SUNDAY WIRE EP 568 – 'Shadows of Zion' with Bryan McClain, Adam Clark & Basil Valentine - Sunday Wire with Patrick Henningsen

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
Hello, and welcome to this week's edition of The Sunday Wire.
It is November ninth, twenty twenty five. I'm Brian McLain,
also known as hesher guest hosting filling in for Patrick
Henningson while he is traveling and doing some work out
there for twenty first century wire dot com. Welcome to
the program. This is your weekly news omnibus streaming live

(00:48):
right here at twenty first century wire dot com, Alternate
Current Radio dot com, going out over Rumble, YouTube x
dot com, bits you several other places, and of course
out to those podcasting streams, those audio and video podcasting
streams after the live broadcast. I hope everybody has had

(01:10):
a good week and has a good week lined up here.
We certainly have plenty to discuss a lot going on
in the current events, geopolitics, national politics, realms. Hopefully we'll
be joined by Basil Valentine during the show here maybe
we can get an update on some UK politics and
goings on as well. I'll also be joined by Adam

(01:35):
Clark today for this edition of The Sunday Wire. He's
going to be popping in right now. Adam, Welcome back
to the Sunday Wire.

Speaker 2 (01:50):
Once I got to find my buttons. I have so
many screens open it's ridiculous. But that's what it is
when you do this sort of thing, right, how sure,
Oh yeah, oh yeah, howdy, good morning, good afternoon, good evening.
I guess in some cases it's pretty much evening time
now for the UK listeners. So there you go. They're
starting to wind down. Their weekend is practically over. We

(02:12):
still got a little time to party it up though,
after the show hasher So that's great, great news. Bad
news for most of the folks around the world, unfortunately
living under the oppression of the West and Israel. But
you know, all that aside, I hope everyone else is
doing all right out there, for presuming you don't live
under the oppression of the West or Israel, which good

(02:35):
luck with that, right.

Speaker 1 (02:38):
Yeah, right, oh, Look, we got new colors on the
interface today. I did not approve that. That's not what
we set out to do here. It's blue. Yeah, why
are we blue today? What is going on here?

Speaker 2 (02:51):
I am feeling kind of blue?

Speaker 1 (02:53):
Yeah, I know, current events will make you a little
bit blue. Well, maybe I can fix that while we
are in the middle of the stream here.

Speaker 2 (03:01):
But in America hasher We did switch pretty quickly from
the red wave to the blue wave in some cases.

Speaker 1 (03:07):
Yeah, oh right, yeah, well that's a good point. I mean,
we've had the elections, We've had this sort of what
do they call this election? This weird little election. It's
not a midterm terms.

Speaker 2 (03:20):
I thought it was.

Speaker 1 (03:21):
We can't be at midterms yet, it's just the first year.

Speaker 2 (03:24):
I don't know, it's just America. We just love elections.
We would have them every day if we could, right.

Speaker 1 (03:29):
Yeah, we just throw random ones here and there. You know,
November is a great time for elections, so even if
it's not midterm season.

Speaker 2 (03:36):
So yeah, mayors, there are a bunch of mayors who
were elected mayors.

Speaker 1 (03:40):
Yeah, stuff like that. I hear New York got a
new mayor. People seem to be either really excited or
really not excited about that.

Speaker 2 (03:49):
Well, that was one of those classic examples going in.
It's like the Aliens from the episode of Simpsons, where
it's like it doesn't matter which one you vote for,
you you're still going to get like pure or evil.
You're you're basically just voting for the same people all
the time. It's like, I don't know, I was listening
to Jimmy Dore the other day. Shout out to Jimmy
Dorney says, it doesn't matter who you vote for, you

(04:09):
get John McCain when he was talking about the president
because the policies, the policies of these people pretty much
don't stray very far from their predecessor. Even if they're
you know, whether it's a D or an R in
their name, that doesn't even matter, you know.

Speaker 1 (04:25):
Yeah, true that. I saw that comment, and I thought
it was pretty funny as well. Whoever you vote for,
you're gonna get John McCain. But I think actually, maybe
whoever you vote for, you're gonna get bb NUT and
Yahoo in many cases here, at least that's the way
it seems. Yeah, here we go.

Speaker 2 (04:43):
Your ruining comes to the foreign policy of all these countries.

Speaker 1 (04:47):
Absolutely, yeah, absolutely, let's see here, curious thanks for reposting
the stream. We appreciate the streamery posts over there on
X and everywhere. What do you mean, no, Patrick, no show.
We are a show. We got a show for you here.
Who knows, maybe he'll even call in. We just don't know. Hi, fam, Yep,

(05:10):
what's up? Good to see everybody piling into the chat.
Rooms here. Speaking of times and this kind of stuff,
Ruckus and I were trying to coordinate with Basil Valentine
and he's given us like UK times here half past
this hour, and we're going, well, we just had daylight
savings here in the United States, so things are wonky

(05:30):
by an hour until everybody else catches up. So you know,
we're in that season right now, the daylight saving season
where things are a little wonky over here. But we
are hoping to hear from Basle today, Ruckus. It sounds
like he might be able to pretty sure.

Speaker 2 (05:47):
It's currently five thirty pm in the UK, and so
Basil will probably be able to join us in approximately
an hour or so.

Speaker 1 (05:55):
All right, okay, great, well that works for me. It'll
be great if Basil joins us today. So what do
we got going on around the world, Ruckus. We had
that crazy UPS plane crash here in the United States.
First off, that was insane. I don't know if anybody

(06:16):
saw the dashcam footage of that UPS plane crashing, but
what tragedy that was. It looked like now they're saying
fourteen people have died and the plane crashed on at
least two businesses. So some people. Maybe most of the
people that perish were actually on the ground. That's pretty crazy, man.

Speaker 2 (06:39):
It's a tragedy obviously, and you know, a pretty serious accident,
and accidents do happen vastly because of human error, which
is a fact, but it is a fact that benefits
the powers that be. They love it when these things happen.
Never let a good tragedy go to waste, because this
will ultimately serve the role of them being able to
push for or the idea. Well, we need less human

(07:02):
intervention because they can make mistakes. But we have a
brand new product to sell you. It's kind of an
old product that we're repurposing technically because we're famous for
doing that. In this case, it's not a medical intervention.
It is a technological intervention. And here come the AI
to help pilot planes or you know, in this inance
is why does UPS need to be flying hasher? Ups

(07:25):
is in the business of delivering packages and last time
I checked it is twenty twenty five. These things can
be delivered via drones. Definitely no human operators involved there.
And even if one of these paltry little drones falls
from the sky, you know, it's probably not going to
take out fourteen people, unless, of course that drone is
made by you know, like Lucky Palmer's in that guy's name?

Speaker 1 (07:48):
Yeah, and a Reil or what's that?

Speaker 2 (07:51):
What's that company? And yeah and Reil yeah and real Yeah, Yeah,
that's the one. Wonderfully scary drones with explosive payloads. They're lovely.

Speaker 1 (07:59):
Yeah, and what happened? Where's the Boeing uninterrupted autopilot? In
a situation like this, shouldn't that thing kick in and
stop something like this from going on? I mean, it's
so weird. How the what do they call that? The
Boeing uninterrupted? The b u A? Is that right to
have the acronym bright growing an uninterrupted autopilot?

Speaker 3 (08:23):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (08:23):
Yeah, that's a whole thing. So we'll see, we'll see. Yes,
people asking where Patrick is, he's on travel. He's on travel.
Don't worry, Stuart. What's up Stuart? Good to see you there, buddy,
Great to see everybody in the chest. But yeah, where
are we gonna head with this? Yeah? Probably more automation,
probably more AI, all that fun stuff. I mean, who's

(08:46):
and of course we're going to get a NIST report
on that one. I wonder if they're going to give
us any information. It's kind of been interesting the way
that they've been sort of slow rolling any of the
factual data on this. It's just a real simple plane crashed,
who what, when? Where?

Speaker 2 (09:02):
You know?

Speaker 1 (09:03):
Who died? That kind of thing. But it's like, only
just yesterday I started seeing an actual death toll.

Speaker 4 (09:10):
That's why.

Speaker 2 (09:10):
That's why I think there's something to this. They're going
to make some sort of meal out of this story.
I don't I don't know exactly where they're going. I'm
just always guess technocracy because it usually is that way
these days. But there's there's also been there's a lot
of choke points going on right now with the whole
aviation industry, the whole government shutdown. We are now on like,
holy crap, I lost track. That's how many days into

(09:30):
this government shutdown here in the United States, we are
what must be day thirty nine, day forty forty something
like that. Holy moly, that's wild. Like, I mean, once
we hit forty two, what happens, because you know, that
is the answer to life, the universe and everything, is
that when all of our problems just magically fixed themselves, hopefully,
day forty two of the US government shutdown. I am

(09:51):
skeptical in that area, but maybe that is one of
the reasons that they're having some issues because again, a
lot of these things do depend heavily on federally regulated
agencies and groups and investigators and things like that, So
I don't know, you know. And plus let's never forget that,
you know, government moves slow all the time, unless you

(10:11):
know when it wants to move fast. It certainly can
move at the speed of like warp speed. I might suggest, right,
sometimes the pen is mightier than the swords some people
have suggested when it comes to getting things done in
the White House. But anyways, that's another story. But there's

(10:32):
you know, we got the FAA. They're concerned. There's issues
right now with all of the travel and the FAA.
FAA has stepped in and said, look, we're not going
to allow this many flights right now. It's unsafe. There's
people who are not working, they're not getting paid. It's
just an unsafe environment. So therefore we're going to say
you can't fly. So now they're just stepping in and
cutting off everybody's travel. Again, why do they always do

(10:55):
this sort of thing always cause some sort of an issue.
Have you noticed this around this time of year? What's
coming up right around the corner in a couple of weeks. Oh,
that's right, Thanksgiving, which is usually a fairly decent busy
travel season, if I'm not mistaken hash or at least
it was before you know, five years ago or so,
during the pandemic. But you know, and then of course

(11:17):
you got the holiday shopping stuff going on, and ups,
planes falling out of the sky, delivery issues, all of
these things, you know, tariffs. I mean, this is all
building up to probably a very disappointing, unhappy Christmas time. Ultimately,
that's what I suspect.

Speaker 1 (11:35):
Could be, could be. I don't know. We're going to
have to wait and see what Christmas looks like this year.
Speaking of Christmas and all of that stuff, though, did
you notice the there was some tariffs. There was some
tariffs talk going on this week. It looks like they've

(11:58):
made a bit of a deal there, right, So a
bit of a deal with China. So it looks like
maybe some of your cheap Chinese bobbles and microprocessors and
stuff might actually uh work out this year. Maybe it
won't be one hundred percent terrifying. It did you see
that wreckas.

Speaker 4 (12:19):
Well?

Speaker 2 (12:19):
They just they changed their mind about that every day
all the time. I don't even I can't even keep
track of that stuff. And usually it's it's to the
benefit of big tech companies. Again, it's always big tech related,
So it's always about the chips, the minerals, the resources,
this and that. It has nothing to do with the
cheap goods that you know, you might think that's going
to pass on to the consumer. No, it's all stuff

(12:40):
that benefits the higher you know, ranking folks, the elite
I guess they call them, or whatever, investors. It makes
investors happy. All of this tariff talk moves the markets
like literally, every time there's a decision made, it goes
one way or the other. Pumping and dumping.

Speaker 1 (12:58):
Yeah, exactly. So what's happened here? President Trump reached a
economic agreement with President Zi Jinping during a summit in
South Korea just eight days ago. I think it goes
into effect tomorrow. And they're reporting that this deal has
concessions from both sides. So China they're saying we'll suspend

(13:21):
rare earth export controls. We know that the Trump administration
is very, very interested in rare earth exports. They also
say China is going to halt fentanyl precursor flows to
the United States. What does that mean? Why is that? Okay?

(13:41):
All right, well we'll just go with that ending retaliatory
tariffs on US agricultural products including soybeans, wheat, corn, cotton, pork,
and beef, and remove non tariff countermeasures against US semiconductor
manufacturers and in return so many wtfs in here. The

(14:03):
US reduced it's quote fentanyl tariff, the fentanyl tariff on
Chinese goods from twenty percent down to ten percent, and
extended the reciprocal tariff rate at ten percent for another year,
which is preventing it from reverting to this thirty four
percent that it was at. So I don't know, do

(14:24):
you think this is a slight de escalation in the
tariff war with China?

Speaker 5 (14:29):
Here?

Speaker 2 (14:29):
Adam, sure, I guess now we can get our fatanyl cheaper.
That's great, and you know, I joke, but that's probably
it's probably something ridiculous. So probably it is not even
technically related to fetanyl. They probably liked, like, well, fentanyl
contains all of these ingredients, like we'll say, there's thirty
two of them, and like this China moves these two
other ingredients that are used for a million different other uses,

(14:52):
and we can say, hey, that's a precursor to it
could be water for all we know.

Speaker 1 (14:59):
Right, the precursor ooh, scary, Oh, those precursors. Uh yeah,
And of course you know, no mention of the the
precursors going to Venezuela, right, and then somehow turning into
the drug and then ending up on a narco boat
that gets the drone strike on its forehead. Right.

Speaker 2 (15:22):
Well, yeah, it's a circle of life. That's how that works.

Speaker 1 (15:27):
Bombs for peace, bombs for fentanyl, you know. Yeah. Yeah,
So we got we got that going. What else do
We got Russian forces maintaining their offensive in eastern Ukraine.
So looking like there's been a lot of action in
uh in that area, northeastern Polkrolsk. I think that's near

(15:55):
in the don Jeesk area perhaps, But yeah, they're saying
the Ukrainian Security Service that they always tout the Ukrainians
SBU Right, SBU units operating in the area killed over
one five hundred Russian service members. I don't know where
they're getting those numbers. I kind of have a hard
time believing that, but looks like there is definitely renewed fighting,

(16:19):
a lot of drone strikes and missiles, energy infrastructure going on,
and of course you know more Still, I don't know, ruckus.
I thought we were gonna have this. I thought President
Trump was going to end this one within what two
weeks of becoming president. This is a familiar span, this
two week span starting to feel like other two week

(16:40):
spans that we've been promised.

Speaker 2 (16:42):
Right, Well, I mean, this thing's been going on for
a while now, I mean I forget when it's like
officially been considered, but we all know has been going
on since well it's like twenty fourteen issue.

Speaker 1 (16:57):
Oh yeah, we want to take it way back. Yeah,
we could go back even further than that.

Speaker 2 (17:01):
But yeah, definitely the recent conflict that has been bothering everybody,
that's still that's been going on for I see, I
don't I forget now, it's been a long time now.
It was getting ridiculous.

Speaker 1 (17:13):
Yes, we're we're building it to year three.

Speaker 2 (17:15):
I think Trump said that he was going to end
it with a phone call before he was elected, So like,
it's so ridiculous, and then here we are and and
and again, I mean like so I'm not saying that
I would like to see this happening, But wasn't this
supposed to kick off World War three? How? I like,

(17:36):
I don't know how many times I've been like placed
on the edge of my seat in the past three
years over this conflict. It's like, oh, I can't believe
we did this and we gave them that. Now like
all of that, guess what Russia is going to do?
Not like it's just this NonStop. It reminds me of
listening to Alex Jones back in the day, just constantly
being like huddled in a corner, sucking my thumb, scared
as af you know, because it's going to be They're

(17:57):
going to nukee everybody. This is it, this is the
big one. And then the Israel thing pops off and
we're like, oh, oh no, this is definitely the one, right.
It's it's always the side there you go. See, So
what is going on here? I'm like, you know, maybe
I'm just upset because I might have some money on
the polymarket. That's I don't know. If you know, you
can do this hashual where you can bet on things
like whether or not World War three is going to

(18:19):
start but anyways.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
Oh, Basil would love that we will have.

Speaker 4 (18:23):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (18:23):
The thing is I was betting that it was going
to happen, and you know, like cheese the least. We're
getting a little long in the day here, aren't we.

Speaker 1 (18:30):
Uh yeah, West.

Speaker 2 (18:32):
Side Expression crapp Er, get off the pot.

Speaker 4 (18:33):
Right.

Speaker 1 (18:35):
Well, here's here's some new fear pron for you. Man,
if you were if your fears of World War three
were starting to fade, don't worry. Here's a fresh headline
for you. It's over at dreaded Express dot co. World
War three fears explode over catastrophic nuclear incident after savage
Russia attack. So there you go a little more nuclear

(19:00):
propaganda for you there.

Speaker 2 (19:02):
Ruckus was an attack on a nuclear power plant, because
they do that a lot, and there's always that like, oh,
this could be it. This is a big one. It's
like that was that that show where the guy was like, ah,
fake to having a heart attack and oh yeah yeah
Stanford and the sons there, this is a big one.
That's what I feel like with all this fear prawn

(19:23):
stuff all the time, and it is very serious stuff,
but it means it's just reminds it just reminds you like, Okay,
how serious are these people taking it? If we've been
in an extended conflict now between Russia and Ukraine, with
Ukraine getting a lot of help, and I mean a
lot of help, a lot of money, a lot of weaponry,
them doing all sorts of fun stuff with their drones.
I mean, if we're to take all of this above board,

(19:44):
you would think by now there would be some sort
of decisive victory one way or the other, somebody would
have won. This would be over by themselves, Like, how
can this keep going on? How can these countries keep
having this amount of people to keep feeding into the
meat grinders and these numbers that we're hearing about and yes,
seeing the press gang videos of them just like coming
tackling people up the streets and throwing them in a

(20:05):
van while their wife and kids are crying, No, don't
do that to grandpa who's eighty nine years old, Like,
what the heck's going on?

Speaker 4 (20:11):
Right?

Speaker 2 (20:12):
But again, I mean, how long can that keep going on?
The war has not been long enough to where there's
now a whole new generation of like, oh yeah, I
remember when I was five years old the war started,
But now I'm a fighting age eighteen years old and
I'm gonna go avenge to the death of Grandma or whatever,
you know, who was identified as a male and was
sent to the front lines as you know, a chief
officer of the tank battalion or something like that.

Speaker 1 (20:37):
Right, we're just never going to get away from duck
and cover. Right. Remember what was that it was about.
I don't know. I feel like it was probably in
twenty twenty three or twenty twenty four. We covered that
story during a boiler Room episode about a public service
announcement that went out from one of the New York

(20:57):
State I think it was actually New York City. I
don't remember what which, uh which bureau it was, but
they basically put out a what to do in the
event of a nuclear strike, and it was so ridiculous.
It was like the the twenty first century version of
the old duck and cover. You know, get under oh,

(21:19):
about to get turned into a you know, atomic shadow. Oh,
get under your desk, you know, duck under, duck, under
your desk and cover your head.

Speaker 2 (21:29):
But in this case it was it said stay in
your house, yeah, and listen to the.

Speaker 1 (21:33):
News trusted authorities or something like that. They use some
weird global ease to tell you, you know, not to listen
to podcasters. Good stuff, good stuff. And it's like, how
much money did the city put into that? You know what? What?
I would love to be a fly on the wall
at the meeting where like the city planners are like,

(21:54):
you know what, we need a big YouTube PSA video
about what to do in case of a nuclear strike.
Are you like, Okay, how much are we spending on that? Guys?
How much tax dollar money are we spending on that? Yeah?
So strategy of tension, right, got to have that, strategy
of tension. Got to keep the you know, the nuclear
conflagration specter, you know, fully gassed up, right, We got

(22:17):
to have that in the back pocket at all times.

Speaker 2 (22:23):
Gotta do it, man, It's the American way.

Speaker 1 (22:25):
That's how we roll here in America. You know, we're ready,
ready for nuclear fallout, going to get under the desks.

Speaker 2 (22:33):
And it was I think it was their their whatever
they call their local version of an office of an
Emergency Management so like a FEMA, but like on the
state level.

Speaker 1 (22:42):
Yeah, right, exactly, it was something like that. I don't know,
I don't have the link handy. It was a couple
of years ago. Now almost, but we are approaching. So yeah,
the Russo Ukrainian War began in February of twenty fourteen,
still ongoing, and it was February of.

Speaker 2 (23:03):
Where did they admit that? They're actually admitting that somewhere online?

Speaker 1 (23:07):
Yeah, it's actually in the Wikipedia. If you believe that.

Speaker 2 (23:12):
You say that just a couple of years ago under
the previous administration, and like, oh you you Russian bought,
you get paid by Russia, you work for Russia. You
will say that this is what you know. It's just facts, yo, Jack, yep.

Speaker 1 (23:26):
So February of twenty two is when Russia launched the
special military actions. So we are rapidly approaching, you know,
the three year mark.

Speaker 2 (23:39):
Here, Oh, we're approaching four.

Speaker 1 (23:43):
Four Yeah, sorry, Mathema four. That's hard for me to
even compute. We've been dealing with this story for almost
four years now.

Speaker 2 (23:55):
Well but longer because we were all tracking it since
like you know, like so oh yeah, I'm so silly.

Speaker 1 (24:02):
It's wild man, You're you're at the wire. It's been
more than a decade pretty much. So yeah, but you know,
most normies didn't really get hip to it until everybody's
you know, Facebook icon turned to Ukrainian flag, and they
were all trying to figure out why we had so
many Ukrainian flags flying on Capitol Hill. That was confusing

(24:23):
for some people and exciting for the people.

Speaker 2 (24:25):
Didn't exist until it was the current thing to support.

Speaker 1 (24:29):
Right, Yep, there you go. We've got old school indoctrinated
duck and cover. I remember that when I was in
school in the fifties in New York City. Yeah. Yeah,
that's the one, the old duck and cover. Now it's
duck and cover and go home and turn on the television.
I guess, duck and cover and go watch Fox News.

(24:51):
Duck and cover, go watch. I don't know is MSNBC
still around or did they? Yeah? I guess so.

Speaker 2 (24:56):
Probably tune into your local mayor their podcast.

Speaker 1 (25:01):
Oh my gosh, man, I have the distinct displeasure of
being unable to not click in when I see Gavin
Newsom on a podcast. I've never made it through an
entire one because he frustrates me so much. But man,
that guy, that guy politicians on podcasts. I thought maybe

(25:25):
we were getting somewhere with that concept. I was like, Okay, cool,
let's get some of these guys in positions where you
know they're in longer form discussions. They don't have, you know,
all the earpieces and the the you know, boards to
read off of and stuff, teleprompters and whatnot. But man,
that guy, that guy, we're I think they're going to

(25:50):
make him president. I have a feeling they're going to
make him president at some point.

Speaker 2 (25:53):
Pes sure, And you're you're making comments about him being
a guest on other people's podcasts.

Speaker 1 (25:58):
Well, he has his own too.

Speaker 2 (26:00):
I know he has his own podcast.

Speaker 1 (26:03):
The Gavin K. Newsome Show, the Michelle Obama Show. I mean,
it's oh gosh, man, I don't know. I think I
thought I would prefer them on podcasts. I thought it
might expose them for who they are a little bit more.
But at this point, I'm starting to think, No, you
guys go back to just your Fox and seeing an appearances,

(26:24):
because you're really polluting the poto sphere here.

Speaker 2 (26:30):
Like I told you in person last night, I said,
can we just go back to a time when nobody
even knew what a podcast was?

Speaker 1 (26:37):
No, we wanted so bad, I go in twenty fourteen.
We wanted so bad for people to know what we
were doing. It's just like, ah, you know, it's like podcasting.
No one's going to do that. What are you talking about?
Was this, you know, some nerdy thing? And now guess what,
your governor, your former first lady. All these people have
a podcast.

Speaker 2 (26:56):
So and what is the vast majority of the news
that we hear about every days surrounding is so Tucker Carlson, this,
Joe Rogan, that, Candice Owens, this right, Megan Kelly that
it's all podcasts. It's ye pretty wild.

Speaker 1 (27:11):
Well that's what Newsom was doing on the one that
I was watching. I don't remember which one it was.
It was one of those like sort of urban oriented podcasts.
But he was sitting there calling out Joe Rogan, trying
to you know, bait Joe Rogan into bringing him onto
his show and completely shining Sean Ryan, you know, just

(27:32):
putting Sean Ryan on a little pedestal. For of course
you're gonna put Sean Ryan on a little pedestal there,
mister Newsom, he gave you the biggest softball podcast you
could have ever asked for. Man, absolutely, just oh that
guy just he's so creepy. Man, he's so creepy.

Speaker 2 (27:50):
They both are, uh yeah, yeah.

Speaker 1 (27:54):
No kidding. What else do we got? What else do
we got? Let's see, So what's going on in Venezuela
and all that? Well, Uh, they targeted another boat, right,
they take out another Narco boat, I think in the
last week or so. Here I'm losing track of the
Narco boat grainy ua V footage. Man, It's it's getting

(28:17):
hard to track.

Speaker 2 (28:19):
Did they take out a Narco boats? Well, if you
were to ask me, since I can't prove that they did,
and I have a sneaky suspension, well those are not
Narco boats that they're blowing out of the water, I'm
gonna say that none. No Narco boats have been destroyed
as yet, just a bunch of fishing boats, is my guess.

Speaker 1 (28:37):
What are you good at point? We've seen zero proof, right,
we've seen no proof of I mean, what what is
left to provide proof after a UAV strikes a small boat?
First off, it's probably nothing left. But yeah, trust it.
You just got to trust them ruckus. I mean, you
gotta trust that if they say, if Pete Hagsath says

(28:59):
it's a Narco boat, it's a Narco boat. Right.

Speaker 4 (29:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (29:03):
Here, let's get a quick little summary on this. Let's
see if AI can keep track of this because this
is pretty wild. So this all began on September first,
as part of a campaign targeting alleged drug traffickers. Alleged
drug traffickers, it says, under President Donald Trump's administration, the
very first strike killed eleven people. Eleven for all my

(29:24):
numerologists out there, whom Trump identified? Who did Trump? Trump identified?
He said that they were members of the trend algar
a trend to argoa cartel, a group designated by WHO
as a foreign terrorist organization. And then the US government
officially claimed, just claimed, without showing any proof, that the
vessel was transporting narcotics towards the United States in international waters.

(29:50):
Let that sink in anyways, These operations have continued through
September and October, with strikes occurring both in the Caribbean
and the Eastern Pacific. By six twenty twenty five, seventeen
strikes at least that we know of, have been carried out,
resulting in the deaths of at least sixty five people.

(30:13):
Neat Secretary of Defense is he? I thought he was
Secretary of War, So strike for you, ai, Secretary of
whoever he is. Pete Hegseth secretary of Fox News confirmed
several of these operations via his social media, because that's
how we do that.

Speaker 1 (30:28):
Now.

Speaker 2 (30:28):
It's not an official statement coming from the Pentagon. It's
Pete hag Seth's Twitter account. Let that sink in stating
that the targeted vessels were operated by designated terrorist organizations
involved in narcotics trafficking. Does any of this sound really
they get all to any of you? Anyways? These strikes

(30:50):
have drawn significant international criticism. Oh well, that's probably not good.
Venezuela under President Nicholas Maduro, the terrorist narco bad Madman.
He doesn't say that has to denounced the actions as
quote unquote imperial aggression. Well, that's what I suppose any
one of us might refer to it, right, hesher mobilizing
four point five million militiamen in response and declaring the

(31:14):
country at quote maximum preparedness and quote Well, you know,
if a military power such as the United States was
just willy nilly blowing fishermen's boats out of the water
and trying to accuse me and my countrymen of being vicious,
that's exactly what I would do. I'd probably get ready
to and protect myself. Right, is anything that this guy
doing or saying necessarily wrong. I don't know. I don't

(31:36):
think so. Anyways, Colombian president. Here's where it gets interesting.
Gustavo Petro alleged that one of the victims was a
Colombian fishermen, not a cartel member, a claim that the
US has, of course dismissed, because you know, that might
then make them look bad and maybe guilty of some
sort of war crime. Human rights groups and international legal
experts have questioned the legality of the strikes under both

(31:59):
US and international law, with some describing them, including my
friend Sam Cheney on Weaponized News shout out to Sam
Cheney extra judicial killings. And there's the problem. No matter
what this really is hesher. This is the allowing this
to happen. Is the foot in the door, the camel's
nose in the tent, or whatever expression you want to

(32:19):
use here. We're like, hey, it would appear that the
American people and Congress and everybody at all different levels
of our current government and administration seem okay, well, that's willing,
nearly extradicially just blowing people to Kingdom come. And that
is a big problem because if they can do it
to them how long before they could do it to
you or I.

Speaker 1 (32:40):
Hesher Uh, fishermen, Yeah, a likely story, that's all. Like,
that's what they all say, all those narco terrorists say
they're fishermen. You know, can't believe that. I mean, gosh,
how can this be going on? Yeah, it's it's crazy, dude,
it's absolutely bananas. Seventeen So the number was seventeen strikes. Wow,

(33:05):
that's even more.

Speaker 2 (33:06):
Sixty five dead now I know there were at least
a couple survivors, which is interesting. I wouldn't. I was
so worried. I'm like, well, they're going to probably survive,
They're going to be recovering in their hospital, and then
a tragic incident happens where like a giant satellite falls
out of the sky and crushes them to death or
something in their beds.

Speaker 1 (33:23):
Oops, yeah, space junk. I don't know who knows. Yeah,
I would not be surprised, Jay Sherlock, not what a
professional military would do. Well, valid criticism.

Speaker 2 (33:37):
And then it gets even worse because you know, what
do we generally need in order for a war to happen? Here?

Speaker 1 (33:45):
A catalyzing event? Perhaps?

Speaker 2 (33:47):
Well, I mean, is there a governing body, a group
of people that need to get involved first before we
can just, you know, say hey, we're going to war. Now,
can the president just determine that we're going to war?

Speaker 1 (34:01):
No, no, no, no no, the Vice Viceroy Trump has been
given the powers to do whatever he wants, so much
like every other president.

Speaker 2 (34:10):
Not not true. We basically need Congress to approve war.
But what happened very recently this week, and I'm pretty
sure it was covered on twenty first Century Wire's website
a reprint from Global Global Affairs, But the United States
Senate voted on Thursday to block a bipartisan resolution which

(34:32):
would have restrained Trump's authority to strike Venezuela. And it
did more than deny Congress as saying war. It opened
the door to yet another undeclared conflict, one that risks
shattering lives across the Caribbean while hiding behind the worn
mask of quote fighting narco terrorism end quote. That's what
the Peace says up at twenty first centurywire dot com.

(34:53):
But yes, so Senate said, oh, you know, we're going
to go ahead and block that resolution. We were just
going to say this is okay, it's totally we're basically saying,
without officially saying it, that you have our approval. As
the headline says, Senate sanctions the war by omission. That's
a great, great headline. Yeah, that's exactly what we're witnessing.

(35:17):
It's really really wild. I mean, so you think it's bad.
Oh no, it's worse than that. It is so much
worse than that. And who were what is really behind
the scenes pulling these strings? What is really going on here?
You know it cannot possibly be what they're saying. Well,
it's because we care are because narco and drugs. I'm like, hello,

(35:37):
to do we need to do a refresher on the
drug war and how that works and plays out. And
then you know, remember the troops guarding the poppy fields
people and all that stuff, right hasher? I mean, so
this is really not about drugs or protecting Americans from
the harms of said drugs. There's really some other big
power play going on here.

Speaker 1 (35:55):
Yah. Yeah, probably Ruckus. I hate to inform you, but
Elvis in Vegas thinks that your tinfoil hat is not
thick enough. Ruckus is mister conspiracy yet he believes they
actually blew up votes the boats. What it's fake no
bloats were blown up. They're trying to scare Maduro to flee,

(36:16):
so obviously fake.

Speaker 2 (36:18):
What do you think, man, this is actually something that
I've brought up on air on Weaponized News, So yeah, absolutely,
there's always that. This is twenty twenty five. We've all
seen that movie Wag the Dog. I mean, what's what's
even better than blowing up a bunch of boats out
of the water, just doing it digitally on a screen
and making people think that we did so much cheaper,

(36:38):
so much more efficient, so much faster, and so much
easier to do now in the advent of AI. I
was watching those videos of these alleged boats being blown out.
I'm like, doesn't this look exactly like the same as
the last one and the one before that, and the
one before that and the one before that. Right, I
guess we've only seen a few of these, but they
all look the same, and it looks very similar to
like when they released these videos of the Google grainy Like, oh,

(37:00):
that little blip right there, but that was it. That
was the tic TAC, that was the UFO. Oh my god,
I can't believe what I'm looking at. I'm like, what
are we looking at, you know, and again the problem
is that whatever it is that we're looking at doesn't matter.
What ultimately matters is whatever the person behind the screen
on the television, using their voice and their brainwashing NLP techniques,

(37:21):
tell us happened, what they want us to believe happened,
and whether or not it really happened, I argue, doesn't
matter either, because it's the outcome, the policies, the decisions,
the next phases, the next steps, what happens after, what's next? Right,
I honestly don't care if it was fake or not.
But in this case, yeah, I wouldn't put it past

(37:42):
them that. Yeah, how many boats are knocked out of
the water? Maybe one? Maybe, I don't know. I wasn't there.
I can't prove any of it for myself, therefore I
don't know.

Speaker 1 (37:52):
Yeah, that's where it becomes a little bit sticky, right,
I mean rainy footage. You're right, It's like, Okay, you're
showing me basically nest monster. You're showing me basically tiktac ufo.
You know, show me where where's the actual information? Someone?
Please tell me where the actual information is.

Speaker 2 (38:14):
Well, the press will well press, the press will get it.
Out of them. They have offices right there in the.

Speaker 1 (38:18):
Oh oh right, No, they have to run that guess.

Speaker 2 (38:21):
Most of them walked out.

Speaker 1 (38:23):
Yeah. And even if they did stay and wanted to
run the story, they'd have to run it by the
Pentagon first, because I don't know, screw the First Amendment,
I guess or something like that. All right, So if
anybody wants to see some receipts on that claim we
made about New York, here you go. There's the press release. Uh.

(38:47):
And this is from the New York City Emergency Management Board. Uh.
And this one, where's the date? On this July eleventh
to NYC Emergency Management Department launched a new public service
announcement that focuses on nuclear preparedness. While the likelihood of

(39:10):
a nuclear weapon incident occurring in or near New York
City is very low, it's important New Yorkers know how
to stay safe. So this, hopefully this will be the
actual PSA.

Speaker 5 (39:23):
Emergency Management want to make sure you know what to
do to stay safe if it ever came to that.
Pretty basic stuff. Go inside and stay there. But people
are wondering what is up with the timing of this message?
He said, Good trs explains, So there's been a nuclear attack.
Don't ask me how or why, just know that the
big one has hit.

Speaker 2 (39:42):
New York City officials releasing a PSA on what to
do in case of a nuclear attack. Their instructions get inside,
stay inside, and stay tuned. PSA is like this seem
like a waste.

Speaker 1 (39:54):
Stay tuned, Get inside, stay inside. So under stay inside.
They've got shut doors and windows. Go to the middle
of the building, get clean, immediately remove clothing, and shower
with soap our shampoo. All right, Hey, thanks for that one. Guys,
what to do if a nuclear bomb explodes in New
York City? Yeah, and then we also had let's see

(40:18):
creative accidents. Thank you for these. US reveals new stealth
nuclear missiles on cold War bomber the second show of
force in a week. This came out at the dreaded
New York Post Compost four days ago. It looks like
US military was spotted testing a new stealth nuclear weapon

(40:40):
on a Cold War bomber last week, just as the
Air Force was preparing to test its minute Man two
intercontinental ballistic missile, so An Air Force B fifty two
was pictured flying over California's Owens Valley on October twenty nine,
with the snapshot revealing rockets underneath its wing that appeared
to match rendering of the a g M one eighty one,

(41:02):
a long range standoff nuclear cruise missiles. So ruckus, We've
got a lot of nuclear warfare. Uh fear porn for
you today.

Speaker 2 (41:16):
Bah humbug? Yeah, no, I know. I mean, the the
one key difference here is that, since you know, Trump's
been in office, I mean, like everything else, we were
promised a whole bunch of peace and we're getting quite
the opposite here. I mean, as I was mentioning there,
this this, this Venezuela tham, I mean, this is all

(41:37):
threatening to start a new conflict. Why would why would
we be starting new conflicts when we have not even
wrapped up the ones that existed when we came into
you know, power. I'm speaking as the president here, right.
Trump's like, oh, I'm the peace I'm gonna and all
the No, he comes in, he starts new wars. What
what are you doing? And we discussed this last week,
So I'm not gonna beat the dead horse here, even

(41:57):
though they are with this war propaganda. Peace through strength,
and that's what that is. The showing the bombers and
all of this talk recently in the news about them
whipping out all their nukes and seeing if they're still working.
They're like, you may have seen the headlines. They're like, uh,
Trump has issued in an executive order make it for
we need to check, we need to test our weapons.
And then it comes out and they're like, well, yes,

(42:17):
we're going to test the weapons, but we're not allowed.
We're not detonating anything that's not allowed. Nobody detonates anything,
you know, Well, then what are we testing. I don't
get it. It's it's just a boom the scary headline
that's just like, Oh, if you're Rusher, you're supposed to
be like, oh dang man, America is serious, bro, they're
even testing their nukes. Man, I'm shaking in my boots

(42:37):
or or that's what they want us to believe. It's
just all this projection of power back and forth. It's
all fake. It's all willy nilly. It's so so silly,
and and I guess, you know, obviously I don't want
to see a bomb dropped or anything like that, But
I mean, again, how how many times can we go
back and forth with these threats and not. You would
think by now we would see something. I mean, if

(42:59):
the is full of these raving lunatics that want to
destroy everything and take over the world, like we're told,
like all of these bad people President g and President
Putin and what's the North Korea? To Guy? What's his already?
Little Ki Kim? So I don't know. I just I'm
not buying into it. And another thing is the threat

(43:22):
of fear, the threat of war that everybody being on
the edge is just so damn useful. I mean, that's
how you control the population. So I personally refuse to
be controlled that way. So I'm not going to be
worried about it. I'm going to live my life. I
will continue to unfortunately live in fear of sharks. I
can not help that. But luckily, you know, in very
rare instances, I don't believe I need to worry about

(43:43):
that here in Central Texasshure.

Speaker 1 (43:45):
So I think not unless we get like, you know,
nuclear radiated, you know, mutant sharks, land sharks or something
like that, I think will be okay, man.

Speaker 2 (43:59):
I'll cross that when we get there carrying my AK
forty seven.

Speaker 1 (44:02):
That's right. Well, you know what speaking of B fifty twos, right, Like,
we just saw the speculation there about B fifty two's
being armed with you know, nuclear weapons and such. Check
this out. Going back to Venezuela, the United States has

(44:24):
reactivated a Cold War era naval base in Puerto Rico
and deployed a buttload of troops to the Caribbean, in
the largest American military build up in the region in decades.
The deployment are you ready for this includes F thirty
five fighter jets, B fifty two bombers, the USS Gerald R.

(44:44):
Ford aircraft carrier, the Army's one sixtieth Special Operations Regiment,
And of course this is following Trump's declaration of a
non this this is a quote non international armed conflict
end quote with drug cartel so treating suspected traffickers as
unlawful combatants. The Trump administration has formulated various strategies for

(45:08):
potential military intervention in Venezuela, ranging from air strikes against
military facilities to efforts to seize the country's oil reserves.
They're saying sixty nine people have been killed across those
seventeen strikes, sixteen seventeen strikes, whatever it is, since September.
So a non international armed conflict with drug cartels. Huh interesting.

Speaker 2 (45:35):
So what you're telling me is the United States of
America literally wants to invade Venezuela.

Speaker 1 (45:44):
Yeah, and seize their oil reserves on top of that, man,
how about that?

Speaker 2 (45:49):
When have we historically, like ever done that? When have
we picked a fight with the country and then just
went and invaded it? Oh well yeah, but I mean
but on our own without you know, this is not
you know, an international community. This is just this is personal,
is what he's saying. With the non international military thing
and above this is wild man. This is this is

(46:10):
I mean, we we accuse the West and countries such
as the United States and UK and France and others
of being aggressor and Israel course, but this is this
is literally in your face. This is like, ha, we're
just gonna We're just gonna set up shop here. And
now here's some fifty two bombers too, and this and
like what the f are we doing? This? This is

(46:31):
more This is far more concerning than the threat of
like nuclear This is like actual hot war troops, boots
and people shooting each other over what like if you
expect that I expect some damn evidence. I want some hot,
smoking gun evidence that this is all what you say
it is and that we need to do this to say,

(46:51):
once we do this, then the drugs go away and
everybody lives happy and free. What is this? This is
this is crazy. This is crazy. This needs to stop, period,
full stop.

Speaker 1 (47:02):
They don't even arrest the people that deal Fenton all.
They don't even arrest the people that sell that poison
to Americans. Okay, so hmmm, let's see some reverse algebra here.
If they're not, if they're not arresting and jailing the

(47:24):
weirdos that are selling this to the weirdos that do it,
why not start there? Why are we starting in another
in international waters outside of another country and this non
international conflict thing. You're right, that's just their way of saying,
no one else supports this but us, and we don't

(47:46):
give an f right. No one else is backing us
on this, but we're gonna blow up your boats. We
may kill some fishermen in the in the fog of war,
but trust us, those fishermen are deafly hanging with narco terrorists.

Speaker 2 (48:02):
Okay, trust is not going to end well.

Speaker 1 (48:06):
No trust is I got news for him. Trust is
running thin in this country, and there's not a whole
lot of it going around internationally either. So yeah, the
trust the plan thing, I don't know if that's gonna
sprout wings and fly. I just don't.

Speaker 2 (48:25):
Gold Swacky.

Speaker 1 (48:29):
Daniel.

Speaker 2 (48:31):
So many times we're like, we're getting involved in these
foreign conflicts on behalf of other countries. But if this,
it seems, well, maybe that's what we're missing. Maybe none
of this is of the board. Maybe this absolutely has
nothing to do with resources. Maybe this has nothing to
do with Narco stuff. Maybe maybe we're just guilty of
doing the same thing that we've always done. Hasher Do

(48:53):
you think there might be another plot line behind the scenes?
Is there something else going on?

Speaker 1 (48:58):
Oh yeah, yeah, Basically anytime we're being shown something like this, yeah,
there's something else going on in the background that is
far more odious. I would definitely bet on it.

Speaker 2 (49:12):
Well, I can't wait for somebody to do a deep
dive into that one. Nudge nudge, wink wink, or I
hope you're out there somewhere.

Speaker 1 (49:18):
Anyway, Elvis says, if we're going to war with Venezuela
to get the oil, then I want my two million
dividend check for doing so, Yeah, there you go, There
you go. If we're just going to go in there
and steal oil and tell everybody it's about saving Americans
from fetti, and no Americans believe it. Yeah, time to

(49:40):
cut some checks. Guys.

Speaker 2 (49:42):
Well I figured it out. I finally figured it out.
I got it. Tell me what you think about this one.
So we've seen how protracted and long warn drawn out
that these conflicts are at modern times, approximately three to
four years at least. Right, if we are just now
entering into a conflict with them as wal, what are
the odds that's going to be all nice and neatly

(50:02):
wrapped up in time for the elections?

Speaker 1 (50:06):
Mmmmm mm hmmm.

Speaker 2 (50:08):
Hmmm, because maybe there's a slight chance it wouldn't be.
And you know, if our country is engaged in some
sort of like if we are literally at war, does
anyone know what happened? How do the elections go in
America when we are literally at war? How does that work?

Speaker 1 (50:28):
Well, sometimes they'll make an argument to suspend them. That
could be a thing.

Speaker 2 (50:33):
You don't say, Well, I'm just just a weird wild
just a strange thought. I know, I get these weird,
strange thoughts on Sunday mornings.

Speaker 1 (50:42):
This guy in the in the destroyed White House too.
He seems to be interested in a third term somehow,
and everybody's kind of just laughed it off. But hmm,
maybe that's a route.

Speaker 2 (50:53):
Or you know, an extended term for his immediate successor
for if something were to happen and you know, a
satellite falls from the sky and crushes him or something,
you know you never.

Speaker 1 (51:03):
Know, yeah, yeah, or you know, a chunk of the
White House, you know, just clos up. Did anybody crack
that thing open yet? And look for tech? Here's one
from Terry. Maybe if Maduro would pledge love in allegiance
to Israel.

Speaker 2 (51:26):
Well he hasn't done that. Does he condemn from US?

Speaker 1 (51:30):
I don't know. I don't think so.

Speaker 2 (51:33):
I know, apparently it's quite the opposite.

Speaker 1 (51:35):
Yeah, I don't think so. I haven't seen him at
the wall wailing. I haven't seen the small hat, so yeah,
I don't know. They even got Kanye to apologize at
this point. So yeah, Maduro might go the way of Kanye.

(51:56):
If you want to avoid this, I hate to say it. Gosh,
Well let's see here. So we brought up that nation.
Here's something out of Al Jazeera. One of our listeners
sent us Israel's focus on political drama rather than Palestinian

(52:20):
rape victim. Uh oh, are we supposed to say grape
instead of that word on the YouTube's I don't really know.
I see a lot of people saying that, but I'm
not going to do that because I'm simply looking at
a news article here. Pretty sure we're allowed to look
at news articles on the platform right right alphabet. The
revelation last week by Israel's top military lawyer, Major General

(52:44):
Yaffit Tomer You'r Shalami, that she leaked the footage of
a gang rape of a Palestinian detainee at the said
ten teamman military detention center last year, has shaken the
country's political and media establishment. Prime Minister Netanyahu, whose leadership

(53:04):
of the genocidal war on Gaza has drawn global condemnation,
called the leak quote perhaps the most severe public relations
attack that the state of Israel has experienced. Okay, so
leaked footage of a terrible assault like that on a detainee,

(53:28):
in his estimation, is a public relations attack. Ruckus.

Speaker 2 (53:35):
It was incredibly anti stemitic of that lady and she's
a trader to her country for leaking that video. Wow,
it's pretty wild.

Speaker 1 (53:46):
The attack was so brutal that the man was admitted
to the hospital with what the Israeli Daily Harets revealed
was a ruptured bowel. I don't even want to go
through you're going to have to read the rest of that.
We'll just stop that one right there.

Speaker 2 (54:02):
That is uh, Now, this whole this whole story always
makes me uncomfortable. It's terrible. I mean, it's just it's
just god awful. It's it's just this.

Speaker 1 (54:11):
Is even worse than that one time when former Vice
President Dick Cheney shot his friend in the face with
a shotgun and then his friend had to apologize for
the harsh treatment that Cheney got when the story broke.

Speaker 2 (54:29):
That would be like getting this victim in this case,
in this story to apologize for harming the broomstick.

Speaker 1 (54:35):
Right, Yeah, I think they might do that. I mean,
it kind of sounds like, you know that that may
be what happens to that poor person.

Speaker 2 (54:42):
Ridiculous.

Speaker 1 (54:43):
Uh yeah, yeah.

Speaker 2 (54:47):
It did I or did I not? Now I'm not
I'm not saying this. I'm just asking a question. And
maybe I saw something about how these people involved. Maybe
it wasn't the people involved with this particular grape. It
might have. And the other one that we seen videos
of them doing it to a female prisoner or whatever,
but they got like awards and stuff, like they got
praised and promotions. Did I see some stories like that?

Speaker 1 (55:12):
Yeah? Yeah, yeah, that's awful too. No, it's totally crazy.
Oh man, Okay, so yeah, that story is frustrating. That
one makes me feel uncomfortable as well. I'm sure it
makes a lot of you feel uncomfortable out there also

(55:33):
to know that your governments and your tax dollars are
supporting that, and that this government has its such a foothold.

Speaker 2 (55:44):
Well it's okay, Husher, because I'm a Christian in America,
and so it's totally okay. God works in mysterious ways
and I support that, just like I support Lindsay Graham anyway.

Speaker 1 (55:57):
Yeah, no bad, yeah, yeah yeah yeah.

Speaker 2 (56:03):
Evil deeds by human beings are still evil deeds by
human beings. Okay, I don't know who needs to hear that.

Speaker 1 (56:09):
Right, We'll just leave that right there for whoever needs
to hear it. Okay, let's look at this one up
at twenty first century wire dot com. You can go
check this out at the website again through Global Affairs here.
From Khartoum to Tel Aviv, Israel's fingerprints in Sudan's genocide.

(56:32):
Oh my goodness, the G word but applied in another country,
say it isn't So maybe someone didn't know. As Sudan
collapses into one of the deadliest humanitarian crises of the century,
international attention is once again going to Darfur, where entire
communities are being wiped out in what the United States

(56:53):
has now formally recognized as a genocide. Oh, we can
recognize these things when they happen. Interesting. Yet behind the
brutality on the ground lies a quieter, more complex story,
one that links Khartom to Tel Aviv, Darfur to the
Red Sea, and exposes how Israel's strategic ambitions in East
Africa may have intertwined with the bloodshed. This is a

(57:18):
really interesting article, Ruckus. I don't want to get into
all of the details, because there are a lot of
details in there. But that's one of the things we
love about twenty first century Wire Global Affairs. All the
people we work with over here, we get a lot
of detail when it comes to these things. But Basically,
Israel's interest in Sudan has been around since the nineteen seventies,

(57:42):
and the country has figured prominently in Israeli defense strategy
as a gateway to East Africa, a buffer to Iranian influence,
and a potential security corridor along the Red Sea. So
you know, it's a strategic location. And it seems like
Trump has taken an interest in some of these places

(58:04):
too lately. How about that? Is that that must just
be a coincidence, right, Well.

Speaker 2 (58:09):
I mean, he's just making America great again. So I
trust I trust the plan or sorry, they don't say that.
They say trust trust in President Trump. That's what it is.
They said, don't listen to the Pannikins. Trust in President Trump.
Promises made, promises delivered, YadA, YadA, YadA, a bunch of platitudes,

(58:30):
not even platitudes, just straight up lives and making it
sound like, man, it's it's it's an inversion. It's so
it's so satanic. It's just a giant satanic inversion. That's
the only way I can see it anymore. Yeah, yeah, sorry,
And that's not me, that's them. They did this to me,
Like I wish I could go back to where it's
like the glasses in the movie. But now I don't

(58:52):
even need the glasses anymore. I just want to see
everything normal again. Why can't I see everything normal again?

Speaker 1 (58:58):
Because man, you took it. You took not only did
you have the glasses, but you took that red pill too,
and you can't go back.

Speaker 2 (59:04):
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pillar?

Speaker 1 (59:07):
Huh? The steak tastes so good when you take the
blue one. Yes, So yeah, Sudan, that's that's pretty interesting.
There's there's a long history of this stuff. I'm getting
spun up on it, largely from this article here. In
the sixties, the late sixties through the mid eighties, Sudan

(59:30):
secretly cooperated with Israel to airlift Ethiopian Jews through Sudanese
territory in what was called Operation Moses and Operation Joshua.
But that relationship apparently collapsed in nineteen eighty nine. So yeah,

(59:51):
Sudan sided with Iran and Hamas at the time. So
in the decades that follow you see attacks, convoys being destroyed,
you see drone strikes in Port Sudan targeting arms smugglers.
So they say, is that sounds similar to what's going
on in Venezuela. Oh we got you know, narco terrorists,

(01:00:13):
Oh we got arms smugglers, drone strike them. And then
there was a bombing in Khartoum at a arms factory
which was reportedly storing Iranian munitions. So you can see
how this area is you know, important, and uh yeah,
there's all kind of stuff brewing over there in Africa

(01:00:38):
and all over the place. And it's isn't it weird
that we see Israel's hands in a lot of these
you know, little sub conflicts, not not the big ones
that we hear about in Western media.

Speaker 2 (01:00:50):
Isn't that weird?

Speaker 1 (01:00:52):
Very weird?

Speaker 2 (01:00:53):
Yeah, just a coincidence. So mind you those.

Speaker 1 (01:00:57):
Those shadows of Zion. Today's show is called Shots of Zions,
so that would be a great example of that shadow
that can be cast by this small country. So Dick
Cheney's dead, you know, we mentioned him briefly, but I
guess we should say he has left the building. Uh,
he's hanging out with Brazinski and many others. So, uh,

(01:01:23):
I don't know a lot of people celebrating. Some people celebrating.
I saw a lot of comments where people are like, hey,
I don't normally celebrate the dead, or you know, celebrate
when someone dies. But this guy, this guy might be
an exception for some people out there from what I
have seen on the.

Speaker 2 (01:01:39):
Social Let's let's be real and honest though, I mean,
is the world technically a better place without him? Has
anything changed the Nah? It doesn't matter. Unfortunately. Yeah, it's
certainly not any worse. But I don't know if we
can even argue if it's even any better. I mean,
I mean, when's the last team anybody even heard heard

(01:02:00):
about that guy, talked about that guy, or nothing even
cross their mind. When's the last time before he passed away?

Speaker 1 (01:02:07):
Well, I think people are thinking about his daughter now,
Liz Cheney, which brings up the whole other thing. Like
we see some of these you know, legendary elite want
to be gohole people leave the planet, But what do
they do? I mean even some of them don't even
leave the planet. I mean, look at George Soros. We've
got his son out there on X this week, congratulating

(01:02:29):
the new New York mayor. You know, we've got Liz
Cheney hanging around. We've got you know, Brazinski's daughter hanging around.
We've got you know, and it's like all these none
of these people go away, They just leave their wretched
spawn laying around where they left off.

Speaker 2 (01:02:49):
It's because they're biblical people and they believe in God's
commandment to be fruitful and multiplying.

Speaker 1 (01:02:55):
Yeah, and that your stuff is theirs because their book sets.

Speaker 2 (01:03:00):
Oh wow, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:03:03):
Oh there, Okay, someone answered your question. Let's see. Uh
the last uh comments are coming in so fast I
can't even click it. Come on, I can't come on,
stop coming.

Speaker 2 (01:03:14):
Just endorse kamala. I know, I know. He said that
the most important like that. He was one of the
people literally saying that Donald Trump becoming president a second
time was like an existential threat. He was literally hitler.
He was going to do a bunch of fascist stuff,
start a bunch of new wars. Oh well, anyway.

Speaker 1 (01:03:31):
Yes, Bart says he's gone to see Henry Kissinger. Uh
huh uh huh uh, Terry, I'm glad we have family
dynasties to govern us, right. What would we do, Terry
without the family dynasties to treat us like the useless
eaters and cattle that we are. I mean, gosh, how
would get.

Speaker 2 (01:03:51):
Out a monarchy out here?

Speaker 1 (01:03:55):
Oh no, don't, Terry, don't President Chelsea. No please? Okay, yep,
there's another great example. We got Clinton wretched spawn rolling around.
You know that one's going to ping pong back into
DC at some point here.

Speaker 2 (01:04:10):
So, yes, I forget on the US presidents I think,
except one was found to be related yeah to the
Queen of England, right.

Speaker 1 (01:04:20):
Yeah, yeah, sounds familiar. I'd never really saw the receipts
on that claim. I've seen some twelve.

Speaker 2 (01:04:27):
Year old girl who figured this out for like a
science fair school. Yeah, that's a known fact.

Speaker 1 (01:04:32):
Yeah, I'm still trying to figure out why she's so
much smarter than me. But I mean I don't doubt
her outcome. Neo CON's come out of conveyor belts. I
love that.

Speaker 2 (01:04:46):
Off of an assembly line in Dearborn, Michigan.

Speaker 1 (01:04:48):
Out and am I So we should be happy with
our twenty dollars tuna sandwiches. Yes, one of the few
things in life we don't have to rent. They are overpriced,
but you know you can't really rent the tuna sand
so maybe we will just own nothing and be happy.

Speaker 2 (01:05:04):
Right, Well, until we get to that point. They certainly
want everybody to go ahead and own something now and
you can go ahead and pay for it later. That
that phenomenon just keeps getting crazier by the day, and
we're going to see a lot more of that as
times get tougher here. Even though, like we're in a
great economy here. According to the President, he always waves

(01:05:24):
his Jedi fingers like everything's great, everything's fine, everything's wonderful,
and the like, can we see some numbers? All well,
you know, the government's shut down. Once we're open again,
those silly Democrats, if they can just kill this filibuster,
we'll look at some numbers and you'll see the economy
is doing great. Thanksgiving, according to Walmart, is going to
be cheaper this year than last year. So that's fantastic news, everybody.

Speaker 1 (01:05:49):
Yeah, wonderful, Everything's gonna be great. Okay, So let's see here,
let's see what else do we got. Oh gosh, I've
got requests to play some Mark Levin clips. Uh Whitebird
if you sat brutal. Yeah, if you have one in

(01:06:12):
particular you want me to play, send it to me.
Maybe I will if I see it come through. I know,
I've got so many like pieces of footage like that,
Like I've got one of Randy Fine here talking and
it's just like, ah, some of these people are so insane.
I don't even know what to do with them. They
just love that shadow, right, love that shadow of Zion.

(01:06:36):
RFK Junior thinks he got the brain worm from a
tuna sandwich from longtime listener. So there was some uh
we were talking about the ozimpic guy on on boiler
Room Ruckus. Uh so so this guy he had a
medical event in the Oval office? Am I is that

(01:06:57):
what happened there? This guy basically collapse in the Oval
office and Trump just stood there while everybody was trying
to figure out if this guy was okay.

Speaker 2 (01:07:08):
Uh yeah, Actually I've not even followed up with that.
I don't know if the guy is okay. That's the
one part of the story that I'm like unsure of.
I'm like that that guy is he okay? What happened
after that? But yeah, there's a link for you with
the good old Levin by the way, But the guy
was he was from Novo nor disc is that it's

(01:07:33):
the company that that makes that makes that stuff, right?

Speaker 1 (01:07:37):
I believe that's it.

Speaker 2 (01:07:39):
Don't they make ozempic. I'm pretty sure? Yeah, Novo nor Disk.
That was the name of the company. So the guy
who was he's not the CEO, he's just he's he's
one of the uh what do you call those people.
He's a corporate guy, I remember, but he's definitely not
he's not. Yeah, there you go. I think he was

(01:08:00):
just on the board member. But the dude passed out
inside the buildal office. It was after a big one
thing where Trump had done some sort of executive order.
The Trump made an announcement about these weight loss drugs,
saying that he was going to force them to lower
the costs and make it more affordable for Americans, and

(01:08:22):
him and the Mahaw crowd and R. K Junior running
around like, oh, yes, this is the answer to America's
obesity epidemic, as if you know, you know, changing your
diet and your lifestyle and eating healthier and working out
all that stuff. No, no, we're just going to go
ahead and give you the ozepic. And and we've tracked
on the boiler room and in other places. Hesher about

(01:08:42):
the dangers there. It's it's not a safe product. What
a shock. And this yet again, by the way, it's
a repurposed product. Anyways, But Yeah, the dude passed out.
It was a They were calling this, uh, the g
l P dash one event, because that's what these types
of drugs are called, the ones like ozempic. There's a
bunch of them. The way it works. The guy's name

(01:09:03):
is Gordon Findlay. He passed out on Thursday, and right
there rf K Junior, doctor Mamette oz were talking, did
a little speech, and then Trump had signed a pace
paper or whatever, and then somebody else was talking and
then the dude just weaking passes out and everybody is
on the dude. Everybody's like ah, rf K Junior, and

(01:09:24):
everybody runs out of the camera and Trump just like
he's standing behind the desk and he just goes like this,
he's just watching the whole thing happen, and he just
turns back like you, just stands there casually, just in
time for somebody to snap a picture of him just
standing there looking at the camera for the picture while
all the chaos is happening behind him. It's an amazing,

(01:09:44):
amazing image. It's pretty wild.

Speaker 1 (01:09:48):
Yeah. One of my favorite comments from a listener here
watching RFK Junior dip out stage left. As soon as
that dude started falling over and Trump just standing there
facing the cameras like he shit his pants. Oh brutal brutality.

Speaker 2 (01:10:03):
What it looked like there you go. Actually, to me,
that was Trump's moment, very equivalent to Biden watching the
firework show and everybody's dancing and clapping their hands around him,
and he's just like remember that, Yeah, yeah, there is.
This is Trump's moment like that.

Speaker 1 (01:10:24):
The United States of octogenarian politicians. Here we are, but.

Speaker 2 (01:10:29):
He's gonna make it for a third term.

Speaker 1 (01:10:31):
Everybody's yeah. RFK Junior left the building. He sure did,
and we showed. I won't replay them here, but go
watch this week's boiler Room. We did it on Friday night.
You can see clips on there that we pulled out
from the archives where RFKJ was being pretty skeptical about

(01:10:55):
GLP dash one drugs and I'm not hearing the uh.
I told you so, it's the vindications. I'm not hearing
the uh. You know, mister Trump, I'm gonna have to
resign because you just signed an EO that goes against
making America healthy again. I mean, I could go on,
I could go on.

Speaker 2 (01:11:14):
This administration is just rank with these examples. What what
is this word? It starts with an H and ends
with a lot of hypocrisy. Oh, I'm going with hypocrisy.
Will that work?

Speaker 4 (01:11:24):
Like?

Speaker 2 (01:11:24):
Who's this dude who's injury? I guess he's in charge
of the FBI or he thinks he is Cat Cash
Cat Cat cat Cash paddle. How do you say this
guy's name cash?

Speaker 1 (01:11:35):
I think his first name is Cashel. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:11:38):
No, there's there's some interesting video of that guy from
not that long ago.

Speaker 6 (01:11:41):
Word.

Speaker 2 (01:11:41):
He was running around condemning the former FBI director Christopher
Ray for, you know, unfairly on wielding his powers, of
using his power flying around on his personal jet when
he probably shouldn't have been doing that. In fact, he
said that that was a big no no. Cash Bettel
said that, and then interestingly enough, cash Betto went ahead

(01:12:02):
and did the exact same thing, and now he's in
hot water for misappropriating use of his private jet to
go jet sit and hang out with his girlfriend, who
is a huge country sensation here in America. In case
you didn't know, nobody's ever really heard of her. She
may or may not be I six or a handler

(01:12:22):
or something like that. But if you can't say that
though she might sue you.

Speaker 1 (01:12:26):
It's I believe right, she's there.

Speaker 2 (01:12:29):
You go, I said, I six, what was tomato? Tomato
massade cia. They're all the same, right, But yeah, no, yeah,
he's in big trouble. But again, these people all do
these are guilty of doing all of the things that
they were condemning and saying, oh, this is terrible and
we're not going to do that, this and that, and
here we are, and I'm just like, man, how many

(01:12:51):
times does your favorite politician, your flavor, your brand, your color,
your this letter between parentheses next to the person's name.
How many times do you need to get before you
just stop falling for this crap? People, I'm done with it, clearly.
I think you're done with it. Hasher So many of
our friends and colleagues are so done with it. It
makes me wonder if that's not the ultimate plan, if

(01:13:13):
they really just want everybody to be so done with it,
so they're like, yeah, I don't even care. You want
to go ahead and turn the government over to AI, eh, whatever,
at least it's not this other thing, because we're so
tired of it. We're so tired of this other thing,
aren't you.

Speaker 1 (01:13:27):
Yeah, the news cycle and political identity, politic fatigue is
become so real. And now the whole like fake and
gay fatigue has become so real. There's the black pilling
is so strong, and it does dare I say, it

(01:13:49):
does seem like people that are the most content are
those that are completely unplugged. Man so, and I'm afraid
that might be the vast majority of Westerners that has changed,
and that is changing. There's a lot of people with
new and or renewed interests in current events, geopolitics, that

(01:14:15):
kind of stuff, authoritarianism. But you know, we're so far
into the post truth world now that you know, if
you just woke up in twenty twenty, good, thank you,
glad to have you here. But you may be too late.
We may all be too late. This whole idea of like,

(01:14:36):
you know, an information warfare that the population can actually
come out on the top of is starting to look
like a non starter to me. Oh yeah, yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:14:52):
If I had the means and the ways and to travel,
I basically if I wasn't to go over the ocean
because of my shark fear, I would probably be an
ex patriot. I would probably get my ass out of
this country. At this stage, that's how far gone they've
taken me. Sure, and I you know, I'm seventeen seventy six, baby,

(01:15:13):
nineteen seventy six, the bi centennial, Baby all for it.
I'm all for America. I still believe in what this
country was founded on. But it's gone. They destroyed it.
Where is it? There's I don't see any hope left
right for when where they're taking us. I don't think
I want to be here when all of this finally
ultimately goes down. This is not where I want to
make my last stand. I think there are other places

(01:15:35):
that I might be happier, just you know, living out
the last of my days. But I don't think this
is it anymore.

Speaker 1 (01:15:40):
Unfortunately, Maybe one of those Narco states. Maybe we should
move to Venezuela.

Speaker 2 (01:15:45):
I'll get myself a nice little fisherman boat and go
fishing and maybe one day i'll poof. There goes Ruckus.

Speaker 1 (01:15:54):
Fun to watch, terrifying to live. Yeah, there you go. Yeah, Okay,
well you asked for it, so you're gonna get it.
Let's see what kind of unhinged madness we can get
from Mark Levin this week. What do we got going here?

Speaker 7 (01:16:15):
And I just want the anti American, anti Israel, anti
West crowd. To understand something, you're gonna have to come
through me and millions of people just like me, and
you're not gonna make it. You think your stupid little

(01:16:37):
podcast or your stupid little subscription program, or your little
TV show or maybe you have a little radio show
is going to change the world, Like hell, it is
not if I and everybody else have something to say
about it.

Speaker 1 (01:16:53):
Okay, your little TV show, your little video show, you
gotta go through Mark Levin and yeah, bear his whiny
nasal accent.

Speaker 2 (01:17:09):
Not just any podcast, not just any little subscription program,
a stupid little podcast, stupid little, stupid little subscription program.

Speaker 1 (01:17:18):
Stupid little subscription program. What do you think he's talking about?
Is I mean, I'm pretty sure he doesn't give a
crap about us. Is he talking about Candace Owens? Is
he talking about Tucker Carlson? Is he talking about maybe
even Joe Rogan? I mean, sorry, Mark, I think Candace
just ended up the number one podcaster in the world

(01:17:41):
writing the tsunami of disinformation that is available to analyze
in the Charlie Kirk event. So yeah, that silly little podcast,
if that is one of the ones you're referring to.
Mark has tens of millions more viewers than you're ever
gonna get. So you know, I don't know who you

(01:18:04):
think is going to be having to come through you
or what you think you're gonna do. Are you gonna
I mean, I think Candice Owens actually did just rail
right through him, considering she's now the number one podcaster,
So yeah, she just went through you, Mark, She just
literally went through you, like like the sphere of destiny here.

Speaker 2 (01:18:29):
Probably lessn't talking to her. Clearly she does not have
a stupid little podcast, right, She's she's a pretty big name,
pretty big face. And you know, we've seen a lot
of these big names and big faces, and we've been questioning, oh,
how are these people allowed to do what they do?
And what's this thing over here? What's this phenomenon with
this this fantasy what had just happened there with you

(01:18:51):
Yay Kanye and Alex Jones? Well, this phenomenon with the
Tucker Cross, with all of the things, right, all of
the things, and until somebody can me otherwise, I don't
know these people personally. I don't know if I can
necessarily trust them. We've seen some of these people appear
to start out a little bit smaller and than just
like shoot up to super stardom level like me and

(01:19:12):
Carroll kind of phenomenon. Not just him. This has happened
with a handful of other people, right. I don't think
that that those are the people that he's talking to.
I really think he's honestly, I think that was a
shot directly at people like us. I really do could
be I took it quite personally. Excuse me, mister Levin,

(01:19:33):
I have a stupid little podcast. I just said something
right now on a little TV show or maybe this
little radio show, depending on how you're watching or listening
to it, that could be considered anti American, could be
considered anti Israel, end or anti West. So do I
need to go through you? Are you threatening me? Are

(01:19:54):
you threatening me?

Speaker 1 (01:19:55):
Are you threaten me?

Speaker 2 (01:19:57):
Do I need TP for my bunghole? Is that a size?
How does one defend himself about Mark Leman? I don't know.
I just I really there was something very triggering about that.
I think it was done intentionally. The guy was seriously unhinged.
I mean there was also something off about him. Either
he was on some sort of substance or somebody flicked
the switch. There was something off about the guy. He's

(01:20:17):
already off anyways, don't get me wrong, but this was different.
There was something off about the way his pace, his breathing, everything.
It was very strange, very very odd. And again, I
think there was something more to this than him referring
to Candice Owens or Tucker Carlson. I think this is
one of those instances where they're talking to us, the

(01:20:37):
little guys, to people who practice and exercise their First
Amendment rights and freedoms and get up on their soapboxes
in the public square, which these days happened to be
social media X Facebook doing stupid little podcasts, streaming content creators.
Facebook and YouTube wants us all to be content creators, right, hasher?
I mean, so, you know, what are you saying, like, Oh,

(01:20:59):
that's wholly okay, as long as you're all on board
with the narrative. Well that's fine. If we're all going
to have to be on board the narrative, I expect
a seven thousand dollars check.

Speaker 1 (01:21:09):
I have not seen the checks yet. Looks like Basil
Valentine's about to join us here. Let me bring him
on before I play this next clip. We're going to
go to US Congressman from Florida, Representative Randy Fine next.
But let me welcome Basil Valentine to the Sunday Wire. Basil, Hello, welcome.

Speaker 4 (01:21:27):
Good afternoon, gentlemen. Great to see you, and hello to
everyone all around the world. Yeah, just before you do quickly.
Mark Levin was absolutely hysterical. You know, he's not physically
the most attractive individuals at the best of times. But
the way he exploded with rage at the Republican Jewish
Convention really betrayed an intolerance of mindset. That was what

(01:21:53):
he came across as unhinged, didn't it. You know, he's
been fascinating all week to watch the Tucker Tuentes, Candice,
Ben Shapiro, etc. Wars raging on in the background of
the commentaria. And the simple fact is that Mark Levin

(01:22:15):
does not appeal to anybody outside a tiny constituency of
firstly his own tribe and then those tremendously sympathetic to it. Likewise,
the bloated Randy Fine as well, another deeply unattractive individual,
whereas Nick and certainly Tucker come across as very reasonable, sane,

(01:22:40):
measured far more the sort of people you'd like to
have dinner with than those that are condemning them. And
of course, let's remember too something Nick twenty has pointed
out in the week and has been pointed out about him.
He might have said a few things that people disagree with,
but he hasn't blown the legs of thousands of children.

(01:23:00):
He isn't a wanted war criminal, he isn't a mass murderer.
And yet the Lights, of course are fine and live
in only too happy to make common cause with people that.

Speaker 1 (01:23:13):
Are Yeah, yeah, exactly. Let's let me let me throw
grandy fine up here so people can take a look.

Speaker 4 (01:23:25):
Warning, issue a warning before you see that. You know,
you need a strong stomach even to look at this guy,
let alone listen to him. That's true, public he should
carry a public health warning.

Speaker 1 (01:23:36):
Yeah absolutely.

Speaker 8 (01:23:38):
I am here to fight, and we are in a
time where we need fighters. We need people to go
out and fight. We need people who are not going
to be afraid, because if we stay silent in the
in the face of what is coming not only on
the left, but on our own side as well, our
time in this country could come to an end as well.
Jews have been kicked out of every country we've ever lived,
and it's never been our own fault. And there are

(01:24:00):
people who would like to do the same to us here,
and unfortunately some of them are in our own party.
But I can promise you this, as long as I'm
in Congress, they ain't gonna win. So thank you guys
for having me.

Speaker 1 (01:24:11):
Okay, more promise is made there. Wow.

Speaker 4 (01:24:17):
Yeah. Nick Fuenter's has been calling for Ben Shapiro to
go and live in Israel, saying, you know you don't
belong here. I mean, the divisions are very deep and
very visceral. And of course Nick or Week has been
repeating his mantra of freedom of speech. Christ is king

(01:24:37):
and that's not something that the likes of living Endoors,
of course.

Speaker 1 (01:24:44):
Oddly enough, because they claim to be such, you know,
ardent Christians, but you know, well, you.

Speaker 4 (01:24:50):
Know they you know, this whole Judeo Christian name was
actually only invented less than one hundred years ago. It's
relatively recent phenomena. It sort of came along at the
same time as the Schofield Bible and the invention of
Christian Zionism, this melding the two together. Lots of memes
circulating on the Internet about how Islam actually has more

(01:25:14):
in common with Christianity than Judaism. Does you know both
Islam Islam recognized this Christ as a prophet and says
that he has sended into him not something that Jews
but even in fact in Ben Shapiro is on air
with with Joe Rogan just simply saying that Christ was

(01:25:37):
just another rebel jew you know, of which there were
quite a number at the time, and he got his
comeuppance and that's the end of that, really, you know, Yeah, and.

Speaker 2 (01:25:47):
Real quick, I would like to let people know that
they should check out our friend and colleague over at
Alternate Current Radio, odd Man Out, who has an extended
twenty something part series called Those We Don't Speak Of,
and in particular, his most recent episodes have been addressing.
If you think it's shocking to know that, you know,

(01:26:08):
the Islamic religion has more in common with Christianity than Judaism,
does you would be even probably even more shocked to
learn exactly what has closer commonality with the modern version
of digit or A lot of their teachings and their

(01:26:29):
writings and their beliefs come from some very very shady sources.
We'll just leave it there, but if you'd like to
learn more, I encourage folks to check that out. You
can find that at our website, Alternate Current Radio dot com.
If you just go to one of his most recent episodes,
there's a link in the show notes that will take
you to a list of all the others in the series.
But I encourage folks to check out the Pharisees, the

(01:26:50):
Tall Mood, and the Oral Law I think was the
name of the episode. He'd like three episodes in just
that mini series within his other series. But yeah, you
can learn also or to interesting stuff if you're into it.
But don't just take their word for it when they
run around and say, oh, yeah, no Judeo Christian Bible,
this and now. The beliefs that these people are far,

(01:27:11):
far and removed from what we would think of as
having anything to do with Christianity is crazy absolutely.

Speaker 4 (01:27:17):
I mean, look, you know, the principal tenets of Christianity
include embodying the qualities of Christ, chief amongst which are love, compassion,
and forgiveness. Now those are all qualities that Zionists certainly
explicitly reject. They see compassion as weakness, there's no room

(01:27:38):
for forgiveness, as has been evidenced by the Gaza Holocaust.
So you know how you can claim, on the one
hand to be a Christian and yet at the same
time Embryce and I embrace an ideology that is hell
bent on revenge and total destruction and mass murder is
beyond me. But somehow some people think that they can

(01:28:01):
square the circle because of one or two references to
ann Israel in the Old Testament, of course, which has
nothing whatsoever to do with the settler colonial state in Palestine.
But just to go back to the rowing. This week,
of course, we had the spectacle as well of Kevin Roberts,
the head of the Heritage Foundation, first of all, coming

(01:28:24):
out and describing the attack, particularly on Tucker Carlson, who
is a good friend of Roberts, apparently as being venomous,
and that word, of course was seized upon by the
Zionists as being an anti Semitic trope. I mean, you'd
be allowed to say that any other political group or

(01:28:48):
subgroup or section of the commentariat with venomous, but you
can't use that word to describe the likes of Mark
Levin or Ben Shapiro or Laura Luma. I don't know
why someone could explain that to me, but anyway, He
was then forced to eat crow for days on end
over a week long's worth of apology. There were meetings

(01:29:10):
at the Heritage Foundation which would then lead to the Internet.
He was forced to record a groveling apology for X.
He had to write to the board of the Heritage
Foundation and apologize, grovel on every level and submit. And
of course none of it is good enough. He's still
likely to lose his job and the American so called

(01:29:34):
antisemitism organization pulled its funding from Heritage. Heritage may indeed
completely implode as a result, because in typical witch hunt fashion,
exactly the same as what happened in this country in
the Labor Party a few years ago, if you were
in any way associated with somebody deemed to be an

(01:29:56):
anti c right, then you two are subject to opprobrium
expulsion from whatever organization. It is ostracism by your peers
that happened across the Labor Party. I mean Chris Williamson,
for example, former Labor MP was thrown out of the
party simply for saying that he thought that the party

(01:30:20):
had been too apologetic and that the anti Semitism crisis
had been exaggerated. That became a capital offense. If you
thought that the crisis was manufactured, let alone synthesized in
Tel Aviv, then you know that put you in the crosshairs.
Now it seems simply for talking to Nick Voentez, Tucker

(01:30:42):
Carlson is in the crosshairs. You know, any questioning at
all of the outsized role of Israeli influence on the
US government, that is, that's a no no. And yet
of course it is becoming more widely discussing quite rightly. So,
I mean, we saw that woman I can't remember her

(01:31:03):
name talking to Candae Owens in the week and she said, oh,
the CNN reporter. She said, oh, I've studying the I've
been studying the white nationalist right and for many years.
And you're using the same terms that they are, things
like Zionist occupied government. You know, this is this is terrible.

(01:31:26):
You must you must recant this. How can you possibly
say that? You know? I didn't listen to all of
Candace's response, but it wasn't particularly effective because what she
should really have simply said was, can you name a
single individual either in this administration or the Obama administration

(01:31:46):
or the Biden administration, indeed, any administration over the last
thirty years that included a single individual who would not
have described themselves as a Zionist one, any any undersecretary
of state, any under you know, anyone at all, anyone

(01:32:07):
at all in the let's take the Trump administration, who
would say they're not designing there isn't anyone, no one.
Everybody is a Zionist. Therefore, how can he not say
that it's a Zionist occupied government. Of course it is.
It's self evident. So I mean, it's you know, the
whole thing is getting boiled down to a degree that

(01:32:27):
we've never seen before. The finally some honest conversations taking place.
I don't think MAGA will recover. People are saying MAGA
is dead. I think to a large extent it is.
I think, you know, Twente is coming out against Trump
and saying what a disappointment he is is enormous, And
of course, you know, on other levels, the warmongering continues,

(01:32:49):
isn't it at Pete Hegxith last week, saying that the
Pentagon needs to be on a war footing. He's now
the Secretary of War I thought Trump was supposed to
be a peace president.

Speaker 1 (01:33:00):
Well, certainly isn't feeling very peaceful lately, Vasel. And it's
interesting that the Heritage Foundation has had to take a
stand on this. I mean, I would almost expected them
to remain quiet, but Kevin Roberts, who is their president

(01:33:20):
right had heritage and anyway, he made a comment on
air saying basically, he spent like two and a half
minutes basically saying that, you know, no, we're not going
to distance ourselves from Tucker Carlson. You know, freedom of speech.
And I think a lot of people were a little
bit surprised. You know, the comment string under that video
was pretty spicy. It's got thirty two thousand likes and

(01:33:46):
seven and a half thousand comments on it.

Speaker 4 (01:33:50):
And then he was forced to recant. That's the whole part,
you know. Yeah, you know, I think he's continuing to
sort of down behind Tucker Carlson. But he apparently also
made a video of clips of Nick Fuentes pointing out
the awful things Nick Fuentes has said over the course

(01:34:10):
of the last ten years in a way that was
fairly unscrupulous. It wasn't an accurate representation necessarily of Nick's views.
I've actually been watching a bit more of Nick for
the first time over the last couple of days, and
what he said about black people, for example, and all
the comments to sort of you know, watch alongs. The
response videos by black people to what Nick Fuentes has

(01:34:34):
said about black people have been one hundred percent endorsing,
you know, often with humor, often with a reluctant shrug,
and often with an honesty about the conversation of race,
particularly in the United States, that has never been seen before.
And you know, black commentators like the Cartier family and

(01:34:59):
others saying he's saying the things that we can't say.
That's why he's popular.

Speaker 1 (01:35:05):
Yeah, yeah, it's uh, it's been interesting, man, it was.
The whole saga has been pretty interesting. Actually, you know,
I watched part I watched some clips of Fuentes and
Tucker together, and boy did that make a lot of
people upset that Tucker would even have him on and
that they were sort of able to bury the hatchet,

(01:35:27):
you know, and have their moment. I thought you were
a fed. I thought you were a fed. You know,
that was I found that to be highly entertaining.

Speaker 2 (01:35:33):
Look at look at the way the Independent spun this.
Look at this headline, white supremacist Nick Fuentes pleads with
Tucker Carlson to tone down his anti senitism. Makes this
stuff upon you that's going down that I'm saying that.
Put that in the book. Put that one in the book.

Speaker 1 (01:35:51):
Yeah, that that definitely belongs in the book. No, it's been.
It's been.

Speaker 4 (01:35:56):
You can't be any kind of white identitarian without being
a white supremacist, according to the corporate media. And that's
one of the things that gets under nick skin so much,
and to some extent gets under Tucker's skin as well.

Speaker 1 (01:36:09):
I think, you know, well, yeah, this whole you know,
everybody that disagrees with me is a Nazi thing. Uh.
You know, this is like a holdover from what twenty fifteen,
twenty sixteen, and now that hold that and that was
a thing that used to be cash shade on sort
of people lower down the food chain like us. You know,

(01:36:30):
it wasn't really ever aimed at these monolithic names, you know,
the you know, Candice Tucker, Megan Kelly even getting some
of that shade. And she's about as milk toast as
you could possibly be on this topic, Like I could
I could.

Speaker 4 (01:36:47):
Say she's in arguably the sort of pivot position at
the moment one side, by Shapiro on the other, and
she spoke to both of them at different times last week.
You know that Ben was trying to get her to
denounce Tucker, you know, and everything he stood for, which
you refused to do. But that's that's one of the

(01:37:09):
main tactics on that side, is that if you don't
denounce people you know, out right and unequivocally, then you
too will be canceled. Classic witch hunt.

Speaker 1 (01:37:22):
M hm mm hmmm.

Speaker 2 (01:37:23):
Are we all expected to run around with a list
of all the terrible things that various terrible people have said?
And just like, okay, now, before we begin, I just
want you to know that I don't agree with x
Y's I mean, this is this is getting silly. Why
is it always Oh, it's always just about the one thing,
isn't it? Nothing else matters. It's just got to be
this one one issue, right, Well.

Speaker 4 (01:37:44):
That's right.

Speaker 9 (01:37:44):
I mean.

Speaker 4 (01:37:44):
Kevin Roberts said at the end of his public humiliation
that he had forgotten that the number one job of
the Heritage Foundation is to fill in the blank combat
anti Semitism.

Speaker 1 (01:37:59):
That's Jeers.

Speaker 4 (01:38:01):
That's that's the main job of the Heritage Foundation. Nothing
to do with the constitution freedom of speech.

Speaker 1 (01:38:08):
What an epic, what an epic one eighty I mean,
the Heritage Foundation took so much hatred from the mass
media and from the left in the run up to
Trump two point zero. You know, they had that Project
twenty or Project twenty five or whatever it was called.

Speaker 4 (01:38:26):
That's right, that was Kevin Robertson's brainshown.

Speaker 1 (01:38:29):
And people hated it. People on the left hated it.
They just said, oh, this is the worst thing ever.
These guys are doing all the planning for Donald Trump.
These guys, it's all on these guys. It's like, you know,
if he would have stood his ground, if Heritage would
have stood their ground, I would argue that they might
have actually been able to cross the that rubicon, right,

(01:38:52):
sort of that partisan rubicon, like they might have actually
been able to pull some support from people on the
other side, or at least opened up some conversations and
stuff like that. But no, he went full back pedal,
full the shadows of Zion were too too dark for Heritage.
I suppose to hang in there, because you know, their

(01:39:15):
original take was, hey, you know, freedom of speech, but
not anymore.

Speaker 4 (01:39:19):
I guess what amongst the remedists that's been proposed is
that all the heritage stoppers go to Sada suppers. I
believe that's the term the Jewish supper on a Saturday nights,
and anybody who kind of well, either doesn't want to
go at all, or looks or feel uncomfortable, well, they
can be identified and kicked out. I don't know if

(01:39:40):
you saw that that came up this week.

Speaker 1 (01:39:42):
Yeah, yeah, I did see that. I thought that that
was really bizarre.

Speaker 4 (01:39:49):
You know.

Speaker 1 (01:39:50):
Yeah, that one runs really well in parallel dovetails nicely
with Jimmy Dore's video Zionist run Paramount to blacklist A
List actors. Yes, yep. So now that Paramount is on
by Zionists, they have apparently a list of A List
actors that will not be eligible for acting gigs on

(01:40:14):
their platform, I guess.

Speaker 4 (01:40:16):
On their network.

Speaker 1 (01:40:17):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:40:20):
So I can't say I'm surprised in the slightest, you know,
I mean, to what extent do organizations networks like paramounts
still hold the key to what people want to watch?
You know what I mean? It's sort of like, I'm
sure the actors and producers black listed by paramount in
much the same way as was the case in the

(01:40:41):
nineteen fifties can go and produce their own content. You know,
these people aren't as powerful as they think they are.
They can be bypassed these days quite successfully.

Speaker 1 (01:40:50):
Mm hmmm, yeah, absolutely, Basil. Did you see the interview
with Matt Gates where he was talking about I think
he used the word demoralizing APAC receptions for where donors
would go around and scan politicians like, oh, yeah, they

(01:41:10):
had to wear QR codes on them, like if they
answered all the right questions in the Israeli struggle session.
I guess that's you know, somebody would scan their QR
code and launch them, you know, a few, a few large,
ten large or something.

Speaker 9 (01:41:25):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:41:25):
I mean the whole APAC thing is becoming increasingly toxic
for US politicians. I mean there's a seismic shift underway.
It's a generational shift. You saw it in New York
with the election of Mamdana in spite of you know,
all the usual suspects absolutely screaming at the top of

(01:41:46):
their voices that this must not be allowed to happen.
I mean, I've even seen since his election. You know
stuff online about well, what is a max xodus from
New York City going to like, Because, of course thousands
of people said, ma'm Danny wins, I'm leaving the city.

Speaker 7 (01:42:04):
You know.

Speaker 4 (01:42:05):
That isn't going to happen. Most people will realize that
actually everything is going to stay very largely the same.
There's a limit to what the mayor can do. And
if he opens a few cheap supermarkets and manages to
hold down rent, so what. But of course, the big
lesson for Republicans, and only v Ramaswama, who's running to
become governor of Ohio, seemed to pick up on this,

(01:42:28):
is that ma'm Danni ran a bubble on affordability, on
the fact that for millions of people, the American dream
is stone dead. You work two or three jobs to
keep up with ever rising rent, you don't have any healthcare.
And on top of that, whatever spare money the government
have got, they ship it over to Israel so that

(01:42:51):
they can continue massacring more women and children. That's the
American dream these days, a total nightmare. And Mamdani ran
on something else. Ironically, Therefore, he is unarguably the most
authentically American of all the candidates, in spite of the
fact that everybody was trying to portray the fact he
was a Muslim and an immigrant as meaning that he

(01:43:14):
couldn't possibly understand American values. Quite the opposite. He's really
the embodiment of the American dream compared to the do nothing,
status quo candidacy of Cuomo, who seems to, like most
establishment Democrats, have absolutely no interest in improving the lives
of bordinary Americans. So, you know, the Democrats have got,

(01:43:37):
you know, a struggle for the soul of the party
on their hands over the next couple of years, you know,
first the midterms in the summer, and then next summer,
and then two years after that, of course with the presidency,
because I think if they think they can run another
continuity candidate for president and put up sort of CIA
candidates and continuity candidates around the rest of the country,

(01:44:01):
that you know, they're going to get quite a shock.
There are quite a few people running against those continuity candidates,
and of course the APAC question is one of them.
You get lots of money, you can carpet bomb your
opponent with negative commercials if you take the APAC money.
But at the same time, that looks increasingly like it

(01:44:24):
might be more of a damnation than a blessing.

Speaker 1 (01:44:29):
Figures political a pac money would carpet bombing would be
the metaphor you pick there. But yes, it makes perfect sense. Yeah,
it's a lot.

Speaker 4 (01:44:41):
Of slightly unfortunate that there are sort of awake and
aware forces in both the Republican Party and the Democratic
Party about the insidious influence of Israel, but they're not
able to if I you know, believe it or not.

(01:45:01):
Fuentes in Mamdanie actually have quite a lot in common,
not just their opposition to uh, you know, Zionism, but
also the sort of desire really to create in America
that works for everybody, something that the two parties have
signally failed to achieve over the last thirty five years.

Speaker 1 (01:45:22):
Mm hmmm hmm. Yeah, with great intention, Some might say, Adam,
what's going on with Lindsay Graham? I see you.

Speaker 2 (01:45:31):
Insurded a really well check out the one after that.
Check this other tweet since we're talking about Zohan or
Oran mam Danni.

Speaker 1 (01:45:41):
Oh, yeah, okay, there he is.

Speaker 2 (01:45:44):
Who's that he's playing basketball with?

Speaker 1 (01:45:45):
Oh that's cool, oh, Jilani. The absurdity is palpable al
Jilani and Abdullah i'll Shabani wanted terrorists casually shoot hoops
with the head of the so called anti Isis coalition.
It's a perfect snapshot of the reality of the Syrian

(01:46:06):
quote unquote blessed revolution. Yeah, so there you go now.

Speaker 2 (01:46:13):
The other one, though, is certainly an example of where
our politicians America first thinking politicians. This is where their
head's at. This an that's an actual tweet from Lindsey Graham.
You can't make this up, Lindsay Graham says.

Speaker 1 (01:46:31):
It is my understanding. Ireland is about to make a
motion to the European body governing Soccer to ban Israel
from playing in European soccer tournaments. Ireland and others would
be punishing the Jewish people eighty years after the Holocaust
because they chose to fight back against terrorist groups who
wish to kill all the Jews. Hamas started this war.
Hamas has put civilians at risk to continue this war,

(01:46:52):
and Hamas is a radical Islamic abough they must be
defeated military if these attacks against Israel continue, I will
do everything in my power to make those who participate
in this effort to marginalize Israel in sports and elsewhere,
pay a heavy price when it comes to access to
the American economy. Oh big words.

Speaker 2 (01:47:10):
From at least to use the word America in there once.
That was fun. Yeah, Clint, Clint Russell. I caught this
because Clint Russell on X shared this post and he
said an American senator is threatening our European allies because
they might ban Israeli soccer team from European tournaments. Just

(01:47:32):
take a minute and read that again. Literally, none of
it has anything to do with America, nor is it
even important at all. And then he says one hundred
percent owned by Israel. Period.

Speaker 4 (01:47:46):
Yeah. Well, the new presidents of Ireland is you know,
Connolly is very sharp, critical critic of Israel. And although
people say largely ceremonial post, it does carry quite a
lot of influence. So you know, it'll be interesting to
see how she is greeted in the White House. Usually

(01:48:08):
Irish presidents have warmly received given the large Irish diaspora
in the United States. I wonder whether she'll get the
state visit treatment or not. But to Lindsey Graham, Tucker's
got him in his crosshairs. He interviewed the leading candidates
running against Graham for the Republican nomination. The primary is

(01:48:32):
in June next year. A real America first Trump stalwart
who has served in the first Trump administration, Brian Dance.
I think his name is d Ans, correct me if
I'm wrong, if you want to look that one up.
He gave him a full interview last week, and they
really really unloaded on the unfortunate seventy year old. He

(01:48:58):
is now looking for another six years Lindsey Graham. Tucker
said that every time he meets him, he's charming and funny,
but always drunk, and of course that his politics are
absolutely in the toilet these days. The other fellow came
across quite well, and he's running hard because you know,

(01:49:21):
whoever becomes the Republican nominee, you will almost certainly win
the seat there in South Carolina.

Speaker 1 (01:49:27):
Yeah, here's something interesting. Paul Dan's a Republican best known sorry.

Speaker 4 (01:49:36):
Yeah, I'm just saying that's him.

Speaker 1 (01:49:37):
Yeah, okay, so best known for leading Project twenty twenty five,
the Heritage Foundation's Presidential Transition project. So I think we
already know what his stance is going to be. If
he's hanging in there with heritage I suppose, well.

Speaker 4 (01:49:53):
No, I mean he was. He's not in Israel firsta.

Speaker 1 (01:49:56):
But it that way, okay, all right, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:49:59):
Yeah, yeah, no, he's He's from the genuine, you know,
original Heritage Foundation Ethos. So I mean that's one of
the reasons why he's running against Lindsay So okay, yeah,
he got he got on, he got on well with Tucker.

Speaker 1 (01:50:14):
All right.

Speaker 2 (01:50:15):
Interesting, Well, it doesn't get much lumped in with that
white supremacist Nick Fuentis label thing right, Yes.

Speaker 4 (01:50:24):
I wouldn't go I wouldn't call Paul Dan's an anti
Zionist by any stretch of the imagination. But he's not
as fanatical about the about the colony as as his opponent,
for example.

Speaker 1 (01:50:36):
Mm hmmm, yeah, so interesting guy there. Definitely I'm going
to be reading up a little bit more on him.
But you can't do much worse than Lindsey Graham. I mean, honestly, like,
do we really need to like read anything to wonder
if someone's better than Lindsey Graham? Probably not.

Speaker 4 (01:50:55):
No, I mean, you know what a what a dreadful
human being Tucker said, he's a physical coward, you know
as well. He really laid into him. See it was
this Corus skating attack and Paul Dan's has Tucker's official endorsement, which,
of course Donald Trump has endorsed Lindsay Graham, but that

(01:51:15):
shows where the battle lines are drawn these days.

Speaker 2 (01:51:19):
He's only endorsed him so far. I mean, the people
that he truly is buddies with, he's let them into
his close inner circle. But I guess in order to
become part of the current administration, you need to have
served at least a partial stint on Fox News or
something like that.

Speaker 4 (01:51:33):
Right. Well, you know, Lindsay was one of the original
never Trump faction back in twenty fifteen, and then he
saw which way the wind was blowing and decided to
jump into bed with Donald Trump instead, because otherwise he
would find himself marginalized and possibly losing his own seat.
So he's gone from being you know, an opponent to

(01:51:58):
Trump's fanboy, really, you know, really sort of virtually worshiping
the ground Donald walks on in a rather mawkish one
where some people would even say curiously homo erotic kind
of way, you.

Speaker 2 (01:52:14):
Know, out of curiosity. Basil, do you remember or know
why Lindsay Graham was so dead set against Trump becoming president.

Speaker 4 (01:52:22):
Well, Trump made noises, isn't he back in twenty fifteen
about what a disaster the Iraq War had been? And
that was certainly one of them, because Lindsay was a
big cheerleader, obviously, But why else, please enlighten me?

Speaker 2 (01:52:37):
Cool, just curious.

Speaker 1 (01:52:39):
That's probably it right there. I mean, that's a big one. Okay,
let me just for a moment here, let everybody know
that today at twenty first century wire dot com, the
Sunday screening is called Israeli Settlers in the West Bank,
What's driving their ideology? So it's documentary film before the

(01:53:04):
October seven attacks and the escalation of the Gaza War,
and it investigates the Israeli settlement movement in the West Bank,
one of the most contentious and obstructive forces in the
Israeli Palestinian conflict. So this documentary covers the history of
Israeli settlement since nineteen sixty seven and their role in
preventing a Palestinian state. So I know a lot of

(01:53:26):
you are going to be interested in this one. That's
up on the front page at twenty first century Wire
dot com today, So that would be a good one
to watch after the show if you want to get
into a bit of a deep dive on the whole
settler topic. I don't know if you've seen that one, basil,
but I know that you know a lot about this,
and I know that this film is a couple of

(01:53:49):
years old now, so and I just think about all
the settler activity that's happened since this film came out,
and it's just like, wow, it's hard to fam what's
been going on for so long.

Speaker 4 (01:54:02):
Just this week, Christian village was attacked and burned. You know,
have you seen them torturing the sheep as well? That
happened this week, regularly killing animals, setting fireder cars, doing
absolutely everything they can to make life as difficult as
possible for the Palestinians. It's driven by Jewish supremacism, hatred,

(01:54:26):
and well a sort of really deranged group think of
homicidal psychopapathy. Really, there's no other way to describe it.
So narcissistic. I believe they can do no wrong, the settlers,
that they think they've got the right to steal, kill,
maim anybody that gets in their way. It's, you know,

(01:54:49):
a particularly extreme form of religious fanaticism. And I think
they're the most disgusting people in the world today.

Speaker 2 (01:54:57):
Yeah, strong words, basil.

Speaker 4 (01:55:00):
Well correctly where I'm wrong, I won't.

Speaker 2 (01:55:04):
I can't care. I'm on the exact same page as you,
my friend. The thing is like, okay, okay, since we're
on the topic here, the more egregious thing here in
this case, because there's nothing we can do to change
those people's minds that this is foundationally a part of
their belief right, and part of it has to do
with their propaganda that they're raised into from their country.

(01:55:24):
It is a secular thing, but it's also strongly a
religious thing. They firmly believe that they are God's chosen people.
We understand this. But where it gets particularly egregious and
dangerous on the world stage is when you have massive
powers like the United States of America, the UK and
others who are acting on their behalf by suckering in
through a fake false teaching, a fake false teaching, a

(01:55:49):
false religion, this idea of Christian Zionism. We moved well
beyond the political thing. So it's okay. If these people
want to run around and act like God that they're special, Okay,
let them do that. Whatever we can't change their mind.
But do you really need to drag us in and
convince us to that they're special and that hey, there's
a sideways associated look Judeo Christianism, wave our little Jedi

(01:56:13):
hands and trick all these people into That's where it counts,
and that's where the coord needs to get cut. We're
never going to be able to tackle the idea of
whether that's an argument of religion. But you can prove
on a religious foundational I mean, if you're a Bible
believing Christian, give me ten fifteen minutes and I'll can.
I can show you and it's not in the Bible.

(01:56:35):
It's not real, it doesn't exist. It was created emithin
Air to further the advances of a secular state and
an evil group of people that also are probably not
even religious outside of maybe they believe in Satan or something.
Who knows what these people really truly believe. At the
end of the day. I think they're high level free
Masonic thirty third degree Illuminati types that do weird stuff. Okay.

(01:56:57):
I'm allowed to think that, Okay, but I don't need
to be told that just because I'm a Christian that
I have to support this group of people just because
they think that they're chosen by God, the same God
that I worship. None of this makes any sense, and
they can't even prove it in their Bible. They have
to create so many hoops to jump through and extra
judicial teachings whatever the word is, outside of the Bible,

(01:57:20):
outside of their holy rights to prove this point, whereas you,
as an individual, thinking person, could just read the Bible
from cover to cover and walk away from that with
a clear understanding of what they're talking about when they
talk about Israel in the future versus Israel in the past.
And then you know how that all squares up with
the Israel as a country, because they're all three completely

(01:57:42):
separate identities, you know what I mean? That's just me.

Speaker 4 (01:57:47):
Yeah, no, you're you're right. And you know there's a
reason why Alison Wea called her book about the creation
of the State of Israel, or rather say the organization
If Americans Knew. The book is called against Alberta Judgment,
but the organization she runs is called If Americans New
because Americans are kept deliberately, very consciously ignorant of the

(01:58:12):
historical context, the religious context, as well as the facts
on the ground. Every day of the West Bank, or
as the thieves like to call it, Judea and Samaria,
and you know Israel likes to operate in the dark.
Luis Theroux, who I believe is Jewish, a British documentary filmmaker,

(01:58:33):
made the film about the settlers, and then a couple
of weeks ago he interviewed Bob Villan, who of course
was famous for his performance at Glastonbury Festival this year
where he called for the end to a murderous genocidal organization,
the IDF, and for that was pillaried. And now his

(01:58:58):
chief sponsor has pulled out of his podcast That's Louis
throu and the BBC had been forced to distance themselves
from him and say they have no plans to employ
him in the future, partly because he made that documentary
about the settlers exposing just what an absolutely abysmal well

(01:59:19):
that that word isn't strong enough evil crowd they are.
And then also he dared to talk to Bob Villain
and allow Bob to speak his mind and put the
record straight. Incidentally, Bob just once huge damages from a
media organization. I think it might have been the day
in me at Mail, but correct me if I'm wrong,

(01:59:41):
only last week because they claimed that when he raised
his arms during a concert he was doing a Nazi salute,
but in fact it was a meditation. It was a
sort of bringing down the light meditation and the one
substantial damage. So fair play to Bob. But yeah, we're

(02:00:03):
going back to the West Bank. People don't know about
the daily horrors there. I mean, imagine, if, for example,
the program that saw the attack on the Christian village
last week, the church set on fire and the attack
on the sheet. Imagine if that was the first item
on the CBS Evening News, you know, and the first

(02:00:27):
item on CNN, and all such attacks were reported with
that degree of vigor, well, obviously support for the Zionist
colony would disintegrate very quickly because people would see just
how evil they are. But that isn't the case. You see,
you have to be you have to really follow the subject,

(02:00:48):
you have to know your stuff and really dig around
to find out exactly what horror, what fresh horror there
is in that part of the world every day.

Speaker 1 (02:00:58):
Yeah, fresh horror. Indeed, here's one from about twenty months
ago or so. This was forgive the source here, but
I'll do it anyways, video shows Israeli's filling Palestinian's water
source with concrete.

Speaker 4 (02:01:21):
Oh, when you see that's one of the old libels
poisoning the wells. Yes, right, that apparently is an old
anti Semitic trope. So I'm not sure what that's doing
on screen, But is that AI because they don't do
that kind of thing.

Speaker 1 (02:01:35):
Do Well believe it or not? Bass, This is coming
from Snopes. They will tell you the truth always, right,
That's what Snopes does. They're the fact checkers, and they
say that This video circulated in March of twenty twenty four,
showing Israeli's filling a water well used by Palestinians with
concrete marked as true all right, and their source, Palestinian

(02:01:58):
news outlet quiz Is Network, first posted the footage in
July twenty twenty three. So that's just, you know, one
little peak into what settlerism can bring people.

Speaker 2 (02:02:13):
It's so nice of them. Concrete is good for you
when you drink it. It's kind of like fluorid. Right,
you add some concrete to your.

Speaker 1 (02:02:22):
Wall, you know, it's like dietary fiber is probably good
for you, right.

Speaker 4 (02:02:27):
I mean, you know, just to keep harping on about it.
But it was only last year that the ic C
confirmed its opinion that the occupation and the settlements in
the West Bank are illegal. So really, the entire international
community should be putting unbelievable pressure on Israel to dismantle

(02:02:48):
all the settlements, every single one, and withdraw to the
nineteen sixty seven borders and to end the occupation. But that,
unfortunately simply doesn't happen. Instead, we just get this, you know,
this slow moving status quo, this gradual erosion of Palestinian
light rights and land. Occasionally the odd sort of mildly

(02:03:12):
critical statement from London or Washington or Brussels or whatever,
you know, but nothing that will have any meaningful effect
on the ground at all. And it's you know, it's
one of the it's one of the reasons why people
become so you know, a lot of people are so disillusioned,
so depressed to be honest about that, about the state

(02:03:33):
of the state of the world and that particular part
of the world, especially because you know, we've had over
the last couple of years the biggest mass murder since
the Second World War. I mean, you know, you could
argue that in terms of deliberate murder even outstrips that.
And yet at the same time, well, we're now seeing

(02:03:56):
this is another topic. I've got to go in a second.
But we now seeing a very deliberate attempt in this
country as well as the United States to marginalize pigeonhole
down play all references to the guards of Holocaust. Robert
inclakesh had seven hundred videos of abuse of Palestinians and

(02:04:21):
scenes of murder and things wiped off YouTube and his
channel closed in one fell swoop last week, and then
his Google his Gmail account was closed simultaneously. Well, you know,
journalists in Britain have been harassed. There's a journalist currently
in an ICE detention facility in the United States, a

(02:04:42):
British journalist. I can't remember his name as I think
it's Sammy something or that. He was on a speaking
tour in the United States, visiting California and Florida. He
was detained by ICE agents at San Francisco. He had
valid visa, it was immediately revoked. He was accused of

(02:05:05):
in citing support for terrorists a mass and whisked off
to a detention center. This is somebody traveling on a
British passport. There you go.

Speaker 1 (02:05:18):
Yep.

Speaker 4 (02:05:19):
So there's you know, concerted attempt now that the so
called ceasefire is in place to kind of erase from
history what's happened, make light of it, you know, continue
to push it down the news index, you know, denigrate
people who want to speak up about it as having

(02:05:43):
kind of failed to move on, you know what I mean,
all this kind of the usual kind of denial and
as well as you know, more sort of vicious outright
attacks on anybody expressing solidarity for the Palestinian people or
could his using Israel. But the cat is out of
the bag. This is the key thing. People can see

(02:06:04):
what's going on now. Anybody other than the sort of
lowest of low information consumer of corporate media is well
aware of what's gone on and the wider power structure
that continues to support it. I don't think there's ever
been a time where, on both sides of the pond

(02:06:25):
We've talked about this many times on this show, where
people have been so aware of just how well, what's
the right word corrupt isn't the right word. I've got
to use the word evil again. You know. The fundamental
power structure that the Anglo American Zionist power structure also

(02:06:48):
with a leg in Brussels and one in Berlin and
all the rest of it that props up the fake
world order that we live in. Just how evil it is.
You know, people got some insight through the whole COVID arago,
and now they've had another insight into it. Of course,
a lot of people who saw through it during COVID
hate Muslims so much that, you know, a lot of

(02:07:10):
the so called freedom movement that they go along with Zionism.
And that's another plank of what's that. You know, the
latest has for a propaganda campaign that israelis realized it's
very difficult to make Israel look good, so instead they'll
just try and make Muslims look worse and and shove
that down people's throats as well, a huge you know,

(02:07:31):
Islamophobia push by their agents here in the UK and
over in the States as well.

Speaker 1 (02:07:38):
Mm. Yeah, okay, let's see here, Basil. I know you
got to go soon. We're going to wind down. Do
you have time for one more clip? Basil?

Speaker 4 (02:07:49):
Sure?

Speaker 1 (02:07:49):
All right, let's see what we got here. This is
taken from part of the BBC documentary The Settlers, which
Basil has mentioned here, I'm going to put that on
the screen and we'll take a listen. Here, I have
to unmute and refresh.

Speaker 2 (02:08:07):
And I do this, yep, do something.

Speaker 9 (02:08:11):
You don't mind what I did to you?

Speaker 4 (02:08:12):
You don't.

Speaker 3 (02:08:13):
You don't necessarily, well, I won't do that to you.

Speaker 9 (02:08:15):
You will, and then the camera takes just part. You
don't have the full picture. Settlers do not wake up
in the morning, go, do not go wait for sundown
to attack. No, no, no, no. Why should we wake

(02:08:36):
up in the morning and think about violence? Why our
life is.

Speaker 1 (02:08:41):
Good because you want the Palestinians to leave?

Speaker 9 (02:08:44):
No, no, no, no, you've said I said that. What
is on my mind all the time is how to
bring more people to settle the land. This is and
you develop and by Jews, this is how brah ha.
This is, it's this we can here, We can develop

(02:09:07):
till we cannot develop. I never think in terms of
I know this is beta. I don't think and I
don't think about betah, not because I think about I'm
a Jew.

Speaker 2 (02:09:20):
I'm a settler the people.

Speaker 9 (02:09:22):
I'm a human being. You are, so I do not
think about this.

Speaker 4 (02:09:28):
You think about tribalism, thinking of your own people to
the exclusion.

Speaker 1 (02:09:32):
It would be understandable to think of your own people
or your own children first, but to think about other people,
other children.

Speaker 9 (02:09:38):
Not at all.

Speaker 1 (02:09:40):
That seems sociopathic, I can doesn't it.

Speaker 9 (02:09:45):
No, not at all, This is normal.

Speaker 2 (02:09:49):
I hope you pushed me back and I do this.

Speaker 4 (02:09:55):
Yep.

Speaker 1 (02:09:57):
Okay, Well she would have liked to have been pushed back.
I guess quite the display there, you guys.

Speaker 4 (02:10:06):
Yeah, that wasn't the worst of it either. As Daniella Weiss,
the leader of the settler movements, they want to colonized Gaza,
you know, I mean, I think the population of Gaza
has been reduced for about forty percent of what was
previously the strip, which is itself a fraction of the
total area that it was fifty years ago. It's been

(02:10:28):
gradually encroached upon. And yeah, I mean, we know, we
don't We don't really know what's going to happen there.
We do know that only a tiny fraction of the
aid that was supposedly agreed under the seas Fire has
been delivered something like one hundred and fifty trucks a day,
when more like seven hundred was the original agreement. So

(02:10:51):
the sadism continues, you know that. The people say, oh,
but there's a seas fire now though genocide is over. No,
the rate of the mechanical extermination of Palestinian people has
temporarily slowed, is the way I would put it. But
the extermination nevertheless continues.

Speaker 1 (02:11:14):
Yeah. Yeah. And the thing with like when she pushes
him and says, you know at the end, or wish
you would have pushed me back, Like that's that's signifying
like if he would have she pushed him first, Right,
there's sort of a metaphor for the situation. She pushes
him first, he pushes back, because that's what happens when
you're a human generally speaking. Right, that's one of about

(02:11:37):
two or three options of things that could happen. And
then what and then she goes absolutely nuts on him,
cries in pain, how dare you strike me? I'm a victim?
And then now I will destroy you.

Speaker 4 (02:11:50):
That's right now, I will cut your head off.

Speaker 1 (02:11:52):
Yeah yeah, right, So we see where she's going with that,
And of course he didn't take the bait there. Of
course he's like, no, I'm not going to push you,
you know, And then she goes on that crazy tirade,
and it's just like I am a human. I am
a human. Okay, you're the human here, but you don't
care about the other humans that live down there. Someone

(02:12:12):
make it make sense, right.

Speaker 2 (02:12:14):
That's the other part that's missing from your analogy hasher
is that before she started this pushing match, she goes
and enters without you know, permission or you know, announcing
herself into this person's home, just lets herself in and
pushes him.

Speaker 1 (02:12:27):
This is with a gun. Push me back with a gun.
Let's not forget armed, armed entry into a home. Come
in your home with a gun, open your fridge, make
a sandwich, do whatever they want, right, and then if
you push back, well you're you're victimizing them. That's how
that works. That's the dynamic.

Speaker 4 (02:12:45):
Yeah, these people are a very serious problem, you know,
you know, for the whole world really, because you know,
the Greater Israel Project says they don't just want Judea
and Samaria. They want Jordan and a chunk of Level
and a bigger chunk of Syria and goodness knows where else.

Speaker 2 (02:13:03):
You know, we keep going past this whole thing that
we've seen already with Gaza, and they want more world it's.

Speaker 4 (02:13:10):
Gone on for our entire lifetimes. So you know, I
only a very very strong willed international community and a
complete sea change in the attitude of the United States
we'll see any kind of meaningful containment. It's worth remembering
that one of John F. Kennedy's stated aims was to

(02:13:31):
impose a permanent settlement on the Middle East. One of
the reasons why they got rid of him. You know,
he wanted to impose fixed borders on Israel, and you know,
obviously they weren't going to have that, so boom.

Speaker 1 (02:13:45):
Yeah, and here again we've got a journalist doing journalism,
and now you know their career is wrecked simply for
reporting facts talking to people.

Speaker 4 (02:14:00):
Yeah, I mean, and there's another journal's Italian journalist in
the week asked simply for asking the question of an
EU official, should Israel be made to pay for the
reconstruction of Gaza, seeing as you want to make Russia
pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine and are in fact
going to use sequestered Russian funds to do so. For

(02:14:23):
asking that question and pointing out the hypocrisy, he was.

Speaker 1 (02:14:28):
Fired amazing as well. Amazing, and let's not forget also
on this program just two weeks ago, I think we
showed the footage of Steve Wikoff and Jared Kushner talking
about how they had had like settler plans basically for
the area for you know years now, many many years,

(02:14:51):
I believe, was the quote, yeah what you got there, Ruckus?

Speaker 2 (02:14:57):
The story about the journalist who is let go after
asking that question? Okay, but yeah it was Gabrielle.

Speaker 1 (02:15:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:15:06):
Gabrielle Nunziata, Brussels based reporter covered the EU for Rome's
Nova agency, told The Intercept he received notice that he
would lose his job barely a month after he became
a correspondent. So it's like, it's like, you just I'm like,
that's what I was thinking. I'm like, some of these
people's careers are ruined before they even begin, you know
what I mean.

Speaker 1 (02:15:24):
It's so sad, No, it really is. You want to
do real journalism, well, you know, you may just get
canceled before you even come anywhere close to reaching escape velocity.

Speaker 4 (02:15:36):
And there's a bizarre twist of events here in the
UK as well, with a chap called Raffi Berg. He's
a kind of gatekeeper for Israel at the BBC in fact,
he's photographed with a copy of Nettaya Who's book and
a photograph of him behind him. So and he sort

(02:15:58):
of filters all the BBC's coverage of the war, the genocide,
and did Owen Jones, the journalist wrote a particularly corus
skating article in which Jones references a number of BBC
journalists who are complaining about the way this individual has
distorted coverage of the genocide, and he now claims that

(02:16:22):
he feels threatened, he felt threatened, that he was the
victim of death threats, and he's suing Jones for libel
for a very large sum of money, which I was
very very surprised to see. Ies frankly flabbergasted, because it's
not very difficult the media lens have done so to
point out the BBC's institutional anti Palestinian bias. So I'm

(02:16:48):
not quite sure where that one's going to go.

Speaker 1 (02:16:52):
Yeah, Basil, question from the audience for you, Basil, how
about the pictures of the awful Yvette Cooper visiting then
full of quote unquote brave Gazan children in a UK hospital?
Any did you see that? Any comments on that?

Speaker 4 (02:17:07):
No, I haven't seen it. You know, she was Home
Secretary at the time, Palestine action was banned. As always
in politics these days, serving the empire and failing are rewarded.
So she's now Foreign Secretary, taking over from that fat
imbecile or David Lammy. I think, yeah, I mean, it's

(02:17:30):
kind of a you know, it's just sort of sop
really to say, oh, look we do you know we
care about we care about a tiny handful of children
from Gaza. You know, we don't care about the fact
that a quarter of a million or three hundred thousand
have been slaughtered by our ally. But look, look what

(02:17:53):
a wonderful sympathetic person I am, says Evet Cooper, being
photographed with some poor, limbless individuals. You know, tiny, tiny
infintesiely small fraction of the total number of amputees amongst children.

Speaker 1 (02:18:13):
You know.

Speaker 4 (02:18:14):
So I haven't seen that in particular. I generally try
and consume as little corporate output as possible and avoid
ministers and their antics. I find it too upsetting. Their
all total scum as far as I'm concerned, And it

(02:18:35):
looks like the head of the scum, the froth on
the top of it, you get on scum. Keir Starmer
might be on his way. He's too repulsive even for
the scummer underneath him, so unpopular with the British people.
One poll last week had the Green Party under its
anti Zionist Jewish leader Zach Polanski or at least his

(02:18:59):
sharply critical of Israel. Whether or not he actually would
go so far as to say he wants to see
it dismantled is another matter. But he's certainly of prominent
UK politicians the most critical of Israel. And he's now
leader of the Green Party and they're pulling at eighteen
percent in the polls, with Labor on sixteen percent, and

(02:19:21):
that could be the death sentence for Starma, who is
really despised by large sections of the British people in
a way that I mean even outstrips the degree to
which Blair was despised. Hard to fathom, you know, or
Boris Johnson, there was a very very strong coterie of

(02:19:42):
people that really really hated him as well. But Starma
seems to unite hate. He seems to manage to he
manages to combine a bland you know, insipidity, total colourlessness,
lack of any real personality, gravitas, intellectual weight or any

(02:20:08):
other of the qualities that you would like to see
in a prime minister he manages to combine, or any
human being for that matter, he manages to combine all
that with being a particularly nasty individual as well with
being sort of vindictive and small minded and petty and
obviously the particularly toxic bruin. There are whispers among labor

(02:20:31):
and ps that he's going to have to go, and
they're talking about the mechanism for removing him, because, of course,
in Britain you can remove the leader of a political
party without having a general election. You know, there can
be a coup within the Palace of Westminster and it
wouldn't surprise me. I mean, not that anybody who replaces
him from the labor ranks would be in any way better,

(02:20:53):
but you know, at least he'd be out of the way,
and that would be a good thing, because he deserves
every humiliation he gets.

Speaker 1 (02:21:01):
Yeah, I have a feeling there's going to be more
to come to Terry Miller. Anyone noticed Trump's hair looks
more and more like Boris Johnson's. Okay, Terry, yep, you
may be onto something there, all right, you guys, we're
probably about ready to shut down here, Basil, do you
have any other you know, you know, betting suggestions or

(02:21:23):
stories you want to make sure we cover before we
get out of here.

Speaker 4 (02:21:30):
Maybe next time. I hadn't done the research on the betting.
I want a few quid today. We're into the jump
season now, so when I come on, I'll try and
put something up for the big races, for the for
the old Tennessee Gold Cup, the King George and all that.
But no nothing today. I mean, you know six, I

(02:21:52):
remember putting up Biden. Do you remember that?

Speaker 1 (02:21:54):
Yeah? Yeah, I'm looking forward to the twenty twenty six.
You know, political betting and predictions.

Speaker 4 (02:22:01):
Too early to call at this point, I think too
early to call.

Speaker 1 (02:22:04):
Yeah, we've got a lot of adventures between now and then.

Speaker 4 (02:22:07):
We really have. Yeah, Kamala says she's going to run again.
I mean some people never learn, you know as well?
What do you got?

Speaker 2 (02:22:15):
What are your odds that we will see a fake
alien invasion before World War three?

Speaker 4 (02:22:24):
A fake alien invasion as opposed to a real one
before World War three? Well, I hope I don't live
long enough to see either. I don't want to see
a fake invasion. I'd rather have a real one, as
long as it's the good guys, and I certainly don't
want to see world War three. I would actually say
that at the moment, world War three is more likely,
isn't it. I mean, I think you'd have to go

(02:22:44):
six to four on World War three, and no even shorter,
I'd go, yeah, I'd probably go five or six to
one on World War three. That means giving world War
three a sort of seventy eighty percent chance of happening
before and fake invasion.

Speaker 2 (02:23:01):
All right, okay, I would rather see world War three
before fake alien invasion.

Speaker 4 (02:23:07):
I don't say i'd rather see it. I think it's
more likely.

Speaker 2 (02:23:09):
There you go, Okay, I'll I'll say it. The ramifications
of the fake alien innovation could be far worse.

Speaker 4 (02:23:17):
Well, you know, if not, if we all go up
in smoke, you know, not, if we're all produced to
Lidium or whatever.

Speaker 2 (02:23:24):
Well, we know we were watching that video. Chances are
under a World War three we'll just be all forced
to stay inside our houses and stay tuned to CNN
and Fox News.

Speaker 1 (02:23:32):
Right now, Duck and cover, don't forget the duck and cover.

Speaker 4 (02:23:36):
Yes, hid under the kitchen table.

Speaker 1 (02:23:39):
Right okay, Basil, give us a shout out to where
people can find you.

Speaker 4 (02:23:42):
This week, well they can't really. This is probably my
sole appearance this week. I will be back with a
new show on un Presidented TV called Current Affairs, and
it's going to be a weekly show. I was doing
a daily show. It was rather like getting up every
morning and charging headfirst into a brick wall. So I'm

(02:24:02):
going to go to doing a weekly show, which I
think will be more manageable. My debut this week, if
not the week after, and I'll let you know. That'll
be Current Affairs and it'll be on YouTube and X.

Speaker 1 (02:24:14):
All right, excellent, Thanks so much, Basil. I appreciate you
taking the time to join us today. I always love
your analysis and reporting.

Speaker 4 (02:24:20):
Thank you.

Speaker 1 (02:24:21):
All right, that's Basil. Valentine ruckus over to you or
is it Basil?

Speaker 2 (02:24:27):
And here in America we would say Basil?

Speaker 1 (02:24:29):
Right.

Speaker 2 (02:24:32):
Final thought, I don't yeah, I'm just I have a
really big saved round. Then I'm going to repurpose somewhere
else because it's really on my mind about this Christian
Zionism thing. So I'd like to do a little roucous
special take breakdown on that thing. But I would like to,
you know, leave everybody with the impression understand this that
I've been able to prove this for myself, So there's

(02:24:53):
no reason why you all shouldn't be able to prove
this for re spells, especially especially if you're a Christian,
but also if you're just interested in understanding what is
the ideology, what is the foundation of what we're witnessing
here with this whole Zionism thing and all of the
terrible things that were witnessing happening involving that secular country Israel.

(02:25:14):
But you know, I officially believe that Christian Zionism in
particular is a It's a heresy, a modern heresy is
backed by a nineteenth century false prophet, specifically namely one
Cyrus Ingersoll Schofield c. I. Schofield. You've heard the Schofield
name the Scofield Bible. He was a person who died,

(02:25:35):
by the way, on my birthday in nineteen twenty one.
I guess he was born August nineteenth, nineteen eighteen forty three,
died July twenty fourth, nineteen twenty one. But yeah, it's
because of the teachings of this one person, not because
of scripture, not the Bible, not scripture that this heresy
has been propagated throughout modern age. Okay, it directly literally

(02:25:58):
contradicts everything that New Testament in your Bible. If you're
a Christian, that's what your faith is supposed to be
based on. It has a set of clear teaching and
principles and ideas in there in the New Testament. Okay. Instead,
this Christian Zionism thing again, a heresy backed by a
false prophet. As far as I'm concerned, it's produced nothing

(02:26:19):
but moral blindness, spiritual bondage, and of course it's perpetrated
some of the worst atrocities that we've seen in our
lifetimes on our Twitter feeds hesher So. Yeah, I encourage
everybody to do a deep dive into the heresy that
is Christian Zionism again, especially especially if you are a

(02:26:39):
professing Christian. Well that being said, don't forget to read everything,
listen to everybody, but don't believe anything, including what I
just told you, unless you can prove it for yourself
with your own research. Thanks for having me, Rucus out.

Speaker 1 (02:26:53):
All right, Thanks Rugus, and thank you for being with us.
Really appreciate all the comments and everything from the live
audience today. Wonderful to be here with you on rumblex bit, shoot, YouTube,
all the places and all the things. If you want
to support our work, you can go to twenty first
century Wire dot com and you'll see the support link

(02:27:16):
in the upper menu up there. You can also go
to Alternate Currentradio dot com. We've got a support page
up there. We've got Patreon and PayPal, which we call
the square jar. We got a merch store all that
good stuff. So go to Alternate Current Radio dot com
forward slash support to learn more. And that's it for

(02:27:41):
this episode of Sunday Wire. We'll go out with some
Joseph Arthur here and we will see you again next
week for another edition of Sunday Wire. Take care, all
the best.

Speaker 3 (02:28:09):
Gratitude, the end it built, the world it's built on.

Speaker 6 (02:28:11):
Fear of the even world. We live in one.

Speaker 10 (02:28:13):
Alf so it disappeared, But gratitude, salvation and never any life,
the transcends.

Speaker 6 (02:28:19):
All the dumb is trying to hold us to the knight.
Thoughts say what is missing? Thank you? Says what's here?
Thought to keep us some conscious? Thank you? Make me
feel that back until the moment.

Speaker 10 (02:28:29):
The best eachal now with God is always with us
in hold it like a cow like a center as
on our child, or a gun for the ruses the
mind miss the magic. He considers all the morosest wild
thoughts against this principalities of bad whispering and difference.

Speaker 6 (02:28:45):
So malitions of dispasso. Thank you is my trust, ma man, ma'am.
Thank you's my mind trust who set up this feasts journey?

Speaker 10 (02:29:02):
For I saw womos never make it in loose all
the control?

Speaker 6 (02:29:06):
How do we get back any.

Speaker 10 (02:29:08):
Soeignty from the laizandinas that we pretend to be?

Speaker 3 (02:29:13):
Thank you as a past to a place side of hell, granted.

Speaker 6 (02:29:16):
To your presence will live. That's where we fail. But
we have to make a practice to come back into
now in the garden of a gratitude and pushed that
ancient cloud. I don't know the reason we are in
only all have we.

Speaker 3 (02:29:29):
Ever come back to cooling we were before than it
started in eating with the happening in the state system?

Speaker 6 (02:29:35):
Have we been fine with this battle as a fate?
So taking is my true my true another? No, thank you,
it's my man true true.

Speaker 4 (02:29:50):
The world and what is the reason?

Speaker 6 (02:30:05):
This is where we are? The light and the darkness
are naim and for our heart or love.

Speaker 10 (02:30:11):
Once those present the punch of gratitude, the darkness.

Speaker 6 (02:30:14):
Wants are scattered with an evil latitude, and we look
at the think and the justifies.

Speaker 10 (02:30:19):
Of course, we see it's not itself that brings on
a divorce from the old.

Speaker 6 (02:30:24):
Distru from grave relations, growing.

Speaker 10 (02:30:26):
From the love of God to the darkness of the
two voices of the demons. We identifies us, and then
we follows of our voices that we trust take us
to destruction and take us to despair when they get
the God himself has always.

Speaker 6 (02:30:41):
Just been in so thank you. It's munch lunch.

Speaker 5 (02:30:49):
Thank you.

Speaker 6 (02:30:49):
It's my monture lunchure, thank you.

Speaker 1 (02:30:56):
It's my runch unchu.

Speaker 6 (02:31:00):
Mo k, thank you. It's muncher muncho world. It's so.

Speaker 4 (02:31:13):
So the world.

Speaker 8 (02:31:24):
It's so.

Speaker 6 (02:31:27):
So thank you guys, my funture, my chub and the

All Episodes

SUNDAY WIRE EP 568 – 'Shadows of Zion' with Bryan McClain, Adam Clark & Basil Valentine

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

The Joe Rogan Experience

Two Guys, Five Rings: Matt, Bowen & The Olympics

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}SUNDAY WIRE EP 568 – 'Shadows of Zion' with Bryan McClain, Adam Clark & Basil Valentine