you don't know,

(01:12:44):
But I do appreciate. Have youguys checked out the end my Prepper channel
very accurate? What does he doI have to look it up? Is
that it's just like a Prepper.I'm actually starting to really consider prepic I
would really like to do it.I lived through Detroit during COVID. You
forget that some cities actually did actlike freaking little kids can go to the
store and buy out all the foodsso no one else had any or no

(01:13:06):
one else could wipe their butts.Do you remember that? Do you remember
when Amazon was like, oh shit, turns out we can't deliver food to
everyone in an emergency all at once. Do you remember that? Do you
remember? Everyone wants to call prepperscrazy. Maybe they are crazy if they're
prepping for weird stuff. But Ihonestly got him really considering starting to stockpile

(01:13:28):
stuff that is useful and becoming somesort of you know, survival list in
the sense that I have all thesealternative, standalone self reliance systems at a
property somewhere in the woods. I'mnot even joking. You think the last
time I'm gonna see them weird wasgo. But it's not all right.

(01:13:48):
People have short term memory. SteveLong just looking at the chat real quick
before I had on here, SteveLong said, September eighteen, ninet eighty
five and fIF teens shot down.So when satellite three hundred and forty five
miles above Earth with a vertically launchedmissile. That's right, still holds the
record, and it's easily founder lookingat anti looking up anti satellite weapons.

(01:14:10):
His picture. What is his nameagain? Oh my god, I know
the guy's name, Wilbert d DougPearson, Doug Pearson, Major Wilbert Doug

(01:14:46):
Pearson. The F fifteen's guidance systemwas modified for the mission and provide a
new directional queuing through the pilot's headsup, displaying aloud from mid course updates
via dattling. Yeah, and alot of times we it's just so hard
to make people that are not usedto military systems understand what's there, what's

(01:15:09):
going on. So they're like,you know, it's just like time equals
something insanely impressive like that. Thatis right, it's true. But in
the minds of the public, they'rethinking faster, they're thinking higher, they're
thinking stealthier. That's pretty much it. They don't consider themselves, they don't

(01:15:30):
consider an impressive for a pilot toflip a switch or AI to do it
automatically now and send out information instantaneouslyat the speed of god dang well near
to the speed of light, anduh in that information bhut down the eyes

(01:15:53):
and the ears invisibly go and manipulatethe highly sophisticated equipment of our adversaries in
order to appear invisible. I hearsthat yet, but I see nothing.

(01:16:20):
The radar is empty, Captain.Okay, So it's uh. It's hard
to make people understand. It's notalways about fancy batman like skin on an
aircraft that moves when you put youknow, electric what is it called ceramic

(01:16:41):
dioelectric ceramics or something like that,when you move stuff, you know,
or when you you know, chargeit up. It's not It's not always
about some sort of fancy shape orsomething that is like that's it. It's
oftentimes about being clever enough to makesomething that works well, that easily replaces
and a massive cost effective nature somethingthat exists today, like a disruptive technology

(01:17:05):
that is a dream, right,a choice for a politician. Or of
course it fits in the old slotthat the other thing does. So it
has to work well and it hasto easy has to either easily replace a
new piece of tech or of coursefit in the old tube, fit in

(01:17:26):
the old hangar, fit in theyou know, the uh, in the
pools that work on it are relativelythe same the engine that goes in it.
The pit crews are all out thereknow how to work on and not
literally pit crews, but you knowwhat I'm saying. And so you have
all these you have all these thingsthat make some of these technologies you know,

(01:17:46):
they have to fit into these thingsto exist. They have to be
there. And one thing is forsure that you cross an intersection watch and
it's hey, wait a second,should we spend billions of dollars trying to
make this SR seventy one into onSR seventy two, or should we invest

(01:18:13):
in a defensive electronic countermeasure that reducesthe surface there missiles chance of hitting us
by like you know, two hundredand one. So the point is is
that that you know it's it's it'salways that way. But then you then
there's another kind of line in thesand of it's not just cost effectiveness and
and and something like that is impressive. Don't always look for don't always look

(01:18:38):
for the SR seventy two, becausethere could just be some little device that
makes it so they don't need togo faster and farther that they can just
stop the weapon from hitting them.But there is another line. What happens
when the world and all the oldproducts that used to be super cheap in
the way of doing things used tobe super expensive kind of just come together
all at once. Space launches adirt. Cheap lasers have become extremely cost

(01:19:02):
effective because it's not about making asuper powerful laser. It's about making that
the beam, the beam that hitsthe target more deadly, which is kind
of weird to think about, butjust for a second, think about like
some sort of Archimedes late mirrors orwhoever the hell came up with those mirrors
type of thing, you know,shining the sun and burning something, figuring
out you don't need a bigger laser, you need something that relays the beam

(01:19:24):
and amplifies it. What do youknow, they figured it out, turning
lasers into a cost effective thing andable to use to shoot down drones,
to shoot missiles out of the sky. Whatever. It wasn't about making the
giant laser. Everyone wants to putthe giant laser on the freaking giant shark,
but it was actually about just makingsomething that amplified the beam after the
beam hit it. And what doyou know, they came up with that

(01:19:45):
sensors in semiconductors, reducing costs spacespace launches in uas becoming swarms, and
much cheaper, way easier, waymore crosspectives. To make a bunch of
little ones than a giant than agiant one, they can get shot out
of the sky, and all thosethings come into play. So you have
at one point during the Soviet Warthe Cold War, Hey, we can't

(01:20:08):
get politicians to agree to pay forboost glide interceptors or a faster as R
seventy one or whatever. So let'sfind an alternative means to make this thing
awesome still by producing awesome things likedefensive electronic And now we're at a war
with China possibly, and all thosethings that we once complained about being super

(01:20:29):
expensive aren't. How fucking cheap isgoddamn dirt? Uh oh, suddenly you
have yourselves a little weird time inhistory. We're all the things you couldn't
justify getting money for in the pastyou can now produce for basically nothing in

(01:20:49):
comparison to what was the problem forOr never use these No, Nope,
cost too much to launch them,cost too much to fly them, cost
too much to maintain them, costtoo much to hide them cost too much.
All of that has gone away becausematerial science has reached points that were
that made that the sixties look likenothing. Oh, based on the work
of them, of course, butbut it's so it's we're out of time

(01:21:11):
where you should expect to see,you know, some fairly new assets to
the point where they're kind of impressiveagain, you know. So it's it's
it's kind of hard to make peopleinterested in the weird, cool, invisible
world things and technology involved in thisstuff that is deeply related to the U

(01:21:34):
a u PHO topic, and alsonot try to speak too far ahead of
time about the stuff that you knowshould be rolling out soon. But the
fact is that some of these things, some of these systems, like the
SR seventy two or something like that, maybe they are it's crossing that line
where is time to produce that kindof that that new asset again, that

(01:21:58):
that reaches that point, I'm notsure sure, but it seems that the
Missile defense agencies of the Missile DefenseAgency is leading, you know, research
on a lot of those different levelsof speed and capabilities and being an interceptor.
And so you suddenly have yourself thisrealization that if they can do that

(01:22:24):
with something like this in order tostop a hypersonic glider or our new AGICBM
with a nuclear warhead on it,or some sort of new goddamn short range
out of a submarine whatever fancy antiship thing, they have the ability to
do that with an aircraft or atleast a drone. And you know,

(01:22:46):
of course other capabilities to add tothat drone that are all you know,
the rage now in the civilian market. So either way, enough of that
rant. I apologize about that veryit's on climact again of the ending here
A little bit sixty and a dronesare dumb. I don't know, sorry,

(01:23:10):
friends, Does everyone understand what Imean by that? I know it's
a long winded rant, but there'stwo things that Like, back in the
day, every report said you can'tpay. We're not going to give you
money for this year of her goddamnmine. Who cares if you want to
go mock twenty with an aircraft,We're not gonna pay for this. He
crazy. But now what happens ifthose materials that were once the hold up

(01:23:31):
atmospheric drag made this thing hotter thana goddamn dud dollar pistol. What happens
if if that type of stuff thatwill cost next to nothing, you have
basically the chance for every military inthe world to make at some point some
sort of high level airborne you know, high level system that falls into the

(01:23:53):
UAP line often when it's witnessed,but uh for dirt cheap, and you
know, you basically are inspiring thebiggest you know, space race, whatever,
race to new the newest, besttoys that you're ever gonna see.
Because all of this is coming togethernot with like a rogue nation, not

(01:24:14):
with some whatever. It's coming witha country that you cannot sanction. It's
coming to a country that, youknow, if it cuts ties with us
in any major way right before orduring a war, suddenly you know,
how are you gonna pay for things? And you start seeing that, In

(01:24:38):
my bet, we're gonna see somesome new toys. Most of them are
gonna be small and nearly invisible orinvisible, but we may we just may
get to see some of that,some newer, better stuff. I don't
know what the hell what is wrongwith me? I'm sorry, folks,
Do you know what I do here? Right? Everyone knows what the show
is, right? I just geton here and my broken brain shuts off
and I just stop thinking and Ijust start talking. Fucking Okay, Look,

(01:25:06):
if you want to just keep doingthe same old thing, then maybe
this idea is not for you.I, for one, am not going
to compromise my autistic integrity, andI'll tell you something else. This is
the show and we're not going tochange it. What you just said is

(01:25:29):
one of the most insanely idiotic thingsI have ever heard. At no point
in your rambling, incoherent response wereyou even close to anything that could be
considered a rational thought. Everyone inthis room is now dumber for having listened
to it. God have mercy onyour soul. Yeah yeah, mustach hair

(01:26:00):
in my mouth? How disgusting,Oh freaking disgusting is that? Anyone with
a mustache is gross to sell?Um? I think last, you know,
we can bring up last thing todayon Strange Aviation Thursday. Thank you

(01:26:25):
Chris Bartell for the thumbnails. Ofcourse, we need to talk about silent
vert us, the zero emissions Iam propulsion drone and in twenty twenty two

(01:26:45):
or the end of twenty twenty one, there they're two point seven minute and
then there are four point five minutetest flights that prove so successful. Now
you know me, I'm a littleconspiracy minded ricon. I don't mean to
be this way, but I'm justthis way. I'm a weirdo. Sometimes
I think, of course, thatthere are opportunities in order, like evangelicals

(01:27:08):
to help the industry look into directionsin which the military is going to or
intelligence comunity is going to most needa product, and oftentimes they produce that
product. Sometimes my gut tells methat it's not just a queue like,
hey, this is what you shouldgo work on, but it's also maybe

(01:27:34):
a bit of information that comes alongwith being a subsidiary of a big company
that was already kind of working onit. To some degree, you suddenly
have information you didn't have, andyou're able to produce a product and maybe
bring it to market. Will helpyou work out all the things that you
know basically seating essentially, you know, conspiratorial speaking with some real facts to

(01:27:56):
back it up, but mostly justguessing. Is that it feels often like
some of these things are completely openfor the market to go after, but
I've never really had a reason to. And then sometimes you think, why,
why are these things becoming big nowduring this UAP thing. Is it
fair? I mean, the UFOtopic has always been going on, but

(01:28:17):
I mean specifically when they've gained somuch attention and whatnot. I think of
what type of aircraft are out thereor could be out there? And we've
covered this past in the past,right Strange Aviation on Thursdays, it's covered
this a few times. What ifthere was a tarp with a shape underneath
it and Elizondo is on camera withEric Weinstein or whatever the hellson, He's

(01:28:41):
like, get ready, folks,we want to pull the tarp off this.
We're gonna tell you I told youso, and we're just gonna say
okay. But if that got tothat point and they actually showed some spaceship,
because again, this isn't just somethingI'm making. UPSA was launched with
social media advertisement of promotion over theconstruction or fabrication of a goddamn fucking spaceship

(01:29:06):
by using earth Tech International or whateverthe hell hol put Offs company and Eric
Davis knowledge mixed with some guy fromthe Air Force. Everyone should know,
some guy from the DoD everyone shouldknow some guy from a job back in
two thousand and four who who's gotbillions of dollars and looks like a praying
mantis is high on percocets. Shouldknow, you should know? Anyways,

(01:29:29):
all of those people were all involvedwith it. Remember, so we would
say sometimes here on Strange Aviation Thursdays, if they pulled the tarp off,
if they showed the hangar door,and Eric Weinstein finally got to see it
after his three and a half probablynearly four year wait now and paired on
a stick type of thing. Whatwould that look like and what could it

(01:29:49):
be if it was all still justa ruse? What could be hovering off
the ground in some sort of likemen in bl the movie I'll production,
I don't know. Come on,man, We know there are things out

(01:30:12):
there that don't have wings, don'tflap like a bird, don't look like
a balloon, don't sound like anengine. We know there are things out
there that can hover off the ground, that could snap the can fire,
that quantum walk in place. Weknow there's things that I don't know two
magnets anyways, But we know thereare forces of nature out there that just

(01:30:33):
could do what people are claiming.We know that the the wast the byfield,
Browning effect. They Field Brown Effect. I forget the damn name.
But as I said in the minuteago, we're talking for a second,
hear about Silent Ventus, a dronecompany that is a civilian drone company that
is producing these drones that have nomoving parts. They sound like essentially there's

(01:30:54):
an electrical storm in the air andbarely and they fly around in ways that
look obviously so eerily similar to somebad but entertaining you know nineteen fifties or
nineteen sixties movie of a UFO comingover the hill and chasing the couple and
it's like wall, where are something? Or like whatever noise they gave it,

(01:31:15):
and these things of this things ofcourse fled around, and this has
its history and something that is withinthe public sector. You know that there
is of course patented information related tothe base Byfield Brown Effect or whatever it's
called. You know that there isthere is a you know, conspiracy related
to certain aspects of ionic wind andall things like that that maybe were of

(01:31:38):
interest to the government at one point. And you certainly are probably well aware
that other euthologists have used ion propulsionand interesting little aspects observed in the universe
as in context as alien technology.I mean, you have to you one
hundred percent half half to see that. At some point they've even tried to
suggest that people in you know,Seattle and the old ion On Lifter day

(01:32:00):
clubs were all just like, youknow, members of this secret organization that
really worked for whatever, and theywere doing this publicly in order to kind
of disclose what the government was reallydoing. And you can write it whatever
story you want. The fact ofthe matter is that the technology exists.
And whenever we see it move intoa commercial space, whenever we see it

(01:32:21):
moving into a commercial space by smallunknown company producing one off, two off
pieces, you have to assume thatif they've figured out there's a commercial value
to it, the military has aswell, someone has as well. If

(01:32:44):
they figured out there's a value tothis thing, this little device right here
that can move around and actually liftpackages and deliver them to people, don't
you think isn't it possible? Oho, No, got a research lab working
in a completely classified setting with anunknown amount of money produce something like this

(01:33:08):
that a small little company could produceand bring the market. Oh reality,
I want to be a real boy. Sorry, I'm sorry, friends,
I'm sorry, friends, and ofcourse that you know, people have huge
names have pushed this out there.They've associated with Tesla and others and just

(01:33:30):
said, like, you know,these these patents and these things working together
that could make like the ultimate aircraft. They could do with this and that,
and there's all types of problem withit. But one thing we know
is for sure is that DoD Darpatand others in Unit Postcarde universes around the
country have not only produced their ownversions of these things, but they've added
wings to them. Right, soit's not simply about being a EV toll

(01:33:55):
system. It can they can unfoldwings and become a fixed wing craft.
It flies around pretty maneuverably too,making them fly on ionic wind. Not
that's not really the you shouldn't usethat name, I'm told, but ultimately

(01:34:16):
that's what it is. A lotof these systems that they've come up with
have actually just kind of shape shiftingplatforms where it's like a box with wings
in the box list and like that, the box just turns and the box
just starts floating this way. Andso you know, whether UFOs are ever
coming or not, which I meanUFOs, whether aliens have ever come to
the planet, Earth or not andchecked out human beings. One thing is

(01:34:40):
for sure that this seventy something yearold technology first used in my understanding,
you know, broadly speaking, searchresearching a way to kind of I was
told that the patents reflex an effortto get near c minds without detonating them

(01:35:03):
or I'm sorry, a patent detectNo, that's incorrect, apologize, I'm
sorry. It was to move underthose what what are those types of boats
that drop depth charges. They wantedto be able to move silently under high

(01:35:25):
likelihood of of of running into youknow, uh, depth charging boats.
So the idea was to to findan alternative method too to reduce the sound
the submarine engine was making, oreven make a whole new engine. And
I think later on this discovery waskind of made, you know, that

(01:35:47):
just showed the efficiency of what happenswith them. We're still talking about it
today. This is in essence,this is really no different than some of
those other systems we're seeing that arejust like plasma actuators that the same power
source is applying a couple of differentphenomenas phenomenons and in one of them,
of course, is you know,using the very free nature we live in.

(01:36:12):
In order to move around, wejust had to accommodate that power source.
And for years and years people alwayssaid these things cannot lift the battery
that they need in order to run. They simply do not have the lift.
And then we found out what likemature researchers, don't look for the
giant ionic lifter, look for thenew lightweight battery. The answer is oftentimes

(01:36:36):
in the claim. And so youknow, what do we have here,
a very lightweight battery utilizing the freeworld we live in to to move around
packages to people's homes and also probablyoffer some sort of military product eventually.

(01:36:58):
But Thailand vent us as one asone of a few companies producing these for
commercial market. And whenever these thingsreach this point, what would we like
to say about the wave gap?Friends? What does someone have that you
know has that billions all those yearsago? I feel I almost feel like
it would only make sense in theearly days to treat this as secretive as

(01:37:25):
possible. But as time went on, you know, I bet the race
for solving some of these issues likeit, what if you could figure out
a system to get this under let'ssay, a super heavy fighter jet or
something would that be better than somesort of thrust vectoring system to lift the
thing off the ground like a jumpjet? Of what would it be?
Would it? Would it be betterto have an aircraft that had this than

(01:37:49):
not? And you're not going toreplace the fifth gen or sixth gen fighter,
But could there be platforms that couldpossibly be use to lift fighters to
a position where they can save endlessamounts of fuel and come at a new
angle of attack that they from andkind of being a place that that they

(01:38:13):
couldn't be without being on a largeplatform like a carrier, which is super
high sensitive to you know area.You don't want to bring that anywhere near
where someone can send an anti shipmissile or something or submarines in the air.
So are there like little independent carrierthings that lift modern day after thirty
fives or twenty twos into the airand float them around at I help,

(01:38:33):
dude, so they can just dropoff whenever they want and go chase someone
down and chase the weapon system downand fire out of the air. I
don't know, but people are weird, all right, It's good, that's

(01:39:01):
okay, let's share, let's let'sstay on topic. Airbell. There is
uh, there is. There's there'sall types of reasons to believe that because
this is in the commercial market,it might be worthwhile looking into what uh
this, what alternative methods or thingscould just be used for. My guess

(01:39:21):
is it'd mostly be used for submarinesrather than aircraft, but I could be
wrong. I personally think that itonly makes sense that large submarines, especially
submarines that are moving as close intointo brown water areas that they you can't
be around and and uh, ohshit, so I was off one hundred

(01:39:44):
years, I said seventy. Imean I was off thirty years, so
I was like cataclose. But thereis there's tons of submarines, you know,
already utilizing it in the civilian marketas well, in the civilian space
as well. These things are notgoing to replace something that's super agile right

(01:40:10):
away. But there are YouTube channelsout there where people just you know,
three D printers and a bunch ofknow how and they go out there and
they produce really cool variants of thesethings that are far faster than the ones
that are being shown on television stuff. And they're just doing that on YouTube.
So I would I would believe ifa YouTuber with a million subscribers and
a little bit of skill can engineersomething in a relatively short time with a
three D printer. Then once againwe should look back to the unknown,

(01:40:34):
not saying because I don't know,therefore I have the authority to make something
else up, but speculatively, insafely, you know, not going wild
with it. Could you see analternative use where maybe they're not flying around
like an interceptor for the military,But is there an alternative use of this?
And I would say I would stickto probably submarines, because you can

(01:40:55):
essentially move silently entirely other than thefact that you're moving a large mass through
the water, which is never goingto be entirely silent. You can,
in fact have a an engine thathums like the sound of someone humming,
you know what I mean. It'snot that I mean obvious you're gonna have
quite a large one, but it'syou can reduce that hum as well insulation
and all types of other methods inorder to reduce the acoustic noise coming from

(01:41:18):
that thing. But again, beforewe get out of here, doesn't that
just look like a UFO on itsown? My friends? Eh? Doesn't
that just look like about a classicLet's just change the shape of a little
bit at UFO. Could aliens beutilizing something like this? Is this like
some sort of thing that we'll doin the future, Like we're gonna be

(01:41:39):
you know, everyone's gonna realize,Oh, let's just all put our money
in uh ion propulsion in innrve's atmosphereand not like space stuff or under the
ocean only. But I think itwould only make sense your flight wide body

(01:42:08):
aircraft lifting slowly, no runway,just lifting slowly into the air casually,
no seatbelts required in the first thirtyminutes of these flights, and then suddenly,
ladies and gentlemen, bloys and girls, please pass in your seatbelts.
The plane will be soon moving intoits second phase of flight. And then
it just that's going off. Where'sthat at? Why they runways? These

(01:42:41):
are the tough questions I've asking myfriends. I'm sorry, I mean,
I have problems, all right,uh ricon, I talked so much.
I bored the living craft out ofyou, and I'm so much I'm so
happy so many of you are stillhere right now, thank you very much.
And then we lost quite a fewpeople. It's Okay, I love
you all. I appreciate time.Give me a massive favor and please hit
that lik and subscribe and share theshow. Can I'll leave all the links
below that I'm pulling this information from, so you know that I'm not pulling

(01:43:03):
it out of you nowhere, andof course some final thoughts from Project bamby
till today, and I'll leave ProjectBambi under there. If you're interested in
looking up over the military side ofthings, the ballistic missile boost intercept tests
of of I think nineteen forty six, you recognize the unprecedented level of secrecy

(01:43:34):
and need to counter and deter thethings that other countries. They're not speculating
about them building. They knew theywere building them, they knew they had
them, they were watching the testflights, the intelligence capabilities and watching them
were all there as well. Allof that fell are unfortunately into the sites

(01:43:55):
of predatory, predatorial like UFO writersof back in the day, people that
could say, holy cow, look, I could take this little bit of
information, take it out of contextand sell it to the UFO community.
They can take the UFO information andtake it out of context and sell it
to the public. They can Theycan take this stuff about you know nineteen,

(01:44:15):
you know, all the way backin nineteen forty five, forty six,
about what the future of these longrange missiles, these ballistic missiles,
these boosters, and these interceptors aregoing to be needed, and they can
turn you know, whatever moves superfast, whatever trigger is an early warning
system. They can turn all ofthat information in the right context into a

(01:44:36):
beautiful story for you in ufology thattells you that we've never gone fast.
Humans can't do that, and thatthere's this forever problem with aliens. It
can't go away because the Air Forcewon't stop looking into it or lying about
it or something. I don't know. I just I'm at my point now

(01:44:58):
where I'm even like people that I'vereally respected for years, and I don't
disrespect. I'm not like, Idon't dislike them, but you know,
I pulled documents from their websites allthe time. You know, you maybe
know who I'm talking about. Buteven if you're gonna sit there and blindly
say that the reason the only reason, or maybe they're not saying that,
but not saying the only reason,but if the government lies about UFOs when

(01:45:20):
asked about UFOs, or about secrettechnology. Therefore they must be lying about
something that is related to what youasked about. That is not the case,
and it's never been the case.If you go asking about UFOs when
they when when what you're really askingabout has nothing to do with UFOs,

(01:45:40):
they'll give you the answer you want. I mean, I'm sorry, they'll
they'll give you an answer in thecontext in which you ask, Can you
please tell me everything you know aboutUFOs in this department? This department.

(01:46:04):
I'm all right, I don't wantto I don't want to burn a bridge
here. I'm not going to burnthis bridge. I better stop now.
The smart Jeff is telling me,dude, you've already burnt a bridge with
every single person in this field.Don't do it in the direction of people
that you kind of rely on forinformation. Sometimes, let's just say,

(01:46:24):
there are more than one reasons forthe Defense Department to not answer you other
than in the context you give,because they have no comment. It's classified,
and what they're working on isn't whatyou suspect, and that's why you
think that what you think. Idon't all right, I got to get
out of here. I'm got toget out of here. Before I just

(01:46:45):
say something burn a bridge. Idon't want to do, but I want
to just stop and say, maybeyou're like me, and I've had a
strange sighting before. I've had aweird experience before, and you think there's
something more going on other than thewhole physical materials connection to this topic.
You know, like you just adesperate attempt to finally get a material connection

(01:47:10):
to the elusive almost basically invisible,almost neurological phenomenon of whatever is happening here,
that we're so close to getting amaterial connection right. And it's like
people keep reflecting back upon the pastand saying, why did the Air Force

(01:47:30):
look into this at all? Ifthere was nothing there? Why did they
continue to talk about it or lieabout it or not be straightforward about it?
Or all these conspiracies surrounding the truepurpose of certain studies whatever, all
comes down to this one simple fact. If people keep screaming UFO, they
will look for the UFO if there'snothing there. Like the thousands upon thousands

(01:47:55):
upon thousands of people are saying aday that are so clearly impossibly not true.
They're not true, it's impossible,they're lying. The people in large
quantities are lying face the facts.A lot of us have had strange startings,
but a lot of other people willsee a light on the horizon and
say that we're talking to fucking zigZorb from Mars. So, because people
will never stop streaming fire, therehave been attempts to try to find the

(01:48:17):
fire, and because their radar isnot showing fucking fire, they're like,
this is nothing. And then we'relike you liars, ladies and poisoned girls,
cats and kids, pooters and poutpuppies. Why are you in my
bedroom? All right, I've gotto get out of here. GI me
a massive favor. Keep it weird, keep it their ad ipeel and all

(01:48:39):
that good jazz. Look for thingshow they truly are versus how they appear
to be. I'm trying to giveyou years of information summed up in one
hour two hour long episodes by tryingto summarize things that are impossible to summarize,
by trying to give you a nuancedperspectives that are really only valuable if
you're interested in in looking at thetopic as it really is versus how it
appears to be. And it's Oh, I apologize for being a fucking loose

(01:49:01):
cannon psychopath on the air for youevery morning. But I am here so
to be a massive favor. Ifyou appreciate this free programming, understand that
it's only free for you. Itcosts for me. Help support the show,
and you can do so for freefor you as well by hitting that
li Liken, subscribe to leave itcome below, or even sharing the show.
Recon peace and love, keep itField, and keep your third find

(01:50:26):
hey ricon Uh. I'm taking afascinating class all about a Hollywood freeway.
It's called one oh one one ohone. Sorry,

All Episodes

Strange Recon - Strange Aviation Thursday 19OCT23

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Crime Junkie

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Strange Recon - Strange Aviation Thursday 19OCT23