Mon Episode #2080: Drug War = Terror at Home, Excuse for Martial Law

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:09):
Well it is Monday, the twenty fifth of August. You
have our lord, twenty twenty five. And I couldn't tell
you that earlier because we made some changes to the
studio and we just realized one of the changes messed
up the mic. So Lanstead a real quick fix, and
I think we're back now. But today I want to
begin with what is happening that I see as an

(02:31):
incredibly dangerous precedent, and that is all of the blustering
about Trump, about using troops, and of course conservatives just
roll over. I would have never believed that what happened
in twenty twenty, with lockdowns and medical martial law and
all the rest of the stuff, disrupting supply chains to
join the Constitution, I would have never believed that Americans

(02:54):
would have stood for that. I'll tell you. By the
summer of twenty twenty, I thought we're never going to
get out of this. The people are such people. But
it all happened because conservatives rolled over and let this happen.
Not only did they let it happen, but they cheered
it and they voted for the guy who did it.
They voted for him two more times after he did this.

(03:14):
That's the amazing thing to me. I would have never
believed that could have happened in America. Would you believe
that we could have martial law? Would you believe that
we could have the federal government take an ownership share
in Intel, that they could put export taxes. We've never
had export taxes. What's all this stuff about tariffs? Was
that I supposed to make exports great again, except he's

(03:38):
now going to tax them. And of course, you know,
he began by saying, we can't have this technology go
to China, and he turns around and says, unless they
pay us enough, and then we'll do it. It's absolutely amazing.
And yet now what we're seeing in Washington, DC, and
he's very excited to talk about how he's going to
do it. In Chicago, what we are seeing is something

(04:02):
that was planned, just like operational warp speed a military operation.
This has been planned and talked about for a very
long time by the Pentagon. And again, who would have
thought that this would be It had to be brought
to you by the Republican Party with conservatives cheering it along.
I remember back in the nineteen sixties with the John

(04:25):
Birch Society, which is behind the New American I remember
when they woke everybody up to the dangers of the
federalizing of the police. And of course, many of the
worst abuses that we see from the police are because
of the federal government's involvement, pushing them to militarize, pushing
them with m raps, pushing them to do civil asset forfeiture,

(04:48):
pushing them to become an army with a drug war.
And now people become anesthetized to that, especially conservatives, and
they're just they're going to cheer the placement of the
actual military in the various cities. So we're going to
talk about the issues of that. But I want to

(05:08):
begin with the Pentagon plans, because this is something's been
going on for a long time. And let me just
go full conspiracy theorist on you here, because I don't
think any of this stuff is a coincidence. I think
that at the same time he's talking about going to
war with the Democrat cities, he's also talking about going

(05:29):
to war with the drug cartels. You know, the first
prohibition that we had what happened. You had al Capone
and other people like him. We're shooting it out in
the cities. Weren't they with machine guns? You had the
Saint Valentine's Day massacre. You had them riding on the
side of cars shooting other people. Now this is going
on much worse in Mexico with drug cartels. I mean,

(05:50):
you had like six heads found on a body on
a bridge the other last week, things like that, that
kind of brutality. This was unusual because it's very close
to Mexico City. Now, let me ask you, what do
you think is going to happen if the military starts
to attack the cartels directly. You think they might engage

(06:12):
in terrorism. You think they might do the same kind
of stuff in some American cities that they have done
in Mexican cities. You think they might come after journalists.
You think they might come after politicians or whatever report
on them, who make laws against them, who run the
war against them. That'd be a perfect opportunity then to
come in. That'd be a real emergency that Trump could create.

(06:32):
That'd be a perfect opportunity to declare martial law. We
take the drug war to being a real war and
the Pentagon has been working on this for a long time.
This is a video and it's kind of long, it's
about five minutes, but it's worth hearing this and listen
carefully because in it you'll hear this has done many
many years ago before they started talking about draining the

(06:53):
swamp that meme from the Maga people, and you'll hear
them say this and this Pentagon video as they say, well,
we're going to have to get into urban areas because
and I remember playing this, I said, this is really
an ominous harbiner of what these people are really planning
to do. They're really planning to take over the cities.

(07:15):
They're planning on preparing to push back against any pushback
against the smart cities and the open air prisons that
they want to create. And so this is something just
like the germ games and the mRNA vaccines and the
lockdowns that they have been practicing, wargaming and rehearsing for.

Speaker 3 (07:35):
Years and years and years. Here's the video. The Future

(07:56):
is Urban. By twenty thirty, urban areas are expected to
grow by one point four billion, with that growth occurring
almost entirely in the developing world. Cities will account for
sixty percent of the world's population and seventy percent of
the world's GDP. The urban environment will be the locusts
where drivers of instability will converge. It is the domain

(08:18):
that by the year twenty thirty, sixty percent of urban
dwellers will be under the age of eighteen. The cities
that grow the fastest will be the most challenged as
resources become constrained and illicit networks fill the gap left
by overextended and undercapitalized governments. The risk of natural disasters,
compounded by geography, climate changes, unregulated growth, and substandard infrastructure

(08:39):
intersect the frustrate humanitarian relief. Growth will magnify the increasing
separation between rich and poor. Religious and ethnic tensions will
be a defining element in the social landscape. Stagnation will
coexist with unprecedented development, as impoverishment, slums and shanty towns
rapidly expand alongside modern high rises, technological advances, and ever

(09:00):
increasing levels of prosperity. This is the world of our future.
It is one we are not prepared to effectively operate within,
and it is unavoidable. Megacities are complex systems where people
and structures are compressed together in ways that defy both
our understanding of city planning and military doctrine. It is
an ecosystem that demands a highly agile and adaptive force

(09:21):
to successfully operate within. Infrastructures will vary radically with concentrations
of high tech transportation.

Speaker 2 (09:28):
Now they're showing a lot of pictures of the third world.

Speaker 4 (09:30):
This is about you, while said that televinth and waste
disposal intermixed with open landfills, overburdened sewers, polluted water, and
makeshift power grindts. Living habitats will extend from the high
rise to the ground level cottage to subterranean labyrinths, each
defined by its own social code and role of law.
Social structures will be equally challenged, if not dysfunctional, as

(09:51):
historic ways of life clashed with modern living. Ethnic and
racial differences are forced to live together, and criminal networks
offer opportunity for the growing mass of unemployed. This becomes
the nervous system of non nation state, unaligned individuals and
organizations that live and work in the shadows of national rule.
Where physical domains can be seen, digital domains will have
limitless potential to breed and expand without limit. Digital security

(10:15):
and trade will be increasingly threatened by sophisticated, ilicit economies
and decentralized syndicates of crime to give adversaries global reach
at an unprecedented level. This will add to the complexities
of human targeting as a proportionally smaller number of adversaries
intermingle with a larger and increasing number of citizens. The
scale and density of these domains is daunting. In a

(10:36):
city of ten million, where you hold the support of
ninety nine percent of the population, the remaining one percent
represents a threat of one hundred thousand. It is an
environment of convergence. Hidden amongst the enormous scale and complexity
of the megacity. These are the future breeding grounds, incubators
and launching pads for adversaries and high bred threats linked globally.

(10:57):
These are man made labyrinths that provide refuse movement across
the vast sections of these cities where alternate forms of
governance have taken control. The advice of doctrine from Sansu
to current field manuals has provided two fundamental options. Avoid
the cities or establish a cordon to either wait out
the adversary or drain the swamp of non combatants and

(11:17):
engage the remaining adversaries in high intensity conflict within. Even
our counterinsurgency doctrine honed in the cities of Iraq and
the mountains of Afghanistan is inadequate to address the sheer
scale of population in the future urban reality. From the
streets of Achen to the Citadel and Way, we have
defeated adversaries who attempted to use urban terrain to their advantage.

(11:38):
No You, Heaven conflict is written deep into the Army's histories,
but in Tomorrow's conflict, these megacities are orders of magnitude,
greater and complexity, and our current options do not meet
strategic ends. Our future operations must allow us to rapidly return.

Speaker 2 (11:52):
The city to the people.

Speaker 4 (11:53):
They will be too large and complex to isolate or
court on in their entirety. Yet our soldiers will have
to operate within these ecosystems with minimal disruption and flow.
Our current and past strategies can no longer hold. We
are facing environments that the masters of war never foresaw.
We are facing a threat that requires us to redefine
doctrine and the force and radically new in different ways.

(12:14):
The future Army will confront a highly sophisticated urban centric
threat that will require that urban operations become the core
requirement for the future landforce. The threat is clear, our
direction remains to be defined. The future is urban.

Speaker 2 (12:29):
Yeah, and the Democrats can kind of see the threat,
but they don't understand what it's really about. They think
it's going to be January the sixth part. This is
another coup. They're going to try to take over the
election like they did on January the Sax. That was
not an insurrection, that was not a coup, and they
still think it was and they think that that's what
this is about, and they're dead wrong on both accounts.

(12:50):
Now this is there will be an election rigging, but
that's going to be done with jerrymandering and both parties
are doing it. They're freaking out because of that, and
we'll talk about about that. But that's the politicians picking
the voters and they're trying to make sure they maintain
a majority, especially during the midterm elections. So they're in

(13:11):
this redistrict in battle that's going on Texas and California.
Now Missouri is going to be next, and they are
going to increase the Republican seats. So it's not about
the election. It's not about Trump. Trump has been from
the beginning a puppet of the military industrial complex and
the Pentagon who wants to run all this stuff. They

(13:33):
were planning this stuff for decades, many decades. They ran
the first one of these games that had already been
planning it. They ran the first one of the games
three months before nine to eleven. This predates Donald Trump,
and they just don't get it. But they needed somebody
like Donald Trump, just like the Rothschild said, you know,
and we can use this guy Wilver Rostol, And they're right,

(13:56):
they can use that guy. The Pentagon understands it as
well to the people like Davos and the rest of them.
That's truly I think what this is about. And I
think that once they pick a fight with the cartels,
then you will either have the cartels directly attack, sabotage
infrastructure and other things like that, which will be a

(14:16):
real emergency, and of course then we got to do
it to keep you safe, or they will do a
false flag attack and blame it on the cartels. Did
you hear that old video where they're talking about how
they defeated the enemy in the cities of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Only in their imaginations and their wargames did they do that.
And that's reality. You know. Part of it was to say,

(14:36):
look at that, in a city at ten million, if
you only got one percent, you know, we got to
deal with one hundred thousand people. And so they have
a daunting task. Therefore they're going to start practicing right
away with Donald Trump. This is not simply about DC.
It'd be bad enough if it was about DC. Maybe
a stretch of his authority, Isn't it amazing? Like I said,

(14:59):
I would never thought in my lifetime certainly that we
would see the kind of authoritarian fascist controls. And I
mean that literally when you take over, when you get
a share in intel, folks, that's economic fascism. And the
militarism and the hypernationalism is also characteristic of fascism. But

(15:20):
it really is a technocracy ultimately, but it has these
fascist elements in it. And I would have never thought
that these types of things would have been allowed in America.
This is why they have to get the so called
conservatives to support it, because it's if it was done
by the left, it would be too obvious. And the

(15:42):
people who would stand for freedom would oppose it, But
not when it's their own guy. Not when it's somebody
that they love so dearly. They will make every excuse
in the book for him, just as they have for
what he did in twenty twenty, and just like they
voted two more times for him. So, Chicago woman, here's
an example of this. I couldn't believe this. This is
a story from the Guardian and it was picked up

(16:06):
by She tweeted us out. It was also picked up
by Breitbart and many other Chicago woman was carjacked, but
still tells Trump not to bring the National Guard, and
these people saying, how stupid can you be? What's the
matter with this woman? Actually she's got a lot more

(16:26):
sense than these conservatives who are trolling her. I think
federal militarized police, folks are not a solution. They are
another problem. What happened to these conservatives? Don't they realize?
Don't you remember when Ronald Reagan said government is not
the solution. Government is the problem. Now you have conservatives

(16:47):
out there willing to trade liberty for the promise of
safety and security. You have conservatives out there who, as
I said, you know, John Bursu Society and sixty said
support your local police. It was actually it should have
been more like support local policing, because it was a

(17:07):
federal government that was incentivizing and rewarding financially and putting
out the guidelines for how they wanted to change the
way policing was done. That's why you've now got the
Brazil type raids nineteen eighty four, Terry Gillims nineteen eighty four, Brazil.
That's why you have those types of raids rather than
Sheriff Andy Taylor. We've gone from that in my lifetime,

(17:31):
those two realities that we had out there, and this
is being driven by the federal government. They've always been
the driver of this. And yet the saddest thing I
thought when I see this militarization of the police, as
I go to the New American and there wasn't a
single article criticizing the nationalization of the police, the militarization

(17:55):
of the police. As a matter of fact, the closest
I could see to it was I'm saying, Trump is
saying no American troops will be sent to Ukraine. Well,
I hope that they are appropriately skeptical. But Trump also
says he's going to send troops to Chicago and California.
Where is the Tom Burt Society? Come on, guys, wake up?

(18:17):
Has Trump put you to sleep? I mean it's like
we talked about the Wizard of Oz last week, Travis.
It's kind of like, you know, I'm watching these people
as they are going across the field and the witch
makes them fall asleep in the field of flowers. That's
really what's happened in the conservative movement under Trump.

Speaker 5 (18:33):
Since it's insane, just as long as Trump does it,
so okay, like Richard nixt thing and the president.

Speaker 2 (18:37):
Doesn't it, so it's not illegal, that's right. Yeah, how
are they gonna like it when you've got a Democrat
president of the same cut as Obama or Hillary running
the militarized police in your cities. And of course there's
nineteen different states that said, yeah, we're great with that.
Let's put the military in our cities. Because in every city,

(18:59):
even if it leans conservative Republican, there's going to be
a big city and that's going to lean Democrat. And
so it's like, yeah, bring them in. Let's get control
of Nashville and Memphis. And I mean, we just had
some heinous murderers in both of those places. So yeah,
bring in the military police, that's what we need. Anyway,
this woman says, the car jackedor they stole her car,

(19:22):
they broke her arm, but I don't want the military
in here. And she is getting trolled left and right.
She had to shut down her account because the conservatives
pretrolling her so much, Conservatives pushing the militarization of the police.
She said, Chicago's a mess. You have an incompetent mayor
grossly incompetent. Rather, she didn't say that. Trump said that,

(19:43):
and we're going to straighten that one out probably next
said Trump. That'll be our next one after this, and
it won't even be tough. There you go. So Trump's
solution to crime, it's the same as his solution to
a so called pandemic, an emergency. We operate as a
military operation. And he is instinctively authoritarian in everything that

(20:09):
he does, whether it's the way he deals with critics
or whatever. And so that in response, she wrote, I've
been carjacked in Chicago with my arm broke. I still
don't want your troops here, she said. And so this
is a reply from the magatards out there who don't
understand anything about politics, history, or what is happening. Are
you mentally disabled? Truly asking for your sake? Oh wow, guys,

(20:33):
Look I can smile after somebody cartacked me. That means
it's okay. Sometimes staying quiet is the best option. Yeah,
that's especially true if you're going to be a conservative
who's going to cheer the stationing of troops and cities.
I'm disgusted with these people. They make me want to vomit.
So does Trump. It's the matter with them. So if

(20:55):
you're going to cheer martial law, yeah you should be quiet.
But these people voted for that screenshotting this to show
my children what an idiot looks like. We could just
show them yourself. I mean, that's hey, kids, this is
what one looks like. So Democrats are pushing back against this,

(21:15):
but just like Bill Maher, for the wrong reason. So
they think this is about elections. Yeah, it is about
political power. Everything they do is ultimately about political power.
But that's not the primary issue of this. So you
have a Democrat representative, Adam Smith of a Democrat from Washington,
and he went on Politics Nation this weekend and he

(21:38):
said crime is the problem but Trump's fascism is not
the answer. He's absolutely right. It's not not even you know,
putting out more SWAT teams and armored personnel carriers or
the answer either. So he said, there are two huge

(21:58):
problems here. Number one, we're using US military for domestic
law enforcement. The second big problem is that Trump is
basically giving himself a national police force. And I think
that they know that this is what's coming down the
pike anyway. That's one of the reasons why they've had
the police wearing masks like they're doing third world countries,

(22:19):
like they do in Mexico, right, because, Yeah, we're gonna
be targeted by the cartels, and they want that to happen.
They're going to create that problem. And if the cartels
do not respond the way that they hope that they do,
they'll do a false flag. That's what I think is
really going to happen. I'll see you on the street,
said Trump, after Pritzker, who I think is absolutely reprehensible

(22:44):
on everything, pushback against this, saying that we're going to
send troops to Chicago's This is governor of Illinois pushes back,
but also the Maryland governor, who's also a Democrat, Wes
Moore More urged Trump to use Maryland's model for fighting
crime instead of deploying federal troops like the administration did

(23:05):
in Washington, d C. He said, if there's anything Maryland
has proven over the last two years is that we
can achieve performance without being performative. We need the right
tool for the right mission. Look, I'm not a fan
of local policing, mainly because of the things that the
federal government has trained them to do and incentivize them
to do. But it's only going to get worse as

(23:28):
we pull this in. This is what they're practicing. So
trumpet out on true social He accused the governor Maryland
More of using quote rather nasty and provocative tone. That's
the kettle calling the pot black, isn't it? And his
invitation to quote walk the streets of Maryland. And he

(23:50):
threatened to revoke the funds that we need to rebuild
the Francis Scott Key Bridge that was knocked down partially
by that container ship. Remember that. Yeah, if you don't
talk to me nicely, I'm not going to help you
build back that bridge. And I don't think the federal
government ought to be doing subsidies of infrastructure. They always
throw the money at the wrong things and do it

(24:10):
in the wrong way. That was one of the big
fights before the Civil War, the fact that it wasn't
just about the trade, but it was also or slavery
or whatever. It was about tariffs. It was about whether
or not we were going to have free trade or
how the taxation was going to be done. But it
was also about the fact that Washington was pouring big

(24:32):
bucks into infrastructure in certain favored areas and the people
were not getting the money were very upset about that. So, yeah,
they're building a big canal system infrastructure in the Northeast
with federal dollars, and the people in the South were saying, well,
wait a minute, we don't benefit from that, and they're
absolutely right. So yeah, to all the MAGA people who

(24:57):
said during the lockdown that all the masks and all
that kind of stuff in the medical martial law that
had nothing to do with Trump, he didn't do that.
And I said, from the very beginning, I said, look,
he paid them to do that, He financially incentivized that.
And Trump understands that very well. Look at what he does.
He reacts immediately by saying, oh, yeah, I'm going to

(25:18):
cut off the money that we give you. All the time,
they do it over the boys in the girl's bathroom issue.
The Democrats say we're going to cut your funds off
if you don't put boys in the girl's bathroom, and
the Republicans will say we'll cut it off if you do.
But they understand that that's a weapon. The Maca people
do not, at least they say they don't. I don't

(25:39):
know if they're just trying at this point. I even
wonder if even MAGA could be that stupid. I actually
think that Trump was not running this stuff. That the buck,
as I've said so many times, doesn't just stop with
the president. He's ultimately responsible, but it's where the buck starts.
That's what the decoration of emergency on his side was about.

Speaker 5 (25:59):
He is the one that says everything in motion and
as such as you said, it doesn't just stop with him,
it started with him. It's full circle, all in one person.

Speaker 2 (26:07):
Yeah. Bill Maher says that this is a slow moving coup,
but he gets it all wrong because he thinks that
this is like some kind of a j six thing.
He thinks that the next election, Trump doesn't get the
results that he that he wants. That they're going to
run in with the military and say that's it, we're
keeping control. That's not it at all. It's going to

(26:28):
be much more subtle, and it's going to be about
a lot of other things. And he's absolutely ignorant of
what the Pentagon has been planning for a very very
long time.

Speaker 6 (26:37):
Bill Meher can't comprehend the idea that the next president
is going to be using all this, that Trump is
just a puppet that's setting up a larger thing of control.
He thinks that Trump is the ultimate evil behind everything.

Speaker 2 (26:52):
Yes, that's absolutely right.

Speaker 6 (26:55):
If only we could get him out, then all these
pictorial powers will be fine.

Speaker 2 (27:01):
Yeah, it's a dance, it's a one to two step.
That's one of the reasons why they had to put
Biden in because Trump locks everything down, messes up the
supply chain, and destroys a lot of small businesses and farms,
and then they put the guy in to mandate his
poison that he produced.

Speaker 5 (27:19):
Also, personally, I'd be surprised if there is ever a
dictator for life, at least in the United States. It
seems as though they realized that elections act as they
sort of pressure release valve. The guy comes in, he
does a whole bunch of things you disagree with. But
every four years you get to pick a new dictator.
So maybe the next guy will be better, maybe he'll
do a bit better job. Oh, he didn't do a
good job, so he's out. New guy. Whereas the dictator

(27:41):
for life, it breeds a lot of resentment over time,
people start getting very upset.

Speaker 6 (27:45):
Yeah, yeah, sort of sacrificial candidate. All the sins of
the government get put on one person's shoulders and then
get a new president.

Speaker 5 (27:55):
Then he's cast out into the wilderness.

Speaker 2 (27:58):
If only we could. Yeah. Somebody sent me in an
article saying that gen Z is getting nostalgic for George W. Bush.

Speaker 5 (28:09):
I can promise you there's nothing to be nostalgic about guys.

Speaker 2 (28:11):
You miss me. I've said that long times. I'll never
miss him. Well.

Speaker 6 (28:15):
The thing is, nostalgia is wishing for something better than
what you currently have that you used to have.

Speaker 2 (28:22):
My favorite meme of George W. Bush was when somebody
morphed him into Alfred Newman from Mad magazine, and it
was they didn't have to do too much morphing actually
he's pretty close to that already, and it was like,
you know what, me worry. So, yeah, the when you
go back and look at all the masks and all

(28:44):
the rest of stuff, think about that. You know, twenty
twenty we had masks enforced by cops, right, twenty twenty five.
Now the cops are going to use force and they
wear the mask to hide their identity. It just works perfectly.
Bill Mars said, First they created a massed police force.
Get people used to looking at that, normalize snatching people

(29:05):
off the street. Get them used to looking at that,
normalize seeing the National Guard in the military on the street.
And He's right, this is about moving the overturned window.
This is about normalizing it. And so what this all
was about. That's what the passport, the vaccine passports, all
the rest of this stuff is all ultimately about, do
you really want to have to live your life under
military occupation like your Paris occupied by the Nazis, or

(29:29):
saying the identity papers disease, Then they have to say
that they're creating a biometric database where they can get
your identity papers just by looking at you. He said,
you start talking about crime in the capitol and it's
always been a fairly crime ridden city, and so Trump says, yeah,

(29:49):
we're going to make it safe, and then we're going
to go after other places. And conservatives are more than
willing to trade your liberty for Trump's promise of of safety.
As a matter of fact, on Bill Myer's show, you
had conservative activist Christopher Ruffo, who has done a lot
of good work against the LGBT and other things like that.

(30:10):
I think understanding that it is about ultimately about the
maoist struggle sessions, but he ripped liberals for just being
too sensitive. Oh your feelings are hurt, you know, you
just don't like the military. That type of thing. Well,
I think they are completely wrong. The Conservatives in my lifetime,

(30:31):
as I said, have done a complete one eighty. They've
become the Democrats of my youth. But even worse than
the Democrats of my youth. I can't imagine the Democrats
of my youth pushing the kind of authoritarian policies that
Trump is doing. Even the Democrats of my youth did
not say we're going to take over major businesses like Intel.

(30:52):
We're going to take a share in them, and let
me ask you know how much of a share do
they have to take before they really manipulate them. They
can manipulate them without even taking shares, but to take
shares in it is taking it to a whole new
level that used to be the province of these third
world dictatorships and communist parties to have ownership of corporations.

(31:15):
People in Chicago are screaming for us to come, said Trump.
They're wearing red hats. Yeah, you know, the red hatted
people are screaming. I think they are barking mad, as
the British would say. They are screaming for Trump and
screaming their approval of him forever day. He said. They're saying, please,
President Trump, come to Chicago. Please. I did a great

(31:38):
job with the black vote, and as you know, they
want something to happen. So I think Chicago will be
our next stop. Then we'll help with New York. So
Maras said, the militarization of US cities could be how
Trump puts systems in place to main contain control of
presidential election processes. I think they've got something much bigger
than that. They don't care about elections. They control the elections. Now,

(32:02):
that's what all this jerrymandering is they pick the voters.
They know in advance which of their parties are going
to win the election. And of course they know which
people are going to win, because the Democrat and Republican
parties pick who's going to run in a particular district,
So they set the district up for their party, they
pick the candidates, they keep independence and third parties off

(32:25):
the ballot, off of the debates, and then they rig
it with the voting machines to vote by mail and
you name it. They've got a gazillion different ways to
rig the vote counting. And so this is not about
the election. This is about smart cities and how they
enforce it. That's ultimately what this is about. And this
is what they've Pentagon has been talking about and practicing

(32:47):
for a long time. They're talking about it and practicing
it before they were defeated in Rock and Afghanistan. So
maybe there'll be the next fake pandemic, or maybe it'll
be some kind of a climate lockdown, or maybe it'll
be the cartels who are invaded. But what they're doing
is they're practicing rolling out literal martial law. I said

(33:07):
it a million times in twenty twenty. It was medical
martial law pushed by Trump, and now he wants the
real thing, just like we've had a so called drug war,
and now he wants a real thing with that. And
the Democrats don't get it either. The presence now of
this army in Washington is going to have its toll

(33:28):
taken when the next election comes down. Well, this is
all predictive programming. A congressman judiciary will also be growing
accustomed to martial law. Start with Washington, DC. So the
congressmen and the judges and all the bureaucrats in Washington
can't get used to seeing military on the streets. So

(33:50):
I don't think anything about it when you send them
into the other areas. I mean, it's all just it,
truly is. Bill Maher was right in the sense that
he said this is a slow roll up out of
a coup. It has been this way from the very beginning. Again,
Chicago is going to be next. He's boasting about it.
And at the center of all this is uh, the

(34:12):
little authoritarian nerd Stephen Miller. He's at the center of
all of this federalization of the police, that's over the
top actions that they're doing, and the so called crime crackdown.
He's got his fingerprints all over it. People in administration say, yeah,
he's the guy who's running this together. And of course

(34:34):
you could look at it as just Trump is marking
his territory, and that's the way many people on the
left look at it. But it's much much bigger than that.
It is a bipartisan move. And let me tell you
that somebody like Obama, Biden or Hillary Clinton are going
to love having this kind of power. It won't be
one of the three of them, but it'll be somebody who's

(34:54):
just like them. Maybe a conglomeration of the three.

Speaker 5 (34:59):
Maybe think turned in like a hydra, you know, all
three heads on one body.

Speaker 2 (35:02):
Yeah, just kind of like morphing. George W. Bush and DALFREDY.
Newman from magazine get Ai to give you a composite
picture of Obama, Hillary and Biden. So The Reason took
it on and said Trump's DC goon squads are an
American Well, even more importantly, it's unconstitutional. They said, the

(35:26):
president is ordering federal troops on the street. That's not
how routine policing should work, even in the nation's capitol.
By the way, you know, we went for a very,
very very long time in this country, without police we
had the sheriff, and the sheriff would bring together the
posse when necessary, if it was something that was really big,

(35:49):
that was called the Posse commatatis. Was actually the power
of the community. And it is the Posse Commatatis Act
that Trump is violating here. But an elected share and
the people the power of the community is a very
very different approach to law enforcement to begin with, than
a police force. A police force works for the city,

(36:13):
hired by the city, controlled by the city. The police
chief is not accountable to the citizens in terms of
he's accountable to the other elected officials. But it's a
very different model. Local Street Resistance says reason is the
occupation to the occupation was limited to a drunk guy
throwing a sandwich at a federal agent. That was when

(36:36):
they put some DEA and Ice people into Washington, c
d c. And when he threw a sandwich at these guys,
they came back later and re arrested him, overcharged him
with a felony, and re arrested him in a big
public show of force. Massed federal agents have set up

(36:59):
an unconstant social checkpoint violently arrested. At least one delivery
driver filmed themselves tearing down a banner that protested their appearance,
their presence rather than the city. Each day, more and
more National Guard members pour into the capital. You know,
no institution has been worse about violating the Constitution than
the federal government in its entirety, and this is just

(37:24):
yet another example of this. The conversation about Trump's declared
crime emergency has understandably, albeit unhealthily, provoked a lot of
discourse about how safety c is, whether a federalized local
police department will make it safer. But I would say
this debate ignores the law, ignores the constitution, ignores the

(37:48):
elephant in the room, which is that he's trying to
set up martial law. It's an a violation of the Constitution.
These are powers that were not delegated to the federal
govern so therefore they don't have them according to the
ninth and tenth Amendment. So these are begins with powers
that they don't have. Now. Reason also takes a look

(38:08):
at the Constitution, says, well, if we look at the
Third Amendment, which for years and years and years people said,
well the Third Amendment is the only one that's not
being violated, because that was when the British government would
quarter troops into a town or into people's homes, that
type of thing. So we don't have the military living

(38:30):
in our homes. And I said, well, in a sense,
you have the NSA living in your home. It's living
in your computer. It's violating the Fourth Amendment, where you
should be secure in your person and your property and
your papers. And it's also basically living there and using
your electricity to spy on you. Uniformed troops and masteril

(38:53):
agents doing routine law enforcement at the command of the
president is just not how we do things. Said reason.
That's putting it a little bit too mild. I think
we need to hate this. I think we need to
speak out against this strongly. It's not just to say, well, traditionally,
that's not the way we've done it. These people are
beginning their martial law with a violation of the Constitution,

(39:15):
just like Trump did in twenty twenty. So this is
not a situation where we're talking about mismanners etiquette. You know,
we're not talking about which side you put the forks
on the plate. This is the Constitution, and this is
a standing army, and this is a form of martial
law conditioning. At the very least. The entire point of

(39:38):
the US Constitution is to prevent the federal government from
becoming a despotism said reason, that's true. That's true. This
is why the Constitution places strict constraints on maintaining a
standing army. That's why they are only three times mentioned
in the There are only three times mentioned in the Constitution,
none of which would plausibly require federal agent. Three crimes,

(39:59):
I'm sorry, none of which would require federal agents to
patrol a street in Washington, DC or Chicago. So what
they're saying is there's only three crimes that are defined
there because law enforcement was not the purpose of the
federal government. It really was for the common defense primarily,
and they were very concerned that they're not be a

(40:19):
standing army. But the army's been standing around now since
World War Two, and they've been sent to other countries.
They stood around on the throats of other countries as
well when we were not attacked. So we've used them,
as Truman said, as a police force. And eventually, when
you use the military as a police force in other countries,

(40:42):
they're going to be used as a police force in
your own country. That was what Madison said. He said,
the instruments of defense abroad become weapons of tyranny at home.
If you're going to have a standing army that's going
to become a global police force, it's going to be
a global police force in your town and your state.
And that's what Trump is now working on, I think.

(41:05):
And it all falls in very nicely with the technocrats.
That's Travis. They are. It just it just keeps rolling together.

Speaker 5 (41:13):
Had a good comment here in chat. Someone's camera can't
find it, but he said, I haven't seen a normal
cop car in ten years now. They all want the
eighty thousand dollars suburbans and want to be something of
enlisted blade runner type of guy.

Speaker 2 (41:26):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (41:26):
It's just every single cop I've seen in my lifetime
has had this sort of aura of you know, I'm
a one man army. I'm here to you know, whatever
I say is the law. You know, it's very judged dread.

Speaker 2 (41:38):
Yeah, and we're seeing this. Just take a look at home.
When the guy that he picked for Ice, I mean,
he is classic that you know, he's got that that's
his persona.

Speaker 5 (41:46):
Absolutely yeah, and that set the stage for this. The
cops have already become so militaristic that it's we've already
moved so far in that direction that this feels like
the next logical step. Like a lot of people probably
won't even notice the difference.

Speaker 2 (42:01):
And the thing that bothers me is the Conservatives are
either silent or cheering it because it's Trump. It's amazing
the control that one person can exercise over this. They
are cheering a literal standing army. Now. Third Amendment says
reason is mostly treated as an anachronistic joke today. In fact,

(42:21):
it is a load bearing part of the Constitution that
makes clear that the military and the police are different things,
and the Americans should not have to tolerate the presence
of armed agents in the States as a routine part
of daily life. Well again, police were something that was
invented in the nineteenth century. Had Robert Peel and the

(42:43):
UK created a police force in London, the Bobbies, and
they were very civil for the longest time, unarmed even
but look at them today. Now they're going around arresting
women for silently praying, even after they've it's been thrown
out of the court three times, and the department has
had to pay. Of course, they don't pay. It's the

(43:03):
taxpayers who pay, and they just did again even though
they've been slapped. They're like Colorado, where Colorado keeps going
after Baker's the same baker, you know, because he won't
custom make a transversary cake.

Speaker 5 (43:15):
Yeah, it's probably about time for him to end up
in another lawsuit exactly.

Speaker 2 (43:20):
But yeah, that's their mission now.

Speaker 5 (43:23):
Oh so I like the terminology that you use your
load bearing part of the Constitution. He's like, no, no,
you can't take that out. That's a load bearing amendment.
You take that out, the whole thing comes down on itself. Boss,
we can't do that.

Speaker 2 (43:33):
Yeah, well they're doing that with the First Amendment that
definitely is a load bearing part of the Constitution and
Second Amendment as well. In his book Rise of the Warrior,
cop Radley Balco writes about how the trend of increased
political militarization has eroted quote the symbolic Third Amendment and
the free society that protects historically ironic then that after

(43:55):
decades of politicians of both parties in DC gifting the
federal cover vast powers to police the rest of the country.
That a militarized police force is now being deployed on
the streets of America's capital against its residents. I think
that is, first of all, the logical progression, but I
think it's also a predictive programming. As I said before,

(44:15):
they want these federal bureaucrats and elected officials to get
accustomed to what they're planning on doing to everybody, so
they want to put it there. The federal government acting
as a beat cop is animical to our constitutional design,
regardless of how effective its efforts are. That DC is

(44:35):
a federal district might seem to complicate the point, but
in fact it reinforces it. Except that Trump has declared
his intent to do it everywhere and anywhere, and he
wants it to be seen as punishment of his enemies.
You know, that is the subtext of all this stuff.
He wants to be seen as a revenge administration, even

(44:58):
in the seat of federal powers. Reason, it's understood that
the force of federal agents policing everyday life is not
something that ordinary citizens should have to put up with.
That's absolutely true. Again another Democrat. Again, it's only only
Democrats are criticizing this, which is the thing that bothers me.

(45:19):
The most Conservatives should be up in arms, they should
be angry about this, but they're just rolling over because
it's Trump. Anybody that criticizes Trump is going to be
taken down and out. That's whether you're doing it in
the media or if you're a politician, he's going to
get you out of there. Rokohanna says, a National Guard
is in DC so that Trump can stay in power. Again,

(45:40):
that's what Bill Maher said, and the Democrats see that
because the only thing the Democrats care about is power.
They don't care about the Constitution, they don't care what
happens to the citizens. It's like, oh, is this a
game so that he can beat us at the power game?
That's what it's really about. So he was asked by

(46:01):
Jonathan cape Hart an interview. He said, Congressman, let's switch
gears to the National Guard troops that are here in
Washington also from about six or seven Republican states, and
they're going to go into nineteen different states. Tennessee's one
of them, Texas is one of them. I mean, all
the Republican states are saying, yeah, yeah, send us your
send us a standing army. We want that because Trump

(46:23):
wants that. So it's a good thing. President is threatening
to replicate this in other cities like New York, Chicago, Oakland.
What do you think they all have in common? And
he says black mayors, So is this racism? He said,
it's going to be about political power and they're going
to play the race card. Well, I just have to

(46:44):
say that there is a correlation with high crime and
with black mayors. But so what. And if you don't
like what's happening in Chicago with the dozens of people
shot with gang violence over each weekend, then get out
of the But the answer is not to federalize it.
If the people there want to put up with it,

(47:05):
if they want to like to corrupt and effective leadership,
then let them do that rather than setting precedents for
military martial law. And the Conservatives are pushing for this
because and you heard in that Pentagon Megacities thing, they
said people of different racial and ethnic groups will be

(47:26):
forced to live with each other, pushed into conflict with
each other. And of course the coming conflict is going
to be when they crash the markets, when they take
jobs with their AI stuff, and so the conservatives are
freaking out over this guy. Kill mar again, kill mar Garcia.
They call him Marylyn manned is what the conservatives call him.

(47:51):
The guy that Trump when he was trying to make
the case, he didn't talk about the guy's real crimes.
He tried to pretend that guy was MS thirteen because
the tattoos on his knuckles. So what might indicate that
he was MS thirteen was that he was caught red
handed in Tennessee trafficking people. But the Trump administration doesn't

(48:14):
really care whether it's true or not. They just want
to and it was evidenced by the phony, ridiculous narrative
that they came up with to defend their actions. He
should have focused on even after you could say, well,
they didn't know that this happened. Well, the people in
the Tennessee star hammered this. The fact that he was

(48:35):
pulled over. He had eight people or something in the
car with them. None of them spoke English, none of
them had any idea where American citizens, and the car
belonged to another guy who was already arrested and convicted
for trafficking. So it looks like, yes, he was cartel.
Not because of the nonsense about the tattoos on his
knuckle that was easily debunked. It was almost like they

(48:58):
wanted to have an argument about this guy.

Speaker 5 (49:00):
Yeah, this him being released to me is a really
really bad thing because this is going to strengthen the
position from the right seat. It's like, well, when we
give them the option to go through the judicial process,
these people, that's right, wrong.

Speaker 2 (49:14):
That's why he's been selected as a poster child to
show we're going to have to act as extra judicial Yeah, exactly, Yeah,
no trial for see what happened to Kilmar, the Maryland man.

Speaker 5 (49:24):
We did it the right way and this is what happens,
and now you don't get any habeas corpus.

Speaker 2 (49:29):
That's right. So in terms of Chicago, actually Washington Post
is talking about the fact that the Pentagon is planning this.
I showed you the video. They's been planning this for
a very very long time, but now they're planning specifically
to go to Chicago as part of Trump's strategy to
address crime, homelessness, and undocumented immigration, according to the Washington

(49:51):
Post report. And so we have reports that the Pentagon
is planning to go into Mexico to fight the cartels
have reports that Pentagon is planning to go into Chicago,
but Magamdia doesn't know, doesn't care what the implications of
this are. The mobilization is set for September. Pritzker, the

(50:13):
governor of Illinois, has received no requests. You received no
request or outreach from the federal government asking if assistance
is needed. They're going to send it in preemptively. House
Minority Leader Hakim Jeffreyes says Trump does not have the
authority to deploy troops in Chicago. Well, he's right, so

(50:33):
impeach him for something that's real. I mean, they've impeached
him for a lot of phony stuff in the past.
Now they've got a real reason to impeach this guy
the National Guard in Chicago. But he's also set about
putting it in la and so in a thread, Pritsker
said that he is using these cities quote as his

(50:55):
testing ground for authoritarian overreach. Yes, it's not about what
some of these other Democrats have said, but it is
about normalization and about testing and about training. Okay, so
now we're going to work on We're actually going to
practice this. I remember a decade ago that conservative alternative

(51:16):
media when I was at Info Wars. We were running
stories all the time because Trump, not Trump, Obama. Sorry,
there's so much alike. Obama was repurposing m wraps. Even
had a situation where since World War II, surplus equipment
from the Army was donated to fire departments, rural fire

(51:38):
departments because Royal fire departments didn't have a big population,
they didn't have a lot of money, and they could
have to deal with really really big fires, especially because
they're usually adjacent to some federal land and the Feds
don't maintain their forests. So it was always a tradition
that the military would donate heavy equipment to these fire departments.

(52:03):
But that was right about the time that he was
shoving these m wraps on local police departments. And basically
the things were massive white elephants, and that was more
than anything else. That was what stopped that program. Had
a lot of sheriffs saying, you know, the contract was
that the Pentagon maintained ownership of it. They just put

(52:24):
it there and then put the expense of maintaining it
on the local police force and said, we don't have
the money to do this. Because those things were rushed
into the Iraq war and they were a maintenance nightmare,
and so it was I saw it as a forward
positioning by the Obama administration. We go to put all
of over equipment there, We'll have the local people maintain

(52:44):
it at their expense, and then it'll be there when
we want to roll out the military in some kind
of an emergency. So we were pushing back against that,
and in terms of the fire stuff, that had a
happy ending because the local fire departments are mostly volunteer firemen,
and these people are politically active, and they started they

(53:05):
got very politically active with their elected representatives and senators
pushed back on this pretty hard, and they stopped it.
About a month after they declared that they were going
to terminate that program, they turned around and said, no,
we're going to continue it. But we're not seeing that
kind of pushback now. And we were talking all the
time about That's one of the reasons why I knew

(53:27):
about this video. We were talking all the time about
the militarization of the police and what is Obama up to.
But now that it's Trump, not a peep from Alex shows,
not to peep from info Wars or Breitbart or anybody else.
If they say anything, they cheer it. And the biggest things.
I can't even believe that that John Birch Society. Hey,
any of you people out there than John Birch Society,

(53:48):
tell them, I said, So you guys have lost your spine.
Wake up, wake up, sick of this stuff, Prisker said,
after using La and Washington in dc'ss testing ground for
authoritarian overreach. Trump is now openly flirting with the idea
of taking over states and cities, Breitbart said. Trump explained

(54:09):
to an announcement in the Oval Office about the FIFA
World Cup, drawing that after his administration finishes cracking down
on crime in the nation's capital, it'll go after another location.
And they don't push back against that. This is Breitbart,
So they don't push back against it. They don't say
that that's wrong. So you've got people. We're in big trouble, folks.

(54:32):
When the only people who are going to speak out
against martial law are people like pritzk or Roquhana and
other Democrats, We're in big trouble. We're in big trouble.
These The poss Comatatis Act, says Breitbart, prohibits the use
of armed forces to execute laws accepting cases, especially authorized

(54:54):
by Congress or a constitutional act. That's right. It's a
violation of the Constitution. It's violation of the ninth and
tenth Amendment. It's a violation of the Third Amendment. It's
a violation of the Posse Comitatis Act, and on and
on and on. But it's Trump so it's all okay.
And the response from Children's Health Defense so as regulators

(55:17):
have to tell the public that digital IDs will be
voluntary and optional, they get rid of the digital IDs,
especially the biometric stuff. So they're pushing back and saying,
you know, we can see all this stuff happening, we
can see it roll out. We can see that the
federal government are turning into literal Nazis.

Speaker 6 (55:37):
So are they saying that regulators must tell the public
the digital IDs must be voluntary in order to get
them passed through, then they can make the mandatory. Yeah, exactly,
they must tell them that or else it will never happen.

Speaker 2 (55:49):
Well, yeah, we all know how that works out. I
mean we've seen you know, real ID was kind of
a slow rollout, and eventually it becomes mandatory for certain things.
We had eve and of course that you had to
get the federal government to verify that you're really American
citizen before you can get a job. Well, that was
voluntary until you had Republican states like Florida start to

(56:12):
make it mandatory. They said. Children's Health Defense requests that
the that NIST publish a formal FAQ to confirm your
department is committed to emphasizing the voluntary nature of digital ID,
meaning that nothing in the new NIST guidance should be
construed to require biometric identification. Well, they don't understand that

(56:34):
digital ID was never intended to be voluntary, and especially
the biometric and facial stuff. And that's what's rolling out
now at the TSA. Remember that was voluntary. You know,
you want to get to your plane with less hassle
and quicker just to sign up for our voluntary program.
Now it's facial ID is mandatory. Everywhere. We could see
that coming. This is the way these people operate. Let's

(56:57):
not be naive about it, they said, clearly moving towards
digital wallets and biometric keys. That will make it harder
for Americans to access their online accounts, email, bank, everything
online unless Americans provide biometric identifiers face scan, thumbprint. This
is going to happen and you won't be able to travel,

(57:17):
You won't be able to get out of your little
fifteen minute area, you won't be able to use your
money if you're geolocated outside the area that you're allowed
to be in. And they will have gate keepers like
the TSA. You know, we talk about federal police. Let's
not forget the TSA. That's essentially what they are. I
really resent that, and it's just amazing to me that

(57:38):
we don't care anymore. And look at what the US
military did in Afghanistan. I remember there was a freak
out towards the end of it. They had the US
military and Afghanistan had a box that they took around
and they used that to do immediate biometric facial identity

(57:59):
on people. Had database that it was associated with, so
they could pull people up just like that. And they're
worried about it because they lost track of one of
these boxes and they said, oh no, now the bad
guy is the Taliban can use this to identify our people, right,
they can use that as a counter thing, and they
can show that if it shows up. You know, they

(58:20):
point at somebody's face and it'll tell them if it's
one of our guys or not if this Afghan has
been friendly to us. That was one of the things
that was an impetus to try to get as many
Afghans here as possible when the whole thing collapsed. So
the military has been working on this for a long time,
just like Palateer, Polunteer first cut its teeth on helping

(58:43):
the military to create surveillance states and areas that our
standing army had taken over and was standing on the
people's throats. And as I said, you know, it's the
instruments of war that we use abroad become instruments of
tyranny here at home. Biometric identification, all the rest of stuff.
That's what it's truly about. Well, let's take a break

(59:05):
before we do, Travis Orb.

Speaker 5 (59:06):
We have a lot of comments. KWD sixty eight, thank
you very much for the tip. We really do appreciate it.
Because of your support that we're able to keep the
show running. So Trump was very concerned about Roger Clemens
being inducted into the Best Baseball Hall of Fame. It's
a main issue for America. Thanks for your attention to
this matter. Winning ye yeah, yeah, we're winning. And so

(59:28):
is Roger Clemens in the Hall of Fame?

Speaker 2 (59:30):
I guess I.

Speaker 5 (59:30):
Don't know, Jerry Alatalo. Transhumanism has now rocketed to the
number one spot in the annual competition, and transhumanism is
expected to become the named twenty twenty five Global Word
of the Year. Oh isn't that something? Yeah, scune Collo
Rose gardens urban areas is perfect area to displace useless
eaters and surplus population. Original.

Speaker 2 (59:53):
Yeah. What was that Spielmberg thing?

Speaker 5 (59:54):
Ready steady O ready player one?

Speaker 2 (59:56):
Yeah, I always I ask you because I cannot for
some reason, I've got a mental block against the title
of that thing.

Speaker 5 (01:00:03):
Yeah, don't worry. Yeah, every politician is someone that I
can never remember. It's like, oh yeah that yeah, he exists.

Speaker 2 (01:00:09):
Sadly, that was a horrific picture of the future that
these people planned. Everybody who's living in these thrown together sheds,
humblest like you would see in a poor town in
India or something like that, and their escape was to
get on the little treadmill and play video games, or
they can escape into this big virtual reality.

Speaker 5 (01:00:28):
Except if it ever does happen for us, it'll be
even worse because all our video games will be lame
and gay.

Speaker 2 (01:00:34):
Yeah, that's right, they'll be.

Speaker 5 (01:00:36):
There won't be many bread in the circuses, and the
circuses will be lame and gay.

Speaker 2 (01:00:39):
Yeah, they'll be designed by the people like the Crocker
Barrel CEO.

Speaker 5 (01:00:43):
It'll be incredibly sterile, boring environment. Original Babe says, Yeah,
the drug cartels are not going to go for biometrics
or digital currency. They might actually be the ones to
stop this.

Speaker 2 (01:00:53):
Yeah, I'll tell you if Yeah, we could have some
strange allies. Of course, that's why they're they're counting on.
You're with the terrorists. That was another George wism right
with that's a year with a terrorist.

Speaker 5 (01:01:08):
You're either with us or against us.

Speaker 2 (01:01:10):
Well, I have to think about that. If that's the
two choices, think long and hard about that.

Speaker 5 (01:01:15):
Yeah, I think that's a no win solution. I think
you just have to abstain. The cartels are continually cutting
people's heads off and practicing like black magic, Satanism stuff.
I think you just got to stand back. And he's like, well,
maybe they take each other out.

Speaker 2 (01:01:27):
Well, they do black magic, Satanism and the Pentagon.

Speaker 5 (01:01:29):
Yeah, you can't side with either of them. They're both bad.
Man militia. This is the constant dialectic used by big government,
making conditions so important and make people feel so helpless
they turn to authoritarian principles. Yeah, that's the thing is
just these cities are failing, they are collapsing. The problems
are getting horrific. The migrant crisis is real. All these

(01:01:53):
things are really bad problems and people do need solutions
to them. They just provide you a terrible, terrible solution.
Then it's them what they want.

Speaker 2 (01:02:01):
They've let people run wild, and you know that that
was the whole thing. You go escape from New York.
You know, everybody knew that was happening in New York City,
and so the joke was just build a wall, run
and they made a movie out of that. You know,
you're like, you know what, make it into one big prison.
You know that's uh, that's what they could do. Who
needs alligator out? Like when you.

Speaker 5 (01:02:19):
Yeah, uh, just there's actually a website now I don't
know who's put it up, but it's called migrant crime
dot org. It tracks migrant crime in the UK and
it has little pin pricks on the map and you
can see, you know, how many there are and what
the crimes were and it's just this is not some
made up, fake nonsense.

Speaker 2 (01:02:38):
Well, it's because Parliament is filled with pin pricks.

Speaker 5 (01:02:43):
But uh, let's see a ton of Lord one three
three seven? When was this video released? That was the
one we watched.

Speaker 2 (01:02:50):
I should have checked the date on it, but I
think it goes back several years. I think it was.
I have to go back and check the date on it. Uh,
maybe Lance you could do that while we're on there,
go back and see if we can figure out it
was actually at the very beginning of it. It was
the Intercept, was it. I think that I did that.
So if you went back and looked at Intercept, Mega

(01:03:12):
Cities and Pentagon, you might be able to find a
date on that. But sorry, go ahead.

Speaker 5 (01:03:16):
When I hear Mega cities, I just think of Dread,
you know, Judge Dred Yeah, Mega City one.

Speaker 2 (01:03:21):
Yeah, yeah, I thought about that as I was reading
the article. I really should have looked up the exact data,
but I know that I've covered this years ago once before.

Speaker 5 (01:03:30):
Go ahead, Uh, a Syrian girl. Cities will always be
the cesspools of humanity. It's always been, always be, always have,
always will.

Speaker 2 (01:03:38):
Yeah, Jefferson, have a threat to the health, the wealth,
and the liberty of man.

Speaker 5 (01:03:42):
Anytime it reaches a certain critical mass, it just becomes unlivable,
becomes disgusting and horrible.

Speaker 2 (01:03:49):
Well, you know, there's the thing they found that if
they took rats. Yeah, the crowded the cage with rats.
So they're you know, bumping into each other all the time.
They start to get violent with each other, physically attack
each other all the time.

Speaker 5 (01:04:02):
They get anxious, violent, unpredictable. Tunnel Lord went thirty three
seven the future that these tyrants engineered to exist. Why
not stop engineering mankind to be stuck in the cities. Well,
because that's getting on what they want. Skun callo Rose Gardens.
Until we get drones capable of apprehending a full sized man,
unsuspecting apprehensions have to be made by boots on the ground,

(01:04:23):
and that is very cost prohibitive. Those race for AI
is just a race to get a robot that can
apprehend a man first.

Speaker 2 (01:04:30):
I agree. Yeah, yeah, wait till they deploy the robots.
And because you know, you've got people in the military
who are humans and they've got conscious about some of.

Speaker 5 (01:04:40):
This stuff, and they might question their orders.

Speaker 2 (01:04:43):
Yeah, if you tell them to, you know, to do
martial laws. Some of them are going to push back
and have enough of them you can do something.

Speaker 5 (01:04:51):
Yeah, that's also a reason there's been such a huge
push in the military over the years to bring in
people from different countries. Okay, you want citizenship, you join
in the military, you get citizenship. And they don't have
any real connection to the country or to the people,
and they're not going to question when told. Hey, that's
why they pushed that door down.

Speaker 2 (01:05:09):
You know, Trump already started this in twenty twenty. All
of us realized that he was pushing out people who
had ethical and constitutional concerns, pushed them out of the military.
You can't force this on me. You can't. I didn't
sign up to be a labrat or this violates my
religious beliefs. It's like, okay, you're out. So that's what
it did to Jason Jason Berker.

Speaker 5 (01:05:31):
Yeah. Minute Man Militia says, Also weird, do they want
to push everyone into big cities and label them as
combat zones? Ha ha, Yeah, very strange. I wonder why
that would be. Yeah, fifteen minute combat zones. Minute Man
Militia says. The irony just keeps getting crazier, especially people
like aj who ranted about martial law for years. Completely quiet.

Speaker 2 (01:05:53):
Isn't that amazing? That's what I said, You know for
years that we were really focused on that. I remember
talking about the War College and how they were gamed
the scenario in Darlington, South Carolina. Look that up. Oh yeah,
you got these people wearing John Deere caps caps now
they're not green caps, now they're red caps. And they
said they've had enough of the federal government and they

(01:06:14):
decide that they're going to secede. So how does that
play out? What do we use the military for against
these people in this rural area? And you had That's
why Biggs and I went to one of these asymmetric
warfare centers. You know, they're training to fight us in
the cities. They built little replica cities. We stood there
at the corner of First Street in Maine, and it

(01:06:36):
was not as they used to do. They would go
in and they would train in terms of urban warfare.
They would train in a mock up that was like
a city that already been bombed. So it's just like
shells of buildings and things like that. Now this is
perfectly intact. They had a soccer feel there. They had
transportation that was there, they had areas that were like

(01:06:59):
a skyscrape. We were an apartment building all this stuff,
and we were walking around taking pictures of it, and
Big said, that is an interrogation room, just like we
had in Iraq over here next to the soccer field.
That's what they're practicing on. And it was pretty clear.
But I could someday actually go into that and talk

(01:07:19):
about the aftermath of that. Alex was not very happy
with that. He got us set up to be arrested
with that thing.

Speaker 5 (01:07:25):
So anyway, Lance says that that video was from eight
years ago, years old.

Speaker 2 (01:07:31):
Okay, yeah, eight years and I thought it was even
older than that. But yeah, at that point in time,
they could still claim that they were victorious in Afghanistan
and Iraq. So that's what victory looks like to these people.

Speaker 5 (01:07:47):
Yeah, well, I mean they did get what they wanted.

Speaker 2 (01:07:49):
Which is perpetual war.

Speaker 5 (01:07:51):
They destroyed country and perpetual war. Tunnel Lord went three
three seven. A few factor in the child protection, Internet
access bills and the Fed's policing cities probably are pushing
for some serious power grabs soon. They're already doing it.

Speaker 2 (01:08:04):
Is right around the corner.

Speaker 5 (01:08:06):
Yeah, Jerry Alatalo. Donald Trump, when asked for his opinion
slash views on the global transmitist agenda, no comment, no comment.

Speaker 2 (01:08:17):
The only thing he has no comment about is that.

Speaker 5 (01:08:20):
I'm going to be gooding a robot. It'll be made
of gold.

Speaker 2 (01:08:22):
It'll be the.

Speaker 5 (01:08:23):
Best robot, gold robot. Like Denver Hadaway, freedom ends and
fades behind the sound of partisan jeers, blind, partisan loyalty
all nothing more than a limited hangout that enables worse outcomes. Yes,
partisan does destroy it KWD sixty eight Magibal cheers. There
carted away, buried or forced into freedom cities Denver for

(01:08:47):
Donald Trump anything. KWD also says many mag honestly believe
Biden did all the COVID tyranny.

Speaker 2 (01:08:54):
Oh tell me about it. That's every time I say
anything criticized. Oh, Trump didn't do that. It was bad
democratic governors and Biden who did that. He didn't do
a thing. He funded it, He funded it.

Speaker 5 (01:09:05):
It was that bad, bad Biden. I'm Marty says, we'll
be living like Gosins under Israel.

Speaker 2 (01:09:11):
That is the plan starves as well.

Speaker 5 (01:09:15):
Yeah, Jerry al Atalo. Geofencing is a technology that creates
virtual boundaries around a specific geographic area, allowing mobile devices
to trigger actions and notifications when they enter or exit
these boundaries.

Speaker 2 (01:09:28):
Yeah. Yes, And I talked about how geospatial intelligence is
a branch that's not really talked about. It's like they
used to not talk about the NSSA. Geospatial intelligence is
where James Clapper grew up. That's how he grew up
in the geocracy, how he became very powerful. They used
to have annual conventions. I don't know what they're doing now,
but he used to have annual conventions that were kind

(01:09:49):
of quiet, but they would get four thousand people to
show up. That was the fastest growing part of the
intelligence agencies. Geospatial intelligence to map your activities, and of
course that metadata allowed them to be able to predict.
They could see who you were coming into contact with.
They can make all kinds of projections about what you're

(01:10:11):
going to do next. They knew what your religious or
political beliefs were from that as well. They bragged about that.
That's kind of fundamental to Palanteer.

Speaker 5 (01:10:19):
Yeah, Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard, And of
course check out Guard at Liberty Conspiracy. He's got his
own show, and he does a great job there. Also.
I believe it's at Guard Goldsmith on substack. I have
a very hard time remembering that, but check Guard out
and he says this is why I mentioned Article four,
section four about twice a week on the show for
the past year. I estimate it's like a state fascist system.

(01:10:43):
The governors spend tons of money. They need the Fed
money and want to play nice with federal candidate slash
politicians so they don't push back. Posse coomatatis is great,
but it actually a subservient Article four section four, and
that prohibits Feds from going in without a state request.
If this is any tie to Ice, it's unconstitutional since
gration is a state issue, not a federal issue. But
we'll leave it to the Scots to claim the false

(01:11:04):
notion of the opposite in eighteen seventy five.

Speaker 2 (01:11:08):
Yes, I tell you, well, when we come back and
talk about how they really are going to do a
coup for the election.

Speaker 5 (01:11:15):
Oh, we still have many more comments. Want to go
through it? Yeah, sure, well ahead, let's see if we
can get through these quick. Guard Goldsmith also says the
standing Armory Vinny kind means we have to provide living
spaces for them as well. That we got to house
them and it's a big cost. Also means they're out
of the workforce and not generating revenue some way else. Denver,
outaway force can't be a starting point because the government

(01:11:35):
meets force of greater force at an inflated price point. Yeah,
a Syrian girl sounds like Trump is trying to make
escape from New York a forward looking documentary.

Speaker 2 (01:11:45):
Well, he escaped from New York eventually, you know that
movie I'm locked up there as a.

Speaker 5 (01:11:50):
Happy ending cold three sixty. How about federalize the forces
to take out all the trucking fake CEDL drivers, along
with all the fake degree and fake SERTs computer Indian
computer people that American Indian workers hire for their departments,
all scams to get around the laws and get visas. Yeah,
there's a lot of immigration fraud that goes on with

(01:12:11):
India and Indians. It is a huge issue.

Speaker 2 (01:12:14):
One.

Speaker 5 (01:12:14):
Yeah, there's a Twitter account called believe It's at ATU
Truckers who has he's really good at documenting what's going
on with the CDL fraud.

Speaker 2 (01:12:25):
I think that's the American Truckers Union, I believe. So Yeah, yeah,
and they've been on this CDL thing in the fact
that California greecess goods for all this stuff. That that guy,
the one who resulted in the death of three people.

Speaker 5 (01:12:40):
Yeah, I think his name was sing or something.

Speaker 2 (01:12:42):
Yeah. Yeah, it's very common. It's like Mohammed.

Speaker 5 (01:12:44):
Yeah, there's a lot of them. Yeah, but yeah, you
can guys, if you guys want to, you can look
at at Atu truckers on Twitter if you want more
and fro about that sort of thing.

Speaker 6 (01:12:54):
Yeah, there's a epidemic of this, you know, people getting
all these fake credentials and everything, and yet they're still
going to push you know, digital ID and stuff as
though that would fix anything.

Speaker 2 (01:13:08):
It's well, that's exactly they use that to say, Well,
that means we were going to have biometric ID because
the people faked it, We're going to have a computerized
system that nobody can break into.

Speaker 5 (01:13:20):
Darn I didn't study for my blood test.

Speaker 2 (01:13:22):
Yeah, we've seen that over and over again with all
the different government agencies, national security especially broken into and
having their data stolen right from under their nose.

Speaker 5 (01:13:31):
It is the it's always the eventual outcome out.

Speaker 6 (01:13:36):
Of r I'm saying, is you know they're pushing that
as the solution for all the you know, illegal immigration
problems and everything, but the mill of fake degrees and
everything coming from India shows that wouldn't work because this
wouldn't do anything to stop.

Speaker 2 (01:13:52):
The Indian.

Speaker 6 (01:13:55):
Mill of fake credentials and all that, or these people
coming in That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:14:00):
Yeah, the he BVS thing is huge and WND talks
about that extensively. Look at you know, the tech jobs
are being looted by these people coming from India, and
yet they will never never connect it to this Trump
administration or the previous Trump administration. It's always Biden Biden Biden. Right.

Speaker 5 (01:14:20):
Yeah, it's a It's been an issue since at least
back in the nineties.

Speaker 2 (01:14:24):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:14:25):
Still Audi, Mr Trump is turning the US into a
perpetual police state and maga cultists or cheering it on
like clapping circus seals. Yeah, that's what they're saying. He's
got an r R R after his name, Stealth Patriot.
Thank you very much, Stealth Patriot. Again, your support is
what keeps us here and able to do the show.

(01:14:45):
So thank you very much. We cannot thank you enough.
Says AI. Intelligence is an illusion. It excels at targeting,
and like a woman, it never forgets. Well, actually I've
seen AI forget quite frequently.

Speaker 2 (01:14:58):
But not a woman. Yeah, if somebody did something they
had they did a test and they said, you know,
you think about interactions with males versus interactions females of
each other. They said they found when they interviewed the
females that they remembered. Things that they remembered really focused
on were conversations. I remember all of it and then
I said this, and then she said that or whatever.
You know. It just it's just the way that we're wired.

(01:15:21):
It very different thing.

Speaker 5 (01:15:22):
I'm hard pressed to remember, Addy de Hills. Just like,
what did you do with your friends? You hung out?
You know, I don't know, we were there. It was
a good time.

Speaker 2 (01:15:31):
Yeah, Well is that all the comments there?

Speaker 5 (01:15:34):
Yep?

Speaker 2 (01:15:34):
Okay, So we are going to take a break and
when we come back, we're going to take a look
at some of this jerry mandering. I think we call
it tyranny mannering because the Republicans and the Democrats have
been rigging the election system for the longest time. And
it begins with the ballots, it begins with debates, it
begins with them picking who the voters is going to be,

(01:15:55):
and yet they claim that they can't see it. We're
going to take a quick break. We'll be right back.

Speaker 7 (01:18:38):
Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 8 (01:18:45):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would and me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(01:19:08):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some At the David Knightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various
gallas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

(01:19:29):
just put it in the next package of bombs and
missiles coming from the USA.

Speaker 2 (01:19:45):
Well, the Texas Senate past, the big beautiful map. Everything
is big and beautiful isn't it even the big beautiful liar?
We got white House, so it's they've got no imagination.
Everything is. You can tell these people are just Trump
suckers because everything they do is a derivative of him.

(01:20:07):
You know, he is the founding father of this new
police state. Because they have no understanding or engagement to
anything other than him, and they are hell bent on
flattering him with everything that they say and do. So
they're calling it the big Beautiful Map. They did this
after midnight Saturday morning. Party line vote to approve the

(01:20:29):
map came after a planned filibuster by a Democrat state
senator was canceled by Republican senators using a parliamentary procedure.
And they claim that the filbuster was not going to
be allowed because this Democrat had put out an email saying, yeah,
we can use this as a fundraiser or whatever. Oh
you can't use how dare you use your position in

(01:20:51):
politics to raise money. You go back and you look
at all these different commissions and all these different hearings.
I mean, they all use it for fundraising or they
use it to get a job in media afterwards. So
they said that this is a dangerous precedent where politicians
would redraw the maps to pick their voters. This has

(01:21:13):
been going on since the early eighteen hundreds. They talked
about what was it eighteen twelve, I think where they
first came up with the term jerry mandarin, and it's
been going on with that. Now. The problem that they
have as they said, well, this is going to be
done after every election. Normally we only do it every
ten years, as if that somehow makes a difference. Well,

(01:21:37):
Trump wants to do this. He's going to fix the elections.
And so he's bent on fixing the problem that is
uniquely his, and that is the vote by mail thing
that he created with his fake lockdown.

Speaker 9 (01:21:51):
Mail in ballots is going to be a great embarrassment
to our country.

Speaker 10 (01:21:56):
President Donald Trump says he will sign an executive order
eliminating mail in ballots and voting machines. Trump has long
opposed voting by mail or electronically, and has long claimed
war except twenty was it due to the systems. Trump
claimed the US is the only country in the world
that still uses mail in ballots. This claim is false. Canada,
the United Kingdom, Germany, South Korea, and more than two

(01:22:17):
dozen other countries.

Speaker 2 (01:22:19):
Yeah, the claim is about mail.

Speaker 10 (01:22:21):
She's with right wing for limited mail in voting. Trump
said recently that Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed that mail
in voting is not honest. Trump blasted voting machines as
highly inaccurate, very expensive, and highly controversial. The president believes
his effort to remove mail in voting and voting machines
will be opposed by Democrats and accuses the party of

(01:22:41):
widespread cheeting. He also noted that his orders are justified
because the executive branch has power over the States. Experts
believe voter fraud is very rare in the United States
and almost never actually influences and elections.

Speaker 2 (01:22:53):
Out Now, he actually said that with a straight face.
Evidently had Ai read that. I don't know. But here's
another joke for you. You know, when this Democrat said he's
going to filibuster, they shut him down. They said, no,
this is violating a long standing ethics and the quorum
tradition of the Texas Senate. It's like, are you kidding me?

(01:23:15):
You know, you guys always are grand standing for fundraisers.

Speaker 5 (01:23:19):
There's moost of the facts is if it doesn't affect
the election, then why do you care if it's removed.
I also personally don't think that we should be sitting
there spending all our time encouraging every single person vote.
If someone doesn't care enough on their own, of their
own free will, I don't think we should have these
giant lobbying campaigns, Oh, you should go vote, You need
to go vote now. If that person doesn't care enough

(01:23:40):
to take their own initiative and do it because they
care about it, I don't want them voting.

Speaker 2 (01:23:46):
Those are the exactly the kind of voters that they want.
They don't know anything about anything except for this group
of people over here.

Speaker 5 (01:23:53):
He's got an R after his name, he's got a
D after his name. Therefore they're on my team and
I'll vote for him.

Speaker 2 (01:23:59):
So, in terms of shutting this down, Republicans wrote, Senator
Alvarado's fundraising activity effectively holds hostage the entire Senate and
forces employees to assist and participate in her campaign. Everything
they do, with all these show hearings, investigations and committees
and all the rest of the stuff, is all really

(01:24:20):
about that. Neither party follows the law. They're both just
about naked self promotion.

Speaker 6 (01:24:26):
Also, he's holding the entire Senate hostage. Isn't that just
what a pilipbuster is like.

Speaker 2 (01:24:33):
Definition that Abbitt responded and said, the one big, beautiful
map has passed the Senate, so on his way to
my desk or to be swiftly signed into law, I
promised we would get this done. Who did he promise?
Oh that's right Trump, Yeah, and delivered on that promise.
So this is a bill that ensures that our maps

(01:24:54):
reflect texans voting preferences. No, it's about the preference of
the ruling party to pick the voters. That's what this
has always been about. Jerry manring was done by Democrats Republicans.
I mean, I think it's absolutely amazing the way that
Democrats have fought tooth and nail since they lost control
of the state legislature in North Carolina. They had had

(01:25:16):
it since the Civil War, and it was a new
experience for them and all the stuff that they had
been doing. The Republicans watched them, and when they got
into office, they did all the same stuff. The Democrats
are hopping mad about how corrupt, unethical, illegal. It all
was all the things that they had been doing, of course,
So that's what it's truly about. So. Abbott says that

(01:25:40):
this map, of course, will boost the GOP. In twenty
twenty six, California has set things up to make sure
that they have five more seats out of California for
Democrats that they did not have. So they're doing a
switch there and the Republicans are doing about the same
thing in Texas. So they said it's going to create
five new Republicans like seats in South Texas around Austin

(01:26:04):
and Houston. That's one of the most amazing thing. Can
you imagine a Republican from Austin or Houston. That must
be a real creative map. I tell you, how.

Speaker 5 (01:26:14):
Do you even get one of those? Where do you
find them?

Speaker 2 (01:26:16):
Yeah? I know.

Speaker 5 (01:26:17):
I will say though Houston, I think it has more
redeeming qualities than many of the other cities. It's got
a very nice area. The museum is nice, the parks
are nice. At least the area I've been to. I've
only seen that part of it. It's nicer than Dallas.
In my opinion. Dallas has nothing nothing.

Speaker 2 (01:26:35):
There's all relative terms. I heard that about. Jared and
I lived in Houston for three years of our marriage,
and then you know when I was thinking of going
to the info wars I heard from doing other people. Oh,
Austin is so much more than Houston. There's like, no,
I'm not interested in any big cities. You know. I

(01:26:56):
don't have a problem with Texas per se Austin, but
I wouldn't want to live ever again in Dallas, Houston, Austin,
or San Antonio.

Speaker 5 (01:27:02):
Now Austin has some of the worst city planning I
have ever seen. Whoever decided they were going to put
the homeless shelter right next to all the bars on
Sixth Street is the biggest fool I can imagine. You
constantly have drunk people interacting with the homeless who are
on drugs or out of their mind, and it continually

(01:27:23):
leads to problems.

Speaker 2 (01:27:24):
Yeah, I just stay away from Sixth Street. You're there. Well,
Newsom is doing the same thing in California, and he
claims that he's doing it to save democracy. The problem
is is that they had a this was something that
was happening before, and they've already modified their constitution in
the state of California to make sure this doesn't happen.

(01:27:46):
So he's going to be violating his own state constitution
in order to do his jerrymandering. He's launched one hundred
million dollar campaign that is banked by the usual suspects,
Planned Parenthood, CiU, the Service Employees International Union, the Government Union,
California Teachers Association, and the California Federation of Labor Unions,

(01:28:09):
and some billionaire donors are all coming together to put
together this one hundred million dollar campaign to rig it
even more Democrat in California. So they're calling this campaign
Democracy's best bet. No, it's actually Democrats best bet that
they've got going here and again, all these people, the

(01:28:32):
Teachers Union, Planned Parent, the rest of them. Back in
two thousand and ten, fifteen years ago, Californians passed Prop
twenty by a landslide. It was sixty two percent to
thirty eight percent. And the purpose of this Proposition twenty
was to take redistricting out of the hands of the
politicians and ensure that it was done by an independent

(01:28:56):
commission made up of citizens that was put into the
state constitution. As one person said, that was the will
of the people. So whether Newsom's plan can survive legal
scrutiny is up for a number of reasons. The thing
is he's going to have to go before the state
courts and State Supreme Court, which are just as politicized

(01:29:19):
as Newsom is, so they may very well ignore the
whole purpose of that constitutional amendment and the commission to
set up districting so it doesn't manipulate like this. In
twenty ten, they took redistricting out of the hands of politicians.
But now Newsom's redistricting plan will violate the Constitution by

(01:29:39):
holding hearings on a bill less than thirty days after
introduction and also by drawing the maps without authority. So
he's going to violate the Constitution in a number of ways.
So he's lack to violate by holding hearings on bill
less than thirty days after introduction. He will violate the
Constitution by drawing maps without authority. His determination to save

(01:30:01):
Democrats appears to me doing whatever it takes to claw
back control of Congress. So we have this thing Texas
versus California. This is you know, who can redistrict and
create the most number of phony seats. But this is
all really coming from Trump. He's only initiated this because
he knows the things that he's been doing. As always,

(01:30:24):
the midterm elections are always a big loss for the
party in power. So he's trying to make sure that
doesn't happen again. But so, it's gonna be plus five
for the Republicans in Texas, it's going to be plus
five for the Democrats in California. But the battle is
going to continue into a lot of other states. Missouri
is going to be the next state to redraw its
congressional map. Trump says, Missouri is going to do it.

(01:30:47):
So I've tried to get a hold of the map
that I've heard about. I guess is not important enough
to be consulted. They said, So we will see what happens.
But this is just more of the same. They pick
the voters, they picked the candidates, they count the vot votes.
It's all rigged, folks. I didn't vote last time. I
don't know if I'm ever going to vote again. The
whole process is just so corrupt. I don't see any

(01:31:10):
point of participating in it except to try to expose it. Well,
we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:31:24):
M H.

Speaker 7 (01:32:04):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 9 (01:32:08):
Here News now at apsradionews dot com, or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (01:32:18):
All right, let's talk about the fascist pharmaceutical companies. CDC
is now launching a group to study the COVID vaccine injuries.
Do you think anything's going to come to that, Travis?
I mean, after all, as Trump in there, who's the
proud of being the father of the c mRNA vaccine.
I mean, there's no way they're going to do anything
about this.

Speaker 5 (01:32:38):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (01:32:39):
CDC is diligently investigating themselves to see if they've committed
any crimes that need to have themselves be punished for it.

Speaker 5 (01:32:47):
Yeah, we have investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong. Surprise, surprise.

Speaker 2 (01:32:52):
Yeah, they had a COVID inquiry in the UK and
it was a whitewash. It's just like the JFK commission.

Speaker 5 (01:32:57):
Restless Stuff can't stop himself from tooting his own horror
over this. Every time he gets the chance, he wants
to remind people I gave you the vaccine. He took
that country singer to go, this isn't popular with your base.
They don't like it. To get him to even slow
it down a little bit.

Speaker 2 (01:33:14):
Yeah, John Rich, Yeah, eventually he got the message. Everybody
kept telling that. You know, it was not just John Rich,
but you had Wayne Allen Root was out there and
Alex Jones saying, stop talking about the vaccine. You know,
we spent all this time telling people that, you know,
after telling you that it was sugar water and you
could take it for Trump, then they told you the

(01:33:34):
real truth about it, but they wouldn't connect it to Trump.
So now you're going to have a working group at
the CDC to review data related the side effects and
deaths associated with the Trump shots. How could they not
have known? Everybody knows? So you know that since everybody
already knows about all this stuff. But the purpose of
this commission is going to be to Whitewashington, to cover

(01:33:55):
it up, to spind it. It's going to be a
propaganda exercise. So this ACIP well decides which vaccines should
be recommended to the public, who should take them, and
how often they should take the vaccines. That's the other thing.
If this thing does what you say it does, if
it trains my body immune system to recognize a pathogen,

(01:34:19):
I don't need to take it again. So you're admitting
that it's not effective. If you're saying you got to
take a couple of shots with it, or you're admitting
that is simply because you want to make money, you're
willing to inject whatever poison you wish into people's arms.
The committee's recommendations help determine which vaccines will be covered
by insurers and will be covered by the Vaccines for

(01:34:41):
Children program that is put out by the CDC. They're
so kind, you know, they actually pay so that they'll
be vaccines to inject aluminum into poor kids whose parents
could not normally afford to pay. They couldn't buy the
aluminum to shoot into the kids' veins.

Speaker 5 (01:34:58):
You know, if you simply can't get to a vaccination clinic,
maybe you could just have them chew on a coke
can or something like that. Just get a little aluminum
here and there.

Speaker 2 (01:35:07):
Yeah, so they say they're going to take a look
at the risks and the cost benefit analysis. Well, here's
the spoiler alert for the CDC. It's all risk and
it's no benefit. The working group will address the things
like DNA contamination. We know that it's a move in fact,
and it violates the FDA's rules, So why would you

(01:35:28):
need to investigate it? Just stop it. That's how you
know that this is nothing other than a cover up
and gaps in scientific knowledge about the persistence and distribution
of spike proteins mRNA and limpid nanoparticles in the body. Again,
this is all a whitewashing and propaganda move that's going
to be coming. The need to reevaluate these novel gene

(01:35:51):
therapies rebranded as vaccines is urgent, says Mary Holland of
the Children's Health Defense. Yeah, you know, isn't that interesting?
She calls it a novel gene therapy. I called it
the GCI, the genetic code injections from the very beginning,
you know, and now you've got you know, these people

(01:36:12):
coming up. Robert Redfield said, well, the problem is is
that we set this up as a have your body
manufacture this, and we don't have any control of it.
We can't turn it off. That was my very first
comment when I saw that, based on the way you're
describing this, there's no way to turn it off. And
now we know from tests that it keeps replicating. You know,

(01:36:33):
nurses who've had the test. Kim Whitsac, who I have interviewed,
she is a safety advocate on the FDA's panel. She's
a citizen that got there. Her husband, of course, was
killed by these SSRIs. He was having some sleeping problems
and he goes to the doctor casually prescribes for him
an SSRI, which then set his body on fire. He

(01:36:56):
was complaining about that to his wife, so he didn't
like the side effects was creating, so he just abruptly
stopped it. And that's when people have these hallucinogenic reactions.
And when she returned home from a trip, she found
him dead. He'd hung himself. So she got involved with
the FDA to get black labels on the SSRI stuff,
and she's been a good watchdog for a lot of

(01:37:17):
other things. But she said this is a positive step,
but also highlights a systemic problem the CDC itself and
the FDA. These questions should have been fully addressed before
recommendations and mandates were made. Exactly Yeah. Witzac said that
in twenty twenty three, and she and others submitted a

(01:37:39):
citizens petition to the FDA outlining safety concerns about COVID
nineteen vaccines. She said, the FDA ignored the petition, and
of course I was pointing out the obvious issues with
all this stuff when Trump was pushing up. But we
were told you can do it for the for the guy, right,
it's just sugar water. Come on, you can do this

(01:37:59):
for Trump. It's like I'm not doing a thing for him.
Aluminum in jabs is clearly a problem that the medical
industry complex willingly ignores. Yes, they have been ignoring this
for a very long time. But as other people started
pointing it out, they actually lied to us and said, well,
we've taken it out of the shots. They took it
out of some of the shots, but it left it

(01:38:21):
in others, and sometimes they would the game that they played.
They said, well, we took it out of the individual shots,
but then if it was like a vial, that would
that they could draw multiple doses from. So it's going
to be setting on the shelf for a while. They
kept the mercury in and just slid to people about it.

(01:38:41):
But this is about aluminum, and they put the aluminum
in there to antagonize your immune system, and it does
such a good job because a lot of people autoimmune disease.

Speaker 11 (01:38:54):
So we inject these shots a needle through the skin
into the muscle generally, and the amount of aluminum in
there is so great. I mean, I remember reading, oh gosh,
Back in the nineteen nineties, there were a few papers
out that were showing that aluminum in TPN total perenerial nutrition.

(01:39:16):
These were how you would feed premies who couldn't eat.
There was enough aluminum in there that it was affecting
their development, and they actually found that if you exceeded
three to five micrograms per kilogram, you would harm their
development more for each day they were getting it. Well,
three to five micrograms per kilogram is a tiny amount.

(01:39:36):
The hep B vaccine has two hundred and fifty micrograms,
So right there, do the math. Let's say a big
baby ten pounds five kilos. Let's say three dimes five
is fifteen, but you're injecting two hundred and fifty. Yeah,
that's what woke me up to the folks, we got
a problem with aluminum here.

Speaker 2 (01:39:54):
They know exactly what they're doing. They know exactly what
they're and if they didn't, there's been plenty of stuff.
Now we've got five studies that link aluminum adjuvants in
the vaccines to asthma, to autism, and to SIDS. You've
had people do studies and they've actually drawn conclusions about

(01:40:14):
how they think the aluminum damages and causes sids and
other things. Here's a little bit about these studies.

Speaker 12 (01:40:21):
So aluminum is the primary targeted appears that is causing
perhaps the most harm in these injections because it is
a neurotoxin, right, it's not good for any bodily system.
And multiple studies now have linked it to asthma in children.
They've linked it to sudden infinite death syndrome because when

(01:40:44):
you inject an underdeveloped baby with not a functional detect system,
you keep injecting neurotoxins that does. Indeed, the appears induce
brain stem failure and thus apnea in sleep, they can't
breathe and.

Speaker 2 (01:41:00):
Then they die.

Speaker 12 (01:41:02):
We have that, and then we do have three studies
of link aluminum to autism or autism rates. So yeah,
this ingredient should be removed from childhood vaccines. It has
no place in there. We don't need neurotoxins.

Speaker 2 (01:41:20):
In these injections. Well, it's true, unless you understand what
the purpose of the injections are, it is doing exactly
what it was designed to do. You know, it's like
the educational system. For the longest time, people say, you know,
this educational system just asn't working. These kids are illiterate
and enumerate, they can't do math, they can't read. It's like, well,

(01:41:43):
do you realize that that's the purpose of this, that
and to dumb them down to kind of brave new
world sexuality that we see there. They're working perfectly, fine, folks.
The schools are working for the purpose that they were intended,
and so are the vaccines. You just project unto them
what you think a reasonable person would want. That's what

(01:42:05):
you want. These things were never to designed to do
what you think they were designed to do, or what
you would like them to do.

Speaker 5 (01:42:10):
It's impossible for most of us to comprehend just how
much these people hate children, how much they want to
harm them, destroy them in every way possible, because I mean,
all of us here would look at a child and
we would want to protect that child. We'd say, this
is a you know, they made the image of God.
They need to be guarded and protected until they're older

(01:42:32):
and capable of guarding themselves. These people look at that
and they see an easy target, something that they can harm.

Speaker 2 (01:42:38):
More that they can make money off of.

Speaker 12 (01:42:40):
Two.

Speaker 5 (01:42:41):
It is impossible, really, you know, the average person we
look at that we just fully don't comprehend where these
people come from, how they're able to do that.

Speaker 2 (01:42:50):
So the doctor that you heard in that last video,
his name is Nicholas Hultzer, and he's talking about hyper vaccination.
What that means is how many shots they give a child.
You know, we get seventy two by the time they
get up to high school, but it's heavily frontloaded in
the first year of life. And then even if you've

(01:43:11):
got some parents who make sure that doesn't happen, if
they get a hold of a child a little bit later,
they do the catchup. And so that has present has
given us perfect examples of how these vaccines and combination
cause autism. Again, I won't go into all the details,
but remember that family that did not vaccinate the kids
that got divorce, and it's part of the divorce. The

(01:43:33):
judge so will give cussy whoever will catch up the
kids on the vaccine. And the woman's lawyer knew that,
and so said she'd do that, and they did. They
took the kids down, got them all shots. And the
so called doctor that did this went easy on the
older girl because she'd already had some issues in terms

(01:43:55):
of reaction. To the vaccines. But for the two younger boys,
they loaded him up with all this stuff all at
once and they both went straight to the intensive care unit.
They so one of them was in a coma for
many days when he came out. He has remained now
permanently damaged with non verbally. He can't he has to

(01:44:17):
be in a diaper.

Speaker 5 (01:44:18):
And he's never going to be able to take care
of himself. It's never going to change.

Speaker 2 (01:44:22):
She abandoned the kids after that as well. And so
the father is the one who is now taking care
of the son who was damaged by his wife. The
judge and the physician who doesn't know or care what
is going on with any of that. Hypervaccination, that's another
word for that. And of course when you look at
aluminum is aluminum. And I keep going back to Mercury

(01:44:45):
as well, because they lied about that. So if they
say they're going to take the illuminum ount, can we
trust them. Just don't get any vaccines at all. You
can't trust what these people say. They will lie to
your face. It's just like Carrie Mola said about Fauci
and the PCR test. He goes there's he'll look directly
into the camera and he will lie to your face
about this. So there's been several studies again five of

(01:45:09):
these studies. One of these showed that with each additional
one milligram of vaccine derived aluminum increased the risk of
persistent asthma by twenty six percent in children with exzma
and nineteen percent in children without exzma, So about twenty
percent overall increase. With each shot, you increase it by

(01:45:32):
twenty percent. The risk children receiving more than three milligrams
of aluminum had significantly higher asthma risk compared to those
receiving less than three milligrams. But who tracks this stuff right?
And the aluminum keeps accumulating as they keep giving them
shots and repeating the shots. That was the thing that

(01:45:53):
was amazing to me when I looked at the vaccine
schedule of seventy two. How many times they keep giving
the same vacum scenes over and over and over again,
many times within the same year. And each of these
is loaded with a lot of aluminum, in some cases mercury.
And you know, for them to pretend that they didn't

(01:46:14):
know is absolutely absurd, especially when you look at mercury,
you look at mercury, and you go back and it
was going to Alice in Wonderland, the mad Hatter. Where
did that come from? Well, it came from the well
known fact that haberdashers, people who made hats, worked with
aluminum quite sorry mercury, quite a bit, and it caused

(01:46:35):
them to have neurological issues. And people said, yeah, they
seem like they're crazy, you know, they can't remember things,
they can't focus or whatever. Mad Hatter became a meme
a couple hundred years ago, and yet they pretend, oh, well,
we never knew. Question. You knew. Everybody knew. Children receiving
more than three milligrams of aluminum had significantly higher risks.

(01:46:56):
So if you step up the dosage, which means that
you're giving them more vaccines, it went up to sixty
one percent of them got asthma if they had egzma,
thirty six percent if they didn't have egzma. And again
that is the something that indicates, I guess the condition

(01:47:18):
of their immune system or something like that. But anyway,
from thirty six to sixty one percent each of those
is really a huge increase. Peak aluminum exposure occurred during
two month well child visits. Even a single day aluminum
load was linked to elevated asthma risk. And so they've

(01:47:40):
seen this for a long time. And then as you
saw in that video, the fact that aluminum is going
to your brain, that is a key factor many people
believe in the dementia epidemic that we're now having brain
tissue analyses and population level of data and experimental evidence.
We're talking about five different studies, all exposes One study

(01:48:03):
proposes a biologically plausible mechanism that links aluminum vaccine in
vaccines to sudden infant death syndrome. He touched on that briefly.
He said, in early infancy, detoxification enzymes are underdeveloped, impairing
the infants ability to metabolize and eliminate pollutants like aluminum.

(01:48:27):
So the immune activation triggered by vaccination releases inflammatory cytokins
which further suppress these detox pathways. This creates the scenario
in which toxic compounds and inflammatory products accumulate in the
infants system. In susceptible infants, this toxic overload may inferre
with brainstem regulation of respiration, particularly the serotonin system, which

(01:48:53):
is known to be abnormal in a majority of sid's cases.
According to physicians for informed consent, up to twin two
doses of aluminum containing vaccines are administered from birth to
eighteen years of age. And of course, the video that
I've played so many times, I won't play it again today.
But as they started talking about people who died from

(01:49:15):
the Trump shot sudden adult death syndrome, that one person
said she heard that and suddenly it made her realize
that she said, I killed my child when I gave
them the vaccines. Because it's just a couple of days
after she did that, her child, male child died from
what they said was SIDS. We just don't know what

(01:49:37):
it is. It's a syndrome. Yeah, it's about money. So
as this they're setting this up to review the COVID vaccine.
Some of the people who are going to be doing it,
whether or not this is a whitewash, a'll that you decide,
but Robert Malone is going to be there. They said
they need to have top secret clearance in order to

(01:49:59):
do their COVID vaccine review. Well why would that be, Well,
it's because, as I've said from the very beginning, this
is all a plan by DARPA and the Pentagon from
the very beginning, so they said they can't look at
this without access to intelligence. About the origins of COVID nineteen, Well,

(01:50:20):
forget about the origin of quote unquote COVID that wasn't
killing people anyway. Ask about the origin of the ventilators
that came from Peter Denbara. Ask about the midazolamb which
was bought in bulk by Matt Hancock in the UK,
and it was also used in the US to do
the same thing the ventilators did, which was to kill

(01:50:41):
people with respiratory issues. The bioweapon was the development of
the vaccine, and of course DARPA and the Pentagon were
involved in that from the very beginning as well. So
RETSEF Malone and their team needed to have top secret
since they've compartmented compartmentalized information clearance, So in other words,

(01:51:03):
this is not just top secret, but it's compartmentalized top secret,
so you know, only certain groups of people are allowed
to see this. This includes access to special intelligence and
other top secret caveats. The ACIP review of the vaccine
issue as a can to a military operation, well guess
what it always was. A military operation. Operation warp Speed

(01:51:29):
was always military, and it was always intelligence agencies from
the very beginning. And of course, if you remember, right
after the election, they said that they were going to
approve the vaccine. So right after the election they did that,
and sixty Minutes had the story and the can and
they ran it as soon as the election was declared

(01:51:51):
for Biden on a Saturday. That Sunday night, sixty Minutes
ran the report about Operation Warp speed rollout and about
the logistics all being handled by the military. It had
military written all over it, especially if you go back
and look at the earlier documents. They said the SARS
Cove two spike prouteine was copied in the vaccines. I

(01:52:13):
don't think they ever had it. I think the bioweapon
was and remains the vaccine. I don't think that they
had a COVID vaccine. They never isolated it. So if
they never isolated it, how could they copy it. It's
always a plan, It was always a bioweapon, but it
wasn't there as a response. So here is the tie

(01:52:36):
to the origins cover up. This is a Brownstone article.
Here a failure to define what SARS Cove two was. Well,
why did they have a failure to define it. If
you copied it, you copied it, but it's not defined.
This is kind of double think that you're seeing from
the conservative media. It's like, come on, you can't copy

(01:52:58):
something that you haven't defined. You can't define it if
you haven't isolated it. And if you haven't isolated it,
it's not science at all. And guess what probably isn't real?
And guess what they do the same thing with other
viruses as well. Well, we never isolate the viruses. Well,
then are the viruses even real? What they're telling us

(01:53:20):
about them is not science, whether they are real or not.
So failure to define what it was and what the
pathogenic risks of its suspicious peptides were, well, again it
goes back to it not being isolated. It goes back
to the entire pandemic being a fraud. I need to
get the Baileys back on again. When I interviewed them

(01:53:44):
about that book, it said, no more pandemics. It's like, yeah,
if you understand what a fraud virology is, it's not
a science at all. The entire quote unquote science of
virology is a fraud, as obvious as Fauci himself. Such
a compounding of risks is more akin to the risks
associated with a complex military operation than it is to medicine,

(01:54:08):
says Brownstone. Well, that's because it was a military operation.
It was a war against the American people, plotted by
the Pentagon, DARPA and others for a very long time,
and executed by the guy that the conservatives trust Trump.
It reinforces the need for the after action review that

(01:54:30):
ACIP will now perform. This review of the mass vaccination
course of action. This is all military terms, right, course
of action, actual doctrinal term in the American operational lexicon.
Is akin to the review by the military that they
do after other types of operations, whether they are successful

(01:54:51):
or failure. So it was plotted as a military operation.
This stuff is secret, top secret, compartmentalized. They're going to
do an after action review to see what the effects
were of this war against US. Errant and unsupervised biodefense
funding likely created Sar's cove two. No, it created the vaccine.

(01:55:16):
Come on, stop it. I am so tired of the
mainstream media and conservative media now all of them in
unison telling you that the virus which didn't kill anybody,
was created in a lab. But the vaccine that everybody
knows was created a lab that truly did kill people.

(01:55:38):
We don't want to talk about its origins, talk about
the origins of the vaccine. Bioweapon America was placed on
irrational warfeiting in response to the virus. That's an absolute lie.
And even if it were true, of course, they will
not blame Trump for it. They'll blame other people for that.
This actually may lead to legal and spiritual closure for

(01:56:01):
the country and perhaps true lessons learned. No, No, everybody
is indeniable and denial about who did this and who
was responsible, and they're in denial about what needs to
be done about it. They're in denial because they're still
pushing this magic virus pandemic as a red herring to

(01:56:22):
distract people away from the bioweapon shot that they're still
using to harm people. It's amazing to me. We had
Karen on facebooks that you saw posts by somebody that
we know used to work for us at the video stores.
And he is as hard left as you can imagine.
And he put out a post just the last week

(01:56:44):
or so about the vaccine and how many shots he
had had and so forth. And he said, and you know,
I've had so many bouts of COVID. I can only
imagine if I hadn't got the shot, how bad it
would have been. All these people his friends are chiming
in and saying, yes, and you'll never die from the shot,
because you know, you may get it, but it won't

(01:57:04):
be as bad as if you had not had the shot.
It's like, this guy is the most clueless person we
have ever known. And of course he absolutely hates Trump,
and I said he is as he's just like the
MAGA people. He will never connect Trump to the bioweapon shot,
and he'll keep getting more and more of these shots,

(01:57:26):
and every time he gets it, it's just like the
flu shots. It's funny. I've had the flu shots so
many times. I always get the flu. You know, the
type of thing that you hear people say. It's like, yeah,
I don't get the flu, I don't take the shots.
I take vitamin C instead.

Speaker 5 (01:57:39):
Yeah. I continually see that refrain. Yeah I got the
vaccines and I still got COVID. But you know, thank
goodness I got it, because I can't imagine how bad
it would have been, you idiot in buffoon.

Speaker 2 (01:57:50):
Yeah, they can't connect the dots. It's truly amazing to
watch that, so Kennedy and Trump's new CDC director, Susan Monarez.
It's an expansion of the biosurveillance state, says Barnshaw Hobby
at Health Impact News. And he's absolutely right. And I've
talked about this as well, her deep troubling connections to

(01:58:10):
DARPA and to the health equivalent of it. They call
it ARPA h ha ha ha. Drop off the defense
part of it because none of this is about defense.
DARPA is not about defense. It's about weaponizing technology against
US and everybody. But you know, put the H on
the back end to justify it with health. But it's
all the same thing. And as I said before, Monarez

(01:58:34):
was a person at BARDA and ARPA h who was
tying AI to mRNA shots. He says, Trump has come
back in his second term. His entire cabinet consists of
those who supported his operational warp speed military mass vaccination program.
Absolutely right, Brian, That's what it was. If someone did

(01:58:56):
not previously support it, such as RFK Jr. Who was
a very vocal opposition voice against it, then they had
to kiss Trump's behind and change their tune by supporting it,
which is exactly what Kennedy did during his confirmation hearings
so that he become so he could become the HHS secretary. Well,

(01:59:18):
of course he's not going to oppose it, and you
know that's the real issue with him. Max Jones at
Unlimited Hangout did a deep dive into Susan Monterez, Kennedy
and Trump's choice to lead the CDC. And remember that
when R. F. K Junior got in, he said his

(01:59:39):
job there was to restore trust in the institution. My
job is to destroy your trust in these institutions. That's
what I'm focused on. Never trust the government, especially the FDA,
especially the CDC, and especially the self serving medical guilds
like the am MAY and the pediatric equipment. Was it

(02:00:02):
the AAP or something. But Susan Monarez is closely linked
to the intersections of rebranded eugenics, to the militarization of healthcare,
and to the expansion of the biosurveillance state. Well, yes, again,
so is Trump. That was the first thing he did
with Stargate was to promote the combination of AI and

(02:00:27):
mRNA and to do it with Sam Altman and the
Japanese bank head soft Bank. During his first term, Trump
implemented the notorious Operation Warp Speed, the Pentagon run COVID
nineteen response Plan, which issued emergency deregulatory measures and massive funding.

(02:00:50):
You fund it, you control it for the mRNA COVID
nineteen vaccines. Now, his second administration has successfully managed to
become associated with COVID era dissonance. Think about that, the
guy who this is the dissonance. I tell you, it's
a dissident mind that these people have. There's this cognitive

(02:01:11):
dissonance between the people who think that Trump is now
the anti COVID nineteen vaccine thing. It's just amazing that
they can believe that though Trump successfully secured through Trump,
they successfully secured the endorsement of figures who were skeptical
of the official line on COVID nineteen. That's how they
did this, most prominently comedian and podcaster Joe Rogan and

(02:01:36):
RFK Junior. And of course you got sellouts in the
MAGA media like Alex Jones Alex sugar Water Jones, who
complained about the vaccine said not Trump, It's not Trump. Well,
first of all, they were fine. Then when it could
no longer be covered up that they were harmful, completely
disassociated Trump from the vaccines and continues to do so.

(02:01:59):
That's basically the position of all of the maga media
that is out there. Were the exception of I mean,
if these people are cheering Trump, it's because they don't
connect him to that, and they don't want you to
connect him to it. Nobody who understands Trump's involvement, like
bran Shaw hobby here, nobody is going to Nobody like
that is going to cheer Trump. If you look at

(02:02:20):
the mass vaccination program and the program of mass murder
that he was involved in, there's no way that you
could support this guy or even come close to it.
Last week, the President touted Operation Warpspeed is one of
the most incredible things ever done in the country. On
that we agree. I think it was truly unbelievable as well.
More quietly, however, Trump nominated a seasoned official of the

(02:02:42):
biosecurity apparatus named Susan Monarez, to be director of the CDC.
Monarez's background is perfectly in line with this technocratic approach
to healthcare that the administration has embarked on. She is
handpicked by Kennedy after the previous nominee, Dave Weldon, withdrew
his nomination in March. Well, it's not exactly that he withdrew.

(02:03:03):
He was on his way to confirmation hearings and he
was ready to answer these questions. I think he was
ready to kiss the ring of the senator from Louisiana.
I forget his name now, but he was the gatekeeper
for all this stuff. He was the one that gave
everybody such a hard time about not supporting vaccines. And
on his way to the confirmation hearing, he got a

(02:03:24):
message from the Trump administration saying, we have withdrawn your name.
And I think the whole thing was a setup. I
think they wanted to use Dave Walden, who was a
critic of the vaccines. I think they wanted to use
him to play Kate Maga, to make the Maga people
think that they're going to make America healthy again and
the Maha nonsense. And I think they wanted her from

(02:03:45):
the very beginning, because look at what Trump did on
his first day in office. He's promoting exactly what she
focused on. AI plus mRNA Susan Moneez is a biosecurity
veteran and what could be described as a gray zone
of public governance where national security merges with healthcare. Let

(02:04:07):
me tell you national security has nothing to do with healthcare.

Speaker 5 (02:04:12):
Anytime you hear someone mentioned national security, run run through
the hills.

Speaker 2 (02:04:17):
National security is what they have used to build this
weaponized government since World War Two. That's what they've used
to make everything secret and off limits to us. It's
always been about national security. That's become a curse word
as far as I'm concerned. In fourteen, remember when we
had the Ebola outbreak in West Africa That came during

(02:04:40):
her tenure in the executive branch. She was working for
Obama back then. That outbreak may have marked one of
the first times that the US commissioned the pre crime
mass surveillance company Pallanteer with conducting biosurveillance during a public
health epidemic. It was a significant step towards the total
transformation of the US public health system into a militarized

(02:05:05):
extension of the surveillance state. Isn't it amazing how everything
that Trump is doing folds into We started talking about
the police in DC and how he's going to send
him into Chicago, New York and LA. Everything is about
the militarized surveillance and police state. Everything about it with Trump,
the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority BARDA, and Homeland

(02:05:29):
Securities Advanced Research Projects agencies made her a perfect candidate
for the position that she maintained until she was recently
nominated to be director of the CDC. She held the
position that she held was Deputy director of arp H.
And when you think about the connection to the military

(02:05:49):
industrial complex, all this biosecurity, health state nonsense that Trump
is pushing, when you look at all of that, it
makes me think about CDC is a perfect fit for her.
I've always thought it was kind of strange that this
quasi private, quasi government organization, the CDC, all these people
dress up like they're in some kind of Gilbert Sullivan

(02:06:11):
pop opera or something. You know, they've all got military uniforms,
And you go back and look at the pictures of
these people at the CDC, they all wear military uniforms.
It has been a militarized threat to us from its inception.
So of course somebody who's worked on essentially the health

(02:06:32):
version of DARPA, that's essentially what CDC is, she's perfect
for that. ARPA H was meant to serve as a
health version of the Pentagon's DARPA, so always heavily militarized.
Always about this. Monreez has provided over significant initiatives and
programs that have deepened the militarization of healthcare. Ever increasing

(02:06:55):
integration of the pre crime company Palanteer, which privatized much
of the George Bush era Total Information Awareness Mass Surveillance project,
including its biosurveillance component, into government, and of course all
of these different streams are coming together into a unified

(02:07:16):
threat getting a biometric biological profile of each and every
one of us, being able to attack us, not with
a weaponized virus, but with a weaponized vaccine. That's all
what this is about. And then there's the dark history
of Bear and this was all this was put up

(02:07:38):
on children's health defense. This is a company that began
as a pharmaceutical company. Of course, you know, it was
not just aspirin. It was also their involvement with ig
Farbin and zyklon B and all the rest of this stuff.
But Bear has been on the dark side, the darkest
corners of the pharmaceutical stream. There's some pretty dark corners there,

(02:08:02):
saying something when they got into the pesticide business as
they bought Monsanto, and Monsanto had this long history of
ancient orange and other things. Of course, clife is it
and the fact that reconstituted after World War Two? Bear
would want to own that says a great deal about them.

(02:08:22):
I mean, it's too bad that we don't have I
can't remember his name is satirist who did the thing
on Vernevan Brown? Oh yeah, he just died recently, ninety
something years old. But yeah, he could do a real
number if he wanted to. On Monsanto and Bear coming

(02:08:43):
together for over a century.

Speaker 6 (02:08:45):
That heroin was originally a cold medicine for children, and
it was marketed as heroin because it was said to
have heroic properties. I think it was Bear that manufactured it.

Speaker 2 (02:08:57):
Probably was, Yeah, it probably.

Speaker 6 (02:08:59):
Was, Remember who manufacture I know it was invented as
a medicine for children.

Speaker 2 (02:09:04):
I'm not sure if it was did it. For over
a century, Monsanto has produced toxic products that have injured
millions and rendered many areas uninhabitable, like with agent Orange.
Bear is conducting measures now to end lawsuits pushing back
against Monsanto's lawsuits that they inherited when they bought the company.

(02:09:25):
And so now we've got a couple of companies, you know,
Bear and it's long history in the pharmaceutical industry. Now
they'd like to get that same kind of legal immunity
deal that the pharmaceutical companies did. They'd like to get
that for their pesticide business. And of course I think
we just fold all these companies together, just call it
Big Pests. The combined group of these Bear is conducting

(02:09:51):
measures to end lawsuits and states and various localities they
want liability shields from the federal government make it impossible
to sue pesticide manufacturers for injuries even if they deliberately
concealed known toxicity, because that's exactly what the pharmaceutical companies do.

(02:10:12):
They can seal they know that it's toxic, they know
it's going to harm people, they can seal that and
they get immunity from it. Presently, a bill is working
its way through Congress containing a covert provision designed to
shield Bear and other manufacturers from these pesticide losses. This
can only pass if the public is unaware. As such,

(02:10:34):
it is vital to expose what's happening and the dark
history behind it. COVID nineteen was only possible because every
virtually every institution that should have prevented unconstitutional lockdowns, suppression
of treatments and vaccine mandates failed instead working in concert
to advance the COVID cartel, and they did that in

(02:10:54):
every country. It was amazing how it all came together.
That's why. And when we look at the people who
should be opposing this, conservative media, conservative organizations that have
always stood for the constitution, for opposing the federalization of
police and all the rest of this, they're all taking
a pass on this, just like they did when COVID
came around. So it's especially true of the alternative media.

(02:11:19):
A holy grail of predatory industries has been able to
neutralize court by passing laws that shield the corporations from
my ability. For example, if you go back and look
at the DIP theory of tetanus and wholesale pertussis vaccine,
it was recognized as particularly dangerous that it frequently caused
brain damage and death, yet for decades medical community and

(02:11:41):
government covered it up. An industry refused to bring a
safer DPT vaccine to market. The thing that stopped it
was grassroots awareness. It spread and it was aided by
a nineteen eighty two NBC program, more lawsuits were filed
against the vaccine manufacturer for this DTWP injuries. So the

(02:12:07):
people who are making that vaccine left the market rapidly
due to rising liability costs, and by nineteen eighty four
there was only one company left making this dangerous, ineffective vaccine.
That led to a deal being brokered between advocates for
vaccine injured children and the pharmaceutical lobbyists. So by nineteen

(02:12:30):
eighty two, NBC exposes how dangerous this thing is, and
then by nineteen eighty four they basically had driven everybody
out of the manufacturing except for one manufacturer. So then
we have nineteen eighty six where Faucty gets together with
Reagan and they say, you know, these things are unavoidably unsafe,
so we're going to give them legal immunity. And that's

(02:12:52):
what they did. They needed somebody like Reagan who had
the trust of the people in order to pull the
wool over everybody's eyes. You've got to get behind somebody
before you can stab him in the back. Right. Fortunately,
the unrestrained proliferation ultimately went so far that a new
check emerged, a public loss of trust. And so that's
where we are right now. After we saw the massive

(02:13:16):
damage done by the vaccines and we saw how hard
they worked to cover that up. The public is pulled
back against all vaccines in general. That's a good thing.
And so what Trump is there to do is to
assuade you, to get you to trust him. And he's
brought in RFK Junior, who says his mission is to
regain the public's trust of these institutions. Don't believe him,

(02:13:40):
don't follow him. And of course that's what Telsea Gabbard
said as well about the intelligence agencies. Our job is
there to restore trust and cash. Betel's job was there
to restore trust. But of course.

Speaker 5 (02:13:51):
He's a good job with that.

Speaker 2 (02:13:53):
Yeah, what he's done with Epstein has blown back on
that mission. But that's what they're all about. Again. Trust
the plan Trump is all the plan has always been
to get people to trust Trump. I think the sulgan
for this show ought to be truth, not Trump. So
if we are trying to show you here and these
other people just want to push Trump trust.

Speaker 6 (02:14:14):
And trusting, restoring distrust in the institution, Yes, exactly. I
looked up Heroin said for almost twenty years, heroin was
marketed as a safe and non addictive substitute for morphine.

Speaker 2 (02:14:31):
Yeah, now we've got we've got the substitutes for Well,
what is it that they use for heroin addiction?

Speaker 3 (02:14:42):
Yeah?

Speaker 6 (02:14:42):
Yeah, Well there you go. We replaced morphine of heroin.
Now we can replace that with fentanyl or there's.

Speaker 2 (02:14:49):
Another drug making it healthier. There's another drug that they
use and rehab and methadone yea for heroin or cocaine.

Speaker 5 (02:14:58):
I think it's heroin.

Speaker 2 (02:15:01):
I don't know, it's like it should be with the
name like that. Maybe it was derived from that. I
don't know. I'll tell you. I remember one time we
were in and a group and one person there said,
you know, I hear these people have these great testimonies
about how God saved them out of a life of
addiction or this or that. You know, they had this,

(02:15:21):
this horrible thing that they were involved in. And she said,
and I always used to feel bad about it because
she said, I grew up in a Christian family and
never had any of those types of things. I didn't.
It's like there was never this point at which I
had this radical repositioning of my life. But you said
someday one day, it just kind of dawned on me. Yeah,
God saved me from heroin addiction or cocaine addiction or whatever.

(02:15:45):
He did it before I ever took the first one.
That's about that.

Speaker 5 (02:15:50):
Well, that's what you want, that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:15:52):
Agent Orange was Monsanto's big moneymaker thing that they used
in the Vietnam War. They met sprayed twelve percent of
South Vietnam. This caused at least four hundred thousand deaths,
five hundred thousand birth defects, and left victims with no recourse.
And now Moncento has a new Agent Orange, Donald Trump.

(02:16:16):
That should be his name, not Billy Ray Valentine from
trading places, right, but Donald Trump is the actual Agent Orange.
Now he's going to give them legal immunity, which is
what they really need. FIRSA said. Note I recently learned
from an excellent vaccine safety book that the same US
agencies and scientists, in other words, the CDC who covered

(02:16:37):
up vaccine injuries, also spent decades claiming that there was
no evidence for Agent orange is toxicity. It's just like
sugar water. Right. And then of course Bear has an
orange for Trump. Of course we can, of course it

(02:16:58):
wasn't just agent orange, but Monsanto also brought us PCBs,
persistent for centuries and highly toxic, causing cancer, immune suppression,
reproductive issues, and neurological impairments. Monsanto produced over ninety nine
percent of America's PCBs. Wonderful corporation, and then when you

(02:17:20):
look at the successful PCB lawsuits, they were awarded billions
against Monsanto, and then Moncento also brought us rBGH. In
nineteen ninety three, they released a synthetic growth hormone that
wound up being in milk. Health concerns suggested cancer, allergy,
and obesity risks. So Monsanto began an infamous pr campaign

(02:17:44):
that quote literally intimidated news stations into pulling critical stories
and firing journalists to refuse to echo unproven, safe and
effective claims. That's the same game they ran during twenty twenty.
Isn't it even an alternative media? Genetically modified organism manipulation,
that's what Monsanto did. That's tied in actually with roundup

(02:18:07):
and glyphysset. They have engineered genetically modified seeds. So after
you poison the ground with the glacysset, the only crop
that you can run is the one that you have
to buy every year from Monsanto, and that's driven a
lot of Indian farmers into suicide because it's bankrupted them.
Hawaii became popular for GMO cultivation, comprising ninety two percent

(02:18:30):
of agricultural revenue. This required heavy, restricted toxic pesticide use,
causing health effects and community resistance. Eventually, Kawhai banned spraying
within five hundred feet of schools, Hawaii banned GMO cultivation,
and Maui's voters pause GMO cultivation despite being outspent eighty

(02:18:51):
seven to one in election. Tragically, Monsanto immediately secured a
court ruling that overturned all three of these And when
they started running into repeated challenges in various parts of
the country, that's when they went to Washington and got
pushed through what we call the Dark Act, saying that
states and local areas cannot protect themselves. And this is

(02:19:13):
exactly what Trump and company tried and failed to put
in in the Big Beautiful Act. They wanted to do
the same type of thing for artificial intelligence. For ten years,
you will not be able to pass any regulations that
have anything to do with AI. The the pesticide industry
already got that done for pesticides, so the toxicity was

(02:19:37):
known as early as the nineteen thirties. Monsanto claimed safety
until it stopped sales of PCBs in nineteen seventy seven.
And so they have long history, and then so does Bear.
They developed aspirin, they sold heroin as they cold remedy
like you said, Lance, and they and they produced chemical weapons.

(02:20:00):
In nineteen twenty five, Bear merged with five companies to
form the German chemical company IG Farbin. Following World War II,
the Allied Control Council seized IG Farbin's assets due to
its Nazi war effort role, including slave labor, human medical testing,
and ziclon B production. In nineteen fifty one, IG Farbens split.

(02:20:21):
Bear was reincorporated, and after the war, Bear re hired
several former Nazis, including convicted war criminals. If you look
at our biowea industry, Fort Detrick and others, they brought
over all these operation paper clip Nazis and Japanese scientists
made them, and Japan had actually used American soldiers as

(02:20:45):
lab rats and violation of the Geneva Convention, and the
US government put them in charge of our chemical and
biological weapons. So it's not any surprise that things like
the COVID shot was produced by this kind of filth.
Glafysit underlies are widespread magnesium deficiency, while others have linked

(02:21:08):
it to autism. Yet Monsento has continued to claim that
it is safe. RFK Junior had spearhead personally many round
up cancer lawsuits, but now it appears that he's gone
quiet about these efforts to get legal immunity for big
pesticon big pests. Of course, one of the reasons that

(02:21:32):
they lost these lawsuits was over their failure to warn.
That was the basis on which they paid out billions
of dollars a year after year. As of May five,
Monsento had settled nearly one hundred thousand lawsuits, paying approximately
eleven billion dollars, with roughly sixty one thousand active lawsuits pending.

(02:21:55):
And so Bear bought them even with all these different
las lawsuits that were penning, And what they decided to
do was to buy this corrupt organization that kind of
mirrored them, and then to aggressively fight these lawsuits and
to buy politicians in order to get liability protection from
big pests. That's truly amazing. So an academic an Oxford

(02:22:22):
academic is saying this it's time to start paying people
to vaccines take vaccines because our confidence of vaccines had
dropped so much. Did he not see what the Republicans
like the wine in Ohio did when he offered a
million dollar lottery.

Speaker 5 (02:22:37):
That's how you know a product is good when you
have to pay people to take it.

Speaker 2 (02:22:41):
Yeah, and when you have to give legal immunity the
people who are making it. Yeah, they get legal immunity.

Speaker 5 (02:22:48):
You have to get paid. Is there anything else? Is
there any other sign that this could be a problem.

Speaker 2 (02:22:54):
It's every Well what they did was they went into
a poor country, into Ghana, and they tried the sounds like,
I wonder if we go into a really poor area
and we pay people, if they will let us stick
poison in their arms, and guess what they will as
if we didn't.

Speaker 5 (02:23:10):
Know that, So surprise, surprise.

Speaker 2 (02:23:12):
Yeah. Talking about another employee that we had, she was
working for us, and nobody can believe that she was
doing this. You know, she was working We had a
lot of pharmaceutical companies there and research Trunkle Park Bros.
Welcome was there and other things like that. She would
sign up as a human lab rat to take these
drugs and everybody was telling you, you're crazy. She wasn't

(02:23:35):
get paid that much to do it either. It was
a chump change. It's like, you're crazy to do this.
But they were paying people and gan are three dollars
to give them injections. And they said, they said, well,
this works by that this article says its Brownstone. They
said by works, they don't mean that successfully reduced COVID

(02:23:56):
deaths or illness. They didn't look at that. The only
thing that they were concerned about was working is to
be able to get their vaccines into people's arms. That's
their calculations there. Since Ghana has almost zero confirmed COVID deaths,
we can assume that the positive impact of vaccination in
the country was non existent. Nobody died from the COVID virus, folks.

(02:24:20):
They died from the ventilators, from the midazzle am, from
the denial of treatment if they got a respiratory illness.
We had excess deaths throughout twenty twenty because Trump essentially
shut down the medical community. They shut down alternative treatments
for people, and they actively kill people with piter Navarro's
ventilators and other things. Like that. And that's the reality

(02:24:43):
when you look at these third world countries, had several
people who lived third world countries had Nobody is sick
with this. This is not a pandemic. It's not an
epidemic that's spread over all the world. Nobody is getting
sick and dying with us because they're not doing the
kinds of crazy stuff that they're doing in the West
in countries. So this person writing this article in Brownstone said, frankly,

(02:25:05):
I had to I find it hard to understand how
this study got ethical approval. Well, how did the wine
and rama slimy get ethical approval for what they did?
In Ohio? This three dollars cash incentive represented about fifteen
percent of weekly food expenditures. And if you look at

(02:25:27):
that in terms of just dollar equivalents, that three dollars,
if that is about fifteen percent of their weekly food expenditure,
that's about twenty dollars a week that they're able to
live off of. There. Yeah, that's like one or two
items here in the grocery store.

Speaker 5 (02:25:46):
That's why they got to reduce us down to that level.
Will be easier to bribe and coerce.

Speaker 2 (02:25:50):
Yes, Well, we're going to take a break, and when
we come back, we're going to take a look at
AI and we'll also take a look at some actions
against parents, because those things never stop either. I mean,
they're constantly looking for ways that they can poison children,
they can poison their mind, their body, and their soul.

(02:26:11):
And so we're gonna take do you want to cover
some of the comments.

Speaker 5 (02:26:14):
When we come back.

Speaker 2 (02:26:15):
Okay, So let me take a quick break and we
come back, we'll take a look at the comments.

Speaker 7 (02:27:18):
Warm is a listening to the divid Night Show, The Globalists,

(02:29:01):
Next Move and now the David Knight Show.

Speaker 9 (02:29:16):
Wait a minute, where am I?

Speaker 13 (02:29:19):
Sorry, Jefferson, The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank
Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some
sort of trophy. Despicable.

Speaker 9 (02:29:28):
This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.

Speaker 13 (02:29:42):
Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed
up the All New David Knight Show commemorative coin. But
now patriots can support a show that won't sell out
with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.

Speaker 9 (02:29:57):
They say, money talks, and this coin is something worth
listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support. Oh
to look round at the patch of round the illness mother.

Speaker 2 (02:30:18):
Nat Jersey.

Speaker 10 (02:30:20):
Tho, it's horrid to be busy.

Speaker 2 (02:30:24):
It's a miserable place to live. Yeah. And so Greenland
is back in the news, not because of Trump this time,
and not because of the miserable climate, but because the
miserable government that is there from Denmark. This is a
newborn that's been removed from a mother in Greenland because

(02:30:46):
she failed their parenting competence tests. Isn't that amazing? And
this is well, the only thing I could find that
they said made her disqualified for being a parent was
that she had been sexually abused by her stepfather, So
I guess they figured that that was going to somehow
pass along. But they had done interviews with her prior

(02:31:10):
to the enactment of this law, because they took the
baby away after a law was passed by the people
there in Greenland saying you can't do this. This is
something coming out of Denmark, and they were using this
against the natives there in Greenland, and so they had
done these interviews with her before the law was passed.

(02:31:31):
They had made the determination that they're going to take
the child away from her, and then the law was
passed to prohibit that. But then they said, well, we're
going to grandfather this in because where he made this determination.
And she went through the pregnancy knowing that when the
baby was born they were going to take it from
her because she had quote unquote failed the parental competence tests.

(02:31:51):
And again I can't find anything like can you change
a diaper? Do you know how to feed the child?
Do you know how to handle things if they have
a temper tank? No, none of that stuff.

Speaker 6 (02:32:02):
It's more likely to be questions like how many vaccines
do you plan on giving them before they turn such
and such an age?

Speaker 2 (02:32:11):
Yeah, all of these things.

Speaker 6 (02:32:14):
What if they are transgender, will you allow them to
get mutilation surgeries?

Speaker 2 (02:32:21):
Yeah, that's right, then we have our way with your kid.
Child was only one hour old when they took separated
the baby from the mother and they said that she
underwentness parenting competence test. Despite a new law banning the
use of controversial psychometric assessments, on people with Greenlandic backgrounds.

(02:32:43):
Think about that, they're going to do a some kind
of a Freudian or Union test on you and decide
that you're not competent to be a parent.

Speaker 5 (02:32:49):
You're going to get the void comps machine on you.

Speaker 2 (02:32:52):
Yeah, she has played for Greenland's handball team, So there
you go. I guess they comes from years of kepe
with snowballs. That pretty get that. So now, after the
child was born, the local municipality took the infant into
foster care. She's eighteen years old, and she says that
she has since then only seen her daughter once for

(02:33:15):
an hour when she was not allowed to comfort the
baby or to change her diaper. The parenting competence tests
were banned on people with Greenlandic backgrounds earlier this year
after years of criticism by campaigners and human rights bodies
who argued successfully that they were racists because they were
culturally unsuitable for people from Intuit backgrounds. As the law

(02:33:38):
came into force in May, campaigners are asking why she
was still subjected to the test, and again, she knew
that was going to happen before the baby was born.
They did it back in April after an announcement in
January that the band was going to come in. They
completed the tests in June, at which point the law

(02:33:59):
was in force. Bronkein was told three weeks before giving
birth at her child to be taken away. She said
that her first meeting with her daughter earlier this week
was cut short early because the baby was quote believed
to be overtired and overstimulated. These are the people who
are the experts on all this stuff, right, she said.

(02:34:21):
It feels like you're not allowed to have any kind
of a trauma if you're going to be a mum.
In other words, this is not anything that she even did.
This is something that was done to her, and they're
using the excuse that they're using again. I think you're
right Lance that probably is you know, you're going to
vaccinate the kid, or you're going to use their pronouns
that we tell you. But their excuse for this is that,

(02:34:42):
having been abused by her stepfather, that she's now not
competent to be a mother herself. One of the reasons
the municipality stated for the moval of her daughter was
because of previous trauma in her life. This feels so
wrong to punish her for something that she he is
not responsible for. There you go. It's the government for you. Well,

(02:35:04):
to show you the value of parents and value Christ's
parents pray over their son who had no heart beat
for half an hour. Everybody was amazed at what happened.
This is a teenage boy who had a sudden cardiac
arrest while taking a bath, despite being without a heartbeat
for thirty minutes. He was resuscitated and later fully recovered.

(02:35:26):
And this is somebody who was active as an athlete.
When I read this, of course, the publication that was
there was not going to talk about whether or not
he had been vaccinated, but it certainly did sound like
the kind of sudden death stuff that we have seen
from people who've been given the Trump shot. Very healthy
in all accounts, and then suddenly his heart just stops.

(02:35:49):
Cardiac arrest is different than a heart attack. A heart
attack is blockage and things like that, but this is
cardiac arrest is just like an electrical issue where it
just stops. Beating son as a freshman and an athlete
in two sports at the school. When they heard the
noise when we dropped the flour, they thought that something

(02:36:10):
had fallen me didn't answer. They went back in they
found out it was him, so the father started giving
him cprs. I waited for the paramedics to arrive. He
was taken to the hospital, later flown to Pittsburgh. He
spent a month in the hospital, with many days and
medically induced coma. The mother is a former journalist and

(02:36:31):
she said, not knowing any better and having no medical background,
we just prayed. The family was told that he had
sudden cardiac arrest and after ten minutes of cardiac arrest,
the chances of survival are low and the risk of
permanent brain damage is very high. But they said that
it wasn't ten minutes, it was thirty minutes. They said,

(02:36:51):
everything we've read, everything we've been told, is that most
often after ten minutes, you're dead. But he's fine. And
a nurse who was a said, this is one of
the top three miracles that she's seen in all of
her years of nursing. You know, that's one of the
interesting things. Lee Struggle had a book, The Case for Miracles.

(02:37:12):
You know, he kind of became famous to the bestseller
called The Case for Christ And in it he talked
about studies that they had done. They found that doctors
and nurses believe in miracles way, way, way more than
the general public does, because I guess that's when if

(02:37:34):
somebody is is heeled under their care, it's a miracle
that you survived this.

Speaker 5 (02:37:39):
They're looking at it just say no, we've got nothing
left we can do where there's nothing left that man
can do in these situations, and then they just miraculously recovers.
Like what else can you call that? There's only you know,
there's only so many times you can rationally be like, well,
you know, crazy things happen.

Speaker 2 (02:37:55):
I guess, yeah, that's right. Well, you know, we're talking
about parenting and stuff. I looked at some of the
I didn't mention James Dobson, who was focus on the
family and founded it and so forth. His passing last
last week. I didn't talk about that. I mean I
was when you look at somebody's life, I mean, it's

(02:38:15):
not our position to judge somebody, and I know that,
you know a lot of people are going to find
issues with things he did. There were some issues with
things that I didn't agree with. You're never going to
agree with anybody one hundred percent, but there was some
good things he did in terms of fighting against the
war on the family, and it literally was a war,

(02:38:36):
you know, the feminism and attacking the family and things
like that. He stood up for that, and he turned
to talk about terms of parenting competence. Doctor Benjamin Spock
was all the rage and that and feminism were the
things that came out, and that's really what gave birth

(02:38:56):
to focus on the family. What he was doing. He
wrote a book called Dare to Discipline, and it was
a pushback against what doctor Benjamin Spock was doing. And
so from that standpoint, I never read the book. Everybody
was talking about it, but we intuitively did a lot
of things that he talked about, and I think you

(02:39:17):
did a great service in terms of pushing that back.
I had some issues with him. I remember we used
to listen to Adventures and Honesty all the time with
you guys, because we had you on the car quite
a bit. We were working and had the kids and
we had six doors or spread out all over the triangle,
so we spent a lot of time in the car
and did a lot of car schooling. Part of that
was you guys listening to Adventures and honysty and you

(02:39:40):
really liked it. But I had to stop it on
at least one occasion and push back against his naive
trust in government. Do you remember that episode.

Speaker 5 (02:39:49):
It was the one where one of some guys during
the Vietnam War and one guy was going to run off.
The other guy's like, no, it's my duty to go
to war.

Speaker 2 (02:39:57):
Yeah. I stopped at that point, and and we spent
a good deal of schooling time on that. I said, well,
let me tell you, his take on this is very,
very different. And that'd be my biggest criticism of him.
He was very trustful of institutions, I would say, and politicians,
and he was there with Reagan and part of the

(02:40:19):
moral majority. He's one of the few people that were
really high up like that that didn't have a big
moral failing blowout. And so that is something that is
definitely in his favor and respect him for that, congratulating
for that. Most of them, as they got into so
much into politics, that became the driving factor in their
life and they would say and do anything with that.

(02:40:42):
And a lot of people have criticized him for his
political stands. I would just say that it was kind
of a naive trust in government. I see that with
a lot of Christians, A lot of them have been
sold Romans thirteen vision that says you do whatever government says,
you know, even.

Speaker 5 (02:41:01):
If it's you put a pinwheel on your head, even.

Speaker 2 (02:41:04):
If it's a toxic vaccine, you just obeyed the government.
We saw that a lot, and I've seen that all
my life, so I understand that, and I disagree with
with that. But at the same time, he also pushed
heavily against abortion at a time when very few people
really were. So he was kind of hitting the front

(02:41:24):
lines on these fights that we've been having, and and
did that at an early stage. I remember we went
to Karen and I went to Colorado Springs for a
short trip vacation when we were living in Austin, and
we wanted to see the focus on the family headquarters,
and they had a big thing down below that was
all about adventures and odyssey and stuff that people would

(02:41:47):
take their kids to, and so that was kind of nostalgic.
It got kind of soap oprush, you know, as you
guys got older. You know, when you were younger, it
wasn't that bad, but then you know, it got into
these subplots and rabbit holes, all these different characters.

Speaker 5 (02:42:03):
Anything that goes on long enough, eventually you've exhausted kind
of all your material, and so you have to get
more outlandish with it. It jumped to the shark.

Speaker 2 (02:42:11):
It was. It was good at the beginning, and even
if they got something wrong, it's still a teaching opportunity, right,
So that's what you have to work with with.

Speaker 5 (02:42:18):
Your kids, because there's not going to be anything you
agree with one hundred percent. But there's even you know,
I don't agree with I love the Chronicles of Narnia,
but I disagree with some of the theology that's present there.
You know, there's that part in the Last Battle where
the Callerman comes in and says, you know, oh what
about this inn Aslyn says, well, you know you didn't
know me by my name, but you were an honorable man,

(02:42:39):
and all the service that you did to Tash I
will count towards me. And it's like, that's not how
that works. And I disagree with C. S. Lewis on that. Yeah,
but again you can use that to say, no, I
don't believe that you can point to that and tell
your children I disagree here. Yeah, there's not going to
be anything you agree with one hundred percent. And if
you're not going to show you know your kids are

(02:42:59):
someone something because you don't agree with undercent, well you
can't show anyone anything that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:43:03):
So yeah, you you know, you eat the meat and
you throw away the bones. So it's always that way.
And I think you know when you look at uh.
We went to their headquarters there and I took pictures
of him put it up on social media at the time.
They had a long display where they showed little had

(02:43:26):
little models of the size of the baby and its
development all the way through pregnancy. They had him physically
laid out there, so you know, his heart was about
the family and about and about saving children, that type
of thing. But again it was a little bit weak
in terms of Christ, just like you're talking about C. S.

(02:43:48):
Lewis right. If Aislin is a picture of Christ, Christ
says that he is the way and there are no
other ways. It's very exclusive. That's why the criticism of
so many people because it's not inclusive. It's very very exclusive,
and there's only one name under heaven by which man
can be saved.

Speaker 5 (02:44:08):
That's one of the things where I tend to take
issue with people getting into these hyper esoteric theologies because
Christ is already exclusive enough. There's already something inside of
us that goes, no, I can't believe this, you know,
I don't want to believe, you know, that I need
a savior like I don't want to believe that, you know,
I'm powerless. That itself is a very exclusionary sentiment. That's

(02:44:32):
a very exclusionary theology to hold. If you start getting
into these extremely specific niche things, I don't think that's necessary.
You know, Christ is the stumbling block. He is there.
You don't need to put any more barriers. You believe
in Christ, and that's what counts.

Speaker 2 (02:44:49):
Yeah, there is no such thing as easy believes. People
want to believe that there's something that they must do
or can do that's going to say. This is what
we see with Trump that everybody is talking about, right,
but it's not just him, it is Bloomberg as well.
You know, if there is a God, I don't even
need an interview. I'm going straight to having because look
at all the gun control I've done. Look what I've
done is saved the environment. You know, and people, especially billionaires,

(02:45:14):
want to believe that they they're better than other people.
They want to talk about their accomplishments and they think
that that's going to recommend them. And of course one
of the criticisms of Dobson was that because he was
heavily involved in politics, he was also a Zionist. You
talk about people getting caught up in niche ideas there

(02:45:37):
and John Hagey, who is one of the worst Zionists
out there, Christian or Jewish. So doctor Dobson was a
stalwart supporter of Israel and the Jewish people silent about
his relationship to Christ, but it was important that he
had this relationship with the political government of Israel. That
was what was important to him. And that's exactly what

(02:45:59):
Brian shall Hobby, who was critical of Dobson, That's what
he was talking about was his political involvement and how
his mission statement was so focused on the family. And
I've seen that as well. Family is a wonderful thing,
but you don't want to put family and I saw
this in the homeschooling moment. There were a lot of

(02:46:20):
home churches and other things like that where they made
it all about the family, and a lot of that
grew out of Dobson. He did the purity culture, and
which is not a bad thing. We just don't want
to make that the main thing. The main thing is
always Lord Jesus Christ and what he has done for
us that we can never earn our salvation. It's a

(02:46:43):
free gift. And that's the thing that is the hardest
for people to believe, is to accept the gift and
the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ. And so everybody's
always looking for these other things.

Speaker 5 (02:46:53):
Anything can become an idol. It doesn't have to be
this negative thing. It could be a positive thing that
you focus too much on you. It's not necessarily like, oh,
you know, like you're doing Heroin, that's your idol. It
could be very obsessed with your own personal fitness.

Speaker 2 (02:47:09):
Could be a good thing. Yeah, you can make an
idol out of the family. And that's why the family
is not our focus. Our focus is on Christ. And
so that was essentially what Brian shaw Hobby was criticizing
him for. And I understand that it's just that in
the context of where he was the family was really
being you know, that was the initiation of it. He
saw it from the very beginning, and he tried to

(02:47:30):
respond to that. The big issue that we have as
Christians is when we look at this is that you
constantly have a lot of different groups that will try
to fold together the calls for discipleship and service, fold
that in as requirements for salvation. And you didn't understand
those are two separate things. Right. There's salvation and then

(02:47:51):
there's service. And that service comes either you do it
right and you do it and you get a reward,
or you get chasing it. And you know we're talking
about disciplining. You know, God is the perfect father. James
Dobson was not the perfect father. He didn't have any
problems in his family, but nobody here is a perfect father.

(02:48:12):
But God is, and he will definitely chase in and
discipline you if you are a rebellious child. So that's
that's the key thing. And the thing is that you
be motivated by love, not by fear. When I saw
some of the comments about Dobson, the criticisms that people
were making, they even his critics said, well, you know

(02:48:33):
he's talking about corporal punishment and spanking and things like that.
He said, and they quoted him on it, which I
thought was fair. He said, if you were prone to
uncontrollable fits of anger, then you get somebody else to
discipline your child that way, or if you take pleasure
in it, you get somebody else to do that. And

(02:48:54):
so I thought that was sage advice and said, you know,
don't do it in anger. Always do it so the
child knows what the purpose of this is.

Speaker 5 (02:49:02):
And that's how you did it with us.

Speaker 2 (02:49:03):
Yeah, And I didn't read his book. I just kind
of picked that up, probably from other Christians who had
read his book.

Speaker 5 (02:49:10):
But it was he would always whenever we did something wrong,
I deserved to spank. You could always make sure it's
like you would even say, I'm very angry with you
right now, so you're not going to get a spanking,
go to your room and wait, which was worse. It
was so much for us. We would sit there.

Speaker 2 (02:49:25):
And have to think about what we done.

Speaker 5 (02:49:29):
So we're just saying there knowing the spanking is coming.

Speaker 2 (02:49:32):
Star. Yeah, yeah, you don't want to spanking when I'm mad.
I was that was a that was a blessing to
have that. So I look at it and I think,
you know, like me and the public figures that are
out there, I think he overall, I looked at his
work as a very balanced He's not not making an

(02:49:54):
I love him, but I think he had a lot
of good things to say. We've got a lot of
comments here. Let's take a look at some of these here.

Speaker 5 (02:50:00):
All right, we have Dougalug. Thank you very much, Doug Lug.
We really do appreciate that. Again, your support is what
keeps the show going, says thank you, David Travis and
Lance Well, thank you, dougalog OUTI m are our global
digital ID was the real purpose for the manufactured migrant
crisis quote unquote problem reaction, pre planned solution, And personally,

(02:50:22):
I do believe that the migrant crisis is a real crisis.
They just because it's engineered doesn't mean it isn't a problem.

Speaker 2 (02:50:30):
Oh yeah, they create real problems, you know, as well
as imaginary COVID or climate. Climate and COVID were imaginary mcguffins.
But the immigration stuff is deliberate. They do want to
have competing ethnic and racial groups for when you know,
things get really rough, that they've planned for.

Speaker 5 (02:50:51):
Yeah, and there's also the fact that seemingly Western cultures
have a more extreme response to tyranny. They're more likely
to you will do something about it than other cultures are.
For some reason, other cultures tend to be more passive
and accepting of whatever the government comes down on them with.

Speaker 2 (02:51:08):
Well, we had a tradition of that, but I think
we've lost it. You look at I can't, for the
life of me imagine any of the founders at the
time of the Revolutionary War, or any of the people
like you know, Davy Crockett and these other people. I mean,
they would have gone into a violent revolution a long
long time ago. Not that I'm approving that, but I

(02:51:29):
mean they had a very short fuse came to that.
Jim Bowie for example, I mean it was a very
violent time. I mean he had been involved. To look
up some time the duel, that fight that Jim.

Speaker 5 (02:51:41):
Bowee got on the sandbar.

Speaker 2 (02:51:42):
Yeah, that was amazing. You can find that on the internet.
It truly is an amazing story.

Speaker 5 (02:51:48):
Audie m are our mail in ballots, voting machines. It
almost doesn't matter since all the primaries are rigged for
the pre selected APAC owned puppets.

Speaker 2 (02:51:57):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (02:51:58):
A fun fact. The guy that owns the porn white
porn website OnlyFans donates a ton of money to APAC
as Welly Nights of the Storm are Trump's fifty percent
tariffs on aluminum, going to make the price of booster
shots go up.

Speaker 2 (02:52:13):
Oh no, we didn't even get to the tariffs today.
And that that's the key thing, you know, when they're
talking about, well, his tariffs are going to be this
big bonus that we're going to get. It's going to
make it a stimulus checking he's already talked about getting
rid of it, not paying down the deficit. And they
keep telling everybody that they've got so much money that's
going to come in, and the question is who's going
to be paying that, Well, the corporations aren't going to

(02:52:34):
be paying it, foreign governments aren't going to be paying it.
The American people are going to be paying it. And
this new round of tariffs on aluminum that you just
talked about there, we didn't get to it. But he's
putting all kinds of tariffs on other forms of aluminum
that are used and appliances. You know, you're going to
see your washers and dryers go up and all these

(02:52:55):
other things. We haven't seen any of that, and so
the Trump media is trump that, look, you know, it's
free money, and there's no inflation yet, and it's like
it hasn't even kicked in. Yet most of these things
they talk about how they've got long term commodity contracts
of people, and that's one of the reasons why you
have the the Chicago Border trade where they have commodity

(02:53:17):
futures on port bellies or whatever. But they also do
that for other materials as well. And so these contracts
are locked in for like three or four months. So
even after the tariffs start, you got another three or
four months wh's going to gradually come in. That's why
I say it's a huge, huge stealth tax increase. And

(02:53:37):
especially considering the fact that they're looking at July and
declaring victory when a lot of these teriffs didn't get
finalized until the beginning of August, and then go another
three or four months. You're going to start seeing this
the beginning of next year.

Speaker 5 (02:53:51):
Yeah, And that also gives them cover to say, oh, well,
it wasn't this.

Speaker 2 (02:53:54):
You know, Yeah, it wasn't the tariff. See, the teriffs
happened a long time ago. It's the same game they
played with the vaccine.

Speaker 5 (02:54:00):
So I yeah, so, well, you got vaccinated two weeks ago,
so it couldn't be that. Yeah, the citizen of Americaca,
you're never going to guess who bounded the Alzheimer's Foundation.
Aluminum tycoons with their pockets steeped in profits.

Speaker 2 (02:54:13):
Wow wow. Yeah, the aluminum industry is a large reason
why we have fluoride dumped into the water because it's
a waste product from them as well as a nuclear industry.
They would have had to pay to get rid of
that toxic waste. Instead, they get you to pay them
to dump it into your drinking water. That's what the

(02:54:34):
Trump administration is fighting. They continue, We're.

Speaker 5 (02:54:38):
So close the Trump, good old Trump solo cat nineteen eighty.
The CDC investigating vaccines is like Foxes investigating the break
in at the chicken coop.

Speaker 2 (02:54:48):
That's a good analogy, that's right.

Speaker 5 (02:54:50):
Citizen of Americaca bears only shows ten percent of the
brutal reality. It's already been tampered with right out the box. Yeah,
they speculate that very only catalogs tend to maybe even
as low as one. Yeah, they don't know for certain,
just because it's incredible.

Speaker 2 (02:55:07):
It's been worse with COVID because they were there were
pressuring people not to do it. They make it difficult
to do it. Yeah, and then if you put some
stuff in there. You know, Hey, we got to talk
to you. Come to my office.

Speaker 5 (02:55:19):
Getting a doctor to actually give you a vaccine. Injury
diagnosis is incredibly difficult. They don't like doing it. Yeah,
a Syrian girl. Some vaccines in the childhood schedule were
tested against a placebo that contained only aluminum thimerosol. Guess what,
new vaccines didn't have any more adverse effects than were
found in the control group.

Speaker 2 (02:55:37):
Yeah, that's right. One of these vaccines that came out recently.
The control group was given a meningitis vaccine. You're talking
about it is that the placebo is just aluminum and thy
Miosol's put the adjuvants in there.

Speaker 5 (02:55:48):
Right, Oops, all adjuvants Alan Nation. The skies are being
sprayed with aluminum. So what's the difference Every breath you take,
Maha is a sham. That's right. It doesn't really matter
if you were state bans aluminum spraying, if they don't
have a way of enforcing it, and if the state's
next to you don't ban it. The aluminum isn't going
to stop at a state border. It's not going to

(02:56:09):
respect the line on the map. It's just going to
cross be my Valentine. I line food with parchment paper
and then aluminum foil. Tomato sauce pits the foil. That's
giving yourself a barrier of parchment paper. That's a good idea. Yeah, Audi, mrr.
I can't believe that I used to accept the SIDS narrative.
It is clear that SIDS, along with autism and other ailments,
are direct results of vaccines. It's pretty obvious.

Speaker 2 (02:56:31):
So you think about the parents that they set to
jail for shaken baby syndrome and things like that. You know,
not only do they you know, it's like a murder
framing somebody else for the murder. It's really what it is,
just crazy.

Speaker 5 (02:56:48):
Yeah, OUTI mrr. No one starts dying until the remedy
is rolled out. Yeah, Karen Carpenter. Twenty seven packs of
it is still being advertised to prescribed, and one of
the side effects is rebound COVID whatever that is rebound
COVID eye Handy. Good to see you, Handy. I hope
you are doing well. It's always nice to see you.
I know you're busy. One of the big problems is

(02:57:09):
the oncology is strongly discourage trying anything outside of the
state to prove treatments. One of my patients went through that.
They told him he could try alternatives just eight days
before he died.

Speaker 2 (02:57:20):
Yeah, that's one of the things that they do to
say that the alternatives don't work. After they have damaged
you so much with their surgery, radiation and chemicals and
you desperately try something else and it doesn't work. Oh well,
you know that didn't help. That made things for us.
It's like, you know, there stuff that's been too late. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (02:57:39):
Handy also says, hey, DK, what's on the lapel pin.

Speaker 2 (02:57:43):
Yeah, it's the lapel pins that we've got. That's the microphone,
the microphone thing that was done by Ryan that remember
the large the really large coins that we had a
limited number of those. That's a small version of that.
And we got something else that's on the way as well.
That's gonna be I think you'll like it, all right.

Speaker 5 (02:58:03):
I gotta run through these so fast. Citizen of AMERICAKA
bears actively revelping using RNA technology to kill pests on
the field, primarily through a method called RNA interference RNAi.
Pest eats the cornplate and in just the dsRNA the
insects cellar machinery then uses this dsRNA two silence the
corresponding gene, preventing the necessary protein from being made. This
leads to the pests death, big pest, going after a

(02:58:24):
little pest MAV twenty twenty two.

Speaker 6 (02:58:26):
You don't have to read it that fast. I thought
that was a really interesting one.

Speaker 2 (02:58:30):
Yeah, yeah, they know what they're doing. This is all weaponized, folks.
There was no lab leak out of Wuhan that was
designed and practiced and run out of Washington by DARPA.

Speaker 5 (02:58:44):
Who's to say it's not going to cause some interference
in your own body MAV twenty twenty two. Apparently Canada
sprang life to say it after they clearcut forests so
only certain trees will grow and not others. They're making
the forest. Canada is a mess. It is a complete
joke of a country at this point. I feel very
sad for our Canadian listeners.

Speaker 2 (02:59:02):
Yeah. Yeah, we covered that the other day. It also
raises a fire risk as well.

Speaker 5 (02:59:05):
It's prankant there KWD sixty eight. We harvest a lot
of our own seeds, tomatoes, we get seeds from Amish.
Nothing in plastic monsento is even infiltrated small vendors. That's right.
And I Handy this about the team that has hard
attacking the shower. September twenty twenty one, the school mandate
of the JAB. He dies three weeks after the start
of school. I think he was JAB. That makes sense. Yeah,
Handy again, I've seen people survive things they shouldn't I've

(02:59:27):
also seen people leave this world who shouldn't have. I've
come to the conclusion that we don't leave here until
our point of time.

Speaker 2 (02:59:33):
That's absolutely right. Yeah, yeah, And you know the power prayer.
I mentioned that because that's the key thing. We are
not the kind of people who have no hope. And
our hope is in God. It's not in government, it's
not in any politician or political party. And God can
do amazing miracles and that's we see that, you know.

(02:59:53):
And when we look at the answers to prayer, I
just want to thank all of you once again for
all your prayers on my behalf. And here's a testament
to what God can do, not to what the medical
community can do, maybe a testament to what they can
do to you. I guess. Thank you for joining us.
Have a good day.

Speaker 5 (03:00:10):
God bless you all.

Speaker 2 (03:00:21):
The common man. They created common Core and dumb down
our children. They created common past, track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(03:00:41):
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

(03:01:06):
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2080: Drug War = Terror at Home, Excuse for Martial Law

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2080: Drug War = Terror at Home, Excuse for Martial Law

Stuff You Should Know