Mon Episode #2115: Trump Tariffs Destroying American Farmers

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
As a clock strikes thirteen, It's Columbus Day, Monday, the
thirteenth of October of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well,
today we're going to look at more Trump tacos thrown
at the market, and the market had a very interesting reaction,
especially crypto. So we're going to talk about that, and
we're going to talk about the Trump Apocalypse that he

(01:08):
is so excited about and doing memes about. I got
my own meme because I saw a lot of work
that was being done by MAGA fans cheering on police brutality,
and I got to say that I just the real
problem is at the grassroots level. That's what enables the

(01:29):
kinds of things that Trump is doing. So we're going
to take a look at where we are and all
that and where they want us to go. The Smart cities,
the Freedom Cities. There's a lot more involved in that.
If you look at Peter tele and Curtis Harvin, a
lot more involved in that than simply falling in line
with the UN agenda. You know, they've got their own agenda.

(01:50):
That's what makes the technocrats so dangerous. We'll be right back,
stay with us. Well, another day, another capricious, arbitrary temper tent.

(02:15):
I'm raising tariffs this time to one hundred percent on China,
and it is in response in Trump's defense to China
putting on new export controls on some key mineral materials
and that type of thing. Does he not realize, though,
that his tariffs are essentially doing the same thing on

(02:35):
the input side for American manufacturing. We don't have the
infrastructure involved here to get all this stuff done in
the US. As Lance mentioned, was before somebody tried to
create a very simple device and was going to have
it one hundred percent sourced in America. But somebody needs

(02:56):
to go back and read Leonard Reid's eye Pencil, which
I and a lot of time on five years ago.
When Trump was setting down, shutting down the supply chains
and breaking them left and right, I said, you know,
things have been distributed all over the place, and that
isn't necessarily a bad thing. It can be done in
a bad way, but we need to have the resources

(03:18):
available to us everywhere. And when you start messing, it's
not even just making something expensive. If he makes it
expensive and leaves it that way. You can deal with it.
People can work around that. But he's the constant chaos.
It's the on again, off again, on again, off again,
on again off. Nobody can operate in a situation like that.
So he's deliberately shutting down our manufacturing in our farms,

(03:42):
especially at the small and mid level. The big guys
who've got deep pockets, and no matter what happens, they
can continue to lose money on us and make it
up on the stock market. We've seen that over and
over again. So what he's doing is he's destroying the
little guys. He's destroying the small and medium sized companies
with this kind of reaction. And I don't disagree. Then
we need to disconnect ourselves from China. I do agree

(04:05):
with that goal, but it makes all the difference in
the world how you do it or if you do it.
I mean, if that's the goal, shouldn't you plan about this?
This is why he's so dangerous when you look at
all the different wars at Trump wants to get us into.
You know, did they plan on this, do they have
a plan or are they just going to jump in
start shooting everybody and then react to what happens. And

(04:26):
that's what he's doing. On an economic level. If they
had a plan, they would have made sure that they
secured some vital sources, for example, the rare earth minerals.
They would have known that there was going to be
retaliation against the farmers, and they would have been ready
to go with relief from day one rather than letting
the farmers die. And they still haven't done anything. They

(04:49):
were quick to relieve Javier Malai and Argentina. That money
came right away, just like that. You're just ask and
he's got it. But if you are a small farmer
in Arkansas, you're facing economic rain and these guys are
still promising it. Someday they're going to do something about it.
So don't worry. Trust the plan. Right There is no plan.

(05:12):
That's the problem. He's got some goal that he would
like to achieve. He has no plan on how to
do it. He's made no preparations, He's done nothing to
make it work. Trump has announced that the US oll
imposed one percent terraffs on Chinese goes beginning November, the
first response to what he described as Beijing's extraordinarily aggressive

(05:35):
new trade restrictions. Beijing announced a new export controls to
certain strategic minerals that have dual use in military applications,
saying that the move was intended to protect national security
and to meet international obligations, including those related to non proliferation,
except that when Trump puts these controls on like tinplate

(05:56):
and things like that that people are using in order
to make cans so that we can put food that
we grow in the cans and other things like that,
when he does that, that may not be something that is
being used by the military, but he's made no preparations
to make sure that that's here, just like he's made
no preparations to secure our rare earth supplies before he

(06:18):
cuts them off with his temper tantrums. So large scale
export controls on virtually every product they make, and some
not even made by them, he said that will affect
all countries without exception. Well, the ninety day pause has
seen US terrace on Chinese goods fall from one hundred
and forty five percent remember the bidding war that he
had on this, to thirty percent. The Chinese terraces products

(06:42):
dropped from one hundred and twenty five percent to ten percent.
The extension expires in November. Trump described China's move as
absolutely unheard of in international trade. Well, so is his.
We've never had a situation where one individual just you know,
latterly imposes trade restrictions like this and then takes them

(07:05):
off and then puts them back on and takes them off.
That is what's unprecedented. It's just amazing that he can
get away with this. He says, it's a moral disgrace. Yeah,
it really is. To see what he's doing. And so
what has been the fallout, Well, stocks plunged in after
hours trade as Trump confirmed the one hundred percent terrace

(07:25):
and export controls on China. And of course, Michael Snyder,
the Economic Collapse blog had an article about the farmers
facing the worst economic downturn in at least fifty years.
And I wonder what Michael Snyder has to say about Trump,
because I know Michael. I've interviewed him a couple of times.

(07:46):
He came to the studio, met him in personally, interviewed
and talked afterwards. When he was there, he was getting
ready to do a run for Congress in Idaho, and
Gary Haven was there as well, the billionaire who did
the Curves franchise, and you know, we talked and put
in a good word for Michael, and I don't know

(08:10):
what came of it. If Gary helped him. He certainly
seemed like he was going to help him, but he
didn't win. But I thought at the time, I thought
it'd be good to have somebody who has the perspective
that Michael does. But what he's showing in this article
is that he would have just been another Mike Johnson.
I'm ashamed to say he didn't mention Trump once. What's

(08:31):
the matter with you, Michael? Come on, you got to
talk about the key part of this problem is you know, yes,
there's a structural issue with the farms. The big issue, however,
what is happening right now is Trump is pouring gasoline
on their fields and setting it on fire. How can
you do an article about what they're facing and not

(08:54):
mentioned Trump and this fiasco with China and shutting down
the soybean market and all the rest of this stuff.
I just don't understand it. He says. The agricultural issue
in the US is deeply broken. Farmers are the foundation
of it all, but they're being financially squeezed from every direction,
being squeezed by the giant monopolies that control the seeds,
fertilizer machinery that they need, being squeezed by giant monopolies

(09:17):
that purchase most of what they produce. Meanwhile, demand from
overseas has dried up thanks to the global trade war.
That's as close as he gets. Does not mention Trump
who started the global trade war. US farmers really are
facing a perfect storm, and as a result, most farms
are losing money and bankruptcies are surging. Yeah. Well, you
know this is all deliberate from Trump, and whether or

(09:40):
not it's a plan of his, whether or not he's
doing this for Peter Thiel and Company as part of
the Great Takedown, he's still pouring gasoline on the fire.
Horror stories. The pain is unreal, worst farming situation I've
seen in my life, says one guy with the who's
the president of the Farm Protectional Alliance. He's forty years old,

(10:04):
he said, Look at the Extension University of Arkansas numbers
corn growers losing two hundred and forty acres dollars per acre,
soybean losing one hundred and forty four dollars per acre,
rice losing three hundred and eighty per acre, and the
cotton growers may be the worst of all. And this
is why we're seeing a large number of bankruptcies, especially

(10:27):
in Arkansas. In a nutshell, we're going over a cliff
in Arkansas, he said. Banks are forecasting farm bankruptcies at
twenty five to forty percent, and the dirty secret is out.
Everyone knows it, everyone feels it. That's why some people
have said about one in three farms kind of midpoint,

(10:50):
roughly between the twenty five to forty percent, but it
could be worse. It could be forty percent, could be
nearly half the farms just in that one state. The
response to all that as you constantly hear Besset, Treasure
Secretary Bessett saying, yeah, we're thinking about doing something. Yeah,
you're thinking about it, are you? In response to what

(11:14):
you kicked off? Why did some and then we have
crypto Crypto had an aha moment here? Why did some
alt coins on binance crash all the way to zero?
So this is affected the stock market, it's affected the
crypto market. And the thing I find interesting about this

(11:34):
is that crypto seems to be moving not in opposition
to the economy and the stock market, but in the
same direction with it, which means that it's not What
tells me is that it's not a it's not a
hedge like gold and silver. Are briefly hit zero on

(11:57):
Binance during Friday's crypto crash state to float elsewhere. Some
of this was a liquidity issue with Binance, Bitcoin fell
about ten to fifteen percent from their highs down to
lows of one hundred and five thousand from one hundred
and twenty four thousand. However, all coins were far worse,

(12:18):
especially those that traded on Binance, with many of them
plunging nearly one hundred percent in minutes. So one hundred
percent tariffs on China and we get one hundred percent
loss value on all coins. Funny how that works. It
is funny how it works if you're not holding this stuff.

(12:38):
A lot of people lost a lot of money. Nearly
twenty billion dollars worth of crypto positions were liquidated, about
twenty times more than during the twenty twenty COVID nineteen
market route, which is also trump. Over one point six
million traders lost their positions as leverage wiped them out.

(13:00):
Million people completely wiped out with their positions on that coin.
There major exchanges, including Binance, were liquidating collateral tied to
cross margin positions, which exacerbated the selloff. Arthur Hayes says,
we're on the street is that big exchanges auto liquidation
of collateral tied to cross margin positions is why lots

(13:23):
of aults got smoked on the move down. Congrats to
all you stink bidders. We won't be seeing those levels
anytime soon on high quality alts. So another guy whose
cowboy says Binances once again why they're the biggest scammers
and crypto During recent market crash. They froze their accounts

(13:44):
across the board, preventing traders from accessing their funds at
critical times. So it's Some analysts said that the market makers,
like Winter Moot withdrew their funds from Binance due to
those delays. This meant that there were no buy orders
left for a few moments, so the system showed zero
prices for some coins even though the tokens still had

(14:06):
value elsewhere. This is the way stock markets crash as well,
and so the question is is this is what it's
going to look like when the bubble finally bursts on
the Nvidia AI boom. That's going on there. What happened yesterday,
says Jean Pierre Demara. He says, what happened yesterday, in
my view, is that the market makers turned off their

(14:29):
liquidity bots. As a result, all coins were left without
buy orders, while stop losses were triggered, and coincidentally, Binance froze,
preventing anyone from buying those buy orders would have helped
absorb the cell pressure and provided liquidity during the drop.
He says, to me, it all seems highly coordinated, especially

(14:49):
considering that just moments before Winter Moot transferred seven hundred
million dollars to Binance. He so, let's be real, do
you really think Binance doesn't have the technology to handle
a crash that without freezing, no other major exchange went down.
So the real question is why did Binance freeze? He said, Well,

(15:09):
again the crypto crash wake up call. This is also
from Michael Snyder. He says, what we just saw happen
was massive liquidations, break of key support levels, weak institutional
flows and investor pullback, macro headwinds and bond yields and

(15:30):
sentiment collapse. Now he's saying that it's a much bigger issue,
and you did have crypto affected, Bitcoin was affected, and
ethereum was affected. I look at it as you know,
these all coins going to zero. That was all binance
and the fact that you know a lot of these

(15:51):
all coins are only traded on one exchange, and so
that's a big issue with that. But when you look
at the direction that it moves and the reaction that
it has to bad economic news, that's the bigger story.
I think it isn't so much that there was a
hitch in these alt coins and that the crypto stuff
went down on the news. To me, the issue is

(16:13):
that it moved in tandem with the stock markets. What's
going to happen with crypto when the stock market bumps
collapses and it is going to collapse. It's not a
matter of if, but it is a matter of when
this AI thing is going to go because it's so
far the hype is so far ahead of the reality.

(16:34):
And I know that there's a reality out there of
how AI can be used, but people are still looking
around for how they're going to be able to use
it profitably. Yes, the killer app is government surveillance and control,
no doubt about that, and they can make money selling
stuff to the government. However, when you look at all
these other issues, the AI slop that is out there,

(16:54):
and Deloitte and Touche or just Deloitte, I guess and
other law firms that have been caught using AI to
put together their audits or their briefs or whatever, and
the AI making stuff up. It's not ready for primetime,
and yet we have people have invested in the stock

(17:15):
market like it's already in primetime. That's the issue, just
like with the dot com bust. Was Internet real Yes?
Was the Internet huge in our lives, yes, But they
got ahead of everything in terms of the hype and
then they panicked and ran for the exits. And that's
the way these things work. In the past few days,
the cryptocurrency market has undergone a sharp reversal prices across Bitcoin,

(17:37):
ethereum and many prominent alt coins of collapse, liquidating billions
and speculative bets, rattling investor confidence. This is not merely
a garden variety pullback. It is a wake up call
that the crypto space may be dangerously overextended and fragile
under stress, far more risky than many public narratives will

(17:58):
admit agree with him on that.

Speaker 4 (18:01):
So when you look at who generally invests in the
crypto space, it's mostly younger guys who are just incredibly bullish.
They're just you know, crypto's going to the moon. I'm
going to invest in this coin, this coin, that coin,
whatever coin I think might be next. It's it's incredibly speculative.
None of it is really based on any sort of Oh,
I think this actually has real world utility. It's all

(18:24):
a bunch of well, this one I think could explode.
I think this one might be the next one that
takes to gamble.

Speaker 3 (18:29):
It's a gamble, and sometimes they put too much into it,
and they gambles too much.

Speaker 4 (18:33):
That market is always going to be incredibly volatile just
based on who is involved with it. It's not based
on reality. It's all based on I'm going to get rich.
This is going to be the next one that takes off.

Speaker 3 (18:45):
And that's the characteristics of all the bubbles. Once you
get a lot of people in who have you know,
they're not really looking at fundamentals or long term investment.
They're just playing a hunch, right, and they're gambling. And
then when things start to go bad, you know, they're
watching this and the first sign that something.

Speaker 4 (19:01):
Better, I gotta get out. I gotta get out. I'm
gonna lose it all.

Speaker 3 (19:03):
Yeah, So first they get in for fear of missing out,
and then they jump out for fear'st thying in. And
that's what creates these situations. Like I said, I lost
a lot of money in the dot com bust because
I looked at it and I said, yeah, the Internet
is for real, absolutely for real. And I didn't even
want to pick a particular stock like Amazon or whatever,

(19:24):
but I wanted to invest in the switching equipment that
was going to be used to build the Internet. I
thought that was a safe bet. Everybody got hammered. Everybody
got hammered. I mean you saw Intel anything, but you
know all all the big tell communication companies, even some
of the others like GDS, Uniphase building switching equipment. I mean,

(19:44):
it was just blood in the streets when happened, because
it was mass panic. And I then looked back on
it and laugh now, but it was not funny at
the time. So liquidity is thinner than advertised narratives mask
real risks, and it is a stress test for confidence,
which they didn't do too well. So the bigger picture,

(20:08):
says Michael Snyder, is a crypto reckoning crashes more than
temporary shakeout. It may signal deeper structural tension in the cryptoeconomy.
The industry has long relied on narratives and forward looking
valuations and not on stable cash flows or durable foundations,
and in tough conditions, these beliefs fail first, So does

(20:29):
have an effective risk structure. And again, even that is
getting out ahead of things because Lucky Lutnik and Trump
have not put in their crypto scam foundation yet, so
you know, they've not started buying the buying into crypto,
and they've not started with a stable coin propping that

(20:50):
up in the way that they are going to prop
it up. So I think that the story for that
is better in the long term, but who knows what's
going to happen in the short term. It's it truly
is crazy. So meanwhile, on the metal side, you're seeing
things like this one way to position for one hundred
dollars silver? Is that crazy? I mean, you know, has

(21:15):
I just ask you this? Are we looking at an
economy that is more stable and the foundations are starting
to get aligned, right, now or is it getting shakier
than it has been over the last year where we
saw the price of silver already double once and I
know that sounds crazy, but following a run up on
the goal market where it has gone up more than

(21:36):
fifty one percent a year to date, silver is now
seventy three percent up. And so again just mentioned David
Knight dot Gold, which take you to Tony ardabund Wolfpack.
If you want to start collecting something that's going to
be a hedge against what is coming, you can do

(21:57):
that on a gradual basis with Wolfpack. I don't know
anybody it does anything like that. Of course, Tony can
handle your gold and silver transactions. He can convert bitcoin
to gold or silver as well without a fee, he said.
And so just to go to David and I Dike Gold,
I let them know that you're coming through us and

(22:18):
you need to get into something that is real. Gold's
acceleration reveals a vanishing calm and coming change. That's right.
It only took two days for it to go from
three thousand to four thousand. It's almost difficult to remember,
really that when that was a really big look when

(22:38):
over three thousand then now it's over four thousand. These
are the kind of psychological barriers that break these things.
And as John Rabino has been warning of a currency
crisis for several years now, it's not just the US dollar,
it's not just the euro, it's not just the end.
Everything is up in the air. And that's why all

(23:01):
the central banks are all collecting gold. They all see
what is on the horizon. We have massive debt that
is unfunded except by crypto and monetizing of the debt.
But we're not the only country doing it. This crazy
thing is that Germany just started doing this massive deficit
financing so they could ramp up their dead military industrial complex.

(23:23):
They jump in at the tail in the bubble. Nobody
told Fred Mertz what was going on. Lucy's gonna have
somes planning to do here. Gold is saying that the
fiat currency experiment is ending globally. That's what Rubina says.
He said, if you watch the financial press, they're noting
that the price of gold is going up, but they're

(23:44):
treating it like any other asset. He said, gold is
humanity's oldest form of money, so that when it goes
up in price, that means that the currencies against it,
which we're measuring it, are going down in value. What
we're seeing all around the world is fiat currencies declineing
and value dramatically, especially against gold. Gold just in the

(24:06):
last couple of weeks pierced. Not just it's all time
nominal high, but it's all time inflation adjusted high. This
is a much bigger deal because we've had so much
inflation in the last thirty or forty years. Basically, gold
is saying that the fiat currency experiment is ending. In
other words, the monetary system we set up in nineteen

(24:26):
seventy one, we went off the gold standard. Brentwoods too.
This led countries to create way too much debt, increase
their spending dramatically, and basically make all the mistakes that
a human makes when you give them an unlimited credit card.
Now we're burdened with that we cannot pay off and
people expect to be taken care of. France is a

(24:48):
good example of this. He said. Governments around the world
are forced to buy more and more money to cover
the obligations they've taken on and to cover the interest
costs on their debt. This requires them to print more money,
and that is lowering the value of the currencies even
more quickly. This basically will lead to a currency death spiral,
and that is where we are right now, because we're

(25:10):
in that death spiral right now. And the thing I
find interesting is that I would have thought that bitcoin
would be something of a counter to that, but it
doesn't appear to be. When things get tough, it doesn't
hang tough in order for gold to service foundation for
the next monetary system. That's why they're accumulating so much gold.

(25:32):
You can see it even with the bricks people right
They're trying to set up their own system. So where
do they go to back it up? They go to gold.
They want to get out of this system that's been
weaponized against them. They want to set up a new one.
So that's why they're accumulating gold. As we did in
the classical gold standard that was in place up until

(25:52):
World War One. If we went back to that, you
would need a gold price of around twenty thousand dollars
an ounce. Would need this to back all the currencies
that are out there now. And if we keep doing
what we're doing now, the Fiat currencies would go to zero,
which means the gold would go to infinity. My guess
on the future goal price is somewhere between twenty thousand

(26:16):
in infinity to infinity and beyond. That's a you're going
to take the buzz light your approach to the price
of gold. But the bottom line is that you know
that may be an optimistic scenario for a gold investor. However,
when you look at the foundation that is there, the

(26:37):
question is you know not it still looks good as
regardless of what the next limit is. As a matter
of fact, another guy, Hartnett, said the gold is going
to be six thousand dollars by next spring. I mean,
keep seeing conservative things coming out of Bank of American
Goldman Sacks saying, well, I think it's going to be

(26:57):
four thousand second quarter next year. Well mate, it hits
four thousand right after they say that, now go up
to like forty nine hundred. They're very conservative on what
they do. But this guy is saying six thousand, Orbinos
saying twenty thousand. Eventually where this all goes. So the
question is what will be meltdown on Friday due to

(27:21):
Trump's response, what will that feel like today? What kind
of a meltdown are we going to see in the
market today, and of course nobody knows. Nobody can predict
the markets in advance, they can rig the markets in advance.
But you know this is all again the let's not
forget what kicked off this whole thing. You know who

(27:44):
lit the fire is Donald Trump? Who lit the fire
on this, no doubt about it. And so the big
crash are we're headed for another? Nineteen twenty nine. This
is from the Telegraph UK looking at a hypothetical sin
where a global financial crisis could occur during a combination
of factors including a bursting AI bubble highly likely, a

(28:09):
dead crisis highly likely, and a loss of confidence in
the US dollar also highly likely. The article also highlights
the parallels between the current situations and the events leading
up to the Great Depression, as I covered twenty twenty seven,
and the poly crisis that financial markets have long feared
is unfolding at speed. Putin has made a strong gains

(28:29):
and has war against Ukraine and begun massing troops at
Europe's border and readiness for an invasion of one or
more of the Baltic states in the Far East. And
again I don't this is the Telegraph, I don't think
that that I could be wrong. I don't know what's
in Putin's mind, but you know, if NATO felt that

(28:50):
it was in their best interests to constantly push, push,
push towards Russia, then to use surrogates to attack Russia,
perhaps Putin would do that. I don't see that their
beef in Ukraine is a domino theory situation, like they
lied to us about Vietnam. But it could be that

(29:10):
maybe he realizes that, you know, he gets into an
existential fight. Perhaps he would come after the countries of Europe.
I don't know. In the Far East, China's Shuji Ping
is openly preparing for his long promise assault on Taiwan,
and boldened by both Putin's success and Trump's drubbing in

(29:30):
the congressional midterms, which has significantly reduced the US's scope
for effective retaliation. In the Middle East, the fragile peace
secured by Trump and twenty twenty five has already falling apart,
plunging the region into a nuwe conflict. And look, we'll
talk about that. We'll talk about Cutter and their role
in it, and the things that were tied to Cutter,

(29:52):
the military base, the arms deal, the golf course, so
many different things that this is just the Trump economics
here and Trump diplomacy. It's like, where's my cut. It's
I just can't I just can't find the words to
adequately express my contempt for what the man is doing.

(30:15):
He's just in every arena. So this is their their scenario. Okay,
just take things where they are right now and tweak
them a little bit to the bad side, which is
very probable. For all this, I don't know that, you know,
Putin feels strong enough to take on all of Europe

(30:36):
and the US. I think for the most part this
has been something of a defensive war. Frankly, but I
was surprised when he went into Ukraine. I thought that
was a bad move. I thought when he did that,
he basically fed their narrative. And so I don't know
about that. But the rest of stuff is pretty straightforward.

(30:58):
On the stock markets, it's ma'am. Trillions of dollars of
losses are being inflicted on the one time boom sector
of artificial intelligence. With the global economy on the brinker
recesion of unemployment climbing sharply, it's clear that the market
for AI services has been grossly overestimated. They got way

(31:18):
ahead of themselves. And I think I saw this early
because of my own personal experience with a dot com bust.
A lot of people I think were slow to see
it because they didn't get Sometimes when you get that
upside the head with a two by four, you sometimes
learn something from it. By yeah, I think I got

(31:43):
hit harder than most of these people who are predicting
the Rosie scenario for AI. Despite promises made my AI evangelist,
productivity is flatlining and far from improving output. Reports suggests
AI is damaging many businesses where it has been most
ferverently applied. Such some claims on which AI has been
sold to investors and lenders even turn out to be

(32:04):
overtly fraudulent. Many of the mega deals that characterize the
latter stages of the Great AI gold rush, with customers
and suppliers ancestuously taking cross holdings in one another. That's
the circular investment we see going on with Nvidia and
some of its customers are fast unraveling in an orgy
of litigation, broken promises, and scattered expectations. But that's not

(32:26):
all overlaying the stock market crash is a debt crisis
of monstrous proportions almost everywhere. Bond market investors are on strike,
and interest rates are rocketing. In other words, nobody's buying
the government debt anymore because they don't believe they're going
to get paid. Global governments are struggling both to refinance
mountainous debts and to fund ballooning expenditures. Private credit, a

(32:50):
form of finance that is flourished outside the conventional, most
more tightly regulated banking system, is in a meltdown, with
a folly of lending to higher risk enterprises able to
access credit elsewhere, now cruelly exposed for all to see,
you know, kind of like the subprime loans that we saw.
The only thing that he doesn't have factored in here

(33:12):
is that I think Lucky Lutnik in Bessett, I think
these guys are really clever. What they do mean best.
It was with sorrows when he broke the Bank of England.
So these guys know what they're doing when it comes
to money. They're fiendishly good at it. And that's what
I think this whole stable coin thing is. It's not
that the coin itself is stable, but it's there to

(33:34):
stabilize the government's debt and to take it out to
the retail level, so that is the one thing that
may come through. I don't know. So bad is a
shock that the whole construct of competing FIAT currencies on
which the world's financial architecture is built seems to be crumbling,
and instead states are hurriedly erecting financial border controls and

(33:57):
a fusual attempt to stop the investors who haven't lost
every thing fleeing for safer shores. But those investors are
realizing a dreadful truth. Even if you can get your
money out, there appears to be no safe place left
to put it. So this, of course is a wholly
imagined doomsday future. Yet finance is built entirely on trust

(34:17):
and confidence, and rarely has it looked quite so fragile
as it does today. Even the usually sleepy Bank of
England and the IMF have now taken to warning about
the possibilities of a sharp, destabilizing correction in the stock markets,
all puffed up as they are by fevered speculation over
the potentially transformative powers of AI valuations are stretched to

(34:42):
the breaking point, with the so called Schuller cyclically adjusted
price earnings ratio, which I've never heard of before, generally
regarded as the most reliable indicator where the markets. Where
the market is relative to past peaks. It's close to
the all time high they recorded during the dot com bubble,

(35:03):
and slightly higher than it was before the great crash
of nineteen twenty nine. The parallels of previous market manias
are striking. So is this nineteen twenty nine all over again?
Surely not. We are all too clever, far too clever,
worldly wise, and conditioned by the disastrous consequences of the

(35:23):
most famous of all stock market crashes to let it
happen again. It's unthinkable, or is it? When a banking
titan is seasoned as Jamie Demon, chief executive of JP Morgan,
openly expresses his concern, it's time to sit up and
take notice. He said in an interview last week that
he's far more worried than others about the possibility of

(35:45):
a serious market collapse. There were a lot of things
out there, he said, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty, and
he went on citing geopolitical instability, unaffordable state spending, remilitarization
because he could sum it up by Saint Trump. Yet,
if it's not clear which needle will burst the bubble,

(36:07):
there's no doubt about the bubble itself. The AI hype
is off the scale with a big prize dominance, not
of the generative AI chatbots, so we've already become accustomed
to using but if so called general artificial intelligence, so
computers with cognitive powers similar to a human being, only
infinitely faster and more powerful. The dangers of AI fever

(36:29):
are not just an unhinged stock market speculation, such as
the magnitude of investment in AI data centers. That's going
to be a huge disruption to our power grid. And
you know we're going to be able to make anything
that's real when we are using all our power to
entertain ourselves in a fantasy cyber world. That's the question.

(36:50):
And so it is really destructive of capital, that is
destructive of power for the grid, It's destructive of so
many different things. And in terms of we can, like
Cory Doctorowe said, look, the AI may not be able
to replace you, but your boss might fire you if

(37:11):
he thinks that it can't. And even if the AI
can't do the job, you won't have a job either.
That's his point. So they're obviously they're believing the hype
because they're investing big dollars in it. We've already seen
a lot of tech companies very early on fire, massive
numbers of people, and you know where they replaced that equately, Well,

(37:33):
we don't know. Rarely, if ever, I have. The fortunes
of the world economy depends so precariously on the judgment
of a small cluster of men, the bosses of Meta Alphabet, Microsoft,
Apple x, Amazon and others, who are chasing the crock
of gold at the end of the AI rainbow. Well, again,
even in that metaphor, we always go back to gold

(37:57):
at the end of the rainbow. You know, you don't
have to you don't have to follow their rainbow to
get to the gold. You can go to David Knightie
gold giants say, this time is different. Unlike the dot
com bubble, which is characterized by lots of aspiring wing
and a prayer enterprises of hardly any substance, the current
investment boom is substantially led by a small number of
well established cash ridge mega companies easily capable of absorbing

(38:22):
the new industry's heavy upfront costs. What's more, they claim
AI promise is an economic miracle that will render current
concerns about spiraling deficits and physical black holes almost wholly
irrelevant with stellar growth fast eroting national debt piles. And again,
I think this is a nat You take George Gilder
in his book Life After Google, so we wrote it.

(38:44):
He was past eighty and he said, but I think
I'm going to lift to see Google going down, And
so I said, I certainly hope he's right, but who knows.
If it's to go down, it's going to have to
be a crash of this type of bangude. And the
fundamental flaw behind the technocracy is that they believe that

(39:07):
their technology, especially AI are AI, robotics and nanotech, all
of the awful stuff genetics included. They think that they
are at the cusp of a situation where there'll be
so much resources that they just have to allocate it,
and they will be the ones to allocate it. And

(39:28):
this is the same fantasy that Carl Marx had about
the Industrial Revolution, so scarcity, Yeah, that's right. That's why
George Gilder calls them neo Marxists, because that's the fundamental
conceit flawed, conceit of Marxism, and these people have bought
into that as well. And just like the communist bosses,

(39:48):
they're going to take everything. You know, it's going to
be true for them, but it's not going to be
true for us.

Speaker 4 (39:55):
Yeah. Back when I was hosting the show Sol, that's
what I kept saying, is just the AI doesn't have
to be capable of doing your job. Well, yeah, it
just has to be capable enough that your boss thinks
that it's worthwhile. They just have to look at it
and say, all right, the product is going to get worse,
But is it going to get so much worse that
we're going to lose customers? How many customers are going

(40:17):
to lose? How much are we saving? It just has
to be the right value proposition, the right risk versus
reward analysis, cost benefit analysis for them is everything. If
it makes them a little bit more money than it
does keeping you on staff, they will gut the entire program.
They will make it borderline unusable, just so long as
it keeps making them more money, that's right.

Speaker 5 (40:37):
So they have any commitment to quality with these things,
as we've seen with the constant intification of everything.

Speaker 4 (40:44):
They'll fire a billion Indians.

Speaker 3 (40:48):
That's right. Well, the a's headline after headline talking about
how Trump triggered a crypto crash, Markets brace for chaos
after Trump triggers a record breaking crypto crash and the
crypto carnage Trump tariff tape bomb triggers largest liquidation event

(41:10):
and history for crypto. This is a guy that's going
to be so good for crypto. And of course he
is going to be good, has been good for crypto,
and will be good for crypto. The problem is that
he's just bad for the economy in general. Anything that again,
it goes back to this tariff thing, right, a bad decision.

(41:30):
The way that he's running the terra stuff on again,
off again, on again, off again destroys everything. Even the
industries that he's heavily trying to subsidize and build up,
he's destroying. And then we take industries that are already
struggling for a number of reasons, like farming. It's just
catastrophic what he's doing. And this all comes from our
dear leader who has determined that he's going to arbitrarri

(41:53):
lin capriciously make these decisions, and everybody's just laying down
and letting him do it. I can't I can believe
that Mike Johnson is going to let him do it.
I just can't believe that the courts are letting him
do it. They're moving so excruciatingly slow. And that's the
key thing. And we're going to talk about this when
we talk about after the break. We're going to talk

(42:13):
about what's going on with the Trump Apocalypse that he's
so happy about, you know, the meme Chicago apocalypse, the
Chai apocalypse or whatever. He jumps in and does these things.
His mode of operation is to declare an emergency and
then to say, because I have declared an emergency, now

(42:33):
I can do anything I want, and then to fake
his authority until somebody shuts him down because Congress isn't
going to push back against him, and the Supreme Court
takes about a year before it can even put its
pants on. That's about the worried pants on of the rope.
But they don't do anything, and so he is faking
it and making it without having any authority on this.

(42:57):
So meanwhile, you have a question as to this crypto
crash an early bitcoin well short did one point one
billion dollars right before the tariffs and made twenty seven
million dollars on this. How did he know that was
going to happen? And so was there insider trading going on?

(43:21):
Let me tell you when they crash the markets, when
they crashed the crypto markets, the stock markets and other things,
people like Lucky Lutnik and Lucky Donald are going to
have some insider stuff that's going on. They're going to
know when they creator this stuff, and they're going to
make sure that they come out on the other side.

Speaker 5 (43:41):
I saw some news late last night about a account
that was created right before all this happened that did
a massive short.

Speaker 3 (43:50):
Yeah. Yeah, going back to nine to eleven, right, same
type of stuff, and they got away with it nine
to eleven. They will get away with it this time
and over again, no doubt about it. So you create
an account and then you crash the market, and you know,
you create account and it shorts the bitcoin and make

(44:11):
twenty seven million dollars just like that.

Speaker 4 (44:13):
There's also the fact that even if someone weren't specifically
doing this like I think they are, with the sheer
number of people that have to be involved with the
administration that know what's going on, someone is going to
tell somebody else. Someone is going to find out and
they will make that play. So even if they're not
specifically going, I got a tip for you, you need to
do this. That's right, someone is just going it'll disseminate,

(44:35):
it'll reach somebody.

Speaker 3 (44:36):
And you'll do it in a plausibly deniable way.

Speaker 4 (44:39):
But yeah, I just got lucky. What can I say?
Sometimes you lose it all, sometimes make one hundred and
sixty million dollars.

Speaker 3 (44:46):
Well, look at what this whale did. A tenfold leveraged
short on six nine bitcoin valued at seven hundred and
fifty two point nine million dollars with a liquidation price
of a high undred thirty eight ten, and a twelve
time leverage short on ethereum worth three hundred and fifty

(45:07):
three million with a liquidation price of forty five hundred dollars.
The timing sparked widespread speculation about insider knowledge, with a
trader doubling down on the shorts just thirty minutes before
Trump's tariff announcement. The most corrupt.

Speaker 4 (45:26):
Nothing suspicious to see here, the.

Speaker 3 (45:28):
Most corrupt administration perhaps we've ever had, certainly in terms
of dollar amounts. The ulysses Grant administration can't hold a
candle to this one, but yeah, it is truly amazing
what he's been able to do here. According to on
chain enlist my MLMABC, the whale approximately ninety percent of

(45:53):
bitcoin shorts and completed completely exited ethereum at the bottom
of the pocketing between one hundred ninety million and two
hundred million in realized profits within a single day. In
case you didn't know, the bitcoin well crossed ninety percent
of his bitcoin short and fully closed on his ethereum short,

(46:13):
making around one hundred and ninety two hundred million dollar
profit in just one day. That was the tweet that
spent out by MLM ABC. Look on chain data. The
trader began accumulating the short positions on October ninth by
depositing eighty million US dollars into hyper liquid, followed by

(46:35):
additional deposits totaling tens of millions throughout the week leading
up to the crash. The market collapse triggered over one
point six million liquidations and twenty four hours, wiping out
twenty billion dollars in positions. According to coin glass data,
the liquidation figure floating around is fake, says MLMABC, the

(46:57):
real number is likely much higher, somewhere in the thirty
to forty billion dollar range. Long positions accounted for seventeen
billion dollars of those losses, while shorts contributed to two
and a half billion bitcoin. Ethereum lead liquidations at five
billion and four billion, respectively, followed by Solana at two billion,

(47:18):
and a ripple XRP at seven hundred and eight million.
Hyper Liquid saw the largest single liquidation, an ethereum dollar position,
worth two hundred and three million dollars. So again, when
we look at the fraud that is possible with this stuff,
and the other thing is that immediately they can go

(47:42):
back and put these numbers together. Why because all the
transactions are public for everybody to see. There's nothing encrypted
about in crypto except for the handshaking when you process
the transaction from one I understand, but the blockchain itself
is fully public, So all the records are there. We
can piece of stuff together immediately. That's how they immediately

(48:03):
know that there's a whale there. With other forms of investment,
it takes a while to go back and get the records,
and the records are not available to the general public.
This stuff is so Trump better watch itself. It's pretty amazing.
So the massive fraud that is involved in all this stuff, well,

(48:23):
we're going to take a quick break before we do,
let's read some of the comments here.

Speaker 4 (48:27):
That's right, con think, thank you very much. You appreciate it.
This piece in the Middle East, now to Ukraine, and
we still want the Epstein file. That's right. Still going
to turn those over.

Speaker 3 (48:39):
Yeah, and we'll see if that piece lasts though.

Speaker 4 (48:41):
Yeah, Israel hasn't been known for keeping their peace agreements.
They've been known for breaking them and finding reasons to
do so. Guard Goldsmith seriously, though, the Trump attacks are
getting me to make a lot of changes and purchases.
I started buying extra caned goods a couple of weeks ago,
but they don't carry Prince Albert my supermarket. Is that

(49:02):
a Is that a canned food? I'm a I'm not
up on my canned food brands, but if you say
they're good, I trust guards A painon.

Speaker 3 (49:10):
I'm thinking Prince Albert might be like, is that chewing?
To back up? What is that guard? It's that pipe pipe?
Put that in your pipe and smoke it. I don't
know that's right.

Speaker 4 (49:21):
You got a stock up on rikotine.

Speaker 3 (49:23):
You lost us on that reference. I have to explain further.

Speaker 4 (49:27):
Make sure you've got some bottle caps as well. You
want all the potential currencies gold, silver, nicotine, and alcohol.

Speaker 3 (49:36):
Bulldog.

Speaker 4 (49:37):
I'm just looking at bitcoin. It dropped from one twenty
five to one fourteen today, and of course that's one
hundred and twenty and fourteen thousand real. Jason Barker was
just at my aunts and her husband's family just harvested
their soybeans and have to sit on them now to
wait for someone who will buy.

Speaker 3 (49:51):
Oh, I'm sorry to hear that. Yeah. Yeah, because the
other thing is not only is China not buying, but
now there's a g lot of soybean on the market,
so the price for soybean has dropped, unfortunately for themselves.
To anybody, Yeah, Mama c.

Speaker 4 (50:05):
Nineteen ninety six. Our grand elevators have huge piles of soybeans.
We'll see if they can sell them or not. Real,
Jason Barker, this is an attack on independent farmers to
help big Agra snatch up farmland.

Speaker 3 (50:18):
I absolutely agree with that. You're absolutely you and I
see this exactly the same way. I think this is
deliberate and I think it's also Jason. I think it's
also Jason Barker nice of the storm. I think it
is also a deliberate attack on all small and medium
size manufacturers. I mean, it's just been it's been very
difficult if you're making something at all here in America.

(50:41):
Trump has cut the legs out from underneath you because
you've got to get some of the supplies or abroad,
and nobody knows what to do. You know, are the
tariff's going to be twenty percent, are they going to
be fifty percent? Are they going to drop down below
twenty percent? I don't know. So how do you jump
into a market light that once you jump in, the
chances there begetting burned are huge. So everybody's sitting on

(51:02):
the sidelines and they can't afford to do anything. And
the small to medium sized people out there have to
compete with these giant guys anyway, and so they can't
raise their prices and they're swallowing these tariffs when they
go up on cost. And they can't do that indefinitely
because they don't have an infinite supply of capital like

(51:22):
the big box retailers do on Wall Street. I mean,
they operate as if they are government that's running on
fiat currency. They have fiat paper stock, which allows them
to put out a nice narrative and collect capital. But
small and medium sized businesses have to work on the
reality of the free marketplace. And Trump is killing them,

(51:44):
absolutely killing him same thing he did five years ago,
just a different way.

Speaker 4 (51:49):
Steve Evs at sd Bullion gold Over forty Rev. Seventy nine,
seventy nine big shorts in the last bitcoin crash?

Speaker 3 (51:58):
Yeah, who would have thought that Trump would have big.

Speaker 4 (52:01):
Shorts guard Goldsmith. The bitcoin short sales set up that
shook things early came from what appears to be a
political insider knowledge connection because I knew Trump would confirm
as one hundred percent tariff on China. You know, there's
always there's always insider trading going on when it's these
people involved.

Speaker 3 (52:21):
Rev.

Speaker 4 (52:21):
Seventy nine.

Speaker 3 (52:23):
Let me interject here, the insider trading is so rampant.
That's why I don't bother with the stock market, and
the insider trading on crypto is going to be that
way as well, because the people like Lutin, make Combescent
and Trump that are all in on it. I don't
tell me that that's not going to be manipulated insider trading,
just like the Yes stock market is. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (52:44):
Rev seventy nine, seventy nine. Nothing is more stable than
tangible assets in your hand, like brass bullets. That's right,
get yourself some brass, some lead. Tyler Rob twenty two.
We farm and he's exactly right. Commodity prices are in
the tank, the real octos spook. Trump is sending long
range missiles into the Ukraine and American contractors are now

(53:05):
arming them and they're being launched into Russia.

Speaker 3 (53:08):
I think he deserves a peace price for that, don't you.

Speaker 4 (53:12):
I've been the best president on peace possibly ever. Wally Wallers,
My wolf fat gold is holding its value. I've been
stocking up on gold backs as well. Excited about the
Texas gold backs coming soon. Steve Evs, I just can't
get into any crypto. I trust things that are in
my hand. I don't fault anyone in crypto. I just
don't trust it. Yeah, that's what I like I said,

(53:33):
It's incredibly volatile just because of who invests in it.
You've got some very very large, major players, like you
saw this guy who's connected and knows when things are
going down, and then you've got a bunch of other
people that are just trying to, you know, have it
go to the moon. So they're just investing what they
can when they can, and they'll be forced to abandon
their positions.

Speaker 3 (53:54):
Well, it's like the original stock market crash and the
guy says, one guy, forget who it was, it said
it say, near the top of the market had been
reached when the shoeshine boys were talking about stock tips
with each other. Goes When it gets that far into retail,
then it's time to get out, you know, because there's
always been an inside game.

Speaker 4 (54:14):
Ah, so we've got too many suckers in the market.

Speaker 3 (54:18):
Yeah, yeah, it's the last fool.

Speaker 4 (54:20):
So there's that old saying. You know, if you can't
tell who the sucker at the table, is it you.
I've never been able to identify the sucker, so I'm
fairly confident it's always been me.

Speaker 3 (54:34):
That's my experience, Bulldog.

Speaker 4 (54:36):
If silver goes up, everything silver is used in goes
up as well, or they can't get silver for production
of everything, manufacturing will have buyer competition on silver. Wally Walrus.
When all those fails, they take us to war. That's right, yeah,
Guard Goldsmith. By the way, that Boston radio host calling
Trump the peace president, oh Man Baston, what a peace

(54:59):
president he is.

Speaker 3 (55:00):
Yeah, it just expells it with an eye as I.

Speaker 4 (55:03):
Say, bulldog, what O the government becomes a big buyer
of silver along with manufacturing possibility possibility Russia.

Speaker 3 (55:12):
Well, yeah, silver is used extensively in solar panels and
some other things like that as well. Yeah, it's like
the copper stuff that they are in the UK. There's
so much copper theft of these charging cables that it's
destroying the charging infrastructure, what little of it there was.

Speaker 4 (55:32):
Who knew that crackheads would be our last line of defense?

Speaker 3 (55:36):
Yeah, And the thing says that it's got that it's
online and there are things there, But then you get
there and there's no cable because somebody cut it off
to sell the copper that's there, So they want the
copper strands and you're stranded.

Speaker 4 (55:51):
Five ninety five bulld or read that one Bitcoin is
just a techno Ponzi scheme tunnel lord one three three seven.
The coin bros should use some of their earnings and
reinvest them into far more stable markets. That does sound
like good advice. Sounds like good advice to me. You
somehow make it to the moon on bitcoin or one

(56:11):
of these alt coins and get out and put it
in something that is not going to just crash for
no reason.

Speaker 3 (56:16):
And Tony can help you do that without a fee.
Exactly takes a bitcoin, it turns it into the gold.

Speaker 4 (56:21):
David gold Nibberu twenty twenty nine, nineteen twenty nine, Will
apperiod time of plenty compared to Trump's big beautiful economic implosion, Yeah,
I certainly hope not. Audi Mr R. Trump is trying
to turn country into perpetually military occupied American gaza.

Speaker 3 (56:38):
Yes, I'm gonna talk about that coming up next.

Speaker 4 (56:40):
And of course, going back to Nibrew, no matter what happens,
God is in control of everything, so more than gold,
more than silver, more than any investment, whether it's bullets
or food. You can trust in him always. He will
always be there, the real Octo Spook. And of course
that I mean the Gospel Jesus Christ. He is who

(57:01):
you need in your life, not just a general God,
the real octavespo.

Speaker 3 (57:07):
China, not just the man upstairs.

Speaker 4 (57:10):
I'm a big believer in the man upstairs. Isn't that
the man upstairs, absolutely meaningless. China is the largest mining
slash producer of gold in the world. China is a
clear winner here, has fifteen percent of all gold ever
mined in the world and increasing every day. Trump's tears
spankrupting Americans just doesn't seem a good response against China.

Speaker 3 (57:29):
No, just like Biden weaponizing the financial system against Russia,
confiscating their assets that they had parked in the financial
system was a self inflicted wound that could be fatal
for the economic system real not just because of Russia,

(57:50):
but because everybody could see they can't trust this financial
system that's been politicized and weaponized.

Speaker 4 (57:57):
Niburu twenty twenty nine. Putin doesn't have to worry about
taking on Marx America directly. Trump will have sabotaged the
nation long before that day arrives. Yeah, bulldog, Oh my god,
it this is going to pop with bricks. It's the
market is incredibly unstable and all it needs is just
a little push one way or the other. Sylvia nineteen.

(58:18):
Catherine Austin Fitz said crypto slash captured stable coin is
pump and dump. I agree, it's another good way to
get the last of your money out of you. Yeah,
Christian cons social conser.

Speaker 3 (58:30):
I'm going to bind anything that look because and Trump
are pushing it.

Speaker 4 (58:34):
Not on my watch, Christian constitutional conservative. I accuse Trump
of insider trading. And Friday was a classic example. Markets
hit all time highs and then he announced his hair
brain tears, markets plummeted, chev Ken three more years of
destruction from Trump to go, oh boy, buckle your seat belts,
bulldog the fortune. Five hundred companies are all maxed out

(58:56):
in debt. The stockbook values are near zero. Real Jason Barker,
the richest of the rich know what's coming and are
often driving it. The real octose book. Here in Walmart,
if you buy booze, everyone with you has to show
ID Booze might be a great investment too. Walmart is
now a branch of the ATF.

Speaker 2 (59:13):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (59:14):
You better start stocking up on ever Clear. Also, it
can be used to disinfect wounds. If it comes down
to it. Pair ods got stuck in retro video games,
and that's right, invest in Pokemon. Buy Pokemon now. Nintendo
only goes up. It's going to the moon.

Speaker 5 (59:34):
It is amazing that their prices are skyrocketing when you
would think that collector's items would crash.

Speaker 4 (59:42):
I think it's partially to do with how utterly ridiculous
our society has become and how out of touch a
lot of people are. They We've lived in a time
of plenty for so long that they don't think.

Speaker 3 (59:53):
That we've memo.

Speaker 4 (59:54):
Yeah, they don't think it can go bad. So they're
sitting there. Oh, you know what's really going to hold
its value? My char is in a time of plenty.
In a time of excess, yes, your charizard might continue
to hold it's you know, five ten thousand dollars value.
If the market collapses, no one is going to be
buying your charizard.

Speaker 3 (01:00:13):
Yeah, or your baseball cards or whatever. It is crazy.

Speaker 4 (01:00:17):
My tulip bulbs.

Speaker 3 (01:00:21):
I wonder if you could eat those tulip bubs. So, yeah,
somebody did. Probably. Well, there's a little bit of hope
in all of this. Marjorie Taylor Green is now torching
Trump's tariffs and his corruption at the same time. So
she has seen the light, and good for her. She's
developing a spine and getting integrity here, just like Thomas Massey.

(01:00:42):
She joined. Thomas Massey has been very outspoken about this.
Epstein stuff, But she said this shouldn't be about helping
your crypto donors. That's exactly what he has made it.
So she said that these are all attempts to enrich
his crypto donors. She said this during a recent conversation
with comedian Tim Dillon. And I'm talking to major manufacturing

(01:01:05):
companies that are saying, we support the president, we support
what he's trying, his long term goals, but we have
a problem with these tariffs. Let me just say that
the devil's not just in the details. The devil is
in the way that you achieve your goals. Right. The
end does not justify the means. So we can agree

(01:01:25):
with Trump on the end, and we can adamantly and
must adamantly oppose the means that he's trying to accomplish
with all of these things, whether you're talking about the
border and immigration flood, or whether you're talking about the
outflow of wealth and manufacturing out of this country in
the first place, we don't want to centrally planned economy.

(01:01:48):
And if we want to centrally planned economy, he hate
the guy to do it. He bankrupted half a dozen casinos,
so he's a lucky loser. As the book said, and
they got him so angry that he sued him for
fifteen billion dollars because it was spot on with the truth.
She goes on to say, Marjorie Tayler Green says, it
shouldn't be about helping your crypto donors or your AI donors,

(01:02:11):
or welcoming in these people that hated you and spent
money trying to beat you. But all of a sudden,
you're excited to come there, excited to come to the
news new Rose Garden patio. That should not be the focus. Well,
she's spot on it. She's the focus is new ballroom
in the Rose Garden patio. Right, even when somebody asking

(01:02:33):
about Charlie Cook, Well, yeah, that's really bad. But hey,
I tell you about my new ballroom plans that are.

Speaker 4 (01:02:40):
Here, very very said, what's un said? My ballroom the
best ballroom gonna be great.

Speaker 3 (01:02:45):
She said. The focus should be on the people that
showed up at the rallies, who stood there for eighteen
hours trying to get in in the rain, in the cold,
in the one hundred degree heat. For those people, those
are the ones that I care about. Those are the
ones that for not only President Trump, but for every
single Republican and gave us power. I don't think those

(01:03:06):
people are being served. Well, She's exactly right. These are
the kind of people who were who had warrants served
on them after the first Trump term. As I've said
for all, that was the biggest betrayal of his own supporters,
with Alex Jones to stop the steal when his Save
America grift where he made two nd fifty million dollars

(01:03:28):
then set these people up. And he just was tweeting
about this and says there has to be some kind
of a payback for this, and people said, wait a minute,
you realize you were the president when that happened. He's
talking about Biden as if Biden pulled off January sixth,
Biden pulled off the punishment that was clearly coming. And
not to say that any of it was justified, but

(01:03:50):
Trump left his own supporters. Not only did he lure
them in, fleeced them of their money, and then lure
them into this to this setup, but he left them
to be punished by Biden, refusing to pardon them before
he left. He was too busy pardoning the crooks associated

(01:04:10):
with the Jared Kushner's family. And so yeah, she's very
strong her statements against it, and she's one hundred percent right.
We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll
be right back.

Speaker 6 (01:04:21):
Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression,
in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
purely an abstract principle. Here it is, however, not nearly
so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved
here is one of monopolies. Today, the British government will

(01:04:46):
monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it
will be something.

Speaker 2 (01:04:51):
Else, liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David

(01:05:47):
Knight Show.

Speaker 7 (01:05:50):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelensky. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(01:06:13):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some at the Davidknightshow dot com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred Those
amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
something other than green military cosplay to my various galas
and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

(01:06:35):
just put it in the next package of bombs and
missiles coming from the USA.

Speaker 8 (01:06:50):
Here news now at apsradionews dot com, or get the
APS radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 3 (01:06:59):
Well, as I said at the beginning of the program,
one of the things that concerns me is that Trump supporters,
and I know it's Trump supporters of its trump bots,
but they're using open a Eyes Sora to generate AI
videos of soldiers salting protesters because they want this. And again,
I don't know how much of this as influencers. I
don't know how much of this is mob mentality, and

(01:07:20):
how much of it are bots that are controlled by
the Trump people. But it thoroughly disgusted me. I'm going
to show you one of these things. Videos created using
open ayes Sora to depict soldiers assaulting protesters, fueling a
narrative of widespread violence. However, the violent crime in the
US is at its lowest in decades, and contradiction of

(01:07:44):
this narrative. So here's what it looks like. This is
what I call it. Instead of martial law, I call
it MAGA law because MAGA doesn't have any respectful law
for constitution. They know and care as little about the
law and constitution do process as they know and care
about politics and about Trump's personal life. So here's the

(01:08:07):
kind of garbage AI slop these people are putting out
to cheer.

Speaker 9 (01:08:11):
No cheerse okay, so no cheers, you hear me?

Speaker 4 (01:08:14):
Okay, so no cheers.

Speaker 6 (01:08:20):
I can't see I now thats out now z okay,
crack it up, check it out.

Speaker 3 (01:08:30):
Yeah. And these people reply and say that was beautiful.
You think that's beautiful, wait till they do it to you,
and before you ask, I voted for this. That's why
I pose MAGA. I have absolutely nothing to say to
these people. They are clueless, useful idiots to take Trump's
word for it. America cities or in rains, forcing him

(01:08:53):
to deploy federal troops to Portland, d C. And Memphis.
But no one seems to be able to find any
real evidence of the mass riots and the anarchistic violence
that Trump and his supporters insist is destroying a nation.
Luckily for them, that problem is easily solved with a
little help from AI. So hey, if it's not there
for real, you can just create a fantasy world to

(01:09:14):
support what Trump is saying. So this was first flag
by Gizmoto, which reported a concerning rise in AI generated
pro Trump propaganda since release of Open Ais Sora two,
which is capable of spinning out short, photorealistic clips along
with sound as well as you noticed. Gizmoto notes how

(01:09:35):
one clip showing a protester harassing a US National guardsman
before getting pepper sprayed went viral on Instagram, notching nearly
one and a half million likes one and a half million likes.
I detest that. I absolutely detest that in the first place.
I don't care what the person is saying. You know,
they have them saying something. You know that was non shows,

(01:10:00):
no cheese or something. What was it, no caeso, no keso,
no cheese or something. Yeah, anyway, but whatever they're saying
to that National guardsman, that does not give him the
right to pep persuade them in the face. When you
support that, then what you're saying is I don't like
your speech. Your speech is hateful. Your speech is violence,

(01:10:21):
and the MAGA people are no different from the left folks.
We don't want to have anything to do with either
of those sides. They are a mirror image of each other.
They come at it from different directions. It's like the
Nazi fascists versus the Soviet communists. You don't want to
be on either side. They're both horrible and they're just
coming at it with a different justification. So had one

(01:10:43):
and a half million likes, forty million views. Can you
imagine that? Liking that? And the comments are making it clear?
Best video I saw today. Let's see more of these
gumbags being taken down. I love a feel good video
like this. Another one, another poster on x uploaded an

(01:11:04):
AI generated video montage of various protesters hollowing, hollering in
the police officers faces, no case so no chiefs, which
I just showed you there and again I voted for this,
said one of them. Well I saw that and that
disgusted me. So here is my take on all this
stuff if I can find it. Let's see here it is.

(01:11:26):
There's trumps on meme sees himself as Robert Wall in
the Apocalypse.

Speaker 4 (01:11:31):
Now beautiful friend.

Speaker 3 (01:11:40):
This is the.

Speaker 4 (01:11:44):
Mily.

Speaker 3 (01:11:45):
Yeah, burned the constitution, burned everything else.

Speaker 2 (01:11:54):
Of no sense.

Speaker 1 (01:12:02):
No ross.

Speaker 3 (01:12:06):
Yeah, this is what Trump wants. That was this meme
that started.

Speaker 10 (01:12:12):
Okay, I said, cracis and we're going to straighten out
one by what they're saying.

Speaker 3 (01:12:18):
You're trying to take over the republic.

Speaker 10 (01:12:20):
And this is going to be a major part for
some of the people in this room. That's a war too,
It's a war from within. I told people we should
use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for
our military.

Speaker 3 (01:12:32):
Yeah, that's what the military is going to look like
right there.

Speaker 5 (01:12:35):
And you that's what.

Speaker 9 (01:12:40):
So sad, just.

Speaker 1 (01:12:49):
Also stranger.

Speaker 4 (01:12:53):
Better just read.

Speaker 3 (01:13:03):
Chicken goats that must be gates.

Speaker 10 (01:13:04):
That's farm.

Speaker 4 (01:13:07):
Gitic modification has gone wild.

Speaker 3 (01:13:20):
Yeah, chicken goats. Now do they lay eggs or give
wool or both? How about that? So they're drumming up
consent and they've got an army of people using AI
to drum this up. And people love that. There's a
red meat to them. So a campaign that Trump happily

(01:13:40):
calls a war a war within. This is from Mediaite,
which is left wing in opposition to Trump. The Quiet Coup.
How Trump is undermining democracy from within. America is not
drifting towards authoritarianism. It has already arrived, quietly, bureaucratically, almost politely.

(01:14:03):
And it's what the Trump supporters want. It's what they
voted for. It really is what they voted for. After
twenty twenty, don't tell me that the people who voted
for Trump, the influencers who supported him, didn't want this,
because he did it already. The crowd's a chance, the
carnival agrievance that was just Act one, Act two. The

(01:14:25):
show has moved backstage and the footlights are off, the
machinery homes, and Trump, who once ruled by impulse, now
governs through the design. Well, the question is, we're going
to talk about this in just a second. Whose design
is it his? Is it Peter Teels, is it Curtis Jarvin?
Is it the technocracy's design or the un He's learned

(01:14:45):
how to run it. After two terms of cultural conditioning,
the American public has been anesthetized by the permanent adrenaline
of outrage. Every assault on legal norms and constitutional norms
lands as deja vus. Now he writes things like democratic norms.
America is not a democracy. It's a republic. It's a

(01:15:07):
constitutional republic with rules of law. That's what's being attacked here.
He's not doing anything with the elections. What's being attacked
as the constitution, folks. That's what the left doesn't see.
What once felt like a scandal now feels like weather
because it just keeps coming. The central project of Trump's

(01:15:28):
second term is not ideological, but architectural, the systematic capture
of the federal government. Very much like what FDR did
and the last fourth turning, it's exactly what he's doing.
And yet the difference is as much as FDR changed things,
he had opposition within his own party saying, we agree
with where you want to go, but the way you're

(01:15:49):
doing it we don't support. Because remember this is back
at a time when if they wanted to prohibit something
like alcohol, they had enough respect for the Constitution of
the rule of law that they would pass the constitutional Men,
no such thing exists anymore. Nobody cares about the rule
of law. So Russvoight, the O and B director, is

(01:16:10):
basically the chief mechanic of this new order. He invoked
emergency powers to lay off thousands of civil servants. They're
very friendly and media eye towards the bureaucrats. Entire agencies
were hollowed out under the pretense of fiscal discipline, inspectors,
general ethics officers, policy staffers, those dull, indispensable sentinels of

(01:16:30):
accountability were shown the door. I don't see them as
sentinels of accountability. But what I think is dangerous here,
and I said this when Elon Musk was using DOGE
to fire people and replace them with AI is what
they're removing is the human factor. And we move the

(01:16:51):
human factor, and you automate the machinery of this. You
are maximizing governance. You may be minimizing human head count
and government, and you may be getting a lot of
get rid of a lot of people that the rest
of us don't like the DMV or the federal equivalents
of it in so many different areas of our life.
But you're still at some level dealing with humans. And

(01:17:15):
you may find somebody who has sympathy for what is
happening to you, what they're doing to you, and they
may also blow the whistle when they see things that
are being done wrong that is not going to happen
once they automate it. With AI. That's the key issue here,
that's total governance, and it removes the human factor. It's

(01:17:35):
the same reason that we talk about autonomous killing machines. Right.
We can have these undeclared, unjustified wars all the time,
but what happens is when you've got real soldiers out there,
sometimes they'll come back and they'll tell you what's really
going on. Some of them will, and that can be
used to turn things around, or maybe they won't follow
the orders that they are given. That's not the case

(01:17:58):
when you've got robotic machines that are going to be
doing the killing. And that's not going to be the
case when you've got robotic machines that are going to
be doing the bureaucratic functions that the federal government doesn't
have any authority for in the first place. So the
Project twenty twenty five's design was to replace neutral expertise
with partisan obedience. Rights media eye. Well, I disagree. I

(01:18:21):
don't think that you know, the bureaucracy was expertise they
were for that matter, or neutral. Yeah, it was. It
was neutral to them because they were on the same side.
But I didn't see expertise at all in that but
it is the demolition He got this right, the demolition

(01:18:41):
of the constitutional balance between Congress and the executive, between
law and loyalty. Power now emanates not from deliberation but
from decree. And I've said this myself from the very beginning.
This is about setting up an autocracy, a dictatorship. He
declares the emergency and then declares, now that it's an emergency,
I can do whatever I want. It's just a little

(01:19:04):
two step formality there. That's nonsense. Trump's deployment of federal
forces in cities like Washington, Chicago, and Portland under the
fiction of crime emergencies has normalized the site of domestic militarization.
That's a key part of this. This is the just
like you did with the lockdown stuff, right, This is

(01:19:25):
normalizing people for that, just like you did with the
stimulus checks that was normalizing ubi. This is normalizing the
military on the streets. That is Trump's purpose. As a
Trump precedent, courts hesitate, Congress sputters, and the White House
learns a lesson that if you act as though you

(01:19:45):
have the authority, eventually you do. You can fake the
authority until you make the authority. None of this looks
like a coup, it looks like a like administration. And
that's what makes it so effective. The press, the courts,
elections are still there where their cumulative weight feels diminished,
like background institutions orbiting a single gravitational center. You don't

(01:20:08):
need to destroy a democracy to control it. You only
need to occupy it from within. Keep the noise loud,
keep the lights bright, and the public too weary to
parse the details. And you keep a mob of fanatical
supporters there. You know, this is Maga, is his brown
shirts that are out there keeping people in line, keeping

(01:20:29):
the politicians in line. They're totally afraid of this guy.
That's what's really concerning. Governance becomes spectacle, and spectacle becomes governance,
and the population learns to confuse fatigue with normalcy, and
to what end. Some may say that this is merely
a political policy disagreement, that Trump favors smaller government, fewer regulations,

(01:20:52):
and a market friendly redistribution of resources. But the danger
is not that the administration pursues conservative goals. It is
how these policies are implemented through emergency powers, through bureaucratic purges,
and through centralized control. Power is being wielded to consolidate
power and wealth, to bypass oversight, and to weaken the

(01:21:15):
structural checks that make the American Republic resilient. And that's
what Marjorie Taylor Green was saying. So this shouldn't be
run for the benefit of your donors. And that's exactly
what it's about. It's about consolidating power for Trump and
consolidating wealth for Trump and his donors. This is destabilization.

(01:21:37):
It is weaponizing government to serve extreme wealth accumulation. The
logical consequences of such systemic enrichment is unrest and if
left unchecked, it may provoke revolutionary pressures. The stakes are
nothing less than the preservation of the republic and the
rule of law. By weakening the civil service, militarizing urban centers,

(01:22:00):
and consolidating power within the executive branch, Trump is laying
the groundwork for a presidency that is not merely strong,
but a total fusion of state, party, and personal enrichment.
The public's focus on daily scandals obscure the more insidious
threats to democracy unfolding behind the scenes. And yes, Trump

(01:22:21):
is great at providing one scandal after the other, isn't he.
David Carr once wrote that journalism's purpose was to quote
name the thing. Well the thing is now authoritarianism, cloak
to legality, spectacle and distraction. And while the noise keeps rolling,
the country risks awakening too late to the magnitude of

(01:22:42):
what has been quietly stolen. And we know what is
being stolen even now. Karl Rove comes in, and of
course he was George W. Bush's political analyst, That's why
he looked at this. So he looks at the polls,
and he said over the weekend on Fox News, he
said that this latest National Guard gambit as bad policies,

(01:23:05):
that it is a loser. He said. He warned Trump
that his effort to deploy the National Guard to Portland
Chicago is bad politics. During appearance on the Journal Editorial
Report on Saturday, Wall Street journalist Paul Gigo who was
interviewing him, and so he asked Rove about this. He said,
if you take a look at the Reuters poll, fifty

(01:23:28):
eight percent of those surveyed said they believe that you
should send troops only for external threats. However, the Republicans
are fifty one percent, Democrats seventy two percent, and independence
fifty three percent. But if you look deeper, there's another question,
which was should the president send troops even if a
governor objects. That was thirty seven percent yes, forty eight

(01:23:52):
percent no, And it was seventy to eighty, seventy to
eighteen among Republicans, it was thirteen to seventy nine among Democrats,
and twenty eight to fifty among independents. So we don't
like him. We believe that he shouldn't deploy if a
governor objects. Though the partisanship seems starts to be felt.

(01:24:15):
Republicans say yeah, override the governor. Democrats say no, and
independence tend decide with the Democrat voters and say no.
I don't think that should happen. Roe said this, Ultimately,
I think will tend to be a loser if the
question is should the president do this or should he
have done it. On the other hand, it might get

(01:24:37):
him a slight improvement among the people saying who are
concerned about crime and saying, well, at least he's taking action.
But overall, I think this is going to end up
being a loser for the president. I'm not so sure
that he's got that right, because, as I said, you know,
I think assuming that stuff is coming from some people
in his base. I would assume that it's probably coming

(01:24:57):
from his meme factory. You know that the Republicans and
the people around Trump are working on that very hard,
and I think for we're seeing a lot of things
like that cheering police brutality, and that is that video.
There was police brutality. Regardless of what you say to
the police, you have a right to peacefully redress your

(01:25:19):
grievances and they don't have a right to retaliate to you.
That is the wrong thing for the government to do.
On January sixth, that's what happened. A lot of people said, well,
the police kicked this off. We were having a protest
and they started attacking people. Yeah, they understood it when
it happened to them, But only when it happens to
them do they understand it. They don't understand the principle involved,

(01:25:40):
because immediately they turn around and support this because regardless
of who created that, you had one and a half
million people who liked that. He's making the case, and
certainly his lawyers are in court that these National Guard
troops are there to protect federal buildings and to protect
the ICE agents that are doing their job, because you've

(01:26:00):
the governor and the mayor, the governor of Illinois, the
mayor of Chicago saying we're not going to cooperate with Ice.
So he says, I mean, there's a kind of logic
to what he's doing to try to protect these agents.
That's Paul Gigo saying that to Rogue. Rogue called rogue,

(01:26:21):
called him Carl Rogue for so long anyway. So but
the reality is is that the principle that local officials
do not have to cooperate with the federal government has
been endorsed by the Supreme Court. Whether or not they
endorsed it or not, that is constitutional. We have a
separation of powers. And what the Trump administration is now

(01:26:45):
doing is treating that established principle of non cooperation, that
principle of nullification, which are really part of the Tenth Amendment.
The Trump administration is now treating that as if that
were an insurrection, as if that were somehow secession or something.
So always in the past we said, yeah, like Marjorie

(01:27:07):
Tyler Green said, I think we needed a national divorce.
I said, well, the problem is you're married to an
abusive husband the federal government, and so in the past,
if you wanted to declare that you are independent and
have a divorce, you are inviting attack from the federal government.
Now Trump has moved the needle so that if you
just don't obey this abusive husband and everything, he's got

(01:27:27):
a right to beat you. That's the reality of this.
And so Rove says, well, look, he has the authority
to deploy the National Guard to protect federal facilities. And
I think the public, though, is going to look at
this and make a decision. And so whether or not
what they're seeing during the summer of twenty twenty and
riots in Portland, nightly attacks on the federal courthouse, or

(01:27:49):
is this going to be you know, protesters outside of
facility in suburban Chicago. Let me just say, you know,
he says, all right, so we know what happened in
twenty twenty. There were a lot of riots. Now Left
called it mostly peaceful, but they're burning stuff up. It
was really out of control, and a lot of people
were calling on Trump to do something about it then
and he did nothing. So now we have something that

(01:28:09):
is much much. There's nothing at all going on like that.
This is just the usual stuff in Chicago or these
big cities, usual crime, and that people there are content
to live with because they don't want to change the
government there or move out. So that is this has
been the status quo for quite some time. It's not
an emergency. Nothing has changed, and you don't have the

(01:28:32):
kind of riots that we did in the summer of
twenty twenty when Trump did nothing. So how could he
argue that this is an emergency that requires the federal
government to do something about it. His own experiences on
administration before this argues against his own actions that he's
doing here. So he says, if it heats up, yeah,

(01:28:54):
the President's going to look better. But if it doesn't
heat up, if it really is just sort of meeting
the needs of the protecting the federal facilities, I'm not
certain that that's going to work to his advantage. We
saw this a little bit in Portland where the President
was asked about and he said, well, you know, I
am hearing that there are fires and riots and lots
of violence every night. I don't know where he's getting that,

(01:29:16):
because that's not what we're seeing on Portland TV. Maybe
he's looking at these the soro to AI stuff that
people are creating maybe that's the reality.

Speaker 4 (01:29:30):
Trump a NonStop diet of fake videos.

Speaker 3 (01:29:33):
Yeah, so a reason is looking at the legality of
this Insurrection Act regardless of whether or not. They kind
of skip over the fundamental question as to whether or
not that's constitutional, but they just assume that that's a
legitimate thing. Even if it were a legitimate thing, Trump
is using it illegitimately. That's how far down the rabbit

(01:29:53):
hole we've gone down the drain. I should say he
can resort to an alarmingly broad statue that gives him
more discretion even if the courts tried to force limits
on what he's doing with the military deployment. On Thursday,
a federal judge temporarily blocked Trump's deployment and National Guard
troops in Chicago, saying there's no credible evidence that conditions

(01:30:16):
there meet the terms of the statute on which he
was relying. That decision came less than a week after
another federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against a
similar deployment in Portland. Meanwhile, at a hearing on Thursday
in the latter case, the panel on the US Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court seemed inclined to
allow the Portland deployment. That's not good. That's especially not

(01:30:41):
good because this is the Ninth Circuit Court. They typically
are on the left, and of course the politicized. It's
not just their perspective on things. The law he is invoking,
which is the US Code one two four six, so
as the President may call into federal service members and

(01:31:01):
units of the National Guard of any state in response
to a foreign invasion, an actual or incipient rebellion against
the federal government, or conditions in which he is unable
to enforce federal law with regular forces. Trump says that
those last two conditions exist in Portland and in Chicago.
But if the courts get in Trump's way, he can

(01:31:24):
always resort to the alarmingly broad Insurrection Act. Again, it's
an act. It's not any act or laws that are
put in by the by the Congress can be in
violation of the Constitution, and I think it is in
violation of the Tenth Amendment. It gives him more discretion
to deploy the military for law enforcement purposes. Trump says

(01:31:46):
the courts have no role at all in reviewing his determination.
That would leave him free to deploy the National guard
wherever and whenever he likes, regardless of the constraints opposed
by Congress. I remember when al Gore made the state
there's no controlling legal authority here, and that was borderline
taken out of context, but it really was what he believed.

(01:32:08):
But this is literally what Trump is saying over and
over again. I can do whatever I want. You have
no authority. I'm the only one with any authority right.
Congress doesn't have any authority, the courts don't have any authority,
and the Constitution has no authority for Trump. So the
nine Circuit Court rejected the argument that his use of

(01:32:30):
Section one two four oh six is completely insulated from
judicial review. However, when this came up before in terms
of the LA deployment, the court kind of said, well,
we still have oversight, but we're not going to fight
you on this. So they capitulated to him to avoid

(01:32:51):
a fight. And so it kind of shows you that
nobody has the guts to stand up to him. That's
why it's good for Marjorie Taylor Green that she would
stand up to this guy. The courts are afraid of him.
Certainly Mouse Johnson is afraid of him. A squeaker mouse.

Speaker 4 (01:33:08):
Yeah, it's incredibly surprising for it to be Marjorie Taylor
Green that's actually standing up and saying something. Just wou
wouldn't have bet it, wouldn't have bet on that out?

Speaker 3 (01:33:18):
Well, I had just written her off as another sick event,
because look, we all saw this in one form of
the other five years ago. In twenty twenty, twenty twenty,
all of this stuff was done all at once. That's
why I say, anybody that would still support this guy,
I just don't understand it at all. But good for her.
She has had enough evidently of this. Yeah, after I

(01:33:42):
don't know what it was that changed her mind, but.

Speaker 4 (01:33:45):
After twenty twenty, at minimum, you would have to look
at it and go, Okay, he is so incompetent and
stupid that he's a massive threat and cannot be put
back into office.

Speaker 3 (01:33:54):
Yeah. Well that was the defense of a lot of
these people. Well it wasn't Trump, it was a deep
state and they were fooling, and it's like, so you
want this guy back.

Speaker 4 (01:34:02):
Ah, good, a fool, just what we need.

Speaker 3 (01:34:05):
I said, you know, whether he's a fool or a tool,
whether this is his idea tool of the technocrats, anyway.
Applying the same test. Last Saturday, the US District Judge
Karen Immergoot, who was appointed by Trump, concluded that Trump's
assessment of the situation Portland was quote simply untethered to
the facts. Yes, as usually his statements are from June

(01:34:30):
eleventh through June twenty fifth. She acknowledged the protests at
Portland's Immigration and Custom Enforcement building included violent behavior and
required increased law enforcement presence, But since then, she noted,
the protests of dwindled to twenty or fewer people and
were generally peaceful, with only sporadic incidences of violence and

(01:34:52):
disruptive behavior. But here's the key. It can be and
should be addressed with normal law enforce It does not
require the over the top response of sending in the military.
By late September, when Trump decided the National Guard is
necessary to protect war ravaged Portland, that's his terms from

(01:35:13):
quote domestic terrorists unquote. The situation was categorically different from
the violent incidents that the government had described in la
she said. She noted that the government cited only four
incidents of protesters clashing with federal officers in September, including
the erection of a makeshift guillotine, flashlights shown into the

(01:35:34):
eyes of drivers and the ice facility, and an online
photograph of an unmarked ice vehicle. Again, this is the
kind of manufactured hysteria that we saw from the Biden
administration about January sixth. Instead of a guillotine, somebody put
up a gallows with a hangman's new Senate And you
know they use any pretense like this to escalate things.

(01:35:58):
She said. While these incidents are inexcusable, they can be
handled by regular law enforcement forces. She said, neither violence
in a different state nor the more potential for future
escalation can provide a colorable basis for invoking Section one
two four oh six. That argument, she said, would render
meaningless the statutes quote extraordinary requirements allowing the president to

(01:36:23):
federalize one state's national guard based on events in a
different state or mere speculation about future events. During the
Ninth Circuit Courts hearing on Thursday, one judge was notably
skeptical of her reasoning, He said, applying that test to
the Civil War, he said, I'm not sure that even

(01:36:46):
sure that President Lincoln would have been able to bring
in forces when he did unless Lincoln acted immediately after
the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter. Well, that would have
been a good thing. Actually, if you go back and
read Shelby foot History of the Civil War, and he
spent twenty years on that, and he I think is

(01:37:06):
by far and away the best analysis of the Civil War.
But he said that it was a deliberate provocation to
make sure that he had the justification. He didn't want
to be seen as the aggressor, and so it was
a deliberate provocation. He had probed a lot of different
places to go in and try to provoke the people,
the different states that had succeeded, and then he determined

(01:37:29):
that South Carolina was the one that they were most
likely to take a violent response to, so that's where
he went.

Speaker 4 (01:37:40):
There's also the fact that just it was a win win.
Either they do something about it and he gets justification,
or he's able to build up enough troops there that,
you know, maybe he becomes the aggressor. But at that
point it's just a flat out I've got enough people
here right now to conquer this area immediately.

Speaker 3 (01:37:56):
But I think it's interesting too that the judge goes
back to the Civil War war and because that's what
we're seeing here, So fourth turning. So what Trump is
doing is structurally he's doing what FDR did in the
last fourth turning, and then with a military aspect of this,
he's doing what Lincoln did and the fourth turning before that,
which you say, lands.

Speaker 5 (01:38:16):
Yeah, I was just gonna say, it's also odd that
he would point to this as though it were an
argument in favor, saying that if this law had been passed,
the civil war wouldn't have happened. Still, that's an argument
the law not to be passed.

Speaker 3 (01:38:31):
Yeah, that's right, Yeah, you argue would have been Okay,
things have de escalated now, so we don't have to
have a civil war. No, we want to have that
civil war, right. So Immergoot also rejected Trump's assertion that
he was facing a rebellion or the danger of a
rebellion in Portland. So, yeah, it may not be it
may not be this yet, but it's going to be that.

(01:38:51):
And so I'm going to do this in anticipation of
it becoming that. Here we have in test and testatory invasion,
I guess, which is the way we fight our wars,
isn't it. You know? It's like, well, they're not attacking
us now, but they could, and if LUs could kill,
it would be us instead of them. Right, So her
analysis relied on Briar's historically informed understanding of the term rebellion.

(01:39:16):
Brier said, or she said, First, a rebellion must not
only be violent, but must also be armed. Second, a
rebellion must be organized. Third, a rebellion must be open
and avowed. And fourth, a rebellion must be against the
government as a whole, often with the aim of overthrowing

(01:39:37):
the government, rather than an opposition to a single law
or issue. So, applying that definition, the Trump appointed Judge
Immergot concluded that the protests Importanland were not a rebellion,
did not pose a danger of a rebellion, especially in
the days leading up to the federalization of sending in

(01:39:58):
the troops. So another judge chafin, rather, this is not judge.
Someone who's arguing the case told the Ninth Circuit panel
that the appropriate definition of rebellion is an open, organized,
armed resistance to an established government or an attempt to
change the government or the leader, usually through violence. And

(01:40:20):
so the Unitth Circuit Court, however, does not seem to
be buying these arguments. On the same day that the
Ninth Circuit considered the Portland deployment, a US District Judge
April Perry, a Biden appointee, issued a temporary restraining order
against the deployment in Illinois, Echoing Immergot who was appointed

(01:40:41):
by Trump, Perry, who was appointed by Biden. So the
Trump administration's perception of events quote unquote in the Chicago
area is quote simply unreliable. She suggested that calling up
the National Guard would quote only add fuel to the
fire the defendants themselves have started. Well, that's what we

(01:41:02):
see happening over and over again, isn't it.

Speaker 4 (01:41:05):
Yeah, this is a scenario in what you're saying reminded
me of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy quote about
diplomacy in the stages of war. So it goes retribution
because you know, I'm going to kill you because you
killed my brother, anticipation, I'm going to kill you because
I killed your brother, And then there's diplomacy. I'm going
to kill my brother and then kill you on the
pretext that your brother did it. And it's just this,

(01:41:28):
you know, diplomacy is this web of nonsense you've spun
out so many lies, and you're justifying everything based on it.

Speaker 3 (01:41:35):
Just yeah, that's right. So Trump had a bizarre rant
on social media about Biden and January six screaming do
something all up her case. Just after midnight on Sunday morning,
he released onto his social media platform a screed in
which he claimed that the Biden FBI placed two hundred

(01:41:58):
and seventy four agents in the Crown out on January sixth,
when Trump himself was still president. It wasn't the Biden FBI.
And I've said this all along to the people, even
the people who went to jail for years and were
so excited that Trump finally pardoned them when he could
have done it before they ever got harassed in the

(01:42:19):
first place. But I also said, from the very beginning
of this, I said, this is not only a grift.
Trump may turn fifty million dollard to have no idea
how much Alviick Jones made off of Stop the Steal.
But they fleeced these people, They endangered these people, and
then Trump left them to face the consequences from Biden.
And I said, it's going to be agent provocateurs. You're

(01:42:40):
being set up if you go there. And they're not
only going to be setting you up and sending you
to jail. They're going to be using this to come
after the entire conservative movement, even those of us who
don't support Trump. The president took his social media site
took to the social media site the dead of night
to write uppercase, All Uppercase the Biden FB placed two

(01:43:01):
hundred and seventy four agents in the crowd on January sixth.
This is when Trump was president and still contesting the
election results. He added. If this is so, which it is,
a lot of very good people will be owed big apologies.
What a now oliper case scam? Do something, President dj T,

(01:43:26):
thank you for your attention. I guess he didn't write
that this time. I don't know. It's amazing something. Yeah,
this is his spell is so strong over these people
that he can even claim that Biden was pulling the
strings when he was president. Of course, the reality is
is that the same people are pulling the strings whether

(01:43:48):
Trump was president or Biden was president, and they're using
these two stooges as a left right faint the march
of tyranny.

Speaker 5 (01:43:56):
Maybe he meant to say net and Yahoo's FBI.

Speaker 3 (01:44:01):
Who knows, who knows well, a lot of billionaires are
preparing for the end of society. Maybe you should too.
What is it that they are afraid of? Well, a
futurism says, these guys are investing in bunkers, guns and
gold and for societal collapse. The text billionaire tech billionaires

(01:44:21):
are still doomsday prepping, and as the BBC reports, it
seems that AI is making some of them more paranoid
than ever. The society as we know it may soon crumble. Well,
I think there's a couple of things going on with this.
I think society as we know it may soon crumble
with this fourth turning. I think they see that. I

(01:44:41):
think a lot of people see it. They don't want
to use that term, even though they use all the
generational perspective millennials and so forth that were part of
that thesis and the words that they coined. However, I
think they're also looking at what Hugo to Garrison characterized
as the artel like war, artificial intelligence war. He had said,

(01:45:04):
and I guess it was maybe about a decade or
so ago when I was interviewing Hugo, and I don't
see the book here, but anyway, the book is out
of print. It's pretty valuable now. I just don't want
to sell it yet. But in that, you know, it's
two The book basically had two premises. Number one, Hugo

(01:45:25):
was not a Christian, and so he believed that if
you could create an exact replica of the brain, it
would come to life. And it's like, no, that's not
what it is. It's that spark of life that comes
from God alone. You know, when you smash mosquito on
your hand, right, all the elements of that mosquita are
still there, All the physical elements of that mosquito are there,

(01:45:47):
but somehow you've disassembled it, and there's that spark of
life is gone. And you can sit there and stare
at that those ingredients for a million years and they'll
never assemble itself into mosquita. You know. That is so
you can create an exact replica of the brain and
it will never become conscious. But that was my difference

(01:46:09):
that I had with him. His other thing was that
he took a very negative contrarian point of view about
AI that was in contrast to Ray Kurzweil's polyannovation. Ray
Kurzwel thinks that it's a good thing that we're going
to create. They think that they're going to create a
godlike intelligence. Ray kurzwell thought that was a good thing,

(01:46:30):
and Hugo to Garrison was one of the first people
to come out and say that's a bad thing. It'll
squash us like a bug. And so he would ask
that question too different communities of scientists when he would
speak on AI, because he's one of the early experts
on AI, and he'd ask them, if you knew that
you were going to create something that was going to
wipe out humanity, would you still do it? And most

(01:46:52):
of the people, the scientists and engineers they talked to,
said yes, they would. And as I said before, the
only time that he first time that he ever got
a first and only time they ever got a negative
response from the audience was when he addressed a Christian audience,
and that interesting. However, the other part of his book
was about the fact that once people catch the idea

(01:47:13):
of what AI is going to do to society, which
were at that point right now, he said that it's
going to be a massive pushback against the people building this,
and he said they're going to take to defending themselves.
He thought, I think that they might be a little
bit more, a little bit further along than they are
right now. His idea was that they would take to

(01:47:36):
near Earth orbit like the thing that you see in Elysium,
and so he called them cosmists, and he called those
of us left behind on Earth terns, and he said
the cosmists would have technology at their disposal that they
could unleash gigadath billions of people killed on us. I
think he'll take the form of some kind of a

(01:47:56):
fake pandemic and a bioweapon injection like Trump, or some
kind of a war that they will engineer here. I
think rather than waging war on us themselves, they will
take control of people like Trump and bring on a
world war. And then that's I think what they're looking

(01:48:17):
at right now. But they're also aware that there's a
lot of momentum building against them, the same scenario that
Hugo de Garrett talked about in the Artellite War. In
twenty twenty three, Zuckerberg was breaking ground and roughly five
thousand square foot underground basement facility that he cared tries.
Its just a little shelter, definitely not a doomsday bunker. Yeah.

(01:48:39):
Five thousand square foot for him is just a little
little shelter.

Speaker 4 (01:48:43):
Yeah, apparely any room at all.

Speaker 3 (01:48:45):
Yeah, these days, a race for AI dominance has ignited
a new wave of existential fear among the tech elite.
Or is it that they see the Fourth Turning coming?
It could be a combination of both of those things.
I think so an AI system that's generally more intelligent
than humans will send human society into irreparable chaos, the

(01:49:07):
art like war idea, Although it could be that it
could be that the AI purveyors are just a little
bit more intelligent than the people who are buying their product,
and that's all the necessary to create all kinds of
economic chaos. So one of these guys said, we're definitely
going to build a bunker before we release artificial general intelligence. Altmann,

(01:49:33):
for instance, is known to have a stockpile of guns
and gold in his bunker. He has sprawling properties and
other resources that he can turn to in the event
of an AI inflicted armageddon, or in the event of
a societal breakdown, or in the event of people figuring
out what these conment are actually doing. Remember, it was

(01:49:54):
Bloomberg when he was running for president, said you know,
we're trying to take their jobs, and we've got to
figure out how we're going to stop them from coming
after us with a guillotine. So we'll use universal basic income.
And Trump was helping to set the precedent for that
in twenty twenty with the stimulus checks as well. AI
also doesn't have to be conscious or achieve human level
intelligence in order to create chaos in our social world

(01:50:18):
and in our financial world either. This AI bubble could
do it all on its own. But where are these
people really going. There's an excellent, very very long article
that we don't have the time to go into fully
that's on the Free Thought Project that came from Unlimited
Hangout and the title of it is City States Without Limits,

(01:50:38):
Part one and this is about forty or fifty pages long.
And this is just part one, so I would highly
I'm going to try to hit some of the high
points here. But you know, the interesting thing is, when
I was putting together that AI thing about Trump's apocalypse,
there was one clip that I going to use in it,

(01:51:01):
and lancelick that and he says, no, it's basically a
bunch of robots walking down an aisle with humans and
cattle car type of things, reaching out with their hands,
and I'll show you that. It's what looks like right here, yeah,
right there. And he said, no, I think what's going
to happen is you're going to have people say, yeah,

(01:51:22):
but I want deportations. That wasn't my idea with that.
My idea with that was that that's the future for
all of us. They want to walk us up in
these cities. So they call them freedom cities, which is
what Trump calls them, where they call them smart cities
or fifteen minute cities. They want to limit us into
these different places and take everything from us. But I

(01:51:44):
agreed with them. I said, yeah, that's going to undercut
this because you've got so many people who say, well,
I agree with the goals of deportation, and so because
of that, I will go along with whatever means Trump uses.
And I said, yeah, you're right. It's that far gone
that people would actually say, no, I want that. Isn't

(01:52:06):
that kind of concerning. It concerns me when I think
about that, and I think he's absolutely right, and I
think this way people would interpret that, well, the intention
is for these city states to form a patchwork of
realms overseen by regional balance of power and a global
governance system, a multipolar world order. And so the Trump administration,

(01:52:29):
along with these Silicon Valley holigarchs, are pushing for the
construction of privatized city states. This has been something that's
been the dream of libertarians for a very long time,
going back to the eighties or nineties. There are people
who wanted to do seasteading and get into international waters
and create a floating city so they could get away
from government. I share that impulse. I would love to

(01:52:53):
get away from government myself. But when you look at
the way these people are taking that basic idpulse and
they're shifting it. When you look at the statements from
people like Curtis Jarvin, you start to see where this
is maybe heading in a direction that we don't want
to have as libertarians. New city states, some of them

(01:53:13):
being constructed from scratch, others being ceded into existing cities,
go by many names, and the US Trump has called
them freedom cities. The UN refers to them as human settlements.
The people that's the network though, started by City Kahan
and Michael Bloomberg, they call them fifteen minute cities. The

(01:53:36):
Global Parliament of mayors refers to them as resilient cities,
and the Charter Cities Institute calls them, unsurprisingly charter cities.
Some of these are already close to being completed as
smart cities. Many of these new city states, as yet undeclared,
have been given independent jurisdiction with varying degrees of autonomy

(01:53:57):
from the nation states in which they reside. The most
striking shared trait is their universal commitment to implement global
governance policy initiatives, that's the sustainable development goals that come
from the UN. To this end, many nascent city states
have already joined city based global governance networks. Some are

(01:54:18):
currently being built and so called special economic zones. Others
announced city state developments, such as Freedom Cities in the
US bear all the hallmarks of these special economic zones.
The global proliferation of the against special economic zones, I
guess we could call them says that's the that's the abbreviation,

(01:54:41):
as in Simon says or Trump says this that most
notably those residential spaces, is rapidly expanding the potential locations
for yet more city state projects. There are already thousands
of them. The notion of phasing out the purported sovereignty
of a nation state now firmly embedded in the strategies

(01:55:01):
to develop a new kind of intergovernmental structure. So, in
other words, rather than imposing this from the top down,
they might give us this global governance from the bottom
up by creating these different cities. And already when you
look at the cities, they've said, remember that Pentagon video
that I played for you. They said, Yeah, this is
where the war is going to be in the future.
You're going to have tremendous concentration of people. You're going

(01:55:26):
to have competing ethnic groups that are going to be there,
and this is where the Pentagon is going to be operating.
Trump is making that happen. The concept of a worldwide
network of privatized corporate city state kingdoms has been embraced
and is viewed as the best and most expedient method
both for enslaving humanity to a centralized digital surveillance and

(01:55:48):
a behavioral control grid and for establishing firm global governance.
And a previous two part investigation for Unlimited Hangout called
the Dark Maga Government Corporate technical that they also did
in two parts, they said, we also this is let's
see the group that does this is unlimited hangout. They said.

(01:56:10):
They explored the so called philosophy of the Dark Enlightenment,
and of course that is coming from the people in
and around Peter Teel and all the technocrats. This is
their philosophical treatise for the technocrats. The Dark Enlightenment was
a philosophical treatise first published by British political theorist and
philosopher Nick Land in twenty twelve. It incorporated the ideas

(01:56:35):
espoused by US thinker, tech entrepreneur and blogger Curtis Jarvin.
Jarvin's theories are especially loved by J. D. Vance as
a disciple of Peter Teel, maybe not disciple, as a
minion of Peter tell And so yeah, it is Curtis Jarvin.
If you want to get concerned about what the future

(01:56:57):
looks like, pay attention to what he has to say.
In The Dark Enlightenment, Land acknowledged the influence of Peter
Teal on the growth of his own ideas. Specifically, he
referenced Teal's two thousand and nine article The Education of
a Libertarian as formative. Curtis Jarvin describes Teal as quote
fully enlightened fully part of the Dark Enlightenment, This guy

(01:57:20):
who is obsessed with global governance and who is obsessed
with the Antichrist, and the idea that if you try
to get in his way, then you are the Antichrist.
A close associate of Teals and Teal's founder's fund financed
Jarvin's tech startup ventures. In essence, the Dark Enlightenment proposes

(01:57:41):
the public sector government should be replaced with a form
of private sector government. Privatized corporate realms should be ruled
by the ceo techno kings, the term that they came
up with of sovereign corporations. They call him sovcore, to
rule as dictator leaderships. The realms can then be linked

(01:58:03):
to form what Yorvin termed a patchwork of realms. In
two thousand and eight, he described his notion of the patchwork,
and he wrote, the basic idea of patchwork is that
the crappy governments we inherited from history are smashed, and
they should be replaced by a global spider web of tens,
even hundreds or thousands of sovereign independent many countries, each

(01:58:25):
governed by his own joint stock corporation without regard to
the resident's opinions without regard to the opinions of the
people that live there. See, that's the.

Speaker 5 (01:58:37):
Difference with the pesky concent of the governed.

Speaker 3 (01:58:40):
Nonsense, Yeah, that's the difference, right, I mean, I would
like to have governance broken into smaller pieces, but still
under the principles that this country was founded on, that
we are created in the image of God, and that
we have enailable rights, and that we are not beyond
freedom and dignity. These people buy into BF Skinner's behavioral

(01:59:05):
psychological controlling one thousand percent.

Speaker 5 (01:59:09):
I mean, is this fundamentally any different from the Middle
Ages system of lords and serfs? Not at all, just
a return to the old fashioned system with a brand
new coat of paint. That they call it ark enlightenment
and give it a techno coat. But it was always

(01:59:30):
inevitable that it would get to this when tech, when
weapons became more centralized, how it became centralized, so government
will naturally.

Speaker 3 (01:59:41):
Follow, That's right. As a matter of fact, they point
that out right here. I'm just about to read that
imagining what life was like for pressed peasants living in
the feudal society of medieval Europe is probably the best
way to visualize the future the darkly enlightened technocrats have
in mind for us, except they had the kind of

(02:00:01):
oversight and continual presence of government during the Middle Ages
like this technology will give them neither. They have these
new reactionary it's what they call them n r X.
They're extremely authoritarian. The Interrex model of government is disassociated

(02:00:24):
from any notion of politics as we understand it. Teal
wrote in his influential two thousand and nine article, the
objective is to quote find an escape from politics in
all of its forms. So again, this is not I
try to fit these guys into our understanding of political philosophies.

(02:00:44):
Understand they're looking for something completely different. They don't want politics,
they want dictatorships. That's where this whole analogy falls apart.
But it's an excellent article and I'd highly recommend that
you read it. But we're going to stop here and
take a break. You want to cover some of the
comments here.

Speaker 4 (02:01:00):
Let's grab Stealth Patriot and the rest. When we come back,
I want to say thank you very much, Stealth Patriot.

Speaker 3 (02:01:05):
We really do appreciate it.

Speaker 4 (02:01:06):
Again, it's contributions from listeners like y'all. Let keep us afloat.
Keep the show running, says the Trumpsters keep cheering on
the boot of the state to the face of their opponents,
not realizing that the leather has been broken in for
their face.

Speaker 3 (02:01:20):
Yeah, that's right, it's just amazing. Well, so you want
to do the comments when we come back, Yes, okay,
we're going to do that. Then we'll be right back.

Speaker 9 (02:01:29):
Folks, stay with us in.

Speaker 2 (02:04:08):
Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show, Elvis,
the Beatle.

Speaker 8 (02:04:19):
And the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the
Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 1 (02:05:35):
Analyzing the globalists next move and now the deep a nutshell.

Speaker 3 (02:05:53):
Yeah, we have Trump as very upset about the fact
that he didn't get the Nobel Prize, the Nobel Peace Prise.
This is something that he has coveted for quite some time.

Speaker 8 (02:06:03):
Well, they should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda.

Speaker 10 (02:06:06):
And have you looked to coago or I should have
gotten it four or five times.

Speaker 8 (02:06:10):
I should get it for the I would think the.

Speaker 10 (02:06:17):
Rush.

Speaker 3 (02:06:22):
And so the people are saying, Norway better watch it's
back right now. What's he going to do? Is he
going to start shooting boats out of the water or
is he going to hit him with massive tariffs? The
Nobel Prize that wasn't Trump's. Why Oslo chose a Venezuelan
rebel over a peacemaker and so this is a putin

(02:06:43):
flattery piece from RTE saying that, well, he really deserved it.
I think this person who got it, Maria Carina Machado,
one of the most prominent faces of Venezuela's opposition, was
one who was awarded the twenty twenty five Peace Prize.
The committee's language is familiar. They talked about rights, about

(02:07:05):
a peaceful transition, but the story behind it isn't. Machado's
record blends volunteer election networks with long running fights over
foreign funding. She's been getting, according to allegations, a lot
of money from the US government to overthrow Maduro, who's
a successor to Chavez, Hugo Chavez. And it's interesting that

(02:07:30):
Chavez Maduro has actually offered to try to buy off
the American government. He understands that this is not about
everybody knows it's not about drugs. It's no more about
drugs with Venezuela than it was about drugs with Canada.
This is a Trump's layer of his facade of bs

(02:07:51):
that he's always doing, this facade of false falsehoods that
he uses to do this stuff. We all understand it's
about regime change. We all understand, and furthermore that the
regime change is about the oil. They have more oil
than Saudi Arabia does. They just can't get it out
of the ground because they're communists and they can't do
anything right. And so Maduro is offering to give some

(02:08:16):
capability to the US to be mutually beneficial thing. Actually
for him, if he was actually able to get the
oil out, he nationalized the companies and he can't run them.
That's precisely what Hitler said about Stalin. He said, you know,
they're both socialists. They both wanted to have centralized command
and control of the economy eventually. But he said Stalin's

(02:08:36):
mistake was that Stalin nationalized the companies and he can't
do it. He can't run it efficiently. He said, I'm
going to leave these guys in place, and I will
then reap the benefits from that. And at the very end,
you know, if I need to, I'll take them over.
But I can effectively take them over and have these
people operate it. That is what fascism is. It's the

(02:08:56):
merger of state and government. And so the communists can't
get this done. So maybe they look at some kind
of a fascist arrangement and bring the American corporations back in.
But she has actually made a bigger offer to the US.
Apparently the award lifts a domestic struggle onto the global
stage and drops it into a fresh context. For much

(02:09:20):
of the year, chatter about a Nobel Prize for Trump
hung in the air, and the very idea of what
counts as peacemaking is once up, once again up for
debate and everywhere. So really, Trump, you know when he
wants a Nobel Peace Prize? I mean when don't you
think this is a guy who when he funds and

(02:09:40):
supplies continuing wars and Gaza and in Ukraine and then
pretends that he's the negotiator who's bringing peace. Who would
have thought that that guy would not get the Nobel Prize.
Who would have thought that a guy who is violating
international law and blowing ships out of the water would
not get the Nobel Peace Prize. Or we could look

(02:10:02):
at Afghanistan. He wants to restart that can of worms
in a fight over the BOGRAM base. Then we could
talk about the bombing of Iran and all the rest
of the things. I think he definitely deserves a Nobel
Peace Prize, don't you. Maria Karna Machado is an engineer
by training, one of the most recognizable figures in Venezuela's
opposition over the past two decades. Born in Caracas to

(02:10:25):
a family linked to an industrial group, she studied at university,
later at Venezuela's leading management school. Early exposure to the
family's business and infinity for market friendly ideas shaped her
public profile an emphasis on entrepreneurship, privatization, and integration within

(02:10:46):
global markets. In two thousand and two, she co founded
a civic platform that built volunteer networks to train election
observers and to run parallel vote counts. Now, why would
you do something like that, Well, it's because Smartmatic was
created by a few cronies of Hugo Chavez. That's where

(02:11:08):
they began in Venezuela rigging elections for him. So what
she did was she set this organization up and they
were going to run parallel vote counts because they knew
that he was rigging the elections, and then Smartmatic got
involved in one scandal after the other, accused of rigging
elections in several different Mexican states as well as Brazil,

(02:11:29):
and a huge fight over Smartmatic rigging of elections in Philippines.
This is all before any of this stuff happened in
the US, which is why I don't understand that nobody
ever talks about that. I was talking about that before
any of this stuff happened with a twenty twenty election,
and it's history, okay, And to say that there was

(02:11:49):
the people in all these different jurisdictions believed that Smartmatic
had not been an honest broker of the elections is
to make it an understatement. They've been accused of this everywhere,
but if you do it here in the US, then
supposedly you get sued or something. Well, they we never
got sued for that reporting because it's factual and historical.

(02:12:13):
So that is when the first major controversy took hold.
Authority is alleged that the group received funding from the
US based organizations. Her supporters countered that the money supported
legitimate civic initiatives, and from then on, every move that
she made in politics was viewed to the lens of
where to draw the line on outside assistance, So Maduro's

(02:12:35):
only defense was to taint her by saying she was
taking American money in a subject to American influence. That
same year, two thousand and two brought Venezuela's most dramatic
recent upheaval, the brief ouster of Hugo Chavez, but he
got back into power and then he passed that on
to Maduro. By the mid twenty tens, Machado had consolidated

(02:12:59):
her own political vehicle into a group that was that
translates the name of Vente Venezuela, which means come Venezuela.
In public, she argued for deregulation, anti corruption measures, privatization
and openness to investment, along with a peaceful transition through
elections and international monitoring of elections. Her biggest surge came

(02:13:23):
in twenty twenty three, when she won opposition primaries by
a wide margin. The ban on her running, however, remained
in force, and her team faced inspections and rest This
is basically what's going on in Germany now and also
to some degree in France. Outlawing the popular opposition to

(02:13:44):
the government. In early twenty twenty four, the opposition shifted
to a substitute candidate at Mundo Gonzalez, a career diplomat,
but she was recognized as the power behind That registration
was marred by technical snags, and the MEETA argued over
whether the campaign conditions were even handed. When the votes

(02:14:04):
were counted and the incumbent held on, several foreign governments
declined to recognize the result, and inside Venezuela, the post
election map barely moved. In other words, kind of the
same way that we do it here with gerrymandering. You
picked the congressional districts, you picked the voters, and you
basically control the outcome. After the twenty twenty four Machado

(02:14:29):
largely disappeared from public events. Her statements came via video,
with her whereabouts undisclosed. The phrase underground network took cold
and media shorthand, and supporters saw a movement that was
operating under pressure against that backdrop. The Nobel Peace Prize
elevates her biography to the international stage and carries a

(02:14:50):
long running national argument over the limits of political struggle
to a much wider audience. The Nobel Committee said that
it was honoring her for her tireless work promoting democratic
rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle
to achieve a just, peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy.
And this is happening while Trump is working to overthrow

(02:15:15):
our own constitution and the rule of law domestically as well,
so then Venezuela, the same actions that OSLO calls peaceful
resistance have been framed by officials as destabilization efforts supported
from abroad. I think she got a win to the
fact that after they rigged that election, she was the
next thing to fall, so she disappeared. She has publicly

(02:15:39):
voiced support for Washington's decision to combat Venezuela and drug
cartel's to military means, so she's by no means an
honest broker. There is no Venezuelan drug cartel that isn't running.
That is pure fiction from Trump, absolute fiction. Her statement
drew wide attention as it aligned her stance with the

(02:16:02):
US administration's tougher regional policy and blurred the boundary between
domestic composition and foreign strategy. So it may wind up
to Trump's benefit the fact that the Nobel Peace Prize
was given to her. It'll give an aura or a
facade of legitimacy to his regime change that he's involved in.

(02:16:23):
For much of the year, Washington buzzed with talk of
a Nobel prize for Trump. The President himself didn't hide
his ambition. He talked about it incessantly. As a matter
of fact, even when he brought in all the generals
and admirals from all over the world, he was telling
them how much he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Of
all the people they would know better. Also, it's just

(02:16:45):
who cares, Yeah, he does. It's his ego.

Speaker 4 (02:16:48):
It's just so again, petty, this is you got to
bring me in the room. You gotta give me the
little metal. You're gonna put the little gold star on
my paper and tell me I'm being.

Speaker 3 (02:16:58):
A good boy.

Speaker 4 (02:17:00):
I deserve it.

Speaker 3 (02:17:01):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:17:01):
It's such a petty, narcissistic feed my ego.

Speaker 3 (02:17:06):
Yeah, well, that's what he's about. That's why it really
does define him. By late twenty twenty five, the Trump
team listed seven cases whereas diplomacy had helped halt or
de escalate conflicts. And the reality is is that these
people in all these different areas say that he didn't
have anything to do with it. As a matter of fact,
I didn't play it for you because it was hard

(02:17:27):
to hear, but you could kind of hear it if
you really dialed it up and tuned in. It was
an official from Azerbaijan who was talking to Macron when
Trump was addressing the UN, and the two of them
were laughing about Trump's claim that he brought peace to
Armenia and Azerbaijan. They were laughing at him at the

(02:17:48):
UN over this claim. So the Nobel deadline fell on
January the thirty first, just eleven days after his inauguration,
meaning that most of his achievements quote unquote technically ineligible.
But that didn't stop his backers. Several world leaders and
families of Israeli hostages publicly endorsed his nomination. And again

(02:18:10):
this is sycophanic occurring of favor and flattering him. The
fact that he claims to have stopped seven wars. White
House Communication director wrote on X President Trump will continue
making peace deals, ending wars and saving lives as he
continues to send bombs to Ukraine and Israel. Yeah, the

(02:18:33):
Numbell Committee proved that they placed politics over peace, and
the Trump White House has proved that it is completely
detached from reality, but not from Trump's ego. He wanted
the prize to openly said one person, there's an unwritten rule.
The more you campaign for it, less likely you are
to get it. I can just imagine if he did

(02:18:53):
get it, he'd get up and he'd probably do that
Sally feels thing. You love me, you really love me.
It was fair. Did another mask with Jim Carrey.

Speaker 4 (02:19:05):
Jim Carrey, Yeah, I mean part of it is no
one likes a striver, no one likes someone that citizens like.
I've got to have it. You've got to give it
to me. I need this well.

Speaker 3 (02:19:15):
Abortion abortion ambition. Abortion ambition used to be a strong
disqualifier for office in America. As a matter of fact.
That was the chief criticism of Lincoln was that he
was too ambitious. And and now all of our politicians
don't try to hide their ambition. You know, it used
to be in the past, you know you would wait

(02:19:36):
and say, well, you'd at least try to keep the
pretense that you were reluctantly pushed into this race, and
you were you're not running for office, you were standing
for office. Now these people are desperately sprinting for it
where they're driving ferraris that were paid for by foreign
corporations and governments. So August eighth, Trump mediated the signing

(02:19:59):
of an a history piece agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan
at the White House, formerly ending their decades long conflict
over Nigorno Karabakh and establishing normalized relations, although neither nation
has ratified, it is for show. In May five, Trump

(02:20:20):
claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan,
though India maintains the truce was achieved directly through bilateral
military channels without any third party involvement, and that would
include Trump. And then there's no mention of the fact
that he threatens to restart the Afghanistan War over Bagram

(02:20:42):
Air Force Base in Afghanistan. So again, these seven things
are just as fraudulent as his claims about insurrection and
rebellion in the US. Look Out Norway, the Nobel snub
for Trump leads to concerns he bombed them while he
assassinates some leaders, will he impose confiscatory tariffs on them.

(02:21:06):
Norway is bracing for Trump's reaction if he does not
win the Nobel Prize. Said The Guardian. Again, the Guardian
is not necessarily your most reliable source in terms of Trump.
They hate him incessantly and they let that take over
their judgment, stating that the US president may impose tariffs,

(02:21:27):
demand higher NATO contributions, or even declare Norway to be
an enemy, according to reports in The Guardian. But one
user said, how dare them? Tariffs on Norway is now unstoppable.
But he can also hurt them in many different economic ways.
And so this is from Judge Napolitano Andrew Napolitano, and

(02:21:53):
it is titled when Presidents Kill And let's just understand
that's what these guys are about about. It's what Bush
was about, both of them. That's what Trump is about Clinton,
all of them. You know, is it worth it to
kill a half a million kids with sanctions? Oh? Yeah
it was. But what Napolitano is talking about here is

(02:22:14):
even more direct action, which Trump is very proud of.
During the past six weeks, Trump has ordered the US
troops to attack and destroy four speedboats in the Caribbean Sea,
fifteen hundred miles from the US. The president revealed that
the attacks were conducted without warning, were intended not to stop,
but to kill all persons on board, and that they

(02:22:36):
succeeded in their missions. He apparently believes, because these folks
are presumably foreigners, that they have no rights and that
he must honor, and that they have no rights that
he has to honor, and that he may freely kill them.
As far as we know, none of these nameless, faceless
persons was charged or convicted of any federal crime. We

(02:22:57):
don't know if any of them were Americans, but we
do know that all of them were extra judicially executed.
And I've had people even on this program leave comments
and saying, don't talk to me about rights for foreigners. Well,
what we're talking about are rights. The concept of rights
in America are based on the idea that we are
created in the image of God. And guess what, people

(02:23:18):
who don't have US citizenship are created in the image
of God. And if we allow our government to kill
people created in the image of God, they will eventually
kill you without any judicial process as well. Can the
president legally do this in a word, No, Here's the backstory.
The Constitution was ratified to establish federal powers and to

(02:23:41):
limit them. Congress is established to write the laws and
to declare war. The president is established to enforce the
laws that Congress has written, and to be commander in
chief of the armed forces if they have declared a war.
Restraints are imposed on both. Congress may only enact legislation
in the sixteen discreete areas of governance articulate in the Constitution,

(02:24:04):
and it may only legislate subject to all persons natural
rights identified and articulated in the Bill of Rights. The
President may only enforce the laws that Congress has written.
He cannot craft his own, and he may employ the
military only in defense of a real, imminent style attack
or to fight wars that Congress has declared. The Fifth

(02:24:27):
Amendment assures that no person's life, liberty, or property may
be taken without due process of law. Because the drafters,
and listen to this, for all of you who say
foreigners don't have rights and should not be given due process,
just do whatever you want to to them. Because the
drafters of the Amendment use the word person rather than citizen,

(02:24:49):
the courts have ruled consistently this due process requirement is
applicable to all human beings. Wherever the government goes, it
is subject to constitutional restraints as it should be. And
this is not just a legal detail that is here.
As I said before, think of the principle. If you're
going to allow the government to do this kind of

(02:25:11):
stuff to people who are foreign citizens, the government will
eventually do it to you in the United States. And
we don't want to have that kind of thing. We
need to keep it restraint on the government. The most
dangerous thing to your life and to your liberty is
an unrestrained government, and the purpose of the Constitution was
to restrain them. That's the Bill of Rights is really about.

(02:25:32):
And we ignore that to our own detriment. These things
will come back around on us if we are not careful. Traditionally,
due process means a trial, and the case of a civilian,
it means a jury trial. In the case of enemy combatants,
it means a fair and neutral tribunal. The tribunal requirement

(02:25:53):
came about in an odd and terrifying way. In nineteen
forty two, four Nazi troops arrived via submarine at the
Amagansett Beach, New York and exchanged their uniforms for civilian garb.
At nearly the same time, four other Nazi troops arrived
via submarine at Ponteverda Beach, Florida, and they also donned

(02:26:13):
civilian clothing. All eight of them set about their assigned
task of destroying American munitions factories. After one of them
went to the FBI, all eight of them were arrested.
FDR panicked and ordered all eight summarily executed, even the
guy who went to the FBI. When two of the

(02:26:33):
eight protested in perfect English that they were born in
the US and their protests proved to be accurate, FDR
decided to appoint a council for all of them and
to hold a trial. At trial, all eight were convicted
of attempting sabotage behind enemy lines, even including the guy
who became an informant. That is a war crime. In

(02:26:56):
Supreme Court quickly returned to Washington from its summer vacation
and unanimously upheld the convictions. By the time the court
issued its formal opinion, however, six of the eight had
already been executed wait for the Supreme Court to weigh
in on this. The two Americans were sentenced to life

(02:27:16):
in prison, and it's not clear as to whether not
the informant was an American or not. Their sentences were
commuted five years later by Harry Truman when the war ended.
The lynch pinned to all of this was FDR's decision
to appoint council and to have a trial. The Supreme
Court made it clear that even on lawful enemy combatants,
those out of uniform and not on a recognized battlefield

(02:27:39):
are entitled to due process, But for the trial afforded
to the Nazi saboteurs, it would not have permitted their executions.
So this jurisprudence was essentially followed in three Supreme Court
cases involving foreign persons whom the George W. Bush administration
had arrested and characterizes as enemy combatants and attained in Gitmo.

(02:28:03):
In wartime, US troops can lawfully kill enemy troops that
are engaged in violence against them, but pursue it. To
these Supreme Court cases, the UN Charter and the Treaty
that the US wrote, as well as the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, another treaty that the US wrote,
if combatants are not engaged in violence, they may not

(02:28:24):
be harmed, but only arrested. All this presumes that Congress
has in fact declared war on the country or the
group from which the combatants come from, and that hasn't
happened since December eighth, nineteen forty one. Now back to
Trump ordering the military to kill foreigners in the Caribbean.
International law provides for stopping ships engaged in violence in

(02:28:46):
international waters. It also provides for stopping and searching ships
with probable cause for the search in U s territorial waters,
but no law permits, and the prevailing judicial jurisprudence deriving
from the Constitution and federal statutes absolutely prohibits the summary

(02:29:07):
murder of folks not engaged in violence on the high
seas or anywhere else. And this is not just Judge
Apollo Tano saying this. This has been said by the
chief judges of the military and various administrations, both Democrat
and Republican. Republican have come out and opposed this and
said this is an international war crime what Trump is doing.

(02:29:29):
The American General, I'm sorry. The Attorney General has reluctantly
revealed the existence of a legal memorandum proposing to justify
Trump's orders and the military's killings, but she insisted that
the memorandum is classified. So think about this, she says,
Pambondi again, I agree with the assessment. Perhaps the worst

(02:29:52):
attorney general of my life is now saying that, well,
there may not be any illegal authority for this, but
as Attorney General, I've given him a memorandum that allows
him to do this, but you can't see it because
it's classified in its secret Neapolitano says, a legal memorandum
can only be based on public laws enacted by Congress

(02:30:14):
and interpreted by the courts. There are no secret laws.
There can be no classified rationale for killing the legally innocent,
and they are legally innocent until you have given them
due process. If the memorandum purports to permit the president
to declare non violent enemy combatants on a whim and

(02:30:35):
kill them, it is in defiance of eighty years of
consistent jurisprudence, and its drafters and executors have engaged in
serious criminality. Where will these extra judicial killings go next
to Chicago? You know he's giving himself. He's not just
giving him self, folks, these powers. He's giving these powers

(02:30:57):
to the next Biden, to the next Obama, to the
next Hillary Clinton. That's who Trump is giving these powers to.
For all of you who think that the end justifies
the means, I'm telling you, that's the end. The end
is that he's giving these powers to some future Democrat
to do this too. You how do you feel about that?

(02:31:17):
Trump has said that the US is at war with
drug cartels, but is Congress on board? And this is
an interview back and forth between on World Radio between
the host their Myrna Brown, and a guest who is
being interviewed, Carolina Lumetta.

Speaker 5 (02:31:39):
We have a ton of comments if you want to
get to that before you move on to another.

Speaker 3 (02:31:43):
Yeah, let's do that. Let's do that. Thank you, go ahead, Travis.

Speaker 4 (02:31:47):
That's right, Jim's seven. Thank you very much, appreciate it
says whatever happened to Greenland? The first smokescreen of the
forty seven admin.

Speaker 3 (02:31:55):
Well, yeah, I played my little Greenland thing there, But
that's got Charlie Kirkson, So I imagine I would be
arrested and putting get mo putting that up. Now.

Speaker 4 (02:32:04):
My personal conspracy theory is Greenland doesn't exist. It never
existed at all. It's just a useful tool they trot
out every once in a while to make you think
there's a greenland.

Speaker 3 (02:32:14):
Well, it's a lie. Greenland is covered in ice. It's
Iceland that's green.

Speaker 4 (02:32:20):
Greenland is covered ice, and Iceland is very nice.

Speaker 3 (02:32:23):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:32:23):
Real Jason Barker. COVID lockdown, shut down small businesses, and
the tariffs are now going for the medium sized producers.
It's a one two punch for consolidation. I'm going to
make sure there's no business is left aside from the
major players Yibaru twenty twenty nine. Once Bill Gates has
stolen enough farmland, the only food being produced will be
coming out of Bill Gates's bug factories. You will eat

(02:32:46):
zibugs Jerry Altalo. Many stock market experts have called for
banning Wall Street bets, shorts, puts, et cetera, which only
win when particular company stocks decrease in value.

Speaker 3 (02:32:56):
Yeah, it's the it's those those stocks, put and shorts
and things like that that turn it into a gambling market.
You know, if you think of it as investing in
a company that you think is going to grow, then
you don't really understand how this whole system works. So
that's the shorts and the puts that turn it into
a casino.

Speaker 4 (02:33:18):
Real Jason Barker says, I do land, guns, ammo, food seeds.

Speaker 3 (02:33:22):
Et cetera.

Speaker 4 (02:33:23):
Skills are a great investment as well hand tools, AMMO
reload set up. There are many ways to set yourself
up outside the dollar. Pray about it, and God will
let you know what to do. Yes, Yeah, Guard Goldsmith says,
great point, Travis, That's one of the mistakes my family
made early with collectible coins. The collectible side shuts down
when the economy tanks, so it's better to buy the

(02:33:43):
metals or junk silver Nibaru twenty twenty nine. Bush Reagan's
nineteen seventy nine nineteen eighty campaign. So logan was let's
make America great again. Trump's nothing more than a plagiarizing grifters,
too lazy to even make his.

Speaker 3 (02:33:56):
Own I was absolutely amazed. You know, when he ran
the first time, How in the world can he try
to copyright that right? Because he was suing people that
merchandise stuff. So that's other people. I've said that for
the longest time.

Speaker 4 (02:34:07):
Yeah, Stealth Patriot says, invest in a lot of lead.
That's right. Make sure that you are able to protect yourself.
You want to be able to defend yourself, and you
want to know how to do that. You can get
the Civil Defense Manual. Volumes one and two at jacklosson
books dot com. It'll teach you not just about defending yourself,

(02:34:28):
but how to prepare, find water, find food, that sort
of thing, and work as a community. So Civil Defense Manual,
jacklosson books dot com. Yes, Trucker Chris for the win.
Imagine laws that prevent any APAC funded candidates being allowed
to participate in electoral politics. Well, anybody that tried to
put forward that law would get shot.

Speaker 3 (02:34:47):
Yeah, listen along that line. I've got a thing about
APAC actually using barcodes for politicians.

Speaker 11 (02:34:55):
Initially, I resented the fact that there was no appreciation
for nuance. If you asked any questions about any decision
of the Israeli government in any place regarding settlements, regarding gaza,
regard whatever you were, like, you had deviated from the script,
and I just in any policy area, I had resentment

(02:35:16):
over that. And then I saw the way the APAC
worked and that that was weird for like a country
lawyer like me. I remember my first a pack reception,
and like your fundraiser tells you you have to go,
and your chief of staff deals you have to go.
Your committee chairman, I'll tell you have to go and
you get there and you wear this name badge and
I remember there's.

Speaker 4 (02:35:36):
A QR code on it.

Speaker 11 (02:35:37):
And what we were supposed to do was go talk
to donors and then if they liked you, they scanned
your QR code to make a donation, like on the spot.
And so this you act you have de moralizing. That
is to be told that your job for the next
several hours to go chat people up hoping they would
scan you like a can of tomato soup. On the

(02:35:58):
way out of the meeting.

Speaker 2 (02:36:00):
It's like, I'm literally purchasing, right.

Speaker 3 (02:36:03):
I love that.

Speaker 11 (02:36:03):
And I was like, Wow, that is so freaking weird.

Speaker 3 (02:36:06):
And then now you know why he didn't make it
into the administration because I guess they didn't like to
didn't scan his barcode or whatever at apack enough. Yeah,
isn't that amazing? Weird?

Speaker 5 (02:36:18):
Demoralizing, These aren't the words I would use. Disgusting, repulsive,
These are more what describe this act of open corruption,
convenience market to buy politicians.

Speaker 3 (02:36:35):
Well, I've said for the longest time that the politicians
ought to be forced to dress like NASCAR drivers. Well,
your sponsors are listed on your uniform, right that your
your suit should be all over that, you know, and
who's paying for it. But this is a step beyond that.
This is I'm literally a can of soup that they're

(02:36:57):
going to buy if they like it, if I make
enough promises for what I'll do for Israel and they
send me the money.

Speaker 4 (02:37:02):
I'm just imagining a Jewish couple, would you like anything
from the store on my way home? Pick me up?
A senator too, you know.

Speaker 3 (02:37:10):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (02:37:10):
And of course, the one time we saw someone trying
to push back on something similar to this was Frank
Nicely trying to prevent out of state money coming into
state elections. Yeah, and of course that didn't get passed,
and then he had a massive amount of out of
state money flooding in supporting his opponent in the next election.

Speaker 3 (02:37:31):
Yeah. If you go against the corruption, the corruption goes
against jew that's not works. And then you are then
a former politician, so.

Speaker 4 (02:37:38):
You don't get to last long if you're a man
of integrity, that's right. Chev Ken says, no caeso, no cheese,
question Mark.

Speaker 3 (02:37:46):
Yeah, that's that's the joke.

Speaker 4 (02:37:47):
I don't I don't understand how that's supposed to be funny.
I guess it's just like they're stupid.

Speaker 3 (02:37:52):
Ha ha, no komprendo.

Speaker 4 (02:37:53):
Yeah, see no comprende god Ender Goldsman. So they are saying,
no cheese, no chie, leave it to Maga to lumber
through even on AI production. Yeah, let's yeah. I truly
do not understand how it's supposed to be humorous a
real Octose book. It is all chipping away rights in
the war on American citizens. We can only expect more. Yeah,

(02:38:18):
we have a Syrian girl sad to see this happening
to what was a great nation in our time, right
before our eyes.

Speaker 3 (02:38:25):
Real quick.

Speaker 4 (02:38:25):
Another thing about that AI video is just it's not
funny on any level. No people get pepper spray routinely.
You could at least go like an absurdist route, like
you know, a tank drives up and vaporizes the person.
You know, that could at least be somewhat humorous in
the sense of, oh, they've gone over the top, this
is ridiculous. But no, it's just the cop pulls out
pepper spray. It's like you can watch a video of this,

(02:38:47):
a real video.

Speaker 3 (02:38:47):
I don't like what you're saying. Yeah, I remember years
ago when you had the it was on the Berkeley
campus in California over the top. Just they did a
set in and you have this guy who comes home
with pepper spray and just walks spring them in the face.
I mean that's real. And now you know the right
is cheering that they like that. I'm disgusted by that.

(02:39:08):
I'm disgusted by these maga people. One and a half
million likes. Just amazing the Syrian girls. Sad to see
this happening to what was a great nation in our time,
right before our eyes, on our watch, yea, says David.
Most voters for Trump voted in abject fear of having
La La and Obama in charge of the new regime.
Most are not maga. Well yeah, but there's one a

(02:39:30):
half million people who like this force that's going to
be used by Democrats against us. I mean, this isn't
even projection this. We've already seen this happen with January
the sixth. These people will never learn. The ones that
it happened to are cheering this on to have it
happen again.

Speaker 5 (02:39:47):
Yeah, and I bring this up frequently, and whenever I
mentioned it, I always see comments pushing back against it.
But we need to get rid of first past the
post voting, that's what causes this whole thing. It was, oh, well,
they just voting because they didn't want to have Lalla,
and that would be even worse because you know it's
down to the two of them with ranked choice. I
see comments whenever I mentioned it saying, oh, it's easier

(02:40:09):
to rig. The thing is, there are just elections that
are ranked choice, so it's possible to do it. And
they are already rigging the first past the post, so
it's not like that's going to prevent.

Speaker 3 (02:40:21):
Well, and the rigging lance starts not with the voting,
not with counting the votes. The rigging begins with ballot access.
I can tell you fighting that they do everything they
can to keep you out of the ballots. If they
can't keep you off the ballots, then they keep you
out of the debates and they don't have debates, which
is what we saw with Trump this last time. Democrats
inoculated him against any criticism from fellow Republicans. He didn't

(02:40:44):
have to go to the debates because you know, he
was the he was unfairly being attacked by them, and
he was unfairly attacked by them, So what what did
he do to us in twenty twenty. That's the thing.
I look at it, and I understand people voting in
fear against La La and Biden and that type of thing.
But let me say that I think that the most

(02:41:06):
dangerous person is the person who gets behind you in
order to stab you in the back. And that's one
of the reasons why they were going to have some
summary execution of these spies who came in to sabotage infrastructure.
And they were in civilian clothing. You know, spies are
killed right away. Soldiers in uniform we try to have

(02:41:27):
along with the Geneva Convention, we try to accommodate them
because they're coming at you in a uniform, and so
we treat them in a different way than we treat spies.
And I consider the people who stabbed us in the back,
Trump and all of his people in twenty twenty, I
consider them to be saboteurs and spies, not enemy combatants.

(02:41:48):
The Democrats are enemy combatants, and yeah, they ought to
be shot on the battlefield. But the more dangerous columns
that are out there is the fifth column that's inside
the city. It's not the fourth columns are coming at you,
but it's the fifth column that's inside the city that
you think is on your side. That's the problem with Trump.

Speaker 5 (02:42:09):
Yeah, So what I was saying about the voting is
it always comes down to that with controlled candidates from
the major parties, when you have first past the post,
there's a turn grade. I forget what it is, but
it's someone's law that it will always boil down to this.
It's inevitable. There's an even better style of voting called,

(02:42:31):
I believe it's approval voting, where you just give each
candidate up to a certain number of points and then
just total up the points, which would be just as
easy to do highly up the votes as the existing
first past the post.

Speaker 3 (02:42:48):
Well, I agree, And when you look at if you
want to get rid of first past the post, you
have more than two parties. If you only have two parties,
you're always going to have first past the post.

Speaker 5 (02:42:57):
But first past the post means that it will always
be down to two parties because if you have a
third party, then it's going to everyone who would vote
for that are instead going to vote for the one
that's more likely to win. Of the two big parties.

Speaker 3 (02:43:11):
You have to make sure they've got a majority, and
so that's what you see in a parliamentary system where
they allow multiple parties. We don't allow multiple parties here
in the United States. The Democrats and Republicans have got
so much power and corruption that they shut that down
a long long time ago in America. But if you've
got multiple parties, whoever wins has to put together a
coalition government, and so there's some restraint on that. But yeah,

(02:43:35):
let's go ahead and finish these.

Speaker 4 (02:43:36):
Ibrew twenty twenty nine. Throughout history, every eighty to ninety
years has been a great human culing on the planet.
The last was in the nineteen forties. Do the math
tunnel Lord when three three seven It is also saying
that your speech can be silenced when they support those
Ai videos. That's right, Audi mur Maga cultists are cheering
on martial law for themselves.

Speaker 3 (02:43:58):
They'll get it.

Speaker 4 (02:43:59):
I'm Marty says, well that chi Apocalypse divid be uploaded
separately so they can be copied and pasted.

Speaker 3 (02:44:03):
Yeah, you should post on time. Oh well, yeah, we'll
put that up on Twitter after the show.

Speaker 4 (02:44:08):
First we had Chirac announce the Chai Apocalypse px MAC.
The media wants civil war. It's losing control of the narrative.
I'm Marty Trump blamed Biden's fi for J six infiltration.
Trump forgot he was still pres on that day Trumps
entered the Bidenheimer's zone. It's utterly ridiculous. Just either he's

(02:44:30):
completely ineffective and couldn't root out the problem people in
his administration and as such, you know, he's not worth
having in or he's part of their team and the
Trump people are completely incapable of seeing that. Chevkin says
Biden FBI Trump really is senile. Px mac says Gaza cities,

(02:44:52):
open air prisons duged a double O seven. We could
even call them reservations.

Speaker 3 (02:44:57):
That's right. Yeah, that's why I talk about that. You know,
when you look at concentration camps, as I've said, didn't
start with the Nazis. It started with the American government
and the Indians. That's exactly what all this stuff is. Yeah,
it just keeps coming back around because human nature doesn't change,
and so politics fundamentally doesn't change either.

Speaker 4 (02:45:17):
That's a That's another thing so many people don't understand
is that human nature is inherently sinful. It's inherently bad,
and you cannot trust people with power. Yeah, you have
to continually any power you give them, you have to
watch them with it. And it's just if you don't
understand that, you cannot be trusted with politics. Niberu twenty

(02:45:40):
twenty nine. Social engineers are masters of hurting Sheeple Unlimited
Hangout series. The PayPal presidency is extremely informative.

Speaker 3 (02:45:50):
Yeah, they'd do good work, and it's very very detail,
very detail.

Speaker 4 (02:45:53):
Niberu twenty twenty OUTI MRR police need to wake up.
The predator's class plans do not include them. Yeah, that's
the thing. I've always said that if these people, you know,
the elite whatever you want to call the mega rich,
were to succeed in their goal of basically getting rid
of all of us, they would immediately start plotting against
each other. They cannot stand other people. They want to

(02:46:15):
be the only person left. Jerry Alatalo Trump administration, arch technocrats, Musk, Teal, Vance,
Jarvin Sex Andresen Kratzios, Lutnik Ellison combine it worth one
point two trillion dollars PX smack funny how evil people
always reverse the intent of their objectives.

Speaker 5 (02:46:35):
What worries me about Teal saying how much he opposes
the Antichrist.

Speaker 3 (02:46:42):
Yeah, it's like Trump saying that he opposes a globalist,
isn't it the thing? He is a globalist, and you
know it's teal is as in terms of conduct is
the Antichrist.

Speaker 4 (02:46:57):
It's truly amazing, just.

Speaker 5 (02:47:01):
The old Patriot Act double thing for his peace.

Speaker 3 (02:47:05):
I love this Nobel War Prize. That's why he deserves that.
They got that. Well, he's able to change the defense departments.
Maybe he can get the Nobel people to change their
name and give him a prize after all, right, you
can get the Nobel War Prize.

Speaker 4 (02:47:17):
Maybe you can get a participation in the Nobel Prize
or something.

Speaker 3 (02:47:21):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:47:22):
Karen Carpenter twenty seven. Good to see you, Karen Carpenter.
I hope you're doing well. Technology such as the television
was used as a weapon from its beginning.

Speaker 3 (02:47:30):
The difference is is that when you look at, you know,
the newspapers. Of course, what was it hersh said that
he could deliver a war for Wilson and did, And
so you look at the propaganda that comes from the newspapers.
And then when they started doing radio made it much
more powerful, and when they started doing television more powerful.
Still now with the Internet, which was designed by a

(02:47:54):
DARPAT psychologist. They are not only able to reach people
with their own propaganda like this and you know, as
a joke or whatever, but they're able to measure your
response to that and fine tunate. That's what the Internet
has brought to them, the ability and of course AI
as well, the ability to not only give you the propaganda,

(02:48:15):
but to know if you saw it, and to know
if you agree with it or disagree with it, so
they can find tunate. That's what's made it so dangerous.

Speaker 4 (02:48:23):
And of course Karen Carpenter is part of Knights of
the Storm. You can find yeah, all that infot Knights
of the Storm dot com. They have a great resource
there for finding out when all the friendly shows O
whether it's nice of the Storm this one or Guard's
Liberty conspiracy. You can find that on Knights of the
Storm dot com. Hero May says Nobel War Prize. That's right,

(02:48:44):
Trump Berger, he would have definitely won if they had
a category for mass death. Christian kNs social conservative. Trump
said that she told him he deserved the prize. Has
that been confirmed? Well, she's sucking up?

Speaker 3 (02:48:58):
Well, I would yes, that would be true, that she
is herself in a position of being a US agent.
If she's going to suck up to him and publicly
say that these shootings of these boats under the allegation
that it's part of a war against a drug cartel,
that is absolutely fault. Since she's going to lie about that,
she should lie to him and flatter him. Putin is

(02:49:19):
flattering him in terms of this Nobel Prize stuff, and
so anybody that wants a thing from him, they know
how to get to him, is flattery.

Speaker 4 (02:49:31):
His ego makes him very easy to manipulate one way
or the other. You know how he'll react. The real
octo spook. When you have to disguise taxes on Americans,
lie and call them foreign tariffs, you respect for the
tariff is already non existent. Yep, real octos. Pok Obama
proved the Nobel Peace Prize is a worthless pos Trump
deserves it. That's right up there in good company.

Speaker 3 (02:49:56):
Mike Wendel just lost his suit. I guess smart Mac
got's I'm sorry to He seems like a nice guy,
even though he's unbelievably naive. I think he is genuine,
and I think he's been fooled into this. One person says,
you can see that he's screaming into that pillow. I
feel sorry for him. He had a tough life and
he overcame with my pillow, and then he got completely

(02:50:18):
suckered in by all this Trump stuff, and so I
do feel sorry for him. I felt sorry for the
January to six people. I don't think they deserved what
was done to them, and many of them still don't
understand it. I wonder if Mike Lindell still understands it.

Speaker 4 (02:50:31):
Yeah, who knows? Christian cons social Conservative. A criminal network
known as the Gartel of the Suns operates in Venezuela,
though it is not a cartel in the conventional sense. Instead,
the term refers to a loose, decentralized network of corrupt
military and political officials who facilitate drug trafficking and other
criminal activities.

Speaker 3 (02:50:48):
I don't know if that's true or not. Quite. Frankly,
the Cartel of the son sounds, I mean like an
invention of the government. As a matter of fact, I've
reported that many people have said that it's kind of
interesting that trend Arugra or whatever, the trendy gang. Yeah,
an invention of the American government to start with, and

(02:51:08):
Remember they created the Mujahadeen, which is also al Qaeda
and ISIS and all the rest of the stuff in
this Al Nusra gang that is killing Christians and everybody
in Syria. So our government does that kind of thing,
So it should always be a possibility with you and
all this stuff about cartel the sons is a narrative

(02:51:29):
that was created by the Trump administration to create a
justification for what they're criminally and illegally doing. Their gang
of thugs. That's all you need to know. The gang
of thugs is in Washington.

Speaker 4 (02:51:43):
Right, Audi mrre responding to Christian Constitutional Conservative says there's
a map that indicates where drugs come from, and that
part of the world. Venezuela is not where the drugs
are coming from.

Speaker 3 (02:51:52):
Right, everybody understands that.

Speaker 4 (02:51:54):
Yeah, Audi Mr. R BB basically said that terrorists attack
will happen in New York, Austin, mar Lago and others.
It will be Israel doing it, but they will blame iron.
A blind man can see this coming from a mile away. Absolutely,
Irs machine gun, Thank you very much, we appreciate it.
Wonder if Trump has looked on Pam's desk for his
Nobel prize.

Speaker 3 (02:52:16):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:52:16):
There's a lot of stuff on that desk. Maybe it
just got lost Niberu twenty twenty nine. There's thousands of
secret laws written into the CIA, into the ACA. Ohbamba care. Yeah,
they have to pass him to see what's in it.
But then they don't ever bother going back and checking.
I don't want to read that. That's boring Niberu twenty
twenty nine. Again, don't buy her Ammo from Walmart, Dix

(02:52:38):
or cal Ranch. There's others as well. All three report
Amo sales to the FEDS by using cash only. Credit
card NAMO purchases are also reported. Audi Mr Trump is
banking on an ice agent or National Guard soldier injury
or worse by member of the public. He needs that
one event to get his Insurrection Act agenda to the
next phase. They may stage one.

Speaker 3 (02:52:58):
Yeah, yes, okay, well we got one more and read.

Speaker 4 (02:53:03):
That one a miller one two three. Evil is evil.
There is no two party system. They're all on the
same team. You only get to vote to make you
think you are contributing.

Speaker 3 (02:53:12):
That's right. Let's talk about this before we take a break,
because we're getting close to the end of the show
and I did want to talk about this. We got
a Tennessee man who has been arrested in connection to
a Charlie Kirk social media post. Arrested folks, and he's
being held under massive bail. What was it, two million dollars?

Speaker 5 (02:53:30):
I think he got two million dollars bail for yeah, tweet,
a joke.

Speaker 3 (02:53:34):
A joke, and it is quite clear what is going on.
He quoted President Trump, and because he put up a
meme that quoted President Trump, they are they came after him.
They said, well, you know, we can't arrest somebody for
hating Charlie Kirk, but we can pretend that you're threatening
a school, which is what they did. A Tennessee man
is the first to be arrested for social media posts

(02:53:54):
made regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And again, when
we look at this, Charlie Kirk was about going to
these places and engaging in debate and standing for the
First Amendment. If he was about anything that was I'm
my disagreements to Charlie Kirk. I have a lot of
disagreements with Charlie Kirk. I've chosen not to go into
them right at this moment, but I got to say

(02:54:16):
that these people who are their virtue signaling to their
base that Charlie Kirk is the be all and end all,
and we're going to punish anybody that says anything negative
about him. They are the antithesis of what the guy did,
and that's what we're seeing here. Larry Bouchart, sixty one,
from Lexington, Tennessee, is a former police officer, and he

(02:54:40):
was arrested September twenty second and charged with threats of
mass violence on school property and activities after posting a
photo and Facebook comments of a Perry County community group page.
The sheriff there told the Tennessee And that statement the
participants on the page were planning to host a Charlie
Kirk vigil. Bouchard posted multiple photos in the comments referencing

(02:55:05):
Charlie Kirk's death, which the sheriff said were hate memes,
but he said, well, they're not against the law, and
we would have to recognize that as free speech, So
we twisted something else that he had to say. One image, however,
caught their attention. In it, you have Trump saying we've
got to get over it. And this was a direct

(02:55:25):
quote from Trump. After a January twenty twenty four school
shooting in Perry, Iowa that left one dead and seven wounded.
So after school shooting, Trump said We've got to get
over it. And that school shooting was in Perry, Iowa.
Now this is Perry High School in Perry County, Tennessee.
And so Bouchard's picture consists of an image of Trump

(02:55:47):
along with a quote ofttributed to Trump on the Perry
High School mass shooting one day after. But it doesn't
have the state of Iowa there. It doesn't say Perry, Iowa.
It just says and it's Trump, and it says we've
got to get over it. Now, how is we've got
to get over it? How is that a threat to

(02:56:07):
do violence to a school? So the school just to recap,
the school has got a memorial or some kind of
Charliekirk event that's coming up, and he's saying, you know
this is you got to move on or whatever. Stop
making so much out of this. I don't know what
the other posts are about. But then he puts up
a quote from Trump saying we got to get over it,

(02:56:29):
and that was Trump talking about people being killed at
a school. So because of that, now this sheriff has
construed that as grounds for arresting him. The photo is
topped with a phrase this seems relevant today, like maybe
you should get over this and move on. A cross
referencing of the photo done by the Tennessee and found.

(02:56:50):
This image has been posted numerous times across multiple social
media platforms not connected with Bouchart, going back to twenty
twenty four. He did not craft this thing specifically for
this event, because that's the other thing they're saying. They said, well, okay, there,
you can see it right there, Donald Trump on the
Perry High School mass shooting one day after we got

(02:57:12):
to get over it. Now, that picture. He did not
create that meme. But they're coming back and saying, well,
because you said Perry in a high school, that we
think that you're referring to our Perry High School. No,
it's been put all over the internet.

Speaker 5 (02:57:28):
Arrested and in jail with two million dollars bail for
posting this.

Speaker 3 (02:57:33):
Yeah, isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing? So Bouchard posted
the picture to indicate or to make the audience think
that it was referencing our Perry High School. Said this, Sheriff,
this sheriff needs to be defeated. This led teachers, parents
and students to conclude that he was talking about a
hypothetical shooting at one of our schools. Well, then that's

(02:57:55):
on them. If they're that stupid, you can't start arresting
people because stupid people are offended by something that is
not about them at all. Investigators believe that Bouchart was
fully aware of the fear that his post would cause
and intentionally sought to create hysteria within the community. No,
that is not the case at all. What he's saying

(02:58:17):
is move on from this stuff. Why keep going back
to the wall For Charlie Kirk. Waves of firings and
suspensions have already occurred across the country in connection with
the individual's social media posts about Kirk, as conservative politicians
and influencers pushed for a crackdown. I'll say this a
crackdown on free speech. A Phoenix sportswriter, a University of

(02:58:40):
Mississippi faculty member, school employees in Idaho, Indiana, South Carolina,
emergency workers, a theater professor, and other university employees in Tennessee,
and US Marine Corps recruiter and many more have been
among the professionals fired and suspended or put on leave
over social media posts that some found offensive. These comments

(02:59:02):
are protected free speech, although the First Amendment does not
annoculate people against actions that private employers would take. But
Bouchard's situation is unique. He was charged under a state
law that was passed in July twenty twenty four that
makes it a class eve felony to make threats against schools.

(02:59:22):
And this is a really bad law that we have
here in Tennessee. The law, which has faced accusations of
being overbroad in its language, has ensnared many. During the
twenty twenty four fiscal year, five hundred and eighteen children
in Tennessee were arrested with this law, and seventy one
of the children were between the ages of seven and eleven.

(02:59:42):
Do they really think that these kids are threatening the school?
But that's the way it's been used, and that's being
used against the guy because he criticized an event, said
you need to get over it, and he was quoting
President Trump using a meme that he didn't even create.
This is how bad things are. Does don't support any
of the Bill of Rights. Thank you for joining us

(03:00:14):
the common man. They created common core and dumbed down
our children. They created common past, track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(03:00:34):
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

(03:00:58):
It's time to turn that around out and expose what
they want to hide. Please share the information and links
you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2115: Trump Tariffs Destroying American Farmers

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2115: Trump Tariffs Destroying American Farmers

Stuff You Should Know