Mon Episode #2149: Trump’s Military Is Killing Without Proof, or Accountability

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:45):
How the clock strikes thirteen, It's Monday, the one of December.
You have our Lord twenty twenty five. Well, today we're
going to talk about should they call it instead of
the war Department, maybe the Department of murder, because that's.

Speaker 3 (00:58):
What he is doing.

Speaker 2 (01:01):
And he has one analyst said, and I think is
absolutely right. This is worse than a war crime. And
many people are pointing out there is no statute of limitations. Yes,
if they do it now, Trump can pardon Pete, but
there's no statute of limitations.

Speaker 3 (01:19):
And Pete Hegseth, who's.

Speaker 2 (01:21):
Running around talking about Christian nationalism at the same time
he is committing openly committing murder.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
What I reproach to christ?

Speaker 2 (01:29):
He is where's his accountability partner in this church they
planned in DC.

Speaker 3 (01:35):
It's amazing.

Speaker 2 (01:36):
And we talk about the other side of this, the
blowback aftermath when we go to these unnecessary, undeclared wars
and we create groups like this double O group, the
Zeros and Afghanistan, we create James Bond like Afghan killer teams.
The CIA does we're gonna explain to you what that was.

(01:58):
We'll be right back well over the weekend. I hope
you had a pleasant Thanksgiving. I'm going to come in
here firing guns at these murderers. We'll talk about Thanksgiving

(02:19):
in a moment, but before we get to that, this
is just amazing to me. I got to say, not
in my name, not in the name of Christ, which, again,
what offends me as much as anything else, is how
Pete hegseth. Where's his brand of Christianity? Literally on his sleeves,

(02:39):
on his arms and his chest everywhere else, boast about
you being a Christian and a Christian warrior in russe.
This is as Unchristian as you can get. You can
profess Christ, you can take his name in vain, but
you're not following him when you thumb your nose at
the most basic moral principles that even Pagans understand. Come on, Pete,

(03:03):
and what's the matter with Doug Wilson. You know I've
seen Doug Wilson. He always likes to do controversial things.
He talks about Christian nationalism in a very controversial way.
And always give him some grace because I think I
understand what he's doing. He's trying to get people to
rethink this. But you need to rethink what you're doing
when the guy who is the most high profile person

(03:26):
in your church plant in Washington, DC is talking like this.
He said, Biden coddled terrorists. We kill them. And this
comes after a report from the Washington Post talking about
the fact that in the very first strike that they did.
And again, I am surprised that it took so long

(03:48):
for this to kind of build into resistance. To me,
when I first saw that, it just amazed me, and
I thought, you know, why isn't everybody on fire about
this issue? When you allow the government to just commit
murder without any due process, without any evidence, and violation
of all the protocols, and you had uh was it

(04:08):
market Market out of New Jersey? Was Market Markets?

Speaker 3 (04:14):
Got? Anyway? Mark?

Speaker 2 (04:16):
I met Mark at Gerald Slente's Occupy Peace thing and
we talked for a while. Anyway, he explained to us,
because he was on a ship, he said, you have
they had very strict protocols about intercepting and about investigating
these things, and they had special people that were the

(04:38):
ones who were supposed to run this. And so why
is all this being thrown out the window. I'll tell
you why. That's why I have opposed the war on
drugs from the very beginning, because once you violate the
Constitution and you say, why don't we don't have follow
the law anymore, you have started out on a path
that is going to take you to this and this

(04:59):
isn't the end. Trump cheered through Terte out of the Philippines.
And I said this on the very first day as well,
cheered him when he was doing extra judicial murders of
people that they suspected of being drug dealers. You think
somebody's a drug dealer, find just kill them. He's now
at the International Criminal Court in the Hague because he

(05:21):
doesn't have a kind of power that the US government
has to keep these people out. But there may be
people in the US government that may do this. They
may do it because of political reasons. They should do it.
They should put these people in prison. Pete Heigsath points
in prison, not the Pentagon. So anyway, he defiantly dismissed
a report on Friday alleging that he ordered no survivors

(05:45):
to be left after the first Militay shrike on a
drug smuggling boat in the Caribbean Sea in September. This
is even worse than we knew from the very beginning.
It's bad enough than instead of stopping the ships, searching
them if they find drugs, arresting the people and trying
them and putting him in jail. And I say, I

(06:06):
oppose that because of the unconstitutional war on drugs.

Speaker 3 (06:10):
You know that's the issue.

Speaker 2 (06:13):
Don't get so caught up in the pragmatic aspects of this.
And I got to say, it's not pragmatic either. The
war on drugs has not stopped drugs, has it. Why
do we have this big problem. It's only made it worse.
And what it has done, it's made drugs worse. It's
made our government worse. It's corrupted our police, our courts,
the rule of law. That's corrupting the military and the

(06:36):
rules of engagement. It is like a cancer in this
society because we decided that we didn't need to follow
the constitution anymore. When we did our first prohibition, they
followed the constitution. They did a constitutional amendment. When Richard
Nixon did this at the behest of the un they
even provided the drug schedules for him. He just dismissed
the constitution completely, and so this is what that leads to,

(07:01):
and it's going to continue. I mean, we've seen things
like civil asset forfeiture, no not drug raids by swat teams.
All these types of things happening here and it's only
going to get worse here in the United States.

Speaker 3 (07:13):
So we don't cap this. So you know, this is.

Speaker 2 (07:19):
It's just amazing how unashamed people like Warpete and Trump
are of their mass murder. Trump is still bragging about
what he did with COVID. It was a mass killing.
But in this particular case, as bad as it was
that they shot this boat from a distance without investigating
it at all, what they did then was they ordered

(07:42):
a follow up for the people who were struggling to
survive in the water, hanging onto wreckage. They shot them again. Folks,
this is the kind of thing that we saw with
collateral murder. Remember when Wikipedia put that out. You had
footage they got leaked the AC one to thirty gun ship.

(08:02):
They could see what they were shooting, You could see
what they were shooting, and they shot up a bunch
of people, some of them one of them at least
was a photographer shot these people up. Then they waited
until the ambulance came and they put everybody in the ambulance.
Then they shot up the ambulance. This is murder. And

(08:22):
when Wikipedia put that, not Wikipedia, wiki leaks, Wikipedia, for sure,
but when Wiki leaks put it out that I believe
was the thing that Mark Julian oesange for imprisonment and
hopefully what they wanted was death. I mean, they had
different ideas about how they were going to kill him,

(08:44):
which also later came out. The call for the second
strike was allegedly given in response to a verbal order
from Hegseth to quote kill everybody. And this is just
so antithetical to every law and every moral principle of
Western society. It is absolutely amazing. As usual, his response

(09:07):
is to attack the news outlets for telling you the truth.
He doesn't deny it, he attacks the news outlets the
same tactic that Pam Bondi used when people asked her questions.
She comes with a list of grievances against the people
are asking her questions and she goes on ad hominem
attacks against them.

Speaker 4 (09:29):
We've seen Trump do that over and over again.

Speaker 2 (09:30):
Yeah, that's the tactic of this corrupt administration as usual.
The fake news, he said, is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory,
derogatory reporting to discredit are incredible warriors who are shooting
struggling people in the water. But he doesn't dispute the report.
As we said from the beginning, these highly effective strikes

(09:52):
are specifically intended to be lethal kinetic strikes. The declared
intent is to stop legal drug lethal drugs. I'm sorry, yeah,
the legal drugs are for.

Speaker 5 (10:04):
More lethal They have no interest in stopping those.

Speaker 3 (10:07):
No, no, not at all.

Speaker 2 (10:09):
This is again, he doesn't even have the authority to
do this under the illegal, unconstitutional war on drugs. There
is no world in which he's even close to any
authority to do this. And just to show you how
thoroughly corrupt the Pentagon is, you had the Pentagon Press

(10:29):
Secretary Kingsley Wilson said, every lethal kinetic strike against narco
terrorists have we established that they are now is one
completely legal, two conducted against the operations of a designated
terrorist organization, and three in defense of vital US national interest.
Three lies and quick succession. It's not legal at all.

(10:53):
And just because you point at somebody say they're terrorist organization,
doesn't make them even an organization, let alone a terrorist organization.
No proof given of any of this stuff. It is
just what they say, this dictatorship of Trump. It's not
even an administration. What are they administering. They're not administering

(11:17):
affairs as stewards for the constitution, which is the rightful king. No,
these are usurpers who are nothing but liars. Trump shared
footage of the September second attack, the first of more
than a dozen of these, showing the first missile hitting
the speedboat and seemingly obliterating it, But The Washington Post
claims that a total of four missiles were fired at

(11:39):
the boat, two to kill the crew member and two
to sink the vessel. A person who watched a live
feed of the second lethal strike, in other words, after
they hit the boat and you got people still alive
in the water told the outlet that the public quote
would be horrified if they saw the footage. They should

(12:00):
have leaked it. Unfortunately now I guess wiki leaks as
no longer operational. Who would have the guts to leak
this with the Washington Post even do that? You can
imagine what it would look like, because we've seen this
done before, and there wasn't any consequence for the people
who did it with collateral murder. And I don't remember
where that was in Afghanistan or rock, do you anyway?

Speaker 5 (12:22):
I think it was Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 (12:24):
I think after the September second strike. Protocols reportedly changed
then to emphasize rescuing survivors. Why wasn't that a protocol
to start with, because that is what has always been
our law, our military protocols, and the Geneva Convention and
the rest of this. You know, when we look at this,

(12:47):
I keep when I read all of this, thought back
to the Great Escape. Remember that, you know, we got
to make sure these people don't do this again. That
was the argument that Pete and some of these other
people are making.

Speaker 5 (13:00):
At the building of the Rock.

Speaker 3 (13:02):
There is a rock where they did collateral murder.

Speaker 2 (13:05):
But you go back to the Great Escape, and they
got tired of these guys escaping over and over again,
so they put them in one prison and then they
did a big escape. And so when they rounded them
up spoiler lord, if you haven't seen it, at the
end of the movie, the guys that they capture, they
take them out into a field and machine gun is
that the way is that what we've become, how we

(13:26):
become what we fought.

Speaker 3 (13:29):
I say we have.

Speaker 2 (13:31):
The Biden administration preferred the kid gloves approach, allowing millions
of people, including dangerous cartels and unvetted Afghans, to flood
our communities with drugs and violence.

Speaker 3 (13:42):
Said heg Seth.

Speaker 2 (13:44):
Biden coddled terrorists, and we kill them. So Democrat lawmakers
allowed to investigate and prosecute anybody who gave illegal orders
and response to the report from the Washington Post. But
there's a possibility that this might happen because prior to
this happening, there had already been both Republican Democratic chairs

(14:08):
of the Senate Armed Forces Committee. We're already asking questions
about this, not happy with what is being done. And
now with this admission, there has now been a committee
like that, equivalent to that in the House. It is
also bipartisan. So we'll see what happens. Usually this is
all just a dog and pony show. But the idea

(14:32):
that wreckage from one small boat in a vast oh,
this is their alibi, right, They said, well, you know,
we shot the boat. We had to do multiple strikes
to get all the wreckage out of there, so that
didn't interfere with shipping.

Speaker 3 (14:45):
Give me a break.

Speaker 4 (14:46):
These were environmentally conscious to annihilate any living.

Speaker 2 (14:53):
This is the only excuse that they've come up with,
the only excuse they've come up with. And so Seth Moulton,
who's a Democrat out of Massachusetts, said, the idea that
wreckage from one small boat a vast ocean is a
hazard to marine traffic is patently absurd. Killing survivors is

(15:13):
blatantly illegal. Mark my words. It may take some time,
but Americans will be prosecuted for this, either as a
war crime or for outright murder. Well, let's hope so,
and then we've got see this is the problem. Give
people like this reprehensible character Eugene Vinman, remember this Ukrainian
who was lieutenant colonel to you, sir, that type of

(15:35):
arrogant guy. Well even he comes out the broken clock
syndrome where he's right once a decade or something. He
comes out and he warns heg Seth, He says, you'd
be accountable for illegal orders that you give. This demands
congressional investigation in the unredacted video of the strike and
radio recordings or the orders given need to be shared

(15:58):
with Congress and the American people. Immediately, he said, well,
again you understand he's doing this simply because of partisan politics.
I'm sure that somebody like Vinman really doesn't care. Well,
the issue is here, but we should all care. And
I say this because again, just like you look at
the due process and the treatment of people who are

(16:20):
committing crimes here. They're here illegally as illegal aliens. But
how should we enforce the law. Should we do it
in a way that uphols the rule of law, or
should we just unleash the government on people that we
don't like, on people who committed crimes and just make
them capital offenses or whatever. I just cannot get my

(16:45):
head around how anybody excuses the kind of conduct that's
being done by the Trump administration, because if they treat
other people this way, they will eventually treat you that way.
And Madison understood that. He said, the tools, but it's
also the policies you know of wars abroad will come
home and be used as instruments of tyranny domestically, and

(17:09):
that will happen. We've already seen amazing things done here
in America that frankly I never thought I would see,
you know, things like the no knock swat team raids
and civil asset forfeiture where they don't even charge you
with a crime, but they steal your stuff and then say, well,
if you want to get it back, you've got to
sue me. So they focus on people who are poor

(17:32):
enough that they can't sue them and just steal from them.

Speaker 3 (17:34):
Just this is.

Speaker 2 (17:36):
From the War on Drugs. Ted Lew, a Democrat from California, said,
nothing in the classified legal memo or military being used
to justify the operation authorize as a second kinetic strike
against defenseless survivors. If the reports are true, then a
war crime was committed. Also, there is general generally no

(18:00):
statute of limitations for war crimes. But it's worse than that.
Andrew McCarthy at a great op ed piece, he said,
we intended the strike to be legal. Is not a defense.
He's writing it in the National Review, and so again
I think this is a level one alert showing the

(18:23):
character of Pete and of Trump and the character of
this so called administration.

Speaker 3 (18:31):
He said.

Speaker 2 (18:31):
The explosive Washington Post report has been the subject to
so much discussion for the last couple of days says
that in the first missile strike the Trump Defense Department
carried out against operatives of boat suspected of transporting narcotics
in the high Seas. Two survivors were rendered shipwrecked. As
they clung to the wreckage, the US commander ordered a

(18:52):
second strike, which killed them. If this happened, as described
in the Post report, it was at best a war
crime under federal law. And I say at best because,
as regular readers know, I believe the attacks on these
suspected drug boats without congressional authorization, under circumstances in which

(19:12):
the boat operators pose no military threat to the US,
and given that narcotics trafficking is defined in federal law
as a crime rather than a terrorist activity, much less
an act of war, that these acts are lawless, and
therefore the killings are not legitimate under the law or
under armed conflict. And I say this, Look, you know,

(19:35):
I don't, As you've heard me say over and over again,
I don't believe that the war on drugs is legal.

Speaker 3 (19:41):
Right.

Speaker 2 (19:42):
But even with that, they have laws and rules, you know,
just like a war. You may have an unjust war
that has been declared, but even within that unjust war.
You have rules and regulations, and there is no way
that you know, first of all, smuggling narcotics is not
an act of terrorism. It's not an act of war,

(20:03):
as they're saying over and over again. Secondly, it is
not a capital offence. Again, as Mark said, you know,
they had rules, and I pointed that on the first day.
I said, look, you know they just had a large
shipment that they interdicted, and they're still doing that in
other areas. So I said, this has nothing to do
with drugs. If this is about drugs, they'd be shooting

(20:27):
people in the water all the time everywhere. But everywhere
other than off the coast of Venezuela, they are interdicting
the ships and as Raan Paul said, about twenty five
percent of the time, the people they suspected of carrying
drugs are not carrying drugs. So if we've had a
dozen of these things, you can say about it. You know,

(20:48):
the three or four of these were not legitimate.

Speaker 3 (20:53):
He says.

Speaker 2 (20:54):
Even if we stipulate that our forces are in an
armed conflict, the laws of war do not permit the
killing of combatants who have rendered or de combas is.

Speaker 3 (21:07):
The French phrase. I don't know what he used this thing.

Speaker 2 (21:10):
Literally, what that means is out of combat, right, out
of combat or de combis. In other words, when you surrender, right,
unless you're somebody like Santa Anna. You give people quarter.
You don't just kill everybody, right, And so he says,

(21:30):
if you're out of the fighting, and that includes shipwreck
and struggling to swim, He said, to reiterate, I don't
accept that the ship operators are enemy combatants, even if
one overlooks the administration has not proven that they are
drug traffickers, has not proven that they're members of designated
foreign terrorist organization. There is no armed conflict. They may

(21:55):
be criminals, but they're not combatants. They were not shooting
as a matter of fact. They even said they turned around, right.
So again, this is rules of engagement. If a cop
shoots somebody in the back that's running away, that should
be a crime, and sometimes it is treated that way.
It always is a crime. If you do it, they'll

(22:15):
come after you, right, But it's not authorized for the
police nor for the military.

Speaker 3 (22:21):
To do that.

Speaker 2 (22:23):
Even if you buy the untenable claim that they are combatants.
It is a war crime to intentionally kill combatants who
have been rendered unable to fight. It is not permitted
under laws and customs of honorable warfare in order to
order that no quarter be given to apply lethal force
to those who surrender, to those who are injured, to

(22:46):
those who have been shipwrecked, or who are otherwise unable
to fight. And again, this is not about honorable warfare.
This is about the Christian principles. Christian principles that defined
justified war. And again, this is like the Nazis machine
gunning down the prisoners and the Great Escape. According to

(23:10):
the Post, two unidentified sources said, prior to the September
second attack that killed at least eleven people, that Pete
Hegseth gave a spoken directive, which one source described as
the order was to kill everybody. The operation was led
by Seal Team six and is directed from Fort Bragg,
North Carolina by Admiral Frank Mitch Bradley. Admiral Bradley is

(23:33):
said to have ordered the attack against the two survivors
of the first strike in order to comply with Hegseth's
directive to kill the boat's operators, that two sources told
the Post. Bradley told people on the secure conference call
that the survivors were still legitimate targets because they could
theoretically call other traffickers to retrieve them and their cargo.

(23:56):
Hegsath responded to the Post report on x begins with
the familiar pining about how all this derogatory reporting about Trump,
you know, and again, but when we get to this
Afghan thing, we're going to learn that in twenty nineteen,
Well it was just recently. You know. We're going to
talk more about it when we get to the zero teams,

(24:19):
but remember it was just recently released that back in
twenty nineteen. Also under Trump, he determined that as he
was having a war of words with Kim Jong unn,
he wanted to put surveillance devices in North Korea. So
he authorized Seal Team six and a nuclear sub and

(24:39):
a bunch of other assets to put these seals in
to put in surveillance equipment. They were seen, or they
thought they were seen by fishermen, you know, they were
flashing a light or something, and one guy just turned
around and reflexively shot him. And then they decided that
they would kill them all abb them and their lungs

(25:01):
after they kill them, so their bodies would sink and
that just came out, and that was six years ago.
And again Trump orders these types of things, then they
pulled out. They never did plant the surveillance things. So
he says, all this is fake news. But then he
doesn't actually rebut any assertion in the report. He says,

(25:24):
as we said from the beginning and in every statement,
these highly effective strikes are specifically intended to be lethal
kinetic strikes. The declared intends to stop lethal drugs, destroyed
narco boats and kill the narco terrorists who are poisoning
the American people. Again, there is no authority for this,
even under the unconstitutional War on Drugs. Excess statement, nor

(25:48):
the explanation attributed to Bradley makes any legal sense. The
laws of war as they are incorporated into our federal law,
make lethal force unlawful if it is used under certain circumstances.
It cannot be a defense to say, as Hegseth does,
that one is killed because one's objective was lethal kinetic strikes.

Speaker 5 (26:12):
No, you don't understand I intended to commit the war crime.

Speaker 2 (26:17):
Yeah, this is like the defense somebody's arrested for murder
and is like, no, I'm meant to do that, Oh, okay,
well you can go.

Speaker 5 (26:22):
Then, Oh we thought you didn't have any intentionality behind it.
If this was an accident, it'd be a real problem.

Speaker 3 (26:29):
That's the difference.

Speaker 2 (26:29):
Between homicide and murder right or van slaughter, manslaughter, thank you,
manslaughter and murder right. Accidental or intentional. No, it was intentional.
We did that intentionally.

Speaker 5 (26:40):
Oh, well, you're free to go. Then, he says, if.

Speaker 2 (26:42):
An arguable combatant has been rendered or de comba out
of combat, really and targeting them with leal lethal force
cannot be rationalized, as Bradley is said to have done
by theorizing that it is gospel so on future point
that the combatant could get help and be able to

(27:03):
contribute once again to enemy operations. I blame the principle
that we've accepted since World War Two that it is
legitimate to target civilian populations, right, because that's what this is.
This is where we refuted the whole idea of Christian war.
In Western civilization would have uniforms, often brightly colored to

(27:30):
identify the combatants versus the non combatants. But when somebody
is wounded, when they're out of combat, even if they're
in uniform, you treat them as you would civilians, as
you would women and children. We don't care about that anymore.
As a matter of fact, that Christians don't care about
that anymore. The ones who support Israel and what they're

(27:51):
doing in Gaza, you support that, and you support the
bombing of civilian populations as we've done in World War
Two and subsequent to that. When you say we're going
to kill civilians, and what you wind up with is
the kind of thing that we saw with collateral murder,
the kind of thing we're going to see with this,
even though they haven't come up with a name for yet.

(28:12):
So once you decide that you are, you don't really
care how many people you kill if your intention is
to kill everybody. As Pete Haig said this, that's the
best summation I would say of American war policy since
World War Two.

Speaker 3 (28:30):
Just kill everybody.

Speaker 2 (28:32):
That's what the Nazis did, That's what we do. You know,
we got prisoners, let's line them up, a machine gun them.
That's what the Nazis do. That's what we do.

Speaker 5 (28:41):
It really makes you think about him getting so pissed
off about that old don't follow any illegal orders.

Speaker 3 (28:47):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (28:47):
Well, that's why they're so upset about this because they
know they know that what they're doing is illegal. They
won't defend it. They won't say it's not illegal. Just
as Lance was saying last week, he said, why didn't
they just say, well, wait a minute, these orders that
were giving down there in Venezuela are legal. They never
said that. Just like Pete Hegseth doesn't come back and

(29:09):
try to explain himself, He attacks them for being fake
news when they're telling you the truth. He doesn't deny
any of the reporting. He just attacks reporters that saying
you just hate Trump. You have Trump derangement syndrome, right,
You've always heard that.

Speaker 5 (29:25):
Look, the president gets to kill whoever he wants, whenever
he wants. And if you don't like that, you're an
anti American.

Speaker 2 (29:31):
Yeah, we know these orders are illegal and it's treason
if you tell people not to follow these illegal orders.
The nineteen forty nine Geneva Convention was ratified by the
United States. Consequently, Common Article three of the Convention binds
our government It prohibits violence. This is a quote violence
to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds

(29:54):
of persons who are taking no active part in hostilities
added to Common Article three. Persons taking no active part
in hostilities include those placed or de cambas by sickness, wounds, detention,
or any other cause. In other words, you don't kill

(30:14):
the people struggling in the shipwreck. You don't machine gun
the prisoners that escaped from your Nazi prison. Christ's law
is higher?

Speaker 3 (30:24):
Is higher?

Speaker 2 (30:24):
However, and it is. It basically says the same thing.
And that's the difference between murder and war. War that
is conducted in a justified way. I always remember the
you know, the left, when they know we would say

(30:46):
that abortion is murdering it is. They say, well, why
don't you support the death mental here? You support this war,
that war whatever. And it's like, well, if it is
a justified war being fought according to the principles of
a just war and fought in a justified manner, trying
to minimize casualties with the purpose of ending the aggression

(31:07):
that was committed against you, not that you started, it's
never justified if you started. So in a just war,
you're defending against an act of aggression, and your defense
is not to just kill everybody. The aim is to
avoid killing non combatants. And to end the hostilities as

(31:30):
quickly as possible.

Speaker 3 (31:32):
That is the.

Speaker 2 (31:33):
Purpose of a justified war. So again, when you've got
when you support the murder of civilians and children for Israel,
this is how we get to these types of situations,
This kind of blind obedience to state. Whether that state
is the American government and the Pentagon or whether it

(31:55):
is the Israeli government and Yahu, doesn't really matter. If
this is Christian nationalism, I want no part of it.
My definition of Christian nationalism is a culture and a
government that embraces Christ's principles. That is not what this is.
So don't talk to me about this church plant in DC.

(32:19):
How disgusting. So again, people who have headed the Justice
Department's Office of Legal Counsel. In the Bush forty three
administration noted that the Department of Defense Law of War
Manual defines or de combas in other words, out of
combat to include persons otherwise incapacitated by shipwreck is specifically mentioned.

(32:45):
Congress has incorporated grave breaches of this in the Penal
Codes War Crime Statute when committed in the context of
and in association with an armed conflict not of internet
national character, which is how the Administration describes the operations
in Caribbean. These grave breaches include murder, defined as the

(33:08):
act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or
attempts to kill or kills, whether intentionally or unintentionally, in
the course of committing any other offense. Under this subsection,
one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities,
including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, attention,
or any other cause. And it also mentions specifically Shipwright.

Speaker 3 (33:32):
But again.

Speaker 2 (33:35):
We see over and over again this guy who evidently
it was Seals who did this first strike, and Bradley
who had commanded them. And I got to say that
war Pete, Bradley, the Seals who did this killing are
all guilty of murder, just like COVID.

Speaker 5 (33:54):
By the way, Oh, when you look at the guy
who founded Seal Team six shock where it's ended up,
he was a complete scumbag, utter scumbag, terrible, terrible individual.
Just would cheat on his wife religiously and had no
interest in maintaining the marriage. Simply wanted to Trump, simply

(34:18):
wanted to be a cowboy, getting to kill who he wanted,
when he wanted, wherever he wanted.

Speaker 2 (34:23):
Yeah, and that's the way they use it, as you know,
double seven license to kill people, right, kill.

Speaker 4 (34:30):
He wants whenever he wants, while cheating on his wife.
That definitely sounds like Trump.

Speaker 3 (34:34):
Yeah, there's a type.

Speaker 2 (34:37):
But again, when you look at COVID, right, this mass
murder of COVID has gone unpunished. Nobody is paying a
penalty for any of that. So why wouldn't they think
they can get away with murder of this sort? And
why wouldn't they think that If they can ignore the
constitution with war on drugs for fifty years, why why

(34:57):
not continue to do this?

Speaker 3 (34:59):
Trump?

Speaker 2 (35:00):
This is undoubtedly going to pardon any administration officials and
potential legal jeopardy. But the penalty for war crimes violation
is life imprisonment or death if the criminal act results
in death, he says again, if the post report is accurate.
Hag Seth and his commanders changed the protocols after the

(35:21):
September second attack to emphasize rescuing suspected smugglers if they
survived strikes. This is why two survivors and a subsequent
strike were captured and then repatriated to their native countries
of Colombia. And Ecuador. There's been several indications that they
got it wrong. Right, these people were not even Venezuelans.

(35:43):
And again, when we look at what is going on
with Venezuela, you know there's no fentanel coming from there.
They just keep repeating that lie over and over again,
no matter how many times people point out that has
never been asserted by anybody in this United Nations war
on drugs. Let's understand what that is. You know, that's
Richard Nixon put that in and it's for the UN.

(36:07):
But it's never been asserted by any of these people
who are engaged in this so called activity of fighting
the war on drugs. It's never been alleged that fentanyl
was coming from Venezuela. That is a false report of
these people. You know, that's fake news from Trump and
Exit to put it in their terms. Under prior policy,

(36:28):
the boat would have been interdicted again, as Mark was saying,
the drugs seize, the operators, transferred to federal court for
prosecution and heavy sentences. The Trump administration policy, if the
operators survive our missiles, they get to go back home
and rejoin the drug trade. But put that aside. The

(36:50):
point is that if the administration's intent to apply lethal
force were a defense to killing shipwrecked suspected drug traffickers,
the policy would not have been changed. Changing the policy
was an admission of guilt. Hag Seth knows that he
can't justify killing boat operators who survive attacks and he

(37:12):
sends them home rather than detaining them as enemy combatants,
because similarly, there is no actual armed conflict, so there
is no basis to detain them as enemy combatants. The
administration's defense can't be that we killed them because our
plan is to use lethal force. Again, that is insane.

Speaker 4 (37:36):
Plus, I mean, if they were normal drug smugglers and
they interdicted them with a boat full of drugs, you
would think they would then arrest them and send them
to a prison for a while, rather than just throwing
them back. Perhaps they weren't smuggling drugs or unless wherever.

Speaker 2 (37:53):
When I read it, I mean, Andrew McCarthy looks at
it and says, Okay, so these people were smuggling drugs,
and so you're going to send them back home. And
when I looked at that, I saw that as you're
pointing out lance as an admission that well, we understand
we got the wrong people.

Speaker 3 (38:07):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (38:07):
The only thing you could say in their partial defense
would be, oh, well, maybe they don't know if they
were smuggling drugs or not, because they blew up the
boat that has them on there, so there's no evidence
against them like there would be an a normal in addiction.

Speaker 2 (38:23):
Well, that's why the Columbian president got into this fight
with Trump. He sall right, we're not going to send
any more money to Columbia, which is if you want
to talk about drugs, that's where the cocaine comes from.
Everybody knows that, and my offends on the cocaine. But anyway,
we were giving them money I guess to do the cocaine.
But he got into a fight with him because one

(38:44):
of the ships that was blown up killed a guy
that everybody knew was a fisherman. His family, everybody else
knew it. And I see all these accounts mocking this stuff.

Speaker 3 (38:52):
Thing. Yeah, he's a fisherman. He's got to.

Speaker 2 (38:54):
Have all those multiple outboard motors on his boat because
he's going after the fast fish.

Speaker 3 (39:00):
Give me a break.

Speaker 2 (39:02):
Is that a death penalty to have too many motors
on the back of your boat. Maybe he prefers to
not spend a lot of time getting out to the
fishing area. I don't know, I don't Having a particular
type of boat should not be a death sentence. I'm
disgusted with conservatives who try to make these ridiculous apologies
for the Trump administration. Meanwhile, as I said before, there

(39:25):
is a bipartisan effort to take a.

Speaker 3 (39:26):
Look at this.

Speaker 2 (39:27):
It'll be interesting to see what happens, if anything. GOP
senators joined Democrats in investigating Hagsheth, saying that he wants
to kill everybody. GOP Senator Roger Wicker, chairman of the
Senate Armed Services Committee, and Democrat Senator Jack Reid announced
the investigation in a joint statement. And this is not

(39:52):
just from this. They had already started an investigation into
these murders prior to this, and so senators from both
parties will join forces to investigate allegations that Defense Secretary
Pete Hegseth order there to be no survivors and US
air strikes on alleged drug running boats. The Committee is

(40:15):
aware of recent news reports and the Department of Defense's
initial response regarding the alleged follow on strikes on suspected
narcotics vessels in the southcom Area responsibility. The Committee has
directed inquiries of the Department, and we will be conducting
vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances. Well, again,

(40:38):
they all bow the knee to national security, which is
the defense that these people throw up for each and
everything that they do. So I don't really think that
without an organization like Wicked Leaks, we're going to see
what really happened here. Congressional committees are going to be
doing this. So there's one in the House as well,

(40:58):
and these are people. This is also a Democrat and Republican.
Leaders of the House Armed Services Committee, Mike Rogers, a Republican,
Adam Smith, the Democrat, followed suit late Saturday. So the
announcement that the Senate Armed Services Committee was going to
investigate that was made on Friday, as this stuff blew up.
The next day on Saturday, the House Armed Services Committee

(41:23):
says they are going to investigate. So they're taking bipartisan
action together a full accounting of the operation in question.
The committee, they noted, is committed to providing rigorous oversight
of the Department of Defense's military operations in the Caribbean
that remains to be seen anyway. It was like I said,
this is maybe it won't be a whitewash.

Speaker 3 (41:46):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (41:47):
I think probably looking at how the military controls had
so much influence the military industrial complex, I think it
probably will be. But unlike Vinman, who you can kind
of dismiss anything that he has to say, even if
it's true, you can dismiss it as partisan attacks. This

(42:07):
is last month that you had Wicker and read to
the chair, and the leading minority member made public two
letters that they previously sent to the Pentagon requesting orders
and recordings and legal rationale related to these strikes. So
they were already on it. But these people who contacted

(42:29):
the Washington Post anonymously really through fire on this. Current
and former US officials and law of war experts that
said the Pentagon's legal campaign, which has now killed more
than eighty people, is unlawful and may expose those most
directly involved in the prosecution. Alleged traffickers pose no eminent

(42:50):
threat of attack against the US and are not in
an armed conflict with the US, say these officials and
other experts. A group of former military attorney and he
who scrutinized the Trump administration's military activities.

Speaker 3 (43:04):
Said that.

Speaker 2 (43:07):
Said that regardless of whether the US is in an
armed conflict conducting a law enforcement or other military thing,
these war this is a war crime, murderer are both.
There are no other options. So we'll see what happens
to this. By the way, you know, when we look
at this, we're getting such conflicting information from the Trump administration.

(43:31):
Trump is going to meet with Maduro, the guy that
he says has to be overthrown. So even though he's
put a fifty million dollar bounty on Maduro, he has
invited him to Washington.

Speaker 5 (43:42):
That's part of his plan. He's going to collect the
bounty himself. Right, He's going to put Maduro in an
arm bar in the Oval office.

Speaker 3 (43:48):
I can pay myself.

Speaker 2 (43:49):
I can do that all. Write a check to myself.
Or I'm going to write a check to myself a
turn of thirty million dollars.

Speaker 5 (43:54):
This sucker, he came right in. I put him in
a headlock.

Speaker 3 (43:56):
What was he going to do as a trap?

Speaker 2 (43:58):
Says Admiral Agbar Right, there are currently no plans for
such an historic encounter to take place yet, despite the
recent call where he offered to do that, say sources
told The New York Times. On Thursday, Trump promised to
start land operations in Venezuela quote very soon.

Speaker 3 (44:19):
I guess it.

Speaker 2 (44:19):
Depends on the Epstein news cycle and the public opinion polls.
Over the weekend, he declared closure of Venezuela's airspace. The
arrogance of this guy. The arrogance of this guy. It's
truly amazing.

Speaker 3 (44:36):
You know, It's just.

Speaker 2 (44:39):
Yet, you know, this is the same Trump. Why should
we be surprised? This is the same Trump that locked
down the United States of America five years ago. He
paid the bad Democrat governors and the bad Republican governors
who went along with it. He paid them to do it,
just like he paid Hillary to show up at his wedding.

(45:00):
Up on Saturday, declared the airspace above and surrounding Venezuela
to be closed. He does it on his social media account.
Isn't that amazing? You have a government where we don't
care what the law is, it's whatever the president says.
It truly is a dictatorship, and a dictatorship that is
running through his own social media outlet.

Speaker 4 (45:23):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure the Constitution has more friendshial requirements
for a declaration of war than a post on troops
social That's right.

Speaker 3 (45:32):
I forgot when they amended the constitution for that.

Speaker 5 (45:36):
All it takes is him to get a little peeved
at somebody and we can be at war like that.

Speaker 2 (45:40):
Yeah, to all airlines, pilots, drug dealers, and human traffickers,
please consider all a per case, the airspace above and
surrounding Venezuela to be closed in its entirety. I get
did he finish with thank you for your attention?

Speaker 3 (45:58):
Is it on? Is it on?

Speaker 4 (45:59):
You know?

Speaker 3 (45:59):
Is the plump the microphone is always do.

Speaker 5 (46:01):
That testing testing.

Speaker 2 (46:03):
It's unclear if the decoration means that the US will
impose a no fly zone in Venezuela. That, however, would
be an act of war when you declare a no
fly zone, and that would be illegal without congressional authorization
according to the constitution.

Speaker 1 (46:21):
What is that?

Speaker 3 (46:21):
What's the constitution? I've never heard of that before, have you.

Speaker 2 (46:25):
The order came after the President said that he may
very soon expand the bombing campaign and take it to land.
So again, what we see here is just like his tariffs,
his wars, his sanctions, his tariffs, they're all capricious, they're
all arbitrary, they're all unilateral, they're all done without consulting anybody,

(46:48):
and they're all done in defiance of the Constitution. The
son of a gun would who can try to cover.

Speaker 3 (46:56):
For this guy?

Speaker 2 (46:57):
Well, you know, people like Alec Shanes and people like
Glenn Bay, people like Mark Levan. As long as Trump
is doing what Israel wants, it's just amazing to see
the sick events around this guys. Andy Warre points out today,
the Cartel of the Suns is used to describe a
network of Venezuelan officials allegedly involved in the drug trade,

(47:20):
but it doesn't exist as a structured organization. The Trump
administration appears set to use the designation as a pretext
to launch an illegal war, one that Americans overwhelmingly do
not want.

Speaker 3 (47:33):
And again, you just create this organization.

Speaker 2 (47:39):
We'll call it the Cartel of the Suns, And of
course what it will be is the administration and the
regime that we want to overthrow, and we'll call it
a cartel so that we can overthrow it. Well, at
the same time, we have this happening, and he wants
to go to war with Minuela over ventanyl, which nobody

(48:02):
has ever said comes from Venezuela. Trump over the weekend
pardoned Juan Orlando Hernandez, the former president of Honduras, who
is in the US serving a forty five year sentence
in US prison for drug trafficking. So at the same

(48:23):
time he wants to open up a massive war against Venezuela.
At the same time that he authorizes he and his
subordinates authorized the execution of non combatants in a phony,
made up war and then defiantly says that, yeah, we
kill people who were struggling in the water after we've

(48:44):
hit the ship. At the same time he does that,
he pardons this guy who has been imprisoned for drug trafficking.

Speaker 4 (48:54):
Well, this is keeping within Trump's whole policy of the
people giving the orders are immune, but the people who
will fall and carry out the orders, they should be
executed for those.

Speaker 3 (49:07):
That's true.

Speaker 2 (49:08):
Now, part of this context is that they had an
election either this weekend or coming up. Yeah, it was yesterday,
I don't know how it came out. Sunday's presidential election Onndors.
So he endorsed a candidate there, and he said, well,
this candidate may not win because Venezuela may rig the elections. Now, Look,

(49:29):
I've reported for years and years, over a decade, I've
been reporting about how Smartmatic was created in Venezuela by
three friends of Hugo Chavez, and Hugo Chavez and other
communists in the area never lost an election as long
as Smartmatic was involved. And there have been allegations, not

(49:50):
just in the US in twenty twenty, but prior to that,
and I'd reported on it way prior to that. There'd
been allegations. I put in all all this stuff in
the twenty sixteen election cycle, and there are allegations in
multiple Mexican states. I think they call them territories like
you know, regions within Mexico, whatever they call them. They're

(50:12):
not provinces like in Canada. But let's say states in Mexico,
also in Brazil, also in the Philippines, that Smartmatic was
rigging elections. And so for Trump to say, well, if
they're gonna use smart Maatic, maybe they're gonna rig the election.
Let me tell you, though, what probably rigged the election
more than anything was for Trump to endorse this person.

(50:33):
That endorsement from Trump was probably would probably cause this
other guy to win in Honduras and then he pardons
at the same time, this massive person who is a
massive drug trafficker that everybody recognized for that endorsed some
guy named nazary Tito as fora. I guess we'd just

(50:55):
call him nasty nasty Tito as for And so he
said I would be very supportive of his government if
he won. And then he said I'll be granting a
full pardon and a complete pardon to Hernandez, saying that
he's been treated very harshly and unfairly. Well last year,
the Department of Justice said, as they were sentencing Hernandez

(51:20):
to forty five years in prison for conspiring to quote
facilitate the importation of an almost unfathomable four hundred tons
of cocaine to this country, and so they accused him
and his brother for drug trafficking and for firearms crimes.

(51:41):
As president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernandez abused his power
to support one of the largest and most violent drug
trafficking conspiracies in the world, and the people of Honduras
in the US bore the consequences, said the Department of
Justice at the time. Well, so a lot of people
are looking at this and saying, how's he taking one

(52:03):
of the biggest drug traffickers head of a country. You know,
he's projecting all this stuff now onto Maduro. And I'm
not a supporter of Maduro. He's a communist and they
have rigged elections and so forth. But I think this
is all about the oil and about regime change, and
I think it's about a wag the dog aspect here.

(52:23):
But the contradiction is just insane. One guy who's a
senior instructor at Western Washington University said Trump is using
the US military to assassinate rival crime lords and using
pardon power to reward and elevate crime lord allies. Another
person said, is this for real? We're killing people we

(52:46):
just suspect of drug trafficking, and yet we are pardoning
convicted drug kingpins. Another person said Trump, I will kill
the drug cartels. Also Trump pardoning a powerful drug trafficker. Finally,
one person said, they're lying to you, and a bunch
of voters falls for it. Every time we know who

(53:09):
that bunch of voters are. Wh there's Democrats who do
it as well. Trump did not immediately state his reason
for pardoning Hernandez. However, we can guess something that may
have something to do with it.

Speaker 3 (53:23):
It was actually in.

Speaker 2 (53:27):
Honduras that Peter Teel and many of his technocrat billionaire
friends had decided that they were going to start up
a special libertarian city.

Speaker 3 (53:38):
They called it Prospero. You remember that startup city.

Speaker 2 (53:42):
You know, wealthy libertarians, I would say not even wealthy libertarians,
but libertarians for the longest time said you know, we
need to just get out of these countries that are
abusing us, that are acting and I you know, that
really strikes strikes the court with me. So they talk about,
you know, setting up a city out in the ocean,
in international waters. And of course you know that that

(54:03):
would not last because of the abusive governments that are
out there. But they worked with the government of Honduras.
They worked with this guy one Hernandez to set up Prospera,
a private, for profit city with his own government, to
court foreign investors through low taxes and light regulation. And

(54:26):
so again. The people involved in it, people like Peter Teel,
Open Ai CEO, Sam Altman, Mark and Dreesen and so forth,
they all worked with this guy Hernandez. Perhaps this is
why he gets pardoned. The drug thing doesn't matter at
all to Trump. So again, if you understand Trump, and

(54:49):
you understand the motives of his donors and controllers, the technocrats,
the Zionists, and so forth, then you understand you just
look at the people that give him money and you
look at what they want out of things, and then
you can understand why Trump is doing these contradictory things
over and over again. There really isn't any contradiction at all.

(55:10):
And you know, as we had this murder by this
Afghan guy, which we're going to talk about coming up,
the zero units from the CIA, Double O units that's
what they called them. Again, I think it's these people
are like playing James Bond. You know, the double O
agents from the British government had a license to kill. Well, basically,

(55:32):
these guys in Afghanistan did have a license to kill.
And so one of them was brought back. He was
brought back by Biden. And then you know, the CIA
was insisting these people be brought back, actually putting them
ahead of other people as they were trying to bug
out of Afghanistan. And so CIA gets these people back

(55:52):
and they pushed this through and the Trump administration actually
signed the papers to let him stay, so Biden brought
him in. Trumpet meanministration did that. And yet when you
look at places like the Bablon b for example, this
is exactly what is wrong. They take the position that
it's all Biden's fault. Right, Turkey pardoned by Biden administration

(56:13):
four times, commits violent Turkey murder. Well, again, this is
just partisan finger pointing, and people are doing that over
this Afghanistan guy. Look, both Republicans and Democrats owned the
Afghanistan War. Trump owns the Afghanistan War. He kept it
the entire four years, even though he said he was

(56:35):
going to shut it down. Biden did not shut it down.
Biden did not do a disorderly evacuation by choice. They
did it because they had no choice. They did it
because they were losing the war. They had no intention
of leaving. I've reported on it so many times. You
had all these people from the Pentagon say we're going
to stay there for at least twenty years. Why, Well, again,
they have lithium, and they had a militarygic place in

(57:00):
terms of being closer to Russia or whatever. But it
could come up a lot of different reasons for it.
I think opioids had a lot to do with it.
The poppy feels that were there. They went from less
than ten percent of the world supply to the high
nineties and kept it there. Every year was a bumper crop,
and RT would point that out. The American press was

(57:23):
silent on that, and so yeah, they were getting their drugs.
Because you want to talk about the drug war, that's
the CIA, folks, that's our own government that's running the
drug war. And it really is what this one guy says,
this is like rival drug gangs. You're gonna pardon this
one guy who's his drug lord ally and another guy

(57:43):
who he wants to come after even if he isn't
a drug lord, he's going to accuse him of that
and come after him. So you know, Bablinbe Turkey, pardoned
by Biden four times, commits violent Turkey murdering. Just in
case you don't understand what they are pointing the finger at,
they say the Turkey, a refugee from Afghanistan, had been

(58:03):
in and out of prison during Biden's presidential term on
charges of trespassing, grand theft, auto and the illegal narcotics orse.
So we're gonna take a look at that guy when
we come back. But we got some comments, one of
them from Marky Mark.

Speaker 5 (58:15):
That's right, Marky Mark, thank you very much for the tip.
Says we long ago became what we fought in World
War Two.

Speaker 6 (58:20):
L C. D. R.

Speaker 5 (58:21):
Mush Morton of sub SS Wahoo.

Speaker 1 (58:26):
At the S. S.

Speaker 5 (58:27):
Wahoo torpedo de Japanese freighter after the sinking, he ordered
his crew to machine gun the survivors in the water.

Speaker 2 (58:35):
And that's you know, I mean, we laugh at the name,
but it's actually a Wahoo fish, I think. But yeah,
it sounds like some pickings riding the bomb down at
the end of the franchise. But yeah, that's a that's a crime,
you know. And when you look at how you know
civilian targets. Both the Nazis as well as the Allied

(58:55):
forces targeted civilian populations.

Speaker 5 (58:57):
You know, they Russia, heinous atrocity the civilian populations. The
Japanese were horrific.

Speaker 2 (59:04):
In China, yeah, the Nan King, everybody was doing it
and we sunk to that level. You know, Western Europe
and America used to have the standards of Christian principles
and the just war theory. You would never do the
types of things that we did with the fire bombing
of Dresden or with the nuclear bombs. As I've said before,
they would say well by the end of the war early, well,

(59:24):
if you wanted to in the war early, you could
have dropped those nuclear bombs on the troops that were
fighting our troops. That would have been legitimate under the
rules of war to drop them on civilian population. However,
it's not. And it's the same kind of argument. Well,
you know, if we don't kill all those civilians, they
might put on a uniform and come after us as well,
So let's kill the non combatants. That's essentially the argument

(59:46):
that murdering war peat is making. It doesn't cut it.

Speaker 5 (59:51):
Also, it's another thing to remember is while what happened
there is still a crime, is still an atrocity that
was in the middle of an ongoing hot war where
they had atrocities to look at and say, look what
they did to our side. These are guys that are
in the heat of you know, the moment where they've
seen what the Japanese are doing, or at least they've
heard about it, and so they are wound up and

(01:00:13):
they want to This is just cold blooded, cold blooded
premeditated precision murder. Yeah, this is you know, they're both
crimes and both should be prosecuted. Both are wrong, yes,
but it's easier to understand how someone could be, you know,
worked up into a frenzy during a war, as opposed
to where we are right now, which is just press

(01:00:34):
the button and obliterate a person.

Speaker 2 (01:00:37):
And the law makes a distinction between murderer that has
committed under passion, murder that's committed accidentally, murder that is cold, calculated, premeditated.
That's what this is. It's that kind of murder.

Speaker 5 (01:00:50):
Because Davonte seventeen seventy six says Clinton, W. Bush, Obama, Trump, Biden,
and Trump are all war criminals and mass murders.

Speaker 3 (01:00:59):
That with that, I absolutely agree with that. The difference
is is that Trump owns it, He's.

Speaker 2 (01:01:05):
Proud of it. He boasts about it. Hag Seth boasts
about it. You know, the other guy has tried to
pretend that they weren't doing. We know that all these
presidents have had affairs, you know what you're talking about, Eisenhower, Fdr,
any of these they they've all had adulterous relationships while
they were married, but they all hit it they covered up.
Trump boasts about it, just like he boasts about his

(01:01:28):
murders with a with a hypodermic needle or with the missiles.

Speaker 3 (01:01:32):
That he's not out there.

Speaker 4 (01:01:33):
You I've never seen Bush bragging about being the father
of nine to eleven like Trump is bragged about being
the father of the vaccine.

Speaker 3 (01:01:42):
I'm the father of the inside job. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:01:46):
Of course you had Obama saying you, I'm very at
killing people.

Speaker 2 (01:01:49):
Yeah, and that's that's what Dave Chappelle said about Trump,
which I keep thinking about that clip.

Speaker 3 (01:01:54):
Right.

Speaker 2 (01:01:54):
He says, Trump's this guy. He says, you know what
these guys are doing in there, but they won't tell
you that. He'll come out and tell you this, this
is why they're doing it. And then he'll go back
in and join.

Speaker 3 (01:02:01):
Them and he'll keep doing it. But he's open about it.

Speaker 2 (01:02:05):
He's going to tell you that that's what he's doing
because he's absolutely unashamed. He absolutely has no morality whatsoever.
It's not just immoral, he's a moral There is no
moral code to Donald Trump whatsoever. It's about how does
he get money, how does he get controlled?

Speaker 3 (01:02:24):
That's it.

Speaker 2 (01:02:25):
He's like some kind of a shark out there's got
one goal to feed.

Speaker 5 (01:02:30):
Scune Collo rose Gardens. War crimes don't stick ever, revolting villager.
Once our police and military is populated with recently illegal aliens,
the government will be a threat to US citizens as well. Well,
the government is already a threat. But yeah, there have
been putting out calls. I've seen it plays like California,
just like, hey, you know, why don't you join up

(01:02:52):
and you can serve the community. And we saw that
in Australia as well. Hey, come to Australia. We've got
great beaches. You can join the police force and we
don't care where you're from. You want to come here,
get a job where you can abuse our citizenry and
feed off of it. Come on, buddy, bring it on in.
We'll give you a night stick. You can beat our

(01:03:12):
citizenry with it.

Speaker 2 (01:03:14):
And somewhere here there was a nice recruitment. Yeah, here
it is DHS. Listen to this. This is the way
they see themselves. This should frighten you. This is the
way American federal law enforcement sees itself.

Speaker 5 (01:03:34):
They think they wicked flee when no man pursueth, But
the righteous are bold as a lion.

Speaker 2 (01:03:50):
I think we should add to that clip for context
what CS Lewis said about the people who are convinced
of being righteous when they're not. This is like the

(01:04:10):
that's really a good intro to what we're going to
be talking about in terms of the zero Unit killers
that we trained, that the CIA train. I say we
because it's our government that they trained in Afghanistan. What
this guy did? You know, you train people to be killers,
and you glorify all of this stuff. It's not done
to protect. This is done, as you were pointing out,

(01:04:32):
the Seal Team six, a guy who just loves to
kill people, and that's what they're selling people. They're selling
that though for domestic law enforcement. Here that's a recruitment
video from DHS. Do you want to wear night goggles?
You want to do no nighttime raids on people? You
want to kill Americans or people who are in America,
whether the Americans or not. That's what they have become,

(01:04:56):
you know, the militarization of the police. You should be
very concerned about that.

Speaker 3 (01:04:59):
Go ahead.

Speaker 4 (01:05:00):
Also, all of these ads for this stuff mar getting
ridiculous with how dramatic they are propaganda. We've got three
of them in the deck including one that is actually
for a propaganda unit.

Speaker 3 (01:05:14):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:05:17):
Uh yeah, that's the dark ad from DHS. Here's one
that is portrays them as superheroes.

Speaker 3 (01:05:24):
This is DHS.

Speaker 7 (01:05:27):
No one ever was.

Speaker 3 (01:05:31):
Cartoon animate.

Speaker 5 (01:05:34):
To train them in my car. One of the one
of the great intro themes of all time. What is
this from Pokemon? It's the original Pokemon theme song.

Speaker 3 (01:05:45):
Okay, it's not my thing. Oh there is.

Speaker 2 (01:05:50):
Pokemon's gonna round up all those Pokemons. They got their
little surveillance things. I got a Pokemon over here, remember
that game? And yeah, yeah, that's right. I got to

(01:06:20):
catch them all. You know, let's go search for the
Pokemons that are out there.

Speaker 3 (01:06:24):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:06:24):
And and this is the that remight when I see that,
and how juvenile that is, you know, combined with this
militarization of the police, reminds me of the Man who
would be King, which, by the way, is what we
should probably be calling Trump, the man who would be King.

Speaker 3 (01:06:38):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:06:39):
That excellent film that had Sean McConnery, Sean Connery, McConnery
and Michael Caine. And at one point they line up
the Afghans. They're going to take over this country. Here,
and he says, that guy there with the size five
hat head size for size five, I've had you guys,

(01:07:00):
want to make a bloody hero out of him. He's
the guy that's got an eighth grade outlook of the
world and it's thinking of Pokemon or whatever. Maybe not
even eighth grade, maybe eight year old. We make a
big DHS agent out of him. That's what I think
of you, guys at DHS, That's exactly what I think
of you. You're a bunch of children killing people.

Speaker 3 (01:07:23):
Go ahead.

Speaker 4 (01:07:24):
I was more talking about that other ad in the
deck for joining the military, which was the SYOP one
first seventh video.

Speaker 2 (01:07:35):
Yeah, that's right, we'll play that one here. This is yeah,
this is from Fort Bragg. This is something that they've
done multiple times now, glorifying syops against US. So your
government is glorifying nighttime raids, they're glorifying syops and this
is a recruitment ad. You know, you can be on

(01:07:56):
the other side of this insanity. You can be the
person who's controlling everybody. We are everywhere.

Speaker 8 (01:08:03):
Says there's another force applied in combat, but we generally
don't think of as a weapon of war. Bad weapons
words words are weapons.

Speaker 9 (01:08:27):
Knowing the truths is the only way in which to
influence people.

Speaker 3 (01:08:33):
The psychological warfare.

Speaker 2 (01:08:43):
And that ghost thing. I remember they did one of
these several years ago. I remember that walking ghost. This
is a new ad. They just keep doing that kind
of stuff.

Speaker 5 (01:08:51):
Go ahead, we have President Avante seventeen seventy six. The
military can be green lighted to murders suspected drug runners
in the high seas. They could be green lighted on
a mayor in soil. That's right, Yeah, that's right, Hi, Boost.
We have to kill all drug dealers that I don't
pardon Trump maggot logic. Well, once you get a pardon
from Trump, you're clear, You're fine.

Speaker 1 (01:09:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:09:12):
Guard, he's great. He's one of our guys. I talked
to him. He likes me. We're going to make money together.
It's a great deal.

Speaker 5 (01:09:18):
Love it, Guard Goldsmith. And of course you can find
Guard at Liberty Conspiracy Monday through Friday at six pm
on Rumble, and you can find him on Twitter at
Guard Goldsmith and on substack. Go check Guard out. Says
the people who voted to fund the NDAA and who
allowed Trump to use the military without any declaration of

(01:09:38):
war are guilty. Trump is guilty. Those who voted for
him to take my money are guilty.

Speaker 3 (01:09:43):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:09:44):
And you know that's the thing. As one of the
commenters said earlier, these war crime things don't ever stick.
And the fact that the NDAA is a guaranteed it's
going to pass. It doesn't matter how much money they
put into it. We went over trillion dollars this year.
It is always going to pass. That's why when they
take something that is really controversial, they don't feel like

(01:10:05):
they can get it through because it's such an affront
to the American people in the constitution, they'll stick it
in the NBAA and because they know it's a guaranteed pass. Yeah,
the military industrial complex runs this country. We've become the
national security state post World War Two. Everything is about
so called national security, and yet it doesn't make us

(01:10:26):
safe at all.

Speaker 5 (01:10:28):
Molly Brown Dog. They used to just plant evidence. Now
they blow it up. Yeah, Hi Boost says, dead men
tell no tales, kill them all.

Speaker 3 (01:10:37):
Yeah. Yeah, we are the pirates, aren't we?

Speaker 5 (01:10:41):
Yo Ho yo ho Pesidentovante seventeen seventy six, bounties, no
fly zones, land operations, regime change sounds like a war
to me, a real war, not a drug war. The
thing that really blows me away is the cavalier way
he just declares, Oh, yeah, we're going to impose an
oh fly zone over here. That's not just effect the country,
that's every other country then has to contend with that.

(01:11:04):
Every other country has to sit there and think, well
if I fly through this.

Speaker 2 (01:11:07):
Well he hasn't declared it has a no fly zone,
but effectively he did. He didn't use that term. Yes,
but again, this is the kind of semantics that they use.
We all know what he's doing. He's making it a
no fly zone. Well I'm not saying it's a no
fly zone, but you know, if you go there, you
might get killed.

Speaker 5 (01:11:22):
Yeah, we might accidentally think that your plane is transporting drugs.
And we all know what we do with suspected drug runners.

Speaker 2 (01:11:30):
I guess it's a no boat zone either from a
pirate peat r out of the water yar meaty.

Speaker 4 (01:11:38):
We found out their definition for a drug boat is
any boat with enough motors on it, So any plane
that's fast enough could be a drug plane.

Speaker 3 (01:11:46):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:11:47):
They all tend to go pretty fast to stay in
the air.

Speaker 2 (01:11:50):
You know, I'm no expert on the kind of fishing
that this guy was doing out of Columbia. But I'm
looking at that and I'm thinking, well, you know, if
I if I was doing some deep sea fishing, I
don't think I would have That's the whole thing I don't
like about fishing is just too slow moving. I don't
think i'd have the patience to sit there on a troller,
you know, going at.

Speaker 3 (01:12:09):
A slow speed out to where it is.

Speaker 2 (01:12:11):
You might need to have a trawler in order to
get the fish on it. But you know, but you know,
if I could get more motors on there so I
could get back and forth to work faster, I think
I would do that. But that's I don't know, killing
somebody because the kind of boat that they have excusing it,
that's insane.

Speaker 4 (01:12:28):
What a liberal mindset to say your boat is too fast?

Speaker 3 (01:12:32):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:12:33):
It's like you got too many rounds in your magazine
and you got too many motors on the back of
your boat.

Speaker 3 (01:12:40):
And I had to kill you.

Speaker 5 (01:12:42):
That's it really is, one two, three, four motors. Sorry, Bud,
that's a missile for you.

Speaker 2 (01:12:49):
So the the Libs will do it for the gun.
The conservative Trump supporters will do it for the boat.

Speaker 5 (01:12:56):
Chev Gen says Trump is easily worse than the other Democrats.

Speaker 3 (01:13:00):
That's right. I he as a democot lest never forget.

Speaker 5 (01:13:03):
Yeah, Molly brown dog. Trump has done enough damage to
the Constitution to warn impeachment, but it wouldn't solve the problem.
A new dictator would just take over in his place.

Speaker 2 (01:13:12):
That's right. He is precedent Trump, He's there to move it.
And I agree that you know these precedents that he's making,
and he's doing it with the complicity of people who
in the past would have opposed violation of the Constitution
because they were originalists. Now these people, these conservatives, applaud

(01:13:33):
it when it's Trump, and I see it across the board.
I mean I see it from not just media people,
but like people like Victor Davis Hanson, you know, historian
who's out there, and they make every kind of excuse
that you can make for Trump to set these things up.
I mean, if you're a historian and you can't figure
out the times that you live in, I'm not interested
in hearing what you have to say about things that

(01:13:54):
happened before you are live. So I can write off
Victor Davis Hanson completely.

Speaker 5 (01:13:59):
It's like that's scene from The Blues Brothers where they
meet up with the girls that are in love with
him again, and he just starts listing off every possible
excuse he could come up with for why whatever happened
happened or didn't happen, didn't happen, just like the sun
was in my eyes as they're wearing sunglasses and a tunnel.

Speaker 3 (01:14:16):
You know.

Speaker 5 (01:14:16):
Just that's what's going on with Trump. No matter what happens,
there's somebody there to list off all the reasons. Well attack,
it's not you know, he didn't do it. If he did,
it's actually a good thing anyway. Hi Boo said, you
have to pardon drug dealers to start wars against drug dealers.
That's right, you've got all the drug dealers locked up.
Who are you going to fight? Real Jason Barker and
of course Jason Barker's parts of Knights of the Storm,

(01:14:38):
which you can find it Nice of Thestorm dot Com
see the schedule for their show, Our show, Guard Show,
Tony Show, many shows. Nights of Thestorm dot Com says
pharmaceutical manufacturers have to do an environmental analysis on the
impact of their drugs to the water. But when it's
spent in al I guess we don't care about massive
amounts being blown into the water.

Speaker 2 (01:14:56):
Good, good point. I think werechard bow up these uh
these flour eye centers drinking the floor eyde under the water.

Speaker 5 (01:15:04):
Maybe to do that in Minecraft. Not really, we shouldn't.

Speaker 2 (01:15:10):
Yeah, I'm being facetious. I'm not calling for the uh
terrorism here.

Speaker 5 (01:15:14):
Do not go commit acts of violence.

Speaker 2 (01:15:16):
That's right, right, We're going to take a quick break, folks,
and we'll be right back.

Speaker 10 (01:15:50):
H M.

Speaker 1 (01:16:19):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (01:16:24):
Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:16:42):
Wellt's talk about this killer who I shot a couple
of National guardsmen in DC. Traveled across the country to
it came from Washington State to Washington, d C. This
was a killer that was trained by the CIA as
part of their zero Unit fighters in Afghanistan. The Double

(01:17:04):
Section there are licensed to kill people and the CIA
helped to bring thousands of Afghan partner forces called the
Zero Unit to the US under Biden's watch. This is
just the news, and again they want to make this partisan.
This was something that was happening under Trump as well.

(01:17:25):
Trump brought under Biden's watch because it all collapsed and
the war was lost.

Speaker 3 (01:17:30):
Under Biden.

Speaker 2 (01:17:31):
Trump could have done it, he had promised to do it.
He did not end the war. He could have ended
it and had an orderly withdrawal. Instead, it was a
panicked evacuation and that was the issue. But of course
the conservative media is making this strictly partisan, which is
also a bunch of nonsense. The Afghan national who has

(01:17:54):
been charged with shooting two members of the West Virginia
National Guard this week was reportedly a member of the
elite Afghan zero Unit forces backed by the CIA.

Speaker 3 (01:18:05):
Why do we.

Speaker 2 (01:18:06):
Call people that have been trained to do really evil stuff?
Why do we call them elite? Just call them evil.
The CIA appeared to have quietly cut a deal with
thousands of its paramilitary styles zero Unit forces in Afghanistan
in August of twenty twenty one, as everything collapsed and

(01:18:26):
the Taliban took back control of the country and its
capital of Kabul. According to a former intelligence officer who
spoke with Just the News who declined to be identified.

Speaker 3 (01:18:37):
The terms of the.

Speaker 2 (01:18:37):
Deals were that if the Zeros helped to secure Hamid
Karzai International Airport during the chaotic evacuation, then in exchange
for that and for their years of coordination with the
US Spy Agency, the fighters and their families would earn
an airlift to the US. The Afghan fighter trow thousands

(01:19:01):
of miles from the west coast of the US in
Washington State to attack two members of the West Virginia
National Guard, killing one of them. The other one is
seriously injured and may still die. Numerous news outlets have
reported that this guy was a member of the Zeri
units based out of Condahar. The US cut a deal
with the Afghan zero Unit commando forces to secure the

(01:19:24):
Kabil Airport.

Speaker 3 (01:19:25):
Again, I'm not.

Speaker 2 (01:19:26):
A military guy, but I looked at this and I thought,
you know, they had Bogram air Base, which is huge,
well fortified. Why did they choose to evacuate from a
civilian airport. That's the first thing I looked at. Scratched
my head. That didn't make any sense to me. Of course,
I don't know anything about wars. I just know when
they're justified. The US cut a deal with the Afghansi

(01:19:49):
units to go out and round up US citizens at
a Kabul. Maybe that's why they chose it, because it
was close to all their political out were. But anyway,
they went into the city and they gave them safe
escort in, and so they relied on the zeros to

(01:20:11):
help clear the airfield and then use the Afghan commandos
to provide security during evacuation. I always say that that
security could have been better, didn't. We have a bunch
of US military that were killed there, and they were
running the security for it. So New York Times reported
that this guy had enlisted with a zero unit at

(01:20:31):
a very young age. The guard members apparently that were
shot by him, were only blocks away from the White House.
One was twenty years old Sarah Beckstrom, and the twenty
four year old Andrew Wolf. Trump and ounced on Thursday
that Beckstrom and army specialists had died from gunshot wounds,
and added that Wolf remained in critical condition in the hospital.

(01:20:55):
Afghan Evak, a US based coalition advocating for Afghan refugees,
reportedly confirmed that this guy served in Unit three of
the Zero Units.

Speaker 3 (01:21:08):
Unit zero three I should say.

Speaker 2 (01:21:10):
Was evacuated by the US military in August twenty twenty one,
arrived in the US under a humanitarian parole, that he
was granted asylum in April, that he had a special
Immigrant Visa application under consideration which had received Chief of
Mission approval, and that his SIV application and CALM application

(01:21:30):
would have required review by the CIA. And so people
blame Biden. The Republicans blamed Biden. Democrats say, we have
but Trump administration signed off in his paperwork. Here's the reality.
This is a CIA and this is the military, and
they're calling the shots. And as it is in so

(01:21:53):
many instances, Trump and Biden are both just a couple
of puppets doing what they're told by their donors and
by the military industrial complex. Legacy media blames Trump for
Biden's program. See and this is just a news shame
on you. This is a bipartisan war. It's a bipartisan failure.

(01:22:14):
And you should understand that doesn't matter whether it's a
Trump or Biden. It doesn't matter if it's Democrat or Republican.
The CIA is running this country and this is the
kind of thing that they do. Thousands of these units,
these zero Unit guys were brought in. NBC News previously
reported that ten thousand to twelve thousand members of the
Zero Units were evacuated from Afghanistan. How elite is that

(01:22:39):
if you got din or twelve thousand, though, this is
not like a half dozen highly trained individuals who've gone
through all kinds of stuff like the Seal Units or
something like that.

Speaker 3 (01:22:49):
They're just killers.

Speaker 2 (01:22:51):
The Washington Post reported that the Zero Unit soldiers collected
US civilian personnel members from their homes there in Kabul
and got them to the air. There were days when
we couldn't get more people through the gates because the
CIA kept pushing their own people. They wanted them out.
We wanted to do what we could to help, but
it threw us back, and there were days when we

(01:23:12):
couldn't let others in the gate because we were helping
the CIA and their Afghans. First, Yeah, that's the way
this thing operates. So what are these zero Units? They
also called them Double O units again a license to kill.
There were four main regional CIA backed Afghan paramilitary units.

(01:23:34):
They were officially known as zero one, zero two, zero three,
zero four, created and controlled by the CIA. Unlike the
Afghan National Armies regular commandos which fell under the Afghan
Ministry of Defense. Now the zero units were recruited, trained, paid, equipped,
and tasks organized directly by the CIA. They did not

(01:23:59):
answer to the Afghan government in any meaningful way. And
you know, when I look at this, this is again
going back to Iran. When I talked to when I
was an engineering school at USF and there were a
lot of Iranian students because of the time, the shaw
of Iran was still there ally of the US and

(01:24:20):
the people were wearing masks when they protested what was
happening in Iran? And I asked him about that, and
they said, well, they told me about the Savak. The
Savak was a secret police organized and trained by the
CIA to squelch any political opposition by arresting, torturing, imprisoning,

(01:24:41):
killing people.

Speaker 3 (01:24:43):
That's what the CIA does. That's what the.

Speaker 2 (01:24:45):
CIA was doing in Afghanistan. It's amazing how ruthless and
criminal the American government has become. That's why I call
the CIA the criminal Intelligence Agency. That's really what they are.
They are, however, central to our government almost exclusively night
raids and direct action kill and capture missions targeting high

(01:25:09):
value Taliban, Al Qaeda, and later ISIS leaders, except those
are our allies. We just put a former al Qaeda
ISIS guy in as the head of Syria, and even
though he's killing Christians and other minority groups, Trump wined
and dined him at the White House and the Oval
Office honored him. These people were the CIA's primary ground

(01:25:33):
force for counter terrorism operations outside of the conventional US
military chain of command. They were extremely effective and feared.
They conducted thousands of night raids, two to three thousand
per year at peak. And what do we see with
this DHS recruitment video night raids? Right, We're going to
go from full militarized no knock raids by SWAT teams

(01:25:57):
to nighttime night vision, I guess is what we're going
to be looking at from DHS repeatedly accused by the UN,
Afghan officials and human rights groups of serious abuses such
as extra judicial killings like warpete is doing, torture, disappearing people,
and civilian casualties during raids. Several detailed UN and Human

(01:26:21):
Rights Watch reports, especially between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty one,
singled them out. Now that's two of those three years
is under Trump right again, the bipartisan nature of this
and the fact that Trump and Biden are just auto

(01:26:43):
pens for the military industrial complex and their donors. You know,
Trump is making a big deal of Biden being an
auto pen. I won'der who's authority did he do this
kind of stuff? I won't know who's authority? Are you
doing things?

Speaker 3 (01:26:55):
Trump?

Speaker 2 (01:26:56):
Is this your idea or is it something that's been
told to you by your donor your contributors, by the
military industrial complex and the CIA. They need to replace
probably all of the presidents from the middle of the
twentieth century on with auto pen portraits, not just Biden.
So the US supplied weapons night vision goggles like DHS

(01:27:18):
now has and makes a big deal out of it,
and join DHS, and you get to wear night vision
goggles and you need to, and you get an opportunity
to do to Americans, do things in America that the
CIA has been training people to do in foreign countries.
The tactics and the weapons of war abroad become instruments

(01:27:41):
of tyranny at home, just like Madison said, night vision goggles.
Helicopter is often flown by CIA contracted air wing pilots
or US Army one hundred and sixtieth sore when attached,
frequently operated with embedded US special forces like Sealed Team six,
those Venezuela Murder or just pure CIA tasking. After the

(01:28:06):
twenty twenty one US withdrawal. When Kabul fell in August
of twenty twenty one, many zero Unit members were hastily
evacuated by the CIA along with their families because the
Taliban had placed them at the top of their kill list.
A large number we resettled in the US. The units
effectively ceased to exist as fighting forces after the Afghan

(01:28:27):
government collapsed. In short, Zero units with the CIA's Afghan
Hunter Killer teams highly capable, deniable from the US perspective,
and extremely controversial. Well again deniable because everything that the
CIA does they deny. But is it any wonder that

(01:28:50):
when we create an assassin monster like that, that if
he has if he has difficulty living with what he's done,
that he would then take it out on people from
the country that had trained him to do this to
his own countrymen? Right, I don't see any surprise in
any of that at all, And it sickens me to

(01:29:12):
see this turned into oh it was Biden.

Speaker 3 (01:29:14):
Who did it?

Speaker 2 (01:29:14):
Oh, it's Trump who did it. It's the corruption of
the American government. And so the DC National Guard shooter
worked for CIA back Condahart Strike Force in Afghanistan, as
I just said, granted asylum by the Trump administration earlier
this year. His cooperation with the CIA has been confirmed
by the Spy Agency's director, John Ratcliffe, former Afghan general.

(01:29:40):
So that unit, the zero three unit that he was in,
they were the most active and professional forces, trained and
equipped by the CIA. All the operations were conducted under
CIA command. Human Rights Watch reported in twenty nineteen the
Afghan members of the zero units have been responsible for
extra judicial executions, enforced disappearances, indiscriminate air strikes, attacks on

(01:30:06):
medical facilities, and other violations of international humanitarian law or
the laws of war. You see, this has been going
on for a very long time, and it just keeps
getting worse and metastasizes to the extent that everybody sees it,
and they continue to do it because there's never any consequences.
During these killer capture operations, it would involve these forces

(01:30:30):
would assault, in some cases kill medical staff. They would
assault or kill accompanying civilian or non combatant caregivers causing
damage to the facilities. This is what happens when we
have severed any attempt to have a moral restraint on war.

(01:30:51):
This is what we've become, the kind of monsters that
we've become. And so when you look at you know
where this guy is coming from in Afghani. At the
same time this is all happening. The Daily Skeptic has
an article about the massive number of Afghans that have
immigrated into the UK. Says Reuters is trying to fact

(01:31:13):
check away the appalling scourge of Afghan sex attacks. It's
been less than a week since an Afghan national admitted
raping a twelve year old girl in Warwickshire. The crime
was first propelled in the news cycle over the summer,
amidst allegations that officials and the police and local council

(01:31:34):
were deliberately concealing the nationality of the alleged defenders. His
co defendant, Muhammed, is also an Afghan national. They pleaded
not guilty to attempting to take a child, aiding and
a betting, rape of a child under thirteen, an intentional
strangulation of the girl. It's a high profile case an

(01:31:55):
example of the link between migration and sex crimes and
the way British and stitutions are trying to downplay this
obvious reality.

Speaker 3 (01:32:02):
And of course they're not the only ones.

Speaker 2 (01:32:04):
Reuters publish an article suggesting that to say that this
is an Afghan issue is unfounded. They're hoping to fact
check a viral social media post which includes a chart
based on the Center for Migration Control data showing that
Afghans have the highest rate of sexual assault convictions by

(01:32:26):
nationality in the UK at fifty nine per ten thousand,
and so that's the fact. Then in June, yet another
Afghan was convicted of dragging a young schoolgirl behind a
pub in the town center and raping her. No remorse
was shown during sentencing as he repeatedly screamed liar at

(01:32:49):
the judge. He sought to justify his depravity as a
simple case of cultural differences exacerbated by language barriers. This
reminds me of the story of when the British went
into India and the military officer saw they had a

(01:33:09):
custom where they would when somebody died, they would also
throw the living widow on the funeral pyre and burn
her alive. They saw they said stop that. They came
up to him. They said, but Sutter, you don't understand.
We have a custom. They said, we have a custom
as well in our country we kill people who do that.

(01:33:31):
It's a cultural difference. So this is another one of
those things. Just there are certain cultures that you cannot integrate.
There's no number of Afghans that is safe to bring in,
not one, not two. The appropriate number of Afghans to
bring into your country is zero, is zero. Their culture

(01:33:54):
is violent and barbaric. They are routinely no matter where
they go, they set up these cabals that allows themselves
to rape. You know, girls, whether the Muslim culture is
just bad, it's evil. You heard it here first, I
guess Joe, Sorry, letes go ahead.

Speaker 4 (01:34:13):
I have the full quote here from Charles James net
here says you say that it is your custom to
burn widows. Very well, we also have a custom. When
a man burns a woman alive, we tie a rope
around their necks and then we hang them. Build your
funeral pyre beside it. My carpenters will build our gallows.

(01:34:33):
You may follow your customs, then we will follow ours.

Speaker 2 (01:34:38):
Like the early days after two thousand and one, there
was a joke going around the little lady had her
knitting needles taken away by TSA because I'm afraid she's.

Speaker 3 (01:34:46):
Gonna knit an Afghan.

Speaker 2 (01:34:50):
So it's just yeah, it's a blanket condemnation of the
culture that we're involved in here.

Speaker 5 (01:34:55):
You don't if we were a serious country, we would
not be importing Afghans or small or these other violent
backwards people that cannot contribute in any meaningful way to
our society. They have not made anything good out of
their countries and they will not be a benefit to ours.

Speaker 3 (01:35:14):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:35:15):
The Daily Mail, based on freedom of information requests to
police forces, found that Afghans were arrested for sex crimes
at a rate that is twenty times higher than Brits.
Daily's skeptic says it is because the norms and socialization
processes of these men are fundamentally different and immeasurably worse
than those here. Men raised in a nation where women

(01:35:38):
are seen as less than cattle are of course more
likely to as a cohort to demonstrate attitudes and behaviors
that these islands did not have In the Middle Ages.
The country feels at the breaking point, the open borders
experiment has failed. There is no doubt that radical change
is coming. Legacy media like Reuters is trying to fact

(01:36:00):
check away reality. They are the last stand of a
dying political paradigm. Their relevance is waning and bereft of
any ideological underpinning aside from vapid internationalism and multi culturalism.
That's why I have to say, you know, we have
to we're going to reclaim our culture our country.

Speaker 3 (01:36:21):
You can't.

Speaker 2 (01:36:24):
Have a culture wharf, you don't have a culture. We
have to decide what our culture should be. And we
have to be unapologetic about standing up for that culture.
And so you know people are looking at this and
just showing itself what's going on, Well, it has to
be the CIA.

Speaker 3 (01:36:38):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (01:36:38):
You need to understand how the CIA is involved from
the very inception of this, as well as the psychological
warfare groups like that video I just showed you a
Fort Bragg.

Speaker 5 (01:36:49):
The of course Fort Bragg is where we're It might
have been just me, but there was that story of
all the drug dealing and drug rush and all kinds
of various actions that were happening out of Fort Bragg by.

Speaker 3 (01:37:02):
The operations groups. Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 5 (01:37:04):
And you know, this is what they get up to
in their spare time. Apparently when they're not murdering people
for Donald Trump, they are going crazy and dealing drugs.

Speaker 2 (01:37:18):
We met a guy who was a former Navy seal.
Its kind of interesting in the circumstances he told, and
I believe he he said. And he was kind of
a small guy, but he was tough and he knew
how to survive in the woods. He said, no matter
what happens to society, he says, I could just walk
out in the woods and never come back and I'd

(01:37:38):
be able to survive out there. And he got out
of the seals because he was he was he said,
he was planting explosives on a bridge somewhere down South America.
I don't thinking, wait a minute, what's this about. And he
fell as he was doing it and he injured his
back and that took him out of the service. But

(01:38:00):
he was somebody that we decided that we didn't really
want to hang around with anymore. He told us a
story about how he was in a bar and some
guy tried to pick a fight with him and he
was just leave me alone, and the guy followed him
outside and he said, I just took out my knife
and I slid him across the throat, not deep enough
to cut the trachia, but you know, pretty bad. And

(01:38:22):
he said he was arrested, and when they brought him
in for arraignment, he said, the military came in there
and went up and said something to the judge, and
judge that you can go with him, go ahead.

Speaker 3 (01:38:33):
This is the kind of government we've got.

Speaker 2 (01:38:35):
They cover up for that kind of stuff, And I'm like,
I don't think we want to know this guy at all.

Speaker 5 (01:38:42):
You also, it's also a matter of like, if you're
telling the truth, this is terrible. Yeah, but if you're not,
you're the type of person that wants to lie about
this kind of thing because you think it makes you
sound cool. In which case was also another person you
don't want to be around.

Speaker 3 (01:38:57):
Yeah, he was a friend of a friend.

Speaker 5 (01:38:58):
And the thing is you also see this with the
sort of thing like Chris Kyle, the best sniper to
ever grace the Navy seals. His book is loaded with
inaccuracies and things he's either made up or lied about,
lied about fighting Jesse Ventura knocking him out, and you know,
as a state lost that case with all the sympathy

(01:39:20):
provided by the fact that Chris Kyle died and it
was his technically widow who was trave him. That was
the estate they lost that case to. Jesse Ventura. Jesse Ventura.

Speaker 2 (01:39:31):
Yeah, that reminds me of that movie Sunset that had
Bruce Willis. I think it's James Garner and it was
set in the early days of Hollywood and Tom Mixed
meeting Wyatt and played by an older James Gardner, and
so he would talk about things that happened in the.

Speaker 3 (01:39:49):
Old West and he goes, is that that really happening?

Speaker 12 (01:39:51):
Is?

Speaker 3 (01:39:51):
Yeah, give or take a liar to good?

Speaker 2 (01:39:54):
Basically the way these guys he kept using that line,
give her take a liar to One.

Speaker 5 (01:39:58):
Of my favorite parts about that that movie is at
the very end when they're riding off into the sunset.
They're going off on a train back east and they're
riding off into the sunset. So it's just more of this,
you know, they're like, oh, it's Hollywood magic, it's meant
to be goofy and silly, and if you're actually paying attention,
you notice, like, wait a minute, they're going back east
and they're driving off into the sunset. This doesn't make
any sense. It's all give or take a liar two.

Speaker 2 (01:40:21):
That's right, that's right. Well, we're gonna take a quick break, folks,
and we will be right back. Let's see hang on
a second. Let me get some Christmas songs up here.
Here's one.

Speaker 1 (01:41:41):
You're listening to The David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (01:41:47):
Here newsnow at apsradionews dot com or get the APS
Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 5 (01:41:57):
Welcome back, folks, and real quickly, I want to remind
you that it is your support that keeps the show
up and running. We appreciate everyone that donates and keeps
us going, so thank you all very much, and you
can get us.

Speaker 2 (01:42:09):
And I have a list here of donations, and I
apologize I don't have. We don't really know where we
ended up at the end of the month of this
last time, because there's Karen got six, she was sick
over Thanksgiving, and then Lance got sick after that as well, so.

Speaker 3 (01:42:26):
We got a lot of that happening.

Speaker 2 (01:42:27):
We didn't get out and pick up the checks on
the po box over the weekend, so we're really not
sure about that. We'll let you know about that tomorrow,
but I did want to mention these people whose checks
we did process earlier. This is Anne Ze, Fred and
Jackie U, Helen T, Stephanie Kay, Ronald C, Mary N.

(01:42:49):
Chip and Tina B, Jack H, Robert and Laura B,
Raymond b, Eric Kay, Philip and Kelly M and Stacy.
Those are checks and we will tell you tomorrow the
names of the people who have contributed that we've not
announced yet on zell and on cash app. But when
we look at Thanksgiving, we do give thanks for those

(01:43:12):
of you who have supported us, especially with your prayers
over this last year. Has we look back at this
year has been a very challenging year for us on
a personal level, and we really do appreciate your prayers
for the things that happened health wise with me and
also with the loss of Karen's brother twin brother recently.

(01:43:33):
So we just we thank God, and that is what
really Thanksgiving is about. That's one of the reasons I
like it in many ways better than what Christmas has
become with the commercialization of it, because Thanksgiving is a
time to look back in gratitude and thanks to God
and also for repentance. Is the history of it.

Speaker 3 (01:43:55):
But you know.

Speaker 2 (01:43:56):
I often think, you know, when we talk about Thanksgiving
and people talk about how healthy it is to have
an attitude of thankfulness and gratitude, often wonder for people
who don't believe in God, who are they thankful too?
Who are they grateful to? What are they thankful for?
Is that just two random chance processes that they express

(01:44:19):
their gratitude? I don't really understand it, but yeah, yeah,
something else that you want to cover?

Speaker 5 (01:44:24):
Yeah, I want to make sure that I let people know.
Then Homestead Products dot shop is having a sale on
their crazy ass gun loob, So if you do a
lot of shooting and you need new gun lube, go
check out Homestead Products dot shop. It's a micro lubricant
that attaches to the metal surface at the molecular level
with no build up. It repels moisture and prevents rust,

(01:44:45):
doesn't run like other oily lubricants do. It doesn't get
sticky or pick up dust or dirt or gum up,
will not attract lint or hair, and has no foul odor.
So if you're looking for a new gun lube, if
you're almost out, want to get something that high quality,
go to Homestead Products dot chop and check out their
crazy ass gun lube. And of course you can get
ten percent off all the products at Homestead Products dot

(01:45:08):
chop by using promo code Night And.

Speaker 3 (01:45:11):
Of course they have some great stuff. Yeah we do.

Speaker 5 (01:45:13):
They work very very hard to make sure that their
products are high quality, made in America, and there are
things that you can actually use that are actually useful.
And quickly, I want to remind you can go to
subscribe Star dot comport slash the David nighthro if you'd
like to support us directly. It's a very easy way.
It's fire and forget. You can sign up and then
it will charge you monthly based on whatever card you've

(01:45:35):
put in. The Only time you ever need to worry
about it is if your card, you know, gets canceled
or expires. So we think everyone on subscribe Star and
if you go there and sign up. I try to
or every day I post the links to the show,
and I try to make sure that I post all
the articles that we cover on the show as well.

Speaker 2 (01:45:54):
Yes, a lot of times I have people say, you know,
what was that article that you were talking about? So
that up for people there as a reference as well.

Speaker 5 (01:46:02):
Also, I got a comment here from Karen Carpenter says,
good morning, Travis. How's the puppy? We need a puppy
cam update? Did you give him a name? The puppies
doing great. He's a lot of fun. He was very
very young when he was taken from his mother. You know,
we encountered them with just three puppies. The mother was
nowhere to be found, so he's very bity and he

(01:46:24):
doesn't have, you know, a mother there to kind of
put him in his place and say hey, stop that,
knock that off. So I'm getting scratches and little bite
marks all over my hands as we're doing our best
to work with him, but he's at the age where
he doesn't really understand, so you just have to redirect him.

Speaker 3 (01:46:40):
The worst one was your son.

Speaker 2 (01:46:41):
We were up there, Karen and I were sitting there
watching him last week, and I was looking at something
else and I here, Karen, stop them stopping and I
configure what was going to look around and Travis's son
is setting on the floor wailing because the puppies got
his foot is gnawing on it, and it's like, ah,
this is fucking nightmare. You know, he didn't know what

(01:47:02):
to do to get the puppy off.

Speaker 5 (01:47:04):
No, no babies or puppies were hurt. It was just shocking. Yeah,
no skin was broken, but he was like he was
just very surprised.

Speaker 2 (01:47:12):
I guess it shocked us because Karen had a nightmare
that night that she was because she had gone to
Florida for the funerals and she had a nightmare that
there was an alligator that did that to her. It's like,
that's not the way they operate. They would definitely break
the skin. They'll drag you into the water, into the
death roll.

Speaker 5 (01:47:32):
But yeah, we did decide on a name as well.
We decided we'd name him Bishop. I like the name Bishop,
and also, you know, it's the name of the android
from the original Alien film. Fun fact about that he
was played by Ian Home. Ian Home played Bilbo in
the Lord of the Rings films, and he also voiced
Frodo in the Lord of the Rings radio adaptation from

(01:47:53):
Guys Everywhere. He was like, Michael King, Yeah, so his
name is Bishop. You'll probably be seeing more of him.

Speaker 3 (01:47:59):
Who knows me.

Speaker 5 (01:48:00):
I can send Lance a picture of him and we'll
get it pulled up for you by the end of
the show or something.

Speaker 3 (01:48:05):
Plus it sounds good together.

Speaker 5 (01:48:06):
Bishop Knight got a chess motif going on.

Speaker 3 (01:48:10):
I remember I interviewed Tony Rook out of the UK.

Speaker 2 (01:48:13):
He did a mock trial about nine to eleven and
a documentary about that, and his name was Tony Rook,
and so he said, yeah, Rook and Knight, but with
a Bishop and Rook you could actually do a castling move,
which we can't do with a night anyway. So Thanksgiving,
of course, and we rebroadcast some of my comments about

(01:48:35):
the original Thanksgiving on Thanksgiving sixteen twenty one. And you
know what, as they originally came, they were very explicit
about why they came. It was to spread the Christian
faith because they wanted to help the Indians who were here.
And when we look at a Christian nationalism, this is

(01:48:57):
what I think of when I think of it, and
that is the aspect that we are going to establish
a nation based on Christian principles, not the fact that
we are going to have everybody attend a particular church
or something like that. And that means Christian principles that
don't murder people that are struggling in the water. I'm

(01:49:18):
disgusted with these people anyway about only about half of
the original one hundred and two members who boarded in
England a year earlier survived the sea voyage and the
cruel winter in the New World. And that was one
of the things I think was so amazing. When we
went to Plymouth Rock one year, we looked at it

(01:49:40):
and they had the ships replicas of the ships.

Speaker 3 (01:49:43):
That were there.

Speaker 2 (01:49:44):
I remember looking at that and thing, how in the
world could you get one hundred people on that ship
where they standing.

Speaker 3 (01:49:51):
Shoulder the entire voyage. I just didn't get it.

Speaker 2 (01:49:54):
I mean, you know, you talk about living conditions that
people were under at that time. And of course the
big effort by the New York Times and the Left
to create the sixteen nineteen project was to deny our
Christian heritage and to change our heritage into one of
greed and slavery. That was on exhibit in Jamestown.

Speaker 5 (01:50:17):
And the thing is, in all periods of history, in
anywhere you look, you can find examples to point to
to make your case. For Look, these people were just
nothing but cruel, vindictive, evil people. You can point to
and pull specific examples out if you want to, from
any time period, from any culture.

Speaker 2 (01:50:38):
And you can do that with any historical figure as well.
You can look at somebody's life and you can point
to the best things that they did or the best
things that they said, or you can point to the
worst aspects of it. Because everybody is a mixed a
mixture of good and bad, and so it just is
how you choose to portray it and what your motivations

(01:50:59):
are in terms of making something look good or look bad.
But I think it's always good to go back and
to eat the meat and throw out the bones, especially
on Thanksgipping right, I don't have any bones to pick.

Speaker 4 (01:51:11):
This is one of the medius times in history in
terms of the good that came out of it is
one of the best. There's good and bad from everything,
but this is one of the few times where the
good definitely outweighed the bad by a large margin, which
is of course why they want to deconstruct it all.

Speaker 2 (01:51:30):
And the Indians and the Pilgrims live together in peace
for about four generations, and then that Fourth Turning happened
and there was a war, and so people can argue
about who started the wars. They always do, and you
will always depending on your perspective, you choose one side
or the other. But it's very difficult to tell on
most of these things which side started the war, But

(01:51:52):
they did a little at peace for quite some time there,
and it is truly an amazing story.

Speaker 3 (01:51:57):
I would.

Speaker 2 (01:52:00):
Encourage you, if you have children and grandchildren, to look
at the story of Squanto in terms of God's providence
and how he helped them, and how he was really
miraculously providentially put in place there when these people landed,
and why they land and the fact that they landed
there was strange enough. I mean, they were headed for
northern Virginia. A storm blew them off course, and then

(01:52:23):
they realized that tried to put out to see several times,
kept getting pushed back and pushed back. Finally they land
And at the place where they land there's an Indian
who speaks English and has been trained because he was
kidnapped earlier but then released by a Christian. He was
trained in the meantime about how to grow food and things.

(01:52:45):
Switch to the Pilgrims, for all of their great motivations,
had no practical skills. It's kind of like we look
at things. If society breaks down, there's going to be
a lot of Pilgrims out there, especially from the sense
that John Wayn would always say, well, Pilgrim, you know

(01:53:05):
you're here and you're out of your depth. You think
you're going to survive this or not. But yeah, it
was a very interesting story.

Speaker 4 (01:53:15):
The providence of it is amazing. How they get blown
way off course to the one spot where there's very
very few Indians that could speak English and help them out.
It's kind of like in Star Trek or wherever where
they go to a planet and everyone it was a
Star Trek they all speak English. Pretty there.

Speaker 2 (01:53:37):
Yeah, no idea said that about Star Trek. How providential
We've gone to a planet where the gravity is the same,
the air is the same, and they even can speak English.

Speaker 3 (01:53:45):
I guess so.

Speaker 2 (01:53:46):
And anyway, it didn't become an official holiday until the
nineteen forties, even though it was a Thanksgiving decoration by
Washington and you had Benjamin Franklin lectured the people there, said,
you know, God's providence, we have to see how God's
providence helped us to prevail against Great Britain, the biggest

(01:54:09):
nation of the world, and told them that they needed
to proceed with daily prayer as they had when they
fought the war in order to put together the Constitution.
But then after that you had the idea that it
wasn't something that people should do again. Jefferson felt that

(01:54:29):
there should not be a proclamation, and he took the
position even though the separation of church and state, that
that phrasing that letter to the Danbury Baptist was to say,
there is a wall around the federal government, and we
are not going to establish and pick one Christian denomination
to be the official federal established religion. There were established

(01:54:54):
religions in almost all the states at the time the
federal government was created, and they did not with the
First Amendment. They continued in Massachusetts and other places in
the eighteen thirties and eighteen forties, and so it wasn't
about that, and it wasn't about suppressing the exercise of
your religion as a member of the government or as

(01:55:18):
a government employee at a school or any other place.
It was never about that. They kind of read that
into that because of Jefferson's refusal to issue a Thanksgiving proclamation,
but it was later done by Abraham Lincoln during the war,
and every president subsequent to that would put out a proclamation.

(01:55:42):
Roosevelt made it official in nineteen forty one. As a
matter of fact, he picked he moved it earlier than
had traditionally been done by a week because he wanted
to kick off the Christmas shopping season a little bit earlier,
and during the depression of the endo the depression and
people did not like him moving it, so they pushed

(01:56:04):
back against that, but it became official with him then,
And so now we have in twenty twenty five we
have Trump's official Thanksgiving declaration, which really was not a
declaration of thinks. It was really more of a ball
humbug and him boasting about what he had done. So
it was rather than thanking God a great deal, he

(01:56:26):
was thinking himself and patting himself on the back, as
you would expect, while warpete is bragging about the murders
that he's committed. So the founder is even the least religious,
possessed a healthy fear of Providence and were humble enough
to invite God's blessing on their land. Today, similar official
declarations would be met by the secularists with derision and

(01:56:48):
the tiresome warning about the threat that Christianity presents to democracy.
But while the men who made this great nation didn't
want a theocracy. They certainly didn't envision a people who
enjoy the fruits of prosperity and freedom without acknowledging their
divine source, and neither should we. So let's not be
afraid to bow our heads in gratitude, and let's not

(01:57:13):
forget to confess our sins, like the national sin of
unprovoked wars and murder, unashamed murder of the unborn, murder
of civilians, whether it is genocidal for land, whether it
is not necessarily.

Speaker 3 (01:57:32):
To kill all Venezuelans, but just we just want to
take their well, that's all.

Speaker 2 (01:57:36):
It's just it's still reprehensible, and it is a national sin.
Let's pray for God to heal and renew this unique
experiment and self government Rights World Magazine, and I agree
with them. And so it is a celebration of family
as well. And that is the other nice thing about it.

(01:57:57):
It doesn't they've not found really a way to commercialize it,
which which is really astonishing. You know, when you look
at this, they've commercialized everything else. Every other holiday is
incredibly commercialized, but not Thanksgiving, which is unusual. I guess
you could say that Black Friday is a commercialization of it,

(01:58:18):
you know, but.

Speaker 5 (01:58:19):
It's creeping in along the edges.

Speaker 3 (01:58:21):
Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:58:23):
So anyway, that is a strange thing about Trump is
what a communtionion he.

Speaker 5 (01:58:30):
Was Scrooge McDonald trump.

Speaker 2 (01:58:34):
A Republican strategist who is on CNN said he can't
even believe Trump's Thanksgiving Day rant. This was the rant
that he had against Tim Waltz, calling him seriously retarded
and saying that Ohan Omar, a Somali immigrant, always wrapped
in her swaddling hajab. Well, we should understand the issue

(01:58:58):
that is. I mean, he he's saying it in the
worst possible way, but there's a great deal of truth
and the problem that has been created there in Minnesota,
and that has been that Tim Waltz has been a
part of because he wants to get the votes of

(01:59:19):
the Muslims there in Little Mogadishu, which is what people
calling Minneapolis now. He wants those votes, the people who
supported Ilhan Omar, and he saddles up right next to her.
And so this one guy who was on CNN, his
name is Abdul He said, when I saw it yesterday,
I was like, oh, bro, you've got to be kidding me.

(01:59:39):
Now because he said something like I think it was
swaddling clothing, he said, using the image we usually associate
with Christmas in Christ and Jesus. And you're saying that
is a swaddling jab well, I think Tim Waltz has
been swaddling Muslims over there.

Speaker 3 (01:59:55):
This is.

Speaker 13 (01:59:57):
Minnesota taxpayers earmark to hungry children wind up in the
hands of a Somali terrorist group. The allegations center around
a massive welfare fraud case being brought in Minnesota.

Speaker 5 (02:00:10):
A seventy eighth seventy.

Speaker 13 (02:00:11):
Eighth defendant was charged just today and now reports are
oh Shabab that some of the stolen money may wound
up in the hands of All Shabab, a Somali based
terror group. In response, President Trump says he intends to
end deportation protections for about seven hundred Somali nationals in Minnesota,
calling Minnesota a quote hub for Somemali gang networks, though

(02:00:36):
he's provided no evidence for that.

Speaker 3 (02:00:38):
So you just provide the evidence on the ground.

Speaker 13 (02:00:40):
Investigative for bond that Richard McHugh is at the federal
courthouse in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Forest tonight, rich what are you learning.

Speaker 6 (02:00:49):
Hi, Elizabeth While We're at the federal courthouse where that
seventy eighth indictment came down just a few hours ago.
All of it tied to feeding our Future.

Speaker 3 (02:00:57):
That's the current looks like a hub.

Speaker 7 (02:00:59):
Center of all of this fraud.

Speaker 6 (02:01:01):
We spoke with current and former federal sources and they
say they tell us billions have been stolen since twenty nineteen,
that Minnesota is just riddled with fraud, and that a
lot of this money goes back to Somalia, and a
cut of all that money has gone to the al
Qaeda linked terror group Al Shabab. But I want to

(02:01:22):
like reset this for views because it's complicated. This all
stems from feeding our Future. That's the largest COVID fraud ever.
These criminals open more than children's federal program sites throughout
Minnesota and sites live.

Speaker 3 (02:01:35):
COVID was a fraud.

Speaker 7 (02:01:37):
Thousands of children a day.

Speaker 6 (02:01:38):
They created fake attendance rosters, fake invoices, and the government
reimburse them. David Gaither, he's a former state senator here,
he saw this first hand.

Speaker 2 (02:01:49):
I covered this sound before COVID downtown Minneapolis.

Speaker 9 (02:01:53):
This is the epicenter of some of the biggest fraud
and waste of use in this.

Speaker 3 (02:01:56):
Area order right now.

Speaker 7 (02:01:58):
He's currently in jail federal to do.

Speaker 9 (02:02:01):
This restaurant, which seats about thirty five supposedly served eighteen
thousand plus meals a day, a day a day for
seven months, eighteen thousand plus.

Speaker 3 (02:02:14):
That's a lot of people, threty five at a time.

Speaker 6 (02:02:17):
She was a fixture at this restaurant, the Safari during
her run for office.

Speaker 7 (02:02:22):
I think we have a photo of.

Speaker 6 (02:02:23):
Her at the restaurant with her supporters in twenty eighteen.
Feeding our future. That's that corrupt nonprofit. It was the
epicenter of it, but others spawned from it. They were
home relocation services, child autism. They were bilking three hundred
and ninety nine million in services fraud in twenty twenty
three alone.

Speaker 7 (02:02:41):
To date, eighty six people have.

Speaker 6 (02:02:42):
Been indicted in counting federal authorities, telling news nations, seventy
nine of them are of Somali descent.

Speaker 2 (02:02:51):
They were feeding their future. They were telling you what
they were doing, just not in the way that you
might claim.

Speaker 3 (02:02:55):
Well, perpetrators of the crime.

Speaker 5 (02:02:58):
We are not holding a convo.

Speaker 9 (02:02:59):
Those that created the opportunity to have those persons what they.

Speaker 7 (02:03:02):
Did, and that would be.

Speaker 9 (02:03:04):
The policy maker, the Attorney General, and the administration.

Speaker 7 (02:03:09):
Now federal sources the way it means.

Speaker 6 (02:03:11):
Tim Waltz, several of them said the same thing to me, Elizabeth.
They say, there's a saying in the Somali community here
that when it rains in Minneapolis, umbrellas go up in Mogadishu.

Speaker 7 (02:03:21):
That just about sums it up back to you.

Speaker 13 (02:03:23):
Wow, almost one hundred people charged in this scheme so far.
Rich McKee reporting in Minneapolis, thanks so much.

Speaker 3 (02:03:31):
And I remember covering that because I remember laughing at
the name of El Shabab. It reminded me of quick
drama grod His al Kabob or whatever, Al Cabog.

Speaker 2 (02:03:40):
Yeah, but this is what it looks like there in Minneapolis.
This is a football stadium that they took over by
Somali so they could hold a large group prayer. And
so whenever we got a large number of people like this,
they can control politicians like Tim Waltz.

Speaker 5 (02:03:59):
I would have sent ice in there, That's what I
would have done.

Speaker 2 (02:04:04):
And and so when you look at the timeline of
Somali fraud, this is another.

Speaker 5 (02:04:11):
Report center of a major fraud case.

Speaker 12 (02:04:13):
Federal prosecutors indicted five people for their roles in offering
a juror one hundred and twenty thousand dollars for a
not guilty verdict in the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme.
Its attorney says the group targeted jurf too because she
was the youngest.

Speaker 3 (02:04:27):
Juror commit fraud. They will only jur of color well bribe.

Speaker 12 (02:04:32):
They dug up information on her family online and even
put a GPS tracking device on her car to track
her whereabouts. During their investigation, investigators uncovered a video of
one of the defendants leaving a bag of money at
the juror's home. You may recall, the juror came forward
with the bribe, and five of the seven defendants were
found guilty of fraud. They were convicted for stealing millions

(02:04:54):
of dollars from the government meant to feed hungry kids
during the pandemic.

Speaker 2 (02:04:59):
Well again, and I'm saying that ilhan Omar was wearing
a swaddling a job was probably one of the least
insults that he could have leveled at are The real
stuff was actually more damaging, Which is the problem, because
that's part of what Trump's gimmick is. It's really kind
of a wwe gimmick, the name calling and all the
rest of the stuff, rather than pointing out the reality

(02:05:21):
of what's going on there. I hope they do something,
but we'll have to wait and see.

Speaker 5 (02:05:27):
One of the worst things is Minnesota is full of
such corn fed, pure Americana type individuals, and they're being
absolutely screwed over by the governments importing these people. The
government then caters to these people, they allow them to
fleece the system.

Speaker 2 (02:05:48):
Well, it's because they've been completely indoctrinated by their school
system to be passive and gullible with all this stuff.

Speaker 4 (02:05:56):
Yes, they're importing a large enough voting block that doesn't
matter if they wake up and a certain point.

Speaker 3 (02:06:01):
That's right.

Speaker 5 (02:06:02):
And of course the Muslims have tons of kids, so yeah,
you keep importing them, but then they also just start
breeding a giant base of their own people in your
country as well. Yeah, and Minnesota is sadly occupied territory
at this point.

Speaker 2 (02:06:19):
So big problem. They need to do something about it.
The question is, well he do something about it? You know,
this is one place where you, you know, should round
the people up and send them home. Do it legally,
and I'm sure there's plenty of legal reasons to do this,
that fraud is not just limited to seventy eight people
or whatever.

Speaker 3 (02:06:35):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (02:06:35):
Also, again this is another one of those things like
there is no amount of Somalians that improves the United States.
They have nothing to offer. What are they mainly on for.
They're mainly known for being pirates. That's what they're known for.
When you think of Somalis, you think of these violent
thugs on the high seas that take over container ships.

(02:06:57):
That's what they're for.

Speaker 2 (02:06:58):
They've given us other pirates like Ihan Omar Keith Elson,
who Again that's the left's tool. It's kind of interesting though,
on the right, as we see Trump going off on
everybody on Thanksgiving again, he puts out a Thanksgiving proclamation
and basically thinking himself and ingratiating himself and then going

(02:07:19):
on this tirade against all of his political enemies. This
article from NBC News the campaign to make Richard Nixon
great again. Make Nixon great Again? And I got to say,
you know, if you are looking at Richard Nixon and
thinking that he is going to be vindicated, I think

(02:07:41):
you've lost the plot. Conservatives. I mean, I look at
Richard Nixon, this is a guy that started the war
on drugs we've been talking about. And he took the
UN agenda and the schedule of you know, the four
different classifications of drugs and how they went. That was
all created by the UN, and he enacted that and
called it his war on He had no respect for

(02:08:02):
the Constitution, for the rule of law. He was a
machiavellian figure, going after his political enemies, creating secret wars,
putting a fifty five mile an hour speed limit. That
was one of the things that I caught on too,
when I was just learning.

Speaker 3 (02:08:17):
How to drive.

Speaker 2 (02:08:18):
That made me dislike Richard Nixon. You'll never rehabilitate Richard
Nixon in my eyes. But then as I got older
and learned more history, I realized many other aspects of it,
in terms of the secret bombing of Cambody and other
things like that. And I just got to say, if

(02:08:38):
you like Richard Nixon, you must love Henry Kissinger, because
Henry Kissinger, mister Bilderberg himself, was the guy who essentially
ran the Nixon administration, just like you had a big
new Berzinski run the Carter administration. The guy who created
the Trilateral Commission and all the rest of the stuff
these globalists. And you can go back and look at

(02:09:02):
the trends, the opening to China that was so celebrated
by Richard Nixon, even by the left. They celebrated that,
and Stephen Sondheim even wrote a musical about Nixon and China.
I never saw it, but I mean that is an
indicator of how popular that was with the left, who,

(02:09:24):
by the way, embraced the global's agenda. But Richard Nixon
embraced the globalst agenda, whether the UN we're on drugs,
and he embraced it by bringing in China. And that
was Henry Kissinger doing that, the Builderberger. They knew they
could make China the beta test site for what the
technocracy wanted to do to everybody, and also for population reduction,

(02:09:44):
the one child policy that they sold in the name
of protecting the climate. And yet look at who's given
a pass on CO two. China and India can have
as many China, for example. The globalists say, well, you
can have as much CO two as you want, but
just not as many children as you want, right, That's

(02:10:04):
what they pushed on them. And so you've got people
like Christopher Ruffo who addresses a studio audience on with
Bill Maher and he says the Watergate scandal that toppled
Nixon was a setup from start to finish. Well, yeah,
so what everything these people do is machiavellian and a

(02:10:26):
setup from start to finish. The stuff that Nixon did
was a set up from start to finish. The stuff
that people opposed him did was a setup from start
to finish. These are two calculating gangs of criminals coming
after each other. So I really don't care about that.
What I care about is all the kinds of things
that Richard Nixon did and is known for. Well, when

(02:10:48):
the president does it, it's not it's not illegal, right,
And that's how we get to the point where, well,
when Trump orders it, it's not illegal. If the president
orders it, it's not illegal. It doesn't matter if you're
killing people floating in the water or whatever, it's not illegal.
So again, the judge was out to get Nixon, says Rufo.

Speaker 4 (02:11:08):
Yes, it's kind of the whole thing that we're seeing
where they'll go after the reporters. They'll talk about the
person asking the question, but they won't say that you're wrong.
It's oh, look, well, the people that came after Nixon
were establishment insiders. Well, yes, that's true, but they weren't
wrong in this case.

Speaker 3 (02:11:25):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:11:27):
Yeah, you didn't get the Kissinger clip and I sent you,
did you lace?

Speaker 3 (02:11:32):
I did not?

Speaker 2 (02:11:33):
Yeah, yeah, that was I was gonna play that Henry Kissinger.
Were missing you, diplomat of our dreams, with your curly
hair and your glassy stare and your Machiabelian schemes. Well,
I guess they must miss Henry Kissinger because they're missing Nixon.
The Watergate scandal has long been viewed as a defining
moment and presidential corruption and accountability. Says NBC, it became

(02:11:56):
shorthand for political scandal and lit the how many president
gate Suffolk suffix to many scandals that followed, Right, it's
always this gate and that gate. Now you got a
lot of right wing figures who insist that Watergate was
actually an underhanded scheme by the deep state and the
press to take down a popular Republican president. Yeah, so what,

(02:12:20):
he had his own schemes that may for things that
he wanted to do. So yeah, the press and the
other party wanted to take him down. That's always the case.
How do you excuse what he did with the war.
Had he excuse what he did with China? Had to
excuse what he did with so many different things. And

(02:12:41):
again you know his wage and price controls. How to
conservatives embrace all that stuff? You know, it always surprised me.
Roger Stone has a tattoo of a smiling Nixon on
his back. He used to say, yeah, I think and
stabbed me in the back as well, repeatedly, just like

(02:13:03):
your tattoo. But beyond rufo, the conservative media personalities like
Tucker Carlson, Michael Knowles, and Steve Bannon have pushed a
revisionist Watergate narrative. In the past year. Hillzell College has
called it a scam, and even actor Bill Murray, well,
there we go. That's the final word. If Bill Murray
says it, that's got to be true, right, says Nixon

(02:13:26):
might have been framed. Again, these are the kinds of
spy versus spy garbage that these people do. So I
really don't care about whether or not Watergate was a
legitimate thing. We saw what he did with it, and
again I despised Nixon. He is arrogant, corrupt, grasping power.

(02:13:47):
I remember his vice president. You know, how did we
get Jerrel Ford. He was taken out of the House
because of and put in vice presidency because Richard Nixon's
vice president was taking suitcases full of cash in his
office in the White House. That's how corrupt Nixon and
these other people were. I remember Nixon cultivating this idea

(02:14:08):
that he was a Quaker, and then you get these
tapes where he's doing this Mockiabellian scheming and using the
most foul language that you can imagine from the nineteen seventies,
and so BLM, Russia Gate, gender ideology, left wing terrorism.
All of the current challenges can be understood through the

(02:14:28):
prism of Watergate frame up, said Rufo. Nixon was one
of the twentieth century's greatest presidents.

Speaker 3 (02:14:36):
Well, I'll tell you what. I understand these things, and
I understand Nixon and.

Speaker 2 (02:14:41):
What a creep he was. That was the committee to
re elect the president. It's called creep appropriately but also
self not aware of how much of a creep and
a criminal he really was. You know, I am not
a crook, Yes you are so. Ken Hughes, a researcher

(02:15:03):
at the University of Virginia's Miller Center, considered one of
the most foremost experts on audio tapes from the Nixon
White House. So the recordings clearly demonstrate that Nixon was
a ringleader of the abuses of power that we group
under the heading of Watergate. They show Nixon deliberately, consciously,
and illegally weaponize the government against those he considered to

(02:15:24):
be political threats. He was the prototype for Trump. If
Trump is precedent, Nixon was Trump's precedent. Nixon was trying
to keep his enemies list secret. He's trying to keep
the fact that he was weaponizing the government against people's secret.
Biden and Trump don't make any secret of it, do they.

(02:15:48):
His congressional career defined him as a strident anti communist,
but as president he opened diplomacy with China. Well, that's
because he wasn't a conservative or anti communist. He was
the man of the globalists, a man under the control
of Henry Kissinger, mister Bilderberg himself. And again, to defend

(02:16:09):
Nixon is to defend Kissinger. So they recount the different
aspects of I'm just amazed to see these people who
here's the defense that the conservativesm make. They contend that
Nixon was oblivious to much of it until after it happened.

(02:16:29):
Isn't that the same thing that we hear Alex Jones
say about Donald Trump?

Speaker 3 (02:16:34):
And maybe he got that talking point for Roger So
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (02:16:39):
They don't talk about due process for us, but they say, well,
he was denied due his due process rights were violated
by prosecutors. And these are the people defending Trump, who's
violating due process for millions of people. It's just amazing
our government denies that to everybody all the time now.

(02:17:01):
So Monica Crowley said in July that full vindication I
think of President Nixon is coming to pass. Not with
me that would be vindicated. Only perhaps perhaps he will
look good compared to Trump, just like Jimmy Carter looked
good compared to Biden. Because this country is going down

(02:17:25):
the drain. We are circling the drain, and so these
presidents that we have now are not any worse. Maybe they,
you know, maybe they are worse than the worst presence
in recent American history for the last fifty seventy years
or so and so. And if you don't believe me,
just take a look at the politicians in Washington who

(02:17:49):
are jumping off of this sinking ship like rats. That's
what's happening in the GOP and also with Democrats. Even
you've got eighteen eighteen congressmen say they're not going to
run for reelection. These are GOP congressmen, and you've got
another eight Democrats who say they're not going to do it,

(02:18:11):
and which is also noteworthy, because the Democrats expect that
they're going to have the majority. You know, it's really
not any fun when you're in the minority. It's not
much fun anymore when you're in the majority with the
kind of rules that have been put in place by Pelosi,
by Bayner and by Mike Johnson. When you're operating under

(02:18:33):
that kind of a situation, nobody has any say in anything.
They don't represent us, They have no voice because the
speaker has controlled everything. That's one of the reasons these
people are getting out. And when the House returns from Thanksgiving,
the GOP speaker will face a chamber in chaos. That
is today, He and his team have struggled to maintain

(02:18:54):
control of the floor in recent weeks, is made clear
by the recent unsanctioned push from rank and file members
to release the Epstein files. But that's not the end
of it. Members of both parties are increasingly feeling emboldened
to buck party leadership, forcing votes on personal priorities, including
a spate of recent votes to punish fellow lawmakers. Mike

(02:19:16):
Johnson said, I would like to just get back to
normal Congress. Well, it was recently on a show where
he was talking about how frustrating it was, and it
was pretty clear that what he was talking about was
the fact that he's not his own man. He just
does whatever Trump tells him to do. He finds that
very frustrating, just like the rest of the people in

(02:19:37):
the House find it frustrating that they have no say
in what they want to do that Mike Johnson is
dictating that to them. And so then when you have
Marjorie Taylor Green leaving, it's not just her, Like I said,
it's going to be eighteen Republicans and eight Democrats, and
they said more retirement announcements are expected. Around the holidays.

(02:19:57):
People get out of Washington and they look at the
normal world and it's like, I don't want to go
back to that place. And so they usually have a
lot of people who come back and say that as
a matter of fact, they quote a Democrat, Emmanuel Cleaver
from Missouri, who is a Methodist pastor.

Speaker 14 (02:20:16):
Or was?

Speaker 2 (02:20:17):
He says, as I told my family last night, the
House has just had a nervous breakdown. I don't know
what kind of drug we need, but it's time for
somebody to give us a prescription, he said. Members are
talking about it amongst ourselves. What's going on with this place?
He said, he's had to arrange for more security when
he's at home because the death threats that people and

(02:20:37):
Congress are getting increasingly. And with the House gone for
fifty four days during the historic government shutdown, it only
took a week for drama to overtake the Lower Chamber.
In just five days, lawmakers brought forward four resolutions to
punish various colleagues. After not being in session for so long,
one week has got everybody ready to go home. After

(02:21:00):
the Epstein push, more lawmakers of both parties now eager
to force their own votes using the discharge petition. What's
rarely successful but now increasingly part of a member's strategy
to work around Johnson. So what is Johnson's cure for this?
What is the Johnson syndrome of power? Well, he wants
to get rid of the discharge petition. So you've got
a way to work around what I do. I'm going

(02:21:23):
to control what gets to the floor. It's got to
come through me. If we don't like something, it never
gets brought up for a vote or discussion. And so
now he wants to shut down the discharge orders as well.
So again, when you look at all of this, and
you look at the threats of political violence that people
are getting all the time, it's not a surprise that

(02:21:45):
Margery tollder Green would want to get out. I think
she has other things in mind as well, and she
knows that regardless of whether these accusations that be made
against her from all these Zionist billionaires with all their
money running character assassination things, it would damage her, whether
it was true or not, just by the sheer volume

(02:22:08):
and repetition of the lies. And so it's probably a
pretty smart movie. She wants to run for governor, senator
or president or whatever her ambition is. But Trump, by
the way, when we look at his financial stuff, maybe
one of the reasons why he was in such a
bad mood was because his bets on his brands have

(02:22:28):
really gone south. Says Wall Street Journal. They have soured
stocks and cryptocurrencies tied to the president and his family
have tumbled amid a broader route of riskier assets. They
point out that the Trump coin is down eighty six
percent and the milania coin is down ninety nine percent

(02:22:51):
since they went public, and it said one of the
Trump families crypto adventures, a token called World Liberty Financial
has dropped roughly forty percent since it's September launch.

Speaker 5 (02:23:02):
So with the milania coin, it's a bear market ba R.

Speaker 2 (02:23:06):
Yeah, well her her milania coin is down ninety nine
and there was a report a couple of weeks ago
that it was less valuable than another main coin, the
fart coin.

Speaker 5 (02:23:23):
I have to understand, fart coin is the only thing
holding up the American economy, and when fart coin goes
to zero, we're all doomed.

Speaker 4 (02:23:30):
Maybe we live in Malia's down. Farts are up.

Speaker 2 (02:23:35):
Mary Trump should rename his coin old fart Coin. That
might bring it back. Who knows. If people want to
get a fart coin like a doage coin, comment here
and then we'll go to break.

Speaker 5 (02:23:49):
Niboo twenty twenty nine says the CIA drug lords will
not stand for any independent competition. Yeah, good movie about
the CIA is The Good Shepherd with Matt David, very
very creepy, very very disturbing, shows you all kinds of
weird stuff they get up to.

Speaker 2 (02:24:06):
Oh yeah, you know, well, we're going to take a
quick break and we'll just remind you we're going to
be playing Christmas songs between now and the Christmas holidays.
And we do still have the Christmas Night album that
is up, and we're going to have a couple of
new songs that we will be playing for you soon.
They are we don't have enough new songs to do

(02:24:29):
an album. It was kind of a rough year this year.

Speaker 5 (02:24:31):
Yeah, it's been kind of one thing after the other.

Speaker 2 (02:24:35):
But anyway, here's our ad from last year about the
Christmas Night album.

Speaker 15 (02:24:40):
I wish either Christmas Night album. You can get the
Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot com for just
thirteen ninety nine.

Speaker 8 (02:24:50):
Was right in the second four there see what'd you waste?
You well, not just one to wish a little hat flag.

Speaker 15 (02:24:59):
First, I'm going to the day Davidnightshow dot com and
purchase the Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to
Christmas classics like are you gonna throw it up?

Speaker 8 (02:25:07):
I want the Christmas Night Album too?

Speaker 3 (02:25:11):
Hey, that's pretty good.

Speaker 8 (02:25:17):
UF Hello girls, can't you come out to me?

Speaker 4 (02:25:19):
Can't you?

Speaker 15 (02:25:22):
David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
all New. I'll be home for Christmas.

Speaker 10 (02:25:33):
What do you want?

Speaker 8 (02:25:34):
You want the moon? Just say the word and I'll
throw a glasshole around it, pull it down.

Speaker 7 (02:25:39):
I'll take it and what and.

Speaker 14 (02:25:42):
Then I'll buy you your own download of David Knight's
Christmas Night Album.

Speaker 10 (02:26:00):
That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sale
on silver and gold. Trump uphoria has caused a nip
in silver and gold. It's time to buy some medals
with via dollars before they come to there. Since is
go to David Knight dot gold to get in touch

(02:26:22):
with the wise wolf himself, Tony Harterburn. He knows where
to look to find silver and gold.

Speaker 1 (02:26:36):
A little.

Speaker 10 (02:26:41):
Yug bet.

Speaker 11 (02:26:44):
Elvis, the Beatles and the Sweet.

Speaker 5 (02:26:48):
Sounds of Motown.

Speaker 11 (02:26:49):
Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 2 (02:26:55):
Yeah, so last year we had the pun time to
get silver and gold before people can to their sense
as and before you know, the the crypto fad around
Trump got a bit old. Who would have thought that
Trump would ban the penny that we held up there,
But that's kind of the way that it's been this
last year. And so now we got you know, silver

(02:27:18):
and gold. It was all gold until just recently, and
then over the weekend silver exploded in a rally that's
reshaping the metals bowl market. And again we had reported
that there had been drastic shortages of silver, that for
five years, they've been using more silver because it is
consumed than they are mining. And so, as this kick

(02:27:43):
coo article points out, gold has broken away from the
rest of the precious metals pack thanks to his role
as a true monetary metal. Central banks have been driving
unprecedented demand as they look to diversify away from fiance
currencies and then there's something more stable and tangible. Silver,
with all of its volatility, simply didn't fit the bill

(02:28:05):
for the official sector holders. But that singular demand has
pushed the silver gold ratio to extremes. In April swored
above one hundred, a five year high and miles away
from its long term average between fifty and sixty the
ratio of the price of gold to silver, so silver

(02:28:26):
usually outperforms because of its volatility. Instead, it has lagged
for years, casting a shadow of skepticism over the whole
precious metals trade. But that skepticism is folding fast. Silver
is ending the week at a record high above fifty
six dollars an ounce. It is up an eye popping

(02:28:47):
ninety seven percent since January. Gold meanwhile, is around forty
two hundred dollars, a year to date gain of nearly
sixty one percent. And again, it's not that the going
up in value us that the dollar is going down
in value, and that these are being priced in the

(02:29:08):
US dollar. The ratio between the two silver and gold,
which hit one hundred and April, has now plunged to
seventy four. Investors are finally waking up to how scarce
silver has become. Industrial demand, tied to the accelerating electrification
of the global economy, has produced significant supplied deficits for

(02:29:32):
five straight years. We saw the first big wave at
the start of the year, when massive volumes of silver
poured into the US as traders braced for potential tariffs
under Trump's global war of trade. Similar Silver ultimately wasn't tariffed,
but the fear never fully dissipated, especially after Washington officially

(02:29:52):
labeled it a critical metal. All of that extra metal
sitting in the US then tightened physical inventories elsewhere, especially
in London's over the countermarket. One thing they leave out
of this article that we reported on earlier was the
mania about getting silver as part of a Indian religious ceremony.

(02:30:14):
Typically they would go out and they would get gold
or whatever, but they had some Indian influencers who said
this year should get silver, and so they all jumped
into getting silver, which caused a big shortage on the
London market as well. Some silver did leave the US
in China as traders chased those premiums, but rising demand

(02:30:35):
in Asia and India especially only deepened the supply crunch,
so silver could flow out of the US vaults, but
then that would just shift the next supply crunch west.
But demand surging and no easy supply fix in sight,
and let's say silver's newfound strength maybe more than just

(02:30:56):
a short term burst, And of course it has helped
to push gold as well, since the two of them
are lumped together as precious metals. So you have Wall
Street bowls moved up through forty two hundred. On Friday,
Main Street adds to the bullish momentum after a three
and a half percent weekly gain. So now it's getting

(02:31:18):
to the point where Main Street is getting into this,
not just Wall Street or the central banks. You got
Morgan Stanley saying gold will hit forty five hundred dollars
an ounce they believe by mid twenty twenty six.

Speaker 3 (02:31:31):
And the reason they.

Speaker 2 (02:31:32):
Give is because of ETF's central bank demand and hedging
of real assets. And so again when you look at
they focus kind of on the ETFs, and that's the
trade out of the Shanghai Gold Exchange where you have

(02:31:53):
these two big funds, JLD for gold and SLV for silver,
where you get the paper gold and silver that we
talk about. You're not really buying gold and silver with that.
You're buying into a fund that owns gold and silver,
and it doesn't track the price of gold and silver
going up or down.

Speaker 4 (02:32:13):
Which bun that allegedly owns gold and silver.

Speaker 2 (02:32:16):
Yeah, and you don't know if they get it or not.
And so they're scrambling around to get gold and silver
for these funds. They say, But you know, there's a
troubling amount of people between you and the gold and silver.

Speaker 3 (02:32:32):
As far as.

Speaker 2 (02:32:32):
I'm concerned with this stuff, I don't trust it. But
I think an even bigger factor is going to be
then the ETFs is going to be stable coins ETFs
when they talk about main street and that's the way
a lot of people are buying into gold and silver
is with these ETF funds because it's easy to do
and it's like a stock or something. So if somebody

(02:32:55):
wants to get out of the stock market, the first
thing they think is, well, I'll buy the silver and
gold ETFs because it's very much like a stock market trade.
But it's too much like a stock market trade. I
think though, that stable coins like teather and others are
going to really drive the price of gold up because
they're going to be accumulating a lot of it as well.

(02:33:15):
Anybody that wants financial credibility, whether it's central banks or
whether it is stable coins, or whether it's the bricks countries,
everybody wants to have a have gold to bolster the value,
the real value of what they have, because everything else
is kind of derivative from that, and stable coins are

(02:33:39):
really away for them to move away to try to
get federal reserve notes, which the central banks and other
governments don't want to buy as much anymore. They're turning
away from that, and so the strategy is to try
to get the retail trade to buy it. And the
way they do that is to get people to put
their money into stable coins. But they're not going to

(02:34:01):
be stable and they're not going to be keeping their
value unless the stable coins start buying gold and things
like that. So I think there's going to be a
big move into the stable coins. They want to protect
the US government, so this is Trump is going to
give them the keys to the Kingdom to do that,

(02:34:23):
and so they want to protect the US bonds by
being a holder of US bonds and spreading that out
globally at the retail level. But it's also the desire
by these people who are running this, people like Lutnik
and people like Eric Trump, who are saying that stable
coins are going to replace banks. And they don't just

(02:34:44):
mean the local banks, they mean all banks, including central banks.
They want to be the ones who are buying the
and keeping the treasury bills. But it is something where
they talk about the getting rid of the penny. That
is the key function I think performed by these local banks,
the fact that when you pay for something in cash,

(02:35:07):
that merchant can take the cash and put it in
their bank account. And if they don't have a local
bank to do that with, I'm not really sure what
happens to the cash trade. It's going to be very difficult,
especially when you've got something that's fast and divisible like
a stable coin. But as Peter Schiff pointed out, if
they start accumulating gold, you could wind up having the

(02:35:29):
real cryptocurrency backed by gold rather than it being something
like bitcoin.

Speaker 3 (02:35:35):
Well, so, thing about this.

Speaker 4 (02:35:37):
If the price increase of gold is being pushed by
these companies buying it up for ETFs and people buying ETFs,
when all that collapses, when people realize that they don't
actually own the gold that they think they do on paper,
that is going to cause the price to go up.
There's going to be a lot less gold in circulation
than people realize. Yes, you look at these things, I

(02:35:59):
think most.

Speaker 2 (02:36:00):
Of that as well. It's like this is a kind
of a shell game. When people will realize that it's
a rod, is really going to get people scrambling for
the real stuff, the physical stuff.

Speaker 4 (02:36:10):
Yeah, I mean, you'll get the ETFs. If they're selling
these assets for less than the gold that they claim
to have is worth, then how are they making money.
Clearly there's some suspicious thing going on. They aren't just
giving away gold for less than they're paying for it.

Speaker 3 (02:36:28):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:36:29):
I don't like tokenized assets at all, and that's basically
what these ETFs are. So we got Morgan Stanley and
also UBS, both of them picking a price of forty
five hundred dollars by mid twenty twenty six. And that
makes sense because we are going to see accelerating chaos

(02:36:52):
as the fourth Turning draws closer and closer to a finale.
But think about that. Where it is right now, it's
about forty two hundred dollars, goes up to forty five
hundred dollars by the middle of next year, let's say
another six months or so. That's a seven percent higher
in six months. You're not going to find any investments

(02:37:14):
that you, as an individual can make that are going
to pay that kind of yield. If that is true. Again,
UBS raised its twenty twenty six mid year gold target
to forty five hundred dollars an ounce, up from forty
two hundred dollars previously because it's just hit that. The
bank also raised its upside target for gold by two
hundred dollars to forty nine hundred dollars per ounce on

(02:37:35):
a possible spike of political and financial risks, but they
maintained their downside case at thirty seven hundred dollars per ounce.
UBS analyst said. On the downside, they said that there
is a potential for federal hawkishness. I don't think there's

(02:37:56):
a chance of that. Remember that this year Trump gets
to take control of the Federal Reserve in twenty twenty six,
because you know Powell is going to be out and
Trump is going to have a say as to who
the next person is going to be, and what is
who is Trump going to put in there. He's going
to put in somebody who's going to monetize the debt,

(02:38:19):
who's going to print money, do quantitative easing, lower interest rates.
All of that is going to feed gold. So I
don't think there's going to be any federal hawkishness. I
don't think there's a chance of that. It is, if
it happens at all, it would be very very short lived,
and then everything is going to go in the opposite direction.

(02:38:40):
So the demand is now shifted to China for silver,
as reserves on the Shanghai Gold Exchange have fallen to
their lowest level in decades. How do you even know
what they've got? Just trust them, right? Do you want
your money Shanghai? Do you trust the Chinese government that

(02:39:01):
is involved in these things as well? So it is
kind of interesting. You know, Russia's central bank is forced
to sell gold to cover the budget and to support
the ruble. This is one of the things that will
temper some of not a hawkishness from the federal reserve,
but if other things start to go south. For example,

(02:39:24):
if you've got the big investors who have bought stocks
on margin, and if the stocks go down they get
called on it, they've got to cover that. Well, they're
going to do well. If they've got gold, they're going
to sell it because gold is up, so that's a
way for them to cover their margin calls. And so
we could see on the downside of this, if the

(02:39:47):
stock market bubble bursts, the Menia bursts, then you could
see people covering by selling gold, and that is something's
being done with Russia, but it hasn't brought the price
of gold down.

Speaker 3 (02:39:59):
Really.

Speaker 2 (02:39:59):
For the first clime in history, the Central Bank of
Russia has begun selling from its reserves directly into the
domestic market, enabling banks and state owned companies and investment
firms to purchase sovereign gold. According to report from Ukrainian
News Service, this is a forced step. Gold is effectively
becoming a tool to support the ruble, to patch up

(02:40:21):
corporate liquidity and cover budget needs amid the rapid deplechiation
depletion of other resources. The move is unprecedented. Before twenty
twenty five, the Central Bank of Russia never sold its
gold to commercial market participants, only receiving it through the
Ministry of Finance to increase its reserves. But the country's

(02:40:41):
National Welfare Fund seeing its liquid assets decline from one
hundred and thirteen billion to twenty and twenty twenty two
to fifty one billion in twenty twenty five, the central
Bank has no choice but to sell off its reserves.
When you talk about those kinds of numbers and you
realize just how how much smaller the Russian economy is

(02:41:02):
in terms of GDP and other things like that, it
fell from one hundred and thirteen billion twenty twenty two
to fifty one billion, and they have had about two
hundred billion has been confiscated by the EU and the
US I'm sorry, three hundred billion frozen Russian assets.

Speaker 3 (02:41:21):
So that's huge.

Speaker 2 (02:41:23):
So the strategy of selling goal supposedly allows for prompt
budget replenishment and ruble stability. You know, they may be communists,
but they knew from the very beginning the value of gold.
It was Max Warburg, the central banker and Germany who
and his brother Paul Warburg was the one who worked

(02:41:44):
with JP Morgan to get the Federal Reserve put in.
But Max Warburg sent Vladimir Lenin to start the Russian revolution,
gave him ten million dollars in gold and put him
on a sealed train to go from Switzerland and to
Russia to start the revolution. So from the very beginning,
the communists knew what real money was, didn't they. Regardless

(02:42:08):
of what happens here, so.

Speaker 5 (02:42:09):
Well, you have to know what's really valuable, so you
know what to steal.

Speaker 3 (02:42:14):
That is communism, isn't it.

Speaker 2 (02:42:16):
It's a justification for a kleptocracy that Republicans are not
actually interested in shrinking government, says the meanses dot Org. Again,
it's always fake posturing and promises, just like the Epstein files,
just like promises of peace. And this context they're talking
about doze in the fact that the Office of Personnel

(02:42:38):
Management says this doesn't exist anymore. They said, it's hard
to define where the effort to cut the federal bureaucracy
stands today as anything other than a disappointment. Republicans are
abandoning campaign promises to cut spending, and that's nothing new,
they said. Virtually every single Republican who's run for any

(02:43:00):
federal office in the last fifty years or so is
guilty of this. But the beginning of Trump's second term
did feel different. Why there was a genuine palpable bottom
up excitement for spending cuts fresh off the pandemic, where
federal bureaucrats helped to lock the country down and then
did their best to force everyone to take patented drugs

(02:43:22):
from well connected pharmaceutical companies to get their freedoms back.
Let me just insert here, miss Come on, this is
Trump directing this when top don't leave him out of this.
It wasn't the federal bureaucrats alone. He was directing all this,
He was bribing and blackmailing people to do all these things,
and the federal bureaucrats were working for him. Nevertheless, because

(02:43:47):
of this and the subsequent economic stagnation, and Thomas Massey
knew this from the very beginning, he pushed back against
all of this stuff. He says, you're destroying the country economically. Result,
that was the first person. He became the first person
that Trump wanted to primary out because he opposed him

(02:44:08):
on these damaging policies that were there so followed by
years of relentless price inflation, an economic stagnation the federal
officials said, was an illusion emanating from the public's economic stupidity.
Many Americans are understandably on board of the campaign to
promise to gut the federal bureaucracy, but not the Republicans.

(02:44:29):
It's just phony promises. And of course Trump's not a
Republican anyway, He's a tax and spend democrat. Republican politicians
derailed the effort because they completely accept the left wing
progressive falsehoods about programs that would have been cut in
the simplistic progressive narrative that dominates the media. The University system,

(02:44:51):
and the Democrat Party government is primarily seen as a
superhuman supplier of social services. Well that's right. I mean,
you know, they are so detached from fiscal reality by
the fiction of the Fiat dollar that they are like

(02:45:11):
the superheroes that can fly. But I think they're really
like Wiley coyote who's just run off of the cliff
and it's still running on thin air. But he's Dick's
lick down and realizes that there's nothing underneath him, and
at that point he's going to plummet like a rock
and above him will be the crushing thirty eight trillion

(02:45:32):
dollar deficit or accumulative debt, and that'll come crashing down
on him, just like Wiley Coyote. Well again, when we
look at the GDP, there's a Russian writer saying, you know,
this is a myth. You can't really measure the productivity

(02:45:53):
of a country just in GDP. And he points out
the fact that there was an economist as the beginning
of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine said Russia cannot win
the war. Why he said, well, because he said their
GDP is roughly equivalent to the combined output of Belgium

(02:46:13):
and the Netherlands. Russia is an economic dwarf in Europe,
and so therefore its military operation was doomed. So the
question I said, does GDP really give us an accurate
representation of a country's strength? Not really, They point out,
this is something that was created by a Russian economists,

(02:46:36):
a metric that was created by them and was made
popular by Kynesian economics. And so after the war, GDP
became entrenched in the grand architecture of the post war
order of Breton Woods, the IMF, and Kynesian macroeconomic theory.
Kynesianism sees the economy as a thermostat problem. If total

(02:46:58):
demand is too low and output falls, the government must
raise demand through fiscal spending and so forth. And yet
we saw in the nineteen seventies that Keynesian consensus broke
down largely because it was wrong. We had stagflation. How
could that happen under Kynesian economics, Well it can't. So
we're about to go through something that I think will

(02:47:20):
be the end of kynes Inism for good.

Speaker 3 (02:47:25):
And it will be good when we get rid.

Speaker 2 (02:47:27):
Of Kaynesanism and deficit spending and fiat currencies. It's going
to be a painful process, but you need to position
yourself now into something that is outside this irrational system.
It's amazing that federal reserved chair. Was it green? Spanish said?
Irrational exuberance. That's what they've been selling for a century,

(02:47:49):
is irrational exuberance. Over the American dollar. Marky Mark, thank
you for the tip, says with silver's spike, gold is
only seventy two times the price of silver. Now it
was eighty five or thereabouts.

Speaker 3 (02:48:03):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:48:04):
It did get up, as the article said, to one
hundredfold over the price of silver.

Speaker 5 (02:48:10):
It's right, I've got skun Collo Rose Gardens says, So
Trump is going to make Nixon a martyr for being
the subject of prosecution by his political opponents to soften
his image for doing so. Nathan Bedford Forrest eighteen sixty five,
Kissinger and Memo stated he cared not who was killed
in the Cambodian bombing campaigns kill anyone and everyone.

Speaker 3 (02:48:29):
Yeah. Sounds like, uh, we're the same back in that
same situation now.

Speaker 5 (02:48:33):
Right, it's all cyclical, and he goes on to say
more bombs were dropped in just Cambodia, then over Berlin
and several German cities. The tonnage was astronomical. Bride b
Mac surprised they didn't make you take this commercial town
like the Alfred Hitchcock one.

Speaker 3 (02:48:50):
Sh I didn't put it up on Twitter, and that's why.

Speaker 5 (02:48:53):
Yeah, keep it a secret.

Speaker 3 (02:48:55):
Yeah, just between us, keep it secret, keep it safe.

Speaker 4 (02:48:58):
So technically they should didn't have any right to apply
any copyright to It's a Wonderful Life since they let
the copyright expire and then pulled that back by saying, oh, well,
we copyrighted the script under book copyright, which has longer term,
so therefore this is derivative of the script and therefore
we should have the copyright to it.

Speaker 3 (02:49:17):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:49:18):
It's the only copyright in the US because again the
influence of the movie studios, you know in the regulatory
capture that we see. Because of that, nowhere else do
they recognize the copyright. They let it expire through a
clerical error. And that's why it became so popular because
a lot of people it wasn't successful and when it

(02:49:40):
was first released, there's some hokey stuff in there at
the beginning that always used to put me off. But
I got past that, and it is one of my
more favorite films that are out there but use paddles. Yeah,
I mean Jimmy Stewart and Dona Read.

Speaker 3 (02:49:56):
How did you go about with that? Right?

Speaker 2 (02:49:57):
So anyway, Frank Capro, it's not one of his most
popular films. But again, they don't really have legitimate copyright claim.

Speaker 4 (02:50:06):
But and ours, of course is still transformative and free
use even if it were copyrighting.

Speaker 2 (02:50:13):
That's right, that's right, and that certainly applies to the
Hitchcock thing. The difference though, is just lawfair?

Speaker 3 (02:50:18):
Right?

Speaker 2 (02:50:19):
Are we willing to? I just didn't want to go
through this whole you know, fundraiser and everything they would
take to do battle with these people. You know, they're
out there trying to justify the big fees that they
charge the Hitchcock estate, so that they're looking for things
to do, and you know they got deep, limitless pockets

(02:50:40):
and all that.

Speaker 5 (02:50:41):
Yeah, that's the part. If you're in litigation with someone
who has massive amounts of money more than you do,
they can just bleed you dry. They never have to
actually get you in court or get a judgment or anything.
They can simply break you.

Speaker 3 (02:50:56):
But we will.

Speaker 2 (02:50:57):
Redo that commercial, and we'll do it with an English,
but that looks somewhat like Alfred Hitchcock, but won't be
Alfred Hitchcock.

Speaker 3 (02:51:04):
You just a a lot like him.

Speaker 2 (02:51:06):
But you know, we'll remove some of those clues there
because people need to understand the principle of the mcguffin thing.

Speaker 3 (02:51:13):
It's very important.

Speaker 5 (02:51:14):
Scun Collo rose Gardens. I would like to think wise,
will gold for my current record high for metals stacking
overall value? Yes, And of course you can go to
David Knight dot gold if you want to start stacking
gold or silver of your own. Lets him know you
came through us.

Speaker 2 (02:51:28):
And that's the thing I like about Tony, you know,
is the fact that he lets you accumulate gold gradually
right on a regular basis. That's a very powerful thing
to do, you know, if you save regularly and that
that is a great way to do it. And it
also averages out the cost of the gold that's there,
so you don't have to try to time it and
buy a massive amount of it all at one spot,

(02:51:51):
maybe pick a momentary high or low. But fortunately it's
gone up and all the factors that allowed us to
say that gold was on sale last year because of
irrational exuberance about Trump. Those are all still there. We
still have the massive deficit, we still have the central
banks that are accumulating it. We still have everybody looking
to reset the financial system. And so we have all

(02:52:13):
these different want to be power centers are all accumulating
gold at the same time. And then it is a
real hedge against politically uncertain times, which is the kind
of times that we live in right now.

Speaker 5 (02:52:27):
And Tony works very hard to make sure he gets
you all good deals. He's constantly busy. We on our
way back up from Texas stopped in at his Dennison location.
It was wonderful. We got to hang out with him
for a little bit. He got to meet our son.
Our son got to meet Tony, and Tony very graciously
sent him back with his first little piece of silver.
So he actually has his own little stack of metals,

(02:52:50):
and we need to continue to accumulate.

Speaker 2 (02:52:51):
For him very small snack of medals, although he's very
small himself. Yeah, well, we're gonna take a quick break, folks.
We'll be right back, and.

Speaker 12 (02:53:26):
A thing.

Speaker 1 (02:54:03):
A you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 5 (02:55:34):
Welcome back, folks, And that's right. Merry Christmas from us
here at the David Night Show. It's December first, which
means that the Christmas season is officially here and no
one can fault you for playing Christmas music now, Markie
Mark in New Jersey, thank you very much for the table,
says the part of Keynesianism everyone forgets is that the
government needs to run surpluses in good times. It's not
all deficit spending. Deficit spending should only be done in

(02:55:56):
bad times.

Speaker 3 (02:55:57):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 5 (02:55:58):
We're all deficit all the time. Baby, No surplus is ever,
that's right, Wally Wallrus. My wolf Pack collection is making
money every month.

Speaker 2 (02:56:09):
And of course, well, actually don't get massive amounts of
money in your checking account because it's like a it's
like leaking out.

Speaker 3 (02:56:19):
It's a container that leaks because the.

Speaker 5 (02:56:20):
Government is continually stealing your value. Narrow Way narrow Gate ministries.
They got rid of the penny, and the stores are
very low on pennies. They're beginning to round up to
the nearest higher nickel. Yeah, question becomes, when are they
going to outmoad the nickel, because I can't imagine that's
worth producing either.

Speaker 3 (02:56:37):
Well, and the whole fallacy of all that stuff is
that you know the penny is the Federal Reserve is
the one that really destroyed the penny.

Speaker 5 (02:56:48):
You know, it's also amazing to me how little fanfare
we got when the penny was just done away with.
One of the most famous sayings, at least when you
hear continually is a penny saved, is a penny earned?
The penny doesn't exist anymore. We got rid of it.
We just said, nah, because you'll own nothing and you'll
earn nothing. Right, you want to have a job because
they out take it, and you want to own anything either,
So get rid of the penny. But you know you

(02:57:10):
used to go buy things with pennies, right and not
in my lifetime, penny candy and stuff. So in your
lifetime used to sell a bubble gum for a penny
at the video stores. But you know that's how inflation
is running. Inflation.

Speaker 3 (02:57:25):
Yeah, that's right, it's a bubble real quickly. I know.

Speaker 5 (02:57:29):
People asked about more pictures of the puppy. I sent
one to Lance. He can pull it up. This is
a picture of our son and the puppy. See he
can behave. We take very good care to monitor and
make sure that he's calm and collected. When he's dealing
with our son, he's he's a very sweet dog, but

(02:57:50):
he is a puppy. He wants to play. He gets
very excited, and our son loves the puppy. He wants
to play with him so badly. But they're both just
a little bit too young to effectively play with each other.
But they love each other and they'll be the best
of friends here soon. So there's your puppy and baby update.
In case you were curious cute things, well here's your.

Speaker 3 (02:58:10):
Update on.

Speaker 2 (02:58:13):
Things economic as well as pharmaceutical stuff. I don't have
time to get in the pharmaceutical things, but I wanted
to begin by talking about how cash strapped Britain is
selling off embassies and I really when I saw this,
I immediately thought of Pfiser shaking down three South American

(02:58:33):
companies countries. Rather remember it was a worldwide conspiracy to
shut down anybody that didn't get the JAB. And so
you had three South American countries and two of them
went public with the threats from Pfeiser because they Peiser

(02:58:54):
had the governments were going to shut down travel and
make basically make it impossible to get or out of
these countries. Unless they gave the jab to their people.
But they also knew that it was going to be harmful.
They knew it was going to be harmful. It was
the telltale sign because they said, you're going to hold
us harmless, even in terms of manufacturing defects and all

(02:59:18):
the rest of the stuff. We want all of these
liability protections and we want you to collateralize that to
guarantee that with assets that are outside of your country. Now,
if that doesn't say that they know that they're committing
a crime, what does. And so part of those assets,
they said, we want to have you put up your

(02:59:40):
embassies as collateral. And that's what's happening with the UK
government now. They're trying to sell assets that they have
in New York and other places. I mean, they had
a big elaborate complex in Bangkok, Thailand. Of course, the
man formerly known as Prince Andrew didn't want to stay there.
He wanted to go to a private hotel so he
coul get his ten occurs a day. But we'll have

(03:00:01):
more on that tomorrow. Thank you for joining us.

Speaker 5 (03:00:03):
Have a good day, Merry Christmas.

Speaker 2 (03:00:05):
Yes, the common Man, they created common Core and dumb
down our children. They created common past, track and control us.

(03:00:26):
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.

(03:00:50):
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,

(03:01:11):
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2149: Trump’s Military Is Killing Without Proof, or Accountability

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

Stuff You Should Know

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2149: Trump’s Military Is Killing Without Proof, or Accountability

Dateline NBC