Fri Episode #2099: FCC as Thought Police: Trump & Bureaucrats Turn Free Speech Into Mafia Rule

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Friday, the nineteenth of September,
Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, the big
news everywhere today is still part of a knock on
effect of the death of Charlie Kirk that has been
used to do what Trump has been wanting to do
for quite some time, and that is to purge political

(01:06):
enemies and come after free speech. He wants to shut
down all of the late night courtjusters of the left.
These guys are not funny. Their shows have been political.
I don't defend what they say. I don't watch what
they say. I don't care about these guys. I care
about free speech and the fact that the FCC is

(01:27):
thuggishly intimidating people. Don't going to talk about that. We're
going to talk about some of Trump's lawfair even Alan
Dershowitz's pals. There's no way that this lawsuit against this
most recent lawsuit against The New York Times, there's no
way that he could win that. There's something else here involved. Again,
it is intimidation, but there's some big news that's breaking

(01:49):
in terms of the pharmaceutical industry. We're going to talk
about the skulldugery, the crimes, and perhaps an extradition one
of these criminals. Stay with us. Will be right back.

(02:10):
Well as Jimmy Kimmel Live is now Jimmy Kimmel dead
air because he's been taken off of the air indefinitely.
Interestingly enough, they've done it in a way, I guess
to appease Trump because they have not fired him. He
still has his contract with him. I guess they're still
paying him. He wants to get out of his contract

(02:31):
so he can do something else. They're not gonna put
him on air. They're just gonna put him on the shelf,
which is another kind of death to be have that
done to you, to try to make you disappear. So
we're gonna play for you what he said. And of
course we go back for a long long time digging

(02:52):
up quotes from Jimmy Kimmel that are outrageous, untrue, malicious
and partisan. But he does not deserve to be fired
by intimidation of the FCC. I mean, I could understand
that if his ratings are bad, he's in second place.

(03:14):
His ratings are not as horrible as Trump wants to
pretend that they were, but his I guess all these
late night shows are losing money, but because they're not
funny anymore. This is not Jay Leno, this is certainly
not Johnny Carson, and so Trump doubles down, takes credit
for it, and once the rest of the show's shut

(03:36):
down as well.

Speaker 4 (03:37):
Have we considered moving our time slot to the late
night it's open.

Speaker 3 (03:41):
Now, we should do that. That's a good point. I
thought about that we're actually late night people. This has
really been grating against us to do a morning show.

Speaker 4 (03:50):
I'm saying, there's a slot.

Speaker 3 (03:52):
Yeah, it was again. You know you got Brian kill
Me was the reason to blame for me going into
the morning slot.

Speaker 4 (03:58):
Because I'll never forgive Brian kill Me.

Speaker 3 (04:03):
Yeah. I had a choice at Info Wars when we started,
because I was mine was the first show that we did.
But I had heard Brian kill Me on the way
in on the radio, and I just thought he was
just the worst commentator in terms not understanding anything and
just being this mind was cheerleader for the government, and

(04:24):
of course he recently came out. It took a lot
of flak because he said, I think we had to
just give lethal injections to the homeless. It's like, I
thought you already did that in twenty twenty. Didn't you
cheerlead for the Trump shot. That's a lethal injection?

Speaker 4 (04:36):
Care ol, Brian, what takes like that? You may be
one of them?

Speaker 3 (04:38):
Fairly so yeah, so yeah, he just just Brian killed me.
It's amazing. Anyway. So in the meetings that the ABC
executives had after this, because immediately it got pushback, of course,
and those meetings, multiple executives back to Kimmel before ABC
ultimately decided to cut the late night host show, so

(05:00):
has said, adding that senior executives ultimately feared retaliation from Trump.
The report says multiple executives felt Kimmell had not actually
said anything over the line. Well, I think what he
said was over the line, but I think that it's
a bad joke, and you can make bad jokes. It's
funny to me that the other things that he said

(05:22):
in the past were not considered to be over the
line anyway. Jimmy Kimmel I was pulled on Wednesday after
FCC chair Brendan Carr had threatened to withdraw ABC's broadcast licenses.
An interview with YouTuber Bennie Johnson, howry pugnant is that

(05:43):
it's just beyond belief to think that this could happen
and to think that the Conservatives would not be up
in arms about this. As I said yesterday and I've
said many times, when Obama tried this kind of stuff,
he used the FCC. He wanted to have the have
news organizations. Who's going to send people from the SEC

(06:05):
and have the news organizations explain how they put the
news together. And it's like, it's none of your business.
I don't want you reviewing my content. You should not
be reviewing content. And of course there's the prohibition is
Congress shall make no law. But we're not ruled by
Congress anymore. We're ruled by corporations, and we're ruled by bureaucracies.

(06:26):
And so the bureaucracies or the president is I guess
the founders never figured that the corporation, that we would
have businesses that would be so tied to a corrupt
government that all you would have to do is say, well,
we're going to make it difficult for you to have
a to get money from the government because they hand

(06:49):
out money to everybody as a bribery. That's the way
they control everybody and everything. That's what I was saying
through all of twenty twenty. You know, they hold the
purse strings to education, so they can punish you and
wantedinistration if you don't put the trainees in the girls' bathroom,
and then they can punish you in the next administration
if you don't pull them out, So it's just as arbitrary.

(07:10):
That's the strings of control. Of course, is the money,
and that is the ways that they got over them.
Of course, also privileged licenses, and that's what Carr was
saying at the FCC. He said, these licenses are a privilege,
and they are. They're not a right, they are a privilege.
And they're weaponizing that against the First Amendment, which I

(07:32):
think is a crime. That is a bit as bad
as making a law. But they always say that there's
a difference between the bureaucratic rules and the laws. And
when they say that, they say you don't have any
due process or constitutional protection against bureaucratic rules. That's even
worse because you don't elect the people who run these bureaucracies.

(07:54):
You elect the congressman in theory. We know how the
jerry mandering works. But the theory is is that the
people are going to make the laws are accountable to
the voters. There is no way that the bureaucracies are
accountable to the voters. And yet when they say that
this is not a law, this is a rule, we
don't have to give you due processes, which is the
argument that they make with civil asset forfeiture and other

(08:17):
things that they do. And that's where we are now
with free speech. So now they don't have to make
a law to kill free speech. They can just do
it with government regulation. So he said, we can do
this the easy way or the hard way. He said
in the interview, he's publicly saying this. These people are
mafia figures. They are I'm just want to I'm just

(08:40):
wondering if these ABC executives, if any of them woke
up the next day with a horse that in their bed.
This is the kind of tactics. Don the Godfather, he
knows that well because he operated in New York for
a very long time. It's just a mafia white house.
And so he said, we can do this the easy way,
or we can do it the hard way, and so

(09:00):
the ABC executives caved on this. ABC pulled him off
the air after FCC pressure. The abrupt decision by the network,
owned by Walt Disney came hours after the chairman of
the FCC, Brendan Carr, assailed Kimmel suggested that his regulatory
agency might take action against ABC because of the remarks

(09:21):
the host had made on the Monday telecast. The comments
at the center of the week's firestorm came during his
opening monologue on Monday night. I'll get right to those.
He actually, this is a second joke he told. What
I thought was interesting was the very first joke he
told was how I opened my show on Monday, which

(09:43):
was looking at Trump's comments about the Sissy NFL, and
he kind of, I don't like this rule that they
just put in. How do these guys get to make
up these rules like this and just put them in
without anybody having to say And it's like, well, that's
a private organization and they can do whatever they want. You.
On the other hand, Trump, have taken this on yourself,
whether it's tariffs or something else, to do this, and

(10:05):
that is against the major rule the Constitution. So I
thought that was pretty ironic. I don't know really where
he was going with and I just thought that was
funny that he had that as the first joke. So
here's the comment defending comment.

Speaker 5 (10:20):
Some new lows over the weekend with the Magga gank
desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and do everything
they can to score political points from it. In between
the finger pointing, there was grieving. On Friday, the White
House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism,
but on a human level, you can see how hard

(10:42):
the President is taking this back indulgens on the.

Speaker 4 (10:45):
Lot of your friend Charlie Kirk asked sir personally, how are.

Speaker 6 (10:48):
You holding up over the last day and a half, sirved.

Speaker 7 (10:50):
I think very good. And by the way, right there
you see all the Trumps.

Speaker 8 (10:54):
They've just started construction of the new ball over the
White House.

Speaker 3 (10:58):
Which is something they've been trying to get.

Speaker 7 (11:00):
As you know, for about one hundred and fifty years,
and it's going to be a beauty.

Speaker 5 (11:04):
Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief construction.

Speaker 2 (11:12):
Construction.

Speaker 5 (11:14):
This is not how an adult grief's the murder of
somebody called a friend.

Speaker 2 (11:18):
This is how a four year old morn's a goldfish?

Speaker 3 (11:20):
Okay, and that was Uh. Lance had mentioned that the
other day, but I had not seen the clip. Isn't
that amazing? Yeah, I'm thinking it pretty well. By the way,
do you notice my great new thing that I'm building here?
So I thought that was funny. It is all against Trump,
and of course you know, I'm a critic of Trump

(11:42):
as well, but he has in the past come out
and said things He basically Jimmy Kimmel did not get
any flack when he wanted to kill those of us
who were not vaxed.

Speaker 5 (11:54):
Remember this, hospitals get any more over crowded, they're going
to have to make some very tough choices about who
gets an ICU bet that Troy doesn't seem so tough
to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes, come
right on him.

Speaker 1 (12:06):
We'll take care of you.

Speaker 5 (12:07):
Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace, wheezy,
you're that's believe.

Speaker 3 (12:15):
Yeah. Yeah, so there you go. You know, if you
play the game, and if you and check the poison
of his sponsors, we'll give you some hospital treatment. If
you got a heart attack, otherwise we'll let you die.

Speaker 9 (12:27):
The example was a heart attack.

Speaker 3 (12:30):
Yeah, and what we know about the vaccine now yeah,
oh the irony right.

Speaker 9 (12:35):
Vaccinated person having a heart attack, and yes, there will
be quite a lot of.

Speaker 3 (12:42):
Yeah. So uh Carr, the SEC said, this is part
of a concerted effort to line to the American people,
and the SCC was going to have remedies that we
can look at. We can do this the easy way,
or we can do it the hard way. As I
said before, we told Minnie Johnson, these companies can find
ways to change conduct and take action frankly on Kimmel,

(13:05):
or there's going to be additional work for the SEC.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
Ahead.

Speaker 3 (13:08):
Look, this is the same kind of stuff that was
happening behind closed doors. It's now been proven. We knew
what was happening for social media companies, and it's now
been proven with the documents that Elon Musk released. By
the way, Elon Musk is now out there, the great
defender of free speech is out there saying there should
be prison terms for some of the people who are

(13:28):
criticizing or making fun or a light of the assassination
of Charlie Kirk. So much for free speech right, and
we knew these people were doing this with social media.
They are just like the Republicans now are just like
Hillary for example.

Speaker 10 (13:46):
The platforms, whether it's Facebook or Twitter x or Instagram
or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate and
monitor the content, we lose total control. It's not just
the social and psychological effects.

Speaker 7 (14:03):
It's real hard.

Speaker 3 (14:05):
Yeah, there you go, and we see the same thing
from AOC.

Speaker 11 (14:08):
You think that several members of Congress and some of
my discussions have brought up media literacy because that is
a part of what happened here, and we're going to
have to figure out how we rain in our media

(14:30):
environment so that you can't just spew disinformation and misinformation.
It's one thing to have different opinions, but entirely to
just say things that are false, and so that's something
that we're looking into.

Speaker 3 (14:49):
Yeah, well, you know the problem is is that people
have honest disagreements of opinion as to what true and
faults are. That's why we have debates and discussions. That's
why Charlie Kirk did what he did. But now the
right has become exactly the same as Hillary Clinton, AOC,
the squad, all the rest of these people, and we

(15:09):
were told that they weren't going to do that. They've
been canceling conservatives for the longest time. And JD Vance
at the beginning of the administration, remember he went to Munich,
Germany at the conference, and he got the Europeans very upset,
because of course the Europeans are doing this as well.
It doesn't matter whether the people are conservatives or liberals,
it really doesn't matter. They could be communists or non communists.

(15:33):
They're all doing the same thing. It's just like the pandemic.

Speaker 6 (15:36):
Our own government encouraged private companies to silence people who
dared to utter what turned out to be an obvious truth.

Speaker 12 (15:46):
So I come here.

Speaker 6 (15:46):
Today not just with an observation, but with an offer.
And just as the Biden administration seemed desperate to silence
people for speaking their minds, so the Trump administration will
do precisely the opposite. And I hope that we can
work together on that. In Washington, there is a new
sheriff in town, and under Donald Trump's leadership, we may

(16:08):
disagree with your views, but we will fight to defend
your right to offer it in the public square. Agree
or disagree.

Speaker 3 (16:17):
Yeah, that has an age. Well, these people are not clapping.
They don't like that. Yeah, we're not going to let
you say that in the public. This is where we are, folks,
the open hostility that you saw there in the EU.
And I've played the clip of Ursula fond of lying
and how she said. Number one thing that we're facing
here is disinformation, misinformation, and of course disinformation misinformation is

(16:41):
anything that they disagree with, anything that exposes their lives.
And so they do not want to have any debate,
any free speech. And so now that's where we are
right now. We have all the political parties. Both sides
want to shut the other side down. There's no tolerance
for free speech. This summer, cars FCC approved a major

(17:02):
merger involving CBS's owner, Paramount, days after CBS agreed to
pay sixteen million dollars to settle a lawsuit filed by
the President. And this is yet another example of this.
Trump filed this lawsuit on a personal basis. This is
a personal lawsuit. This is not a lawsuit that was

(17:22):
filed by the federal government or the Attorney general. This
is for him personally. You damaged me, You made La
La Harris good and It's like, well, you want they
should have fought, but they didn't. Instead they settled with
him and gave him sixteen million dollars. So think about this.
Trump used the threat of people like car and the
FCC to pull their license so he could profit sixteen

(17:46):
million dollars. Is that not, in your face corruption? I
just I can't believe it, Travis. This is just the
most corrupt administration I've ever seen in my life, and
it's only going to get worse. This is just the
beginning of it, and he's getting his way. He's only
being emboldened because you cannot appease tyrants, whether it's Hitler

(18:08):
or Trump. A tyrant is only going to be embolden
when you give up like this and again, to use
the power of his office to threaten somebody so that
he can personally gain from this just amazing. And what
they were saying was, of course there's nothing that they
can do really against the network, but it's against the

(18:30):
affiliates who have a broadcasting license for a particular frequency.
And that was the reason given for why they set
up the FCC, was that they were going to have
an auction to sell off their frequencies to people, and
then they were going to make sure and police it
so that somebody didn't infringe on their frequencies in a

(18:53):
particular area. So they have rules about how powerful the
broadcast can be. So you've got a lot of AM
radio stations who don't have a lot of power. We
had one in the Raleigh area that was a fifty
thousand watt station and with AM radio, with right weather conditions,
could bounce it off the atmosphere and you could pick

(19:16):
them up down in the Caribbean somewhere. Sometimes it was
very very powerful. You get them a very long way
if you had the right kind of weather conditions. It's
just the way AM works. But they don't give out
those kind of licenses anymore. That was grandfathered in for
that station, and so they've got these this frequency spectrum.

(19:36):
They can use that to bully people. And of course Sinclair,
which is a network of stations. If you remember, we've
played the clip in the past. May people played it
where Sinclair was giving talking points to their news presenters.
Now they say that they're coming from the conservative side,

(19:56):
establishment republican social speaker. So they had and we've played
that where they start reading the script and they're all
reading it. In unison. You start with one anchor reading it,
and then you go to another station where somebody else
is reading exactly the same script. We played that many times.
So just how scripted the media is and how it

(20:17):
is centrally controlled when it is a large corporation like Sinclair.
So what Sinclair is going to do is on their
stations tonight, in Jimmy Kimmel's airspace, it's now void. They
are going to broadcast a tribute to Charlie Kirk. This
is getting kind of crazy. Look, it bothered me a
great deal to see that assassination, and I feel for

(20:41):
his family, but I got to say, we've got to
stop with this hero worship. It is just going too far,
and they're using it to destroy everything that he worked
for in his life. He worked for free speech, he
worked for debate, He worked for people being able to
have discussions and disagreements with each other. He worked against
the cancel culture, and so they're destroying it now in

(21:05):
order to honor him, so to speak. So Kimmell said
he was going to address the backlash on the Wednessy telecast,
but Disney executives decide that they would not allow his
show to be taped yet again. So as FCC chair
mister Carr Wheel's power over the broadcast licenses granted to
local TV stations by the federal government car encouraged local

(21:28):
ABC stations to push back and to preempt coverage that
does not serve their local communities. There you go, and
he will tell you what serves the local communities. This
is what we feared from Obama is being done now
by Trump. And what it has done is it's allowed
Obama to get on a pedestal and pontificate about how

(21:51):
wonderful free speech is. He doesn't mean that. He doesn't
mean it any more than Jade Vance meant it. These
people are just hypocrites and liars. He wanted to do
the same thing, but it didn't happen. Why because it
was massive pushback, those pushback from the media against it,
those pushback from conservatives against it. These people are not
pushing back when Trump does it. You know, I played

(22:13):
Hillary Clinton and I said, if Hillary Clinton wanted to
shut down speech and use the FCC to threaten to
shut down stations, everybody would have pushed back against that.
But see when Trump does this kind of stuff and
I said this about the pandemic. If Hillary Clinton had
been there, the system needed to have Donald Trump because

(22:34):
the people who would have been most likely to push
back against this would be mesmerized by Trump. They would
have definitely pushed back against the lockdowns and the vaccines
if they had been done by Hillary. And we saw
the left pushing back against the vaccines when they were
done by Trump, but then as soon as Biden got in,
it was okay. There were same vaccines. But now that

(22:57):
Biden is president, we can take the vaccines. Couldn't take
them if it was Trump. This is the insanity that
these people are operating under. So Carr said, frankly, I
think it's just really sort of past time that a
lot of these licensed broadcasters themselves push back on Comcast
and Disney and say, listen, we're going to preempt We're

(23:20):
not going to rank Kimmel anymore unless you straighten this out. Well,
of course, they could make that decision if they thought
it was in their best interest. They don't need car
to tell them that they carried it because they thought
it was in their best interest. Now that the government
is wiping out the free market's input, it's in their
best interest to censor this because car is threatening them.

(23:41):
Shortly after Carr's remarks, Next Star, an owner of affiliate
ABC affiliates around the country, said it would preempt mister
Kimmel's program quote for the foreseeable future. Late Wednesday, Sinclair
this is the one I talked about, said that they
will make a meaningful donation to mister Kirk's family and

(24:02):
the organization that he had Turning Point USA, and then
later on they said that they're going to air a
tribute to him and Kimmel's former time slot. Trump and
his allies seem to want to shut down speech that
they don't like to hear. That's Chucky Schumer. Do we
really want to hand Do we want to give a
softball pitch to people like Schumer and Obama? These people

(24:27):
don't like free speech? Why let them pretend that they do.
But of course the right was pretending that they did
all along as well. He said, this is what autocracies do.
And for the first time in his life, Chucky Schumer
is right. It doesn't matter whether you agree with Kim
or not. He has a right to free speech. That's right,

(24:49):
Except now we know that this is just a partisan thing.
Free speech depends on who is in power. Truth depends
on who is empower, doesn't it this is truly orwellian.
We change our enemies as we change administrations. So many
goes on to say, well, we're not done yet, even

(25:11):
after Kimmel was suspended by ABC, and so there's a
lot of different ways that you can interpret this. Is
he going to as Trump tweeted out wanting to say, well,
the next guy's come on NBC. You got to get
rid of these next guys that are still there? And
is that what he means or does he mean that
there is He seemed to imply that there's going to

(25:32):
be a punishment for ABC. Nevertheless, because again, if you're
going to allow these people to operate as dictators against
free speech, you can't appease dictators. So, just like Bondi,
the sky Car is a lawless partisan thug, his loyalties

(25:54):
to Trump, not to the Constitution that he swore to.
Car believes most comments about the murder of Charlie Kirkle
misleading and could warrant action against ABC. It was appearing
to directly mislead the American public about a significant fact
that probably one of the most significant political events. We've
had a long time for the most significant political assassination

(26:18):
we've seen in a long time, he said, And again
that was the nonsense which a lot of people are
questioning a lot of aspects about the assassination. The official story, however,
is that the guy was in a relationship with the trainee,
that he had left and fought with his conservative family.

(26:42):
And yet the left wanted to portray him as if
he was a right winger. Some wanted to portray him
as a follower of Nick Quinte's and Gropers and whatever.
But again that doesn't even fit in the official story.
And we must not say anything other than the official story.
So are they going to go out and hammer people

(27:04):
like Candice Owen who is saying that it is Israel
that killed him, because I mean, that's both anti Semitic
and against the official narrative. That's two strikes against her
right there. Again, Yeah, I think we need to I
don't think we can really make a conclusion yet whether
the any of these stories are true, including the official narrative,

(27:27):
but to shut down any discussion of this, this is
exactly the same stuff that was being done in twenty
twenty I asked earlier about Follon and Seth Myers, But
is the president's view that they should be taken off
the air shared by the SEC asked the interviewer, Carr said, well,
I don't speak for the president. In other words, he

(27:49):
tells me what to say, he tells me what to do.
We don't know. This is all up in the air
because we don't have any principles here. We don't have
the principle with First Amendment that's gone, so it's all
up to the whims of the president. I don't speak
for the president, and the president doesn't follow the Constitution,
so we really don't know what he's going to do.
We can try to read the tea leaves in the

(28:10):
garbage that he spews on social media. What does it
mean when you say that you're not done yet? He
was asked in another interview with David Farber CNBC. Then,
I mean, will you only be pleased when none of
these comedians have a show on broadcast TV? Carl said, no,
it's not any particular show or any particular person. It's

(28:31):
just that we're in the midst of a very disruptive
moment right now, and I just frankly expect that we're
going to continue to see changes in the media echo system.
That's a good way to put it. It's actually ecosystem,
but I guess as before it didn't slip. It is
a echo system, and you will echo what the official
story is about whatever the crisis of the day is. Right,

(28:56):
when the crisis of the day was a pandemic, you
can't say there's not a pandemic. When they are pushing
rem dazevir and ventilators, you can't tell people about ibermactin
or CQ, and when they're pushing the genetic code injection,
you can't warn people as you see people dropping dead
on the vey's database run by the government. So it's

(29:19):
whatever the issue of the day is, asked by anchor
Jim Kramer. Yes, it's also.

Speaker 9 (29:26):
This assassination. We don't know what happened yet. But if
you set the precedent of once there's an assassination, then
you can't say anything bad about the one that was assassinated.
Then even in cases where it's a clear false flag
in the future, or are they going to extend that
protection to anyone questioning the official story?

Speaker 3 (29:49):
Wouldn't they've liked to have had that back of the
JFK assassination. I mean, they're the only feeble attempt that
they could do is to coin the term conspiracy theorist
if you didn't believe the official story. That was the
best they could do at the time. Now what you
can do is you can shut down any and all media,
you can ban people off of social media, maybe even
put us in jail if muskets his way. It's just insane.

Speaker 4 (30:13):
Their techniques have gotten a lot more Yeah, sinister and
authoritarian effective.

Speaker 3 (30:18):
Yeah. So, speaking in England on Thursday, Trump said, Kimmel
said a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as
Charlie Kirk, and Jimmy Kimmel is not a talented person. Well,
actually he said nothing about Charlie Kirk. What he was
saying was he was criticizing MAGA, saying that the government

(30:38):
alleged assassin was part of MAGA, and that is not true.
And he also ripped Trump every opportunity that he got. Well,
he showed what a horrible person Trump is. But anyway,
he said he had very bad ratings. They should have
fired him a long time ago. So you know, you
can call that free speech or not. He was fired

(30:59):
for lack of talent, but he wasn't fired. They still
have him under contract. They're putting him on the shelf,
trying to silence them. This is for him worse than
being fired. And that's the other thing about it that
bothers me. It's not just making a hero out of
Obama and out of Chuck Schumer, letting them stand on

(31:20):
the side of the constitution and right and being on
the right side of the issue verbally about this, even
though they have pushed deep platforming and censorship heavily themselves
in the past. It's that they're making a hero and
a martyr out of somebody as vile and disgusting as
Jimmy Kimmel. So again, Carr continues to make these threats

(31:45):
about taking licenses from people, and we're at a moment
right now where he's going to create an echo chamber
for the government. House Democrat leaders on Thursday call for
Carr's resignation, alleging that he had engaged quote in the
corrupt abuse of power, as they did a couple of
years ago. And it's not to say then that he

(32:05):
gets a pass. I want to see all these people
taken out, going to jail exact etca. So there's just
no pushback from either side now on this. Kimmell's cancelation
proves that right wingers are the real snowflakes rights the
metro out of the UK, the hypocrisy of those who

(32:26):
claim to champion free speech but are quick to silence
dissenting voices, and that gives them an opportunity in the
UK to come after Trump because it was a JD
vance that was lecturing the British over their outrageous censorship.
So now it's like no, no, no, no, yeah, this
is the the childish aspects of this. You don't need

(32:50):
to be a civil liberties lawyer to feel the chill.
What happened to the absolutist free speech that the right
used to love so much. Well, they don't love any principle.
They love Trump or Charlie I guess, but actually that's
not I just don't see how they can think that
they are honoring Charlie Kirk to do exactly the opposite

(33:14):
of what the man always said and always stood for.
I just don't get that. I mean, I understand Trump
never made any glowing recommendations about free speech he never
stood for free speech. We're getting purged during the Trump administration.
The big purge in info wars was midterm for Trump
is just before the midterms is in twenty eighteen. And

(33:34):
it wasn't just info wars that happened the beginning of August,
and then when we got to October, right before the election,
there were eight hundred sites that got purged on social
media by the Democrats and on Democrat orders that had
a list that they put together and they sent that
around to the different social media companies who did their

(33:55):
bidding just like this. That's way it's done. And so
you don't need to be civilibities lawyer to understand what's
going on with this. And the right who used to
hate cancel culture now loves it. It truly is Orwellian,
you know. So Trump is now setting his sights on

(34:16):
Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers, he said in his tweet.
He said that leaves Jimmy and Seth two total losers
on fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do
it NBC, So you know you need to fire them
or we will do something to you as well. Kimmel Show.

(34:38):
As I said before, was in second place among viewers
overall in late night, but it was first place amongst
the eighteen to forty nine age group, which is a
key demographic that advertisers are looking for. You if you
get past forty nine, you're not so susceptible to buying
the latest fad thing like those glasses from Zuckerberg, you know.

(34:59):
So they want they want to get the people between
eighteen and forty nine. They've got some money, but maybe
not enough experience to see through the glasses that he's putting.

Speaker 4 (35:10):
They don't have that much money, but they've got even
less common sense. But they are the key target, the
generation that will, you know, finance a pizza or something
on door dash.

Speaker 3 (35:19):
So that's right. So as long as they get it,
they don't care if they can afford it or not.
We hit some new lows over the weekend with a
Maga gang desperately trying to characterize the kid who murdered
Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them. That
was the thing that they're saying that this is about. Now,
is that a criticism of Charlie Kirk? Now, it's a

(35:41):
criticism of Maggan. As I said, it's a criticism of Trump.
He really made Trump look absurd and ridiculous, and I
thought that was quite funny. Anyway, Jimmy Folland drops out
of an event at the last minute following Jimmy Kimmel's suspension,
so already it seems to be having in effect. Maybe
NBE is going to fire him. He's already disappeared from

(36:02):
an event. An next Biden adviser says that the Trump
crackdown is disrespectful to Charlie Kirk's memory. Well, we all
know it is. It's not not just me and the
Democrats who are saying this. Bablan Bee pointed that out
as well in terms of an iry, so they said
they're doing exactly the opposite of Charlie Kirk. Former senior
Biden aide Andrew Bates said the perceived Trump led crackdown

(36:27):
on speech is disrespectful to the memory of slain activist
Charlie Kirk. In a SUBSTANCT interview before Kimmel's suspension. Bates
brought up the efforts to punish speech around the Kirk killing,
as well as Trump's idea to use racketeering laws at
so Rico's statutes against protesters who called him Hitler in
a restaurant. Again, the Rico's statutes arose from the drug

(36:53):
war issues, and that was really the thing that Rudy
Giuliani used to make his career, his career as a prosecutor,
then he became heir. That was all based on the
Rico Statutes. And then the Rico Statutes continued to evolve
as they were able to dispense with due process and

(37:14):
a conviction, they could take people's property before they tried them.
That was what the Rico Statute was about. That continued
to evolve into civil asset forfeiture. And this is one
of the horrific knock on effects of the war on drugs.
It hasn't stopped anybody from taking drugs, not a single
person as we can see. And it hasn't stopped them

(37:35):
actually encouraged them to make more virulent forms of drugs.
But the other thing that has done is it's destroyed
due process. That's corrupted the judiciary, law enforcement, and the
government in general. Andrew Bates said, I think what you're
seeing a lot of the time is a lack of decency,
or say the fact that after you had this terrible

(37:55):
murder of Charlie Kirk. And now this week we have
and Trump trying to take away First Amendment rights the
people who disagree with them, which is disrespectful to Kirk's
memory and to the memory of everybody who has been
harmed by political violence. I don't think that that is
the kind of thing the American people want from their
leaders at all. I'm afraid that it is. I think

(38:18):
the people on both the left and the right want this.
That's why we're getting it from the people. The politicians
on the left and right. Certainly the radical left likes it,
and the maga right likes it as well. I think
they want to be brought together. I don't think that
we want this railing against unity, which is literally literally

(38:41):
all this week. And then the interviewer said Kirk as
a free speech warrior. I've heard few people say that
he would not approve. If Charlie Kirk could materialize before
our eyes, would he be speaking out against?

Speaker 9 (38:54):
What?

Speaker 3 (38:55):
Would he be speaking out that Trump and these guys
have been doing. Andrew Bates says, well, what I know
is that it is not respectful to people's intelligence. On
the one hand, to talk about someone as a champion
of First Amendment rights and then the same breath, try
to take away First Amendment rights from the people who
disagree with you. I can't speculate on what he would say,

(39:17):
and I respect that his family is going through a loss,
something that we should never ever happen, something that is
the opposite of what we need to be as a country.
But what distresses me and what I think is especially offensive,
is this attempted political weaponization of what happened to try
and scare people out of saying that they disagree with

(39:37):
their government, which is a sacred American right. That's the
sacred American right that the Biden administration did not support
on January sixth. But again, the hypocrisy is rife on
both sides. As a matter of fact, kim Well was
suspended for calling Charlie kirk shooter MAGA, but Don Trump

(39:58):
Junior did exactly the same thing after the Minnesota shootings.
This is from Mediaite, which is a left wing publication.
I said, MAGA supporters have done the same thing they've
accused Kimmel of doing. In June, Minnesota house speaker Melissa
Hortman and her husband was shot and killed in their
home by a man pretending to be a police officer.

(40:19):
The same man also shot John Hoffman and his wife,
but they survived the attack. The suspected gunman was later
identified as Vance Luther Belter. Those who knew him claimed
that he was a conservative and a supporter of Trump.
Belter previously worked on the Governor's Workforce Development Board in Minnesota.

(40:40):
In twenty nineteen, Governor Tim Waltz reappointed him to the
nonpartisan board, leading the right to claim that Belter was
a fellow Democrat. So countless MAGA figures pushed this theory
as a matter of fact, that the guy is mentally unbalanced.
I don't know if when you say that he belongs

(41:02):
to one team or the other, you're basically accusing both
the teams of being middle unbalaced, which at this point
is probably true. But again, he was appointed by Tim Waltz,
it was a non partisan board or whatever. He eventually
came out and said that he was ordered by Tim
Waltz to assassinate people. So I think that this is

(41:27):
something some of the people on the right picked up
and believed that claim. I think the guy is totally yeah,
I think so. Yeah. Anyway, Trump Junior told News Nation
the suspect seems to be leftist and a Democrat, and
he referenced Laura Lumer, which you know we always go
to for the most accurate information.

Speaker 4 (41:49):
Trusted source. How are those tires.

Speaker 3 (41:52):
Who called for Waltz to be detained by the FBI
and interrogated. Conservative podcaster Benny Johnson was quoted saying Alter
was a Tim Waltz associate. Sinator Mike Lee famously came
under fire for a series of unhinged tweets micking Waltz
for the shooting. In one of them, Lee included a
photo of the suspect and said this is what happens

(42:13):
when Marxists don't get their way. Lee later deleted the
tweets after being confronted about it by a fellow member
of Congress. He was also grilled by reporter of the tweets,
but simply walked away without saying a word. So again,
this is the same type of thing. There was not
a lot of evidence to show that he was a
lefty shooting other lefties, and yet they played the same

(42:38):
game exactly.

Speaker 9 (42:40):
And how many times of people, both political figures and
media figures fallen for the meme of Sam Hyde was
the shooter for whatever assassination or atrocity has gone on.

Speaker 3 (42:53):
I got blocked by Jake Tapper when he fell for that,
and I called him out that he blocked me on Twitter.
But that was years ago, so.

Speaker 9 (43:01):
They all need to be fired now.

Speaker 3 (43:05):
Yeah, I guess. So what was that reference about the tires?

Speaker 4 (43:09):
Oh, at one point, Laura Lumer started to griff, saying
that people had slashed her tires and posted pictures of it.
But it was really obvious she had just left her
car sitting so long her tires had rotted and deflated.

Speaker 3 (43:20):
So she's gone full of Jessie Smalllett.

Speaker 4 (43:22):
Yeah, this was many years ago, but it's something that
lives eternally in my mind, just the fact that either one,
she's so utterly shameless that she'll try to grift off
some obviously you know, just old bad tires, or she's
so dumb she can't tell the difference between a rotted
tire and a tire that has been slashed maliciously. So
either way, it's just slashed.

Speaker 3 (43:43):
My father time. Yeah, so Handy claims no conservative one
of Kimmeo fired really, uh, completely ignoring Trump doing that.
Sean Handy actually said on his show he had Fox
News contributor Joe Kancha. He said, I would argue that
did this to himself. But of course people want to
blame conservatives for this happening, said Sean Hannity. He said,

(44:06):
can you name one prominent conservative that said I want
Jimmy Kimmel fired? Because I can't, said Hannity. Concha said,
I can't find it, don't see it online. Quite frankly,
it doesn't exist. And so that kind of leaves out
one prominent conservative who seems to be the only conservative
who matters. Now, it's whatever Trump says. That is what

(44:29):
the Conservative Party believes.

Speaker 9 (44:31):
Well, that's what the Republican Party believes. Are they admitting
now that Donald Trump isn't a conservative?

Speaker 3 (44:37):
Yeah, no, they're not admitting that, although we know that
he never has been. Trump himself has explicitly called for
ABC to fire the Kimmel as well as many other people,
and he was calling for other people to be fired
as well. He had attacked Kimmel as talentless, at one
point demanding that ABC get rid of Kimmel and replace
him with George Stephanoppholis during an Oscar hosting gig. After

(45:03):
Stephen Colbert Ouster. Earlier this year, Trump even leaned into
a mob boss flourish by suggesting that Kimmel would be
the next to go. Brendan Carr said plainly that ABC
should suspend Kimmel and suggested affiliates could refuse to air
his program and that if they didn't, he would take
their license. We can do this the easy way or

(45:25):
the hard way, he said. In short. The claim that
no prominent conservative ever called for Kimmel's ouster strange credulity, well,
that's putting it modey. It's a bullface lie. Trump has
done so explicitly, Carr has done so in his official
capacity as a regulator, and Fox News contributors have repeatedly

(45:45):
taken aim at Kimmel's continued employment at ABC, and so
The Atlantic and I won't go into details of what
they have to say because it's pretty redundant, but they
do call it an escalation in every way. Kim suspension
from Late Night is a chilling precedent that could have
deep consequences if it isn't swiftly undone. But that's what

(46:08):
Trump is there for. He is there for precedents. He
is President Trump, and he is there to keep us
fighting with each other. I mean, just go back and
look whatever happened to all this stuff about Greenland and
about Canada and fentanyl coming from Canada. He's made one idiotic,
baseless claim after the other, all designed to get people

(46:30):
fighting with each other. It's just pure professional wrestling.

Speaker 1 (46:34):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (46:34):
So you got John Nolty at Breipbart says that Jimmy
Kimmel is unrepentant and livid. Well, of course he is,
but he's going to be put in the Hall of Fame.
He's now going to be a hero forever to the left. Yeah,
we got to yeah play the well no, we won't

(46:55):
play the Greenland song. We did that. That was Don
Junior and Charlie Kirk up there in Greenland. So this
is what John Nolty is saying on Breitbart. He says,
this is blood libel. What utter nonsense to say that
the shooter was one of the MAGA people. That was

(47:16):
a false claim that was circulating early on, and it
didn't fit the allegations that they made if you believe
the allegations that they made. But this is blood libel.
So next he's going to say this racism and anti Semitism,
and this is not this is not certainly an argument.

(47:37):
This is a garbage coming from John Nolty, who, by
the way, was wrong about every single thing about the
fake pandemic throughout its entirety. And when he would put
up these articles on Breitbart, he would get ratiowed by
the commentators that were there. They absolutely they knew what
was going on, and he was lying to his own

(47:59):
audience about it. But he's still there, he says Kimmel.
Kimmel's joke was not a tasteless joke. His was an
ethical breach. He lied he can lie on substack, but
not on our airways. And so now Noulty is cheering
for the FCC to be a federal censorship organization instead

(48:24):
of Communications right, instead of so to be the Federal
Censorship Committee instead of the Federal Communications Committee.

Speaker 9 (48:32):
And then, of course how long before they say, well,
why should they be allowed to lie on substack if
they aren't allowed to lie?

Speaker 3 (48:40):
Oh yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah. Breitbart needs to be careful,
just like the rest of these so called conservatives, who
are not trying to conserve anything, especially free speech. They're
not trying to conserve our culture. They're trying to get
political gain out of this and money, and shame on
them for that.

Speaker 4 (49:00):
We have many comments. We've got MOE Studios, says David.
I watched Richard Jewel excellent film. Yes, thank you for
the recommendation. I watch that.

Speaker 3 (49:10):
Yeah, I would recommend that everybody, especially you, I know
you would like it. Yeah, yeah.

Speaker 4 (49:15):
B l Hoten. Indeed, FBI equals fib that's right, they're
fibbin maybe phibbin the real octo spook. Trump has destroyed
his credibility with Epstein evil and he continues full tilt
and it's not slowing down. Francine, freedom of speech is
not freedom of consequences to what you say.

Speaker 3 (49:34):
That's right, but the consequences don't need to be determined
by the government. That's the key. The market is fully capable,
as we saw a cracker barrel, right, somebody does something
that people don't like, and we saw that with a
bud light where they're pushing trainy stuff. But if people
of the public doesn't like what you're doing, we've seen
it also in NASCAR. NASCAR decided that they would go

(49:54):
full tilt against the values of their audience. So the
marketplace should be making that decison, and you should be
able to boycott anybody that you disagree with. But that's
not something that we want the government telling people what
to do.

Speaker 4 (50:11):
That's been my position as well. It's just yeah, as
an individual, as a group of individuals, you know, make
your voices heard, make it known. If you know these
people are out there and they're celebrating the death of
Charlie Kirk. If there's someone like a teacher, you cannot
leave that person in place. They are going to harass
your children, They are going to treat them differently. A doctor,
anyone in a position where they're supposed to be giving

(50:32):
care cannot be trusted to give care equally and as
such they are not entitled to that job. In my opinion,
they cannot be trusted and need to be removed. But
we don't want the government in there telling people, oh
well maybe if you don't remove this, we're gonna, you know,
we'll make life difficult for you. I don't want the
government involved in this.

Speaker 3 (50:48):
That's right, And like Sparko said Frank Spiko. Frank, he
said that when you're always going to have bad people,
and the test of the organization is if they're going
to get rid of those bad people. If they don't,
the organization itself is contaminated and bad. And that applies
to any of these institutions, whether they're public or private,

(51:10):
that are out there. But we don't want to see
the government making it illegal to run boycotts of people either.
And that's one of the allegations of what's going on
with the movement for the pro Israel groups that they're
putting pressure on Johnson and others as Johnson is meaning

(51:31):
in secret with these people and pledging that he will
do everything that he can that they want. There are
indications that they want to stop the boycotting and diversification
movement of people not investing in Israeli companies and things
like that. That is also your right to do a boycott,
so we'll know if that's true. The Israel has already

(51:52):
jumped in as an enemy of free speech, and that's
one of the things that has emboldened Trump. And it
began with that, It began with censorship. That's why when
John Nolty said this is blood Liabel, it's like, come on,
you know, have you been bought to It's just amazing.

Speaker 4 (52:09):
Yeah, yeah, we've got Yona Annie wody. Free speech includes
false speech and hate speech. Freedom is scary, bite your
fingernails or something.

Speaker 3 (52:16):
Yeah. As a matter of fact, a lot of people
are putting up the quote I haven't read it yet,
the quote from Charlie Kirk himself back in May, and
I'm just paraphrasing it here. He said, there's no such
thing as hate speech. There's vile speech, there's ugly speech,
there's false speech or whatever, but there is no such
thing as hate speech, and we just need to get

(52:39):
over it, right, And that's exactly what he was doing
when he was on campus.

Speaker 4 (52:45):
We have the real No, we've got Doug to w seven.
Misinformation is whatever the government declares is misinformation. That's right. Yeah,
they get to decide. You're not going to have a
say and Toroinator thank you very much. We appreciate that.
So it's happy for everyone. I highly recommend playing this
video that contrasts what Charlie said about hate speech versus

(53:05):
what Bondi is saying.

Speaker 3 (53:08):
Well, if you want to play that, yeah you can.
If you want to pull that up, yeah, give us
an idea and you're.

Speaker 4 (53:14):
Abady to look at that.

Speaker 9 (53:17):
That go ahead and keep bringing the comments law.

Speaker 4 (53:18):
Yeah, we've got Shelley A never let a good crisis
go to waste, and this is a very good crisis.

Speaker 13 (53:24):
B L.

Speaker 4 (53:25):
Houghten. They've been fundraising on Charlie's death too.

Speaker 3 (53:28):
Yes, yeah, yeah, if.

Speaker 4 (53:31):
I tyrants seventy seventy six, Jimmy Kimmel said nothing that
should have got him fired, that's right. Over the years
he said some very unfunny things.

Speaker 3 (53:39):
I think he's far worse than that. Actually, yeah, you know,
I mean just that that clipped that played where he said,
you know, you need to youth andize people if they
don't get the vaccine. I mean, it's just or deny
medical treatment to them. And we saw that was happening
as a matter of fact, and he made a joke
of it. That's absolutely reprehensible. But you know, just to

(54:00):
say that, yeah, this guy was a maga guy. That's
what they're focusing on. He showed what Trump did, which
was reprehensible and funny at the same time. It was
Trump did that to himself. He didn't even need to
make the joke. He just showed what a joke Trump is.

Speaker 4 (54:18):
Yeah, we've got the real octo spook. Government has no lands,
no radio frequencies, nothing. They are selling hours. Yeah, yeah,
selling off public lands, the only last refuge of wildlife, recreation, hiking, exploring, jeeping,
et cetera. Selling out public radio frequencies with none allocated
for home broadcasters. Government are only the government only gets

(54:41):
worse and more destructive.

Speaker 3 (54:43):
Yeah, do you have the clip? Okay, let's play that
clip that was suggested by Tornader.

Speaker 12 (54:49):
People are allowed to speak.

Speaker 14 (54:51):
There's free speech, and then there's hate speech, and there
is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to
Charlie in our society.

Speaker 15 (55:00):
My position is that even hate speech should be completely
and totally allowed in our country. The most disgusting speech
should absolutely be protected. And it's not a viewpoint that
is held by the left. The ACLU used to hold
this viewpoint, the American Civil Liberties Union. They sued so
that legitimate Nazis could march through downtown Scochie. You remember

(55:21):
this back in the eighties and nineties. Now, why would
the acl you do this? Because they said, as soon
as you use the word hate, that is a very
subjective term, because then all of a sudden, it is
in the eyes or the it is in the implementation
of whomever has the power.

Speaker 11 (55:41):
Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups
who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people.

Speaker 9 (55:48):
So we show them that some action is better than
no action.

Speaker 14 (55:51):
We will absolutely target you, go after you if you
are targeting anyone with hate speech anything, and that's across
the aisle.

Speaker 15 (56:02):
I think that in a civil society, the best ideas
will win as long as you have that marketplace.

Speaker 12 (56:07):
And here's the real issue.

Speaker 15 (56:09):
As soon as you shut up hate speech, those people
only get more powerful. And this is the unintended consequence
of censorship. You give more credence to the silenced person
the moment you shut them up, because then they can
play the victim and they say they're trying to shut
me up because i have something that everyone else wants
and I'm a threat to them, though you're not.

Speaker 9 (56:27):
You're just a fool.

Speaker 15 (56:28):
And those people have too much power. And so the
minute that you start to enforce speech laws like they
do in Europe, based on specific opinions, regardless of how
reprehensible they are, then you actually give credence them. This
is why in Germany, where they do not allow swatstikas,
they do not allow Nazi paraphernalia, their white nationalist awful

(56:48):
movement is actually gaining traction because it has like a
rebellious underbelly.

Speaker 12 (56:53):
No, no, let me be very clear, Bring your.

Speaker 15 (56:56):
Bad ideas publicly so decent people can cross examine you,
so we can see who you are. We can talk
to you and convince the public.

Speaker 14 (57:03):
Otherwise there's free speech, and then there's hate speech, and
there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened
to Charlie in our society.

Speaker 15 (57:13):
This is a hard argument for some young people to
hear because they're like, it's so hateful, it's so awful,
it deteriorates our country. No, no, no, those ideas, if they spread,
deteriorate our country. But good people will speak in opposition
to them. And that's why I'm a big believe. I'm
a free speech absolutist through and through, and I think
that the utility of speech is what makes human beings

(57:38):
different than any other type of being on the planet.
Aristotle said we are the speaking beings, that our capacity
to communicate is who we are. And I actually think
it creates an active citizenry when bad people are allowed
to speak, When really bad people are given a permit,
all of a sudden, the entire population is like, that's disgusting.

(57:58):
Let's go get our card signs, go make them, and
we're going to go speak out against them. They're kind
of on their toes. They're looking out for things.

Speaker 14 (58:05):
We will absolutely target you, go after you if you
are targeting anyone with hate speech anything.

Speaker 7 (58:14):
And that's across the aisle.

Speaker 15 (58:15):
All of a sudden, if the government becomes the speech
police and they start calling the shots, like all the
government will get rid of the bad guys for me,
and they kind of become complacent, they become less active,
they become less responsible for the country around them. And
so I don't draw a line that's me.

Speaker 3 (58:32):
That's good. Whoever did that video that's Pam Bondi is
nothing other than Donald Trump and drag. Disgusting to watch
the two of them. She's that video of Rudy Giuliani
and drag.

Speaker 4 (58:49):
I try not to think about that.

Speaker 3 (58:50):
But yeah, that's when I see Pambondi, I see Trump
and drag because she embodies his hate of freedom the constitution.

Speaker 1 (59:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (59:02):
Good for Charlie Kirk doing that, and it is exactly
the opposite of what he believed. If you believe him, Yeah,
and I do. I believe that he was sincere with me.

Speaker 4 (59:12):
I think so too. I don't think it would have
dedicated that much time going around debating people if he wasn't.
I need the comment scrolled lancem at the bottom Niberou
twenty twenty nine. The aristocracy swapped Trump out for Biden
for the sole purpose of getting as many leftists to
roll up their sleeves for Trump's warp speed euthanasia.

Speaker 3 (59:30):
Yeah. Now they're doing the same thing again. They're swapping
out Biden for Trump to get the right to embrace
Biden's persecution of political differences that he did throughout his administration.
Fifteen hundred people at j six.

Speaker 4 (59:46):
Yeah, and nib also says no one, no in a position,
will ever go to jail. That only happens in the
scripted movies in TV series. Yeah, we don't see that.
Dewey b l Hoton Maga is still defending Trump. They
won't ever. I think it's important to keep trying. I
see a lot of people post things like, you know,

(01:00:06):
don't give into divide and conquer, don't give into divide
and conquer, And they'll continually try to reach out to
the left. They'll continually try to reach out to the left.
But you know, they'll sit there and they're like, Oh,
these maga idiots, these maga dummies, they did this, they
did and it's true, maggot, Yeah, they did stupid stuff.
They vote for dumb things. But if you're going to
extend that much grace to the left, you've got to

(01:00:28):
extend that much grace to these people as well.

Speaker 3 (01:00:31):
I don't extend grace to either side. I think they've
had their shot. They come to their senses, and I
think that they're so hardened in their minds that they're
never going to get it. They don't have any.

Speaker 4 (01:00:44):
Principles, probably not. But I try to keep hope. I
try to continue to hope that these people can be
reached and that they're worth trying to reach.

Speaker 3 (01:00:55):
Maverick, the right and the left cannot be reached. The
problem is how do we keep them away from ourselves,
Because they're going to go to work with each other.
We're going to be the ones in the middle being
shot at. They're both going to come after us. Maverick Pilgrim,
thank you very much. That's very kind of you regarding freeze, peach,
free speech, and so the Kingdom of Gondor sanker to
ruin the line of kings failed, the white trees withered,

(01:01:18):
and the rule of Gondor was given over to lesser men. Yes,
Gondolf j R. R. Tolkien, Yes, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:01:27):
We've got solo Cat nineteen eighty. Tyrants will always seek
to capitalize on tragic events to further their tyranny. Trump
dishonors Charlie by taking advantage of his death. Well, Trump
a lot of things, dishonors, many.

Speaker 3 (01:01:40):
Things, dishonors as wives, the people that he just smothered
with flattery when he put them in his administration. Then
he chases them down the road after he kicks them out.
He's doing the same thing to the Constitution. It's all
about the Constitution and America. And now he is trashing
America and the Constitution like you were a next wife.

Speaker 4 (01:02:03):
Bille Hoten says, where is the bullet And no news
on that yet on that, of course, who knows if
we'll ever see anything about it, Phonsie Bear. They already
paved over the crime scene for cognitive dissonance at its apex.

Speaker 9 (01:02:18):
We mean so yeah, we said that the other day.
I said that they're paving it. I'm not sure if
that's true. Some people were reporting that they were paving it,
and there were pictures of them tearing up the grass there.
Others were saying that they were just tearing up the
grass to put down fresh sod because you know, the
other grass had blood on it, which I guess they
couldn't wash off of grass for some reason. But as

(01:02:42):
the next comment is saying, other people are saying they're
going to be putting up a monument there. But whether
they're just renovating the grass or putting up a monument,
it is very strange that they couldn't wait even a
week before tearing up a crime scene like that when
they haven't even found the bullet, especially when the shoot
was supposed to have been shooting from an elevated position.
The bullet would be in the ground that they just

(01:03:05):
scooped up and carried away.

Speaker 3 (01:03:07):
That's right. Yeah, that's what they have y'all tape for.
It is suspicious.

Speaker 4 (01:03:13):
I think sa Miller won two three. The bullet was
in the ground, but they've already started renovating the area,
moving sod and concrete to make a memorial. It figures
by Tyrants seventeen seventy six left his voters want an
authoritarian dictator to punish those on the right, and voters
on the right one authoritary dictator to punish those on
the left. Government plan working swimmingly. Yeah, well, personally be

(01:03:38):
a little divisive here. I do think if you're mutilating
children and doing that sort of thing, you know, if
you're directly involved in the process, yeah, punishment we're coming
for you. Absolutely. If you're one of these doctors that
provides these services, we're stripping your license and you're getting
shipped to Guantanamo Bay for the rest of your life.
But that's just me.

Speaker 3 (01:03:55):
Yeah, well, I mean you come after that particular thing.

Speaker 4 (01:03:58):
Yeah, that's a that to me, that's a crime that's
specifically provable as a obvious crime. You're mutilating a child,
not these nebulous terms like hate speech, what wrong think
all these Yeah, no, you mutilated a child. So you know, I.

Speaker 3 (01:04:13):
Wish they would call it wrong think, but that maybe
I think even if they did that, it wouldn't wake
up MAGA or the left.

Speaker 4 (01:04:20):
You're right, it is wrong think. Barringer seven to seven.
No Kimmel was done. Ratings are crap. This is all
made up. Look his ratings probably were garbage. But these
people keep this on the air for a long time,
so it's possible that this is some political stunt where
they get to go, oh, look, the FCC this, the
FCC that. But the truth is the FCC did come

(01:04:42):
in and lean on them, and the FCC did get
their way.

Speaker 9 (01:04:45):
So yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean, I don't think it
was a coincidence that they just happened to get rid
of him right when they started having the FCC lean
on them.

Speaker 3 (01:04:54):
M m. Well, we're going to take a quick break
and we'll be right back, and when we come back,
we're going to talk about Alan Dershwitz. Even other people
have weighed in on this. Many different legal authorities have
weighed in on Trump's garbage professional wrestling lawsuit against the
New York Times for fifteen billion dollars, and we talk

(01:05:14):
about just how absurd that is according to lawyers. You
won't believe some of the stuff that's in the laws.
It truly is amazing. We'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:06:14):
You're listening to the David Night Show analyzing the globalists

(01:07:26):
next move and now the David Nutshell decoding the mainstream propaganda.

(01:08:18):
It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (01:08:21):
Well, Joe Lancaster at Reason has an article Trump's fifteen
billion dollar lawsuit against the New York Times is his
craziest one yet. And he's talked to some lawyers and
he's got some quotes from the lawsuit that you will believe.
He says, the complaint suggests at the Times showed actual
malice quote unquote because its reporters hated him. But that's

(01:08:44):
not the way it works.

Speaker 4 (01:08:47):
Jelice is a very specific term in the law, and
it's extremely difficult to prove.

Speaker 3 (01:08:52):
Trump is no stranger to filing defamation lawsuits. And to
that point, Travis, there is a much higher standard for
public figures, especially for political public figures. He's no stranger
to filing defamation lawsuits against media companies with varying degrees
of merit. Again, they've not had any merit at all.

(01:09:14):
But he's been able to shake down CBS and Paramount
because they were going to deny or at least hold
up a merger that the owner who has contracted cancer
wanted to make this happen very quickly. This week he
added to that list, filing a lawsuit that is more ridiculous,
more meritless than any of the others so far, he says.

(01:09:37):
Rather than straightforwardly listing the facts of the case, the
complaint spends dozens of pages histrionically detailing how great Trump
is and how terrible The New York Times is. It
reads less like a formal legal document than one of
Trump's social media posts, calling the Times a quote full

(01:09:57):
throaded mouthpiece of the Democrat Party, saying that it engaged
and quote wrong and partisan criticism in his very first
statements of fact. The lawsuit rags that Trump quote won
the twenty twenty four presidential election over Vice President Laala Harris.
He did, say La La, in historic fashion, emerging victorious

(01:10:19):
in both the Electoral College and the popular vote, and
securing a resounding mandate from the American people, which it
calls the greatest personal and political achievement in American history.
If narcissism were a crime, Trump would have a life sentence.
I think he does have a life sentence. I think

(01:10:40):
it's been narcissism his entire life. Much of the complaint
reads this way like a breathless hagiography that any attorney
should be embarrassed to file. Even Dershowitz won't jump in
on this But here's the thing, folks. It just shows
howbarrassing for an attorney to file something like this, But

(01:11:05):
they will humiliate and embarrass themselves in the same way
that Pam Bondi did over both the Epstein files as
well as her movements against wrong think and wrong speak.
These people want to suck up to Trump, and it's
like he sat there and dictated this nonsense to them.

(01:11:25):
Sounds just like him. To the allegation that the apprenticed
Apprentice saved him irrelevance, Trump said it was the other
way around. So evidently that's what The New York Times said,
that The Apprentice saved him and was sinking into irrelevance.
He said it was one of the top rated shows
of all time and a trailblazer in American television. His success,

(01:11:47):
says Trump, was thanks solely to President Trump's charisma and
unique business acumen. The Apprentice represented the cultural magnitude of
President Trump's singular brilliance, which captured the zeitgeist of our time.
I guess that would be money and greed as a
zeitgeist of our time. It really sounds like a North

(01:12:09):
Korean dictator, doesn't He increasingly sound like that you know,
it's going to be the point where, perhaps in his
memory jd Vance, when they have a state field for Trump,
will come after anybody who doesn't cry and weep properly
as they did in North Korea. So he saw everybody
faking the tears.

Speaker 4 (01:12:29):
Do you're thinking get the treatment where he's laden state
in like a glass coffin, you know, somewhere in DC,
so we can go make the pilgrimage upon his glorious visage.

Speaker 3 (01:12:39):
Well, if somebody in Migo will probably do something. They'll
probably make some kind of a golden statue that they
can worship of him. This is presented as evidence that
Trumps owed billions of dollars in restitution for being defamed
by a newspaper, because, after all, it represented his singular
brilliance and captured the zeitgeist of our time, and only

(01:13:00):
somebody like Trump could have done that. Trump arrives at
this number of fifteen billion dollars, deciding that he has
suffered that amount of harm through some fanciful accounting. The
lawsuit says the value of present Trump's one of a kind,
unprecedented personal brand alone is reasonably estimate to be worth

(01:13:21):
over one hundred billion dollars, claims a lawsuit. Incredibly, in
May of this year, Bloomberg estimated Trump's net worth at
five and a half billion. They claim the lawsuit is
a hundred billion. If the lawsuit survives, a motion to
dismiss Trump is extremely unlikely to prevail on the merits.
Defamation of a public figure requires proving actual malice. Defendants

(01:13:48):
baselessly hate President Trump in a deranged way, says a lawsuit.
But that's as close as they get to any statement
of facts. Points for creativity. But that's not how any
of this stuff works. There's been a lawsuit, a Supreme
Court decision called Sullivan, that defines actual malice as knowledge

(01:14:10):
that statements are false or in reckless disregard of the truth,
even if what the reporters wrote was not true and
actually hurt his reputation. Trump must prove either that they
knew the information was false when they printed it, or
that they were so careless with the truth that they
should have known better. But what he's basically upset about

(01:14:30):
is an op ed piece that was endorsing La La Harris.
You're entitled in America to have an opinion. That is,
of course, unless your opinion is one that Donald Trump
doesn't like. Since March or twenty twenty four, Trump has
sued ABC and CBS, extracting fifteen million and sixteen million
dollar settlements, respectively, for similarly questionable allegations. More recently, he

(01:14:54):
sued The Wall Street Journal for reporting on the existence
of a birthday card he reportedly wrote in the early
two thousands to Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later convicted of
sex trafficking young girls. Trump called it a fake story
and implied that the note did not exist. Now it
has been released, obtained through a subpoena of the Epstein estate.

(01:15:18):
So that case is ongoing. But that is going to
be one that is going to also crash and burn.

Speaker 4 (01:15:23):
Also, I don't mean to break in, but if Jujun
six twelve and Chat asked, have you guys seen the
recently erected ten foot golden Trump's statue holding a bitcoin
in DC. I just looked it up and it's real.
It's real. Oh boy, so it already exists.

Speaker 3 (01:15:37):
Yeah. Well, you know they carried around that statue of
him in shorts. You know that was that the sea
pack or something. We had a lot of fun with
that Oh well, yeah, this latest lawsuit is somehow Trump's
craziest when yet, over eighty five pages long, the complaint
makes little effort to quantify any actual harm to Trump's reputation,

(01:15:59):
instead simply claiming that he is the greatest man to
ever walk the earth, that any information to the contrary
is not just inaccurate but malicious. You either worship me
or I'm going to come after you, because that's you know,
you you bow down. It's the same attitude that we
see from these North Korean dictators because that's his position
and that's what gets him. So that's why he flips

(01:16:22):
out on the people and the wives that he used,
that he chose originally. If there is some dispute they
don't worship him sufficiently, then it is treasonous to him.
So the complaint is frivolous on its face, and I
hope that they hit him with a big slap lawsuit.
Katie Fallow, deputy Litigation director of the Night First Amendment

(01:16:45):
Institute at Columbia University, about that they got a First
Amendment Institute named after somebody down the road from us.
But anyway, the complaint is full of bluster, they said.
But sure, on any allegations of specific false statements of
fact that would meet the rigorous standards for defamation claims

(01:17:06):
brought by public figures like Trump's numerous past and ongoing lawsuits.
The complaint reads like a childish gripe about people being
mean to him that arguably doesn't even raise barely plausible claims,
let alone meet the exceedingly high bar. The First Amendment
wrecks to the defamation claims for public figures like Trump
that was the lead Council for Technical Policy and the

(01:17:30):
foundation for individual rights and expression. That's fire. This lawsuit,
he said, is yet another extortion racket wrapped in perverse,
anti democratic commodification of votes and political support as a
form of damages. And that's what concerns me so much
about the caving of CBS and ABC. Those lawsuits had

(01:17:53):
absolutely no merit, and in the case of CBS, the
pressure was using the regulatory agency to deny their merger.
Winning isn't the point, The process is the punishment. This
humiliating settlement from CBS starkly illustrates how the powers of
the presidency can be abused to punish news outlets for

(01:18:17):
constitutionally protected speech. Says Jacob Sullom, It does not bode
well for freedom of the press under a president who
has no compunction about weaponizing the government against journalists who
irk him. Alan Drschwitz, meanwhile, who's friendly, very friendly to Trump,
explains why Trump's media lawsuits are set up to fail

(01:18:39):
in US courts. And this is the thing, you know,
when you look at a lot of the lawfair that
was set up against him. And I said this when
it was happening. There were quite a few people who
are going to run who began to run against Trump,
not just as Santis, but several of them, and they
couldn't get any traction at all because of the frivolous

(01:19:01):
lawfair that was run against Trump by the Democrats. And
I said, they're doing this deliberately to make a hero
out of him and to make sure that he doesn't
have to defend his record, he doesn't have to debate
any of these Republican candidates. And that's exactly the way
that it worked. I think they knew that exactly, and
I think that Trump is doing something like that with

(01:19:21):
these lawsuits. Even dersh says it. Dershowitz warned New on
Newsmas that Trump's ongoing defamation lawsuits against major media outlets
are unlikely to succeed under current US legal standards. He said,
in the US, he would have to prove not only
that there were factual misstatements and not opinion. And remember
it was an op ed piece that he is so

(01:19:43):
talked about the fact they put their op ed piece
on the front page, but they labeled it as an
opinion piece. But it would actually not be opinion, but
factual misstatements, and that they were made with malice, that is,
that they were made with reckless district guard for the
truth at Dershowitz well, he personally believes them all a

(01:20:03):
standard may be too restrictive. Dershwitz says that any meaningful
change would require the Supreme Court to revisit and to
revise its own doctrine, and that is difficult to get
them to do it. It's not about anything other than
professional wrestling, and it's about punishing them through the process,

(01:20:24):
and he will find ways to punish them through the
regulatory bureaucracy as well. Well. We're going to take a
quick break and when we come back, we're going to
take a look at some of your emails. We have
some important emails here, some important comments from people. So
we'll be right back.

Speaker 2 (01:21:27):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 8 (01:21:31):
Here News now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 3 (01:21:40):
I wanted to cover some of the emails that have
come in because I really do appreciate people letting us
know what things are happening. And we've had some Prairie
quests and I've got some updates on those, and we
have a new Prairie quest from a listener who's very
distraught and understandably so. His mother was just diagnosed with cancer.
He says he's gotten the B seventeen laya trill other things,

(01:22:03):
he said, but he would really like to have our prayers.
He says, I'm a newly redeemed sinner and my mother
was diagnosed with a horrible form of breast cancer. I'm
trying to get prayers for her, and I appreciate yours,
and so I wanted to pass that on. This is
RS in Alabama. He said, my father died about a
year ago, and I don't know what else I can do.

(01:22:24):
I'm asking for everyone's prayers because I know that that works,
and I would appreciate that. Thank you, he said. He
said he feels that his mother's that his lifestyle caused
his mother's cancer, and I would just like to encourage
him that that is not the case. And he says
he has more to say, he says, and I follow up.
He got just this morning. He said that he's struggling

(01:22:48):
with PTSD and other flaws. I'm just lost and I
would appreciate any thoughts that can comfort me while knowing
that this is all his plan. Sorry to be a bother. Well,
you're not a bother, but I don't know anyone who
has shown me more than you anyway, he said. Sorry,
I'm emotional. I just feel broken. Sorry to hear that,

(01:23:09):
but again, this is RS, and so we asked for
your prayers, and I would just say to RS, you know,
one of the things we look at with this is
and I asked Travis to read some of the lyrics
of God works in mysterious ways. I think it really
does speak to this type of thing. I've been around
long enough to see God answer miraculous prayers in our life,

(01:23:34):
and I've also had things that I dearly wanted to
see happen that did not happen that God did not answer,
because it's not about us getting what we want, but
it's about a loving God who sees the bigger picture
through all of this. Read a little bit of that, Trevis.

Speaker 4 (01:23:49):
Yeah, so this is God moves in a mysterious way. Starts.
God moves in a mysterious way his wonders to perform.
He plants his footsteps in the sea and rides upon
the storm. And we go to Oh, fearful saints, Now courage,
take new courage. Take the clouds that you now dread
are big with mercy and will break in blessings on
your head. Judge not the Lord by feeble sense, but

(01:24:12):
trust him for his grace. Behind a frowning providence, he
hides a smiling face. God's purposes will ripen fast, unfolding
every hour. The bud may have a bitter taste, but
sweet will be the flower. Blind. Unbelief is sure to
air and scanned his work in vain. God is God

(01:24:32):
is his own interpreter, and he will make it plain.

Speaker 3 (01:24:36):
Yeah. So we see this several times. And John, it's
not just with Lazarus, but it was also with a
blind man. The people said, who has sinned this man
or his parents to the point where you say that
you feel like your lifestyle is responsible for your mother's cancer,
And Jesus said, neither of them. This happened so that

(01:24:59):
God be glorified. Now was God glorified by Jesus making
giving the blind man sight? And so sometimes we have
situations where the prayer gives us an opportunity to see
God working in response to prayer, listening to our prayers

(01:25:19):
and mercifully granting that, and we see him working in
our life. Other times, he's got other plans there and
we can't really see where those plans are going. To
think of the situation with Job, we're given a glimpse
to what was happening in reality, behind the scenes, but

(01:25:40):
his friends all misinterpreted it. They all thought that it
was Job that was doing it, or something some other
reason that it was happening, and they all got it wrong.
But in the end God restored everything double as a
matter of fact. And so that is the thing that
we always need to keep in mind when we pray

(01:26:01):
to God. We can sometimes see him act in amazing ways,
and certainly we have seen that type of thing in
our life, and so we're praying for you that that
will be the case with your mother, So we're praying
for her healing. This was sent to me by listener Hayden,
who says that bows and Arrows has been sentenced to

(01:26:22):
twenty seven years. And that's as I said. When we
had the I used to use a transcript program to
help me figure out where to do the cut. Stravis
is doing all the cuts now.

Speaker 4 (01:26:33):
Which is why there's less of them now, just because
everything is so busy. Yeah, but hopefully I'm trying to
get more cuts back out slowly, getting a system where
things are a bit easier, and I'm working out how
to do it more efficiently, so more cuts should be
coming daily.

Speaker 3 (01:26:49):
Again, whenever I would say bows and arrow it would
say bows and arrows. And he's been given a twenty
seven year sentence. This should be a cautionary tale for
Trump if we're going to have a government that punishes
all political opponents. He's already seen been a warning shot

(01:27:10):
with what happened when he left the first time, and
he is now establishing a system that if they get
out of power, so he's going to do everything he
can to rig the process. So the Republicans don't get
out of power, because the other system that he is
setting up is one where those who lose the election
go straight to jail, which is what our ally in

(01:27:32):
Ukraine does. That's what Putin does in Russia. He says, Hi,
David and family, I know you and your sons haven't
covered the twenty seven year sentence of bows and arrows.
He was also recently diagnosed with skin cancer, so he said,
your gas gauge looks a little bit low, so I'll
look forward to helping a little bit.

Speaker 9 (01:27:50):
Well.

Speaker 3 (01:27:50):
I appreciate that. I just I do have a list
here and I have not updated this with I've not
updated in a couple of weeks because I try not
to be too focused on the gas gauge or finances.
But let me just thank some of the people who
have sent us things in the mail. Austin M. And

(01:28:12):
Ryan F. Love the Road. Thank you so much, Martin Kay,
Scott C. Steve and Donna B. Margaret, Mary T, Marty T.
I'm Marty, Aaron W. Bethany, David and em Marie N.

(01:28:32):
James F. Michael T. David and Wie W. Stephanie K.
Thank you all of you, and I really do appreciate that.
As I said, I'm not updated to gauge exactly where
it is. This is an article from a small paper

(01:28:52):
in spring Hope, North Carolina about the Cracker Barrel thing,
and they sent this along. I thought it was interesting
because this person, uh clearly didn't think that, uh, you know,
what was going on at Cracker Barrel was any big deal.
And I think that it was actually kind of important

(01:29:14):
because it showed, you know, she thought that everybody was
overreacting to this, and she didn't think that anybody really
cared about it. That was her little trip to Cracker
Barrel and Karen and I, I guess it was a
more on Labor Day weekend. You know, they had a
sale going on. So I was curious to see how
things happened to local Cracker Barrel. So we went and

(01:29:38):
had breakfast there. I think it was by one get
one free or something like that, and we talked to
the waitress, we talked to the person at the checkout thing.
They all were adamantly opposed to the CEO asked us
to write and all that other kind of stuff, and
I said, well, yeah, I'll think about it. But anyway,
they really hated it. And h and at that point
in time, she had relented from changing the logo but

(01:30:01):
was still moving forward with the story models. And they said,
none of us want to see that happen. And so anyway,
I thought it was kind of interesting. She said, the
cracker barrel brand change is just another opportunity for those
who wheel and deal in divisive politics to stoke flames.
They said, the fragile, seething anger of white men who

(01:30:23):
still believe that they own America is alive and kicking.
That is exactly the attitude of the woman who was
running this thing into the ground. So I thought it
was an interesting op ed piece, and I totally disagree
with what she had to say. I'm not, by the way,
calling for her newspaper to be shut down because we
disagree with them. So the AI bubble. This is from Matt,

(01:30:46):
who says I had just written but I wanted to
add thoughts on the AI bubble. He says, it is
a solution without a problem. That's why when I heard
about what happened in Utah, I was like, oh, a man,
mandatory market has just opened, you know, for our safety,
and it can be mandatory to cooperate in other words,

(01:31:07):
maybe what we need to do is run everybody's tweets
through artificial intelligence to figure out who is saying the
kinds of things that we don't want, and that's the
real danger of AI. And they can mandate the companies
by this. We know that the government is going to
be buying this to look into things, but they can
then tell the companies you have to do that because

(01:31:29):
the government can't directly punish us. It's the same principle
that Trump used during the pandemic. The federal government had
no authority to do the kinds of things that the
state governments were doing in terms of mask mandates and
things like that. He could reward them with money if
they did what he wanted to do, but he couldn't
directly run that through. That's why when they set this

(01:31:49):
whole thing up around the time of nine to eleven, again,
the first simulation of doing exactly what they did two
months before nine to eleven, the anthrax false flag attack
one week later, and then months after that, they ran
through a push through legislation that was model legislation, telling
the states what laws they needed to pass so that

(01:32:09):
when they're ready to pull the trigger and twenty twenty.
The laws are already in place, and Trump just had
to reward them financially to get them to do it.
They always have a way that they can avoid any
direct responsibility for things that they are explicitly prohibited from doing.
They will do it through the state government. They'll do
it through corporations or whatever. So the state is going

(01:32:32):
to be completely and the federal government is going to
be completely in on buying AI to surveil us and
to report on what we're all about to them. But
now with this they can mandate that all of the
media companies get this so they can run their own reports.
And that way the censorship quote unquote won't be coming

(01:32:54):
from the government. It will be coming from the AI
and the corporations, and they can claim plausible deniability even
though we know that the AI is going to be
rigged by them and they will be mandating that people
have That's an interesting thought and I do agree with that, Matt.
So this is from Will. He says, in my view,

(01:33:18):
free speech is dying and or already dead. A society
with no soul, no moral compass, and a youth that
has been slowly destroyed over the past few decades. Free
speech is a wonderful thing if it is used constructively
by parties with an intellectual capacity to disagree, without the
injection of uncontrollable emotion based on lack of knowledge, radical tribalism,

(01:33:41):
foul language, and threats. The main contributors to this climate
of dysfunction and hate are academia, social media mainstream media.
Social media allows people to say anything with no fear
as they are hiding behind a keyboard, far removed from
personal eye to eye debate. They are cowards the keyboard warriors.

(01:34:03):
Academia teaches hate and division, nothing intellectual, churning out brainwashed
zombies who, after four years of been doctrination or more,
can't find a job related to their education. The hate
taught in the universities is combined with this and creates angry,
entitled individuals with a short viuse. Mainstream media only compounds

(01:34:25):
this by twisting events and politics. By misrepresenting news items,
they actually encourage violence, along with well known politicians, riots, looting, murder,
Celebrating and politicizing events to the masses has perverted people's
views and their sense of what is right or wrong.
Summing up, I hate to say this, but I do

(01:34:45):
not believe at this point that our society can handle
free speech with no moral compass, no God. Free speech
will be used as an excuse for a plethora of
insane behavior. What the solution is I don't know. God
has been so far removed from our daily life, and
only he has the capacity to heal our world. The
problem is that you have to want to be healed.

(01:35:07):
As with everything, the few destroy things that affect the many. Well,
I think that I think will that it was John
Adams would agree with you. I think he was the
one who said that our system of government only works
for moral people, and they have done everything to make
sure that we don't have a moral society in our culture.

(01:35:29):
And so when you have a society where there is
absolutely no morality, no ethics, and it is always pushed
against by the institutions that are a part of that society,
you're not going to be able to have the nice
things that we would like to have, like free speech
and liberty. It's all going to be about keeping me

(01:35:49):
safe from the mob that is out there. I think
that is where we are today. Well, before we take
a break, I mentioned yesterday that Trump's in the UK
we showed some clips of them celebrating him, treating him
as king for a day, and on Channel four in
the UK they announced a night of TV dedicated to

(01:36:12):
Trump Untruce to mark historic second state visit to the
UK of the American President. Channel four is rolling out
an altogether different kind of welcome with an unflinching night
of programming that puts the spotlight on his untruce and
his falsehoods. They will broadcast Trump versus the Truth, an

(01:36:32):
unbroken catalog of over one hundred lies, distortions and inaccuracies
uttered or written by the President since taking office in January.
So I guess they had to limit it to just
the second term here, running over several hours, these untrue
statements would be punctuated by text based fact checks, offering

(01:36:53):
viewers a truth behind the tweets, speeches and sound bites.
The theme will run throughout the day with a Trump
and taking over from Channel four continuity announcers in order
to deliver false information from misleading program synopsis to exaggerated
run times as a sobering reminder of what can happen
when once trusted sources of truth cannot be relied upon.

(01:37:16):
Also in the schedule will be the second episode of
The Donald Trump Show, a landmark three part documentary from
multi award winning filmmakers seventy two Films. The unique series
uses news footage from TV podcasters, from TV podcasts, and
social media to tell the story of the last nine
months of the presidency as an unfolding soap opera. In

(01:37:39):
an unfolding zap opera, Hasn't it? Ian Katz, the chief
content officer Channel four, said, Trump loves making history, so
on Wednesday, Channel four will do just that. We will
show what we believe to be the longest uninterrupted reel
of untruce falsehoods and distortions ever broadcast on television. We

(01:38:00):
hope it were remind viewers how distorted, disorienting, and dangerous
the world becomes when the most powerful man on earth
shows a little regard for the truth. And if Trump
cares to watch along after the state banquet, he may
even clear up a few misconceptions. So they challenged him
that was on Wednesday nights. That's already happened. But I

(01:38:20):
can imagine there's going to be some broken TVs and
his and his suite if he turns on the television
set to watch that.

Speaker 9 (01:38:31):
The thing is, it's probably going to be the same
nonsense criticisms.

Speaker 3 (01:38:37):
Yeah yeah, the.

Speaker 9 (01:38:38):
Left has already's been throwing at him and inoculating him
against the real criticism.

Speaker 3 (01:38:43):
That's right, just like the nonsense impeachment charges and legal
charges against him. And that's the Unfortunately what happens because
the people who are doing it usually do it from
a perspective of being deranged and just their their hatred
of the man, which at this point I'm starting to
see the.

Speaker 9 (01:39:02):
Point criticize them about that. I somehow doubt they're going
to be talking about Operation Warp Speed.

Speaker 3 (01:39:10):
That's right, that's right. Well, they're focusing on his second term.

Speaker 9 (01:39:15):
It sounds like it's going to be insufferable. Well, actually,
here's the facts of the case.

Speaker 3 (01:39:21):
Yeah, yeah, exactly. It may not be very entertaining except
for the Trump impersonator of this there. Well, in Japan,
they have a political party that is going to install
an AI leader. That's how we can get around all
this stuff, right, we can have AI because you know
that I will never lie to us, right, it will
always tell you the truth. It'll always tell you what

(01:39:42):
you want to hear. Is really that? So they have
a new political party there said they're going to install
AI as their leader after it's Maverick founder quit following
a disastrous showing in recent elections. It was called the
Path to re Birth Party. That's kind of ironic considering
that their birth rates are crashing in Japan, probably more

(01:40:07):
than any other country. They do need rebirth, not just
from cultural and moral and ethical standpoint, but a spiritual standpoint,
but they need it literally in terms of births.

Speaker 9 (01:40:19):
Yeah, I think the AI is going to help with that.
That's the real question here that they should be asking
is who is programming the AI. That's who they're actually electing.
That's the person that needs to be up there doing
the debate. This is the guy that's thinking for it, the.

Speaker 3 (01:40:35):
One who's doing the labeling. Yeah, the person that they're
paying fifteen dollars an hour. Launched in January by a
former mayor of a small city in western Japan. It
doesn't have a policy platform. Well, that sounds like exactly
like all the political parties that we've got, none of them,
even if they have a party platform, paying the attention
to it. Maybe they're waiting for AI to come up

(01:40:57):
with a platform for them as members are free to
sell their own agenda. He unexpectedly, however, came second in
the Tokyo gubernatorial election. I guess Tokyo doesn't have a mayor.
It's got a governor, I guess, thanks to a successful
online campaign. But then he quit the party when it
failed to pick up any seats in the Upper House elections.

(01:41:19):
The new leader will be AI, said a doctoral student
of AI research who described himself as an assistant to
the new leader. He's an assistant to the AI. Details
about the AI are yet to be decided, including when
and how it will be implemented, so they don't even
know which chatbot they're going to use yet. I guess
the AI will not dictate political activities of party members,

(01:41:42):
but will focus on decisions such as distribution of resources
among members. For example, who recently won a party contest,
says the guy who recently won the contest to succeed
the founder. The Path three Birth has struggled to win seats.
All of its forty two candidate lost in June. All
of its ten candidates who ran for the Upper House

(01:42:05):
also lost, so I don't think they're going to gain
much support with the AI stuff. As I point I'm.

Speaker 9 (01:42:10):
Just thinking of that story where it's the guy that
gave the AI control of his database and it deleted everything,
and he asked about it, and this, right, I did
delete it. Sorry, I did destroy everything. This is catastrophic.
My bad.

Speaker 3 (01:42:27):
I think that's what we're going to get from Trump.
It's like, oh, I'm sorry, I deleted the entire constitution. Yeah, catastrophic.

Speaker 9 (01:42:33):
Yeah, let's give these machines control of the nuclear launch codes. Oops,
I started World War three. This is catastrophic.

Speaker 3 (01:42:42):
Well, we're going to continue to see this kind of
bring me the man, I'll find the crime. This was done.
You know, AI was used by Pulty at hud in
order to find the information about Lisa Cook, the Fed
governor that Trump wanted to get rid of. And now
we find that Scott Bessant reportedly made two homes his

(01:43:05):
primary residence. You can only have one primary same thing
that Trump wants to fire Lisa cookover. In two thousand
and seven, he indicated that homes that he owned in
both Massachusetts and New York were both his primary residents,
according to mortgage records. Bloomberg, pointing to mortgage experts, said

(01:43:26):
there's no sign of wrongdoing. On Bessant's part. Oh really,
and that Bank of America, the lender he was working with,
did not expect him to use both homes as his
primary residence. But the thing is that they already went
after Trump even they said that he misrepresented his financial statements,
even though he paid the loans, and even though the

(01:43:48):
bank was not upset about that, they still went after him.
I think it's really going to undermine his case to
get Lisa Cook fired. He's going before the Supreme Court
ask them to allow him to fire him. She filed
a lawsuit and that judge put a restraining order from
Trump doing anything, leaving her in the Federal Reserve. So

(01:44:10):
he wants to get the Supreme Court to allow him
to immediately fire her. I think it's going to be
difficult to argue that she should be gone when his
secretary of the Treasury has done exactly the same thing.
Bank of America lent Bessent twenty one million dollars to
fund deals for a home in Bedford Hills, New York

(01:44:32):
and a beach house in Provincetown, Massachusetts. The report comes
as Trump has moved to fire Lisa Cook over allegations
of mortgage fraud. She had documents in twenty twenty one
indicating that her home in ann Arbor, Michigan, and also
an Atlanta property where both her primary residences. So Cook's
firing has been blocked by two courts in the last month,

(01:44:55):
and on Monday, an appeals court in Washington, d c
upheld a temporary halt on Trump's firing of Cook over
the claims of mortgage fraud. I looked at this and
I thought, I think that is fraudulent, and I think
that they should be able to get rid of her.
But now that this is there with a bessant, if

(01:45:16):
he's going to tolerate that from Bessant again, I think
Asia fire Bessant as well. I'd be happy to see
that guy go. A US Muslim mayor, by the way,
wants a US citizen to go. He said, you are
not welcome here. Move away. And of course this is
in dearborn, Michigan, which has really been taken over by Muslims.
The mayor, Abdullah Hammoud scolded the resident, Ted Barham, a Christian.

(01:45:43):
He said, although you live here, you are not welcome here.
And this fight came because Barham had objected to renaming
an intersection in Dearborn after Osama Siblani, Arab American news
publisher who was promoted, who has promoted both Hesbealah and
Hamas and so how Hamoud, the mayor issued a dangerous

(01:46:09):
suggestion for Barham to not see the scigens. He said,
the best suggestion for I have for you is don't
drive on Warren Avenue or close your eyes while you're
doing it. His name is up there, and I spoke
at a ceremony celebrating it because he's done a lot
for his community. He then turned to a personal attack
on the resident, accusing Barham of being quote a bigot,

(01:46:34):
and you are a racist, and you are an islamophobe.
We hear these same things over and over again. Although
you live here, I want you to know, as mayor,
you are not welcome here. And the day you move
out of the city will be the day that I
launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out
of this city. Baram had explained that Siblani is a

(01:46:55):
promoter of Hesbelah and Hamas. He talks about how the
blood of Martin irrigate Slanda Palestine. He says, whether we're
in Michigan, whether we're in Yemen. Believe me, everyone should
fight with his means. They will fight with stones, others
will fight with guns, others will fight with planes, drums
and rockets. Bomb compared the signs to naming a road

(01:47:17):
Hesbula Street or Hamas Street, and he said honoring Siblani
was provocative. But the reality is is that the Muslims
have taken over Dearborn. A couple of weeks ago, I
showed the patch that was on the new patch that
was designed for the Dearborn police, which had their name

(01:47:37):
in Arabic on it. So that is they've got a
mayor there, They've got a police department that's putting their
Arabic on their patches.

Speaker 9 (01:47:48):
So we have the video of the mayor on the board.

Speaker 3 (01:47:51):
Okay, go ahead and play that.

Speaker 16 (01:47:52):
Yeah, I mean, you know, bombed the embassy in Bay
Route sometimes many Americans, So I just feel that it's
quite inappropriate, Amopolk.

Speaker 17 (01:48:04):
And although you live here, I want you to know,
as mayor, you are not welcome here. And the day
you move out of the city, well with the day
that I launched a parade celebrating the fact that you
moved out of the city, because you are not somebody
who believes in coexistence.

Speaker 3 (01:48:19):
Coexistence, there we go.

Speaker 4 (01:48:20):
Muslim's known for their belief and co existence.

Speaker 3 (01:48:24):
That's right. Well, Zelenski has no intention of coexisting with Moscow.
The Ukrainian leader wants to fight to the last, but
he wants other people to do it, said a member
of Ukrainian parliament. He said yesterday's closed meeting, Zelenski, like
the other individuals exempt from military service, made it clear

(01:48:45):
that he intends to fight to the last, but of
course with others doing the fighting. We have said this
from day one. We had military people. We played comments
from them in India, which is a neutral in this
particular war, and they said they're going to fight. NATO
is going to fight Russia to the last. Ukrainian that's

(01:49:05):
what this truly is about, the MPCE.

Speaker 9 (01:49:07):
But he dresses like he fights.

Speaker 3 (01:49:10):
That's right, He's got that green T shirt. The MP
said that Zelenski estimated the Ukraine would need another one
hundred and twenty billion dollars to fund the armed forces
if the conflict drags dto twenty twenty six, adding that
the leader was quote still unclear where to get half
that sum, and he now wants to focus on finding
those funds abroad, of course, he said. And that's and so,

(01:49:36):
as many people pointed out, if Trump wanted peace, he
could have it immediately. All he needs to do is
just stop funding this war. As a matter of fact,
you had one questioner in the UK confront Trump over
what's going on in Gaza, said, you alone, of all

(01:49:57):
the people on earth, are the one who could stop
this genocide going on in Gaza.

Speaker 13 (01:50:01):
We learn the whole world have the power to persuade
Prime Minister Netanyahoo to stop the demolition of Gaza City,
to stop the starvation of Palestine, and to stop the
killing of civilians. If not now, when will you exercise
tell them to stop? And then, for both of you,

(01:50:24):
all you.

Speaker 18 (01:50:25):
Do understand about October seventh, You do understand, believe me,
one of the worst days in the history of humanity.

Speaker 7 (01:50:34):
What happened.

Speaker 18 (01:50:35):
I have seen the tapes. Babies that are four months
old and just chopped up to pieces, and you've seen
the tapes, and I've seen the tapes. You're a professional,
and so am I. And people forget about October seventh.
I can't forget about it. So I wanted to end
but I want the hostages back. I don't want the
hostages used as human shields, which is what har Mass

(01:50:57):
is threatening to do.

Speaker 13 (01:50:58):
As soon as they're back, that's the moment you will
tell nothing else.

Speaker 18 (01:51:01):
Well, it would certainly help, but I have to have
the US as just big and I don't want them
back piecemeal. As I said before, I want him back.

Speaker 3 (01:51:09):
Yeah, well again, he points to October seventh, which is
a totally different issue. I said over and over again,
with a look at the principles of the just war.
A just war is when you are not attacked, but
somebody else attacks you. And that would apply even if
Net and Yahoo, like I believe FDR did with Japan
and Pearl Harbor, even if he put things in place,

(01:51:33):
stand down whatever to allow that to happen, to encourage
it to happen, and to remove defense to allow that
to happen. Even if that happens, you are entitled to
do something about it. And I also said that they
need to go after Hamas, and for the first time
you've now had Net Yahoo attack Hamas and their luxury

(01:51:55):
towers and Doha. And Trump was very upset about that.
He said that, to quote the Wall Street journal and
sources talked to them. Multiple sources told them that Trump
was screaming and saying that Natanya who is efing me?
Is what he said, and they also said that he
called Natyahu twice. The first one he called and ranted

(01:52:18):
about the fact that they would attack the leaders of
Hamas in Doha, and then he called back a second
time to find out what the effect was. Presumably, if
they had they thought that it was very effective, he
would have been okay, But they told him that it
wasn't very effective, so then he got even more angry.

(01:52:39):
But the fact that you are targeting the Hamas leadership
that's living in luxury in the UAE for the first
time is very telling, I think, because they've been attacking
the people living in the rubble and gaza, the civilians
and the children for the longest time, and that is
what is not justified. That has nothing to do with

(01:53:03):
October seventh. If you're going to sustain the attack and
just make it your goal to wipe out every last
person in the area, and if you're going to target
civilian population, then it's unjustified, regardless of how it began,
even if it began with a justified thing, So that
is a clear misdirection. It's the same type of thing

(01:53:24):
that he does. He never answers the question about his vaccine.
He wants to talk about how everybody was going to
die if he didn't do it because of the fake pandemic.
While we're on the topic of the UK Niger Pfarrage
now is doing kind of an interesting thing, politician's secret power.
He will say anything for ninety five dollars. Nigel Frage

(01:53:48):
is winning young fans partly for selling short, sometimes inappropriate
video greetings that he probably doesn't understand they're saying. He
is a pure legend for doing this. He does it
on cameo, and some people have done that. You've got
what was George Santos, the giant liar Ish? Yeah, yeah,

(01:54:09):
I didn't say I'm Jewish. I said I'm Jewish and
all the rest. Anyway, he set himself up on cameo
so that you could get him to leave messages for
people and put them maybe on your answer machine.

Speaker 4 (01:54:20):
I don't know a lot of people do nowadays. Just
any one of any vague notoriety or fame. They'll be like, hey,
send me your message and I'll record it.

Speaker 3 (01:54:28):
That's right, they said, there's something a little discomforting about
watching Rudy Giuliani perform I'm a Little Teapot for a
few hundred dollars, or George Santos filming rye videos on
demand to mark birthdays or to provide pep talks. But
British politician Nigel Farage hasn't just mastered the business of

(01:54:48):
selling short video greetings on the Cameo website. He has
turned it into one of the most one of the
main planks in his campaign to become the UK's next
Prime minister. Here an example of him engaging in some
slang language that I certainly don't understand language.

Speaker 19 (01:55:07):
Well, a very happy wedding day to the simply on
an incel no more and she isn't even an email. Brian,
Yes you are, sus, but you put the chunk back
into big jungus. So he sends his regards for a
pantastic day. Hopefully all those beans you're eating don't interrupt
the day. That would all be a bit cringe amazing.
Lyrics to elbeats remain as hating on you, but they

(01:55:29):
replay your playlist. Lads, Lads on tour because we score
on the floor. Stick to privileged productions a guaranteed win.
And don't forget little obster Leon. You're safe him and
all seen now that we control.

Speaker 3 (01:55:41):
Our fishing rights once again.

Speaker 19 (01:55:43):
Love from Big Nige, Nutty Bars and Fat Bee have
a great day.

Speaker 3 (01:55:50):
You put the chung and tongers. I don't even understand
what that means.

Speaker 4 (01:55:53):
Big Chungus was a meme. There's this one frame where
there's a fat Bugs bunny in one of the cartoon
UNEs and someone is grabbing is like, this is Big Chungus,
and so it's a bit of an old meme now,
but you know it occasionally rears its head every once
in a while.

Speaker 3 (01:56:09):
Yeah, well, anyway, they love that, and it is at
least it's not as cringe as watching Rudy Giuliani singh,
I'm a little teapot. So a woman as we're talking
about crazy news, a woman has just been defrauded. She
was convinced to send money to a stranded astronaut so

(01:56:30):
that he could buy oxygen. She's branded, who's gonna buy
the oxygen from in space?

Speaker 4 (01:56:39):
Those those oxygen pedalers up there, got them over a barrel.

Speaker 3 (01:56:44):
As they say on futurism. The sky is a limit
for how outrageously implausible some scams can get.

Speaker 9 (01:56:51):
I get some clips from spaceballs.

Speaker 3 (01:56:54):
Yeah, fairy a fairy air. An only woman in Japan
sent thousands of dollars to a tree who claimed to
be an astronaut trapped in space and dangerous suffocating. In
fairness to the lady, though she thought they were in love.
She's eighty years old, lives in Sapporo, the capitol of
Japan's northern island, and met the scammer on social media

(01:57:16):
in July, describing it as a romance scam that may
be as impossible like they stuck in space, and messaging
her for getting money anyway, She said she was doing
her part and to be fair, it isn't even the
first time that an online scammer has claimed to represent

(01:57:36):
an astronaut trapped in space, so just to I don't
think we need to warn our audience about that, but
you might want to warn your friends if you've got
some of them who are part of MAGA or the Left.

Speaker 4 (01:57:49):
I know at least part of ourtists to be like,
I'm not falling for this. Space isn't real, which based.

Speaker 3 (01:57:56):
Some are using AI powered real time deep fakes to
give themselves beautiful and realistic fake faces that hold up
even during live video calls. Well, it is kind of
interesting to see.

Speaker 4 (01:58:15):
This.

Speaker 3 (01:58:15):
And there was one scam not too long ago. It
was Brad Pitt, and somebody used AI to create these
Brad pit images and to interact with the person and
convince them that Brad Pitt was in the hospital I think,
and needed some money, and that there was going to

(01:58:35):
be potentially some romantic involvement there. And so it made
me think of it when I was thinking about the
death of Robert Redford, who always to me looked like
he was the dad of Brad Pitt.

Speaker 4 (01:58:51):
You know, they used to share extreme resemblance.

Speaker 3 (01:58:54):
They should have done a movie a few years ago,
which shouldn't they, But we were talking about that the
other day. And Robert Redford, even though he was a
radical leftist environmentalist and we wouldn't have any common ground there,
he was in so many movies when Kara and I
first started dating, that's kind of what we would do.
And it was we were talking about that with a

(01:59:18):
family the other day, and we started dating in the
spring of seventy four. It's one Robert Redford movie after
the other. It was the Sting the way we were
Jeremiah Johnson, which I always one of my favorites and everything,
and of course The Godfather was there as well, and
I thought, wow, all those things came out at the
same time. I went back and look at the release
dates and they came out, Like The Godfather came out

(01:59:40):
in seventy two. We saw it in spring of seventy four.
The other films that I mentioned came out in the
fall of seventy three, but they showed up in Tampa
and seventy four. And that was the way they would
release films back then. Usually that what they would do
is they release it in the big markets like New
York and LA where there's a lot of film critics,

(02:00:00):
and they would get their reviews because they were trying
to make good films that people wanted to see at
the time, like just shoving this stuff in your face
that they know that you don't want to see. So
they get their good reviews, and then they would premiere
sometimes six months or longer before it would show up
in some of the ancillary markets like Tampa. Wise, at

(02:00:21):
the time, today they take just the opposite approach.

Speaker 4 (02:00:24):
They just dump it everywhere every sucker weekend, the first weekend,
because otherwise it's done.

Speaker 3 (02:00:30):
Flow it against the wall before where the mouth hits
and the thing comes down. That's really where it all is.
So it was kind of a kind of a nostalgic thing.
And you guys have seen The Sting. Great movie it is.
It's just in every level it was. It was next
to the film.

Speaker 4 (02:00:49):
It's one of those movies where if a sitcom goes
on long enough, they will parody the Sting. It's that iconic.
If a TV show goes on long enough, they do
a Sting episode. That's how it is.

Speaker 9 (02:01:03):
One of my old time favorite movies.

Speaker 3 (02:01:05):
Yeah. Yeah, it's just done with so creative George roy Hill,
who also did Butch, Cassie and the Sun Dance Kid,
which I like that movie except for that stupid scene
with the bicycle and the rain Dropskip phone in your head.
That was something that they just did as an impromptu
thing and threw it into the movie. And it was
pretty obvious that they just did that impromptu and threw

(02:01:27):
it into the movie.

Speaker 4 (02:01:27):
What if we threw this in here, well ruin the pacing.

Speaker 3 (02:01:30):
But yeah, they were they were just kind of goofing
around in between working and playing around on the bicycle.
And so the director saw them doing that, took pictures
of and he thought it was so great. They just
want to stick this whole movie in there. And I
just thought that absolutely did not work. This is the.

Speaker 4 (02:01:48):
Why, you know, everyone, you need someone next to the
director going yeah, I don't think so. You don't want
to George Lucas yourself.

Speaker 3 (02:01:56):
That's right, Well, we're gonna take a quick break.

Speaker 7 (02:01:59):
We do.

Speaker 4 (02:01:59):
There is one that I really want to respond to.
So Mullen's two Cooper says, they only fired him talking
about Jimmy Kimble to try and make MAGA look bad.
He was already losing money people. They only got rid
of him to try and make MAGA look like hypocrites.

Speaker 3 (02:02:11):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:02:11):
They were sitting there thinking what can we do to
make MAGA look like hypocrites?

Speaker 2 (02:02:14):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:02:15):
We give in to their demands. If we do the
thing Mago wants, they'll look like hypocrites. Those dastardly people
at ABC and whoever owns Jimmy Kimmel. It was all
a plot on there. It was four D chess.

Speaker 3 (02:02:27):
Well, i'll tell you what. They certainly have made MAGA
look bad and even giving an opportunity for people like
Obama and Chucky Schumer to look good to stand there
with the First Amendment. It's just it's just the dumbest
thing I've ever seen, it says, the dumbest one of
these lawsuits.

Speaker 4 (02:02:44):
Curse ABC. How could they do this?

Speaker 9 (02:02:46):
Yeah, yeah, so according to the ratings, he was number
two overall and number one in the most important marketing sector,
which you know they're saying that that's not accurate. Maybe
that's true. But even if they were looking for an
excuse to fire them, Trump gave them the perfect excuse.
It's pressure from the government that is a violation of

(02:03:10):
the First Amendment. This same person, it's been kind of
trolling in chat saying freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom
from consequences, but it does mean freedom from consequences from
the government.

Speaker 3 (02:03:25):
That's right.

Speaker 9 (02:03:26):
There can't be government consequences for your speech.

Speaker 3 (02:03:30):
That's right. And so unfortunate that the founders couldn't imagine
that we would live in such a lawless society that
they would find ways to do things without even creating
a law. The pressure from the FCC is it's un American,
it's unconstitutional, and it's just another organization that should be

(02:03:52):
shut down. It's outlived any rational purpose that it could have,
and it has now been thoroughly corrupted. And that's pretty
much all the different organizations that are in Washington how
to get the same treatment. We're gonna take a quick
break and when we come back, we're gonna be talking
to Jarl Silente. So stay with us.

Speaker 4 (02:04:10):
A journal dot com promo code night.

Speaker 3 (02:04:13):
Yes, we'll be right back.

Speaker 2 (02:05:50):
You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 3 (02:05:54):
Now, as Gerald Celente, who has trans Journal. As people
who watch this show know you, you can use the
code night to save on the subscription there. I think
you get ten percent off. And it is a wonderful publication,
weekly publication. It's got about three hundred pages. It's an
online magazine. I love Trend's Journal, and we really do

(02:06:16):
appreciate Jerald coming on and talking with us. And this
is a kind of a risky time to be giving
your opinion about anything, isn't it, Gerald?

Speaker 8 (02:06:26):
Now the Fourth Amendment of freedom of speech, Yeah, yeah,
well you have no right oh hate speech? How about
if I hate some slimy politician that loves to kill
people all over the world.

Speaker 7 (02:06:40):
How about hating that? Oh?

Speaker 8 (02:06:42):
Actually speech, how dare you hate the murderous presidents we had?
Which one you're talking about? Obama? The Nobel Piece of
Crap Prize winner? Yeah, hey, folks, who's always focused us?

Speaker 7 (02:06:54):
Folks? Folks? You let me.

Speaker 8 (02:06:57):
I'm gonna add peace as soon as he gets in there.
Oh the Afghan troops surge. Oh you forgot about that.
Everybody we love Obama. I want that guy Kadaffi out
of there. I want that guy a sot at it there.
Why are you hateful, hateful little wop from the Bronx?
How dare you say that about Obama?

Speaker 7 (02:07:17):
All right?

Speaker 8 (02:07:18):
Yeah, I hate it and I hate the murderers. That's
why launched Occupy piece dot com well over a decade ago.
And as you know, you've been up here your family
and spoke at one of our rallies, and we're having
one this next Saturday.

Speaker 7 (02:07:35):
The twenty seventh, twenty seventh.

Speaker 3 (02:07:37):
Good we have.

Speaker 8 (02:07:39):
Scott Ritter, Judge Napolitano, Joel Larea live broadcast with Roger
Waters is going to do a live stream. Garland Nixon,
Deniskasinitch and others. Ray mcgovernn We're doing everything we can
in the name of Piece.

Speaker 7 (02:07:57):
So that's he.

Speaker 8 (02:07:59):
If you're for Piece, you're to hate and you want
to proof. Not one little slimeball on the media. They
don't like anybody whose little slime ball prostitutes mediahores that
get paid to put out by the corporate pimps.

Speaker 7 (02:08:11):
Have nobody on speaking about peace, nobody, that's right. How
about Bill Clinton?

Speaker 8 (02:08:15):
I remember this is one of the two shirts I did,
by the way, when Clinton ran for president in nineteen
ninety two.

Speaker 7 (02:08:22):
Beware is slick Willie every time he.

Speaker 8 (02:08:25):
Got caught with his pants down, bombs away over bag dad. Oh,
that's slime ball that I hate for his murder. Oh
remember Maddelin all Bright, maddle not all that bright. You
remember the one?

Speaker 7 (02:08:37):
Google it up.

Speaker 8 (02:08:38):
Everybody speaking to Leslie stall On sixty minutes and Leslie
stall asks Maddelin all Bright, is the death of over
five hundred thousand I rocky children under the age of
five worth the price what Bill Clinton has done? And
she said, yes, it's worth the price.

Speaker 2 (02:08:58):
Yeah, didn't even have the decency.

Speaker 7 (02:09:00):
Yeah, don't you hate that?

Speaker 2 (02:09:02):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (02:09:03):
Now you better say that's she's one hundred percent correct.

Speaker 3 (02:09:07):
Yeah, And that that was the fact, you know, when
when you look at that, a normal person would if
they had done that. They was we didn't kill half
a million kids. But she doesn't care about that. Yeah,
she says, yeah, it was worth it. She didn't even
deny that they killed them. Yeah, that's right, really amazing. Well,
and then.

Speaker 8 (02:09:26):
One after another, yeah, oh oh, how about how about
little Georgie Bush, a little spoiled daddy's boy with a paracohon,
he's swaller than a morthball. Oh, daddy was George Bush White,
uncle was priscal Oh that oh that, oh that crime syndicate.
Oh yeah, we got to get that guy who saw

(02:09:47):
al ditter alive.

Speaker 7 (02:09:49):
Yeah.

Speaker 8 (02:09:50):
The afgad wore the longest war in American history. Oh
you forgot about that when everybody yeah, oh and you.

Speaker 7 (02:09:55):
Don't hate that, you don't hate that? Oh ninety percent
of people so sported it. I forgot.

Speaker 8 (02:10:01):
Yeah, so you're again again. I got blacklisted from all
the media. I used to got everybody OPRA, the Today's,
your Good Morning, amor everybody all the time when I
came out against the Afghan war, BIP blacklisted.

Speaker 7 (02:10:15):
I can't have them on.

Speaker 3 (02:10:16):
It's a badge. Of honor. It's a badge of honor
to do that. Obama gave us seven wars, and of
course Trump kept them all. And even though the Trump
supporters criticized rightfully Biden and the disaster when they pulled
out of Afghanistan. Trump could have done that at any
point in time, and he could have done it in

(02:10:37):
an orderly way. But instead they waited until basically they
were thrown out, and that created the chaos, the confusion.
But Trump is out there ready to get us involved.
He continues to escalate this Venezuelan thing. I guess he's
given up on going to Warwick, Canada for the time being.

Speaker 7 (02:10:52):
Right, you mean you mean you're talking about the Trump.

Speaker 8 (02:10:58):
By the way, when Trump ran for office in twenty
and sixteen, I took out the trademark. We own the
trademark presidential reality show.

Speaker 2 (02:11:09):
That's all it is. He right, and you will left me?

Speaker 7 (02:11:14):
Oh you played more in twenty four hours?

Speaker 1 (02:11:17):
Right?

Speaker 7 (02:11:17):
All right? All right?

Speaker 8 (02:11:19):
Hey, no, no, no, man, Before I get at the office,
that was gonna end the riot.

Speaker 7 (02:11:26):
Hey, how got these quotes? You ready?

Speaker 8 (02:11:30):
We want to have peace on earth all over? He
said that on September twenty fifth, twenty twenty four. We
are going to have peace through strength. We will not
have to fight. October twelfth, twenty twenty four. There are
two ways that iron could be handled militarily or you

(02:11:51):
make a deal. I would prefer to make a deal.
Your lionss so be your bomb them. You bombed them
while you were lying that you were gonna make a deal. Right,
only the facts? Yeah, how about this one? They keep
going on. I want immediate peace with Ukraine war. January

(02:12:11):
twentieth is inauguration. We will measure our success by not
only the battles we win, but also by the wars
we end. But most importantly, you ready, the wars we
never get into. My proudest legacy will be that of
a peacemaker and a unifier. That's why I want to

(02:12:34):
be a peacemaker and a unifier. Oh wait a minute,
you said that in January? And how many people is
you're kill inventers a whaler?

Speaker 1 (02:12:42):
Now?

Speaker 3 (02:12:43):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (02:12:43):
Fourteen illegally bombing people in a boat. You don't bring
them to court. You don't have any proof.

Speaker 3 (02:12:49):
What do you mean?

Speaker 7 (02:12:49):
We don't have improove, We a proof. We could kill
anybody we want. Yeah, where is the outrage.

Speaker 3 (02:12:55):
I know, I know. It's the same kind of stuff
that we saw from de Tarte in the Philippines. It
was just authoritarian thug. He told the police, if you
think somebody's in the drug trade, just shoot them on
the street. And they killed twelve thousand people that way.
And of course, as Trump is bombing these ships, the
Coastguard is still interdicting ships. And you know, the standard

(02:13:19):
procedure that they've used in their illegal, unconstitutional war on
drugs is to stop the ships, to search them. If
they find the drugs, they destroy them, and they take
the people to jail. None of that was done. And
I've talked about this, I talked about this jail. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
I told I told the audience. I said, so, what

(02:13:40):
if the Coastguard should just stop these ships, and how
would you feel about it? If they stop the ships,
they search them, they find drugs, they line the guys
up on the side of the ship and just shoot them.
Would that be good? You know, because this is not
even to that level. As you point out, they don't
just take them to jail. They take them to court
and then convict them with the evidence. But this is

(02:14:02):
extra judicial killing. This is just like a dictator in
the Philippines.

Speaker 8 (02:14:07):
Yep, But do look at all the murders that the
presidents of the United States have committed against innocent people
all over the world.

Speaker 7 (02:14:17):
How many Iraqis did we kill? How many Afghans did
we kill?

Speaker 3 (02:14:21):
Yeah?

Speaker 7 (02:14:22):
Oh, and by the way, remember.

Speaker 8 (02:14:24):
They were gonna it was gonna bring down the defense budget,
and now it's over tillion dollars.

Speaker 7 (02:14:29):
Yeah, yeah, here's another one. You ready.

Speaker 8 (02:14:32):
Our objective is to immediately have a total secession of hostilities.
All shooting has to stop. We need peace without delay.
That's what he said on February fifteenth of this year.
One lie after another. Oh and how about the clowns circus,
that guy Kellogg, Oh Kellogg frosted flakes, that little arrogant jerk.

Speaker 7 (02:14:54):
Hey, we're gonna have that U credit on one hundred days.
They have to come to the where's the outrage?

Speaker 3 (02:15:03):
Yeah yeah, well, I guess if you have outrage, they
will shut you down. Now because JD. Vance, who began
the administration talking about played the clips for him things
that he said at the very beginning of the administration
when we went to Europe and lectured them about censorship.
And now they're doing exactly the same thing in the
wake of the Charlie Kirk things.

Speaker 7 (02:15:23):
So it is go back beyond Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 8 (02:15:28):
How about how about all the kids that were punished
and all the universities in college, right because they came
out against Israeli genocide.

Speaker 3 (02:15:37):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 7 (02:15:38):
So now they're making a Kirk thing a big thing.

Speaker 3 (02:15:41):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 7 (02:15:42):
But how about that? How about how about that? Oh no,
don't talk about that Israel again? Trump here? You ready
for this one about.

Speaker 8 (02:15:54):
I want to see the Middle East get back to
peace and real peace, but a piece that is going
to be a lasting piece.

Speaker 7 (02:16:00):
He said that on March tenth this year, as.

Speaker 8 (02:16:03):
The United States is giving Israel all the money and
weapons to keep this genocide going. Yea knowing people in
front of everybody's eyes bombing their place into total ruins,
and Trump supports it a thousand percent. Oh by did
you by the way, as you hear the bs they
put out where he said that net Yah who is

(02:16:27):
fing him?

Speaker 3 (02:16:27):
Yeah, we talked about that earlier.

Speaker 7 (02:16:29):
Yeah, so I didn't know. Maybe maybe he's a different
kind of guy there. Maybe how did he f him?

Speaker 3 (02:16:38):
Yeah? I don't know. Yeah, this is a Yeah. Meanwhile,
Jared Kushner is now a newly meanted billionaire based on
blood money, said one tweet. After leaving the White House.
He raised four point six billion from Gulf Royals to
launch Affinity Partners. In twenty twenty four. He poured two
hundred and fifty million into Israel's insurance at the height

(02:17:02):
of the war when others pulled out, and that bet
has now returned more than ninefold. So I guess you know, really,
when the trap says he wants peace, he spells it
with an eye, doesn't he.

Speaker 8 (02:17:15):
Yeah, No, it's disgusting. Look at the whole crypto worlds.
The Trump that hated cryptos before. Hey, but now my
family's into it. The Wick Cough Thelus, the other guy, Luckwick,
the other one in there, the Commerce secretary, their kids
are in it.

Speaker 7 (02:17:31):
Hey, shut the hell up silenty oh.

Speaker 8 (02:17:33):
And this is why the Arabs aren't doing anything to
stop the murder going on, because back in nineteen seventy
three they had the they put the oil embargo on
because of what Israel was doing. And you remember those days, yeah,
oh yeah, when oil price is quadrupled and that stopped it.

(02:17:56):
Not anymore, because you just mentioned you're all in the
deal together, the pushners, Yeah, make all the deals, and
one after Witkoff is over in the UA making deals.

Speaker 3 (02:18:10):
And that's what Trump apparently was upset about. You know,
you got the Hamas people, We're attacked by net and Yahoo,
and it's like, come on, we're all part of this
club here. You know, we gotta not kill each other
in this club. So that was what he was upset about,
the fact that they launched it, and then he was
upset about the fact that they didn't do more damage.

(02:18:30):
So yeah, it's it truly is amazing. When you look
at what these guys are doing. What do you think
is going to happen to gold? We just had the
FED cut interest rates. Here it looks like does it
look like the fundamentals are still in place for gold?

Speaker 7 (02:18:44):
Oh yeah, yeah, we went on the air. I think
gold was what three thousand, six hundred and sixty something
dollars an ounce it's gone of this year.

Speaker 8 (02:18:53):
Yeah, and you go back to the Trench Journal and again,
you know, we only put the facts in there. We
said twenty twenty four would be a golden year for gold.
It went up twenty seven percent last year, and we
say we'll keep righting. No goal is going to keep
going on and on and on, higher and higher and higher.
This isn't rocket science. It's very simple.

Speaker 7 (02:19:13):
The lower interest rates fall, the deeper the dollar falls.

Speaker 3 (02:19:17):
Yeah, the dollar's happening. Yeah, it's not. The gold is
going up. Is that the dollar is going down significantly, so.

Speaker 8 (02:19:23):
It becomes cheaper in other countries to buy gold because
their currencies go up.

Speaker 7 (02:19:28):
Number two, the world gold prices have gone up. Yeah.
This is one of my books. Trend tracking far better
than mega trends.

Speaker 8 (02:19:37):
Time magazine came out in nineteen eighty nine for eighty
six or forget when anyway, I read about how I
started buying gold in nineteen seventy eight when the Iranian
conflict broke out, and they taught us to hate Iran
without anybody ninety percent of the people ninety nine not
knowing how the United States overthrow the democratically, like the

(02:19:58):
governor mosadag in fifty three because he said the oil
belonged to the Iranian people and they had no right
to do that, and about to savok the secret police
that made SS look good. So when the revolution began,
I knew it was real, and I said golden oil
prices would go up, and that's when I started buying gold,
and that's when I became a trend forecaster and a
political atheist.

Speaker 7 (02:20:19):
Ray Dalyo just.

Speaker 8 (02:20:20):
Came out today, well yesterday and said, how gold prices
are going to go up.

Speaker 7 (02:20:24):
This is the guy that founded Bridgewater. He's a multi
multi billionaire.

Speaker 8 (02:20:28):
Old prices are going to go up because the world
is going down again. They're going to keep lowering interest
rates to keep propping up the equity markets.

Speaker 7 (02:20:36):
You got to look at the facts. This is a
there's a there was an article here and wanted a yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:20:44):
Ray Dalio also had a very interesting quote this last
week saying that the massive debt was going to basically
cause our economy to have a heart attack. This building up,
its squogging up everything.

Speaker 8 (02:20:58):
That's a good way to put it, exactly what he's
saying about goal too part of the debt.

Speaker 7 (02:21:03):
You're ready.

Speaker 8 (02:21:04):
The top ten percent of earner households making about two
hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year or more account
for more of the nation's total spending than ever, reaching
nearly fifty percent in the second quarter. Ten percent of

(02:21:27):
America's population accounts for fifty percent of all the spending
in the country, So the rest of the people were
just plantation workers of slave land. Here all the money's
going to the rich. And then you got to go
back to all what they're doing with the Trumps tax deal.
In twenty seventeen, he said that he was going to win.

(02:21:51):
They lowered the taxes and the big corporations and the
very rich. Oh, they're going to use it for capital improvements.

Speaker 2 (02:21:56):
No it didn't.

Speaker 7 (02:21:57):
That was the next year, twenty eighteen.

Speaker 8 (02:21:59):
It was a big year ever a stock buybacks, and
according to the Tax Policy Center, the one percent got
sixty four percent of the benefits. We're getting nothing. The
richer getting richer. And again you've got to go globally
on this. Look at the riots now going on again
in Indonesia, in France, the people taking to the streets

(02:22:21):
again because lack of basic living standards, government, corruption, crime
and violence. This was happening in twenty nineteen. One of
our top trends of twenty twenty was going to be
new World disorder. There were protests going on, the yellow
Yellow vests in France, in South Africa, in Algeria, in Bolivia,

(02:22:46):
in India, in Chile, all over the world. People were
taking to the streets. Then they launched the COVID war.
Can't go out and protest, get back in your house.
Those days are over. The rich get richer. This is
off with their heads two point oh time.

Speaker 3 (02:23:03):
Yes, absolutely, yeah. In terms of the middle class, you
know this article came out this last week talking about
how in many cities, even with zero percent interest rates,
even if they fell, people who are making what the
median income is in that city could not qualify to
get a loan at zero percent for what the median

(02:23:26):
price of a home was in that city. And so
it's exactly what you're going about the concentration of wealth.
It's a generational thing. And it's also the policies that
they have. They're now the Trump administration, vescent has said
that they're going to have they're going to do something
about the home ownership crisis coming up. And so I

(02:23:47):
would imagine that they're going to do some kind of
a declared emergency so that Trump can just dictate policy.
What do you think they might do with that.

Speaker 7 (02:23:56):
They've got to try to lower interest rates and mortgage rates.
And again, look the data going down.

Speaker 3 (02:24:01):
So when they lower the rates, then the investors who
are buying the bonds say that, are you know, putting
out a longer term loan like a home mortgage. They say, well,
but lower rate is going to be inflationary. So we've
seen several times so they have cut the FED rate
and it's wound up increasing the home mortgage rate. Has
that happened this time or did the home rates actually

(02:24:23):
go down?

Speaker 8 (02:24:23):
It went down a little bit and then it went
up again. But you know they're going up and down.
They're going to do everything they can to bring them down.
They'll make up anything they want.

Speaker 7 (02:24:31):
Again. In twenty twelve, I thought the markets would crash again.
I was wrong.

Speaker 8 (02:24:37):
They didn't teach me about zero interest rate policies or
thinkful quantitative easing and economics one on one in graduate school. Yeah,
they'll make up anything. Look what happened when COVID happened.
I thought everything would crash. No, No, we're going to
bring interest rates down to zero and pumping trillions of
dollars of fake money back by nothing and printed on nothing.

Speaker 7 (02:24:58):
So they'll make up anything, going to.

Speaker 8 (02:25:00):
Do everything they can to bring down mortgage rates and
prop up the markets. And by the way, the South
has taking a hit right now.

Speaker 7 (02:25:07):
I know people that have.

Speaker 8 (02:25:08):
How place is in Florida. I know a woman that's
been trying to sell it. Now the price keeps going
down and down and down. They overbuilt when the COVID
War happened, and people overinvested in the South. In California,
prices are going down and you're looking at home new

(02:25:29):
home building going way down.

Speaker 7 (02:25:31):
We are this is very important.

Speaker 8 (02:25:35):
We're talking about the economics, and what people don't understand
is you know that in trend forecasting you make connections
between different fields.

Speaker 7 (02:25:47):
So now we'll talk about China again.

Speaker 8 (02:25:50):
Before Slick Willy brought him into.

Speaker 7 (02:25:54):
The World Trade Organization.

Speaker 8 (02:25:56):
You look at China's GDP from nineteen seventy to two
thousand and one. It's like that whom they get in
its skyrockets. China's leading the world now in ev manufacturing,
leading the world.

Speaker 7 (02:26:08):
How come?

Speaker 8 (02:26:09):
Oh, because all the Western government companies that went over
there gave China all their heavy industry and high tech knowlogy,
manufacturing and development that they never had before. These are
very smart people. They were ruling the world for a
long time. You know, they're not dumbbells. And there are
four one point four billion versus bout three hundred and

(02:26:31):
forty seven million in America. As I mentioned to you
and Travis before when Bill Clinton before he brought him
into the World Trade Organization Temper Center, Chinese eighteen year
olds went to college now nearly seventy percent, and young
people are totally AI and high tech addicted.

Speaker 7 (02:26:49):
So here are more of the facts. Are you ready?

Speaker 8 (02:26:53):
It's about China what they're doing in developing the Yeare
Beijing slaps ban on Nvidia chips in bid to bolster
homegrown AI industry?

Speaker 7 (02:27:09):
You got it.

Speaker 8 (02:27:10):
They're going to lead it with they over invested. Going
back to the equity markets and where things are going,
we've overinvested in the new companies in the AI world.
Trends are born, they grow, they mature, riach, old agent die.
The real AI trend was just born three years ago.
It's an infant. China's going to lead the world in AI.

(02:27:32):
There's going to be a dot com bust. Oh and
what did Nvidia just do? They investing five billion dollars
in Intel?

Speaker 3 (02:27:40):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (02:27:40):
Oh, Intel that the United States has taken a ten
percent ownership in Yeah, and uh, you.

Speaker 3 (02:27:46):
Think there's some arm twisting going on the background for that, As.

Speaker 7 (02:27:50):
The Italians used to have.

Speaker 8 (02:27:51):
This guy called Mussolini the merger's state and corporate power's fascism.
That's his definition, and that's what we have in front
of our eyes. Yeah, corporations run everything. One slime ball
president after another. Did away with the antitrust laws that
allowed the bigs to take over everything. Again, when I

(02:28:14):
was a young guy, there were grocery stores, hardware stores,
stationary stores, shoe stores, drug stores, grocery stores.

Speaker 3 (02:28:20):
Now the world chains and Trump is really accelerated this trend,
you know, both with the lockdown of twenty twenty and
now with the tariffs and the vacillation on the tariffs.
He has lockdown and destroyed small businesses left and right.
They're screaming bloody murder. We haven't even really seen the
full effects of these tariffs. Shed and again it's still.

Speaker 8 (02:28:42):
One after another though, I mean, he's just doing a
different trip. Yeah, but what Clinton did was the worst
of the worst. How about NAFTA, Yeah, get your jobs
out of America. Use that cheap labor down there in Mexico,
are right, Yeah, get them out of here, right?

Speaker 7 (02:28:58):
Hey, and I'll make a lot of money.

Speaker 8 (02:29:00):
They paid me three hundred thousand dollars an hour to
talk at Goldman Sachs. Right, Oh, I'm only worth one
hundred and thirty million dollars. I was a little jerk
from Arkansas, but now I'm worth one hundred and thirty
million dollars.

Speaker 3 (02:29:14):
That's right. And both Clinton and George H. W. Bush
in that nineteen ninety two election, both of them wanted NAFTA.
It was just Ross Brow who was pushing back against that,
talking about how it's going to be a great sucking sound.
We've been hearing that sucking sound since then. But of
course Trump is going to fix everything right except as
us MCA just shuffle things around a little bit. But

(02:29:36):
it's essentially the same agreement as the as an after agreement,
wasn't it. Yep?

Speaker 8 (02:29:41):
Yeah, yep, I saw not shiny before. Here's the article
China dominates ev market even in.

Speaker 7 (02:29:47):
Face of levings. Yeah, shiney is going to be the
world leader.

Speaker 3 (02:29:52):
Well, it's not just the technology, and it's not just
the slave labor that they've got, but even the energy.
They've been given any vantage on energy with the Paris
climate cord In twenty fifteen. They have by far and
away the cheapest source of energy that anybody has, and
that's going to be really key with AI. It's going

(02:30:13):
to be key with any automated factories. Having that edge
and energy. They're they're putting out all the industrial businesses
in the UK and in Germany, they're shutting them down
because they can't afford to operate and manufacture things with
the price of energy that they've that the governments have
artificially inflated.

Speaker 7 (02:30:31):
But again price of energy.

Speaker 8 (02:30:35):
Hey, we're going to put sanctions on Russia and Putin's
going to pay the price, and that was genocide. Joe
Biden had said that one didn't he m h. And
we said, no, Putin's not going to pay the price.
Russia has all of the high tech, heavy industry, technology

(02:30:55):
and country. What it is the people to be self
sufficient mm hm. And that's exactly. But you're talking about
high energy prices. How about they cut it while they
blowup the North Stream pipeline. They drove up the prices
in Europe by the sanctions. And then the other thing
about it is Europe is so damn bureaucratic. They and

(02:31:19):
again they caused the problems themselves by getting cheap labored
to go over to get the products manufactured in China.
You go back to early two thousands again, you go back,
you know again, we're talking twenty five years ago. You
go back to two thy to twenty fifteen for christ

(02:31:41):
of Volkswagen, Porsche making tons of money in China, all
the manufacturers because China didn't have it, and now they
had the technology, high tech and heavy industry. We don't
need you anymore. Those sales have gone down to the toilet.
But you know what Porsche is doing now, getting into

(02:32:02):
the military industrial complex.

Speaker 3 (02:32:04):
Oh yeah, that's right. Yeah. Yeah. When you can't compete
in the marketplace, you can always do whatever the government
wants you do. And they've got because now the German
government is buying into this massive debt program to build
up the military. That's there.

Speaker 8 (02:32:18):
Trillion dollars, yeah, a trillion dollars in Germany, the third
largest country, the third third largest economy in the world
and the largest in Europe, has been in a recession
for two years going into the third and you're going
into debt a trillion dollars.

Speaker 7 (02:32:37):
Yeah, Oh god, you got to stop those Russians.

Speaker 8 (02:32:41):
Oh you mean the Russians that you killed twenty five
million in Operation Barbara Ross in World War Two. Hey, everybody,
don't you love those German military? You like World War Two?

Speaker 9 (02:32:52):
No?

Speaker 7 (02:32:53):
I like World War One better.

Speaker 8 (02:32:55):
We need more money for ould military, all right, Yeah,
a little arrogant black rock guy.

Speaker 3 (02:33:05):
Yeah. Yeah, they're pushing their economies down into the toilet
so that they can then bring us to war. You
always point out when everything else fails, they take us
to war. You know, let's go back to Venezuela, because
Trump is telling everybody, you know, I'm not going to
help with this Ukrainian thing, and your plans have World
War III if you continue to buy Russian will you're

(02:33:27):
not serious about this. I look at that. At the
same time, he's making moves to go into Venezuela, I'm thinking,
is he drumming up business for himself there with that?
And if he goes into Venezuela, the Russians are running
a lot of the defense, the air defense stuff that's
in Venezuela, as well as other connections they have there.
The Chinese have got a lot of connections in Venezuela.

(02:33:48):
Do you think that an attack in Venezuela by Trump
is going to run smack dab into Russians and Chinese
and Venezuela.

Speaker 8 (02:33:56):
I don't know, but let's go back. Let's go back
to when Trump was president and you try to overthrow
the Maduro government back then. Yeah, oh yeah, with that
little clown Guido. Yeah, what did they try to do?

Speaker 7 (02:34:11):
They tried.

Speaker 8 (02:34:12):
We wrote about it again the Trench Journal, by the way,
if you put night in it, of course, is a
grand total of about two dollars and fifty cents a week,
a couple of pennies a day. Again, we write only
the facts. And they tried to overthrow the Venezuelan.

Speaker 7 (02:34:31):
Government back then.

Speaker 8 (02:34:32):
They launched a move, they launched an attack out of
Columbia to Venezuela.

Speaker 7 (02:34:36):
It totally failed.

Speaker 8 (02:34:38):
You're not going to beat them again, as I say,
you think we would have invaded a rock Libya or
Syria if their major exports were broccoli it's all about oil.

Speaker 3 (02:34:51):
Or even if their major export was cocaine, like Columbia. Instead,
you'll use them as a basis support to go after Venezuela,
which is not in the end cocaine.

Speaker 8 (02:35:01):
It's I'm saying, you know, you get in that book
was a racket by Smedley Butler. Yeah, the most decorated
marine in history at the time, right, And he writes
about how you know, he went into all these continents
because of the corporations to steal what the people had.

Speaker 7 (02:35:17):
Yeah, that's right, what I mean, what the country had.
And that's all this is about.

Speaker 3 (02:35:23):
Again, at that time, as he said, it was a
United Fruit Company, you know, they were doing it. Now
they've got different products that they want to make and
different things that they want to steal. But it's the
same game. It absolutely is. It's a racket. Yeah.

Speaker 8 (02:35:37):
Oh here's the other thing. By the way, this really
gets me. I got this picture here right here, this
is this is the New York Times.

Speaker 7 (02:35:45):
Could you see this?

Speaker 3 (02:35:46):
Oh? Yeah, King for a day, wasn't he?

Speaker 8 (02:35:49):
Look at these little clown boys dressed up in these
stupid costumes. What kind of a low life jerk could
you be to put these stupid costumes on?

Speaker 3 (02:36:01):
What is it.

Speaker 7 (02:36:02):
Halloween for you every day? Have you take this stupid crap?

Speaker 3 (02:36:07):
Have you seen these guys up close? I mean they
got they've got souls on their on their shoes that
are like four inches high to make them taller and
then they put the tall hats on and make them imposing.
It's really funny.

Speaker 7 (02:36:19):
Actually, it's a clown show. And I'm plied of this crap.
The royal family, the King, the Queen, a bunch of murderers.

Speaker 8 (02:36:30):
If they were Italian, you'd call them a mafia.

Speaker 3 (02:36:33):
Yeah.

Speaker 8 (02:36:34):
The sun never sets on the British Empire. We slaughter
people all over the world. But Seleti, you have to
say it properly. You have that bronx attitude where people
don't like that. You have to speak probably, what's this
king crap? What is How stupid can you be to

(02:36:55):
let this crime syndicate stay in control?

Speaker 3 (02:37:00):
Yeah?

Speaker 7 (02:37:01):
Oh, by the way, you ready for this?

Speaker 8 (02:37:05):
Yesterday I took out the domain name we the People's
Party dot world. A week ago I took out the
domain name we the People's Party dot us. These should

(02:37:27):
have been gone when the Internet revolution began in the
early nineties, when everybody was buying up domain names.

Speaker 7 (02:37:34):
That shows you how we the people don't count.

Speaker 8 (02:37:37):
I've had it, We the people, Oh the beginning of
the constitution, we the people. Oh that we the people
in the preamble. Who the hell is some short politician
to tell me what to do. How about we the
people tell you what to do. Go to hell, celenty,

(02:37:59):
you're in a different world, get back in the time
of today. You're nothing more than a little giddy from
the Bronx, So shut the hell up. I'm the mayor
of Kingston. I'm a little noble nobody. I'm a little
jerk off over there who used to be the zoo keeper.
But don't you know my daddy is I'm a little
Georgie pusher warm.

Speaker 7 (02:38:20):
Don't you know my dadd is? I meany qualmo? Don't
you know my daddy is? Where they're helling up people
to say enough for your crap? Where are a few I.

Speaker 8 (02:38:29):
Don't want to hear his crap from a politician to
get the rest of my life.

Speaker 3 (02:38:34):
Well, they showed up by the millions in the UK
over the weekend. What do you think about that? What's
that the Unite the Kingdom rally that Tommy Robinson was running.
They showed up by the millions. What do you think
about that? I mean the press tried to downplate as
they always do, only about one hundred and ten thousand people,
but it was a big pushback because of this two

(02:38:55):
tier justice system that they've set up, and because they're
deliberately trying to stroy manufacturing and the society that's there.
All these people showed up to protests. What do you
think is gonna come of that party?

Speaker 8 (02:39:08):
In Germany they're winning too. Populism is going to be
a big trend. That's why I'm telling you. If I
had the money behind me from a billionaire for we
the People's Party, it would happen tomorrow.

Speaker 7 (02:39:20):
It would happen tomorrow.

Speaker 3 (02:39:22):
And of course in both cases, what their their response
is to call the groups, the populist groups a FD
or the United Kingdom people call them terrorists. And again
I think that's they're setting up the structure to do
that in the United States as well.

Speaker 2 (02:39:39):
If we do it.

Speaker 8 (02:39:40):
Ever, in the United States, got this crime, sin and
get that morons and imbeciles call a government. Hey, let's
go back to Obama, the nobel piece of crap prize winner.

Speaker 7 (02:39:51):
All right?

Speaker 8 (02:39:52):
How about this one when when the banks the bandits
that caused the panic of eight the Donain name that
I took out in two thousand SI subprime mortgages, remember
that one. Hey, you don't have a job, deep, don't
worry about signo via derivatives. That one the Federal Reserve,
when I call a crime syndicate twenty nine trillion dollars

(02:40:14):
to bail out the banks. Twenty nine trillion dollars to
bail out the banks. Now it's not my language. That's
from the Levi Institute of Board College.

Speaker 3 (02:40:24):
So instmentals only the big banks, I mean the small
medium sized banks were going out a by the hundreds
every year, going out of business. Yeah.

Speaker 8 (02:40:31):
Oh, and that, by the way, you could thank the
other peanut farmer, Jimmy Kada. Oh, the guy that gave
us Mujia Hardina became Aljazeera about I mean al Qaeda.
Oh that that Jimmy Carter, or to Jimmy Carter with Brazinski.
Oh that that that slime ball me he rotten Hill.
Oh yeah, that we got to stop those Russians in
Afghanistan because they were trying to overthrow the Taliban that

(02:40:54):
was destroying Afghanistan.

Speaker 7 (02:40:55):
You know that one.

Speaker 8 (02:40:57):
That was a Jimmy Carter that first back in the
day there was only intrast state banks. Bank of America,
it was only in California. Jimmy Khana got started to
allow banks to go interstate and slime ball slick Willy

(02:41:18):
Clinton made it official. Remember when we were young guys,
there were banks, all local banks in every little town,
every little city.

Speaker 9 (02:41:27):
No more.

Speaker 7 (02:41:28):
The bigs owned everything. They owned everything.

Speaker 8 (02:41:31):
So Jimmy Khana was the guy that started at and
again that's the slime ball that gave us al Qaeda.
He's the one that supported what's his name, Osama bin Laden.

Speaker 7 (02:41:45):
There was Moujia hardin back then.

Speaker 8 (02:41:48):
People have no idea about this, And this is a
slime ball that also ramped up the Tarad the Iran war.
We had no business getting in. They said to us,
get out of here. We had enough of you Americans
in here.

Speaker 7 (02:42:00):
We want you out.

Speaker 8 (02:42:01):
No, you're going to tell us to leave the embassy.
Who the hell are you to tell us to leave
your country?

Speaker 3 (02:42:08):
Yeah, yeah, we got the shaw, Yeah yeah yeah. I
remember when that happened. I remember when Bank of American
Nations Bank Nations Bank was in North Carolina, and that
was the bank that we were using at the time.
I remember when they merged with Bank of America out
of California, and it was a guy named Erskine Boil's Bulls,

(02:42:29):
who was in North Carolina. He was a big wig
in the Carter White House, and he got that approved,
and everybody said, you're going to wind up having all
these bank mergers, and we're going to wind up with
just about a half dozen gigantic banks, which is what
happened when they all became too big to fail about
ten years later.

Speaker 4 (02:42:45):
I remember you used to call them irk some boils.

Speaker 3 (02:42:47):
Yeah, that's why I almost went back to that. That's
why I refer to that guy as a irk some
boil for the longest time because of that. But yeah,
they just laid this. It's an ongoing progressive pattern. They
lay this, and they each build on the foundation of
consolidation that the other one started, don't they.

Speaker 8 (02:43:07):
You look at the cover of this week's Trench Journal
magazine and it said I forgot exactly what it was.

Speaker 7 (02:43:15):
This week's the last weeks.

Speaker 8 (02:43:18):
We the people, We the people are supreme. No, we
the politicians are in control, you know, to enrich ourselves
and to enrich the rich.

Speaker 7 (02:43:31):
We're in power. That's all it is.

Speaker 3 (02:43:34):
I got a comment here from a listener, d g
a thank you. He says that David Fascism is in
full display as Larry Elson is now the richest man
in the world. He teamed up with Trump on day
one to push this AI m R and A stuff.
And you know, it's just going to have custom made
poison for each and every one of us. Right, But
he is, He's now the richest man, richer than Musk.

(02:43:58):
But I just saw that free speek. Musk is calling
for people to be jailed if they if they say
something that the government doesn't like. And I just kicked
off the social media platform to.

Speaker 7 (02:44:09):
The crime syndicate.

Speaker 8 (02:44:11):
A new crypto superpack plans one hundred million dollar effort.
Cryptocurrency companies, including some tied to the Trump administration, are
funneling one hundred million dollars into a new political effort
to support pro crypto candidates.

Speaker 7 (02:44:30):
Yeah, there's another one.

Speaker 3 (02:44:31):
It's a massive record.

Speaker 8 (02:44:32):
Yeah, digital assets can save the US dollar, says Eric
Trump his Financial Times today. Eric Trump has said growing
demand for cryptocurren skis could save the US dollar.

Speaker 3 (02:44:48):
I mean, if you believe this, Yeah, he said that
he thinks that the stable coin thing is going to
basically shut down all the small banks. And he's right.
I think, will you know that's CBDC in terms of
its functionality. And that was one of the things that
we're always warning about CBDC. It was going to consolidate

(02:45:09):
all capital formation and control into the people who are
running the stable coin stuff. And who's running that. It's Lutnick,
who is his Commerce secretary. It's just like when he
had the Rothschild banker Wilbur Ross in his first term.
Now he's got Lutnick in there, and Lutnick is mister
stable Coin. I think it's also a way Wickclough.

Speaker 8 (02:45:29):
Yeah, let me ask you this one second before we
keep going two, because we talked about this before.

Speaker 7 (02:45:38):
Here's the proof. This is from the front. This is
from the New York Times.

Speaker 8 (02:45:43):
Two big deals intertwined, latest chips for u A, crypto
games for Trump. This summer Steve Wikoff, President Trump's Middle
East envoy, paid a visit, and it goes on and

(02:46:03):
on to say how they do in the deals with
the UAE, the Trump family, the wid Coughs, the Lutnix,
on and on and on. It's a crime syndicate in
front of everybody's eyes.

Speaker 3 (02:46:16):
Oh absolutely, yeah, absolutely, And that was where, by the way,
it was in the UAE. If I'm not mistaken, where
Eric Trump made that statement. It was at a crypto conference.
So we made the statement that the banks are going
to be gone in ten years yep. And of course
if the local banks are gone, how do we how
do we get how do we process cash?

Speaker 8 (02:46:35):
Again, it's everything's going to go digital. Yeah, they're going
to make up a new coin. And we just got
rid of OUID debt level got of course this coin
is worth a thousand times more than a dollar or
some crap.

Speaker 7 (02:46:47):
They're going to make it.

Speaker 8 (02:46:48):
Yeah, yeah, and no, it's it's disgusting. It's disgusting. And
again you're not It's been going on.

Speaker 7 (02:46:58):
All our lifetime.

Speaker 3 (02:47:00):
Well, you know when you talk about the mafia tactics,
organized crime tactics that Trump is using, we see that
with the FCC guy saying, well, we can do this
the easy way or we can do it the hard way.
And you look at the lawsuits that Trump has filed
against CBS because Redstone, the heiress, wanted to sell Paramount

(02:47:23):
and they could slow that down or make it not happen,
and so they basically shook them down. And the thing
I was talking about earlier, Gerald was the fact that
Trump used the government to shake them down, and he
was the one who had a lawsuit against them. They
settled for fifteen or sixteen million dollars and then their
troubles went away. So basically he was using the government

(02:47:46):
to shake down this corporation and profiting fifteen sixteen million dollars.
It's the most open corruption I've seen, besides the First
Amendment issues. It's just in your face corruption, isn't it.

Speaker 7 (02:47:58):
And how about this guy, which is Guy Ellison you
talked about, Oh yeah, Larry Elson.

Speaker 3 (02:48:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (02:48:09):
Didn't they just buy Paramount?

Speaker 3 (02:48:12):
His son did? Yeah? Did Sunday? Yeah?

Speaker 7 (02:48:17):
Sun did?

Speaker 1 (02:48:17):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (02:48:20):
And what it is?

Speaker 7 (02:48:21):
What is he's suing? The New York Times like thirteen
billion dollars or something.

Speaker 3 (02:48:26):
Trump fifteen yeah, fifteen billion, Yeah, I was. There was
an interesting article on Reason I talked about earlier Gerald
and they went through the lawsuit and they said, this
reads like a hagiography, not like a lawsuit. Any lawyer
would be ashamed to follow this. Of course, a hagiography
is a biography of somebody that just makes them into

(02:48:47):
a saint, right, And it's just boasting page after page
after page about how Trump is the greatest man who
ever lived. And anybody who doesn't acknowledge that is malicious.
That's his proof.

Speaker 7 (02:49:01):
Again.

Speaker 8 (02:49:02):
I told you I had lunch with his brother Robin
back in twenty seventeen. Yeah, and I had a restaurant
over here with Saic which is across the river. And
his brother Robert told me that when the father died,
he left him the family. I think the father died
in two thousand and two, left the family over a
half a billion dollars worth of real estate. Trump's nothing

(02:49:25):
more to spoil Daddy's boy.

Speaker 3 (02:49:27):
Yeah. Oh, that was one of the things that figured out.

Speaker 7 (02:49:29):
After the other guys.

Speaker 8 (02:49:31):
It's George Collins said, it's one big club and you
ain't in it. Yeah, one guy after another. I mentioned
little Andy Cuomo. My daddy was marrioed, little Georgie Bush.
You know that slime bolover he got over there in
the gruesome newsom over there. Oh yeah, it comes from
the Yeah Pelosi, it's all everybody, don't you know my

(02:49:51):
daddy was. I mean, it's one one after another.

Speaker 1 (02:49:53):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:49:54):
That was one of the things. One of the reasons
why he also included Penguin Books in the lawsuit because
they had published book talking about how Trump had inherited
so much money and then blew it with all these
failed casinos, you know, that really got under his skin.
But going back to the Ellison guy, he's got so
much money his son even that they're saying this is

(02:50:14):
going to be a new infusion of cash into the
entertainment industry that's going to be as big or bigger
than what Netflix did, just because this guy's personal fortune.

Speaker 7 (02:50:25):
Again, it's disgusting.

Speaker 3 (02:50:28):
Yeah, there's concentration of wealth, you know.

Speaker 8 (02:50:30):
I mean when Eisenhower was president, the tax rate for
people like Ellis who was ninety percent.

Speaker 7 (02:50:38):
Now they paid nothing.

Speaker 8 (02:50:39):
Yeah, what's his name, Buffett Bread That his secretary pays
a high tax rate than he does.

Speaker 3 (02:50:45):
Yeah, that that's right, that's right. Yeah, whenever they raise
the taxes, that doesn't go on the rich, it goes
on everybody else. And that's what's going to happen. I
think with the tariffs as well. I mean, tariffs really
haven't kicked in yet. There's a lot of people who
have long term contracts of two or three different months,
so you know those contracts, the tariff costs have not

(02:51:05):
shown up yet. I've seen one article after the other
and the Trump press bragging about the fact that a
we're going to make so much money out of this
that it's going to pay off the debt or it's
going to do these wonderful things that they're going to
have a kickback to middle class Americans because the tariffs. No,
they try to deny that it's going to have any

(02:51:26):
effect on prices, but of course that's just nonsense. One
of the key things I think is the fact that
Trump put an extra tax on any ships that come
to port that are made in China. And it's not
like we have a shipbuilding industry that's going to take
up the gap with that, and so that affects exports

(02:51:48):
as well as imports. If you have a Chinese ship,
he's going to hit it with a million dollar, multimillion
dollar fee for coming to ports if the ship was
made in China, regardless of who owns it. Isn't that amazing.

Speaker 8 (02:52:02):
Again, but he changes his mind on everything every day. Again,
Look what he did to Brazil because bolscenario. Yeah, fifty
tariff on them. So coffee prices have gone way up.
In a lot of other stuff that's none of my business.
I'm an American again. I read the at the rallies.

(02:52:24):
I often read George Washington's Farewell address. He tells American people.
He says, this, this stuff in Europe and Asia be
going off as centuries. It's not We're not going to
fix it, nobody.

Speaker 7 (02:52:38):
It's not our business. Our businesses to protect America. Yes,
and again I want to hear these these jerks that say,
oh you're in isolations.

Speaker 8 (02:52:49):
Hey got some you want to support the Ukraine war.
Put on your costume, go over there and fight, said
your wife, your kids, your money, you transgenders, go over
there or shut your mouth.

Speaker 3 (02:53:01):
Well that's right. I think it's Mark Cuban who was
pushing that, and somebody called him out and said, well,
once't you send your money over there? Right, he's got
a family that is part Ukrainian or something, so so
you know, instead of going to fight, why don't you
just send some money over there, instead of having the
taxpayers to it. Of course he doesn't want to talk
about that, none of them do.

Speaker 8 (02:53:21):
Oh look at the god, look what this is disgusting?
What's going on the slaughter of the Palestinian people in front.

Speaker 7 (02:53:27):
Of everybody's eyes?

Speaker 8 (02:53:28):
Yeah, outright slaughter in front of everybody's eyes.

Speaker 7 (02:53:33):
Yeah, why you anti Semite? How dare you say that?

Speaker 3 (02:53:39):
Yeah? I read an op ed piece I actually wasn't
up ed it was. It was a report where they
had talked to some Israeli snipers who were talking about
how they had been told to execute people when they
came up to get food. It was published by Harettes.
I think it was published that interview.

Speaker 8 (02:53:59):
To write about the stuff every day, I'm so heartbroken.
I'm so heartbroken. You have no idea, I gotta yeah, yeah, yeah, sure,
like the articles, I got to underline all the salient
points of the articles.

Speaker 7 (02:54:12):
What's this one?

Speaker 8 (02:54:13):
Trump fumes about net and Yahoo but gives him free
reign fumes. Yeah, again, he's definitely Yeah. So I don't know,
I didn't know. Trump liked it up the you know.

Speaker 3 (02:54:24):
What, he's running on fumes. Yeah, Trump is always running
on fumes. That's one of his secret paths.

Speaker 7 (02:54:33):
It's yeah, it's just so so disgusting.

Speaker 8 (02:54:37):
Israel presses Gaza incursion as death toll surpasses sixty five thousand,
sixty five thousand people they officially killed, according to Lanced,
it's almost over two hundred thousand.

Speaker 7 (02:54:51):
That's right in front of everybody's eyes.

Speaker 8 (02:54:55):
Yes, and again you go back to what Trump said
that Israel controls the Congress.

Speaker 3 (02:55:02):
You know, we just had Mike Johnson do a conference
and several people that were their courses. Pretty much every
American Jewish organization, Zionist organization was in this conference except
for the ADL, but saying they were going to work
bipartisan to do whatever these people want to do. I
mean they have. They're openly prostituting themselves to a foreign country,

(02:55:23):
working against our interests.

Speaker 8 (02:55:24):
Oh, and I'm tired of hearing his fairy tales from
these people. You know, God gave him. I don't want
to hear this blogy. I says, God got locked you
and they would talk to anybody else before or after.
I got to believe this stuff, you know, I don't
want to hear it. And uh and his Zionism is
nothing more than the political movement created by uh, what's
his name, Theodore Hertzel by the eighteen ninety It's a

(02:55:47):
total political movement, a guy from Hungary. Well again you
look at what's what's who's real name? The Lakowski. Oh Semites, No,
Someemites are from the Mesopotamia region the people want in
Israel or Eastern Europeans. Yeah, from Bengry. Oh not Bengory
and Green I forgot. Yeah, we'll make up any name

(02:56:09):
we want. We'll make up any fairy tale. And you
got to swallow my crap.

Speaker 3 (02:56:14):
Well, Mike Johnson is telling them that he is going
to screen out. And that's the way the political parties work.
That's why they keep two parties there and why they
close ballid access. He's going to screen out any candidates
that he believes are going to be isolationists. And of
course that means anybody that doesn't want to get involved
in wars. And you know it's we are canceling and

(02:56:37):
firing people left and right. We had one of the stories.
I had a guy who was a manager at a
store and because his wife went on this tirade about
Charlie Kirk and how much she hated him. After he
was murdered, the man lost his job. He didn't say
anything on social media. I mean, it's become an absolute
witch hunt about this kind of stuff.

Speaker 7 (02:56:57):
And to this guy, what's his name you just mentioned,
Mike Mike Johnson.

Speaker 8 (02:57:03):
Johnson isolationist. He hates Let that little boy go fight.
Could you imagine that little boy of nothing getting into
a can you imagine him fighting?

Speaker 7 (02:57:13):
Yeah, Can you imagine that little boy of nothing.

Speaker 8 (02:57:17):
Fighting no way anybody that supports war overseas, every one
of you slime ball politicians, you go over there and
fight or shut your mouth.

Speaker 3 (02:57:29):
Yeah. Mike Johnson is kind of like Captain America before
he got the special juice, Sarah.

Speaker 7 (02:57:36):
Enough juice to juice that cat.

Speaker 3 (02:57:37):
Except he doesn't want to go to war like that guy.
Did you know he doesn't have the he doesn't have
the jews to go fight, and he doesn't have an
inclination to do it either.

Speaker 8 (02:57:45):
So again, Occupied peace dot com, Occupied Peace dot Com
next week up here in.

Speaker 7 (02:57:50):
Kingston, New York and Europe. How beautiful it is?

Speaker 8 (02:57:53):
Oh, the must have scored four corners in America where
the Seeds of Democracy was selling me all the time.
Scott Ritter, Joe Laurie, Garland, Nixon, Roger Ward is going
to be doing a live stream, Dennis Cousin each others.
We're doing everything we can in the name of Piece.
We need to get you here and put your money

(02:58:14):
where your mouth is or heart is, if you want
to and support us with Occupied Piece. This, of course
a lot of money, a lot of dough. We have
top security. Everything is cool. Man, and so we're doing
everything we can in the name of Piece.

Speaker 3 (02:58:28):
But it's going to be beautiful up there this time
of year as well. It's the fall time right nowous,
So next next week Kingston, New York. And what time
does they kick off?

Speaker 7 (02:58:40):
Two o'clock?

Speaker 3 (02:58:40):
Two o'clock. And where's the website where people can find it?
Occupied Piece Piece? Okay?

Speaker 2 (02:58:45):
Is that dot com or dot org dot com?

Speaker 4 (02:58:47):
That's great, I'm dropping the Lincoln chat for people as well.

Speaker 3 (02:58:50):
Okay, good, thank you, Travis. Yeah, it was a great
rally that you did. Actually that one was in May
when we went up I think in twenty twenty one.
But I would recommend it to anybody to go up
there and be counted as being on the side of
peace because war is breaking out everywhere for every reason

(02:59:13):
or for no reason at all, which is typically why
it's being brought up. But the people who push back
against war, they call us all kinds of things. They
call us for right now, they call us isolationists. Yeah,
we would like to isolate ourselves from that kind of
death and suffering and having that kind of blood on
our hands. We definitely I would own that label. I

(02:59:36):
want to be isolated from these monsters who are doing
this stuff. Thank you so much for joining us. Geril,
thank you for what you do. Again, everybody. Next Saturday,
a week from tomorrow in Kingston, New York, look at
Occupypeace dot com and you find out how you can
show up for the rally and the great speakers that
are going to be there, and you can add your

(02:59:56):
voice to that as well.

Speaker 7 (02:59:57):
Thank you so much, Jeryl, and thank you and Travis
and all your team for what you do. I really
appreciate it.

Speaker 3 (03:00:03):
Thank you. Drill the common man. They created common Core.
They've dumbed down our children. They created common past, track

(03:00:24):
and control us their Commons project to make sure the
commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the
common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us
has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

(03:00:44):
That is what we have in common. That is what
they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
everything from us. Time to turn that around and expose
what they want to hide. Please share the information and

(03:01:06):
links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you
for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support
us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot
com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Fri Episode #2099: FCC as Thought Police: Trump & Bureaucrats Turn Free Speech Into Mafia Rule

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Fri Episode #2099: FCC as Thought Police: Trump & Bureaucrats Turn Free Speech Into Mafia Rule

On Purpose with Jay Shetty