Mon Episode #2100: JFK & Charlie Kirk: Magic Bullet Lies & Government Cover-Ups

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:35):
It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
it's Monday, the twenty second of September. Ye're of our lord,
twenty twenty five. Well, today we're going to begin with
a death of free speech everywhere US, UK, Europe. And

(00:58):
there will be no memorial, sir, for it either. Both
sides want it so badly. And we're going to take
a look at war as we see the narrative of
the Russian incursion into Poland was an ad hoc false
flag attack. Folks, it is. There's no end to the
lies that NATO will tell to drag US into a

(01:20):
global war. And of course, when they want war, Trump
is their guy. He's now saying that Afghanistan has to
turn Bagram Air Force Base back over to the US,
or perhaps what that he'll restart the Afghan war that
he never ended. For four years, he's still bragging about

(01:41):
the war against the American people, and he still has
MAGA people shamelessly and foolishly defending him. We'll be right back.

Speaker 3 (02:10):
Good morning, and welcome to the show today, folks, And
if you have a brief down what we're going to cover.
I'm looking at the death of free speech. You've got
watch UK cop grills woman in her own home over
a Facebook post that up set someone.

Speaker 4 (02:22):
Oh no, we're upsetting people. Can't do that.

Speaker 3 (02:24):
Republicans are turning on free speech in wake of Charlie
Kirk's murder. Then we've got David Ike on Twitter and
he's asking some interesting questions. It's extraordinary how Magan now
stand for everything they once claim to oppose. It's okay
when we do it. Hate speech isn't real. And Pam
Bondy is an enemy of freedom. That's from the Mises Institute.
And Charlie Kirk reached out to Van Jones about civil discourse.

(02:47):
Hair Starmer and Starmer Troopers confirm Britain will ignore you
US and Israeli anger and recognize a Palestinian state. That's
from the Daily Skeptic. The Kimmel knows under the tent.
Actually libs are being hoist did with their own petard.
That's from The New American and Ran Paul absolutely inappropriate
for FCC to weigh in on Kimmel suspension in the

(03:08):
left calls for the genocide of conservatives.

Speaker 4 (03:12):
It's been happening for a while now.

Speaker 3 (03:13):
The residence on x this terrorist is May Golan, who
said I am personally proud of the ruins in Gaza
and that every baby, even eighty years from now, will
tell their grandchildren what the Jews did. National Trust sacks
volunteer gardeners for not being inclusive enough. How dare they?
How dare they not have enough multi racial volunteers. Trump

(03:36):
criticizes Pentagon's new press restrictions, and Trump threatens Code Pink
with RICO changes after public confrontation. Don Bacon rips Trump
on Russia. Kimmel in CNN interview, Dana Bash battles Mark
Wayne Mullen on Trump and free speech, and Trump says
Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch involved in TikTok deal.

Speaker 2 (03:57):
I wonder if that's part of the deal for their
law suit. If I'll ten billion dollars lawsuit against them
and then puts them on the new board of the
fascist TikTok that'll be owned and run by the government.

Speaker 3 (04:08):
You guys take a dive on this lawsuit and safe
and do some money.

Speaker 2 (04:13):
You know, We're going to take a look first at
the UK cop that grills this woman if George Arwell
had done a black comedy like Terry Gilliam did in
nineteen eighty four when he did Brazil, this is what
it would have looked like.

Speaker 5 (04:29):
You can come in, but you better have a damn
good reason for being here. I'm a member of the
Free Speech Union and I'm an American citizen.

Speaker 6 (04:35):
I have you known?

Speaker 5 (04:36):
Mysk on you so quick? Your feet won't touch something.

Speaker 4 (04:39):
That we believe you've been on Facebook.

Speaker 5 (04:42):
You're here because somebody got upset? Is it against the law?
Am I being arrested? What are you doing here?

Speaker 7 (04:51):
Lewis?

Speaker 4 (04:51):
If you mentioned to come in, you could just the person.

Speaker 5 (04:56):
I'm not apologizing to anybody. I can tell you that.

Speaker 8 (05:00):
I have to talk to.

Speaker 9 (05:04):
So what.

Speaker 5 (05:07):
Are there? No houses that have been burgled recently? No rates,
snow murders. Well, then why aren't you out there doing
you know, investigating those? Well, you're not investigating houses being burgled.
I don't mean to I know exactly the things I've said.
You know how many people in this neighborhood have been

(05:28):
broken into?

Speaker 6 (05:30):
Please?

Speaker 5 (05:30):
No, of course you don't. Unless there's a tweet, then
you do. I haven't broken any laws, So you're going
to be wasting your time when you can be instead
doing things that are more important.

Speaker 4 (05:41):
That's why I wanted to come to.

Speaker 5 (05:43):
No, No, you should not be doing this. I'm a
cancer patient. You can see that because I'm bald.

Speaker 7 (05:51):
But it doesn't change.

Speaker 5 (05:56):
Well, you know whether I've broken a law. You can
judge for yourself. But are you leaving? Somebody knows what
you guys are doing. We know what's going on in
this country. Get on to them and tell them to
apologize to me. A cancer patient, a woman living on
her own who has never broken alaw in her life.
By the way, ever, an older woman. You tell them
I'm an elderly woman, I'm a cancer patient. Well, you

(06:21):
can arrange it, but I'm going to tell you the
same damn things that I'm telling you now. Next time,
I'm going to have a free speech union lawyer with me.

Speaker 2 (06:30):
Well, I don't know the rules are in the UK,
but let me just tell you that's the wrong way
to handle it in the US. I'm glad you stod
it for her rights. I'm glad that she gave him
a time enjoyed daring that if the police show up
at your door or stop you somewhere, you say am
I under arrest? Am I under arrest?

Speaker 10 (06:49):
No?

Speaker 2 (06:50):
Okay, am I free to go?

Speaker 5 (06:51):
No?

Speaker 2 (06:52):
Well, since I'm being detained, I have nothing to say
to you. And in the US you plead the Fifth Amendment.
That's the way you handle it. You don't let them
in your house, you don't let them sit on your sofa,
and you don't engage them in speech, no matter how
angry you are, no matter how unjust the charges. Understand that,
Understand what you're dealing with. They're trying to entrap you.

(07:14):
So you heard the issue there, and of course it
reminds me of Rowan Atkinson. I guess it's been now
about ten years. They were trying to head this off.
They saw this coming, and Rowan Atkinson and some other
comedians were there to support free speech against a proposed rule.
I've played it a couple of times where he talks

(07:36):
about he says, this is very much like the gits
that we used to do in comedy. He said, with
a police officer is arresting a man for walking about
with a loud shirt at night and things like that,
and you know, just making up these charges nonsense. But

(07:56):
they knew that it was coming for free speech. And
he had big sign behind him, go ahead, offend me.
We must not come after offensive speech. And yet now
in the US we have conservatives doing that most appallingly
in the name of Charlie Kirk, who is adamantly exactly

(08:18):
the opposite of this. He was someone who engaged people
in debate. That was the thing that he did so well,
and they are just destroying his memory by using his
death as an opportunity to undo everything he believed in.
And I think he believed in it. So we're going

(08:40):
to talk about his death. By the way, we now
have a magic bullet that has been unveiled in this assassination.
It is I don't know what happened. I'm at the
nine to eleven stage right now, where the only thing
I know is that what the government is telling me
is impossible. So I don't know who did it. I

(09:01):
can pretty much guess what the motives are, and I
know how the government is using these events. So she
is a Trump supporter, which I don't understand by still
being a Trump supporter when you see that kind of
attack on free speech. And they told her to apologize,
but they would not tell her what the offense was

(09:23):
or who to apologize. She still doesn't know what it
was that was offensive, and she doesn't know who she offended.
You know, we've had these types of situations in the
UK centuries ago. That's why when this country was founded,
they said, you will you have the right to be
to answer your accusers face to face, to know the

(09:47):
charges against you, to bring witnesses in your defense. That's
called due process, which Trump is thumbing his nose at
at every opportunity as well. So he told her that
I'm there to get apology, but I won't tell you
to whom or for what you apologize to the state
for having an opinion. He's not going to record something

(10:12):
and send it in a text message to the complainer
that's there. I'm so sorry. I don't know what it
was that I said that offended you, but I'm so sorry.
This sounds like sometimes arguments that somebody can have as
a married couple. I don't know what I offended you for,
but whatever it is, I'm sorry. But that's a different thing.

(10:33):
We want to keep that relationship going. So she said.
When the Free Speech Union got there to help her,
they contacted the police and they said, we would like
to see the charges here as part of this investigation.
And then the police claimed that they had accidentally deleted

(10:54):
the record of the complaint. They must be keeping them
in the same desk where the Epstein files are kept.
We have accidentally deleted and redacted that. And one person
tweeted out tyrant says, we're investigating you your potential commission
of thought crime. You what was the thought tyrant? I'm

(11:17):
not at liberty to say, are you going to apologize
or what.

Speaker 3 (11:23):
I can't tell you what you did, I can't tell
you who you did it too, But would you like
to apologize for it? How are you supposed to apologize
for something when you don't know what it is. In fact,
most people tend to get very upset if you just
apologize as a blanket statement, as opposed to actually knowing
what you did wrong.

Speaker 11 (11:38):
Yes, yes, I think the communists just want you to
be sorry.

Speaker 2 (11:42):
In general, they want you cowed down to the government
is what they want to the police state. And so
when the said we've lost the complaint, that made people
more angry. One person posted, you are not police. Your
bullies picked on average people who have expressed opinion is
because you two are too cowardly and useless to do

(12:03):
your actual job of going after criminals. You and all
of your officers should apologize to your citizens for your
bullying and threatening them. So this is the problem, folks.
We have a disconnect in what we think the government
is supposed to do and what the government wants to
do and does do. It shows up when we talk
about the police. It shows up. And we talk about schools.

(12:25):
You think the schools are there to educate your kids
to read and write, to think critically. You better grow up.
You think the police are there to protect you against
violent crime and property crime. Come on, let's grow up.
That's not what they're about. We need to have a
discussion about what education is and this institution that is

(12:46):
interfering with that, And we need to have a discussion
about what a real safe community is like and how
the police are interfering with that. We need to define
what the police are supposed to be doing, and we
need to define the role of government. That was done
in the Constitution, but that document has been destroyed, especially

(13:07):
now by Trump and Mike Johnson. The statement from your
officer quote unquote, the alternative to the provision of an
apology would be that I have to call you in
for an interview was absolute nonsense. Then a threat to
induce capitulation, just like Trump and the FCC are doing
two news networks threats to push them into capitulation. It's

(13:35):
just the difference is this is a small version of
that versus the bigger version. If you want to see
how that looks what happened to Jimmy Kimmel. What you
should do, conservatives, is take a look at this and
substitute a TV network for that woman. I know they're
big and you don't like them. I don't like them either,

(13:57):
but substitute the press or any news organization, maybe one
that you like. And then for the police when you
substitute FCC's Brendan Carr. It was kind of interesting that
over the weekend or at the end of the week,
Ted Cruz came out and criticized him an interesting travesy
called him. He said, this sounds like a mafia threat.

(14:20):
Remember what I said, did the ABC executives wake up
with the horse head in their bed?

Speaker 12 (14:25):
But you're gonna make.

Speaker 2 (14:28):
You didn't say that, but that's basically it. I think
the best response to all this is from one individual
who simply tweeted out two words. He said, I'm offended.
I'm offended to the actions I guess of these police.
But again, don't let the police into your home. Especially

(14:49):
in America. You have Fifth Amendment, say get a warrant?
Am I under or if you're outside of your house,
am I free to go? Oh? I'm not okay now
being because words have meaning and so does a Fifth Amendment.
Not saying another word to you, Republicans are turning on
free speech now in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder.

(15:13):
You know, one of the things that we had yesterday,
I was surprised that we didn't get the rest of
the details about the ballroom. Evidently that Trump is that
with his response and people ask him about his grief
of Charlie Kirk's death.

Speaker 3 (15:26):
I assume that what he meant is the ballroom. He's
going to be balling in there. He's so upset that
he's going to go in there and he's going to weep.

Speaker 2 (15:32):
Yeah, he just immediately changed the subject started talking about
his great ballroom that he's building. Well, the question is
should linkeded officials since sir Americans, reason says the Trump
administration says yes, and so do the people who need
jerk support. This jerk Republicans one cast themselves as defenders

(15:53):
of free speech against cancel culture and the censoring impulses
of the political left. There was merit the argument. The
Reason has covered many cases of overreach, but over the
last week, Margauripublicans has scoured social media for government employees
who are posting about Kirk's murder, contacting employers and attempt

(16:15):
to get them fired. Kirk's online defenders have snitch tagged
the employers of government workers over social media posts and
saying that they don't care about the assassination or that
they didn't like Kirk, even as they condemned his assassination,
even criticizing Kirk prior to his assassination. Well, and that's

(16:38):
just it. You know, these are people who are engaging
in a Stazi tactic. It doesn't matter what the subject is,
it's what they're doing about it. How they despise free
speech now, free speech that they were clinging to when
they were being persecuted by Biden unjustly less than five

(17:01):
years ago. Now. And so what has happened to these people?
Is this just people online? It's not that those with
government power are advocating such a thing, right, well, Trump
is advocating it as well. He said, I think maybe
their broadcast license should be taken away. All they do

(17:22):
is hit Trump referring to himself in the third person.
They're licensed. They're not allowed to do that. They're not
allowed to criticize me, your dear leader. This is straight
out of North Korea. Folks, When you see someone celebrating
Charlie kirksch murder, call them out, SAI advance and report
them to their employer. His argument bears a striking resemblance

(17:45):
to the comments made just a few years ago by
his alleged ideological enemies, except now they're all really strange bedfellows,
aren't they.

Speaker 11 (17:55):
Anyway, we have the video of Trump saying that on
the board.

Speaker 2 (17:59):
Yeah, let's go ahead and play that. It was consequence.
Culture is how they're spending this. The people who are
apologizing for Trump. Oh, well, there's consequences to speech, not
if it's free, not if it's legal. There should not
be any consequences. I don't care if you like it

(18:19):
or not. There should be no consequences. But that is
a cute little SoundBite that is being echoed throughout social
media chambers. I've even seen it on some comments here.
Get over it. Understand what free speech is. That means free,
means free. You're free to say whatever you want without
any recrimination, without any consequences. We already have consequences for

(18:42):
speech that is not free, and that means things like libel, slander,
legitimate threats that are imminent. All of these things have consequences,
but not something that simply because it offends somebody. Did
you find that clip?

Speaker 13 (19:00):
That's something that you'd be talking about for licensing too.

Speaker 14 (19:03):
Don't sell this free speech question because you've said that
you've restored free speech in America.

Speaker 7 (19:08):
Yeah, is that free.

Speaker 14 (19:09):
Speech, including for people who are harshly critical of you,
for your political opponents, for people who say things you
don't want.

Speaker 7 (19:15):
To become immune to you fairly, I've become immune to it.

Speaker 15 (19:19):
There's never been a person that's had more unfair publicity
than me.

Speaker 7 (19:22):
And that's why your network.

Speaker 2 (19:24):
Made he's immune to it.

Speaker 7 (19:25):
Million dollars or sixteen million dollars.

Speaker 2 (19:27):
We filed a ten billion dollar lawsuit and fifteen billion dollars.

Speaker 7 (19:30):
Why CBS paid me a lot of money too.

Speaker 2 (19:34):
It's a thug shaking people down.

Speaker 12 (19:35):
Times two days, critics.

Speaker 15 (19:36):
For a lot of money, because well I'm winning. I mean,
I'm winning the cases. And the reason I'm.

Speaker 2 (19:41):
Winning is No, you're not guilty, John, You're guilty, got
your lawsuit thrown out.

Speaker 15 (19:45):
Well, network a very unfair network, and you should be
ashamed of yourself. NBC is equally bad. I don't know
who's worse. I think they're equally bad. And you know,
for you to stand there an ax so innocent and
ask me a question like that, but.

Speaker 7 (19:58):
Look, you if you've paid a big.

Speaker 15 (20:00):
Price because you were dishonest, Jan The reason I won
that lawsuit was because you were dishonest. You were proven
to be dishonest. And so you can't sit back and
just say, oh, well, what do you think you know,
like you're some wonderful person. You're not a wonderful person. Practically,
you're a terrible reporter. You know it, and so do I.

Speaker 2 (20:19):
Okay, he didn't win the lawsuit. They count owed to
financial pressure. And so you hear this, fair? Fair, fair?
Does he sound like a democrat to you? Like a
democrat from New York certainly sounds like it to me.
You know, the fairness doctrine was what they used to
stifle conservative speech for decades. It was only when Ronald

(20:42):
Reagan got rid of the fairness doctrinequote unquote that you
had the rise of conservative talk radio, Rushling Ball and others.
So if you want to talk about fair just understand
where this guy is coming from and where he is
pushing us. He's not a conservative, he's not a legitimate Republican.

(21:03):
He is a manchurion Democrat. When you see we.

Speaker 11 (21:07):
Have two videos of Trump talking about censorship, we've got.

Speaker 2 (21:13):
Ahead.

Speaker 11 (21:15):
Should I play the other one?

Speaker 2 (21:16):
Yeah? Sure, Look.

Speaker 13 (21:19):
That's something that you'd be talking about for licensing too.
When you have a network, then you have evening shows
and all they do is hit Trump. That's all they do.

Speaker 15 (21:30):
If you go back, I guess they haven't had a
conservative on in years or something somebody said.

Speaker 13 (21:35):
But when you go back and take a look, all
they do is hit Trump. The license they're not allowed
to do that. They're an arm of the Democrat parties.
Thank you everybody, you know.

Speaker 2 (21:47):
Yeah, that's the problem with licenses they have, you know,
with a broadcast and with the FCC, And that's the
way we're going to come after people again. The licenses.
They brought them in and same reason they brought in police,
the same reason they established government schools. There was a
stated purpose which made sense to people on a practical,

(22:11):
pragmatic basis, but there was no authority for it. And
so what happens is when you create a government program
on the basis of some pragmatic compromise of the constitution,
it metastasizes into a cancer. And that's what we see
over and over again. But we have the maga influencers

(22:34):
who are out there nudging people say, hey, say this,
there's consequences for speech. Sure, your speech is free, but
there'll be consequences. You know, you might get a knock
on the door from a cop who wants to sit
in your living room and lecture you about hurt feelings.
It's no surprise that Trump has no principles on free speech,
said reason. From the beginning of his first term he

(22:54):
called the press the quote enemy of the American people.
But Vance's position marks a notable pivot from just a
few months ago. Yeah, they are all spinning very rapidly.
If you've got to pay consequences, folks, it is not free.
And there's a lot of consequences that they can be

(23:14):
for speech that you don't like. I mean, you personally
can boycott the corporation if you don't like it, if
they come after you individually. There's slander, there's libel, there's
other things like that. And of course the threat of
violence has to be not only credible but imminent. People
have used warfare type of talk forever, forever, both sides.

Speaker 3 (23:38):
That's the thing is like what Jimmy Kimmel said was
factually wrong, but he's protected the under the First Amendments.
He gives very very strong protections. Now, potentially the MAGA
movement could have come forward and said, you know, this
is slanderous in defamatory against our movement, and they could
have brought some sort of lawsuit as a group of people,

(23:59):
But the FCC has no room here. It doesn't give
them the ability to do that.

Speaker 2 (24:03):
Now.

Speaker 4 (24:03):
I think they would have lost that lawsuit.

Speaker 3 (24:04):
I don't think it has any real bearing or weight
enough to be carried through court.

Speaker 2 (24:09):
The real remedy to bad speech is more speech. It's debate.
That's what Charlie did. It wasn't afraid to go in
and engage people who were just making baseless accusations against
people and slanders. That's the best way to do it, rather.

Speaker 3 (24:26):
Than I'm saying that I think they should have brought
a lawsuit. So I'm just saying, you know, technically that.

Speaker 2 (24:31):
You have to have free speech in order to have
the right approach to all of this stuff.

Speaker 11 (24:36):
Yes, absolutely, one thing though they're talking about government employees
at the beginning of this Reason article, which I think
is somewhat different. I mean, there can't be any government
consequences for public employees or else. It's not free speech,
but government employees. It's kind of people that are in

(24:56):
a way working for you, So it's different to make
your opinion known that you don't think they should be
in that public position working for the American people, with
them shouting that Charlie Kirk deserved it or whatever.

Speaker 2 (25:12):
I agree. One of the most egregious one of these
types of issues that jd. Vance is out there creating
witch hunts for was an individual who was fired because
his wife posted something. He didn't post it, his wife
posted it, and they couldn't reach him for comment the Prescotton,
but they were able to get his father and he said,

(25:34):
well that sooned to be my ex daughter in law.
So I don't know that was something that came up
because of this, but he got fired because of what
his wife said. This is the ridiculous extreme that's being
taken to. This is the hallmark of communism and all
authoritarian regimes.

Speaker 11 (25:54):
And didn't you say that he wanted to go or
sweet something about it against his wife what his wife
was saying, and his company told him no, don't say
anything about it, and then later fired him.

Speaker 2 (26:09):
That's right, that's right. They didn't want him talking anymore
about it. They just wanted this all to go away.
Let's just put a gang on everybody and let's put
something over everybody's mouth so they can't talk. Then we
will hear no evil and you will say no evil.

Speaker 11 (26:24):
Well, I saw another thing about that, where it was
a teacher that posted a meme about Trump, and because
the meme referenced Charlie Kirk, it was saying the meme
was Trump talking to Charlie Kirk. This Epstein thing isn't
going away. You need to take one for the team.
And that's a meme about Trump. It has Kirk in it,

(26:45):
but it's not a meme making fun of Kirk. And
she got fired for that.

Speaker 2 (26:52):
Yeah, well, you know that is it is they did
have and it's gone away. In the US, all the
said seen stuff that has helped him very much, but
it hasn't gone away. In the UK, they have and
we'll get to this video later. We have a video
about the police there now confiscating, seizing and confiscating a van.

(27:15):
You know. First last week they arrested four guys for
an unauthorized projection on the castle right showing and it
had sound and all the rest of this stuff showing
Trump and Epstein partying together. What great friends they were
for about fifteen years, and so the police showed up
and arrested them. This group does that kind of thing

(27:36):
all the time. This is the first time they've ever
had an arrest. Now that's been followed up by a
van that was confiscated and it was here. It is
right here, let's just play it. You can see this
van has got pictures of Trump and Epstein together, and

(27:58):
so the police stopped them, stole the van like civil
asset forfeiture, theft, that type of thing. Yeah, pretty amazing. Well,
he can run, but he can't hide, and he can
try to hide the documents, but he's gonna be able

(28:20):
to people understand what's going on. Interesting thing is if
they had complied with this or released the stuff, even
as he had his army going through scrubbing and sanitizing
this stuff, if he had released that, it wouldn't have
been his damaging to him. He and his administration includes

(28:41):
people like Bondie and Catter, Hotel, Dan Bongino, all them
together working very very hard to cover up. It only
makes everybody's suspicions more and more confirmed and stronger. You know,
the interesting thing about Watergate was not the essence of
what was there. It was the cover up that came afterwards.

(29:04):
You might should remember that when the opposing party was
in power, Brendan Carr, the FCC chair, recognized the errors
of threatening people with the FCC over speech. In twenty
twenty two, Meta CEO Zuckerberg told podcaster Joe Rogan that
during the twenty twenty election, Facebook artificially decreased the spread

(29:28):
of a story about Hunter Biden in response to requests
from the FBI. Again, it comes from the government, and
they use the private corporation as plausible deniability. But it's
really the government that is doing this. We knew it
we knew it all along. We have now seen the
documents released by Musk, and we've heard Zuckerberg talk about

(29:49):
it as well. Carr posted in response on X Brendan
Carr the FCC guy who just throttled Jimmy Kimmel because
of a joke. It really, you know, talking about what
you were saying before. Lance. The offense I think was
not the fact that he falsely said a maga guy

(30:09):
did it. I think the real offense was for him
to show the absurdity of Trump's reaction to all this
to pivot, didn't really care. Pivoted from that question to
talking about the ballroom, and he says, he shows all
the compassion of an eight year old who just had
his pet goldfish dye. I think that struck home, and
I think that was what resulted in this guy's got

(30:32):
to come down, because satire is the most powerful weapon,
and that was very true satire showing the true character
of Trump. Anyway, back in twenty twenty two, you had
Brendan Carr say, quote, the government does not evade the

(30:53):
First Amendments restraints on censoring political speech by jaw boning
a company into suppressing. Rather that conduct runs headlong into
those constitutional restrictions. As Supreme Court law makes clear, that's
not what he's saying today. Now he's doing just the
opposite and even more troubling. Listen to this quote from

(31:15):
Senator Cynthia Loomis, who is out of Wyoming. She says,
under normal times, in normal circumstances, I tend to think
notice that she says, tend She's not really sure about
the first minute. She says, I tend to think that
the First Amendment should always be sort of the ultimate right. Well,

(31:37):
we don't get our rights from the First Amendment. What
the First Amendment does is it prohibits government officials like
these hypocrites of Brendon Carr and Cynthia Loomis. It prevents them,
or prohibits them, I should say, from violating our God
given rights, she says, and that there should be almost

(31:59):
no checks and balances on it. Almost almost. She doesn't
want to say she supports free speech. She supports nearly
free speech, maybe maybe under normal circumstances. But of course
these aren't normal circumstances. Everything now is an emergency, and
emergencies call for a strong man to issue dictates. She said,

(32:23):
we just can't let people call each other those kinds
of insane things and then be surprised when politicians get
shot and the death threats they're receiving, and then trying
to get extra money for security. Well, just wait until
you establish your dictatorship and see what happens. Women says,
complaint sounds like a more aggressive version of the Heckler's veto,

(32:47):
which is a form of censorship where speaker's event is
canceled due to actual or potential hostility of ideological opponents,
wrote Zach Greenberg of Fire, the Foundation for Individual writes
an expression, and he knows this very well because Fire
had been supporting a lot of people. Charlie Kirk was
not the only one going to different campuses and talking.

(33:09):
As a matter of fact, somebody sent me, I've had
a couple of people send me statements saying Erica Kirk
is not going to be running Turning Point USA. It's
going to be Ben Shapiro. Look at what he had
to say. You know, he went out there and said,
I'm going to pick up the bloody microphone. I'm going
to carry on his work. I don't think that there's

(33:29):
some agreement to put him in at the top understand
Erica is the CEO. She answers to the board of directors,
especially to the donors. They tell them what to say.
But Shapiro's got his own organization and he's been doing
some of this. He didn't do it as well or
on the ground like Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk just went

(33:51):
out in the open and engage the students. Ben Shapiro
would go into more formal debating settings where he'd typically
debate somebody on something. Of course, Charlie Kirk has done
that as well, But I think what he's trying to
do is to virtual signal to the people that he
is the successor to Charlie Kirk, not that he's going
to take over Turning Point USA. We'll see what happens.

(34:14):
But the Heckler's veto has been used over and over again.
They start saying, well, I'm going to you know, threats,
whether real or imagined, are going to happen if this
conservative speaker comes on campus, and the university then says, okay, well,
we don't want to have any problems, so you're disinvited.
You can't speak. It's going to be too controversial, And

(34:36):
that is now what the conservatives are doing. The Heckler's veto.
Zach Greenberg said, Lewis is telling us the government must
punish people for saying offensive or inflammatory things because of
how others might respond. He says, this is not only
completely wrong, it's unconstitutional. And I don't care who you are, Senator,

(35:00):
or whether you're somebody who is just working in state government.
If you swore as a condition of your office to
pull the Constitution, you have no authority for anything after
you violate and shred the Constitution and ignore what it
has to say. First amendment to the Constitution protects speech,
no matter how offensive its content, said the ACLU. Speech

(35:25):
that deeply offends our morality or as hostile to our
way of life warrants the same constitutional protection as other
speech because the right of free speech is indivisible. What
it is is a litmus test for your belief as
to whether or not there should be something called free speech.

(35:47):
The litmus test is if you support free speech, when
you don't support the speech that's being said, you support
their freedom to say it. Who've seen this over and
over again. So David Ike came out. He called out MAGA.
He said it's extraordinary how MAGA now stands for everything

(36:08):
that they once claimed to oppose. It's okay when we
do it. We were never against it to start with,
only when it was done to us. The lack of
self awareness, says Ike, is stunning. Whether it's Trump on
the right or Starmer on the left, it's the same
agenda promoted with different excuses. And he was referring in particular,

(36:35):
he responded to a post that Trump put up talking
about how people who screamed at him in a restaurant
that's code pink. Those are the people they wants to
use Rico statutesy and he views them as terrorists because
they're anti war. I kind of think the terrorist is
more like the guy who drops bombs on boats without

(36:56):
even talking to them or establishing what they're doing. To me,
that fits the definition of terrorism, not free speech. I
think we have a right to peacefully redress our agrievances,
and you don't have a right to violently execute people
because of suspicion.

Speaker 15 (37:14):
And the women, in many cases women, you can see
the professional agitators. I had one the other night. I
had four the other night, all in one group, total phonies.
I started to scream when I got into a restaurant,
oh you know something with Palestine, and he said, look.

Speaker 2 (37:29):
Four women. He couldn't handle it.

Speaker 7 (37:31):
Peace in the Middle East.

Speaker 15 (37:32):
I should get lots of awards for that, right with
the Abraham Accords and everything else. But a woman just
stood up and starts screaming and she got booed out
of the place to the people.

Speaker 7 (37:42):
There were a lot of people in the restaurant. I
went there to show how safe, and it was safe.
I mean a woman, it's just a mouthpiece.

Speaker 5 (37:48):
Or she was paid.

Speaker 7 (37:49):
She was a paid agitator.

Speaker 2 (37:51):
You're paid shell for war.

Speaker 15 (37:53):
I've asked Pam to look into that in terms of
RICO bringing RICO cases against the criminal, because.

Speaker 6 (37:59):
They should be criminal.

Speaker 7 (38:00):
RICO to this country is really a subversive.

Speaker 2 (38:05):
Yeah, where's the crime? Speech or the desire for peace?
Is that a crime? Because people want to see a
declaration of war and a debate about it before you
do it by executive order. So again, those four women
were there, well you know who else was there. It
was Trump and Bondi and Hegseth and Marco Ruby and

(38:25):
all other security details. You can imagine how large that
was and all the different security details overlap. They couldn't
handle four women. You can't handle the truth, can you?
No dictator can? You're just like Kim Jong An so
Kim John Trump. So Bondi declared that as a prosecutor,

(38:46):
shall go after those who engage in what it's called
hate speech, especially if this is the kind of speech
that El Presidente hates. But hate speech does not exist,
as the Musa's institute. It's just a phrase that left
invented to define speech the left doesn't like as being
outside the protections of the Bill of Rights. I guess

(39:10):
it's kind of like the assault rifle that they invented.
I can't get a definition of assault rifle. We can't
get a definition of hate speech.

Speaker 3 (39:17):
Fully automatic assault words, Yeah, they're scary.

Speaker 2 (39:23):
Their knees are jerking on, fully automatic. Maybe it's to
call it assault speech. There we go combine the two
memes together.

Speaker 11 (39:29):
Person, I mean, it's the same definition. It's anything they don't.

Speaker 2 (39:32):
Like, that's right, Any kind they don't like, any speech
they don't like, that's right. So it's just called assault speech.
The very fact that Bondi on ironically uses the term
hate speech illustrates how deeply immersed she is in the
culture of coercion and despotism that permeates the Washington ruling class.
Any politician who promotes the concept of hate speech, says

(39:56):
the Mesa's Institute, should be considered an enemy of our
most fundament natural rights, and her political career deserves to
be ended immediately. She needs a new career behind bars.
That's where she needs to be so traitor to the constitution.
I one hundred percent agree with the Mesas Institute on
this Bondi's dangerous comments. On a broader level, she has

(40:19):
talked about anti semitism. What's been happening at college campuses
around the country, which are war protests. She said, it's disgusting,
but it's not as disgusting as Trump's reaction to it.
The Trump administration. She said, well, absolutely target you, go

(40:39):
after you if you're targeting anyone with hate speech. And
again we now see the right using the same tactics again, right,
what are the tactics of the left. You're racist, right,
that's hate speech. You're racist. Now they say that's hate speech,
you're anti Semitic, same stuff. These people are a mere

(41:02):
image of each other. It's amazing. Miller then gave Bondi
an opportunity to clarify her outrageous comments, but Bondi doubled down.
Miller said, do you see more law enforcement going after
these groups who are using hate speech and putting cuffs
on people? So we show them that some action is
better than no action, But Bondi responded no, we will

(41:23):
absolutely target you, go after you if you have speech
that she hates. She also seeks to justify prosecution of
alleged anti Semites, by which she really means people who
don't like the socialist state of Israel. And that's the reality.
You know, we talk about what's going on, the things

(41:45):
that they've done in the universities. Isn't it interesting that
when you talk about the universities as being the center
of evil? That's what Charlie Kirk said. So I go
to the heart of where the evil in our society
is coming from, and it is it's coming from these
seminaries that we call educational institutes. And he says, I
go there to combat it. How about if we just

(42:07):
cut off the money to these institutes, right so that
we could own homes or things like that. Imagine the
amount of money that we could say, because Harvard was
getting nine billion with a bee from the federal government alone.
Harvard is a private institution. It has the largest endowment
of any university on earth. And that's one of the

(42:30):
reasons is because they're so politically connected. Trump cut that
off because he didn't like the content of people's speech
on campus. But if they changed their content to suit him,
then the spickett opens up again and they start flooding
them with money again. This is the sickness that is
at the heart of all this, the sickness that will

(42:51):
not be named and will not be addressed. The freedom
of speech is a property right, says mess It is
a natural right to own one's self, to own one's property.
The right to use your body to express certain opinions
stems from the basic natural right of self ownership. Well,
I don't disagree with that, but I think the founders

(43:14):
couched it in a Christian understanding, the fact that we
are all created in the image of God. That's my basis.
It's not an economic understanding of rights, which again is fine.
But you know, this is ultimately going to come back
to being a conservatives you think about this, it's going

(43:34):
to ultimately come back to being a gospel issue. Why
is that Well, because faith comes by hearing. We know
that we're not going to shut up about it. Doesn't
matter what the consequences are. We're not going to be
quiet about that. And so that means the consequences are
going to be following on Christians, prison, cancelation, and unable

(43:55):
to earn a living. That type of thing may be
more severe. Penalties are going to happen, as we have
seen in other authoritarian societies. So we will die or
be imprisoned, but we will not be silenced. And people
need to understand what his coming. It's just amazing to
me how blind these people are. Trump has turned them around.

(44:18):
The only thing they can see is what is in
the past, and they can't learn any lessons from what
happened to Trump in twenty twenty or Jay six Ers
in twenty twenty one. They can't see any lessons from that.
A person cannot make speeches or express opinions in places
where the property owner does not allow it, says Mesus, again,
continuing down to the theme of economic justification for rights. A

(44:44):
person cannot distribute political op eds in the grocery store
if the store owner says no, And I've had this
argument with who is the guy? If it was a lawyer,
I can't remember his name. Now we had disagreements about this, well,
we've had Supreme Court cases saying that you can't you

(45:06):
can't hand out flyers in the mall. And I said,
the mall is private property, and it's a business that's
going on, and people pay to have a store there
and to use all of this stuff. They don't want
it commandeered and stolen by that. So I said, it's
not the same thing.

Speaker 4 (45:21):
Robert Barnes.

Speaker 2 (45:21):
Robert Barnes, Yeah, I said, the controlling factor here should
be in a nineteen forty six case against the person
who was handing out as martialurss Alabama, it was the
person who was handing out religious texts. Again, it's not
a religion that I would agree with, but they're handing
out religious texts in the public square. But the public

(45:43):
square was privately owned by the company that was a
mining town and they owned the town. The Supreme Court said,
even if the public square is privately owned, you can't
shut down free speech. And so it was not something
that was being used even though it was privately owned.
It was not being used as like a retail space.

(46:07):
Barnes would say that subsequent hearings in the Supreme Court
shut down that right of people to get into malls,
So that's not the same thing at all. The mall
is not the public square. It is private retail property.
Pim Barney may not like it. People criticize the state
of Israel or cheer the murder of Charlie Kirk on
a privately owned website, but whether or not that person

(46:30):
is allowed to say things in that place is not
something the US government can legitimately regulate. The only legitimate
limitation on free speech is when that speech involves a
real and specific threat against another person. The nineteen sixty
nine case of Brandenburg versus Ohio concluded speech can only
be limited when that speech is directed to inciting or

(46:53):
producing imminent lawless action. This was the get out of
jail card that many of the people who organized and
promoted J six pulled to get out of it, the
same people who are now calling for the left to
be purged. It's just amazing this urge for self destruction
that has surfaced during the Fourth Turning. I'm glad Charlie

(47:15):
Kirk is dead. Doesn't even come close to that standard,
neither to saying I hope members of the IDEF get killed.
Vague attacks on foreign armies are a form of free speech,
pure and simple. Even the idea of incitement lends itself
to abuse, since it's not always clear when speech is
encouraging something in general, or if it involves a specific

(47:38):
imminent threat. Not every call for violence is necessarily an
incitement to eminent lawless action. Remember that we kept hearing incitement, insurrection,
all this kind of stuff all the time about January six.
None of it was true. It is clear, however, that
in her comments to Katie Miller, Pambondi is not concerned

(47:59):
by IDA legal standards or by property rights. She's just
a politician. We should not be at all surprised to
discover that she is likely to be more concerned with
sounding tough to pend her to certain interest groups and
to please her the guy who put her in the
position there. Bondi's embrace of the absurd notion of hate

(48:21):
speech is dangerous because it is so vague, undefinable, and
open to abuse. Any practicing Christian sees this every time
the Left claims that opposition to gay marriage is a
form of hate speech. The Bondi facsimiles on the left
would love nothing more than to target and go after

(48:43):
any Christian who criticizes gay marriage, especially those who do
it from a pulpit. And as I said, this is
going to be the tit for tat that's going to
lead us into massive Christian persecution now being pushed by Trump.
Virtually anything can be defined as hate speech. In a

(49:06):
lecture in two thousand and four, historian Ralph Raiko pointed
out the inherent malleability of the hate speech canard. He said,
hate speech can include everything that you might think of,
including hate speech that might very well include it could
be argued in court doing away with, for example, welfare
in New York City. One could say, well, that's hate
speech because the implication is clearly that we should do

(49:28):
away with welfare for minority populations, which are the great
bulk of the people who get welfare in New York City.
So it's obviously racist and hateful speech. But it's also
when you look at anybody who uses this as a weapon,
it always comes back to this type of thing. To

(49:50):
the credit of many rank and file MAGA people, Bondi
has faced substantial blowback. Matt Walsh has denounced her comments
and it's called for her to be fired. I think
she should be jailed, she later claimed, as she tried
to walk it back. Hate speech that crosses the line
into threats of violence is not protected by the First Amendment.

(50:12):
It is a crime. It's still not a crime, Pam,
I mean, this is just juvenile. How does she ever
win a case as a prosecutor? She ever win a
case an argument like that. So when hate speech leads
to threats of violence is a crime? Why because threats
of violence is a crime, hate speech is not a crime.
So she tries to make that connection to it. This

(50:35):
is little more than damage control, says mess. It's unlikely
that BONDI will be removed for declaring the First Amendment.
Nolan Void. Trump has shown a willingness to be quote
unquote flexible when it comes to the rule of law,
and that he's more than happy to use the same
immoral and unconstitutional methods used by his predecessors, both left

(50:56):
and right. Good article on visas dot Org. Well, interestingly enough,
Van Jones spoke out about Charlie Kirk and when he's
going to get canceled now he said he was getting
racist death threats, and then Charlie Kirk reached out for
a civil debate.

Speaker 16 (51:17):
Guys, I've decided I'm going to do something. I'm going
to share something, something personal that I wasn't sure I
was going to share, but I think it's important. Charlie
Kirk and I were not friends at all. In fact,
the last week of his life, we were beef and hard,
beefing online, beefing on air. But the day before he died,

(51:38):
he did something that shocked me. He sent me a
personal message calling for a personal dialogue, wanted me to
come on the show. He said we could be gentlemen together.
He said we could deal with our disagreements agreeably. And
in the past week and a half, just watching people
talk about civil wars and censorship and all this stuff

(51:59):
coming out of his that, I just thought it was
important to let people know don't put that on Charlie Kirk,
because the last day of his life he was reaching
out to have not more censorship, more conversation, more dialogue
with somebody who honestly was one of his adversaries. Me
and I just want to share that with the world,

(52:22):
And I hope that maybe it might help somebody on
both sides deal with issues more like he did.

Speaker 2 (52:31):
Well, good for him. You know, I can't think of
any issue on which I would have an agreement with
Van Jones except on the importance of free speech and
trying to dial this back. And that's what Charlie Kirk
was trying to do. That is not what the people
are doing who claim that they are honoring his legacy.
They're not. They're trashing it. They're defecating on it, the

(52:54):
Kimmel's nose under the tent. Actually, libs are being hoisted
with their own petard and yeah, see, you did it.
This is an article, unfortunately on The New American by
Selwyn Duke. I think he got it exactly wrong. He
is the issue of what we've been talking about. Well, okay,
the left did it, so therefore we should do it. Well,
the left did it, therefore we should take the high

(53:15):
road and stop it for everybody. Right, Let's not propagate this,
let's not multiply this. Let's end it instead of the
tit for tat. Let's diffuse this instead of you know,
oh okay, they dropped these land bines here, so let's
drop some more on the ground, and I'm not going
to clean up the ones that are there. And so

(53:38):
they start with La La Harris tweeting in two thousand
and nine, let's be honest, Trump's Twitter account should be suspended,
and he was suspended from Twitter, who also deplatformed conservatives.
How do we stop this from moving forward? I'm one
of the platform I'm one of the conservatives that got
deep platforms so many different places. Debanked from some payment

(54:00):
like PayPal, then move So how do we stop this
downward spiral of authoritarianism? Do we stop it by saying
they did it first? Right? This is like a couple
of kids fighting in the backseat. What did I do
with you guys when you would have a fight with that?
Do you remember?

Speaker 4 (54:16):
I don't, To be fair, we didn't have that many fights.

Speaker 2 (54:18):
You didn't. You didn't. And one of the reasons why
was because early on when they started, you know, he
hit me first, so he did this first, or whatever
we would care with this approach. She made the two
of them hug each other until they got over it,
and they didn't like doing that at all. So it's like,
don't make us make you hug each other like that?

(54:39):
So that that worked, and that's really what the left
and right need to do. They need to come in
and have some group hugs. I think maybe they treat
them like toddlers because they're acting like toddlers.

Speaker 11 (54:52):
They're saying, well, we get to trample on free speech.
Now it's our turn because love did it. But it's
the American people that get hit by both.

Speaker 2 (55:03):
Ways, that's right. Yeah, we're the ones when they have
a war. We're the ones in the middle. We get
trampled on by the left, and then the right guns
and tramps on us and then left again. USA. They
calumnist Nick Russell said that she is Nicole Russell, I'm sorry,
is disturbed about Kimmel's nixing, being partially driven by pressure
from SEC chairman Brenda Carr. Nevertheless, she says the left's

(55:26):
canceled culture amnesia is striking just as striking as the
rights is. The rights got amnis about what happened in
the aftermath of J six, don't They did not understand
what really happened, did not understand what it's going to
happen again. And of course the left will say, well
it's justified. Lick at what you guys, did when Trump
was present. They're all becoming the monsters that they supposedly fight,

(55:52):
because they're really not fighting any monsters. They're all monsters
that have come out of the same laboratory basically. So again,
this guy goes to this long litany on the New
American and he talks about all the different people and
things that have happened to them. Let's talk about Rosean
bar Let's talk about this person, Let's talk about that person. Hey,

(56:12):
just stop it, just stop it. This is the Christian approach.
This is not a part of san political approach. This
is the Christian approach. If you're going to keep dredging
up every offense that happened, in the end, there will
be no peace, there'll be no agreement. At some point,
you got to say we're gonna take the highroad. We're
gonna forget what has passed so we can have a

(56:33):
better future. But they don't want to do that. I'm
ashamed of them, and just get over it. And you know,
it's interesting that in the funeral, Erica said she forgave
the killer, even though we don't really know who.

Speaker 6 (56:46):
The killer was.

Speaker 2 (56:48):
But still it's that kind of forgiveness that you see
many times from Christians after they've had a relative who's
been murdered, they will say they forgive the killer. So
he goes to this long litany people. Tim Hunt was
nixed by the University College of London for making a joke.
Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich was compelled to resign. Larry Summers

(57:09):
is dislarge from Harvard. Professor Burt Weinstein was bullied out
of Evergreen State College, and on and on on. So
all this justifies what the right is doing right. Not
one of these justifies them acting like the monsters that
they criticize. What's the matter with these people? I don't

(57:30):
get it. It's all the more reason to oppose Trump.
When Trump acts like Biden, this is a totally wrong approach.
You're feeding the divide. You're doing exactly what they want.
You're doing exactly what Trump is here to do, and
that is to set the two sides at war with
each other. That's what he's about. He's the globalist Manchurian candidate.

(57:55):
He's a leader of chaos and we want to get smart.
Then there was the aforementioned pressure that the Biden administration.
He just goes on for page after page, every time
that you had somebody punished for free speech or canceled.
Leftists are pretending as if conservatives somehow originated cancel culture.

(58:19):
They started it, they started it, We're going to finish it.
That type of thing. They're blown up by their own
hoisted by their own patar. That means Petard was a
bomb hoisted means that they've got blown up, right, So
let's just put more bombs out there everywhere. Let's bomb everything,
because that's exactly what Trump and the technocrats want. It's
what the world economic form wants. It's whether uinn wants.

(58:41):
It's part of the great reset. First, tear everything down,
just like they're doing in Gaza. Then we can rebuild
whatever we want because we'll own everything. You won't have anything.
So this is freedom of speech does not mean freedom
of reach, which ideologists made that a common smug retort

(59:03):
some years ago, says the New American. Who was it
that said that over and over again. Well, the hero
of the right for free speech, Elon Musk, that was
his way of shadow banning people, and that's the way
he described the shadow banning that he would do to
people like me. So it's like, yeah, freedom of speech,
but no freedom of reach. If you say something we

(59:24):
don't like, will hide you. We won't kick you off
the platform. We don't want people to see that we're sensors,
but will censor you nevertheless, So ram Paul, as I said,
also Ted Cruz, a couple of the only people that
come out here and actually criticize FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr
for the way he did. Ram Paul said it is

(59:45):
absolutely inappropriate for the FCC to weigh in on the
Kimmel suspension. He said, Brendan Carr has no business weighing
in on this. The government has no business in it.
The FCC was wrong to weigh in, and I will
fight any attempt by the government to get involved in speech. Well,

(01:00:09):
it's all justified because the left is calling for the
genocide of conservatives. Well, the right is basically doing that
as well, to one degree or the other. Is it
better than for the right to call for the destruction
of the constitution. It is the genocide of conservatives. On
the other side, Elon Musk is doing this as well.

(01:00:29):
We must fight back or be murdered. This is where
they want you. They want you afraid and desperate and
ready to kill the people that you have a disagreement with.
That's what Musk, the technocrats, Trump, all of them are
doing that. It is the left right divide. Are you
going to be that foolish to fall for this? Can
you try to talk down people that you know that

(01:00:51):
are conservatives and try to remind them what it's worth
conserving rather than trying to tear down our society and
the foundation that it was built upon. Can someone drop
a bomb on them? Please?

Speaker 9 (01:01:05):
Like?

Speaker 2 (01:01:06):
Kill them all? Thanks? I wrote one person? Does that
matter whether that's left or right? It's protected speech. Right,
they can somebody just drop a bomb on them. Right,
We're gonna fight this guy. We're gonna pull him out
one way or the other. Is that something that you
should go to jail for or is that rhetorical fight speech?

(01:01:29):
It is protected speech. And I don't think we should
we be friends with somebody like that, but it is protected.
Christopher Rispeli, the woke owner of an animal hospital in Oklahoma,
suggested on social media that people should be inspired to
kill more people like after Charlie Kirk. He is only

(01:01:50):
the first, he said. So, now you've got conservatives out
there saying just this guy needs to be canceled. He
needs to be punished, he needs to be targeted. Conservatives
need to stop this because they're becoming the left. Do
you want to conserve anything, Well, if you do, you

(01:02:10):
better start leading instead of just reacting to what the
left is doing. Because you're going to react, if you're
going to be influenced and nudged by these people on
social media, they are pushing you into a literal civil war.
People are saying that. Taking that very seriously. Right now,
let me give you an example of what this looks like.
This is a woman by the name of may go On,

(01:02:36):
and this kind of hatred has been festering in the
Middle East for a very long time. This is eventually
where it leads.

Speaker 5 (01:02:45):
IDF is the most moral army in the world.

Speaker 9 (01:02:47):
I repeat, it's the most moral in the world.

Speaker 17 (01:02:50):
He's not shooting?

Speaker 5 (01:02:51):
Is that one second?

Speaker 9 (01:02:52):
One more sentence? Mister Morgan's plea is not shooting a population,
is not shooting an innocent population.

Speaker 5 (01:02:58):
But you tell me what do we need to.

Speaker 9 (01:03:00):
Do when when her masterists are hiding behind human people
are hiding up behind school You know the first thing
you could do of hospitals, what do we need to do?

Speaker 18 (01:03:10):
You know, the first thing you could do, you could
lift the ban the Israeli government has put on international
journalists going into Gaza, so that all the claims that
you make, which always blame her, mask that absolutely everything
could be verified by independent journalists. Why don't you do that?
Why for twenty months have you banned international media from

(01:03:31):
going into Gaza, an unprecedented band for any modern warfare.
Why why have you done this?

Speaker 9 (01:03:39):
Well, I want to tell you that first of all,
you have to understand something. The idf army speaking trained
to shoot in births, that are trained to shoot through
sites in a single shot mode. That means they are
not shooting like in the movies like you think spec I.

Speaker 18 (01:03:56):
Got to do with the media going back, we can.

Speaker 5 (01:03:58):
I will tell you.

Speaker 9 (01:03:59):
I will tell you right now. So if you'll just
let me finish, so you would agree with me that
if the ideas would have shot in birth, the guys
that would have been a parking lot within twelve hours,
and and and that dangerous to the not no, it's
not destroys for the garden.

Speaker 18 (01:04:25):
You have reduced.

Speaker 2 (01:04:26):
I couldn't cars and the bodies and the rumble that is.

Speaker 5 (01:04:32):
No I'm not pretending.

Speaker 9 (01:04:33):
I don't think I'm saying the reality like it is. No,
that's funny, of course it's funny. It's funny when you
think that I'm pretending. I'm sitting here in front of you,
I don't have to.

Speaker 2 (01:04:43):
Yeah, well, but you won't let the journalists in, and
you won't let the food in. And some of the
the only journalism that we're getting is from some Israeli
people who are talking to Idea of people who say
that she's lying, that they were told deliberately to target
and assassinate. And we've had doctors from other countries who

(01:05:04):
were there saying that's a lie. They were targeting. Yeah,
they weren't doing massifire. They were targeting children, once in
the chest, once in the head. Make sure that's what
this kind of tit for tat stuff, folks, leads to.
It leads to just insanity and monstrous actions by governments

(01:05:25):
doing what they always want to do. Well, David said
retweeted this from one person who was talking about Carl,
who was a reporter. You've said you restored free speech
in America. Is that free speech, including people who are

(01:05:46):
harshly critical of you.

Speaker 14 (01:05:49):
Sell this free speech question, because you've said that you
were restored free speech in America?

Speaker 7 (01:05:54):
Is that free speech?

Speaker 14 (01:05:54):
Including for people who are harshly critical of you, for
your political opponents, for people who say things you.

Speaker 7 (01:06:00):
I'll become immune to it. I've become immune to it.

Speaker 15 (01:06:04):
There's never been a person that's had more unfair publicity
than me. And that's why your network made me fifteen
million dollars or sixteen million dollars I believe to be exact,
George Slapadopolis. And that's why CBS paid me a lot
of money too, And that's why I sued The New
York Times two days ago for a lot of money
because well, I'm winning.

Speaker 7 (01:06:24):
I mean, I'm winning the cases.

Speaker 15 (01:06:25):
And the reason I'm winning is because you're guilty, John,
You're guilty. ABC is a terrible network, of very unfair network,
and you should be ashamed of yourself. NBC is equally bad.
I don't know who's worse. I think they're equally bad.
And you know, for you to stand there and act
so innocent and ask me a question like that, but look,
you've paid a big price because you were dishonest, Joan.

(01:06:48):
The reason I won that lawsuit was because you were dishonest.
You were proven to be dishonest. And so you can't
sit back and you say.

Speaker 2 (01:06:55):
You didn't win the loss.

Speaker 7 (01:06:56):
I think you don't like you.

Speaker 2 (01:06:57):
You won the intimidation person.

Speaker 15 (01:06:59):
You're not a one a whole person practice. You're a
terrible reporter. You know it, and so do I.

Speaker 7 (01:07:04):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (01:07:05):
And with CBS, of course, as we've talked about before,
he came after them with a large lawsuit and subtle
for a smaller portion of it. And the reason that
happened was because he intimidated the owner of CBS. She
wanted to sell, had cancer, wanted to sell, and they
were going to use the government to hold up the

(01:07:27):
transaction so she wouldn't be able to sell. So she
capitulated over government pressure, not over the fact that there
was a free speech issue. Look, when you look at
these free speech things, as I said before, with the
Info Wars lawsuit, for example, there was you know, whether
they were right or wrong. They had a right to

(01:07:49):
say whatever. They did have a right to be wrong
about something. And the test is not whether something is
true or false, because that can't be determined by our
government overseers. The test is whether or not there is malice,
and so they never got to that because he decided

(01:08:10):
he didn't want to comply with discovery. So Alex Jones lost.
That came out in the trial when they found the
text messages that he claimed he didn't have, that was
sent to opposing counsel by mistake. The bottom line is
is that free speech was not defended in the Info
Warst case. Free speech was not defended in the ABC case,
It was not defended in the CBS case. These people

(01:08:31):
all settled in a sense. The other two settled, and
he lost because he refused to comply with discovery. But
they all did what they did for their own personal benefit.
Nobody wanted to defend the First Amendment. And one of
the things that happened over the weekend, I read you
reasons excerpts from this Trump lawsuit against the New York Times,

(01:08:54):
and they said it was written like a childish hagiography,
in other words, the kind of bioge that makes somebody
into a saint. And said it just went on for
like eighty pages of praising Trump and how amazing and
important he was. And that's basically they said a lawyer
ought to be ashamed to turn something like this in

(01:09:16):
as a lawsuit, and that's essentially what the judge said.
He goes, this is not a valid lawsuit. Go back
and rewrite this so you actually can file a complaint,
and he goes, and when you do it, I don't
want it to be longer than forty pages. Is the
same criticism that all these lawyers that Reason had talked
to their criticism of the New York Times lawsuit. They

(01:09:38):
were all laughing about it because it was all just
this big praise of everything that Trump had done in
his life, and so that got thrown out. But he
doesn't have a chance of winning that case against the
New York Times. They're not going to cave if they
don't cave, if they're going to fight it, and I
think that they will. He doesn't have any leverage over

(01:10:00):
them like that. So I think they will fight it,
and I think that they will win. But it's interesting
that it's Wall Street Journal case where there was the
birthday card that had the birthday suit that he drew,
and it looks like he's going to continue on foolishly

(01:10:20):
with this case and he's going to get shoved down
his throat. The thing is when the judge says, you
didn't write a valid complaint, you didn't even find what
you're concerned about. Redo it. When he does that, the
way it's spun by the Maga press, this is a
see another leftist judge. They're always against Trump. We can't
have courts, we can't have rule. He needs to act

(01:10:42):
as a dictator and shut this thing down. It only
helps him to do this, and that's why he does
these kind of clownish things out there, because it helps
his left right divide.

Speaker 19 (01:10:52):
Well.

Speaker 2 (01:10:52):
Trump came out actually against a new restrictive rule from
the Pentagon restrictions on journalistists, which is really surprising. Pentagon's
widely criticized new restrictions on journalists, which reportedly forbid reporters
from publishing unauthorized information even if it's not classified. This

(01:11:13):
sounds like something that happens during war, doesn't it. Except
they are at war, and not just with more than
a half dozen in other countries and wanting to start
it up with another half dozen. This is war with
the American people, and they want all of this stuff
censored and kept quiet. We never did end the war.

(01:11:35):
That's what the national security state was, which is a
continuation of this, Well, you can't say anything about this.
I've classified it as secret. Now they're saying, even if
it's not secret, you need to have our permission to
report it, even if it's unclassified. And so Trump is
asked about that if he favored the Pentagon allowing journalists
to only report information that it approved beforehand, he says, no, oh,

(01:12:00):
I don't think so. Nothing stops reporters, you know that. Well,
again he's just prevaricating around the bush. He's lying as usual.
He will stand with Hegseth. But doesn't this tell us
something about Pete Pete Headseth. He used to be a reporter.
He hates free speech and free press. Now, the Washington

(01:12:22):
Post reported on Friday, So the Pentagon is forcing journalists
to sign a new policy in which they agree not
to gather information which has not been approved for public release.
So now everything is prohibited unless expressly permitted by the Pentagon.
And that even goes beyond this absurdity of classifying everything,

(01:12:44):
which is what they have been doing now since the
end of World War II. Don Bacon, who came out
to criticize Trump of many different things, rightfully, so, by
the way, and he's doing it now because he's retiring,
none of the politicians who want to stay in office
are going to criticize Trump. He said, this is so dumb.

(01:13:04):
I have a hard time believing it's true. We don't
want a bunch of Pravda newspapers that only taut the
government's official position. This sounds like more amateur hour.

Speaker 4 (01:13:15):
The thing is done. The dumber it is.

Speaker 3 (01:13:18):
The easier time I have believing it is true when
it comes out of our government. The stupider and more
authoritarian the idea that one, I'm like, oh, yeah, that's
they're for sure doing that.

Speaker 4 (01:13:27):
Absolutely.

Speaker 9 (01:13:28):
Well.

Speaker 2 (01:13:28):
Listen, if you want to hear something really dumb, listen
to Pete Heggsath's reply. He defended it, and he said,
the press doesn't run the Pentagon, the people do. Did
you know that you run the Pentagon, Travis.

Speaker 3 (01:13:40):
Oh my goodness, I'll have to go do an inspection
of it immediately, apparently doing some rather naughty things.

Speaker 2 (01:13:47):
Yeah, I like to know where my lovers of control are,
where my ballot is or any of this stuff. Yeah, absolutely, no.

Speaker 3 (01:13:55):
Kind of I have a message. Guys, you're all fired,
pack it up, go home. You won't be getting a
severance package.

Speaker 11 (01:14:02):
By the way, she had figured out that what I
wanted was to have all the press not be able
to report what's going on in there to me, so
I don't know what's happening.

Speaker 2 (01:14:14):
By the way, this is shared by an official rapid
response forty seven account, a rare instance of that account
amplifying a position which contradicts a stance held by another
department of Trump's government. So this is they're blowing the
whistle on themselves. And then we come back to the
Code Pink issue. These are the people that scared Trump

(01:14:37):
so much at a restaurant for women, who protested and
did it, by the way, peacefully. But you know, hey,
if speech could kill, they would have been dead by
now right. And that's the thing we need to understand.
The hate is really the censorship. The censorship is hatred
of speech. And when you censor people, what you're going

(01:15:00):
to do is you're going to initially eventually lead to violence.
As Kennedy said, if you make peaceful change impossible, you
make violent change inevitable. Activists from the Andy war group
Code Pink confronted Trump in his cabinet at a restaurant
September the ninth and It sent the Trump administration into
a frenzy. The activists got surprisingly close to Trump and

(01:15:24):
the cabinet members, including Vance Rubio Haig Seth, shouting free
d C, Free Palestine. Trump is the Hitler of our time. Oh,
it's kind of a little bit of a rhyme. Trump
appeared to react with a visible frustration as he gestured
for security to remove the protesters, saying, get them out

(01:15:45):
of here. It's good to be the king. The people
are revolting. You're looking at this and every one of
these characters named here, the president, vice president, secretary of Defense,
secretary of State, got massive security details. These security details
you've got basically with those four people, you've got four

(01:16:08):
security details. The four security details could not keep the
four women away from Trump to suit him enough. So
Trump said, what they're doing to this country is really subversive.
We need RICO charges or something. And see that's the
hypocrisy of it. It's the RICO charges that are subversive.

(01:16:30):
As this article on indye War points that that RICO
was intentionally originally intended to combat organized crime, and then,
like everything else, we see that it had mission creep
and it metastasized and the civil asset forfiture and the
other thing that it did instead of it being it
was used by Rudy Giuliani against organized crime with great effect.

(01:16:54):
But he killed due process in doing that. I think
that's too high to pay. And then what happened shortly
after that. I've told the story about Randy Alcorn. He
was a pro life pastor and a very successful author.
He has sold many millions of books. And he was

(01:17:16):
charged of the Rico statute because he was part of
a peaceful abortion protest and Planned Parenthood won an eight
million dollar judgment against Randy Alcorn. Rather than pay it,
he lived on minimum wage for twenty years. He donated
all of the millions of dollars from the books that

(01:17:37):
he wrote, and they were Christian commentaries as well as
fictional books. He donated all of that money to charity,
so he didn't pay Planned Parenthood a penny. But that
was all basically the Rico Statute. And so they create
this thing, and then one of the first things they
do is target Christians pro life Christians with it. We

(01:18:00):
should remember history, so don't keep repeating it all the time.
Anyone who values free speech should be appalled at this
attempt to criminalize it, said a spokesperson for Code Pink,
and hopefully people will remember history enough to remember that

(01:18:20):
they were charged with false crimes when they peacefully redressed
a grievances on January sixth. We've never shied away from
disrupting power, regardless of which party is in office, said
Code Pink. They began organizing in the lead up to
the US invasion of Iraq, kicking off a four month
all day protest vigil in front of the White House

(01:18:41):
on November seventeenth, two thousand and two. Code Pink members
composed of anti war women activists participating in numerous actions
against the war on Iraq. And if these kinds of
protests were effective, they would have been banned a long
time ago. Now they're effective at tweaking the ego of

(01:19:03):
this narcissist in chief, and that's why he's coming after them.
Code Pink has been organizing against war for human rights
ever since and unfortunately these types of tactics, and I
saw this with the Vietnam War protesters. It was absolutely

(01:19:23):
counterproductive what they were doing. February seventh, twenty twenty four,
Code Pink activists confronted Marco Rubia who is then a senator,
about his support for Israel amid the the killing of
Palestinian children by Israeli forces, and he said, yeah, Amasa
is responsible for killing all those kids. So over the weekend,

(01:19:47):
as I said, Don Bacon was unleashing on Donald Trump,
the only one to do so in the GOP because
he's not going to run for reelection, and he had
some very effective things to say. But we're gonna look
to see what our comments aren't here.

Speaker 4 (01:20:04):
Yep, we've got quite a few. BT Taylor two four six.

Speaker 3 (01:20:09):
We're watching that video of the UK cop is when
these comments came in, said pure dystopia that it is.
That's right, Sorry, you've been very naughty. You'll have to
let me in so we can discuss it. Such a
literal nanny state coming in and lecturing you on how
naughty your words are. Yeah, you gotta have to issue

(01:20:29):
an apology. B. L. Houghton says, I wouldn't open the door.
That's again for the nannying UK police come back with
a warrant. Then again, I don't know what UK law
is on that subject.

Speaker 2 (01:20:44):
Well, they should be able to get that doormat. It's
on Amazon in the US. As come back with a warrant.
It's not a welcome. Let get out, yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:20:55):
Citizen America. It's really quite simple. If you're a school
teacher and you're applauding the murder of someone on a
college campus, you don't need to be teaching kids, because
before long you'll be encouraging someone to come on your campus.

Speaker 2 (01:21:05):
Correct. Well, the reality is is that I've got a
long list of things that are wrong with the schools.
The schools themselves are the problem. The teachers are just
a symptom of the problem. Let's stop shooting at the
little things on the side and let's hit the foundation
of all this stuff. You want to say trainees are crazy.

(01:21:26):
I agree with you. I mean they're like Norman Bates,
I said that from the very beginning. But let's get
to the heart of the issue instead of hitting around
the edges. That's irrelevant. It's absolutely irrelevant. And what it's
doing is instead of fixing the problem, what you're doing
is you're creating a second problem, and that is this
censorship cancel culture.

Speaker 11 (01:21:48):
And also it's the critical difference of school teachers. If
it's a public, government run school, are government employees and
then responsible to the public. If it's a privately run thing,
then they have free speech about that.

Speaker 2 (01:22:07):
That's right. Who do you work for? Who's your daddy?

Speaker 3 (01:22:11):
And as they talked about government, schools are inherently collectivists
and always will be. You cannot divorce them from that
to try to have them work against their own interests,
which basically no organization will ever engage in that sort.

Speaker 2 (01:22:24):
Of Frankly, I see somebody cheering the murder of Charlie
Kirk as less offensive than them pushing pornography on children
in kindergarten. And that's going on in the schools and
they're not stopping it. They want to make it about
trainees playing sports. Come on, you know what the problem is.
We know what the problem is. Get to the problem
or shut up.

Speaker 3 (01:22:44):
Seriously, the real octo spook the SEC needs reduced in
sized about one tenth of the insane size it is.

Speaker 4 (01:22:50):
You could just get rid of it entirely.

Speaker 2 (01:22:52):
It doesn't need to be there at all. You could
have an auction and then record who had it, and
then they can enforce the tressmass on their stuff. If
you want to do something about it, shud y'all can
go to just a massive bureaucracy looking for something to do,
trying to expand its empire.

Speaker 4 (01:23:09):
Cobos eight eight eight.

Speaker 3 (01:23:11):
When are people going to admit Trump is a Democrat
and you just changed the letter at the.

Speaker 4 (01:23:14):
End to win elections. That's right, Olivio Roslow.

Speaker 3 (01:23:18):
The government just released an app to snitch on anyone
who makes bad remarks about Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 4 (01:23:24):
Dougle Ug.

Speaker 11 (01:23:25):
Of course that app is the same one they'll be
using for whatever the next snitch thing is. They'll just
rebrand a few things, change the text around.

Speaker 2 (01:23:35):
I don't know if it's an app. I think it's
a company called Pallantier. They already know.

Speaker 3 (01:23:40):
Yeah, the Dougal Ug thirty arrests per day in the UK.

Speaker 2 (01:23:44):
Yeah, over speech.

Speaker 4 (01:23:46):
Yeah, just absolutely insane. The UK is it's fallen from
what it once was.

Speaker 2 (01:23:53):
Christ is really fired for a meme. Really, that's insane. Look,
you need to understand social media was always up as
a tool of psyop control and this is a part
of it. JCR Loklier a darkest psychologist. And of course
it only happened when they had to wait forty years
for the technology of thirty years, I guess for the

(01:24:15):
thirty or forty years for technology to catch up to
them so they could actually put up something like social media.
But it was all these spooks who were setting on
the venture capital boards. The CIA even went public with
their venture capital board in Cautel, so they could control
the Internet, so they could control you.

Speaker 3 (01:24:35):
Says, I knew from the moment that FBI's fibbs started
resting the wrong people CIC EIGHTA seventeen. Those media sources
inside the violence that killed Charlie, they they have definitely
been stoking the flames. They have been increasing the animosity
on both sides.

Speaker 2 (01:24:56):
But again, we gotta be careful about this claim about
incitement cuts both ways. Look at January the sixth, Okay,
And you can have inflammatory rhetoric if somebody uses violence,
because that's on them, it's not on the person who
was making arguments. Let's get real about this.

Speaker 3 (01:25:14):
Yeah, there's between incitement, as you said, inflammatory, Yeah, rhetoric.

Speaker 11 (01:25:18):
And that's what I was about to say, is that
Charlie Kirk, or rather less shooter is going to say
that you know, it was justified because Charlie Kirk had
bad rhetoric. Apparently, I mean, obviously Kirk didn't have any
extremist rhetoric, but that's their justification for it, so you

(01:25:39):
can't really use that for this.

Speaker 2 (01:25:43):
Yeah, when we say he didn't have any extremist rhetoric,
we think it was kind.

Speaker 3 (01:25:47):
Of moderate what he had to say, very moderate comparatively
to me. The cloyda oyster hate is just a emotion.
M sellers Amen. Hate speech is a heart issue you
just like LGBTQ is, and you cannot change it.

Speaker 4 (01:26:02):
Only Jesus can.

Speaker 2 (01:26:04):
That's right. But we can shut down the seminaries for
Satan that we're being taxed to support. And notice that
nobody wants to do that. Nobody in power is even
talking about doing that, not at all.

Speaker 3 (01:26:17):
Centurion Blood. They let their emotions control their governance. Audi,
m r R.

Speaker 4 (01:26:23):
Good to see you.

Speaker 2 (01:26:23):
Audi.

Speaker 3 (01:26:24):
Has Pambondi gone after any of the pedos and the
Epstein files yet?

Speaker 2 (01:26:27):
I know she decided not to target them. That was
a conscious, conscious decision not to target the pedals, but
to target criticism of Charlie Kirk because that is the
effective way to move things out modern retro radio. Audi,
thank you, Adam.

Speaker 3 (01:26:46):
And this is from a Syrian girl. I believe most
funerals use photo slideshows and saw video memory. Showing a
graphic death scene on a big screen is generally considered
inappropriate or even harmful because it can traumatize mourners, especially
kids or anyone of PTSD overshadow of the person's life,
of their final moments, conflict with religious slash customary norms around.

Speaker 4 (01:27:04):
Dignity of the dead.

Speaker 3 (01:27:06):
I agree that's a totally inappropriate way to under the
life and death of a Christian man. The world has
lost its collective mind. That's replying to a CULTI sim
that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:27:16):
I agree. I think you know they want to wave
the bloody shirt and revel in it because they want
a revolution.

Speaker 3 (01:27:23):
Guard Goldsmith, the key is private property, market response versus
government pressure an outright threat, and I agree with Guard
there that's the side I come down on.

Speaker 2 (01:27:32):
The government is not about persuasion, it's about coercion.

Speaker 3 (01:27:35):
And again I fall under the lines of sort of
the Hans Hermann Happa idea. These people have gone insane.
We don't want to be involved with them within our society.
We should try our best to exclude them and remove
them from our lives as much as possible. We cannot
have a decent functioning society with people that.

Speaker 4 (01:27:56):
Revel in death.

Speaker 3 (01:27:57):
We cannot have a decent functioning society with people that
would absolutely revel or engage in violence.

Speaker 2 (01:28:04):
Again, Travis, the government that revels in death and engages
in violence, threats, and intimidation is going to protect us
from the trainees that revel and death and function with
all this things. That's the absurdity of.

Speaker 3 (01:28:18):
All this stuff there is there are no allies to
us on this or out here on our own, Denver Outaway.
Trump is such the perfect straw man. The manipulative fading
system is going full ham to instigate a civil conflict.
The predictive programming in movies like Civil War.

Speaker 4 (01:28:35):
Or what kind of American are you? Yeah, Denver Outaway,
the ban eh.

Speaker 3 (01:28:39):
Never mind the two hundred and thirty or so dead journalists,
and I'm assuming that's referencing what's going on in Israel.
They have killed many journalist, that's right, They just indiscriminately
fire and kill.

Speaker 2 (01:28:52):
Oh no, actually, the targeted journalists, just like collateral murder
targeted journalists, and Wikipedia exposed that, and so then they
came after we could. Pedia tried to kill Julian Signs
for a decade.

Speaker 3 (01:29:03):
Not Wikipedia, Oh yeah, wicked Wikipedia. He left us to
shill organization.

Speaker 2 (01:29:09):
That is why I have Travis here. He catches those
things that just go right over my head.

Speaker 4 (01:29:14):
Fstein Island.

Speaker 3 (01:29:15):
Trump made sure to praise himself at the Charlie Kirk
funeral the greatest.

Speaker 2 (01:29:20):
I didn't watch it. I gotta confess. I know, good
for you if you're able to stick through it.

Speaker 3 (01:29:24):
Again, I feel terrible for Charlie Kirk's widow. Yeah, but yeah,
I have no interest in watching the funeral.

Speaker 2 (01:29:32):
I except the spectacle has been turned into a huge
marketing opportunity. Is cringe and the extreme I think.

Speaker 11 (01:29:40):
Used by these soulist politicians to push the opposite of
what Charlie Kirks stays right absolutely.

Speaker 3 (01:29:47):
Liberty Valiant says, now there is proof that alleged assassin
Tyler Robinson is innocent. Thirty out six caliber rifle would
have blown Charlie Kirk's head off. The bullet never exited
his body.

Speaker 2 (01:29:57):
Yeah, we got a report about that, the magic bullet,
And it's a surgeon speaking out about that, and we're
going to talk about that in detail.

Speaker 3 (01:30:04):
That is the strangest thing about all this. Everything else
I think has a reasonable explanation.

Speaker 4 (01:30:09):
Well, not the thirtys the rifle thing.

Speaker 2 (01:30:12):
I mean, yeah, he didn't. He couldn't fit that in anything.
We don't see it when he jumps off, and then
you know, why would he disassemble that, reassemble it, disassembled, reassemblate,
leave it in the woods. None of that makes any sense.

Speaker 3 (01:30:27):
When I watched the video of him jumping down, he
had a towel and it did look like there was
something long and thin that was being covered by it,
so I could potentially see the rifle being under there.
I think there's reasonable enough doubt that you can't say
definitively one way or another, but the thirty odd six
not exiting the body, given how power, how large of
a caliber, and what it does to on entry and

(01:30:48):
exit another magic bullet, Yeah, it was going around Liberty
Valiant Charlie Kirk's death. Obviously the shot was from a
small caliber handgun from close vicinity be my value. Love
Randy Alcorn's books.

Speaker 2 (01:31:02):
Yeah, I do too, Treasure Principle by the way. You know,
he's got some really good fiction books. It was one
about underground Christian church in China, I remember, But he
has some really good books about the Christian principle, heaven
other things like that. Yeah, a good writer.

Speaker 3 (01:31:19):
Yeah, Christian constitutional conservative says, will this drive up the
cost of beef? They got a Reuter's article link there
says China Brazil's beef exports US fall further September after
a Tariff's industry group says, well, probably probably. Anytime you
start reducing the supply, the price goes up.

Speaker 2 (01:31:38):
Well, of course, what we're saying in Brazil is political warfare,
gelling their opponents, which Trump would like to do, but
he doesn't like it when it's done to his friend
bows and arrows as a transcript, likes to go on Bolsonaro,
and so he slapped tariffs on just because of his

(01:31:59):
personal feelings about it. That's not why we should be
doing tariffs, but that's what Trump is doing. Just another
example of the stupidity.

Speaker 3 (01:32:09):
Denver out of way. When Rico was sold at preventing
and breaking at monopoly, and somehow the entire YUS economy
is centralized just about as China. So Rico was never
enforced as intended. Funny how that always seems to happen
with what the government sets out to do. Yeah, tomorrow,
the war on speech is about government protecting themselves from truthers,
waking up others who are under the government's hypnosis. They've

(01:32:31):
effectively kept people under the left right paradigm. Tunnel Lord
one three three seven. I've had a really good senator
want to create some sort of system to filter out
trainees from owning guns. Except the system sounds like it
would have the government screening people's mental health. And of
course mental health is a somewhat nebulous term.

Speaker 2 (01:32:49):
Mental health has always been the excuse to go to
excuse sor to tallitarian machines, you know, and the jokes
about it, like well, if you could incide is Stalin,
you must be in an asylum and or kill you.
That's the way this all works. So just real briefly
before we take a break, because we're going to be

(01:33:10):
coming back to this same theme in different ways. That's
not what he's talking about. Cinns Dana bash Battle as
a GOP senator on Trump redefining free speech. This is
always the kind of misdirection that we see from the
MAGA people. No, it's about consequences about free speech or

(01:33:31):
this or that. And we see this as Trump was
bragging about warp speed and his vaccine. Yet again, I've
got someone that I saw the comments when they put
up to that and said, that's not what he was
talking about. He was talking about the lockdown and how

(01:33:51):
the vaccine saved our lives from the lockdown. The lockdown
was going to kill us. Oh, so why were we lockdown?
I thought we were lockdown to save us from the
COVID genary ferry that was out there. And of course
COVID didn't lock us down. Trump locked us down. Trump
paid states to do it, just like he pays them

(01:34:13):
for the tranning policy and Obama pays them for the
different training policy. You know, put the girls and the
boys in the girls bathroom or take them out. Do this.
Do what I say, and I'll give you money. If
you don't do it, I'll cut your funding all the way.
That's what he was doing. That's what the decoration of
emergency that he did on March the thirteenth, That Friday
the thirteenth was about. We already had an emergency decoration

(01:34:34):
from the big pharmaceutical executive that he put in Alex's
ar former ceov like Lily. He did that at the
end of January and when he did that in this
so called global pandemic, they only pretended that six people
had been killed by COVID. Were they killed by COVID

(01:34:55):
or were they diagnosed to the PCR procedure that said
that they died with COVID when actually they died from
other things. So we're going to be talking about that
when we come back. We're going to take a quick
break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 6 (01:36:00):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 20 (01:36:03):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(01:36:26):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some. At the David Knightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various.

Speaker 11 (01:36:44):
Galas and social events.

Speaker 20 (01:36:46):
If you want to save on shipping, just put it
in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
the USA.

Speaker 21 (01:37:05):
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, LAOS, your annual Global Risk
Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the
global business community. The top concern for the next two
years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and

(01:37:31):
misinformation for not closely by polarization within our societies.

Speaker 1 (01:37:48):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 6 (01:37:54):
You are listening to the David Knight.

Speaker 2 (01:37:56):
Show Welcome Back, and of course, as you heard Ursula
fond of lying, she said that the top priority for
the next two years. When did she say that? Twenty
twenty four. She said it was going to be misinformation
and disinformation and that was going to be the cut

(01:38:20):
result in societal polarization, she said, And they've got to
fight that. Well, that's exactly where we are, isn't it.
They tell you their plan, they monologue like a James Bond,
because that's exactly who they are. Before we get back
into this, and we're going to talk about the magic
bullet here in just a second, Travis tell us little
bit about how people can support the program and our sponsors.

Speaker 3 (01:38:43):
A very easy way to find out how to support
the program is going to Davidknight dot news. We have
all of the links there, so we'd like to support
the show. It's an easy way to do ingo there
and see that we have zell cash app the po
box which is David Knight peobox nine nine four, Kodak
Tennessee three seven seven six four and subscribe Star is
an excellent way to support the program. You can sign

(01:39:05):
up and we have many many different tiers there that
may fit your budget. It will charge you monthly. Of course,
it helps if you go and check occasionally because you know,
the cards expire and other things can happen. So that's
a great way to support the show. Subscribe Star dot com,
forward slash the David Night Show, and of course the link,
as I said, is on David Night dot news. Another
way to support us is to leave a tip on Rumble.

(01:39:27):
If you do that, we'll try to make sure that
we read your comment. We really do appreciate all the
sport that we get that way. We appreciate the chat
and we appreciate the engagement we have with you all there.
You can also subscribe on kick that's another place we stream.
It's got a lively community and it's a fun platform,
very very smooth. You can also go to David Knight

(01:39:48):
dot goal. Tony ardburn is kindly set that up so
if you're looking to start accumulating gold or silver, you
can go there and do it.

Speaker 2 (01:39:54):
Well, you better start looking at that because we've got
a whole segment coming up about the push for digital
id is really really escalating, just like the push for censorship,
and it is coming at us from across the spectrum.
It doesn't matter who, what country you're in, or what
they're supposed to political ideology is. They're all pushing it.

(01:40:17):
From conservativestick communists, they're all pushing digital idea. It's coming
very quickly.

Speaker 3 (01:40:21):
It's the it's the it's going to be the easiest
way to track and control everyone. Oh we don't like
what you said, Well we can just turn off your
entire wallet and sorry, no one accepts cash anymore.

Speaker 2 (01:40:34):
The Beast system. Yeah, you combine that with the free
speech stuff, you're total You've gone total.

Speaker 3 (01:40:38):
Beast going to make sure you can't buy So gold
and silver is a great way to hedge against market uncertainty.
Gold has always been a store of value and it
continues to be so. As the dollar goes down, gold
goes up. But of course, if things get as bad
as they possibly can, you want something like the Civil

(01:41:01):
Defense Manual so you can learn how to protect yourself
and your community, Your family, your loved ones, teach you
how to protect your community how.

Speaker 2 (01:41:10):
To and we'll be talking later in the program as
well as to what happened on the no fly weekend,
the airport's going down. First time I ever talked to
Jack Lawson. We were talking about the fragility of the
complicated interconnected infrastructure, and what happened to flights over this
last weekend just drives that home. It's not speculation, folks.

(01:41:30):
Has happened time and again, and of course it can
be done by Fiat order, as our dear leader Kem
John Trump did five years ago.

Speaker 3 (01:41:41):
So yeah, yes, you want to defend yourself. You want
to be able to defend yourself and know how to survive.
Civil Defense Manual is an excellent resource in that regard
because you want to be able to make it to
the point where you can use gold and silver to
trade if necessary, so Civil Defense Manual and that's at
Jacklaws in Books dot com. And we really do appreciate

(01:42:01):
all the support. There's other avenues to do that. I'll
briefly mention Trends Journal dot com use promo code night
for ten percent off. There's rncstore dot com where you
can look at their products see if they can help
your health, and you get ten percent off with promo
code night there as well. In Homestead Products dot shop.
They've got high quality made America products and they are

(01:42:21):
the good guys.

Speaker 2 (01:42:22):
And we'll have more about that later.

Speaker 3 (01:42:24):
Yes, yes, so promo code night for ten percent off
there as well. We appreciate all the support. Cannot thank
you enough. We really do appreciate the people that work
with the show and Dougalug thank thank you much, Dougalug.

Speaker 4 (01:42:36):
We appreciate it.

Speaker 3 (01:42:38):
The gas gauge is at half full. Let's hit the
like buttons and help spread the word.

Speaker 2 (01:42:41):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:42:41):
You can also hit the like button. That does help.
And sharing the show where you can helps us as well.
Cannot thank you enough. We appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (01:42:50):
Well. We had somebody mentioned this last week, I've been
slow on the uptake on this because I don't hunt.
But they mentioned how powerful that bullet was and how
taken his head office. As Travis mentioned, now the physician
who worked on Charlie Kirk is saying the same thing.
Listen to how this is couched though, right because when

(01:43:11):
people start saying, wait a minute, that's not the kind
of wound that we see from that caliber of bullet
and that powerful rifle, they couch it as Charlie Kirk's
final miracle. This is going to be his canonization, I guess,
revealed by the surgeon who examined the fatal neck wound.

(01:43:31):
The surgeon who operated on Kirk revealed that the bullet
miraculously did not exit his death. It's a miracle. So
did they find it well, notice that they don't really
say if they have it right all through this article,
I'll tell you what the guy has to say. This
is from Daily Mail. The surgeon who operated on Charlie

(01:43:52):
Kirk said the bullet that killed him miraculously did not
exit his neck, likely saving others from getting hit. Turning point,
USA spokesman Andrew Colvett revealed on Saturday night that he
had spoken with a surgeon who made the comments. Directly
to him. In a post on x, Corvett said, I

(01:44:12):
apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the
fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle,
and I want people to know maybe maybe there's something
else happening here besides a miracle. The surgeon told Corvet
that the bullet quote absolutely should have gone through, which
is very, very normal for a high powered, high velocity round.

(01:44:36):
I've seen rounds from this caliber many times, said the surgeon,
and they always go through everything. This would have taken
out a moose or two. And again this is what
the hunter told this last week. And a thirty odd
to six bolt action rifle, the kind of discovered hidden
in the woods after Kirk was killed, is used to

(01:44:58):
kill deer, elk, moose, bar and other big game animals.
Because of this, because this rifle can kill animals six
times bigger than humans. The fact that Kirk's neck stopped
the bullet was an absolute miracle, according to the surgeon. Yes,
another government miracle. We've had government miracles in the past

(01:45:20):
around the assassination attempts, And I.

Speaker 3 (01:45:22):
Said, this is where things get really really ridiculous to me.

Speaker 2 (01:45:29):
Listen to this comment that's reportedly from the surgeon by
According to Colvet, his bone was so healthy and the
density was so impressive that he's like the Man of Steel.
Well now he's superman. It should have gone through and
through it likely would have killed those standing behind him too,
said the surgeon. Other people have talked about by the way,

(01:45:52):
the angle of the wound and other things like this,
but I think this is the most suspicious thing, just
like the JFK Magic bullet. And just as a reminder
all the issues about the magic bullet. And of course
this all came to light yet again with a book
that was written in twenty twenty three called Final Witness.
It was about one of the Secret Service agents that

(01:46:13):
was there at the assassination. He was twenty eight years
old at the time, and he was talking about this
special magic bullet that took center stage. Arlen Spector was
a small time politician and he took the case to
argue about the magic bullet and how it changed reverse

(01:46:33):
courses and all this other kind of stuff and did
all this damage, but it was only a single bullet,
and they liked what he had to say, and he
was rewarded with being Senator for life. That's the way
these things work. So the magic bullet from the JFK
Commission Exhibit three nine nine, and they referred to it
as CE three nine nine. It's even got a name.

(01:46:56):
It's so special, this magic bullet. The magic bullet was
found in pristine condition, near pristine condition with minimal deformation.
Despite allegedly passing through Kennedy's neck, Connolly's chest, wrist, and
lodging in his thigh, it didn't have really any deformation.

(01:47:20):
Critics argue that a bullet causing such damage would be
significantly deformed, as seeing in ballistic tests with similar six
and a half millimeter carcano bullets. Then there was the
trajectory and the timing. The Warrant Commission conducted rather concluded
that this single bullet caused seven wounds entry and exit

(01:47:44):
wounds in Kennedy and Connolly while following a complex trajectory
including sharp turns to align with the lone gunman theory
from the Texas School Book Depository. The ZAPRU suggests these
injuries occurred within a very tight time frame one half

(01:48:04):
to one point eight seconds, leaving questions about whether one
bullet could account for all the wounds without defying physics.
I guess we need a new category instead of UFOs,
we need UBOs, unidentified ballistic objects. We have seeing evidence
of this in the past.

Speaker 11 (01:48:24):
Just like they're doing a right wing rebranding of the
magic bullet, it's now the miracle bullet. Magic.

Speaker 2 (01:48:32):
We're going to make it. We're going to christianize it,
we're going to baptize it. Right. Instead of it being
a magic bullet, it is now miracle. Yeah, you're right.
We don't believe in miracles, in magic, so we believe
in miracles. Then there was the weight discrepancy of the
Kennedy bullet, the c E three nine nine. It weighed
one hundred and fifty eight point six grains, close to

(01:48:52):
the expected one hundred and sixty to one hundred and
sixty one grains of an unfired carcano bullet. However, BA
ballistic experts noted that the fragments recovered from Connolly's wrist
alone weighed more than the mass that CE three ninety
nine could have lost, suggesting that it couldn't have caused

(01:49:12):
all the attributed damage. Then there was a chain of custody,
and this is where the Secret Service agent who like
I said, he was twenty eight when he was there
in that detail that day, there in the cars, and
he's now I guess he wrote this like two years ago.
Two years ago, he was about ninety years old. He
said he wanted to get this down. His name is

(01:49:35):
Paul Landis, and he said that. People said, well, why
did he say something about this before? And he said,
you got to understand that. You know, it was perceived
as a gigantic failure, and he just wanted to distance
himself from it. Everybody was coming after him. He just
walked away from the Secret Service and all the rest
of stuff. And he didn't want to talk about it.
And he said there was also survivalors, survivor's guilt, feeling

(01:49:58):
bad about this. Didn't want to get involved in talking
about it. But now, after more than fifty years, he
did talk about it. The bullets discovery on a gurney
at Parkland Memorial Hospital, where Kennedy and Connolly were treated
as inconsistencies. It was reportedly found by a hospital employee,

(01:50:20):
Darryl Tomlinson, but its exact origin, whether from Connolly's gurney
or another, is unclear. The chain of custody from discovery
to FBI analysis is poorly documented, raising suspicions of tampering
or planting. As a matter of fact, he says that
he found it on the seat behind Kennedy. Doesn't say

(01:50:41):
that it was embedded there. It's just a seat that
was there. And he said that, he said it on
the side there with Kennedy. And he said somebody picked
it up and put it on the gurney that had
Connolly on it. And then people said, look at this,
the same bullet that was with Jfkayns, now with Connolly,

(01:51:02):
and they created that narrative. That's the beginning of the narrative,
he said. But he said he first saw it there
in the seat behind Kennedy. The bullet was found hours
after the assassination, and its connection to the crime was
not immediately established. The delay and the lack of clarity
about its source, for example, whether it fell from Connolly's
body or was unrelated, undermined its evidential reliability. It's near

(01:51:28):
pristine state contrasts with the extensive damage that it supposedly caused.
Some witnesses, including medical personnel, describe Connley's wounds as suggesting
multiple bullets or fragments, and very inconsistent with a single
intact bullet. And so now we're going to revise, relive

(01:51:48):
all this stuff, and we've got a new conspiracy theory
about a miracle bullet. Even in death, Charlie managed to
save the lives of those around him with his man
of steel bones. Just amazing. This is what his assistant
is writing at Turning Point USA.

Speaker 11 (01:52:07):
The canonography of this guy is ridiculous to the point
where he is now Wolverine's.

Speaker 2 (01:52:14):
The other way to look at it, Yeah, Wolverine. But yeah,
I mean, you know, give the guy his due for
what he did. He did a great job of debating.
He was very courageous to go in places where everybody
hated him, and we're threatening him with violence and eventually
he was killed. But again, you know what, you don't
have to make up stories about him. The real thing

(01:52:36):
is impressive enough. And now they're twisting his life's work
and inverting it, because that's what the power structure always does.
They always invert the truth. One hundred eight degrees. The
gun that killed Charlie Kirk is a World War One
era rifle that may be untraceable. It has no serial number,

(01:52:56):
and that's one of the things that they were writing
in the text messages, which, by the way, many people,
not just the people who were in the audience last week,
questioned whether or not that text which was really something
that would be written by somebody of that age. And
I got to say, regardless of age, when you're under

(01:53:18):
that kind of a system like that, I wouldn't take
the time to be formal with it. I tried to
add commas and punctuations and things like that when I
put text messages for clarity. But if it was a
situation like this, you would be going real fast and furious,
and you'd be using some abbreviations I think.

Speaker 11 (01:53:38):
An old punctuation aside, it is also somewhat suspicious that
they have a chain of text messages just completely incriminating
every aspect of the plan.

Speaker 2 (01:53:49):
Oh yeah, it got it at all.

Speaker 11 (01:53:51):
Like you've never heard of the government going after and
getting these documents and text messages from people's phones.

Speaker 2 (01:53:59):
Yeah, they got that. They can't find the Epstein stuff though, somehow,
I don't know. I mean, it's just amazing how that
fell into the lot. But Epstein unattainable, absolutely, so it
predated the serial number mandates that they have on all
guns as a matter of fact, and believe to be.
They said, this is from the New York Posts, So

(01:54:20):
they use this to scare people about guns. There are
believed to be millions of such weapons and homes throughout
the country, raising concerns among federal authorities of the potential
for other assassins to carry out similar attacks with their
untraceable rifles. So how long is it going to be
before Trump bans that?

Speaker 11 (01:54:41):
Yeah? I mean, it's a good thing they were able to.
If they had a serial number on the gun, it
wouldn't have made any difference in the investigation, right.

Speaker 12 (01:54:53):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:54:53):
Yeah. Short of the security afforded to the president, there's
no way to defend against the threat posed by this
retired official with BATF because you know now we know
that if you do have the Secret Service, of course,
the president is completely protected. They never fail anyway. Cops

(01:55:14):
found the weapon hours after the assassination. Everybody was pointing
to the building. We got video of somebody running across
the top of the building, but even though he dropped
it in the woods, they couldn't find it. I don't
know if it has a serial number, but it wouldn't
trace to me, he wrote in some of these text messages,
I'm worried about Prince. I had to leave it in

(01:55:34):
a bush where I changed outfits, didn't have the ability
or the time to take it with me. Again, the
questions about this rifle, as I showed last week, the
stick issue. You know, how long would this thing be?
And do we see anything like that now? Travis Hues
said that you thought that maybe this cowl thing was that,

(01:55:57):
But I don't know. I mean, to me, there's a
lot of pushback.

Speaker 3 (01:56:01):
Yeah, to me, there's enough plausibility. The quality of the
video is so bad at that distance that it's hard
to make out. You can see there is something under
the towel that's kind of keeping it straight as he
sets it down on the roof as he goes to
jump down, so you can't make out what it is.
It could just be a stick under there for all
we know. To me, it does look like there is something,

(01:56:23):
But we'll.

Speaker 2 (01:56:24):
Talk a little bit more about that and about breaking
the rifle down. Many believe the text exchange reads like
a Bargain Ben Harlequin romance novel. They say it's cheesy, unrealistic,
nothing like how young adults even mentally ill adults would
actually talk in a text message and of course, you know,

(01:56:44):
taking the time to all the punctuation and all the
rest of this stuff. Drop what you're doing now, look
under my keyboard. And of course you would expect I
would think the person would say what for, right, but
it doesn't. The reply is not that. The reply is
you're joking, right, I'm still okay, my love shouldn't be
long until I can come home. But I got to

(01:57:04):
grab my rifles. Still, you weren't the one who did it, right,
I am comma, I am comma. I'm sorry again. It
doesn't read authentic could of course, what they write is
focusing on is not how phony this looks, but the
fact that you have a mainstream media commentator saying, well,

(01:57:27):
this looks very romantic. I really really feel for these guys.
So that was ABC News, and Matt Gutman called the
messages touching. He called him my love, and he said
I want to protect you, my love. Very touching in
a way I think many of us didn't expect. People said, so,

(01:57:48):
why is ABC romanticizing a murderer? Well, in order to
sell it, that's exactly why they're doing it. And these
people have bought into it. If you sell this training
aspect of it, people get upset about that, and they
focus on that rather than focusing on the questionable nature

(01:58:10):
of the text messages in their entirety. So do you
believe the texts are real or fake? The more I
look at this stuff, the more I'm where I am
with nine to eleven. I don't know what happened on
nine to eleven, except I know what the government told
us is impossible. I don't know what happened, Charlie Cook.

(01:58:30):
I just know what the government is telling us is impossible,
and I know how they used it for nine to eleven,
and I know how they were using this event as well.
They always take these events, whether they did them or
whether somebody else did them, and they use them for
their purposes. Here's a guy talking about the rifle breakdown.

Speaker 6 (01:58:53):
On this episode of You Might Be a Dumb mone.
This is my rifle.

Speaker 22 (01:58:56):
It takes two different tools to take it apart. It
takes a torque key and an Allen key. Now, if
I take a shot and immediately disassemble this, I have
to remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my Alan key,
hit the two bolts, on the bottom, put those away
in the Allen key, grab my torquees key, remove the scope,
put everything in the backpack, make sure I have everything,
and make my way downtown, okay, which is going to
take a lot longer for him than it is for me,
especially because his fine tuned motor function something as simple

(01:59:18):
as grabbing an Allen key to a little bowlt it's
going to be extremely impaired due to a dump of
adrenaline throughout his bloodstream an extreme elevated heart rate is
going to make these fine tuned skills extremely difficult. I mean,
just for him to think and analyze of what needs
to be done to disassemble this rifle and.

Speaker 2 (01:59:32):
Get away would be difficult.

Speaker 22 (01:59:34):
And we're not beginning to touch the topic of him
assembling the rifle on top of the roof, which if
you reassemble a rifle and you take a cold dead shot,
it's not.

Speaker 12 (01:59:40):
Going to be one hundred percent accurate, okay.

Speaker 22 (01:59:42):
Or the fact that he disassembled this after taking a shot,
which the rifle's going to be up and they found
no gloves. There's just so many inconsistencies that just make
zero sense. I mean, I'm still working on this and
I have taken this rifle apart in a thousand times.
Now he has to put the pieces of the rifle
into a backpack. And this is a gigantic backpack shot
a wolf pack best.

Speaker 6 (01:59:59):
Back the planet.

Speaker 22 (02:00:01):
Anyways, as you can see, this barrel broken down, does
not fit in this backpack.

Speaker 2 (02:00:05):
And this is a big boy, way bigger than the
one he was carrying. Okay, I put.

Speaker 22 (02:00:08):
The rifle stock in here and guess what, it doesn't fit.

Speaker 5 (02:00:11):
It sticks out.

Speaker 22 (02:00:12):
Now, let's just say for sake of argument, that he
put these in his pantle like and he was walking.
These are still so long, broken down that he would
not be able to walk straight.

Speaker 6 (02:00:19):
He wouldn't be able to bend his legs. Doesn't make sense.

Speaker 2 (02:00:28):
Sorry about the language, we missed that. But we had
a video talking about just the stick and he says,
this is how long it is, the different components, and
he goes, where would he put this where he could
hide it? He couldn't stick it in his pants like
he could pop out of the backpack. So there's a
lot of things like that.

Speaker 23 (02:00:46):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:00:47):
Again, I think the bullet is very conclusive, and they
don't say that they have it. The only thing that
we've seen about that is the surgeon saying that didn't
exit his neck harm a lot of other people. I mean,
why didn't they say that sooner? Because all week people
are saying, well, where's the bullet? And just do not see

(02:01:08):
the damage that would have been done by that bullet.
David Ike says, how about some research before jumping to conclusions?
Do you want the truth or do you want the
truth that suits the narrative?

Speaker 8 (02:01:21):
They want us to believe that it was the Left
that was responsible, and we're supposed to believe that this
guy shot Kerk, then took the rifle apart, put it
in the knapsack, jump down, and hurry away. Were then
told he hid it in a wood in a reassembled state,
and then tells his mate on a text where he's

(02:01:42):
admitting everything in the official story. And so, what you
need to do before you start jumping to the conclusions
so Left there may be elements in which that is
the case, but.

Speaker 4 (02:01:54):
Who's orchestrating it.

Speaker 8 (02:01:55):
Let's do some frecking research and let's find out what
really happened instead of jumping to conclusions immediately left killing
which are the conclusions they.

Speaker 6 (02:02:03):
Want us to have.

Speaker 8 (02:02:04):
Why into this Now they want civil war between.

Speaker 2 (02:02:08):
Left and right.

Speaker 8 (02:02:10):
You have to do is should have to go here
and you have to go to that level that is
working through both left and right.

Speaker 2 (02:02:19):
That's right, Yeah, the left did it right. Well, what
did Alex get that? Well, you got it from drop.
You're going to repeat whatever Trump says, regardless of how
ridiculous it is.

Speaker 13 (02:02:31):
When we attack people, we have to prepare for.

Speaker 14 (02:02:35):
What time cutivated on the left popping up the.

Speaker 13 (02:02:40):
Fact, Well, the problem is on the left.

Speaker 22 (02:02:44):
When you look at the problem, the problem is on
the left.

Speaker 13 (02:02:46):
It's not on the right like some people like to
say on the right.

Speaker 11 (02:02:50):
The problem we have is on the left.

Speaker 13 (02:02:52):
And when you look at the agitators that you look
at the scum that speaks so.

Speaker 15 (02:02:58):
Badly of our country, the American flag burnings all over
the place, that's the left.

Speaker 13 (02:03:02):
That's not the right plan on investigating. We'll see, we'll
be announcing.

Speaker 8 (02:03:07):
They're already under investigators.

Speaker 15 (02:03:10):
They're already under major investigators.

Speaker 8 (02:03:12):
A lot of the people that you would traditionally say
are on.

Speaker 13 (02:03:15):
The left already under investigators.

Speaker 15 (02:03:21):
Celebrated trying to take test.

Speaker 13 (02:03:24):
Well, have you had to start revoking the visas of
the foreigners to celebrated.

Speaker 2 (02:03:29):
Trying to take det No, we haven't, we haven't, but
we are looking at names.

Speaker 1 (02:03:33):
We don't like that.

Speaker 2 (02:03:34):
That's not right.

Speaker 13 (02:03:35):
We wouldn't celebrate if something happened on this and we.

Speaker 2 (02:03:37):
Don't know you wouldn't.

Speaker 13 (02:03:38):
These are sick people, They really deranged people. Any talker
from the Christier Moberg.

Speaker 15 (02:03:45):
Well other than I don't like him, the stores and
always incompetent.

Speaker 2 (02:03:50):
The FED chairman. So yeah, that was the video that
was put out and said bringing Trump just said there
are a large number of people on the left there
being investigated in the wake of Charlie's assassination. That was
put out by Alex Jones, and so that's why you
had the response to it from David Ike where he
put up that video and he said, you know, let's

(02:04:13):
just not fall for this silly left right paradigm Agellian
dialectic this year. He says, why do you think that happened?
How the mighty have fallen? Talking about Alex Jones, he said,
you are a disgrace to everything you once claimed to
stand for. The deep state is now only the left pathetic.

(02:04:34):
And remember you know, Alex did his whole series of
documentaries about the police state. He had police State two
thousand that he did in nineteen ninety nine, police State two,
The Takeover two thousand, Year two thousand, police State's Total
Enslavement two thousand and three, then in twenty ten police

(02:04:55):
State four, the Rise of FEMA. But now the FEMA
camp are good because they're being used to deport people, right,
And we don't have to worry about the police state
going into cities like we did when it was Obama
because now it's Trump and so we'd have to worry
about police State one, two, three, and four. I mean

(02:05:17):
this just like a Jaws franchise. It's like Steven Spielberg. Now,
now sharks are a good thing. We want more sharks
out there. Let's chum the water. Well. The problem is
is that Alex is such a chum of Trump that
there is blood in the water. That's there. I guess
coming will be police State five, Trump Our sugar Daddy.

(02:05:41):
That's going to be the final sequel. I think that's
where the series ends. It's when Trump is your sugar daddy.
David Ike said, this, by the way, is where the
claim that Alex Jones is always right comes from. You
know after toying the line for Trump and saying the left,
it left did it, which you put in there, he
got a lot of pushback from people who believe that
Israel did it. For example, again, you first dogmatically say,

(02:06:06):
but he's right about regardless of what happened. As I said,
I don't know what happened. I don't claim to know
what happened. I just know what did not happen, which
is what the government is telling us. Just like nine
to eleven, he said, So this is a way that
Alex creates this mythos that he is always right. He said,
you first dogmatically say this is what happened, and then

(02:06:26):
you dismiss other possibilities the left did it right. Then
as belief and other possibilities grow, you say, I never
said there was no other explanation. Finally, when other possibilities
turn out to be true, you say, I said from
the start that other possibilities is how it happened. I
am always right. It works every time, says David Ike,

(02:06:48):
so long as your audience has the memory of a goldfish.

Speaker 19 (02:06:53):
I never said it could have not been a false
flag or set up. I just simply said, when I
see evidence all cover it. I certainly couldn't, for his
body was gold. Seeing Israel Dad with the weapons, Israel
was definitely pissed off and does stuff like that.

Speaker 2 (02:07:05):
So maybe Israel did it. Yeah, okay, let's say in
this or and again you take every position and then
whatever happens in the end and it becomes a consensus.
You say I said that all the way from the
very beginning, and then you get your staff to pull
out the eclips.

Speaker 3 (02:07:23):
It's especially easy when you create the amount of content
that Alex does all the time. It gets buried under
an avalanche, and no one really has time to sit
there and catalog the list of claims you make. And
so just so long as you were able to go
in and then cut out, like you said the one
thing you said that was right in the ocean of
things you said you were wrong, you get to go
look I was right and also there and go in

(02:07:47):
and this fact check, you know, like one hundred hours
of content to see if you said anything else.

Speaker 4 (02:07:52):
No one's got that kind of time.

Speaker 2 (02:07:54):
He also makes the truth unbelievable. That's the real issue here,
and that's why I don't want to jump into anything
and say this group or that group did it, and
this is how it was done, because we don't want
to set ourselves up for that type of thing. They
want you to do that so they can discredit you.
We just need to look at what they're saying. Are
they telling the truth? No? Why are they going to

(02:08:14):
use this? That's the key issue. How are they going
to use this? We knew right away they were going
to put the Patriot Act out, and we knew exactly
what that was going to be. You know what I
didn't see at the time, which I've tried to explain
to people over and over again, is how Dark Winter
was an integral part of nine to eleven and how
it was the other shoe to drop after twenty years
of practice. These things were always tied together because they

(02:08:36):
were always focused on pushing a police state. So just
remember how those who question the impossible government magic stories
are treated and how they're treated with smug contempt. And
here is an example of it from Tucker Crass. Remember
when anybody who questioned the official story of nine to
eleven was treated with smug contempt by Tucker kralson do

(02:09:00):
you do good?

Speaker 24 (02:09:01):
They're gonna see After we met briefly at the event
in two thousand and eight in Minneapolis.

Speaker 5 (02:09:05):
For Paul, it was fun, but but you had to
leave early?

Speaker 6 (02:09:09):
What happened?

Speaker 11 (02:09:12):
You know?

Speaker 6 (02:09:12):
How did you?

Speaker 5 (02:09:13):
Why did anyway?

Speaker 6 (02:09:15):
I didn't fail on Ron Paul.

Speaker 2 (02:09:17):
When jesseven Shark got up and started.

Speaker 6 (02:09:19):
Saying nine to eleven was an inside job, you didn't
say that it.

Speaker 2 (02:09:22):
Needed to do.

Speaker 9 (02:09:23):
No.

Speaker 24 (02:09:23):
He said that it was curious why the FBI, you know,
have been lod in on on on I look, I
got it, I was there, and but so you had
to leave because that one guy was arranged.

Speaker 5 (02:09:35):
I was enraged by It wasn't.

Speaker 2 (02:09:38):
From answer.

Speaker 6 (02:09:39):
Sure, it wasn't controversial.

Speaker 2 (02:09:41):
It was stupid.

Speaker 5 (02:09:43):
And if there's any evidence that.

Speaker 17 (02:09:45):
The government is behind one eleven, I believe anything if
there's evidence, but there isn't.

Speaker 6 (02:09:49):
It, so knock it off.

Speaker 7 (02:09:50):
That's my views.

Speaker 2 (02:09:51):
Okay, but I said that to him.

Speaker 24 (02:09:53):
Sure, sure, but one stupid person says something stupid at
Ron PAULA man, Yeah.

Speaker 9 (02:09:57):
I hate that.

Speaker 25 (02:09:58):
By the way, I am open to almost any crackpot
theory about anything.

Speaker 2 (02:10:01):
It is a really open object.

Speaker 6 (02:10:03):
Come on, you know what I mean? That's too much
that even for me.

Speaker 24 (02:10:07):
So just out of curiosity, then what what's your take
on Building seven.

Speaker 11 (02:10:10):
Which explanation do you believe?

Speaker 6 (02:10:12):
Come on, no, this is here's question. Which explanations it was?

Speaker 5 (02:10:19):
Either it was it was pol or.

Speaker 24 (02:10:21):
It was isolated pockets and fire in the building that
blew that we.

Speaker 2 (02:10:27):
Need the stupid towers coming down.

Speaker 5 (02:10:30):
Down is no win conversation.

Speaker 6 (02:10:31):
So I'm not going to continue that. But let me
just say one thing.

Speaker 15 (02:10:34):
The Macro my Macro viewers study is the obvious one
which the buildings came down.

Speaker 11 (02:10:38):
So what's the playing movie?

Speaker 6 (02:10:40):
Okay, so are you still yeah?

Speaker 2 (02:10:43):
Well, now he's going to reinvent himself as a nine
to eleven documentarian after mocking this stuff and Building seven,
especially right, play that clip, Lan, It's about Tucker Carlton
when he had the engineer on who wanted to show
the film and explain why this is a control demolition
as everybody can see with their own eyes, and Tucker

(02:11:03):
knew it was damning evidence, and he refused, refused to
allow that clip to be played.

Speaker 5 (02:11:09):
Claims, do you have any care the building?

Speaker 18 (02:11:13):
Sure?

Speaker 23 (02:11:13):
Sure, let's start with the collapse of building seven. Can
you roll the video clip that I sent to you?

Speaker 6 (02:11:20):
Okay, I'm not sure.

Speaker 5 (02:11:21):
I can't specified.

Speaker 23 (02:11:23):
Maybe there's some kind of code you just don't show
the collapse of Building seven.

Speaker 6 (02:11:27):
I don't know what it is. They don't care if
you think the earth is flat. But it's not threat
to anyone.

Speaker 8 (02:11:32):
But if you say, like, what actually happened with Building seven,
like that is weird?

Speaker 19 (02:11:37):
Right?

Speaker 17 (02:11:37):
It doesn't liquid that, right, if you were to say
something like that on television, they'd slip out.

Speaker 6 (02:11:43):
They would slip out.

Speaker 9 (02:11:45):
You'd lose your job over that.

Speaker 26 (02:11:46):
Why why sis World Trade cent to seven? Just before
it collapsed on September the eleventh, two thousand and one,
It had not been hit by an aircraft. It had
been damaged by falling debris and fire, But by five
twenty and most of the files have been extinguished. Although
the building was forty seven stories high, it doesn't fall
sideways nor collapse unevenly. For this to have happened, all

(02:12:14):
of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost.

Speaker 6 (02:12:18):
Exactly the same time.

Speaker 26 (02:12:20):
Yet, the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse
was due primarily to fire.

Speaker 6 (02:12:27):
But what does it look like to you? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (02:12:34):
So you would be fired if you showed the sunfoxtion
neers fired by Fox or fired by whoever he really
works for. That's the question, right And so right now
Tucker is in the process of rebuilding his credibility with
a different group, so he may throw out some truth
nuggets out there. Before he had a problem with truthers.
You know, the opposite of a truther is a liar,

(02:12:57):
I think. And so we saw that it were, as
they sees on a very believable boogeyman to do it,
Islamic terrorists, because we know that Muslims want to murder people,
and we know that trainees are crazy, and we know
they want to murder people as well. So let's go
down that road and build that up. So we've got
more reports. This is from the Daily Wire. They're exclusive

(02:13:21):
the attempted Kavanaugh assassin identifies as a transgender woman, show
the legal filings. Okay, so yes, yes, like I said before,
they are nuts, they're like Norman Bates. But what is
going to stop it? And you know, when you look
at this and people don't want to address the fundamental issues,

(02:13:45):
I think that they're just putting this out as a misdirection.
In other words, you're going to ignore the SSRIs, You're
going to ignore the role of schools and making kids
crazy and suicidal, and then you're going to hype them
up with murder suicide pills like the SSRIs. Why don't
you stop this, Why don't you stop the schools? None
of this has ever talked about, so we know that

(02:14:06):
it is part of an agenda, and we know as
Travis you mentioned this. You know, you go through these
processes of what they're doing to the kids in the
school and it's like MK ultra training. You know, once
you get these people in process, you can actually then
nudge them in the directions that you want to go. Yeah,
I think they ought to rename one of these high
schools after Jolly, call it Jolly High.

Speaker 3 (02:14:29):
Very unjolly, it would be. It really is incredible how
mirrors mirrors what he talked about with d d D
debility dependency DREAD. You debilitate someone, you take something away
from them, you harm them in some way. You make
them dependent on you. You know, their source of whatever
it is, food, shelter, information, anything. Really they look to

(02:14:51):
you as a source of what they need. DREAD, you
make them fearful of something, whether it's pain from you
or consequence from outside sources, and then.

Speaker 2 (02:15:00):
They worry about the withdrawal from that drug that you
gave him that made them feel that way or what.

Speaker 4 (02:15:05):
And so it just it mirrors it incredibly well.

Speaker 3 (02:15:08):
And just you know, in almost every single aspect of
American life, they're almost utilizing this against everyone.

Speaker 2 (02:15:13):
Yeah, and of course the thing with SSRI drugs is
they have so many other adverse effects, like it feels
like your body is on fire or something like that.
Somebody will cut that cold turkey and it's like a
diver who's down at a deep level. Besides that, I've
got to get out of here. He panics, and he
runs up to the surface real quickly. He gets the bends.
And that's what happens in a pharmaceutical way. It gives

(02:15:34):
your body, it gives your brain the bends, because we
call it a mind bending drug. And people go on
these murder suicide things and they have no recollection of it.
They don't have any idea what they're doing. Well, we're
going to take a quick break and we come back.
We're going to ask some questions about what does it
really take to win a culture war? How do we
fight it. We'll be right back.

Speaker 12 (02:15:56):
Stay with us in.

Speaker 6 (02:18:34):
Defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (02:18:43):
Welcome back, folks. We've got a lot of comments from
Liberty Valiant. Have you seen a watermelon? You get hit
by a small caliber bullet, smaller caliber caliber bullet than
at thirty odd six, the watermelon explodes into thousands of pieces.
Kirk's head was intact impossible. Well, I think if he
had been hit in the neck, it probably would have
just shredded the neck and blown out the other end.
I don't know if it would have had an impact
on the head, but if he was shot in the head,

(02:19:04):
it would have absolutely done massive damage. It would have
been horrific. Karen Carpenter twenty seven, Absolutely ridiculous. No one
who's buying this story about the bullet? Yeah, that's this
is where it becomes utterly unbelievable to me. The thirty
odd six is far too powerful for it to get
lodged in the throat. It's not going to deflect off
the spine. I don't believe it's gonna go It's gonna

(02:19:24):
punch straight through. It's not gonna it's not gonna be
deflected by that. The Syrian girl, guess Charlie Kirk was
not shot with that rifle, then hunt. It doesn't seem
like it. Tunnel Lord won three three seven, Yeah, No,
thirty odd six doesn't stay in the body. Every big
game animal hit by any such cartridge always has an
exit wound.

Speaker 2 (02:19:44):
Yeah. Yeah. This is kind of like the collapsing steel
buildings collapsing out of their footprint is like, that just
doesn't happen. It didn't happen before, that hasn't happened after that.
And this is the same type of thing. There's always
some kind of a found dayational flaw and their lies,
no matter how well constructed.

Speaker 3 (02:20:04):
Yeah, if if what really happened with nine to eleven
actually happened, they would have had to tear down every
skyscraper in Manhattan rebuild.

Speaker 4 (02:20:13):
Them from scratch.

Speaker 12 (02:20:13):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:20:14):
It wouldn't have been It would have been looking like
soh no.

Speaker 2 (02:20:16):
And change change all the building codes, and change all
the ways that firemen handle fires and skyscrapers. No rules
were changed. That was the point of Tony Rook. I
think Tony was his first name. I think Rook, I
know was his last name because we made a joke
about Knight and Rook and he had a trial talking

(02:20:41):
about that, and that was one of the points that
he made up in the mock trial was that there's
been no changes in any country to change the way
that the building codes or the way fires are fought. Therefore,
no country believed that it's not just us, it's not
just the Truthers. Yeah, no country.

Speaker 3 (02:20:57):
Liberty Valiant says thirty out six caliber bullet three thousand
pounds per square inch force at a range of one
hundred and fifty yards, and Assyrian girl says the bullet
may have been Old in charge getting weak. It was
Grandpop's gun, after all. It was applying to Doug Lug there.

Speaker 11 (02:21:12):
But it was Doug Lug that said that the Assyrians
girl is the reply after that.

Speaker 3 (02:21:17):
Oh okay, So Doug Lug said the bullet may have
been old in charge getting weak. It was Greendpop's gun
after all. I don't know enough about decay of gunpowder,
but I imagine even at that point, the thirty odd six
is going to be carrying enough kinetic energy that it's
not going to stop. I don't think you're going to
lose enough of it over time to be that big

(02:21:37):
of a difference maker.

Speaker 2 (02:21:38):
I don't know about those numbers because I'm not saying
that they're right or wrong, but I mean it looks reasonable.
Three thousand pounds per square inch of force a range
one hundred and fifty yards that is just incredible. And
even if you were to derate that a little bit,
it's still incredible.

Speaker 3 (02:21:53):
I think even if you're shooting a subsonic round, it's
going through and through. I don't think it's stopping Doug Lug,
a searing girl says, but if it was a big rifle, Doug,
it would take out a moose, then I think it
would have passed.

Speaker 4 (02:22:04):
Through Kirk's body.

Speaker 3 (02:22:05):
I agree with that up tomorrow. That round was designed
for deep penetration tunnel Lord. When three three seven big
game animals have denser muscles and bones in any human,
there is no way the exit wounds on big animals
which are big, can somehow be smaller.

Speaker 2 (02:22:18):
On a human. That's especially because she's talking about the neck.
The neck is not a large area, right, It's not
a lot of flesh they would have to pass through.
But the bone supposedly stopped it. I don't think so.

Speaker 3 (02:22:30):
Yeah, very shadow boxer. I used to watch a YouTube
channel called Demolition Ranch on YouTube. They did a great
job of showing a different calibers would do to different objects.
Demolition Ranch was a great channel, really really great channel.
I enjoyed his videos a lot. He's also seems to
be a really genuinely nice guy. He gave up YouTube
because his children were getting older and he wanted to
spend more time with them. So despite the fact that

(02:22:51):
he was making a lot of money, he decided, you know,
I've done enough, I've made.

Speaker 2 (02:22:54):
He didn't get canceled by you to be quit.

Speaker 3 (02:22:56):
Yeah, he just quit, and he decided, you know, I
want to spend as much time with my kid before
they go up to college as possible. So I really
like Demolition Ranch, and he seemed like a really nice guy.
A tunnel lord one three three seven, a big game
heart shot has to cut through at least two feet
of flesh and the exit wound is still big. If
you can cut through that, it can cut through Kirk's
neck without issue.

Speaker 2 (02:23:14):
Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 3 (02:23:16):
This is again where it starts to become completely unbelievable
for me. If it's a thirty out to six, what
they're saying just doesn't make sense. Wishbone or backbone says,
I shoot long range twenty two long rifle all the
time at five hundred and seventy two point six yards
a forty ground, a forty grain subsonic norm attack twenty
two long rifle will punch through two pounds of beef,
through an entire pumpkin and in bed in a half

(02:23:37):
inch of plywood just south of six hundred yards. Wow,
twenty two long rifle has a surprising amount of kinetic
forest velocity.

Speaker 11 (02:23:44):
And that's subsonic. Usually twenty two is supersonic.

Speaker 3 (02:23:49):
Yeah, the pretty Valiant says Tyler was a decoy, just
like the two guys arrested in the crowd decoys. Yeah,
trump Berger, this reads like a CIA intern rotor. Imagine
he's talking about the text messages.

Speaker 4 (02:24:01):
It could be.

Speaker 3 (02:24:01):
I've also, sadly, I've dealt with a lot of leftists
online and younger leftists. I've interacted with them, and I've
seen a lot of other people interact with them. So
to me, the text messages do read like a very
specific type of sort of theater kid leftists, very pretentious,
very my love.

Speaker 4 (02:24:18):
Oh.

Speaker 3 (02:24:19):
I've seen a lot of people like that, so I
could believe they're real, But also I could believe that
this is some like you said, CIA.

Speaker 2 (02:24:27):
In turn, it wouldn't be that hard for them to
mimic that. I mean, you could feed that into AI.
So you know, say these particular things in a way
that somebody who writes like this here's an example, would
write that.

Speaker 11 (02:24:38):
And it's also, as you point out, this is an
extremely high stress situation where they're also under a lot
of time pressure, So you typically aren't going to have
time to write out your pretentious, nonsense way of doing
theater kid texts unless it's a AI trying to spit
out content similar to what they typically text.

Speaker 2 (02:25:00):
Yeah, well that adrenaline kicks in, your hand is shaking
and your heart is pumping.

Speaker 3 (02:25:05):
To fytire at seventeen seventy six. When the news reports
a knife killing, they never say knife violence over, they
always say gun violence.

Speaker 4 (02:25:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:25:13):
Well, you know, knives aren't as scary liberty valiant. Apparently
it had to be someone nearby with a very small
caliber handgun.

Speaker 2 (02:25:19):
Yeah, and we have some people have identified some suspects
and some videos. But again I'm not interested in solving
the crime because I don't have the expertise to do
that and I don't have access to the information to
do that. I think that's something of a trap, a
brier patch, if you will. But what we know is

(02:25:39):
how it's being used. They're going to use this for
gun control or for speech control, if they want to
use it for a police state, we know that that's
just another indicator to me, another red flag that this
is something that's set up by the government. Of course,
they can always use something that was even a real
event for their own agenda, and that's what we have
to be concerned about. How are they going to use this?

(02:26:03):
That's my focus.

Speaker 3 (02:26:05):
We have Doug lug saying Tucker did an interview a
month ago with an ileven adult pushing the narrative he
will never tell the truth. You know, why give up
on a lie? Audi, Mr r Anyone who's dad is CIA?
Ain't on your side?

Speaker 2 (02:26:18):
And it was CIA, Disinformation News Broadcasting the Voice of America.

Speaker 3 (02:26:22):
Yeah, that's a That was one of the things that
when Nick Flints and Tucker had their recent back and forth,
Nick really hammered him on you didn't know your dad
was CIA? Really you had to find out from other people.
Come on, it was such an easy dunk for Flint
as well.

Speaker 2 (02:26:38):
And the other thing too, is when you look at
all this back and forth about the Smith Mount Act
and all the rest of this, Nobody in writing about
this mentions the fact that this was about the Voice
of America and what it's truly about. I mean, they
just gloss over that, and they don't acknowledge what it
was about. If they cared to even find out what

(02:26:58):
it was about.

Speaker 11 (02:27:00):
Of the Smith Act really was written to keep Tucker's
dad and others like him out of the US, to
keep them from doing their propaganda here on us go away.

Speaker 2 (02:27:12):
Yeah, it's the anti Carls. That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:27:17):
Out of mrre read that shadow Boxer. None of the
crimes against humanity were possible without the mocking Bird media.
They've been in bed with the CIA and the government
in general for decades. OUTI mrr. Imagine having to spend
your entire career lying and deceiving the masses. Yeah, Doug
A lug I will say it. Our government killed three
thousand people in nine to eleven. My eyes were opened.

Speaker 2 (02:27:39):
Yes, yes.

Speaker 3 (02:27:41):
Secluded at Oyster says trainees are a collective patsy. They're
actually just mentally ill people abused by medical industrial complex,
and they are a perfect scapegoat for syops because everyone
knows they're unwell. I have a lot of empathy and
compassion for a lot of trans individuals. I think they
have been lied to, I think they've been abused, and
I think you also still have to be very careful

(02:28:02):
with them because once they start advocating for policies that
are going to harm other children, you know, you have
to somewhat distance yourself from that empathy and compassion.

Speaker 2 (02:28:11):
Well, it's kind of like somebody who may be a pedophile.
Maybe they were abused as a child, right, but there's
still a dangerous pedophile, right, that's the issue. But yeah,
they are becoming the scapegoat, and they are. This is
how they're running the left right thing in the same
way that they had the Islamic terrorists, who are dangerous,
very dangerous. I'm not minimizing that at all. But they

(02:28:33):
were not capable. Men in caves are not capable of
pulling that off. And they didn't even hit Building seven.
And you can ask yourself why there's no videotape, but
the Pentagon a place that was surrounded by surveillance tapes
and all the rest of this stuff. It goes on
and on yeah.

Speaker 11 (02:28:48):
Yeah, So if you're looking to do a mk ultra
type thing, you can start with someone that's already halfway there.
Don't start with us, you get that's right, Yeah, already
somewhat crazy Patsy.

Speaker 3 (02:29:04):
They've been prepared exactly. It's just do not obey. They'll
laugh at us. And how easy they get away with
their organized crimes. I mean, look at trying to discuss
these matters with your neighbors. Nothing but conflicting beliefs. That's right,
narroway narrogate ministries. Note eleven was the beginning of the
quilling of rights, in the beginning of the end of
propping up the dying American influence politically, economically, militarily of

(02:29:24):
the world.

Speaker 2 (02:29:25):
And it was tied with the pandemic from the very beginning,
and the two of them, and that was the other
shoot to drop. After they'd practiced what they wanted to
do at the lockdown and the vaccine, they practiced it
for twenty years, put out the model legislation, but it
was two months before nine to eleven, and then they
set it up with another false flag attack, the anthrax attack.
That anthrax in that attack, and of course the nine

(02:29:47):
to eleven engineers have done a good job of investigating
the anthrax thing as well. That form of anthrax, that
weaponized form of anthrax, was only done by the CIA,
as well as the delivery mechanism. How they adomized it
and made it very easy to spread in an aerosol way.
And yet they even move people. The FBI moved people

(02:30:11):
away from the two facilities in the US that were
making that specific kind of anthrax, and they picked a
Patsy and blamed it on him and insinuated all the time,
never indicted him, and then when he died they said
he was the guy. We never indicted him, but now
that he can't defend himself, he's the guy. It's just
so obvious, right.

Speaker 3 (02:30:31):
Overture says, in a world of magic bullets, anything is possible.
Man Militia, that's not true. I have shot bears of
thirty out six and the bullet was still inside bear
hunting well, minute Man Militia has some real life hands
on experience.

Speaker 11 (02:30:47):
So also there's a big difference between a bear and
a human neck.

Speaker 2 (02:30:51):
Yeah yeah, so yeah, was that center of mass shot
or was that his paw or something?

Speaker 3 (02:30:58):
Minute Man Milicia seems to live in a very interesting life,
I believe memory. He's our listener who works in a
silver mine. So bear hunter, silver miner, very interesting, a
very interesting fellow, very cool.

Speaker 11 (02:31:14):
So there's a bit more of a conversation about this
where they're saying that it depends on the type of
bullet that was used. So he's just saying that it's
uncertain that some types of bullets.

Speaker 2 (02:31:27):
Well that's the other thing to For a week, everybody's saying,
where's the bullet, where's the bullet? Remember, we had all look,
they're paving this over, or they're putting grass in or
this or that. You know, we don't have any information
about the bullet has been recovered, it's been matched to
the gun, and none of that stuff was not It
was just crickets about the bullet. And then all of
a sudden, the first thing we hear was it was
magic and he stopped it with his superpowers. Yeah.

Speaker 11 (02:31:53):
And again, like I was saying, even if you have
a type of bullet that can get stuck in a bear,
there's still a huge difference between that and a human neck.

Speaker 4 (02:32:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:32:07):
Tunnel Lord than thirty three seven says the decay of
gunpowder in this case is negligible. That's kind of what
I was thinking an NDPIO if the bullet was getting weak,
which they really don't, would have affected the accuracy a lot.
That's also true here. When you're shooting, you're trying to
you want to have as consistent batch of AMMO as possible.

(02:32:29):
You don't want to have to account for variances in
the amount of powder and things. So if you're bullets
are all kinds of difference in decay, you're gonna have
a very hard time making consistent shots. And trump Berger says,
I shot AMMO from one World War two that was
still one hundred percent wishbone or backbone. Subsonic rounds will
absolutely go through a human. Yeah, thirty out six, I

(02:32:51):
assumed subsonic is not going to make that much of
a difference.

Speaker 2 (02:32:55):
Well, let's talk a little bit about the digital ID
and also about the hy B VISA applications. Now, I've
seen this smattering of criticism about the H one B
visa thing that's happening with India, and WND has really
focused like a laser beam on this. They've been running
multiple articles each day on this H one B visa issue,

(02:33:19):
and it is a problem. It really is a problem.
It's how they are taking away not just manual labor
jobs at the bottom, but they're taking away the kinds
of jobs that people typically go to college to get,
and it is a crooked system. They're bringing people that
they claim have educational credentials and abilities that they don't
have to replace American workers. So Trump has signed a

(02:33:41):
proclamation imposing a one hundred thousand dollars annual fee for
H one B visa applications by executive order. It turns
out that this whole thing is a massive Trump lie.
It is a headfake. It is a huge fake, fishy taco.

(02:34:01):
This entire nonsense about this. There's all kinds of exceptions
that are riddled throughout this executive order, which makes it
basically ineffective. And the key thing Lasa and I were
talking about this, The key thing is it doesn't even
start for another year, and by that time the executive

(02:34:22):
order has expired. I mean, that's how fake this whole
Trump thing is. He is doing this, making a statement
to appease his base. There's no reality in it whatsoever,
none at all.

Speaker 11 (02:34:35):
Yeah, I saw a thing that it was specifically starting
a few days after this year's immigration lottery thing, so
it's not affecting this year. It might affect next year,
but it only has a one year date, so even
if it does affect next year, it would only be

(02:34:55):
a one year thing that it was affecting.

Speaker 2 (02:35:00):
So this is when they say they can't find the
qualified Americans and so they've got to bring somebody in
from a foreign country. We saw this first at Disney
World where they kicked out Americans and they said, well,
if you want to train your cheap replacements from India,
we will give you severance pay, but only if you
train your replacements. Over and over again, we see that

(02:35:20):
they are embargoing these jobs so that they can get
in people who work at a lower rate. So the
idea was is that they would raise these h ONEB
visa fees from two hundred and fifteen dollars to one
hundred thousand dollars for new applicants. But again it's all
smoking mirrors for his fan club who want to believe
that he's going to do something to protect them and

(02:35:42):
he's not. Really. The key thing is when we look
at what is happening with the digital ID again, Vietnam
is a good example of this. Take a look at
what has happened in Vietnam just the last couple of days.
This is Vieta's digital ID access.

Speaker 10 (02:36:02):
I say, it's a total loss of privacy and it's
set up for control. Miss it and you'll be stuck
in immigration, airport shut down, flights grounded, not dictated by
the o ECD, where one late payment dingsuers for. What's
for sure is Vietnam is the test and America is next.
I've seen this movie in other countries. The trailer says efficiency,

(02:36:24):
the plot twist is controlled, leaving room for abuse. Vietnam
cells is as part of Agenda twenty forty five, and
the fallout was apocalyptic.

Speaker 5 (02:36:33):
This exposes the trap.

Speaker 10 (02:36:34):
One glitch and you're practically locked out of your own life.

Speaker 11 (02:36:38):
Picture this.

Speaker 10 (02:36:39):
You are sipping your face at ad Sagong and scrolling
your banking app and boom, your bank account vanishes in
thin air, No email, no warning, just a digital black
hole where your money used to be. Sounds like a nightmare,
right well, for millions in Vietnam US, I'm wiped out
over eighty six million bank accounts. That's right, eighty six million.

(02:37:02):
The official narrative says, it's about security and efficiency. But
come on this screens of the World Economic Form playbook,
a self strike in the.

Speaker 11 (02:37:10):
Great Reset Wars.

Speaker 10 (02:37:11):
Remember when Vietnam fired two hundred and forty five thousand
officials overnight and called it efficiency, and when Vietnam issued
the gas vehicle band.

Speaker 4 (02:37:20):
Starting in twenty twenty six.

Speaker 10 (02:37:21):
This is the next chapter in Vietnam surrendering to the
Great Reset and the globalist's agenda. And it's happening faster
than a motorbike dodging traffic on wing Way Street. Stick
around as we're explosion today about what's going on, why
this can be a trap, and what are the workarounds
if you're an expat investor or someone who just cares about.

Speaker 2 (02:37:42):
Again, it's the real Domino theory, folks. The real Domino
theory is about global governance and a permission society everywhere,
total surveillance and permission that you have to beg your
masters to do anything. It was also covered by doctor
Andrew Kaufman, who had this to say.

Speaker 25 (02:38:00):
We must, you must.

Speaker 6 (02:38:03):
I think this deadly seriously.

Speaker 25 (02:38:06):
Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the
challenge of pushing Cosboala north of the Latani River.

Speaker 2 (02:38:13):
This is ADL.

Speaker 25 (02:38:14):
Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to
mount harmone libel as tweets certainly might seem less deadly
than missiles from Yemen.

Speaker 2 (02:38:26):
Okay, that's not just the intro to it. That's actually
the wrong video. That's the TikTok has been taken over
by the technocracy, and Trump is handing out shares all
the usual suspects. I mean, this is very much like
the Godfather who had the guy in Florida and he's
cutting the cake and he's handing out different pieces to

(02:38:47):
this family and to that family. That's what Trump is
doing with TikTok. But what Andrew Kaufman said, and I
apologize you don't have the video, maybe you could find
it lance He said it was eighty six million accounts
bank accounts deactivated overnight, no warning, no grace period. Individuals
who failed to submit biometric data were immediately denied access.

(02:39:12):
This is not speculation. This is applied state level biometric
enforcement and it's coming everywhere.

Speaker 11 (02:39:21):
Huh, which video are you looking for?

Speaker 2 (02:39:22):
I was looking for the one of the Vietnam deactivates
eighty six million ban on bank accounts. But David Ike said,
this is what I have been warning about for decades.
Starmer is planning to impose digital ID on the say
so of his cult handler Tony Blair, who's been pushing
this for year after year. Those who shouted conspiracy theory

(02:39:46):
should prepare to apologize, but they won't. They'll say, what's
the problem. If you have nothing to hide, what's the problem.
Then they'll say, who is that banging on my door
this time of night. By then it'll be too late. Yeah,
we've already seen. This happened to us, so PayPal. When
we started the show, we were only five months into it.
At that point in time. The only way that we

(02:40:07):
were getting we didn't have sub we didn't have Subscribe Star,
we didn't have zell, we didn't have cash app, and
we didn't have a PO box that we'd set up
at that point in time, and instead what we got
was PayPal. That PayPal was working without our first contributions,
and it was still pretty much the place that we owe.

(02:40:30):
Money that was donated to the program came through that
and they just cut off no explanation. As I've said
many times, I actually got two hours. I was on the
phone with him. All you could say was I can
only find one thing, and that's a message saying, you know,
delete this account immediately. Well here's the clip.

Speaker 27 (02:40:46):
Why is Vietnam the testing ground for the new banking order? Well, recently,
Vietnam imposed a requirement for a digital ID, including a
biometri scan of everyone in order to have a bank account.

Speaker 6 (02:41:04):
And what they.

Speaker 27 (02:41:05):
Did to enforce this is they closed eighty six million
bank accounts and seized all of the assets in those accounts.
So the owners of those accounts have no ability to
do banking or access their funds because they chose not
to sacrifice their privacy and submit to this biometric surveillance

(02:41:31):
tracking mechanism. Well, this is not something that is going
to stay in Vietnam. This is a test because if
we look at, for example, what's going on with the
European Central Bank and digital ID initiative in Europe, as
well as the real ID and the CBDC system FED

(02:41:52):
now being imposed in the United States.

Speaker 2 (02:41:54):
We can see the stable coin actually now that rebranded.

Speaker 6 (02:41:57):
US as well.

Speaker 27 (02:41:59):
So what are you going to do about it?

Speaker 2 (02:42:02):
Yeah, mandatory everify real ID that they're pushing really really hard.
After getting pushed back for twenty years. Now Trump's ind
we don't have to worry about it. Now that Trump's end,
we don't have to worry about censorship by the government
of free speech. So let's go for the censorship. Let's
go for the real ID. And as many Republican jurisdictions
like Florida for example, they're pushing in mandatory everify. Well,

(02:42:24):
we got to do that because they've got illegal aliens
that are in here. And as he pointed out, it's
going everywhere, and as David I point out, it's coming
into the UK as well. And here's a labor secretary,
a labor minister actually, Liz Kendall in the UK, threatening
punishment if you don't get the digital ID mark of

(02:42:44):
the beast.

Speaker 28 (02:42:45):
Well, the government is looking at digital ID cards at
the moment. How would that help prevent the situation that
we're in now, Well, k S Dahmer, our prime is said,
we are looking at what hairs Starmer I've done to
bring in a sort of digital creditation. I think there's
real actually benefits right across here from obviously dealing with

(02:43:07):
illegal working, but also actually imagine if your viewer is.

Speaker 2 (02:43:11):
Immerg that's a problem.

Speaker 28 (02:43:12):
You created one credential that would allow them to access
all the different government services and public services. Do I'm
sure many of your viewers often tear their hair out
with all the different numbers and passwords of the different
bits of government that they have to deal with. And
I do think there could be a real benefit here

(02:43:33):
for people who are here and working legally.

Speaker 2 (02:43:36):
An access the government that makes you want to carry
my hair.

Speaker 28 (02:43:38):
Out not my pers word routine, as well as the
benefits it could have with illegal migration. We're looking at that.
I think it is an interesting idea that other countries
have taken forward, and we want to learn from what
they've done.

Speaker 2 (02:43:52):
Illegal immigration is their key tactic. Hair Steimer is all
about illegal immigration. Now that out there some kind of
a carrot to the population saying you take the digital
ID and will help you with this. It's not believable
at all coming from labor. Some people will fall for
it when it's put out by the Republicans.

Speaker 11 (02:44:10):
Yes, Lands, Yeah, I think it's real interesting how she
carefully avoided saying social credit system. It's well, we've been
looking at what other countries have been doing with a
sort of accreditation and it's very promising.

Speaker 2 (02:44:25):
Yeah, it's a plot, it's a plan. I've shown the
video many many times. I'm not going to show it again. Now,
Ukraine twenty thirty, remember that was put together by the
NATO people. Well it's twenty thirty. We won the war,
and look at this. You can go to the Department
of Motor Vehicles, you can register to Oh, you can
do this, you can do that. All of these things
are your interaction with government, which I didn't want to

(02:44:46):
have in the first place. But now they're going to
make it easy for you because you've got this electronic
thing on your phone, and so it makes it easy
to do all the things that you never wanted to do.
And if you don't that, there is punishment and exclusion.
And here's the issue in what she is pushing in
the UK. Lose access if you don't get it, you

(02:45:09):
lose access to welfare, you lose access to pensions. If
you want that's a social security check, you have to
get a digital ide. That's the only way that we'll
pay you. You lose access to public services and so forth.
This is the same plan, folks, that Gates ran through
in India. They call it the oddharsh system. Gates went

(02:45:31):
to Bill Gates went to India and he said, I'm
going to help you with a numbering system. And you've
got all these poor people out there. We've got to
get them under control. They're operating in a cashless society.
We can't see or control what they're doing. So let's
make medical care and welfare and all these different things
that they're dependent on for their very existence because of

(02:45:54):
their poverty. Let's make that only acceptable access only through
the our system. So everybody must take the number or
you will not be able to live in India. In
developed countries, they don't go for the juggular right away.
What they do is say, it's going to be a
lot easier for you to deal with all the things

(02:46:16):
that government mandates if you've got this, and if you
don't have it, we're going to make your life exceedingly difficult.
So this is as a matter of fact, here's Tony
Blair talking about his long dream of digital ideas.

Speaker 17 (02:46:31):
This issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure.
I just want to emphasize how important I think that
is because in the end, you need the data, you
need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't been.

Speaker 11 (02:46:45):
Some of the vaccines that will.

Speaker 17 (02:46:47):
Come on down the line will be multiple, there'll be
multiple shots.

Speaker 2 (02:46:50):
So it was a perfect overturned window move.

Speaker 17 (02:46:54):
Well generally, but certainly for a pandemic or for the
vaccine past the vaccines, you to have a proper digital infrastructure,
and many countries don't have that. In the fact, most
countries don't have that.

Speaker 2 (02:47:05):
Yeah, the common pass, and that was something that was
sold heavily by the World Economic Forum and they all
came up with their own version of it. The EU
had its own version of it. Well, we know how
that's going to work. And we know we saw the
police van that they the police getting that van and
confiscating it. This is all just playing into the hands

(02:47:25):
of the police state. And if you want to fall,
if you want to jump onto these absurd narratives about
assassinations and nine to eleven and all the rest of stuff,
then they have got you on the road to the
real police state. Forget the four documentaries that Alex did.
That's what's really happening now. Any money honoring is the

(02:47:48):
stable coin use case that nobody talks about. This is
coming from zero Hedge. This is the permission society, and
let's understand it's not going to be CBDC. There's been
enough talk about CBDC that they want to avoid that label.
Stable Coin is the rebranded trojan horse that has all
of the functions that we did not want to have

(02:48:09):
with CBDC. Look, we want to be able to clear
transactions easily and efficiently around the world, perhaps, but is
it worth it to have a surveillance permission state? And
that's what stable coin does. It allows them to shut
down where your money is. The trajectory of the stable

(02:48:30):
coin industry is heavily influenced by warring factions on opposite
sides debating possible criminal use. There's a lack of awareness
of how a deep integration of stable coins in global
finance can drive the use of the blockchains properties of
immutability and transparency in order to fight financial crimes. Think

(02:48:55):
about this, Why should there be financial crimes? Do you
have somebody who wants to buy something to somebody who
wants to get paid, Why should the government be in
there determining that it is a financial crime. Go back
again to Dennis Hastert, the pedophile who was the longest
serving Speaker of the House for the Republicans, and perhaps

(02:49:17):
with the Democrats as well, I'm not sure, but he
was caught taking money out in a way to avoid
the withdrawals getting attention. In other words, he's structuring his deposits,
taking out a little bit of a time to get
a large amount of money that he would then pay
to the blackmailer. And of course the people in Congress
who put him in Congress, who put him in the

(02:49:38):
speaker's position, knew that he was a pedophile. And even
after they found this, they never came after him for
being a pedophile. They never prosecuted him for being a pedophile.
What they prosecuted him for was a so called financial
crime of taking money out to avoid being reported to

(02:49:59):
the government. Are they doing anything about the financial strange
withdrawals that are being done by Jeffrey Epstein. No, those
are all secret. And so if you want to run
a pedophile ring, if you want to run a blackmail
sex ring like Jeffrey Epstein, or you want to pay
off your pedophile victims that are blackmailing you, the only

(02:50:24):
thing they care about in that particular case, I said,
is the financial crimes. But they're not caring about the
financial crimes of the Epstein issue. So it's very selective,
isn't it. Where they're looking at stable coin industry is
being aided by increased regulatory clarity and meaningful use cases.
In other words, Trump is greasing the skids to let

(02:50:46):
them do whatever they want because the stable coin is
going to bail out their US dollar. It's going to
be the new petro dollar. And it is also going
to be the means by which they put in a
stealth CBDC. If you go back to the Technocracy blueprints
that they had, the organization that was selling Technocracy originally

(02:51:07):
in the nineteen thirties, what they were saying was is
that we need to have exactly what the stable coin
and the CBDC provide, and that is tracking of energy resources.
They started bringing in this idea as something that was
a real feature, not a bug, because of the climate mcguffin.
And so we've got to track your carbon usage and

(02:51:28):
prohibit it if you've had too much steak to eat
or whatever, you've driven too much this last time, you're
using too much gasoline, so we're just not going to
let you pay for this. That was always a part
of the technocracy's plan, and it kind of was echoed
in what Henry Kissinger did when he set up the

(02:51:48):
petro dollar. Again, that was a recognition that the real
thing that moves society is energy. That is why they
did the Paris Climate Accord in twenty fifteen to take
energy away from the US and the EU, to de
industrialize us, to make us poor third world, so they

(02:52:12):
don't get any resistance from us. It's always been about that.
The ability to facilitate swifter, more cost effective transactions than
traditional banking has accelerated their adoption worldwide. That's how they
will sell it. That is the marketing ploy but the
real reality is worse than that. And even in this
article of the stable coin thing, they have a chart

(02:52:33):
up there that was put up by the World Economic
Forum over and over and over again. There it is
right there we see that Trump is pushing the World
Economic Form agendas. He is one hundred percent in on
all of these agendas. It doesn't matter what it is.
This is just another one, and he really loves this

(02:52:54):
one because this one, while he makes us poor and
puts us in a survey balance state, a prison planet,
he gets fabulously wealthy feeding off of the stable point industry.
But they say that it is about tracking illicit finance. Again,
if we don't want government permission to speak, why do

(02:53:17):
we need government permission to engage in financial transactions? What
business is it of theirs? There is no use case
to explain this, even though zero hedge tries to make
that case any anti money laundering. So if you're going
to get paid for something, that is part of their probition. Again,
drug war. This is mainly coming in the drug war,

(02:53:39):
and Trump is going to try to use the drug
war to drag us to war. That's really what's going
to be happening with Venezuela, and that is what is
already happening. The drug war has been a war on
the rule of law, the constitution, and due process from
the get go. They decided from the very beginning of

(02:53:59):
this drug war, which is put together by the United Nations.
As a matter of fact, they created the four schedules.
They sent it to Richard Nixon. He called it his own,
but his name on the legislation turned it in right.
But they had decided from the very beginning that they
were not going to do this constitutionally. Again, when we
look at alcohol. That was the first time anything had

(02:54:20):
ever been prohibited by the federal government. They had no
authority to do that. Everybody knew they had no authority
to do that, so they had to have the eighteenth Amendment,
and then later they repealed it with the twenty first Amendment.
But when they started the uns War on Drugs, Richard
Nixon just completely ignored the Constitution, and so it was
born out of contempt for the Constitution and the rule

(02:54:43):
of law, and it's only gotten worse since. So now
we have all these financial crimes, stable coins flowing through
the globe on immutable, transparent public blockchains, no privacy right
because these people want us to be, in the words
of BF Skinner, beyond freedom and dignity. If you have

(02:55:03):
no freedom, you have no dignity. If they can barge
into your house, as we began the program and tell
you that you gotta apologize for something that you said,
and they won't tell you what that is, is there
any dignity for citizens in that kind of estate. No. No,
So they add teeth to the global fight against illicit

(02:55:24):
finance by providing traceability in international finance with a much
needed leg up. But you better believe that we'll never
know what happened with all the payments that Jeffrey Epstein
was receiving and sending out to and from the people
that he was blackmailing. But they will always come back

(02:55:44):
and say, but the drug cartels and the terrorists. Matt
Tiaby had a great series when he was at the
Rolling Stone talking about the banks that were too big
to jail, and he really ripped Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney general,
who was every bit as bad as Pambondi, if not worse,

(02:56:06):
just in different ways. And he joked that these banks
were not only too big to fail, they were too
big to jail. He went into a great deal of
detail about how the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank HSBC it
began as part of the drug trade with the opium
wars and things like that, and they were still trading

(02:56:27):
with terrorist cells and with drug cartels and so all
the stuff that they need to have this massive surveillance
of everything that you and I do. It is all
based on this fiction of the drug war and the
authority to do prohibition that they don't have. Let's get
some of these comments before we run out of time.

Speaker 3 (02:56:47):
Yeah, we're close empty grave says they might not get
their civil war, but they'll settle for the thrashing.

Speaker 4 (02:56:51):
Of the constitution.

Speaker 3 (02:56:52):
Yeah, they'll shoot for the genocide and settle for the
deconstruction of our god given rights. I agree, ap rumble Seat.
They're building so much propaganda, legislation and censorship around the
Kirk incident, which alone makes it suspect to have been orchestrated.
Don't get too drawn in or caught up in hostility. Yes,
paleo armory, I've seen Wild West AMMO. That was from
the eighteen hundreds. That was still good.

Speaker 2 (02:57:15):
Oh, that just reminded me. You know, remember the case
where we had Andrew Jackson who shut down the Central Bank,
right he went to war with the Central Bank, and
they tried to kill him just like they did you know,
JFK and so forth. This guy comes up to him
point blank and tries to shoot two times with this
pistol that he's got, and it misfired both times. And

(02:57:36):
that was enough for Andrew Jackson, even though he's a
old man, to thoroughly thrash him with his cane. It
came out decades later, like one hundred years later. Perhaps
somebody pulled out the gun to see what was wrong
with that whited it missfire and they shot it and
it worked. Still had that ammunition in this about one
hundred years old and it worked. So yeah, God moves

(02:57:57):
a mysterious ways.

Speaker 3 (02:57:59):
Funny thing about that Paleo armory. They are fifty five
million visa workers in the US and twenty to fifty
million illegals. That's insane. Yeah, and it's something that does
need to be addressed and great replacement. You cannot have
a country, you cannot keep it.

Speaker 2 (02:58:15):
Trump is fixing that. Look what you do, the H
Y B visa. It's all fixed, folks. Great Trump, We're winning, right,
It's all a head fake.

Speaker 3 (02:58:21):
People aren't replaceable. Different peoples have different values in different cultures.
If everyone was the same, every country would have achieved
the same things and have the same architecture. And you know,
you just can't replace people and expect the country to remain.
Douglas says, it'd be nice to see the bullets. They
leave a lot open to speculation for some reason. I
hope they release the autopsy.

Speaker 2 (02:58:42):
Well, the FBI has been completely silent about that side
of the police. The bullet. We don't hear about it
from the pr guy.

Speaker 3 (02:58:52):
Then five Tyrant says, they only show us descripted stuff,
not the truth. Audi Mr r I was warning folks
at the manufacturer migrant crisis is a ruse for the
global digital id.

Speaker 4 (02:59:02):
Trump is the trojan horse.

Speaker 3 (02:59:04):
And again just because you know they manufacture real crises.
But that doesn't mean you have to give in to
their plan on how.

Speaker 4 (02:59:13):
To fix it.

Speaker 3 (02:59:13):
Okay, it's just gonna make everything worse. Big brit is
back again at CBDC. They just rename it talking about
stable coins, high boost Trump carp Palanteer celebrate.

Speaker 4 (02:59:23):
We need more AI that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:59:25):
Yeah, and there's a huge contract the bish you're doing
with Palateer. Now let me just say this before we
run out of time. Six six hundred dollars Gold History says, yes,
this is an article from zero Hedge. So I need
to go to tony Ardiban's why is wulf Gold. You
can get there with David Knight dot Gold. I'll let
him know that you came through us. Folks. You need

(02:59:45):
to start making some measures to try to protect yourself
from this enslavement they want to put us under.

Speaker 4 (02:59:52):
Yes, ran to see you all tomorrow, folks.

Speaker 2 (02:59:56):
God bless you all. Thank you so much for joining us.
Have a good day. The common man. They created common Core.

(03:00:16):
They dumbed down our children. They created common past, track
and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the
commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the
common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us
has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

(03:00:41):
That is what we have in common. That is what
they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
expose what they want to have. Please share the information

(03:01:02):
and links you'll find at Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank you
for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support
us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot
com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2100: JFK & Charlie Kirk: Magic Bullet Lies & Government Cover-Ups

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2100: JFK & Charlie Kirk: Magic Bullet Lies & Government Cover-Ups

On Purpose with Jay Shetty