Thr Episode #1991: Trump’s Tyrannical Revival of 1798 Act: Innocent Man (says White House) Doomed, Free Speech Crushed

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:45):
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, and what is
the day today, seventeenth of April. You ever learned twenty five?
So I can look it up and we're going to
talk today about what is really happening, the issues behind
all this. This goes back to the aliens and Sedition acts. Really,

(01:06):
we're starting to see that reincarnated in the Trump presidency.
This dispute about how people are being deported, whether they're
getting due process or not. That's the alien part of it.
The deportation and the censorship of people who are even
here legally being arrested and deported without due process. That's

(01:26):
part of the sedition. Yeah, Trump calls it treason, but
it really is what was called sedition. And so we're
going to take a look at the historical background of this,
and we're going to look there's things on both sides.
At somebody yesterday say, oh, so we're going to talk
about the rights of illegal aliens, I'll do a hard pass. Well,
why don't you take a listen to what I'm going

(01:48):
to say? Because people are getting things right and wrong
on both sides of this issue. And the devil is
in the details. If you care to listen, we'll be
right back. As I said yesterday, that was the only

(02:12):
comment I got on Twitter, and I have such great
engagement on Twitter, it's amazing. And that's the comment. Oh,
so today the topic is rights for illegals pass and
I said, no, that's not the topic. I said, the
topic is the rule of law and do process or
are we going to be ruled by fake emergencies? And look,

(02:36):
this is not like the fake emergency of COVID. There's
real issues with border and I've called it an invasion
before they started calling it an invasion. And many of
the things that are being done or things that I
said should have been done. But there's differences in the
way when we look at what this judge is doing.
This judge Boseburg has been involved on both size this issue.

(03:01):
He's been a FISA Court judge appointed by Roberts, but
before that he was put in by George W. Bush.
Then he was put into the current position by Obama.
This guy is a typical Uni Party guy, this judge
that is challenging Trump, and he clearly is an activist judge.
And this is when I've talked about judicial supremacy. What

(03:23):
I mean by that are the judges that decide that
they're going to set policy that they're going to push
aside what a president does. And then we're also seeing
in this back and forth, we're seeing a reincarnation of
the DACA dispute from Trump's first term. And in that one,

(03:44):
as I pointed out, this was an executive order. DOCCA
was an executive order. They could never get it passed
through Congress. So the Obama administration decided that they just
weren't going to enforce immigration law. They called it deferred action. Well,
it was an executive order by the previous president. And
Trump says, well, I'm going to get rid of it,
and the courts said no, you can't. And so he

(04:05):
played that game, and he went to them to see
if they would allow him to do it, and they
said no, you can't do it. So he complied with
that and didn't do it. I said that was stupid,
it was cowardice. He should have asserted his position there. Well,
now he's doing that and some of these things, it
mays to be seen what he's going to do and
the reincarnation of this because there was a similar thing

(04:29):
from Biden for people from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Haiti. He
gave them citizenship and it was by executive order, it
not citizenship, but he gave them legal residents here. And
Trump said, well, I'm going to revoke that. Now Judge
is saying you can't do that. So we'll see what
happens with that. But on the flip side, what is

(04:53):
concerning and concerning to all of us is whether or
not we're going to have due process. It's a very
different thing to set policy than it is to go
to a specific case, and not just about deportation. Look,
the deportation the immigration courts are a mess. They are

(05:13):
slow moving, back logged, log jammed mess, and something needs
to be done to clear that out because of the
massive numbers of people that have come in, millions of them.
But when you start talking about sending somebody to this
supermax prison, now you're starting to talk about something that
is very serious, life threatening. This is like, you know,

(05:36):
the people are tortured there, they're deprived of medical care,
intentionally brutal to break these gangs. And I don't oppose
that prison system, just like I don't oppose the death
penalty if the person is legitimately a member of MS
thirteen or the Venezuelan gangs. But you know, when you

(05:58):
have a death penalty, which you don't want to have,
is lynch mobs right, you want to make sure that
you got due process. And when the punishment is that severe,
We're not just talking about merely deportation. We're talking about
sending people to this prison. And when it is something
that is that severe, then the courts need to take
up those individual cases. And if they don't, then we

(06:23):
are at risk. When I said yesterday, as I said,
you know the real issue, when I replied to her,
I said, the real issue is the rule of law
and of due process, and if we throw those out,
then it is the government that is illegal. It is
the government that is illegitimate, and that is a threat

(06:44):
to all of us. Look, I'm not here to opine
about every single thing that Trump does. And I'm here
you know, I mean, we have fun with some of
the stupid stuff that he does target rich environment. I
mean I could just do it just a show about that,
and that would be fun. But my purpose on this
show is to warn you about things that may be coming.

(07:05):
Now that's perceived by many to be negative, but I
also want to give you. You know, I don't have
any hope and politics frankly, so yeah, I guess I
am pretty negative about all of it. My hope is
in Christ, in the High King of Heaven, not in
the President of the United States. And so I see
this as temporary. And we got some amazing news in

(07:28):
the Christian Front about that kidnap missionary, but the and
what subsequently happened with that. Nevertheless, we talked about it.
My purpose is to warm people about what is coming
so you can make preparation, so you can be forewarned.
I just feel like if I see it and I
don't say anything about it, you know, and it's a

(07:48):
biblical principle. If you don't warm people when you see
something happening, their blood is on your hands. I don't
want that. So I'm sorry if it's negative. I'm sorry
if it doesn't fit nicely into the cheer leading of
the Maga Club or the cheerleading of the Democrat Club.
But I just call it the way that I see it,

(08:08):
and we got to say that, you know, if you
skip a trial that it's going to determine guilt, and
if you pronounce somebody as guilty, as we saw with
that little display that Trump arranged with the El Salvador president,
Oh well he's a terrorist. Now you haven't determined that.
If he is illegal, that's one thing, the porting, But

(08:30):
if you're going to call him a terrorist and put
him in that prison that they set up, and if
you look at that prison, they're proud of the fact
they've got guards all over the place, and they got
guards on the outside standing there with you know, fully
automatic weapons six feet apart, and they've got the prison
there says, you know, Corrections Institute for Terrorism, you know,
and all the rest it's that's on the wall there.
They you know, they're proud of that. And they need

(08:52):
to do something about MS thirteen and about this trendy gang,
trendy rugwill whatever it is, I don't care Venezuelan thing.
Something needs to be done about that. And we're going
to take a look at the issues that are here,
because there's some very important constitutional issues and issues that
are going to have bearing on us. Because if a

(09:15):
president can ignore what the courts are really about or
solving disputes, right, And the primary thing about the federal
courts never intended to set there as the final arbiter
of whether some policy is constitutional or not. That's not
what it was for. They gave themselves that power with
Marbury versus Madison, and Jefferson says, well, that's the end

(09:36):
of the constitution, and it is if we go with that.
But we've had other presidents who didn't go with that.
Ye had Andrew Jackson, and I've talked about that many times.
But if you're going to have what the courts are
there for are to adjudicate disputes between individuals, between individuals

(09:58):
and companies, between states. Okay, and especially the federal courts
between things that are not within a complete state jurisdiction.
But they have grown out of that role and they
need to be put back in there. But when you
start talking about a situation where an individual is going

(10:19):
to be determined as a terrorist and given that kind
of punishment, the courts need to be involved in that,
not involved in the big scheme of things about whether
an entire class of people can be deported. That's not
their business. And so you know, shut down DACA or
to say that you can't shut down DACA because they

(10:41):
like that policy. I mean, how can you make a
legitimate argument that an executive order from the prior president
from Obama cannot be countermanded with an executive order from Trump.
That's nonsense. And the same thing is now coming up again. Oh,
we got an executive order from Biden about immigrant and
you can't get rid of it. That's nonsense. That's judicial activism.

(11:04):
Those are judges who are writing law. Those are judges
who are creating policy. They're not looking at an individual
case and making sure that there is due process. And
so I want to take a look at this, but
before I do, I just want to play this. This
is the response of Caroline Lovitt, the press secretary for Trump,

(11:26):
and she starts to talk about this, and listen to
how she pivots its classic case of red hering, just
like Hillary Clinton did when people found her violations of
national security in Russia Gate and all the rest of
this stuff that she invented Russia Gate. She said, Oh, well,
don't look at what I was doing. Who gave you

(11:47):
that information? Ah, that was Russia. Look at who gave you.
Don't look at what I was doing. And that's a
classic red herring, and it's what Caroline Levitt did with
this particular case.

Speaker 3 (11:57):
Democrat and media outrage over the deportation Barbrago Garcia in
MS thirteen. El Salvadorian, a legal alien criminal who was
hiding in Maryland, has been nothing short of despicable.

Speaker 2 (12:09):
Actually that was not termin that he was.

Speaker 3 (12:11):
Of many of the people in this room. You would
think we deported a candidate for Father of the Year.
That's because unfortunately many in this country care more about
this quote unquote Maryland father, a legal alien MS thirteen
gang member, than a Maryland mother.

Speaker 2 (12:26):
Here's a red herring.

Speaker 3 (12:27):
Citizen who was brutally murdered at the hands of a
different illegal alien. Of course, I am referring to Rachel Morin.
And if you didn't see yesterday, a Maryland jury found
illegal alien Victor Antonio Martinez Hernandez guilty of murdering Rachel
Morn in August of twenty twenty three. She was a
thirty seven year old mother of five who was jogging

(12:48):
in an otherwise safe community northeast of Baltimore when this
monster ambushed, strangled, and beat her to death before stuffing
her brutalized body in a tunnel drain.

Speaker 2 (12:58):
That's a different case.

Speaker 3 (12:59):
Family five only got justice yesterday, but they will never
get Rachel back. Our hearts go out to Rachel's family,
her five children and her mother Patty, who has suffered
the unimaginable loss of her daughter.

Speaker 2 (13:12):
You know what this reminds me of. Remember when the
ATF attacked Waco, came in with guns blazing, They had
the media there. The code word was showtime for them
to initiate the rain. They come in with guns of
blazing and it was telling. They caught it all on camera.
And when they were criticized for doing that shooting first

(13:32):
right and you know, setting that whole conflict up, they said, well,
we had heard that there were young children who were
being married with the consent of their parents at an
age that we don't allow that, and that's you know
the child abuse is there. Child abuse is not what
the ATF is about. That was an obvious misdirection. And

(13:54):
then these people subsequently burned those children to death. But
that was not their brief. That was not there what
they are about. And this is another issue of that. Look,
I understand and everybody understands that there are a lot
of criminal illegal aliens. The determinations whether or not this

(14:17):
guy is MS thirteen. He may be, but it's up
to them to prove it. And we have to stand
for due process. Even when it's pretty clear that somebody
actually kills someone, they still need to have a trial.
We don't want to have lynch mobs. We want to

(14:38):
see this done in an orderly fashion under the rule
of law. And they skipped all of that with this guy.
And then Trump doubled down in his administration, including her Or,
saying yeah, we might do that with US citizens as well.
You might get sent to a foreign prison, a Gitmo
or Venezuelan, no El Salvador in prison. They might do

(15:00):
that to you. They're talking about that when they enact
the other side of the Alien Insedition Act. Yeah, we're
going to deport these people because we don't like what
they're saying about Israel. So you might get that as well.
In both of these cases, both the alien aspect and
the sedition aspect, the Trump administration said, yeah, we might

(15:21):
do that with American citizens as well. Don't put it
past him. He's used lies and phony emergencies. Just taking
the most recent one obviously being the lies about the
fentanyl emergency with Canada. What a bunch of nonsense. And
I controlled migrants and all the rest of this. Look,

(15:42):
you can make that case for Mexico. But he wanted
to create an environment and narrative where he could declare
an emergency and arbitrarily set the tariffs on his own.
I don't like judicial tyranny and I don't like presidential
tyrann either. Do you are you going to excuse that,

(16:03):
because well, it's bad when the Democrat judges do it,
but when Trump does it as president, it's great. No,
it's not. I don't want to live in a country
where we've got some you know, whether it's the bureaucracy
or the judiciary or the Congress of the president acting
as dictators. I don't want to have that. And so
when you look at his solutions for these emergencies five

(16:27):
years ago, what was it? It was a fake emergency
with COVID and the solutions were the problems solve anything.
And just like with this, you know, so called fentanyl
emergency from Canada, when we look at the drug war, yeah,
drugs are a real problem. And guess what all the
stuff that we've done with the drug war for the

(16:48):
last fifty years. Hasn't solved it, has it. It's worse now,
isn't it. So they're not doing the right thing, obviously right.
And what they've done is they've made it worse. And
then they've given us a whole slew of other problems.
We've got corruption of the courts, corruption of law enforcement.
We have denial and subversion of the Constitution, and on

(17:10):
and on with this stuff. And these gangs that we're
talking about are a creation of the drug war, just
like al Capone was a creation of alcohol prohibition. The
MS thirteen and the Trendy Gang, they're all creations of
this drug war. Now they've branched out into other areas
as well, but that's what created them. And so we

(17:34):
need to take a look at their quote unquote solutions,
even if it is a real problem. Again, Trump's solutions
to the fake COVID pandemic were horrible. But sometimes this
is a real problem, and drugs are a real problem.
And guess what, prohibition of drugs and trying to use

(17:56):
law enforcement to fix the spiritual problem isn't the answer.
But and so beware of emergencies. The presidents are going
to use to operate as dictators. And of course Biden
did the same thing.

Speaker 4 (18:11):
Right.

Speaker 2 (18:11):
It was bad when Biden did it, but it's good
when Trump does it. We're starting to see that with
taxes now. But I tell you, the rich Republicans like
Sean Hannity really got their hackles up when Trump started
talking about soap the rich taxes. That doesn't sound Republican
at all. That's right, because the guy you've been supporting
as a New York City Democrat, he lied to everybody

(18:32):
when he said, we're going to raise taxes tariffs, but
you're not going to pay them. Other people are gonna
pay him, and it's only fair that they pay him.
That's the rhetoric we've always seen from the Democrats. The
other rhetoric we've always seen from the Democrats is the tariff,
the taxes, tariffs, taxes, whatever, it doesn't matter, the same thing.
The taxes are good, taxes are an investment, and so forth.

(18:53):
We're seeing that from Republicans now. Some idiot put out
on chronicles and he says terrorifts are necessary to a
free country. That's what America is founded on. It's like
no America was founded on people fighting against the tariff
on tea. That's what started the whole thing. They're rewriting history.

(19:17):
They've forgotten their economics. They don't understand what liberty is about.
They think taxes and regulations are good. They don't understand
what made America great. It wasn't tariffs in the eighteen hundreds.
It was liberty and limited government. And they don't care
about that stuff. They just want to sell Trump. And
I'm sick of having lies being told to me by
these people to sell Trump's Trump Sucker proxies. So this

(19:45):
is a recap. What Trump is doing is a recap
of what John Adams did with the alien in seditions
at now, just to review what happened with that. He
was going to deport people that you know. It was
an executive order that he put in basically, and I
think it was an executive but no, it's actually an act.

(20:07):
But anyway, he was pushing it even if Congress did it,
but it was opposed by Jefferson and Madison. It was
only nine years after the Bill of Rights had been
put in. I think it was a Bill rights. I'm
getting foggy today. Seventeen eighty nine was that the Constitution
of the Bill Rights. Anyway, I think it was the
Bill Rights, but Madison opposed. Jefferson opposent. Secretly at first

(20:30):
they did the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which said the
Alien and Seditions Acts are wrong. They are dangerous expansion
of executive power by Adams, and they are restricting freedom
of speech and freedom of the press, and they must

(20:50):
be nullified. Nullified. They said, by the states. That was
the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. We're going to nullify that.
And so they were successful in doing that. Eventually it
became known that they were the authors of that. Okay,
the Bill Rights was seventeen ninety one, so it was
only seven years old. It was a Constitution that was

(21:11):
seventeen eighty nine, thank you, Travis, proposed in ratify. Oh, okay,
ratified in seventeen ninety one. Proposed in seventeen eighty nine. Okay, Well, anyway,
a little bit foggy this morning. I don't even know
what day it is. What is the date today? Don't
expect me to tell you the Bill Rights and the

(21:33):
Constitution are ratified. I got it in the ballpark there, Okay,
I might be able to pass the citizenship test. Who knows,
So just cove me some slack. I went to a
government school, Okay, I had to learn this stuff on
my own, if I learned it at all. But so
it was known eventually that Jefferson and Madison wrote it,

(21:57):
and it helped both of them to become president eventually.
And so it was what they were doing, or you know,
it was sedition if you criticize the government. Does that
sound familiar? Of course history doesn't exactly repeat. It rhymes though,
So now it is treason, not sedition if you criticize

(22:19):
not the US government but a foreign government Israel. I've
got a real problem with that, a real problem with that.
And he has folded that in along with the alien thing.
Oh well, that makes you an enemy. You're a terrorist, right,
so now you need to be deported as well. So
the alien and sedition acts being reincarnated by Trump. You

(22:40):
see this happening on these universities. And look, if somebody
is here, even you know, on a visa studying and
something like, if they are engaged in violence or whatever,
charge them with a crime. You can then deport them
or whatever. It's like when we talk about with impeachment
for example, Right, the first thing you do is you
impeach somebody and then kick them out, and then you

(23:04):
can come after them for the crime. It's a little
bit different with the other stuff. Show that the person
has committed a crime first, and that if they have,
then deport them. That's fine, but give them due process.
And that's not what is happening. We got people who
have not been violent, who are being arrested by groups
of men wearing masks, abducting these people on the sidewalk,

(23:28):
taking them away. Their lawyers don't know where they went,
their family doesn't know where they went, secretly being kidnapped.
And we've had this happen not once but twice. And
the other I'm going to talk about that one coming
up here in a moment as well. This is a
real issue. These alien and sedition acts of Donald Trump
are a real issue. Now. There's also a real problem,

(23:51):
and the courts are part of that problem with the border,
and so there needs to be some changes there, and
he needs to the courts that are going to set
immigration policy and fix the courts that are not functional
and so forth. But to just throw away due process
in the rule of law, is not the answer. You understand, right,

(24:12):
Don't get caught up in this binary thinking of well,
I'm either with Trump or I'm against Trump. I'm with
the Republicans, or I'm with the Democrats. No, no, no, no, no.
It isn't this or that. Don't let them put you
in a box with that kind of binary choice. You
have to look at what is actually happening and say,
this is the real problem. But that's not a real solution.

(24:35):
That's a solution that's going to pour gasoline on a fire.
This is the argument I've had for the longest time
about the drug war. I don't like drugs. I hate drugs.
I don't use drugs. I've watched people's eyes be destroyed.
I know people who have had children. I know two
people who've had children who died from fentanyl. That's a
real problem. But to use that an excuse so you

(25:01):
can arbitrarily set tariffs and then not really do anything
about that problem, which, by the way, our pharmaceutical companies
were heavily involved in that, just like they were the
opioid epidemic. But to ignore the real problem, to not
come up with a solution, but to cynically use that
to do other things is what I'm opposed to here.
I hope you can see that. Well, in this issue,

(25:25):
we've got a lot of different things that are happening here.
We got judicial activism on the one hand, right to
oppose that, but on the other hand, we got the
due process being opposed in the rule of law. We
have the abuse of emergency decorations to act like a dictator,
and we have personal vendettas. Who you accuse your opponents

(25:46):
of sedition or we don't use that word anymore. Trump
uses the word treason, and I don't like what CBS did.
That's treason. We need to pull their license, We need
to do this, we need to do that. And so
what he's referencing at the core of all this is
literally a part of the Alien Insedition Act, the Alien

(26:06):
Enemies Act of seventeen ninety eight. So I wrote that down,
so I remember the date. So the president has brought
authority to relocate or to deport non citizens from the
country considered an enemy during times of declared war. Declared war, well,

(26:29):
that doesn't fit. Or when a foreign nation or government perpetrates,
attempts or threatens invasion or predatory incursion Now this is
what the people on the left, the Democrats, are saying, Well,
neither the one of these cases are met. I think
the second one is when you look at this, remember
that obnoxious guy, the social influencer from Venezuela who was

(26:53):
all about squatting and houses and I'm going to tell
you how to do it. You know, you see that guy,
and it turns out he was with the Venezuelan intelligence agencies.
I think it was deliberately weaponized. And of course we
have had in the past Cuba and the Murial boat

(27:15):
lift and other things. Castro had dumped out his prisons
and sent the people to Florida. That's a hostile act, right,
But it's gone beyond that now with these Venezuelan gangs,
and so I think that that really does qualify. Now,
what they're saying is not that there isn't an invasion,
not that there isn't predatory incursion, but that it's not

(27:37):
being done by a sovereign nation. Well, I don't really care.
You look at we have the term narco state, right,
which is a lot of these Latin American countries that
have such shaky governments and shaky societies that these cartels
that have been created by our drug war are on

(27:58):
a par with a government. It's like a government within
a government. So you can say that they're non government
organizations and goos or something like that, but they have
the kind of military strength that is on par with
their own government, and they have hooks into that government
as well. They have their own people on the inside.

(28:19):
You know, they're executing and assassinating politicians who oppose them
and so forth. They are like a government, and they
do control territory of those places. So I think that
that is I think that certainly he could invoke the
Alien Enemies Act, so because it's part of the Alien

(28:41):
and Seditions Act. But we understand also the history of
has been used in World War II, for example, as
well as in World War One. You had Germans, Italians,
and Japanese arrested and put into internment camps. They did
not prove for the Japanese that they had any connection
to the Japanese government. As a matter of fact, you
had Japanese people in Californiaho's family had been there for

(29:01):
generations and they were you know, completely California, and they
were arrested and put into tournament camps. Later it was
admitted during the Reagan administration. They gave compensation to the
people for what had been done to them when they
were children or to their families and things like that.
And that's where this starts to go. That's where it

(29:22):
can go off the rails. You can fall off on
the other side. And that's why we have to always
look at these things. You know, there's certain principles, but
then when you put it into practice, you've got to
be careful not to go sideways on this, not to
go too far to the extreme on this. And they
did on that. So Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act,

(29:44):
a part of the Alien and Seditions Act. He evoked
that on March the fifteenth, and he did it to
target members of the Trendy Gang, the trend d Arragua,
the Venezuelan gang. They designated them as a foreign ter organization.
That was done in February twentieth, and then not quite

(30:06):
a month later, they enact this Alien Enemies Act, and
so they described it as infiltrating migrant flows, engaging in
drug trafficking, and conducting irregular warfare. I think that's all true,
and it constituted an invasion or pedatory incursion against the US.
The proclamation authorized the apprehension, detention, and deportation of Venezuelan

(30:30):
citizens aged fourteen and older who are determined to be
TDA members and are not US citizens or lawful permanent residents,
labeling them as alien enemies. I agree with all that
so far, but then the question has to be, you
need to do this determination of whether or not they
are a terrorist before you send them to this maximum

(30:50):
prison where they may likely die, but they will certainly
it's horrific conditions, horrific punishment. You need to do that
determination on a one by one base, And so I
would support that in principle, but with a due process.
And so then on March fifteenth, Trump administration sported about

(31:12):
two hundred Venezuelans, with at least one hundred and thirty
seven of them removed under the Alien Enemies Act to
El Salvador, where they went into that maximum security prison
where the US government is paying the president of Al
Salvador to take these the maximum security prison. It's an
agreement with the US. Now Here is where the rub happens.

(31:36):
These deportees were not given a chance to challenge their removal.
Some lawyers argued that there was no evidence linking them
to the group. The TDA we'll call it with identifications
sometimes based on vague criteria like tattoos. Now, I remember
when we talked about MS thirteen, which was there before

(31:58):
the TDA, the trendies. MS thirteen actually grew out of
the drug war. You know. These were El Salvador and
gangs that were in prison for drug violations in the
United States and they organized, actually organized in prison in
the United States and then took that back to El
Salvador and where it was a huge issue in El Salvador.

(32:24):
And so I understand this present creating that prison there.
I talked many times about the father from El Salvador
who fled El Salvador because it was this narco state
violence everywhere. He had to get out of there, so
they came here illegally. He brought his entire family to
escape that and had his kids in school on Long Island,

(32:48):
and his daughter was murdered by these young high school students.
That's why they took it down to fourteen years old.
They use them very very young young high school students
who are here illegally under DACA. So the government knows
that they're there, they know that they're illegal, but they're

(33:09):
not going to deport them because of Obama's executive order
for DACA. And they have Ms. Thirteen tattoos all over them,
and I said, it's literally written. I've said it many times.
They literally wrote it on their face, and they would
not remove them because of Obama's DACA. And they killed

(33:31):
this father from l Salvador, killed his daughter, and he said,
I came here to escape that, and then I get
here and they're there. And I've said that about the borders.
I said, that's why we have to have borders, because
they won't just kill other El Salvadorans who have come here,
they'll kill us as well. And they have been involved

(33:52):
in that. And that's what Levitt was using as a
red herring in this particular case. But if they've got
THEOS quite frankly, I think that is evidence enough. That
is an open declaration written on their face, and so
I guess we would say prima facia evidence. He had

(34:16):
him at thirteen carved under your face. So then the judge,
this guy Boseburg, he decided that he jumped into this
to block it. And it's set policy and they were
already flying people to El Salvador, and so he demanded
that they turned the planes around, that they bring him

(34:37):
back and all the rest of this kind of and
the Trump administration said, nope, we're doing it. That set
off this, that's the beginning of this. And so he
put up a temporary restraining order, a tro and the
Trump ignored it. Trump administration ignored it. They took it
to the Supreme Court. In the Supreme Court throughout that

(34:58):
temporary restraining order and they said, the President, the executive
branch is within its rights to do this, provided though
that you do have some there were some caveats there
for due process. So the same day, within hours of
Trump putting these people on the making this declaration. As

(35:20):
soon as he made the declaration, this Judge Boseburg puts
out a temporary restraining order saying I'm not going to
let you do that. Who elected you? Does that policy
like this? And Trump did it anyway, and then they
appealed it and the Supreme Court took off that temporary
restraining order. And now what he wants to do is

(35:41):
find the Trump administration and contempt of court highly in
the temporary restraining order that was removed by the Supreme Court. So, yeah,
this guy is not a hero at all, and he
is a political apparatic, an example of one of the
worst cases of Judai supremacy. So the Supreme Court five

(36:04):
to four removed his Temporary Restraining Orders TRRO, allowing the
Trump administration to do the deportations. However, the court mandated
that detainees must receive notice of their removal and have
a reasonable opportunity to challenge their detention via habeas corpus
petitions in a federal court where they're held, and so

(36:28):
for many of them that would be in Texas. The
ruling did not address the constitutionality of the Alien Enemies Act,
which has been there since seventeen ninety eight, or whether
the tda's actions legally qualify as an invasion. So it
left those two issues open to be decided by lower courts.

(36:48):
And that's a big issue because they're all going to
be deciding it in different ways. And so, but Bosberg
is coming after the Trump administration now because of this
tro that was removed by the Supreme Court. So you know,
to me, when they started doing I've been talking about

(37:10):
just removing these people for the longest time. And look,
I said, at the beginning of the Trump administration in
twenty seventeen, I said, he said he's going to end
the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Fine, do it. It's
a two for one. Bring those people home. You can
put them on the border, and you can use that
to stop this mass immigrations coming in. Because everything stopped

(37:31):
when Trump got elected, and then they started, they started
to get the idea that he was a paper tiger
on the border, and he was, and so then it
resumed with a vengeance. That's when we started having the
caravans organized by soross and geos and things like that.
And I said, so you put the military there and
they can intimidate them from coming in. But now what

(37:52):
Trump wants to do is he wants to turn over
that area permanently to the military. Let's to make it
all a military zone. And other people like Lucky Palmer
with his company and Will wants to set up high
tech border walls, essentially drones and other things like that

(38:13):
that'll make crossing the border impossible. And I don't like
the militarization of our border. Yeah, to put them there
to stop an invasion is one thing, But to turn
us into a police state that we can't get out
of is another thing. And they're doing that at the
airport's as well with real ID, with biometric ID, and

(38:37):
it is all in lockstep, just like we saw five
years ago with COVID. All of this digital ID biometric
stuff that is being done by the Trump administration is
in lockstep timing wise and policy wise. It is in
lockstep with the UN agenda for all of this, for

(38:58):
digital IDs and for controlling movement. And so getting back
to this, Trump initially downplayed his role, stating on March
twenty first that he didn't sign the proclamation, though it
was in the Federal Register with his signature. Then they
clarified that said no, I was referring to the original
seventeen ninety eight Act. He's old, but he's not that old.

(39:21):
The administration and Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, argued that
the Alien Enemies Act grants the president near unfettered authority
to address national security threats like TDA framing the Game
gang's presence as an invasion. And I believe that that
is true. You know, that's the one thing that is

(39:42):
left up in the air by the Supreme Court. Is
it an invasion? I think it is. Clearly is. They
criticized Boseberg is an activist judge, Clearly he is. The
administration also signaled plans to expand the acts used to
target other gangs, such as MS thirteen from El Salvador.
So you got a lot of civil liberties groups to

(40:04):
push back against this, like the ACLU, Democracy Forward, the
Brennan Center. They argue that Trump's use of the Act
is illegal because the US is not at war with
Venezuela and TDA is not a foreign government. I think
those arguments are wrong. I think they're part of a
narco state. They're the narco part of the narco state,
their own separate government. And in the case of the TDA,

(40:30):
the fact that you've got people like that influencer, the Swatter,
who works for the Venezuelan government as part of their
intelligence agency. Yeah, yeah, that's pretty clear. I think. Then
there's the due process violations and their opposition to that,
and I agree with them on that issue. They said

(40:51):
initial deportations lacked judicial review, some deportees allegedly misidentified as
gang members. Requirements for habeas corpus challenges aims to address this,
but concerns are made about the practicality of legal recourse
and the immigration detention setting. So that's a big issue
because again, if we allow them to get rid of

(41:12):
due process and the rule of law, then we are
all at risk. This thing's going to be tastasized. So
soon you give power to one branch of government, it
keeps going. I've said this over and over again. Look
at the bump stocks for example. Right when Trump comes in,
he sets a precedent. I can do bump I can
do gun control in the executive branch. I can do

(41:32):
it as president, or I can let the ATF do
whatever they want. And what's happened with that. It was
bad enough when Congress was violating it, but they had
to have a vote with a lot of people. And principle,
it's the same thing. Neither the Congress nor the president
can violate it. But when Congress is the means of
violating it, they have to build a consensus, and it's

(41:54):
harder for them to do that. It's a lot more
dangerous when the president does it as a dictator. And
so we need to have the rule of law. We
need to have due process here, and then, as I
point out, many people concerned about historical president precedent that
we've seen with detention centers in the Japanese and that
type of thing. So then there's the issue of Boseburg

(42:17):
versus the president. And I think that you know, it
is pretty clear that he's an activist judge, that he
is overstepping his authority there. And yet you know, we
say that with the caveat that there needs to be
due process on individual cases. The judiciary should not be

(42:39):
setting policies on broad issues across the board, which they're
doing and still doing again, as I said, we've got
a DACA two point oh conflict coming up again. They
a lot of people are very upset about the fact
that Trump had mentioned that Boseburg should be impeached. I
absolutely agree that he should. He's an activist judge. He's

(42:59):
exceeded authority and he ought to be impeached. Robert's Chief
Justice Roberts was very upset about that and called Trump
out on that. But I think that this judge should
be impeached. He is an activist judge. And then you
have the political groupings. You have I hal ilhan Omar,

(43:24):
who introduced the Neighbors Not Enemies Act to repeal the
Alien Enemies Act. Neighbors Not Enemies. Well, it's interesting because
she is both an alien and an enemy. She's trying
to protect herself here. She is here illegally. Her father

(43:46):
worked for a Marxist administration in Somalia, and according to
the law, if you work for a Marxist organization, you
are banned from coming to American and getting citizenship. So
all of her family is here in violation of immigration law.
And Marxists really are our enemy, and she is Exhibit

(44:11):
A and all of that. So again, legal scholars note
that existing immigration law already allows deportation of criminals, and
so they said this is a symbolic escalation to bypass
the due process. Well, again, there are problems with the
immigration courts. They're overwhelmed, they don't have enough resources. They

(44:34):
need to streamline that, add more resources to that to
get that cleared up. But you need to make those
determinations on an individual basis. And rather than giving people
a card and say come back in ten years. I mean,
that is the absurdity that has created this. And so
we all know that there's a real problem here at

(44:56):
the core of it, and the immigration courts are a
big part of But rather than fix them, we're just
going to ignore due process altogether and habeas corpus. Is
that a good idea or is that not a dangerous precedent?
You got a problem over here, I'm not going to
deal with the problem. We're just going to pretend that
I can do anything that I want and operate as

(45:18):
a dictator. I don't think that's the appropriate response to
that real problem. So supporters are framing it as a
national security necessity, critics or warning of the slippery slope
towards authoritarianism and mass human rights violations. They're both right
and they're both wrong. It really is a necessity, and

(45:39):
it really is a violation of our constitution and due process.
And so how do we reconcile this thing? Well, it's
not for us to decide. We're not elected officials. We
can talk about it. We can. Mainly, what I'm concerned
about is this attitude that is repeating itself, whether you're
talking about free speech issues, or board and immigration issues,

(46:01):
or where they're talking about economic issues or the terrorists.
This is a pattern of behavior from Trump that is
extremely dangerous. I'm just going to declare an emergency and
make myself a dictator. His answer to every problem is
to essentially declare martial law with himself as the dictator.
Do you see the pattern here. That's what I'm opposed to.

(46:24):
That's why I picked this thing up. And that's the
real issue here, and that, folks, is a bigger issue
than the border there really is. It's a bigger issue
than the economy. It's a bigger issue than all of
these problems. That is the biggest issue. We do not
want to live under a dictatorship. And this guy's instinct
is to to create an emergency, to create martial law,

(46:48):
and to rule as a dictator every time he comes
up to a problem. That's what he wants to do.
And that's what makes Trump so dangerous. Precedent Trump setting
that precedent of martial law with every single issue. So

(47:09):
let's bring it home and let's look at you're going
to allow this with this one guy. Now, as we
do this, I've seen some reports saying, well, they said, now,
now they're saying we never heard this before. Now they're
saying this Garcia guy, they said, well, he was portrayed
as the ideal father and blah blah blah. Weh. You know,
nobody's innocent, right. They found out that four years ago

(47:32):
his wife had took out a restraining order on him
or something evidence of domestic conflict or violence, or maybe
just she overreacted because she's lived with him since then
she took that out. Maybe they have an argument. We
don't know the details of that, but they throw that
out there to slander. That's the same kind of stuff
that Levitt was doing when she starts talking about this

(47:53):
woman who is murdered by an illegal that has nothing
to do with this case. Yeah, borders are open and
it's problem, but that's not what this case is about.
You talk about the details of this case. No, you
don't want to talk about that. You want to talk
about some other case rather than making an explanation. The
White House is admitted that they made a mistake sending
him out. That's the key issue, folks. You see, it's

(48:15):
not that there's a dispute between Boseburg and the administration
over whether or not this guy is a terrorist. The
White House admitted that they made a mistake. They admitted
that he is not a terrorist, and to avoid having
to talk about that Lovett who you know, when I

(48:39):
see somebody stand up and lie for the president over
and over again, and then she arranges a photo op
where she stands with a people. Before she's going to
go out on the the and answer questions, she has
a prayer meeting, you know, they all get together and
they pray about it before she goes out there. Well,
you might want to pray that God would keep you

(49:01):
from telling a lie, that he would hold you to
the truth, that you would honor him in that way
and not lie for your job, not lie for the president.
And what she was doing there was really just shameful.
They admitted that they made a mistake, and then they
pretend that there's nothing that they can do to correct

(49:22):
that state mistake. You see, that's what we're talking about,
that kind of cynicism, as well as the bigger principles
of every problem is going to be solved by declaring
martial law, making me the dictator. I was not talking
about rights for illegal aliens. I was talking about the
fact that the White House admitted that they were wrong.

(49:44):
You see, it's not about rights for them, It's about
the White House being wrong. And then saying we're not
going to correct it. I don't care. You know, he's
in this prison where he will probably die, and we
sent him there wrongfully, but I don't care. We're going
to leave it that way. And Trump's first term, he
made a mistake, and he corrected it when that happened,
not this time. And he's got Caroline Levitt who wants

(50:11):
to parade her Christianity in front of you, covering it
up and lying for that. They made a mistake, they
admitted they made a mistake, they said they got the
wrong man. He's not a terrorist, but they're not going
to do anything to correct that. Are you not ashamed
if you're defending this because you like Trump and Republicans

(50:31):
and because you don't you're worried about the border. Are
you not ashamed to embrace that? Have you no shame
if you embrace that? Seriously, I am so disgusted with
people on the right who throw everything away that they've
always believed, and who are just as deranged and dangerous

(50:54):
as these radical leftists that we've seen all this time.
They've shown themselves equally capable of that. So the sedition
part of this, and also the alien part of this,
ice kidnaps a permanent resident in the US for ten
years on his way to an interview to become a
US citizen, writs Branshaw Hovey. No warrant, no criminal record,

(51:19):
no charges, and nobody knows where he is. Do you
have a problem with that? I have a big problem
with that. What's going to stop the Democrats from doing
that to you? We've already seen the weaponization of Biden
when it came to January the sixth. Do you really
want to have that happening till you just get disappeared
off the streets. That's the hallmark of a dictatorship. They
did that in Argentina. Political opponents would just disappear. They

(51:42):
were putting them on flights and flying them out over
the Atlantic Ocean and pushing them out of the plane.
I had a massive pushback against that, the mothers of
the men who that had been done to having you
calling out that Argentinian dictatorship to shame them. So a

(52:05):
legal permanent resident holding a Green card, he should have
had the Gold card. You know, that's the gold card privileges.
If you pay him five million dollars, you can do
whatever you want. Right, they had a green card say
he's here legally. He had been in the US legally
for ten years. He was attending an immigration interview to
become a US citizen in Vermont Something, writes Marianschall Hobby

(52:28):
that he would not be able to do if he
were here illegally, and if he had not already resided
in the US for many years with no criminal record
in order to be able to earn this interview to
become an American citizen. Like previous students before him, he
was approached by mask men who reportedly had no warrant.

(52:51):
They handcuffed and took him away, and at the time
of this writing, nobody knows where he is, not even
his lawyers, whom he apparently has not been allowed to call.
When I see this type of thing, it reminds me
of the Savak that was the secret police that the
chavran the guy when we had the CIA coup and

(53:13):
throw out the guy that was elected because they didn't
like him, didn't like his politics, didn't like him nationalizing
the oil fields. They put in the shaw of Iran,
and then the CIA trained their secret police, the Savak,
to arrest their political enemies, take them away, torture them,
whatever is all what we want to become. Because folks,

(53:35):
that was our government that put in the Chavaron, it
was our government that trained the Savak. It was our
government that suggested that that kind of criminal tutalitarianism is
right there below the surface, and it is active in
America now and has been for decades. Do you want

(53:57):
that to bubble up and become the open tyranny? Go
ahead and cheer for Trump doing this kind of stuff,
and that's what you're going to wind up with. You're
going to wind up with public u Savak, the go
public with it. CIA is a criminal organization. It's criminal satanic.
It's one of the darkest things that's ever existed. And

(54:19):
that entire not just a CIA, but that entire intelligence
community is just aching to go public with this kind
of stuff like they did in Iran. And if you
excuse this kind of stuff, that's exactly what you're going
to wind up with in this country. So this guy's
name is Madawi Madawi, I guess he's leader of a
pro Palestinian group at Columbia University. There you go, there

(54:42):
is the sedition against our government. Well, the government that
owns our government. Right the net and Yahoo government. The
Trump administration is seeking The New York Times as the
Trump administration is seeking to deport a Columbia student because
his activities could potentially undermine the Middle East peace process.
Is that grounds for setting somebody out that you've granted

(55:06):
legal process too? You know, he's exercising his free speech.
You don't have to agree with him or not. You
better understand that if you don't protect the rights of
people you don't agree with, you're going to wind up
with no rights either. That's the way this thing works. So,
according to a memo from Secondary of State Marco Rubio
that was reviewed by The New York Times, he said, well,

(55:28):
this guy could potentially undermine our Middle East peace process.
I think they misspelled it. I think it's supposed to
be piecee right. They want a peace a piece of land.
They don't want peace as an absence of war. Now,
so that constitutes in this Trump administration sedition, sedition against Netanyahu.

(55:53):
The memo asserted, without elaboration, that protests of the type
that mister Mahdawi had led could undermine the Middle East
process by reinforcing anti Semitic sentiment. Well, you know it's
going to reinforce anti Semitic sentiment is disappearing people off
the streets because they criticize the government of Israel. It
has also said, without elaborating, that mister Madawi had quote

(56:16):
engaged in threatening rhetoric and intimidation of pro Israeli bystanders.
Oh well, yeah, we criticized the UK because you know,
they're they're saying we're going to have a banter band,
so what they call it. You know, you're gotta be
careful about what people say in a pub and if
there's they've got a group of people together and they're
talking about something, and perhaps you might have some weight

(56:38):
staff that are there, they might be offended by what
they hear. We can't allow that to happen. Well, if
you're gonna not be able to offend people even accidentally
like that. Uh, And that gets even more absurd because
it's doesn't have to be something that's direct. It could
be somebody who heard something that was said about some

(56:59):
other person. So the person you know that maybe some
ethnic group that they're criticizing or making a joke about. Well,
I heard you say that about that ethnic group. And
we got a waiter waitress over here that is part
of that ethnic group. So I'm going to report you
to the government. Do you really want that here? Do
you really want to have a situation where we've got
to protect the abortuaries. We don't want anybody to be

(57:22):
offended by somebody who's just standing there saying I'm here
to talk. If you want to talk, I'm free to talk. No,
can't have that, and we can't have somebody has threatening rhetoric. Well,
we have the right to redress our agrievances with the government.
You know that was what January the six is about,

(57:43):
wasn't it. And yet now Trump is going to arrest
people that have rhetoric that he doesn't like. A lawyer
for Madawi asked to comment on the assertions, and the
memo said that they were quote baseless claims made with
no evidence. If there's a crime charge him, right, did

(58:05):
he hurt feelings? Who cares? Did he? Is he going
to say things that are going to make Marco Rubio's
job difficult? I really couldn't care less, so Haretz in
Israel said. Despite leading Colombia's Gaza solidarity encampment, this guy

(58:26):
Madawi spent months fostering ties with Israeli and Jewish students,
even holding meetings with university administrators to promote dialogue. See,
there's a lot of Jews who don't support what net
Yahoo is doing in Gaza. And there's a lot of
Jews that don't support Zionism period and a lot of
them have taken out ads saying not in our name

(58:49):
what is being done in Gaza. And so what he
was doing was he was trying to talk to them.
Ronnie Ziv, an Israeli student who met with Madawi, says,
the Trump administration will come forevery one. And look, you know,
when I would see this kind of stuff, and like
I said, it was happening on the campus when I
was in school of different groups, different countries. But it's like,

(59:09):
you know, take your grievances somewhere else. You know a problem.
You know, these these two people, two groups of people,
Palestinians and Jews are fighting each other. You know, take
it back to the Middle East and find each other
over there instead of in our campuses. But they have
a right to speak out, yea, even though I'm not,
I don't want to get involved in this stuff. Trump

(59:29):
has stated that he wants to be able to deport
US citizens that his administration declares are criminals. Now, Brian
Schall Hobby says, I actually expected some kind of retraction
or clarification from the administration, since Trump has a habit
of going off script and saying embarrassing things that later
need to be clarified. Surely, the thought of deporting US

(59:53):
citizens to one of the most barbaric and famous prisons
in the world, and El Salvador would be one of
those cases. I thought to send an American citizen there, right,
he says, But no, the White House doubled down and
said this is actually true headline Trump looking into quote

(01:00:13):
unquote the legality of deporting US citizens to foreign criticien prisons,
says the White House. It's another question that the President
has raised, said Press Secretary Caroline love It when a
reporter asked if Trump currently has the power to send
Americans to foreign prisons or would need to change the law. Well,
it's another question that the President has raised, she said,

(01:00:35):
And it's a legal question that the President is looking into.
He's looking into sending US citizens into foreign prisons like
this that doesn't concern you. You don't want any rights
for people who are here legally or for people whore illegally.

(01:00:55):
You don't want to have any determinations to certainly deport
people who are here illegally, but to send them into
that prison, you need to make a determination whether or
not they're terrorists or not. And now we're the next situation.
What he doesn't like what you have to say, he's
going to deport you, and he's going to send you
to one of these perhaps one of these supermacs prisons.

(01:01:20):
There are no laws that would give ICE agents the
ability to start pulling US citizens off the street, says Brian,
shall have you then immediately fly them into a prison
in Al Salvador with no due process of law. So
the only way this could happen is the same way
they're doing it right now with students, by issuing an
executive order and declaring some kind of an emergency to

(01:01:42):
give Trump martial law powers, which is what he did
in twenty twenty with COVID, and it's what he's doing
right now with his tariffs, and it's what he's doing
right now with his anti anti Semitism task Force. Only
just a couple of months in this administration, already, how

(01:02:03):
many different emergencies and martial law actions do we have,
And so Branch Slabby at healthimpact dot Com says, well,
the Zionists prevail in taking over the US and eliminating
free speech because it appears to be where their goal is.
He said, what we're now observing in real time here
in the US is Trump's Zionist administration trying to abolish
the Constitution of the US and turning the country into

(01:02:26):
a Zionist Jewish monarchy instead. And I got to say
here that you know, when you look at what the
technocrats want, and you look at what the Zionists want,
they want an authoritarian to talitarian society without any basic
human liberties. They want it for different reasons, but there's
a great deal of overlap and their goals of where

(01:02:47):
they want to go and also in their techniques. And
there's a great deal of overlap between the Zionists and
the people who are running these technocrat companies as well.
But they're both taking us into this stalitarian thing. This
why it's even more dangerous, the fact that Trump is
making himself a king and a dictator and every one

(01:03:10):
of the big issues by declaring an emergency, the DOJ
and the attorneys of the Maryland man who was mistakenly
sent to El Salvador, and they, the Trump administration admitted
that it was a mistake. They admitted it. So they
are now looking at this contempt of court thing. Now

(01:03:31):
this is again I hate to see this judge doing
this over the temporary restraining order stuff and the flights
of people, because now it's too easy to make this
into a partisan left right thing, and clearly this judge
is in the wrong on those issues. They're not making
it about the fact that the Trump administration mistakenly sent

(01:03:54):
this guy, admittedly made a mistake, sent him there, and
refused to correct that mistake. And so Brian Schaw Hobby
points out that in the first Trump administration they made
a mistake like that and they did correct it. In
August of twenty eighteen, during Trump's first term, an Iraqi
immigrant went missing. His name was Subai Honi. Subai Honi,

(01:04:16):
I guess he had been living in the US for
nearly twenty five years. Subai Honi was among hundreds of
Iraqis who had been protected from deportation under federal court order.
As lawyers thought he was still in custody when he
had been swept up in an ice raid. A search
of the federal ice database, however, turned up nothing, and
as they investigated, they realized that he had been deported.

(01:04:39):
And then the government said that it had made a mistake,
and so mister Subaihani had been deported to a rock
and violation of a court order. But the Trump administration's
response to the two cases could not be more different.
In that particular case, they brought him back. But now
even though they said they made the heir, they're not

(01:05:00):
going to bring this guy back. They don't really care
what the law is. They don't care if they got
it wrong. So, as Brian says, I've received a lot
of emails from people demanding I stopped criticizing Trump or
complaining that I now cover politics too much. He said,
the good news about the New Covenant that we live

(01:05:21):
under as Christians is that any believer in Jesus Christ
has filled the Holy Spirit and can now testify to
the truth. He said he took an opportunity at the
beginning of the Trump administration just stop everything he was
doing and fast and pray and think about his direction
for ten days. And he said was really pressed upon

(01:05:45):
him was the fact of John the Baptist, who had
opposed the crimes of Herod sins of Herod and was
executed that for exposing him. He says, whatever the consequence,
he says, if Zionism spreads unchecked, he goes, we might

(01:06:05):
have the same type of situation. I fear that what
we saw during COVID and Trump one point zero will
pale in comparison to what might be about to happen
in Trump two point zero. Here we are just a
couple months in, and look at the number of emergencies
and martial law aspects that Trumps pulled in. I'm going

(01:06:26):
to act as a dictator to set the tar frates,
and he's changing him day by day. And folks, yeah,
James Carville said, they don't care about Monica Owensky. It's
the economy, stupid. Well, let me tell you the economy.
It's about the uncertainty, stupid. It's about the constant vacillation
and Trump changing his mind one day after the other.

(01:06:49):
That's why the founders set it up for the Congress
to set tax rates so that you don't have some
dictator in the White House changing at every twelve hours.
It's not even pragmatic. It's not even practical what he's doing.
It's not a solution to some real problems. He identifies

(01:07:11):
a real problem, he declares an emergency, and then he
acts like a dictator under his martial law. Well, before
I take a break on rumble a North American house, hippo,
thank you for the tip, he says. Earlier this year,
somebody commented that Trump would be Santa Claus to Maga
early on with pardons and border executive orders, et cetera,
before he betrays them. Now, like Futurama's equal robot, Santa

(01:07:33):
Trump is getting ready to shove coal so far up
bart stockings that will be coughing up diamonds. I never
thought it in this way, gunned down by Santa Claus. Honestly,
I never saw it coming. Yeah, well, you know that's
the problem. You allow people to rule and do the
kinds of things that he did in twenty twenty, the

(01:07:53):
scams that he started over COVID and the scams that
he did over the election, and stop the steal and
all the rest of this stuff, and the people who
pushed that and made money off of it. You let
that happen. It's going to come back again. On Rumble, Ratisbrough.
Has anyone talked about how Republicans control three branches of
the government again? But it's all executive orders and nonsense,
isn't it. Yeah, that's right, that's right. Well, what they

(01:08:13):
would say is that they can't get anything done because
they don't have more than sixty senators. Let me tell
you they're going to get fewer this next time if
they let this kind of chaos rain. But they said, well,
you know, we can't. There's a lot of things that
we can't do with just a simple majority vote in
the Senate, and that's going to be their excuse. On Kick,

(01:08:34):
General mcguffin gifted five subscriptions on Kick, Thank you very much,
And Travis reminded me to if you go to Kick
and you want to find the show, type in David
Knight Show, but no spaces, no spaces, otherwise they won't
find it. On Rumble DG eight, thank you for the tippy,
said David. The Trump cult applauds Trump's tyranny. Remember that

(01:08:54):
power goes to the left when they take power, like
Trump getting operational works, speed approve go out, proper testing
for Biden to mandate and now it's just crickets. Oh,
that's absolutely true. We're gonna take a quick break. We're
gonna relax a little bit. Here's the Smokey's music.

Speaker 1 (01:10:47):
You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 2 (01:10:51):
All right, welcome back. And I've been talking for an
hour and ten minutes here without a break, and so
I do need to take care of some business for
the show. We're at the midpoint in the month and
I haven't talked about donations or anything like that. I
got to do that, and I want to thank the
people who have donated, a lot of the same names.

(01:11:13):
We have one new donor, Terrence B. But I want
to thank all the people who are regularly supporting us
On Zel, Thomas H. Susan L multiple times, Lyndon H,
Sean S. Salty d, Adam D. Kimberly M, Gretchen C.
Susan again, Terris B, Linda M. Raymond, g Ryan F. Lois.

(01:11:40):
That's An L, Susan L. And Benjamin R. Thank you
all so much. I really do appreciate that. And let
me also well, I've got it here short. We had
three people contributed on cash app. By the way, you
can find if you like to use cash App. There's
no fees on zel, so one hundred percent of it
goes to us. There are some fees on the other platforms,

(01:12:02):
varying amounts of fees. But I want to thank the
donors on cash app, John W. And we had two
new ones, Bryce T and Lionel C. Thank you very much.
Where we are right now, we're just a little bit
past three eighths on the gas gage. I think they've
updated the graphic on that, but you know, we're just

(01:12:23):
a little bit past the halfway mark and we're at
three eights. So this one'll let you know that. Oh
and Karen just gave this to me. This is These
are checks for the second week of April. Mark C.
Thank you very much. Aaron W. David and Susie S.
Timothy W. Marilyn B. Kimberly S, James F, Eric Ka,

(01:12:48):
Michael E, Ronald C. Austin M, Josh B. And Ryan F.
Thank you all. Those are the people, the few people
who keep this broadcasts going, so I really do thank
them for that. Let's talk just briefly about the judge

(01:13:11):
in his background. I alluded to it, but I don't
want to spend a whole much a lot more time
on this one issue. But I think it's important, you know,
when we look at what is going on to the
southwest border, and this is something that also happened in
twenty seventeen, Immigration basically just stopped as Trump took office,
wanting to see what would happen. And so I think
that a lot of this really tough talk is also

(01:13:34):
to show people that he's serious about it this time,
unlike the first time. But again, if we're going to
have every problem solved by declaring an emergency and running
martial law, that is unbelievably dangerous. Unbelievably dangerous. They've got
a loaded gun to our head collectively by doing that.
But when we take a look at what is happening

(01:13:55):
at the border, the conservatives are very excited about the
fact that, I should say the Trump supporters that Southwest
border apprehensions last month were lower than the first two
days of March of twenty twenty four, So for the
entire month, they had fewer apprehensions, which is a part

(01:14:17):
of you know, that doesn't tell you how many people
cross the border. That tells you how many people I caught.
But that's kind of an indication of traffic, I guess,
but they had less apprehensions for the entire month than
they did the first two days of March and twenty
twenty four, So that's good. But I just want to

(01:14:38):
caution you into not accepting that the mean that the
end justifies the means. That is never true. That's true
for the Marxists. Well, if I are the authoritarians that
you know, whatever it takes right the end, if the
end is good, I can use whatever means I want
to know. That is not the kind of thing society

(01:15:00):
that we want, and it certainly isn't the kind of
government that we want. So Bosberg has threatened to hold
Trump officials in contempt of court for not flying the
gang members back to the US. This broke yesterday. He's
now found probable cause. This guy's really feeling his oats
and he really does need to be impeached. He really does.

(01:15:20):
He issued the temporary restraining orders. I pointed out, they
took it to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court removed that
temporary restraining order. Now he wants to come after the
Trump administration for ignoring his temporary restraining order that was
removed by the Supreme Court. That is now going to
be what the fight is over, instead of are we
going to have a determination as to whether not somebody

(01:15:41):
is a terrorist or not. Deporting him is one thing,
but declaring them a terrorist and essentially giving them a
death penalty is another thing. And that needs to have
that must have due process, so willful disregard of his
prior order that was thrown out by the Supreme courts,

(01:16:02):
And so yesterday Boseburg gave the government a deadline a
third either to comply with his initial order and thereby
purge the contempt or alternate alternatively identify members of the
administration who should be subject to individual sanctions for their role. Now,
the founders said they thought that the judiciary was the
least dangerous of the three branches. And again that's the

(01:16:24):
way they regarded government. They regarded it as a danger,
as a threat right, and they said it's the least
dangerous because they don't have any means to enforce what
they want to do. Well, he doesn't have any means
to enforce this either. He said that the Trump administration
quote defied my order deliberately and gleefully. Of course, he

(01:16:48):
doesn't call it my order. He calls it the court's order.
But he is the court, right, and he says the
Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders, especially
by officials of a coordinate branch who sworn in to
uphol it. Well, again, we have checks and balances, So yes,
the Constitution does support that. Constitution does support nullification of

(01:17:11):
one branch's actions by another branch. That's exactly what it supports.
That's what it was there for. Again, the Kentucky and
Virginia resolutions, we're calling on the states to nullify the
federal government. And so the states can nullify the federal government.
The citizens can nullify the federal government or the state
government with jury nullification. That's the power of the citizenry.

(01:17:35):
Which all the judges will lie to you about that,
but yeah, the citizens have a veto there with a
jury if they think that the law is bad or
that the punishment is excessive. We've always talked about that
with fully informed juries, right, and that's what I'm saying
about this. This punishment is excessive. Yeah, this guy, if
he's here illegally, absolutely deport him. However, to that punishment

(01:18:00):
is excessive, and so people can nullify it. States can
nullify a Kentucky and Virginia resolutions, and then the different
branches of the federal government are there to nullify each
other as well. You see, the founders saw government as
dangerous and they wanted to make sure that different groups
the checks and balances are all about nullification. This is

(01:18:25):
the judge Boseburg who says the Constitution doesn't tolerate willful
disobedience of judicial orders. That right there shows that he's
not qualified to be a judge. He can't properly judge
what the Constitution says. He needs to be thrown out.
He needs to be impeached, along with a lot of others.
Boseburg is the chief judge of the Federal Trial Level

(01:18:46):
Court in DC. He outlined the next steps in the
contempt proceedings since it is not proven yet beyond a
reasonable doubt that the administration committed criminal contempt of his
temporary restraining order that we removed by the Supreme Court.
Boseburg said that he wants sworn statements first, some people
who can attest to the officials making the decisions not

(01:19:07):
to turn the planes around as they carried migrants to
El Salvador. So again, you know he's living in a
fantasy world. A little bit about his background. As I
said before, he's nominated by George W. Bush initially into
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The Obama
put him into a federal judge ship after he had

(01:19:28):
been in that other position for nine years. He was
confirmed by the US Senate and a unanimous vote. This
is the Uni Party here putting somebody like him in
Chief Justice. John Roberts likes him. One of the reasons
why John Roberts would push back against suggestions by Trump
that Boseburg got to be impeached is because Roberts liked

(01:19:50):
him enough to put him as put him in the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which is not a you know,
it's not a it's one person without a jury. You know,
he didn't have a grand jury situation. He is the court, right,
just that one person is the court. And so it
was Roberts who put Bosburg on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

(01:20:15):
In twenty twenty, he was appointed to the US Alien
Terrorist Removal Court and he was designated as chief judge.
Perhaps that's why we haven't had any terrorist aliens removed,
because he's there. He's there. So his background, he comes
from a family of bureaucrats. Born in California, moved to Arizona.

(01:20:38):
King Tutt, now he was his family came from California,
moved to DC. His dad worked for Lyndon Johnson and
the War on Poverty, the Office of Economic Opportunity. With
a background like that, how could this guy go wrong?
Oh he also attended Yale. Okay, So there's all of
that together, right, explaining the lot. Now, the Dhaka two

(01:21:02):
point zero that I was talking about earlier, again, the
Obama admisstery. They wanted to have Dreamers, and they had
this Dreamer legislation over and over again that kept being
shut down by Congress. They couldn't get a passer. So
Obama did it by executive order. Trump becomes president, He's
going to remove the Obama executive order. The courts say, no,

(01:21:23):
you can't do that. Now we've got this happening again,
and so what is Trump going to do this time?
A judge has blocked Trump from revoking the legal status
for five hundred and thirty thousand plus migrants who flew
into the US via a Biden program that was by
Biden's executive order and so Trump says, we don't like

(01:21:45):
that he gave legal status to Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and
Venezuelans the CHNV mess humanitarian parole program that was created
by a Biden executive order in twenty twenty three. This
is just like the DACA things. Is DACA two point zero.
And so now you've got a federal judge, Judge Indira

(01:22:07):
Polwane and an Obama appointee, said that each migrant needs
to have an individualized case by case review. Again, if
they're here illegally, they can be deported and he can
just you know, remove that. But the issue is, you know,
are they going to be declared terrorists or are they

(01:22:28):
going to be declared illegal immigrants. There's a big difference
between those two things, and I think that we need
to That's not just a nuance, it's not quibbling over details.
That is a huge difference. You know, that's like giving somebody,
you know, a prison sentence of a couple of years
or sentencing them to death. And so you need to
make that determination. So that would determine whether or not

(01:22:50):
this needs to be reviewed on a case by case basis.
I think in my opinion. A termination of parole processes
for cumensations Nicaraguans and Venezuelans has is hereby still. In
other words, so we're not going to let him get
rid of Biden's DOCA two point zero. Biden created this
program in twenty twenty three with the executive.

Speaker 4 (01:23:12):
Order.

Speaker 2 (01:23:13):
He said, I've got the ability to parol people. So
you bring them in and that's a crime. They've now
committed crime because it came into this country illegally. But
I'll parole them and forgive them. Yeah, this is the
kind of stuff and we ought to that is contemptible,
But we don't want to embrace equally contemptible things on

(01:23:37):
the other side of rule by martial law. So again,
as we look at judicial tyranny. On another issue, we've
got a judge ruling against the Trump administration after it
couldn't find evidence of fraud in a clean energy program.
Did you look hard enough? I don't think so. This
judge is Tanya Chutkin, the judge who presided over the

(01:24:02):
law fair against Trump over the fake election charges and
things like that, and she on Tuesday ruled in favor
of eight nonprofit nonprofits that sued the Trump administration saying
give me the money, show me the money. Jerry, EPA
unlawfully terminated their gravy train. Okay, so they're suing over this.

(01:24:25):
Chuckkins said if EPA had concerns over oversight and the funding,
the way to do it is either to get a
court order, which you didn't do, or to go through
the procedures for termination. The EPA could still shut down
the program in the future, said the judge, as long
as it follows proper procedures and gives nonprofits advanced notice
of its plans. Well. Lee Zelden, who is the new

(01:24:48):
EPA Administer Administrator, said that the Biden administration unlawfully awarded
twenty billion dollars to Progressive Ventures. In a video that
he did, he said, what they're doing in terms of
these are last minute things that the Biden administration did right.
In other words, this is not something goes back here

(01:25:09):
is it's just like, we got this money, let's get
it to people before Trump gets in office. And he
compared it to somebody throwing gold bars off of the Titanic,
and he said, well, we found the gold bars, we
retrieved them, and we're not going to give that money.
To these different groups. And so again, if you know
what you're looking at are the arbitrary executive actions by

(01:25:31):
the previous president, and the judge saying you can't ignore that.
So again, this criminal contempt thing, that is what's in
the news breaking yesterday. Everybody is talking about that finding.
The only remedy for purging a contempt order is by

(01:25:52):
complying with a temporary restraining order that is no longer
in effect. He says, I'm going to come after you
contempt somehow. You know, Boseburg and some army are going
to come after administration. He doesn't even know who to
come after. He's telling them, tell me who I can
come after, give me some names, and so he's going to,

(01:26:17):
you know, make allegations them. And the only way that
they can do that avoid that contempt charge is if
they comply with his temporary restraining order, which has been
thrown out by the Supreme Court. Yeah, it's a mess,
It really is a mess. So we're gonna take a
quick break and we come back. I want to talk
a little bit. Well, actually we've got Tony is going

(01:26:39):
to be joining us in just a little bit, So
I'm gonna go a little bit longer because you don't
have Tony yet. Right, we're about four minutes out. Let
me talk a little bit about what's happening with the news,
and we'll take a break and get Tony on. Here
we have in the UK as we talk about alien
insedition acts and you might get deported, disappeared off the
street if you say the wrong things about some of

(01:27:01):
Trump's political friends like net Yahu. Well, what does this
look like in the UK. We have a minister there
in the UK Government Minister Lillian Greenwood has said she
defended Labour's banter band. She said, you know, people are
entitled private conversations as long as they don't offend other people.

(01:27:24):
If you remember about ten years ago, and I've played
this several times, I'm gonna play for you again today,
but rowing that let's say, mister bean, what's his name
was Zakinson? Was that his last name? Anyway? Mister bean?
You know Atkinson? What's that Rowan? Yeah, Rowan Yeah. He

(01:27:44):
addressed this, this is something that's been percolating around the
UK for quite some time, at least a decade, and
he said, please feel free to insult me. And they
beat it back ten years ago but it's back. I mean,
these people are relentless. They want to take your free
speech and they will use any kind of excuse to
take it back, and so they're back with a vengeance.

(01:28:05):
Lilian Greenwood is a Transport minister and she said it
was an exaggeration to say that rules and the Employment
Rights Bill could threaten pubs with closure. She said, this
is about getting the balance right between free speech and
workers' rights. There isn't any balance on free speech. There
aren't any restraints on free speech. It's either free or
it isn't. And if you're going to put rules on it,

(01:28:29):
it is no longer free speech. It's like we're talking
about free trade, right. If you've got a free trade
agreement that's thousands of pages long, that's not free trade.
If you've got a free speech agreement that has all
kinds of restrictions and exceptions and caveats in it, that's
not free speech either. Freedom to speak is the freedom

(01:28:50):
to offend. Somebody is always going to be offended by
something that you say. When I spoke against Hillary's takeover
of health care, everybody there, I wasn't intentional like it
would be today, but the I got up and I said,
you know, we got some real problems of the medical thing,
but you know we also we shouldn't have the government

(01:29:13):
practicing charity in these particular when I mentioned charity, oh,
these people think everything. They're entitled everything. It's not charity.
They're entitled to what you have, what you worked for, right, well,
I said charity boy, Oh, crowd of Democrats is booing me,
and so you know I offended them. I guess I
should have been locked up would be today, I guess.

(01:29:35):
The Equalities watch Dog has told the government that measures
and labors workers' rights overhaul could disproportionately curtail freedom of expression.
A Conservative peer who is also tied to Free Speech Union,
which is part of the Daily Skeptic in the UK,
has tabled several amendments that would stop pub and university

(01:29:57):
bosses having to ensure that they're st were not subject
to harassment by overhearing opinions that they didn't agree with.
It could be about anything, right, It could be that
you think men or men and women are women, which,
by the way, they just had a court decision there
affirming that, which is something we always knew, but at

(01:30:18):
least removed some of the legal threats. So Young is
the founder of the Free Speech Union. He said that
the way the law was written would mean that an
employee could take offense on behalf of another member of staff,
even if he or she did not hear the comments made.
His amendment to the bill would exempt opinions on political, moral, religious,

(01:30:40):
or social matters from the law as long as the
opinion was not indecent or grossly offensive. Oh well then, okay,
not even this guy gets it. So you can say
whatever you want about all these controversial things like politics, morality,
religion and everything, as long as you don't offend anybody.
This is the free speech conservative position in the UK.

(01:31:04):
They're done, folks, stick a fork in it. They've completely
lost the plot because you can always say that something
is grossly offensive anyway. It's the other Minister of Greenwood said, well,
you can have any say anything joined in private conversation
as long as it's not overheard by somebody who takes
offense at it. Well that's not freedom at all, That

(01:31:25):
is not freedom at all. Well, Tony is ready to
join us without any further ado. We're going to take
a quick break and we'll be right back with Tony
Ardaban of wise Wolf Gold, also David Knight Gold. That'll
take you to Wise Wolf, will be right back. A
lot to talk about with what has happened with gold
in the economy this last week. You know, there are
some weeks where nothing happens, and then there are other

(01:31:46):
weeks where decades happened. This is one of those the
latter category. We'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:32:42):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:32:46):
All right. Joining us now is Tony Ardabun of wise
Wolf Gold. And we've got so much to talk about.
And again he set up David Night dot Gold. I'll
take you to Tony's Wise Wolf and let him know
that you came through us. And as we look at
gold going up record prices, as Tony has always said,
you know when it starts shooting up when everybody gets
interested in buying it, and so it's kind of a

(01:33:06):
feedback loop. There's some other fundamental things that are driving
it as well. Thank you for joining us, Tony. It
certainly has been an amazing week, hasn't it.

Speaker 4 (01:33:13):
Well?

Speaker 5 (01:33:14):
We keep saying that, yeah every week. For again, every
time I come up, there's another record high. David and
the monetary system is melting down.

Speaker 4 (01:33:20):
Well, what's going to happen next week? Stay tuned, folks.

Speaker 5 (01:33:24):
Look, we've got the gold silver ratio now is one
hundred and two. It's one hundred and two ounces of
silver to make one ounce of gold. Isn't that absolutely insane?
That is that is that history has is at ten
to twenty at most ten to twenty ounces of silver
to make one ounce of gold. That changed around nineteen

(01:33:47):
thirty three, but it's never, i mean, never been like
this on a consistent base. It's one hundred and two
ounces of silver to make one ounce of gold. That's
a price disparity in and of itself. But as I
was telling you off air, there's something really wrong with
the price of gold itself. Based off of the dollar
I mean, in nineteen seventy one is thirty five dollars
an ounce, so it's almost one hundred times it's almost

(01:34:11):
one hundred times what it was in August fifteenth, nineteen
seventy one. And gold really hasn't gone up in value,
and of course it increases about two or three percent
a year in supply, so it's kept up with you know,
inflation and other things. But that's the price of gold
versus the purchasing power of the dollar and almost one
hundred times, David, absolutely amazing.

Speaker 2 (01:34:32):
That truly is amazing. Yeah, And of course we had
a lot of things happening with pronouncements by Powell, things
happening with the stock market, stuff happening with tariffs. This
war between China and the US, of trade war is
driving people to away from the dollar, away from treasury bills,
and even more so into gold. As you and I

(01:34:53):
have been talking about for the last couple of years.
You know, China's central bank and others saw this coming,
actually saw it with the tariffs, and they started moving
away from the dollar towards a gold seeing the resetting
of the financial system. And now this, I don't know.
I don't see anything fundamentally changing with US. I think
this is going to get really crazy, and I think

(01:35:16):
this is part of the financial meltdown. I think Trump
wants that.

Speaker 4 (01:35:21):
I do too.

Speaker 5 (01:35:22):
What else would explain this sort of chaos? Markets love certainty.
I mean, you're not making it advantageous for companies to
move here, build here, invest here. We haven't restructured, not
working on our internal tax system, work on external tax system.
At the same time, So we haven't lowered taxes, we're
actually raising taxes. You know how I feel about tariffs.

(01:35:42):
I like tariffs. I think that there's sound. I think
they can create an environment of freedom and liberty. The
problem is if you add them on top of the
income tax, you just get a new tax. Yeah, so
we're It doesn't make any sense on its face, And
I think that's why this has nothing to do with
economic nationalism, has everything to do with the controlled demolition
of the American economy, the American dollar. It's the rhetoric

(01:36:06):
back and forth between Trump and Powell. Trump to put
out on his truth social that he's looking forward to
Pale's termination. Termination can't come fast enough, is what he said,
based off Palell's remarks on tariffs and everything else. And
he says he's always late. He wants Powell to act.

(01:36:26):
And this is part of the weaker dollar strategy. If
you really listen to what Trump says. He's trying to
get the FED to inject massive amounts of liquidity into
the market's QE. And of course Powell, as we've covered
for the last couple of years, has raised interest rates
faster than any other FED chairman in history trying to

(01:36:47):
curt tail inflation so that it goes against the policy.
I mean, if you want to call the FED fed hawkish,
it reverses all of the Fed's policy over the past
two or three years. And that would be absolutely devastating,
a final blow for the dollar, if you will, and
it might lend a I think a temporary boon to

(01:37:07):
the economy. I think we would see, you know, stock
prices would sore, there'd be a temporary high. But ultimately
that sort of injection right now, when we're at one
hundred and twenty five percent of debt to GDP David,
I that would be the final blow. I mean, I
think after that we'd be looking at the fallout from
that because you could no longer really do anything by

(01:37:29):
injecting liquidity. That's like the last run. It's just based
off mathematics. And I think that's what Trump wants. I
think he wants a giant liquidity injection. And then you
can put a hang of question mark over that. You know,
he likes injections.

Speaker 2 (01:37:43):
He likes injections of an injection, maybe even you know,
heroin injections, because that's what this is like, This is
like a junkie looking for a fix, and you know
he can't get high anymore, and he's going to have
to use more and more, and eventually he's gonna ode,
and we're going to have an eke and make overdose
of quantitative easy. It's going to kill the economy, kill

(01:38:04):
the government. And you know this. This is the guy
who bankrupted casinos.

Speaker 6 (01:38:07):
No.

Speaker 2 (01:38:08):
One of the things that he really I guess really
got him angry was what Powell said in his remarks
yesterday to the Economic Club of Chicago. Just read these
two here. We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario
in which our dual mandate goals are intention If that
were to occur, we would consider how far the economy
is from each of these goals, and the potentially different

(01:38:30):
time horizons are which those respective gaps would be anticipated close.
But then what really got it is I think he
said terrorists are likely to move us further away from
our goals, probably for the balance of this year. And
he said for the time being, we're well positioned to
just wait for greater greater clarity before considering an adjustment
to our policy stance. So what he's saying is like

(01:38:52):
all the businesses out there and CEOs and everybody's like, well,
we don't know what Trump's going to do in another
twelve hours, so let's just wait and see. Right. It's
this uncertainty, you know, that's the other thing that has
jumped into this tony Besides you know the inflation and
the spending and you know, adding taxes and everything. It's
the uncertainty about everything, and that's freezing everybody. And even
now Powell echoes it and says, well, we're gonna we're

(01:39:14):
gonna just wait and see what he's gonna do, wait
and see what the stuff shakes out before we make
any policy commitments. And everybody is doing that with their
businesses across the board, across the world.

Speaker 5 (01:39:26):
Well absolutely, I mean, the uncertainty is what is causing
all of the market chaos and the whip sawing and
the back and forth. I noticed something. There's a metric.
You know, the Chinese used to be the largest holder
of US treasuries.

Speaker 4 (01:39:40):
Now that's the greatest seller.

Speaker 5 (01:39:43):
This is the upside down, and this is the changes
that are on the horizon are absolutely massive. You look
at dedollarization continuing the trend. If if he gets his
wish I think that's what I think we're trying to
suss out here is what is the goal?

Speaker 4 (01:39:57):
Because you know.

Speaker 5 (01:39:58):
Powell, he's not wrong about the tariffs. Because we're placing
tariffs on a top of a system that wasn't designed
for economic nationalism. It doesn't look like policy, and that,
you know, policy would be a reformation of our current
economic system, how we tax, what incentives we give to

(01:40:19):
corporations and to individuals and to investors to build things here.

Speaker 4 (01:40:23):
We didn't do that. We just we just put something.

Speaker 5 (01:40:26):
We put a relic on top of a system that from.

Speaker 4 (01:40:30):
A bygone era.

Speaker 5 (01:40:31):
We put a relic on there, on top of a
new system that is designed for cheap liquidity, it's designed
for debt, it's designed for fiat currency, it's designed for
you know, again the currency.

Speaker 4 (01:40:44):
Creation in order to survive that.

Speaker 5 (01:40:47):
Do you know the stock market in nineteen seventy one,
go back to Nixon's arrow and go off the gold standard.

Speaker 4 (01:40:52):
This is a.

Speaker 5 (01:40:52):
Completely different economy, different everything you know it used to
and you know this, I mean it was the stock
market was based off of earnings and you know profit
and loss statements. You know, the Warren Buffett's era, that
is no longer that way. It's about your it's about ESG.
It's about your ties to UH central banking and venture capital,
which all that just circles around itself. This has nothing

(01:41:16):
to do with with old metrics and building things and
manufacturing and all that stuff. So yeah, putting the tariffs
on there like that, it doesn't make any sense and
it will be inflationary.

Speaker 4 (01:41:28):
But again because we didn't.

Speaker 5 (01:41:29):
Cause we didn't, there's no there's no carrot, it's just stick.
And that's to tell this is not about that. It's
about forcing Powell or forcing a new chairman of the FED,
which is I'm surprised to even stayed on in the fire.

Speaker 4 (01:41:42):
I was always surprised he stayed on. I thought, this
is very good.

Speaker 5 (01:41:44):
You know, exit stage right there, Jerome, you should probably
exit because this is going to be a bumpy ride.
He didn't do that, so you know that's on him.
But something, something is going to happen. I can't imagine
they've gone all this way to become fiscally responsible. I
had a high school student, the daughter a lady that
works for me in Branson. She texted me earlier this

(01:42:06):
week and said, can you tell me how the US
could balance the budget, and so I sent her back
an audio message and I said, well, they'd have to
pass a balanced budget amendment. They'd have to cut spending,
they have to spend less than they took in. This
would have to be a complete reformation of the financial system,
and I said, they'd have to we'd have to repeg
the currency to something stable so we wouldn't constantly lose

(01:42:27):
purchasing power. There's a few steps, you know, there's you'd
have to have.

Speaker 2 (01:42:30):
I would have sent her back a three word reply.
I'd say, follow the constitution.

Speaker 4 (01:42:34):
Well, that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:42:36):
That would be the big cuts to the welfare warfare state.
That would eliminate for real, all this stuff that those
just playing around with, the different on the fringes. You know,
it's just completely gone. That's what it's going to require.

Speaker 5 (01:42:51):
Absolutely, And I said, you know, we'd have to we'd
have to end I called it the welfare warfare states.

Speaker 4 (01:42:55):
So there's back three things to me.

Speaker 5 (01:42:57):
If all the constitution, that's even of course, that's what
David and I would say. I had to make it convoluted.
But that's what I looked at. I said, we don't
talk about that anymore.

Speaker 4 (01:43:07):
Yeah, we don't talk. That is not on the table.

Speaker 5 (01:43:09):
So you know, I think that that is the tell
if you want to read the room, this is not
the spirit of the age, the zeitgeist, if you will.
That they're not throwing that out saying we need to
become physically responsible. Nobody talks about that. This is all
about strategy and who gets left holding what?

Speaker 2 (01:43:27):
Yeah, you know, this is the Machiavellian monetary theories.

Speaker 4 (01:43:31):
Oh I like that.

Speaker 2 (01:43:33):
Another MMT Right, I'm going to use this politically for something.
You know, it was interesting you mentioned it's all stick
and no carrot, and that was the same thing that
a commentator on RT on Russia today said as well,
in terms of talking about the two big issues here,
How is the EU going to respond to Trump's tariffs

(01:43:53):
and things like that? How is China going to respond?
They said, well, you know, for the EU, because of
you know, the dominance of the US in so many
different ways with them, they will probably grudgingly go along.
But it's all stick and no care. They don't get
anything out of it. He hasn't given them anything to
go that way, but he's got a big enough stick
that he could beat him with that maybe they'll go

(01:44:14):
that way. You know, it's over China. You know, he's
talking about it. And and this is the key thing
when we start talking about devaluation and things like that.
China devaluated there you want. And so what's Trump going
to do? Is he going to respond with that? Is
he going to devaluate the dollar? You know, that's that's
part of what they've always done with the China price
is currency manipulation. And so you know, how does he

(01:44:37):
respond to that? You know, everybody says, well, Trump's holding
all the cards because we buy more from them they
buy from us, well, not at all. I mean, besides
the rare earth minerals that they've just stopped that they've
got like ninety percent of the processing on globally, so
they just stop that they can devalue their currency. They've
also matched him on tear freights, so as he goes up,
they go up, and they keep going up. But he

(01:44:59):
doesn't have any cards to play when it comes to evaluation,
because that's going to work against dollars, certainly work for
the advantage of gold, and when it comes to minerals
and other things like that, it seems to me like
he doesn't have the cards. He's got the big stick
with Europe, but he doesn't seem to have the cards
in the trade war with China. And I think that

(01:45:20):
that's going to continue to go on. And I think
it's this instability that is there, this uncertainty that he's created,
that is driving gold the most, don't you.

Speaker 5 (01:45:30):
Well, that's what the Chinese are buying gold, They're dumping
treasuries to buy it. The world's buying gold, and I
think this has been happening really accelerated rates since twenty
twenty two. You look at when we put the sanctions
on Russia and then the ruble fell and then bounced back,
and then they stopped using dollars and went and did
direct trade deals with places like India and China for petroleum,

(01:45:53):
for gold and vice versa. I think what we're on
the cusp of is a world that's moving away from
the dollar.

Speaker 4 (01:46:02):
I've said for a while.

Speaker 5 (01:46:03):
I think gold is already the world's reserve currency, it's
just not in name. And that's what Bricks is working
on in cross border payment systems. You know, if this
was twenty years ago, you could probably take on the
Chinese no problem.

Speaker 4 (01:46:19):
But we've given them so much.

Speaker 5 (01:46:21):
We gave them the infrastructure, we gave them the trade,
we gave them the technology.

Speaker 2 (01:46:26):
Cheap energy, well, we gave them cheap energy.

Speaker 4 (01:46:28):
You know, that's keep energy.

Speaker 2 (01:46:29):
Yeah, you think you're going to manufacture Sorry.

Speaker 4 (01:46:32):
Opened everything for them, you know you have to.

Speaker 5 (01:46:36):
We built them up so we could do something like
this because we can blame the other. I think this
is another part of the great reset the technocracy, all
the thing they've been building up China since the Trilateralists
formed in nineteen seventy three with Zignu Braziski. It's moving
the technology eastward and building up their infrastructure. And of
course we opened China in seventy two. Everything following the

(01:46:58):
timeline David trade surplus the United States ran was in
nineteen seventy four. This all makes sense if you look
at it in reverse. And now we get here. It's
hard to see exactly what the next move is, but
it's not good. I think it's just using this as
a buffer, you know, using them as the other. They're
setting up the boogeyman because the damage that we've done

(01:47:19):
to ourselves with our own policies, with globalization and you know,
with you know, the empire, the American Empire, has been
absolutely disastrous.

Speaker 4 (01:47:28):
And this is not this can't last forever.

Speaker 5 (01:47:31):
That's what we're up against is the timeline is the
window for us fixing our currency and our system is
rapidly closing.

Speaker 4 (01:47:39):
And it's not gonna be great.

Speaker 5 (01:47:41):
It's not gonna be it's not gonna be sunshining rainbows
on the other side. I hate doing this because it
sounds so pessimistic, but you just I mean, look again,
the dollar was thirty five dollars an ounce for gold
in nineteen seventy one, and now it's almost one hundred
times almost, I mean, right there. I didn't think this

(01:48:02):
is something I've been studying for years and years, and
I gotta say this all the time, but it's it's
moving faster than.

Speaker 4 (01:48:07):
I thought it would.

Speaker 1 (01:48:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:48:08):
Really, oh yeah, we're really in a different timeline now.

Speaker 2 (01:48:11):
Yeah, Peter Schiff has said this is what I've been
talking about as long as that is there is there,
you know, you know, and all of the gold bugs
have all been saying that. But that's the case. As
you point out, you know that ratio to silver, everything
has flowed into gold, right, it's not into bitcoin, It's
not into silver. It's not any of these other alternatives
to these fiat currencies. It is all going into gold

(01:48:32):
right now, and so it's acting like a big hose
that's there, you know. And that's one of the other
things bitcoin, as one person said, well, we're poised for
a twenty twenty three style rebound. As Goldman says, the
dollar is overvalued. Now that's coming from coin desk and
they're going to look at it. Oh, well, the dollar's overvalued,

(01:48:52):
so we can have rebound with bitcoin. Well, not necessarily,
you know, it's just like the silver thing that is
there going to be gold that everybody's going to run into.
And that's what we've been seeing is that that's where
the the foreign banks are going, the central banks are going,
and a lot of individuals are going into gold because
they see that as the you know, the an island
of stability and this chaotic situation that Trump is manufactured.

(01:49:17):
What do you think about bitcoin? I mean, is is
that going to regain this or is it going to
kind of hang around and wait for the economy to
settle down on the stock market and all this other
uncertainty about tariffs.

Speaker 4 (01:49:31):
Well, I think bitcoin is is actually held up. Okay,
it hasn't done.

Speaker 5 (01:49:35):
I mean this is this has always been the question
is is bitcoin digital gold? In times of uncertainty and
times of fear, in times of chaos, can bitcoin hold
its own?

Speaker 4 (01:49:47):
It certainly has done. Okay, give it a C minus.

Speaker 5 (01:49:50):
It's not a failure, but it did it did you know,
have a lot of you know, price drop since Inauguration day,
which was I think one hundred and eight thousand day,
but I think was trading the other day at about
eighty six thousand, so not terrible.

Speaker 4 (01:50:04):
And it's not like a lot of these stocks, I
mean they were just or some of.

Speaker 5 (01:50:08):
These mean coins other things that are digital assets that
like trump coin or whatever that just plummets.

Speaker 4 (01:50:15):
So it's held up. Okay.

Speaker 5 (01:50:16):
I think bitcoin in the infrastructure, and I have a
bitcoin company. I think the long term it goes I
think hand in hand with gold in some way, and
because it's a digital it says something that gold can't do,
but gold does something that bitcoin can't do.

Speaker 4 (01:50:32):
A lot of these people that are bitcoin maximusts. I
scratch my head.

Speaker 5 (01:50:35):
I don't really understand why they think that bitcoin will
will demonetize gold or demonetize silver or everything goes to
zero again. It seems kind of cultish maw like some
of those guys. I think they're very smart people, but
at the end of the day, I don't agree with that.
I think it's just another asset alongside of precious metals
that has a long term viability. I don't like any

(01:50:59):
other crypto. I don't sell any other cryptos. I don't
deal in them. I think bitcoin being the it is
an island unto itself, so I will leave that and
put a pin in it.

Speaker 4 (01:51:09):
I don't know. I hang a question mark over.

Speaker 5 (01:51:11):
I think that I definitely see a rally for bitcoin
sometime in the next twenty four months, but right now
nobody's doing anything. I mean the win when there, I think,
what might happen?

Speaker 4 (01:51:24):
I think you and I can probably what was that?
What was the Johnny Carson bit? You know where he
puts the puts the letter and opens it up.

Speaker 2 (01:51:34):
He already the great Karnak.

Speaker 4 (01:51:35):
Yeah, the Karnak, Yeah, Karnak, yeah, Karnak.

Speaker 2 (01:51:40):
I think, yeah, it's.

Speaker 5 (01:51:41):
Like, what is quantitative easy? That's what we're gonna get.
And when that happens, it always happens. Following that, when
they get some new fed policy and there's you know,
trillions dumped in or something.

Speaker 4 (01:51:54):
There will be this boon.

Speaker 5 (01:51:55):
There'll be like, you know, everything is happy and everybody's
doing great, and then bitcoin will there will be a
sell off in gold at some point. It's a little
bit of sell off. It'll pull back, maybe not that far,
but there'll be some I think that's what happens a
lot when when these in these times, when there is
an opportunity to buy something, people will liquidate their gold holdings,

(01:52:16):
which puts presser on the price, and so that'll come
out and I think going will go back over one
hundred thousand, and we're not that far away from it'll
top another one hundred thousand. But I don't in this
current environment, a lot of these new technologies can't grow,
whether it's AI, whether it's crypto, it's just stagnant. It
doesn't know what to do because the global order is
being reset, the entire global economy is being reset. So

(01:52:41):
for the for the foreseeable future, it's commodities. And I
think maybe in the maybe in the totality of this decade,
in to this century, it's going to be commodities. Rare
earth minerals who controls things like crude oil and gold
and silver and other things. I think real estate, timber
of the thing. I think those will be that's true wealth.

(01:53:04):
And then all of this stuff is speculative.

Speaker 2 (01:53:06):
So I got a question from somebody when you mentioned commodities.
I get a question from somebody here. James Faithways says,
can you ask Tony what he thinks of buying a
little copper? I understand the premium is high and that
it's not really considered to be a precious metal, but
I can't seem to get a straightforward answer on it.
So what do you think about that?

Speaker 5 (01:53:26):
I think it's a great idea. If you can get copper,
it's only good. Look at copper against any currency. That's
what you have to remember that if you're using fiat currency,
whatever currency it is worldwide, whether it's the Chinese you on,
whether it's Japanese in, whether it's the euro, whether it's
the pound, sterling. If you're buying a commodity that has

(01:53:48):
limp that is limited, it's finite in this market, you're
doing good. You're going to replace something. I mean copper,
I wouldn't necessarily, I mean in history, the cop or
it's been money because it's been the penny and other
type of coins.

Speaker 4 (01:54:03):
We stopped making copper pennies in nineteen.

Speaker 5 (01:54:05):
Eighty two, but there's still any penny prior to that
is copper. If you go look at it the next time,
you know, when you see a copper penny, you should
save that. It's worth more than the scent, you know,
put that away. So I think, yeah, copper is a
is a Sometimes we put copper bullion rounds and for

(01:54:26):
gifts and things like that into wolf Pack and to
some of the direct purchases that we get wise wolf
because it's just it's an extra little thing. But yeah,
I mean I have actually have copper bars I bought
from a customer years and years ago, but they had like,
you know, ten ounce twenty ounce copper bars.

Speaker 4 (01:54:45):
Yeah, stack those and if at the end of the
day that's wealth.

Speaker 2 (01:54:51):
Especially when Trump is stacking taxes, you might want to
want to, Yeah, stack.

Speaker 4 (01:54:57):
We're not holding taxes on top of taxes.

Speaker 2 (01:55:00):
That's what I was, you know, start stacking it. Yeah,
that's a yeah. You know, when you look at this,
and we've talked about crypto before, I think the play
that's going to happen is going to be stable coins
because that's something that they're going to use. And we're
seeing this more and more people talking about it. This
article headline from zero Hedge stable coins supply to surge

(01:55:21):
to two trillion dollars in order to support the US
dollars hegemony. And I think that's exactly what the play is.
When you look at Lutnik and his or Loutnick whatever
it is, when you look at his connection with Teather
and how much he is in the treasury bonds and
things like that. As countries are getting more and more

(01:55:44):
reluctant to buy the treasury bonds, they can get a
stable coin to suck it up. And it's a dual
win for them because they can use they can start
to move us over to a digital currency. They can
use that then to control us economically, to deny us
being able to use it to track what we're spending,
but then also soaks up their treasury bonds and their

(01:56:05):
debt that as other people start to get reluctant to it,
what do you think is gonna happen with that? With that,
is that the path that you see moving forward?

Speaker 4 (01:56:12):
Well, unfortunately, I think that's the trend.

Speaker 5 (01:56:15):
It has to come in that form, you know, based
off of the rhetoric of you know, being anti CBDC.
I always thought there was something underlying that. I think
this is the what did the Zigni Brazienski say, we
needed an in run around sovereignty, you know, with the
with the technocracy needed in run around it. They're gonna
do an n run around your perceived notion of CBDC

(01:56:38):
with stable coin. That's right, and you and it's really
not that hard to suss out when you give it
five minutes a thought. Because this this era of history,
this this timeline, the the resetting of the global financial order,
the the generational wealth that will be created, if you will,

(01:57:00):
when they change the monetary system.

Speaker 4 (01:57:03):
I think a lot of this is on the table.
I think they're looking at who will control the keys
to some of these uh these technologies, blockchain, whatever it is.
It won't be bitcoin. It won't be bitcoin. It I
know too much about bitcoin and the and the decentralized network.

Speaker 5 (01:57:19):
It won't be bitcoin. I don't see it being that.
I think I think you're right. I think the the
thing to watch is the stable coin and those who
control that. And then you know, pairing that with things
like the dollar, but it's worldwide, you know, and the
Bank of International Settlements has been working on a you know,
the clearinghouse aspect of this. Uh, the i m F

(01:57:42):
with their uni coin. It's all about centralization and the
technology of blockchain, using these stable coins to get back
somehow to what's the original goal. I don't think we've
ever perhaps we've never left the uh, the paradigm of
the just the old new there's nothing it's the old
new world order. I mean, it's maybe we never really

(01:58:03):
left that, and we just this is all a distraction
to give us, you know, the illusion that there's you know.

Speaker 4 (01:58:10):
A populous uprising.

Speaker 5 (01:58:11):
But perhaps this has all just been a you know,
and it looks more and more like that. It's like
a funhouse mirror version for people like me that are
nationalists and believe in think like the way that the
country was built. And then you see you finally get
the tariffs and then they're they're this, yeah, and you
just go, well, that's not what I was, that's not
what I meant, and you know, or you get this.

(01:58:33):
It's this is a very strange time. So it's I think,
you know, when you really just go back. Perhaps this
is just a it's all a pageant. The world's a stages,
as Shakespeare said.

Speaker 2 (01:58:43):
Yeah, and uh, and Trump is an earthquake. He's it's
just he's juggling the tariffs, you know. And are we
not amused at seeing him change him every couple of hours?
You know, it's it's insane what is happening with it?
But yeah, it's it's stacking the taxes. And it is
also the uncertainty and the you know, the capricious and

(01:59:03):
arbitrary nature, and how it's constantly changing. That's what's really
wrecking everything. You know, you and I both agreed. We
like tariffs better than we do an income tax. I
like any kind of tax better than I like that.
I don't like taxes. I don't think taxes are an
engine of growth. But hey, you got people out there
who are cheering it. Oh, we got to have tariffs.
You know, it's what made America great. No, it isn't,
you know it was. It was the absence of taxes

(01:59:26):
and a small government that made America great and they
forget that. But you know, we talk about this stable
coin thing. It's interesting to see there's a couple of
articles there on zera hedge. The first one talking I
just called you the headline for about stable coin turning
into two trillion dollars and soaking up the debts and
you know, becoming soaking up the supporting the US dollars

(01:59:47):
hegemony and that type of thing. But then also the
fact that the d banking issue with crypto has not
been solved yet by the Trump administration. You know, that
was going to be that was the attack that was
coming on all the crypto community under Biden. That's still
an issue, and that's going to be an issue if
we got stable coins, because they're going to be able

(02:00:08):
to effectively debank individuals and stop you from buying certain things.
You know, it might be a geofence around a particular area.
You know, you can't take your coin out of your
fifteen minute city or whatever. Maybe it's going to be
a geofence around a particular item. You can't buy this
kind of gun or guns at all, that type of stuff.

(02:00:28):
So there's all these different ways that they can use
it to control us, and I think that's where that's
going to go. But with you know, with everything that's happening,
as I said earlier, Peter Schiff said, this is what
I've been talking about for years. This is the dollar
bubble just burst. Was his statement about it. And he's
not the only one saying that. I mean, he's a goldbug.
He's always been saying that. But now there's articles on

(02:00:50):
places like MarketWatch saying the US dollars role as the
de facto global reserve currency is looking increasingly uncertain. They're
going to have to pivot, just like they did when
Breton Wortz too or they went to the petro dollars,
They're going to have to pivot to something else. I
think it's gonna be the stable coin, because then that's
how they're going to try to preserve their their machiavellian

(02:01:11):
power and then usher in the new technocracy as well,
the surveillance state. I think that's I think that's where
they're going to pivot.

Speaker 5 (02:01:19):
Well, and I think the they'll say that the advantage
that they have there what makes it different this time
is that they have the ability to expand and contract
the money supply it will, they can do it in
real time, and they can use this technology so we'll
never get you know that we can always account for
every single cent that's the way they'll sell it, and

(02:01:40):
this is the way we can cond to be stable.

Speaker 4 (02:01:42):
It's a stable coin, yeah, you know, something like that.

Speaker 5 (02:01:45):
But really it's about you know, we've said it for Catain,
Austin fitz has said, it's surveillance disguises money. That's what
they haven't given up their goals, you know, for for
these control grids and things that they want to do
with the financial system.

Speaker 4 (02:02:00):
But at the same time, a lot of things are
out of their control.

Speaker 5 (02:02:02):
I mean you look at the history of the dollar
and where we were in price structuring against gold, and
then everything that's kept gold suppressed. I think all of
those things, I think the wheels have come off. I
think the the Black Swan event was the tariffs in
a lot of these countries. We look at Germany. Germany
is absolutely worried about its gold holdings in the US.

Speaker 4 (02:02:25):
Yeah, that's a country.

Speaker 5 (02:02:27):
It's not a it's not a corporation. I mean, it's
a whole country that's like, hey, is this available?

Speaker 4 (02:02:33):
Can we get that?

Speaker 5 (02:02:33):
We need to you know, they they want an audit
all that stuff that's going on that they're not They're
not alone. And a lot of these vaults got cleaned out.
You know the London bullyond Mark that got cleaned out.
A lot of their holdings were repatriated. Nobody knew exactly.
So when those contracts, you know, the stuff that they've
papered over for years, David like hiding deep in those
vall all these papers that you have to account for it.

(02:02:55):
It's something I think. I think that it's anybody's guess
at this point. But where we end up on price,
where we end up at anything, especially when the ultimate
goal here of the Trump administration is not economic nationalism,
it's quantitative easing. And so we just look that it's
not about strengthening a dollar, it's not about having a state.

(02:03:17):
It's about short term boons in the stock market. And
I think that ultimately that's fake. If you're buying gold
and silver right now, I think you're doing yourself a
favor holding on to You're preserving your wealth. As the
currencies of the earth continue to go to zero, all
fiat currencies, folks, go to zero. History does not show

(02:03:39):
me one single currency backed by nothing that stays around.

Speaker 4 (02:03:44):
Okay, that's hung around. The average lifespan is twenty six years.

Speaker 5 (02:03:47):
I don't have to be you know, some sort of
seer or I don't have to be able to be
nostra domis. You don't have to be you don't have
to be the smartest man in the room. You just
need a library card and you can figure this out.
It's going to zero, or it's going to a place
where it's you don't recognize.

Speaker 4 (02:04:04):
It like that we talk about every week.

Speaker 5 (02:04:07):
I mean, go look at the price of silver in
nineteen eighty it was fifty two dollars and fifty cents
an ounce. Well, that doesn't even make any sense today.
I mean, right now, I'll look at the spot price.
You're at thirty two dollars and seventeen cents an ounce,
and it's twenty twenty five, and we debase the dollar.

Speaker 4 (02:04:25):
Trillions and trillions of times over.

Speaker 5 (02:04:27):
I mean, so what does that mean? Well, I just
think all of this is the metrics. You're judging it
the wrong way. There's something else underlying this, And I
think the wheels are going to come off, and I think.

Speaker 4 (02:04:37):
We'll see a true price valuation sooner than later.

Speaker 2 (02:04:40):
I agree, Yeah, I think you know the fact that
gold is taken off from silver and from bitcoin is
a function of what a lot of foreign governments are doing.
You know, they see gold as that currency of exchange,
not necessarily these other things, and so I think they're
piling into that a lot, and I think that the
public has picked up on it. They look at gold
as a safe haven. I look at it as privacy.

(02:05:03):
You know, all these different commodities and things like that.
I see it as a privacy issue, and I don't
think you can put a price on privacy when you're
talking about these digital currency. So regardless, you know, it's
great if it goes up and I'm holding it or whatever,
but you know, to me, it's really about the privacy,
because I think that the stable coin thing is what
they're pivoting towards, and that's going to be you know

(02:05:25):
really you know, they tied the petro dollar in there
to energy, and of course that's something technocracy wanted to do,
and they tied it to something that was real. But
this time, as you point out, with the SG and
all the rest of stuff, their objectives are really about
total control, and so they've got to have some kind
of a digital currency, and the stable coin to be

(02:05:48):
a way they can get that digital currency and still
maintain their agimity. You know, when we look at what
is happening. I'm looking at all these different headlines. Gold
jumps one hundred dollars, gold up twenty five percent for
the month. Whatever, And how I did it get? Was
it thirty three seventy something? Was it?

Speaker 4 (02:06:04):
Yes? It's almost thirty four hundred dollars an ounce.

Speaker 2 (02:06:07):
It's amazing.

Speaker 4 (02:06:09):
Yeah. And the calls now are four thousand wow.

Speaker 5 (02:06:13):
I think it's that there's you know, analysts in major
banks that are saying four thousand wow, because I mean
where when you have d dollarization worldwide and what is
the price of gold?

Speaker 4 (02:06:25):
Yeah, you know, what is the price? I don't think
we've I don't think we This isn't the price discovery.
I don't think it's true.

Speaker 5 (02:06:31):
And much of what has happened over the years with
Stewart Angler, you know who wrote the book Rigged I've
had on my show. It's he's spent his entire like
last thirty years looking at the gold price suppression.

Speaker 4 (02:06:46):
Yeah, and how they've done it. I don't think they
can do it anymore. David. You know, perhaps they don't
want to.

Speaker 5 (02:06:51):
Perhaps this is part of that, because it doesn't seem
like anybody's putting an effort in.

Speaker 4 (02:06:56):
I mean, the FED is watching gold.

Speaker 5 (02:06:57):
Believe me, the Federal Reserve is watching gold right now,
very very closely, looking at this wondering what their next
move is going to be. And the world is watching it.
That's why I think that, you know, I said this
back in December. I think gold is the world's reserve currency.
The dollar's been supplanted. You go back into Basel three

(02:07:18):
at Switzerland, the Bank of International Settlements in twenty twenty one.
That's when they remove gold from a Tier three asset
to a Tier one asset. And then central banks started,
you know, supplanting their holdings and they it surpassed the euro.
So it was, you know, way down on the list,

(02:07:39):
and now it surpassed the Euro. Is number two holdings
of central banks around the world. The number one is
the dollar. But I think that's only for transactional at
this point, it's not about stability. I think the world
is moving to gold faster than I thought possible. But
it's certainly happening right before your eyes.

Speaker 2 (02:07:59):
Well, everybody was concerned about it, and became more concerned
because of Biden using it, weaponizing it. Back in twenty
twenty two and then Trump has just doubled and tripled
down on it. It truly is amazing. I got a
question from a high boost for you. He says, can
you ask Toney? Wouldn't it just be wise for businesses
to wait four years and let the next selected president
fix all of Trump's mistakes? Is he just the go

(02:08:23):
in dialect? Dickie says, that's there.

Speaker 4 (02:08:26):
I think we pay way too much attention.

Speaker 5 (02:08:30):
To the so called policies of either party or whatever's
going on. I mean, you have to start thinking in
terms of your your own autonomy and sovereignty and what's
the best move you think outside of politics, I mean,
whether what administration is going to do X, Y or Z.
You know, David and I talked about this before the
selection and we said what's going to I think we

(02:08:51):
called it, you know, what's going to happen? We talked
on Halloween, like, what's going to happen on the election?
You know, if it goes Harris or goes Trump, and
I think we called it, and now it's resetting itself.
It didn't even matter, you know, because we throw the
tariffs in and that I think, you know, the price
of goal would probably be similar if there was a
Harris presidency right now, because they'd be going after crypto

(02:09:13):
or something like that, or they'd take us to be
deeper into the war with Russia and Ukraine or something
like There would be some policy difference, but the goals
are always the same.

Speaker 4 (02:09:22):
Yes, you know, we're not fixing our fiscal house, we're
not reigning in the empire.

Speaker 5 (02:09:27):
There's there's nothing new here. It's just the fundamentals are
all there. So I think whether these what doesn't matter
what administration. You need to you know, bank on yourself,
understand what the difference between currency and money, and you know.
But there's always underlying opportunity in this too. I don't
want to sound like an alarmist, but I don't think
it's going to get better from the top down.

Speaker 4 (02:09:48):
And I definitely you know, if you've got a four
oh one k or I ra a.

Speaker 5 (02:09:52):
Folks, and there's a temporary lull, you really need to
consider putting that.

Speaker 4 (02:09:56):
And this is not financial advice.

Speaker 5 (02:09:57):
Can I just bracket that it's I don't know where
the prices of medals are going, but I feel like
I know where.

Speaker 4 (02:10:03):
The prices of some of these stocks are going.

Speaker 5 (02:10:05):
And these pools of so called value. I don't think
we're going to hold up well in an uncertain world
or you know, any of the thing. Especially I said something.
I looked at something the other day and I brought
it up on the show. One point two trillion dollars
of holdings of the mortgage backed securities, the same that

(02:10:28):
acidic thing that.

Speaker 4 (02:10:31):
That had like the China syndrome where it melted into
the markets and.

Speaker 5 (02:10:34):
Caused thea debacle at one point true trillion dollars of
those holdings are held by foreign governments, and the largest
foreign government holder is China. So China can literally just
you know, you're not going to win this if you're
going after China with the stick.

Speaker 4 (02:10:51):
They've got too much.

Speaker 5 (02:10:52):
Leverage and they think long term. We think presidency to presidency.
They think one hundred years in the future and structure
they'll lose for a long time just to win in
the So you're not going to beat them that way.
You know, if you really want to go after China,
you would you create an atmosphere of liberty, You create
an atmosphere you would have, you would incentivize, you would

(02:11:15):
take off the regulations, you would you would give people
certainty and incentive. And that's that's the you know, just
the same way you balance the budget, you know, follow
the constitution.

Speaker 4 (02:11:26):
That's good.

Speaker 2 (02:11:27):
You have stability and freedom and liberty, and stability and
liberty would win every time. But instead they want to
become like China, right, And because we've always seen this
from all these presents, remember George W. Bush, I wish
I could be like the Chinese government just tell everybody
what to do or you see tru dos and I
love the fact that they can just tell people what
to do. I wish I could do that. They all

(02:11:48):
want that, and that's what we're seeing from Trump. You know,
everything is an emergency, and the solution every emergency is
to let him make all the orders, you know, and
dictate the solutions. And and so you know, he wants
to he wants to be like Mao or she or whatever,
and so it's it's crazy, but that's where they're headed.
And so the best thing that we can do, I think,

(02:12:09):
is to try to get out of that system, try
to maintain privacy as much as we can, try to
prep for what is coming. And you know a lot
of people are looking at this and the instinct of
a lot of people, especially who've been in the stock market.
As they see the stock market failing, they decide they're
going to get into these gold and silver ETFs, and
that is not I wonder how they have been going

(02:12:30):
because I first caught on to that. I did that
myself for a while, and then I saw that when
gold started to move, they weren't moving, and I thought,
what's up with that? You know, why isn't that going
Why is that going up? Why is it flatlining? And
then I realized as I looked into it, it's like, no,
they're not. This is not actually you know, an ounce

(02:12:51):
of goal there that they're splitting in ten different ways,
you know, selling you a share of it. No, that's
just just another derivative, like the the real estate market derivatives,
you know, and you don't really own anything in that.
So it's really key for people to have it on
their own. That's when it's private, that's when they can't
take it away from you. And when you've actually physically
have it, you know, that's the key thing. I think.

Speaker 5 (02:13:14):
Wasn't a Jefferson that said that paper was poverty something
like that, right, So we paper is poverty.

Speaker 2 (02:13:21):
We got to the essence. Didn't me of all these
different things.

Speaker 4 (02:13:24):
It's so funny.

Speaker 5 (02:13:25):
Yesterday here in Dennison, Texas, I went by, talked to
my accountants, my bookkeepers, and I'd just done a trade.
I consolidated a lot of stuff I got to take
to the trading floor and I held up a bag.
I said, this is fifty thousand dollars, and it was
you know, gold one ounce eagles.

Speaker 4 (02:13:39):
I like, this is fifty thousand dollars. They just looked
at it and held it. They're like, that's not that's
not a lot. Yeah, you know, like they thought it
was gonna be like a suitcase or something like. No,
that's fifty thousand dollars. It's just a zip lock bag
full of point. I'm like, no, that's that's what happened.

Speaker 5 (02:13:54):
I get, you know, and I go basically, you know,
if you go back to this would be about five
hundred dollars, you know in nineteen seventy one.

Speaker 2 (02:14:05):
That's amazing. Well, it's uh so, tell us what's going
on at at Wisewolf. I mentioned, you're really pretty pretty
heavy there. People are looking at this and you've got
headlines saying, you know, gold is going to go hyperbolic,
and this may be the start of it. So there's
kind of a market media that's happening.

Speaker 4 (02:14:23):
Yeah, I don't know. I don't know what happens next.

Speaker 5 (02:14:26):
I think there's a strain on you know, there's strain
on these institutions with this price going the way it is.
I mean, honestly, like I like a stable price, yes,
I like just kind of clear cut and dry in
and out that way. You know, I think there's going
to be a lot of urban gold mining going on.
What I mean by that people are going to go
through garage sales, start going through their addicts, start looking

(02:14:47):
just like they did in the seventies with silver.

Speaker 2 (02:14:50):
I think there's just you're gonna have rappers pulling out
their teeth and selling them.

Speaker 4 (02:14:54):
Yes, I've bought lots of teeth over the years.

Speaker 5 (02:14:56):
I've bought crazy things you couldn't believe. Between San Antonio
and here and and Branson, I've about some crazy things.
But I think I'm gonna see lots of urban gold mining.
I think the price continues, especially in this environment. So
you know, it's hard to say, David, what happens to supply.
I think silver is an outlier, right, now you know,

(02:15:19):
price reflection, I don't think is is. I don't think
that we have true valuation or even close to it now.
So you know, if you're stacking silver, I think you're
you're you're doing yourself a favor at some at some
level because it's just super cheap based off of where
everything that I know, I think silver is just a
great thing to have.

Speaker 4 (02:15:37):
And if you have those those.

Speaker 5 (02:15:39):
IRA's and four one ks, you really ought to let
us take a look at putting you in some bullion
gets you out of this. You know, I think that
this roller coaster ride, and I don't know where we're headed,
but it's a it might be advantageous for you to
take a look at at just converting that into something
physical outside of the financial system, that you know that
that's you know, stored on the third party, that you

(02:16:00):
know these vaults that they're not in, that they're not
a bank. And I don't trust these CEOs. I don't
trust anybody who's wanting drone pile to cut rates. So
and that's what they're all looking for. So I'm just
I'm working on continue to work on supply and infrastructure,
and wise Wolf's gonna stay lean. We have the wise

(02:16:20):
Wolf Bitcoin uh where we're up and running. So if
you've got you want to buy some bitcoin or you know,
sell some bitcoin, we buy a sell and we have
the ability for you to use it as cash for purchases.
So if you've got some bitcoin you want to turn
it into some precious metals, give us a call.

Speaker 4 (02:16:39):
Great.

Speaker 2 (02:16:39):
Yeah, well, it's always great talking to you, Tony. You
really do appreciate your support of the program and the
things that you've got there at wise Wolf. For the
longest time, you said, we appreciate having stability. You know,
for the longest time, we went through this period where
you could gradually accumulate stuff and you set up wise
Wolf Wolf Pack to let people do that on a
great actual basis. And we're seeing that, you know, the

(02:17:01):
dollars losing a few percentage points of value every year
and it accumulates over the long term. So that was
kind of the long term stable thing of it. Now
we're getting into craziness, and I guess you know a
lot of people are saying this is great because Trump
is scaring everybody. He's making very much afraid of him
because he's acting like a crazy man. But then you

(02:17:22):
can only do that for so long and then it's
going to really backfire on you. And so we're going
to it's going to be a rough ride, I think.
And so it's good to try to get out of
the system as much as you can, try to get
something of value that you can physically hang on to yourself.
I think that's an important part of prepping. And you've
got a lot of programs there to help people do that.
It's been great to deal with you over the years,

(02:17:44):
and really do appreciate your support of this program. And
you've got a program that's coming up right after this program.
Is that correct today?

Speaker 5 (02:17:50):
And God willing, if we can, if there's no work
going on in my house. Rdburn Radio transmissioned eleven am
Central Time, we'll kind of dive more into to these
headlines stuff that you and I have gone over.

Speaker 2 (02:18:01):
That's great, that's great. And where are you right now?
Where are you broadcasting Twitter?

Speaker 4 (02:18:05):
Right now? I'm in Dennison, Texas.

Speaker 5 (02:18:06):
I'm on and I'm broadcasting over the ex at tony
Ardaburn and Rumble on the America Unplug channel. We're working
on some new channels as well, so I'm looking at
some new streaming stuff.

Speaker 4 (02:18:17):
I need to talk to you and Travis.

Speaker 2 (02:18:18):
Yeah so yeah, yeah yeah. Kick looks like it's got
a lot of nice features for streaming as well. It's
really kind of set up for streaming. I think from
what Travis was saying, I haven't looked at Travis's been
the one who's taking care of that. But all right,
So coming up on Rumble and on X right after
this program, you can find up more from Tony and
again David Knight Dog Gold will take you to Tony
Orderban's wise Wolf Gold a way to get to an

(02:18:42):
island of stability in this storm, and that is physical
metals that you hold yourself. Thank you so much, Tony,
appreciate it.

Speaker 4 (02:18:49):
Thank you.

Speaker 2 (02:18:50):
All right, we're going to do you right back. Folks,
stay with us.

Speaker 6 (02:19:01):
Here is a little song I owed you might want
to hear in your par You'll own nothing and be happy.
I got no cash, I got no car, not twenty
four booster shots in your arm. Own nothing to be happy.

(02:19:28):
You can't even buy it in the store because of
your low social credit score. Own nothing, be happy. You
will own nothing and be happy. Be happy at eats

(02:19:53):
and bugs.

Speaker 4 (02:19:54):
They're doing what in the place they named after me.
Good thing.

Speaker 6 (02:19:58):
I have the David Knights to keep me informed on
the plots of these traders.

Speaker 1 (02:20:04):
Making sense common again. This is the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:20:12):
Yeah, and we were talking before Tony came on about
the free speech and how dead it is and has
been for quite some time in the UK. Yeah, you
can say anything you want as long as it doesn't
offend somebody, even saying the Conservatives who put themselves out
as supporters of free speech. But it's about to get worse.

Speaker 5 (02:20:30):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:20:30):
We look at what is happening with technology and it's
like they have seized every one of these dystopian films
and turned them into reality. So now we got minority report.
The UK Ministry of Justice, this has Norwellian ring to it,
has developed a computer program to predict who might commit

(02:20:51):
murder straight out a minority report. And of course, for
the longest time, the fastest growing part of the intelligence
community here in the United States geospatial intelligence, and that's
where the pollunteer people and everything hang out. They had
this thing called anticipatory intelligence. They used, the military used
it abroad. You've got police departments that are using here

(02:21:12):
trying to predict peoples, You profile them with your geospecial intelligence,
you profile them politically, religiously, their contacts and all the
rest of stuff, and you keep looking at it to
predict what they're going to do. They call that anticipatory intelligence,
and so that AI is about to meet the other
AI AI squared. I guess anticipatory intelligence meets artificial intelligence,

(02:21:39):
which really is artificial anticipation, and it's a dangerous thing
because these people are going to act on it as
if it were true. The UK Ministry of Justice just
called it. The Ministry of Warwell has a new tool.
They originally named it the Homicide Project, and they're now

(02:22:01):
calling it sharing Data to improve Risk assessment. It raises
concerns about bias and the ethical implications of using such
predictive models on vast data sets, including those already facing
structural discrimination in the UK, such as those within the
white British ethnic group, particularly white men. They've had a

(02:22:24):
lot being talked about the two tier system that they've
set up there, even saying we're going to ease off
on the penalties for everybody, all these different ethnic groups,
except for white men. So, in other words, what they're
saying is they're going to go up on the penalties
if we thank everybody else down, but you leave them
up there. And as we see this paranoia, this authoritarianism

(02:22:46):
throughout Europe, you've seen people sued by the German politicians
and the Green Party, especially just two Green Party politicians alone.
Each of them had about eight hundred points against people
for things that people make criticisms of, criticize their masters,
their betters, their their rulers on social media. And they've

(02:23:09):
had eight hundred complaints, people getting arrested, people having police
show up in groups in their house because of what
they said. Now he got a man who was fined
five thousand dollars after he hugged the German chancellor. I
like this. I thought, who would hug the German chancellor?
My first impression this guy must be high, And it
turns out yes he was. He hugged the Olaf Schultz,

(02:23:34):
which no German in the right mind would either vote
for this guy or hug him either. He was fined
five thousand dollars. He walked up, he made himself a
part of the motorcade. He said it happened accidentally. They
said he did that on purpose. He got in he
had a dark audi. He joined the motorcade as Schultz

(02:23:55):
was returning to Berlin after the twenty fifth anniversary of
the European Central Bank. There you go, that's just all
the pieces that are there, the twenty fifth anniversary of
the European Central Bank. Once the convoy arrived at the airport,
the driver exited his car, shook Schultz's hand and hugged
him on the tarmac, and then was detained, perhaps tackled

(02:24:17):
by police. He insisted he had joined the convoy by mistake,
explained that he was high on cocaine. That's his alibi,
and he said he had been partying for two days.
He just wanted to hug a chancellor. I guess the
court found him guilty of driving under the influence of
drugs and of trespassing. And Schultz said, well, people were
saying hello and greeting me. It's never something that particularly

(02:24:40):
affects me. He said, that's the very normal. I didn't
find the situation to be dramatic, but the police did.
And when we talk about preparation, this is a great
story that's sent to me by Ryan for the love
of the road. Yesterday I talked about the elephants circling
the wagons, essentially circling themselves around the young. Everything is vibrating.
Something's wrong. They get into a defensive circle around their children,

(02:25:05):
and I said, you know, we should learn from that.
You know, we can feel the tremors. We know that
something is wrong. We don't know exactly what. We're not
really sure what we're going to do. I don't know.
The el friends are just you know, they're on the
lookout as to what's going on. You know, it's t
Rex coming in. What is it? Well, this story here
in Tennessee. They had to circle the homestead here with

(02:25:25):
levees to protect it from floods. And there's an amazing
picture about this. A Tennessee family built a levee to
protect their home from floodwaters. Aerial video shows a home
in Ridgely, Tennessee, surrounded by floodwaters on Tuesday of April
the eighth, but the property was untouched thanks to homemade levees. Now,

(02:25:47):
this is something that has been a problem throughout Tennessee,
problem through East Tennessee. This is over a western part
of Tennessee. But that's one of the reasons why we
have the TVA. You know, the that's one of the
first big federal projects that they had was a TVA
because it was regular flooding. And so what they did
was they created massive they created dam and massive artificial

(02:26:10):
lakes and things like that to control the flooding around here.
But these people, they didn't have anything there like that,
so they took it upon themselves and they built their
own levee to protect themselves. As a lot of people
looked at this picture, they said, well, country folks can survive.
Another one said, well, it ain't their first rodeo, y'all.
That's right, because these floods happened, they said. It's a

(02:26:31):
great reminder that with the determination and the hard work,
we can overcome even the toughest challenges. It's also a
testament to the importance of being prepared and taking proactive steps.
And that's why it's important to prepare in a lot
of different ways. We're talking about preparing financially, having precious
metals that you control, that are in your possession, that

(02:26:54):
are private, and so on and so on, but also
Jack loss in books, it's a great way for you
to start to prepare in a lot of different ways.
And so if you go there. He's got a lot
of ways for you to prepare to make sure that
you have water. These people are trying to keep the
water out. You want to make sure that you've got
water in order to survive. He's got a free chapter

(02:27:16):
there at his for his Civil Defense Manual, two volume books,
He's got a free chapter there telling you how you
can maintain water and many other things. It's an excellent guide,
especially in these types of situations. Jack Laws some books
is excellent. So again, when you look at this picture,

(02:27:38):
I don't know if you could pull it up, Travis,
it's the one about the Tennessee family building a levee.
When you look at this picture, the family and it's
just got like old square around it, and everywhere else
you look it's nothing but water. And they had to
evacuate about one hundred people. This is not a Bogata, Tennessee.
And there's that picture there an island, and it takes preparation,

(02:28:01):
it takes fore thought to do that kind of thing.
That's what we all want to emulate right there, those
people protecting themselves when the government's not there to protect them.
We have a lot of people who are looking at
doge and cheering it. And I'm just kind of astounded
when I look at this because they don't know or

(02:28:23):
don't care where Elon Musk is coming from. How did
he get to be the world's richest man, and what
are his plans for the future. They're absolutely totally disconnected
and clueless about it. They're so caught up in the
Hegelian two party system they don't even know. And so
we see articles like this cutting the plastic doge has

(02:28:44):
deactivated an astronomical number of credit cards. Well, what they
need to do is they need to deactivate the astronomical
credit card that the Congress has. And this is the
kind of sound and fury coming out of doughs that
signifies nothing, folks. A lot of these things that they're
doing are being revoked by you know, the judiciary, but

(02:29:07):
they're not really going to make much difference anyway. And
we're talking about some of the cuts coming up in
the health issue, but it doesn't really make any difference.
And nevertheless, you still have people like this, here's here's
you know, these Tesla dealerships and things like that are
under attack, and yeah, we don't want to see that happen.
We don't want to see arson, and we don't want

(02:29:27):
to see that of any sort. But that's not why
these people with trucks are getting there. And they got
American flags all over the early car and they're pulling
up to blockade and to protect the Tesla dealership. And
when I saw this, it was on a site that
is all about pushing climate stuff. I said, look at

(02:29:50):
these people that are out there with their gas guzzling
SUVs and pickup trucks, and they're using their gas guzzling
SUVs and pickup trucks to p detect Elon Musk. The
left is just as deranged about this stuff as the
right is, and so the you know, they think that
the enemy or the trucks and the pickups and everything,

(02:30:12):
and they're going to cheer Elon Musk as long as
he's making a lot of money by selling us these
green lives. He has a green washed billionaire if there
ever was one. He is the epitome of wasteful money.
That's how he got to be the world's richest man.
He was a king of chronic capitalism. And they can't
see where this is going, and these conservatives can't see

(02:30:34):
where he's going with this technocracy and his universal basic income.
They can't see where he came from. I wonder what
they're gonna do when, let's see, we're only five days
away from Earth Day, when he's going to announce a
what was it, one hundred million dollars I think it
was to whoever could suck the most CO two out

(02:30:56):
of the atmosphere. We don't want CO two taken out
of the atmosphere. It's not a problem. Plants need it.
And these people are cheering this guy so caught up
in this phony stuff. It was only a couple of
years ago that he was They were adamantly opposed to

(02:31:17):
everything this man stood for. And now they can't cheer
him enough. Why because of Trump? And when he looks
at all this doge stuff, he's not going to look
at the Pentagon. You know, he's a major military industrial
contractor himself. He's not going to look at waste at
the Pentagon. They're not going to pull any of that
stuff out and so, and believe me, there's a plenty

(02:31:40):
of waste that is there. And as all this stuff
is happening, and they're putting in this surveillance and control
grad they're going to anticipate what we're going to do,
maybe charge us for murder before we do anything at all?
Who knows, right what is they're going to prevent murder
in the UK? So that means are they going to
arrest people that they think you're going to wind up

(02:32:01):
committing murder? And now we've got the UN preparing aviation
biometric overhaul and the US is already on board and
it is a bipartisan thing. Biden was on board with it.
Trump is on board with it. This is coming from
the new American as they point out, as a Trump
administration begins enforcement of the real ID Act. Isn't that interesting?

(02:32:24):
Do these people have a problem with it? Would they
have a problem if it was Joe Biden doing the
real ID Act? I think they would. But as long
as it's coming from Trump and Elon Musk's okay. So
it's going to happen next month requiring Americans to carry
enhanced identification or to board domestic flights. The UN is
preparing to execute an equally radical and arguably complimentary transformation

(02:32:48):
of global air travel. They even have a name for this.
It's an UN agency. They created an entire agency to
do to an act this agenda. They call it the
International Civil Aviation Organization. This UN agency is leading what
is already dubbed to be the biggest air travel shakeup
in fifty years, scrapping boarding passes, eliminating check in, and

(02:33:13):
shifting to fully digital biometric system. The United States is
expected to align with and to implement the forthcoming standards
along with other participating nations. In other words, this is
a UN agenda, and just like we saw with COVID,
Trump's going to march in lockstep with it. But hey,
that can't be. It's just forty chess, right, Yeah, you're

(02:33:35):
the Ponds. If you think that he's going to follow
through on this as their Manchurian candidate, Well you think
that he's pushing back against globalism and all the rest
of this stuff. He's fully on board. But you won't
be getting on board the planes, not unless you buy
into their biometric system. The key elements of the UN

(02:33:57):
lead framework are already being rolled out major US airports
and border control systems. It began under Biden. Whether it's voluntary,
oh we've got a TSA. They can do a face
scan all the rest of stuff and insinuating it in
you know, some people thought they had to do it,
and they do the same thing with real ID. They
got me, by the way, when I went to get

(02:34:18):
my license, we moved here to Tennessee. They said, we
need this and this and this. Okay, here's a documentation. Sure,
there's a lot more documentation than they asked for. More
documentation all the time, it said, and they didn't say
anything about real ID. And at the end of it,
she says, oh, now you got your real idea and
this is really going to be use I said I
didn't want a real ID. Well, look it's got a

(02:34:39):
little gold star. It's like, oh yeah for the concentration camp,
is it? Well? The Times in the UK saying that
this UN agency is introducing a global framework. They'll remove
the need for both check in calendars and for traditional
boarding passes neither printed nor digital. Instead, travelers will receive

(02:35:01):
a digital travel credentials also known as a journey pass.
Does that sound familiar? Remember during all the lockdown stuff
in twenty twenty, you have the World Economic Forum saying
we need to have a common pass. Remember that common
I even have it in that commercial I'll put up
about the common man. So they wouldn't have a common

(02:35:21):
pass and a common database that of course they or
some of the friends would run. And you you know,
if you did everything they told you do, took all
the shots they told you do, well, then you were
in the in the common database and you get your
common pass to do what you want to do. Otherwise no,
So now they're going to call it a journey pass,
but it's the same thing. It'll be stored a smartphone.

(02:35:45):
It'll include passport data, flight details, biometric identifiers, and extras
such as car rentals or seat upgrades. So make sure
you got your big brother device with you at all times.
And if you don't have that, you know, we can
still do the the facial recognition. Like I said, with
Minority Report, they want to take every dystopian sci fi

(02:36:07):
film and they want to enact it. So here we
have a total recall Schwartzenegger going there. They're doing the
X ray thing, they're going to do the face scan,
they're going to identify. With all this stuff, a passenger's
face becomes the boarding pass one scan. The system verifies
your identity, confirms travel status, and grants access at each
stage of the journey. Airports will use facial recognition at

(02:36:30):
designated checkpoints. And the UN expects this overhaul to be
in place within two to three years. Oh, you know,
in time for the twenty to thirty control grid. You
know that's exactly what. So how do we escape this thing? Right? Well,
you know, he just crashed to it. There's no problem
with any of that. Well again, I don't think I'm

(02:36:52):
going to be traveling anywhere ever. Again, this week, the ICAO,
that's what they call their UN Agency Facilitation Conference, took
place where it's actually going going on this week in Doha,
and the theme is facilitating the future of air transport collaboration,

(02:37:13):
efficiency and inclusivity. They're not facilitating anything for us, and
they're not including us in all of this, and we're
not collaborating with them. We are not considered to be stakeholders,
are we? The agenda Item number two is Travel document
Integrity and Border Control. They won't to have standardization of
travel documents again like the Common paths from the World

(02:37:35):
Economic Form, new methods for identity checks that border control points.
They're going to have deployment of new technology across global
air travel, interoperability of digital identity systems AI based identity
verification and passenger flow management and coordination of a public
key directory something that they call the Traveler Identification Program

(02:37:58):
and they got an acronym for it trip. And when
we look at the Republicans, are they pushing back against this. No,
As a matter of fact, they're giving us more and
more justifications beyond just traveling. Why you need to have
an identity, a digital identity. Oh we've got to have
it to protect the kids from pornography on the internet. Oh,
we've got to have it to protect us from you know,
make sure that we've got jobs. We need to have

(02:38:20):
mandatory everify before you can get a job. So we're
going to go all these justifications, even coming from the Republicans,
in order for you to have an identity card. And
it's just this seamless transfer from Biden to Trump, both
of them marching in lockstep with the UN agenda, just

(02:38:42):
like they did with covid US deployment. Facial recognition technology
has already expanded its own biometric infrastructure through the Biometric
Entry Exit Program. So we can't got to make sure
that we don't have any illegal aliens coming in, or
any gang members or anything. So yeah, we're all going
to have to be scanned. The TSA began doing this

(02:39:07):
last year voluntarily supported, you know, purportedly through Atlanta, Denver,
Los Angeles, many other places. Eighty airports they're bringing this in.
So we're gonna take a quick break. When we come back,
we're going to talk about a positive thing here that
is a limited extent, but at least it is a

(02:39:27):
positive move. We'll be right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (02:40:16):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:40:21):
Well, we have some House Republicans. They're talking about taking
guns away from the bureaucracy, but only one bureaucracy, only
the irs. That's the only one they think needs to
be taken. So this kind of smacks of theatrics. But
it would be a place to start, wouldn't it. House
Republicans have gone pushing for a plan that would take

(02:40:41):
guns and ammunition away from agents of the Irs. Well,
you know, let's do it for the Department of Education
and for the rest of them. Every one of these
bureaucracies has their own little army that's out there, and
it would be safer, perhaps to have have one law
enforcement agency where maybe there's better training. We would hope

(02:41:04):
better control, and that's probably a pipe dream. But I
think it only gets riskier when all these different bureaucracies
have their own armed agents. A Congressman has said that
the only thing the IRS agents should be armed with
are calculators. But of course, as I mentioned the other day,
they've armed swat teams for the Department of Education to

(02:41:26):
go out and collect their loans. I mean, it seems
like if you have something like that, you would always
you could turn it into a local law enforcement or
something like that. You don't need to have your own
swat team with the Department of Education. The plan is
called from these Republicans, why does the IRS need guns?

Speaker 4 (02:41:43):
Act?

Speaker 2 (02:41:44):
It would prohibit the Commissioner of the IRS from using
funds to buy, receive, or store firearms and ammunition. It
require the bureau to transfer to the arms that already
has to the Administrator of General Services. They would go
on auctions or sales to licensed dealers. So it's kind
of reverse of the gun buyback. It'd be the gun

(02:42:04):
take away from the guns from the bureaucrats and some
to the public. US Representative Barry Moore from Alabama, Republican.
So the IRS has consistently been weaponized against American citizens,
targeted religious organizations, journalists, gun owners, and everyday Americans. Arming
these agents does not make the American public safer. My legislation,

(02:42:24):
the Why does the IRS Need Guns Act would disarm
these agents, auction off their guns to the federal Firearms
license owners, and sell their ammunition to the public. The
only thing IRS agents should be armed with is a calculator.
Here's the problem. You know, if they've got a calculator
and the income tacts, they don't need a gun to

(02:42:44):
take everything that you've got, right, it can still everything
you've got with a pen or with a keyboard stroke.
That's the real issue, and they can focus on these
visceral issues like this. Oh yeah, I don't want all
these bureaucrats armed or this stuff. They're armed with all
kinds of authority, and they're armed with all kinds of regulations.

(02:43:05):
Not just the IRS, but all of these agencies are
armed with this stuff to destroy your life, just like
I was talking about yesterday with the guy and why
that was a local bureaucracy playing games with him. Bought
a house, was thirty seven years old. He said, well,
you know, we just put up a new computer system.
So we got rid of all these things. It's not
grandfathered in, and you didn't have the final inspection thirty

(02:43:26):
seven years ago. Nobody did that. So even though this
is the second time it's changed hands and he had
a renovation thing, they said no, now you're going to
tear your house down. They didn't need a gun to
do that, right, And they could always get on the
phone and call up the police and drag him out
of the house and knock it down themselves. It's the

(02:43:49):
regulations and when the Congress involves itself and these kinds
of theatrics. Yes, it is a problem to have this
multiplication of agencies that are all armed and swat teams
and all the rest of stuff. But the real issue
is the multiplication of all these different agencies and the

(02:44:09):
multiplication of all these different regulations. That's a much bigger
issue than the guns. And so this is grand standing
really and not really talking about the problem. The Trump
administration is also talking about massive budget cuts being proposed
for federal health agencies, and this is the same kind

(02:44:29):
of stuff. The eplmonary memo sent from the White House
budget officials to the Department of HHS, Health and Human
Services previews the administration's plans to slash discretionary federal health
spending and to rework health agencies, and the image of
what DARF. K Junior wants to do with his make

(02:44:49):
America Healthy again. The document dated April the tenth could
still be finalized with changes, but if enacted as it is,
it would cut total federal health spending by ten of
billions a year. You could cut tens of billions a
year by cutting Harvard out, you know, Harvard's like nine billion,
and start going through these other Ivy League schools and

(02:45:11):
the rest of it. This is not a whole lot
of money, but consolidate dozens of health programs and departments
into the Administration for a Healthy America. So they've here's
we're going to fix everything, right. So what is RFK
Junior's first instinct is to create a new department, a

(02:45:32):
new bureaucracy, and so we're going to move some things
into that. We're going to put my name on it. Essentially,
let me name the baby, and I'm gonna shuffle the
chairs around, and they really are. We are arranging the
deck chairs on the Titanic. When they do this kind
of stuff, Congress is out there. They're not going to
pull back the scope and the range, or these bureaucracies
and the regulations of the IRS or any of the

(02:45:53):
rest of them. Instead, they're going to focus on, well,
the IRS has got guns when you to take those away.
These people are doing the same kind of misdirection. Deep
cuts to the CDC, their budget reduced by more than
forty percent. I'm sorry, but the CDC's glass is more
than half full. That means that this criminal, unconstitutional agency

(02:46:14):
that did everything it could to destroy our country and
accrued to itself all kinds of unconstitutional powers under Trump,
continued under Trump at least once and then multiply multiple
continuances under Biden to insert themselves into foreclosures and evictions

(02:46:34):
of people who are having financial difficulties because of the
Trump imposed lockdowns. That agency is going to be allowed
to keep sixty percent. There's no authorization for that all.
They should kill that agency. Some of the agency's work
would be moved to the new AHA centers, but they're

(02:46:56):
going to have programs on gun violence and others would
be eliminated in entirely. You need to eliminate the CDC entirely. Again,
going to be a lot of deck chairs were arranged
the Department of Education. We're not going to call it
that anymore. But all the money that creates, all the
strings to control everybody that will continue to happen. It'll

(02:47:17):
just be moved to different agencies so that you don't
see it. And this is what the Trump administration is
truly about. It's about making sure that you well, we're
not going to call it CBDC, No, Instead, it'll be
a stable coin that will be coming after you on
the other side. And as we look at this, and
we look at the wars that are being done, and

(02:47:39):
we look at this, you know, the WHO Thies and Yemen,
and now they have taken down their nineteenth reaper, nineteenth reaper,
while the US continues to attack the civilian population there,
killing over a hundred and twenty yem and E's So

(02:48:02):
they just did another strike wounding twenty nine others, including
five children. Did that on Sunday night. And so they're
killing children and the WHO the these are fighting back
and shooting down these reaper drones, nineteen of them. They're
thirty million dollars apiece. So you know, like I said,
we're not going to look at any money that's being
wasted by the Pentagon. We're not going to look at

(02:48:23):
any of these wars that cost blood and money. We're
just going to continue to do the same thing to
kick the can down the road. Five hundred and seventy
million dollars worth of drones. And isn't it amazing that
now the asymmetric warfare has gone to this level. You know,
we decided that we're going to be able to do
whatever we want to. It didn't work too well in

(02:48:45):
Iraq and Afghanistan, a long protracted war. They came up
with improvised stuff, and asymmetric warfare has not worked out
wealth wars, but those are very primitive. Now we've got
asymmetric warfare that is coming after these sophisticated drones, these
expensive drones. The Huthi's have claimed nineteen of them. They

(02:49:07):
targeted the drone, they said with locally manufactured missile. We
don't know if that's true or if it's coming from Iran.
The Pentagon will say that it came from Iran, so
they've got an excuse to attack Iran. Among its arsenal
of surface to air missiles, which have been used frequently
and again we now have asymmetric air warfare, and this
is the fourth Reaper drone that has been shot down

(02:49:30):
within two weeks. So there you go about two of
them a week. That's about sixty million a week as
being thrown away. You really think that Doge is going
to make any difference in any of this stuff. I
don't think so at all. We're going to take a
quick break and we come back. I'm going to tell
you the story of what happened to that pastor that
was kidnapped in South Africa as he was preaching. We'll

(02:49:53):
be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:51:28):
Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:51:41):
Well, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit. I gave
you the story of the pastor that was abducted right
in front of his congregation. He had previously that he'd
had an interesting experience where he had been set up
to have his pockets picked. He chased the guy but
couldn't catch him. But eventually he got into the general
neighborhood that the guy fled from, and people that were

(02:52:05):
there caught him, brought him back, and they.

Speaker 1 (02:52:07):
Went to kill him.

Speaker 2 (02:52:08):
You know, he had already had a chance to talk
to the family, his extended family that he was staying with.
The guy gave back his wallet, He talked to him
about issues and gave him the gospel and anything. Then
he comes out and these people want to kill him.
They want to set him on fire, and so he

(02:52:29):
does the whole thing again and he talks to them
about that. He gave him an opportunity to talk to them,
and so that had already happened, and he already talked
about that. He's out of Tennessee, out of Maryville, Tennessee,
which is in this general area. It's around the area
around the Smoking Mountain National Park. But then he was
kidnapped as he was giving a sermon. They took him

(02:52:50):
into his own truck and drove away. And now he
has been rescued, and it really was kind of miraculous
what happened with him. Again, these guys have kidnapped him
in his own truck. Evidently they noticed that that was
the situation. The truck was confronted with armed officers. The

(02:53:10):
guys in the truck started shooting back at them, and
the officers killed all three of the people inside the truck,
but this pastor was unharmed. The officers returned fire, fatally
wounding three suspects. Sullivan was found inside the same vehicle,
miraculously unharmed. He was immediately assessed by medical personnels, currently

(02:53:31):
in excellent condition. And so the people in South Africa
and the people back in Tennessee who are praying for
him or praising God for answering their prayers. His home
church is, i guess said in Merriyville, Tennessee, And so
it's good to see that happen. Meanwhile, Cuba banned Christians

(02:53:54):
from celebrating Palm Sunday tradition. This is not a Easter
parade where they all compete on the fact show. This
is a religious ceremony that they had there. And the
Marxists are doing what the Marxists always do, which is
to censor any expression of Christianity. They do it here
in the US, and they do it especially in Cuba.

(02:54:17):
But I thought it was especially interesting to see this
Associated Press story trying to spend Mayan child sacrifice as nonviolent. Yeah,
they do that. They've had a lot of practice at
that in terms of defending abortion, haven't they. And they said, well,

(02:54:38):
these people are just really trying to connect with celestial bodies.
I guess my celestial body, my choice.

Speaker 4 (02:54:46):
Right.

Speaker 2 (02:54:48):
Archaeologists in Guatemala I covered an ancient Mayan altar that
was clearly used for child sacrifice. Yet the Associated Press
managed to find someone to claim that the practice was
quote not violent, but it was just their way of
connecting with celestial bodies. Right. So I guess you're not profile.
You are anti child sacrifice rights spelled that as our ites.

(02:55:15):
This AP story published last week recounts the discovery of
an altar and national parks is about three hundred and
twenty five miles north of Guatemala City. The enormous city
state of Tekal, whose towering temples still stand in the jungle,
battled for centuries with this dynasty for dominance of the
Mayan world. It's interesting what God has done to societies

(02:55:39):
and governments and civilizations that engage in child sacrifice. Really,
how to give us a pause in the west. We
may be at the beginning of that as well. That
Mayan world extended north into Mexico and to a city
that was one of the largest in the world at
its peak between one hundred BC and eighty seven hundred

(02:56:01):
and fifty. So this is a significant archaeological fine. They said,
it was believed they found this altar. They showed the
altar they talked about. They said, the remains of three children,
not older than four years were found on three sides
of the altar. Well, that's only three children. You know,
when you go back and you look at especially in

(02:56:22):
Carthagen and also in Canaan, the Philstines and others would
do massive child sacrifice to Molok. You had a lot
of the Israelitie kings would also as they fell into
that pagan religion, they would also sacrifice their own children.

(02:56:44):
And God judged that. You go back and you look
at the tafits and Carthage and stuff like that. It
was amazing the thousands of children's skeletons that were there,
But you know here it was three of them. Had
Ap left it that readers might have come away with
the impression that the Mayan religion was evil, perhaps even demonic. However,

(02:57:10):
given the anti Western, anti Christian mindset of the present day,
the New American says, the Left and his allies didn't
want to leave that kind of impression. So Ap sought
out an archaeologist. She was not involved with the project,
but they go to her for her commentary. She said,
the discovery confirms quote that there has been an interconnection

(02:57:32):
between both cultures and what their relationships with their gods
and their celestial bodies was. Like, she said, we see
the issue of sacrifice exists in both cultures. It was
a practice. It's not that they were violent, it was
their way of connecting with the celestial bodies. There you go.
One person says, Okay, so now we're being told there

(02:57:53):
were mostly peaceful sacrifices, mostly peaceful child sacrifices, coming from
the left, And one guy really got to the heart
of a Red State contributor said, what you need to
understand about that type of misrepresentation is that it is
vital to upholding left wing dogma on colonization and the
supposed evils of capitalism and of course Christianity. Right they

(02:58:18):
were morally superior to the Spanish invaders, despite sacrificing their
children to false gods, perpetuating the most brutal form of
slavery and history, and murdering each other with reckless abandon
because if the left loses that framing their entire worldview,
which centers on Western cultures being the only ones capable

(02:58:40):
of evil collapses. Yeah, it is the nature of humanity
that we're talking about here. Any culture is capable of
doing that. It's one of the things about the American Revolution.
They understood the fallen nature of man. That's why they
created the checks and balances nullification methods that are there.

(02:59:00):
But you know, it is also we have to understand
that God will judge societies that do this type of thing.
So the same way that the left considers abortionary be
the height of self actualization, to the point that some
progressives actually celebrate that fact. They have sold that they

(02:59:20):
have sacrificed their unborn children to their modern day gods.
And along that same line, I just don't have time
to give you the headline here. The number of US
adults who don't want children has doubled over the past
twenty years. Not unable to have kids, but don't want kids.
You need to talk to them, Travis. It's gone up

(02:59:43):
twenty nine point four percent. People who say they don't
ever want to have kids, they really don't understand where
they're missing. It's some of the saddest things in our
country that we not only understand the blessings of children,
they misunderstand that we miss that blessing, and we don't
understand the e of sacrificing them have a good day.

(03:00:14):
The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down
our children. They created common past, track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(03:00:34):
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

(03:00:58):
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Thr Episode #1991: Trump’s Tyrannical Revival of 1798 Act: Innocent Man (says White House) Doomed, Free Speech Crushed

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Thr Episode #1991: Trump’s Tyrannical Revival of 1798 Act: Innocent Man (says White House) Doomed, Free Speech Crushed

Stuff You Should Know