Sacred Tax Dollars Pt 2: 300 Years and The Goddess of the Hunt

Part two of our meditation on sacred tax dollars, the people in charge of legislating, collecting and  stewarding those funds and what went so fucking wrong?!?  We explore the current (ridiculously over budget / behind schedule) NASA project. We take a quick break to attempt to put “$1 Billion Dollars” in actual real life context. We top it off with a deep dive into the NASA ARTEMIS Project. 

Featured Sources:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-10-17/michael-bloomberg-nasa-s-artemis-moon-mission-is-a-colossal-waste

https://www.theblaze.com/shows/glenn-tv/leaked-documents-reveal-insane-dei-plan-for-nasa

https://www.theblaze.com/news/blaze-news-investigates-nasa-whistleblowers-expose-dei-playbook-that-risked-moon-mission-safety

Visit Website: www.abracast.com
The Red Vault / Subscribestar: www.subscribestar.com/abracast 
The voice of The Abracast – Hila Assor https://hilaassor.com/
Theme Song “Red Horse Rising” by X-Proph3t: http://www.reverbnation.com/xproph3t
Written / Produced / researched / Performed – Jon Towers

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:08):
In the dark shadows, in the white cold. Fearlessly, we
search for knowledge new and old. We drink the strong
spirits and read the ancient tongs. The order of the Abercast.
We are the brave.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
And the bold.

Speaker 1 (00:34):
The Abercast a cold history, conspiracy and violence.

Speaker 3 (01:20):
Hey everybody, this is John Towers and we're continuing with
our talk. I guess the through line to this is
the sacredness of your tax dollar. And we're gonna just
jump right in. This is a direct continuation from the
last episode. I was forty four minutes in and I

(01:42):
realized that I hadn't even got through half the shit
that I want to talk about. So I'm like, Okay, well,
here we go. We're gonna do part two. So this
is it. I haven't moved my butt since last since
last week. Here we go. I wanted to get into
this article. Here we're gonna be talking about the Artemist,
which is a NASA program. It's it's not a conspiracy theory.

(02:04):
It's out there. We it's known, and there's an article
that we're gonna be talking about, uh from Bloomberg News.
If you guys don't know who Bloomberg was or is
he was a he was a mayor of New York City,
and he crashed the whole city. Not as bad as
it's crashed now. Uh, there's not uh you know, people

(02:27):
throwing each other on subway tracks and should on this
a lot of should not. I mean there's probably should
on the street, but not so much as it is now. Anyhow,
Bloomberg was like the precursor of the New York City
apocalypse that has happened recently. Anyhow, he created Bloomberg News,

(02:50):
which I didn't even know of until he was, uh
running for president, So silly, what are you talking about?
But he's a crazy status of course from you know,
New York City mayor. You know, they don't come in
any other shape and size other than in sane status. Right,

(03:11):
So here we go. This is from Bloomberg News. Oh
I think he actually even wrote this. Michael R. Bloomberg Opinion.
This is an opinion piece. It says the headline is
NASA's one hundred billion dollar Moon mission is going nowhere.
The Artemis program years behind schedule and billions over budget.

(03:33):
Should have who? Taxpayers and presidents demanding answers by Michael R. Bloomberg.
Michael R. Bloomberg is the founder of a majority owner
of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, and
he's the founder of Bloomberg Philanthropies. And he's a failed
presidential candidate from the red the blue side whatever. I

(04:00):
always think that the Democrats should be the red side,
because you know, they're a bunch of communists. But anyhow,
I think that also plays into my I also have dyslexia,
so anyhoy whatever. Remember I've just recorded an episode, so
I'm already kind of three sheets to the wind. The
government boondoggles. And then there's NASA's Artemis program. More than

(04:24):
half a century after Neil Armstrong's giant leap for mankind,
Artemis was intended to land astronauts back on the Moon,
and it has so far spent nearly one hundred billion
dollars without anyone getting off the ground. Yet its complexity
and outrageous wastes are still spiraling upward. When did he

(04:45):
write this? Did I say, twenty twenty four October seventeenth,
twenty twenty four, not that long ago. However, what we
know about the Artemis program now is so different, And
we're going to talk about where what this one hundred
billion dollar bought you what your one hundred billion dollars
of sacred taxpayer money bought you. We're gonna talk about

(05:08):
that this evening. It so far has spent one hundred
billion dollars without anyone getting off the ground. Yet its
complexity and outrageous waste are still spiraling upwards. The next
US president should hand his South African henchmen. The next

(05:31):
US President and South African henchman should rethink the program
in its entirety. I believe they probably are as someone
who greatly respects science and strongly supports space exploration. The
more I've learned about Artemis, the more it has become
apparent that it's a colossal waste of taxpayer money. Whenever,

(05:53):
from now on, whenever I'm doing the show and I
run into the term taxpayer money, I'm gonna say the
sacred taxpayer money. This no hold on tax the taxpayer's
sacred money. You're taking food off my table. You're taking
shoes off my kid's nubbins. You're taking a roof off

(06:15):
my house when I need to get it replaced. You're
putting obstacles in my way of replacing my furnace when
I need to replace it my water heater when I
need to replace it, I'm broke, bitches. I you know
what I'm talking about. That money means stuff to us.
One hundred billion dollar waste of a fucking space program.

(06:37):
And you know what he's saying is the is the
accepted like line. What we know now more. What we
know more now about Artemis is you're gonna find out
where this one hundred billion dollars went and what what
this whole fucking thing actually is. I feel like I'm
hyping it up a little, like, let's just let it

(06:58):
speak for itself. The problem is start with a mission
which is more political than scientific. There are little humans
can do on the Moon than robots cannot. Technology has
come a long way since nineteen sixty nine. To put
it mildly, we do not need another person on the
Moon to collect rocks or take scientific measurements. And the

(07:22):
cost of putting people on the Moon and of planning
for their potential rescue should complications arise or truly astronomical, Well,
what Bloomberg here doesn't even know at the end of
last year was that the point of it was should
I even say this? The stage the idea of it

(07:43):
was to have a base on the Moon that we
can launch to Mars from. So it wasn't about collecting
space rocks and whatever he's fucking talking about. It was
having a permanent base on the Moon in which we
can use to launch to Mars. It's kind of like
a way stay. It's kind of like a point in between.
I know it's not that far away, but think about

(08:06):
the vast amount of energy and power and fuel used
just to get off of the at to get out
of the atmosphere of the Earth is astronomical. So if
we can take off from the Moon instead, things get
a little bit easier. And that's the point of it.
Michael Bloomberg didn't understand this a few months ago. But

(08:28):
let's go to understand the level of wasteful spending. Forget
the one billion in space suits that have yet to
be developed. That's pocket change compared to a rockets called
the space launch system see space Launch System. The National
Aeronautics and Space Administrations and Spectro general estimates the program

(08:49):
has so far burned through twenty three point eight billion dollars.
Each launch will likely cost at least four billion, quadruple
initial estimates. This exceeds private sector costs many times over,
yet it can launch only about once every two years,
and unlike, unlike, SpaceX's rockets can't be reused. So this

(09:14):
sentence speaks to the free market. By the way, you
know why SpaceX's rockets can be reused because they cost
a lot of money and someone's got to pay for them.
You know why NASA's rockets aren't reusable because we pay
for them our tax our sacred tax dollars pay for them.

(09:35):
So who cares if they can only be used once
and get thrown in the ocean. We'll just squeeze these
motherfuckers a little bit tighter to buy another rocket. That's it.
Or we can run the printing presses and then use
these motherfuckers and squeeze them to pay for interest on
our loans. That's it, our sacred tax dollars at work

(09:58):
for you right here. Even if the space That's launch
system is completed, there's a hitch. It isn't even powerful
enough to actually get anyone to the Moon, at least
not in its current configuration. It will instead deposit its
capsule called Orion into what's called the near rectilinear halo

(10:19):
orbit here the capsule, which, despite twenty billion dollars being
twenty billion dollars of your sacred tax money being poured
into it, currently has a faulty heat shield. I had
a faulty heat shield in my car. Once must rendezvous
with the landing spacecraft, which will then take the astronauts

(10:40):
to the lunar surface. And getting the landing spacecraft into
orbit before it can be propelled towards the Moon to
meet Orion is itself a complex process. So keep all
of this in mind, because as we get deeper and
deeper into this, it gets more and more insane. So
just think about that real quick. Just keep that in

(11:01):
your mind, put it in your memory. Banks simple artemis
is not a lot could go wrong, and that's before
NASA adds its new space station to the mix, known
as the Gateway. It will cost more than five billion
to build, require perhaps one billion in annual maintenance, and

(11:22):
has no clear rationale. See even he doesn't know, he's whatever.
The idea is that in future missions, O'Brian might dock
at the Gateway, two astronauts will exit and board the lander,
and the remaining crew will sit in the station observe
their colleagues collecting rots rocks. Unfortunately, that's not all to

(11:44):
build gateway, NASA is adding a second stage to the
space launch system called Block one B. Block one B
that is six years behind schedule, expected to cost five
point seven billion, and we'll add about one billion to
every launch to accommodate Block one B. The agency is

(12:07):
erecting a new launch tower called mL two, which is
expected to cost two point seven billion of your sacred
tax dollars. Two point seven billion dollars of money that
they took off of your table, They took off of
your kid shoes, and they took off of your furnace,
and they took out of your hot water replacement situation.

(12:32):
You couldn't afford to get your car service because they
took one point two billion dollars of your sacred tax dollars.
Everybody one point two Where am I at? What the
fuck am I talking about? More than seven times the
initial estimates. It doesn't have a plausible completion date. The
company building mL two has built the government for eight

(12:56):
hundred and fifty thousand overtime hours in the past two years.
Why are they able to do this? Because it's just
your money, it's not their money. They don't make the money.
They steal it from you, your sacred tax dollars. Bro

(13:17):
Let me just revisit this. Eight hundred and fifty thousand
overtime hours in two years. Bet you that's a union job.
Bet you, it's a union job. A celestial irony is
that none of this is necessary. A reusable SpaceX starship
will very well. We're going to talk about why it

(13:37):
can't be SpaceX. We're gonna get into that very likely
to be able to carry cargo and robots directly to
the moon. Do robots on the moon?

Speaker 2 (13:47):
Man?

Speaker 3 (13:48):
Can you believe the fucking time and history that we're
living in? Fucking robots on the moon?

Speaker 2 (13:54):
Man?

Speaker 3 (13:56):
No, slc's oryan gateway block one b mL two required
at small fraction of the costs. Successful landing of the
starship Booster was a breakthrough that demonstrated how far beyond
NASA it is moving here here. Meanwhile, NASA is canceling
or postponing promising scientific programs. We're gonna find out spoiler alert,

(14:20):
this is not a scientific program. Artemis is not a
scientific program. We don't need to talk about secret space
programs and stargates and interdimensional travel and astral projection. This
is a conspiracy that's black and white right in front
of us, right now that your secret tax dollars paid
hang tight, and we're gonna get to it. I should

(14:41):
probably do this. God, I'm run late. I'm so badly,
I'm so I got a lot to say. I've been
away from you guys for too long. I guess it's
what it is, anxious to get back in the flow. Meanwhile,

(15:56):
NASA is canceling or postponing promising scientific proms, including the
Veritus mission to Venus, the Viper Lunar rover, and the
Neo Surveyor telescope intended to scan the Solar System for
hazardous asteroids. As Artemis consumes ever more of its budget,

(16:19):
taxpayers and Congress should be asking what on earth are
we doing? And the next president should be held accountable
for those answers. He's like, yeah, the next president, that
goddamn Donald Trump should be held accountable for all this.

(16:40):
All right. So we've been talking about billions of dollars
a lot, and I've been talking about sacred tax dollars.
So I wanted to just kind of figure out how
to put a billion dollars in context. So Matt Brinker
dot Com. I don't know who this guy is. I
don't know. I just pulled it up and I'm like, Okay,

(17:02):
this sounds good. How much is a billion dollars in perspective?
By Mark Brinker of February six, twenty twenty four. I'm
gonna skip down here to this thing. Ten thousand dollars
a day. Let's say I gave you ten thousand dollars
in cash. That's one one hundred, one hundred dollar bills.

(17:23):
Even with inflation for the average person, ten thousand dollars
cash is still a pretty good day at the office. Now,
let's say I gave you ten thousand dollars squad of
cash every single day. So Monday you have ten thousand dollars,
Tuesday you have twenty thousand dollars, and by the end
of the week you have seventy thousand dollars. I'm not
good at math, but I'm following. My question to you

(17:46):
is this, if we continue at this rate of me
giving you ten thousand dollars every day, how many days
would it take to reach a million dollars? One hundred days,
that's the answer. So in just over three months, you're
a millionaire. Congratulations three months. How long does it take

(18:07):
to get to one billion dollars? Let's keep this experiment going.
If I'm still giving you ten thousand dollars a day,
for every single day, how long would it take for
you to accumulate a billion dollars? Do the math quick,
all you math minded people. You probably might have already
figured this out. The answer is two hundred and seventy

(18:28):
four years, almost three centuries. And here we go. We're
just blowing one hundred billion of your sacred tax dollars
on this bullshit. And when we get to what this
is actually about, I hope it pisses you off. I

(18:49):
hope you get so mad. What can you do with
a billion dollars? Back to this, Markbrinker dot com? What
could you do with a billion dollars? Let's say that
you now have a billion dollars in your possession. What
could you do with that amount of money? If you
did nothing and just parked it in a savings account
at your bank. There's problems with this, especially when they
start trying to roll out digital digital money. You're you're

(19:14):
gonna take a soaking with the money that's in your
bank account. But enough of that, we'll talk about that later.
If you did nothing and just parked in a savings
account at your bank, and yes, I know you can't
just go down to your local bank and deposit a
billion dollars, but we're talking hypotheticals. So if you are
only collecting a measly three percent annual interest on your

(19:36):
one billion, you'd collect thirty million dollars a year in interest.
This is what Warren Buffett did with Coca Cola, by
the way, I mean, it wasn't a bank account. He
bought stock and now he basically just lives off this stock.
If you look in terms of homes, in most places
you need a pretty nice house for like five hundred
thousand dollars. With a billion, you could buy two thousand

(19:58):
of these half a million dollar homes and give them
out as Christmas gifts. Or you could do like mister Beast.
I was actually at a Mexican restaurant today and the
guy sitting on the next booth looked a lot like
mister Beast. I was like, hey, can you pick up
my nacho? Can you pay for my nacho's please? Or
you could do like mister beast does and help these

(20:21):
less fortunate, whether it be providing food, housing, clean drinking water,
free nachos here and there, or whatever social cause you're
passionate about, and make the world a better place, and
you'd still have plenty left over for your garage full
of expensive cars. In conclusion, anyway, that's how big one
just one billion dollars is. So the next time you

(20:43):
see a corporation reporting twenty billion dollars profit or the
government wanting to invest fifty billion in some project, instead
of looking at those figures like monopoly money, hopefully now
you have a better feeling of how big those numbers
actually are and what's what's the word of the day,
sacred tax dollars. Let's take a break, and then we're

(21:06):
actually going to get into the insane real purpose of
this Artemis business that Bloomberg thinks. Oh, it's just a
failure of you know, planning and management and you know science. God,
I'm so far behind Blaze media Leaked documents reveal insaeing

(22:26):
DEI plans for NASA. This was just two days ago
March well two days ago as of this recording March thirteenth,
twenty twenty five from reckless spending and warmongering, to importing
illegal immigrants and carving up children in labs. That's it.

(22:47):
That's incendiary calling it care. It's hard to say which
part of living under Biden Harris regime was the worst.
The insidious cancer that is diversity, equity and inclusion certainly
makes the top five. Though once the administration rubber stamped
the fundamentally flawed system that champions racial division, underperformance, and

(23:09):
cultural Marxism while thrashing merit and free speech, it spread
like a disease through the federal government and then across
the country. There was no place that was safe from
the poison of DEI, not even the Moon. In Glenn
Beck's latest Wednesday Night Specialty shares the disturbing content of

(23:31):
newly leaked documents that reveal NASA's dangerous plan to prioritize diversity,
equity and inclusion in its Artemis mission and to put
the first woman and first person of color on the Moon.
The ninety nine page file, Glenn says, was leaked exclusively
to my team at the Blaze by two NASA scientists.

(23:53):
The document outlines NASA's plan to return to the Moon,
and yet there's no science in it, and there's not
even a breakdown of costs. Well one hundred billion dollars
is what Michael Bloomberg thinks. He explains it's because the
document isn't produced by scientists, but rather by public relation
gurus who use emotional appeal, psychology and PR to manipulate

(24:17):
our feelings. See are the past shows we've done on
culture creation and advertisement and all this stuff. In his
first term, Orangeman Bad set the US on a path
to return to the moon, but when Biden took office,
he changed the trajectory. Hold on, I'm going to reread this,

(24:39):
so I know I'm complaining about time, but I just
got to do this right. In the first term, Orangeman
Bad set the US on a path to return to
the moon, but when Plugs took office, he changed the
trajectory suddenly, and it wasn't about going to the moon again.
It was about getting certain people to the moon. Science
was replaced by cultural Marxism and the EI. And you know,

(25:02):
you could go back and you could just look on
YouTube and you can find him. You know, whoever was
telling him what to say. He I mean, it's clear
he was even more useless than he was in the seventies, eighties,
and nineties going we're gonna double down on you know

(25:23):
uh and we know this is in his heart right
because whoever picked his vice president candidate for him was like,
I'm a woman of color. Like, what about the most
you know, awesome person? Now, now we're gonna skip the

(25:44):
most awesome people and just focus on a woman in color,
which is gonna This is it? Like this is the
if you take that little clippet of history back then
this is the as far as you can get on
the scale, Like, this is the I don't want to

(26:07):
say logical conclusion, but this is it. This is what
happens when you take that sentence. Hold on, all right, Sorry,
I had to I had to find this. This isn't
exactly what I was thinking of, but this is close enough.
When you hear the fucking this puppet talking and what
he is about to say, this is can I find

(26:28):
a year on this? Four years ago? Obviously four years ago,
this is when he was running for president. Remember he
was vice president and then he was gonna he was
thinking about running, but he couldn't run against Hillary Clinton
because she would have fucking destroyed him. She would have
I don't know if I'm talking about metaphorically or physically whatever,

(26:49):
she would have destroyed him. So he sat that one out,
and then when she got destroyed, he jumped in and
he was like, Hey, they're gonna fix all this for you, Joe, Hey, Hey, hey,
they're gonna fix all this for you. And so listen
to what he says. And he's sitting here next to
Bernie Sanders, who's chewing the bottom of his face off
on this debate stage because he's like, God, I wish

(27:10):
I could have said that first. But listen to what
he says and what he's about to say in this
I don't know, forty two second clip. What he's about
to say is the starting point. And then what we're
going to talk about with what happened at NASA, what's
going on with this one hundred billion dollar and your
sacred tax money, sacred tax dollar budget is the logical conclusion.

(27:38):
It starts here and it ends here. It starts very narrow,
very tiny, just two sentences whatever, forty two seconds, and
then what you wind up with is this astronomical ass
fuck for the American people. And that's enough. You'll get it.
I'm sure you guys are smart. Whatever, just here listen, God,
damn it, where's it at? Here?

Speaker 4 (28:00):
Committed that if I'm elected.

Speaker 3 (28:01):
He looks like a Jeff Dunham puppet.

Speaker 4 (28:02):
By the way, appoint someone to the courts will be
I'll appoint the first black woman to the courts. It's
required that they have representation. Now it's long over.

Speaker 3 (28:11):
What about merit? What about uh? You know that doesn't matter.
It's your gender and your skin color. That's what's going
to land you in this position, lady.

Speaker 4 (28:23):
The secondly, if I'm elected president, my cabinet, my administration
will look like the country, and I commit that I
will in fact appoint a I'll pick a woman to
be vice president. There are a number of women who
are qualified to be president. Tomorrow, I would pick a
woman to be my vice president vice president.

Speaker 2 (28:43):
It's got to just follow up, just to be clear.
You just committed here tonight that you were running mate,
if you get the nomination, will be a woman.

Speaker 3 (28:50):
Yes. She looks so happy with them, She's like, that's amazing.
What do you tell me? What are you doing? And
so we're gonna talk about Hollywood. In Hollywood and the

(29:11):
messaging and CIA and propaganda. We kind of already been
talking about it. But think about, like, remember now that
we're just talking about like Hillary Clinton running for office.
Remember all the TV shows and movies and stuff that happened.
Remember they had like Madam's Secretary and all this all
this bullshit and I was blind to this. And in

(29:33):
the nineties, people were around me were talking about the
West Wing and I'm like, who gives a shit about
the West Wing? And they're like, no, this is important
because Bill Clinton was president, you know, and so they're like,
all of this messaging was pro president. Think about now,

(29:53):
Think about what all the presidential messaging in TVs and
movie are now. Think about that. You got the Red Hulk,
you got the Kingpin, who's the mayor of New York,
you know, with the fixed can fix it hats instead
of a make America great again hats. Like just think
about it, and it reminds me of in there was

(30:16):
in the nineties. Most people don't know this, probably most
people of this pod, you know, people listening to this show.
They're like, oh, Harrison Ford played other people than Indiana
Jones and Hans Solo. Yeah, he in in the nineties.
He played the president in the American of the United
States in this movie called Air Force One, and he

(30:39):
was like a war hero and Gary Oldman was like
hijacking Air Force one, and Harrison Ford was like the
President and he was like karate fighting him, and it
was laughable. It was all silly. And also this is
when ID four came out the first Independence Day and
again this president who was played by Bill Pullman, was

(30:59):
like an ex Air Force pilot and he rallied everyone
again and he gave this amazing wartime speech and mister
Limbaugh had said, like this is propaganda, Like this is
Hollywood saying the President is like this strong, verile, you
know of action hero kind of figure. And I was like,

(31:23):
it's just a shitty movie. I mean, it was literally
a shitty movie. And when the White House got destroyed,
that part was pretty cool. Other than that, like, it
was pretty shitty movie. And then like the weird Quaid
brother who got adducted by aliens or something flew up
a the butthole of a UFO or whatever, I don't
know whatever, and Will Smith was fist fighting aliens. This

(31:47):
is so much to think about. But the Harrison Ford one,
it was like karate fighting Gary Oldman in the galley
of Air Force one or something. Well, he met Bill Clinton,
and Bill Clinton was like, oh, I really like your movies.
You know, he's probably talking about Star Wars or something.
And Harrison Ford was like, well, you know, I based
my performance off off of you, Bill Clinton. You're like,

(32:09):
what if terrorists tried to hijack Bill Clinton's Air Force one?
He'd be like, Okay, well, what are you gonna suck
my dick? Now? Like, what's going on? He's not karate
fighting Gary Oldman in the Gallon Air Force One. He's
trying to jam a cigar up his bothole or something.
I don't know. I feel like I've veered off, so

(32:35):
I need I need a break. I need to regather my.

Speaker 2 (32:41):
Do this.

Speaker 3 (32:41):
You'll sit through this, We'll come back.

Speaker 2 (33:01):
H h.

Speaker 3 (33:38):
My fellow Americans get oh god, sorry, he's doing trying
to do some on the fly show prep. But I'm
caught up to where I need to be. In his
first term, the president, President orange Man set the US
on the path to return to the moon. But when
Plugs took office, he changed the trajectory and suddenly it

(34:01):
wasn't about getting to the moon again. It was about
getting certain people to the Moon. Science was replaced by
cultural Marxism and DEEI. The whistleblowers who leaked these documents,
Glenn says, unfortunately cannot be on the show to reveal
their identities because they're still afraid for their jobs even

(34:21):
though they're now in the private sector. Glenn instead shares
some quotes from these anonymous sources. I was told to
be seen and not heard in all meetings related to
science as a scientist. I was just pretty shocked by
how meticulous they were in controlling the narrative and ready

(34:45):
already pre identifying protagonists and antagonists, so controlling the narrative
protagonists and antagonists. Keep that in mind, what are what's
all this? This is storytelling the way they would chair
picked these rag tag, these rags to riches stories of
these astronauts. A lot of it was centered around DEI. NASA,

(35:07):
in my opinion, had become a glorified DEI program. And
remember not I don't want to go backwards again because
I don't feel like I muddled this up and fucked
it up enough. But going back to Obama, remember Obama said, hey,
NASA's actually one of the main jobs in NASA is
now going to be making He didn't say it this way.

(35:29):
I can't remember the way he said it. In my brain.
It goes, you know, making Muslim people happy about their
contributions to science, and you're like, what are you even
talking about? And this is when he was on his
he was on he was railing against the Muslim place

(35:49):
in the American story. And everyone, everyone that I spoke to,
was like, what is he talking about? And I'm like, oh,
I know what he's talking about. America has found because
we were trying to find a way around Muslim pirates.
That's the whole reason that they found America. They were

(36:09):
trying to find a way to steer around Muslim pirates.
That's the reason that the New World was found. It
was in direct we were running from them. Okay, okay,
back to this. The leaked Artemis playbook reveals who NASA

(36:29):
wants to build massive appeal with and to get to
participate Big Shock incoming. They're targeting underserved and unrepresented groups,
including BIPOC, which means I didn't know what this means.
I mean, I knew what PAC was. It's like a
person of color, but BYPOC is black, Indigenous, and people

(36:51):
of color youth. In other words, there's not a mission
to the moon. It's a marketing campaign for social activism.
Says NASA isn't trying to inspire the next generation of astronauts.
They're trying to sell an ideology that documents, in an
effort to employ emotional appeals, outlines the artemis's mission, antagonists

(37:14):
and if they're planned to go to the moon, or
a real story in a children's book. So let's think
about Hollywood real quick. Didn't we just have a movie
with like Kevin Costner and like BIPOC ladies of color,
mathematicians or something. I don't know, but like, and I mean,

(37:37):
the story might be real. I'm not a NASA historian,
but I'm like, why is the movie just coming out now?
It's because of this. It's directly because of what we're
talking about right now. Are sacred tax dollars paid for
that movie? I don't have the proof of that, but
it's coming. I guarantee it's coming. I'm in trouble. We're unaware.

(38:00):
Public skeptics who control the budget, conspiracy theorists, and dissatisfy
NASA employees, among others, were considered threats to this mission.
I've never seen anything like this from a Maurica and
it would make Bernet's and Gerbels proud because it was
designed to simulate widespread behavioral changes among individuals, says Glenn,

(38:26):
asking when did NASA get into this game? Could be
the Space Agency was motivated by a lucrative end game
to hear more about NASA's leaked documents, including the agency's
play and to get rich off of its Marxism infused
Arnamous program. Watch the episode above. I'll have this link
inn here in case you guys want to get to it,
but I'm i am running really behind, so we're gonna

(38:49):
jump to the new The next thing, Blaze Media. Blaze
News investigates NASA's whistleblowers exposed di playbook that risk Moon
mission safety. So we've been talking an awful lot about
space in this episode and also plugs Biden, And there
has been some debate going back and forth whether he

(39:11):
left those astronauts on the ISS for political reasons, and
everyone's like, no, he would never do that, Like that's
just crazy, And I'm like, go back and listen to
the abercast, motherfuckers, just go back. I believe the episode
was called the eternal recurrence of Joe Biden. And he
has a fucking track record to do this. We have
such short memories. It's it's it's kind of embarrassing, like

(39:36):
I don't I just don't know, I just don't know
what happened. Joe Biden has a track record of leaving
people behind in places. It's been happening since the seventies. Man,
go back and watch it if you're if you're trapped
in this thing, and it's like, you know, Elon Musk
is like he did this for political reasons, and everyone's like, no,

(39:58):
he would have never done that. Just go back a
couple of years. Look at what happened in Afghanistyan, and
look what happened in Vietnam. Look what happens, saygon, look
what happened Every fucking place this guy gets to put
his dick in. It's something this happens his metaphorical old, fucking, prehistoric, aged,
fucking hair plug dick. Over the past decade, diversity equity

(40:18):
inclusion initiatives have infiltrated federal agencies. We are seeing that
we're living post us AID. Most expected institutions like National
Aeronautics and the Space Administration rooted in scientific discovery to
resist such woke ideology. Yet it has to be apparent

(40:39):
it has. Yet it too has apparently drifted away from
merit based practices. On the first day of his second term,
Orange Man bad moved swiftly to eliminate DII from federal government,
issuing an executive order to terminate all such programs. He
criticized Plugs Biden's administration for embedding deeply unpopular, illegal, and

(41:01):
radical practices within every agency and office land the first
woman and the first person of color on the moon unquote.
In response to the executive action, Trump and Acting NASA
Administrator Janet Petro distributed a memo to employees announcing that

(41:24):
the institution was taking steps to close all agency diversity, equity,
inclusion and accessibility offices and end all DEIA related contracts.
These programs divided Americans by race. This was the legacy
of Barack Obama, who, by the way, I believe his
dad was actually Frank Marshall Davis, sex rebel black Like,

(41:48):
I mean, it's wild, this guy, the whole thing is
create like, this whole guy story is insane, wasted taxpayer sacred,
tax payer dollars and results in shameful discrimination. Petro wrote,
we are aware of efforts by some in government to
disguise these programs by users coded or imprecise languages. Petro

(42:12):
encouraged employees to report efforts to conceal such initiatives within
the agency to top level NASA whistleblower spoke to Blaze
News about the infiltration of DEI, and the scientists asked
to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. NASA's extensive listen
to this marketing for DEI for a DEI driven mission.

(42:36):
In December twenty seventeen, Trump signed the Space Policy Directive one,
reinvigorating America's human space exploration program. The action directed NASA
to prioritize returning to the Moon, lead an innovative, sustainable
program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable

(42:59):
human expedi across the Solar System to bring back to
Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Bringing with missions beyond low
Earth orbit. The United States will lead the return of
humans to the Moon for a long term exploration utilization,
followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations. It read,

(43:23):
so this is the part that Bloomberg didn't understand. The
base wasn't there to collect rocks and to take measurements.
It was there to establish a base to launch for
the next step in twenty nineteen. Of course that seems
wild and it seems radical, but this is how things
were done in the sixties. JFK stood up and he

(43:44):
was like, we're going to go to the Moon, not
because it's easy, because it's the hard thing to do,
and we're going to do it in this decade. Remember
he said this. This was a Democrat said this. It's amazing,
it's amazing. Everyone on the ground was like, what's he
talking about. We're not gonna be able to do this
in ten years, and he's like, yeah, we're gonna fucking

(44:06):
do it. We're gonna do it. Nas And I'm not
a Kennedy guy. I mean, I'd like to know who
actually killed him. I believe the majority of his UH
international policies were disastrous, according to especially in Vietnam, UH

(44:29):
and Cuba. Like I believe, you know whatever, I think
he was kind of a tipstick, honestly, all right. In
twenty nineteen, then NASA administrator Jim Bernstein announced that the
mission would be called Artemis, named after Apollo's mythological twin

(44:49):
sister who was a hunter. By the way, NASA described
Artemis Power by Space Launch System Rocket as a series
of ongoing lunar missions paving the way to Mars and beyond. Initially,
the agency pledged that Artemis would land the first woman
and next man on the Moon, although Trump's directive did
not call for this. Under the Biden administration, NASA updated

(45:11):
of a mission vowing to land the first woman in
the first person of color on the moon. A twenty
twenty one international presentation slide deck obtained exclusively by Blaze
News and Glenn TV revealed NASA's exhaustive marketing plans for
Artemis DEI driven missions. And I bet you I haven't

(45:35):
seen them. I haven't read them. God, I'm not even
halfway done with my tabs. Jesus Christ. It was, hey,
let's put women. And you know this was I guarantee
they paid for that fucking Star Trek show. I bet
you they paid for that Star Trek show where that
lady from Walking Dead died in the coffin or whatever,

(45:58):
and then she went and she was spots half Black
sister or something. They paid for that, dude, I bet
you they fucking paid for that. God damn it. That
was your sacred tax dollars at work elevate Artemis into
the luxury fashion world. The ninety nine slide presentation meticulously

(46:22):
outlined how the agency would promote its program and build
public support. It detailed Artemis's branding and messaging, identifying target audiences,
highlighting potential marketing obstacles for these groups, and proposed company
partnerships the Artemis brand. The Artemis Brand playbook stated that

(46:43):
the agency would use innovative technologies to explore more of
the lunar surface than ever before. Will collaborate with our
commercial and our international partners to establish long term exploitation
or exploration Fraudian slip exploration by the end of the decade.
It added, then we will use what we learn on

(47:04):
and around the Moon and take it to the next
giant leap to Mars. Right. That was the idea to
the presentation, explain that NASA's planned to establish quote the
Artemis brand unquote. It stated the mission must inspire several
audience segments, future supporters, the public, collaborators, advocates, and the

(47:29):
list included BIPOC which you know individuals. Noting that Artemis
should build mass appeal and get to participate, especially underserved
and unrepresented groups. The presentation outlined potential roadblocks NASA might
face when marketing its mission to the public, including the

(47:50):
perception that other companies are ahead of NASA, which we
already know is true, and a feeling among some Americans
that tax payer fund should be used elsewhere within and
outside of NASA. That's your sacred tax dollars. This is
part of artemis messaging. The slide deck stated that the

(48:12):
agency should highlight stories about its people, partnerships, technologies, and more,
including how we are selecting the astronauts, how we are
creating opportunities for women in space. The selection, titled Creating
Stories and Inspiring a Generation, outlined Artemis's key characters defining
the mission and protagonists and antagonists. The protagonists in Artemis's

(48:37):
story were listed as those directly involved in the missions,
such as astronauts and engineers, also first time entrepreneurs, former
NASA administrator Jim Berenstein, outside skeptics of NASA, a mechanic
living in Alabama, and intern from India. Artemis antagonists could

(49:01):
be people who challenge us, tangible obstacles or intangible obstacles,
as well as those who may pursue a goal of
contrary to what artemist stands for and have a weakness
that can be exploited by the protagonists. Listed as antagonists
were the unaware of public, skeptics who controlled budgets, skeptics

(49:25):
in the media, competing space agencies, conspiracy theorists, and dissatisfied
NASA employees, to name a few. So I started the
last episode out with kind of a victory lap that
there were some I don't know, probably AI run website

(49:46):
that put together a list of the top ten conspiracy websites,
and the abercast was a solid fifty, solid fifty, right
in the middle of the pack. I love it, but
I'm not a conspiracy We don't have to talk about
secret space programs and astral projection and underground alien bases

(50:07):
and reptilians. There's enough conspiracy around us every day to
fill the show. And this is what I'm talking about, Man,
this is it. I feel like I just got it.
We're going to do a number three. I think scientists

(50:29):
expose NASA's DEI direction to and NASA whistleblowers spoke to
Blaze News about the severe decline and the agency's culture
and the misuse of resources. That should say, the misuse
of your sacred tax dollars, remember one hundred billion dollars
From the straight up Bloomberg News site. Scientists describe corrupt practices,

(50:52):
very toxic work environment, and I was told to be
seen and not hearing all meanings related to scientists. As
a scientist, people are very afraid to speak up. Sources
describe her reaction to the Artemis playbook, staining it really
just opened my eyes to the public affairs office. All right,

(51:17):
I think that's enough. I'll save the rest. We'll do
actually do a part three. We're gonna do a part
three about this. I didn't realize it was such a
this is gonna be such a problem. I'm John Towers, doctor.
I'm a doctorate from the Church of Universal Life, doctor
of Divinity. I paid like twelve dollars for it or
something one hundred years ago. So there are my credentials.

(51:43):
And yeah, I guess we'll see you next week for
part three. Thank you, doctor John Towers signing off. You
need a drink anyway?

Speaker 1 (51:57):
Are you interested in the occult history, conspiracy and violence?

Speaker 2 (52:04):
Learn more at aprocast dot com and visit the storefront
for tarot cards, merch and books. Support the show get
access to the show archive at subscribe star dot com.

(52:31):
Thank you for listening to this episode. Send an email
or visit us on social media to let us know
what you think about this topic, and please remember to
leave a five star rate and review.