SUNDAY WIRE EP 563 - The Line In The Water - Sunday Wire with Patrick Henningsen

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to this week's edition of
The Sunday Wire, streaming out live here at twenty first
Century Wire dot com, Alternate Current Radio dot com, Bitch
You Rumble x YouTube. Welcome to the program. It is
October fifth, twenty twenty five. I'm Brian McLain aka hasher

(00:46):
sitting in for Patrick henningson here while Patrick's out on assignment.
Hopefully we'll be able to connect with him over a
audio or video link from wherever he may be this Sunday.
We'll be looking for him to drop in. I'm also
gonna be joined by Adam Clark aka Ruckus, as well
as Basil Valentine. It all goes to plan and it

(01:10):
looks like it shall today. So you probably caught last
week's episode. We had a live conversation with some of
our colleagues that were aboard the humanitarian aid flotilla heading
for Gaza, and we're definitely gonna have to give some
updates on that. You can see in the background here. Unfortunately,

(01:33):
kind if I can stand in front of this guy
might look better. There we go, Yeah, we don't want
to look at that guy. Actually, Yeah, it's gonna be
an interesting, interesting program here getting the update on that.
Hope everybody's well out there, and it's been a bit
of a crazy media week, my goodness, current events media
almost a torrent, you know. So Luckily there's a lot

(01:57):
of good articles up at twenty first century wire dot com.
We might reference a few of those actually as well.
But yes, to get right to it, the eventuality that
we discussed last week with our guests aboard the flotilla
has come to pass. And yes, it looks like those

(02:20):
people have been detained, and we're gonna see what we
can find out about that detainment, what it looks like,
what the members of the Israeli government are saying, and
and more so, you know, I can't say I'm surprised,
it's I don't think they were either if as you

(02:41):
saw last week, they've been you know, doing drills, running drills,
rehearsing and preparing for that potential which was getting basically
crossing that line in the water. The line in the
water was crossed. As far as Ben Gevier and and
Yahoo and Israel are concerned, and let's face it, most

(03:04):
of the Western governments are concerned. Not seeing a lot
of speaking out about it from Western governments, seeing a
lot of speaking out about it from people on social
media and citizens of Western governments. That seems to just
be a growing and growing ground swell right there, especially
after two years. I mean, we are two days away

(03:28):
from to yr anniversary of October seven, so a lot
of people are tired of seeing the dead babies and
the dead women and all that stuff in their feeds.
It's just gone on too long. So there's definitely a
groundswell happening on social media and in the public. But

(03:50):
of course Western media not covering it much, and the
ones that are are, well, I don't even know if
they're actually covering it as far as media goes. And
even some of the probably inaccurately labeled independent or alternative
news sites also seen some pretty bad takes out there

(04:15):
on certain channels. But yeah, so let me go ahead
and bring Adam Clark into the stage. Here, we've got
Rucus with us. Rucus, what's up? Welcome to the Sunday Wire.
I feel like we just did this last night or something.
Were we doing a different show last night? I think
one called boiler Room maybe was that last night? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (04:37):
I believe that time is a funny thing, especially as
the years go by, which is another funny thing. Yeah,
what's not so funny of a thing is what's going
on right now with this current situation that you just describe.
Isn't it interesting and strange and surreal all at the
same time. Previous instances where one young lady who seems

(04:59):
to love to get her self in trouble all the
time in the name of various causes, as it were,
Greta Thunberg is always seen smiling and happy and laughing
and being quite jovial during the whole being arrested process
during her previous climate justice stuff. But she doesn't look
like you're having a good time now, Yeah, not at all.

(05:20):
And we're going to get into it. But we've heard
some very very disturbing reports that not the least of
which are surprising to me, because whether or not I
vocalize them on air or inside of comments somewhere, I'm
pretty sure most of us were thinking it as soon
as those people were taken, that they are going to
make an example, as it were, out of that young lady.
And here we are. It's just a terrible situation. But

(05:43):
thank you for having me. I'm pleased to hear that
we'll be joined by some others here shortly so that
you and I don't have to both carry the entire
thing here, because there's a lot of things to discuss,
and some of us might get emotional, some of us
might lose our understanding that are we really defending Greta Thunberg,
because that in itself is strange to say. So there's

(06:07):
a lot to be dealing with on this program today. Actually,
they'll be laughter, they'll be tears, there'll probably be some sweat.
I'm starting to feel some of that right now. It's
still hot in Texas, folks. Yeah. Again, I'm glad to
be here and shout out to everyone in all the
various chat rooms and everything. We see you and we
love you.

Speaker 1 (06:25):
Yeah, yeah, absolutely, and we'll do our best. We're kind
of managing a lot of stuff here today, but it's
great to see you out there in the chats on
Rumble and YouTube and in the boiler room Discord as well.
It's sort of an alternate current radio as a little
in house chat, if you will. We'll see how much

(06:45):
longer Discord's around. Oh my goodness. Discord has been very
much demonized lately in certain events yet again, but we'll
put that on the shelf for now because Discord is
rolling great. I see a bunch of our people in there.
What's up, wireheads. It's great to see you over there
and on all the chats. Will definitely be featuring some

(07:07):
of your comments a little bit later in the show here,
but ruckus. So this I'm just going to read this
really quick. This is from the Global Some Mood Flotilla
ig page and they've got a couple of infographics here
for us. Just as an overhead update, the Adala Lawyers

(07:31):
report participants reported various forms of mistreatment and aggression from
the prison guards, so we've got here's their update here
in the description update on detained participants, we continue to
receive updates from Adala Lawyers regarding our volunteers abducted in

(07:51):
international waters and illegally detained in Israeli prisons. Lawyers have
not yet been able to meet all participants, but we'll
do so in the coming days. As verified information becomes available,
we will share further updates. So you can follow that
account on multiple social media platforms. There is a couple

(08:16):
more slides in here. Let me bring Basil Valentine into
the conversation as well. Hello, Basil, welcome to the Sunday Wire.
It's great to see you today. I got you. It
looks like you're muted there, my friend.

Speaker 3 (08:33):
Sorry, Good afternoon, gentlemen. Good to be with you, and
hello to everyone all around the world tuning in.

Speaker 1 (08:39):
Yes, yes, absolutely, I'm really glad you're able to be
here with us, Basle. We're just going through the global
some mood flotilla update here from the Adala lawyers, and
it looks like you joined just in time, because they're
basically saying that, hey, there's various forms of mistreatment and
aggression from the pre and guards. Lawyers haven't been able

(09:02):
to speak with the prisoners yet, and medications are being
withheld in some cases, and a lack of access to
clean drinking water. Basil, I'm afraid that might be the
least of some of their concerns from what we know
about these Israeli prisons.

Speaker 3 (09:23):
Yeah, I mean haven't bad. They've got it, I can
promise you the Palestinians have got it far, far worse
the ones in the torture Goolag. I don't think any
of the flotilla activists I certainly hope not. I spoke
to both tie Kiki and Frank Romano during the week
and of course so we spoke to Tiger and Yara

(09:44):
last weekend. I don't think any of them are being
raped to death anally, which of course has happened to
a number of Palestinians. But nevertheless, Israel takes pride in
abusing people. They adela legal aid organization which represents activists,
says National Security Must Team Minister Itamar ben Gavier's comments

(10:08):
about being proud of the harsh treatment of the participants
are an active endorsement of inhumane treatment, abuse and intimidation.
But we shouldn't be surprised by that. We know that
Ben Gavia is a demonic sadist. He is simply being
true to his colors. What's appalling is the lack of

(10:32):
not only outcry, but material support from diplomats from those
that have been let's remember, kidnapped in international waters in
what was an act of piracy. You know, from a
legal standpoint, they were the flotilla was attempting to enforce

(10:57):
the dictates of the World Court, which said that no
impediment must be allowed to the free flow of aid
into the Gaza Strip. That was nearly two years ago.
That was in January twenty twenty four that their interim
Advisory ruling was that there was genocide. You know, since

(11:17):
then we've had you know, innumerable human rights organizations coming
out and saying the same thing, in coluding the United
Nations commissioning inquiry. But really we can use our own
eyes and ears to see what's been going on in Gaza.
So anyway, you know, they were trying to enforce international law.

(11:37):
The Israeli broke it again, but crucially, where was the
material support from the so called global community. The Italians
are only because of the enormous pressure from their own population,
from you know, the near general strike that took place
the week before the protests in Genoa, at the ports

(12:00):
all over the country. Really they sent two warships out
supposedly to protect the floating but they cleared off as
soon as they got into the Orange zone, So did
the Spanish, so did the Turks, although the Turks did
give them some food and water. So pictures of supplies

(12:22):
being transferred from Turkish warships to the flotilla, all that
will have been stolen, as I have the boats from
what White one can tell h And really the international
outcry about this latest you know, breach of international law
should be much much louder.

Speaker 1 (12:46):
Yeah, we were talking about that before you joined VASIL.
I was mentioning that, like what we're seeing in the
mass media, the mainstream media is appalling an appall lack
of coverage, first of all, mostly and then when you
do see outlets covering it, it is like it's just

(13:11):
missing all of the key words, like the one you
use their kidnapped in international waters, for example, like that
that is a headline level term that is very true,
and I have not seen that in any mainstream headlines.
And I've even seen a couple of h unhinged sort

(13:33):
of semi independent, semi alternative voices out there on certain
channels saying that it's fake. I've literally seen people saying
that this is a hoax, it isn't happening. I mean,
are you kidding. There's there's like between eighty and one
hundred people I think over one hundred people that were

(13:54):
rounded up from those boats. That's a lot of people,
and it's it's an international group of people, people from
multiple countries, to include American military veterans. I mean where
what American military veterans kidnapped on the high seas And
just now we're not going to talk about that. We'll

(14:16):
talk about you know, Antifa in Portland. We got all
this other stuff going on, people acting like the sky's
falling here in the United States. Well, this has gone
on in the backgrounds. It's absolutely insane.

Speaker 3 (14:28):
Yeah, a number of headlines said that the activists on
the Flintida had been arrested. Haven't been arrested. That suggests
that they've committed some sort of crime. They've been illegally
kidnapped international waters. But it's been like this, as we know,
for two years, the misrepresentation, the endless reframing to suit

(14:52):
Israeli narratives, and of course in Britain, over the last
few days we had the Manchester synagogue attack. Two people
were shot dead by the police. I believe a third
person was also killed as a result of actions by
the attacker. But the wall to wall coverage that this

(15:14):
incident received was way off the charts compared to the
seriousness of the events themselves. It's worth remembering too that
an imam from a mosque was stabbed last week. Been
random acts of violence against Muslims in Britain. Over the
last couple of weeks a Sikh was raped, you know,

(15:35):
and beaten up. People believe this is because of the
scoundrel Tommy Robinson stoking as much division as he can.
But all those attacks on the Southern Asian community are
ignored by the corporate media. But as soon as it's
an attack on anybody Jewish, then of course the wailing

(15:57):
and gnashing of teeth has to go on for days.
Not only that, you then get you know, struggling to
find the right word there. Because Brendan O'Neill, you can
call him what you like, he writes for Spiked Arch racist,

(16:17):
anti Palestinian Zionist property now saying that after the Manchester attack,
this means anti Zionism is synonymous with antisemitism. There's no
distinction between the two. And it's very sinister the way
so called Jewish community leaders have similarly leapt on the

(16:39):
bandwagon to say this is all a result of people
showing solidarity for Palestinians who are being genocided. I mean,
I ask you. Even the British government said, you know, oh,
hold off the Palestine protests. While the Jewish community is
grieving as if people are not capable of, on the

(17:00):
one hand, sympathizing for those who were killed in Manchester
and also wanting to empathize with the far greater number
of people killed in Palestine. Caitlin Johnston, the Australian journalist,
wrote an excellent piece about this, saying, you know how

(17:21):
many Palestinians would have to be killed to have knocked
the synagogue story off the top of their headlines in
the Guardian or the BBC, let alone the Telegraph all
the times because that same day, I think one hundred
Palestinians were slaughtered in Gaza and you have to turn
to page twenty seven.

Speaker 4 (17:42):
Why is the government?

Speaker 3 (17:44):
Sorry, you have to turn to page twenty seven to
discover that, So you know the double standards. Now I'm
going to say something which I hope isn't controversial here,
but it's simply a fact. Sorry, my light has just
gone out. I have no idea why with something which
is simply a fact. And that's this has been the

(18:06):
case for decades really, you know, throughout the so called
Arab Israeli conflict of the last seventy years, but particularly
also with reference to events of the Second World war
and since, and of course October the seventh being the

(18:29):
most egregious recent example. And that's the primacy of Jewish suffering.
In other words, if a Jew suffers, if a Jew
is killed, this is far more serious globally, This is
a much bigger tragedy. This requires far more tears, This
requires action, This requires legislation than if anybody else is killed,

(18:54):
any gentile Palestinian, let alone, it Rockies or you know,
people in Sudan. If a Jew is killed, this is
really really serious. Now, this is in line with a
lot of Jewish tradition, you know. I mean, if you
want to look at the Torah, the Talmud, it'll say,
you know, the life of a Jew is worth much

(19:15):
more than that of a gentile. You know, quite open
about it, and certainly is raerey society views it that way,
but we see it reflected in our corporate media. And
the last few days in the UK have been a really,
really pungent example of that. And I don't know if

(19:36):
people can see through it, because it's absolutely rammed down
their throats. And when it is rammed down their throats
to the extent, then it actually unfortunately starts to become
a thing. You know, the average person actually starts to
believe that the death of a single Jewish person is

(19:57):
more important, is more newsworthy, is more tragic than the
death of one hundred Palestinian children. And so we end
up in a completely inverted world with no moral absolutes,
with no moral compass whatsoever, but obviously one where one

(20:20):
group of people seem to hold sway over the over
the minds of the others, over the zeitgeist, certainly over
what the media decides.

Speaker 1 (20:35):
Yeah, it's highly frustrating for a lot of people. You know,
these things that have been made you know, I've said
this so many times. Everything has been made political. Now
every single thing has to be political, so to include death,
all right, So we can't have any sort of commentary

(20:55):
on death or violence or murder without there being a
identity politic wrapped around it. And what you're describing right
there clearly was felt by British Israeli Jewish journalist Rachel Shabby.

(21:16):
She was talking about this exact same thing that you
were talking about, Basil. Let me play her comments. I'll
get you guys, I'll get you guys' take on that.

Speaker 4 (21:27):
Here here she is asking people to choose between the two.
Why is the government saying you cannot support Jewish people
who are shaken in the aftermath of a terror attack
and also support Palestinians experiencing Israel's genocidal war in Gaza.

(21:52):
Why is the government saying that people do not have
understanding and compassion and empathy in their hearts to do both.
I think that's disgraceful and divisive, But also it speaks
volumes about the government's limited and frankly facile worldview.

Speaker 5 (22:12):
And do you think that the government should be even
trying to discourage people from not protesting today? I mean,
they've obviously held back from trying to cancel any protest,
but do you think they've gone too far in their
discouragement of you know, what is free speech today?

Speaker 4 (22:28):
Of course they have, of course they have. But it's
also outrageous, it's insulting, it's divisive to pit one cause
against the other. Again, I would ask why does the
government think people cannot do both? Why does the government
think people don't have compassion and understanding enough to support

(22:49):
both British Jewish people in this horrifying moment and Palestinian
people in Gaza after a horrifying two years of Israel's
genocidal war on Gaza. What is it that makes the
government presume to tell people that they cannot do both?

(23:11):
That in itself is outrageous and insulting.

Speaker 1 (23:16):
Okay, I've got a I don't know why Elon inserted
himself into our viewer there.

Speaker 3 (23:24):
Brother is watching you.

Speaker 6 (23:26):
I don't.

Speaker 1 (23:26):
I have no idea.

Speaker 3 (23:28):
It looks like an overlay if you want to go there, Okay.

Speaker 1 (23:31):
Then yeah, I found anyway.

Speaker 3 (23:32):
You know, she makes a very good point. And of
course it's anti Semitic. And this is the irony of
the whole thing to say that, you know, all Jewish
people are somehow upset or offended by people protesting against
the Gaza genocide. What a load of nonsense. Has been

(23:53):
a very large Jewish block and all the demonstrations to
date some of the most vocal opponents of genocide, some
of the most prominent anti zionists worldwide, of Jewish of course,
whether it's Norman Finkelstein or Max Blumenthal, the General's son,
of course, you know, so it's scurrulous nonsense. It's really

(24:17):
very sinister. We heard the so called chief Rabbi who
has been in Britain Mervis who has been praising the IDF. Yes,
this is supposed to be a man of God or something.
You would think he would confine himself to purely spiritual matters,
But as far as he's concerned, the mass slaughter of
Palestinians is also his remit. I believe he has family

(24:39):
serving in the IDF, you know so, And of course
he's pushed forward by the corporate media with this title
chief Rabbi in the UK, sort of the equivalent of
a local pope, archbishop or something like that, as a
sort of man of God, you know, as someone whose
word must be respected, you know, at all casts. And

(25:03):
how dare you speak against the chief Rabbi? I saw
another rabbi the other day from the true Torah Jewish
community saying, what an abomination. But the state of Israel
is that it has absolutely no right to exist whatsoever.
And that is a very large Orthodox Jewish community that

(25:26):
hold that view. And of course amongst young Jewish people,
particularly in the United States and also in Europe, they've
all become anti Zionists as well. The Zionists, of course,
are propped up by obsequious, brainwashed, propagandized gentiles like the

(25:48):
scoundrel Tommy Robinson or Praiser Meyer's Brendan O'Neill. You know,
that Douglas Murray character Alison Pearson another absolutely dreadful one.
And these equally abysmal, morally vapid so called commentators are
amplified in the pages of the Telegraph and the Times

(26:09):
and what have you over here.

Speaker 1 (26:10):
Yeah, and don't forget all their new influencers. Right, we
just saw the footage of net and Yahoo speaking with
you know, the influencer class and talking about how how
important both TikTok and x are to keeping the narrative
that they want to have in the minds of in

(26:34):
particular American conservatives. Ruckus. We watched that footage last night
in the boiler room, and it's shocking. Like most people
that saw it thought it was a deep fake at first,
because it was just like, why would you do this
in public? Why would you film this?

Speaker 7 (26:50):
What? You know?

Speaker 1 (26:50):
But it's real footage as far as we could.

Speaker 2 (26:53):
Tell which one, because that's you say that about everything.

Speaker 1 (26:57):
Yeah, pretty much. You have to have that thought about
every video now, which is you know, kind of destroying
our media zeitgeist a little.

Speaker 2 (27:04):
Bit Okay, No, seriously, which.

Speaker 1 (27:08):
Video the video where Nettan Yahoo is sitting there with
the influencers and that blonde gallot who said, you know,
Charlie Kirk was one of her mentors. You know, what
are we going to Israel? You don't keep American conservatives
engaged in, you know, supporting Israel.

Speaker 2 (27:24):
The only thing you're talking about that was what you
pointed out in your commentary about the fact that we
live in a world where it's anti Semitic to even
suggest or hint at or whisper in a dark circle
somewhere across the room that Israel has any influence or
control over any narratives through the media. And then juxtapose
that with everything that nan Yahoo is pushing forward with

(27:45):
this new initiatives to literally bribe and pay for hire
influencers to push a narrative on behalf of Israel. That's
probably then, by definition, the most anti semitic thing we've
ever seen. I mean, it's so freaking crazy, It's so wild, man.
I'm like, is this real? Is reality real? Is Patrick

(28:07):
Henningson real? Is he really with us right now? These
are the questions I have so but I just want
to say, real quick that a lot of these things
fundamentally stem forth from a basic misunderstanding, probably on purpose
by the powers that be, whoever they are, a conflating
confusion of religion and identity. For instance, America, people who

(28:29):
don't live in America and most people live in America
think America is a quote unquote Christian nation. I'm like,
that's not exactly true. And then all the people who
you would run into out in the street to say
they're Christian, well, there's so many different splintered factions within
that and what they believe. It would be erroneous on
your part, a fallacy logically speaking, if you're not from
the America or inside of the Christian group, to suggest

(28:51):
or assume that everyone who's a a Christian and everyone
lives in America believes whatever fundamental hardcore thing you discover
or believe it, that's a religion. For instance, look at
how Muslims and the Islamic faith is treated. Oh well, yeah,
they believe they're taught in their teachings that they need
to run around take over the whole world and kill
everybody and chop off their heads. So clearly, anyone who

(29:14):
identifies from any nation that has been labeled as a
Muslim country or any person who has had any dipping
of their toe, and any part of that faith is
automatically lumped into that weird belief system, which is false.
So I just wanted to point that out.

Speaker 1 (29:27):
Welcome Patrick, Yeah, good one, Patrick, great to see you.
Thanks for joining us today. We're kind of talking about
what's gone on with the flotilla participants being held. I
can't believe how fast these hearings happened. Two hundred hearings
late Thursday night and into Friday morning, without any prior

(29:49):
notice to the Adulla lawyers, no legal defenders for the
flotilla participants present, and this is just really on very fast.
We called the episode the line in the water, apparently
it was crossed by the flotilla, and now we're sort
of seeing the aftermath of it. What have you heard

(30:12):
and what are you expecting to happen next?

Speaker 7 (30:15):
Well, I think thanks for thanks for holding the fort,
you guys. I like what you've done with the place
as well. I like the color a little bit, a
little bit of flair.

Speaker 1 (30:25):
Streamyard's taking its own thing today. Like when I got started,
it started changing colors on me elon Musk even jumped
up over one of our videos we were just watching
on his own. I don't know what's going on back here,
but it's looking all right.

Speaker 7 (30:37):
I like it. I really like it. Actually, it really
pops well, especially on x on the live feed. But
first of all, you guys are especially ruckus, you and
Basil and you guys are noticing way too much. We
have to we have to talk about that. The flotilla.
I think a number of the participants have flown back.

(31:03):
There's still I don't know who's accounted for and who's
not accounted for. I don't know if you guys have
seen or spoken to the reports about Greta being the
subject of extra abuse by the idea of captors. Yeah,
that was interesting. So it'll be interesting to hear what
she has to say when she comes out. And you know,

(31:23):
I'm gonna I'm gonna say this as well. There's a
lot of people in the alternative media that have been
joining in on this dog pile of slagging off Greta
Thumberg because she's involved with this. And look, I don't
need to tell you guys my position as a climate
skeptic right back to two thousand and seven. So you know,

(31:49):
I absolutely oppose the way the establishment was using her
as a battering ram during her teenage years. But Greta
is an adult now and she has her own own views,
her own opinions. I might not agree with the whole
climate issue with her, or any of it for that matter,
but on this issue she deserves nothing but my respect,

(32:12):
and I absolutely applaud her steadfastness, her clarity, her absolute
crystal clarity on this issue, and the fact that what
I find amazing about Greta is she has been trained
by the best. She's been trained by the biggest pr organizations,
the biggest NGOs for you know, being the main voice

(32:34):
of the climate issue, okay, and she's taken those skills
and she is I think she is definitely one of
the best in terms of a you know, a seasoned activist.
She's taken those skills and applied them in full measure
against one of the most evil entities in the history

(32:55):
of the planet. And we're talking about the colonial settler project,
the Zionist entity known as Israel. What they're doing right
now in Gaza is absolutely incredible and horrific. And to
see Greta Thunberg on the front line of this putting
herself out, not just once, but it's the second flotilla

(33:16):
that she's put herself on. You know, she deserves nothing
but admiration, respect and support for what she's doing, along
with every other participant on this flotilla. That's what I
have to say. And those people sniping at her get
a life, grow up. I see grown men sniping at her,
and I'm just like you guys from your wherever, you're

(33:37):
sitting comfortably and you support, you know what the flotilla
is doing, but you're sniping at her for putting yourself out.
And I'm gonna tell I'm gonna say this as well,
like had she not been on that flotilla or on
the boat that she was on, we were having trouble
tracking her because I think she switched boats, so I

(34:00):
didn't know, We didn't know where she was. We didn't
know if she disembarked at Crete because she wasn't on
the first boat that she that we saw her on.
So I think she was on the Alma when it
was seized. And had she not been on that boat,
had she she's easily the most high profile person on
the flotilla, what would Israel have done. Could is it

(34:21):
possible at somebody they could have taken extreme you know,
extreme prejudice in those cases. Who knows, But it's only
to me only a positive thing that her, anyone else
with a profile is on board that flotilla.

Speaker 1 (34:37):
Yeah, and as far as I could see, uh, you
were not she did. She doesn't have the typical or
I should say maybe the Greta one point oh climate protester.
She doesn't have that typical media fanfare around her. There's
not you know, specifically placed professional forographers to capture a

(35:01):
moment where you know, some cops come and grab her
by the elbows and walk her to a car or
something like that. I mean, I understand why people. We
covered a lot of those things, and you know, we
even on our soundboard here we've got you know, the
how dare you clip? And all that, like, we're very
critical of that whole Green New Deal phase of Greta's

(35:22):
personality and activism. And we also have a major expose's
at twenty first century wire dot com that go into
who her handlers were when she was fifteen, sixteen, seventeen
and what kind of pr machinery was behind her. So
we acknowledge all that, and we've been there reporting all that,
but that machinery does not seem to be following her

(35:46):
around right now. I've noticed. She seems to be there
like any other protester, risking you know, freedom, life and
limb pretty much, you know, risking getting phosphorus dumped on
her with a drone at night in the middle of
the night, or or or like like we're seeing here
on this page. Let me just bring this up really quick.

(36:09):
Let me get a little bit bigger there so everybody
can read it. There's video here. There's no English in
the video, but I believe this is a translation of
something that's being said by this guy here. Zionist dragged
little Greta Tunberg by her hair before our eyes, beat
her and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They

(36:32):
did everything imaginable to her as a warning to others.
Uh So that's that's pretty disturbing, you guys.

Speaker 3 (36:42):
Yeah, bit surprising. I'm surprised she consented to kiss the
Israeli flag. What would they have done next that she
not done? So from what I can tell, Uh, some
of the more high profile and vocal people like our
friends Frank Romano and tyg Kike are still in custody.

(37:03):
Others have been deported. I saw some Israeli accounts complaining
that they would have to pay for the deportation flights.
People have been sent to Turkey in the first first
instance for the most part. But Frank's there for the
second time, of course, because he went on his own
boat the Handler a few months ago. And ty Kike

(37:24):
is well known as being, you know, a very articulate
opponent of Zionism. So I believe they're still in custody,
just made to suffer that little bit longer. Of course,
the Israelis are on the one hand, as is often
the case, denying that prisoners have been badly treated, that
there was a lack of food or clean water. But

(37:47):
at the same time Ben Givere is celebrating the fact
that prisoners have been badly treated. They want to have
it both ways, you know, they want one arm of
the you know, the Hasba are willing to say, oh no, no, no,
that's all an exaggeration. Basically, it's been like staying in
the Ritz Carlton. But on the other hand, you know, uh,
the I was gonna say darker elements, but they're all

(38:07):
extremely dark are celebrating the mistreatment and saying it's exactly
what they deserved.

Speaker 1 (38:17):
Yeah, I've I've actually got footage here, Ben Gevere bragging.
Let's uh, let's take a look at this one as well.

Speaker 6 (38:35):
What you've.

Speaker 1 (38:38):
Insame time to Kelly Corny again no English on that one,
but he brags, quote as I promised, the flotilla activists
are now in security prison, treated like saboteurs, the bare
minimum of everything. Uh. And then the comment are here
at the Global Samood flotilla.

Speaker 7 (38:57):
UH.

Speaker 1 (38:58):
Post On X says this is coming from a man's
sanctioned and banned by thirty five countries, including the UK, Canada, Australia,
New Zealand, Norway, Spain and the entire Engine area. And
yet government still stays silent as he oversees the abduction
of peaceful humanitarians. Yes, they certainly do.

Speaker 2 (39:22):
What what would normally call it? If somebody illegally kidnapped
a group of peaceful humanitarian workers? Would that be considered
an act of terror? Out of curiosity?

Speaker 7 (39:32):
It's an international crime, it's kidnapping. It's you know, illegal,
especially in international waters, and a humanitarian thing, Ben Gavira
is just you know you just see what a slovenly,
fat slob of an individual and just grotesque, not just
in how he looks, but in the things that come

(39:53):
out of this man's mouth. It's just unbelievable. I mean,
he's just a very unsavory his that she was kind
of big mugshot of that guy on the background there.
I like that montage, by the way, that's very fitting.
All the key elements of the story are there. Thank you, Ruckus.
I see Thiago as well, Thiago Alvala behind Rucus. Thiago

(40:16):
is an absolute hero. I don't know if you guys
caught Thiago's video audio from him and they're trying to
hail his ship and he just took the Israeli American
Suburbian Ideaf reservist apart. I mean, it was just epic.

(40:38):
That's going to go down in history as one of
the great audios of all time.

Speaker 3 (40:42):
Yeah, no, absolutely, he answered line by line, didn't he
about how it was them that was breaking the law
and so on and so forth. There was this bizarre footage,
wasn't there, of a so called Israeli navel office, a
woman with blonde hair and an American accent. You know,

(41:05):
it's instructing the flotilla what to do. Did you see that?

Speaker 7 (41:11):
No, I didn't know, but I've got the Thiago audio.
Do you guys want to hear it? Absolutely? Yeah, yeah,
this is just epic here. I'll bring this up right now.

Speaker 8 (41:26):
We don't If you could an attempt to preach the
naval blockade, we will stop your vessel and act to
confiscate it through legal proceedings in court.

Speaker 9 (41:35):
You will bear full responsibility for your actions.

Speaker 8 (41:40):
Say that we are entering an active war zone. You're
saying that we're entering a place for our committing war crimes.
This is against international law. Once again, the International Court
of Justice made a provisional ruling that any attempt to
hinder an entary A mission to Gaza is prohibited by
international law. Is complying with the request to make you

(42:02):
accountable for the crime of genocide. The International Criminal Court
has your Prime Minister Benjamin tan Yaho under an arrest
warrant for the crime of starving children and starving people
to death using starvation and femine as a weapon of war. Therefore,
it's our moral duty to continue sailing. It's our moral

(42:26):
duty to refuse any attempt of an occupying force to
control humanitarian aid for the Palestinian people in Gaza, who
have the rights of their sovereignty, who have the right
of their self determination and to control their own borders. Therefore,
we do not recognize you as a legitimate agent to

(42:47):
control any attempt to bring aid to the Palestinian people
in Gada. We request you to stand down, to do
not commit another war crime among so many that you've
been committed, and to spend down. Do not engage with
our peaceful, non violent humanitarian solidarity mission for the Palestinian
people in us I advise you again.

Speaker 7 (43:11):
Yeah, that's it. So, I mean what an absolute g
tiago is. I mean, imagine being hailed by the IDEF
knowing that they're going to basically come and you know,
take you at gunpoint, basically, which they did, weapons free.
I mean, did you see did you guys see any
of the scenes of those I mean, it's just pointing

(43:33):
their muzzles. Those are very powerful weapons they're pointing into
the faces and heads of humanitarian workers and a people
that are just wearing life jackets. Totally unarmed obviously, I mean,
just totally uncalled for it. But this is the thuggery
that unfortunately we're dealing with.

Speaker 3 (43:52):
They sprayed some of the boats with skunk quarter as well,
the foul smelling liquid that they spray in the Paldestinian
districts of Jerusalem as well.

Speaker 7 (44:01):
Yeah, that's disgusting.

Speaker 1 (44:03):
Yeah. Yeah. Do you guys follow Greg Stoker? I've been
following Greg Stoker on IG for the last couple of years,
and he is an American veteran military veteran. We've got
at least two or three American military veterans that were

(44:23):
on the flotilla, and Rupert asked about him. Greg Stoker
is seen as the special forces leader of the flotilla.
I fear his interrogation maybe harsh. Yeah, that's a valid fear,
I would say.

Speaker 3 (44:42):
Yeah. As I said, I've no doubt they're going to
make it particularly hard on those that higher profile that
they're a bit more afraid of. I just want to
draw attention quickly to a letter to the newly incumbent
British Foreign Secretary yve At Cooper, the woman, of course,
who proscribed Palestine action a couple of months ago. Barry

(45:08):
Gardener's a left wing labor renp he rode to vetters follows.
Please advise me of any other situation in which the
UK government would remain quiescent after the kidnapping of more
than a dozen of our citizens by a foreign government
in an act of piracy on the high seas. My constituent,
Aaron White, is part of the Global Summred flotilla. Last night,

(45:31):
Aaron's boat was intercepted by the Israeli NAVI and since
then we've heard no word from him to confirm his safety.
Have you called the Israeli ambassador to protest? Have you
spoken with your counterpart in Israel? As the Prime Minister
spoken to Benjaminetta Yaho, did demand the immediate release of
all British citizens. If not, why not? The UK flag
vessel l V Alma is part of the flotilla and

(45:54):
was in international waters when it was detained. Has the
UK lodged a complaint against the State of Israel at
the National Maritime Organization headquarters in London for this violation
of Articles one hundred to one oh seven and one
ten of the unclos If not, why not? The UN
confirmed last month that Garza is suffering from famine, which

(46:14):
was the direct result of Israel's systematic obstruction of aid
entering the territory. My constituents and others on the flotilla
were engaged in an attempt to relieve that suffering by
bringing much needed food and medical supplies to the guards
and people. Yet our government is mute. There are urgent
measures which the UK can and should take to impose

(46:35):
further sanctions on Israel and its politicians, including Prime Minister
Letting Yahoo. These must now be put in place. The
UK must not remain pitifully silent in the face of
this direct assault on its citizens when future generations look
back on the role of British polities. Okay, anyway, you've
got the gist of it. There, Absolutely bang on the money,

(46:56):
Barry Gardner. But the simple fact is that obviously we
all know the UK government is in bed with Tel Aviv.
You might as well call labor liquid light or something.
But essentially they're afraid of the Israelis. This is the point.
They're afraid of the Israelis and they're afraid of the

(47:16):
Jewish lobby in the UK. You know, we had the
so called Chief Rabbi mentioned him earlier, dozens of others
wailing and gnashing of teeth that you've never heard before
because of the Manchester synagogue attack. This basically they wanted
as a result to outlaw Palestine's solidarity, outlaw the marches,

(47:36):
dubbing them hate marches. Again, the synagogue attacks sort of
refueled this extremist, progenocide Zionist position. So you know, in
the light of that, people like your Vet Cooper and
the Prime Minister to himself, even if they wanted to act,
and I don't think they really do, but they're terrified.
They're terrified of Israel and they're terrified of the lobby.

Speaker 7 (48:00):
Yes, very convenient distraction obviously, very like the Manchester thing.
I mean, the pats He's dead, right is he? Has
he been?

Speaker 3 (48:11):
He was shot? So the police shot two people. They
also shot one of the victims.

Speaker 7 (48:17):
Oh did they well so so so so they shot
one of the victims, They shot the alleged assailant right
the and then so and then the assailant has they say,
shot or killed one of the victims.

Speaker 3 (48:34):
That's right, right, So the police.

Speaker 2 (48:36):
Killed Toots name by the way, real quick.

Speaker 3 (48:40):
Well his first name was you had believe it.

Speaker 9 (48:43):
Or not.

Speaker 2 (48:46):
Totally, yeah, exactly.

Speaker 3 (48:48):
And of course the narrative being pushed by scoundrels and
scumbags like Tommy Robinson. Is that the Palestinian struggle is
you Had know that it's Western civilization that's at stake,
and that's why everyone in Gaza must be obliterated because
they're all gi had hees. Look at this guy, his

(49:09):
name's g Had. This is all part of the race
war narrative that he's trying to stoke. Robinson has now
been invited to Israel, by the way I.

Speaker 7 (49:18):
Saw that, Yeah, I mean I was hoping that they
would apprehend the assailant so that we could learn the background,
more motiva, what the motivation might be, that there might
be some cross examination, maybe a trial or something like that.
I mean, that would be useful, wouldn't it. It would
certainly be helpful. That's what I was hoping for, uh,

(49:39):
you know, and will determine sort of more about the
story that way. But now that's not going to happen, obviously,
I said, I said Patsy earlier, alleged Patsy alleged gunman,
alleged terrorist. What what do we actually know? What do
we actually know about this situation? Not much? And what
happens when there's no information we don't know much. What

(50:01):
does the public do? They speculate, so they speculate on stuff,
which is what we're left. That's the only thing that
we're left to do. Otherwise are we not allowed to speculate?
And we have to just wait for the official line
on it and then swallow that and accept that percent Yes, sir, yes, sir,
three bags full, sir, No questions here, move along, thank

(50:23):
you very much. Anything shady, any potential shady activity there?
Who knows? Dare we say false flag? That's not appropriate
in this case? Of course, it's impossible. We're told that
it could be anything the far is going on here
other than what the government is declaring here. So that's
where we're at, folks. And did I lay that out?

Speaker 3 (50:45):
Well?

Speaker 1 (50:46):
Yeah, yeah, pretty much. And it's par for the course
here in October twenty twenty five to just be given
narratives and data points. Here's the narrative, here's some data points,
here's some conflicting data points. Have fun, gang, you know,
it's just like that whole paradigm you know that you
spoke about in that in one of your presentations that

(51:09):
we talked about recently, is just gone. Like the whole
paradigm of the people writing the narrative and making the
claims are the ones that have the onus of, you know,
providing enough context, factual information and verifiable sources to actually
have an international or a national or a media discussion

(51:32):
about current events. And you know, I kind of opened
boiler room last night with just sort of lamenting the
loss of news like it's it's very difficult to even
be a commentator and analyst in news right now because
all we get are managed narratives and conflicting data points.

(51:54):
It's just a mess of stuff, and so many people
are tuning out from it. It's you know, many people
are tuned in. You know, sort of those people that
light bulbed on during in twenty twenty and twenty twenty
one are queued in, and you know a lot of
folks on X and TikTok are queued in. But what's
going to happen to X and TikTok now? I think
we kind of got a bit of a harbinger, a

(52:17):
bit of a warning. You know, we got an executive
order out, we got Larry Ellison up there working with
TikTok now, and we've got Benjamin Nett and Yahoo openly
publicly hiring more influencers to go, you know, as the
cherry on top of the hasbara, a toxic cake that

(52:38):
you know, we're all forced to eat here in the
in the social media feeds.

Speaker 7 (52:42):
I mean, let me just I got asked be to
go on to a space on x A panel, okay,
and I didn't accept it obviously. I didn't reply because
it's just And I went to check out the space
anyway afterwards. And who was the main guest. It was
Jonathan Circus so whatever his name is, the IDEAF spokesperson.

(53:04):
He israelly, oh god, main propagandist that that that sort
of meat head looking character. I mean, he was the
main guy. And the panel was just stacked with Israeli
spooks and hills. And why did why on earth did
did they invite me to? I mean, like they would
I would have had to sit there probably for two hours,

(53:24):
and then I'll be passed over for a comment. It's
really just a way of generally usually frustrating people like
myself or people with heterodox views I would say heterodox,
truthful views on the issue. But it's I mean, I
was thinking, now the revelation that's seven thousand dollars per

(53:45):
ex post that some of these so called influencers are
getting from these from these agencies and then via the
Israeli Foreign Ministry or media ministry where wherever the money
is originating from. How much do people get paid to
do these spaces platforming the IDEF spokesperson, I mean, come on,

(54:05):
I mean, it's just ridiculous. So, I mean, I'm just
asking a fair question. There there's money behind this. People
don't do this out of the bottom of the goodness
of their heart. And some of these influencers guys are
pretty pathetic like and they don't even have big followings,
you know, they have outsized reach obviously because they're not

(54:25):
shadow band like myself or other accounts, but it's just
pathetic that they have to pay seven grand for a
tweet and they're getting buried in terms they can't keep
up with, at least on x with the pro Palestinian
and the anti genocide posts. I think they're getting hit

(54:46):
like twenty to one. So Palestine's not spending any money.
By the way, I can pretty much attest to that
they're not spending anything for their twenty to one victory
margin on social media. Impression. Guys, what does that tell you?

Speaker 1 (55:04):
You mean they don't they don't have giant pr engines
working with them.

Speaker 7 (55:08):
I mean no, no, we get paid in karma points.
As Bill Murray famously said in Caddyshack on your deathbed,
you will receive total consciousness when he's talking about the
Dali Lama catting for the Dali Lama.

Speaker 3 (55:21):
I think, yes, I've got a question for you that then, guys,
do you think the enough of the cat is out
of the bag for the you know, anti Zionist movement
to continue to grow, particularly among young people, even though
Larry Ellison's taking over TikTok and you know, we know

(55:42):
that they're going to try and clamp down across the
board on social media. Let's not forget Jonathan Greenblatz, you know, exclamations,
this is the most important battle, et cetera, blah blah blah.
They're calling for more censorship of anti Zionist voices, obviously
conflating them with anti Semitism. So is enough of the

(56:03):
cat out of the bag? And is the assassination Does
the assassination of Charlie Kirk mean that the Maga Wrights
are going to be successfully redirected as they hope back
into the you know, Zionist cheap.

Speaker 7 (56:20):
Pen mm hmm. I'll tell you what, I'll tell you what.
You know that this this all, this is all kind
of going by the playbook. This is just like advanced
has Barra or in sort of late stage has Borrow,
if you will, in terms of Israeli propaganda. Because for
for decades, and I'm writing about this right now, there'll

(56:41):
be a new article, a new next issue in New
Don magazine out of Australia. But for Israel's been allowed
to run covert operations and do things incrementally for decades,
so it's never aroused the sort of you know, overt
suspicion of the Western public and all of the opposition
you're seeing now. But in the last two years they've

(57:03):
basically taken the restraints off, and they're just so over
the top and seem to be in a rush to
you know, to expedite their final solution by you know,
exterminating and ethically cleansing the native Palestinian population, and in
doing so it's evoked a visceral reaction from the global public.

(57:26):
So you can censor all you want and continue to
try to censor, but you're just looking really dumb and
stupid in the process. And in Britain they just rested
a blind pensioner, a blind pensioner. He must have been
in his mid eighties, and the two police are like
escorting him off and then giving him directions of like
where the steps are and what because he said he

(57:48):
supported Palestine action. I mean, how stupid and ridiculous. So
the people who are protesting a genocide are getting arrested,
and people who are supporting it and calling for it
and chilling for it, chilling for the mass slaughter of
innocent civilians, are nothing's happening to them. In fact, they're

(58:11):
giving they're giving the given privileged positions to buy and
take over large social media platforms and mainstream outlets like
CBS in the United States. So, I mean, how did
Barry Weiss become like the head of news at CBS, Like,
what did she what did she achieve? She was a
mediocre columnist and nobody really knew until she was on

(58:34):
Joe Rogan, at which point she made a complete our
side of herself at that point and then somehow reinvented
herself as the quote free press stealing a term that's
ubiquitous and belongs to the public domain, the free press.
I mean, what kind of hutspa does it? Does it
take to appropriate to occupy the term free press and

(58:59):
name your outlet after it and copyright it, and I
mean this, and it's a total Israeli a propaganda platform
in terms of anything relating to these issues. And then
she gets gifted a quarter of a billion or something
for a payoff for her blog in some merger and

(59:19):
acquisition with some whatever private equity or whoever bought the
Free Press, and then as buying CBS, and then Fast Tractor,
Ellison's son, Fast Tractor, into the head of news editorial,
so in a gatekeeper position basically, so she's rewarded for
mediocrity and batting, caring, you know, shilling for Israel herself. Obviously,

(59:43):
she's a Jewish, Lesbian Zionist who's anti woke and that's
her credentials. Basically, she hasn't what are her journalistic achievements.
I'm not sure. She was given access to the Twitter
files by Elon along with Michael Schellenberger, Matt Tayibi, and

(01:00:04):
a bunch of other people that were handpicked to have
access to the emails when Elon took over Twitter, and
that kind of gave her. I think she launched the
so called free press on the back of that Twitter
files thing, But that was a sort of hand picked,
privileged appointment, if you will, like what she actually broken,

(01:00:25):
Like what story is is she actually broken? What sort
of profound analysis as she offered the world on any
major issue? I have no idea, but I watched that
Rogan clip that she did, where Joe Rogan just dismantled
her in the most polite way possible you could dismantle somebody,
and her reputation should have been toasted that point. But

(01:00:48):
you know, in that end of the media, no tobacco
goes unrewarded, really, and so look at her now, she's
fabulously wealthy and charage of a major US media title.

Speaker 3 (01:01:04):
And I just want to go back quickly to the
Palestine Action protests in the UK. The UK government did
everything they could to discourage people from attending yesterday in
Trafalgar Square. Originally they were going to be fifteen hundred
people there who had signed up to be arrested. In
the end, about five hundred were arrested. But you add

(01:01:26):
that to the fifteen hundred that have already been arrested nationwide.
I was in a Parliament square a few weeks ago
for the last big mass arrest that were arrests outside
the Labor Party conference in Liverpool. This week there have
been arrests up and down the country, including in Scotland. Anyway,

(01:01:49):
the horrendously zionist Metropolitan Police Commission from Mark Rowley, he
has come out and said, right, that's enough enough now
had enough. Police are fed up with it. They're tired
of carrying elderly vicars and Quakers and blind and disabled people.

(01:02:12):
They're tired of carrying them out of important spaces in
central London, dumping them in vans, processing them, charging with
charging them with a thought crime or you know, holding
a banner which says I oppose genocide, I support Palestine action.
That's what the banner says. Everybody holds the same one.

(01:02:34):
Please have had enough of it? He said, okay, so
what happens next? Mark? Are you going to recommend to
the police that they de prescribe Palestine action or are
you expecting everybody to simply row along with the genocide?
You know, so it's going to continue, of course, it
is more people are going to get arrested. A lot

(01:02:56):
of people have been arrested more than once. So it'd
be very interesting to see how this plays out because
it's coming up the courts with completely unnecessary, idiotic cases.
And if you were facing fourteen years in jail for
expressing material support for a terrorist organization, you're entitled to

(01:03:16):
a trial by jury. Well, you know fifteen hundred and rising.
Trial by juries are enormously expensive. Are the government going
to employ their own barristers to prosecute all these people?
I've no doubt a lot of the defendants will represent
themselves and incur no costs at all. The whole thing

(01:03:36):
is a complete farrago mess, but it's coming to it,
of course, you know again after Manchester, you know, whereas
pressure might have been building to deep prescribe Palestine action,
now the lobby will be going, oh, you can't give in.
You know, my god, be another terrorist attack if you

(01:03:57):
give in and de prescribe Palestine action. But at the
same time, the police are saying they've had enough and
people are going to continue to get themselves arrested. So
it'd be very interesting to see where this goes quite unprecedented.

Speaker 7 (01:04:13):
I mean, how is how is the synagogue attack? I mean,
by the way, we have the British police took out
one of the victims. I mean, that's quite two.

Speaker 3 (01:04:25):
We've got one of the victims and the apparently the perpetrator.

Speaker 7 (01:04:29):
The perpetrator. So but even put that aside, So if
the perpetrator claimed one victim, how does that obviously not
taking anything away from the pain and suffering of that
victim and the Famili's caveat, how does that compare to
six hundred and eighty thousand dead or missing and the

(01:04:53):
US and Britain actively providing military support and intelligence for
the Israelis who are carrying out a genocide right in
front of our eyes. I mean, how on the moral
scale and term, if you had to prioritize those two things,
are we it pains to say that the latter is

(01:05:14):
actually a bigger priority, if human life is worth anything.

Speaker 3 (01:05:24):
Before you joined this, Patrick, I made the point about
the primacy of Jewish suffering. This is the key thing. Really,
if the Jew dies, it's much much more tragic than
a gentile in this country, and obviously a thousand, one
hundred thousand times more tragic than a Palestinians.

Speaker 7 (01:05:44):
Or a Muslim or a Muslim.

Speaker 3 (01:05:46):
Oh, I mean they don't. They hardly count at all.
It was an m arm was stabbed last week. Was
not mentioned in the corporate media at all, not at all.

Speaker 7 (01:05:56):
Did you see Craig Murray just tweeted a video of
a being burned in Sussex and the fire department stood
down and watched it burn in peace Haven. That's a
community we know. And now if that was a synagogue,
it would be a global news right, it's not. It's

(01:06:19):
not garnered any media attention in the UK that I
have seen yet. But I haven't looked that hard. I
haven't checked the BBC in the last hour. But that's
I was just that's that's at the top of Craig
Murray's feed. You guys can find that if.

Speaker 2 (01:06:36):
And if if the firefighters stood down in that instance, Patrick,
they would probably be detained somewhere and treated as terrorists.

Speaker 7 (01:06:44):
Yes, it's just a mosque after all, I mean, you know,
who cares. It's a mosque and there might be some
Muslims inside, you know, But it's not.

Speaker 2 (01:06:53):
That it was a synagogue. Yeah, you have a question
for if it was a.

Speaker 7 (01:06:57):
Church, if it was a church. Tommy Robinson would retweet
that it was Muslims that towards the church, even if
it was a fire that happened from an artist that
happened to be white and English and that actually happened
in Wales. He did push that as well as Alex
Jones that Muslims set fire to a historic English church

(01:07:18):
of England church and that was debunked as fake news,
but it went viral, got millions and millions and millions,
and Elon of course, and people like Elon. I think
Elon probably retweeted that too to help boost it. So
but and job done, job done. This is the power.

(01:07:41):
This is some serious, high octane propaganda, guys. It's not
just the propaganda itself, it's the people that can boost
it that they have privileged sort of fast tracked access
to into our feeds, like Elon for instance, into our feeds.
I just noticed, by the way, sorry to digress, guys,
but I just noticed I'm no longer following Nico House

(01:08:04):
and Craig Murray. Isn't that interesting? And a whole bunch
of other top accounts. And I contacted some of these
accounts and said, are you aware of this, and they said, yes,
I am. And one of these top accounts said, I've
been losing four thousand followers per month, four thousand followers
every month the last few months. I am in the

(01:08:25):
same bracket. I counted maybe two thousand per month over
the last three months, and so I was over two
hundred thousand followers and I've been keep getting pulled back
under so like, and how am I unfollowing all these
top accounts that I've followed for like ten to fifteen years.
How's that what? And they all happened to be the

(01:08:48):
most effective communicators on this issue? I mean, is that
just am I conspiracy theorizing here?

Speaker 2 (01:08:55):
I just noticed Patrick just this week because I was
doing some cleaning up of the following and the checking
out my followers and stuff on my own Twitter. And
I noticed after I did that, because then I knew
what my numbers were where they were, and I knew
exactly how many people I was following. And then I
noticed after a day or two, like the number of
people that I was following started to be reduced. And

(01:09:18):
I'm like, huh, I've never seen that happen before. Doesn't
that usually only happen when you choose to unfollow that person,
and I thought, oh, this just kind of weird. Maybe
that's what happens when like the person gets their account
canceled or they stop using X. Maybe maybe they blocked me.
I didn't think anything of it until just now, and
then I realized, Man, I've been using ext for a
long time. I don't think I've ever seen that number

(01:09:41):
be reduced unless you do something. So this is clearly
something is rotten in this state of X right now.

Speaker 7 (01:09:49):
Yep.

Speaker 1 (01:09:51):
Yeah, And you know, if I may, can we watch
a short video here? Maybe this will help explain some
of the the shenanigans that we're seeing. Oh, by the way,
on screen right there you can see pretty hot article
over there at twenty first century wire dot com which
will dovetail with this clip nicely, how Israel plans to

(01:10:14):
buy silence and manufacture consent in the United States. Let's
take a peek.

Speaker 9 (01:10:24):
So something I would like to raise, which was actually
my first published paper, was how you and the Likud
party are cut from the same ideological cloth as Trump
and the GOP in America, and so specifically with Charlie
Kirk's assassination, who was a big mentor of mine. Who's
my first mentor in the space? Evangelicals From all my research,
evangelicals are the reason that Israel has been supported in

(01:10:46):
public sphere outside of just Jews. So with Charlie's assassination
and with the kind kind of trajectory that we see
with like Candice Owns and Tucker Carlson, I guess I'm
curious about what's another game plan if we lose evangelical
support for the state of Israel. What's our backup plan
to be strong like outside of did diaspora.

Speaker 10 (01:11:05):
Well Christian influencers Okay, he said, Uh. We talked about
the woke right, and he said, I call it the
woke rife. That's a brilliant the wolke rife because these people,
you know, they're not any different from the woke the left.
I mean, they're they're insane, they're movies, but they're actually

(01:11:27):
a meeting on some of the things. And what we
have to do is we have to secure that part
of our the base of our support in the United
States that is being challenged systematically. A lot of this
is done with money, money of ENGOs, fast, money of
governments faster.

Speaker 7 (01:11:47):
Okay, we have to fight back how do we fight.

Speaker 3 (01:11:50):
Back our influencers.

Speaker 10 (01:11:52):
I think you should also talk to them if you
have a chance to that c uh, that community, they're
very important.

Speaker 3 (01:11:58):
Hm.

Speaker 10 (01:11:58):
And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle.

Speaker 7 (01:12:02):
You know, the weapons change over time. You can't fight
today with the swords.

Speaker 10 (01:12:07):
That doesn't work very well, okay, and you can't find
with the fight with cavalry that doesn't work very well.
And you have these new things you know about drones
things like that. I won't get into that, but we
have to fight with the weapons that apply to the
battlefields in which one engaged. And the most important ones
are on the social media. And the most important purchase

(01:12:28):
that is going on right now is.

Speaker 11 (01:12:30):
Class tikto number one, number one, and I hope it
goes too because it's it can be consequential.

Speaker 10 (01:12:42):
And the other one, what's the other one that's most important?

Speaker 1 (01:12:47):
So it cuts right there. But the other one, if
you watch the full clip, is X. He goes on
to say that it is X.

Speaker 3 (01:12:57):
Yeah, I mean, who are these scumbags listening that homicidal
maniac and wanted war criminal as if he's a normal person.
And the woman's got to cheat to say at the beginning,
liquorld is cut from the same ideological cloth as MAGA conservatives.
What in other words, they're all homicidal maniacs as well,

(01:13:18):
you know. And then Nettigno who says, oh, I mean,
I don't want to impersonate him, but the weapons of change.
You can't fight with cavalry anymore. No, you can just
bomb civilians and burn countless children alive.

Speaker 10 (01:13:34):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:13:34):
He talks as if there isn't a bloody massacre going
on every day.

Speaker 7 (01:13:40):
This guy is so tone deaf it's shocking even. I mean,
he's just comes. His mask is completely off, like it's
just a psychopathic, murderous fascist, like basically I mean the right.
He's very good. His German pronunciation, it's very good, very impressive.

(01:14:02):
The way he said Reich. I mean, nobody could I
don't know anybody could pull that off other than German.
Find me a German it will say Reich in public.

Speaker 3 (01:14:12):
You know, he's Polish, which is next door to German German.

Speaker 7 (01:14:15):
Yeah, he is, he's Polish. I know, he's he's extremely
and raised in America, so obviously yeah, yeah, completely uh,
completely of the region.

Speaker 2 (01:14:26):
And Tony Blair.

Speaker 7 (01:14:29):
Yeah, so I mean, but what what he's done there?
Did you did you see what is doing? It's so disingenuous.
He's trying to play conservatives against liberals, left against right.
So he's sitting in his catbird seat there trying to
play American right against the American left, so manipulative, and
then openly talking about taking over whole platforms in order

(01:14:53):
to censor and and it's supposed to be a conspiracy
theory that the Zionist lobby controlled the I mean, come on.
So and the other thing he's doing, which is disingenuous,
is he said he's using the term woke right. And
we've gone through this that that that was originally we
were saying the woke right describing Ben Shapiro and all

(01:15:15):
these Zionist identity politic UH fanatics. After October seventh, how
these are the people that you know, castigated the left
and the woke left for being you know, extremist identity
politic purveyors, and then after October seventh they are the

(01:15:38):
biggest purveyors of identity politics. And a Zionism is the
highest form of identity politics, and it is the most
weaponized on the planet. It's militarized in fact, and it's
being used to attack and shut down all of our
Western institutions, to undermine the rule of law internationally, to

(01:15:59):
undermine free speed, each and assembly in Europe and the
UK and in the United States, to protect this colonial
settler state that's on genocide or rampage under the guise
that they need to be protected because of the identity
politics being an ethno state, being a religious exclusive, religious
exclusive ethno state. I mean, how high do you need

(01:16:22):
to get on the identity politics hierarchy pyramid than that.
You find me anything that's higher than that on the
planet right now, I think that's the apex. So that's
where we said woke right, and then the Maga crowd
in the Daily Wire crowd took it. They basically appropriated it,
which they're very good at. We'll leave it there, and

(01:16:45):
they reappropriated it to use to attack people on the
right that we're criticizing Israel and speaking out against the genocide,
calling them woke right, totally disingenuous, no basis at all,
and obviously ignoring the whole irony of the whole the
fact that Ben Shapiro and all these culture warriors made

(01:17:07):
their bones, attacking you know, gender fluid, purple haired undergrads
at Berkeley under the guise of exposing how stupid identity
politics are. And these are the biggest identity politics pushers
going right now with Zionism and Israel. I mean, does
anyone see the irony of this? I mean, that's what

(01:17:27):
we were pointing out, Netanyahu running the Shapiro fake woke
Reich reappropriation of it. I mean, so they totally Israel
that term. They just took it, reappropriated, stole it.

Speaker 1 (01:17:43):
It's crazy because what does the woke left like to do.
One of their main things they like to do is
censor and ban, right, they want to censor and ban people,
and exactly Young's sitting here saying, we're gonna dump a
buttload of money into X and TikTok We're gonna buy
We're gonna have people that are friendly to us buy

(01:18:03):
TikTok run TikTok uh and we're gonna censor these messages.
We're gonna censor these accounts, We're gonna unfollow them from
their colleagues, We're gonna take their followers and unfollow them
from these commentators. And what happened. Check this out. This
is totally freaking insane. So the juice emoji has been

(01:18:26):
banned from TikTok? Is that not peak wokeness right there?
I don't care if it's woke left or woke right. Uh,
the seemingly innocent juice emoji is allegedly getting banned. Here's
the dark reasons why. You can go on and read
this if you want, but we all know what the
reason is because young people replace words that are sometimes

(01:18:50):
banned or censored with emojis, and I think we can
all figure out what the juice box emoji is code for.

Speaker 7 (01:18:59):
It's ojson, yes, But are they going to ban the watermelon? Yeah,
they'll ban the watermelon next because that's so they're canceling
like crazy, and that is the woke right. These are
the woke right? Yes, DNA, who's the woke He's more
than the woke right, he's fascist. But uh, but Shapiro

(01:19:19):
and all of this Fox News crowd and Pam Bondi
saying we need to arrest people that Satan asked unkind
things about Charlie kirk Uh in the wake of his death.
I mean that's just about as cancel cultureish and woke
as you can possibly get the irony dripping from that situation.

(01:19:40):
So that's that's what the woke right is. We were right.
We coined that term after October seventh, and we pointed
it at the people who deserved it. They took it
and tried to reverse it in a very disingenuous way.
And you can see net Yahoo's still trying to squeeze
the last bit, the last dirty drop out of that

(01:20:01):
that you could possibly ring out of it. There, he goes,
I mean this guy's wasn't it.

Speaker 2 (01:20:07):
Wasn't it? People like us so also originally coined the
term fake news, and look what they did with that one, right.

Speaker 7 (01:20:13):
Yeah right, fake news? Yeah right. Just the list goes on.
So a lot of reappropriation. Are we Are we wrong
pointing this out? Is that? Is it? I feel guilty
of pointing this out? I think it might be. You know,
is that hate speech? Pointing out this obvious contradiction?

Speaker 1 (01:20:36):
It's so obvious. I mean, look at this. You even
titled an episode the Real Woke Right with all of
us here in this program on That was episode five
sixty one, The Real Woke Right Before is this where
Nett and Yahoo got the idea to change it. I
mean no, no.

Speaker 7 (01:20:55):
It would No, you got to go all the way
back to October twenty twenty three. Oh yeah, We've listened
to our commentaries around then, and you'll see on TNT
I smashed that thing, so oh yeah for months, and
then I did so on twenty one Wire, on Sunday Wire,
probably on the UK column as well at that point

(01:21:18):
as well. But no, it happened before.

Speaker 1 (01:21:20):
Oh yeah, yeah, no, I get it. That episode was
a refresher course for those that didn't hear us talking
about it for almost two straight years, because it was
easy to see coming down the pike, even before Trump
two point oh came in October seven. Was when it
was like, oh, oh, this is how they're going to
play it on the GOP side, I guess.

Speaker 7 (01:21:39):
So the bottom line hasher guys is the you know,
the soak and I want to call them the conservatives
in America because that now there's I got. I was
on a major podcast it got I don't know, many
hundreds of thousands of years recently, and people in the
comments were saying, I'm a lefty because I'm not supporting

(01:22:00):
Israel and supporting Trump. So How is anything about Donald
Trump conservative? Can somebody please explain? How is supporting Israel
in this genocide conservative? How is bombing Iran conservative? Can
someone please how is launching tariff wars against all countries

(01:22:21):
on the plant, including your allies? And how is that conservative?
I mean, I'm totally missing something here. They have reappropriated
the term conservative to mean a whole bunch of different things.
It started with the neocons, by the way, during the
Bush years, but to mean a whole bunch of different
things that have nothing to do with conservatism in the

(01:22:44):
history of the United States. They have taken it and
redefined it to mean all of these crazy bat you
know what, crazy and attributes supporting wars, bombing people at
the cleansing genocide. That's you have to if you're not
if you're not supporting that, you're you're not conservative. According

(01:23:05):
to these people. It's amazing.

Speaker 3 (01:23:08):
It was the same with Satyr in the eighties. She
was an iconoclast. You know, she destroyed British industry, went
for privatization, so, you know, so the term has been redefined.
I mean, occasionally people try and redefine it as small government,
as libertarianism, as what then gets derided as isolationism, in

(01:23:32):
other words, non foreign intervention like Ron Paul. You know,
but the neo con Zionist takeover of the term conservative
is in the West pretty much complete. You know, you
can't you know that the leader of the Tories and
also Maarage but all died in the wool Zionists. And

(01:23:54):
you have to ask you why you know they're supposed
to they're supposed to you know, present sort of you know,
church going middle class English people. Why are they why
do they want to allow themselves with this demonic death cult?

Speaker 6 (01:24:10):
You know?

Speaker 7 (01:24:11):
I like this comment here, this by Piano Man. It's
not left, right, blue or red which should guide what's
morally ethically right or wrong. I think I know what
he means there. So it's like, what what are the
morals and ethics of the issue, not whether it's being
classed or trying to be filed by certain influencers as

(01:24:32):
you know, left, right, red, blue, conservative? Liberal? Is it
is that? Is it morally ethically? Uh? Sound? Is it?
Does the issue? Does the policy fall foul of morals
and ethics? And and and this is this is my
criticism of the right, and I everyone knows my story.

(01:24:54):
I left the Democratic Party went to follow Ron Paul
into the Republican Party in two thousand and eight. That's
my long and the short of my political story. But
I'm very critical of the so called right because they're
completely inconsistent. They're inconsistent, they're hypocritical, and they're they're more there,

(01:25:16):
they're virtue signaling and moralizing when they actually don't, at
least mainstream. A lot of magas as well, who are
supporting Trump right now. Christian Conservatives have no leg to
stand on, and that's why there's a split in MAGA.
That's what happened. That's what Charlie Kirk represented, I believe,

(01:25:37):
and that's what Tucker represents. That's what Candice Owens represents.
Even Megan Kelly, I'll throw her in that basket.

Speaker 3 (01:25:43):
Okay, she's heading in that direction.

Speaker 7 (01:25:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:25:47):
So called Christian Zionists need to ask themselves a simple question.
What part of Israel's genocide would Jesus Christ support?

Speaker 7 (01:25:56):
Yeah? I tell that to Mike Huckabee, you know, could
be completely fake Christian. I mean, how can these people
sleep at night? Probably because they're really well paid and
really well fed, and probably a few other things that
they're well, well, well, but that's I guess how they
manage it, how they reconcile these problems. But so this

(01:26:19):
is my this is my issue. And I've been also
chastised and harangued by my colleagues for being on panels
or platforming socialists. Okay, and I don't you know, when
it comes to foreign policy and human rights issues, I
couldn't give a flying you know what what their affiliations

(01:26:41):
or ideological position is, whether they're a communist, I really
don't care. But I'll tell you what. The old Left,
the anti imperialists, the communists, they're more consistent on their
moral positions when it comes to human rights, international law,
and just like protecting people who are getting civilians are
getting bombed. They're a lot more consistent on those issues

(01:27:05):
than people on the so called right at the moment,
and and the left too, and the liberals as well.
But so, at least, and I say this with the
greatest degree of deference, at least I know where the
far left or the Marxists are, the communists, at least

(01:27:26):
I know where they stand on those issues. Like we
don't have any arguments or debates, or I don't have
to poke around to get their position. It's it's ironclad
and it's clear. But I can't say the same for
for neoliberals, and this new breed of fake conservatives are
Christian Conservatives that are just completely all over the place whatsoever.

Speaker 3 (01:27:50):
Well, I mean this is the problem that you know,
there is no fundamental guiding philosophy behind conservatism for that
you know anymore? You know, what is it actually used
to believe in at its core?

Speaker 6 (01:28:02):
You know?

Speaker 3 (01:28:02):
Is it just American exceptionalism and Zionism? Is that it?

Speaker 9 (01:28:08):
You know?

Speaker 7 (01:28:08):
Well, I mean bassle between American conservatives and British conservatives.
So American conservatism is a whole bunch of different like
small government, and so for British conservatism it's not about
small government. It's and it's it's Roger Douglas Murill say,
it's Roger Scrutin and an appreciation for the sublime and

(01:28:29):
the beautiful forms and all this other garbage about Western civilization.
But you talk to Americans, it's like small government, first Amendment,
second Amendment, don't take my stuff and leave me the clone.
So that's that's American conservative has always been that way
right and less adventurous foreign policy. Don't go overseas to

(01:28:56):
find monsters to kill. That's traditional American conservatism. Yeah, what
are these people talking about?

Speaker 1 (01:29:02):
You know, pat Ron Paul's the person that brought me
to politics in twenty twelve. Also, you know, I was
a DGAF figure it out yourself if you don't know
the acronym. That was my stance on politics. D g
A F big time.

Speaker 3 (01:29:16):
Yeah, I think we've got that one.

Speaker 1 (01:29:18):
And it's like, you know, then Ron Paul came around,
and then I started looking into nine to eleven and
I started looking into medical tyranny and eugenics, and I
was all on. I was all in. It was like, okay, cool,
this is this is where the fights are. And you know,

(01:29:38):
what are we actually when we talk about conservatives, particularly
American conservatives, what is it? We have to stop and
ask ourselves what is it we're trying to conserve. Well,
it's the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Ultimately, it's
not doing foreign or domestic policy and legislation that tramples

(01:29:59):
on on people's freedoms. And what do we see from MAGA.
We see them doing the opposite of what they said
they were going to do on so many things. They
said they were going to clean up the FBI, They
said the FBI was going to become honest. It doesn't.
It's not looking very honest right now. Cash. A lot
of people are questioning everything that has happened with Charlie

(01:30:21):
kirk situation. So you know, what are we conserving here?

Speaker 6 (01:30:26):
What you know?

Speaker 1 (01:30:26):
And of course you've got turning Point USA now using
Charlie's show to say that, well, we're conserving Jesus. I mean,
it's it's all evangelical stuff. It's all maga slash evangelical stuff.
That's what Charlie would have wanted. And it struck me
when that blonde girl that was sitting there across from
NETANYAHUO asking that question started her statement saying that Charlie

(01:30:48):
was her first mentor in that space. And I mentioned
last night in the boiler room that most of those
people sitting on the other side of that table from
him will not We'll look back on that day months
from now, a year from now, five, ten years from
now and say, oh my god, if Charlie was actually
my mentor, I would have been asking this guy some

(01:31:09):
other questions, not how can we help you with your narrative? Management.
But why did Charlie start having different opinions about you
things like that. You know, there's just too much information
out there for those young people. I hope if they're
using their their brains, you know, to come around eventually.

(01:31:30):
But you know, as as all things, you know, it
will it be in time.

Speaker 7 (01:31:36):
Yeah, Well, they're trying to set up their snake oil
stand on on the on top of Charlie Kirk's grave
quite frankly, so it's just completely over the top, just
totally politicized. They're trying to to trying to rake political
capital out of this guy after he's gone. Clearly that's
what's going on, and ignoring the complete, you know, damascene

(01:32:03):
conversion that he was going through regarding this unflinching, undying
support that Americans are trained to have, including himself, support
for Israel. You know, Max Blumenthal has whistle blown about
he was brought on the Birthright Tour to Israel along
with other American Jews the Birthright Tour, and he said

(01:32:26):
they were openly sending women to you know, sexual services
favors or whatever to these people at all hours of
the evening in their hotel rooms and whatnot to try
to help them bond with the experience of going to Israel.
I mean, that was what Max was talking about recently.

(01:32:49):
I shared the video on our Instagram account. I mean
shocking stuff actually, but he and he was kind of
blowing the whistle on it. So that's what happens. And
it goes for press and politicians as well, what goes
on when they go do these visits to Tel Aviv.

Speaker 3 (01:33:05):
I mean, well, Matt Matt Gates said he went back
to his hotel room in Tel Aviv and there was
a Mossad guy there waiting for him, and everybody was like, yeah,
that's normal. You know, were starting to turn with Matt Gates.
Interesting that he didn't quite make it into Trump's cabinet
and now he's you know, he's on television news and
he started to notice a few things as well. I'm afraid, gentlemen,

(01:33:29):
I have to leave you at this point. It's been
a pleasure as always. I'm back on a part of
the reason I've got to go. I've got to get
ready for tomorrow one pm UK time. That's a am
on the East coast, five am if you're up nice
and early on the West coast. For as sending order

(01:33:49):
my daily news edit on Unprecedented TV, follow me on
x and it also goes out live on YouTube, and
I will be discussing tomorrow with the author and campaigner
Luke and Dreski the ethics and the morality of the
current global situation, particularly with respect to the Middle East.

Speaker 1 (01:34:13):
All right, thanks for joining us. Basil, really appreciated the
fire that you brought to the show today. You got
a lot of fans in the chat. I've seen people
like it when you get heated there. So yeah, we
really appreciate you and have a great week. Let us
know if there's anything we can do to help.

Speaker 7 (01:34:29):
Thank you.

Speaker 3 (01:34:30):
Yeah, I'll be in touch.

Speaker 7 (01:34:31):
All right, great week.

Speaker 1 (01:34:33):
Everyone, that's Basil Valentine. Now Patrick, I have a question.
I have been seeing reports over the week that, to
paraphrase paraphrase that HAMAS is going to release hostages at

(01:34:53):
Donald Trump's you know, threats or requests. I don't know
what to classify those as, but I have been having
a heck of a time trying to find a source
other than Reuter's on this report. Is where do they
come up with headlines for this? Is there a direct
line to HAMAS leadership that we don't know about. Is

(01:35:14):
it a believable story. I also noticed that they killed
thirteen civilians that day, the very same day I was
seeing those reports, and I'm just curious what your take
on that whole thing is.

Speaker 7 (01:35:29):
Yeah, you just have to repeat after me, release the hostages,
release the hostages. It's all Hamas's fault. Release the hostages.
Really well, all this will end when you release the hostages.
So that's just repeat those terms. I think what I've
seen this headfake many times already. And so if you

(01:35:50):
follow the headlines with Trump and all these piece gambits
and whatnot, you're just going to go around circles. They
managed to get the media going on circles on this.
I don't react to any of these. I'll just wait
twenty four hours and it's usually dead. But if you
go to the Washing Post or look in the Reuter's
fine print, read carefully and you'll see what the source

(01:36:12):
of the claim is and whether it's going to be accepted.
And then even if it's if they say it's going
to be accepted, or Trump says they're going to do it,
or whatever the Israel says they're going to do it,
then you have to wait to see if it's actually done,
and that might take a couple of days, and by
that time the whole thing might have gone to pot.

(01:36:34):
So the window is really now seventy two hours to
four days in order to confirm whether something's real or not.
So it But you know that's not what people do
these days. They just jump and react, Look, oh Trump's
doing Trump's got a deal, Trump's got a deal, and
they'll go away and they'll just tell each other out
when they're having paps, blue ribbon over the barbecue. Whatever,

(01:36:58):
Trump's done a deal, what are you talking about? Got
He really deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. Meanwhile, nothing happened,
nothing efing happened. There's no material difference. It's all cannon
fodder for the press, for media. So negotiators head to Egypt.
That's not good for Egypt. That's not going to be

(01:37:21):
good for Egypt. What does that mean? Israel can attack
Egypt because Amas is in Egypt. Amas right is in Egypt.
So that that's what I've been saying on various shows
and programs is saying, look at what look at what's
going on. They attacked him in Doha and they're going
to attack him in Egypt? Is that that? I mean,

(01:37:43):
how else can you read these situations? I just look at.

Speaker 1 (01:37:45):
History, places where we have bases, places where the United
States has military bases. That is another small piece of context,
actually massive piece of context that the mass media does
not want average Americans to know. Hey, our largest air
base is actually over there, these kind of things, you know,

(01:38:05):
little things like that, and yeah, together with Israel, we're
providing intelligence and dropping bombs on these places, Ruckus. That
headline that you put up there kind of says something
about this too, because there was a not so veiled
threat right there coming from Trump.

Speaker 6 (01:38:27):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:38:27):
No, And the main reason I flashed this was because
Patrick is right, you have to wait for these things
because nothing's going to come of this. But in the meantime,
the people who pretend like they're the news, the quote
unquote media like CNN right now, tune into our breaking
the most important, exclusive live coverage of the negotiators who
are going to solve the problem in the Middle East,
right like it's gonna like it's actually gonna happen, right

(01:38:50):
when they don't understand what we're discussing here. Instead, it's
just a way for them to keep everybody's attention and
everything in here. But the threat is apparently and hesher.
I've seen this, this is reported. This came from Trump's mouth.
He said this. I watched video of this. I reported
this on Weaponized News the other day with sham Sam
Cheney shout out to weaponized News. But yes, he threatened.

(01:39:10):
He says that we've got to It's like a twenty
point piece deal. It's going to happen. Net Yaho's approved it.
Then they said Hamas approved it, without proving that Hamas
actually approved it. And then he said, oh, by the way,
if they don't accept this deal, we're going to obliterate them.
We're going to completely destroy them. They have the like
he said. I forget his exact words. He said something
to the tune of, we are going to fully support

(01:39:32):
and allow and the fund Israel to do what Israel
needs to do. I think those are the words that
he used to allow the Israel can do what it
needs to do. And I'm like, well, what does that mean?
No explanation. Does that mean, oh, they're going to drop
a new bomb? What are they going to do?

Speaker 7 (01:39:49):
I mean it means finally exterminating the native Palestinian population
and anyone who survived to ethically cleanse them. That's that's
what Israel quote needs to do. And this is what
Donald Trump is backing. This is what the Trump administration
is backing, and everybody else who's under the thumb, and
that's what Israel's openly stated they want to do. And

(01:40:10):
we're pussy we're having the pussy foot around the issue
because people are just telling lies to get from A
to B because it's so easy to hoodwink anybody who
watches Fox News these days and it's just so low
IQ and that's that's that's the low IQ end of maga.
So unfortunately, that's that's that's where I hate to leave

(01:40:33):
it on a bad note there, but I will have
to chip off now, gentlemen, But I want to say
thank you so far amazing and I love the comments.
The engagement is off the chain obviously, guys. You know,
be uh, be tactful please with your comments and just
avoid the types of things that are going to get

(01:40:54):
that stream. You know what I'm talking about, guys, But
thank you very much. Rucus hasher Basil and everybody who's
engaged on the issue. Stay smart, guys. Stay intelligent and
follow all these very smart gentlemen hosting this program with
us today as well. And yeah, looks good. The studio

(01:41:15):
looks amazing.

Speaker 1 (01:41:17):
All right, excellent, Well, thanks for all the help setting
up today, Pat, and good luck on the rest of
your travels, and we'll look forward to doing this again
next week. All things line up, we should be here
again next week for Sunday Wire five hundred and sixty four.
So it was great having you. Thanks for taking the time.

Speaker 7 (01:41:35):
We'll see you then, we'll see you then take you guys.

Speaker 1 (01:41:38):
Thanks there goes Patrick Henningson right there. Thank you once again,
Patrick Rucas. I have a comment I want to highlight
here momentarily tangentle, but very well timed and associated. And
it's a great question. We had Crease Asks asking a
similar question in the discord chat. Why aren't you comment

(01:42:00):
commentators spreading out to other platforms they don't control. We'll
just put our quotes around they. I think we all
kind of have our own internal definition of what they
means in a sentence like this. More work, but it
could shift user base over time. Yeah, that is the
logical solution, right. I love that you know your your

(01:42:22):
solution oriented their tyrone increase made a comment like why
not why can't we just copy TikTok and call it,
you know, kit kat or tik tak or something like that.
And you know that that's always been an ever present
question since twenty seventeen, when the Google ad apocalypse happened
and the d ranking all happened. Twenty first century wire,

(01:42:44):
alternate current Radio. We were proudly and unfortunately on the
pointy end of that spear, still suffering the ramifications of that.
But you know, Parlor did that. Parlor was sort of
the great example of what happened when an independent business
can successfully replicate something like Facebook, and unfortunately, uh, that

(01:43:10):
didn't work out.

Speaker 7 (01:43:11):
You know.

Speaker 1 (01:43:12):
So it's like a lot of money went into that,
a lot of investment went into that, and a lot
of people's time and hope went into that, and then
once it hits a certain level of engagement, boom, all
of a sudden, Oh, these this site is bad. This
is a mean speak site. This is a site for
antiseptic alt right in cells. So all of a sudden,

(01:43:37):
Microsoft gets a call from someone and they say, yeah,
sure we can shut down their single sign on we can,
we can, or you know, PayPal gets a call. Yeah, sure,
we can shut down their their PayPal account and and
that's exactly what happened, and and Parlor is no more.
So you know, I fully support the idea. It is
the logical thing. You would think that it is doable.

(01:44:00):
But unfortunately, I mean, look at TikTok. TikTok is maybe
an even better example that has been the play you
know they in twenty twenty two. We did a lot
of reporting about the whole you know, concept of a
TikTok band in twenty two and twenty three, and it
was all GOP people mostly, and it was like, you know, saying, oh,

(01:44:24):
we can't have China, we can't have China having American
citizens data, China, China, China. We got China, China, China
during that phase of the TikTok discussion. And here we
are three years later, and look who owns it now.
I mean, it's just amazing. Like Ruckus and I, with

(01:44:44):
your support, we could set up a TikTok clone. I'm
sure we could. You know, we may not have that
information sitting in our brains, but between us and our
AI friends, I'm pretty sure we could figure it out.
You know with the amount of investment, but I guarantee
you if it were to get even a marginal percentage

(01:45:07):
of the user base that TikTok has or x has,
things would start to become very difficult. All of a
sudden pressure would start being applied. So we're open to it.
We're always looking at alternate pathways. You're right, it is
a lot more work, though, Tyrone. As it is, we're

(01:45:27):
fifteen minutes late for the show today, just getting posts
up on all the places that we currently use, and
we do use, like we're streaming right now on bitshoot,
we're streaming right now on Rumble. People have questions about Rumble,
but for the most part, seems pretty open right now
as far as you know, banning and all that. We'll
see how long that lasts. Hopefully that will last, but

(01:45:48):
you know, we do our best with that, and it's
easier said than done, unfortunately in many cases. I don't know,
what do you think, Ruckus.

Speaker 2 (01:45:57):
We have an add on to everything you said. I agree,
But there's another obvious reason that most people have forgotten
because we've gotten ourselves so freaking politicized and so stuck
inside of our echo chambers. I assume that the person
who asked that question may have seen or heard of
a little movie called The Matrix, where the main character

(01:46:19):
knows that he's stuck inside the Matrix. Most of the
main characters do the heroes of the film, but they
choose to be inside that terrible place in order to
help save the other people who are stuck inside that matrix.
By the way, this image is one that I had
AI helped me make. That's supposed to be me in
the image there. I've been trying to make it create

(01:46:41):
a reusable animated character who doesn't look exactly like me,
but it's supposed to represent me so that people when
you see it. So if you see this, start seeing
pictures with that guy that's supposed to be me. But
this is me inside the Matrix asking the oracle to
speak to the manager, because that's what I would do
if I was inside the Matrix. But that's why, that's

(01:47:01):
why we go on these platforms, because this is where
the fight is.

Speaker 7 (01:47:04):
Right.

Speaker 2 (01:47:05):
We don't need to go like, hey, everybody, we made
an exclusive platform where we do nothing but talk about
stuff you already know, right, like, okay, so why do
I need to keep being repeated this same stuff over
and over again again, the aforementioned echo chamber. When it's
my next door neighbor, maybe I should go hang out
with my next door neighbor rather than trying to do
any of this on social media. Hey, there's a concept everybody,

(01:47:28):
and take the fight to them and not like a
physical fight, but have a debate, which is what Charlie
Kirk and people like him were all about, like, hey,
not less speech, more speech. You know, hey, you believe
this way. I believe this way. Let's talk about it,
you know, instead like, hey, we all believe this way,
so let's all go hang out here. Well that's great
because if the other side, who doesn't like what you

(01:47:50):
have to say, sees you all hanging out there in
that one place together, it's going to be very simple
for them to take you all out at once, right as.

Speaker 1 (01:47:58):
You're okay, there we go. Sorry about that. Yeah, I
appreciate the questions and ruckuson. I do talk about this
a lot. We just talked about it yesterday. Actually, you know,
if Discord were to disappear or nucas, what would we do.
And we've got some ideas, you know, some alt technologies
out there on blockchains and things like that, so we

(01:48:20):
will keep an eye on that. Frankly, I personally just
I'm skeptical of why YouTube has changed and these sort
of conversations are now allowed there. It used to be
we couldn't even say anything about medical stuff without getting
medical misinformation flags and stuff like that. So why even

(01:48:44):
under still being undershadow band The fact that we can
even broadcast on YouTube is is amazing. So I don't
understand how that works, but I have some good ideas
about it.

Speaker 2 (01:48:56):
Maybe it's part of a larger problem. We keep gassing
this one too. But I'm going to come back to
it again, like some of these problems using air quotes
for the listening audience only are created on purpose so
that they have a pre made solution ready to go.
So what if it's all of this stuff is still
out of control everywhere about all of this stuff online
and the speech and the YouTube, And yes, they're going

(01:49:18):
to allow it, but once they allow it, it's going
to get worse, right, because it's just going to increase
because they're allowing it and like okay, wow, look we
were wrong and here's what we need to do, and
just bam, like no, longer will YouTube be using human
made content. And it's just everything's going to be switching
to AI and technocracy, the government, the politics, your media, entertainment,

(01:49:38):
your news everything. That's where I really think we're headed
with all of this stuff.

Speaker 7 (01:49:43):
Hesher.

Speaker 1 (01:49:44):
Yeah, yeah, Ultimately it's going to come down to grid control,
it's going to come down to technological control, and a
lot of these. You know, it'll be interesting to see
what happens with the future of TikTok, with the future
of YouTube tube, you know, the future of rumble bit Shoot.

(01:50:04):
You know, we're on bit Shoot right now. I don't
know how well that company is doing. I hope they're,
you know, doing well enough to keep the platform there.
I don't see a huge ground swell there. So you know,
there's other ones. There's Odyssey, right, We've had some problems
hooking with Odyssey for some reason there. They don't make

(01:50:25):
it simple for us to output there. But you know,
I mean, we're streaming on one, two, three, four, five,
six different outbound streams right now, and if we can
add more to that, we will where that's something else
we're looking into is making sure that we can get
as many outbound streams as possible.

Speaker 2 (01:50:45):
So furthermore to that point, has sure. That's the other
thing I wanted to mention real quick is something I've
been cussing around in my head, so I'm just gonna
throw it out there.

Speaker 7 (01:50:53):
Now.

Speaker 2 (01:50:54):
That's what we're used to. We're used to as us
individual having multiple output streams. We are swiftly moving to
a situation where it is all it's all coming directly
to us, one massive feed wherever it is, whatever that
might look like, because they want to get everybody into
this brain ship thing. Like right now, we're used to

(01:51:15):
going to our devices, going to our programs, doing the things,
going to YouTube, going to Rumble, going to BITCHU, making
these choices to go to these various places to then
seek out all of these things like our information and
our entertainment. Pretty soon all of that is going to
go the other direction. It's all being fed to you,
and you're pretty much I mean, I don't see why

(01:51:37):
why whoever said that we had to be in control?
I don't think are we still going to be able
to like, are we going to be surfing the internet
through a brain ship or is this just going to
be like a direct like I think it's going to
be a one on one thing. It's just like, Hi,
how are you today?

Speaker 7 (01:51:50):
Good?

Speaker 2 (01:51:51):
What are you in the mood for a comedy? Here
you go, you know what I mean. Make it sound
so utilitarian, but I really think that's where it's headed.

Speaker 1 (01:51:58):
Yeah, I mean, the less things you have to think about,
the simpler your day is. Right, So all that doom
scrolling and trying to figure out what you're gonna listen
to when you go to the gym or mow the
lawn or whatever, like, you're not gonna need to worry
about all that if you so choose. We're already there.
I mean, you can bring up Spotify or Podbean or

(01:52:18):
whatever and it's got playlists for you of you know,
three hour long podcasts. You can just hit shuffle on
that sucker and two speed and you know, whip through
a whole bunch of stuff and not have to think
about it, you know. And that's where web searching is
going too, that's where programming is going. That's where many
people's jobs are going. It's just like, well, the system

(01:52:39):
can do it on its own. So you know, go
take a smoke break or go eat some bugs. You know,
I will not, No, Yeah, So the whole tech and
broadcasting aspect. Again, thanks for bringing those questions up. We
will keep our eyes on it. But yeah, that cancelation factor,

(01:53:04):
it's always there. Like what Lance said here defunding, d banking,
dispossessed and silenced.

Speaker 7 (01:53:13):
I did some.

Speaker 1 (01:53:13):
Minor corrections on that one. I like the way you
wrote that though. It's great. Okay, Ruckus, I don't want
to hang too long today, but I did want to
bring this one on board and get your comments on it.
This is uh posted on x by one Tricia McLaughlin,

(01:53:35):
who I'm not familiar with, but I thought this was
an interesting write up here current events. This was posted
yesterday this morning. During routine patrolling in Broadview, in the
same area of Chicago that law enforcement were assaulted yesterday,
which would have been the third our brave law enforcement
officers were rammed by vehicles and boxed in by ten cars.

(01:53:58):
Agents were unable to of their vehicles and exited the car.
One of the drivers who rammed the law enforcement vehicle
was armed with a semi automatic weapon. Law enforcement was
forced to deploy their weapons and fire defensive shot at
an armed US citizen who drove herself to the hospital
to get care for wounds. The armed woman was named

(01:54:19):
in a CBP intelligence bulletin last week for doxing agents
and posting online quote, hey to all my gang, let's
f those mfors up. Don't let them take anyone. Thankfully,
no law enforcement officers were seriously injured in this attack.
Pritzker's Chicago Police Department is leaving the shooting scene and

(01:54:40):
refuses to assist us in securing the area. There is
a growing crowd and we are deploying special operations to
control the scene. So that's pretty bombastic scenario there. I mean,
it certainly seems interestingly timed with their everything going on

(01:55:01):
in Portland right now and other places. But I'm smelling
smoke here. I don't know if I'm seeing flames, but
I'm smelling smoke ruckus. You can see so many questions
this this post begs so many questions.

Speaker 2 (01:55:18):
Like it's just a post.

Speaker 1 (01:55:21):
Who's we and what do you mean we are deploying
special operations?

Speaker 2 (01:55:27):
Yeah, I don't, I don't. I'm I'm going to pass.

Speaker 1 (01:55:30):
On that one actually, and that woman that I'm.

Speaker 2 (01:55:32):
Comfortable with all of this, this this scenario that they've
got the National Guard out there, they got the ice
with them face masks people. I mean, they got people
being removed from their vehicles and from their homes with
hoods over their heads, and we don't know is that
really a foreign national or was that just some guy
they didn't like? What the hell they were saying on
a radio program somewhere. You know, this is very frightening stuff, dude.

Speaker 1 (01:55:51):
Yeah, And just for somatic context, that that poster Tricia McLoughlin,
Assistant Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.

Speaker 2 (01:56:00):
So that's why I'm like, is this supposed to be
some sort of official statement from this administration? Because I'm confused.
Usually that comes a company with a nice, slickly produced,
like million dollar budget propaganda video with like jets flying
overhead and smoke and pyrotechnics, right, So, and then you
get something like this, like what the F is this?
Like I didn't hear about this in the news, did you?

(01:56:21):
This is the first time I'm hearing this is right
here on this program alongside you, hesher.

Speaker 1 (01:56:25):
And it's been two days yesterday, I guess two days.
It's crazy.

Speaker 6 (01:56:31):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (01:56:31):
And and for the assistant secretary at Department of Homeland
Security to post that is like, oh wow, Okay, So
more and more official statements I suppose are moving to
x like the social media posts are just wild right now?

Speaker 2 (01:56:50):
Well, you heard it from from from our shadow president's mouth.

Speaker 7 (01:56:54):
BB.

Speaker 2 (01:56:55):
That's that's where it's at. That's where the battle is.
In fact, if I'm not mistaken, he was not only
saying that we are inside of an info war, which
wherever I heard that before? Alex Jones?

Speaker 7 (01:57:06):
Right?

Speaker 2 (01:57:07):
But that are you saying? Yaho? Okay, correct me if
I'm wrong, I'm happy to be wrong. Here is social
media a weapon? Is that what you're saying? Like we're
changing the We don't fight with swords anymore. We thought, oh,
we fight with TikTok, we fight with X WHOA, Well,
hold on there a second, buddy. That's the kind of

(01:57:30):
stuff that if you or I were to discuss that
on a program such as this, hasher say, oh, I
don't know, five to ten years ago, we will be
labeled as being a crazy conspiracy theorist. Of course, today,
by noticing it, we're going to be being labeled as
anti Semitic and or possible supporters of terror and therefore
deserve to be arrested in international waters and not giving

(01:57:52):
food or water beaten, potentially raped. Isn't twenty twenty five fun?

Speaker 1 (01:57:57):
Yeah? Who to thunk it? Right? I mean, it's not
like we've been sitting here warning against this and predicting
this for over a decade on this program. But to
see it all unfold is quite staggering. Let's see. I
like this comment from Lance here when asking you know, hey,
why why are we seeing comments like this reasons for

(01:58:19):
coming martial law? I suspect the Top Brass meeting had
some behind the scenes meetings. Lance you're not alone. You
are not alone follows up.

Speaker 7 (01:58:30):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:58:30):
I don't believe for a second where they were like, okay,
we're we're gonna all. They closed all these people in
a room and the first thing they said is like,
if you don't like anything that we have to say
to you right now, tough crap, you're out of here.
We will fire you, you will be dismissed. You're at
your gonzo mister. And I'm like, and then we hear
these stories about how they're talking about how like, okay,
you got to meet the weight requirements. We don't possibility,

(01:58:52):
we might not like women in the middle, all these
weird like talking point, divisive political left right stuff when
I'm like, no, they wouldn't do that, and unless they're saying, Okay,
we might need you to shoot American citizens, we might
need you to do things that are unconstitutional, and hey,
if you don't like that, there's the door. That's what
I imagine is going on, hasher. I can't prove that, but
I really have a strong suspicion that those men and

(01:59:15):
women are being asked to do things that traditionally, in
the past, not that long ago, would be considered illegal.
But you know, the entire world seems to be completely
fine with that since it's been you know, so desensitized
to that. You know, look what's just happened with the flotilla.

Speaker 1 (01:59:29):
Yeah, anyway, Yeah, great comment here from pat Rivers. Thank you. Update.
The woman didn't drive herself to the hospital. She was
transported there. I don't have a source for that.

Speaker 2 (01:59:40):
It's all that makes it all better, right.

Speaker 1 (01:59:42):
Like, I don't have a source for that, Pat, But
that makes the most sense to me. You really, like
Tricia McLaughlin at DHS, do you really expect the American
public to believe that that scenario unfolded and then that
woman got back in her car and drove herself to
the hospital. I mean, what are you doing? Like, did
no one check your post? I mean, this is just madness.

(02:00:08):
Oh yeah, there's just let her go, Just let her
drive to the hospital. She's been shot. What get out
of here with that? Yeah, let's see here another one
from pat Ice just shot and killed a man. They
lied they were attacked, but videos proved they were lying. Wow, okay,
well we're gonna have to look into that. But I

(02:00:31):
think this just all is sort of you know, the
harbingers of what's to come here when it comes to
National Guard, when it comes to Ice, when it comes
to this very strange I'm having. I want to call
it a manipulated situation, but it's like it is, it
has been, but the manipulation is so subversive. So mk

(02:00:57):
ultra in in nature sure, as far as how people's
worldviews are meshing with the incoming you know, data, and
then there's all these you know, of course there's FEDS
probably fed infiltrators in a lot of these groups. So
you know, it's very difficult to look at this as

(02:01:20):
an organic situation. It's like an organic slash inorganic situation.
It doesn't it wouldn't be if it hadn't have been fostered,
and it wouldn't be if law enforcement was doing their
job in twenty twenty, during the Summer of Love, it
wouldn't be. There would be no need for this. But hey,
here we are. So we're looking at National Guard going

(02:01:43):
to Oregon. We're looking at National Guard going to Illinois.
DHS highly involved. Clearly DHS calling in special operations forces
when an event like this happens. Okay, and we the

(02:02:03):
American public are supposed to just read a comment like
that and go, yeah, get them. But how did she
get to the hospital again, you know, it's ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (02:02:14):
A drone, A drone came and lifted her up and
took her right there.

Speaker 1 (02:02:19):
DHS drone. There you go, medevac, DHS drone for their ic.

Speaker 2 (02:02:25):
See wait a minute. Disproof that they have not disclosed
the fact that they have teleportation technology and they're hiding
it from the public.

Speaker 7 (02:02:32):
Hesher. This is awful.

Speaker 1 (02:02:33):
Yeah. And the other thing that bothers me about that
post ruckus is the ten cars. What was that boxed
in by ten cars? So you're telling me there were
at least ten assailants that boxed in law enforcement officers

(02:02:54):
and rammed them with their cars. And the only thing
you can say is is that, well, there was a
woman with a semi automatic rifle who you know, fired
at or drew her firearm. I can't remember which it was,
but they said armed with a semi automatic weapon. Law
enforcement was forced to deploy their weapons and fire defensive shots.

(02:03:17):
Did the woman shoot at them? Who were the other
nine people driving the cars? I mean, there's so many questions,
But what do they give us? They give us this
like almost like clickbait, short narrative that makes very little sense.
And I mean, you hadn't even heard about it yet.
I hadn't heard about it until I woke up this morning.

Speaker 2 (02:03:36):
It's not ready for prime time. None of this is
what is all half a big time? Yeah? What what's
with the big rush? Again? I'll ask. It's almost like
the proverbial they know something we don't like. There's a
timeline that they're trying to beat, like they have a
deadline to meet, and it just makes it and they
and therefore they're they're being quite sloppy about a number

(02:03:56):
of things that otherwise I think they would be more
meticulous and take their time with because these we are
dealing with groups and organizations that have nothing more than
patient I mean, that's what they've been known for historically speaking.
So what's what's with all the mad rush all of
a sudden. It makes me really nervous, that's all I
gotta say.

Speaker 1 (02:04:12):
Yeah, yeah, And we've been saying that in various ways
for months now, for quite a long time, like why
is everything getting the rapid treatment right now to include
you know, the new events in the news cycle. It's
all getting processed so quickly. Let's see here zipzapp judge

(02:04:33):
over rule to Portland National Guard deployment. By the way, Okay,
that's very interesting to see. I'm not surprised to hear that.
But you know, there's also executive orders being signed by
Donald Trump, and there's new decisions coming out in the
Supreme Court that are going to limit district judges' abilities
to do things like that. So we may just be

(02:04:54):
in the middle of a you know, four D chess
game right here right now. So I wouldn't expect that
to be the end of the story. But I'm glad
you dropped us that update.

Speaker 2 (02:05:06):
There's always flip flop. I've noticed that. So Trump he's
going to do something, and then Judge steps in and
then it's like nope then and then it's back on,
and then it's off again. I'm like, dude, everything.

Speaker 1 (02:05:16):
Constant law fair, constant law fair. And you would think,
I mean, Trump said that was something he was going
to shut down, but you know, no, constantly said.

Speaker 2 (02:05:25):
He was going to end wars to Heer's.

Speaker 1 (02:05:27):
Yeah, we did end seven of them, right, he's ended
seven and seven months. I remember him saying it. I
forget the lift because they were like, what, he's.

Speaker 2 (02:05:35):
Going to release some files and he's going to audit
some places. We get all the things.

Speaker 1 (02:05:40):
Bro, It's all right, Yeah, it's all good. I think
Amanda's cracking a joke here. She says I heard she
was a trans Venezuelan. Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised. Cash
Valhalla Patel, Cash app Valhalla Patel probably come out and
say that in the next few hours here.

Speaker 2 (02:05:59):
Without the pack with an inflatable unicorn costume and a hammer.

Speaker 1 (02:06:05):
Right, you just but uh wait.

Speaker 2 (02:06:08):
Tell us that was another story. Sorry, get confused exactly.

Speaker 1 (02:06:12):
Yeah, you just but be careful there, man, It might
actually happen. It might turn out that way.

Speaker 2 (02:06:16):
I mean, Oh my gosh, I jest, but it might manifest.

Speaker 1 (02:06:20):
Yeah, exactly. Hey Albania and cambody are no longer at war? Awesome, Okay,
good job done.

Speaker 2 (02:06:27):
That's the that's the one that's I think that's the joke, right,
isn't it. There's the one where he keeps saying the
wrong country name.

Speaker 1 (02:06:34):
Yeah, yeah, good times, good times? All right? Ruckus? Well,
I'm about ready to shut this one down. You got
anything else you want to throw out there today?

Speaker 7 (02:06:44):
Uh?

Speaker 2 (02:06:45):
Actually, I leave a question for the viewers to consider
as they they head home. Drive safely, everybody on your
way back to where you're at. I was always just curious.
I want to I wanted to ask Basil and Patrick
about this, but I think it's just a fun like
what exercise in order to be arrested inside the UK
currently or in the near future? Do you need a

(02:07:08):
digital ID? Isn't that a weird question?

Speaker 7 (02:07:11):
Ye?

Speaker 2 (02:07:11):
Anyways, I don't know the answer because I haven't done
my research, and all of you should do your research too.
Something leave me. One of my favorite quotes read everything,
listen to everybody. Don't trust anything unless you can prove
it with your own research. That was, of course, William Cooper.
Thank you so much for having me asher. Have a
great weekend, everybody, and thank you Patrick for allowing us
to run the show in your stead.

Speaker 1 (02:07:33):
One hundred percent. Thanks Rucus. There goes Ruckus. You can
find him at Alternate Currentradio dot com. You can also
support twenty first century Wire on their support link. We've
got the support link in the description box below and
on the show page. It's easy to find at twenty
first Centurywire dot com. Same goes for Alternate Current Radio.

(02:07:55):
This is our annual bills season. So a couple of
you have in on that shouted everybody out. Tried my
best to shout everybody out on boiler Room last week.
If you missed boiler Room this week, that's because it
happened last night. Show pages up at Alternate Current Radio
dot com. If you want to check it out, please
follow boiler Room, myself and Ruckus, everybody on the show.

(02:08:18):
On all our socials. You can find links to our
x accounts and website, social media, all that good stuff
on the show pages. It's been quite a week. It's
been quite eight week. We're gonna go ahead and get
out of here, though, and we'll look forward to seeing
you guys again next week. Thanks to everybody in the discord.

(02:08:38):
Thanks to everyone at twenty first century Wire dot Com,
Alternate Current Radio, the whole team, and you out there
in the various locations where we do our best to
keep up with you while you send your chats into
the show. Don't forget to like and subscribe, do all
that stuff that helps us theoretically defeat some of the

(02:09:00):
shadow banning and unfollowing by the systems that we are
trying to broadcast on.

Speaker 6 (02:09:07):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (02:09:07):
We'll see you again next week and I'll leave you
with let's see I leave you with some Joseph Arthur here.
I have a great rest of your weekend. We'll see
you again real soon here on Sunday Wire.

Speaker 12 (02:09:41):
Gratitude the end and built the world this Tilton see
the evil world we live in one. So it's disappear
and gratitude salvation and never any light.

Speaker 13 (02:09:51):
The transtans on the dumbest trying to hold us to
the night.

Speaker 12 (02:09:54):
Thoughts and what's missing? Thank you, says what ts thoughts
keep us sometimes.

Speaker 6 (02:09:58):
Says thank you. May create that can take the moment.
The best eternal now with God is always with us.

Speaker 13 (02:10:05):
A hold it like a cow, like a center as
of a child, or a garden full of roses.

Speaker 6 (02:10:10):
The mind. This is the magic.

Speaker 13 (02:10:11):
He considers all the posest, wild thoughts against his principalities
of the whispering in different.

Speaker 6 (02:10:18):
Mundations of dispass. So thank you this, thank you as
my tru.

Speaker 12 (02:10:32):
Who set up this one has his journey for I
saw womenos never make it a news under control?

Speaker 6 (02:10:39):
How do we get back.

Speaker 12 (02:10:40):
Any sovereignty from the lazardinus that we pretend to be?
Thank you as a past to a place us out
of hell, grat initude, your presence will live.

Speaker 6 (02:10:50):
That's where we fail.

Speaker 12 (02:10:51):
But we have to make a practice to come back
into now in the garden of a gratitude and push
that ancient cloud. I don't know the reason we I
mean only or have we ever come back to couby
we were before?

Speaker 6 (02:11:04):
Then it start in eating with the paddle estates. Since
then have we been fine.

Speaker 12 (02:11:09):
With this battle as our faith? So taking this romanture
my true I haven't never known. Thank you is my
my true truth.

Speaker 7 (02:11:23):
The world.

Speaker 13 (02:11:26):
And whatever is the reason, this is where we are.
The light and the darkness are eating for our heart.

Speaker 12 (02:11:43):
The live wants those president the push of gratitude.

Speaker 6 (02:11:46):
The darkness wants are scattered with an.

Speaker 12 (02:11:48):
Evil latitude, and we love, get to think and they justify.

Speaker 6 (02:11:51):
As of course we see it's not itself.

Speaker 12 (02:11:54):
It brings on the divorce from the old street, from
grave relations.

Speaker 13 (02:11:58):
Going from the love of God to the darkness of
the two voices, double demons.

Speaker 6 (02:12:03):
We identify us and then we.

Speaker 13 (02:12:06):
Follow the poses that we trust.

Speaker 12 (02:12:08):
Take us to destruction and take us to despair when
they get the gun himself has always just beengin.

Speaker 4 (02:12:15):
So thank you.

Speaker 6 (02:12:15):
It's my bunch mancho. No, thank you, it's my montu,
thank you. It's my runch.

Speaker 12 (02:12:30):
Munch man, thank You's my unchimncho.

Speaker 6 (02:12:53):
Word. Thank you guys. One man chu my chosen, thank

(02:13:20):
you me

All Episodes

SUNDAY WIRE EP 563 - The Line In The Water

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Breakfast Club

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}SUNDAY WIRE EP 563 - The Line In The Water