Mon Episode #2085: Fascism in America: Trump Fuses State & Tech

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Today.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
I want to begin with what is happening that I
see as an incredibly dangerous precedent, and that is all
of the blustering about Trump about using troops, and of
course conservatives just roll over. I would have never believed
that what happened in twenty twenty, with lockdowns and medical

(00:20):
martial law and all the rest of the stuff, disrupting
supply chains to join the Constitution, I would have never
believed that Americans would have stood for that. I'll tell you,
by the summer of twenty twenty, I thought we're never
going to get out of this. The people are such sheeple.
But it all happened because conservatives rolled over and let
this happen. Not only did they let it happen, but

(00:42):
they cheered it, and they voted for the guy who
did it. They voted for him two more times after
he did this. That's the amazing thing to me. I
would have never believed that could have happened in America.
Would you believe that we could have martial law? Would
you believe that we could have the federal government take
an ownership ship and intel that they could put export taxes.

(01:04):
We've never had export taxes what's all this stuff about tariffs.
Wasn't I supposed to make exports great again, except he's
now going to tax them. And of course, you know,
he began by saying we can't have this technology go
to China, and then he turns around and says, unless
they pay us enough, and then we'll do it. It's absolutely amazing.

(01:24):
And yet now what we're seeing in Washington, DC, and
he's very excited to talk about how he's going to
do it in Chicago. Now, what we are seeing is
something that was planned, just like operational warp speed a
military operation. This has been planned and talked about for
a very long time by the Pentagon. And again, who

(01:47):
would have thought that this would be It had to
be brought to you by the Republican Party with conservatives
cheering it along. I remember back in the nineteen sixties
with a John Birch Society, which is behind the New
American I remember when they woke everybody up to the
dangers of the federalizing of the police. And of course

(02:09):
many of the worst abuses that we see from the
police are because of the federal government's involvement pushing them
to militarize, pushing them with m wraps, pushing them to
do civil asset forfeiture, pushing them to become an army
with a drug war. And now people become anesthetized to that,

(02:30):
especially conservatives, and they're just they're going to cheer the
placement of the actual military in the various cities. So
we're going to talk about the issues of that. But
I want to begin with the Pentagon plans, because this
is something's been going on for a long time. And
let me just go full conspiracy theorist on you here,

(02:51):
because I don't think any of this stuff is a coincidence.
I think that at the same time he's talking about
going to war with the Democrat cities, he's also talking
about going to war with the drug cartels. You know,
the first prohibition that we had, what happened. You had
al Capone and other people like him were shooting it
out in the cities. Weren't they with machine guns? You

(03:15):
know the Saint Valentine's Day massacre. You had them riding
on the side of cars shooting other people. Now this
is going on much worse in Mexico with drug cartels.
I mean, you had like six heads found on a
body on a bridge the other last week. Things like that,
that kind of brutality. This was unusual because it was
very close to Mexico City. Now, let me ask you,

(03:37):
what do you think is going to happen if the
military starts to attack the cartels directly. You think they
might engage in terrorism. You think they might do the
same kind of stuff in some American cities that they
have done in Mexican cities. You think they might come
after journalists. You think they might come after politicians or
whatever report on them, who make laws against them, who

(03:59):
run the way war against them. That'd be a perfect
opportunity then to come in. That'd be a real emergency
that Trump could create. That'd be a perfect opportunity to
declare martial law. We take the drug war to being
a real war, and the Pentagon has been working on
this for a long time. This is a video and
it's kind of long. It's about five minutes, but it's
worth hearing this and listen carefully because in it you'll

(04:22):
hear this has done many many years ago before they
started talking about draining the swamp, that meme from the
Maga people, and you'll hear them say this in this
Pentagon video as they say, well, we're going to have
to get into urban areas because and I remember playing this,
I said, this is really an ominous harboneer of what

(04:43):
these people are really planning to do. They're really planning
to take over the cities. They're planning on preparing to
push back against any pushback against the smart cities and
the open air prisons that they want to create. And
so this is something thing just like the germ games
and the mRNA vaccines and the lockdowns that they have

(05:05):
been practicing, wargaming and rehearsing for years and years and years.

Speaker 3 (05:11):
Here's the video. The future is urban. By twenty thirty,

(05:32):
urban areas are expected to grow by one point four billion,
with that growth occurring almost entirely in the developing world.
Cities will account for sixty percent of the world's population
and seventy percent of the world's GDP. The urban environment
will be the locusts where drivers of instability will converge.
It is the domain that by the year twenty thirty,

(05:53):
sixty percent of urban dwellers will be under the age
of eighteen. The cities that grow the fastest will be
the most challenged as resources become constrained and illicit networks
fill the gap left by overextended and undercapitalized governments. The
risk of natural disasters, compounded by geography, climate changes, unregulated growth,
and substandard infrastructure intersect to frustrate humanitarian relief. Growth will

(06:16):
magnify the increasing separation between rich and poor. Religious and
ethnic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape.
Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development, as impoverishment, slums and
shanty towns rapidly expand alongside modern high rises, technological advances,
and ever increasing levels of prosperity. This is the world

(06:37):
of our future. It is one we are not prepared
to effectively operate within, and it is unavoidable. Megacities are
complex systems where people and structures are compressed together in
ways that defy both our understanding of city planning and
military doctrine. It is an ecosystem that demands a highly
agile and adaptive force to successfully operate within. Infrastructures will

(06:58):
vary radically with concentrations of high tech transportation.

Speaker 2 (07:01):
Now they're showing a lot of pictures of a third rule.
This is about you. While said that.

Speaker 3 (07:05):
Televinth and waste disposal intermixed with open landfills, overburdened sewers,
polluted water, and makeshift power gridts. Living habitats will extend
from the high rise to the ground level cottage to
subterranean labyrinths, each defined by its own social code and
role of law. Social structures will be equally challenged, if
not dysfunctional, as historic ways of life clashed with modern living.

(07:27):
Ethnic and racial differences are forced to live together, and
criminal networks offer opportunity for the growing mass of unemployed.
This becomes the nervous system of non nation state unaligned
individuals and organizations that live and work in the shadows
of national rule. Where physical domains can be seen, digital
domains will have limitless potential to breed and expand without limit.

(07:47):
Digital security and trade will be increasingly threatened by sophisticated,
ilicit economies and decentralized syndicates of crime to give adversaries
global reach at an unprecedented level. This will add to
the complexities of youth. Human targeting has a proportionally smaller
number of adversaries intermingle with the larger and increasing number
of citizens. The scale and density of these domains is daunting.

(08:10):
In a city of ten million, where you hold the
support of ninety nine percent of the population, the remaining
one percent represents a threat of one hundred thousand. It
is an environment of convergence. Hidden amongst the enormous scale
and complexity of the megacity. These are the future breeding grounds,
incubators and launching pads for adversaries and high bred threats

(08:30):
linked globally. These are man made labyrinths that provide refuge
and movement across the vast sections of these cities where
alternate forms of governance have taken control. The advice of
doctrine from Sansu to current field manuals has provided two
fundamental options. Avoid the cities or establish a cordon to
either weight out the adversary or drain the swamp of

(08:50):
non combatants and engage the remaining adversaries in high intensity
conflict within. Even our counterinsurgency doctrine honed in the cities
of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan is inadequate to
address the sheer scale of population in the future urban reality.
From the streets of Achenes to the citadel and way.
We have defeated adversaries who attempted to use urban terrain

(09:10):
to their advantage.

Speaker 2 (09:11):
No, you have.

Speaker 3 (09:12):
An inflict is written deep into the Army's histories, But
in tomorrow's conflict, these megacities are orders of magnitude, greater
and complexity, and our current options do not meet strategic ends.
Our future operations must allow us to rapidly return the.

Speaker 2 (09:26):
City to the people.

Speaker 3 (09:27):
They will be too large and complex to isolate or
court on in their entirety. Yet our soldiers will have
to operate within these ecosystems with minimal disruption and flow.
Our current and past strategies can no longer hold. We
are facing environments that the masters of war never foresaw.
We are facing a threat that requires us to redefine
doctrine and the force and radically new in different ways.

(09:48):
The future Army will confront a highly sophisticated urban centric
threat that will require that urban operations become the core
requirement for the future land Force. The threat is clear,
our direction remains to be defined. The future is urban.

Speaker 2 (10:03):
Yeah, and the Democrats can kind of see the threat,
but they don't understand what it's really about. They think
it's going to be January. The sixth part, This is
another coup. They're going to try to take over the
election like they did on January the sixth. That was
not an insurrection, that was not a coup, and they
still think it was and they think that that's what
this is about, and they're dead wrong on both accounts.

(10:23):
Now this is there will be an election rigging, but
that's going to be done with jerrymandering and both parties
are doing it. They're freaking out because of that, and
we'll talk a little bit about that, but that's the
politicians picking the voters and they're trying to make sure
they maintain a majority, especially during the midterm elections. So

(10:44):
they're in this redistrict in battle that's going on Texas
and California. Now Missouri is going to be next, and
they are going to increase their Republican seats. So it's
not about the election. It's not about Trump. Trump has
been from the beigin getting a puppet of the military
industrial Complex and the Pentagon who wants to run all

(11:06):
this stuff. They were planning this stuff for decades, many decades.
They ran the first one of these games that already
been planning it. They ran the first one of the
games three months before nine to eleven. This predates Donald
Trump and they just don't get it. But they needed
somebody like Donald Trump, just like the Rothschild said, you know,
and we can use this guy Wilver Rostol, And they're right,

(11:30):
they can use that guy. The Pentagon understands it as well,
and so the people like Davos and the rest of them.
That's truly I think what this is about. And I
think that once they pick a fight with the cartels,
then you will either have the cartels directly attack, sabotage
infrastructure and other things like that, which will be a

(11:50):
real emergency. And of course then we got to do
it to keep you safe, or they will do a
false flight attack and blame it on the cartels. Did
you hear that old video where they're talking about how
they feed of the enemy in the cities of Afghanistan
and Iraq only in their imaginations and their wargames. Did
they do that? And that's reality? You know. Part of
it was to say, look at that in a city

(12:11):
at ten million, if you only got one percent, you know,
we've got to deal with one hundred thousand people. And
so they have a daunting task. Therefore, they're going to
start practicing right away with Donald Trump. This is not
simply about DC. It'd be bad enough if it was
about DC. Maybe a stretch of his authority, Isn't it amazing?

(12:32):
Like I said, I would have never thought in my
lifetime certainly that we would see the kind of authoritarian
fascist controls. And I mean that literally when you take over,
when you get a share in intel, folks, that's economic fascism.
And the militarism and the hypernationalism is also characteristic of fascism.

(12:53):
But it really is a technocracy ultimately, but it has
these fascist elements in it. And I would have never
thought that these types of things would have been allowed
in America. This is why they have to get the
so called conservatives to support it, because it's if it
was done by the left, it would be too obvious,

(13:16):
and the people who would stand for freedom would oppose it.
But not when it's their own guy. Not when it's
somebody that they love so dearly. They will make every
excuse in the book for him, just as they have
for what he did in twenty twenty, and just like
they voted two more times for him. So Chicago woman,
here's an example of this. I couldn't believe this. This is
a story from the Guardian and it was picked up

(13:39):
by and she tweeted us out. It was also picked
up by Breitbart and many other Chicago woman was carjacked,
but still tells Trump not to bring the National Guard.
These people saying, how stupid can you be? What's the
matter with this woman? Actually she's got a lot more

(14:00):
sinse than these conservatives who are trolling. I think federal
militarized police folks are not a solution. They are another problem.
What happened to these conservatives? Don't they realize? Don't they
remember when Ronald Reagan said government is not the solution.
Government is the problem. Now you have conservatives out there

(14:21):
willing to trade liberty for the promise of safety and security.
You have conservatives out there who, as I said, you
know John Burst, Society and sixties said support your local police.
It was actually should have been more like support local policing,
because it was a federal government that was incentivizing and

(14:43):
rewarding financially and putting out the guidelines for how they
wanted to change the way policing was done. That's why
you've now got the Brazil type raids nineteen eighty four,
Terry Gillims nineteen eighty four, Brazil. That's why you have
those types of raids rather than share Fanny Taylor is
we've gone from either in my lifetime, those two realities

(15:06):
that we had out there, and this is being driven
by the federal government. They've always been the driver of this.
And yet the saddest thing I thought when I see
this militarization of the police as I go to the
New American and there wasn't a single article criticizing the

(15:26):
nationalization of the police, the militarization of the police. As
a matter of fact, the closest I could see to
it was the I'm saying, Trump is saying no American
troops will be sent to Ukraine. Well, I hope that
they are appropriately skeptical. But Trump also says he's going
to send troops to Chicago and California. Where is the

(15:47):
Tom Burt Society? Come on, guys, wake up? Has Trump
put you to sleep? I mean, it's like we talked
about the Wizard of Oz last week, Travis. It's kind
of like, you know, I'm watching these people as they
are going across the field and the witch makes them
fall asleep in the field of flowers. That's really what's
happened in the conservative movement under Trump. It's insane just.

Speaker 4 (16:08):
As long as Trump does it, so okay, like Richard
nixt thing, and the president.

Speaker 2 (16:11):
Doesn't it, so it's not illegal, that's right. Yeah, how
are they gonna like it when you've got a Democrat
president of the same cut as Obama or Hillary running
the militarized police in your cities. And of course there's
nineteen different states that said, yeah, we're great with that.
Let's put the military in our cities. Because in every city,

(16:33):
even if it leans conservative Republican, there's going to be
a big city and that's going to lean Democrat. And
so it's like, yeah, bring them in. Let's get control
of Nashville and Memphis. And I mean, we just had
some heinous murderers in both of those places, so yeah,
bring in the military police. That's what we need. Anyway,
this woman says, the car jackedor they stole her car,

(16:55):
they broke her arm, but I don't want the military
in here. She is getting trolled left and right. She
had to shut down her account because the conservatives were
trolling her so much. Conservatives pushing the militarization of the police.
She said, Chicago's a mess. You have an incompetent mayor
grossly incompetent. Rather, she didn't say that. Trump said that,

(17:16):
And we're going to straighten that one out probably next,
said Trump. That'll be our next one after this, and
it won't even be tough. There you go. So Trump's
solution to crime, it's the same as his solution to
a so called pandemic with deare an emergency. We operate
as a military operation. And he is instinctively authoritarian in

(17:42):
everything that he does, whether it's the way he deals
with critics or whatever. And so that In response, she wrote,
I've been carjacked in Chicago with my arm broke. I
still don't want your troops here, she said. And so
this is a reply from the magatards out there who
don't understand anything about politics, history, or what is happening.

(18:02):
Are you mentally disabled? Truly asking for your sake? Oh wow, guys,
Look I can smile after somebody car track me. That
means it's okay. Sometimes staying quiet is the best option. Yeah,
that's especially true if you're going to be a conservative
who's going to cheer the stationing of troops and cities.
I'm disgusted with these people. They make me want to vomit.

(18:26):
So does Trump. It's the matter with them. So if
you're going to cheer martial law, yeah you should be quiet.
But these people voted for that. Screenshotting this to show
my children what an idiot looks like, we could just
show them yourself. I mean, that's hey, kids, this is
what one looks like. So Democrats are pushing back against this,

(18:49):
but just like Bill Maher, for the wrong reasons. They
think this is about elections. Yeah, it is about political power.
Everything they do is ultimately about political power. But that's
not the primary issue of this. So you have a
Democrat representative, Adam Smith of a Democrat from Washington, and
he went on Politics Nation this weekend and he said

(19:12):
crime is the problem, but Trump's fascism is not the answer.
He's absolutely right. It's not not even you know, putting
out more SWAT teams and armored personnel carriers or the
answer either. So he said, there are two huge problems here.

(19:33):
Number one, we're using US military for domestic law enforcement.
The second big problem is that Trump is basically giving
himself a national police force, and I think that they
know that this is what's coming down the pike anyway.
It's one of the reasons why they've had the police
wearing masks while they're doing third world countries like they

(19:54):
do in Mexico, right, because, Yeah, we're gonna be targeted
by the cartels, and they want that to happen. They're
going to create that problem. And if the cartels do
not respond the way that they hope that they do,
they'll do a false flag. That's what I think is
really going to happen. I'll see you on the street,
said Trump, after Pritzker, who I think is absolutely reprehensible

(20:18):
on everything, pushback against this, saying that we're going to
send troops to Chicago's This is governor of Illinois pushes back,
but also the Maryland governor, who's also a Democrat, Wes
Moore More, urged Trump to use Maryland's model for fighting
crime instead of deploying federal troops like the administration did

(20:39):
in Washington, d C. He said, if there's anything Maryland
has proven over the last two years is that we
can achieve performance without being performative. We need the right
tool for the right mission. Look, I'm not a fan
of local policing, mainly because of the things that the
federal government has trained them to do and incentivize them
to do. But it's only going to get worse as

(21:02):
we pull this in and this is what they're practicing.
So Trumpet out on true social he accused the governor
Maryland more of using quote rather nasty and provocative tone.
That's the kettle calling the pot black, isn't it, and
the invitation to quote walk the streets of Maryland. And

(21:23):
he threatened to revoke the funds that we needed to
rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge that was knocked down
partially by that container ship. Remember that. Yeah, if you
don't talk to me nicely, I'm not going to help
you build back that bridge. And I don't think the
federal government ought to be doing subsidies of infrastructure. They
always throw the money at the wrong things and do

(21:44):
it in the wrong way. That was one of the
big fights before the Civil War, the fact that it
wasn't just about the trade, but it was also or
slavery or whatever it was about tariffs. It was about
whether or not we were going to have free trade
or how the taxation was going to be done. But
it was also about the fact that Washington was pouring

(22:05):
big bucks into infrastructure in certain favored areas and the
people were not getting the money were very upset about that. So, yeah,
they're building a big canal system infrastructure in the Northeast
with federal dollars, and the people in the South were saying, well,
wait a minute, we don't benefit from that, and they're
absolutely right. So yeah, to all the MAGA people who

(22:31):
said during the lockdown that all the masks and all
that kind of stuff in the medical martial law that
had nothing to do with Trump, he didn't do that.
And I said, from the very beginning, I said, look,
he paid them to do that. He financially incentivized that.
And Trump understands that very well. Look at what he does.
He reacts immediately by saying, oh, yeah, I'm going to

(22:52):
cut off the money that we give you. All the time,
they do it over the boys in the girls' bathroom issue,
the Democrats say we're going to cut your funds off
if you don't put boys in the girl's bathroom, and
the Republicans will say we'll cut it off if you do.
But they understand that that's a weapon. The Maca people
do not, at least they say they don't. I don't

(23:13):
know if they're just trying at this point. I even
wonder if even MAGA could be that stupid. I actually
think that Trump was not running this stuff. That the buck,
as I've said so many times, doesn't just stop with
the president. He's ultimately responsible, but it's where the buck starts.
That's what the decoration of emergency on his side was about.

Speaker 4 (23:32):
He is the one that set everything in motion. And
as such as you said, it doesn't just stop with him,
it started with him. It's full circle, all in one person.

Speaker 2 (23:41):
Yeah. Bill Maher says that this is a slow moving coup,
but he gets it all wrong because he thinks that
this is like some kind of a J six thing.
He thinks that the next election Trump doesn't get the
results that he wants, that they're going to run in
with the military and say that's it, we're keeping control.
That's not it at all. It's going to be much

(24:02):
more subtle, and it's going to be about a lot
of other things. And he's absolutely ignorant of what the
Pentagon has been planning for a very, very long time.

Speaker 5 (24:11):
Bill Meller can't comprehend the idea that the next president
is going to be using all this, that Trump is
just a puppet that's setting up a larger thing of control.
He thinks that Trump is the ultimate evil behind everything.

Speaker 2 (24:26):
Yes, that's absolutely right.

Speaker 5 (24:29):
If only we could get him out, then all these
pictorial powers would be fine.

Speaker 2 (24:35):
Yea, it's a dance, it's a one two step. That's
one of the reasons why they had to put Biden in,
because Trump locks everything down, messes up the supply chain,
and destroys a lot of small businesses and farms, and
then they put the guy in to mandate his poison
that he produced.

Speaker 4 (24:52):
Also, personally, I'd be surprised if there is ever a
dictator for life, at least in the United States. It
seems as though they realized that elections act to say
sort of pressure release valve. The guy comes in, he
does a whole bunch of things you disagree with. But
every four years you get to pick a new dictator.
So maybe the next guy will be better, maybe he'll
do a bit better job. Oh, he didn't do a
good job, so he's out. New guy. Whereas the dictator

(25:14):
for life, it breeds a lot of resentment. Over time,
people start getting very upset.

Speaker 5 (25:19):
Yeah, yeah, sort of sacrificial candidate. All the sins of
the government get put on one person's shoulders, and then
you get a new president.

Speaker 4 (25:29):
Then he's cast out into the wilderness.

Speaker 2 (25:32):
If only we could. Yeah, somebody sent me in an
article saying that gen Z is getting nostalgic for George W. Bush.

Speaker 4 (25:42):
I can promise you there's nothing to be nostalgic about.

Speaker 1 (25:45):
Guys.

Speaker 2 (25:45):
You miss me yet, I've said that a long times.
I'll never miss him.

Speaker 5 (25:48):
Well, the thing is, nostalgia is wishing for something better
than what you currently have that you used to have.

Speaker 2 (25:56):
My favorite meme of George W. Bush was when somebody
morphed them into Alfred Newman from Mad magazine, and that
was they didn't have to do too much morphing. Actually
he's pretty close to that already, and it was like,
you know what me worry. So, yeah, the when you
go back and look at all the masks and all

(26:17):
the rest of the stuff, think about that. You know,
twenty twenty we had masks enforced by cops. Right twenty
twenty five, Now the cops are going to use force
and they wear the masks to hide their identity. It
just works perfectly. Bill Maher said, First they create a
mass police force. Get people used to looking at that,
normalize snatching people off the street. Get them used to

(26:40):
looking at that, normalize seeing the National Guard and the
military on the street. And He's right, this is about
moving the overturned window. This is about normalizing it. That's
what this all was about. That's what the passport, the
vaccine passports and all the rest of this stuff is
all ultimately about. Do you really want to have to
live your life under military occupation like your Paris occupied

(27:02):
by the Nazis, or saying the identity papers disease, then
they have to say that they're creating a biometric database
where they can get tr identity papers just by looking
at you. He said, you start talking about crime the capital,
and it's always been a fairly crime ridden city. And
so Trump says, yeah, we're going to make it safe,

(27:25):
and then we're going to go after other places. And
conservatives are more than willing to trade your liberty for
Trump's promise of safety. As a matter of fact, on
Bill Myer's show, you had conservative activist Christopher Rufo, who
has done a lot of good work against the LGBT
and other things like that. I think understanding that it

(27:46):
is about ultimately about the maoist struggle sessions. But he
ripped liberals for just being too sensitive. Oh your feelings
are hurt. You know, you just don't like the military.
That type of thing. Well, I think they are completely wrong.
The Conservatives in my lifetime, as I said, have done

(28:06):
a complete one eighty. They've become the Democrats of my youth.
But even worse than the Democrats of my youth. I
can't imagine the Democrats of my youth pushing the kind
of authoritarian policies that Trump is doing. Even the Democrats
of my youth did not say we're going to take
over major businesses like Intel. We're going to take a

(28:27):
share in them. And let me ask you know, how
much of a share do they have to take before
they really manipulate them. They can manipulate them without even
taking shares, But to take shares in it is taking
it to a whole new level that used to be
the province of these Third world dictatorships and communist parties
to have ownership of corporations. People in Chicago are screaming

(28:52):
for us to come, said Trump. They're wearing red hats. Yeah, yeah,
the red hatted people are screaming. I think they are
barking mad, as the British would say. They are screaming
for Trump and screaming their approval of him for whatever
he said. They're saying, please, President Trump, come to Chicago. Please.
I did a great job with the black vote, and

(29:14):
as you know, they want something to happen. So I
think Chicago will be our next stop. Then we'll help
with New York. So Maras said. The militarization of US
cities could be how Trump puts systems in place to
main contain control of presidential election processes. I think they've
got something much bigger than that. They don't care about elections.
They control the elections. Now, that's what all this jerrymandering is.

(29:38):
They pick the voters. They know in advance which of
their parties are going to win the election. And of
course they know which people are going to win, because
the Democrat and Republican parties pick who's going to run
in a particular district, so they set the district up
for their party. They picked the candidates. They keep independence

(29:58):
and third parties off the ballot, off of the debates,
and then they rig it with the voting machines to
vote by mail and you name it. They've got a
gazillion different ways to rig the vote counting. And so
this is not about the election. This is about smart
cities and how they enforce it. That's ultimately what this
is about. And this is what they've Pentagon has been

(30:19):
talking about and practicing for a long time. They were
talking about it and practicing it before they were defeated
and Afghanistan. So maybe there'll be the next fake pandemic,
or maybe it'll be some kind of a climate lockdown,
or maybe it'll be the cartels who are invaded. But
what they're doing is they're practicing rolling out literal martial law.

(30:41):
I said it a million times in twenty twenty. It
was medical martial law pushed by Trump, and now he
wants the real thing, just like we've had a so
called drug war and now he wants a real thing
with that. And the Democrats don't get it either. The
presence now of this army in Washington is going to

(31:01):
have its toll taken when the next election comes down. Well,
this is all predictive programming. A congress and judiciary will
also be growing accustomed to martial law. Start with Washington,
d C. So the congressmen and the judges and all
the bureaucrats in Washington can't get used to seeing military

(31:23):
on the streets. So I don't think anything about it
when you send them into the other areas. I mean,
it's all just it, truly is. Bill Maher was right
in the sense that he said, this is a slow
rollout of a coup. It's been this way from the
very beginning. Again, Chicago is going to be next. He's
boasting about it. And at the center of all this

(31:44):
is the little authoritarian nerd, Stephen Miller. He's at the
center of all of this federalization of the police, that's
over the top actions that they're doing, and the so
called crime crackdown. He's got his fingerprints all over it.
People in administration say, yeah, he's the guy who's running

(32:06):
this together. And of course you could look at it
as just Trump is marking his territory, and that's the
way many people on the left look at it. But
it's much much bigger than that. It is a bipartisan move.
And let me tell you that somebody like Obama, Biden
or Hillary Clinton are going to love having this kind
of power. It won't be one of the three of them,

(32:26):
but it'll be somebody who's just like them. Maybe a
conglomeration of the three.

Speaker 4 (32:33):
Maybe thinking tournament like a hydra, you know, all three
heads on one body.

Speaker 2 (32:36):
Yeah, just kind of like morphing George W. Bush and DALFREDY.
Newman from mag get Ai to give you a composite
picture of Obama, Hillary and Biden. So the Reason took
it on and said Trump's DC goon squads are an
American Well, even more importantly, it's unconstitutional. They said, the

(33:00):
president is ordering federal troops on the street. That's not
how routine policing should work, even in the nation's capol.
By the way, you know, we went for a very
very very long time in this country without police. We
had the sheriff, and the sheriff would bring together the
posse when necessary if it was something that was really big.

(33:22):
That was called the Posse commatatis. Was actually the power
of the community. And it is the Posse Commatatis Act
that Trump is violating here. But an elected sheriff and
the people, the power of the community is a very
very different approach to law enforcement to begin with, than
a police force. A police force works for the city,

(33:46):
hired by the city, controlled by the city. The police
chief is not accountable to the citizens in terms of
he's accountable to the other elected officials. But it's a
very different model. Local Street Resistance says, reason is the
occupation to the occupation was limited to a drunk guy
throwing a sandwich at a federal agent. That was when

(34:10):
they put some DEA and Ice people into Washington, c DC.
And when he threw a sandwich at these guys, they
came back later and re arrested him, overcharged him with
a felony, and re arrested him in a big public
show of force. Massed federal agents have set up an

(34:33):
unconstitutional checkpoint, violently arrested at least one delivery driver filmed
themselves tearing down a banner that protested their appearance, their
presence rather than the city. Each day, more and more
National Guard members pour into the Capitol. No institution has
been worse about violating the Constitution than the federal government

(34:54):
in its entirety, and this is just yet another example
of this. The conversation about Trump's declared crime emergency has understandably,
albeit unhealthily, provoked a lot of discourse about how safety
c is, whether a federalized local police department will make
it safer. But I would say this debate ignores the law,

(35:20):
ignores the constitution, ignores the elephant in the room, which
is that he's trying to set up martial law. It's
in a violation of the Constitution. These are powers that
were not delegated to the federal government, so therefore they
don't have them according to the ninth and tenth Amendment.
So these are begins with powers that they don't have now.

(35:41):
Reason also takes a look at the Constitution, says, well,
if we look at the Third Amendment, which for years
and years and years people said, well, the Third Amendment
is the only one that's not being violated because that
was when the British government would quarter troops into a
town or to people's homes, that type of thing. So

(36:01):
we don't have the military living in our homes. And
I said, well, in a sense, you have the NSA
living in your home. It's living in your computer. It's
violating the Fourth Amendment, where you should be secure in
your person and your property and your papers. And it's
also basically living there and using your electricity to spy

(36:24):
on you. Uniform troops and masteril agents doing routine law
enforcement at the command of the president is just not
how we do things. Said reason, that's putting it a
little bit too mild. I think we need to hate this.
I think we need to speak out against this strongly.
It's not just to say, well, traditionally, that's not the
way we've done it. These people are beginning their martial

(36:46):
law with a violation of the Constitution, just like Trump
did in twenty twenty. So this is not a situation
where we're talking about mismanners etiquette. We're not talking about
which side you put the forks on the plate. This
is the Constitution, and this is a standing army, and

(37:07):
this is a form of martial law conditioning. At the
very least, the entire point of the US Constitution is
to prevent the federal government from becoming a despotism. Said Reason.
That's true. That's true. This is why the Constitution places
strict constraints on maintaining a standing army. That's why there
are only three times mentioned in the There are only

(37:28):
three times mentioned in the Constitution, none of which would
possibly require federal agent. Three crimes, I'm sorry, none of
which would require federal agents to patrol a street in Washington,
DC or Chicago. So what they're saying is there's only
three crimes that are defined there because law enforcement was
not the purpose of the federal government. It really was
for the common defense primarily, and they were very concerned

(37:52):
that they're not be a standing army. But the army's
been standing around now since World War Two, and they've gone,
they've been sent to other countries. They stood around on
the throats of other countries as well when we were
not attacked. So we've used them, as Truman said, as
a police force. And eventually, when you use the military

(38:13):
as a police force in other countries, they're going to
be used as a police force in your own country.
That was what Madison said. He said, the instruments of
defense abroad become weapons of tyranny at home. If you're
going to have a standing army that's going to become
a global police force, that's going to be a global
police force in your town and your state. And that's

(38:36):
what Trump is now working on. I think, and it
all falls in very nicely with the technocrats, doesn't it, Travis,
They are it just keeps rolling together.

Speaker 4 (38:46):
Had a good comment here in chat someone's can't remember,
can't find it, but he said, haven't seen a normal
cop car in ten years now? They all want the
eighty thousand dollars suburbans and want to be some of
enlisted blade runner type of guy.

Speaker 2 (39:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (39:00):
It's just every single cop I've seen in my lifetime
has had this sort of aura of you know, I'm
a one man army. I'm here to you know, whatever
I say is the law. You know, it's very judged dread. Yeah,
and we're seeing this.

Speaker 2 (39:12):
They just take a look at home when the guy
that he picked for ice, I mean, he is classic that,
you know, he's got that, that's his persona.

Speaker 4 (39:20):
Absolutely yeah, And that set the stage for this. The
cops have already become so militaristic that it's we've already
moved so far in that direction that this feels like
the next logical step. Like a lot of people probably
won't even notice the difference.

Speaker 2 (39:35):
And the thing that bothers me is the conservatives are
either silent or cheering it because it's Trump. It's amazing
the control that one person can exercise over this. They
are cheering a literal standing army. Now, Third Amendment says
reason is mostly treated as an anachronistic joke today. In fact,

(39:55):
it is a load bearing part of the Constitution that
makes clear that the military and the police are different things,
and the Americans should not have to tolerate the presence
of armed agents in the States as a routine part
of daily life. Well again, police were something that was
invented in the nineteenth century. Had Robert Peel and the

(40:16):
UK created police force in London, the Bobbies, and they
were very civil for the longest time, unarmed even but
look at them today. You know. Now they're going around
arresting women for silently praying, even after they've been it's
been thrown out of the court three times, and the
police department has had to pay. Of course, they don't pay.
It's the taxpayers who pay. And they just did again

(40:39):
even though they've been slapped. They're like Colorado, where Colorado
keeps going after Baker's the same baker, you know, because
they won't custom make a transiversary cake.

Speaker 4 (40:49):
Yeah, it's probably about time for him to end up
in another lawsuit exactly.

Speaker 2 (40:54):
But yeah, that's their mission now.

Speaker 4 (40:57):
So I like the terminology, that's her load bearing part
of the soution. He's like, no, no, you can't take
that out. That's a load bearing amendment. You take that out,
the whole thing comes down on itself.

Speaker 6 (41:05):
Boss.

Speaker 4 (41:05):
We can do that.

Speaker 2 (41:06):
Yeah, well, they're doing that with the First Amendment that
definitely is a load bearing part of the Constitution and
Second Amendment as well. In his book Rise of the Warrior,
cop Radley Balco writes about how the trend of increased
political militarization has eroted quote the symbolic Third Amendment and
the free society that protects historically ironic then that, after

(41:28):
decades of politicians of both parties in DC gifting the
federal government vast powers to police the rest of the country,
that a militarized police force is now being deployed on
the streets of America's capital against its residents. I think
that is, first of all, the logical progression, but I
think it's also a predictive programming. As I said before,

(41:49):
they want these federal bureaucrats and elected officials to get
accustomed to what they're planning on doing to everybody, so
they want to put it there. The federal government acting
as a beat cop is animical to our constitutional design,
regardless of how effective its efforts are. That DC is

(42:09):
a federal district might seem to complicate the point, but
in fact it reinforces it, except that, you know, Trump
has declared his intent to do it everywhere and anywhere,
and he wants it to be seen as punishment of
his enemies. You know, that is the subtext of all
this stuff. He wants to be seen as a revenge administration,

(42:31):
even in the seat of federal power, says Reason. It's
understood that the force of federal agents policing everyday life
is not something that ordinary citizens should have to put
up with. That's absolutely true. Again another Democrat. Again, it's
only only Democrats are criticizing this, which is a thing

(42:52):
that bothers me. The most Conservatives should be up in arms.
They should be angry about this, but they're just rolling
over because it's Trump. Anybodyriticizes is Trump. It's going to
be taken down and out. That's whether you're doing it
in the media or if you're a politician, He's going
to get you out of there. Rocohanna says, the National
Guard is in DC so that Trump can stay in power. Again,

(43:14):
that's what Bill Maher said, And the Democrats see that
because the only thing the Democrats care about is power.
They don't care about the Constitution, they don't care what
happens to the citizens. It's like, oh, is this a
game so that he can beat us at the power game?
That's what it's really about. So he was asked by

(43:34):
Jonathan cape Hart an interview. He said, Congressman, let's switch
gears to the National Guard troops that are here in Washington,
also from about six or seven Republican states, and they're
going to go into nineteen different states. Tennessee's one of them.
Texas is one of them. I mean, all the Republican
states are saying, yeah, yeah, send us your send us
as standing army. We want that because Trump wants that.

(43:57):
So it's a good thing. Is threatening to replicate this
in other cities like New York, Chicago, Oakland. What do
you think they all have in common? And he says
black mayors, So is this racism? He said, It's going
to be about political power and they're going to play
the race card. Well, I just have to say that

(44:19):
there is a correlation with high crime and with black mayors.
But so what. And if you don't like what's happening
in Chicago with the dozens of people shot with gang
violence over each weekend, then get out of the place.
But the answer is not to federalize it. If the
people there want to put up with it, if they

(44:39):
want to like to corrupt and effective leadership, then let
them do that rather than setting precedents for military martial law.
And the Conservatives are pushing for this because and you
heard in that Pentagon megacities thing, they said people of
different racial and ethnic groups will be forced to live

(45:01):
with each other, pushed into conflict with each other. And
of course the coming conflict is going to be when
they crash the markets, when they take jobs with their
AI stuff. And so the Conservatives are freaking out over
this guy. Kill mar again, kill mar Garcia. They call
him Marilyn manned is what the conservatives call him. The

(45:25):
guy that Trump when he was trying to make the case,
he didn't talk about the guy's real crimes. He tried
to pretend that the guy was MS thirteen because the
tattoos on his knuckles. So What might indicate that he
was MS thirteen was that he was caught red handed
in Tennessee trafficking people. But the Trump administration doesn't really

(45:48):
care whether it's true or not. They just want to
they and it was evidenced by the phony, ridiculous narrative
that they came up with to defend their actions. Theocused
on even after you could say, well, they didn't know
that this happened. Well, the people in Tennessee star hammered this.
The fact that he was pulled over. He had eight

(46:10):
people or something in the car with him. None of
them spoke English, none of them had any idea where
American citizens, and the car belonged to another guy who
was already arrested and convicted for trafficking. So it looks like, yes,
he was cartel. Not because of the nonsense about the
tattoos on his knuckle that was easily debunked. It was

(46:31):
almost like they wanted to have an argument about this guy.

Speaker 4 (46:34):
Yeah, him being released to me is a really, really
bad thing because this is going to strengthen the position
from the right seat. It's like, well, when we give
them the option to go through the judicial process, these
people are wrong.

Speaker 2 (46:47):
That's why he's been selected as a poster child to
show we're going.

Speaker 4 (46:51):
To have to act as extra judicial.

Speaker 2 (46:53):
Yeah, exactly, yeah, no trial fandy. See what happened to Kilmar,
the Maryland man.

Speaker 4 (46:58):
We did it the right way and this is what happens,
and now you don't get me habeas corpus, that's right.

Speaker 2 (47:04):
So in terms of Chicago, actually Washington Post is talking
about the fact that the Pentagon has planning this. I
assured you the VideA there's been planning this for a
very very long time. But now they're planning specifically to
go to Chicago as part of Trump's strategy to address crime, homelessness,
and undocumented immigration, according to the Washington Post report. And

(47:26):
so we have reports that the Pentagon is planning to
go into Mexico to fight the cartels. We have reports
that Pentagon is planning to go into Chicago, but MAGA
media doesn't know, doesn't care what the implications of this are.
The mobilization is set for September. Pritzker, the governor of Illinois,

(47:48):
has received no requests, said, you received no request or
outreach from the federal government asking if assistance is needed.
They're going to send it in preemptively. House Minority Hakem
Jeffries says Trump does not have the authority to deploy
troops in Chicago. Well, he's right, so impeach him for
something that's real. I mean, they've impeached him for a

(48:10):
lot of phony stuff in the past. Now they've got
a real reason to impeach this guy the National Guard
in Chicago. But he's also set about putting it in
la and so in a thread, Prisker said that he
is using these cities quote as his testing ground for

(48:31):
authoritarian overreach. Yes, it's not about what some of these
other Democrats have said, but it is about normalization and
about testing and about training. Okay, so now we're going
to work on We're actually going to practice this. I
remember a decade ago that conservative alternative media, when I

(48:51):
was at info Wars, we were running stories all the
time because Trump not Trump Obama. Sorry, there's so much alike.
Obama was repurposing m wraps. Even had a situation where
since World War II, surplus equipment from the army was
donated to fire departments, rural fire departments because Royal fire

(49:13):
departments didn't have a big population, they didn't have a
lot of money, and they could have to deal with
really really big fires, especially because they're usually adjacent to
some federal land and the Feds don't maintain their forests.
So it was always a tradition that the military would
donate heavy equipment to these fire departments. But that was

(49:38):
right about the time that he was shoving these m
wraps on local police departments. And basically the things were
massive white elephants, and that was more than anything else.
That was what stopped that program. Had a lot of
sheriffs are saying, you know, the contract was that the
Pentagon maintained ownership of it. They just put it there

(49:58):
and then put the expense maintaining it on the local
police force. Andy said, we don't have the money to
do this because those things were rushed into the Iraq
War and they were a maintenance nightmare. And so it
was I saw it as a forward positioning by the
Obama administration. We got to put off equipment there, We'll
have the local people maintain it at their expense, and

(50:19):
then it'll be there when we want to roll out
the military in some kind of an emergency. So we
were pushing back against that, and in terms of the
fire stuff that had a happy ending because the local
fire departments are mostly volunteer firemen, and these people were
politically active and they started they got very politically active

(50:40):
with their elected representatives and senators pushed back on this
pretty hard, and they stopped it. About a month after
they declared that they were going to terminate that program,
they turned around and said, no, we're going to continue it.
But we're not seeing that kind of pushback now. And
we were talking all the time about this, That's why

(51:00):
I knew about this video. We were talking all the
time about the militarization of the police and what is
Obama up to. But now that there's Trump, not a
peep from Alex Shows, not a peep from Info Wars
or Breitbart or anybody else. If they say anything, they
cheer it. And the biggest things I can't even believe
that that John Birch Society. Hey, any of you people

(51:20):
out there in John Birch Society, tell them, I said,
so you guys have lost your spine. Wake up, wake up,
sick of this stuff, Prisker said, after using LA and Washington,
DC's testing ground for authoritarian overreach. Trump is now openly
flirting with the idea of taking over states and cities.

(51:41):
Breitbart said Trump explained to an announcement in the Oval
Office about the FIFA World Cup, drawing that after his
administration finishes cracking down on crime the nation's capital, it'll
go after another location. And they don't push back against that.
This is Breitbart, So they don't push back against it.
They don't say that that's wrong. So you've got people.

(52:04):
We're in big trouble, folks. When the only people who
are going to speak out against martial law are people
like Pritzk or Rokuhanna and other Democrats, We're in big trouble.
We're in big trouble. These the Posse Commatatis Act, says Breitbart,
prohibits the use of armed forces to execute laws, accepting cases,

(52:27):
especially authorized by Congress or a constitutional act. That's right.
It's a violation of the Constitution. It's a violation of the
ninth and tenth Amendment. It's a violation of the Third Amendment.
It's a violation of the Posse Comittatis Act, and on
and on and on. But it's Trump, so it's all okay.
And the response from Children's Sealth Defense so as regulartors

(52:51):
have to tell the public that digital IDs will be
voluntary and optional, they get rid of the digital IDs,
especially the biometric stuff. So they're pushing back and saying,
you know, we can see all this stuff happening. We
can see it roll out. We can see that the
federal government are turning into literal Nazis.

Speaker 5 (53:11):
So are they saying that regulators must tell the public
the digital IDs must be voluntary in order to get
them passed through, then they can make the mandatory. Yeah, exactly,
they must tell them that or else it will never happen.

Speaker 2 (53:23):
Well, yeah, we all know how that works out. I
mean we've seen you know, real ID was kind of
a slow rollout, and eventually it becomes mandatory for certain things.
We had everify and of course that you had to
get the federal government to verify that you're really American
citizen before you can get a job. Well, that was
voluntary until you had Republican states like Florida start to

(53:45):
make it mandatory. They said, Children's Health Defense requests that
the that NISS publish a formal FAQ to confirm your
department is committed to emphasizing the voluntary nature of digital
ID meaning nothing in the new NIST guidance should be
construed to require biometric identification. Well, they don't understand that

(54:08):
digital ID was never intended to be voluntary, and especially
the biometric and facial stuff. And that's what's rolling out
now at the TSA. Remember that was voluntary. You want
to get to your plane with less hassle and quicker,
just sign up for our voluntary program. Now it's facial
ID is mandatory. Everywhere you could see that coming. This

(54:29):
is the way these people operate. Let's not be naive
about it. They said. This is clearly moving towards digital
wallets and biometric keys that will make it harder for
Americans to access their online accounts, email, bank, everything online,
and less Americans provide biometric identifiers, face scan, thumbprint. This
is going to happen and you won't be able to travel,

(54:51):
You won't be able to get out of your little
fifteen minute area, you won't be able to use your
money if you're geolocated outside the area that you're allowed
to be, and they will have gate keepers like the TSA.
You know, we talk about federal police. Let's not forget
the TSA. That's essentially what they are. I really resent that,
and it's just amazing to me that we don't care anymore.

(55:13):
And look at what the US military did in Afghanistan.
I remember there was a freak out towards the end
of it. They had the US military and Afghanistan had
a box that they took around and they used that
to do immediate biometric facial identity on people, and it
had database that it was associated with, so they could

(55:37):
pull people up just like that. And they're worried about
it because they lost track of one of these boxes
and they said, oh no, now the bad guy is
the Taliban. Can use this to identify our people, right,
they can use that as a counter thing, and they
can show that if it shows up, you know, they
point at somebody's face and it'll tell them if it's
one of our guys or not, if this Afghan has

(55:59):
been friendly to us. That was one of the things
that was an impetus to try to get as many
Afghans here as possible when the whole thing collapsed. So
the military has been working on this for a long time.
Just like peer Palateer first cut its teeth on helping
the military to create surveillance states and areas that our

(56:21):
standing army had taken over and was standing on the
people's throats. And as I said, you know, it's the
instruments of war that we use abroad become instruments of
tyranny here at home. Biometric identification, all the rest of stuff.
That's what it's truly about.

Speaker 1 (58:11):
Making sense common. Again, you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (58:25):
Well, let's get to what's happening at the CDC. And again,
Susan Monarez, who I had no love for. This is
somebody is who has been in the darkest corners of
this public health dictatorship for the longest time, very concerned
about her appointment, so much so that I thought, this
is a plan, you know, to put this other guy

(58:47):
up that MAGA would like, who is something of a
vaccine skeptic, and then pull the rug out from underneath
him as he's on his way to his confirmation hearings,
and he was going to toe the line with him,
but they pulled the rug on him, and they put
this woman in who has been at the top of
the deep state for the longest time, and places like ARPA,

(59:08):
h like DARPA, but for health and other issues like that,
pushing mRNA and artificial intelligence, which was near and dear
to Trump's heart. But it appears that there was something
of a personal disagreement between her and RFK Junior after
he had showered massive praise on her when she was

(59:30):
first put in. I mean, you look at her background,
and it's like, how could you say anything nice about
her background and her career. The White House and Department
of HHS, which oversees CDC, did not immediately respond to
requests for comments. The officials spoke in the condition of
anonymity to discuss a sensitive personnel matter. Trump had nominated Monarez,

(59:52):
a longtime federal government scientist, put the scientists in their
quotes after withdrawing his first pick, former Republican Congressman Dave Weldon,
who was criticized for his views on vaccines and autism.
Monarez was confirmed in July. She had scheduled an agency
wide call on Monday, but that was canceled on Friday.

(01:00:14):
According to several CDC employees that spoken condition of anonymity,
they mentioned that over and over again, that's the Washington Post,
and she wasn't the only one who left. Others followed
her and Apparently what happened was she was called to
DC and to talk to RFK Junior, and he said,
I've got some people here that I want you to fire.

(01:00:35):
She refused to fire them, so he fired her, and
then some of these other people have walked out in sympathy.
Her departure was quickly followed by the resignation of several
high level veteran agency officials, leaving the CDC leaderless. At
a perilous time, says CNN. Perilous time. They got something

(01:00:56):
planned for us. I say, good riddance, get rid of
them all, get rid of the entire CDC.

Speaker 4 (01:01:03):
We'll take our chances with the peril.

Speaker 2 (01:01:05):
Yes, the CDC.

Speaker 5 (01:01:06):
Do you feel so unsafe knowing that the viruses are
coming and we have no CDC director to stand between
them and us?

Speaker 2 (01:01:13):
Yeah, the contagion direct place. But the CDC has for
the longest time been a big seller of vaccines, making
a lot of money out of it. It's this quasi government,
quasi private thing, and they wear a military unit. It's
a cesspool of an example of everything that's wrong with
Washington federal government. The whole thing should go. Morale, which

(01:01:36):
is already low after deep staff cuts this spring plummeted
after a gunman open fire on the agency's main campus
on August eighth. Evidently that's what they're referring to seeing
in a perilous time. This person shot up to the
building and just took shots from a long distance away,

(01:01:57):
just had the building, shot up the building. He didn't
shoot anybody that was there.

Speaker 4 (01:02:00):
I'm pretty sure he killed a cop, if memory service
wasn't that one of the ones that happened.

Speaker 2 (01:02:05):
Was that in case the cop engagement.

Speaker 4 (01:02:08):
I think he killed one cop and then was killed
by the others, if memory serve.

Speaker 2 (01:02:11):
But he was angry at the CDC for the Trump
shot and kind of a metaphor for MAGA. Right, We're
going to take our anger out on a building instead
of the people actually produced the bio weapon. And he's
probably a Trump supporter as well, but he doesn't really
understand who's responsible. So HHS said in a post. Susan

(01:02:34):
Monarez is no longer director of the CDC. We thank
her for her dedicated service to the American people. Yeah,
thank you, thanks a lot for what you did. RFK
Junior has full confidence in his team the CDC, who
will continue to be vigilant in protecting Americans against infectious
diseases at home and abroad. Let me just say, you know,

(01:02:57):
when we look at the CDC, these vaccines and the
virus says, I can't recommend highly enough and they need
to get them back on. The Bailey's and Samantha Bailey
and her husband I can't remember his first name. I
remember her name because she goes by Sam Bailey. She's
not a Trenee. But they wrote a book, No More Pandemics,

(01:03:19):
And if you understand just how shaky the entire quote
unquote science of virology is, how unproven all of their
assumptions are, there will be no more pandemics because the
pandemics are something that does not reflect reality but reflects
their statements on public health controllers. Monreez's attorneys just.

Speaker 4 (01:03:43):
To let people know the interview you did with the
Bailey's is called silencing dissent. Doctor Sam Bailey's license ripped
fortifying covid lies. At least that's one of them that
you did.

Speaker 2 (01:03:52):
Yes, I should get them back on though, because things
are always being updated. Montreez's attorneys said in a statement
doctor has neither resigned nor received notification from the White
House that she has been fired and as a person
of integrity and devoted to science, she will not resign.
So what's going on with this? Now you've got people

(01:04:13):
that Trump is getting rid of or RFK Junior that
she works for, supposedly Again, I wonder if she's going
to make the case, well, we're a private agency. You
can't fire me like the Federal Reserve, because it is,
like I said, this kind of quasi public, quasi private institution,
which is one hundred percent outside of the Constitution. So

(01:04:35):
they refer to her throughout the CNN article as departed
as then dearly departed, I guess shortly after Monarez's departure
was confirmed Wednesday. So she's not resigned. She says, she's
not been fired, but she has departed. Three other top

(01:04:55):
SEC officials also announced that they were leaving. The agency's
chief Medical Officer and Deputy Director of Programs and Science, CDC.
Elener exactly, the director of the National Center for Immunization
and Respiratory Diseases and the director of the National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. Well, there you go.

(01:05:16):
We are at a perilous time. We're open to a
zombie apocalypse any day now.

Speaker 4 (01:05:21):
No, not the zombie apocalypse. It'll be so cringe. Those
went out of style in like two thousand and nine.

Speaker 2 (01:05:30):
Did you say something, Lanz.

Speaker 5 (01:05:33):
Anyway, for the good dearly departed CDC.

Speaker 2 (01:05:36):
Director, Yes, exactly, for the good of the nation and
the worldl the science at CDC should never be censored
or subject to political pauses and interpretations, one person said
in his resignation email to staff that was shared with CNN.
Just think about the hypocrisy, the rank hypocrisy, and that

(01:05:57):
for the good of the nation of the world, nobody
was allowed to talk about either their imaginary pandemic or
their real bioweapon that they were going to be the
main sellers of. They have the audacity to say that,
you know, we are science and we're going to shut
you up. Vaccines save lives. This is indisputable. No, it's
not well established scientific facts, she said. But actually they

(01:06:21):
should put she lied. Informed consent and shared decision making
must focus not only on the risk informed consent. This
is the first time I've ever seen anybody at the
CDC mentioned informed consent, but also the true life saving
benefits that vaccines provide to individuals and communities have saved

(01:06:42):
the life of the community. That's whole idea behind public health.
We don't care about you. You're just a member of
the herd, and the herd needs immunity. As I've said before,
that's just an abstraction to control you. It's ultimately about
the individual. If the individuals and the herd are not healthy,
then the herd is not healthy. If they don't have

(01:07:04):
immunity to a disease, then the herd cannot acquire immunity
to the disease. And if your vaccines convey immunity, you
wouldn't have to hit people with them multiple times. Except
it's about profit, which we're going to see here in
a moment. The while it's an important to question and
analyze research, this must be done only by experts with

(01:07:25):
the right skills and experience. Trust with us where the authorities.
That is the antithesis of the scientific method. So don't
talk about science and say only experts can investigate this stuff.
If you can explain it to a lay person, you
don't understand it, and they don't even want to try
to explain it to a lay person. Just you do

(01:07:46):
it because I say so. It's an argument from authority,
from academia.

Speaker 4 (01:07:50):
It's truly amazing how utterly ineffectual so many allegedly highly
educated people are at explaining anything to the normal person.
They are completely and utterly only capable of thinking about
in terms of their own jargon.

Speaker 2 (01:08:04):
Yeah, that's right, which means that they don't really understand
the issue. If they could understand it, they could explain
it to an eight year old, or.

Speaker 4 (01:08:10):
They're specifically rapid it in jargon that you don't understand
to keep you from being able to understand it.

Speaker 2 (01:08:17):
Yeah, explain it to me, lady, like I'm an eight
year old. And then tell me about the tests that
you have run on these things to test their safety,
to test their efficacy. Tell me about how you isolated
the virus. Oh, that's why you didn't isolate it, did you.
So people are being supposedly inoculated against something that they
haven't even isolated and identified properly according to scientific methods

(01:08:40):
of observation. Hourly then said that misinformation has already cost lives,
signing a record high number of measles cases in the
US this year. Well, nobody died with measles. Yeah, not
even the two cases that they mislabeled as deaths from measles.
Those have been debunked as a lie. But even if
those were true, two people from the most and they

(01:09:02):
continually said that measles the most contagious disease we have anywhere. Well,
if that's the case, why didn't we have a global
pandemic Once it raised its head again? It was very
localized and small in terms of the spread. It didn't
go over the entire country. And I think about that,
we have the most contagious disease according to them, and
yet you know, we had Trump's HHS Pharmaceuticals are alex

(01:09:28):
a Zar who declared a pandemic for the entire United
States after they had about two or three they said cases,
whether they were real or not. And yet that did
not that supposedly quickly spread throughout the entire country. And
yet measles is supposed to be more contagious and didn't
spread throughout the entire country. And you had two people,

(01:09:49):
but they alleged died. That has been completely debunked by
the families, by doctors who were in attendance. But even
if that were true, look at the millions, tens of
millions of people that have been killed by their vaccines,
killed by their ventilators, and all their pandemic measures that
have happened. There's a lot more people just in the

(01:10:11):
last year that continue to be killed by the ongoing
knock on side effects of these bioweapons, as well as
the boosters that they continue to.

Speaker 4 (01:10:22):
Get, or probably just about any drug that they bring
to market. I would be surprised if there is any
drug that is sold that you need a prescription for
that does not kill more than two people.

Speaker 2 (01:10:34):
That's right, yeah, or do unbelievable harm to people that
they don't warn you about. Talk to me about informed consent.
What cynical liars.

Speaker 4 (01:10:43):
These people at Lance? Real quick? Do you think you
would rather get the measles or go through what you
went through with the antibiotic again ziprobe based.

Speaker 5 (01:10:53):
We need a black label for measles?

Speaker 2 (01:10:56):
Yeah? Well yeah, The issue is that they had a
black label on that drug, and you had a doctor
who casually prescribed that, like he's given somebody docs a
cyclone or something. Yeah, here you go whatever, Yeah, but
he didn't inform you about the parting from the doctor
or from the pharmacist. Now it is untenable to serve

(01:11:17):
an organization that has not afforded the opportunity to discuss
decisions of scientific and public health importance released under the
Moniker of CDC, said one of the people who resigned.
The lack of communication by HHS and other CDC political
leadership that culminates in social media posts announcing major policy
changes without prior notice demonstrates a disregard of normal communication

(01:11:41):
channels and common sense. Having to retrofit analyzes and policy
actions to match inadequately thought out announcements is Poorly scripted
videos or pagelong exposts should not be how organizations function.
And yet that is exactly what they did. When their
own internal tests started showing the link to autism, they
went back and changed it all right, and to cover

(01:12:04):
it up, they said, we're responsible for the health of the people,
and that's not the way that we should function. No,
you're not responsible for our help. You're responsible for the
diseases that are afflicting us in epidemic proportions. The real
epidemic is autism. And you don't even want to talk
about that. You don't want to show the research that
you've done. You've spun that and lied about that. And

(01:12:28):
the one thing that gets the Senator Cassidy and these
other people who are covering from the vaccine industry. You
even talk about doing some research on why we have
an epidemic of autism, and these people go ballistic. They
don't want you to even look at that. That shows
their hand right there. If they had any concern about

(01:12:48):
health the people, they would want to know what's causing this.
But they want to shut down all research into autism.
It's kind of like the smoking gun of a murderer.
I think when you see that. So the director of
the Office of Public Health, Data, Surveillance and Technology also
left the CDC on Wednesday, said our agency is crumbling. Good.

(01:13:09):
You should all go to jail. Set a source within CDC.
All of our top people who kept us protected are
being taken out by this new administration from twisting science
for their agenda. Sciences, data and facts. We're simple people
that way. We trust numbers and facts. I don't trust
any of the facts. So called facts are numbers from

(01:13:31):
these twisted liars. I tell you the total projection of
these people, it's amazing. It came soon after Kennedy summoned
Monaredz to Washington, demanded that you fire these people that
I've just been reading clips from. According to two people
familiar with the matter, she refused angering Kennedy and triggering
his move to remove her. He should have fired her

(01:13:53):
from the very beginning, but instead he praised her when
she was put in place. Monareds also clashed with Kenny
and his team over vaccine policies, including an impending announcement
they could draw links between immunization and autism. They are
preparing this RFK Junior is kind of preparing the public
hinting that it's something external to the kids that is

(01:14:16):
causing autism. In other words, is not some kind of
a genetic defect or anything. And of course everybody knows
that when you look at something that is exploded like that.
And Trump has echoed that they're going to be revealing
that sometime in September, so we'll see what's actually said
about that. CDC's kept it hidden for decades. They should
be punished for the epidemic of autism. Think about how

(01:14:36):
they have harmed people with this. It is truly amazing.
I keep thinking back to that case here in Tennessee
where the judge decided that these two kids in a
divorce case that all the kids need to be caught
up on their vaccines, and one of the kids who
had the most severe reaction to it is now has
fully grown child now has to be kept in a

(01:14:59):
diaper all the time, and his father has to take
care of him and support the kids because a mother
who vaccinated them in order to get custody then abandoned
them after this child got that severe autism.

Speaker 4 (01:15:10):
Well, probably taking the children is more about getting back
at the dad than it was ever about her desire
to actually take care of the children. And as such,
you know she.

Speaker 2 (01:15:19):
Got what you wanted.

Speaker 4 (01:15:20):
Yeah, real quick, before we move on, there's a comment
here from Brandon Grateful Baptist. I have it here on
the my screen says, I agree with a lot of
what you say, but I'm on medications. Unfortunately. I truly
exhausted every way I could, but I have to pay
rent and I'm in a great deal of physical pain
every moment of every day. Please pray for me. So
I just wanted to make sure that we got that. Yes,
so please do pray for Brandon Grateful Baptist. Again. Once

(01:15:44):
you've exhausted everything else, there may not be any other
options for what you need than some pharmaceuticals. I think again,
you should be able to make that choice. It should
be an informed decision. If there's something out there, even
if the consequences, even with the side effects are really bad,
may not be as bad as what you're dealing with,
and you should be allowed to make that decision for yourself.

Speaker 2 (01:16:06):
Well, you know, going back for many years, you know,
when you look at the cancer industry and the pain
and the nausea that they put people through with chemotherapy
and things like that, I always felt that if somebody
wanted to take a chance on some new drug hoping
that it's going to be a miracle, they should be
allowed to do that or in a terminal situation, and

(01:16:27):
if there's something that they know they can help them
in terms of nausea, like medical marijuana was rumored to be,
they should be able to do that without fear of
going to jail. I remember the case of Peter McWilliams,
who was he was an LGBT activist that was in
the Libertarian Party and he got AIDS and he found

(01:16:50):
that the only thing that could keep him from throwing
up constantly was medical marijuana, and he wrote about it publicly,
and so they made a public example of him. Judge
through him in jail, and so that he could not
get access to marijuana, and he died on his own
vombit in the jail cell. And that's you know, that's

(01:17:12):
that's the drug war for you.

Speaker 4 (01:17:14):
That's the government nothing but murdering.

Speaker 2 (01:17:19):
Yes, I'm not going to judge you or anybody for
the medications that you take. That is a personal decision
that you should be free to make on that. And
I will pray for you and you know, explore all
the different spiritual issues with this, whatever it is that
you are dealing with. There may be some help that

(01:17:40):
is there as well. So because God is ultimately the
one who heals, who gives us life. So they said
in their comments here, they said, when CDC Director Susan
Monrez refused to rubber stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire
dedicated health experts, she chose protecting the public overserving a

(01:18:02):
political agenda. This is not about one official, and it's
about the systematic dismantling of public health institutions, the silence
scene of experts, and the dangerous politicization of science. So,
according to CNN.

Speaker 5 (01:18:15):
Protecting these bureaucrats from the consequences of their actions is
somehow protecting public health, serving public health over the bureaucracy,
when she's literally serving the bureaucracy.

Speaker 2 (01:18:28):
Yeah, I can confidently say that people have had mixed
results from pharmaceutical drugs, but I can confidently say nobody
has been helped by vaccine. Right, nobody has been helped
by that they supposedly. Even if they were right and
they stopped measles, I had measles as a child. It's

(01:18:51):
no big deal, and it's not worth the side effects
to have stuff directly injected into your veins. That is
something that you ought to think about. When God designed
the body, he did not design it to have things
directly injected into your veins. And that's a very serious thing.
You know, You've got a lot of different levels of
protection in your body, the skin, when you breathe in

(01:19:13):
through your nose and other things like that to filter
out stuff. But this is when they put something into
your veins. There's nothing there, there's no bodily system that's
there to really help you with that. You're very vulnerable
and they take advantage of that.

Speaker 4 (01:19:28):
Yeah, there's also the fact that you can take steps
to mitigate your exposure to you know, I don't believe
in like I said, don't believe in viruses. But whatever
it is that might make you sick, you know, whether
it's bacteria, you can mitigate the risk when it comes
to colds and other things like that. There's nothing you
can do to mitigate the risk of a vaccine once
it's in the system.

Speaker 2 (01:19:50):
It's just it's.

Speaker 4 (01:19:51):
Playing Russian Roulette and you don't know how it's going
to turn out.

Speaker 2 (01:19:55):
That's right. So we've had Paddy Murray, who is a
Senator from Washington in state. She's weighing in on this
to courssi's RCA junior Trump administration. But Monreez was Principal
Deputy Director and acting director of the CDC from January
to March. She has a PhD in microbiology and immunology,
but she is not a medical doctor. She just plays

(01:20:18):
one at the CDC. This is somebody who pushed artificial
intelligence and mRNA. That's why I'm kind of surprised by
this because she seemed to fit the pattern of what
Trump and his billionaire investors really want, and I thought
she was there to it may be that there was
just a personal conflict between her and RFKA Junior, and
these other people are moving out because they're on her side.

(01:20:42):
Montrez's tenure in government spans Republican and Democrat administrations. Before
coming to the CDC, she was Deputy director for Advanced
Research Projects Agency for Help That's ARPA H and was
founding director of the Center for Innovation at Health Resources
and Services Imistration. She held other leadership positions at the

(01:21:02):
Department of Homeland Security and the Biomedical Advanced Research Development
Authority BARDA. That's what I'm saying. She has the deep
state pandemic written all over her. A very dangerous person.
And whoever got her U and these to be exposed?
Where's Laura Lumi when right, come on, Laura do it.

Speaker 4 (01:21:27):
Maybe you know, maybe she was just too old and
unattractive for Trump. Maybe he's just gonna start staffing the
entire government with nothing, but you know, like attractive, young blonde. Yeah,
he has old she's old, gotta go, gotta go, she's old.

Speaker 2 (01:21:39):
He had this very uncomfortable eye rolling moment in his
three hour live TV cabinet meeting the other day where
you start talking about how attractive he thought Pam Bondi
was and everybody's like, ooh, it's awkward.

Speaker 5 (01:21:56):
That explains why she has her child.

Speaker 2 (01:22:00):
Yeah, oh she looked great. Hire her. Yeah. The day
of her swearing in, Kennedy had said that Monreez had
unimpeachable scientific credentials. No, she should have been impeached based
on her LinkedIn profile. So if you look at it,
it's nothing but a list of the usual suspected organizations.

Speaker 5 (01:22:20):
If he's talking about like blackmail material, you could not
impeach this person. They can't even fire her. That's how
connected she is.

Speaker 2 (01:22:27):
Yeah. Yeah, CNN and the Democrats establishment are just freaked
out about this, and you have to take some chadenfreud
out of that. Frady years, said former director Tom Frieden.
For eighty years, CDC has been a beacon of health
protection for the US and the world. That beacon is

(01:22:48):
now engrave changer of being extinguished, please, endangering all of
our health eroting health protection capacity at the top further
undermines trust at a time when it is most needed.
If these reports are true, the firing of Susan Monterez
represents a very dangerous turn for American health. Yeah. Letting

(01:23:08):
people get away from some of these vaccines. If the
CDC director was fired because she would not embrace Kennedy's
lies about vaccines, we truly have entered a dangerous time
for US health and security. The possibility are limitless. They said, Well,
what he did was he changed the framework for this,
and the bottom line is that, like I said, I

(01:23:34):
suspected when I first saw this on Twitter, and I
respond to it yesterday, I said, I think this is
all a headfake and deception. And the more I look
at it, the more convinced I am. That's the case.
The FDA rescinded emergency use authorization for COVID nineteen vaccines. Yet, folks,
the bio weapon poison is not banned. It's still out there,

(01:23:55):
as Kenny said, for people who want it, well, who
wants it? The people and lied to who have been gasled.
It's like saying we're going to let people have training
surgery if they want it. Okay, this is the same
equivalent to it. The emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines,
once she used to justify broad mandates on the general
public during the Bid administration, is now rescinded. Well, if

(01:24:18):
you go back and look at what happened with the
emergency Use authorization was really to get them a liability
protection of the PREP Act. And I remember when I
interviewed the individual from Children's Health Defense, her name was Meyer,
and she said, they want to get disapproved and put
into the children's schedule because if they can get it

(01:24:40):
put into the children's schedule, then their legal immunity is
conveyed via this nineteen eighty six Childhood Vaccine Act. And
so they were able to do that. They didn't really
need to have the emergency Use authorization anymore. There's this
overlap there. But he said I promised four things, to

(01:25:00):
end the COVID vaccine mandates, to keep vaccines available to
people who want them, especially the vulnerable, to demand placebo
controlled trials from companies, and for to end the emergency
in a series of FDA actions. Today we accomplished all
four goals. That's not true at all. I mean, we

(01:25:20):
still don't have any placebo controlled trials from companies. And
this emergency use authorization it's not the same as the
decoration of the emergency that was done by the prior
HHS guy. Maybe that's what he did. Maybe he removed
that executive ward that was put in there by the

(01:25:42):
alex Azar But nevertheless, they're still making these vaccines available.
And I've played this for you once before, but let
me just it was a movie that I saw that
I thought had a really striking scene. Always remember this scene.
And this is a housewild life. He's kind of going nuts,

(01:26:02):
and at one point she goes to the family dog
and she tells him, I'm putting some poison in your milk.
If I were you, I wouldn't drink it. But she
puts it right in front of him. And that's the
analogy I think of what RFK and these other people
are doing when they say, well, I wouldn't recommend that
you get this mRNA stuff, but if you want it,
you can get it.

Speaker 1 (01:26:23):
I know you're a very wise dog, and the wise
must know how to make decisions.

Speaker 2 (01:26:30):
I'm going to put poison in your milk.

Speaker 1 (01:26:36):
Whatever you do is up.

Speaker 2 (01:26:37):
To you informed consent. She told him you can drink
it or you can leave it alone. Whatever you do,
it's your decision.

Speaker 5 (01:27:00):
Wait a bit, wasn't their statement had been.

Speaker 2 (01:27:02):
Removed from the milk. Yeah, that, folks, is what these
people are doing, and I think it's as reprehensible as
that scene is. So yeah, I promise people if you

(01:27:24):
want them, if you want them, you can get them,
especially the vulnerable people.

Speaker 4 (01:27:27):
This scene implies that the average American is not as
intelligent as a basket hound.

Speaker 2 (01:27:31):
Yes, that's right, one of the dumbest dogs out there.
And I can say that as since we had two
basket hounds at one point. We decided to go the
other direction with Scout and we got a border call a.

Speaker 4 (01:27:42):
Bit too smart for his own good.

Speaker 2 (01:27:44):
He is he is. He's almost autistic in the way
that he gets fixated on something. You can get very
destructive of that. But anyway, the FDA has now issued
marketing authorization for those at higher risk. They can get
five or novavax or moidernam. These vaccines are available for
all patients who choose them after consulting with their doctors,

(01:28:07):
who won't be honest enough to tell you, as she
told that bassett hound, there's poison in here. I wouldn't
take this if I were you, but it's up to you.
They won't tell you that there's poison in the milk.
The American people demanded science, safety, and common sense, and
this framework delivers all three. That is total bs from
Rfgate Junior. You know, yeah, just for those who want them.

(01:28:31):
And so he's approving these vaccines, but he's putting them
there with restrictions for age. So those he says they've
been approved for adults who are aged sixty five or
older and for those who are between the ages of
five and sixty four who have at least one underlying
condition that puts them at high risk. So this is

(01:28:54):
the game that they played at the very beginning, where
if you have if you're somebody that's sixty five were older,
if you die from their vaccines, they can claim that
it wasn't their vaccines, it was your age or underlying conditions.
And that's the reason I believe that they're also making
it available to the people between the ages of five
and sixty four is to protect the vaccine companies who

(01:29:17):
already have legal immunity. But they don't want the public
to see that they're killing people these vaccines. They'd love
to get rid of the people sixty five and older
save on social Security, and that's where they started with
this whole fake pandemic in the first place. So Americans
who are six months and older, those who are twelve
years and older can get the Novavax machine. If you're

(01:29:39):
six months or older, you can get MODERNA. Twelve years
in older can get novavacs. Healthy children under eighteen will
be able to receive a COVID nineteen abomination. The American
Academy of Pediatricians says that limiting the availability of shots
for kids is deeply troubling. This is about nothing other

(01:29:59):
than money, folks, Because one of the things that CNN
and the mainstream media is saying is that by changing
the approval stuff for this, if somebody wants to get it,
if somebody really wants to get it, they can get it,
but they're going to have to pay for it out
of their own pocket because the insurance companies now will
not cover it if it's not put into the schedule

(01:30:21):
by the CDC. And they said it can cost one
hundred and forty dollars per shot. Think about how many
boosters they put out there. No wonder these pharmaceutical executives
all became billionaires overnight, and that was because Trump gave
them the money to ramp up their production, gave them
the liability protection so they couldn't be sued for anything,

(01:30:44):
and then paid them one hundred and forty dollars is shot.
And that's why they're still pushing this stuff because they
get paid so much money. And the pediatricians are pushing
this as well, and the Academy of Pediatrics, this money hungry,
ruthless guild that doesn't care what harm they do. They
are getting tens of millions of dollars contributed to them

(01:31:07):
by pharmaceutical company and by government grants to continue to
browbeat people into getting these shots. So that's that's the
real way that they made a killing, not just in
the literal killing of people, but they've made a killing financially.
One hundred and forty dollars a shot. The vaccine companies

(01:31:28):
are making out like murdering bandits that they are, and
so the pediatricians. It's amazing.

Speaker 4 (01:31:35):
As a general rule, the bandits didn't leave you crippled
or destroyed for life. They would just take what you
had on you in the moment.

Speaker 2 (01:31:43):
Yeah, these people take your money and your life. And
you know, the one hundred and forty dollars per shot,
I've never seen that figure before until these people complain
now about the fact that the government and the insurance
companies are not going to be paying for that. You're
going have to pay for it out of your own pocket.
How are we going to kill the poor people? American

(01:32:03):
College of Obsietricians and Gynecologists are also pushing the COVID
vaccine and hopping mad that's not going to be paid
for by government and by insurance. And the obstetricians are
pushing this for pregnant women. They said, they're got to
have this schedule changed so that pregnant women can get

(01:32:24):
this at any point during pregnancy, when they're planning to
become pregnant or when they are lactating. Always, until I
guess maybe about six years before this nonsense began, they
would always tell pregnant women, women who were breastfeeding, they
would tell them do not take a vaccine. But now

(01:32:44):
they push it specifically for pregnant women. That tells you
just how ruthless this planned eugenics thing is really.

Speaker 4 (01:32:54):
Yeah, when my wife was pregnant, they continually were pushing
one vaccine another, Oh, you should really get this, you
should get that. The the whooping cough vaccine was one
that they continually kept turying and be like, well, we've
got a new version of it. And it's better at
passing on the immunity to the child. Just I don't
want anything that is going to be passed on. It'd

(01:33:17):
be bad enough if it was just going to you know,
you were going to inject my wife and it was
going to stay there. But the fact that it's going
to reach the embryo, it's going to reach the child. No,
I don't want you doing that at all.

Speaker 2 (01:33:29):
Well, this is why we have seen the massive numbers
of uh, you know, miscarriages and things like that, and
and children that have died after their mother's I remember
at the very beginning of this insanity, they had a
a doctor who had just given birth and she was
going to be at the front of the line. You
get a COVID shot, her child died, and you know

(01:33:53):
it's it's for all the people who think that Donald
Trump is pro life and he saved us from rov Wade.
I wonder how many millions of people he's personally responsible for,
how many millions of babies he's responsible for the death
of because of the shot. Globally, he's probably killed more
people directly than Bill Gates has the FDA approved updated.

(01:34:18):
I mean, that's the thing. You look at Bill Gates.
All these people rightfully blamed Bill Gates because the money
that he gave Planned Parenthood and so forth and so
on in the cover that he gave them. What about
when the president gives money to Pfizer Moderna. What about
when the president does a massive pr campaign and pressure
on everybody that you can't live your life unless you

(01:34:38):
get the vaccine? Is he as responsible for the deaths
of babies with these abortions and miscarriages because of these
COVID vaccines? As Bill Gates says, no wonder. They've met
many times privately, they've got a great deal in common.
It's a shift from previous policies that used to broadly
recommend COVID shots. So they're playing the recommendationation games. Do

(01:35:01):
we recommend it or not recommend it. That's the big
difference between the Republicans and Democrats recommending it, right, and
so that's supposed to be a virtue. We don't recommend it,
we don't mandate it. We just manufacted pay the government
to the pharmaceutical companies to manufacture it, and we tell
the insurance companies they should do it. And that's the

(01:35:22):
big difference between they won't stop. Neither one of them
will stop the poison.

Speaker 5 (01:35:26):
It makes me think of the whole thing about how
modernat failed to get a single product to market before
this warp speed thing, and ignoring all of the laws
that they had in place to prevent these horror these
horrific side effects from these unsafe medications.

Speaker 2 (01:35:44):
Yes, but they got the.

Speaker 5 (01:35:47):
Emergency authorization, so they just were able to ignore.

Speaker 2 (01:35:50):
All that that's right or in existence. For a decade,
never could get anything approved, even with the lax rules
of the FDA. They had one story after the other.
We've got an mRNA injection that's going to fix this
or fix that.

Speaker 4 (01:36:08):
It's like losing a case after you've bribed the judge.

Speaker 2 (01:36:11):
Yeah, yeah. And then so they've got this miracle RNA.
I guess what the mRNA stands for. And they had
one thing after the other. They sold the story on
Wall Street. Everybody bought their stock. And it turned out
the story was just a pump and dump because when
anybody took a look at it said, everybody's dying from
this stuff. It's like Gilead and the rim does of air.

(01:36:33):
They tried to sell that for every wave of so
called pandemics. They tried to do it for ebola, they
tried to do it for AIDS and all the rest
of this stuff. Their patent was about to expire, so
FASCI bought stock in them and pumped it.

Speaker 4 (01:36:47):
And one of the most horrifying things to think about
is that the pharm of bro Martin Skrelly might be
the most honest person involved in the pharmaceutical industry.

Speaker 2 (01:36:55):
Yeah, that's right. At least he tells you that it's
all about money. He doesn't care what happens to you.
So yeah, they want to talk about it being the
so called new framework where they only go for the
sick and elderly, because then they can say that it
wasn't their poison bioweapon that killed them. So, as I
said on Twitter, I said, I think removing this emergency

(01:37:18):
use authorization is a trick. The bioweapon poison from Trump
needs to be banned, and after they approved it for
the children, it got the legal immunity that comes with
the nineteen eighty six Act on Children's Vaccines. Removing the
eway does not stop the vaccines from being used. It
doesn't even take away their immunity from lawsuits and people

(01:37:41):
who want it. Who been gas lit with lies can
still be given it. I believe that it's a headfake,
and I think we'll see that. I'm right here on this.
But I had somebody reply to that and said, ah,
you are suffering from TDS Trump derangement syndrome. You're delusional,
And I I said that, I just have no These people,

(01:38:03):
the MAGA people are so stupid. They can only speak
in memes and sound bites, and they don't even know
what they're doing. They have absolutely no knowledge about what
is happening.

Speaker 5 (01:38:15):
When you think of that, what even is this? You know,
they've still got the immunity for all side effects that
are still available. They are promising to push it a
little bit less. They are no longer going to be
propagandizing us as much with their recommendations.

Speaker 2 (01:38:31):
They're not going to recommend it. Remember Trump spent two
hundred and fifty million dollars at the AD Council to
push it. That was unprecedented. They'd never done that for
any AD Council thing. I mean, we've had we've been
hectored with NonStop ads about this is your brain on drugs.
You know, only you can prevent forest fires all the
rest of stuff. We've had these long ad council things

(01:38:52):
in the past. Nobody came close to the amount of
money that Donald Trump put on the vaccines. I don't know,
we don't watch TV, so I saw the results of
me of that stuff. But then he got people like
the wine and Ramaswami was part of his committee, and
they came up with it, We're gonna put you in
a lottery where you can win a million dollars if

(01:39:13):
you take this. And I talked about that, compared it
to the scene the Russian roulette scene from The Deer Hunter.
I say, yeah, different kinds of shots. I say, keeping
Trump's COVID mRNA available for people who want them is
the American version of Canada's made assisted suicide. These poor

(01:39:37):
people have been lied to and you know, again, just
a lot of virtue signaling. So HHS announces that certain
interventions are behind the rising autism rates, and RFK Junior
said this during the Trump three hour live Cabinet meeting,

(01:39:58):
and Trump echoed the sentiment. So hopefully they're going to
finally tell us the truth about autism. Well, we'll have
to wait and see. That's coming out in September it's
good to have this discussion. Kennedy noted that in nineteen
seventy eight, a fewer than one and every ten thousand
children had autism. Today the numbers are about one and

(01:40:19):
thirty one nationally. It has to be external to the child.
There has to be something like the vaccine that is
doing it. And so it's just kind of interesting that
it coincides with a rapid escalation of the push of
these vaccines and seventy two of them.

Speaker 4 (01:40:37):
So just coincidence, I'm sure.

Speaker 2 (01:40:39):
Yeah, But when you look at that, when it's exploded
like that, why is it that you got people like
Senator to Cassidy, a Republican from corrupt Louisiana. I say
corupt Louisiana because he's from there, and Squeaker Mouse Johnson
is also from Louisiana. But anyway, when you've got people
like that who reflexively just lose it on you if

(01:41:01):
you say anything about we need to see if there's
a correlation about autism. You don't even have to say
anything about it being a vaccine. You just have to
say we need to investigate autism. What they go ballistic
on you. They know what this is and as I
said before that is the smoking gun, that they know
exactly what it is, and that that's what it is,
the vaccine. Brian shaw Hovey says, I'm sorry, that's not

(01:41:25):
Brian Schall Hobby, this is Chunn's health Defense says that
the AAP the pediatricians have sold their soul. That sounded
like a headline from Brian shall Hobby. I thought it
was from him, as sooner or later the devil will
come to collect. The AAP briefly sided with truth during
the COVID nineteen lockdowns. I read this sometime of it.

(01:41:46):
I don't remember them siding with truth in one and
so I went through this article and the credit that
they try to give to the pediatric society, fact that
they said at one point the kids should be allowed
to go back to school. That was the big move
where they sided with the truth or whatever. That was

(01:42:10):
the one thing that I wanted to see continue shut
the schools down and let people see what's going on
in the classrooms and school from home. I thought that
was the only silver lining to come out of Trump's lockdowns,
and I still do. The prime directive of Western medicine
used to be first, do no harm, says HD. Unfortunately,

(01:42:31):
COVID era caught us that. From the patient's point of view,
it is let the buyer beware. Yeah, he should be
aware of the person who was the buyer, and that's Trump.
He's the one who bought the vaccines, who paid them
to develop it. And it wasn't the COVID nineteen era er.
It was the Trump error r R. Trump himself was

(01:42:53):
the error. He didn't make a mistake. Every medical student
is taught that first and foremost, they should not cause
harm to the patients. Every doctor's familiar with this maxim
but that no longer applies. Actually, it's first, do no
harm to pharma and their profits and your profits. They'll
make sure that you're protected, that you get money if
you look out for them. This has been the core

(01:43:16):
tenet of medical ethics. But we don't have medical ethics anymore.
They replaced it with a brutal, inhumane, unethical martial law
as public health approach to medicine. With Trump's emergency, it's
interesting to see the Children's Health Defense find call it
medical martial law. I said that in the spring of

(01:43:39):
twenty twenty when it happened, everybody, Oh, you're exaggerating. It's
not medical marshal. You know, take the vaccine for Trump,
it's just sugar water, right, constant propaganda and lie. Some
public health authorities, the medical establishment, the mainstream media, and
medical professional associations, and then you have the American Academy
of Pediatrics. The group was harmed more or unnecessarily than

(01:44:02):
children who lost multiple years of education, socialization, and normal
growth and development. I'm in favor of shutting the schools now.
I thought that's a great thing. Let's just keep it down. Anyway,
that was their issue that they had sided with that policy,
then pulled back, then caved again, because you know, it's
all about science, and science is constantly changing.

Speaker 4 (01:44:22):
You got to trust the science.

Speaker 2 (01:44:24):
But the one thing they do have here is they
looked at the money. You need to always follow the money.
Jerry and the AAP was handsomely rewarded to push vaccines
and to combat misinformation. That means anybody who pushes back
against the official story. By twenty twenty three, the year
for which data is most available, the AAP was absolutely

(01:44:47):
raking it in. They got thirty four point nine million
dollars in government grants during twenty twenty three according to
the organization's most recent tax disclosure documents, show some of
the money we used to advance childhood vaccination in the
US and abroad, to target medical misinformation and disinformation online.

(01:45:07):
That's yours, truly, to develop a regional pediatric pandemic network.
And as they come in, they said, the mouthpieces for
government initiatives and the advertisers for big pharma will be
paid well. And that's exactly why. That's why they say
they made a deal with the devil. It's nothing more
than a professional guild that sent it just for the money,

(01:45:31):
they said. The value paid membership to these organizations like
AAP has disappeared over the years, causing income from membership
fees to fall. Individual paid subscriptions to their flagship journals
have nosedived as well. Their financial survival increasingly relies on
big farmer large ess and as we saw above the
AAP during COVID nineteen, they relied on government payouts. In

(01:45:57):
return for big pharma and government money, these professional organizations
function less and less as champions for their professional members
and their patients. Well, they are championing the government's cause.
That's exactly what's happening. It was Brian Shawhabi, who talked
about what is happening in Mississippi. He said they have
now declared a public health emergency over infant death rates,

(01:46:22):
and it's especially high with black babies. He pointed out
that the death rates are going up because of SIDS
and that for black babies it's been much higher than
it has for other ethnic groups. He said infant mortality
in Mississippi is now the highest that it has been
in ten years. In Mississippi, ninety seven infants died for
every one thousand live births in twenty twenty four, nearly

(01:46:44):
double the most recent national average of five point six
deaths per one thousand. Since twenty fourteen, more than thirty
five hundred Mississippi infants have died before their first birthday.
Infant mortality is mostly with SIDS and things like that,
so it is tied to the vaccines and it has
been so the black community has good reason to be

(01:47:07):
skeptical of the so called science from the CDC and
other professions when you go back and look at the
Tuskegee experiments and things like that. So he recounts how
the professional basketball player, instead of accepting the vaccines, lost

(01:47:28):
I think it was one hundred million dollars by refusing
to get vaccinated. And he stood with the Black community
to oppose these vaccines because they have learned the hard
way from experience. So as you look at all this stuff,
where is Kennedy To say that he's sending mixed signals

(01:47:49):
is to put it mildly, He has authorized six COVID
vaccines have been approved by the FDA so far this
year after he's been there. So you have to ask yourself,
is he really pushing to shut this down? Or is
his real mission what he said? And that is to
restore trust trust that you should not give them. Trust

(01:48:12):
in pharmaceutical companies, trust in the CDC and HHS and
the FDA, and trust in the vaccines. You should not
trust any of those things. And that may be what
his ultimate mission, truly is.

Speaker 4 (01:48:26):
The only thing you can truly trust is Christ. That's
the only thing you can trust.

Speaker 2 (01:48:32):
Yeah, and God we trust well, Travisa. How easy is
it to get an indictment with a grand jury? What's
the old meme that we have?

Speaker 4 (01:48:41):
Well, the old saying is you get a grand jury
to indict a ham Sandwich. But apparently not if you're
Ham Bondy.

Speaker 2 (01:48:46):
Seems like you can't indict a person who's thrown a
ham sandwich. Maybe they were trying to assert that it
was a club sandwich to try to show what a
threat this was to their agents who are there. There
was a guy who was up said about the fact
of the policy that they were doing the deportation policies,
which I don't disagree with. I want to make sure

(01:49:07):
that they follow due process very strictly, because I think
that's a very dangerous thing. If you're going to get
rid of illegal aliens, let's not get rid of illegal
aliens by having illegal federal police. That's not a good exchange.
I don't want to replace the illegal aliens illegal federal police.
I think it's even more dangerous. But they bragged about

(01:49:28):
how they were going to come down hard on anybody
that pushed back against them. And so this is Jean
Perro I believe this is this video here, and she
has been she by flattering Trump, she was able to
get her husband, who had been jailed for financial crimes,

(01:49:50):
get a pardon for him, and she is now the
head of the She's now the federal attorney for the
District of Columbia.

Speaker 7 (01:50:00):
So President Trump has vowed to make DC safe and
beautiful again, and it's part of his effort to fight crime.
He's bringing in our federal law enforcement partners like FBI,
atf DEA or Park Police everybody to help the Metropolitan
PD fight crime. And the President's message.

Speaker 2 (01:50:20):
Crime right there isn't it if you spit he hit?

Speaker 7 (01:50:24):
Well, we didn't quite do that the other night when
an individual went up to one of the federal law
enforcement officers and started jumping up and down, screaming at him,
berating him, yelling at him, and then he took a
subway sandwich about this big and took it and threw
it at the officer.

Speaker 2 (01:50:43):
He thought it was going well.

Speaker 7 (01:50:45):
He doesn't think it's funny today because we charged it
with a felony assault on a police officer.

Speaker 2 (01:50:50):
Yeah, I don't think you're overcharging is funny either, And
you got it shut down by grand jury.

Speaker 7 (01:50:55):
With sandwich somewhere else.

Speaker 2 (01:50:57):
Yeah, lady can't indict a hymn sandwich or a hymn
sandwich thrower, and she has an awful record from the
Trump administration. But there's something very important about this. It's
not just about partisan politics. First of all, let me
talk about the partisan politics single Does she sound exactly
like the people that were trying to overcharge from the

(01:51:18):
Biden administration. She sounds like she's straight out of the
Biden administration. They've just switched the j sixers for a
peanut butter and jelly sandwich person and the same game, folks,
is just a different club, different cult that's doing this.

Speaker 4 (01:51:34):
You could probably cut down on crime a love by
having her wander the streets at night. She looks kind
of ghoulish. I wouldn't want to.

Speaker 2 (01:51:39):
Well, this guy actually had been a Department of Justice
trial attorney. They fired him, which is fine, Okay, if
he's that adamantly opposed to this administration's policies, maybe that's
the appropriate response. But they came after him and charged
him with a felony. And that kind of overcharging is
exactly what was about all this January the sixth stuff

(01:52:01):
and the Biden administration. And now she's doing that and
bragging about the idea that if you we hit, I
think that is not called for. I think that there
ought to be a proportional response to things like that.
I don't think you ought to give a license to
uniformed people who say, well, you know, if you talk

(01:52:22):
back to me, I'll kill you. You know that type
of thing. I am the law. This is the kind
of judge spread thing. And I think what is happening
is the appropriate response to this kind of tyranny that
she's boasting about. You spit, we hit. And I think
the appropriate response to that, the overcharging of her department
and the over policing that we see on the streets

(01:52:44):
in some of these places. The appropriate response is for
a jury to refuse to convict people. That was the
thing that in the early twentieth century that was really
what shut down alcohol prohibition is jury is refusing to
convict people for what they considered shouldn't be a crome.
And now we're back to that point again. And we
saw in the documents emails that were released as part

(01:53:07):
of this Smart Magic versus Fox News lawsuit. We saw
what a sycophant and suck up she was to Trump
and those emails that were there. Anyway, federal prosecutors failed
to obtain a grand jury indictment against a former Department
of Justice employe who allegedly hurled a subway sandwich. I

(01:53:28):
have the when I look at the things that the
Trump administration is doing, I want to hurl, as in
throwing up. It makes me want to vomit to see
what this administration is doing in terms of the police state.
So yeah, I guess they could also charge him with
assault and pepper. It was a felony assault that they
charged them for. A grand jury, however, failed to indict

(01:53:51):
him in the case, which was heavily touted by Trump
administration law enforcement officials like her. It's not clear if
prosecutors will try again to get an indictment of him
or to ladge another charging instrument against him. And they said,
again Trump is boasting about I'm sorry, it's Pam Bondi.

(01:54:11):
He says, if you touch any law enforcement officer, we
will come after you. And I got to say that,
you know, if they're going to talk like that, if
I was on the jury, I would let these people
go because I don't like to see this idea that
the police are judged by a different standard. I don't
think we're going to have a two tier justice system.
I don't think that they ought to be able to

(01:54:33):
beat and kill people and you can't talk back to them.
I utterly reject that idea. That is a federal idea.

Speaker 4 (01:54:40):
We've got a good comment here from high Boost. He says,
maybe Jared from Subway should have thrown it. Then Trump
could have pardoned him since he's a paedo.

Speaker 2 (01:54:46):
Yeah, yeh, that's right. So again to charge this guy
with a felony and to drive home just how unusual
this is that they could not get a grand jury
to indict him. We've got some statistics. It was a
remarkable failure, says The New York Times. They said the
US Attorney's office in Washington, this is the second time

(01:55:09):
in recent days that a majority of grand jurors refused
to vote to indict a person accused of phony assault
on federal agent. It also amounted to a sharp rebuke
by a panel of ordinary citizens against the prosecutors assigned
to bring charges against people arrested after Trump's deployment of
National Guard troops and federal agents and cities. Before he

(01:55:32):
threw the sandwich, he called them fascists and said, I
don't want you in my city. So that's really what
they're concerned about. Right, You've got to stop that and
cannot have that kind of speech, just like Biden. So
if you look at the actual statistics about this.

Speaker 4 (01:55:50):
You know, maybe the officer had a gluten allergy or something.
Maybe this really was an attempted killing.

Speaker 2 (01:55:56):
Well, it is kind of interesting. It's the LA Times
that actually point out these statistics. In July they noted
that in LA more than three dozen people who are
targeted with federal charges, only seven of them were actually indicted.
And I think about that, that's about one sixth of them. Okay,
that's about sixteen seventeen percent were actually indicted. What is

(01:56:17):
the typical situation for a grand jury grand juries? The
reason you can indict a hand sandwich is because the
prosecutor can make his case to the grand jury and
there is no case being made on behalf of the defendant.
None of the assertions or the evidence is challenged whatsoever,

(01:56:38):
So it's just put out there unchallenged. That's why having
public trials instead of star chamber processes like the British
were doing to the American colonists. And what FAIZA is
doing when it puts somebody on a no fly list
or a no buy list or whatever else they're doing.
That's why it's so important that you are allowed to
confront your accusers and present, you're side to this because

(01:57:01):
like the grand jury operates, you only hear one side
of it, and so they typically get their conviction. Now,
remember that you had only seven out of thirty six,
only about one sixth of them were convicted. In LA,
the grand jury even was doing jury nullification. That's what's
really rare. And so they point out that less than
one percent of time the grand jury fails, but it

(01:57:25):
is far far less than that. Listen to the actual statistics.
Federal data show that out of one hundred and fifty five,
six hundred and fifteen total offenses that the government investigated,
only six were dropped because they couldn't get a grand
jury indictment. Six cases out of one hundred and fifty
five thousand, and then they said, figures are similar for

(01:57:48):
previous years. In twenty fifteen nineteen, out of one hundred
and sixty three thousand grand juries, they did not get
a grand jury indictment. And then let's see in twenty fourteen,
it was five out of one hundred and ninety six thousand,
nine hundred and sixty nine five out of almost two

(01:58:10):
hundred thousand in twenty thirteen. In twenty fourteen it was
fourteen out of one hundred and seventy thousand folks. That's
not one percent. That is far far less than one percent.
That is one one hundredth of one percent. Or to
put it another way, when the grand jury is operating
without the other side being able to present any evidence,

(01:58:31):
they get an indictment ninety nine point nine nine percent
of the time. Ninety nine point nine nine percent of
the time. That's why they say you can indict a
ham sandwich. Yet, what is the record for the Trump
administration with these charges sixteen percent instead of ninety nine
point nine nine percent. That is during nullification, And that's

(01:58:54):
the way that it should work. Juries are pretty much
gone now, especially grand juries. So it just shows you
the level of dissatisfaction of the community. And it's one
of the reasons why we have to have juries. That's
why the founders thought that was so important. They said,
it is the you know, the power of the citizenry

(01:59:15):
comes out of three boxes, the cartridge box, the ballot box,
and the jury box. Well, you can forget about the
ballot box. You have those anymore. And we don't want
to go down the path of civil war. So the
peaceful way to do this the peaceful way to nullify
tyranny is as these juries are doing. And it's even

(01:59:35):
more amazing to see this with a grand jury. So
you know that they're not going to get these convictions
if it actually were to come to trial. That's one
of the reasons that they have the grand jury. They
know they're going to get an indictment, but they're trying
to test to see how strong their evidence is with
kind of a you know, a mock jury before they

(01:59:56):
actually have to make the case with the other side
pushing back, and so instead of getting ninety nine point
ninety nine percent of the time and indictment, they're only
getting at sixteen or seventeen percent of the time. So
that's good news. That's the wisdom of the Founders at
work right there. I think judges have also been pushing

(02:00:17):
back against the Trump administration, rebuking the government for bringing
cases that traditionally wouldn't have been prosecuted at all, like
cowing a sandwich, making that a felony, or that would
be handled locally rather than in federal court. One magistrate
judge has repeatedly condemned the Trump administration in multiple cases,
reports The Post, saying that law enforcement decision to search

(02:00:39):
one man's bag where they found firearms was quote, without
a doubt, the most illegal search I've seen in my
life unquote. In another case in which federal agents tackled
and detained a delivery person who was leaving a coffee shop,
the judge commented, this is not consistent with what I
understand the United States of America to be. It's not

(02:01:00):
the one I consider it to be either. So from
that we look at the other over the top reaction
of Trump burning the flag. And this is an op
ed piece from the Rutherford Institute from John Whitehead. His
headline is burning the flag or torching the Constitution, which
is exactly my take on it. He said, only one

(02:01:22):
of those actions destroys freedom. And we got a clip
of a guy who immediately challenged Trump's executive order saying
that he's going to put people in jail for a year.
This guy is a twenty two year combat veteran.

Speaker 8 (02:01:37):
Yep, I'm being detained because I expressed my First Amendment
right to burn the United States flag in public, not
causing harm or causing any danger to any citizens or
personnel in the area.

Speaker 2 (02:01:49):
A lot.

Speaker 8 (02:01:53):
For every single one of you American citizens we burned.

Speaker 6 (02:01:56):
The flag in protests.

Speaker 8 (02:02:01):
President feel that it is right to do whatever he wants,
make whatever lot he wants, regardless the.

Speaker 2 (02:02:08):
Biguedal war illegals.

Speaker 8 (02:02:09):
Exactly, it is art wor committed right to burn this flag,
regardless of what the President said.

Speaker 2 (02:02:22):
You know, my first thought when I saw this and
people were saying, no, there's gonna be a lot of
people are gonna be burning flags now, just to make
a point, and and I kind of thought about it.
I thought, you know, Washington not that far away. But
then when I watch him, you know what he said
is he's being handcuffed. I absolutely agree with it. But
then when I watch him, you know, actually doing the
flag burning and all the rest of this stuff, It's like,

(02:02:43):
I really hate stunts like that. That's what I hated
about in four Wards. I hated the stunts and the
you know, look at me, I'm doing this or that,
you know, and I just so, yeah, I would not
do that. But I.

Speaker 4 (02:02:56):
Was watching I was assured that you know, this led
to riots, so I assumed that we were about to
see just you know, people start storming the Capitol.

Speaker 2 (02:03:05):
That's right, Yeah, he's in sighting a riot right there
in the park, and he's got to be arrested in
charge of fundy.

Speaker 5 (02:03:11):
Yeah, and he was arrested, But wasn't the argument that
or what they were claiming was that it was going
to be something where if you committed another crime, this
would increase the severity of the other crime.

Speaker 2 (02:03:25):
I don't know what they arrested him for. It was
a park. Police arrested him for setting a fire basically,
not because he was burning the flag, but you know,
he poured gasoline on the ground on the flag and
then lit it, so they arrested him for that. I
don't know what they're going to charge him with. I
don't even know if they've got a law. I mean,
Trump's executive order is not a law, and we got

(02:03:46):
to stop treating them as such. And that's reason enough
right there to defy it. John Rutherford says we are
living in an age of intolerance, intolerance from both sides.
Nothing illustrations more clearly than Trump's latest executive order calling
for criminal charges for anyone who burns the American flag,
a symbolic act long upheld by the Supreme Court as

(02:04:09):
protected political expression. This push is not about patriotism This
is political theater, which is what Trump does all the time.
That's what this guy was involved in. The counter theater,
I guess. In an administration that's under fire from the
Epstein cover up to tanking approval ratings and mounting constitutional crises,

(02:04:31):
flag burning serves as a symbolic outrage staged as political cover,
a culture war diversion to distract from the more serious
abuses of power. Consider the timing. On the very same
day that Trump announced penalties for flag burning, he also
signed an executive order establishing specialized National Guard units to

(02:04:52):
patrol American cities under the guise of addressing crime. This
is the real bait and switchok milit terry policing in
patriotic theater and hope that no one notices the deeper
constitutional violations that are taking route. Trump's flag fight is
a decoy to strike people away from his creeping martial law.

(02:05:15):
That's I absolutely agree with John White Eddi's spot on
with that, as he usually is, well, we're going to
take a quick break and we come back. We're going
to take a look at an outrage. Many outrages that
are happening as the UK and the EU governments are
at war with their own citizens over the immigration and
the crime that is happening. There will be right back

(02:05:37):
stay with.

Speaker 9 (02:05:37):
Us, US.

Speaker 1 (02:08:15):
Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:08:29):
Joining us now is John Richardson of RNC store dot com.
Great to have John on, and I really do like
the products that they've got there. One of the ones
and it's what got me connected to John was I
interviewed Gederald Griffin his book A World Without Cancer, and
now we have a world with turbo cancer. So you

(02:08:51):
should go to RNC store dot com. They have information
to educate you about that. They also have products that
Edward Griffin wrote about in A World Without Cancer, and
you can also use the code Night to save ten
percent off. They support not only the health of our listeners,

(02:09:11):
but the health of our show. So we really do
appreciate John and what he does at R and C Store,
and I wanted to get him on because he just
had a health issue as well. Thank you for joining us, John,
tell us a little bit about that. What happened to you?

Speaker 6 (02:09:24):
Well, yeah, thank you so much. David. It's my pleasure
to be here. I know, as we age, we tend
to forget the fact that we need to take care
of ourselves, so get into these situations. You know, I've
always thought of myself as being bulletproof because i know
I'm never going to die of cancer, and nobody in
my family is ever going to die of cancer. Like

(02:09:44):
and Gerra Griffin, our mutual friend. I just saw him
in Tols, Oklahoma. He'll be ninety four this year, and
his book World Without Cancer has been you know, it's
kind of like the Bible of what I do. He's
been talking about for fifty years. So going through my
own health scare, which I've never been through anything like this,

(02:10:07):
basically opened my eyes further to how incredibly deviant or
devious the medical system is. Not necessarily because everybody and
it's bad, David, I'm not. We all have friends that
are in the medical industrial complex, and most all of
them are good people. Most all of them, you know,
mean well, but most all of them are learning. They

(02:10:30):
they've never been taught, you know, what it really means
for good health. So their answer in our in our
system is just to cut burn and poison us. As American,
we want to have immediate surgery. That's always you know,
it's everybody surgery. So my story not any different than

(02:10:50):
anybody else's, thankfully had a better outcome because I am
who I am. But it's given me, David a whole
new mission to get the world into a place where
people don't have to be John Richardson to have the
good outcome.

Speaker 1 (02:11:05):
So I.

Speaker 2 (02:11:08):
Was.

Speaker 6 (02:11:08):
It was Easter Sunday. I'd been having for months. I'd
been having stomach pains, and I was just dealing with
it because I'm bulletproof. I was just dealing with it,
you know, like us we do. We know, I don't
need a doctor. I got friends. It will tell me,
you know, eat sour kraud and you know, take some
bent tonight clay and some cilium husts and I'll clean
your system out. Drink this drink that. Not getting any

(02:11:29):
you know, support from my hundreds literally hundreds of naturopathic
doctor friends until on Easter Sunday, I went out to
branch with my son afterwards and I had some pastrami
you know, eggs Benedict, and I developed this blockage in
my intestine, and the rest of Easter Sunday I just
felt worse and worse till war I was just throwing

(02:11:52):
up incessantly. I had been losing weight, but I thought
it was all good. I'd been losing weight while I
had this pain in my stomach. And so I, my
seventeen year old, said, Dad, I'm tired of seeing you
throw up. This is just this is not working. I'm
gonna take you in to urgent care. My wife happened
to be in Florida, so I didn't have my wife,
who's you know, into health and nutrition, and she wasn't

(02:12:14):
there by my side, so I kind of didn't couldn't
call any of my doctor friends. And I said, Okay,
let's go in. And I threw up on the way
to the hospital, to the urgent care. I threw up
while checking into the urgent care, signing away all my rights. Yeah,
and then I threw up while I was when I
was in the room, and by three o'clock in the morning,
they had ambulance to me over to the It was, gosh,

(02:12:36):
the Honor Healthcare I usually have. It was Honor Healthcare,
five story, high rise, multi million dollar hospital here in Arizona.
And they, you know, immediately, they put me on ivy
offered me morphine, which I declined. Yeah, yeah, they offered
me morphine, which, by the way, as I've learned about morphine,

(02:12:59):
it basically helps you not make good decisions. It might
take away pain, but it also makes you pliable that
they say, well, we'll take off your foot. If we
take off your foot, it'll make you feel better to go, oh, great.

Speaker 2 (02:13:09):
Do whatever. It sounds like fun. Let's try it. Yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:13:11):
Yeah. And so as I've told this story, David, it's
people go, yeah, that's they did to me too. They
offer that to me too. I'll get to that later.
But by three o'clock in the morning, I was getting
a cat scan, and then by Monday, this was Sunday,
that Sunday night, Easter Sunday. By Monday, at about three
o'clock in the afternoon, I was sitting with a good

(02:13:33):
looking you know, straight out of Central Casting, a surgeon
who told me I had stage three colon cancer and
that I had an emergency surgery scheduled for you know, Wednesday,
you know. Within David, I hadn't even been in this
hospital for twenty four hours. And of course I knew
I didn't have cancer, but he was sure I did.

(02:13:56):
And I said, well, how do you know? I said,
have you you know what'd you do you know I
was awake through this whole time. I wasn't on morphine.
I probably fell asleep a couple of times. And they
were sticking things in me and pulling blood and all
this stuff. But one of the things, David, is they
stuck a tube a nasal stomach pump in through my nose,
down my throat, and we're pumping out this bile that

(02:14:18):
was causing me. Previously they'd be throwing up so much.
Now they were taking that pressure off. So I wasn't
feeling sick to my stomach, even without the morphine or
any other things. But they were putting fluids into me,
and so I said, how do you know? He said, well,
we see from the cat scan, we can see you
have an apple cor lesion. And we know that that

(02:14:40):
ninety nine point five percent of the time if you
have that presentation, that means you have colon cancer. So
I said, well that's all the indication. Yeah, well we
know that that you have a colon cancer, and so
we can't do a colonoscopy. And at that point, David,
I didn't know how horrible colonoscopies were, because again I've
wrote on my hire life eating apricot seeds, and never

(02:15:02):
known anybody that's ever had cancer, so I was never
concerned about when the people say, oh, you got to
get a kolonosky when you're forty five now or forty
six and forty seven. Every year since this, I've learned,
which I'm happy to share, how deadly colonoscopy's can be.
One out of a thousand people that gets a you know,
standard colonoscopy dies during the colonoscopy, so it's a it's

(02:15:25):
a it's a horrible procedure that many people watching him said, well,
I just got mine and they clipped off some polyps.
That's what starts the process down to getting you know, sick,
more sick, getting cancer, so getting a colonoscopy. Thankfully, they
didn't do one when I was like not coherent and
I didn't take any morphine, so they didn't they didn't

(02:15:47):
offer one. But he said, we couldn't do a colonospy
because we it's one hundred percent certain that we perforate
your colon, so we're going to take out this many,
this much of your colon. He drew a cartoon picture
on the whiteboard of my my room. I took a
photo of it. I've shared it with people and I
can even share with you. But I took a photo
he had literally like a first grader's picture of my coal.

(02:16:10):
And I'm gonna take off this section down to this section.
And I go, why do you have to cut out
so much? And he said, because we want to make
sure we get all that cancer, because there's gonna be
some lymp noose and things like that. And I said,
you know that that seems pretty, you know, drastic. You know,
I want to see how I feel and talk to
some naturopathic doctor. There's no other choice. Let's see it.

(02:16:32):
There's only three options. Okay, So I go through the surgery.
I'll have a colostomy bag, he'd explained. I'd have to
come in every three months and get anti rejection drugs
because David, they would have to connect a tube this
big to a tube this big. They were going to
cut out my margin test is at the top all
the way down to my duadenum. And you know, because

(02:16:53):
I had I was for sure had cancer. Well that
started the process. Now I got started getting on the phones.
Was I should have done before with my good friends,
my doctor friends, Doctor John Murphy, a cancer specialist who
uses integrative therapy here in Arizona for twenty five years.
I talked to my good friend Daryl Wolfe, who is

(02:17:13):
called the Doc of Detox, who's been doing colon non
surgical colon repair for forty years with you know, he says,
ninety five percent of colon surgeries are unnecessary. John. You know,
don't let them give you a colonoscaby, don't let them
cut into you. Don't do any of that. So I
was pushing back to these doctors, but that just started, David,

(02:17:35):
a process of fifteen white coated doctors coming into my
including palliative care. When I told him I wasn't going
to do the surgery, they said, why do you want
to die? John? You know you're sixty years old. We
can we can get you to seventy. You know, you
can live another ten years with your kids, your eleven

(02:17:55):
grandchildren or your eleven children, see some grandchildren. If you
don't do this, John, you'll be dead within ten days.
And literally, David, Yeah, GI, the head of GI. I
was told him, was the top GI guy in the
state of Arizona, and I have his name, the head
of the whole hospital, the payulent of care, the nutrition.

(02:18:17):
Every one of these people said, you you have you know,
you are healthy. I had no symptoms of any other
kind of It was good blood pressure, good heart rate,
good all my, you know, my, every The only thing
I was low and I was iron because I was
throwing up so much, and hydration. I needed some hydration.
So they continued that into Wednesday. About Wednesday morning, about midnight,

(02:18:39):
I started having bowel movements, and I was told by
my friend doctor, the doc of detox, Darryl Wolfe, who
has become a very dear friend of mine. He said, John,
you know, let them keep getting the pressure off you.
We've got some kind of blockage. You colon could be twisted,
you could have some kind of food blockage. Whatever it

(02:18:59):
is is, just let them get that pressure, keep that
tube in there, don't let them take it out, and
stay with it. So I start having I had fifteen
bowel movements between midnight and Wednesday till about six pm
on Wednesday when I was scheduled for my emergency surgery.

Speaker 2 (02:19:16):
Wow.

Speaker 6 (02:19:16):
So I told all the nurses and all the doctors, David,
and you know what their response was, there's change, no change.
You know, well, you still need to do the surgery.
So I requested, against their advice to have another cat scan,
although you know, I wish I didn't do that, but
I did another cat scam. To this day, David, one

(02:19:36):
hundred and twenty days after this whole episode, I've never
seen that second cat scan. And my doctors who have
requested that second cat scan, I have not seen it.
They but they said, no change, John, This is no change.
Everything is the same. But guess what. We found a
colonoscopy expert. We found one that will do a colonoscopy now,

(02:19:58):
and he will you know, he's not gonna perforate. He's
never had a perforation where you would die on the
operating table because you get sepsis and everything. So this
we've miraculously found this expert. And because I refuse the surgery,
and so I was I was considering it, David. I
was saying, well, you know, they're saying I'm gonna die.

(02:20:18):
They're telling my kids that, they're telling me what. You know,
everybody's surrounding me. So I was considering going to colonoscopy.
And that's when derow Wolf said, I wouldn't do that
to my worst enemy.

Speaker 2 (02:20:27):
John.

Speaker 6 (02:20:27):
All they're gonna do is dump radioactive materials down you.
It's gonna be like cement. It's going to destroy your
gut biome for five weeks. They're going to find a
polyp that they're gonna cut off, or they're gonna find
this blockage and they're gonna do the surgery. You're gonna
sign away. You're right, You're gonna be passed out sleeping now.
These doctors, fifteen doctors are told you need surgery, are

(02:20:49):
going to prove that you need surgery. If you think
if you think you have inflammation now John, which I
was a ten out of ten with a colon and inflammation,
they're going to increase that inflammation, don't do it. So
I was literally they were setting in nurses to give
me the medications to make it so I could have
this colonoscopy, and I said, no, I'm declining, and they

(02:21:12):
all looked at me, the nurses, everybody looked at me
like I was crazy. And then they basically said, you know,
we're gonna have to write you off. We're not gonna
be able to keep you here at this hospital. You're
gonna have to sign a document saying that you're going
against medical device and none of your procedures going forward
to me covered by insurance. You got your surgery covered.

(02:21:32):
You know it's gonna be a fifty thousand dollars reductible
for the two hundred fifty thousand oars surgery that's gonna
be covered. But if you continue down the path you're doing, John,
you're not going to be covered.

Speaker 2 (02:21:41):
And so, of course, David, money, yeah, open money trigger now.

Speaker 6 (02:21:47):
Yeah, it's all about money. And the surgeon that that
guy with a good bedside manor said he had six
surgery scheduled for Wednesday. I was the sixth, and at
an average of two hundred to two hundred and fifty
thousand dollars per colon surgery, you can imagine how much
the hospital stood the game that day. So I just
started having these epiphanies after epiphany. Never was I considering it, David,

(02:22:11):
but I was seeing what the average Joe who has
no history. I remember, I grew up with Gerra Griffin.
I grew up without cancer. I grew up with my
father and so I had this backbone knowing I didn't
have cancer, but they were all telling me I did.
And on I think it was Wednesday or Thursday. Fox News.

(02:22:32):
A flashed was signed from God Fox News. I took
a photo of it. Said there's been one hundred and
fifty eight thousand diagnoses of colon colon cancer so far
in twenty twenty five, and one out of five of
them are occurring at people under fifty. So there they
are Fox News saying this is a this is an industry. Basically, David,

(02:22:55):
there's my friend doctor Murphy and my friend at doctor
Ed Group, and Henry Eely and Brian Artists and all
these amazing healers are all saying, you know, ninety five
percent of cold issues are just irritation. You've got something
going on. You just need to change your diet, change
your lifestyle, change whatever you're doing. Stop drinking alcohol, John,

(02:23:17):
that one drink I have, you know, to make me
relax in the day, that's not good if you've got
stomach pains. So here I am watching it on God.
I took a picture. Not only have all the different
doctors who were listed on my chart and how they
were drawing. So I was just being hit and I
had those fifteen bowel movements. And then so by Thursday

(02:23:39):
when I refused the colonoscopy, they basically they started writing
me off. I was told, or am I going to
hear from the guay? No, he wrote you off. The
gastro entrologists, the most famous one in Arizona had never
even come to see me, David, He never even came
to my room.

Speaker 2 (02:23:56):
They've all got the number one guy and the most
famous one. Every hospital's got one of those guys.

Speaker 6 (02:24:02):
Yeah, and what of those what does that mean, David?
What does it mean when they're the number one guy?
You know what it means?

Speaker 2 (02:24:08):
Yeah, he gets the most surgeries.

Speaker 6 (02:24:10):
Yeah, there you go. Why is he number one because
he produces the most income for that hospital of anybody.
He's not number one because he sends the most people
home without destroying their life. So there again, I'm I'm
just a statistic And they've told me they had never
had pushback from anybody. So they told me, okay, John,

(02:24:32):
the only thing you can do is surgery, chemo and radiation.
That start would start Monday after five years of healing. So,
of course, David, I kept pushing it out. My friends
were saying, stay in with the tube in, let them
keep you comfortable, keep getting the liquids out. I was
pumping out this bile that was backed up in my colon,
and so it was helping relieve that pressure. Otherwise I'd

(02:24:52):
had to be home just throwing up, you know, because
that's that's what your body does. If you've got a blockage,
your body's gonna naturally throw up. Doesn't feel good, David.
It's not fun, but it's a lot more fun than
cutting out two and a half feet of your colon.
So by Friday, I had negotiated with the with the
main doctor, he and I had befriended each other, and
we agreed that Okay, I can come back and get

(02:25:15):
the surgery at any time. Right, Yes you can, but
you're much higher risk. John. You're going to be right
back in the hospital immediately if I send you home.
But you want to take the risk, So I'm gonna
let you. But you first got to take the tube out,
and you got to eat some food, and we've got
to see how how your body reacts if you if
you have the same problem all over again, I'm not

(02:25:36):
gonna be able to let you go. And I'm like,
what do you mean You're not gonna let me go?
He said, well, I'm have to send you to another
hospital because we can't take that liability on you. I said, well, okay,
let's do that. I knew that I could get up
and walk out, David. I knew they can't just gestoppo
hold me. I actually there was ten percent of me
that wasn't sure.

Speaker 2 (02:25:55):
Yeah, that's sure.

Speaker 6 (02:25:57):
What the laws are. Yeah, they're really good at it
stopping you. So I basically went through that on Friday,
and then by Saturday the doctor signed me out. Then
I was persona non grata. Nobody stopped by anymore. There
was no interest in talking to me except that one

(02:26:17):
main doctor who made me promise that I would come
back if you get the surgery if I didn't heal.
The last words he said to me before I finally said, okay,
this episode is over. As he said, John, if there
was a natural way to heal what you have naturally,
the guy that would do that would be a trillionaire John.

(02:26:39):
And that's when I realized these guys are so they're
not just they're not evil, they just don't know that
there's any other way. So if you've got colon bluckage,
you've got to have surgery that shortened your life to
seventy And when they told me I could live to
be seventy day. But I thought, well, you're going to
shorten my life by fifty years because I had planned

(02:26:59):
to be one hundred and twenty years old. Like for
your audience, a CNB seed did an article on February
of twenty twenty four that said the Hunzas of northern Pakistan,
just like Ed Griffin said, lived to be over one
hundred years old. And the number one way that they
lived to be one hundred years old is they eat
apricot seeds and apricot kernel oil. So that the CNBC

(02:27:24):
they're not a friend of ours, are they? But they
said that they linked it to a study that said
a mingling causes apop toast as a cancer cell. So
I got out on that Saturday. I was weak, I could,
you know. I felt like I had a new lease
on life. And I started forty days and forty nights
of drinking my meals, taking you know, B seventeen injections.

(02:27:46):
I did everything that I would recommend or that a
doctor would recommend to a true a real colon cancer patient.
And I at the end of forty days and forty
nights it was funny. I didn't plant it that way.
My Mama Bear we call her. Jan said, you know,
it's been forty days and forty nights, and you just
said one hundred percent, David, I feel better that I

(02:28:08):
felt in years. I always have felt good. I've always
felt bulletproof, but now my energy levels are incredible. I've
been doing, you know, fifteen podcasts a week telling the story,
letting people know about it. Because never was I concern
that I had cancer, but they were telling me I did,
so I went to the entire process. So the natural
question is, how are you doing now. I haven't gone

(02:28:29):
back for my third cat scan because I just went
recently went back and saw doctor John Murphy, who's who's
been practicing for twenty five years using leatroll as his
practice as an MD in Tempe, Arizona, but underground. He's
never really published, he's never told people, but he took

(02:28:50):
over the practice. I want to tell people how incredible
of a story it is. He took over the practice
of a doctor named doctor Benzel who was in the Midwest,
who wrote a book called Alive and Well, and I'm
looking for it right now. My assistant is usually in
the office. He's not here, but I'll try to find it.
He wrote a book called Alive and Well about his

(02:29:11):
practice in the nineteen eighties, nineties, and in the first
year of two thousand where he was treating patients with
leatroll successfully and doctor John Murphy and MD here in Tempe, Arizona,
who has asy good health, has been doing it for
twenty five years. His very first patient, David, is still
alive today that he treated with leatroll. He tells a

(02:29:33):
story of that regularly, and he's got over four hundred
patients currently taking leatrol right now, and he's an MD.
They tried to take his license in twenty sixteen and
were unable to do it because they couldn't find anything
he did wrong because he doesn't recommend against people doing
chemo radiation. He just recommends they also take care of
their immune system at the same time. He actually offers.

Speaker 2 (02:29:57):
That's the answer to that surge, and if there was
a natural way to do that, they'd take away your
license exactly. That's what we've seen over and over again.

Speaker 6 (02:30:06):
And doctor Murphy chuckled when I told him that story
because he said, John, I actively try not to become
wealthy because they'll always claim, oh, he's just doing this
to get rich, Whereas he said, I've got friends that
are one hundred millionaires because they do chemo radiation surgery,
and no one ever says, oh, they're just doing it
to get rich. But if you try to treat someone

(02:30:28):
naturally for a couple thousand dollars or maybe ten thousand
dollars for their entire natural treatment, but you have to
charge cash because there's no insurance policies that cover it,
then they claim you're just doing it to get rich.
So I went through the process, and so now, David,
you know, so I had some people going, oh, you know,

(02:30:49):
they said you had cancer. John, I thought, you know,
if you take apricots eats, you never have cancer. Well
I don't believe. I don't. I never did.

Speaker 2 (02:30:57):
But did you ever find out what it was?

Speaker 6 (02:30:59):
It was a I believe, and doctor Murphy believes, and
other doctors believe I had. What I had done is
created a blockage from bentonite clay and cilium husts, which
are great things to use, but I had used them improperly.
So it is a lesson that even if you think
you're the most smartest guy like I am. As far
as history of b seventeen and all that. I think

(02:31:20):
God let me know in a way that John, just
because you know a lot about B seventeen and cancer
and all that doesn't mean you know anything about Bent
and night Clay. So it's given me this new epiphany, David,
to find natural healing doctors out there and let people
know about them. So when people ask me about what

(02:31:42):
they to do. I've never given medical advice. I always
say I'm not a doctor. I've just said here's what
my dad said. But I really want people to have
someone to hold their hand alongside them, because if you
try to do it yourself, you can't know it all
about everything. And there's doctors like doctor Murphy who have
been practiced for twenty five years that have seen in
a situation or they've seen five percent of time somebody

(02:32:05):
you know, had some other issue they had to deal with.
So he does. The doctors I'm talking to do a
lot of testing. They do a lot of testing, and
then they say, John, it's like a road map. If
you're if you're weak in niosin, or you're low in
you know, iodine, or you're low in vitamin C. We
get all those things adjusted and then the B seventeen

(02:32:25):
the B fifteen, and the enzyme's worked that much better.
So many times we've seen people take them and get
great results, and then other times they don't get the
great results, but so what's the issue. They might be
have some other thing going on. So it works really
great when someone's diets balance, and that's so that's what
we've I've discovered throughout this. So I've really been you know, and.

Speaker 2 (02:32:47):
Of course having a medical professional that's there and monitoring
what's going on. Always whatever kind of treatment or medicine
you're talking about, it always comes down to dosage, right,
two level of something. It's not going to be effective
to much of it. It's always gonna be a problem.
I mean, you can dye it too much water. You know,
we've seen that over and over again, and I had
that thrown back in my face many times. But when

(02:33:09):
I was in the hospital by these doctors, well you know,
water can kill you, and it's like, yeah, but I'm
not taking your statins, you know all the rest of
this stuff. It's I said to a couple of different
lectures about the framium study from my from the doctor
that was there who did the operation, trying to get
me to take statins, and it's like, I'm not going
to take them. I've done my research. I know they

(02:33:31):
created a cholesterol deficiency. I don't want anything else messing
with my brain and of course my thing when I
got into it, I'm looking at it and I'm skeptical
of their motivations for money, as you were talking about.
And yet you know, absolutely yeah, I'd had like a
probably a tia and I fell out of my chair
and then the next day I had a real stroke

(02:33:55):
for real, and so it's getting worse. And they took
me to a hospital and nearby, and the hospital said, well,
we can't do this operation, but you really need to
have this operation because they did an MRI and they
saw that I had karate blockage, And of course I wondered,
how did they know what percentage that blockage is? You know,
that sounds a bit suspect, but they weren't. They weren't

(02:34:19):
trying to do anything with it to make money. So
I thought, all right, well I'll listen to what they
have to say. And the doctor who was there spent
a great deal of time trying to get me into
one of the two hospitals around here that did it
trying to get me into the closer one because it
was one down in Chattanooga, and so I thought, well,
maybe I should listen to them. And then they come in.
They say, well, you know, you've had two strokes. You're

(02:34:40):
going to have another one unless we clean this out,
you know, because it's breaking off and causing you to
have strokes. And they showed that to me on the MRI.
You could see the different areas where it hit my brain.
And so I okayed it, and I really regretted that.
I really regret. I woke up in the ICU and

(02:35:01):
I call it in retrospect, you know, you say, there's
a lot of good people there in the ward. And
I had a lot of really good nurses. They were
very thoughtful, very kind, very responsive with things. Uh. But
then this ICU nurse that I had there was going
to be leaving in a couple of days and had
this real attitude. And I woke up and my mouth
was so parched. I was begging for some water and

(02:35:22):
he wouldn't give me any and I'm all wired up
with all this other kind of stuff and I'm begging.
I said, please have mercy on, you know, give me
some water. He wouldn't do it, and I'm fidgeting because
I also had this hithercloth thing canel or something in
your nose and it was drying out my nose.

Speaker 6 (02:35:36):
It wasn't a breathing, it was oxygen.

Speaker 2 (02:35:38):
They were giving oxygen and I didn't need it. And
I'm trying to get this thing out because drying my
nose out to boot you know, my mouth was so dry.
And he says, don't touch that, and and I moved
it again and he says, I'm going to put you
in restraints, you know. And that was like it was
a war to this, and so he set me up
to fail a swallowing test and he put that tube
down my nose and my throat and damn my vocal cords.

(02:36:01):
But I'm better now, and I praise God. I had
a lot of people praying for me. Yeah, but you know,
they they caused me to have a third stroke. It
was the operation caused me to have a third stroke.
And then they damaged my vocal cords. And as part
of the operation, they damaged the hypoglossal nerve, the nerve
under your tongue. And I'm still not fully recovered from that.

(02:36:23):
But it was really bad. It was. It did cause
me problems was swallowing, and it did cause me a
lot of problems with talking. And it even felt like
I had my tongue was burned. I mean, it was
really The side effects of the operation were horrific and
it was so bad. I was so fed up with
the whole thing that as soon as he got off
the shift, I couldn't even stand up. But I pulled

(02:36:45):
out that thing and threw it on the floor. And
the next nurse she was really nice, but you know,
I was a very bad patient. And I got up
on the edge of the bed and I said, get
this thing out of my arm. I'm getting out of
the hospital. And I would have if I could have walked.
I walked right out of if I couldn't.

Speaker 6 (02:37:01):
And you have did you have any support with you?
I mean, was your wife or yes?

Speaker 2 (02:37:05):
At that point Karen got in and she was invaluable.
You got to have somebody there as an ad we
do you need it?

Speaker 6 (02:37:12):
That's what That's one of my one of my epiphanies.
You need an agent. But if you don't have a
relative that can be that agent, they call it a
I don't know, great care. Priscilla Grath is a friend
of mine. I didn't even know what she did what
she offered before, but now I understand how great it is.
And that is having an advocate that will that will
be there so you can ask what they're trying to

(02:37:33):
shove this to, mean, what's the good and bad about this?
And got people available to you.

Speaker 2 (02:37:37):
So all that stuff that happened to me happened before
she got into the ICU, and after she got in
that stopped. Uh. It really is important that you have
somebody there watching out for that. Yeah, and they're you know,
they're always trying to push the next thing. At one
point I said, can I get an ivy vitamin C?
And they said, well, no, we don't do that. Insurance

(02:37:59):
won't pay for that. I'll pay for it. You get that.
Well we don't do that because you can just take
a vitamin C. But then they wouldn't give me a
vitamin C pill, you know, I mean it's like, is
this I couldn't get.

Speaker 6 (02:38:09):
That, And the fact is the vitamin C that they use,
even if they did at the hospital, it has to
be GMO. See that's a whole other subject. If you're
gonna get high dose vitamin C. Don't do it in
California because California made a law, David, they made a
law that you cannot do high high dose VIBAMC unless
it's gmo. Really, it's got glypha sated. Yes, the medical

(02:38:33):
system is so stacked against us. Wow. And that's why
that's my mission. And so each step of the way
what you went through, you went through the exact same
thing I did about some other thing. And here's the
good news, David, that now I know we're to send
people to to get through proper advice. But our system
is broken because we don't have an emergency system that

(02:38:55):
takes you, that gives you options. The emergency systems leads
you right into the MIC, and once their clutches are
around you, only a strong personality like you. There's there's
no other. Ninety five percent people probably wouldn't have survived
what you did. They would have they would have continued
keeping the MIC for weeks and then got you on

(02:39:15):
stints and and this this stat and and that thing
and this and then he just you're in that cycle
of keeping you alive, just above dead, so they can
suck as much money out of you and that's what
they're that's the system. That's the system I got into,
and you know, and so now I'm I'm looking actively
and I'm finding and God is putting in my path. Doctors.

(02:39:38):
I met a doctor just two days ago in Florida
that's that's doing miracles with natural medicine as an MD.
Another doctor that's doing that's that's treating the He's an
MD named Scott Stole that my son introduced me to
that is treating the ten percent most unhealthy people at
Whole Foods because he's got a relationship with the CEO.

(02:40:01):
They take them away out of retreat and they give
them organic food, vitamins, they teach them about breathing, teach
them all the things, and they're having miracles happening to
these people. So everything you've gone through, there's a natural,
God given thing that will help you. Keylated minerals is
one that I've known about for fifty years that I'm

(02:40:21):
not an expert on by any stretch of the imagination,
but that's one of the things that helps clear arteries.
And vitamin B fifteen, which helps auxygenate the blood and
helps the blood clear out arteries, and that's something that
my dad offered fifty years ago, and we have it
as part of our This is not the sales pitch.
We have it part of our prevention bundle because Hans Neeper.

(02:40:43):
Hans Neeper said that beef seventeen apricot seeds are the
most Let me just read from the quote from his book.
Leatroll extracted from Apricott pits is one of the most
powerful anti cancer substances found, he said, it's the most
He is the one that helped Ronald Reagan wipe out

(02:41:06):
his colon cancer. We have all the documented proof of
that he helped him wipe it out. I'm not gonna
say cure because Ronald Reagan was afraid he couldn't run
for a second term, and so he got secret injections
of beat of leatrol in the old office and on
a naval vessel off the coast of West Germany from
Hans Nieper. But Hans Nieper said that it also helped

(02:41:28):
with cardiovasco disease. So if there's a nutrient that that
has been demonized for fifty years by the FDA, by
the AMA, by all these organizations that profit from pharmaceuticals,
it's b seventeen. It's Amignoalan.

Speaker 2 (02:41:45):
I need to do more research on that. I still
haven't gotten Gederal Griffin's book, and if it does, if
it helps with cardiovascular stuff, I need.

Speaker 6 (02:41:53):
To Well, I'm gonna we're gonna have some good news
for you and your your loyal audience today about the book.
I'll finish at the end, but I first want to
say I've put into the notes if you want to
give people links to it, or if Travis wants to
bring it up on the screen. I don't know how
you guys do it, but I did the CNBC article

(02:42:13):
from about the Hunzas and let me just click on
it in case if Travis wants to bring it up,
we can do.

Speaker 5 (02:42:21):
Ah.

Speaker 6 (02:42:21):
Right, So if you look at that, it's fascinating because
this is CNBC, David. You know how they like to
tell you the truth but then kind of keep it
quiet so that later on when you discover they lie
to you, they can say, oh, we told you that
in twenty twenty four. We told you that the people
and huns that live to be one hundred years old,
We did that right there. They consume the number one

(02:42:46):
reason David, that CNBC says if you look at. If
you scroll down, it says they consume apricott seeds and oil.
Apricott seeds are one of the most important local crops
in the valley. Studies have shown that apricot seeds can
help fight cancer and other source of inflammation in the body,
in part due to a compound called amiglin. You know,
if I said those exact words on YouTube or Google

(02:43:08):
or any place, they would delete me immediately, David. But
here it is in CNBC.

Speaker 2 (02:43:13):
You can click on NBC gets a NBC and CNBC
they give a lot of pharmaceugal money. I guess they
figured they were safe and the censers aren't paying attention
to them. I guess right.

Speaker 6 (02:43:22):
Exactly, because there's probably article. There's probably advertising on this
article that advertises a some kind of pharmaceutical. But there
it is that they consume apricot seeds and oil. Which
the reason they consume apricot seeds is because that's their
major crop. The wealth of the Hunzas has developed on

(02:43:42):
how many trees they have, and we've known this for
one hundred years. Ed Griffin wrote about it and were
without cancer and there you go. So I also linked
to our prevention bundle, and I also linked to our oil.
So I don't shy away from the fact, David, that
people should be on the prevention bundle. It's it's the

(02:44:04):
it's the click, the fourth click, and they just use
the night discount. They can get a discount. They down
to a dollar a day. Is that too much to
to have the peace of mind that the HUNS has
had the the prevention bundles available. It's like it's the
fourth link that I that I gave to UH, to Travis,

(02:44:25):
but UH I also linked the the the link to
the most recent study by ni H about how he
can click on that it says the protective and chemo
therapeutical role of amignalan an induced memory cancer and experimental
mice and upregulation of related genes. Right there in plain sight,

(02:44:47):
they say that amigdalan kills cancer cells on the ni
H and David, if we put that on NBC News,
they would cut us off immediately. But that's right there
with our National Institute of Health.

Speaker 2 (02:44:59):
So when what do you think is going on with R. K. Junior?
I mean getting such mixed signals from him about things.
He talks about the importance of food and many other things.
Like that, and yet you know they authorized then they
pull back some of the authorization for the m R
and A vaccines and think, how do you read that?

Speaker 6 (02:45:15):
Well, I mean, David, like always, we have we have
those that tell us the truth, and then we have
those that lie to us to make us hate the
people that we shouldn't hate. RFK Junior was on vacation.
I know what I'm about to tell you because I
meet every every two weeks with the MAHA Action whatever. Okay,

(02:45:38):
it's called the Maha Action Media Hub where they were
they're having us be the mockingbird media of the truth. Now,
there's not anybody on this platform that will lie for administration,
so not me included. But they told us he was
on vacation. These two plants allowed this, these m R
and A vaccines to be approved. He not only fired them,

(02:46:01):
he repealed that, and then he came out and said
that we've pulled all the five hundred million dollars of
funding from all mRNA vaccines. That is a win.

Speaker 4 (02:46:12):
David.

Speaker 6 (02:46:12):
Oh yeah, And so you know I will I will
defend RFK Junior. Although I don't know him personally, I've
never had any meetings with him. I try to dig
down into what he's doing. He's got a tremendously difficult job.
Who I've been doing this for thirty years.

Speaker 2 (02:46:29):
I ask you, why do you think they're reluctant to
ban the Trump shot? I mean we saw this first.
There was you know, the Trump shot, the warp speed
so called vaccine, the mRNA COVID shots. We looked at Florida,
you know, DeSantis and Latipo there stopped recommending it first,

(02:46:49):
you know, for one class of people. Then they broadened it.
Then they said no, you know, we don't want to
have that here at all. So they did it in
a gradual process like that. I guess the question is,
you know, it seems like RFK Junior has been avoiding that.
I don't know if it's because it's a pet project
of Trump or what what the issue is.

Speaker 6 (02:47:09):
But let me explain it. You're a brilliant guy like
you can can get it. And I mean this sincerely
that the deep state is far deeper than even you
or I believe. I mean, you know what I'm saying.
I've been doing this my whole life. I was born
in the John Birch Society. Robert Welch used to have
meetings at my house as a kid, Jerrah Griffin, you know,

(02:47:30):
fed me. You know, Jerry Griffin still thinks of me
as a five year old running around his house. So
he has to, you know, watch out that I don't
tip something over. I've known I've been in this industry
that long. I've been in this industry, this truth movement
that long. You know, my uncle was a member of
the Bohemian Club and you know all the stories about that. Oh,
the deep state is about three thousand people that are

(02:47:50):
in there right now that are kind of undercover. So
for example, we get RFK that says flora should be
banned from all drinking, but the Attorney General, Pam Bondi
uh pushes that aside because her last job was with
one of the legal law firms that promotes chemical poisonous chemicals.

(02:48:12):
So you would think, you know, you would think that
she would would you know, we're's so much proof about
how poisonous floride is.

Speaker 2 (02:48:20):
But yet it's Yeah, her Department of Justice is appealing
the decision that said, you know, take it out, uh,
and she just has to say we're going to walk
away from this, and it's a big win. But No,
she's going to continue to pursue that.

Speaker 6 (02:48:34):
Yeah, what in the heck? I've hung out with Cash Patel.
He was in my hotel room. I talked to him.
I I thought I knew who he was. But he's
now in there and he's being his I find we
find out his pilot, uh, you know, is a deep
stayer that was against all the J six guys and
he didn't know for eight months. It's just so deep,

(02:48:57):
you know, And it's so deep that that it's I'm
not saying it's we're going to fix it, David. I'm
not saying we're going to fix it. But I'm telling
you the grassroots is stronger today than it's ever been
in my lifetime. I can point to that things are
happening on the grassroots level. We're saying we don't want
to wait for them to tell us it's okay. From

(02:49:18):
the top. There's not a single person I know in
Arizona that I bump into in all these Maha movement
things will ever take another vaccine for some pandemic thing.
The general public in Minnesota might still be sixty percent
or seventy percent will follow what the deep state tells
them about a vaccine. But the people in the know,
the people that have woken up in states like Arizona,

(02:49:41):
where are one of our Andy Biggs. I hung out
with his wife at a meeting. If they know the truth,
Andy Biggs is now running for sent He's one of
our congressmen out here. The movement is happening from the
ground up, David, more than ever.

Speaker 2 (02:49:55):
And once you see the once you see the deception
that's there, you'll never unsee it and you'll never trust
them again. That's the key thing. If you can get
through to them on one issue. And that's the hopefulness
about this is that you know, with this Epstein documents
and stuff, maybe that'll be the thing that'll whaite people up.
And then it'll just be a cascading thing and they say, well,

(02:50:16):
you know, I lie to me about this. Maybe he's
lying to me about this other thing.

Speaker 6 (02:50:19):
Most likely he is, and it's very true. So that's
what my hope is. I'm not a I know, you know,
oh there's a savior up there. I'm not one of
those guys or I'm not you know, there's people that
I have friends that you still think there's some plan,
you know, whatever, I've lived this for sixty years, and
there's good and there's evil, And today two thousand people

(02:50:42):
will die of cancer, David, needlessly, needlessly, because we've been
lied to about everything, And even my own compatriots, even
people that will consider me a friend, don't really understand
how deep the cancer lie is, how deep it really is.
It's and but we saw it in live time with COVID,

(02:51:04):
so we get it. I get that they liked about
ivermectin and hydroxy colorkin, and the average you know, sheeple
knows that at least they got to look at ivermectin,
or at least they got to look at vitamin D.
And the average you know, Gary Breca, who's out there
being famous from teaching people about health, may not believe
me about apricot seeds yet, but he does believe that
ivermectin and hydroxy chloroquin and these other things. And some

(02:51:28):
of these movie stars are coming out and going on
Tucker Carlson and saying the truth that you know, David,
you and I would have said five years ago. They're
saying it and they're getting away with saying it, Whereas
we were tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists now that general public
is waking up to it, and it's.

Speaker 2 (02:51:48):
Of course there's also the PCR quote unquote test, the
procedure that they have. You said earlier that you are
glad that you didn't get the other cat scan. Was
there something in particular that you were learned about cat
skins warn people about.

Speaker 6 (02:52:02):
Well, yeah, cat's cancer are just they stick poison in
you and then they radiate you. And so it really
we as we as Americans, been taught let's let's let's
figure out what it is and then cut it out.
That's our whole medical system. So all the tests memory,
they've proven that mammograms are cancer causing. You know, I

(02:52:26):
could go a whole show with you about doctor Harold Manner,
who said in nineteen seventy eight that breast cancer and
mass eectomies should be a thing of the past. This
amazing doctor that had fifty published articles and six textbooks
said that in nineteen seventy eight he proved it beyond

(02:52:46):
shadow of a doubt that breast cancer is just a
deficiency of B seventeen, vitamin A and pancretic enzymes, and
that he had one hundred percent good results with not
only the laboratory mice that were bred to grow breast cancers,
but the fifteen women that were sent home to die.
And he was fired after thirty years at Loyola. That

(02:53:08):
is a tragedy that my dad went through the same
as he did. And Harold Manner his life ended in
October of nineteen eight eighty eight, the same month my
dad died. So I could tell this story and people
would go, oh, is that real? Is you telling the truth?
I didn't know about Harold Manner tell less than nine
months ago. And David, it's been proven by like thousands

(02:53:31):
of studies and tens of thousands of case histories and
current case histories about B seventeen Lantro. But people that
are listening to you, that know you only tell the truth,
they're still going to think this John Richardson, guy, he's
just crazy. And there's no way an apricot seed could
prevent my grandmother from dying the breast Cancer's no way

(02:53:53):
B seventeen could help somebody not ever get cancer in
the first place. Even though it's been proven, David got
a shot of a doubt and Gea Griffin ninety four
years old, will tell you if you ask a point blank,
do you know anybody that's ever died of cancer that
regularly eats amigdal one or B seventeen, And he'll tell you, No,

(02:54:14):
I don't know anybody. And I just had. I was
just with him three weeks ago in Tennis. Was gosh,
I'm in so many places. Where was it? No? I
was in a Tulsa, Oklahoma with Jierra Griffin for the
most recent Red Pill expo and ends ninety four, still speaking.

Speaker 2 (02:54:32):
Well, I know somebody who took apricot seats when he
was diagnosed with cancer and he got over the cancer,
you know. And I said this to this doctor who
was she was a not a cardio vascio doctor, but
it was. I can't remember what her title was. Basically
she works on arteries. And so she was pushing me

(02:54:56):
with the stuff she's told me several times about. I
kept pushing back against Statton's and she she wanted to
sell me the Framingham study, and I said, look, I'm
not interested in studies. I'm much more interested in anecdotes,
quite frankly, because I know that studies can be manipulated
to hide certain things and to escalate other things. And

(02:55:16):
I would like to know from people. I've said, so
it has actually more weight with me to get somebody's
anecdotal experience with a particular substance or of what they
have done in treatment. I just don't really care about
studies anymore.

Speaker 6 (02:55:30):
Well, I agree with that, but I agree with that completely,
even though I show an NI study about it make going.
It's more. It's more to help the normies because I
want to give you. I gave you a list of
just the doctors I have personally vetted or the clinics
I personally vetted. It says it's the third link I
sent to you you can share with the audience. These

(02:55:52):
are all doctors I've personally talked to that are that
are working with natural path or integrative at least natural.
There's all sorts some other lists. Gold Care has a
list of doctors. So I'm searching to get people in
touch with doctors that are actually telling the truth and
not just doing what they've been traded. I've had tearful

(02:56:12):
doctors say John, I've had to relearn twenty years of
what I was lied to about to now know the truth,
and all this stuff with COVID helped them wake up
and So doctor Avery Jackson, who's in neurosurgeons, opening a
medical school in North Carolina that's going to teach people
eighty percent natural God given answers and twenty percent of

(02:56:36):
the pathic One of the richest women in the world, Walton,
just opened a medical school in Bentonville, Arkansas, where they're
teaching seventy percent of the education will be about lifestyle,
eating properly, all the things that these mds will graduate
in four years, David, and they'll know the truth. So

(02:56:59):
it is is actually happening. But in the meantime, we
have to be our own We don't know the resources
because we've been lied to so long as we have
to be our own best defender. So you've got to.

Speaker 2 (02:57:12):
Yeah, I have a friend. I have a friend from Austin,
Mark Hall, who does documentaries, and right now he's working
on documentary on stem cells and he's going to be
going to Japan to interview people there because in Japan
they have a different model. They look at it and
they say, the government says, Okay, if you can demonstrate
that this doesn't harm people, go ahead and do it.

(02:57:32):
We'll let you go ahead and do a study on this.
And we won't restrict the use of that. And then
you know, so first step is you show that does
no harm, which is ought to be the very first
thing in all of our medicine. First do no harm.
That used to be in the medical community's ethics. And
if that's the case, then give it a try and
show us your data to show if it was effective

(02:57:52):
or not. Now that's a very rational approach, and frankly,
that was the approach that I took after these strokes.
I looked at this stuff. It's like, Okay, well, if
that's not harmful, I'll try it, you know. And so
and we did find that things like red light helped
a great deal. I think it helped a great deal
with my tongue.

Speaker 6 (02:58:12):
And absolutely no question to studies are proven, But again,
we don't want to do studies, but the actual results
what I go for, David. I literally talk to doctors
that are having one hundred percent results with diabetes if
people follow their treatment plan one hundred percent.

Speaker 2 (02:58:29):
Wow.

Speaker 6 (02:58:29):
Okay, So they can't advertise that this doctor I talked to,
he's on the list of organizations that I that I
sent you. He's Saint John. I'm having such incredible results.
I don't even advertise I'm an MD that I don't
even put my name out there. I just I have
twenty four staff members and I can I can barely contain.

(02:58:49):
And I don't advertise. Wow, I said, can you do
phone consultations? Says yeah, John, I'll do phone consultations. But
every time I refer a new doctor that I trust,
you get six months. I start referring people to him,
and they go, oh, well, doctor, I'm not going to
name a name. The doctor such and such is a
great doctor, but I can't see him. He won't see

(02:59:10):
me for two months. The medical industrial complex wants you
to start chemotherapy within twenty four hours of giving you
a diagnosis of cancer, David. They don't want you to wait,
so they suck you in. And every one of these
doctors say, I'm so much more successful with someone that
hasn't been had their immune system destroyed with chemo and
radiation and surgery on. My success rates are approaching ninety

(02:59:33):
five percent for people you know, or higher. And of
course I'm not going to give you. There's a hospital here,
a medical system here in Arizona, and I can say
their name, but the founder of the hospital says they're
having thirty five hundred times better results with cancer than
a normal oncology department at a normal hospital, meaning I

(02:59:56):
don't even know how they get to a statistic like that,
but they're publishing and they're called en Vida. Now I'm
not related to Vida or have any you know, I.

Speaker 2 (03:00:07):
Know this.

Speaker 6 (03:00:08):
They're kind of a transition between a half a million
dollar cancer therapy that cuts you, burns you, and poisons
you for cold hazard and one hundred and twenty five
thousand dollar therapy through Vita. That's all cash. It's all
that you paid out of your pocket. So the system
is still not be like it should be.

Speaker 2 (03:00:26):
It's all driven by insurance. I mean, right, Karen, my
wife injured her ankle, broke her ankle, but she also
injured her knee in the same fall, and they focused
on the ankle because they could see that it was broken,
but there was a lot of dam egineerr knee, and
they wouldn't take a look at the knee because they
had to get special approval for the insurance. And they
got worse and worse and worse. So finally it swells
up a lot of fluid. Then they'll open up another

(03:00:49):
ticket on it. But it's all driven by insurance. And
you know, that's the key thing, and.

Speaker 6 (03:00:55):
That is that's changing. Believe it or not, you're not
going to hear for for a while. But and in
the health world, or even in the political world, we
look at all these things and we decide, hey, the
most important thing should be this on a given day, David,
I don't even know what the most important thing is anymore. Like,
is it the stuff they're spraying on us? Is it
the fact that our food has no nutrition in it?

(03:01:17):
Isn't the fact that they put poisons in all our
processed food that's not in any other country. Isn't the
fact that we've been lied to about natural God given answers?

Speaker 2 (03:01:26):
I all of the above.

Speaker 6 (03:01:29):
And so it's a lot of work. And the good
news is guys that we would have never politically agreed with,
like Russell Brand or you know, or some of these
other guys, you know, even Joe Rogan or some of
these people are making a difference for the normies. They're
waking them up because again my dad didn't believe. My

(03:01:49):
dad was a hero of the liberal left, because the
hippies loved the fact that he was using natural treatments
even though he was ran for Congress as under God,
family and country. They loved him in the seventies because
he was telling people the truth about nutrition. And nobody
ate organic food in the seventies unless you're a hippie. Now,
you know, we were knowing the truth that organic food

(03:02:12):
is the best way to get the health and nutrition
we need. So there is a lot happening, but it's
never fast enough, and all of us or such a
time as this need to be you know, working hard,
because it may switch completely in two years, for four years,
it may switch.

Speaker 2 (03:02:27):
Well, that's what I want to do. I want to
give people an idea of, you know, where they can
find help to identify problems that are out there, and
certainly one of the biggest problems that are out there.
And I think that is the only silver lining that
came out of the twenty twenty thing, is that people
became skeptical of the medical community and its motivations and
these treatments and that type of thing. Even if they're

(03:02:49):
not skeptical of the politician who ran it, you know,
they at least are skeptical of the product that's out there.
So there's still this double think that is going on,
but it's open the eye to a lot of things
like that, And I think it's it's very key that
we we passed the word long as to where we
can find help. We need to keep the communication lines

(03:03:09):
open to each other so that we can take control
of our own life. And you know, they don't want
us to have informed consent, but we can still not
give consent to this system that is out to victimize us.
So I'm saying, before you know, we look at insurance.
It's so strange that insurance would be driven to the

(03:03:30):
most expensive treatments rather than the cheaper treatments that are
out there, isn't it. It's really a lot of this
is very counterintuitive.

Speaker 6 (03:03:39):
Why a cycle pharmaceutical company's own insurance companies, so it
just supports the same sens of people always go, well,
if it's paying for it, how is they how do
they make profit? Because they keep the dollars that are
spent so high. The only way you can get those
treatments is to have these insurances, which then in turn
support this whole system. And we're paying higher cost for

(03:04:01):
pharmaceuticals than any other country in the world. How does
that make sense if the insurance companies are owned by
the pharmaceutical company because they keep that locked circle that
everybody's on the dole. Everybody's on the dole in this
trillion dollar cancer industry. So the truth about things like
layo trill or ozone therapy or even high dose vitamin
C or any of these natural, cheap effective things will

(03:04:24):
never be covered by insurance when it's locked in this
system that the government owns the patents. And you know,
so we are going to have to see the system crumble,
and I'm watching it crumble real time. So I did
send you another link to something that was put out
by the Truth about Cancer Folks, Tie and Charlie Bollinger

(03:04:44):
that just I don't even I didn't even know they're
putting it out. And it's all about the truth about
you know, B seventeen and a layotrill and how the
medical mafia buried a cheap, natural cancer remedy. It seems
like that's all I want to talk about. But that's
that's my laying, David, that's my that's key.

Speaker 2 (03:05:02):
That's the second leading cause of death, and I think
it's it's well, of course, the vaccine also upped the
number one cause, which is heart disease, so it stepped
them both up to a new level. I guess I
was going to say maybe immune system, Yeah, exactly, immune system.

Speaker 6 (03:05:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (03:05:21):
Well, I'm very interested to take a look at what
you said. We'll cover it here on the show. And
if you got anything about rheumatoid arthritis and natural remedies
that work with that, I'd be very interested in hearing
with that. My son Travis suffers with that quite a bit,
so we've been trying a lot of different things to
see if we can find something works, and so far
have not been able to do so. So if you

(03:05:42):
have anything like that, I'd be very interested and I'll
pass that along to the audience too.

Speaker 6 (03:05:46):
What was that again, I want to have my assistant
right that now.

Speaker 2 (03:05:48):
Rheumatoid Okay, I will, I will.

Speaker 6 (03:05:51):
Get back to you. I promise my best resource, not
that I'm an expert, yes, but I'll appreciate the best
resource because, like I said, I'm running these circles with
doctors that are the results speak for themselves, but they're
still they're still kind of underground. But we are in
a transition phase. We are in a transition phase where
I'm watching people open clinics that are helping people all
over and we're trying to add them as we go.

(03:06:13):
So the last thing I want to say, David, is
that I offered before about the World Without Cancer book.
Get your free pdf of the World Without Cancer sent
your email today at everybody watching they can have it
before the end of this podcast. It's at my World
without Cancer dot com. Just the word m Y with

(03:06:36):
the title of the book. You should be able to
remember it. And everybody can tell all their friends because
with this information, David, we could take the next step
to them never being able to lie to us again.
Once people read this book, which Ed Griffin says, they've
never found one fact that they could prove he was
wrong in not one in fifty years. You can get

(03:06:57):
the copy of the book at my World Without Care
answer dot com and it's free. There's no strings attached.
All we do is put you on our mailing list.
And what does that mean. You get updated information about
all sorts of things. And so that's that Eds gladly
doing this. He knows that people need this information and

(03:07:18):
that also people will buy the copy of the book
sometimes as well. So it also supports it. Yes, but
it's a free copy that anybody can get. You don't
need to have any excuse. Oh it's too expensive. I
can't afford. It's not covered by insurance. It's free. My
worldout cancer dot com and you can get that today.

Speaker 2 (03:07:33):
That's great. I will get that today. Thank you so much,
John richardson r NC store dot com. And if you
use the code night you can save ten percent off
of what you get there. But of course you can
get My World without Cancer dot com. You can go
there and you can get a free copy of the
PDF of the book. Thank you so much for joining us,

(03:07:54):
and thank you so much for what you do.

Speaker 6 (03:07:56):
Thank you, David. I'm so happy. I was so happy
because you're one of my heroes because you're a truth teller.
I'm so happy that you're healthy and you look great,
and I will continue to support you anyway I can.
Thank on your health journey.

Speaker 2 (03:08:10):
Thank you so much. Thank you John.

Speaker 6 (03:08:12):
Okay, thank you David, God bless you. Thank you both folks.

Speaker 2 (03:08:16):
As it for today. Thank you for joining us. Have
a good day. The common Man. They created common Core
and dumbed down our children. They created common past track

(03:08:38):
and control us. Their Commons project to make sure the
commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the
common man as simple, not sophisticated ordinary. But each of
us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

Speaker 6 (03:08:59):
That is what we have in common.

Speaker 2 (03:09:01):
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find

(03:09:21):
at Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you
for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep
us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2085: Fascism in America: Trump Fuses State & Tech

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2085: Fascism in America: Trump Fuses State & Tech

On Purpose with Jay Shetty