20Nov23 Osama bin Laden, CIA, ADL, FCC and UN Join to Takeover Internet

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:21):
Using free speech to free minds.You are listening to the David Night Show.

(00:46):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it'sMonday, the twentieth of November.
You're of our Lord twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to begin
with the what has happened with Jsix, the new footage that's been released,
as well as the criticism of theway it was released and what is

(01:07):
really behind this? What are wefinding out about this? And now the
army is getting desperate. They wantpeople to come back, Please come back,
Please come back. We've got someshots set aside for you. After
everything is all healed up, we'lltake a look at the wars. We'll
look at the not just the moralbankruptcy, but the financial bankruptcy of the
Pentagon, having failed six audits ina row each year more than three trillion

(01:33):
dollars. Maybe they want to beon the lookout for some kind of cruise
missile coming at the accounting office thereand Javier Malay managed to get through and
become the head of Argentina, thePresident of Argentina. What's going to happen
next? We'll be right back.We'll also take a look at you know,

(02:08):
Sama Bin laden the new hero.I think probably he's going to be
the new Cheguavara of the TikTok crowdas young kids. Absolutely amazing. Again,
we'll take a look at it.One person said, well, regardless
of what you think about happened atnine to eleven. You know, we
have our big questions about nine toeleven, don't. We don't believe the

(02:30):
official government narrative. But regardless ofwhat you think about this, these kids
believe it, hook line and sinker. And even though they believe that he
orchestrated the attack instead of CIA,even though they believe it, they still
worship him. That's how incredibly dangerouslystupid a lot of the younger generation is.

(02:53):
But let's take a look first ofthis January the sixth stuff, and
we had made available on Friday MikeJohnson, the new Speaker of the House.
So they're going to make available fortythousand hours of security footage by at
the capitol there. It's going tobe made public. Now, they've only

(03:15):
released ninety hours of it so far, so it's only one quarter. It's
like zero point two three percent,so it's one quarter of one percent of
the total footage that is there.And yet what was macarthy going to do.
Part of the reason that some ofthese people said they'd vote for him

(03:35):
was that he would release this andgive it to Tucker Carlson. Why give
it to Tucker Carlson? And alot of people are saying this now,
after they saw what Tucker Carlson andhis producer did in terms of hiding information,
Yeah, that's right, hiding information. After they saw the betrayal there
by Tucker Carlson and his producer,they say, no, we want to
have this put out completely. Andthe problem is a lot of people are

(04:00):
concerned about the fact that they're takingthe time to blur out people's faces.
Now, let people see what's goingon. We need to see this,
and we need to see it becausethe people who are being accused have already
been publicly outed as part of theaccusation. But we need to see the
faces of the people who were actingas if they were members of the crowd

(04:24):
when they were actually police officers.That needs to be shown. And so
this blurring out the faces, whatthey're doing is they're actually hiding the faces
of agent provocators. There may nothave been cops, it looks like it
with the fist bumps and things likethat that are now coming out, and
so we need to know who thesepeople were to prove that this was an

(04:47):
inside job, as I said itwas going to be anyway, individual video
clips released to the media other requesterswill have the faces of identifiable individuals blurred.
Sod A Singer, Senior Congressional aidthat restriction drew the immediate ire of
some defendants in January sixth, theyhave been publicly outed. Why can't we

(05:13):
know the people who instigated this thing, provoked it, and so forth.
Isn't that a crime? Is thata crime to do that? Well,
if it isn't, it should be. So while we're significantly expanding the amount
of clips it will be available andwho can request them, we will be
blurring faces with respect to individuals whoare identifiable, Johnson wrote, to restore

(05:35):
America's trust and faith in their government, we must have transparency. Well,
that would include blurred faces that wecan't see. So there's that. I'm
glad that he's moving forward with it. Of course, you know, Pelosi
wanted to keep them hidden in secretand to you know, cherry pick what
they were going to show to createa narrative. Everybody knew that was very

(05:59):
dishonest, but it was also verydishonest what MacArthur and Tucker did it tell
us it's a great deal about them. My current estimates, there's roughly forty
thousand hours that we will be makingpublic over the next few months as quickly
as we can blurt out so youcan't see faces. Beginning on November the
twentieth, members of the public willbe able to view footage on terminals in

(06:20):
the Committee's office and Capitol Hill.In person viewing of the Congressional video terminals
offers advantages over the online viewing roomin person, so they've set this up
online and you know they're going tobe putting clips out there just you know,
I don't know if there's any orderto them or not. The point

(06:40):
is that if you go to theirin person viewing room, then you kind
of get a map and it showsyou different cameras and so you can start
to coordinate it, and so youcan switch from camera to camera to follow
an individual or something like that whohas their face blurt out. So the
in person system has maps for eachlevel of the Capitol. The Capitol grounds

(07:02):
are separated into zones of the cameralocations indicated by small icons. Viewers can
access the entire database, whereas theonline viewing room that's what they mean the
website. The online viewing room willbe stocked with tranches of footage on a
rolling basis. So McCarthy said earlierthis year that he would release it,

(07:23):
but that commitment never resulted in thepublic getting any direct access. They ran
it through their controlled opposition, TuckerCarlson and his producer, who, by
the way, has gotten so muchcriticism that he has essentially taken his Twitter
account private. The viewing room setup and the plans to blurfaces on the

(07:45):
video clips drew fire from some onsocial media. Releasing batches of January sixth
Close Circuit TV is merely a wayfor Congress to pretend that they're making the
tapes public while holding back important footagethat they will someday get back to us
on a future batch, said WillPope, who was a January sixth defendant.

(08:05):
He said, they gave it allto the FBI. Americans deserve it
all in one batch two. Theygave it all to the FBI in January
twenty twenty one. This is whatI said from the very beginning about Ed
Snowden leak. It bothered me agreat deal. It was very suspicious of
what Glenn Greenwald was doing, releasingit here and there a little bit at

(08:28):
a time. It just put itall out there. But you know,
we saw this in spades of Januarythe sixth. So Pope Is, who
is a defendant, said, blurringthe faces of those shown in the downloadable
videos, will he rode public trust? He called the November seventeenth announcement Friday

(08:50):
a publicity stunt. Americans another trustblurred and edited January the sixth footage.
Others ask, how can they besure they haven't already been altered, or
that footage hasn't been deleted by theDemocrats in the Capitol police, the FBI.
You know, the FBI has ahistory of deleting evidence, don't they.

(09:11):
You go back, you look atTWA eight hundred. We talked about
that great deal with Jack Cashle andof course when it happened, there was
ample testimony from people talking about howthe FBI came in, confiscated footage,
confiscated tapes of air traffic control.You know, people were getting ready to

(09:33):
give to the media this is whatthey typically do, so have they deleted
a lot of footage with this stuff. During an online spaces meeting on x
on Twitter, several of the morethan eight hundred participants said they expect Google
and YouTube to censor not only newsabout the January sixth video releases, but
also any video clips that people tryto upload to social media. Oh really,

(09:56):
well, that'd be pretty big,pretty predictable, don't you think they
do not understand why the online viewingroom does not have a download function.
Well, you can still do screencapture. And by the way, you
know, here's some as we're talkingabout this, here's one individual who is

(10:18):
being escorted. He's evidently a rioter. He's dressed as a Trump supporter.
So before then here they bending over. These guys take him into a room
and they undo the handcuffs, andas soon as he gets his hand free,
he does a fist bump to theother cop. Yeah there we go.
It worked good. Yeah, Iguess I can go out and do

(10:41):
this again. Yeah. And whenyou see the videos and the handshakes and
the rest of this stuff, here'sanother Oh yeah, he's got well his
face you can't see anyway because he'sgot a helmet on. When you look
at these people prepare preparing shaking handslike a cop shaking hands, and people

(11:01):
dressed as protesters and street clothes givingthem fist bumps and all the rest of
this stuff, because that is apreferred way to celebrate. So the question
is is people talk about this.You know, they've criticized Mike Johnson because
he hasn't released all of it.I'm glad that he's releasing it. I
think that was a good move.Frankly, they should criticize and ask for

(11:22):
more to be done. I thinkit should not be blurred. I think
they need to just put it out, just dump it, and the organization
can be done later to help peoplewill go through it again. Sometimes when
you look at this is not youknow, what they're not doing is trying
to say, well, we're holdingit back and we're doing it a little

(11:43):
bit at a time so we canorganize it. As I've said before,
when I've been involved in organizations tryingto get information from the government, they
would comply and they would give usa massive, unorganized dump where you can't
find anything. Well, the informationis all there, go fish right,
and you can put you know,to try to find the proverbial needle in

(12:03):
that kind of a haystack is verydifficult, so it is good to be
able to have it. I'm gladthat they're putting this in an online viewing
room where you can go through andlook at it, but blurring it is
not a good idea, and theyshould put all of it out and let
people start to go through it themselves. There'll be some die hard people who'll
make this their life work and theywill get the truth out there if they

(12:28):
were to do that. So that'sunfortunate that they're not doing that, but
it is good that he's doing more. And the question is, you know,
we know Pelosi was covering it up. Pelosi was, you know,
cherry picking and editing the footage andMcCarthy wouldn't release it except to Tucker,
and they didn't release much and thenTucker hid some of what they released.

(12:48):
That was a real misdirection. Sohopefully this is a bit more genuine.
But you know, what nobody istalking about is did Trump know all this
stuff? Right? Did Trump knowthat all of this stuff happened under Trump?
But of course he's not responsible forthis. He's not responsible for what
happened on January the sixth. He'snot responsible for the capital area, even

(13:11):
though he's head of the government.Nothing that the government does to his supporters
is her responsible for. Just likehe wasn't responsible for the lockdowns. He
wasn't responsible for the federal government policiesthat paid hospitals to kill people. He
wasn't responsible for the poisonous vaccine.Oh yes, he took credit for that,
But he's not responsible, say hisschizophrenic supporters, even though he bragged

(13:37):
about that, Even though he tookcredit for it, even though he took
credit for the lockdown, he's notresponsible. Fact, she's not responsible either.
Other people did it, not them, and we'll never hold him responsible.
Trump can tell everybody send me money. He took in two hundred and
fifty million dollars a quarter of abillion dollars. He fleeced his supporters for
said, go to Washington January.He gets up there, makes a speech,

(14:01):
meet me at the Capitol. Hedisappeared. Alex Jones, who fired
me for telling people this was agrift? Who fired me for telling people
don't show up? Who fired mebecause I told that? Sorry, sob
don't come on my show and pushthose lies to people, and I did
it in front of my crew.That line, grifter, Why did people

(14:24):
send Alex Jones money? He wasn'teven supposedly hiring any lawyer. Supposedly Trump
was going to hire lawyers, buthe didn't. So what was going on
with all this stuff? The firstI saw of January sixth was I got
Twitter notifications people saying exactly what yousaid was going to happen happened because I

(14:46):
said it that morning. I saidit right after Steve Patinnick started lying two
days after the election. I talkedabout it, and I talked about it
for about a month and a half. I got fired. I continue to
talk about it because I continued onair, and I talked about it the
morning of January sixth, I said, don't go. It's going to be

(15:07):
loaded with agent provocateurs. This wholething is a setup. The whole thing
is a setup. Here we arenearly three years later, and people see
this as a setup. Can theysee who set them up? Trump and
Alex Jones and the rest of thesestop the steal and save America. Grifters

(15:28):
out there their biggest crime, theirbiggest crime was what they did to their
supporters, people who have committed suicide, people who are rotting in jail after
they fleece them of money. Absolutelyreprehensible. The insurrection stuff, as far
as you know, the Democrats,it was all made up. There was

(15:50):
no insurrection, and there's plenty ofevidence in this stuff. As we're talking
about this, we take a lookat these people. Take a look this
shooting into the crowd, and ofcourse has been and now that's a paintball
gun, right, except that youknow, when they're shooting this, it's
got enough force that you'll see,you know, the crowd is standing there,
they're not attacking anybody, and thecops start shooting into the crowd there.

(16:15):
And as I've said before, lookat that that was a non lethal
thing, went through the guy's cheek, went through his cheek, so called
non lethal thing. Blood all overthe place, being shot at close range
with these you know, I don'tknow if it's pepper spray or if it's
just paintball gun, whatever it was, rubber bullets, I think it was
that they were shooting. And asthis footage goes on, this is some
of the footage from the police camerasshowing that they're firing into the crowds.

(16:41):
And I've said over and over again, look at the difference in the Tennessee
insurrection led by the Tennessee Three againstthe State House. And you got this
mob that shoves its way in,the mob that gets its hands on the
state legislators here in Tennessee, startsshoving them around. What did the state
police in Tennessee do. Well,they didn't fire, They didn't put on

(17:02):
body armor and fire into the crowd. No. What they did was they
were just wearing their state Patrol uniformsand they used their bodies to try to
put themselves between They didn't push backon anybody, even right turn their backs.
These protesters just use their bodies asa shield to try to shield the
legislators who were trying to get tothe floor. And they were shoving the

(17:25):
legislators, they were shoving the StateHighway Patrol. That's the way it should
have been done. These cops andDC were the provocateurs. You had hidden
provocateurs, and you had provocateurs inuniform shooting into the crowd, throwing tear
gas into the crowd. And thesepeople were led into this by these judas

(17:47):
goats like Trump and Alex Jones andwhat they do. They get you focused
on ray Epps. I don't careif ray Epps which side he was on.
He didn't do a tiny fraction ofwhat Trump and Alex Jones and Ali
Alexander and Roger Stone, the restof these people, all of them making
money off of this, off oftheir own supporters, what backstabbers, what

(18:12):
judas goats to lead them into thisstuff. So yeah, meet me at
the capitol. Yeah, this willnot stand. We will not let him
take office at Alex. Well,here's one of the victims here. This
guy's name is Matthew, Matthew PernaAnd as you look here he's in the

(18:33):
red T shirt. Look at thispeacefully walking through. They're being escorted by
the police. Come on in,everything is fine, you know, just
as you've got some people who arein their pastor a couple of pastors in
their seventies had to go to therestaurant. Police say come on in,
come on in. It's right aroundthere. Now they're looking at several years
in jail, which is essentially alife senate. So there's Matthew right there.

(18:55):
They didn't blur his face out,and so he Initially, he was
just walking calmly there. He pledguilty to the initial charges, believing that
he would face six to twelve monthsin prison for that. That's an outrage,
just to walk through there when thepolice are standing there, not telling

(19:15):
you you can't come in, notopposing you, just to walk through six
to twelve months. Only after hepled guilty did the Department of Justice,
Yeah, inform Matthew that they wouldseek a terrorism enhancement to his sentencing,
which would raise his sentence to apotential nine years in prison. Four days

(19:36):
after getting the news that they wouldpush for this terrorism enhancement, Matthew went
into his garage, put a ropearound his neck and hung himself. Yeah,
how do you feel about that,Alex, Get that on your conscience.
These people you betrayed. Yeah,it doesn't excuse the Department of Justice.

(19:57):
They're criminals for doing that. TheDepartment of true criminals, the FBI,
and the DOJ. These people politicizedtyrants, and you delivered them into
the hands. You didn't know thatwould happen. You didn't know that would
happen. Many Tucker Carlson's could showthe world, but he won't. And

(20:23):
that was that shooting video that Arishowed you. His producer Greg underscore Ra
and his team at Fox were givenall of this last year. That shooting
footage. By the way, thatwas back in September. I had not
seen that. I don't spend muchtime on social media. It's just now

(20:44):
getting coverage from a lot of mediabecause of the release of this other footage.
But that was not just recently released. That was there. I got
no coverage whatsoever. JA six protestersfired upon with no warning the US Capitol
Police Chief Waldo, Where's Waldo liedsaying that he gave warnings that you can

(21:07):
see from the footage that they didn'tdid not give warnings, And so new
footage So the Capitol police may haveincited the riot by firing muitial munitions into
a peaceful crowd. They may haveentrapped people by saying, oh, you
want need to use the rest ofthem coming in he was in the Capitol,
sent him to jail for five orsix years. Each new piece of

(21:30):
footage only confirms what Americans already understood. Many many a lot of them believe
the Weaponized Line Committee that the fewscant minutes available video recycled by the media
paint a false picture of what happened. The latest footage shows capitol police inviting

(21:52):
protesters into the building as a peacefullyassembled in the corridor, the same people
who would later be prosecuted and labeledas insurrectionists, such as Matthew and so
the police firing rubber bullets, teargas grenades, stun grenades under the crowd
peaceful protesters before anybody tried to enterthe Capitol building, possibly triggering the violence.

(22:18):
Again, compare that to what thepolice officers did the state police at
the Tennessee Capitol taking the de escalatingthe situation down because you know, we
don't want to have any leftists becharged with insurrection or violence or have to
go to prison or anything like that. Right, No, it was all
set up on the way they handledit. To the people who led them
in, the Judas Coats, it'seasy to control the narrative when you have

(22:42):
all the evidence under lock and key. So we're Cheney and Kinsinger and the
rest of these people doing well.They got a lot of criticism as more
footage came out. Some of thecriticism was coming from Senator Mike Lee.
He said, why didn't Liz Cheneyand Adam Kinsinger ever refer to any of
them these tapes. Maybe they neverlooked for them, Maybe they never even

(23:03):
questioned their own narrative. Maybe theywere just too busy selectively leaking the text
messages of Republicans that they wanted todefeat. Well, it was more than
that they have. This is allpartisan political warfare. It is political persecution,
and they're using it for political purposes. Just take a look at this

(23:23):
back and forth between Corey Bush onthe progressive left and Mike Johnson. We're
not here today to consider real solutionsthat will make people's lives better. We're
here as a distraction from the sadtruth that dangerous MAGA Republican policies make us
less safe. They deprive us ofbasic investments that would move us closer to

(23:48):
a genuine community safety. And atthe end of the day, Republicans refuse
to consider those investments because Republicans arenot seeking solutions to the problem. Gen
ladies time, they are the problem. Thank you. When I yield back,
only the's times is bribed. Thegenial lad yells back speak. I
want to welcome miss Bush to thecommittee. Did she leave already? Oh?

(24:10):
She left already. She's still here. She makes fortunate. I was
going to point out to her acouple of ironies. She came to lecture
us. She was here for fiveminutes and three seconds. I appreciate her
time investment. She came to lectureus about quote avoiding responsibility. We've had
four full committee markups. She hasnot attended three of the four. I'm

(24:33):
not sure today her five minutes councilsand attendance, but let's say she's she's
made two of them now. Iwas going to ask her if she's still
in favor of defunding the police,because we have her on record more times
than I can count of having beenthe great champion of that. She wanted
to talk about responsible investments that willmake a difference. I wanted to ask
her how that defunding police thing workedout. I think everybody in the country

(24:56):
knows that we're facing chaos and acatastrophe of crime, violent crime, and
all the major cities that she wentand protested in and many more that took
the CUE. I wanted to askher about the reality of how that works
out in real life. She accusesus of engaging in talking points. We're
trying to pass meaningful legislation to solvethese problems, and she is advancing policies

(25:21):
and ideas that create the mayhem.So wow, it's so unfortunate that she's
not here to engage in a colloquyon that. But I'm not surprised.
This is what we get from theradical left. She is part of that
radical left that is bringing down theparty and having them associated with the crime
crisis that we have on the streets. This is the very reason that we
need Police Week to reinforce our supportfor the brave men and women who are

(25:45):
on the front lines, that thinblue line, put their lives on the
line every single day, and welose them now at alarming rates in the
line of duty, trying to protecttheir communities from wacko, crazy, maddening
policies like the one that Miss Bushhas supported in Congress. I will also
point out she, as we notedearlier, she was the vice chair of
the Crime Subcommittee of Judiciary and shedoesn't believe in funding police. What a

(26:11):
tragedy that she's not here to joinus. Yeah, she makes her a
little speech and runs away, Andthat's exactly what this is about. However,
you know, we talk about defundingthe police, just just look at
the big picture. You've got theradical left, and you've got George Sorows
removing police from protecting communities and creatingchaos, the Soros chaos everywhere. Well,

(26:36):
on the other hand, you havethe federal government that is engaged in
a police state persecution, political policestate persecution. I absolutely agree with what
he had to say about this defundthe police and the communities and Soros district
attorneys and the progressive left. Butthe ball is now in his court and

(26:56):
what he needs to do is heneeds to do something about the police.
They're at the capitol. Something needsto be done about that. You've got
to have some people fired, publiclyhumiliated, have their pensions taken away.
At the very least, if youdon't put them in jail and let the
j sixers out, don't blur theirfaces, show their faces, make examples

(27:21):
of them. If you don't reform. Look, every institution, every institution
is going to have good and badpeople in it. And as Frank Serpico
said, when it comes to thepolice especially, but it's any institution,
you have to purge the bad actors. Out. If you don't, the
institution becomes bad. Well that shouldhave been done decades ago with the Capitol

(27:44):
Police and the FBI, and they'vebecome bad institutions. And the question is
what are you going to do?You're going to continue to fund them and
do business as usual. Are yougoing to actually reform this mess? That's
the real key. So you know, there was again back and forth with
Mike. Lee also called for aninvestigation in the committee itself. Exactly,

(28:11):
you know these people running this McCarthyitehearing who have even if these people have
their convictions overturned or pardoned or whatever, they still spent years in jail under
very harsh circumstances. And so Ithink that Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger,

(28:32):
these Democrats that they worked with,they need to be given a taste of
that medicine. I think they needto be investigated. I think they need
to go to jail because they werethe ones who unjustly jailed so many people
and escalated these charges so much thatmany people, several people committed suicide.
Lee called the investigation of Sham.He said the crucial information about the committee's

(28:57):
work could have been deliberately lost weredestroyed. He cast doubts on the committee's
transparency and its objectivity. It isMcCarthyism, and that kind of McCarthyism just
continued under Kevin McCarthy, didn't it. The FBI lost count of how many
paid informants were a capital at theCapitol in January the sixth, and later

(29:18):
performed an audit to figure out theexact number. According to the New York
Post, Well again, I thinkby now we all know what's going on,
and it just becomes more of anirritant, more perhaps of a deliberate
provocation for this to continue to goon. And I think Mike Johnson's made

(29:45):
an appropriate step. I think heneeds to step it up. They need
to dump everything unedited, unblurred.So Jordan has a poena the Bank of
America because it is a very widenet that was involved in capturing people.
Again, Bank of America, aswe've talked about in the past, they

(30:07):
went through their data and they gavejail location, you know, stuff that
they went through and they gave allthe charges that were done on Bank of
America credit cards within a couple ofdays, and that large vicinity there of
the Capitol and surrounding areas into Virginiaand Maryland. They sent if you used

(30:29):
a credit card there, Bank ofAmerica tried to get you in jail.
Think about that, if you dealwith Bank of America. What criminals they
are? What absolute criminals. Bankof America. The FBI didn't even ask
for it, they did it.And then they went through and they also
gave them anyone who had used theBank of America credit card to purchase a

(30:53):
gun, anyone anywhere, anytime.This is not just January the sixth in
that area, anyone anywhere, anytimeyou use a credit card to buy a
gun. Bank of America. Isaid to the FBI, here, do
something with this too. What abunch of criminals. And so now they
have subpoena them. Now we've knownall of this stuff. So what is

(31:17):
new about this? Well, JimJordan has subpoenaed them for records that would
be internal communications, in other words, what was said back and forth between
Bank of America officials within the bankand then what was said between them and
any communications that they would have withthe FBI. Now that will be interesting

(31:37):
to know, but we're not goingto find out anything about that. For
another six, well seven months.They've got till June the eighth to comply
with that, so it's going tobe a while before we get that data,
but that will be interesting to see. Bank of America told the Judiciary
Committee that its conduct was quote withina legal process initiated by the US Department
of the Treasury un quote November sixteenthletter to Bank of America CEO Brian moynihan

(32:06):
informing him of the subpoena. MisterJordan, who also chairs the Weaponized Select
Subcommittee, wrote that quote, itis unclear what legal process permits the FBI
or the Bank of America to sharesensitive customer information of potentially thousands of BOA
customers and to implicate them in federallaw enforcement investigation without any clear criminal nexus.

(32:34):
Yeah, what is it that allowsthem to do that? Again,
it amounts to a violation of privacy. It also amounts to Bank of America
trying to get you in jail.I mean, just look at what's happened
to so many of these people.Sam Montoya, who was the only Info

(32:55):
Wars person acting as a real journalistthat day, goes in and shot footage
and he narrowly escaped jail, butit was a real ordeal financially for him.
Of course, he was fired byAlex in the midst of all of
that, and because he doesn't wantto be connected with any of that stuff.

(33:15):
The only person who actually did anyreporting at Info wars arrest. The
people were instigating this and then trappingpeople. But Sam went in an honestly
shot video of it and he getsin trouble. Just amazing. Before we
go to break some of the commentspeople have Georgia Boy eleven forty two,

(33:37):
could we please see all the footagefrom the Venegon on nine to eleven,
two thousand and one. Yeah,wouldn't that be interesting? Yeah, maybe
they could also do that. Youknow, we never had any We had
promises that were broken by Trump thathe was going to show release some nine
to eleven information and all this otherkind of stuff in JFK assassinated and things

(34:00):
like. None of that happened.But it didn't even talk about releasing the
footage from the Pentagon around nine toeleven. As a matter of fact,
we know they went around confiscating outsidesurveillance cameras to get the footage from that,
and of course the Pentagon it's coveredeven at that time was covered with

(34:23):
a surveillance footage and so yeah,they don't want that scene, Jay Caravella,
why don't Why does Nancy release Paul'sfootage from her living room? Yeah,
Jason Barker says, ha ha,blurring faces as they rush in public,
facial recognition for things like airports andeverywhere else. That's right. Yeah,

(34:47):
this is a government that demands toknow everything about you, but keeps
everything about what it does hidden fromus. Let's talk about transparency. I
mean, that's where we are today. We got a long way to go.
Releasing ninety hours of this stuff andthen blurring faces on what's coming out

(35:07):
that is not uh, that isthat is such a minor move towards transparency.
It is almost laugh it's laughable.But it's also almost cynical to do
something like that. Guard Goldsmith,I still wonder how much they gave to
Carlson. Yeah exactly. Well,you know, his his producer was stonewalling

(35:30):
on it. But good to seetheir guard and Jason Teta ninety seven four
oh one. They were dumb enoughto think they were part of the plan.
Now they know they're expendable. That'sright, that's right. How much,
says d G eight, is Trumpgiving to the victims and the families
of the j six. Lie.Yeah, wouldn't give them the time of

(35:50):
day. Didn't want to talk aboutit for several months. He was worried
about what's going to happen. Andagain he's somebody who is as we could
see with the pardons for the Januarythe six people, and his defense of
these people who came to his defense, we can see that, as his
former lawyer said, he is incapableof acting except out of his own perceived

(36:13):
interest or as we now see inthis campaign, out of revenge Michael de
Silvia, everyone will think twice aboutpeacefully protesting from now on. That's a
big part of it. Unless youknow you're the left. Now, as
we talked about this on Friday,you know you had, you know,
these protesters. You showed up atthe DNC video footage of some of them

(36:36):
pounding on it. Yona the listenersaid, well, that was taken out
of context. The cops incited this. They attack people. I can easily
believe that's the case. They Thereason that I talked about that to agin
with is because the left has typicallygotten a pass on any of the stuff.
No matter what they do, evenif it's riots where they're torturing a

(36:57):
neighborhood that's mostly peaceful, they'll tellus as they stand in front fire,
the mainstream media will And so nowwhat you're seeing is and we've always said
this, look right now, they'reusing these useful idiots on the left to
help them to take away our freespeech, to take away so many things.
But it'll all be used against them. And perhaps that was what happened

(37:17):
with that group's protesting the DNC.Yeah, perhaps we and we have seen
that in the past with them,but typically is not the case. Perhaps
it'll be more and more the casenow that they will use these same tactics
they've been using against people on conservativesthat we now use this on the progressive
left. And so anyway, Ilet me finish a couple more of these

(37:43):
comments before we take a break.At KWD sixty eight, all the focus
on reps, there were hundreds ofinstigators there besides the police and Stasi.
Exactly right, exactly right. Butyou see that's the way that these people
operate. That's a very effective propagandatool for Darren Beattie, who started all
that at Revolver and then got onwith Tucker Carlson. Right. That's why
I say Tucker Carlson again by usingRay Epps to distract attention away from Trump,

(38:08):
from himself, from Alex Jones,other people who were pushing everybody to
go to this thing, right,Well, we got a scapegoat out here,
and so you personalize it because youknow, if you start saying,
well, there was just one hundredinns agoin now, you have to have
some face, some face, Andthat's the purpose that reps serve for them.
Whether or not he is an agentprovocateur, I really don't care at

(38:32):
this point. There are hundreds ofthem. The question is why the focus
on this one guy, because hecouldn't have possibly kicked off this whole thing
by himself. So what are theydistracting you from? You see Darre Immediate
Revolver, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, all these people on the right,
reps, reps, reps, reps. So what is it that they're using

(38:52):
him as a red herring for tothrow you off the trail? What is
it that they don't want you tosee? They don't want you to see
what they did because they're the instigators. They're the agent provocateurs, they're the
backstabbing betrayers of their own people whocontinue to follow them. It's amazing to

(39:14):
me, amazing, Guard Goldsmith.I don't understand how the current speaker can
claim it's a release of all thefootage if that already happened when it wasn't
given to Fox. Unless it wasn'tall of it, then yeah, I
don't think that it was. Idon't think that he gave everything to Tucker,
but I think he gave more thanTucker released. I don't know.

(39:37):
I don't know. We'll have tosee. But again, what he's saying
is he's going to release forty thousandhours. He's released ninety hours, and
they're going to blur things out.That's the real issue. And I think
that he released a lot more thanTucker actually put out there because people were
complaining, Yeah, there was acertain quantity that was said, and I
think it would They said it wasas large a quantity as McCarthy released to

(40:01):
Tucker. The question is why wouldit be released to Talker. See everybody
complained about that at the time.Everybody said, yeah, but can we
trust Tucker to show the stuff andthen they believe that he did not show
a lot of stuff. We don'tneed to have this stuff filtered. We

(40:22):
don't need to have it blurred.We need to have it dumped for everybody
to see. That's transparency. Sendingstuff to Democrats who are going to edit
it, sending stuff to Republicans whoare going to edit it, maybe not
release all of it, and thenblurring it out is not transparency. There
needs to be transparency. Too.Many people's lives have already been ruined with

(40:44):
this KWD sixty eight. The useof cash is getting harsh enough that people
will welcome CBDC. Some places arenot accepting. Banks are questioning deposits and
withdrawals. Yeah, they're gradually pullingthe net in, aren't they. So
what will happen is we usually seewith this stuff, we'll go through a

(41:04):
gradual process of pushing people, nudgingpeople psychologically. Well, it's easier if
you do this, and then ofcourse they do make it. It is
easier to use plastic than it isto use cash. For the longest time,
there's the guy Dave Ramsey. Okay, tell everybody get out of debt.

(41:27):
Don't have credit card debt, Getrid of credit cards and all the
rest of it. And I rememberhim having on a physician. He said,
look, I've got you know,I'm not struggling financially, But he
says, I force myself not touse a credit card. Even when I'm
getting gas. I'll make myself walkin and give them the cash and then
fill it up and go back andget the change and all the rest of

(41:47):
the stuff, because I just don'twant to use a credit card. I
absolutely refuse to use it. Well, most people will go for the convenience
of just, you know, atleast using your gas card to pay for
it, so you don't have towalk in. Remember when they used to
come to your car and fill itup for you and check your will and

(42:08):
clean your windshield and make the change. I'm old enough to remember that.
Now it's the incoming. Well,I don't want to have to walk in
after I do everything for myself,or at the pump. I don't want
to have to walk in there andget the change as well and all the
rest of this stuff. So theymake it easy for you, They nudge
you along with a comfort and ease, and then those of us who don't

(42:30):
want to do that at some pointin time they drop the hammer and just
ban it. You know, mostpeople get the Brave New World treatment,
and for those people who don't wantto go Brave New World, you get
the nineteen eighty four or wellly intreatment. Jason Barker, thank you very
much for the tip, he says. I pray that all have a safe

(42:50):
and happy Thanksgiving this week. Withall the chasts in this world, we
need to remember to be thankful forwhat God has given us. Absolutely true,
and you know we all have beengiven so much, and many of
us don't even realize what God hasgiven us. We should be able to
see it in the land that welive in. The founders who fought to

(43:12):
set this up saw God's providence andhis blessing, and they gave him credit
for it. But we have becomea generation that does not recognize what God
has given us and given us inour own homes and our own families.
I know everybody has struggles that theygo with and some people are going through
some horrific stuff. But even witha death of loved ones, try to

(43:36):
think of it as the fact thatyou had them for a while. That
was a gift from God, thatyou enjoyed for a while, and it
doesn't have to end with this lifeif we have a relationship with God and
that begins with thanksgiving for what He'sgiven us. Audi, Mr. Arth
and Modern Retro Radio. Thank youvery much. Just wishing everyone a good

(43:58):
week. Modern Retro Radio. Yes, we'll be doing rebroadcasts on Thursday and
Friday, and we'll have something ofsome Thanksgiving stuff that do every Thanksgiving.
We also have on Wednesday. I'mexcited to talk to David Stockton. Many
people, younger people may not rememberhim. He's still been very active.

(44:22):
He's just written a book. Buthe was there in the Reagan administration as
the deficit was exploding. He wasdirector of OMB and he actually pushed back
against Reagan on that and he's gota lot to say. As a matter
of fact, I've got an articlehere from him today talking about how we're
going to spend all this money forall these wars. We don't have a

(44:43):
single penny of the hundreds of billionsof dollars that we want to send.
People are totally in debt. JasonParker says they're working on making the unbankable
be bankable. It's one of thesigns of incoming cbdc's The fifty and five
plan is to do the same withcountries that are not ready for the system.
That's right. The fifty and fiveplan is their idea that by I

(45:08):
think the date was twenty twenty five, if I'm correct, but fifty fifty
states signed onto this digital and optagonon everybody. Grammy for God, says
Mike Johnson, the Christian who killeda bill to stop abortions. They're all

(45:29):
frauds KWD sixty eight. Yes theyare, Grammy. The upright people character
in Congress could be evacuated in asmart car, assuming that the battery was
charged. They may have some gasolineversions, so I don't know. Well,

(45:49):
we're going to take a quick breakand we'll be right back. If
you like the Eagles on the cars, Heuey Lewis and the news, they
say the hard you'll love the classichits channel at APS Radio, download our
app, or listen now at APSradio dot com. When I was my

(46:20):
stern down booker, I thought withouta doubt that I was through with all
my parents' trivet, that I wasthere a mes after months of tough civilian
life. But gee, I wishI was back in the army. The
Army wasn't really bad at all.Three meals a day, three for which

(46:44):
you didn't pay you and the momsor winners bring them all. There's a
lot to be said for the armyand life without responsibility. A soldier out
of luck was re stock. There'sover something one higher up where you can
pass the buck policy. I wishI was night to be well, just

(47:07):
in time for Christmas. I guesswe've got a new recruitment film for the
military, because now they're begging theunvaccinated soldiers to return the ones that they
kicked out. And of course there'ssomebody higher up that they're not passing the
buck to. Instead, they're passingthese people that were higher up that instituted
this relentless policy of vaccinating every lastperson with an experimental drug and again playing

(47:30):
these games. Well, you know, cormonati, but it's you know,
it's approved, it's not approved,and you know, but we're going to
do this so that we don't haveany legal responsibility all that stuff. We're
going to say that Coromanati is approved, but it's legally distinctive, I said.
Pfizer said the FDA. It's legallythey're identical, but it's legally distinctive,

(47:51):
but we're going to legally require youto get it. And so with
all of that, they've you know, promoted the people who kicked everybody out,
and now they've got a big shortfall, and it really is big.
Quite frankly, a lot of people. The US Army is now begging the
unvaccinated soldiers that they kicked out whounderwent in voluntary discharge for refusing to take

(48:15):
the vaccine, begging them to returnto service and permitting them to correct their
military records. Well that's good thatthey're going to let them correct their records
because a lot of these people weregiven dishonorable discharges because they were really vicious
about this stuff. Just two yearsago, in a shameful campaign, the

(48:37):
Pentagon was gleefully discharging soldiers who refusedto take COVID vaccines. Says the Zero
Hedge article, one individual has putup the letter that he got and the
woman in charge now the army hopehope, rampy, hope springs eternal.

(48:58):
I guess a lot of people hopethat the Army has changed, but it
hasn't. And so he underscored somethings. Former soldiers who were involuntarily separated
for refusal to receive the COVID nineteenvaccine may request a correction of their military
records. Individuals who desire to applyto return to service should contact us go

(49:24):
to your nearest recruitment office. Yeah, you know they're getting serious. The
memes show when they go from promotingtrainees and their DEI stuff to showing hardcore
males and their recruitment stuff. Youknow that the war is coming, right,

(49:44):
the war's coming, and they've gotall these these DEI generals in charge
of it, and they can't getanybody to sign up. So, yeah,
you want to sign up. Tobe elaborate, you want to sign
up to go to a foreign warwhile our border is being crashed and invaded

(50:04):
all the time. Yeah yeah,that government, that government wants you.
Uncle Sugar wants you, doesn't heWe were assured that these discharges would not
affect military readiness at the time,The Marine Corps Lieutenant General David Adding said
to lawmakers in Congress, I cantell you there are no operational impacts across

(50:28):
the force for readiness. There's notone community that has signaled an instance where
a leader, an NCO or anotherenlisted Marine is not present. Because of
that vaccine thing, they kicked outmore people than anybody else. Supposedly that
number is one nine hundred and sixtyeight kicked out of the Marines. Twenty

(50:49):
percent of those got an honorable discharge. That means that eighty percent didn't didn't
And so that's when you look atthat. Now, kicked out about two
thousand people and only four four hundredor so got an honorable discharge. Now
the Marines are looking for a fewgood men to use as cannon fodder and

(51:15):
whatever the next war that they wantto get us involved in. The readiness
suffered. Thousands of service members weredismissed. Potential recruits then declined to enlist
in the armed services. More thanseventeen thousand service members bulked at taking the
shots, citing safety fears linked tothe vaccines. Speedy development spurred by misinformation

(51:38):
about messenger RNA technology, as wellas concern over fetal cell lines used in
the formulation and testing. The morethe controversy raging the news, and more
troops asked to skip the shots,said the Military Times, And they're reporting,
and so you got people like JasonBarker, who even though they had
seventeen thousand people they say, whorefuse to get it, they kicked out

(52:01):
about a little more than half ofthat, well, well less than half
of that three hundred and thirty ninethey said. Okay, so they were
kicked out, and if the Marinesare any indication, eighty percent of them
got dishonorable discharges. Others. Youknow, Jason was able to hang in
there and retire, and I'm gladthat he was, but he was not

(52:22):
going to take this stuff. Andhis letter that he wrote was very thoughtful,
very complete. A lot of peopleused it as a template, an
idea for what they could do towrite about their religious exemption, nurses and
other people. I remember we putit up and many people used that letter.
And so, you know, theeight three hundred and thirty nine people

(52:45):
that they kicked out is way morethan were killed in Afghanistan. They had
twy four hundred and two soldiers killedin Afghanistan over twenty years. So they
kicked out, you know, nearlyfour times that many. And I wonder,

(53:05):
you know how many are slowly dyingnow? How many have they crippled
and injured? Kind I think ofthis as kind of the roadside bomb of
the Pentagon against its own troops.Who I look at it. You got
a lot of people wounded, longterm, poisoned, stabbed in the back
by the people that they had signedup to protect this country. But of

(53:30):
course the Pentagon is not about protectingthis country. It's about everything but protecting
this country. Not only do theynot protect the borders, but they get
us involved in foreign wars that getus put targets on our back everywhere.
They're putting targets on our back,not to mention the money and the blood
that they're spending. Lieutenant Colonel TerryKelly, a spokesperson for the army,

(53:53):
so that twenty seven hundred and sixtyseven soldiers have received General Officer written reprimand.
So this is you know, twentyeight hundred or so that stayed in
and they're getting reprimands. Yeah,to pull that picture up, that's the
clownish look at that Darth Vader reviewsthe troops. I mean that picture just

(54:15):
they've seen it before. It's justyou know, a thousand words right there
in that one picture. You wantto sign up for that joke of an
army. What a joke this is. There's one great, big, traveling
stomach sucking up all of the moneythat it can. They can't even button
his jacket there. As a result, the military is missing its recruitment goals

(54:37):
by twenty five percent. So theykicked out eight thousand people and they're missing
fifteen thousand soldiers. They kicked outpeople who were trained, they kicked out
people who had great records, andnow they're looking for fifteen thousand soldiers and
it's your shortfall. And a lotof people say, well, I don't

(54:59):
really want to join a clown showlike that. You look at all the
woke garbage and rest of this stuff. I'm sorry, it says this person
who wrote this article on zero Hedge. I'm sorry about the destroyed careers of
the best service members. And theyare the best because not only they stood
by their principles, that's the creamof the crop that they kicked out.

(55:23):
Really, they kept their health.They'll get military discharge papers corrected, but
they'll always remember the unfairness, thetrauma of the helplessness that they felt as
their commanders dismissed them for not takingexperimental vaccines that we subsequently saw it did
not work, unsafe and effective.The soldiers have not been compensated, but

(55:45):
they at least remained healthy and stayedtrue to their principles. Please appreciate how
hard it was for those brave soulsto stick to their principles, their entire
lives and careers being wrecked by thisillegal COVID order. These are courageous people.
The military needs stoic, strong heroes, of which three and thirty one

(56:09):
were dismissed due to the insane ordersof the Biden administration, and many more
took early retirement. So I thinkwe ought to have a special Veterans Day
to honor the people of the vaccinewars. Not a foreign war, but
it was a war that was broughtonto us by foreign power, by the

(56:29):
UN, by the World Economic Forum, by billionaires. You people who fought
this, and whatever profession you're in, are veterans at the beginning of the
art elect war, the artificial intelligencewar, the war of the technocratic elite
against us. So the army istrying to get back the soldiers that it

(56:52):
kicked out. And when we lookat this in retrospect, it truly is
amazing how they have just trashed thesepeople. Recently retired Army Major Chase Spear
suggested in a Peace on the AmericanMind that the recent measures were tied to

(57:15):
the Army's abysmal recruiting numbers. Hesaid, one might be curious why of
the Armies doing it about face onthis right now, given that its top
official clearly has a different perspective fromthe policy change that she is authorizing.
Last month, the Army missed itsfiscal year twenty twenty two recruiting goals by
ten thousand. Spear has discussed thepersecution that soldiers who did not wish to

(57:39):
receive the vaccine faced from overzealced commanderseager to implement the mandate from Biden.
He wrote, the Army requires severalimmunizations and checkups throughout the year to maintain
one's medical readiness. Not one ofthose came with a coersive force of the
COVID mandate. Were you laid onyour flu shot, well, you just

(58:00):
get told to take one at yournext convenience late on a vision check.
Same thing applies. But in twentytwenty one on Fort Levenworth, proof of
the COVID shot was the only pathto being able to live in existence that
in any way might reflect normal.It became the primary marker of human worth
on that base and at many others. Under the management of Major General Douglas

(58:23):
Simms, some base facilities against isFort Levenworth were set aside only for the
vaccinated. I traveled to Fort Rileyfor a war fighter exercise in late twenty
twenty one. First Infantry Division policylimited unvaccinated visitors to hotel rooms and workplaces.
It also restricted access to base moralefacilities and the commissary, such as

(58:45):
the base grocery store. It limitedto those who had a vaccine card.
Friends of mine on Fort Bragg,which is now called Fort Liberty, because
you know, we can't talk abouta Confederate soldier told me of similar policies
at their location. A two classsystem among military service members was established across

(59:07):
much of the base, hearkening backto Biblical language. You were clean or
unclean based on your shot status.That's right, you get set outside the
camp like a leper. Major Generalsims performance, however, was rewarded.
You say, oh, it's alwayssomebody higher up to pass the buck.
No, you pass these people higherup. That's what happened. He has

(59:31):
since been promoted to lieutenant general.He's currently the director of Operations for Joint
Staff. Would he treat an unvaccinatedofficer who re enters the army with respect
in the days to come, orwould such a uniformed citizen still be worthy
of segregation? Have they changed?No, No, of course they haven't.

(59:52):
They've rewarded the people who did this, same people still there that the
leaders who pushed this through there otherarmy leaders punished unvaccinated soldiers and were rewarded
and said retired as spears. Sohe said, a force that can so
easily lose sight of its purpose isone that is rightly viewed through a skeptic's

(01:00:16):
lens. So what is the purposeof the military? I mean, you
know foreign wars? Do you evenwant a military that is competent and capable
in order to fight your foreign wars? Because we know that you're not about
defending America our borders. So whatis the purpose of this. We've got

(01:00:36):
an expeditionary empire and they can't evendo that competently. By the way,
when we look at the vaccines themselves, like I said, how many people
has the Pentagon killed of its ownsoldiers slow killed. And of course this
is something's always been there, whetheryou're talking about depleted uranium or other things.

(01:00:57):
They constantly expose their soldiers to healthrisks and they don't care about it.
Ninety four percent of COVID nineteen deathsover the past year were among quadruple
vaccinated and triple vaccinated. This iscoming out of the UK. The Office
for National Statistics in England has justreleased some new data, an update on

(01:01:19):
deaths by vaccination status, and thisis you know, we've already had a
lot of this released. We sawthe big spike that happened in September and
on of twenty twenty one. Nowthis is for the twelve months between June
twenty twenty two and the thirty firstof May twenty twenty three. They said

(01:01:42):
ninety five percent of those COVID deathspeople who died with COVID or from COVID.
Ninety five percent of those were peoplewho had been vaccinated, and ninety
four percent of those deaths were amongthe people who were triple or quadruple vaccinated.
So the question is how many ofwhen the military is requiring people to

(01:02:05):
get the jabs, did it juststop at the first one or the second
one, or did you have toget booster after booster after booster after booster.
Yeah, they're going to have abig problem moving forward. It is
going to be very, very bigbecause they're going to start seeing all kinds.
And of course, this is themilitary, who has their own d

(01:02:29):
MED database that you had several officers. Medical officers said, look at this.
We have all these different things thathave gone up by several hundred percent,
several of them by thousands of percentincrease, and these medical issues that
are gone up, life threatening medicalissues compared to our own database. Because

(01:02:52):
they want to keep a very detailedrecord that's not like not like the vyar's
database from CDC where people voluntarily callstuff they're not required to. As a
matter of fact, they're discouraged fromdoing it. A previous study back in
twenty ten, they paid Harvard tolook at it. Harvard said only about
one percent of the adverse events fromvaccines are actually sent in. It's a

(01:03:15):
time consuming to do it. They'rediscouraged from doing They were heavily discouraged from
doing it with COVID. But whenyou look at the military's database, they
need to have as a part ofreadiness, they need to know if something
is going around, is it achemical attack, is it a biological attack?
And so they keep very detailed recordsof everything, and so these records

(01:03:36):
showed what was happening. And sothen the Pentagon went back and said,
well, last five years that you'recomparing this to that was all wrong,
and so we're going to get ridof that obvious lies. How much more
obvious could they be? The unvaccinatedaccount for at least for the least amount
of COVID nineteen deaths, and everysingle month up to May twenty twenty three,
barely even getting into and that's whenthe data stopped getting into triple figures

(01:04:00):
in most months, whereas the vaccinatedpopulation accounted for the majority of COVID nineteen
deaths every single month, hitting fourfigures in all but two months throughout that
year. Yeah, this is whatwe're talking about. And so the last
thing is why are German politicians soeager to vaccinate children? Why are they

(01:04:21):
lying about it now? Ask eugipiiswhy were they so eager in the summer
of twenty twenty one to vaccinate children? Why would they place public pressure on
vaccine regulators to recommend child vaccination becausewe were told, well, it doesn't
affect children. And by the way, that was a big red flag right
there, telling you this wasn't anykind of a pandemic. It was what

(01:04:44):
they were doing, was they werehastening along the actuarial table of our death
by age and by the hospital protocolsthat they were doing and they weren't even
trying to make a case that itwas affecting children. But now you've got
children who have to have a hearttest before they can participate in any athletics
at schools. They believed, orprofessed to believe that a vaccination rate and

(01:05:09):
excess of some magic number within thepandemic. Remember that all that heard immunity,
Well what is it, doctor Faunci, mister science, what is that
number? Well, I don't know, you know, it could be this,
it could be that. I don'tknow it just yeah, they and
they keeps changing it, right,so he says. Eugipia says, I'd

(01:05:30):
still say that maybe they didn't knowwhere they were doing. But a recent
news story has caused me to considerthis question more deeply. Where did the
specific pressure come from? What drovefor example, random regional ministers in Germany,
ministers of education to mount their ownappeals to vaccinate school children. What
did these dumb people ever know aboutviruses or reproduction numbers or population immunity?

(01:05:54):
What was going on? Well,of course these are all rhetorical questions.
We know this is political, weknow it was psychological, and we know
it was mass murder, and it'scontinuing. The people who did it are
continuing in effect. Doug Log,thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that it's on Rockfinn Audimodern retro radio. Those kicked out soldiers

(01:06:15):
would have to be crazy to reenlist. That's right, Jason Barker. I'm
waiting for a recall Audi. Beforethey do a draft, they will recall
all of the ir R guys andretired that are not broken. Yeah,
you're right, I'll recall you,he says. There are also a lot

(01:06:36):
of soldiers that have died suddenly.Yeah, died from suddenly. Brian and
Deb McCartney, our son in law, is glad that he is out of
the army. Yes, yes,j Caravella. What's wrong? Doesn't this
younger generation want to enlist to becannon fodder? In Ukraine, Israel,
any other of our many foreign entanglements. Jason says, that just shows you

(01:06:59):
these people don't support these wars.Yeah, it's all media propaganda. Remember
after nine eleven people flocked to comeinto the military. They lacked the same
conviction now, says All. Yeah, a lot of people believed it,
a lot of people believed it,sincerely believed it. And I think that's

(01:07:19):
another part of it too. Youknow, quite frankly, as I've said
over and over again, the twentytwenty stuff that Trump pulled and Biden pulled
after him continued, that's just theother shoe to drop from nine to eleven.
They were born at the same time. As a matter of fact,
Dark Winter two months before nine eleven. Let's see Brian dub McCartney, our

(01:07:43):
son in law, was made toput on high heels when he was in
I've seen pictures of that. I'venot hurt anybody say that. It made
them walk around in red shoes andjust pathetic. Audi. Mr. We're
looking for a few good non genderspecific pronouns. That's what they're looking for.
It's a game. It's a game. Yeah, they're still experimenting on

(01:08:05):
people's minds, even if they're backedoff a little bit. The experimenting on
the bodies. Brian Devincartney, whowas a recruiter in the end and hated
every minute of it. They've forcedthousands to be recruiters. Now. Trump
Burger forever says no vaccines, butthey didn't say anything about not making you
wear high heels. Nathan Bedford,for is eighteen sixty five. Most of

(01:08:27):
those that left because the JAB werewhite Christians. They should not go back
because the deck is stacked against themand they will be used as cannon fodder
for the military industrial corporations. Yeah, and I say corporations instead of the
complex, because it's not too complicatedto see that the corporations are driving this
thing as these stakeholders. It's apublic private partnership, so let's synthesize the

(01:08:48):
private part of this. We'll beright back. Whether you're feeling like the
blues or blue grass, ATS Radiohas you covered. Check out a wide
variety of annals on our app atAPS radio dot com analyzing the globalists next

(01:10:13):
move and now the Deep Nut show. Well, Biden is invoking wartime powers
for what for his climate war inthe same way that Trump invoked wartime powers

(01:10:38):
for his COVID war, these differentmcguffins, and then Trump did it.
He invoked wartime power so they couldmanufacture ventilators to kill people. Well,
high eighties, low nineties percent ofpeople who put on ventilators died. Biden
is doing this so he can killgas powered residential furnaces. He was to

(01:11:03):
get rid of our gas furnaces.So you know, they've all got something
they want to kill. It's awar against us. And they both have
the same tactic, don't they BothTrump and Biden petty little dictators going to
war with their own people using executiveorders. Whether there's ventilators or in the

(01:11:26):
case of Biden, I guess youcould say duckwork. But a Cold War
era law that will pour tax payerfunds into domestic manufacturing of electric heat pumps,
an alternative to gas powered residential furnaces. Well, I mean you could
look at it and say, atleast at the moment, of course,
this is part of the Green agenda, is going to kill us all.

(01:11:47):
But at this moment, you know, Biden is not engaged in directly killing
people like Trump did with the ventilators. This is the same thing that they're
doing here. The federal government wouldaward an a store one hundred and sixty
nine million dollars for nine projects acrossfifteen sites nationwide and an effort to accelerate
electric heat pump manufacturing. The significantlevel of funding was made possible with a

(01:12:16):
grant from the Edinburgh Pandiction No afterBiden utilized the nineteen fifty Defense Production Act
today's Defense Production Act. He saidfunds for heat pump manufacturing show that Biden
is treating climate change as the crisisit is, said John Podesta, who

(01:12:38):
is the White House clean energies are. Yeah, he's been involved in some
other things too that weren't so clean, wasn't he. Yeah, the climate
change as the crisis that it isnow as the mcguffin that it is.
It's the mcguffin. And he said, these are will grow domestic manufacturing.

(01:13:00):
They will create good paying jobs,good paying jobs for some millionaires and some
billionaires in these companies that are gettinggraft and corruption. Were those jobs where
people made gas furnaces that actually workedbetter? Were those not good paying jobs?
So the people who are going tobe making electric heat pumps, they're

(01:13:25):
going to get better paying jobs,and the people are making gas stuff.
Is that right? No? No, but they will be getting government money,
government money. No. The otherjobs are just as good, and
they made a product that people wantedand would purchase in the free market.
So this is a harbinger that notonly is Biden misallocating resource, essentially planning

(01:13:48):
the economy, but also getting readyto ban the other stuff. Ben Lieberman,
a senior at the senior fellow atthe Competitive Enterprise Institute. So do
all the Biden administrations claimed climate emergencydeclarations? This may be the craziest of
them all. There is no shortageof heat pumps. It's just not that

(01:14:12):
every homeowner wants them. Consumers oughtto be able to decide for themselves.
The government has no role in tiltingthe balance in favor of one energy source
over another, or one appliance overanother. But that is clearly what is
happening here. Yeah, they wantto micro manage our life and destroy it.

(01:14:35):
That's the purpose. They're not eventrying to help us. They want
to destroy everything. They want totear firm the environment here. I mean,
they're sucking CO two out of theair. In general. For the
first time, you have they've alreadyset up these facilities where they would go
to some manufacturing facility or some powerstation where they're generating power, and they

(01:15:00):
would capture the exhaust and they wouldextract the CO two and they would send
it into a pipe and they wouldyou know, the idea is to pipe
it all the way across the countryand to start somewhere underground. What a
bunch of nonsense that is. Butit's even worse now, and it's gone
from silly grifting lies to something thatis really dangerous for us all. And

(01:15:24):
now they're starting to set up thesefacilities where they're going to extract CO two
out of the air. We needCO two. CO two is you take
CO two out of the air,the plants are going to die. The
more CO two that's there, Themore the plants grow, the more they
produce oxygen and other things like that. But no, no, no,
we're going to just we're going tocut the trees down and we're going to

(01:15:45):
bury the trees. We're going toextract CO two out of the atmosphere.
These people are insane, and thecraziest ones are us for letting them get
away with this. Meanwhile, aswe look at this war that he has
a against heat pumps. Biden goesto war with Americans. It's not just
going to war with heat pumps.He's going to war with Americans and the
Pentagon. As I said early inthe program, has failed to produce sufficient

(01:16:13):
information for the accountants to do anaudit six years in a row, and
their budget is over three trillion,So there's no accountability for three trillion dollars.
I don't know this stuff has gonemissing like it did just before in
January, you know, September eleventh, of January sixth, September eleventh,
and I've told the story. Iwon't go into detail about it. Lady,

(01:16:35):
we went down to Wimberley in Texasand it's kind of a tourist area,
just kind of hanging around. She'sin a shop and she says,
yeah, yeah, it was completelyempty. Karen is looking around at some
of the nick knacks, and I'mstanding there, and so she wanted to
talk, and so she starts tellingme about all of her history, how
she used to be in the military, she and her husband they retired.

(01:16:56):
She said, I got out justbefore nine to eleven. It's a good
thing I did because because she said, you know that that missile went right
through the office where I was working. And then she tells me, and
we had trillions of dollars that wasmissing, and she said, I can't
tell you how many congressmen and seniormilitary officials resigned rather than facing the charges

(01:17:20):
and crimes and all the rest ofstuff. And she couldn't put that together.
She couldn't put it together. Askedher, I said, what do
you get your news? Usually CNN? She could not connect the dots.
And so you know again, Pentagonsix years, three trillion a year.

(01:17:41):
I mean, that's eighteen trillion.Now not all that is missing, but
they can't really account for it.And the annual audits, the twenty twenty
three audit, when the accountants didit, they added a disclaimer. A
disclaimer of opinion is the technical termthat the accountants use, which made that
there's not enough data here to forman opinion. So you paid us through

(01:18:03):
an audit, but you wouldn't giveus the data. So here's the disclaimer.
We have no opinion. An unqualifiedor clean opinion would be the highest
possible rating, and a qualified opinionis an acceptable rating. Both of those
would mean that the auditors were givenenough information to make a complete judgment,

(01:18:26):
but they didn't get either one.They didn't get an unqualified and they didn't
get a clean. Instead, theygot a disclaimer. I've got no opinion
on this because you didn't give meany data on this. And twenty twenty
two, the Pentagon only managed toaccount for thirty nine percent of its three
and a half trillion dollars in assets. And then, of course there's the
four budget estimations in the rampant overexpending, like you see with the F

(01:18:46):
thirty five program. The estimated lifetimecost for the F thirty five planes one
point seven trillion dollars, would makeit the Pentagon's most expensive weapons project ever.
A twenty twenty one Pentagon assessment ofthe F thirty five found eight hundred
resolved unresolved defects still in the plane. This was before it was hacked by

(01:19:10):
the Chinese. He ejected the pilotor whatever whoever hacked it. Chinese Russians,
you know, they ejected the pilotand uh, whatever happened to the
point, we don't know about thateither. Furthermore, in twenty nineteen,
a loon the Pentagon made thirty fivetrillion dollars in accounting adjustments. Accounting adjustments.

(01:19:32):
I was twenty nineteen. Now theypoint out thirty five trillion dollars that
they made in accounting adjustments. It'sbigger than the entire US economy. Talk
about a fudge factor. You're lookingat the repo market. Yeah, the
Federal Reserve kicking in. You know, well, here's here's some money we

(01:19:55):
kicked into the repo market. That'sabout the size of the Puerto Rico's economy.
And then a couple of weeks later, let's kick some that was about
the size of the Swiss ecunty.The Pentagon is out there with their eraser
making adjustments that in the thirty fivetrillion dollars bigger than the entire US economy.
Pentagon budget is not only gargantuan,but it's replete with waste. These

(01:20:17):
shadowy practices have boosted the profits,however, of US weapons makers. That's
why I say the military industrial corporationsof Lockheed, Martin, Raytheon, Boeing,
Northrop Grumming major gains made despite thechallenges posed by inflation and supply chain
issues caused by the pandemic. Alongthe same lines, the US government is

(01:20:41):
expected to reach a one trillion dollardefense budget by twenty twenty seven. If
not before, I think it'd beway before. I mean, we've been
up in the eight hundred billion dollarrange for quite a while, and now
with all these multiple wars are tryingto get going fire up, I think
they'll make it way before twenty twentyseven. The defense budget has expanded as
a result of both the war,both these wars and Ukraine with Russia and

(01:21:08):
as well as the guys between Israeland Hamas, and of course the eager
anticipation of a larger war with Chinaand Taiwan. That's why they're doing all
this stuff. Germany vows to massivelyexpand their war effort in Ukraine even as
they're melting down their economy. Youknow, we're in we've got suicidal people

(01:21:29):
who are leading our countries in theWest. Now, the suicide of the
West, the suicide of actually it'sa demicide of the West by his own
government. Yeah, you want todescribe government in three words? How about
war, death and poverty that theyget through taxes. Germany is my overall
value, the second largest source ofweapons and combat material to Ukraine, having

(01:21:53):
promised or delivered to Ukraine seventeen billioneuros of military aid in all forms from
late January twenty twenty two to Julytwenty twenty three. Over the same eighteen
month period, the US delivered orcommitted about four forty one billion euros.
So again, you know, weare way more than anybody else, more

(01:22:17):
than double the number two guys.And David Stockman. So as Uncle Sam
doesn't have one thin dime for JoeBiden's hundred and six billion dollar war package,
I'm going to be talking to himagain about his new book. His
new book is not on this,by the way, is another topic.

(01:22:38):
Win your face with the next essentialthreat to your very national survival. He
says, this is what you do. You mobilize your economy for an all
out struggle, and you impose heavyduty war taxes to pay for a dramatic
buildup of military capabilities. And here'san example what happened during World War Two
with the American government. Between nineteenthirty nine and nineteen forty five, federal

(01:22:59):
government seats rose nearly sevenfold. Ontop of that came a huge amount of
war bonds and borrowing. You hadis mostly for military mobilization. The military
expenditures rose from less than ten percentof GDP in nineteen forty to a wartime
peak of forty percent by the endof the war nineteen forty four to nineteen

(01:23:21):
forty five. So he says,now, as you look at Israel talking
about the Hamas attack, every singleone of them is comparing this to Pearl
Harbor. And yet there is nocomparison to Pearl Harbor when you look at
the Israeli reaction to this. Netanyahuhas insisted that Israel's withering bombardment of Gaza

(01:23:43):
must not give way to a pauseor a ceasefire, just as Washington did
not stand down from Pearl Harbor either. However, where is Netanyahu's powerful budget
speech to the Kanesset, there'd beequivalent to FDR's famous call to arms and
economic sacrifice before the Congress in Januaryof nineteen forty one. Member, it
is December seventh. In nineteen fortytwo, it was December seventh, nineteen

(01:24:08):
forty one. Pearl Harbor happened,and in less than a month he said,
all right, we got to massivelyramp up. You see anything like
that in Israel isn't Yahu talking abouthow they have to go undergo massive build
up and we've got to have youknow, we've got to suck it in

(01:24:28):
and build it up. No,where's his lobbying campaign for an all out
Israeli economic mobilization and stiff war taxesthat would dramatically increase the government's claim on
the nation's economic source resources. No, of course not, because he's got
Uncle Sugar who's going to pay fortheir war. They don't have to have

(01:24:49):
any big military budget or any buildup. We will pay for that.
Where's the plan for a true garrisonstate with a vastly expand ded military budget
and armed forces that be needed forthe future to protect Israel's citizens from being
caught flat footed again? Where arethe plans for the hundreds of thousands of
additional soldiers it would be required toensure that several thousand Hamas barbarians who inhabit

(01:25:14):
the open air prison on Israel's southernborder never again break through the properly sealed
off militarized barrier on the perimeter ofthe Gaza Strip. There is nothing like
that in the works. There isa whole lot of lobbying going on,
but not in the Kanesset. Instead, it's in Washington. Uncle Sam is

(01:25:35):
flat outbroke. Washington cannot afford asingle dime of the one hundred and six
billion dollar package that Biden is tryingto shove down the collective throats of America's
Apolis of legislators. That especially includesthe utter waste of another sixty one billion
dollars for Washington's insane proxy war againstRussia and Ukraine, and the fourteen billion

(01:25:56):
dollars for Israel as well. Israelhas not yet even begun to tighten its
own economic belt in order to payfor its war policy that its militaristic and
religious extremist government insists upon. Instead, the pending usaid package amounts to only
two and a half percent of Israel'sGDP, and it comes on the back

(01:26:17):
of Netanyahu's ceaseless, decades long campaignfor a garrison state national security policy,
but one that he funded on thecheap via a quasi pacifist defense spending level
Dogman said that's right. Israel's militaryexpenditures had plunged from more than twenty percent

(01:26:38):
of GDP at the time of thelast existential crisis during the Yam Kapor War
of nineteen seventy three, they werespending twenty percent of their GDP on military.
Now they're only spending five percent.It's as of October the seventh.
When that happened. Netnyah Whuo falselytold Israeli voters that they didn't have to

(01:26:59):
take the risk and make the territorialconcessions implicit in a two state, diplomatically
based solution to the Palestine problem.But at the same time they could also
avoid having to be taxed to thegills for the alternative, a costly,
heavily militarized garrison state. So we'renot going to we are not going to

(01:27:23):
make any concessions. We're going tobe tough. We're going to have a
garrison state. We're going to approachthis with a military with no political negotiations.
But then they don't fund that garrisonstate. Instead, they're going to
look to us to fund it.So, even more than the failure of
Israel's vaunted intelligence operations and the runup to the October seventh massacre, the

(01:27:45):
real deep policy failure is the flaccidblue line below, slouching toward five percent
of GDP defense spending after the Netand Yahu coalition came to dominate policy in
the nineteen nineties. You simply can'thave Garrison state policy. No negotiation with
a Palestini is no two state solution, no continuation of OSLO or anything else.

(01:28:09):
And do it on a four ona five percent GDP war budget unless
you get America to foot the bill. Israel seeks twenty five billion dollar defence
budget, and he points out thatthe entire GDP of Gaza was twenty eight
billion, and that they have afive hundred and fifty billion dollar national GDP,

(01:28:35):
and their GDP, in other words, is twenty times larger than what
is in Gaza. Their military budgetis about the same size of the entire
GDP of Gaza, and yet theycome to US for money. Between twenty

(01:28:56):
twelve and twenty eighteen, net Yahoogave Cutter approval for transfer of accumulative sum
of nearly a billion dollars to Gazain the form of suitcases full of cash,
same kind of stuff that Obama wasdoing, where they ran by and
doing giving them suitcases of cash,and we at least and at least half

(01:29:16):
of that is estimated to have reachedHamas, including its military wing. In
an interview with the Whynutt News websitein twenty nineteen May fifth, Netya Who's
associate gershen Hakkonen Cohen, a majorgeneral in the Reserve, said quote,

(01:29:36):
we need to tell the truth Netna, Who's strategy is to prevent the option
of two states. So he isturning Hamas into his closest partner. Openly
Hamas is an enemy, but covertlyit is an ally. Earlier that spring,
in twenty nineteen, Netanyahu himself widelyquoted as saying whoever opposes a Palestinian

(01:29:58):
state must support delivery of funds toGaza done in the case of suitcases of
cash from Cutter because maintaining separation betweenthe Palestinian authority in the West Bank and
Hamas and Gaza will prevent the establishmentof a Palestinian state. So that's where
we are now. Now what isgoing to happen? The Pentagon is mulling

(01:30:20):
deploying marine regiments as the Israeli Hamaswar rages. Yeah, they're going to
send about I forget, I didn'tput down it. Six to eight thousand
people about the number of people thatthey kicked out over the vaccine. Eighty

(01:30:40):
percent of them with a dishonorable discharge. We're not going to just send weapons,
We're not just going to send money. We're going to send people.
And as Jason said, they maynot wait for people to voluntarily re enlist.
They might be recalled because not onlywill we pay for their war,

(01:31:00):
but we will fight their wars forthem as they go to war with us
trying to ban everything, every littleconvenience in life, because nothing is too
small to escape the purview of Biden. And these people who want to wage
war on us with their climate justification, well they get us involved in an
actual war because we see what ishappening with the pandemic. We'll be right

(01:31:24):
back here News Now at apsradionews dotcom or get the APS radio app and
never miss another story. Liberty,It's your move. And now the David

(01:33:14):
Knight Show. Some of the commentshere is hearing girl says, I guess
Netanyahu didn't just didn't kill off enoughJews with a jab. He has to
thin out the herd a little bitmore. Yeah, that's right, Jay
Caravella talking about the heat pump warsthat Biden is using. You know,
we're at war. We got ayou know, send special financing in to

(01:33:39):
make heat pumps. Jay Caravella saysheat pump is the most inefficient thing ever
created. It barely puts out acouple of degrees warmer than what is taken
in. I know because we sufferedwith that. We we bought, we
built a house. We're living inNorth Carolina, and I argued with this
idiot architect that we had, andI was a general I was a general

(01:34:01):
contractor for it, but I hiredan architect. Oh no, heat pumps
are completely different. Now. It'slike, seriously, I don't know.
But he convinced me, against mybetter judgment, to get a heat pump,
and we were shivering all the time. The only thing that saved us
was that we had a really intensefireplace. We had a fireplace that had
an interior that was I forget thematerial was made. It was some kind

(01:34:27):
of sandstone or something like that.But it had a venting that went up
and around, and then they builtthe facade on it. But that thing
had had smaller doors, very heavydoors, and we had in vented from
the outside the fresh air coming in, and we could stoke that thing really
big. I got it so hotthat we melted the iron grate that was

(01:34:50):
holding the logs up. And uh, and we did that on a regular
basis. I mean, there wasn'tany wood anywhere close around that thing.
It was all it was all marbleand brick and everything else. But that,
you know, it was that wasin another room, and it still
didn't help us in the bedrooms.It was still very, very cold all
the time. I really hated that. He says, It's even funnier about

(01:35:13):
it is there's no way that hepump is going to be adequate to keep
people from freezing to death in Canada. That's right, that's right. It's
for very mild climates like you wouldhave in Florida or something like that.
And he writes Trude Hoe justin Stephencaspar I worked at a power plant in
the nineteen eighties. They were burningoil and gas and ran almost perfectly clean.

(01:35:36):
Everything was adjustable to do that.And they keep graphs that the EPA
collected monthly. Yeah. Well,you know that's the thing. It's like
anything you can make it diesel carsthat are perfectly clean. But they're going
to ban him anyway. And thisis, you know, just as last

(01:35:57):
year, first time the EPA hasput out emission standards to ban power plants,
and it's just absurd. We knowwhat their religenda is, there's no
question about it. Jason Barker said, when the military terminates a contract early,
they have to still pay out thefull amount to the contractor. In
that spirit, they should pay allthe soldiers they kicked out. That's right,
with full salary they would have gottenover the course of their contract.

(01:36:20):
I absolutely agree. Of course,there's not going to be any justice there.
They will get very stingy. Isn'tit funny how they are so free
with money when it comes to theircontractors, and how stingy they are when
it comes to their soldiers. Andthis is what you see in government all
the time when it comes to payingtheir friends. Money is no object and

(01:36:43):
we don't really care to do anyaccounting. But oh, but you know,
we've got to balance the budget here. That means we've got to do
something about social security. And Iknow that it's Social security and Medicare and
these things. You know, that'sthe biggest part of the budget. There's
not even any talk about transitioning ina way. There's no talk about maintaining
their quote unquote Social contract if youwill. So I've said before people criticized

(01:37:06):
ain Ran for taking Social Security.She said, well, I had to
pay it. I was forced topay into it, and I was given
assurances that this is going to happen. And it's not a retirement account anyway.
If you had an individual retirement account, and if you died before you
depleted it, you could pass iton to your heirs. But you can't

(01:37:26):
do that with Social Security because it'sa Ponzi scheme. It was always designed
that way. They picked the ageof sixty five Bismarck did in Germany because
that was life expectancy of the time. That's why they keep saying, well,
the best thing we can do isto raise the age of retirement because
they never planned on anybody getting itgreg talent. They will offer a path
to citizenship to illegal immigrants in exchangefrom the military service. Yeah, that'll

(01:37:48):
be part of it. Angus mustnang. Maybe that's why they're bringing in
the army of young men across theborder. You think they'll do that,
do you think they'll find Maybe they'llbring them in and train them to fight
us when they create the chaos inthe Civil War. Angus Mustang Greg Talent.

(01:38:08):
Yes, that's what I've been saying. They will load up the ranks
of them as thirteen members or anyimmigrants that they can ye turn against the
US citizens during martinal law. Ihaven't read that, but yeah, I
agree. I think the same thingTeteb. Ninety seven four oh one.
Plenty of military age males seeking UScitizenship, paycheck, healthcare, etc.
Will gladly take a rifle and pointit at anyone they are told to.

(01:38:30):
Exactly, so let's talk about thisis from Daisy Luther and the Organic Prepper
blog. She says an insurgence ofidiots, and so everybody's talking about insurgents
everywhere. I guess that's the newpoint of view on TikTok these trend on
social mediallity is a bunch of stunnedyoung people making shocked faces at the camera

(01:38:57):
talking about the brilliance of Osama Lawden. And I see this is the problem
that I have with it. Idon't you know, is this? Why?
Is this a big thing? Rightnow? Right? You should be
asking yourself why now? Why havewe not heard anything about Osam bin Laan's
letter for twenty years and now allof a sudden we hear it. I
have my real, real doubts aboutthis. This guy is the Swiss army

(01:39:20):
knife of misinformation from the CIA.They can use them for anything and everything.
So now we got from Tim Osmond, that's the name that they gave
him when they would check him intothe Pentagon, the CIA would and anything.
So now Tim Osmond's stuff is outthere. Do you trust anything about
Osama bin Lauden? I don't quite. Frankly, I don't trust anything.

(01:39:42):
But the other thing about it isis that was this letter from Osama bin
Laden? Do you care? Doesit make any difference? It's as if
you know, we got a letterfrom Anthony Fautsci about vaccines and pandemics,
does that matter to you, Orif you got it from somebody that you
would trust, you know, putin the name of one of these doctors

(01:40:04):
or somebody that's pushed back against thisstuff, does that make it legit?
It should never make it legit.It's just like we're talking about different news
organizations, right. I've always hadthis discussion. You should never ban a
news organization, which is what theCIA developed news guard working with Microsoft,

(01:40:25):
an election guard. That's what theydo, you know, they give labels
and say, don't trust anything thatthis organization says. Meanwhile, you know
they're most highly trusted news organizations likethe New York Times, the Washington Posts
and others like that. Oh,believe everything that they tell you. No,
you should be doing this on acase by case basis. New York
Times and Washing Posts are even capableof doing something accurate once in a while,

(01:40:48):
capable, but not usually doing it. And you know, even though
somebody else that may be overall trustworthy, they everything that anybody says, it
is not always one hundred percent trueor trustworthy. People make mistakes, and
then you have other people who deliberatelytry to lie to people. But they

(01:41:09):
don't make that distinction. They justsay, well, I don't like the
fact that they're opposing our government narrative, and so we're going to say that
you don't pay attention at all towhat these people do out there. But
what difference does it make whether thisletter is from Obama Osama? I always

(01:41:30):
get them confused for some reason.I don't know. Does that make it
credible because it comes from Osama binLaden? What does it say? You
got to look at what it saysand say well, is this true,
because there's a lot that's in itthat's not true, a lot that is
opinion and conclusion. It's an oped piece. Whoever wrote it, it

(01:41:53):
should stand on its own as towhether or not it's true or not.
I give references when I quote thingsbecause I don't want to plagiarize people.
But it doesn't make something true becauseit comes from, you know, somebody
that you generally agree with. ButOsama bin Laan is becoming the new Chegwavara
of the TikTok generation, and soDaisy Luther says would call them useful idiots.

(01:42:18):
I call them youthful idiots, becausethere's nobody that's more useful than the
youth. And of course Lenin knewthat. I think he was the one
who called him useful idiots. TikTokhas now rehabilitated Osama bin Laden nine to
eleven. They say was justified andan act of resistance. They say,

(01:42:40):
well, you know, the realityis is that what is really scary about
this is that this is multiple layersof idiocracy. Not only do these people
believe it hook line and sinker,but even though they believe that Osama Lawden
did nine to eleven and was ableto take down in New York three say

(01:43:02):
ice scrapers with only two planes,and they fell right into their footprint.
Even though they believe that's true,they support him, but truly is amazing.
I mean, if you believe it, you would want to do something
like go to war with Saudi Arabia, you know, not Afghanistan, but
you'd want to go to war withSaudi Arabia. You do want to go

(01:43:23):
after Asama bin Lan, which bythe way, they didn't. It's kind
of like you see what happened what'shappening right now with Israel and Hamas.
You have these terrasts who organize thisthing, and they're living a life of
luxury and cutter and everybody knows thatthey're there. But you don't have the
US negotiating turning over these people.You don't have Israeli assassins going there to

(01:43:45):
take them out. No, they'regonna They're going to use this to pursue
their agenda of what they wanted,which is land in territory. And I
think that was a big part ofwhat Afghanistan was all about. They wanted
the poppy fields, they wanted thelithium that was there, and they use
nine to eleven as an excuse forthat. But just as a reminder about

(01:44:06):
what we're talking about, osam BinLatten, let's remember what nine eleven was
about. Here is a retired chiefwith the Fire Department of New York.
How did you come to the conclusionthat nine to eleven was a false flag?
For the first ten years, Idid not see New York Fire Commissioner
other than the official narrative. Thenafter being shown a video, a close

(01:44:30):
up video of Building number seven comingdown, and that got me going because
it's obvious to me that Building sevenwas a controlled demolition because the building collapses
from the bottom down. Did youbasically break down and it wasn't even hit
by a plane? Firefighting and constructionfor US, okay, I've been involved

(01:44:51):
with heavy construction for over thirty years, been involved with the constructions of a
high rise steel framed buildings in Manhattan. I've worked on bridges and I know
what goes into these buildings. Iknow what file loads that they can handle,
how fire is going to act.The trade centers were unique in that

(01:45:14):
they were designed to withstand the impactof a jet. From what I understand
the outer skeleton of the building,the outer columns, was like a fish
net, and you had these innercore columns which were substantial, thick steel
beams to withstand four or five timeswhat the loads were. That the engineers

(01:45:35):
always over designed a building. Nosteel frame building has ever collapsed before or
since nine to eleven, so thatshould say something right there. I came
across an analogy of the twin towers, and if you could visualize cast iron
stoves stacked one on top of eachother, the stoves up at the top,

(01:45:56):
Yes there's fire and they've been damaged, but the stoves on the box,
they haven't been damaged. So thestructure underneath all of that is intact.
So it's impossible for a building tocollapse near free full speed and increase
without a control demolition. You're runninginto the path of most resistance. Something

(01:46:17):
else is going on. I don'tbelieve that it was just the planes or
the fires. I think that.And they examined the dust and they found
what they call thermitic material, whichis like an explosive incendiary which was in
the dust samples, and that's document. I think the fireman knew something was
up. City New York City FireDepartment knows exactly what happened, and they've

(01:46:41):
they've been told, you know,not to not to comment on it.
They know. These are my brothers, These are the guys I went to
fight fires with. These are theguys I grew up with. They don't
see how you know, when youlose my friend Mike Kaefer. He was
the only son, he was goingto get married, he had a life
ahead of them. His parents weredevastated. So you have all this,

(01:47:03):
you know, collateral damage on topof that that people don't see that.
It just infuriates me that something likethis could take place. These people that
did it don't even care about that. You know, you killed some of
the best people in this country.You murdered them. Yeah, I learned
a lot of people. They alwaysdo that, isn't it interesting? And

(01:47:25):
again that's the New York Fire Department, former fire commissioner. And there's been
no change in building codes or construction. There's been no change in firefighting procedure.
So obviously these people don't believe anyof this stuff. The architects who
are lying to you about that,they don't believe this, or they would
change the way they build buildings.They don't change anything in terms of fire

(01:47:48):
fighting tactics or fighting a fire.And a skyscraper is he pointed outs,
the only time before and since thatyou've had a steel core building that just
collapsed. I've shown pictures of steelbuildings in other countries on fire for days

(01:48:10):
and there's nothing left but this,you know, steel structure, and it's
leaning a little bit, but itstill didn't fall. And so these people
on TikTok are too stupid to understandthat. And I say stupid, it's
stupid to believe the government narrative.This is beyond the magic bullet, stupid,

(01:48:30):
incredibly stupid, so low information.And so, as Daisy Luther says,
let's put aside for a moment allof our doubts about what occurred on
nine to eleven, the actual culprit, because that isn't the topic of this
conversation. This conversation, these youngpeople believe lock Stock and Barrel that the
Biden bin Laden was a mastermind ofattack on America, that he was able

(01:48:53):
to kill three thousand innocent people,and they think that he is awesome,
awesome. These are the double downdummies, ignorant haters, incapable of any
critical thinking, and so she says, the letter is ravings about why they

(01:49:15):
attacked America. And of course,again this supposedly surfaced about two thousand and
I think this was set up toenforce the CIA story. But now these
idiots on TikTok are looking at itand in the context of what's going on
with Israel and Hamas, and they'vemade him a hero. Where did we

(01:49:38):
get into a situation that this crazyno sources are cided. He simply goes
on on about the evils of Americaand Israel through the lens of his religious
belief. Again, I think thisis the CIA. CIA made him the
mastermind. We had to have aboogeyman. And even though in the narrative

(01:49:58):
that they created most of these hijackerswas in Saudi Arabia, they went to
Afghanistan. Tim Osman, you know, the guy that's supposedly on a dilation
dilator machine. He's running through themountains with his dilator machine for years and
years until he served the useful purposeof making Obama look good. Because Obama's
They've used this guy over and overagain. I guess they were all really

(01:50:23):
upset that Obama decided to kill thisfictional character because now they've lost that.
But now they're bringing him back,bringing him back. So you know,
when you look at the CIA,think about the fact that the CIA organized
feminism campaign. They were very involvedin that, using these radical feminists in

(01:50:46):
the sixties and seventies, and ofcourse, you know, creating the drug
war, creating many of the drugs, but you know, running the drugs.
The CIA is doing that to theextent of pushing abstract art and architecture,
removing beauty from our society. TheCIA has been at war, a

(01:51:09):
satanic war against us. The climatestuff that's heavily footprints and fingerprints in that,
the poisoning of our minds everywhere.But of course they were also involved
in the poisoning of our bodies.There's a CIA running these germ games going
back to two months before nine toeleven. beIN Laden hated Jews, Americans,

(01:51:30):
and gay people, just to namea few on his hit list.
Again, I don't, unlike DaisyLuther, unlike Jerald Slindy, I don't
even think this has been lauden.I think this was written by the CIA.
And if you know this is youknow their attempt to sow discord and
chaos and hatred and everything else.And it's an attempt to shore up again
in two thousand and two, toshore up their phony war against their guy

(01:51:56):
tim Osman. He believed the namebody who died on nine to eleven deserved
it and wasn't innocent because they paidtaxes in a country that committed the acts
against what he had grievances. Hewas filled with hate because the first segment
of this manifesto mentions the Palestinians.These kids think that he is now a
beacon of truth. Well again,the fact that they would celebrate this is

(01:52:24):
bad enough, and it's compounded bytheir total ignorance and gullibility to believe this
CIA narrative in the first place.Again, I don't believe that this has
been laden. It wouldn't make ittrue if it was. But they're now
making bin laden another che guevera.The letter goes on to demand that everyone

(01:52:45):
convert to Islam. It discusses howwe've separated church and state in Americans,
says that's a bad thing. Well, it's only a bad thing if it's
Christian, right, Yeah, See, the organizing principle left my entire life
has been We've got to get Godout of our society. We've got to
get Christ out of our society.We got to purge any free exercise of

(01:53:05):
religion out of our schools and anyother institution. And there is again,
there is an ignorance and an inabilityto understand history to distinguish between establishment of
religion and the free exercise of religionby people who work for the government,

(01:53:26):
or work in schools, or whoare students in schools, and all the
rest of this stuff. The letterconcludes, if the Americans refuse to listen
to our advice and goodness, guidanceand righteousness that we call them to,
then be aware that you will losethis crusade Bush began just like the other
previous crusades in which you were humiliatedby the hands of the moujah hadeen,

(01:53:48):
fleeing to your home and great silenceand disgrace. Well, she said,
ignorance is bliss until it gives youa big fat dose of scharial law.
And so TikTok, they say,is cracking down on this, But that's
another aspect of this. Daisy Luthersays, I think the genie is out

(01:54:10):
of the bottle. Well, it'smore like a gin, right, that's
what the Muslims essentially called a demon. Our young people have been radicalized,
which is something I've written about before. They've been taught by our education system
and our media to hate America.Yeah, because we're colonizers. And again,
that is what is going on withall this stuff about Musk. You
know, he's pointing out, you'veweaponized these kids along and Marxist agenda,

(01:54:38):
along a Hitler agenda, where you'vegot to have the other, You've got
to have some ethnic group that everybodyis organized to hate. What was that
group? Well, people like JonathanGreenblatt at the ADL and others like that
still celebrated and infended by the massmajority of Jews out there. They don't
say anything about that. They embracethat, but they weaponize us. Greenblat

(01:55:00):
says, well, we got anoppressors Olympic. Well, he was one
who said white people are the oppressors. It's not okay to be white,
and we don't know not all livesmatter, only black lives matter. This
kind of tribalism that was pushed forpower and money by the ad L,
the Southern Powary Law Center and thefederal government who was using them to do

(01:55:25):
this. They were the surrogates forthem, in the same way that Twitter
and Facebook and Google and YouTube wereused for censorship. It was coming from
the government. You know, theuseful and well paid idiots. Well,
they aren't idiots. They knew whatthey were doing at the ADL and the
Southern Powary Law Center. They've beendoing this for a long time. They've
been running this oppression Olympics and thisvictimhood status. Everybody is a victim of

(01:55:50):
white Christian males, and so wegot to kill the white Christian males.
I'm sick of that game. I'msick of the ADL. And you can
call me whatever you want. Iwill I am. They've called me everything
that they wanted to. You know, they've been doing this crying wolf stuff,
and you know what, it's gettingreally old. That's why I defend

(01:56:11):
Elon Musk on this. He's absolutelyone hundred percent right about this. These
people have been selling hate. They'rewhores selling hate. I'm sick of the
ADL. I'm sick of Jonathan Greenblatt. He's the most racist, hateful person
out there and he's spewing this andprojecting it on to everybody else. Yeah,

(01:56:33):
it wasn't oppression Olympics until, asVictor Davis Hanson pointed out, until
the Jews got labeled as white oppressors, white colonizers. They're not going to
escape that once you get labeled bythe mob that you created. Just like
Grobspear created the mob and then hebecame somebody impowered create a mob to take

(01:56:56):
the people in power out. Well, then these Jacobins got into power and
guess what, the mob came afterthem and they got sent to the guillotine.
And so when you look at thisTikTok stuff, you need to understand
the bigger picture here. Why isit that conservatives are so focused on TikTok
and now all of this stuff aboutOsam bin Laden And you want to know

(01:57:19):
what I think is happening. Idon't think this is something that happened organically.
In my opinion, this looks likea CIA operation. CIA going back
and pulling up this letter that theyprobably wrote themselves back in two thousand and
two and putting it out there,obviously antisemitic, as an excuse to take

(01:57:43):
down TikTok and so TikTok is saying, well, we're going to aggressively take
this stuff down and so forth.But you got all these people, all
these conservatives who say we got toget TikTok down. Look, I agree,
it probably is a horrible piece ofpropaganda. So what these people,

(01:58:03):
the ADL wants to censor, andpeople like Descent is doing it for them,
going to Israel and signing a lawin Israel, not in Florida,
signing a law in Israel about hatespeech. We'll take down your opponents.
Got some cash, can you payme? Now? I'm sick of this

(01:58:23):
type of thing being done. Andof course they want to take TikTok down
because if they can ban an entirewebsite, and imagine what they can do.
They can take down Rumble, theycan take down Odyssey, they can
take down bitch Shoot, they cantake down substack because you know, that's
all content that they hate. That'scontent that they've already been able to censor

(01:58:44):
on YouTube and Facebook and other places. And so if you let this precedent
of being able to take TikTok down, that's going to go everywhere. And
so I think that the CIA ispushing this beIN Loden thing. I think
they wrote it. I think theyresurfaced it and resurrected it. Oh look

(01:59:04):
it's Andy Semitic. So now wecan take down TikTok. You got UNESCO
out there launching an action plan toregulate all Internet content and social media platforms.
Let's see who was it that wasat the UN under Trump. Oh
that's right, it was Nuki Hayley, who's now the darling of Wall Street

(01:59:25):
investors. They just love her.She's going to be so good for business
for the military industrial corporations. Theplans were announced on November the sixth.
The UN says the action plan it'saction plan outlines the principles which must be
respected as well as the concrete measureswhich must be implemented by all stakeholders.
Whenever you see that, understand thatthese people are holding stakes that they want

(01:59:49):
to drive through our hearts. Theysee us as vampires and vermin and a
virus and everything else that they've labeledus. So UNESCO is going to organize
a the World Conference of Regulators middleof next year, a world conference of
regulators who will do regulation without representation, just like our bureaucracies do now.

(02:00:11):
We have taxation without representation from thebureaucracy in Washington, all under the president.
You know, the entire swamp wasunder President Trump, that's the executive
branch. He did nothing about it, by the way. And so this
swamp that taxes us without representation,this swamp that regulates us without representation,
now they're going to get a globalswamp a conference of regulators in mid twenty

(02:00:34):
twenty four seven tenants. Number one, the impact on human rights at every
stage will be examined by every stakeholder. Yeah, it doesn't say that they
support these rights. It's going tobe the compass for their decisions, you
know, the impact on human rights. But they very carefully don't say they

(02:00:55):
support human rights. If they did, they be lying. Number two,
independent public regulators are set up everywherein the world with clearly defined roles and
sufficient resources to carry out their mission. This is what the UIN wants.
So they want public regulators set upeverywhere in the world taking orders from them

(02:01:15):
about what to ban. Number Threeprevent digital companies from taking advantage of disparities
between national regulations. In other words, we're going to have one set of
global rules. We're going to havesome unelected global regulators. We're going to
tell every sovereign nation what they mustdo centrally controlled censorship. Number four,

(02:01:39):
Content moderation is feasible and effective atscale thanks to artificial intelligence and other things
that are coming along. Number fiveaccountability, they hold people accountable to them.
And transparency. Not transparency for whatthey do, but transparency for what

(02:01:59):
we do. Transparency at all theseplatforms take a look at all of their
algorithms and where are you hearing thatwith the FCC regulation as well. Number
six, platforms must take make atake more initiative to educate and train users
to think critically. Yeah, startwith the Osama bin Laden. And finally,

(02:02:24):
number seven, the bureaucrats and theplatforms must take stronger measures during particularly
sensitive moments, like you know,elections and crises. Well, yeah,
it's always an election is a crisisfor them. They're worried that's going to
get out of control. Now yousee people on the right, like this

(02:02:47):
article from Epic Times on zero Edge, millions of Americans are walking into a
Chinese made trap, and they talkabout how bad TikTok is, and it
is it's stupid. I've never beento it though, I mean, I
know how stupid it is because I'veseen what libs of TikTok has pulled from
there. But look, do weban everything that's bad? Is that a

(02:03:11):
response everything that's bad needs to bebanned and needs to be banned by the
federal government. Well, you knowthere is another option. You don't have
to use it, or you cando something that is positive, right,
or you can oppose it publicly.It's very much like drugs. You know,
drugs have not been over fifty years, they've not been able to stop

(02:03:33):
the drugs by force of prohibition bybanning. They did try to do it
legally. They understood the Tenth Amendmentdidn't give them the power to ban anything,
and it still is there. Sothey don't have the authority to ban
TikTok anymore than they have the authorityto ban anything else without a constitutional amendment.
And that's why everybody went to thetrouble of putting in the eighteenth Amendment

(02:03:57):
when they wanted alcohol prohbition, Becausethe federal government doesn't have the authority to
ban anything, whether you're talking aboutalcohol or tobacco or pot or TikTok or
anything. They have no constitutional authority. The emperor has no clothes. That's
why Jeff Sessions was afraid to pushthat. As much as he hated pot,
you know, the states could makeit legal, you know, and

(02:04:19):
say, well, we're not goingto enforce those federal prohibitions, and there
was nothing he could do about it. He did not want to have that
argument. He didn't want to exposethe fact that this is naked tyranny,
that the emperor has no clothes,but the whole idea that everything that we
don't like needs to be banned.This is essentially cancel culture. Do you

(02:04:41):
think the cancel culture began with aleft. No, the right was doing
that as well. We don't likedrugs. I don't like drugs. I
don't use drugs. Therefore, butI understand that it is a spiritual issue,
not a law enforcement issue, andafter fifty years, maybe the other
people might understand that as well.I understood that a long time ago.

(02:05:04):
I was in bands in college.Everybody was using drugs. The people on
the band using drugs, the peoplein the audience were using drugs. I
didn't have to use drugs. Ididn't use drugs. I said. That
was to the engineers. I workedwith, and they said, yeah,

(02:05:26):
they probably thought you were a narcand probably did always been that way.
Anyway, Thank god he saved mefrom saved me from addiction and a lot
of other things before I ever gotinvolved in them. Uh. But anyway,
when you when you look at this, Okay, so they're they're freaking
out about the fact that you gota lot of young people getting a lot

(02:05:50):
of their news. Was it fortythree percent or something from TikTok And that's
more than quadrupled. Okay, Soyou banned TikTok. Let's say the tristics
full conservatives, and you get TikTokbanned, Well, where are they going
to go for their news? CNN, PBS, New York Times, Fox
News? Where are they going togo to get their news? These are

(02:06:11):
all phony places anyway. I meanyou have to look at everything and with
a skeptical eye. Yeah, fortythree percent of TikTok users say they regularly
get their news on their site fromthirty three percent who said the same thing
a year ago. So it's increasing. So I guess you should get your
news from the New York Post,the New York Times, the Washington Post,
the Washington Examiner places like that.I know these people are going to

(02:06:33):
get off a TikTok and start watchingme. So but you know what I
do is I look at this stuffand try to deconstruct it, try to
make sense out of it, andtry to deconstruct these lying narratives that the
government has put together. Earlier thisyear, the Guardian published a piece of
meticulous piece meticulously outlining how TikTok appearsto be a part of the Chinese communist

(02:06:59):
parties quote cognitive warfare campaign. Well, of course they are. Of course
they have a cognitive warfare campaign.Do you realize that the American government does
as well? Oh they won't talkabout that, will they They have a
cognitive You know, Russia will tellyou the truth about America most of the
time. The lighty about Russia,same thing about the Chinese. Earlier this

(02:07:21):
year the Guardian published a piece talkingabout that, and they said, it's
the cognitive domain of their military operations. They always have to have a boogieyman
for for what purpose? For censorship, for internet totlitarianism. Look where we're
just talking about Asama bin Laden,right, they had to have a boogieman
so they could put in the PatriotAct. They had to have a boogeyman

(02:07:44):
so they could have the Irockan AfghanistanWars. They had to have boogeyman so
they could usher in the police state, surveillance state. So TikTok is now
the boogieyman to give themselves a powerto arbitrarily seize and shut down any website
that is dissenting from their official story. That's what you need to understand about

(02:08:05):
this. And when you look atNikki Haley pushing all of this stuff,
she doesn't want you to know hername. As a listeners pointed out,
and we talked about this last week, but she demands to know your name
because you know it's going to makethe internet such a friendly, friendly place.
We'll be right back. Sometimes youwant to go where everybody knows your

(02:08:31):
name, as Batch came, Youwant to be where you can see say.
You want to be where everybody knowsyour name. Whether you're feeling like

(02:08:54):
the booze or bluegrass. APS Radiohas you covered. Check out a wide
variety of channels on our app atapsradio dot com. All right, Eric,
thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Thank you.
About nine to eleven. Chevkin threetwenty one says, the B fifty
two, the crash in the EmpireState Building, that's right, in nineteen

(02:09:16):
forty five, didn't bring that buildingdown. Isn't that funny? Yeah?
And isn't it funny that it didn'tbring didn't bring the Empire State Building down?
And even though it didn't collapse intohis footprint, they came up with
more stringent building codes, which youknow, even after you have three buildings,
only two of them hit biplane collapsein their footprint steel buildings in just

(02:09:39):
a couple of hours. They don'tchange anything about the building codes or the
firefighting procedures. Militant Melankovic, ifthe heat warped the steel, it wouldn't
fall straight. Make that make sense? That's right. Yeah. I've said
before we didn't have TV to watchany of this stuff as it was unfolding,
and and we had relatives in NewYork. As a matter of fact,

(02:10:01):
Karen had a cousin who worked inone of the nine to eleven,
one of the trade center buildings gotout, and so you know, her
parents were calling us with updates andall this other kind of stuff, you
know, And yeah, they wereand and then you know the phone call.
She says, one of them isfalling down, and I'm thinking,

(02:10:22):
I thought, wow, Manhattan's notthat big. This thing falls. How
many buildings did it knocked down?How many? You know? How far
down in Manhattan did this thing collapse? And never occurred to me that this
thing would fall straight down in itsfootprint. And then another and then another
one that wasn't even hit by aplane te Ub ninety seven four One free

(02:10:43):
fall speed is the key. Thelaws of physics dictate that can only happen
if all the supports are cut simultaneously. Exactly right, Nathan Bedford, Force,
eighteen sixty five. It was aB twenty five Mitchell bomber that ran
into the Empire State Building. TheB twenty five is much much smaller than
a B fifty two, that's right, you know, I think they'd be
fifty two's came along by until WorldWar two or around then or after.

(02:11:09):
I guess a B twenty five massgross weight is about fifty thousand pounds.
A B fifty two's max gross isover three hundred thousand pounds. Still,
it was hit by a plane,didn't fall down, and they still changed
their procedures Jason Barker, just likecup Operation Northwoods exactly. They had the

(02:11:30):
exact plan to get us into awar with Cuba back in the early nineteen
sixties. They just recycled that planethat was shut down, that plan that
was shut down by JFK. That'sright. They said, we can make
it look like Cuba did this.We can fly planes into buildings, and
we can pose fake hijacks, soyou know, we can have people calling

(02:11:50):
in and saying that you know,they're in a plane that's been taken over,
and then destroy the plane over theocean where nobody can find it.
You know, it was everything thathappened on nine to eleven, you know,
with was it United ninety two,ninety eight, something like that,
Audi modern intro radio. JFK wasn'tpro secret societies, says she had on

(02:12:11):
secret societies weren't pro JFK either,Yeah, very much. As a matter
of fact, you know, theguy who was putting that stuff together,
Liman Limitser. He fired him.He went to Europe, became head of
NATO after that, so he waschair of the Joint Season's staff when they
did the Operation Northwoods, and thenhe sends him you know, he gets
fired, he becomes head of operationsin NATO, and that's when they ran

(02:12:35):
Operation Gladio, this false flag thatyou know, had these NATO people pretending
that they were communists, you know, shooting people and killing people, killed,
kidnapped, and then killed. AldoMoro, the Prime Minister of Italy
and the Italians did an investigation andsaid that Steve Pachennik favorite guy, their

(02:13:01):
favorite guest of n four Wars doThey had it on and on, over
and over and over again. SteveA. Cennick who sold the lie about
the sting January the sixth, whilehe was sent by Henry Kissinger to trying
to negotiate for the release of Aldomorro. What the Italian government said was that
Oldhamorro saw through all this, andSteve Achenick said, got to kill him.
Then went on to help to writefantasy novels with about spice stuff with

(02:13:24):
Tom Clancy Brian Taylor. The twintowers were built with a possibility of planes
crashing into it in mine. Sothe official narrative is BS Yes about Osama.
KWD sixty eight says anyone can bea hero. Lucifer has been a
highly rated TV show that's now.I saw that there was a TV show

(02:13:48):
like that. I haven't seen it. Ripper sixty seven to twenty. In
my opinion, Ben Lauden was nota man but an idea. Well,
it might have been some guy namedtim Osman. I don't know. It's
a look Cat nineteen. I'm abin lot and a useful boogeyman that never
dies. Yeah, because even thoughit runds me so much, wag the

(02:14:09):
dog, you know where they've got. They're playing this game. They got
a hero that's coming back and they'redoing and then like the other guys realize
that they're playing this guy up andthey kill off the guy and it's like,
oh, they put a narrative outthat is planning and crashed about Biden's
carbon war. Karen Carpenter says,plants need CO two to thrive, animals
need plants to thrive on So itall adds up to life not doing it

(02:14:33):
doing too well. That's right,That's what the big plan is for.
And so when we see that theUN UNESCO in particular is going to be
setting up a big conference next yearto come up with global rules for everybody
from unelected bureaucrats to control everything,to make sure that none of these corporations
get a pass because they're based ina particular country. All the countries together

(02:14:54):
are going to come together and sayno, you know, we're going to
shut down Twitter or whatever. Ifthere's any speech thing, we'll be able
to shut it down. You gotNicki Haley out there saying everybody's got to
have an ID. I got toknow everybody's name. They're pushing everything and
it's all to protect the children.You've got conservative Republicans saying we got to
have IDs so kids don't get pornonline. You got others saying, well,

(02:15:18):
artificial intelligence is going to be creatingall kinds of fake stuff, so
you're going to have to prove thatyou're a human and also give Nicki Haley
your name. We're not going tocontrol AI, we're not going to control
the smut generators or whatever. You'vewanted to do something again, I don't
think that that would work. That, like drugs, is a spiritual issue,
which doesn't really lend itself to anykind of government prohibition. Unfortunately,

(02:15:41):
if only it were that easy,right, get rid of all these demons
that addict us and control us andimprison our spirits. Not that easy,
you know, we keep using keepusing a hammer when a nuclear weapon would
be better. You know, ourweapons are mighty. As Christians, we
can pray because we have a mightyGod. But instead we would prefer to

(02:16:05):
try to use these little hammers tohammer everything, because everything looks like a
nail to be prohibited by the government. And so you've got all these different
threads that are coming together for censorship. Right. The TikTok thing is just
another one. Nikki is just anotherone. They are coming at it from
multiple places, and of course theFCC Commissioner, the FCC has exerted its

(02:16:30):
plan for Internet control last week.I haven't talked about this yet, and
it is all about DEI. EvenBiden is calling it digital equity. Digital
equity, Well, we know whatthat means. They've used DEI programs to
punish people. You get sorted intodifferent groups, many of these groups based

(02:16:52):
on characteristics that you can't change,like your skin color and or even your
gender because you can't really change thegender. If you're a man, you
know, you get kicked to theside here as well, and so they
sort you to these different boxes.Some boxes are good, some boxes are
bad. They've got a hierarchy.How many good boxes did you check?
How many bad boxes did you check? That's what this is all about.

(02:17:15):
Digital equity or digital equity is nodifferent from diversity, equity and inclusivity.
It's all about intersectional ranking. That'swhat they call it. When they put
you in the boxes, then rankthe boxes good and bad. Biden's plan
hands the administrative state, the FCCin this particular case, effective control of
all Internet services and infrastructure in thecountry. Isn't that convenient? You know,

(02:17:37):
just as the UN is coming upwith this marching orders for what everybody
is supposed to do, they're layingthe groundwork through the FCC for them to
be able to implement the plan,which we've already known that was a plan.
I read you the seven points.It's horrible, but it's just like
the CBDC. We know what CBDCis intended for, and we know what

(02:17:58):
their censorship of the Internet is intendedfor, and so never before and the
roughly forty year history of the publicInternet, has the FCC or any federal
agency for that matter, claimed thisdegree of control. Indeed, Biden's plan
calls for the FCC to apply afar reaching set of government controls that the

(02:18:20):
agency has not applied to any technologyin the modern era, including Title II
common Carrier, said Brendan Carr,a former FCC commissioner. He says this
is unprecedented, and he's also saysit's unlawful. Congress never contemplated the sweeping
regulatory regime that Biden has asked theFCC to adopt, let alone authorize the

(02:18:46):
agency to implement it. Of course, that's Congress. That's so old school.
We don't do regulation with representation anymore. We have regulation as being done
by executive orders by our tyrants,whether it's Biden or Trump. They do
executive orders now, and then theregulatory agencies, whether it is the FCC
or the ATF under Trump, youknow, they just implement these orders and

(02:19:09):
do whatever they wish. They don'thave to be accountable to the Constitution,
and they don't have to get ourapproval. They don't have to be held
accountable to us or stand for electionor that stuff. And what's even worse
is when they put these rules together. You understand, they use the legal
fiction that we will call these rulesinstead of laws. Even though they have

(02:19:35):
the same they use them under colorof law. So they use these rules
as if they were law. Butthey say, well, since this is
not done by your elected representative,since this is regulation without representation, these
rules are not laws, and wedon't have to obey the Constitution when it
talks about due process or presumption ofinnocence or protection against excessive fines. We'll

(02:19:56):
just do all those things to youbecause these are rules, they're not laws.
That kind of cynical, kafka esquespeak. This makes me want to
throw up. I hate this regulatorystate, this regulation with that representation,

(02:20:18):
and as bad as it is,as bad as it is that they're writing
laws, they say, well,with rules, you don't have any protection
against you know, we can doit without due process. We can punish
you as much as we want.The cost of car the former FCC commissioner
car Side, The Biden administration's broadband policies are failing. The Costs of

(02:20:39):
building internet infrastructure in this country haveskyrocketed due to Biden's economic policies. Of
course, everything is skyrocketed due tohis economic policies by design. While the
FCC has been looking to expand newfive G services, he said, it's
needlessly blocked and delayed new broad bandinfrastructure bills because of reglatory red tape.

(02:21:01):
Well, because they want to controleverything, right, I mean, I
don't even want new five G services. I reject this. It hasn't been
tested. We don't know if it'ssafe. Plenty of evidence that it's unsafe.
We know that it is the necessaryfoundation for the smart cities and the

(02:21:22):
full time surveillance and police state.So I don't want any five G services,
But they don't want them for adifferent reason. They want to make
sure they completely control everything. Bidenhas chosen to blame the private Secretary says
in free market capitalism for the administrationson policy shortfalls. If passed, the
FCC would be empowered for the firsttime to regulate every ISP's service termination terms,

(02:21:46):
the use of credit, the accounthistory, the credit checks, account
termination, among many other things.Look, I'm not interested, and well,
we want to have you know,the free market work as good as
spot. That's not what this isabout. Really, this is about them
being able to control everything. Becausewhat they're doing is they're exercising this control

(02:22:07):
over ISPs. It will eventually drivethem out of business or make them or
take them over to such a degreethat they're just a little bit of a
pass through for the government. RegulatoryThis is about the government directly controlling everybody.
There'll be a little bit of anin direction and then eventually that'll disappear.
They're not talking about, you know, how can ISPs better serve people

(02:22:28):
or whatever. And the Republicans geton the side of this to say,
well, let's carve out a littlebit here so the big business can still
make some money because they give memoney when I run for Congress and that
type of thing. That's not whatthis is. Ultimately, this is about
complete control, and that's why they'redoing this. The government wants to be
able to shut down our life exceptthrough the virtual reality of the Internet,

(02:22:52):
and then they want to control thatcompletely and shut us out of that because
you're going to have to have theirnumber, their mark for the beast government.
You know, again, the beastis a reference to the government.
You're going to have to have thatin order to buy, sell, trade,
move anything like that. That's partof it. Complete control, global
control. The Biden administration's plan,says the SEC former Commissioner, and powers

(02:23:18):
the FCC to regulate every aspect ofthe internet sector for the first time ever.
And when do we see that theywant to regulate every aspect of energy.
They want to regulate every aspect ofthe internet, every aspect of our
food and our transportation and everything thatwe see here and say, so we
see no evil, we speak noevil, and we hear no evil.

(02:23:39):
The plan is motivated by an ideologyof government control that is not compatible with
the fundamental precepts of a free marketcapitalism. Way, if that isn't a
understatement, Biden is turning digital discriminationinto a pretext for regulating everything. Yeah,

(02:24:00):
how is that different? Right?When they want to shut something down
or shut somebody up, what dothey call you racist? And that's what
the ADL has been doing for themfor the longest time. Oh, you're
racist. Okay, we can cancelyou, and we can cancel this,
and we can cancel that. That'swhat all of this is about. And
that's coming not from the former FCCcommissioner, but from a former FCC policy

(02:24:24):
advisor, Evan Schwartz Traumber. Hesaid, to call it extreme or radical
doesn't do this proposal justice. SenatorCruz reacted to that, saying Democrats are
hoping to convince the American people thatbroadband internet is so racist that they need
to plow ahead with government mandated affirmativeaction, race based pricing again, racist

(02:24:52):
for anything. They want to destroy, anything, they want to cancel,
anything they want to take over incontrol. That's what's going on here.
So Cruz and twenty seven of hiscolleagues called on the FCC to rescind its
draft. Worry, see, thisis how we got here. You know,
you'll have maybe a quarter of theSenate we'll oppose this, but nobody
will oppose the regulatory state that justdoes whatever it wants because they like that

(02:25:18):
they have. The Senate and theHouse have both agreed that they don't want
to have responsibility for making laws.They would rather have show hearings and show
trials and this and that. Butthey don't want to actually have to write
laws. Besides, they could neverget the kind of oppressive government that they
want if they had to actually passall these laws. So they punt it

(02:25:43):
over to the bureaucracy, and thebureaucracy moves so quickly that the boiling frogs
wake up and complain about it.Well, then Congress can come in and
pretend that there are saviors and adjustthat little thing just a little bit and
make them pull it back. Yousaw that with the FAA a few years

(02:26:05):
ago. They said, well,you know, even if you've got a
drone that's about the weight of apaper airplane, you'll have to report that
to us and pay a twenty fivedollars fee to report it. And if
you don't report it to us andwe see you flying this, well then
we're going to hit you with atwenty five thousand dollars find Everybody said,
what this is crazy, So theytalked about it. They pulled it back
a little bit. But look,this is all under the executive branch.

(02:26:28):
Trump is not going to change anything. He didn't change anything the first four
years. As a matter of fact, he increased this by doing gun control
by executive fiat and then giving usmartial law by executive fiat as well.
We'll be alright back. Tell Alexato add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere,from country to blues, classic hits to

(02:26:52):
news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverseplaylists for you to enjoy. Get details
at apsradio dot com. If youare listening to the David Night Show.

(02:27:54):
Well, something did happened over theweekend. Uh, very surprising. Yesterday
we had the elections in Argentina andJavier malai one and the establishment press is
freaking out about this. They're afraidthat he might set a new trend,
might show what happens when you've gotfree market economics. It's a tall order.
I don't know if he'll be ableto get it done. He's like,

(02:28:16):
you know, a man alone.He doesn't have a big party there,
so not clear whether this is goingto be able to work or not,
or how they will use this.And I've said even before the twenty
sixteen election, I said, ifyou've got somebody who's really popular as Trump
wise, I said, they willrig the elections if the elections are close.

(02:28:37):
But if there's if you've got somebodywho's popular enough, they're not going
to try to rig the election.You know, if it's again, if
it's a very narrow thing, theycan squeak it out. But if it's
a landslide, they're not going todo anything about it. And we see
that even here in some of thestates. But I said, what they'll
do is they wait. I saidthis about Trump and twenty sixteen, I

(02:29:01):
said, he's so popular. Ithink that he's going to I think he's
going to win, and then they'lloppose him afterwards. And of course they
did, and they were already opposinghim even before the election with all this.
Oh well, you know, Iviolated all of the national security rules
and regulations, says Hillary. Well, who released that information about me?
That's what I want to know.Forget about the crimes, forget about what

(02:29:22):
was there. I want to knowwho did this? You know that red
hearing And so I imagine that they'lldo the same thing with him. You
know, the fight is just beginning. He has now got himself into in
a tight spot now, as GeorgeClooney would saying, brother, all right,
though he's in a tight spot nowand it's going to be really tough

(02:29:45):
for him to do anything about it. But he did make that first hurdle
there. And listen to the headlineslike from Reuters Argentina elects quote shock therapy
unquote, libertarian aver Malay as presidentand again just a reminder, one hundred
and fifty percent inflation. But theythink that this is just too risky to

(02:30:07):
try to do anything different. Let'sjust keep going down the same path that
we did. Maybe it'll all justgo away. And I've talked several times
to Axel Kaiser, who wrote thevery popular, best selling street Economics,
best selling economics book in South America, and he's translated into English recently,

(02:30:28):
so I've interviewed him a couple oftimes. And you know, I am
somewhat surprised because I figured that thewell two things that were happening and we
had he came in second when theyhad the first runoff. So when I
first had the election the summer,he surprised everybody becoming by coming in in
first place. But they have alot of different candidates, so they said,

(02:30:48):
all right, we'll take the topthree vote getters and we'll have another
election. And they did that whatabout a month, the six weeks ago
or something like that, and atthat time he came in second, and
the top vote getter was the socialistcommunist Paranista, who, by the way,
is the Minister of Economics when they'vegot one hundred and fifty percent inflation.

(02:31:16):
And so it was set up towhere the older generation loved Parone and
Avida Parone and the Paranistas and theyloved socialism. It was the young people
who are looking at this, asAxel pointed out Axel Kaiser, the young
people will look at this and say, I haven't got any future. This
is insane. They had known nostalgiaabout one Parone and Avita Parone, like

(02:31:39):
you know, the delusional, schizophrenicmaga people have these, you know,
images that they've built of Trump,and it was the same type of things.
Its cult of worship of a personality. But the younger people were looking
at it. And so their secretweapon was going to be Taylor Swift opening
up her con CERTs in South America, you know, one in Brazil,

(02:32:01):
another one in Argentina. And wewere laughing about the fact that mainstream media
here in the United States said,well, maybe they can pull this off,
Maybe they can convince young people thatthey want to stay with socialism,
stay the course. And so theyhad Swifties against Freedom Advances self owned name

(02:32:24):
the Taylor Swift fans who were againsthis party, which is called Freedom Advances.
But when you look at the phrase, it was really pretty funny.
So again Reuters says he is anoutsider with radical views to fix an economy
battered by triple digit inflation, alooming recession, and rising poverty. Well

(02:32:46):
it's one hundred and fifty percent inflation, they said, And of course he
won by fifty six to forty four, so it was pretty good. I
went. And, by the way, the reason he came in second and
that the party that came in thirdwas a business party. So that's why
it looked unless it was going tobe cheating, it looked like you would
get this kind of result. Somaybe they had an honest election because the

(02:33:09):
Conservative pro business party threw their supportbehind him. Once that party was eliminated,
and so the Paranista. As Ipointed out before the second election where
the Paranista came in first place,he pulled out all the usual stops.
Even as they were having hyperinflation,and he was the economics minister. One

(02:33:30):
hundred and fifty percent inflation. Hedecides that he'll lower taxes and increased giveaways
to people, added some new socialspending programs and things like that. So
I thought, well, is thatgoing to work? Is it going to
work to have the swifties on hisside, the not so swifties. Maybe,
Well, none of it did,and he cleared that hurdle, and
so then this is the way itis reported by Bloomberg, Argentina takes a

(02:33:52):
leap into the unknown. Better tostay with the devil that you know,
right, the socialist paradistas who haveailed at everything. According to Bloomberg,
I guess libertarian outsider Javea Malay wonArgentina's presidency, promising a radical shake up
to fixed decades the policy of mismanagement, a strategy that resonated with a populace
suffering under a nose diving economy andone of the world's worst inflation rates today,

(02:34:18):
starts the building of Argentina, saidMalay Malai. He said, there's
no room for gradual measures. Butthey push back and they say, well,
some economists are warning. In otherwords, they are they don't like
it, right, because then furtherdown they actually have a Bloomberg writer who
opposes them. That's always attack tothese Well, some people have said this,

(02:34:43):
and then they say what they wantto say, but out their opinion.
Anyway, He says there is noroom for gradual measures. He wants
to ditch the Argentine peso for theUS dollar. He wants to close the
central banks. It wouldn't this bea nice example. If he's able to

(02:35:05):
do this, maybe somebody could getsome ideas about our own central bate and
have drastic cuts to public spending inan attempt to jolt the country out of
its forty six million people out ofits malaise. And so then Bloomberg says,
well, some economists, some economists, unnamed economists warn that dollarizing the
six hundred and twenty two billion dollareconomy at a time when international reserves are

(02:35:28):
depleted could tip the South American nationinto another bout of hyperinflation, another bout.
International Monetary Fund officials have meanwhile calledon the next government to swiftly reset
the economy, emphasizing that there isno time for gradual policies. So not

(02:35:50):
even the IMF agrees with Bloomberg,Not even the IMF, because they want
to get some money out of thisthing. Potential will now turn on how
Malai implements his most contested measures withonly a handful of representatives and a fragmented
Congress and an impatient electric with morethan forty percent of Argentines below the poverty

(02:36:11):
line. See this is this iswhere it gets difficult, because he's going
to have to put together some kindof a coalition to getting this stuff done,
unless he decides he's just going tooperate by executive fiat like Trump and
Biden. I don't think he's likethat, though he's not going to He's
going to take office December the tenth. The Central Bank has nearly run out

(02:36:33):
of international reserves to prop up thePAESO, meaning a large currency devaluation is
expected any day now. Despite hisnon existent party structure, he placed first
in the August primary, shocking politicalestablishment. Then that in October that that
was when they had the second one, and then the pro business block of

(02:36:54):
a former president was eliminated, andso their candidate then and worst, Malai.
He is has a very interesting personawell they Wall Street Journal when they
do articles, they don't talk abouthis free market economics. Let's not talk
about that. They talk about hishair. They talk about the fact that
he has a dog, a favoritedog of his that died and he had

(02:37:18):
him cloned. He's got a lotof dogs and he's named them after economists,
like you know, Milton Friedman.He's got Milton and you know the
other. He'll be Argentina's first formallytrained economist elected to the top job,
and of course they desperately need aneconomist, and he is somebody from the

(02:37:39):
Austrian school of economics. As wetalked to our guests last week who was
with the Musa's Institute. He's fromthe practical school that practically works. He
has accused the parentised opponent and hisallies running a campaign of fear, but

(02:38:00):
he walked back some of his mostcontroversial proposals, such as loosening gun control.
In his final campaign ad, helooks at the camera and assures voters
that he has no plans to privatizehealth care or education. Unfortunately, but
again they keep the epithets coming apfiery right wing populist. He's not libertarian

(02:38:22):
now, he's a populist according then, because that's a dirty word to say,
a populist. So meanwhile, howwas Taylor Swift in her army doing?
It was a big defeat for them, even though in when we look
at Riodesian era in Brazil, shegoes there for her concert and they have

(02:38:45):
this giant statue up there of theycall it Christ the Redeemer. So they've
got this statue that's supposed to looklike Jesus whatever Jesus looked like and in
a robe with arms outstretched arms.And what they did was they projected her
stuff about her and her albums andeverything projected it on. There's a yeah,

(02:39:07):
you pull that up and show peoplewhat that looks like and make that
bigger. Yeah, there you go. So they essentially got Jesus wearing a
Tailor Swift T shirt. That's thatyou can look at that. She's getting
into John Lennon's territory here, Ithink, or whoever did that. Yeah,
bigger than Jesus, right, eventhe big Jesus that's up there in

(02:39:30):
the hills. Rio Mayor Eduardo Paysconfirmed that the little symbols and the projection
were meant to evoke Swift on Thursday, and he gushed that she was as
big as Michael Jackson, you likeall the rest of us is, you
know, died and all of uswill die, so you might want to
stop comparing yourself. Well, hedidn't directly compare her to Jesus, but

(02:39:52):
you know, in terms of politicallogic, I am a mistake, said
Malai, because what I have cometo do is in fact to stamp out
the privileges of politician. Again,he wants in the currency controls that protect
the peso, and he does favorlaxer gun control, although he's walked back

(02:40:15):
on that. He also talked abouttighter rules on abortion. You know,
across the board he was leaning conservatives. Why the American press hates him so
much? One Gonzalez, Of coursethe press there hates him as well.
A journalist and an author on abiography of Malai. The biography is called
El loco, which means the crazyone cast doubt on the wisdom of electing

(02:40:41):
a leader who is seeking radical changeat a time when inflation is one hundred
and fifty percent state that's a risingin recession is looming. Okay, So
according to this guy, they shouldkeep on doing the same things they've been
doing. So who is crazy.The person who's crazy is the one who
says, well, let's keep doingthe same thing we've been doing all along
and hope for different results. Thattruly is crazy. So we need to

(02:41:01):
stay the course, even though wegot one fifty percent inflation, massive reception,
recession and people falling into poverty.Let's stay the course and keep electing
our socialist, communist government. Let'snot try anything different. Harp says the

(02:41:22):
bloke wants to get rid of thepeso for the US dollar and is an
Avid israel fan. Well, thefirst part of it there, in terms
of getting rid of it. Idon't like the Federal Reserve, but he
says it's more stable than he says. All the central banks are awful and
he doesn't support central banks, buthe says there isn't any central bank that
is worse than the Argentine Central Bank. And I guess you could make a

(02:41:45):
point that if you look at theirinflation rate of one hundred and fifty percent,
maybe they are the worst one that'sout there unless you have Zimbabwe or
somebody that's a little bit worse.But again that is a stopgap measure.
What he wants to ultimately do,as we talked about in the interview with
the guy from Sir Thharnton from theMesa's Institute, he wants to get back
to people owning gold and silver andget the money, get the government out

(02:42:11):
of the money business. That's theeconomic school that he subscribes to, you
know, the Austrian school, andhe believes in that, but he sees
the you know, getting shutting downthe Argentine Central Bank and shutting down the
Argentine Peso. He sees that asa stop gap measure. So we'll see

(02:42:31):
about that. But I don't thinkthat they're going to be sending any money
or troops to Israel, unlike US. So we're gonna take a quick break
and we will be right back.Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
Check out the Jazz Channel at APSradio dot com and the APS Radio app

(02:42:52):
and leave the stress behind. You'relistening to the David Knight Show. Well,

(02:44:33):
let's talk a little bit about someother pro life issues besides stopping war.
Nikki Haley's attempt to thread the needleon abortion. It's the way that
Business Insider put it. Well,I think what she's trying to do is
not thread a needle, but she'strying to thread the forceps. Maybe that's
what she's trying to do here.Nikki Haley has called for a consensus on
the issue of abortion. She's goingto bring for us a consensus on abortion,

(02:44:56):
something we haven't been able to achievefor fifty years. Right, Well,
if you want to have a consensus, that means that you've got to
show that what is actually happening tothe babies that are being killed. She
doesn't want to talk about that.What she wants to do is to have
a consensus of financial donors on WallStreet. And as we've seen over and

(02:45:16):
over again, they don't care.They don't care about the murder of babies.
They only care about winning. Andif this is something that's going to
be difficult for them to convince peoplenot to kill babies, to show what
the truth of the abortion is.If that's an issue, then these financial
backers say, drop that issue.The important things that we win so that

(02:45:37):
you can give me a payback forthe money that I've given you. Because
return on investment for these politicians isreally very high, and they want to
get that. If they win,they win really big. You know,
you're going to get like a twentyfive hundred percent return on investment or better.
But they have to win. Haleyis anti abortion, says a business

(02:45:58):
insider. No, you're not.If you want to try to make exceptions,
carve out exceptions on you're not,you're not. It's a matter.
Then we look at the other sideof this, this progressive group that is
operating out of Washington, DC.Several of them have been arrested for violating
the Face Act, which again isbeing weaponized like the January the sixth stuff

(02:46:22):
against pro lifers. But they've beenvery active in terms of protesting. And
these people are true progressive, Theyare true leftists who for whatever reason,
have I don't know where they're comingfrom. They don't seem to be coming
from a religious standpoint, but Idon't know what their basis of objection is
to it, but they seem tohave a clear moral objection to this,

(02:46:46):
and they have used all the tacticsof the left. And so the Daily
be says, these progressive anti abortiongroup is playing dirty to get ahead.
So that's just it. You know, they're going around bring graffiti everywhere and
writing slogans everywhere, the same kindof stuff that progresses always do. I
mean, I would imagine they're goingto start gluing themselves to the sidewalk or

(02:47:09):
something or the road, you know, that kind of stuff. I don't
think really changes hearts and minds.And I don't think really that there's going
to be you know, we canshow people what the truth is and we
can pray that God is going tochange hearts and minds. That's what we
can do. You know, sprayinggraffiti and insulting people and getting in their

(02:47:30):
face about that does not work.It doesn't work for the left, it
doesn't work for the right, Itdoesn't work for any of these issues.
It's not going to work for thepro life issue either. No, the
tactics of the left won't do it. You have to show the truth and
then you have to pray for Godto change, to change hearts and minds,
to open them up to the truth. The truth is there that abortion

(02:47:54):
is murder. You don't have tospray paint the slogan abortion is murder.
You need to show people what theabortion procedure is like. You need to
show people the aftermath of the abortionprocedure. Then they will understand that abortion
is murder, or at least ifthey haven't hardened their heart that much.
So this summer, pedestrians, driversand passengers in DC so a new type

(02:48:16):
of graffiti amongst the usual urban scrawlsand anti abortion advocacy, designed to troll
this democrat city. Again, theyprefer to these colors I hate that stuff,
blue and red. The group iscalled Progressive Anti Abortion Uprising, and
again they want to do all thestuff that the left does, you know,

(02:48:37):
taking over buildings. And this isanother thing that I didn't like about
January sixth. That's not a persuasiveIt never accomplishes anything. You know,
show up and scream at people toshut down hearings or this or that.
I mean, that's a code Pinkthing. It doesn't work. It doesn't
change people's minds about anything. Andif you're conservative, will throw you in

(02:49:01):
jail for doing that. Just askgoing you know, Code Pink gets away
with that, but not if you'rea conservative operates mostly in the nation's capital.
They've embarked, they've embraced whether they'reall kinds of media and as Daily
Beast likes to say, and misinformationto communicate a smash mouth message. And

(02:49:24):
so again, you know, thisis a leftist approach to this, which
I don't think is going to work. Graffiti is part of it, decorating
public spaces, celebrating defacement. Imean, here they think they are they
can't do this stuff. Now.These are progressive tactics that Daily Beast has
never criticized, but when you doit for this issue, they'll criticize it.

(02:49:50):
So again, why why focus onthis? Because as critics. As
Christians, we understand that we havea much better way to do this.
We have weapons that are mighty.By the way, we're talking about prayer.
There is a very important thing tokeep in mind. I saw this

(02:50:11):
on a couple of different sites,talked about it. This is a guy
who was a street preacher and hejust collapsed and they thought they he had
some kind of a seizure or something. They happened to the hospital. They
found that he had been shot inthe head. And they don't know who
shot him. Somebody that was standingaround there, or somebody that's in a

(02:50:31):
passing car, whatever. Nobody heardanything, but he was shot in the
head while he was a street preachingsharing the gospel. Arizona church leader in
critical condition after being shot in thehead while street preaching. He is only
twenty six years old. He's afather of two. A CT scan revealed

(02:50:52):
that he had been shot. Hebegan seizing and was intubated. There's been
some movement, however, physicians areuncertain how much of the movement is voluntary,
and they began draining fluid from hisbrain. No suspect has been apprehended.
They're not even sure, you know, no witnesses. Really. Again,
it wasn't until they got him inand did a CT scan that they

(02:51:13):
saw the bullet. Who knows whysomebody we wanted to take out take it
out on a preacher like that,because he was speaking good news to everybody.
Well again, keep him in yourprayers, and let's see where is
his name? Looking here? Justkeeps talking about a street preacher. But

(02:51:39):
I don't see his name here.I'm looking everywhere in the article. Oh
Schmidt, Schmidt is his last name. But God knows who he is,
so please pray for him. It'sjust really horrible to see it. Another
street preacher, Great Comfort is findshimself at the center of a controversy.
They're trying to demonize Mike Johnson bysaying, well, Licky's had involvement with

(02:52:01):
Great Comfort. Who does street preaching? It's it's kind of a different thing.
He he You'll see a lot ofhis videos on YouTube. He will
walk up to somebody and say,hey, you got a moment you want
to talk, and they volunteer todo it, and they agree to be
on video publicly on video, andhe starts asking them what they believe about
God, And you know what,they think their basis of you know,

(02:52:22):
standing before God when they die.You know, you know you're going to
die, and uh, you know, what what is it that you're going
to tell God? And so youknow, they typically they don't think that
they've done anything wrong, and sothey spend some time convincing them that they
have done things wrong, We've alldone things wrong, that we're all condemned
in God's sight. And then hetells them and by the way, somebody's
already paid your fine. You know, if you had traffic violations or something,

(02:52:45):
somebody paid your fine, you'd beable to walk out. He said,
well, Jesus paid your fine.You know, why don't you Would
you trust in that? Would youthink about that? You know? And
so it's interesting to see how peoplewill react to that. And that's basically
what his thing is. And yetyou have Politico the size that they will

(02:53:07):
try to demonize Mike Johnson. Look, Mike Johnson's to point out before,
he's not perfect. I mean,there's things I disagree with him, especially
if he's a Christian. Why flipflop on Ukraine? Why support that war?
I understand why he's supporting Israel becauseit's a theology that I don't agree
with, but he's a Zionist onthat. I think, you know,

(02:53:30):
regardless of what you think, theend of the world is going to be,
Like, God doesn't need your helpto make it happen. God has
told you what to do. He'stold you to defend life, whether you're
talking about life in the womb orlife in a foreign country that you can't
find on a map, or thatyou don't know anything about. That's the
problem. We keep getting involved inthese conflicts. We don't know anything about

(02:53:54):
either side. Most cases, wecan't even find it on a map.
And I was like, went outthe quote I think it was from hl
Mincon He said, God gives Americawars so we can learn geography. Right,
that's the only thing we find outabout it. We still don't understand

(02:54:15):
what was happening there. Just likein Vietnam after the war. You know,
we got this domino theory happening,and you have McNamara, who was
a whiz kid that ran that thing. He goes back to Vietnam and the
guy pounds the desk. He says, don't you know anything about history?
For a thousand years we fought Chinawe're not there, puppet. This was
not a Domino thing. It's like, Oh and McNamara film that the Fog

(02:54:37):
of War. Just before he died. He said, yeah, I didn't
know that. Whiz Kid doesn't knowanything. He may have known the geography.
We all learned the geography about Vietnam, didn't we the hard way,
But he didn't know anything about thehistory or who was there, or this
or that. And so we getourselves involved in this stuff again. Before

(02:55:01):
we're going to get involved in wars. As a Christian, maybe you know,
we can pray for Mike Johnson thathe will understand that God has given
him clear orders to be pro life, that they are just war principles that
should be followed. So maybe somethingwill come of that. But again a

(02:55:24):
lot of slander statements. I'm notgoing to read the back and forth about
why they accuse him of It's nearlynot very important, frankly, and I
would much rather read you this letterfrom a listener. Ron. He said,
you know, boomers watching wonder anddread that our country is falling,
failing rather irrevocably. Yet how manyof us realize what we have become?

(02:55:48):
He said, painfully? The restof the world knows by their destruction,
knows us there by destruction, death, and that in for a very long
time, our military has operated asa special interest, policy driven agency rather
than one that is for the protectionand defense of the American people. Think

(02:56:09):
about the terror that we have broughtto nations in your lifetime that can't be
justified by self defense. Note thealliances so gloriously praised, falsely contrived by
the ruling elite to preclude war thatguarantee across the board conflict. Where israelis
on the beach of Normandy with us? Did you know where Ukraine was in

(02:56:30):
a map before you cursed Russia?What did we have in common with Akuwaitis
before we killed Iraqis? For themwho surely contributed to the motivation behind terrorism
on US soil? He well,this very process is now is how the
citizen representatives are held accountable for whenwe kill overseas. Instead, these decisions

(02:56:52):
are made singularly by evildoers, senileold men and orange blowhards. Reflect on
the terror that we have brought tonations in your lifetime. They cannot be
justified in retrospect. The untold sufferingthat we wrought while we lived comfortably.
Consider do you think that it isonly anti fohon BLM who showed no respect

(02:57:13):
for our founding fathers. These greatmen spoke eloquently to the horror of former
alliances made at the whim of theelite. So let us not dishonor them
by murdering those who are not adirect threat to us. Establish for yourself
some rules before you support bombs droppedon complete strangers. And of course are

(02:57:35):
our rules established for people like MikeJohnson and for us as Christians. Whether
the other people follow it or not, that's no excuse. As Michael did,
Sylvia says, what are they doingin our name? Yeah, and
so he says, if guilt orshame fails to restrain your lust for punishing

(02:57:56):
bad guys once again and a morass. We are not a party of to
know this. Israel is supremely capableof taking care of itself. Our sugar
daddy regard for that nation, longcultivated in us by the most powerful lobbies,
ensure it a robust military without soundand formal reasoning. Like the Christian

(02:58:20):
doctrine of just war. It isa moral and the worst way to enjoin
that war, and that's what we'vebeen doing for the last seventy years.
And I don't see any change comingfrom this speaker, who has been involved
with one Christian cause after the other, I think are good causes, and

(02:58:41):
yet he's not looking at what justifiesa response. Again, a just war
says, we don't go to warunless we have been attacked, and we
have not been attacked. But wewill be attacked if we continue doing this,
if we continue to be the aggressor, if we continue to initiate this,
if we continue to support both sidesand most of these wars, we

(02:59:05):
will be attacked. And you knowit may come from God as we reject
him say well, I was justtrying to make your prophecies as I understand
them come true. Well, thatisn't going to carry much weight. And
part of this is not just initiatingthe war, but part of a just
war is to try to avoid civiliancasualties. And net and Yahu said,

(02:59:30):
well, we did a really poorjob. Yeah, I think everybody noticed
about that. And the other partof it that comes back to us and
comes back to people like Speaker Johnson, is that we need to as part
of a just war, seek toend the hostilities as soon as possible,
not just try to avoid killing noncombatants, but to try to end the

(02:59:52):
war as soon as possible. Isay, for today's broadcast, thank you
for listening. The common Man.They created common Core and dumbed down our

(03:00:16):
children. They created common past,track and control us. They're Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothingand the communist future. They see the
common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and
dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

(03:00:41):
That is what they want to takeaway. Their most powerful weapons are
isolation, deception, intimidation. Theydesire to know everything about us while they
hide everything from us. It's timeto turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share theinformation and links you'll find at d davidnightshow

(03:01:03):
dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially, please keepus in your prayers. D Davidknightshow dot
com. If you like the Eagles, Highway, the Cars, and Heuey

(03:01:46):
Lewis in the news, they saythe You'll love the Classic Hits channel at
APS Radio download our app or listennow at APS radio dot com.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}20Nov23 Osama bin Laden, CIA, ADL, FCC and UN Join to Takeover Internet

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

20Nov23 Osama bin Laden, CIA, ADL, FCC and UN Join to Takeover Internet

Stuff You Should Know