Prince Israel Zaar on: There is a Way to Absorb Contrary View Points

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
The state of the human war is in crisis. Humans
needs to accept their responsibility that the peace and security

(00:30):
of the world depends on the humans themselves. The amplifiers
of division and height to social media and to politics,
and to the economy, and the gap between the rich

(00:57):
and the poor, the educational god, the gap of reliable
information and sources to reliable information. Humans are inundated with

(01:18):
a lot of information. And most of this information is garbage.
It's not informative, it's not educative, it's not healthy, it's
not safe, it's not friendly, does not improve the life

(01:39):
of the human being, does not make the human being
happy and satisfied with itself. The information chambers today are
actually creating an information gap. Humans are exposed to so

(02:03):
much content, so much hyperbolic content within the windows and
nuances guise to hate to make the human being feel
unhappy with the stead of event, and it's just finger pointing.

(02:34):
You know. Humans are living TODs if they're in the
course of law, constantly cross examining nonfactual information as if
it's true. And the new media is gradually overtaking the

(02:56):
mainstream media. Because the new media at least gives you
variety there's so much variety on what you choose from.
You got news from so many angers. You have information
beyond politics for many angers, and sometimes even though the

(03:18):
information is not true in itself, but it's enough information
the social media that you can if you're interested, you
can you can browse true many websites, you know, many
news organizations local, national, international, to at least come out

(03:39):
with something if you like to be informed. So the
advantage of today's media is that it is good information
out there and new technologies in science, and heroes doing
great work and good parenting, and on people doing their job.

(04:06):
You know, you got information on learning something about dificial intelligence,
where the world is going, you know what new is discovered,
what new is made. You got religious person, You got
information about faith spirituality and you like gott to do

(04:27):
itself person, You got information on how things are made,
how things are done. So the social media, you know,
provides many sources of information, just depends on what you're
looking for. But based on the likes and clicks, the

(04:49):
hysteria got two point five million or ten million, one million,
like what you say. It's creating a world that real content,
real information. It's been overlooked and people go for the clicks,

(05:14):
and so she becomes the problem. So she becomes the
problem that what is being hurt the most. It's actually
not helpful the most. So the algorithms to stay relevant

(05:37):
to the help of AI. On the contrary, and unfortunately,
it amplifies what people want to hear, and it has
segregated humans into their echo chambers. And once humans get
segregated in the in the echo chambers, fractual information is

(05:59):
dead and conspiracy and propaganda becomes the thing. So the
information age today especides the politic as saying, is driven
by misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, conspiracy, and miseducation. Where he has

(06:30):
the most cliques and has the most likes. So to
be liked today on the social media, to have a
lot of cliques, it must push the envelope. It must
go beyond yourself to throw those baits, take things to

(06:54):
the extrain and casl like humanity and watch and see
how many likes, how many clicks your god. And that's
what we cannot there. We cannot go out there to
gaslight the people, to divide the people, to mislead the people.

(07:22):
We can give people information, educative information. That's seeks to
open your mind. That's sex to make you think, to
doubt and ask questions, that seeks to make your self reflect,
that seeks to motivate an inspire year to be the

(07:47):
best person they want to be, to achieve your best
self in order to serve humanity better. This life is
not a movie. It's not a Hollywood script, it's not

(08:09):
a drama on stage. It's a reality that you are living.
If you come to this world today, the AI world today,

(08:29):
the large language language models today, where information is at
the tip of a clique. Everything you think in this
world today that can improve your intelligence or your knowledge,
you can be enlightened if you go to Churcheypity, a

(08:56):
matter Ai, a Germini o'clock. If you can have access
to a clerk or Dipsy or many other language models,
you can ask every question. I get the answer. And

(09:20):
it's very shameful at the mainstream media are doing everything
to sabotize the new language models because you can actually
ask information and gave fractual information without spain or constant

(09:42):
bias hearing you in the face. You go on the
mainstream media, you do your best that they must be
listening to. When you go there, you see this elit
ignorance of arrogance of intelligence. That's a commendatortal word, ignorance

(10:09):
of arrogance of intelligence, as they're actually saying something that
you know is factually not true. But to them only
they can brainwash you. They assume that they have the
right and authority to lie to you. The misrepresents information,

(10:35):
and they purposefully give you the news that they are
paid to give to you, and the facet that year
you must the fact to subscribe to it. They have
this elit arrogance that the garbage that they're giving to
you a mystic can the fact checked. There is something

(10:56):
that you're missing if you're not listening to them. They
have this entitlement that no matter the nonsense that they're
given to you, that you must consume because it's coming
from them. They have that divine authority of knowledge that

(11:19):
even though they are not that they refuse to report
actuality is that is happening all over the world because
they are scared of being silent or being unemployed. They're
paid to speak. The main media is paid to speak,

(11:45):
like paid to ply. They're not free thinkers, they're not
free speakers. They're no power of the debate, and don't
be wondering why say that their ratings is going down,
because they care about those ratings. We are philosophers, we

(12:09):
are informers. You might not like what I'm saying. That's
some people like us. We are different. We make you think,
we make you doubt, We make you ask questions to
be better. The things we are worried about, we are
not worried about. We are sufficient in ourselves, are decreating ourselves,

(12:33):
and secured in ourselves. We like what we do. We
believe in ourselves. We are the people of novelty. We
create newness. We create content that does not exist. We
don't create redundance. Say we are new me talking to

(12:57):
you is now, or like the mainstream to improve their following.
They's it difficult for them to do that. To assume

(13:18):
that you're the god of knowledge when you for a
short time after time, assume that you have that power
to fact check others while you're lying by fact checking.

(13:40):
To be so blind folded to a narcissistic way of
seeing yourself in the information chamber, sometimes people get so
shortsighted that humans have a choice. Humans do. It means

(14:07):
if I go sometime to New York Times. Don't look
for information. I will go to the Washington Post, Washington Journal,
New York Posts. I'll try to see an n SMBC,

(14:27):
Fox News. I'm trying to Haffington Post, Actions, act cheers,
they're here the daily paste, and look at news is around.

(14:48):
I tried to go into National, the Sky News, the
Bob say what is happening in Europe? I got to
what is happening in Hong Kong and Singapore. I got
to see um to see what the up in China.
I go to YouTube to just look for news everywhere,

(15:08):
and I'm always attracted at opposite voices. Opposite voices attracts
me a lot. It means I want to see what
is it's not on the mainstream. I want to see
where the mainstream is scared of. And then I see

(15:29):
the limitations of those people themselves. When there own eco chambers,
you must somebody must get into an echo chamber in
order to know what the echo chamber is thinking about.
It must not enslave and shock at yourself with limited

(15:50):
knowledge of the world of yourself. As a philosopher, when
I write a this is, I must ask ai to
give the counterpositive toward appriten. Go check my writings out.

(16:15):
Go to my website AI philosopher dot com. Go to
AI philosopher dot com and check it out. I cross
checked myself as a philosopher. Sometimes we are provocative to

(16:39):
make people think. I write what the writer is original,
is organic, is authentic as I'm talking to you now,
but I make sure in my writings I give you
the other side. For example, if I tell you how
great our country is, how great things are going, I

(17:04):
will give you the counter argument to that, because that
creates a balance in your mind. Because my intention is
to inform you, not to gaslight to you, not to
make you have a weapon to use against others, not

(17:26):
to make you take a drug to hurry you, not
to make you addicted to something. If you can be
addicted to philosophical knowledge or or inspirational thinking or motivational speaking,
then you are the right place. When you give information

(17:52):
to humans, tell them to find print, let them not
define print that I'm not. I'm not meant to inform you,
to educate you. I'm just talking to you because i
want my ratings to go up, or that I've been
paid to play, or I'm playing to be paid. Just

(18:20):
give the fine print because you are free to die
because you still have a following a Niche don't play
the both side. Reason when the people the person knows
that we have already taken a side while you're speaking.

(18:42):
Look at the wars we have having the media contributes to.
They failed to report the news that's cared to report
the news they're paid to play. It's better for me
to go listen to a podcast somewhere. Listen to somebody

(19:11):
to the best of their knowledge, saying what they think
is true, without having the authority that what they're saying
it's true. See, the main media will call any other
channel a conspiracy theory. Ah, they make fun of podcasts

(19:36):
because podcasts you flip the pages of news. They're not
telling that you must listen to them. It's the means
to media telling you that if you don't listen to them,
they ignorant, they are not educated. You are something else
if you don't listen to them, and we do try

(19:56):
to listen to them. Day. That goes back with I
me trying to see what is on the mainstream media.
Was on BBS, SKY News or CNN of Fox New
or SMBSA. I want to see what is on the
New York Post, on the New York Times, on the

(20:20):
Washington Post, on the Washington JOHNA. I want to see
what is on Bloomberg. I'm going for the MPR and
I go for the newspapers, the websites. I go to X,
to Instagram. This is some varieties. I go to YouTube

(20:47):
to look for news everywhere on planner Earth. That is me.
You cannot lie to me because AI has made it possible.
Nothing but light. Politicians used to use the mainstream media,
and now they have infiltrated the system into the podcast world.

(21:12):
Because the goal is to corrupt the mind of the people.
Do not tell the truth, to lie to the people.
That's what it's all about, because the people don't have
the right now as a human being, have the right
to now us. Why should Galileo suffer for us? I

(21:42):
should sookrate this die for us. I should play to
Aristotle ixist. I should die as Isaac Newton montesquie Johans votaire.

(22:05):
Why should they suffer for us? Why should Spinosa suffer
for us? Why should Jesus Christ be crucified the cross
for us? On Matinuta King, I'm Bram Lincoln. Why should

(22:28):
scientists and inventors are innovators and not be lawried? Why
should they? Right? There is a sign that if ignorance
is placed, then it's valletible wise, that you are paining

(22:49):
wise and pound foolish. If information doesn't matter where do
you live? What makes you happy than learning something new,
improving your mind, your knowledge, your word being. Isn't that

(23:13):
what a good citizen is all about? When you go
to the mainstream the criticized till it prompter by using
tell a prompter, I speaking to you. I've never read

(23:35):
a script before speaking to you. I don't follow in
a script because talking to you, I'll spend like four hours.
If you can watch my media fate, I'll spend like
four hours sometime five hours, six hours just trying to
recycle news everywhere in the world before I come a

(24:00):
podcast for ten ten minutes so I can write something
for a page, because you have to write to be
motivated to think. He listened to me, says something new
all the time. But the core of it, what should

(24:24):
make you happy is the new nourishment of knowledge. You
have the right to now and people like to now.
This subscribe to so many things. They want to read
a new book. People are trying to get information about
something that can better their lives, that can bring their

(24:46):
happiness and meaning for them to find purpose. I can
let them create a business, to generate wealth, to have
a job. Four a new form of medicine of treating
their disorder, solving their problems, uniting their families, resolving their

(25:13):
marital dispute. People like to entertain themselves, something positive, something
that makes them laugh. You must not make a joke
by insulting another person. You must not say people thinks

(25:33):
things skin by insulting them. Your gatings must not must
must not be based on hurting other people's feelings. It
must not be a let nice your host that your

(25:55):
glory is the pain of another person. You must not
be the person on the extreme right now your happiness
for your ratings is how much you divide America. It
must not be the person on the extreme left, where

(26:18):
your ratings is based on how you destroy American values.
The board ends must not be working against itself. Left
and right doesn't mean right or wrong. It means balance,

(26:45):
but that's not what it is. It means you go
to your left, You get the same information. You come
to right, you get the same information. Then you decide
for yourself and me. It's both sides, both information giving

(27:06):
to you. It's meant to help you. If I get
information under what they call the right media, I go
to Fox. It's not there's not a day past. What
I mean mean what happens on Fox and or the

(27:30):
right leaning podcast Information Chambers, and a day cannot pass
immediately what I mean going to the left. If there
is something called the left, because American must be divided
for some other people to feel happy, I go to
the left and now do my best to get every

(27:51):
whatever they're saying. It means I can't hold my nose
trays to listen to information I'm not supposed to listener.
It's not a secret that I support Israel. My name
is Israel, so it's not a secret that I support Israel.

(28:20):
But the day cannot pass what I'm going around the
world to listen to what haters of Israel I say.
I must listen to the hatred against Israel because I
love Israel. My love for my country, for America, I

(28:47):
cannot be contested. Some people will say I love American,
mon anybody else you must profess that self love something
for your country before you can defend before you can
defend it with objectivity, with objectivity not sevility. I must

(29:24):
know who hate Israel in adert to defend Israel. I
must know who hates America in adert to defend America.
It means I cannot be biased to get information to
the facts that does don't make sense. I studied law.

(29:50):
I studied law. Therefore, to defend a client, I must
seek to know the information that the others had got
against me. Against my client, I cannot go to court
mainly with the information I'm given to me by my client.

(30:10):
The judge will not be happy because he knows there's
something wrong. You're in court because you're in an adversary system.
It means you're in court because nobody buys what you
west side. You are coming to define what you hold

(30:31):
to be self evidence. That's truth. That's what I Americanized
all about. It's a debate. When I used to be
in college. If I go to a school and there
is no debate club, I we create one. That's why

(31:02):
I faired offended. I fairly hurt when Charlie Kirk was killed.
When Charlie Kirk was killed. I fell offended, I fear hurt.
I am still now. I feel for the wife and

(31:28):
the children. I don't live not to see their father.
Charlie Kirk did not go some with guns, with threat
with violence. They did what an American constitution asked us

(31:50):
to do. Go back to read the Federari's papers, then
Bram Lincoln debate, HM. Listen to Douglas. Douglas if I

(32:12):
pronouncial named properly, go back to those the debates of
the American founder, our founding fathers. Listen to them. Jefferson Adams,
listen to them. Listen to Blur and Hamilton what letter

(32:36):
they do? Listen to Ted Cruise. He came to defend Kimmel,
who insult Tad Cross all the time that he likes
the guy. That's what America is all about. M hm. Teed.

(33:00):
Chris came out and said, no, that's not right. It
doesn't mean that he does not love the president or
does not love the country. That's what they got tough. Laugh.
Think about parenting, three types of parenting and let's say fair.

(33:26):
Let's say fair parenting. Do what you like, change my
gender if you likes your ears or switch your hands.
If you like, augment your body, if you like be
a genius, if you like experiment everything, if you want
be a criminal, if you want be a pastor, if

(33:48):
you want just do what you want in sort the
parent if you want as let's say, fair parenting. We
always know that in that system the best of the
human beings not realized, because they might not there might
not be any life left to say that. The flight

(34:12):
does not, a fly that doesn't listen follows the cops
to the grave. The power of self restrain, the power
self resp self reflection, the power self respect, that power

(34:35):
of measurement, proportionality and balance, the power of empathy and sympathy,
the power of when in the crown to know it hurts,
or when the other person's show, to know how it feels.
That's not not an initiate system of parenting or in

(34:58):
the system of government. We know that the libertarian they
save economics to the extreme create virtual capitalism, something different
from Adam Smith capitalism. So in parenting you gotta less

(35:26):
safe fire parenting. You've got the authoritarian parent, a dictatorial parent,
a tyrannicar parent, an oppressive parent, just like a system
that suffers from oppression, dictatorship, and tyranny. You create the
quickest set of people and the most informed, and you

(35:48):
cared crue people. Most dictators come from tyrannical systems. So
an authoritarian parent equally credit kid that is that is aggressive,
that that rejects everything that's combative and is becoming a

(36:12):
psychopathus so so bad. And the third part of parenting
we now is all authoritative, always separate authoritarian authoritarian think
about authoritarian governments around the world, authoritative think about irresponsible democracy.

(36:37):
An authoritative parent is like a conservative parent as a
parents that assumed that the kids need to have rights
and freedoms. That saved the kid's life and save society.
And an unauthoritative parents perhaps ain't like a law enforcement

(37:02):
officer or like the courts, like a leader. When things
go wrong, you are free to do the right thing.
That's an authoritative parent. Now you're my child, you're not
my friend. To be my friend, it must be good

(37:25):
to yourself. It must be the best of yourself. An
authoritative parent lost and care for the child. They know
what the child needs. At that level. They get tough,
love of respect, They do everything for the child to
develop its individualism. It's intrinsic individuality. They teach their kids

(37:48):
self alliance, independence, self determination, self control, self made self help.
It's tough. The one they kiss to be the the
best of itself, but their kids becomes the pride of
the family, the pride of a nation, and the pride
of a world. Most great people in life come from

(38:10):
authoritative parents. It may there must be an authority, not
an abusive authority. It mays a kid must know my
mom and dadgess at home. The authority prevent them from
doing something. And if those kids don't have those authority
at home, when they see the police or law enforcement,

(38:32):
that gets careed, they must need the authority for there
to be ordered. Law and order come from a society
driven my authoritative parents and kids that came from authoritative homes.

(38:54):
Most scientists, inventors, ladies. You don't see any great person,
the richest per, or the most powerful person without a
person with authority in their lives. Somebody must better to
tell you to sit down, to listen as you die.
Under a person's death. Most of the criminality in society

(39:19):
comes from lacy for parenting. The parents know very less
and the expect very less from their children. But society
expect more from everybody. So if your parent knows less
and expect very less from you, society expects more from you.

(39:39):
And since you cannot give way, don't have relayship fair parenting.
The kids are not their best. Doing what you like
means being a criminal. Doing what you like means hurting somebody.
Doing what you're like means not being sensitive. Doing what

(40:04):
you like means being narcissistic apathetic. Doing what you like
means being inhuman means means being crue, means being racist
or sexist, or means being going to war. Destrain the
word that it doesn't matter, it's what you like. That's

(40:25):
not what we wants society to be, because society can
be better. Linking back to the field of information, we
cannot just listen to the information we like. This a

(40:48):
less affair. Does you have the right the right to speech?
They don't need to inform me that they have free speech.
Just the fact that you're a human being with your mouth,
you have the right to speak. You don't need a

(41:08):
law to tell you how the right to speak. The
birds doesn't know anything that is the right to speak.
The right to speech is mostly an American thing. As
an American thing to the history of the right to
speak comes because some people who have slaves, some people

(41:30):
who have slaves. So the right to free speech was
the right giving to slaves, not to the person with authority,
with the person with power, not to the slave owner.
The slave, how already had the right to speak. Martin

(41:53):
Lutakian did not die for the slave owner. A Bromncoln
did not die for the slave owner. William Wilberforschool in England,
and all and others people fighting for the abolition of slavery,
the abolitionists, they were not fighting for the slave owners.

(42:18):
They were fighting for the rights of their slaves. Again,
is the misinformation a misappropriation of what right is? It
cannot be the person in power talking about right. It
means it's a right to hate wh you think. The

(42:40):
right to free speech was meant for the slaves and
those without power. The right to free speech was meant
for women because they couldn't speak. The right to free
speech were meant for those who had been opprised and
the big family, the only educated, the ignorant, the farmers,

(43:06):
the poor farmers, the poor vendors, the poor workers were
not paid well in the days of the Conugies and
the Rockefellers. They give that age. He need the right

(43:28):
of the unions to be paid well, the rights for
good working conditions, right for clean air, the right not
to be robbed, to be safe for your property. That's

(43:48):
what the right meant. That would right means that right
cannot be taken from you. And it's the right to
do the right thing. It means you cannot oppress somebody's
peach for protesting for the right thing. That's what the

(44:12):
right means, right to do right. It's not right to
abuse somebody. That's I got the movement to fight for
the abuse. It's not right to oppress somebody, as I
got the movement fighting against oppression, against gyranny, against dictatorship,

(44:35):
against cruelty. It don't have the right to be crue
against somebody. That's why you have the humane societies. It
don't have the right to subject somebody to enslave somebody.
That's why you got the abolishest right to do what

(44:57):
is right. Mm hmm. It cannot be a oppressor talking
about right, it means your right is to keep uppressing people.
You cannot be the person with power talking about all
rights are equal? What rights do you mean an equal?

(45:26):
It means if I cannot, if I can protest against oppression.
In your logic, it means the oppressor needs to need
to need to protest for me protesting against oppression, that's
when it's dangerous. Then my generalized fights for their rise

(45:54):
because their rights are been taken away. Racist has created
two class sense of people. They're free and all free
don't free? Fight to be free, to be treated with dignity,

(46:17):
that is right. That's why they're called it right, because
cheating people with dignity is the right thing to do.
The mageneralized people are fighting to be treated fairly. That's
the right. They're fighting to be treated fairly. To be

(46:40):
treated fairly is right. That's why it's the right right.
That's why. Now what right exists? Fighting for your right
it means fighting for what is right, which means what
the right right to everybody. It's just a universal fundamentor fairness.

(47:03):
It means it's a natural right to be treated with fairness.
The concept of right back to the days of the philosophers.
I read the philosophers, does think John Locke or convict. Example,

(47:25):
we can go to Nizche, go back to vote to deca,
to the Western philosophers, to Persian philosophers, Asian philosophers, Egyptian philosophers.

(47:51):
We philosophers always talk about right. The philosophers don't something
that the truth, the fact that's drive society. Right, truth, fact, right, truth, fact,
that's what builds society. And that's what it's missing in

(48:15):
the media. That's why I started by saying this too
much information. It's not about right, it's not about truth,
it's not about fact. And as a philosopher, we want
to talk about right, truth and fact. It's not the right,

(48:41):
truth and fact that the media talk about. Don't misunderstand
my right a natural right. It's a right that is
in doubt in every human being. Somebody is fighting about
a natural right because somebody is taking why you're born

(49:02):
not to be poor, that's a right because they are resources.
But well, blame humans for being poor when the resources
that is natural for everybody, A group of people has
decided upon themselves that they have some type of inalienable

(49:27):
rights separate from that or others to on those resources.
And when you do, some people will left out. And
when those who are left out, They are disenfranchised, They imaginalize,

(49:49):
they're our pressed. They think they don't matter. Elitism, for example,
in the self is classification and stratification. They call an
elite education. Why can the system accept that, because that's

(50:13):
a hierarchy, the system creating itself. When you create that hierarchy,
some people be taking advantage of. How can you then
therefore blame those people for protesting that they're being abused

(50:33):
and they're being cheated, that they're not being paid. While
if I go to Fox for example, Foctions for example,
remember all these guys on on the mainstrain, they're all millionnaires.
Remember that we go to the mainstrain, know that they

(50:54):
are millionnaires, they're elite. I start by saying, nothing wrong
with being a leader and being a millionnaire. I am one.
I have more than that. I am born a prince.

(51:15):
Not being born a prince, I have born an artists.
So that's not the point. My point is, if I
choose to go to Fox, for example, I should be

(51:37):
informed about what is happening in the world, because that's
why it myself in news outlet. It must keep your
biases aside and first gives me information unless you're not
a news outlet, you take away news from the outlet.
It means you must first give me refine information. It
means you must give me water to drink first. That's

(52:00):
informative speech. Who learn in public speaking? It's informative. You
must inform me first. That's the right. That's the right right.
I have the right to be informed when I go
to to see another elite nails before you start to

(52:24):
brainwash me first. I have the right to be informed.
That's the right. Right. I need to fight for that right.
I fight for that right because we live in a society.
That right means something different. Right means victim hurt. Right
means entitlement. That's what right has come to me. It

(52:48):
means thin skin. It means have the right to gaslight
to you. You have the right to listen to have
the right to lie to you. You have the right
to have the right to gaslight to you. I don't
have the right to protest. I have the right to
lie to you. We don't have the right to say
now I have the right to mislead you. I don't

(53:12):
have the right to say now I have the right
to misinform you. I have the right to say, now
I have the right to to self. You your conspiracy
and this infinant propaganda. I don't have the right to object.
If you object that, then I'm entitled to be a victim.

(53:39):
So we create a system of laziness to seek information
and entitlement to mislead people. I'm victim here to cry
foul the people saying that you're lying or that you're
not right. We have created a society of information where

(54:02):
right truth and fact. It's not natural, it's not philosophical,
it's not theoretical. It's not theological. It's not scientific. It's

(54:23):
not rooted on the scientific method. It's not rooted in logic,
it's not rooted in divinity of spredetuality. It's not in reality.

(54:43):
What leads today, it's laziness to the truth, entitlemental eye
about the truth, and victim hurd to complain. And why
when people object to what you say? America was founded?

(55:12):
So Curtis died for the truth with philosophers always ask
for that. What becomes the being to live in alife,
light upon and die without knowing is in truth. The treasure.

(55:33):
Seeking the truth is different from proving proving the truth.
Seeking the truth is enough, you're sick to know it.
That's what enlightenment is all about. Look at our population today.
Everyone has a cell phone. Just ask that person what

(55:53):
is happening in their neighborhood, in their neighborhood. Think about it.
People today don't think even to care to know what
is happening in the neighborhood. Local news. It means just
your surrounding. They're entice to this echo chambers of people

(56:21):
become addicted to themselves. I can addict it to yourself. Oh,
we know. Humans have flowed addicted to that which is cared.
They're good in here. It's the way of thinking. The

(56:45):
right we talk about to day. It's not the right right,
it's the legal right, the legal right. See the legal

(57:06):
right and the legal truth is different from truth itself.
For example, take the guy who killed our beloved Charlie Kirk.
We all saw it. Unless the media was lying to us,

(57:29):
I mean, unless our eyes are lying to us. That's
what I mean. We saw the gunman on the roof,
We saw the bullet came out, and we saw this
great guy fell, and we discovered that he'll not go
back home. We discovered that he didn't Hark, the kids

(57:49):
and the wife. We know that he's not here today.
I don't see him anywhere. I know he got his funeral.
I saw him being buried, so it means he died.
I'm connecting this fact. That's how logic is being connected.

(58:09):
But if you go not there for for conspiracy somewhere,
don't tell that he didn't die, it was not buried,
or it was just a a lie. That's how it goes.
That madaur Ki did not die. It's their life is
just a lie. That Jeff kid did not die. It's
a lie. Was not shot, that's still lie. That was

(58:34):
not shot by the ear, that's de a lie. That
Reagan was not shot. Everything's just as conspiracy. That's where
we are today. Think about it. The escalator stopped in
front of our eyes, watching our beloved first lady and

(58:55):
our president, all of us saw it. It stopped because
because of a mechanical error, because of a scientific error.
But what happened there is an escalator, git it miss?
This is conspiracy for that and the gate miss a conspiracy,

(59:18):
And then think about it. You be the person finding
that rubbish. What does it do to the iq of humans?
The escalator gate is where Americans find themselves. Remember that

(59:39):
why there's real information there in the world. China just
breaking your record today in tipsy exploration. Ohah wait last week,
h just add the breakth through on AI and chips

(01:00:11):
are sent chips will weare just the only part on
Silicon's photography January chip making to bypass inn VideA so
that they can stop second vent any assumption assumptions to
create independence. If you contend here an assumption I could

(01:00:35):
act saint chips I sent nine nineteen C nine fifteen
pr A fright nine fifty DT nine sixty nine seventy

(01:01:01):
you might not know what that means. Usually now you're
going to concern here what is happening in Gaza, Consentsia,
Just what is happening in Sudan, in Cameroon, in Nigeria,

(01:01:26):
in the Power in Japan, in Singapore, in South Korea
and China, in Taiwan, in India, in Afghanistan, in France,
in Hungary and Finland, in Ukraine. You have that right

(01:01:50):
because the world is yours. The wall of information is
power going to system and the media don't want to inform.
You ask yourself why and when you don't want to

(01:02:11):
go out there to seek information. Ask yourself, why is
it true that if ignored as this place thens falletable.
Wise we'll talk about right. Ask yourself, what right are
we talking about? Because even the guy that killed that

(01:02:41):
murdered or assassinated Charlie Kirk, we all know the guy,
but you see, we can still not know that because
your court need to prove what we already know. That's
the leaguer right we're talking about. So you're talking about
about right, is it legal right? Because the legal right

(01:03:04):
therefore can be bad. If that guy has the best lawyers,
there can be a mistrier, there can be a procedural error,
and that guy can walk free. It doesn't mean that
he didn't do it. It meant because this established type

(01:03:26):
of right said that even though he did it, the
procedure to prove that he did it, it's contaminated. So
therefore need to throw the case out of court. So
if you do not get confided on talking about right,
that type of right is the right of the powerful,

(01:03:48):
because the poor person will not have a lawyer, and
that type of right system those with that power always
been abused because they don't have the right to have
a good lawyer. The same goes with troath truth when

(01:04:10):
somebody said it's true. True should be truth in its
naturality or in its artificiality. Find the scientific method. If
you stay in the sun, you're gonna get burned because
his son is hot. That's naturally true because you can

(01:04:34):
feel it. But the scientific metal truth equally. Like I
need to prove truth in the court of law, like
you need to prove right in the court of law,
you need to prove truth equally in the field of
science to the scientific method. So even though you stand
in the sun and it's hard, it's not true. Let's

(01:05:00):
being proven by science that scientific truth equally. It's in
seat of truth that if you don't have power again,
truth will not be truth. What do I mean by that?
So if somebody can corrupt the system, they can therefore

(01:05:21):
corrupt the scientific research. And then therefore if we depends
on the scientific research, research of which of which we should,
but it can be corrupted, and therefore the truth that
the science tell us is fact proven proof is infected.

(01:05:42):
Just as a guy that killed Charlie Kirk might go
free if there's a procedural error. So you've been in
the sun, I'm being burned by the sun. If the
scientific method still cannot prove that to be true, or
it's infected to prove that it's not true, then truth
would be that if he's standing the sun, the son's

(01:06:03):
gonna burn you, that if he's staying the son, the
son wanna burn you. Even though you're standing the son,
the sun is burning you. It's not true scientifically, even
though it's true naturally because you are feeling the heat.
But scientific scientifically it was supposed to be true. But

(01:06:24):
the people, their research is flawed because maybe if if
you prove that, if it's staying the here, they're gonna
burn you, then maybe they're gonna be the responsibility of
the government or somebody to make sure that you're not burned.
So maybe the government need to invest they be housing

(01:06:47):
in cooling systems. So since they don't want to do that,
for example, I'm just trying to create logical to see
why the truth might not be necessary. Because if their
truth is necessary, some people spend something on it. If

(01:07:07):
it's true that there is crying, then we need the
government to do more. But since we don't want the government,
since we have a cared for limited government, then we
can't say there is no crime. So logic sometimes it
spins your heart if you need to, if you need

(01:07:28):
to seek to know what it is all about, so
you see the truth they are talking about. Therefore, depends
on the set of expert. It means the people don't
know the truth. That's why you see CNN. We need
expert to can't tell you about what you're already now.
I'm just using CNN for example, because I cannot go

(01:07:51):
a day without going to CNN because you seek it intelligent,
academic base information. If they could let the person speak,
but if the person they bring to speak on CNN
for example, to give you the facts, if the fax

(01:08:15):
does not go with the corporate or the lobbies of
people buying you know, the media, you pay to speak.
So the person that paid to speak the most, that
the person that paid to speak the most, we actually
speak the most on the media. Therefore, and then the

(01:08:36):
person that's actually saying the truth we speak less. Again,
I'm you're using CNN for an example. I just call
in CNN. I'm helping the media. I call him Fox News.
I'm helping the media. The means I'm calling their names

(01:08:57):
because we expect to get important because they are the
mainstream media with the follower you see for example, in writing.
In ACA writing, you choose a side. I teach the

(01:09:20):
kids that take for example, if a libra said Fox
News is terrible, fox News is not goot fire. Okay, okay,
give me the facts and let me be the George.

(01:09:40):
Don't tell me Fox your is terrible. And you know
my brother asks why, and then don't give me any reasons. Right,
that's what is happening, And mister just gaslight. I just say,

(01:10:00):
somebody is terrible. Okay, tell me why. In ASA writing,
you must teach a kid how to speak. I'll tell
the kid. You can just say somebody is wrong. So

(01:10:21):
if you tell me that Fox is Fox News, a
b C. That Fox is not good news, of which
I think it is, tell me why. Normally, as a
writing I'm expected of you to have three parts. In
the most simplified terms of it, you introduced to me,

(01:10:45):
what will you be talking about why I think Fox
News is not good? And then that's the introduction. In
the body of your ESSI you will give me the
reasons why. That's the first part of the body of
your essay. You give me the reasons why. If you
give me the reasons why and you conclude, then that's

(01:11:07):
not an essay. You did not inform me because you
did not challenge my brain. You just fit me in
an echo chamber of those who don't like Fox News.
So if you tell me that Fox News is not good,
of which I think it is, you introduce me to that.

(01:11:31):
I don't want to go into scholastic writing about an
abstract and review and literature about it and backgroundly job
about it. Now, I'm going to do a basic, basic
elementary how information is retained. So if you tell me

(01:11:53):
Fox is not good source of information, of which I
think it is, I keep repeating that. I just stay
on it so that and this will still focus. That's
why I try hosted there. Then good. I'm happy to
know about that. It's good for mis healthy. You tell
me why I think Fox is not good. But you

(01:12:17):
have the obligation, the responsibility, the expectation, the commitment and
the investment to tell me why Fox is good too.
Miss must create balance. When seeing try to do that balance,

(01:12:39):
it's not informing, it's not in to get here the
balance in itself. It's just a ritual it's just okay,
we spoke about the other side of it. They know that.
That's why the writings is suffering. Have the gods fox

(01:13:01):
if he chose to be to take it down that
I would just I'm just a defender of this. So
everybody knows that. So you're not trying to objective. You
don't go to the social today, to any news organization
today and look for objectivity. Objectivity is a branding because

(01:13:25):
they're paid to apply. Socartists was objective? He got killed?
What the Muther king was? They got killed? Jesus was
they got killed. See, even Charlie Kirk tried to be

(01:13:48):
objective to what he believes in. He got killed because
both sides don't want that truth, honesty and fairness. It's
a type of society again. Fairness. I've spoken about truth,

(01:14:11):
it doesn't matter. I talk about right, it doesn't matter.
I talk about fairness. Fairness is a natural right. It's
just natural that if you see a human being one
is blue, one is green, you cannot hit the human being.
Put the human being is green, you cannot hit that

(01:14:35):
human being because the human being is blue. It's just
not right, it's not fair, and it's not truth. It's
not just. It's not because there is nothing being wrong
by being white. There's nothing wrong by being black, about

(01:15:01):
being blue green. You cover even to the the white human.
There is no white human again because we know the
color white. There is no black human because we know
the color black. Again, the human being husband brain washed.

(01:15:23):
A new type of white was invented, and a new
type of black. What it was invented in impost on people. Remember,
wouldn't be silly to see a person fighting that the
person is white or the person fighting the person's black.
You'll be asking what part of their brain? What happened

(01:15:44):
to the brain? Because then be brain washed. That's it
dip so much that the truth that they are not
white will be offensive. The truth that they are not
black would be offensive because actually, again, that naturality of

(01:16:05):
right truth has been taken away. I means the naturality
of being truth is taken away, the naturality of being
right is taken away, the naturalty of being fair is

(01:16:26):
taken away. You know, it's not fair to be the
richest person in the world. Why the people in the street.
You ask yourself, what did I do to deserve that?
It'll be you ask yourself that question, what rules did

(01:16:50):
you not apply? How did you buy a way to that?
Who suffered for that? It's just natural in the society
that if you see just dinosaurs and miss everybody else
is hiding and why they're hiding? What makes some people

(01:17:16):
do very successful and some people to be struggling? How
did they get it so right? What type of school
did they go to? What is their IQ? What makes
them so special? You can't ask those questions to that.

(01:17:39):
It therefore means there for that you hate wealth and
you hate that. That's where societifind itself, I whet the
person says that, therefore, since you're asking intelligent questions. But
since people are not taught to entertain intelligent questions, since
people are not taught to think down and ask questions,
that's the call of my philosophy. You must think, doubt

(01:18:03):
and ask questions on everything to get the sanity of
your mind, to purify your brain. You must seek the
truth and what is right? Not the right and truly
spoken to? And what is fair? You go back to John,
to John Locke, you make a simple example of what

(01:18:24):
is fair. I would like to go back to it.
If you build your house and I pass by. I'm
just paraphrase and I'm making I'm I'm just trying to
make sense out of it. You build your house, I

(01:18:45):
passed by. You build a house, and in labor, and
once the house is finished, and I can and I
say to you that whether I need to take the house,
now give me your house. You know it's not right,

(01:19:07):
and I know it's not right. It means I don't
need to go to Havard as an expert. Now we're
told to to ha betraate on what is right and around.
But what about their corrupt and their partisan? What about that?

(01:19:27):
Some people are there because of corruption and the partisan,
not because their IQ speaker, not because the high a
higher IQ, not because of some super intelligence. But they
just buy their ways to it. And then now they
become the expert to talk to us about news, to
teach and see their cast lighters, and they themselves they
don't now because they'll be so entitled. I'm victim to

(01:19:48):
not know that they don't. Now. I know you don't Noway,
don't seek information. You blindfold yourself to information. You believe,
you believe h what you're saying to yourself is true.
I do everything it means it's just monolithic. You live

(01:20:09):
in a pluralistic society. You know it's not fair to
hit somebody because they are short. You know, it's not
fair to hit somebody because they are tall. You know
it's not right, it's not true. Right, fair and true
work together. I'm being just. It's another caveac of being fair.

(01:20:40):
But fairness in itself goes alongside right and true. There's
the beginning of our being, the beginning in Genesis. Seeking
to know the beginning OF's philosophy, Gallant your questioning, you
go back to the ancient philosophers of Egypt, Mesopotamia, Babylon, Persian.

(01:21:05):
You move around the world Confucius to no question of faith,
thinking of doubting. Always remember I always say that between

(01:21:28):
the completely opposite and the completely obitrary, there is always
a why. Find a way when there is no why,
because there is always a why. I said a long
time ago, am I writing and my heart in triangulism,

(01:21:51):
that our numerical system is flawed when it starts from
zero and one. It's even super floor. Really, just start
of one zero one means just two positives. The binary
that we have today. That's part of our system. That

(01:22:11):
becomes part of the problem we in computing and technologies,
the binary either all. But you see even in the
binary in computing, it's two positives. Zero is a positive
and one is a positive and the worst in human

(01:22:34):
in numerical system, zero is not even mentioned. When teacher
kids to count. You start to teach a kid to
come from one to three, four, five six, and my system,
we don't do that. It was changed to teach a
kid to start coming from zero one to three four

(01:22:55):
five because zero was invented by India. Zero do not exist.
Imagine what a zero douben no one dono binary system
dubno competing. I teach my skids to start counting from
minus one zero one. See if what if you ask

(01:23:19):
my child to come from one to ten, My chilways
start counting from minus one zero, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight,
nine ten. I teach my kid to now that within

(01:23:41):
every thigh, expect a negative as the minus one I
expect a positive. I'd exprest a neutral number. You can

(01:24:03):
must see things in three to get basic logic, right.
That's triangleism, I said, cough my philosophy, I said, the
human being must think doubt and ask questions. That's three things.
And then it's all about projection, perception, and perspective. That's
three things. And music, measurement, proportionality, and balance. That's three

(01:24:26):
things that way want to count. Start from minus one,
zero and one. That's three things. That binary cannot work
or binary that binary will be obsolete. If it's not
minus one, zero and one, there must be an impetuent.

(01:24:50):
I'll make this simple example. Follow this philosophy. There is
no conflict. It's just a flow of information. If, for example,
go back to Fox somebody said and liberal said, fuck news,
it's terrible. In my system, he say, yes, fox News

(01:25:14):
is terrible because that person says so that he yes
A in my system of logic. If you say fox
News is terrible, of which is not a yes, first
us is terrible, b No, firstness is not because there

(01:25:39):
are people who say Foxes is not. So that's the truth.
And then see fox News might be and fox News
might not be. That might be or might not be.
That's the beginning of information. It's for you not to
go seek the information. That's how we solve the media

(01:26:08):
information deficiencies that we have. That's why I can go
anywhere on the news. I can watch any channel on
the news. I follow the same principle if I go
on the website and the website it's ranting how terrible
Israel is, of which Israel nat. Don't confuse a people

(01:26:35):
for a politics. Don't judge a people to a politician,
and don't judge a people by course of action, because again,
based on my logic, you might be right, you might
not be right, and you might be both. Remember that

(01:27:00):
take this home very important today. Then America will be
a better place. It means you can get news anywhere
and don't be no problem. Don't make it personal this
time you listen to information. It's an opportunity to let
to learn something. So ort to take home with you today.

(01:27:27):
I should tell you forever when somebody says something, always
make that as a b negate what that person say
as a counter argument to what that person say. That's

(01:27:47):
b That's how it used to be. But I've added
it that layer negat the negative and positive. That's all
I've added. With disurben non violence, domin no conflict. You

(01:28:09):
will have the right to speak and not kill somebody
at somebody, I mean, they said you're intacted to what
you're saying, does not understand it. Speech is not physical.
It cannot be falset onto you. It cannot be falset

(01:28:33):
unto you. Again, because I said three things, you must
be open minded, open hearted, and open handed. Three things again,
open minded, open hearted, and open handed. Open mind. Information

(01:28:53):
you have ears, let it get in open heart, Assume
the best way the person saying it, open hand, reach
out to the person. I let you guys debate about it.
Remember open mind. They information don't get in open heart,

(01:29:21):
think the best way the person saying it, open hand,
reach out to the person, shake the person's eyes. I
let you guys debate about it. Why because of our
theory and principle that there are three sides to everything triangalism,

(01:29:44):
there are three sides to everything. There are three sides
to everything as triangalism. Take for example, I like America.
You have the right to say you don't like a America.
And what is true is that you might or you

(01:30:09):
might not. That is true? And if it because you
might say you don't like America when you're just lying
to yourself, are you might say you're like America when
you're just lying to yourself too. So the truth is
that you might like America or you might not like America.

(01:30:30):
That's the balance I talk about. And when you know
that you might, you might not, and there is no
reason to fight. And therefore it's not God's good truth.
It's left back on you to think. But the media
of today and the information system today, they want to

(01:30:53):
impose the world of thinking that's conflict, people hiding one another, violence, threats, shuldance.
The new way of information is a chamble way. And
I would like to start to see people say that
when I want to say something, give your speech and

(01:31:21):
always end by saying that I might be wrong. I
will go to upport somebody. Let people. Now that's based
on the fact that you have that's a gift. Open

(01:31:47):
channels for dialogue. But people speak to everything. Is God's
put truth? When even the Church is trying to tell
people that believe in yourself. On the contrary, today the
secular system is in believe in us. Isn't that Ironica

(01:32:07):
that the church to die is becoming a place of
freedom and the secular system is becoming the old Roman
Catholic Church and in its new Galileo, in its new
galileole us to come back and assure the people. And

(01:32:33):
there is no conflict unless we create a conflict. There
is a conflict because once I believe that they are
true and the other is not. If you guys have
a boundary dispute, A boundary dispute means ask claiming that

(01:32:55):
the land is mine, disclaimed that land is mine, right,
they cannot solve that. That's a most bounded displate dispute.
This war was then my ted element came in comes
in the country claiming that it's theirs. She said it

(01:33:15):
might not be theirs. And likewise, and if she said, oh,
the band might not be but this, and the other
said the band might not be this, then this, then
there is a workable compromise. Don't be no war there,
don't can't we can't reach in the middle. Then, based

(01:33:39):
on nationalism, our system of thought that we always try
about this is wrong. And now you need you need
not to readucate your people that we're thinking like this
our boundary. We did not create the earth, so we
might not be right people, and they might not be
right too. So therefore we might reach in the middle

(01:34:04):
and they will be peace forever. But today, no use
of media outlet on social media and propagate the right
and division. That's all they tell because they're blain the
blind people from the traitings that matters the most. Triangulism again,

(01:34:28):
truth right and fairness, Truth right and fairness is taken away.
A mind I supposed to think, doubt and ask questions
is taken away. A mind I supposed to have a projection, perception,

(01:34:50):
and perspective is taken away. A mind I supposed to
seek measurement, proportionality, and balance is taken away. A mine
I was supposed to calculate based on minus one, zero
and one and thereforeward. It's taken a why. A mine

(01:35:13):
I was supposed to see mathematical computation, our governums based
on zero one and in bettery, it's taken a why.
A mind I was supposed to see the opposite of
things to secret itself, it's taken a why and got

(01:35:37):
information age that there's so much information unless knowledge, I
cannot be The beauty is to learn something near, to
make a new friend, to get something new. The newness

(01:36:03):
of the information stage aspair the newness on the information
or on the information stage. It's not what create creates
it's that which creates a great society, an enlightened society,
a civilized society, a society that does not fight and

(01:36:24):
destroy itself, society that develop, heals, and flourishes itself. That's
my philosophy. Go to a podcast and an equal chamber.

(01:36:44):
Don't be scared of the news anymore. When listening to
what somebody say, do me a favor, counter that, and
look for the in between. M hm. That impty means
you have learned something. If somebody tells you Israel is bad,

(01:37:12):
take there as a and connect the b b. Israel
is not bad. That is, that is an equivalent to
what is said. So not all enough with a neutrality
a teed ran a triangulism factor. Israel might be good,

(01:37:35):
Israa might be bad. If you come to that conclusion,
then deferre may side is rest like everybody asks, and
miss Israel is like you. Therefore there is no reason
to hate. Therefore, therefore you attain a neutral stage your

(01:37:58):
balance m h. But now you'll learned information. If the
person say is Ras bad? Is Ray bad? Tell your
person that you want to work on something. Give me
the reasons why don't gas like me? Remember if somebody
said it is not, you must seek the reasons to

(01:38:22):
know why it is not. There must be an equivalence
to have something to walk with, it must be something
to walk with. So if I tell you there is
Ray bad, that's not information. The information that you're expecting

(01:38:49):
is the be part of that person's information. Why is
very bad? And by the person proven what is raised bad,
you can see within the pulse of what the person's
sign that Israel is not bad. I know the information

(01:39:19):
not about Israel and the fallacy in that person's statement.
You cannot not debate the person if it's not a debate,
know within yourself that even though Israel it's bad, based
on what that person's sign from the information I have,
it's verse not bad. That's when that's where academic ended

(01:39:47):
all write my writing. I'll ask Ai to look for
a counter argument to my writing. But if you see
the counter argument in itself is flawed, h I can't
the counter argument does that actually counter what I'm saying.
For me to learn from what I'm saying, it's just

(01:40:08):
opposing what I'm saying. So opposition is not a counter argument.
That's my new walth of thinking. I would like to
think that way. You can see Democrat opposing Republican. You're
not getting anything out of that. Out of that, the
opposition judgements that my side is wrong, my side is right,

(01:40:31):
my side is right. That's it. Nothing new. So you're
you're left with a. It means you go to the left,
you get a. You go to the right, you get a.

(01:40:52):
There is no pay. That's how far we've gotten. Remember
if somebody tells you that, because your mind must think,
doubt and ask questions, that question part gives you the
B part. If I tell the apples are not good

(01:41:20):
for you. For example, there is the debate that Tyler
now is not good for pregnant women. Y'all, storty debate.
That's a A Tyler Know is not good for pregnant women. Okay,

(01:41:47):
B Tyler Know is good for pregnant women. That's our
logic automatically based on my philosophy. You don't need the
person to prove that to them. It means you're trying
to equivicate what the person you just said to therefore

(01:42:14):
think to therefore, think down and ask questions. So you
have you have negated you have you have negated what
the person said with the equivalence of what the person said.
I'm trying to make my philosophy very clear. So you're
still maintaining your mental state. That's so I see when

(01:42:37):
people go to the midd that they cannot stand it
because they believe the air already, or to oppose the air,
but just negate the air it miss you got nothing
to do. That's a compartible negation. You want to have
room to therefore think that and ask questions. Because you

(01:43:03):
must think that and ask questions. That's the goal. And
that's the third part. So without any information, therefore, it
means tyler know is bad for you automatically in your brain.

(01:43:27):
The big part is it's from you, not the person.
Yet tyler noise is good for it's good for for
pregnant women. So you have equip You have equipated the
same information. So to keep your balance. Remember that that
that equivocation keeps your balance. It means it does not

(01:43:49):
affect your internalization. That's why I said, don't let the
externalization infiltrate and destabilize your externalization. HM. So once you
get the externalization, give an equivocal internalization of the opposite

(01:44:09):
of that which you said to keep your mental state.
Say if I tell you that Taylor noise bad for
pregnant women, don't say, oh my wow, am I arist?
Now don't do that. You get a heart attack, You
misinformed and gaslight it. Immediately say to yourself, Tyler is

(01:44:35):
good for pregnant women. That is a shield to that
information coming to you, so you can have space to think,
doubt and ask questions. So the A tyrann is good
for you is an automatic er A tylranno is not

(01:44:56):
good for pregnant women. Automatic b tayl I know it's
good for pregnant women. See, so you have two things now,
so see now is tell I no may be good
for pregnant women. Tell I no, man not a good
for pregnant women. You see now you're you're reasonable. Now

(01:45:24):
Now I can ask questions. They're not without it's hurting you.
Now you're trying to solve a problem. Now, don't make
yourself the problem. That's why somebody tell you giving you
for me, I said, you must be angry, you must
be sad, you must be worried, you must be traumatized. No,
you don't need to be just as a person said,

(01:45:46):
you must be worried automatically, I don't need to be worried,
and the Changlism effect. I might be worried. I might
not see and then type the person now tell me more.

(01:46:11):
We don't worry about what the person saying. I cannot
hurt you. I cannot give your heart attack. It's on
the person right now, because you already know that the
person may be right, the person I be wrong. And
when the person is giving you their facts now at
least in the fallacies and flaws in that now you're

(01:46:32):
being informed, I can still forgive the person then, because
you know even that person speaking three things is happening.
That person might think they're right automatically. It means if
you think they are a miss, they're not. That's what

(01:46:53):
said I teach humans on that. What's you think you are,
then you're not amiss. You might I might not be
to be or not to be. It's a choice. Therefore, remember,

(01:47:18):
but when the completely contrary a mister right, and the
completely abictuary the mister left, there is always away, a
mister meadow. Then he goes make away way. There is

(01:47:45):
no way a man not sad because we must seeking
for meself to know I try to to to do
my best to make you to be able to absorb information,

(01:48:05):
whether handing yourself, where hading others, and then the person speak,
Then the person speak. They don't kill somebody for speaking.
That's the problem, right that it means you took the
A to bed. When there's A, there is B, and

(01:48:31):
when there's B that is C. Even the most logic
you got a B and C. Or they go to
why the why is all known? There is why. There's
always always push the envelope of information on God. Right,

(01:48:56):
don't take things for God for truth because the truth
in itself truth and I has already been corrupted. We
live in a society. I've started by saying I want
to be psycle in mine am I am? I am
I speaking I aspect does I I speak. I try
to take a point. I go many ways to make

(01:49:17):
a point because my intent is not to hurt or anything.
I don't want to think. I don't want to take
an opinion then after hurt because I am I be wrong.
It's on my own philosophy. The miss everything I'm sighed
to be in a balanced that obey have the opposite

(01:49:38):
of what I'm saying and then I might be right
and I be wrong, and he's like I can listen
to something and are obliged to listen to that, and
I was forced to take any point. I must not
believe in anything. I can't believe in something if you
want to as a freedom. And my philosophy brings to

(01:50:05):
the world Philosopher, Prince, they are intelligence is philosopher. Prince
israe'sar from the Great City of Las Vegas, September twenty seven,

(01:50:32):
twenty twenty five. Thank you,