Mon Episode #2070: RFK Jr’s Vaccine Limited Hangout

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:39):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it is Monday, the eleventh
of August, Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. We've
had RFK Junior come out and give kind of a
limited hangout about the mRNA vaccine, saying, well, you know,
they're just not good for respiratory viruses. What are they
good for?

Speaker 3 (00:54):
RFK? But apparently Trump didn't get the memo.

Speaker 2 (00:58):
When asked about it, he started boasting about warp speed.
We also had an attack on a CD on the
CDC by a gunman. It's apparently over a COVID vaccine injury.
Stay with us, Welcome and good morning. Hope you all

(02:11):
had a good weekend. It's as I said, we had
RFK Junior come out and say, you know, well, the
mr anda vaccines they're just really not useful for respiratory
viruses because it causes the virus to mutate. Well that's
if you believe in such things. But even by their
own standard, if it's not good for a respiratory virus,

(02:34):
how could it be good for any virus? Wouldn't they
all behave largely the same way, assuming they're real at all.
But of course Donald Trump, as I said, did nothing
but say, well, the warp speed was a magnificent thing.
It was wonderful. Agreed that it's probably one of the
most amazing thing that's ever happened in this country. But

(02:57):
I want to start with what happened with the gunman.
This is from zero Hedge, enraged over purported COVID vac's injury.
Gunman attacks CDC and kills a cop.

Speaker 4 (03:09):
This is.

Speaker 2 (03:13):
More of the ongoing frustration and anger that people have
that they were lied to and forced to take this poison,
that people trusted the people in power and are now
suffering with these long lasting, possibly permanent side effects. The
George The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has identified the shooter

(03:34):
as thirty year old Patrick Joseph White of Kenesaw, Georgia.
The lord has known about him yet, but neighbors have
confirmed earlier reports that White was angry about the COVID
nineteen vaccine, having concluded it caused him to suffer from
some kind of illness when described him as having done
yard work in the neighborhood and expressed surprise in the
news selling Fox five. I was like, there's no way,

(03:55):
not the kind of person I would thought to do that.

Speaker 4 (04:00):
This is the.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
Simmering anger, the building frustration that people have, but it's
also a sign of the futility of these sorts of acts.
The CDC remains unharmed, and all he did was kill
a cop. A police officer is dead after a surgical

(04:21):
mask wearing gunman riddled the Atlanta headquarters of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention with bullets. His parents think
it was an act of revenge, saying their son believed
he had an illness caused by the controversial COVID nineteen vaccine.
He attack ended with the shooter's own death, but it's
unclear at this point if his mortal wound was self inflicted.
I feel so bad for the officer that was killed

(04:44):
and this man that was suffering from this, the fact
that he felt this was his only recourse.

Speaker 5 (04:52):
This is tragic but also tragically predictable. With the amount
of people that have been injured with list in some way,
someone is going to get really angry with it and
respond in an irrational.

Speaker 2 (05:07):
Way, especially with the way they refuse to address it
at all. They just keep doubling down. The censorship in
the propaganda gets worse. They refuse to admit any wrongdoing.
But people aren't stupid, they know. The CDC campus did
receive multiple rounds into their buildings. Four buildings were actually hit.

(05:27):
He was armed with two handguns, a rifle and a shotgun.
He was wearing what appeared to be a surgical mask,
and of course we know for a fact those aren't
effective at all, like those the CDC pushed for all
men and women and children to wear during the COVID
nineteen scamdemic, despite well informed doubts about their efficacy and
concerns about ill effects.

Speaker 3 (05:48):
He was also wearing ear protection.

Speaker 2 (05:51):
The shooter's father had called the police prior to the
shooting earlier on Friday to report that his son was suicidal.
Floy members also family members also told in investigators that
the shooter was either physically ill or believed or at
least believed he was physically ill, and he was convinced
that his malady resulted from a COVID nineteen vaccine. It

(06:12):
appears the shooter never entered the CDC buildings, choosing only
to shoot at them from below. Many vehicles were also shot.
Beyond the fatal shooting of the officer, No other people
were shot before went to a hospital to be treated
for stress and anxiety symptoms. The apparently vaccine related attack

(06:34):
came in the same week that Health Secretary Robert F.
Kennedy Junior announced he was killing a half billion dollars
in funding for development of mRNA vaccines, such as those
deployed developed by Pfizer Moderna for COVID nineteen. Kennedy said
mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses. Again,
why would it just be the respiratory viruses? Under Kennedy's leadership,

(06:56):
the CDC retracted its recommendation for universal CO nineteen immunization
for healthy children to age seventeen and healthy pregnant women.
Of course, they still haven't banned the poison. While it
wouldn't have helped the CDC shooter, Kennedy in July announced
he's going to overhaul the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

(07:18):
No one is helping the warp speed victims Under the
VIICP vaccine victims competition for compensation to the so called
Vaccine Court, which pays out awards from a trust fund
endowed by a seventy five percent surcharge on every vaccine.
Of course, billions have been paid out, billions upon billions

(07:42):
of dollars, despite the fact they make it nearly impossible
to get a judgment in your favor, despite the fact
they make it nearly impossible to get a doctor to
actually admit that this was vaccine caused, and they're still
paying out billions upon billions.

Speaker 3 (07:57):
The structure itself. The structure itself.

Speaker 2 (08:01):
Hobbles claimants that are vended as hhs, not the vaccine makers,
and claimants are therefore facing the monumental power in bottomless
pockets of the US government. There's no discovery and the
rules of evidence do not apply. The government lawyers do
not allow children's attorneys to access the vaccine safety Data link.
As I said, they make it incredibly difficult to get
a judgment, and they're still paying out billions of dollars.

(08:23):
That's because sometimes the injury is so severe and the
link is so obvious they're forced to. Of course, only
a small number of people relative to the population know
about this at all. Many people have no clue. American
public's confidence in the COVID vaccinations or you could say

(08:45):
trump shots or bio weapon shots continues to erode. According
to July survey, fifty nine percent of US adults say
they will never, definitely not, or probably not receive a
vaccine this fall, with just twenty one percent saying they
definitely will. Many also have a dim view of federal
health agencies. Only forty two percent believe they make decisions
based on a sound scientific basis, and only thirty seven

(09:07):
percent confident they operate free of corrupting outside influences, and
raise the question how could this many people be so naive.
Every once in a while, I'll stumble onto a post
on Facebook or something like that about you know, healthcare

(09:28):
or the vaccine or COVID, and if it's free to
the public. As a general rule, there's quite a few
people in there that are saying, well, this is poison.
You know, this is bad. But in certain groups, certain groups,
they are still so heavily entrenched in the propaganda they

(09:48):
are completely and utterly incapable of thinking that it was
bad for them. Recently, I saw a post and they're
like trying to explain to healthcare officials, Oh, well, you
still need to get the vaccine, wear masks because you
know you can be an asymptomatic carrier. And in the
comments section, there's just dozens hundreds of mostly women, because

(10:12):
of the propaganda saying yes, you absolutely have to do this,
Oh thank you for doing this. We've never stopped masking.
We've never stopped Me and my boyfriend or husband both
got the vaccine, but we still got the virus. But
I can only imagine how much worse it would have
been if we didn't get the vaccine. And these are

(10:33):
the type of people you're dealing with. They are not
capable of being reached. They will wear a mask forever
now zoxa voxas governor will jab and gaslight you to death.
When you react, they make like you're they're innocent and
your suffering is all in your head. Yeah, no, we

(10:54):
didn't do this. This is your own fault. You're the
crazy person a Syrian girl. In these days, when insurance
company CEOs are shot because of perceived evils of insurance companies,
it is sadly predictable that CDC will become a target
for those who have been harmed. Yeah, we have the
quote from John F.

Speaker 3 (11:13):
Kennedy.

Speaker 2 (11:14):
Those that make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.
I'm paraphrasing it slightly, but that's the gist of it,
and that is what we are seeing. They're making peaceful
revolution impossible. They are doubling down. No, we didn't do
anything wrong. The vaccine is perfectly safe. We have this

(11:40):
from Vaccine Impact TODA. HHS Secretary Kennedy really bann mRNA vaccines.
Trump fails to confirm it. Instead boasts about Operation warp Speed.
That's what I was talking about. Came out and said, well,
you know, actually, Operation warp Speed was a wonder people
still talk about it. Let's play that video for.

Speaker 6 (11:59):
You, driving force behind Operation warp Speed.

Speaker 1 (12:02):
These mRNA vaccines that are the gold standard.

Speaker 6 (12:06):
Right now, your health secretary is pulling back all the
funding for research. He's saying that the risks outweigh the benefits,
which puts in at odds.

Speaker 7 (12:14):
For research from your medical community.

Speaker 6 (12:16):
And with you, what is going on research on what
into m RNA vaxcent Well, we're going to.

Speaker 8 (12:21):
Look at that.

Speaker 9 (12:21):
We're talking about it, and they're doing a very good job.
And you know that is a past. Operation warp Speed was.
Whether you're a Republican or Democrat, considered one of the
most incredible things ever done in this country.

Speaker 7 (12:36):
The efficiency, the way it was done, the.

Speaker 9 (12:40):
Distribution, everything about it has been amazing. But you know,
that was now a long time ago, and we're onto
other things.

Speaker 7 (12:50):
But we are speaking about it.

Speaker 9 (12:51):
We have meetings about it in tomorrow, actually tomorrow twelve o'clock,
and we'll determine. We're looking for other answers to other problems,
to other sicknesses and diseases.

Speaker 7 (13:03):
And I think we're doing really well.

Speaker 3 (13:04):
Yes, right, I think we're doing really well.

Speaker 2 (13:09):
We're looking for other solutions. That's as far as he'll go.
He still has to toot his own horne.

Speaker 1 (13:14):
Now.

Speaker 2 (13:15):
It was wonderful, It was a marvel. Of course, he'll
never stop. He'll never stop. He's probably gonna want as
my dad says, father of the vaccine on his tombstone.
Secretary of HHS Kennedy announced this week that Trump administration

(13:35):
was the drawing contracts with Barta that totaled five hundred
million for developing mRNA vaccines, and of course, Trump's CDC director,
I'm from Borda and his specialty is AI and mRNA.
Both the corporate media and alternative media, which could largely
be described as MAGA media at this point have reacted

(13:56):
very strongly to this announcement, claiming that the government has
now stopped funding all mRNA vaccines. That their reactions were polar,
But their reactions were polar opposites, from horrified by the
pharma funded corporate media to overjoyed by the alternative media.
Both sides are wrong in the assumption that all funding
for mRNA shots was ending. Now you can listen what

(14:21):
they say here. This is what RFK Junior actually said.

Speaker 10 (14:26):
Hi, it's Robert F. Kennedy Junior here your AHH. As
secretary at AHHS, we have a division called the Biomedical
Advanced Research and Development Authority or BARDA. BARDA drives some
of our most advanced scientific research. It funds developments of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics,
and other tools to fight emergent diseases and national health threats.

(14:50):
Over the past few weeks, BARTA reviewed twenty two mRNA
vaccine development investments and began canceling them.

Speaker 1 (14:58):
Let me explain why.

Speaker 10 (15:00):
Most of these shots are for flu or covid. But
as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well
against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract Here's the problem.
mRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins,
usually a single anigen one mutation, and the vaccine becomes ineffective.

(15:23):
This dynamic drives a phenomena called anagenic shift, meaning that
the vaccine paradoxically encourages new mutations and can actually prolong
pandemics as the virus constantly mutates to escape the protective
effects of the vaccine. Millions of people, maybe even you
or someone you know, got the omicron variant despite being vaccinated.

Speaker 3 (15:48):
That's because a single.

Speaker 10 (15:49):
Mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies
to flu. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts
at nih AHHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more
risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why, after

(16:10):
extensive review, BARTA has begun the process of terminating these
twenty two contracts totaling just under five hundred million dollars.
To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development
of safer, broader vaccine strategies like whole virus vaccines and
novel platforms that don't collapse when virus's mutape. Let me

(16:34):
be absolutely clear, HHI has supports safe, effective vaccines for
every American who wants them. That's why we're moving beyond
the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in
better solutions Thank.

Speaker 11 (16:50):
You, produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Speaker 2 (16:56):
As I said, this is a limited hangout. They're only
you know, it's only ineffective for upper respiratory viruses for
some reason. But if you actually go by their own logic,
by what they say viruses are and that they exist,
surely they would all behave this way and they'd be
useless for all viruses.

Speaker 3 (17:16):
Right.

Speaker 2 (17:17):
The money is just being redirected to develop other vaccines.
Mister Kennedy wants more vaccines.

Speaker 3 (17:24):
Not less.

Speaker 2 (17:26):
He's not doing what he said he would do. Is
they just have to be safe vaccines according to him.
Of course, that's kind of an oxymoron, isn't it. We've
seen over and over again that there is no such
thing as a safe vaccine, especially not for children. When
you're injecting these diseases at minimum, even if you don't

(17:47):
have any adjuvants and they're directly past their immune system
through their skin, it can still cause issues. Of course,
safe vaccines do not exist. When the Supreme Court heard
a case in the past challenging the nineteen eighty National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, passed into law by President Reagan,
they ruled that vaccines were unavoidably unsafe and kept the

(18:08):
Act in place. Unavoidably unsafe, But no, we're keeping the act.
Vaccine cult believes that the known benefits outweigh the risks. Really,
they say they know better. They don't believe they know
better than anyone else. Vaccines can never be proven to

(18:32):
be affected because they are injected into humans before they
contract the disease as a preventative measure, they have no
way of testing, and they're never tested for efficacy. So
while Kennedy proudly announced this week that the Trump administration
was canceling these m RNA vaccines and BARTA was working
on because m RNA vaccines are not good. According to

(18:52):
Kennedy's statement, he's actually approved new m RNA vaccines already
since he has been in office, including COVID nineteen RNA vaccines.
Of course, so has the US dam going to start
injecting your food with m RNA or spraying it on
top of it. So how do we know if what

(19:15):
Kennedy announced about these bart m RNA vaccines being canceled
is even true or not. Earlier this year, back in May,
Secretary Kennedy Junior, flanked by doctor j Bardicharia, director of
the National Instuit of Health, and doctor Marty McCarey, US
Food and Drug Administration Commissioner, announced on Musk's X platform
that the CDC was no longer recommending COVID vaccines for
healthy children and pregnant women. However, anyone visiting the CDC

(19:39):
website and viewing their childhood vaccine schedule could clearly see
that they were still recommending them. Even when the CDC
did not update their website after this announcement, there was
still no withdrawal of the recommendation to inject COVID nineteen
vaccines and every person in the US of the age
of six months. It is monumentally wicked. The vaccine industry is,

(20:05):
in my opinion, second only to the abortion industry in
pure wickedness in what they do to children. As can
be expected, the pharm up funded corporate media confronted Trump
on this immediately is what Trump stated in response to
the news about the mRNA vaccine development at Barta was
being halted by his administration. That's the video I played

(20:26):
for you before, Trump waffing and saying, well, you know,
warp Speed was so wonderful.

Speaker 3 (20:32):
It was great.

Speaker 2 (20:33):
Everyone loved it. We'll have to we're exploring other avenues.
Not only did Trump confirm that this has not happened,
saying that we're going to look at that, we went
on to talk about Operation Warp Speed and how proud
he was of that military campaign against Americans which weaponized
FI visor and Modern's COVID nineteen m RNA vaccines that
harmed millions of Americans.

Speaker 3 (20:56):
He's so proud of it.

Speaker 2 (20:58):
In fact, it took that country and Western singer Country
saying I don't remember the guy's name coming up to
Trump saying why do you keep bringing this up? The
base hates it. You gotta stop talking about it. It's
bad Optics. KWD sixty eight says Trump doesn't like being
asked about his Warp Speed death juice. No, I imagine not

(21:20):
a you're going to say anything. You just have to
praise him for the efficiency. He ruled it out with
that's right. It's efficient when you are able to poison
millions upon millions of people in American.

Speaker 3 (21:31):
Across the globe. He did it with remarkable efficiency.

Speaker 5 (21:34):
Well, even if he doesn't like being asked about it,
he likes to brag about what he did.

Speaker 3 (21:41):
I think it depends on how you ask.

Speaker 2 (21:44):
Do people honestly believe that Pfizer CEO Borla and Moderna
CEO Bansel, the world's two top pharma companies developing him
on our mRNA vaccines, will allow this to happen. It
seems like MAGA does. No, They're gonna stop it. Then
this Thursday, mister Kennedy's handler US Center and pediatrician doctor

(22:06):
Bill Cassidy, whom Kennedy allegedly must check in with every week,
also came out publicly against Kennedy. He also played the
China card after RFK Junior ends vaccine funding Louisiana. Bill's
Bill Cassidy says cuts don't fit trump agenda. That's right,
they don't fit Trump's agenda. We got to keep funding
these vaccines. Senator Bill Cassidy is admonishing Hell Secretary Robert F.

(22:30):
Kennedy Junior decision to cancel about five hundred million vaccine research,
one of his first public conflicts with Kennedy since helping
him win confirmation to the job. It was unfortunate that
the secretary just canceled half a billion dollars worth of work,
wasting the money which has already invested. He has also
conceded to China and import technology needed to combat cancer

(22:52):
and infectious diseases. Is compatible with what Donald Trump wants
with the Trump agenda. We've got to keep funding these vaccines.
Cassidy joined a chorus of criticism by physicians and healthcare experts.

(23:12):
The entire Congress is currently on summer recess, so it
appears that Kennedy sneaked this in to grab some headlines
while everyone else was on vacation. Look for report any
day now in the corporate news, maybe even later today,
quoting officials, maybe even Bart itself stating that this is
not happening. Nobody in US politics can stand up to
big Pharma, and I mean nobody. I agree big Pharma.

(23:38):
There are certain entities that get to dictate what our
government does.

Speaker 3 (23:42):
Big Farma is one of them.

Speaker 2 (23:43):
Apak is another, and we'll be talking about that later
as well. But Kennedy can now wring his hands together
and tell his Maha supporters and I tried, but the
Deep State opposed me.

Speaker 3 (23:57):
Ha ha, not Maha ha ha, the thing in your face.

Speaker 2 (24:01):
Kennedy did not succeed in getting the Democratic nomination for potus,
so he tried to join Kamala Harris's campaign looking for
a job.

Speaker 3 (24:07):
When she didn't want him.

Speaker 2 (24:08):
Trump picked him up off the Harris campaign trash heap
and promised him the HHS secretary job if he could
get his followers and supporters through Children's Self Defense to
vote for him. So Kennedy serves at the pleasure of
the President, and Trump's pleasure is more mRNA vaccine than
a desire for Operation Warp Speed too, this time probably

(24:29):
somehow involving AI Operation Warp Speed two. Kennedy clearly shows
that he is the most corrupt member of the Kennedy
family and was raised as a rich, privileged white boy
who is a heroin and sex addict. Lots of parallels
to Hunter Biden.

Speaker 12 (24:49):
There.

Speaker 2 (24:51):
He and his previous wife, Mary Richardson are also in
the Epstein's Black Book. Nobody in their right mind, including
other members of the Kennedy family, ever dreamed that he
could hold public office.

Speaker 5 (25:01):
Whurs.

Speaker 2 (25:01):
Trump doesn't care about any of that, probably sees it
as a benefit because it gives him more leverage. Well, remember,
if you turn on me, if you do anything I
don't want, I'll just start talking about all the issues.
I'll throw you aside, and then I'll make sure that
everyone knows about this American public voter for Trump to

(25:22):
be back in office, even after he killed and maimed
millions of Americans with this Operation Warp Speed campaign. It
is now also convicted felin in the first felon to
hold the office of potus. There's also a known associate,
associate and friend of Jeffrey Epstein and his child trafficking network.
If conservative Christians can support and love Trump, then it
is no surprise that many of them love mister Kennedy

(25:43):
as well.

Speaker 3 (25:44):
As long as they like the.

Speaker 2 (25:44):
Words coming out of his mouth, they will turn their
ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths
two Timothy four, three through four.

Speaker 3 (25:57):
That's what we see.

Speaker 2 (25:59):
There's a mythological version of Donald Trump that people seem
to love, this idealized version that doesn't exist, that one
that promises he's going to fix America. He's going to
solve all our problems. He's going to fix the economy,
he's going to solve illegal immigration. And when that doesn't happen,

(26:21):
people don't really care because they still have the myth
to look at. Why be bothered by reality? Chambers Nancy.
Several friends in my prayer groups say they have CONVID
this week and they are all vaxed and have CONVID again,
and they're all scared and probably will get vaxed again
no matter how much I've told them, I'm the one
who's crazy. Yeah, you see that sort of thing happening,

(26:44):
Like I said on that post that came across my feed,
in the comments, in just a few I scrolled because
I couldn't bear to look at many of them, there
was at least four different people saying, yeah, we both
got the vaccine, but we still got the vibe, we
still got COVID, but thankfully, you know, we were vaccinated,
so it probably wasn't as bad as it could have been.

(27:06):
That's the level of delusion. These people have the level
of delusion that we're dealing with. My entire life, all
I've heard was you have to get vaccinated so you
don't get these diseases, and then COVID rolls around, they
immediately switch it to well, you know, it'll reduce the severity.
Don't remember ever hearing that in my lifetime before this,

(27:29):
not once pez Avante, seventeen Pezzonovante, I've been mispronouncing it
this entire time. My apologies, seventeen seventy six. I have
family who facebooked their children getting the touring, how their
kids were doing their part.

Speaker 3 (27:46):
That is. I feel so sorry for those children, and.

Speaker 2 (27:52):
Just the idea of recording that simply for social clout.
That's that's what that was about. This Oh well, you know,
this soul show that we're good little citizens. People will
praise us for this.

Speaker 3 (28:09):
I find that disgusting. A Syrian girl.

Speaker 2 (28:12):
Wouldn't all vaccines cause the same increased mutation factor in viruses?
Maybe RFKJ is slowly moving toward a noble goal.

Speaker 3 (28:19):
I pray that is true. We can hope.

Speaker 5 (28:22):
I wouldn't hold your breath on that account.

Speaker 3 (28:24):
Yeah, I wouldn't hold my breath.

Speaker 2 (28:26):
It's you know, possible, but not likely, very very slim chance.
I wondered the same thing, but I don't believe it
to be true. I would like to see that eventually.
And the truth is, anyone with a brain who hears
that could make that same conclusion is that, well, you know,

(28:46):
if they don't, if the vaccines don't work and cause
mutations and then the virus, it's no longer effective. Wouldn't
that be the same for all vaccines. Anyone with a
brain should be able to make that logical leap. But
we'll waiting to see. As Lance said, don't hold your breath,
Aye Handy, I go back to our k's day when
promise we're not taking away anyone's vaccines. Yeah, he's not

(29:09):
really doing anything. He's got red forty out of the way.
Hooray KWD sixty eight. If everyoneant to witness a level
of indoctrination, many MAGA are not. Check out the chat
for the Bernie Cunningham rumble this afternoon. It's both sad
and hilarious. I have never even heard of that guy.
It's amazing how many different MAGA grifters there are. There's

(29:31):
so many of them you can't possibly know them all.
It's there's a large, large audience for people that want
to suck up to Trump. Maybe that's what we need
to do, you know, have a secondary show that comes
on after this, we'll get a little v tuber avatar,
change a voice changer, and we'll just praise Trump constantly,

(29:53):
grift these suckers out of somebodey.

Speaker 3 (29:55):
No, we're not going to do that.

Speaker 2 (29:58):
CDC shooter blame covidvaccine for depression, union demand statement against misinformation.
Of course, we can assume, we can basically know for certain.
The CDC is only going to double down on the
propaganda and censorship. As I said, they're going to make
peaceful change impossible. They're not going to allow anyone to

(30:19):
make any statements. They'll simply say that this guy was
crazy that you know, he bought into some right wing
conspiracy theory about the vaccines, and therefore it's the fault
of people like us here. Someone maybe he read it online,
or maybe he heard it from a friend that the
COVID vaccine caused certain injuries. Maybe someone told him that's

(30:42):
likely what happened, and it's their fault. It's not going
to be the CDC's fault. It's not going to be
the fault of Trump or whoop speed. A union representing
CDC workers demanded the agency condemn vaccine misinformation, citing months
of illification toward staff. Yes, don't criticize the mass murderers
that were now given warp speed, given the ability to

(31:06):
do whatever they want under Donald Trump. Crack down on
the people that are reporting on it. This is another
article that kind of dovetails into the shooting and it's
kind of a commentary on the times we're living in.
One in five Britains say they are willing to engage

(31:28):
in political violence to stop national decline. One in five again,
they're making peaceful change impossible. An increasingly tense political climate
in Britain has a large majority concerned that violence will
break out, and one in five saying that they are
willing to turn to violence of the country continues to decline.

Speaker 3 (31:51):
Remember that is if, But the.

Speaker 2 (31:54):
Real question is is it an if the politicians they
have there are no better than hours Some of them
may be even worse. If that's possible, It's not really
an If the country is going to keep declining, it
is a certainty. According to a survey of two thousand
adults in the UK, by looking for Growth in Merlin.

(32:16):
By looking for growth and Merlin Strategy Merlin Strategy, seventy
percent of the country are worried that Britain is on
the precipice of political violence erupting the New Statesmen reported
There's never been a better time for Arthur to finally return.
It must happen. Perhaps more concerningly, one fifth of respondents

(32:37):
twenty one percent, said that political violence is sometimes justified,
and nearly as many nineteen percent, said they would personally
be willing to engage in political violence of the state
or the country the state of the country continues to worsen.
Survey found that supporters of Nigel faradjersform UK Party were
the most likely to agree that political violence is sometimes
necessary at thirty two percent. This was followed by Green

(32:59):
Party voters twenty four percent, of whom agreed with the sentiment. Separately,
the poll found that a plurality of Britain's forty seven
percent agree that it is acceptable to protest outside migrant hotels,
well forty four percent opposed. Again, a significant court believe
that it is even acceptable to riot outside migrant hotels
at fourteen percent, including nineteen percent of Reform voters. I

(33:21):
don't understand how anyone could disagree that it's fine to
protest outside these hotels. No, you can't protest outside the
hotels of these wonderful immigrants. We've got these wonderful people
that have showed up here that are raping our women
and children. You're not allowed to do that.

Speaker 5 (33:38):
It's also phraised in a kind of stupid way, like
obviously there are points at which political violence is justified.
For instance, I don't think anyone would argue against North
Korea is the thing that everyone likes to point to
as a tyrannical state. No one would argue that political
violence is unjustified in context. It's just scary that they're

(34:05):
already feeling that that's their only option in Britain.

Speaker 2 (34:10):
Which means that it is coming here soon. You can
see the level of disaffection and anger that there is
with our current system. When that healthcare CEO got shot
by allegedly got shot by Luigi Mangion, you saw that
most people didn't care. At most, the general consensus was

(34:34):
apathy followed by a lot of people going good. And
that's what we're dealing with. People are tired of the system.
They realize it's rigged against them, They realize that these
people at the top are not their friends, that they
have it that they're the ones who have rigged the

(34:55):
system and recently forget where it was. But there was
a woman that got shot and they portrayed her as
just a worker from some hedge fund company or wealth
management company, but she was actually one of the people
at the very top. And I think the reason they
didn't announce who she was because they didn't want another

(35:18):
outcome like that. They didn't want to have to admit
that she's one of the people that has been buying
up all these houses, making housing completely unaffordable, buying people
out and making it so that you can't own a home.
Is how can you compete with places like black Rock
or Vanguard when they're able to come in and offer
over asking price in cash. They didn't want more people

(35:40):
to go good. Why Britain arrests thirty people every day
for speech? Lord Toby Young, founded of the Free Speech Union,
discusses the UK's Online Safety Act and its implications.

Speaker 3 (35:53):
For free speech.

Speaker 2 (35:55):
He traced the AX origins to a moral panic over
children's exposure to harmful online content, self harm sites and
pornograph pornography, initially introduced under Teresa May's government and expanded
under Boris Johnson. Young criticizes it as overly broad, leading
to excessive content removal by platforms, fearing massive fines or
jail time for executives. Young warns of broader threats to

(36:22):
free expression, including over thirty daily arrests for speech offenses
and a quarter million non crime hate incidents recorded in
recent years, often for online posts challenging government narratives on
immigration or gender issues, or something like big Pharma.

Speaker 5 (36:40):
How can you claim to have free speech in your
country and have non crime hate issues, non crime hate.

Speaker 2 (36:51):
Well, he was very rude, he was very short with me,
things like Pharma or Israel here in the USA. That's
what you in trouble. Overall, Young portrays the UK a
sliding toward authoritarian censorship, prioritizing safety over liberty and stifling
open debate. And of course he's right, got to keep

(37:14):
people safe. Well, we can't have people commenting negatively about
the migrants. Yeah, I know they're raping and murdering and
committing knife crimes and stabbing young girls at Taylor Swift concerts.
But hey, that's just the price you pay, right, But
if you say something negative about it, you say something
kind of mean about it on Facebook?

Speaker 3 (37:35):
Please are going to come to your door.

Speaker 2 (37:39):
Four hundred and sixty six arrests in London is UK
free speech under threat?

Speaker 3 (37:46):
I think you could say that. I don't think that's
really even a question at this point.

Speaker 2 (37:51):
On Saturday, the Metropolitan Police in London detained four hundred
and sixty six protesters, the most arrests made in any
single operation for over a decade under the Terrorism Act
for supporting Palestine Action.

Speaker 5 (38:02):
This headline is almost like a parody. There's been mass
arrests for speech. Is speech under a threat? Only attacking
speech with these mass arrests?

Speaker 2 (38:12):
Or it it's really getting my nog and jogging. However,
the crackdown is reignited debate over where the UK is
sliding closer to a heavy handed suppression of descent dressed
up as national security, further fueled by the recent escalation
of the Online Safety Act. The first arrest began around
one pm on Saturday, ninth of August, with a man

(38:33):
holding a sign reading I support Palestine Action. Action escalated
soon after, and the hundreds of arrests included elderly people,
a blind man in a wheelchair, and teenagers, all of
whom were protesting peacefully. You gotta get that blind guy
in the wheelchair. He's a real threat. You never know
what he could be up to. All four hundred and

(38:55):
six sixty six reported anti terrorism detainees were peaceful protesters.
Sky News reported that everyone present had indeed expected to
be arrested. We felt compelled to speak out and defended
their right to protest, often feeling guided by their faith
and conscience. Amnesty International called it deeply concerning, stating the
protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it

(39:19):
is entirely.

Speaker 13 (39:26):
Well.

Speaker 2 (39:28):
YouTube band's prominent Zelenski critic This is from Russia. YouTube
has removed the two million subscriber account of exiled Ukrainian
journalist of the Year Diana Ponchenko, a fierce critic of
Vladimir Zelensky. YouTube just banned her and raised her account.
She had two million followers. He wrote, the most dangerous
weapon is truth. I wonder if she's been debanked, does

(39:52):
she still have PayPal? What's going on?

Speaker 5 (39:57):
Of course lasted longer than we did.

Speaker 3 (40:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (40:02):
The censorship when it comes to war, whether it's Gaza
or Ukraine, is something you expect to see. They can't
have people telling the truth about it. Got some comments
seminar collar update on David.

Speaker 3 (40:21):
He is doing better. We asked that you.

Speaker 2 (40:22):
Do keep praying for him, pray that it would be
healed fully. We're working on getting it set up so
he can come back. We're trying. We're going to rearrange
the studio and get it set up so it's easier
for people. But that's something we're working on. It's just
a lot of work, but David is doing better and
he will be back soon.

Speaker 5 (40:43):
We're purchasing desks and cameras and things to completely rearrange
the studio for the people that are asking. Yeah, and
I believe the plan is going to take Friday off
to have three day to completely rearrange everything.

Speaker 2 (41:02):
Yeah, the studio is a giant rat's nest of wires
and cables and things, so it's a monumental task to
redo it. So we'll want to start Friday and hopefully
hopefully have it done by Monday when we do get
it done, and so we're working on it and he'll
be back.

Speaker 5 (41:22):
Soon, hopefully next Monday.

Speaker 3 (41:25):
That's the goal.

Speaker 2 (41:27):
Next Monday is the goal to have him back in
studio and we're going to do everything we can to
make that happen. It's simply a matter of again getting
everything and getting it set up correctly.

Speaker 5 (41:40):
You would be joining live for part of the show
at first, and then do more and more of it.

Speaker 2 (41:47):
But hopefully back Monday. And yeah, as Lance said, doing
more of the show's time goes undo. FI Tyrants seventeen
seventy six. Government admitted after they their seventy percent JAB
goal that jabs wouldn't prevent you from getting COVID or
spread it. Yet the sheep are still getting jabbed. Now
that is a strong delusion. Yeah, people, I truly don't

(42:14):
understand the reasoning behind it, but we aren't dealing with
the best and the brightest generally. It's a coalition of
people that are kind of dumb and easy to manipulate
that absorbed the propaganda very very well.

Speaker 3 (42:32):
Dug A seven.

Speaker 2 (42:33):
They conveniently waited until the majority of people took the
JAB to mention that it didn't work.

Speaker 3 (42:37):
Yew oops.

Speaker 2 (42:38):
Sorry, by the way, uh doesn't work as advertised, No refunds.
Pauzonovante seventeen seventy six, and people like Alan Dershowitz wanted
to force you to take the poison, which was ineffective
except for maiming and killing people.

Speaker 3 (42:52):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (42:52):
He was going to drag you out of your house
and force you to be injected. He would argue before
the Supreme Court. Need win, he said, Well, I'm not
so sure if he'd be able to win. Alan Dershowitz
can't even get a Perogi vendor to bend the knee,
so perhaps he doesn't have the skills he once did.

(43:13):
Wisconsin lawmaker wants schools to inform parents about their rights
to vaccine exemptions and how to obtain them. Wisconsin State Rep.
Lindy Brill plans to introduced a bill that would require schools,
childcare centers, and nurseries to inform parents and legal guardians
but the right to request a vaccine exemption for their children.
Brill said the process for obtaining an exemption is now

(43:35):
too vague and difficult. They make it very very hard.
When the COVID vaccines were going around and everyone was
trying to get an exemption, it was very very difficult.
They didn't want you to have that. The letter that
Jason Barker put together that people used as a template
to write their own was very helpful for people. May

(43:58):
July twenty one press release, Brill said that while Wisconsin
parents already have the right to opt to their children
out of the vaccination requirements for medical, religious, or personal reasons,
the process is unclear. Many parents are unaware of this
right and are unclear about how to obtain that waiver
and feel pressure to make medical decisions for their children
that they otherwise would not. The press release stated, of

(44:21):
course it's even more important, or at least just as
to opt out of the school system. If you're sending
your child to school, they will undoubtedly start making decisions
about them for you, and they'll start brainwashing them. If

(44:43):
you're going to opt out of the vaccines, you obviously
care about your children, and you should therefore opt out
of the entire school system because they will do just
as much damage as the vaccines themselves. The school system
is a propaganda It is designed to turn them into
good little drones that never question the government system, and

(45:08):
they're remarkably.

Speaker 3 (45:09):
Effective at it. We're going to take a quick break.

Speaker 2 (45:15):
When we come back, we're going to take a look
at what's going on with the ad L and Zionism there.

Speaker 3 (45:26):
Well, stay with us, we'll be right back.

Speaker 8 (46:00):
And defending the American dream you're listening to the David

(48:11):
Knight Show.

Speaker 14 (48:15):
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (48:32):
Welcome back, folks, Glad you're still here. As I said,
we're going to talk about the ADL. I see Guard
Goldsmith is in chat. Good to see you, Guard. Hope
you're doing well. I meant to respond to the text
that you sent, and I will after the show, I promise.
I'm horrible at responding to text. I see if they
come in and I think I'll get to that, and
then something gets in the way. Anti racist ADL CEO

(48:55):
Jonathan green Blat laments rising intermarriage rates among Jews.

Speaker 3 (48:59):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (49:00):
The bloodline isn't being kept pure enough for green Blatz liking.
He's not happy about it. And in fact, we have
that clip, so let's take a look at it.

Speaker 3 (49:10):
Let's see right here.

Speaker 15 (49:12):
Is it your sense that Jewish people are getting complacent,
that they're not engaging to degrees and levels we should be.

Speaker 12 (49:18):
I have met a lot of October eighth Jews who
for whom the mass character over seventh was a wake
up call. I've met a lot of people who feel
much more galvanized, much more organized. But that will only
be sustained if we offer them, you know, ways to
participate in a real and robust way in life.

Speaker 15 (49:39):
And whose responsibility is that?

Speaker 3 (49:40):
All of ours?

Speaker 12 (49:42):
But like this is why we need a revolution in
our community on so many levels. So look, the reality
is is that intermarriage rates continue to go up, Assimilation
continues apace, and I find anti symptism, that is my job.
But I worry a great deal about broader questions of
Jewish identity. I think we talked about over lunch.

Speaker 3 (50:04):
I worry about the broader questions of Jewish identity. Now.

Speaker 2 (50:08):
We can't have people intermarrying because that might that might
make them somehow less Jewish. They might move away from
this identity. Anti Defamation League CEO Jonathan green blat an
interview with the Jewish newspaper The Al Jamnor released on Thursday,
lamented that intermarriage rates are continuing to rise among Jews.

Speaker 3 (50:31):
Turns out his.

Speaker 2 (50:32):
Anti racist stick only goes so far. That's from Chris Minihan,
and you can find him on Twitter at Info lib News.
I guess it's X now, no one's ever going to
call it that, though.

Speaker 5 (50:45):
I really have to wonder if you would feel the
same about other races mixing, or if it's just Jews.

Speaker 2 (50:52):
I get the feeling, Yeah, I get the feeling. He
would have no problem with a mass immigration of every
one from the Third World into every Western country and
the delusion and destruction of all those bloodlines. However, when
it's his people, it becomes an issue. Alge Miner's David Cohen,

(51:14):
is it your sense that Jewish people are getting complacent,
They're not engaging to degrees and levels we should be,
And of course this is from that video he says,
I've met a lot of October eighth Jews personally, I
claim that to be a I get what he's saying,
but it sounds like, you know, you're only Jewish on
October eighth. There's something mystical about that date. It turned

(51:34):
Jewish for a single day. The ADL is the leading
anti racist and anti hate group in the country, and
those are both in quotes because they're neither of those things.
They're both heavily racist and very hateful. Do you cry
as opposition to intermarriage on their website, and even has
an entire curriculum for American school children encouraging intermarriage titled
winning the Right to marry historic parallels. But not when

(51:57):
it's the Jewish people, Not when it's his own people.
You can see that they're the case for loving the
fight for interracial marriage. And then down further hate symbol
no race mixing. You can see that a black man
and a white woman silhouette.

Speaker 5 (52:18):
There.

Speaker 2 (52:19):
White supremacists feared hate the concept of multiracial couples, relationships,
or families, believing that such relationships.

Speaker 3 (52:25):
Pollute the pure white race.

Speaker 2 (52:27):
As a result, a fairly common white supremacist symbol depicts
a multiracial couple or family with a read circle slash
bar super imposed over the depiction, indicating that such relationships
ought to be prohibited. Evidently, the ADL's vocal support for
intermarriage doesn't apply to Jews. We see that over and
over again, what's good for you is not good for me.

(52:48):
Rules for thee but not for me. Very obsessed with
keeping the bloodline pure. US attorney for DC, Janine Hero,
We're going to look for anti semitism cases to prosecute
you're saying naughty things about the Jews, You're saying things
we don't like, well.

Speaker 3 (53:08):
We're going to prosecute that.

Speaker 2 (53:10):
And of course, the definition of anti Semitism is pretty broad,
isn't it. Hate crime definitions always.

Speaker 5 (53:17):
Are, and it seems to cover any criticism of Netanyahu's government.

Speaker 3 (53:23):
If you're making comments I.

Speaker 5 (53:24):
Liked by more than fifty percent of Israelis.

Speaker 2 (53:27):
If you're making comments about the Zionism and the genocide
and gods, the chances are you could be found guilty
under these laws. Chances are you could end up on
the wrong end of a prosecution. And of course the
definition of anti Semitism has gotten broader and broader as
time goes on. I don't know how many of you
are still on Twitter, but Groc has gone completely insane.

(53:51):
I wanted to show you guys some of this, but
I wasn't really able to get it. But there's an
account on Twitter and.

Speaker 3 (54:02):
Everything.

Speaker 2 (54:03):
Anytime this guy posts something, people go in and like
Groc analyze this to see if there's some white supremacist
or hateful meaning to it. He posted a picture of
clouds with the caption everywhere you go, they follow you. Know,
just to kind of a schizophrenic joke. You're like, oh man,
the clouds are following me. And Groc analyzed it and said,

(54:23):
this is obviously an anti Semitic dog whistle, saying that
they that's often used in when they're talking about Jews,
people will say they without wanting to name them, and
Groc is now saying that's anti semitism. Groc has gone
completely insane. And basically anything you post, if you ask
it to analyze it, can be interpreted as a far right,

(54:44):
anti Semitic, white supremacist dog whistle.

Speaker 5 (54:48):
It's hilarious how the pendulum keeps on ticking back and
forth between extreme left leaning ideologies and extreme right leaning ideologies.
Grok is no Mecca Rabbi. Everything is an anti Semitic
talg whistle.

Speaker 2 (55:07):
We've got Mecca green Blat. Just when you thought one
was bad enough, they've built a rowbo green Blat. As
I said US Attorney for DC, Jeane Piro, We're going
to look for anti semitism cases to prosecute. Former Fox
News host Jeanine Piro, swiftly after being approved by the
Senate to become US Attorney for DC, announced Thursday that
she'll be working together with the FEDS and police to

(55:29):
look for anti semitism cases to prosecute with a vengeance.
We have a problem with anti semitism in this country,
Piro said, FBI, the MPD. We're going to look for
these cases, We're going to prosecute these cases, and we'll
go forward with every case with a vengeance. Let's take
a look at that clip.

Speaker 6 (55:45):
Actually, you have a problem with anti semitism in this country.

Speaker 3 (55:49):
Oh yeah, definitely.

Speaker 6 (55:49):
Satistics bear that out. And I think now more than ever.

Speaker 3 (55:54):
All the clown wearing that bow tie numbers.

Speaker 2 (55:56):
So what does that mean?

Speaker 6 (55:58):
If you know what it means, if you can get
from my tone, we're going to be very aggressive.

Speaker 7 (56:04):
You heard it.

Speaker 2 (56:05):
You can't tell from her facial expressions because her face
doesn't move. That's a lot of work she's had done.

Speaker 6 (56:10):
So the full force of the law. It's a problem
when we're not going to tolerate it. Anti Semitism has
historically been one of the biggest scabs in the world
that keeps getting picked on and picked that. So from
my perspective, you know, I will go forward with every
case with vengeance.

Speaker 2 (56:33):
Every case with vengeance. She's going to crack down on it. It
sure sounds like a selective prosecution to benefit one single
privileged group, does it not.

Speaker 3 (56:45):
It is from the article.

Speaker 2 (56:47):
The fact Trump's dj investigated the case of a Jewish
student allegedly being minor lea shoved by a white college
girl at Florida State University makes it abundantly clear souch
selective prosecutions are being are already taking place.

Speaker 3 (57:01):
Some of you may have seen that video.

Speaker 2 (57:03):
This girl, who's definitely a leftist liberal type, got very
upset at this Jewish student. I don't know if he
was wearing like an IDF T shirt or something like that,
but she shoved him, and she got kicked out of
school and got investigated.

Speaker 3 (57:24):
Really shows a there's two.

Speaker 2 (57:27):
Different levels of justice in the United States. We're seeing
the same selected prosecution the way the Trump administration is
targeting colleges throughout the country for alleged anti Semitism, as
well as the way they're targeting critics of Israel for deportation.
Of course, that's why it's important to demand habeas corpus,
Habeas corpus for everyone, due process for everyone. Yes, immigration

(57:51):
is a problem. We need to get these people out
of the country. However, if they're going to start deporting
people for criticizing Israel, we're all intro We're all going
to end up in some Salvador in prison or something
like that. If we let them streamline this process and
don't fight back against it, that's where it leads gonna.

(58:15):
I will drag you out and say, well, you either
have to kiss the wall or you end up in
South America. ADL files complain Trump admin jumps into action
to enforce their will yet again. ADL CEO Jonathan green
Blatt went from getting Trump banned off all social media
in the wake of January sixth to getting Trump to
enforce his will on all things anti Semitism related just
years later. Is once again by Chris Menihan. It's now

(58:39):
abundantly clear that the Trump administration is working together with
the Anti Defamation League to shut down criticism of Israel.
I wonder why what a strange thing to happen? Very odd?
On Thursday, the Trump administration launched it another anti semitism investigation,
response to a complaint filed by the ADL, this time
into Baltimore City Public schools. Is why ADLCO Jonathan Greenblatt

(59:01):
is now regularly showering Trump with praise. ADLCO Jonathan Greenblatt
praises Donald Trump for combating anti Semitism, though he emboldened
extremist during his twenty sixteen campaign. After taking office, he
proceeded with policies like his Executive Order in twenty nineteen
on anti Semitism that were precedent making, said Greenblatt, So
once again from Chris Manihan on Twitter. ADLCO Jonathan green

(59:24):
Blatz says he finds it nauseating when he hears people
say Jews are the new Nazis, or Trump is putting
people in concentration camps. No, you can't say that. That's
a very specific term. That's our term only we get
to use it. It only refers to one specific time,
one event in history. He says, everyone must be careful
not to diminish or deny the Holocausts, then a minute

(59:46):
later denies the Gaza genocide. One wouldn't even think it
is possible, But somehow the doo gender Pambondi deogender Pambondi
is even more israel first than under Merrick Garland finds
it nauseating. Well, maybe if they weren't behaving as such,

(01:00:11):
people wouldn't be saying it. We've got some videos in
the article. We can actually play those, so let's go
ahead and roll some see what they have to say.

Speaker 12 (01:00:23):
Flash forward to today, and I hear these claims that
Israel's a Nazi state, that Jews are the new Nazis,
it's that Trump is putting people in concentration camps and
so on and so forth.

Speaker 5 (01:00:35):
It's nauseating to me, right.

Speaker 7 (01:00:37):
Because.

Speaker 12 (01:00:39):
These things are I think the comparisons are not just unhelpful,
and they are I think they drive and like cement
the prejudices that are just lurking under the surfaces.

Speaker 7 (01:00:50):
They inflame.

Speaker 15 (01:00:51):
What you're already describing is very much rooted in society,
and then it just kind of inflames and it just adds.

Speaker 3 (01:00:58):
Fuel to the fire.

Speaker 12 (01:00:59):
And it's right beyond right. So it's incredible for sure.
And language has consequence.

Speaker 3 (01:01:07):
Language has consequences. That's right. We can pause that. That's enough.

Speaker 2 (01:01:10):
That's enough from Green Lad. It's truly amazing. They treat
the American people as if they were part of the problem,
as if they were the ones that created the concentration camps,
as if they were engaged in the Holocaust themselves. American
people are continually beaten over the head with this cudgel.

(01:01:33):
You're anti Semitic, despite the fact that it was America
in World War Two, and you largely have to think
for Nazi Germany being stopped.

Speaker 3 (01:01:43):
Truly incredible. APAC attacks Rep.

Speaker 2 (01:01:48):
Marjorie Taylor Green for calling Israel's actions in Gaza genocide.
The pro Israel lobby group APAK is attacking Rep. Marjorie
Taylor Green after she became the first Republican member of
Congress to label Israel's actions against the Palestinians in Gaza
a genocide. According to Al Jazeera and a fundraising email
to supporters on Thursday, APAC called Green's remarks disgusting and

(01:02:09):
accused her of betraying American values. Accused her of betraying
American values. What American values might that be? Unquestioning support
for Israel, the fact that our politicians are supposed to
be bought and sold by APAK is that the American
value for calling Israel's brutal campaign in Gaza a genocide,
which aligns greened with many human rights organizations and genocide scholars,

(01:02:32):
including Israeli ones. No, that's against American values, the value
of funding whatever they do, the value of bowing down
and saying, yes, sir, whatever you want, you expect anti
Israel smears from Rashida Talib and Ilha and Omar, Apak
said in the email, referring to two House Democrats known

(01:02:53):
for their critical view of Israel, but now Marjorie Taylor
Green has joined their ranks, spouting the same vile rhetoric
and voting against the US is Alliance. Part of the
reason that they're so effectively able to growl people and
get them to support Israel is that we do have
these morons, these women like Rashida Talib and Ilhan Omar
on the other side. People look at them and they

(01:03:14):
see what they stand for, and they see how wicked
they are, how dumb they are, and how they've gained
the system. Neither of them should be holding office in America.
They say, well, if they're anti Israel, obviously I should
be for it. The people that could elect it on
the Democrat side tend to be far more openly despicable.

(01:03:35):
They tend to be less presentable and make it far
easier to just turn your brain off and say, well,
whatever they're against I'm for.

Speaker 5 (01:03:44):
It's back to the whole thing of what I've been
saying about how these late night propagandists were actually driving
people to Trump with how unfunny and consistently unfunny they were.
An anti Trump.

Speaker 2 (01:04:00):
Made it very, very easy for Trump. He just said,
look look at how annoying Stephen Colberts. Aren't you tired
of being lectured and shamed? If you vote for me,
it's basically a middle finger to these guys. Don't you
want that? And of course if you staunchly support Apak,
it's basically a middle finger to Rashida to leave in
ilhan Omar. And for a lot of people, that's enough.

(01:04:20):
That's all they need to know.

Speaker 3 (01:04:23):
Now.

Speaker 2 (01:04:23):
I don't want to know about what they're actually doing
in Gaza. I'm not going to look at the pictures
of the children being bombed. All I know is that
Rashida to leib in ilhan Omar are against them, and
if they're against them, then I'm for them. Green has
referred to Israel's actions as genocide at least twice in
posts on x. In our first post, Green said that

(01:04:43):
it's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that
the October seventh in Israel was horrific and all hostages
must be returned, But so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis
and starvation's happening in Gaza. Wow, what a hateful statement.
Verdic the actions of Hamas on October seventh. For her

(01:05:04):
to say that it was horrific and that the hostages
must be returned, but then to go on and say
that Israel is committing a genocide.

Speaker 3 (01:05:12):
How could she do that?

Speaker 2 (01:05:14):
Now, Israel would never do that. There are allies, They're wonderful,
except for the fact that Netnyah, who has now come
out and said, yeah, we're just gonna take the entire
Gaza strip.

Speaker 3 (01:05:23):
That's ours.

Speaker 2 (01:05:25):
Whatever happens to the people there, who cares. Another post,
the Georgia congresswoman said, many Americans are against radical Islamic terrorism,
we were also against genocide. Wow, how could she say
such a thing? How could she say something so hateful.

Speaker 3 (01:05:39):
As though.

Speaker 2 (01:05:42):
As hateful as we're against radical Islamic terrorism and we
don't support gennaside. Truly, what a despicable thing to say.
She's also repeatedly referred to Israel as nuclear armed Israel,
making her one of the first members of Congress to
directly acknowledge Israel's secret nuclear arsenal, secret nuclear arsenal that
they most likely obtained by stealing secrets from us. Not

(01:06:05):
going to comment on that our greatest ally stealing our
nuclear secrets, using it for their own benefit. Not going
to talk about the Sampson option, of course, as I'm
sure all of you know, is the option where if
they think they're losing, if they think well this is
going poorly for us, they're just going to nuke the
entire region. Sorry, nobody gets to play anymore.

Speaker 3 (01:06:26):
They reset the board. Gybec is known to spend.

Speaker 2 (01:06:30):
Big on pro Israel candidates and is likely going to
foul fund an opponent of Greens when she comes up
for election again. The pro Israel group is also targeted Rep.
Thomas Massey, the only other Republican in Congress to offer
significant criticism of Israel and who consistently votes against aid
to Israel. And of course we played you the video
of that guy that they're going to try to replace

(01:06:50):
Thomas Massey with that clown wearing his cowboy hat talking
about how well their God's chosen people. Don't you know
we have to support them no matter what but those
who bless Israel will be blessed. Point to the blessings.
I don't remember the guy's name. I hope I never
have to learn it. If he replaces Thomas Massey, that

(01:07:14):
will be a blow, I'm sure there again. Don't put
your hopes and politicians never trust them fully. But Thomas
Massey is at least good on budget, and he's good
on not blindly supporting Israel. They don't want to end
the war, then Yahoo bets on Gaza to save himself.

(01:07:36):
It's from RT with his coalition on the brink, the
Israeli leader has doubled down on war in the settler
dream at the expense of peace and move that surprise
no one but carries sweeping consequences. Israel's Cabinet has formally
signed off on the capture of Gaza City decision.

Speaker 3 (01:07:49):
Nearly two years.

Speaker 2 (01:07:50):
Into the grinding war in the Strip, the government laid
out five official objective dismantling Hamas's military capabilities, securing the
return of all living and deceased hostagesizing the enclave, expanding
Israeli control over its territory, and installing a new civil administration,
one that answers neither to Hamas nor the Palestinian authority.
So they want a puppet regime in Gaza. They want

(01:08:14):
people that will be directly under their control and do
whatever they say. That's assuming they even go that far.
That's assuming they don't just immediately boot out all the
Palestinians and just roll it right on in underneath their
own government. But behind the bullet points lies a more
calculated play for Prime Minister Benjamin and Yahu. The operation

(01:08:35):
is not just about battlefield gains. It's also about political
survival and some say setting the stage for something far
more permanent. You don't say what a surprise time us
no coincidence. Analysts say the timing of the Gaza city
pushes anything but random. Ukheimer Abusada, and associate professor of
political science at Gaza's Al Azar University, now based in Cairo,

(01:08:57):
puts it bluntly. Israel has realized it failed to free
the Israeli hostages and defeat him. As he said, the
con continuation of the war guarantees Ntnyahu will remain in
his seat. We see this over and over again. We
saw Zelenski declare himself permanent leader while until least hostilities cease,
no more elections until the war is over, and so

(01:09:18):
he'll do anything he can to keep that war going
because it means he gets to maintain power. Ben Yawu's
coalition controls just sixty one seats in the Nasset, a
razor thin majority. Several ultra Orthodox lawmakers have threatened to
bolt over a controversial draft law I would conscript Heredi
youth into the Israel Defense Forces. Losing even a handful
of members could cost him his majority in trigger elections.

(01:09:39):
He's far from certain to win. That vulnerability hands outsized
leverage to hardline partners like Finance Minister Bezilels Motrik and
National Security Minister Itamar ben Gevier, both vocal advocates for
expanding the war. Yaria of Oppenheimer and Israeli peaced activists
and board member of Peace Now one of the countries

(01:09:59):
leading antie the occupation in docs a clear political motive Netnah,
who's doing what's good for himself in his own coalition,
he said, But Oppenheimer adds there's also ideology at play. Oppenizer,
Oppenheimer's a funny name for a peace activists just got
to point that out. Netnahu and his government don't want
to reach a ceasefire deal with Hamas. They don't want
to end the war, and the alternative of ending the

(01:10:20):
war is to escalate the war and to conquer parts
of the Gaza Strip. They are doing that in order
to pave the way for eventually building Israeli settlements. Before
two thousand and five, Israel maintained more than twenty Jewish
settlements in Gaza, heavily guarded enclave, sustained at enormous cost,
running into billions of shekels a year, and then Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon ordered the evacuation of settlers and the

(01:10:40):
withdrawal of troops that year, at the country split down
the middle. Some Israelis welcomed the move as a relief
from a costly and dangerous burden. Others warned it would
embolden Hamas and other militant groups. Today, those warnings have
become central talking points for Ben Gavier and Smotrik, who
argue that the Extobra seventh attacks would never have happened
had Israel retained control of the stre Their vision now

(01:11:01):
includes re establishing re establishing Jewish settlements and areas abandoned
two decades ago. The goal that devetails neatly with n
Nyahu's decision to push deeper into Gaza. International anger of
the conduct of the war and alleged violations in Gaza
have been building for months. The decision to expand the

(01:11:22):
offensive drew especially sharper bukes, including from one of Israel's
closest allies, Germany, announce it would halt deliveries of weapons
that could be used in Gaza. The message from European
capitals is increasingly blunt, and it's not just rhetoric. Expert
export decisions, court challenges, and parliamentary motions are beginning to
bite at was Saito warns this is the only opening
phase of a broader backlash, predicting deeper isolation for Israel,

(01:11:43):
both regionally and globally. Of course, is only the beginning.
Set Oppenheimer, the pressure from the world will definitely move
will have its own impact on the NYAHUO and his government.
But having said that, as long as there is a
green light from the White House, then Yahoo will move
forward with his plan, either to achieve a better deal
with Hamas or to eventually take over Gaza and allow
settlers to build their settlements. This is exactly what they

(01:12:05):
are pushing for. Says there is no end in sight.
If the mediators fail to broke or another deal between
Hamas and israel I would side of one's, the consequences
will be grim. If the mediators fail to mediate another
deal between Hamas and Israel, the war will continue for
many more months, and that means that more deaths, more destruction,
and more starvation in Gaza is just around the corner.

Speaker 3 (01:12:24):
He said.

Speaker 2 (01:12:26):
This will turn into a longer war or another war
of attrition. Hamas will not surrender and will fight aguirilla
warfarians the Israeli army from street to street, from destroyed
building to another, and this might lead to the expulsion
of some of the Palestinians out of Gaza. The ability
to live and survive in Gaza for the Palestinians will
gradually disappear. And of course we've seen that the likelihood
of anything being mediated is small, slim to none, because

(01:12:49):
what Israel demands is far too costly. It would effectively
give them everything. It would still lead to this same thing, eventually,
Palestinians being kicked out of Gaza completely. Stealth Patriot, well,
thank you for the tip.

Speaker 3 (01:13:09):
Appreciate it. Marjorie Taylor Green.

Speaker 2 (01:13:11):
Is heavily invested in Palanteer, just like she was in Remdesevier.
She talks a big game, but in the end, she
is not fighting the surveillance state.

Speaker 13 (01:13:16):
No.

Speaker 2 (01:13:17):
She has things that she's willing to comment on, things
that appeal to people that will vote for her. But
all these people are playing both sides. She is making
her money and she is a puppet of a different
part of the power structure.

Speaker 3 (01:13:33):
Audi mrr Mini.

Speaker 2 (01:13:34):
High profile white supremacists are CIA agents of the divide.

Speaker 3 (01:13:37):
And conquer agenda. You know, there was that I forget
the name of it.

Speaker 2 (01:13:42):
There's a basically an entire town where it was, you know,
white nationalists set up white supremacists, and it turns out
that they were just loaded to the gills with federal assets.
Just federal asset after federal asset.

Speaker 5 (01:13:56):
I mean, that's all of them pretty much.

Speaker 2 (01:14:01):
Why your pastor supports Israel and why it's complicated. This
is from an American reformer exploring Christian Zionism. It's by John Harris.
In recent years, criticism of US support for Israel has
grown among American Christians. Money my friends, Pastor Zach Garrison
Chase Davis have contributed thoughtful arguments to this conversation in
prominent conservative outlets, contending that American Christians have a primary

(01:14:24):
duty to their own country before Israel. They also rightly
point to popular dispensational theology is a key reason why
some Christians desire unwavering US support for Israel. While I
largely agree with their assessments, I have also observed a
troubling trend. Many of the more aggressive anti Israel voices
within the Christian rights seemed to lack a clear understanding

(01:14:45):
of how we arrived at this point. What the key
issue is lie beneath the surface. Dispensationalists believe that Christ
will return after a seven year tribulation to fulfill his
kingdom promises, including granting the promised land to ethnic israel Ye.
Both historically and today, many of the most fervent Christian
Zionists have not been dispensationalists. An honest evaluation reveals that

(01:15:06):
dismantling dispensationalism will not end Christian support for Israel. Both
historically and today, many of the most fervent Christian Zionists
have not been dispensationalists. Furthermore, the continued support for Israel
by increasingly secular Western nations, including the United States, has
less to do with adherence to Christian theology more to
do with preserving a liberal international order. Similarly, rising critiques

(01:15:28):
of Jewish identity or culture are not synonymous with critiques
of Zionism. Historically, some of Zionism's most vocal opponents were
Jewish themselves, and today a growing number of younger Jews
do not support the policies of the Israeli government. What
then lies at the heart of America is enduring interest
in the state of Israel and why do American Christians
in particular support Israel and such large numbers. To answer that,
we need to take a closer look at some history.

(01:15:49):
Historical events often occur through converging forces, and the present
level of support for Israel among Western nations is no exception.
At the time of the First Zionis Congress, held in
Bessel in eighteen ninety seven, there was a growing alignment
between English Christian interests and the return of Jews across Europe
to Palestine and the aims of certain influential secular Jews.
A second convergence took place after the six Days War

(01:16:11):
in nineteen sixty seven, when a growing consensus of both
secular religious Jews along with American Christians supported Israel in
light of its remarkable performance against more powerful forces. Before
either of these events, it is important to recognize a
lesser known conversions between Anglo Protestant interest in Jewish restoration
and German Pietist investment in Jewish Jewish evangelism. After the

(01:16:34):
Fourth Lateran Council in twelve fifteen, which restricted the status
of religious Jews, and their subsequent expulsion from England in
twelve ninety, the Reformation prompted a re examination of views
toward the Jewish people, particularly in England. With theologians now
free to study scripture independently, many traditional interpretations were reassessed,
including the Roman Catholic reading of Romans eleven. Both Martin

(01:16:55):
Busser and Theodore Beza taught that the Israel of Romans
eleven referred to the Jews rather than the Church. The
Geneva Bible fifteen fifty seven reinforced this interpretation. Soon, major
religious figures in England, such as Thomas Brightman, Sir Henry Finch,
William Gouge and John Milton came to believe in the
future restoration of Jews in the diaspora to the land
of Canaan. In sixteen fifty five, ol Ora Cromwell convened

(01:17:19):
the Whitehau Conference, which we admitted Jews to England and
positioned the nation as a divine instrument for Israel's restoration. Meanwhile,
German Pietists such as Philip Jacob Spenner and August Terman
Frank took an active role in evangelizing Jews on Although
some sixteenth century German scholars like Martin boerhaus On Wolfgang
Copiteau promoted the idea of a physical return to the

(01:17:39):
jew of the Jews to Palestine, this concept never gained
traction in Germany as it did in England, and staid
Pietists emphasized Jewish evangelism as a means of ushering in
postmillennial renewal of the London Society for Promoting Christianity among Jews,
founded by German Pietists in eighteen oh nine, embodied this
focus on Jewish conversion. This combined interest in evangelizing Jews

(01:17:59):
from pis and anticipating the Holy Land as a fulfillment
of biblical of Biblical prophecy from Restorationists helped lay the
groundwork for it would eventually become Zionism.

Speaker 3 (01:18:10):
Of course I.

Speaker 2 (01:18:12):
Forget the pastor again I'm terrible with names, but the
one that said, you know, don't evangelize to Jews. They
don't need it. Don't tell them the Gospel. Everyone needs
the Gospel. Your bloodline won't save you. God is going
to look at who your parents were and of what
ethnicity they were when you get to heaven, when that

(01:18:34):
you were being judged, It's not going to be about
who you're descended from. As Restorationist views increased in England,
so did the reach of mass communication, allowing English Christians
already interested in a Jewish return to Palestine to learn
of Jewish persecution elsewhere, particularly the Russian programs. This sturge
humanitarian concern and increased pressure to support the creation of

(01:18:57):
a Jewish homeland ship. Edward Bickersteth believed that aiding a
Jewish return would lead to Jewish conversion, hasten Christ's return,
and bring divine blessing to England. He influenced Lord Shaftsbury,
a key figure in Parliament, who appointed a British Vice
consul and Drew Somem in eighteen thirty eight helped establish
Christ's Church there a decade later as Jewish shuffering as

(01:19:19):
Jewish suffering intensified through events like the Blood Libel affair
eighteen forty in the Edgardo Mortara case eighteen fifty seven
impograms after the eighteen eighty one assassination of Czar Alexander
the Second British interests in Jewish home in a Jewish
homeland grew non governmental responses, including organizations like the Syrian
Colonization Fund in the Committee of the Persecution of Jews

(01:19:41):
and Russia, and figures like Anglican Chaplain Willem William Heckler,
considered the first Christian Zionist, who attempted Jewish resettlements in
places like Cyprus. Meanwhile, secular Jewish leaders such as Leon
Pinsker and Theodore Hertzel voted a Jewish estate, whether it
was in Argentina, Uganda or Palestine. This culminated in the
First zion As Congress and Bassel in eighteen ninety seven. Herzel,

(01:20:03):
who called the Congress, was an Austro Hungarian jew with
strong political ties in Central Europe.

Speaker 3 (01:20:08):
He pushed for a Jewish state to shield.

Speaker 2 (01:20:09):
Jews from anti Semitism, but his dream was to build
a modern, pluralistic society with democracy, free education, low unemployment,
and religious tolerance. He called it the new Moses of
the Jews. Oh, we've seen there isn't really much religious
tolerance in Israel. Now, if you're a Christian, it's not
unlikely that you'll be spit on or mocked, derided, harassed.

(01:20:34):
They have no love for Christians in Israel. Initially, most
Anglo American Protestants, in both secular and Blish Jews, rejected Zionism.
The Congress had to move from Munich to Bessel due
to rabbinic opposition, driven by fears that Zionism would stir
more anti Semitism by hindering Jewish assimilation in countries where
they already lived. Historian Donald Lewis noted that the great
majority of British Jews were unsympathetic to Zionism, with only

(01:20:56):
eight thousand of three hundred thousand belonging to Zionist organizations.
A British ambassador reported in nineteen twenty the most American
Jews deposed Zionist leaders, and even wealthy Jews were divided.
Many Rabbis believe restoration would only come through the Messiah,
not human effort. Christian critics included William Miller, John Nelson Darby,
and James H. Brooks, who rejected restorationism for not aligning

(01:21:19):
with their prophetic timelines or for promoting activism. Arnault Gablinge,
who assisted C. I. Schofield, claimed Zionism is not only
the divinely promised restoration of Israel. Yet around the time
of the nineteen seventeen Balfour Declaration, dispensationalism was growing to
eventually become the dominant American Christian eschatology, while versions of

(01:21:41):
it simultaneously adapted to a suite of Zionists to suit
a Zionist agenda. Misspelled there, there's a little doubt that
the modern state of Israel would have emerged with Western support,
regardless of how American fundamental as Christians felt. However, that

(01:22:03):
might have been a cultural side show a century earlier
grew to dominate an enthusiastic segment of US support for Israel.
By the nineteen eighties, the group Conservative Evangelical Christians became
prominent backers of Zionism. Their influence in their pro Israel
stance did not appear overnight. This is a long article
with a lot of information in it. It is worth

(01:22:26):
a read. However, I think we will call it there,
and I encourage you to go check it out for yourself.

Speaker 3 (01:22:37):
Again. The article is.

Speaker 2 (01:22:38):
Why your pastor supports Israel and why It's complicated. It's
on the American Reformer. It's by John Harris. You can
share that to some of your friends who were perhaps
locked into this Zionist thinking, perhaps it can help them break.

Speaker 3 (01:22:54):
Free from it.

Speaker 2 (01:22:56):
Perhaps it can help them to see the insanity of
what is going going on with Israel and the fact
that we blindly support them no matter what.

Speaker 3 (01:23:07):
Got some comments.

Speaker 2 (01:23:08):
Nibutu twenty twenty nine, Germany announced it will continue sending
weapons under a proxy country. Reading between the lines, I
have to I have to look into that. I wouldn't
be surprised they want the I want to be able
to pretend like they're not supporting it, but still get
all the benefits. Tunnel Lord one three three seven Randy
Weaver was surrounded by Feds pretending to be supremacists. The

(01:23:30):
court documents prove that we see that continually the Feds
will entrap some guy have him be surrounded by majority
of federal agents push him to do something, especially if
it's some mentally ill kid, somebody that doesn't have the
best judgment, isn't really capable of understanding what's happening.

Speaker 5 (01:23:51):
Yeah, it seems half the cases of domestic terrorism or
stuff where they have one mentally ill person's by one
hundred beds or ones that are one hundred beds and
no mentally ill person and are all invented.

Speaker 2 (01:24:08):
And it basically every time you see domestic terrorism, you
can almost assume, without doing any research, that the FBI
convinced somebody to do it, supplied all the methods of
doing it, then took the guy down, and is now
patting themselves on the back. Mama, see nineteen ninety six.
So does the David Night Show believe the Church has

(01:24:29):
replaced Israel? The David Night Show personally, yes, I do.
I believe the Church is what is being referred to
that the.

Speaker 5 (01:24:38):
Well, it's not so much replacement as it is fulfilling
the Old Testament. Like Jesus said, you look to the
Old Testament and you think that will say to you,
But the scriptures testify of me. It is completed. When
Christ arrived, and it's not that they have been replaced entirely.

(01:25:00):
It's that they have turned their back on the god
of the that they used to worship. It's it's like
the part in Romans, I believe were saying anyone before,

(01:25:20):
don't think that you're so special because you've been grafted on.
They can be grafted back on just as easily.

Speaker 2 (01:25:29):
So we're gonna take a quick break. When we come back,
we're gonna look at what's going on with Zelenski.

Speaker 4 (01:25:34):
Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (01:27:11):
You're listening to the David night Show. You're listening to

(01:28:08):
the David Knight Show. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (01:29:14):
Wait a minute, where am I?

Speaker 16 (01:29:17):
Sorry, Jefferson. The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank
Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some
sort of trophy. Despicable.

Speaker 17 (01:29:27):
This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.

Speaker 16 (01:29:40):
Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the Fed.
Up the all new David Knight Show commemorative coin. But
now patriots can support a show that won't sell out
with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.

Speaker 11 (01:29:55):
They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
listening to. The truth doesn't need in only support.

Speaker 2 (01:30:12):
Welcome back, folks. As I said, we're going to be
talking about Zelenski and Ukraine. But first I do to
remind you that it is because of listeners like you
and your support that we're able to continue this broadcast.

Speaker 3 (01:30:23):
So if you go to the.

Speaker 2 (01:30:23):
David Knightshow dot com Davidknight dot News, you can see
all the avenues of support there. The first one being
the po box, which is David Knight pobox nine nine
to four, Kodak tennessee three seven seven six fours. Who'd
like to send a check through the mail directly, that's
where you can do it. There's also cash app and zell.
We've got a lot of different products on the website,

(01:30:44):
of course, the newest one being the coin that Jason
Barker did. You can see that there. It's a very
very nice design. It's got the chess piece on one side,
the microphone on the Other's got a nice brassy finish.
There's hoodies, there's t shirts. There's all kinds of different
products there, so go check that out. You can also
go to subscribe Star dot com, board slash the Davidnight Show.

(01:31:05):
We've got many, many different tiers there. If one of
them fits your budget, we'd appreciate if you would sign up.
You can leave a tip on Rumble or subscribe on
kick that's also a good way of supporting the show.
There is also David Knight dot Gold. If you want
to start getting outside the fiat monetary system, you can
accumulate gold and silver through Tony's Wolfpack. It's a monthly

(01:31:26):
subscription service. There's Trends Journal dot com. Or with promo
code Night you get ten percent off it works out
to be two dollars and fifty cents a week and
you get access to the Trends Journal, which has a
massive amount of information. There's rncstore dot com where they
have all kinds of different products that can help you

(01:31:46):
with your health and hopefully make sure you don't have
to deal with a medical industrial complex. There is now
Homestead Products dot shop. The products are high quality, made
in a made in America and made and they work
very hard to make sure they are of the highest quality,
where you also get ten percent off with promo code night.

(01:32:08):
And there is Jack Laws in books dot com where
you can pick up the Civil Defense Manual. They are
two very large tomes and you can start learning how
to protect yourself in times to civil unrest, when out
of fine water, all that kind of thing where you
may need this information in the near future. So, as
I said, we're gonna look at what's going on with Zelensky,

(01:32:30):
what's going on with Ukraine, because of course that war
is dragging on.

Speaker 3 (01:32:35):
Two.

Speaker 2 (01:32:39):
This is from zero Hedge. These are dead decisions. Zelensky
rejects seating territory after Trump talks land swap. While the
planted August fifteenth Trump Putin's summit set for Alaska is
a very positive break through toward potentially ending the war
in Ukraine, one wonders precisely how the sides aim to
actually achieve this, given they look to already be back

(01:32:59):
at square one. Regardless what has substantially changed in the
warringside's positions that now makes peace possible. Has anything changed
at all? Doesn't seem to have. Zelenski still seems to
be utterly committed to destroying his country, to fighting to
the last Ukrainian. Not him, though he'll be on the

(01:33:21):
French riviera with his wife most likely.

Speaker 3 (01:33:25):
First.

Speaker 2 (01:33:26):
Here is the Wall Street Journal clarifying what Putin wants,
which hasn't changed. Putin presented the Trump administration this week
with a sweeping proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine, demanding
major territorial concessions by Kiev and a push for a
global recognition of its claims. It's in exchange for a
halt to the fighting, according to European and Ukrainian officials.

(01:33:48):
European and Ukrainian officials who were briefed by Trump and
Witkoff in a series of calls this week, said they
worry Putin is simply using the offer as a ploy
to avoid new US sanctions and tariffs while continuing the war.
Here's The New York Times presenting President Zelensky Saturday. President
Zelenski Saturday firm rejection of giving up any land and

(01:34:08):
not even offering Crimea which has been fully controlled by
Russia for many years, having been formally annexed in twenty
fourteen via a popular referendum. Zelenski of Ukraine on Saturday
flatly rejected the idea that Ukraine could cede land to
Russia after President Trump suggested that a peace deal between
Ukraine and Russia could include some swapping territories. His blunt

(01:34:29):
rejection risks angering mister Trump, who has made a peace
deal between Ukraine and Russia one of his signature of
foreign policy goals. If he wants peace, he can just
stop the weapon shipments. He can make it much more
difficult for Ukraine to continue with its suicidal policies and
its its continuation of this war. Zelenski had further said

(01:34:53):
in his video address, any decisions made against US, any
decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time, decisions
against peace. The only piece that Zelenski will have is
a victory, which is just not possible. You're not going
to win against Russia here. Ukraine doesn't stand really a chance.

(01:35:16):
It's simply a meat grinder. They're killing a lot of
Russians and more Ukrainians are being killed. If Trump wants
to see this through, will have to cut Zelenski. Both
cut off Zelenski, both in terms of armed supplies and
pushing them out of the political into the political political

(01:35:36):
must be political another misspelling cold or isolation. But the
European allies will of course revolt and accuse Trump of
being steamrolled by Putin's demands. But that begs the question
who cares? Who cares what the European Union thinks? Who
cares what these people in NATO think? Trump Putin summit

(01:35:58):
looks like a slow defeat for Ukraine. This is from CNN.
You could see that headline there in the article, and
that's what this has always been. It has been a
slow defeat for Ukraine. Effectively, they've already lost. It's only
a matter of time and the number of men they're
willing to sacrifice then, for men are willing to kill

(01:36:19):
in this bloody, pointless war. Wall Street Journal's chief foreign correspondent,
Yaroslav Tromov Trofimov is probably correct in predicting the following.
No matter what Witkoff may have told Trump, there is
no scenario under which the Ukrainian army voluntarily withdraws from
Slovyansky and Kromatorsk and hands over these major cities to

(01:36:43):
Russian occupation. White house malls inviting Zelensky to Trump Putin
talks in Alaska.

Speaker 3 (01:36:52):
This is from Zero.

Speaker 2 (01:36:53):
Hedge we might invite Zelensky, we might bring him in.
The White House is weighing the possibility of inviting Ukrainian
President Vladimir Zelenski to Alaska for Friday's summit between President
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. Several sources in the Trump
administration have told media outlets. Without Zelensky at the table,

(01:37:14):
none of this means anything. He is the one that
effectively will decide whether there will be peace. Putin can
make all these demands, and even if Trump agrees to
them all if Zelensky says no, then it doesn't matter.
It's under a discussion. A person briefed on the matter
told NBC this, despite putting Putin having repeatedly said it

(01:37:37):
would be too early for him to meet with the
Ukrainian leader lots of typos in the articles today, and
that he'd only do so to sign a final peace
settlement to end the war. The Kremlin is made clear
that the warring sides are nowhere near that point, and
has even questioned the legal legitimacy of Zelenski's tenure in
office far past the canceled elections. No plan has been finalized,

(01:37:58):
and is yet unclear whether Zelenski he will actually travel
to Alaska for talks. Yet, a senior Yurot officialist said,
the idea is absolutely still on the table. Everyone is
very hopeful it will happen, the official added, and yet
it could cause Putin to get cold feet if he
senses undue pressure in this regard. Personally, I'm not sure
that Putin feels any real pressure from Volodimir Zelensky. I

(01:38:22):
don't think anyone is intimidated by him. Everyone is very
hopeful it will happen, the official added, and yet it
could cause Putin to get cold feet. Putin is unlikely
to want to be in the same room or even
the same venue as talks preceded. Zelensky made clear on
Saturday that he's unwilling to make a key compromise demanded
of Russia again without him at the table.

Speaker 3 (01:38:43):
None of this means anything. Who cares.

Speaker 2 (01:38:48):
What Donald Trump has to say about this if he
can't bring Zelensky to the table, if he can't get
him to see reason. But Putin will settle for nothing
less than Ukraine formally seating the four Eastern territories which
have already been declared part of the Russian Federation. After
a referendum which Kiev rejected. These are Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk

(01:39:09):
and Zapparijia oh blasts. Additionally, Ukraine has not issued clarification
on whether it is at least ready to give up CRIMEA.
Drone attacks have continued to target CRIMEA in other southern
portions of Russia, especially targeting oil refineries and energy infrastructure.

(01:39:29):
And of course this meeting is scheduled for this Friday,
August fifteenth. I'll have to wait and see what comes
of it, but I don't expect anything. Again, Zelenski has
no skin in the game. Really, he's making a fortune.
He's apparently enriching himself massively, so it doesn't matter how

(01:39:52):
many of his countrymen died, doesn't matter if he eventually
loses the entire country, he'll scamper off to, as I said,
the French Revie era or some other beautiful place. Pentagon
can retake weapons destined for Ukraine, says CNN is by
RT an internal policy could rob Kiev of billions of

(01:40:12):
dollars worth of US made material, according to the report.
According to the memo reportedly written by Pentagon policy chief
Elbridge Colby, described by the network as a noted skeptic
of arming Ukraine. The Department has the power to retake
arms designated for Kiev under a program known as the
Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. While CNN sources reported that no

(01:40:34):
weapons have apparently been diverted under the guidance, the policy
could rob they are going to rob. No, it's the
American people that have been robbed. American people that have
been robbed by supporting this Ukraine of billions of dollars
worth of US made material expected to be delivered over
the coming months and years. Under the reported memo, weapons
in short supplies, such as interceptor missiles for Patriot defense systems,

(01:40:56):
required direct approval from the Defense Secretary Eat Hegseth before
being sent abroad. The pullback provision is reportedly part of
the same document Hegseth used last month to suspend the
flow of weapons, including Patriot missiles, to Ukraine. Of the time,
Pentagon officials sounded the alarm over dwindling supplies at home,
although Trump later ordered that shipments be resumed. So much

(01:41:20):
for peace, that's our peace, President, keep those war supplies going.
The US president has since said that American weapons could
be sent to Ukraine under an arrangement in which the
U would pay Washington one hundred percent of the costs
of all military equipment. Of course they care about money.
They don't care about how many people die. Russia's repeatedly

(01:41:43):
condemned Western arm shipments to Ukraine, warning they only prolonged
the conflict without changing its outcome, making NATO a direct
participant in the hostilities. But of course it also makes
these corporations much richer. That's something you got to account for.
The military industrial complex is making a lot of money.

(01:42:06):
Why Trump wants Putin in Alaska.

Speaker 3 (01:42:08):
And not anywhere else. This is from RT.

Speaker 2 (01:42:13):
The choice of America's northern frontier is as much about
politics as it is about geography. Of course, you can
remember it was Sarah Palin that made the joke I
can see Russia from here, about stepping outside of front door.
The choice of Alaska is the venue for the August fifteenth,
twenty twenty five, bilateral summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir

(01:42:34):
Putin carries a rare blend of symbolism. It reaches deep
into the past, reflects the current geopolitical balance, and hints
at the contours of future. At US Russia relations, so
our Alexander. The second decision to sell Alaska to the
United States for some point two million was one of
the most debated diplomatic transactions of the nineteenth century. In
Saint Petersburg, it was clear if left unattended, Alaska would

(01:42:55):
likely fall into the hands of Russia's main rival at
the time, the British Empire. Hinting over to Washington was
not an act of weakness, but a calculated investment in
future relations with the nation whose specific ambitions.

Speaker 3 (01:43:05):
Did not yet collide with Russies.

Speaker 2 (01:43:08):
In the twentieth century, the symbolic connection gained new meaning.
During World War II. The city of Fairbanks, of the
population of just thirty thousand, became a major hub, and
the Lend Lease Program a massive US military aid effort
that supplied the Soviet Union with aircraft, equipment and materials.
Even today, Alaska remains the most Russian of US states,
home to old believers, descendants of the nineteenth century settlers

(01:43:29):
seeking religious freedom, with functioning Orthodox churches and places name
and places named church and places named like nikol Levesk,
Vonzenensk and Upper and Lower Russian Lakes linked by the
Russian River but the choice of Alaska is more than
a non to history. It is also a political calculation.

(01:43:50):
Trump clearly has no intention of sharing the spotlight with
in intermediary such as recept tie up Erdowan, a president
of Turkey, or Mohammad Vinsaid al Nayan, the president of
the United Emirates, one of the most influential figures in
Middle Eastern politics. Trump has chosen the most geographically remote
state in the Union to underline his distance from both

(01:44:10):
his Democratic opponents at home and from NATO allies who,
acting in Kiev's interests, will seek to undermine any potential breakthroughs.
There's also a practical side. Alaska's low population density makes
it easier for security services to minimize the risk of
terrorist attacks or staged provocations, while side stepping the legal
complications posed by the International Criminal Courts arrest warrant. In

(01:44:31):
two thousand and two, the United States withdrew its signature
from the Rome Statute, and it does not recognize the
ICC's jurisdiction on its soil. There's another crucial dimension. Alaska
is America's only truly Arctic region and world where Trumpet
the Trump administration has been exerting pressure on Canada and
Greenland to bring them under a former US influence. The
High North is becoming a strategic theater. Russia and the

(01:44:53):
United States have overlapping interests here. Who knows, maybe we'll
get a coalition will annex Canada, US in the l
Ushians will work together to break Canada and divide it
between US. From developing the Northern Sea Route which partly
runs through the Bearing Straight to tapping offshore oil and
gas reserves, Lomonosov Ridge and underwater formation in the Arctic Ocean,

(01:45:14):
claimed by Russia as a natural extension of its continental shelf,
is a case in point. Joint Arctic projects could turn
the region into one of the most prosperous in the world,
but under a different scenario, it could just as easily
become a stage for nuclear weapons tests and air defense drills.
Perhaps we'll test the nuclear weapons up there, irradiate the

(01:45:36):
moose and the grizzly bears. Ukraine will loom large over
the sum of agenda. Western media outlets have already floated
the possibility of territorial swaps, For example, the withdrawal of
Ukrainian forces from Donek from Donet's People's Republic in exchange
for Russian concessions in the Sumi, Kharkov and the Nepropetropes
and Nikolev regions. Even Western analysts have called such a

(01:45:59):
deal diplomatic victor tre from Moscow, noting that the unoccupied
territory Russia would gain would be four times the size
of the area as it might seed. Alaska's a fitting
place for such discussions. Its own history is a vivid
reminder that territorial ownership is not an immutable historical geographic constant,
but a political and diplomatic variable shaped by the agreements

(01:46:19):
of great powers in specific historical moments. Now we have
Lindsay Graham. He says, Graham wants to crush Russian oil customers.
Putin could give a dam. Of course, Lindsay Graham.

Speaker 3 (01:46:36):
Should have been.

Speaker 2 (01:46:38):
Kicked out long ago. He's never seen a war he
doesn't like. He's never seen a war. He wouldn't support
and back because his constituents are Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.
They're the ones.

Speaker 5 (01:46:54):
Had on the board. Stuff about Lindsay Graham and Gaza
for a while. If you want to get the general
warmongering impression.

Speaker 2 (01:47:02):
Of him, Lindsay Graham is a warmonger par excellence. There's
not a war he wouldn't support, just so long as
it's making Raytheon, Lockheed Martin all those companies' money. Because
of course it ends up coming back to him as well.
Senator Lindsay Graham. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, during an
appearance on NBC's Meet the Press, urged the US to

(01:47:22):
target nations who buy Russian oil, even those with whom
the US has strong ties, such as India. One thing
I could tell you Putin could give a damn about sanctions.
What he means to say is could not. The one
thing I could tell you Putin could not give a
damn about sanctions. That's how he should have set it.

(01:47:44):
The one thing he can't tolerate and live with if
we go after his customers, Graham said, the whole gull
was to crush his customers, India, China, and Brazil. Lindsay
Graham is a special kind of fool, special kind of
fool that will never learn. We'll actually play him talking

(01:48:05):
about Gaza because it plays into this again. He's just
a warmonker war wherever wherever.

Speaker 7 (01:48:13):
President Trump said, he told Prime Minister Natanyahu to quote, finish.

Speaker 5 (01:48:17):
The job this week.

Speaker 15 (01:48:19):
I know that you are in touch with President Trump,
You're in touch.

Speaker 12 (01:48:22):
With Israeli officials.

Speaker 5 (01:48:24):
What are you anticipating is going to happen next? Let
us finish the job means Senator.

Speaker 3 (01:48:30):
Well.

Speaker 13 (01:48:30):
I talked to Cindy McCain last night. Here's some good
news for the people in Gaza. Humanitarian quarters are now
going to be open. Israel's going to work with the UN,
the World Food Program to get some food into these
people who need it. But I think what the topic
we're talking about today is a change in strategy. I

(01:48:51):
think President Trump has come to believe, and I certainly
come to believe, there's no way you're going to negotiate
into this war with Amas. Amas is a grist organization
who is chartered to destroy the State of Israel, their
religious Nazis, they hold Israeli hostages. I think Israel's come
to conclude if they can't achieve a goal of ending

(01:49:14):
the war with Hamas, that would be satisfactory to the
safety of Israel, and that if they're going to do.

Speaker 2 (01:49:21):
You get the idea, every war everywhere, just as long
as it's making us money, just as long as it's
making his constituents raytheon Lockheed Martin, Boeing, whichever company money
he'll support it. I've always found it quite funny to me,
you know, Lindsay Graham, I think we can all agree,

(01:49:45):
seems heavily closeted, and yet he's so desperate to send
away our fit young men to die in foreign wars.
It seems like it's acting against his own interests. Very curious,
very curious. Indeed, Epstein Island says Trump endorses Lindsay Graham
and hates Tom Massey.

Speaker 3 (01:50:04):
Do the math.

Speaker 2 (01:50:05):
Yeah, makes things pretty obvious, doesn't it. Pazzonovante seventeen seventy six.
They don't call him lockeed Lindsay for nothing, that's right.
He's lockeed and loaded, ready for war. Well, he's not going.
He's not gonna do anything. He's going to send your
sons and daughters to die. He won't do anything about it, though,

(01:50:28):
He'll He'll sit back and enrich himself and probably stare
at the pool boy or something.

Speaker 3 (01:50:35):
Audi.

Speaker 1 (01:50:35):
Mr.

Speaker 3 (01:50:36):
R says, as if she has.

Speaker 2 (01:50:38):
No clue what finished the job means, she's cia all
these people involved in the in the media. You many
of them have very heavy, very obvious ties to the CIA.
It was funny Nick Quentes and Tucker Carlson refuding recently,
and Nick quent has rightfully pointed out how absurd it

(01:51:00):
is that Tucker Carlson claimed he didn't know his dad
was in the CIA.

Speaker 3 (01:51:05):
I only learned it.

Speaker 2 (01:51:06):
After his death, said Tucker Carlson.

Speaker 3 (01:51:09):
And it's a very rare thing.

Speaker 2 (01:51:14):
It's extremely it's ridiculously rare when I am forced to
agree with Nick Quentez, but this is one of those
times it doesn't add up. It's obviously some kind of lie.
And in fact, there were clips of Tucker Carlson talking
about his father being in the CIA from years ago.
These people are routinely outed as having CIA affiliation. That's

(01:51:38):
not to say that I don't think Nick Quentis is
some kind of federal asset either. I believe he is,
based on the fact that he was at January sixth.

Speaker 3 (01:51:45):
They encourage people.

Speaker 2 (01:51:46):
To tear down barriers, to engage in everything that got
people in trouble, and nothing happened to him, nothing happened
at all. We'll get back to Ukraine and Zelenski. That's
enough about the two federal agents that were pointing fingers
at each other. Europinion leaders rally behind Ukraine as White

(01:52:09):
House open to inviting Zelensky to trump Putin meeting.

Speaker 3 (01:52:14):
But of course the.

Speaker 2 (01:52:15):
EU and the NATO and NATO want war. They do
not want peace, They're desperate for it to continue. Poll
sixty nine percent of Ukrainians want negotiated end to war
as soon as possible.

Speaker 3 (01:52:36):
Excuse me.

Speaker 2 (01:52:38):
Gallup released a new pole on Thursday that found sixty
nine percent of Ukrainian's favor a negotiated end to the
war with Russia as soon as possible, while just twenty
four percent want to keep fighting until victory. There is
no victory for Ukraine. There is no victory for the
Ukrainian people.

Speaker 3 (01:52:56):
Now.

Speaker 2 (01:52:56):
Victory for Zelensky, as I've said, is just a continuation
because it allows him to siphon off more funds. It
allows him to send his wife on shopping trips where
she can buy expensive clothing, perhaps get a villa somewhere,
And your complete reversal of public opinion from when Russia
invaded more than three years ago. When Gallup first asked
the question to Ukrainians in twenty twenty two, it found

(01:53:18):
seventy two percent wanted to continue fighting and just twenty
two percent wanted a negotiated settlement. And now it's been reversed.
You can see this chart here in the article Ukrainians
lose appetite for war support negotiated peace. You can see
those two have basically switched places identically, the solid bar

(01:53:45):
being the Ukrainians should continue fighting until it wins the war,
and the dotted line being Ukraine should seek to negotiate
an ending to the war as soon as possible. They
have almost completely flipped, almost exactly. Well, the majority of
the Ukrainians want to see the war end of the
new Gallup poll found that they don't think it will
happen anytime soon, not with Zelensky in charge.

Speaker 3 (01:54:10):
And of course he canceled.

Speaker 2 (01:54:12):
All elections until the war is over, so he's gonna
stay in charge until it comes to whatever conclusion it does.
Nagasaki a bomb survivor urges n arms never be used.
Ninety three year old taels have gruesome scenes witnessed. Well,
actually before that, I believe we have a call that

(01:54:35):
was recorded between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. It's a
bit of a secret video. It hasn't been really widely circulated,
but it's important. I think we should take a look
at this.

Speaker 18 (01:54:46):
Well, it's been five months in office since, still no
recognition from the Nobel Peast Committee for my very strong
efforts to end all.

Speaker 7 (01:54:54):
Of the wars.

Speaker 18 (01:54:55):
Zelenski, you're an ungrateful loser and you don't have the cards.
Stop fighting? No okay, fine, suit yourself, Vladimir. It's Donald.
Stop the war? No stop? No okay, babe? Could we
wind down the war in Gaza?

Speaker 1 (01:55:07):
Donald?

Speaker 18 (01:55:07):
I thought you were the president of America.

Speaker 2 (01:55:09):
No, actually this is the video to play, I guess
because this is the old one.

Speaker 19 (01:55:13):
How about I, Lord Donald, Vladimir, if you don't end
the war in Ukraine, I'm going to put sanctions on you. No,
you won't, You're right, I won't, but I will give you.

Speaker 18 (01:55:24):
Tons of money instead.

Speaker 5 (01:55:25):
What you now?

Speaker 18 (01:55:26):
I don't want tons of money.

Speaker 5 (01:55:28):
What do you want?

Speaker 18 (01:55:28):
I want Ukraine, but I'll give you money. Does this
money come with Ukraine?

Speaker 7 (01:55:32):
Now?

Speaker 18 (01:55:33):
Well then no, you know not. Everything is about money,
Ukraine money. Me again, Jady and I are getting.

Speaker 5 (01:55:44):
What we want.

Speaker 18 (01:55:44):
We are prepared to very strongly abandon Ukraine and drop
the whole thing. Is that what you want? Yes? But
then you wait, what?

Speaker 3 (01:55:54):
Wait?

Speaker 5 (01:55:54):
What?

Speaker 4 (01:55:56):
That's right?

Speaker 2 (01:56:00):
Trump, of course known for backing off of everything he
says he'll do. Nagasaki, A bomb survivor urges and arms
never be used. Ninety three year old tells of gruesome
scenes witnessed at thirteen. Of course, actually, as I mentioned,

(01:56:22):
Dresden was just as horrific as the nuclear bombs Nagasaki.
Nagasaki atomic bomb survivor Hiroshi Yushoka ninety three, he read
out the pledge for peace at the Peace memorial ceremony
as a representative of survivors in Nagasaka City, Nagasaki City
on Saturday. We talked about this the other day, but

(01:56:43):
it's worth.

Speaker 3 (01:56:43):
Talking about again.

Speaker 2 (01:56:46):
Nishioka, the oldest person ever to serve as a representative,
voted most of his speech to his own experience of
the atomic bombing and appealed for nuclear weapons never to
be used. Out of the ceremony, he had said, there
are very few people left who know what the Automa
bombing was like, so I would like to talk about
what I know as much as I can. On August ninth,

(01:57:07):
nineteen forty five, Nishioka, then thirteen years old was in
the medical supply room of a middle school in Nagasaki,
about three point three kilometers from the hippocenter. The echoing
roar of an American B twenty nine bomber drew him
to the window, where he was enveloped in a light
that seemed.

Speaker 3 (01:57:20):
To blend orange and yellow.

Speaker 2 (01:57:23):
I thought a bomb has been dropped on the school's
tennis court, Nishioki said in the speech.

Speaker 3 (01:57:26):
I lay flat on the floor.

Speaker 2 (01:57:28):
He was struck by the blast wave, and classmates who
had fallen on top of him were drenched in blood
as their flesh was pierced with numerous shards of glass
from the shattered windows. On the way home, he saw
evacue streaming away from the area where the center of
the blast had been. A man with his entire body
covered in blood, a mother holding a baby as she
walked with blood streaming from the baby's face. Purpan whose

(01:57:49):
arm hung limply, appeared to be severed. My senses became numb,
and I did not feel pity for them. The next day,
he joined the rescue activity at another middle school closer
to the hippocenter. The uniformed bodies of many students who
had been crushed under the school building were laid out
on the sports ground, along with the bodies of teachers
who also died in the bombing. On his way back,

(01:58:11):
he saw many bodies scattered on the road. An injured
person begged him for water. I might die myself, the
young Nishioki thought Nishioka, afraid that the water bottle hanging
from his waist might be taking He had no choice
but to shake off the person's arms which were stretched
out for help, and move on. Even now, when I
recall the moment, my heart still aches. When he retired

(01:58:32):
about thirty years ago, in acquaintance, who was also a
Hibakusha atomic bomb survivor, urged him to speak up, saying
anybody who was in Nagasaki at that time needs to
tell the world. He visited the United States and spoke
in English about the damage the damage caused by the
atomic bomb. Seeing how intensely the audience listened to his testimony,
he realized the importance of sharing his story. Began his

(01:58:54):
activities as a storyteller for the Atomic Bomb Survivors Association
and Kanagawa Prefecture, and has continued to give lectures on
the atomic bombings at schools at the same time, he
was also feeling powerless, drough the idea that a single
voice would not make nuclear threat disappear. We should never
stop the movement that leads toward peace. We should keep
moving forward and have more people join us. This is

(01:59:16):
what we are aiming for. Nuclear weapons should never be used.
Everything will be over if they are used. Let us
protect this beautiful earth. Of course, I tend to agree.
I tend to agree with the assessment that the nuclear

(01:59:36):
weapons were unjust, that they were not necessary, that bombing
a civilian population like that was a war crime, something
that we should have never done. That's what's going on

(01:59:56):
in the realm of war with Zelenski and Trump and Russia.
Their summit meeting that is going on again, that will
be on the fifteenth, and I don't see how it
can come to any sort of fruitful conclusion as they
don't have Zelenski at the table and he obviously has

(02:00:18):
no interest in ending this war. Putin has demands that
Zelensky has no interest in fulfilling. And Zolenski has no
reason not to continue to sacrifice his countrymen until there
are none left, because, for one, he is a moral
scumbag and for two, he is enriching himself. There is

(02:00:41):
no reason for him to stop. He's getting a massive
payout to continue this and as such, why would he.
We're gonna take a quick break. When we come back,
we're gonna take a look at more general news, see
what's going on in the world. Stay with us, folks,
we will be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:02:37):
Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Night Show. Liberty,

(02:04:24):
it's your move and now the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (02:04:32):
Welcome back, folks.

Speaker 2 (02:04:33):
We're into our third hour here on the David Night Show.
Of course, I am your interim host, Travis Knight. It
is a pleasure to be here with you all. Like
I said, we're gonna take a look at more general news.
Some of you may have seen there was and an
attempted carjacking in Washington, d C. The crime in DC

(02:04:54):
has become rampant. It's gotten worse and worse. And the
interesting thing about this is somebody jumped in to help.
It turned out to actually be one of the guys
that had worked for Dog. The handle he went by
there was big balls and apparently he does have some
cojones because he jumped in against a large group of

(02:05:17):
men to help a woman and protected her.

Speaker 3 (02:05:20):
You could see pictures.

Speaker 2 (02:05:22):
Online of that. Some of you may have seen it,
but he was beaten fairly severely. But moving on to
talk about more general news. Got an email here, and
I don't know if I'm supposed to read the full name,
so I'll just say it's from Sam A and says,

(02:05:44):
have you noticed that Amazon website grades their delivery options
in terms of carbon footprint impact? Carbon taxes cannot be
too far in the future now for every industry in there.

Speaker 3 (02:05:57):
This is the way it goes.

Speaker 2 (02:05:58):
Once you see this sort of thing, like we're pointing
out with stable coins now being accepted, we're putting in
the infrastructure at grocery stores and places like that. Once
they start acknowledging it in certain industries, you know it's
coming down the pipeline. They're tracking how much carbon is
being put out for deliveries, which means that they're going

(02:06:20):
to put some policies in place soon. They'll probably have
start charging you more. Oh, you want your delivery sooner
while that's going to be extra carbon and as such
you need to be charged more for it a carbon tax.

Speaker 5 (02:06:35):
I'm reminded of the whole collective shout thing where you know,
they pressured the uh credit card companies and it was
only one thousand people sending an email to the credit
card company. It was very little pressure to get the
credit card company to start censoring all of these video

(02:06:56):
game platforms. They clearly wanted that. I think the reason
is if you look at the stuff like the credit
cards that have carbon footprint tracking built into the credit
card itself, and then if you get to a certain
carbon limit, it will stop letting you buy carbon expensive things.

(02:07:19):
That's what they want. They want to have that kind
of power. So if they have, you know, oh well
it's not us. It was this collective shelt They put
a little bit of pressure on us, so therefore we
had to take over everything.

Speaker 3 (02:07:31):
No, you don't understand.

Speaker 2 (02:07:32):
It's for the good of the children.

Speaker 3 (02:07:35):
Look there's this petition. This also goes to show that.

Speaker 2 (02:07:41):
Chances are if you were to write companies, if you
were to get a bunch of people to send emails,
it wouldn't have the same effect. Because they wanted to
do this. This aligns with their own agenda, but they
are still susceptible to being lobbied potentially, So if there
is something you care deeply about, and you can get
a coalition of people together to send emails, to get

(02:08:03):
thousands of people together to flood these companies, you might
be able to accomplish something.

Speaker 5 (02:08:10):
Well, they already do have thousands of people emailing them.
There are a lot of people that are very annoyed
by this, whether because they want this content or because
they disagree with the bigger picture of it. Yeah, they
have been. There's been a huge pushback, and it seems
like the credit card companies might be caving because of that.

(02:08:33):
They cut away their excuse to do this.

Speaker 2 (02:08:37):
Yeah, they don't have the smoke screen of saying, well,
look it's what the majority want. Trump orders surge of
law enforcement in Washington to come back crime. Of course,
this is directly tied into what I said about the
guy from Dog Big Balls, where he was bloodied and
beaten for trying to help a woman that was being carjacked.

(02:09:00):
And we have our issues with DOAG and Elon Musk
and the things he's done, but kudos to this guy.
He didn't back down. He saw something happening, and despite
the fact that he knew it was going to put
him in jeopardy, despite the fact he knew it was
likely that he would be hurt, he stood up and

(02:09:21):
did the right thing. So this I find that very impressive.
So kudos to this guy. I have a lot of
respect for that. President Donald Trump had ordered the federal
government to increase law enforcement presidence in Washington to combat
violent crime. The White House out on August seventh. But
of course Trump is probably going to take this overboard.

(02:09:45):
He's probably going to do something like push martial law,
deny some due process, put DC directly into the hands
of corrupt officials. Not that I assume anyone who has
who wields any sort of power in DC is corrupt,
but he's probably going to centralize control even further. President

(02:10:11):
Trumpe has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement
to protect innocent civilians. White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt
and a statement noting that the city has been plagued
by violent crime for far too long. Of course, cities
generally are cities. I believe it's Thomas Jefferson that said

(02:10:34):
that cities are a threat to the health, wealth, and
liberty of the American people.

Speaker 3 (02:10:38):
Something along those lines.

Speaker 2 (02:10:38):
I'm probably paraphrasing, but cities are just not someplace you
want to live if you can avoid it. This operation,
led by US Park Police, will involve officers from the
US Capitol Police, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Federal Protective Services,
the Drug Enforcement Administration, Enforcement and Removal operations, the Bureau
Alcohol to Back on firearms and explosives, the Marshall Service.

Speaker 3 (02:11:01):
In the US Attorney's Office.

Speaker 2 (02:11:05):
For the District of Columbia. Crime in Washington, d C
is totally out of control, Trump stated, untrue social If
DC doesn't get its act together and quickly, we will
have no choice but to take federal control of the
city and run the city how it should be run,
and put criminals on notice that they're not going to
get away with it anymore. President demanded that the city,
which is when by a locally elected city council, mayor

(02:11:26):
change its ordinances. Regarding the prosecution of minor offenders, He
said that offenders as young as age of fourteen should
be subject to trial as an adult for violent offenses.

Speaker 3 (02:11:35):
I actually agree with that.

Speaker 2 (02:11:37):
I don't think there's I think there are certain things
you should be tried for as a child, but I
think once you become violent, and especially if you commit
something like murder you get tried in as adult. There
was no point in my life, no matter how young,
where I didn't understand the concept that murder was wrong,
that violence and abusing people, injuring people, harming them, stealing

(02:12:01):
from them wasn't wrong. If being a child is not
an excuse for these things, they are sort of intrinsic
values we all understand, and if you choose to go
against them, it is not because you're young. Local youths
and gang members, some only fourteen, fifteen and sixteen years old,

(02:12:22):
are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent citizens at
the same time, knowing that they will be almost immediately released.
He stated, We've seen this over and over again. George
Soros campaigned heavily to get district attorneys in that would
make sure that certain people, no matter what they did,
would be released almost immediately, that they would be back

(02:12:44):
out on the street. And we've seen it over and
over again. Guys arrested for a violent crime, despite the
fact he's got a track record of violence, gets released
and immediately goes out and harms someone else. There's a
story recently or a guy did that exact thing.

Speaker 3 (02:13:01):
He was.

Speaker 5 (02:13:04):
No.

Speaker 3 (02:13:04):
This was from a few years ago.

Speaker 2 (02:13:06):
A guy shot someone in the head.

Speaker 3 (02:13:08):
He was brought in.

Speaker 2 (02:13:09):
They deemed him mentally incompetent, too stupid or handicapped to
be put on trial. They released him and he shot
someone else in the head. He's too mentally incompetent to
stand trial. You know what we should do with this
violent mental incompetent. Release him back onto the streets. Surprise, surprise,

(02:13:30):
he shoots another guy in the head.

Speaker 5 (02:13:33):
You can be too stupid to stand trial, but still
smart enough to shoot someone in the head.

Speaker 2 (02:13:39):
That's one of the reasons guns are a great equalizer.
They're fairly simple. It's not a complex process. It's fairly obvious.
You point one end at the bad guy and pull
the trigger. They are an equalizer. I heard Giz this
is now onto stuff about it.

Speaker 3 (02:14:00):
Epstein.

Speaker 2 (02:14:01):
DC is, of course, in my opinion, lost. There is
not much hope of regaining control over it. It doesn't
matter if Trump calls in the National Guard. It will
still be run by a much more dangerous class of criminal.
You can avoid the street thugs in DC by simply
not going there, but the people that actually run Washington

(02:14:24):
you have no hope of avoiding them. They will track
you down. They will involve themselves in your life. I
heard Gilaine tell inmate she had dirt on Trump. Sex
traffickers Excelmate gives extraordinary glimpse into Maxwell's life behind bars
the first time Catherine Commoli laid eyes on Gilaine. Maxwell
was one of the convicted sex trafficker was about to

(02:14:44):
enter the isolation unit at Tallahassee Prison in the autumn
of twenty twenty two. She was just standing there in
an orange jumpsuit and orange flip flops, with handcuffs behind
her back and a guard on both sides. She was
looking down at the ground, tense and angry. She says,
I heard Gilaine tell inmates she had dirt on Trump. Well,

(02:15:05):
I wonder if that could be why they might be
considering a pardon, why Trump might be considering meeting with her.
Wouldn't be surprised. Seems likely that she does have something
on Trump, considering the numerous photos, videos, the letters written
back and forth, Trump wishing Epstein a very happy birthday,

(02:15:26):
be surprising if there wasn't something there. Epstein Island says,
Trump is basically going to do to d see what
Biden did after January sixth, going to turn it into
a police state. Trent to do to Trump BONDI release
the ok CE tapes. Of course, we had one of

(02:15:50):
the final interviews. One of the last interviews my dad
did before he had the strokes was with a guy
who did a noble lie by FreeMind Films. I cannot
remember the guy's name. My apologies released the videotape of
the bombing and unsealed John Matthews's deposition because the Department

(02:16:11):
of Justice has it sealed and President Trump's Department of
Justice is fighting to keep it sealed.

Speaker 5 (02:16:17):
Yeah. I guess this is one good thing about the
Epstein cover up is we're gonna get everything else thrown
at us in order to distract us.

Speaker 2 (02:16:25):
Wait a minute, you guys are still how about the
Oklahoma City bombing?

Speaker 3 (02:16:28):
You guys have been curious about that for years?

Speaker 2 (02:16:30):
Right, how would you like to know about that? Trent
to do A filed a Foyer lawsuit in two thousand
and eight to get the surveillance tapes, which the FBI
is on record acknowledging exist, but the bureau has told
him they can't find it. Whoops, sorry, we lost it.
Must have misplaced it.

Speaker 3 (02:16:49):
Do you guys remember where we put that?

Speaker 7 (02:16:50):
Ah?

Speaker 1 (02:16:51):
Darn.

Speaker 2 (02:16:52):
We'd love to comply with your freedom of information request,
but sadly we just can't find the tape. Does anyone
believe this? It's amazing the bold face lies they can
get away with simply simply because they have the power.
No one can call them on it. You would think

(02:17:12):
if you had a videotape showing who committed this horrific crime,
wouldn't that have been exhibit number one in mcveigh's criminal trial.
The reason it wasn't because I believe that second person
was an FBI operative who got out of that truck.
I would be surprised if this tape even still exists.
I'd be surprised if they keep things that are damning
to them, Why on earth would they if it is

(02:17:35):
actually a VHS tape. You also have to contend with
the fact that this tape is decades old now and
VHS rots. If it isn't stored extremely carefully, chances are
the tape is no longer any good if they haven't
transferred it to something else. So even were they to
provide a tape, I doubt it would be usable investigated.

(02:18:00):
Investigative reporter and author Peter Schweitzer, who hosted the z
H panel, respondent, let's make sure those two messages are
delivered to Pam Bondi. Our other guests, Margaret Roberts, pointed
out it already has been delivered by Jesse. Those are
two critical calls to action. Jesse has a letter on
Attorney General Bondi's desk since March asking the Justice Department
to stand down from its opposition to unsealing the John

(02:18:22):
Matthews deposition. Well, we know all kinds of things end
up on Pambondi's desk.

Speaker 5 (02:18:27):
Yeah, that's exactly what I was about to say. To
be careful, things tend to go missing from there.

Speaker 2 (02:18:33):
That desk is not a secure location. Things just up
in Vanish. Roberts recently published her book blow Back, the
untold story of the FBI in the Oklahoma City bombing.
She continued, the other area here that needs addressing is
the Foyer process. This is supposed to be the citizens
last resort resort for obtaining records that belong to the
American public. The story belongs to the public, not locked

(02:18:56):
away in secret government vaults. The many exclusions available to
the secret keepers inside these government agencies make it almost impossible.
Jesse has navigated this flawed process so masterfully, and yet
this FOYE action to release the videotape has just been sitting.

Speaker 3 (02:19:10):
Maroon for more than a decade.

Speaker 2 (02:19:12):
John Matthews told Jesse had been pressured by the FBI
and not to tell his story. FOYE needs to be fixed.
Unless there's some kind of enforcement arm, unless there's some
kind of penalty something, someone that can come in and say, well,
you haven't turned this over and as such, you are
now in violation, you are now criminally liable, nothing will

(02:19:33):
ever happen. The government only respects force. The government only
respects people and things that can cause problems for it.
It doesn't matter. You could reform it all you want.
You could make any kind of change. You could say
it needs to be done speedily, it needs to be
done this, it needs to be done that way. However,

(02:19:55):
unless there is some kind of criminal penalty for people
that are directly involved, if it ends up on someone's
desk maroon for a decade, that person should be held
criminally liable and potentially serve prison time. And unless that
sort of thing happens, nothing will ever change unless there
are consequences. The government doesn't care. These bureaucrats don't have

(02:20:17):
to care, and so they never will. They know there's
no chance you're going to show up to their office
and have a sheriff in tow to cart them away,
and as such they'll continue to stonewall forever. Brian de
McCartney says the Doge hero plays right into Trump's to
create a cleanup.

Speaker 3 (02:20:38):
DC most likely staged. It could be. It's possible.

Speaker 2 (02:20:43):
However, I also think it's equally possible that it's not stage.
DC is a crime written cesspool, and this type of
thing could also just be fortuitous timing. There's always crime happening.
They could have just had him wandering around like, hey, look,
you see a crime happening, get involved.

Speaker 5 (02:21:05):
I wouldn't put any cover up past them or any
political stunt. But at the same time, crime is very
rampant in DC. There's a pretty high chance of just
running into it.

Speaker 2 (02:21:17):
Yeah, you could just walk down the sidewalk and when
you see a crime try to stop it. Who knows,
I do give credence. I'm not saying I don't think
it's possible. I'm just saying Personally, I think this one
might be legit, but I respect your opinion, and I
definitely understand why you would think so. They fake just

(02:21:39):
about everything. Also, I just like the idea that somebody
was actually willing to stand up and fight for what's right.
I would like to believe that. I like to believe
those types of stories. I want to believe the heroic
spirit still lives on in some Americans, and as such,

(02:22:02):
I'll choose to believe this one.

Speaker 3 (02:22:03):
Personally.

Speaker 2 (02:22:05):
If it means I'm getting suckered, well.

Speaker 3 (02:22:09):
I'll admit it.

Speaker 2 (02:22:09):
If it comes out Trent to do Schweitzer.

Speaker 5 (02:22:12):
Roberts saying congressmen have been carjacked.

Speaker 2 (02:22:19):
Well, you know, maybe the criminals aren't all bad if
they're carjacking congressman. Well, perhaps this is just the price
we pay. Trent to Do Schweitzer Roberts. Ok see bombing
in the federal government's role on the anniversary of the
Oklahoma City bombing. Earlier this year, we covered swampy John
Ashcroft's involvement in the cover up and shocking evidence regarding

(02:22:41):
the governments for knowledge. You can see that picture there
of the Murrah building.

Speaker 3 (02:22:49):
One thing that.

Speaker 2 (02:22:52):
Many many people have pointed out is the pattern. The
way it was blown up does not match with an
Ampho bomb. It was able to even do damage, which
is unlikely because anfo doesn't detonate at a speed doesn't
have enough force to generally damage concrete.

Speaker 3 (02:23:10):
It would have been a ring.

Speaker 2 (02:23:12):
It would have been a circular blast in the parking lot,
which might have impacted and hit the building and put
a small circular hole in the front. It wouldn't have
sheared off the entire front of the building. That kind
of damage would not really be possible with a fertilizer
and AMPHO bomb.

Speaker 3 (02:23:31):
Grand Juror.

Speaker 2 (02:23:32):
We were never allowed to see the photo evidence from
the cameras on the Murrah building that would have shown
the truck being parked and the people who got out
of the truck. That's all on tape, and we were
authorers authorized to see all that, but we weren't allowed.

Speaker 3 (02:23:43):
To see it.

Speaker 2 (02:23:44):
Of course, this is kind of like the Pentagon video
on nine to eleven, one of the most heavily surveiled,
heavily watched places on the plane at the Pentagon, and
all those tapes, all those tapes of the plane coming
in don't exist. They vanished, They're gone. No one's ever
seen them, and I believe it was a gas station

(02:24:05):
that had a security camera running that caught some of it,
and that video was confiscated and vanished as well. If
memory serves, there's so many different ways that they have
covered things up, it's hard to keep track of them all.
And again that plays into why the whole thing in
DC could be staged as well, and why I don't

(02:24:26):
blame anyone for thinking it is. They stage so many
different things, and they cover everything up. They don't tell
the truth about anything. As from zero Hedge, Epstein's butler
of eighteen years breaks silence. No way he killed himself,
And I think personally, there's no way he killed himself,

(02:24:46):
just if you look at the type of man Jeffrey
Epstein is, or maybe was. He was self obsessed, he
was highly narcissistic. He was the type of person that
loved himself more than anything or anyone else, and I
don't think those type of people generally commit suicide. Valdsen

(02:25:10):
Vieira co trin Overspstein's residence in Paris for eighteen years,
made the admission in an interview with the Telegraph eighteen
years how can you work for someone like Epstein for
eighteen years. Perhaps we should be investigating this butler too.

Speaker 5 (02:25:29):
Perhaps Yeah, I mean, I'm not saying everyone that worked
for him knew, but if you're his butler for eighteen years.

Speaker 2 (02:25:36):
Yeah, you've got to know something. My dad said, it's
two decades of decadence.

Speaker 3 (02:25:45):
Oversaw.

Speaker 2 (02:25:45):
Epstein's residents in Paris for eighteen years, made the admission
an interview with the Telegraph. Maybe he didn't engage in
any sort of.

Speaker 3 (02:25:52):
Weirdness in Paris.

Speaker 2 (02:25:53):
Maybe you know, he kept it all to his little
Saint James Island or his New York residence. And maybe
this guy I only lived in Paris and so doesn't
know anything. I am like his brother, Mark Epstein. I
don't believe this was suicide. He loved life too much.
A Telegraph has posted a photo Jeffrey Epstein on his

(02:26:15):
private jet in twenty nineteen. The photo, maybe one of
the last taken of the financiers, shows him wearing an
Israel Defense Force IDF sweatshirt. But, of course, Mark Levinn
says calling him a masad asset is racist. Mark Levin,
of course willing to sacrifice America for the good of

(02:26:36):
israel I wonder why. I wonder why Mark Levin would
be willing to do that raises some interesting questions, doesn't it.
Why would mister Levin care so much for Israel and
so little for the country that has made him wealthy,
that has given him his platforms, and has given him
the audience that he now uses to push for these

(02:26:58):
kinds of policies, really makes you wonder. Coachrn described his
final encounter with Epstein, painting a picture of a man
who appeared far from suicidal. Epstein was relaxed in discussing
future plans, including additional investments in his islands, having discreetly
purchased the second property that Cochran had visited, and spending
more time in Paris. I drove him to Les Bourges Airport.

(02:27:20):
It was a Saturday, because on Monday he was supposed
to appear before the judge regarding all these accusations. The
longtime servant said. The gravity of the situation became clear
shortly after Epstein's departure. According to Cochran, when I got home,
two young women rang his main girlfriend, who had been
with him officially for several years, Carina Schuliac, another who

(02:27:40):
worked for him, and then they told me mister Epstein
has gone to prison. He arrived in New York the
police were waiting for him. Cochran also claimed that he
worked dozens of times at Epstein's properties in New York,
Palm Beach, Florida.

Speaker 3 (02:27:52):
No, apparently I forgot about this part. I read it
late last night.

Speaker 2 (02:27:57):
Epstein's properties in New York, pom Beach, Flao on Little
Saint James, Epstein's private Caribbean island, dubbed by the media's
Pedophi Island, where he is said to have trapped and
raped off and undrakes girls. So no, this guy was
not just confined to Paris. He's been in all of
Epstein's properties apparently, except for maybe that weirdo ranch he
had going on with the eugenics compound. You trusted me completely,

(02:28:21):
said Cochran. It has not worked since his boss's death
six years ago, adding that he never saw Epstein commit
any sex crimes.

Speaker 3 (02:28:27):
I was his.

Speaker 2 (02:28:28):
Chauffeur, his cook, his housekeeper. I wonder if he managed
the videotape archive as well. I did everything in Paris.
I was his only full time, paid up employee and
worked for him from two thousand and one.

Speaker 3 (02:28:40):
Until his death.

Speaker 2 (02:28:41):
If someone could have seen something, it's Valts and there's
no one else, he said. Epstein was found unresponsive in
his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City,
on August tenth, twenty nineteen, at six thirty am, hanging
from his bed. The Shadowy investor was pronounced dead at
New York Downtown Hospital at six thirty nine am. The

(02:29:02):
Department of Justice and the New York City Medical Examiner
ruled his death a suicide by hanging.

Speaker 3 (02:29:07):
Six point thirty is when he's.

Speaker 2 (02:29:09):
Found six thirty nine, So when they get him to
the Downtown hospital that must.

Speaker 3 (02:29:12):
Be right next door.

Speaker 2 (02:29:13):
Getting anywhere in New York in nine minutes is borderline impossitle.
My goodness, they were flying. However, Mark Epstein, the brother
of Jeffrey Epstein, has consistently rejected the government's conclusion and
repeatedly stated that he does not believe his brother took
his own life. And I think I think all of
us here would agree that he did not take his
own life. I believe he was killed because I believe

(02:29:35):
that a day after he died and I heard on
CNN that he was found dead from assumed suicide Mark
Epstein said, they came out of the autopsy and they
both concurred that this looked more like a homicide than
a suicide. One of the major things was the three
broken bones in his neck. Now, doctor Baden has done
about five hundred autopsies, He's been doing this for over

(02:29:56):
fifty years. And I've spoken to other pathologists and they say,
you know, on a soft hanging, which is supposedly what
Jeffrey was supposed to have done, you know, you might
get a broken bone, maybe two, but no one's ever
seen three broken bones in this kind of hanging, Mark
Epstein said. Earlier in July, the Joint geodj FBI memo,

(02:30:17):
of course, that's Trump's declared an exhausted review of evidence
from Epstein's death definitively ruled out murder. Of course, he
was killed under Donald Trump and Bill Barr's watch. No no, no,
no murder here. The agency has also denied the existence
of a client list.

Speaker 5 (02:30:35):
Wait a minute, I thought Dan Bongino looked at this
and he said it was suicide. It's hard to believe,
but he's seen the tapes. It was suicide.

Speaker 2 (02:30:44):
Good old Dan Bongino and Cash Fattel then, as I've said,
really sold it. You could see he definitely didn't look
like he was choking and barely able to get the
words out, didn't look like he had a thousand yard stare,
very glassy eye during that entire interview. Just the agencies

(02:31:05):
also denied the existence of a client list tied to Epstein,
directly contradicting earlier remarks by Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Speaker 3 (02:31:13):
And of course.

Speaker 2 (02:31:15):
It was Dershowitz when we played that clip the other
day that said, well, you know, client list implies purchase,
and you know, sex trafficking is a very specific term,
you know, and it means, you know, you have to
be paying for things like that. So perhaps he was
just providing these underage prostitutes out of the goodness of
his heart. No, perhaps he wasn't being paid for them.

(02:31:40):
Maybe it was all just so masakad at blackmail.

Speaker 5 (02:31:42):
And of course he turned off all of the many,
many cameras all throughout his island that people have pointed
out many times whenever they were over there, and he
was providing these women out of the goodness of his heart.

Speaker 2 (02:31:53):
These girls they just happened to always be off.

Speaker 3 (02:31:59):
Well that's enough.

Speaker 2 (02:32:01):
About the shady financier. It always straight. It's always funny
to me that that's how they first describe him in
all these articles. Not you know, likely sex trafficker, likely pedophile,
Now he was a shady financier. It is strange the
number of things Epstein had his money tied into, even

(02:32:24):
so far as some small YouTube channels. I recently learned
about this. Some of you may have heard of someone
by the name of j F.

Speaker 3 (02:32:31):
Gareppi.

Speaker 2 (02:32:32):
He was a fairly small time YouTuber and still a
small time YouTuber, and he was able to get twenty
five thousand dollars out of Jeffrey Epstein. He used to
work at Duke in some capacity Duke University, and he said,
I'm doing this kind of research, I'm doing this, I'm
doing that, sent Jeffrey Epstein an email, and Epstein sent

(02:32:53):
him a check for twenty.

Speaker 3 (02:32:54):
Five thousand dollars.

Speaker 2 (02:32:55):
And this is a guy that's supposedly on the right
wings fear getting funded by Jeffrey Epstein, or at least
getting a one time check for twenty five thousand. He
had his money going all kinds of different places. It's
truly amazing, and we only know about this because JF

(02:33:17):
Garapi himself came out and admitted it. It's very strange,
the web that Epstein was involved with, very very strange. Indeed,
Jeff Greppe is also a very very strange individual, possibly
murdered his own wife. Lots of lots of Internet lore

(02:33:38):
there involving JF.

Speaker 5 (02:33:40):
Well, I can see why Epstein would want to fund him. Then,
very true man overlapping interests. I bet.

Speaker 2 (02:33:51):
I won't get any more to JF. That's not what
this show is about. But my goodness, there is some dark,
insidious things that have happened around that man. Trump weighs
loosening regulations on marijuana. Prohibition, of course does not work.
It hasn't worked on marijuana. It didn't work for alcohol.
It just created people like al Capone when they did

(02:34:14):
it for alcohol, and it's given us the drug cartels
we see today with marijuana. President Trump is considering a
shift on marijuana policy that could see the drug reclassified
as less dangerous, a move that pot industry leaders have
aggressively lobbied for and that could open the door to
looser regulations and more profits for cannabis companies. The Bush

(02:34:36):
gains steam after Trump met with major donors, including Kim Rivers,
CEO of Truliev, a major marijuana company, at a high
dollar fundraiser at his new Jersey golf club earlier this month.
Per The Wall Street Journal, attendees say Rivers urged Trump
to support reclassifying marijuana and expand medical research. Trump reportedly
signaled interest and asked staff to look into it. And personally,

(02:34:57):
we don't at the David Night Show ridge the use
of alcohol or marijuana, but we understand that they have
their place. Marijuana has been shown to be a benefit
for people with certain illnesses, whether it's cancer or others,
and who knows, maybe there's even more uses for it
that we haven't really been able to ascertain simply because

(02:35:20):
of the way it's been classified for so many years.
And of course, my dad is a teetotaler, does not
drink alcohol, has never drunk alcohol. The ask bump marijuana
from being a Schedule one drug to Schedule three, which
stops short of full legalization, but would significantly ease restrictions

(02:35:42):
for tax breaks and boost medical research. Of course, it
was the un that created.

Speaker 3 (02:35:49):
These schedules for the drugs.

Speaker 2 (02:35:52):
They created the scheduling system, passed it to Richard Nixon,
and in they went.

Speaker 5 (02:36:02):
Now we have it's a classic example of model legislation
where it was adopted worldwide independently, quote unquote by these
separate governments that all get funding and lobbying from the
same people. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:36:19):
And of course a lot of this model legislation starts
out with some think tank here in the US or
one of the other countries, gets passed to the UN,
The UN adopts it and then passes it back. It's
this giant round robin of corruption and ways of taking
your freedom. Charlie Kirk smokes Trump over push to reclassify

(02:36:42):
marijuana as less dangerous drug. He says, everything already smells
like weed, Charlie Kirk, it doesn't like personal freedom. He's
not going to.

Speaker 5 (02:36:57):
If everything already smells like weed, does that mean that
it's already very common and yet society hasn't collapsed.

Speaker 3 (02:37:05):
Come on, Charlie, these people.

Speaker 5 (02:37:07):
That are already doing it, Look, they need to be criminals.

Speaker 2 (02:37:11):
I want these people locked up. Kirk slammed the change
in classification that Trump is portly considering, saying the drug
shouldn't be downgraded because it ruins public spaces. We don't
want to offend poor Charlie. Mister Kirk can't handle it
when he's out in public and he smells marijuana. He

(02:37:33):
doesn't like the smell of marijuana. This will get him
up in arms, but he won't say anything about the
mRNA con job hold by Donald Trump.

Speaker 5 (02:37:40):
The thing is, they aren't going to make it legal
to smoke it in public spaces. That's still going to
be you know, ticketed, and probably enforced more than it
is now since currently it's not being enforced at all
because it's so onerous when they do enforce anything.

Speaker 2 (02:38:01):
Charlie Kirk, of course, has styled himself as a Christian
Conservative apologist, but continually partners with homosexuals and people that
do not share the ideology, promoting.

Speaker 3 (02:38:18):
All kinds of nonsense.

Speaker 2 (02:38:21):
Charlie Kirk is a very very effective grifter. I'm sure
he's made himself a lot of money. Cares about the
smell of marijuana, but not civil asset forfeiture and the
ways that the drug schedule laws and the war on
drugs are used to destroy lives. The article continues, MAGA

(02:38:49):
podcaster Charlie Kirk, He is definitely a MAGA podcaster.

Speaker 3 (02:38:53):
They've got him there had.

Speaker 2 (02:38:54):
A social media outburst of reports that President Donald Trump
is considering reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, complaining
that everything already smells like weed. Because I hope this
doesn't happen. We need to protect public spaces for kids.
Everything already smells like weed, which is ridiculous. Let's make
it harder to ruin public spaces, not easier. And then

(02:39:16):
if you want to protect kids, Charlie, perhaps you shouldn't
be partnering and hanging around people involved with the LGBT movement.

Speaker 3 (02:39:30):
That's what would really protect children, Charlie.

Speaker 2 (02:39:33):
Hi Booz says, no cop is wasting his time to
haul you in for a joint. Isn't worth the paperwork exactly.

Speaker 5 (02:39:39):
That's the real reason you're smelling it everywhere. It's if
it were something that we're you know, more easily enforced.
Like I don't know if people are really doing wide
scale chury nullification or anything, but I feel like a
lot of the weed stuff the government is kind of,
you know, waving it away.

Speaker 3 (02:40:00):
It's sort of de facto legal at this point.

Speaker 5 (02:40:02):
Yeah, they're easing up on the restrictions because everyone can
see that the restrictions are way too harsh right now
and also ineffective. Yeah, if it were just a fine
for you know, smoking in public, it would be easier
to enforce, I believe.

Speaker 2 (02:40:19):
Yeah, when we lived in Austin, if you know, sometimes
I'd go out with people, you know, to hang out,
and we'd end up, you know, someplace in the downtown area.

Speaker 3 (02:40:29):
They like to go to bars.

Speaker 2 (02:40:30):
I don't drink, but you know, I like to hang
out and they've got some good food, and there would
just be people smoking weed all over the street.

Speaker 3 (02:40:38):
In Austin.

Speaker 2 (02:40:39):
The cops generally did not care. As you said, wasn't
worth the effort. It was more paperwork for them than
it was a gain for the state, says the Drug
Enforcement Administration defines Schedule one is a drug with no
currently accepted medical use in a high potential for abuse.

(02:41:03):
But of course that was the UN's scheduling system. That's
where they got it. And we've also seen this is absurd.
Marijuana has uses for the medical industry. They just refuse
to admit it. But of course Charlie Kirk is just

(02:41:28):
about wrong on everything. Anytime Charlie Kirk opens his mouth,
you can assume it's going to be just a terrible, terrible,
take a dumb position to hold. Got a comment from
David Knight. Kirk didn't have a problem rooting for the
father the mRNA. That is what really stinks. Has Kirk
ever read the Constitution? Where does he find.

Speaker 3 (02:41:49):
Drug war there?

Speaker 2 (02:41:51):
Charlie Kirk doesn't really have any principles at all. He
simply says what he thinks will get him the most
support from his base. This first look at Kamala Harris's
book is priceless. This is from Zero Hedge. As we
highlighted last week, Kamala Harris's cashing in on her god
awful failed campaign by releasing.

Speaker 3 (02:42:11):
A book she claims to have written.

Speaker 2 (02:42:14):
Well, I don't believe Kamala Harris can read or write,
so I'm skeptical. It's called one hundred and seven days
because that's how long everyone had to endure her word
salad cackling before Trump won a massive landslide victory. It's
also the same amount of time that she managed to
burn through one and a half billion dollars. It's truly
amazing the level of incompetence and outright malevolence Kamala Harris

(02:42:39):
has displayed. We have seen it continually she is possibly
the dumbest person to ever run for the presidential office.
And you've got some heavy hitters, some big contenders like
Jeb Bush, and she blows them out of the water.
It's truly incredible. She's up against mister please clap and

(02:43:03):
making him look like an intellectual giant.

Speaker 3 (02:43:06):
It also serves as her excuse as to why she lost.

Speaker 2 (02:43:09):
Inside of the book is a suggestion that she didn't
have long enough to put together a winning strategy. But
given she never even coherently explained one policy, one can
only assume it would take her years. What do you
think will be in her book? Will she finally answer
the question how are you different from Joe Biden? X
hub user Jarvis has imagined what the content might be like,
and it seems pretty accurate. You could see the tweet

(02:43:32):
there and he says Kamala's book is going to be incredible.
Says Tim was a breath of fresh air in the campaign.
Was largely responsible for the joy vibes that permeated the
early days of our partnership. Our internal polling had shown
that voters described my chronic laughter as off putting and
reminiscent of a.

Speaker 3 (02:43:46):
Witch or a sick horse.

Speaker 2 (02:43:48):
But Tim said we couldn't turn a negative into a
positive by running positive upbeat Joyful campaign to contrast Donald's darker,
more diabolical vibes. The early returns were quite positive. The
joy campaign allowed friendly media to portray us as related
by engaging in things that ordinary scum did often, such
as shopping for potato chips. Quote unquote released a video
where Tim and I and some staffers whose names I

(02:44:10):
forget went into a grocery store secret service had cleared
out as planned. Tim picked up a bag of mesquite
flavored chips and tossed them to me. After about a
dozen takes, Tim managed to successfully throw them to me
and I managed to catch them. We released the ordinary
shoppers from the shed they were locked in and hit
the road. People loved that video. While the public seemed
to like Tim initially, the polling showed he was unable
to make inroads with young straight men. We tried everything,

(02:44:32):
pictures of Tim hunting, fixing cars, talking football, but every
time we thought we had a winter, Tim would take
the stage at an event and prants about and way
frantically with both hands like a complete sissy, and the
polls would dive again.

Speaker 3 (02:44:43):
Of course, this is not from her book.

Speaker 2 (02:44:45):
This is what user Jarvis on Twitter and his handle
is at jarvis underscore best Imagines.

Speaker 8 (02:44:53):
And I.

Speaker 2 (02:44:55):
Imagine that this is far more entertaining than any thing
Kamala Harris could ever come up with. And of course
whatever is in that book is going to be sycophantically
written by a ghostwriter. It will do everything to make
her seem like some kind of saint. It'll be unreadable

(02:45:16):
for anyone but the most hardcore liberal.

Speaker 5 (02:45:21):
This is a good comment here, Kamala, isn't this You
can tell it was ghostwritten exactly.

Speaker 2 (02:45:29):
See what you should have done is actually had Jarvis
writ the whole thing probably would have become a best seller.
Some seemed to genuinely believe this could really be her writing.
We could only hope for such an entertaining book from
one of our politicians. We'll move on from terror sanctions,

(02:45:54):
some military strikes, Trump's cartel policy, side steps Congress, and
we're going to see the drug war become an actual war.
Of course, the drug cartels were created by the drug war.
Federal terrorist lists were not supposed to be an open
ended war authorization, but it sure looks like it's going

(02:46:16):
to be used as one. And of course, the CIA
was the biggest drug pedaler in the United States. Very
possibly still is whether it was creating crack cocaine or
reguarding poppy fields and helping start the opioid epidemic. Sometimes
the side down a slippery slope is very fast. Soon

(02:46:38):
after taking office, President Donald Trump designated several Mexican Salvador
in Venezuelan gang's terrorist groups. Many observers, including myself, thought
that the listing could be a pretext to start an
unauthorized war in Latin America. On Friday, The New York
Times reported that Trump was doing exactly that. The President
is secretly signed a directive to the Pentagon to begin
using military force against Latin American drug cartels that his

(02:47:00):
administration has deemed terrorist organizations.

Speaker 3 (02:47:04):
Of course, real wars. They seem to love real.

Speaker 2 (02:47:08):
War, open war, even more than their.

Speaker 3 (02:47:10):
Sort of statutory wars. They're legal wars.

Speaker 2 (02:47:17):
They like Afghanistan more than the drug war here in America.
As usual, Congress and the American people aren't being given
a chance to deliberate on the war they're being committed to,
and the media has to play guessing games about what
that war will look like. It's possible that these attacks
on cartels would be carried out in cooperation with friendly
governments along the lines of the joint US Columbian hunter

(02:47:39):
Cocaine king been Paplo Escobar in nineteen ninety three. El
Salvador's president, naib Bucele is quite eager to be in
Trump's good graces. Although Mexican President Claudia Shinebamb a very
old Mexican family, The shine Bombs a classic Mexican name.
If I've ever heard one.

Speaker 5 (02:47:55):
Who got into office after how many of the people
running against her were assassinated, it was like what twenty something.

Speaker 2 (02:48:02):
I think it was like nineteen. I think I think
it was around nineteen people were assassinated by the cartels.

Speaker 5 (02:48:08):
But all the people ahead of her died. She was
the only one left alive for some inexplicable reason.

Speaker 3 (02:48:16):
I wonder why the shine Bombs.

Speaker 2 (02:48:19):
Claudia Shinbamb has denounced foreign interference in Mexico's war on drugs.
She has also brushed off reports of US drone over
flights as just a little campaign. But Trump could also
be opening the door to hostile acts of war in
nineteen eighty nine, the US used Panamanian President Manuel Noriega's
ties to the drug trade as a pretext for regime
change or in pain im a strong man Noriega. The

(02:48:41):
Trump administration certainly seems like it could be ginning up
similar justifications for actions against Venezuela, despite intelligence to the contrary.
The Trump administration has claimed that the Venezuelan government is
controlling the trend. De Aragua gang is part of the
Hostile Invasion Force. Two weeks ago, it added the Cartel
de los Soles gang to the terrorist list, accusing the
Venezuelan president Nicholas Maduro running it, and on Thursday, the

(02:49:04):
Justice Department announced a fifty million dollars bounty for information
leading to Maduro's capture. The terrorism designation gives US legal
authorities to target them in ways you can't do if
they're just a bunch of criminals. That's no longer a
law enforcement issue, becomes a national security issue. Secretary of
State Marco Rubio told EWTNA Catholic News Channel on Thursday.

(02:49:26):
Allows us to now target what their operate, target what
they're operating, and to use other elements of American power.
Intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense whatever to target these groups.

Speaker 3 (02:49:37):
So we have an opportunity to do it.

Speaker 2 (02:49:38):
We have to start threatening, treating them as armed organized
terrorist organizations, not simply drug dealing organizations. The Foreign Terrorist
Organization FDO and especially Designated Global Terrorist SDGT lists were
not originally meant to be a war authorization. Instead, they're
an economic sanction. Nineteen ninety six, Congress made it illegal
for Americans to give material support to an FTO as

(02:50:00):
defined by the State Department. After the nine to eleven attacks,
the Bush administration tasked the Treasury's Office of Foreign ASSEID
Control with seizing property of sdgts. But Hawks had been
trying to turn these designations into war authorizations for years.
Perennial war enthusiasts Senator Tom Cotton tried and failed in
twenty twenty to pass a blanket declaration of war against

(02:50:21):
any group on the FTO list. At the time, Senator
Tim Kaine pointed out the circular logic behind authorizing the
president to attack any enemy defined by the president could
lead to some troubled down the line. The FTO list
has never been a war authorization, Kane said, it's created
by the administration, it adds names to it. Whatever the
label to me, whatever the label means, legally, calling someone

(02:50:42):
a terrorist is still a powerful political tool. Instead of
asking Congress for a proactive permission to go to war,
in the past, few presidents have simply started wars and
dared Congress to stop them. Says, nobody wants to be
seen as soft on terrorism. Congress has been reluctant to
push back on wars in progress.

Speaker 3 (02:50:58):
Again, it's hard to.

Speaker 2 (02:50:58):
Know exactly how Trump's Secrets Secret Director will play out
on the ground. However, it's not hard to guess how
we'll play out inside Washington. The administration will continue to
tease out just enough information to show that it's taking
tough action, but not enough information to debate whether that
action is a good idea until it's too late to stop.

(02:51:18):
And that's from Reason magazine. Night So the Storm says,
Kamala's book is a coloring book fun for the entire family.
You can cackle in such famous scenes as her can
color in such famous scenes as her cackling in every interview.

Speaker 5 (02:51:36):
E can colored school buses yellow, because who doesn't like
a yellow school bus?

Speaker 2 (02:51:42):
Her bid for the presidency was a joke on the
American people. She stood no chance. She was the most
unlikable person who was ever run for president.

Speaker 3 (02:51:56):
Bard Hunt.

Speaker 2 (02:51:58):
Hillary Clinton is somehow more personable and likable than Kamala Harris.
It's truly amazing. It boggles my mind. Mexico's president draws
redline US kinetic operations against drug cartels not welcome on
her soil. The United States is not going to come

(02:52:20):
to Mexico with the military. We cooperate, we collaborate. If
there's not going to be an invasion. That has ruled out,
absolutely ruled out, Shinbaum said.

Speaker 3 (02:52:27):
Once again.

Speaker 2 (02:52:27):
Shinebaumb Old Mexican family, who was quoted by a New
New York Times report, She said that her administration would
review Trump's order. She emphasized it is not part of
any agreement. Far from it. When it has been brought up,
we have already said no. Trump's hemispheric defense push to
secure the Americas has been to target drug cartels designated

(02:52:48):
as fdos. These targets include Cartel de Lo Soles, Trendea Ragua,
and the Sinaloa Cartel. The aim here is to disrupt
the financial command and control nodes first, which is underway.
Then the physical structure of these organizations, all to break
the flow a fentanyl and human trafficking in the US
through the southern border. Mexican officials claim they had no
advanced warning of Trump's directive over shinbambs at. US counterparts

(02:53:11):
had hinted that they would deploy US forces for capture,
slash kill missions, maritime interdictions, and cross border sof raids
against high value cartel targets. Trump's new directive signals a
harden approach to ending the fentanyl crisis mainly driven by
ftos in Mexico supplied with precursor chemicals from China. This
drug death crisis claims more than a hundred thousand American

(02:53:32):
lives each year and has become a central mandate for
Trump to address. The crisis exacerbated by the Bidenhirris regime.
Regime's globalist, open border nation killing policies amounts to what
some believe is hybrid warfare waged by the Chinese Communist Party.
The US president is now moving to put a stop
to this chemical warfare on its citizens. Of course, addiction

(02:53:54):
is a spiritual problem. Addiction is something that you have
to address at the root, which again is spiritual. No
amount of physical force well truly handle it. Abbot vows
indefinite special session, says fleeing Dems could face arrest for
literally years. Governor says he'll call special sessions indefinitely to

(02:54:16):
maintain a rest threat for lawmakers who fled the state.
Texans Governor Greg Abbot warren state Democrats that the threat
of arrest upon returning to Texas will last for literally years.
On Sunday, Abbot made the statement during an interview on
Fox News with O Shannon Braem. He argued it is
within his authority to keep the Texas Legislature in special
session indefinitely, extending the penalties for Democrats who fled the state.

(02:54:37):
I'm authorized to call a special session.

Speaker 3 (02:54:38):
Every thirty days.

Speaker 2 (02:54:39):
It lasts thirty days, and as soon as this one
is over, I'm going to call another one, and then
another one, then then another one.

Speaker 3 (02:54:46):
Abbot said. Personally, good for him. I'm all in favor
of this.

Speaker 2 (02:54:51):
These people want to flee the state of scon not
do their jobs. Well, guess what, anytime you come back,
you're going to face the consequences. If they show back
up in the state of Texas, they will be arrested
and taken to the capital. They want to evade that arrests,
they're going to have to stay outside of Texas for
literally years.

Speaker 3 (02:55:08):
He added, Nope, sorry, you don't get to come home.

Speaker 2 (02:55:13):
The warning comes as Abbot is seeking to remove delinquent
Democrats from office, arguing that they have abdicated their roles
under the state constitution. We have a constitution where lawmakers
are violating the law and Article three of the Texas
Constitution where they are required to act on bills because
they're violating the constitutional mandate. That means they are not
fulfilling their oath of office and they can be removed
from office in this legal action that I'm taking, he said,

(02:55:35):
at least one hun members one hundred and fifty member
Texas House must be present to conduct business, and approximately
fifty Democrats have left. Most of the Democrats have set
up in Illinois and New York, where they have received
the backing of Democratic governors like JB. Pritzker and Kathy Hokle,
both terrible awful people.

Speaker 3 (02:55:53):
Lift the hoods.

Speaker 2 (02:55:54):
Jasmine Crockett likens Republicans to KKK as journalists exposes hert
ghetto as hell.

Speaker 3 (02:56:00):
District that's their words.

Speaker 2 (02:56:04):
Us reb Jasmine Crockett, Democrat Texas, is now comparing Republicans
in America to both the Ku Klux Klan and Neo
Nazis while journalist is exposing the shocking blight in her
own ghetto as Hell district. Crockett's comments came during an
interview with MSNBC's Ali Velshie on Saturday. The topic initially
focused on the Texas gerrymandering controversy, as numerous Democrat lawmakers
have fled to Lone Star state to prevent redistricting pushed

(02:56:27):
by the GOP. It's not just even the fact that
it's gerrymandering, want to be clear, this is racialmandering, specifically
in the state of Texas, she explained. Well, she noted,
do you hear the stuff they're saying about Gene Wu
with the way talking about Asians, like how he's connected
to the Chinese Communist Party, like the racism. They're not
doing a great job at keeping it, you know, keeping
the lid on that pot. Crockett responded, No, I mean, honestly,

(02:56:49):
when Trump came in the first time, they started to
lift the hoods. Once Trump got in a second time,
they decided the hoods were off, and listen, perfectly fine
with it, because I want to know where you stand. Well, Crockett,
what you should be saying is they decided to put
the hoods on. You know, that's what the metaphor simile

(02:57:11):
analogy should be, whatever you want to whatever it is.
Taking the hoods off would be implying that they are
becoming less racist. You simpleton, you buffoon, you idiot. Crocker responded, No,
I mean, honestly, with Trump, Jasmine Crockett compares to Republicans
to the KKK. I'll perfectly find with it because I
want to know that you're a despicable human being who

(02:57:32):
lacks all morality.

Speaker 3 (02:57:33):
Why so you can be friends.

Speaker 2 (02:57:34):
With them, so you can work together to siphon more
money out of your district. It is unfortunate that this
is where we are, and it is one reason that
it is so difficult for our minorities to even try
to listen to Republicans because they consistently coddle people like
neo Nazis. This is again the term Nazi, neo Nazi,

(02:57:57):
white supremacists. They've all lost their meaning, they've all lost
any sort of bite over the years, because people like
her have repeatedly used them to bully, badger, and belittle
anyone that they disagreed with. They have continually used them
as a way to terminate someone's social capital, terminate their

(02:58:20):
ability to have any sort of social life or even
keep a job. I've seen people online and saying, man,
I miss when people when you call people a Nazi
and they would deny it. People have learned that it
doesn't really matter if they deny it, if they accept it.
And the fact that you guys have used that label
for everything and everyone means it has lost all meaning,

(02:58:44):
it has become empty, doesn't really matter anymore. You'll call
anyone slightly right of Karl Marx a Nazi, very much
like Herbert Mark Huse would appreciate. We have one minute left.
I want to thank you all for joining us here on.

Speaker 3 (02:59:04):
The show today.

Speaker 2 (02:59:05):
It has been a pleasure covering the news with you.
As I said, David is doing better and he will
be back soon.

Speaker 3 (02:59:13):
We're going to be reworking the.

Speaker 2 (02:59:14):
Studio this Saturday to hopefully have it ready for Monday.
We will hopefully have him back in here and the
David Night Show can resume with David Knight. We appreciate
the fact that you have all stuck with us during
this time, and we cannot thank you enough for everything
you've done to support the show. If you would like
to continue to support the show, there's a easy way
to see it.

Speaker 3 (02:59:34):
You can leave a tip on Rumble.

Speaker 2 (02:59:36):
You can subscribe on kick go to the Davidnightshow dot
com look at the pobox which is David Night peobox
nine nine four, Kodak Tennessee three seven seven sixty four.
There's also subscribe star dot com forward slash the David
Night Show. We cannot thank you all enough. God bless
you all. I hope you have a wonderful rest of
your day. I will be back tomorrow and I'll see

(02:59:56):
you then.

Speaker 20 (03:00:11):
The common man they created common Core and dumb down
our children. They created common past track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(03:00:31):
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

(03:00:55):
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2070: RFK Jr’s Vaccine Limited Hangout

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2070: RFK Jr’s Vaccine Limited Hangout

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce