Tue Episode #2076: NATO’s Endless War Trap for America

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the nineteenth of August,
year of our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, today we're
going to take a look at the EU warmongers who
made a trip to the Oval Office, and you can
see them all lined up and pushing for war. Will
they push us into another World War three? We're going
to take a look at what is being rumored, because

(01:05):
that's all we've got right now, his wars and rumors
of wars. Maybe we've got a little bit of rumors
of peace as well. We're also got some important news
that we're going to begin with about chemotherapy, and so
stay tuned for that. And as we look at AI,
even Sam Altman says that AI is a bubble like

(01:26):
the dot com bubble? How long have I been saying that?
And we also now have the perfect metaphor for understanding
AI and how we perceive it. Stay with us. We'll
be right back. We had a little bit of different

(02:10):
arrangement there for a moment of the basic but seriously,
I want to talk about something I think is such
a sad story, a story that affects so many of
us as we interact with the so called healthcare system.
You look at the junction of pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies,

(02:32):
and big medicine hospitals and the like, and this is
the kind of tragedy you get out of it. A
Kansas woman suffering from cancer is opening up a roadside
stand to try to sell some baked goods and things
like that so she can get her cancer treatment. Her
chemo is going to cost ten thousand dollars per month,

(02:53):
per month. It's not amazing. It's just an amazing example
of greed and of really false hope that they've given
her as well as you know, we're your only hope.
And that's the saddest thing about it.

Speaker 4 (03:09):
Of course, as you're going to stay. But the article
starts out with the insurance won't cover it. They're just
that's right, yeah, they won't cover it. But you know
that's the insurance company is the very reason why this
stuff is so expensive. It's when I was talking to
John Richardson, you know, it's like, yeah, of course they
want to bid the prices up, because then that gets

(03:30):
you to uh, that's an incentive for you to get
insurance because otherwise you're not going to be able to
pay to get your chemo therapy, and then they deny you.
And I've known people like that as well. When we
were in North Carolina, a friend of ours who had cancer.
In the treatment they wanted to get from the doctors,
they would not pay for it, and they dropped him.

Speaker 3 (03:52):
It was blue cross Bow shield.

Speaker 4 (03:55):
It really makes it obvious. Somebody people were like, how
could Luigian Luigi Manngioni what he did? Just like, ye, well, yeah,
that's got a solution.

Speaker 3 (04:04):
But I understand the anger.

Speaker 4 (04:06):
That he has there, right, I'm not trying to condone
it what I'm saying. I absolutely understand why he was
so furious, that's right. I'm more confused as to how
we haven't seen more of it. And that's why not
to condone or suggest it.

Speaker 3 (04:18):
But that's why people were condoning it, why people were
cheering it, because the frustration we have at this corrupt system.
It is so incredibly corrupt that are you given her
a double missectomy, she has breast cancer and then a
few months ago it came back. Now our cancer is
considered to be terminal spreading throughout from the initial tumor.

(04:40):
She says she feels more fatigue and pain in her
day day life. She can't work her previous job, so
now she's trying to do bake goods and sell them
on the side of the road like a lemonade stand.
She said, the medication will literally save my life.

Speaker 2 (04:54):
It won't.

Speaker 3 (04:56):
And that's the saddest thing about it. You know, when
you look at this, there are things out there. You know,
there's there's We've got a very long history of B
seventeen and apricot seeds, and sorry about apricot seeds. It's
anyway B seventeen. You take a look at that at
RNC stores dot com and you can even get a

(05:19):
discount off if you use a code from this show tonight.
I'm not telling you this to make money. We don't
make big bucks like this. Aren't getting a gate the
kind of money that the hospitals and chemical people do.
But the bottom line is, if nothing else, get the book.
I hope you downloaded the free PDF from G. Edward
Griffin last week, And of course you can also get

(05:43):
the paperback book. I prefer to read things in paperback,
but The saddest thing is I've seen this over and
over again with friends. They won't try something that is
not harmful, something that is cheap doesn't have any appeal
to them, right, it doesn't have the medical community that

(06:04):
people have white coats backing it up. I would just
encourage you not to be that way. It always reminds
me of the story of the Assyrian commander who's got
leprosy and he comes to Israel to get was it
Elijah or Elisha? Always get the two of them confused. Anyway,

(06:25):
he comes to him to get cured, and he says,
go dip seven times in the Jordan. He goes, that's
a muddy river. We got cleaner water than that. That's
all the best you can do.

Speaker 4 (06:37):
That's gross something doing that.

Speaker 3 (06:39):
Well, we're not talking about being healed by faith here,
but you know, don't put all your faith and something
that you've seen fail over and over again. So she's
now running a roadside bakery selling baked goods as well
as clothing and coffee mugs. She says, since I'm no
longer able to do a full time job, I focus
what energy I have on doing this to try to

(07:00):
come up with ten thousand dollars. Her husband, Adam, says
that while he works in a factory, his wife works
even harder to save her own life. They're trying to
stay positive and enjoy the time they have together. It's
just so sad to see people taking advantage of like this,
and that's really what's going on, just being taken advantage

(07:21):
of such an amazing grift. And then when we talk
about things that are harmful versus things that are not harmful,
a new study out of Russia has come out talking
about permanent brain damage that chemo does to you. Many
people complain of chemo fog and brain fog that they

(07:44):
get after chemo therapy. They looked at breast cancer patients
just like this lady here, and they found that right
away it shrinks the brain. But even more amazing, they
found that after three years it had shrunken even more.
So the damage doesn't stop. It continues to go. It's
like an mRNA vaccine and it continues to shrink your brain.

(08:07):
So they said, the reason that people are getting fog
was always dismissed by the doctors. They said, oh, that's
just psychological, right, just like they tell people about the vaccines.

Speaker 4 (08:18):
I know we're injecting you with poison and it's destroying
your body, but that's a psychological effect.

Speaker 3 (08:23):
They're talking about the ultimate cynical gas lighting for greed.
It's just amazing. About eighty percent of brain of breast
cancer patients deal with chemo brain doctors say psychological, but
research now shows that it physically shrinks your brain and
some areas of the brain that are part of your

(08:46):
balance and coordination. The cerebellum was particularly effective affected rather.
They said, forty two percent of women reported walking problems,
thirty one percent dealt with dizziness. Areas controlling memory, attention,
and decision making also showed major shrinkage. They said. When
they looked at these ladies after three years, they said

(09:08):
that again he continued to shrink and they had lost
about ninety cubic centimeters of brain over three years because
of this chemotherapy. White matter, which connects different brain regions,
also suffered serious damage. This explains why patients struggle with
multitasking and thinking quickly. Their brains literally can't communicate between

(09:30):
regions as efficiently anymore. And it's always you know, we
look at the greed, people who were motivated by the
love of money. It's not surprising that they do more
harm than good. Some brain regions continue to shrink as well.
You know, I've said this for a long time. I said,

(09:52):
eventually people are going to look back at chemotherapy as
we look back on the bleeding of people with leeches. Right,
You're going to see it as barbaric and ignorant. And
that's exactly what it is. How many times do you
have to keep doing the same thing and expect different results?

Speaker 4 (10:11):
Right, they were injecting people with this stuff. I thought
it was helping to fight cancer.

Speaker 3 (10:16):
It's just amazing, just amazing. So the brain scans backed
up all these different complaints about chemo brain But they
point out in this article, you know, cancer doesn't just
randomly appear. Chronic information sets the stage for all this stuff.
And if you want to know more about it again,
get the book g Edward Griffin's book A World Without Cancer.

(10:39):
You can find that at RNC stores dot com. Educate
yourself because you're going to get nothing but lies from
these people who want to take all of your money.
They have no conscience. The whole cancer treatment paradigm is questionable.
So get real food, Get real nutrition. And there are

(10:59):
things that you can find that are cheap and effective.
You know, the B seventeen that they sell R and
C stores has been very effective. We've got a lot
of anecdotes about it. And as I said, I don't
discount studies completely. I just look at them if they
have If it's a study that's being done by the
company that's going to benefit from it, you know, you

(11:20):
have to look at the study and say who benefits
from this?

Speaker 4 (11:23):
And it turns out our product is completely and utterly safe,
no side effects.

Speaker 3 (11:27):
It was off reported many times. You have examples of
competing drugs for the same condition done by multiple drug companies.
Each of them runs their own study, and each of
the studies shows that they're better than brand X and Y.
So you know, when you look at the studies, I
think about that if it's a study that doesn't have
an obvious benefit to the person running the study, then

(11:50):
pay attention to it. But other than that, just understand
that they can cherry pick the data and we've seen
this over and over again to get exactly what they want.
So anecdotes make a big difference to me, and that's
one of the reasons why we look at something. I
know that Gerald Griffin is honest and he does good research,
and you should take a look at what he has
to say about this.

Speaker 4 (12:11):
When it comes to the medical industry, I always remember
the old commercials. Nine out of ten doctors prefer camel's cigarettes.

Speaker 3 (12:18):
Yeah, they prefer to get rich too, nine doctors. When
you go back and look at different things. In other words,
getting information down, reducing chemical exposure. How could we do
that effectively? Maybe we could get the fluoride out of
the water. But of course the Trump Department of Justice
is appealing the decision that we get fluoride out of

(12:39):
the water effectively, and I don't see RFK Junior pushing
against that with or the people in Maha. As a
matter of fact, he's gone silent about pesticides and our
food supply, and that is happening as the people in
Congress are working on trying to give immunity to the

(13:01):
pesticide companies, just as they've done the vaccine companies. Well,
before we take a break, you mentioned the cigarette stuff.
This is a very interesting story about Philip Morris pushing
cigarettes as a way to help their government save money.
This happened decades ago in fact.

Speaker 5 (13:22):
In two thousand and one, Philip Morris secretly presented a
report to the Czech government telling them that encouraging smoking
in the country would help them grow economically. The argument
they made was that smoking is deadly and therefore if
the government encouraged smoking, people would die earlier, which would
save the money since they wouldn't have to pay out
their old age pensions or support them with old age
medical care. Plus they would make extra revenue from the

(13:44):
tax on cigarettes. In summary, the report said that encouraging
smoking could help the Check government save one hundred and
forty seven million dollars a year. It's unknown what the
Czech government did with this report, but it soon leaked
to the public and triggered a global outrage. Philip Morris
tried to downplay the incident, saying the report was commissioned
by their Czech division and had nothing to do with
the head office. But then it came out that similar

(14:06):
studies had been commissioned in countries all over the world,
like Canada, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia.

Speaker 3 (14:12):
They're just looking from back to.

Speaker 5 (14:14):
The study an issue of public apology.

Speaker 3 (14:18):
Yeah, that's it. Well, we're going to take a quick
break and we're going to come back and talk about
another issue of life and death, and that is what's
going on in Ukraine.

Speaker 2 (14:26):
We'll be right back. Stay with us, Joan listening to

(15:20):
the David Knight Show.

Speaker 6 (15:25):
If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis
in the news, they say you'll love the Classic Hits
channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now
at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 4 (15:43):
Welcome back, folks, I said, we've got some comments here.

Speaker 7 (15:46):
B L.

Speaker 4 (15:47):
Houghten says, to my family members had cancer and chemo
made their lives miserable and did not cure them. They
said they would not do it again if they had
the chance.

Speaker 3 (15:55):
And that's I've mentioned it before. The first dose of
my father you went to a coma and never came
out of it.

Speaker 4 (16:03):
Yeah, And I've heard so many stories of people from
who had chemotherapy saying, oh, I would never do it again.
I think that seems to be the general consensus from
a lot of people.

Speaker 3 (16:15):
Want you want to do something right. You feel like
there's got to be something I can do, but you
have to look at it. I remember when there was
a debate about nationalizing healthcare with Hillary Clinton, and I
went to this It was a Democrat district and everybody
that was there were Democrats except for me. So they're
all yelling, we got to do something. The system stinks.

(16:36):
It's like, I agree with you, but you might want
to take a look before you throw that bucket of
liquid onto the fire, if it's gasoline or not. You know,
that's that's the key issue.

Speaker 4 (16:46):
I'm doing something. I don't know what it is, but
I'm doing something. Nights of the Storm. Good to see you, Jason.
Hope you're doing well, and you can find they're broadcast
at Nights of Thestorm. Dot com says if they drop
you to avoid paying, then they should refund all premiums
paid in and adjusted for inflation with interest. Yeah, that
would be at least a start for insurance companies because

(17:09):
they've got no they've got no consequences. You pay in,
they drop you, and then.

Speaker 3 (17:14):
They look at how connected they are the government. You know,
just you're required to get all kinds of required to
get car insurance. Banks require you if you have a
loan to get you know, insurance. Of course you wouldn't
have that, but you know, you're basically they're twisting your arm.
And that's what the Obamacare stuff is all about, was forcing
you to get insurance. The insurance companies wanted Obamacare. So

(17:38):
it's a it's another one of these fascist industries over there.

Speaker 4 (17:42):
Opossum King, says Ai Trump se care cancer. Trump said so. Well,
if he said so, I trust him. He's a trustworthy guy.

Speaker 3 (17:50):
Trust the point. I thought it was like sugar water,
but that it turns out it's like a cancer cure.

Speaker 4 (17:56):
Can we take a little bit of a cancer cure
for Trump? Absolutely? Grandpa sixty eight says, my ex head
cancer and was on chemo and got pneumonia and it
killed her. She's one of those who trusted the science.
There's many such cases, sadly, Maluten Malankovic. You can increase
brain volume with exercise and mindful meditation. You also have
to manage your stress or else it keeps shrinking. Not

(18:16):
easy in today's times. I don't know how you even
manage stress anymore.

Speaker 3 (18:21):
Yeah, that's right, are you? You know? Getting alkaline and
getting rid of cancer which feeds the cancer stuff. So
that's another thing that helps to should mention that, you know,
that may be a big factor in the b seventeen stuff.

Speaker 4 (18:35):
It's again. You can go to RNC store dot com
if you want to get yourself some B seventeen. There's
promo code night and you can see if any of
those products or things that would be helpful for you
with your health. A minute man, Malicia says, this is
about the woman with the chemo or the that needs
ten thousand dollars a month for the drugs. So I
wonder if she has a gift send go.

Speaker 3 (18:55):
Set up or I'm going back and looking at that.

Speaker 4 (18:57):
I didn't see it in the article myself.

Speaker 3 (18:59):
That neither her name is Jennifer Gordy, G O, R
and D.

Speaker 4 (19:03):
Why you might And she's in Kansas. I believe the
article is out of Wichita, Kansas. I don't know if
that's where she is in Kansas. I didn't specify in
the article, but that's where the news outlet was from,
so it could be Kansas.

Speaker 3 (19:16):
They say, is the name of the star? Right as
the munchkins said, yeah, well, let's talk a little bit
about Ukraine. You know, it was funny to see the pictures.
We've got all the usual suspects in the lineup, except
this time there standing down as the standing up in
front of a wall that's got their heights marked there.
That would have been kind of embarrassing for Zalinski. I
think maybe background as well. But anyway, the question is

(19:40):
are they going to drag us into another World War three?
These people are determined that they are going to go
to war with Putin. And if you go back and
look at the history of all of this, just remember
when you had Georgia Soros talking about the Color Revolution
there in Ukraine. You want to know how this whole

(20:02):
thing began.

Speaker 8 (20:02):
George Source, pleasure to have you on same here. First
on Ukraine. One of the things that many people recognized
about you was that you, during the revolutions of nineteen
eighty nine, funded a lot of dissident activity civil society
groups in Eastern Europe and Poland the Czech Republic. Are
you doing similar things in Ukraine?

Speaker 9 (20:24):
Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine
became independent of Russia, and the foundation has been functioning
ever since, and it played an important part in events.

Speaker 10 (20:41):
Now, do you.

Speaker 8 (20:42):
Think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of
independence from Russia and an alignment with the West, Not
but not a specific alignment as a NATO, but a
kind of orientation toward the west. Or will the Russians
always stop them?

Speaker 9 (20:56):
No, will try to destabilize Ukraine. The foundation has been
functioning ever since and it's pretty an important part in
events now.

Speaker 3 (21:10):
That's an important thing to keep in mind. Just who
was behind this in the first place, and how recently
Ukraine was birthed. We used to always talk about it
as the Ukraine because it was an area of Russia.
It wasn't an independent country. That was a big deal
very beginning, breaking people from saying the Ukraine because everybody

(21:32):
had referred to it that way for the longest time.
And of course you can also if you look on
the internet, you can find pictures of the Maiden Revolution.
We had the big square filled with people who were
holding up their cell phones with lights and a picture
showing John McCain there with Victoria Newland. Okay, you want

(21:54):
to talk about the warfare state here in America, there
you go.

Speaker 4 (21:57):
John McCain was the real ghost of Kiev.

Speaker 3 (22:00):
Yeah, the only person missing was Lindsay Graham. But McCain
is there at the window taking pictures of you know,
all the people in the square and everything that was
his life cause just think about that, you know, creating
warriors are going to kill untold numbers of people. Just
just incredible.

Speaker 4 (22:17):
And he's gone on to his reward.

Speaker 3 (22:19):
Yes, the interesting thing about the Putin summit, according to Trump,
was the insight or maybe the reminder, that the mail
in ballot fraud had cost him the election. That's basically
what he wanted to talk about. And he's now said
that he's launched a movement to get rid of that

(22:39):
kind of voting. I hope he succeeds. I think it's
an awful thing. I thought it was an awful thing.
When Trump did it, he was hoisted by his own petard. Actually,
and when you understand the fear and the panic that
was behind all of that, it was a full courtpaganda piece.

(23:02):
We talk about what they do with cancer. But just
as a reminder, here's a covid psa public service announcement
from an actress who had the authority to speak on
this because she had played a doctor in the movie Contagion,
which is a sciop piece.

Speaker 11 (23:18):
Of ever there was one the movie Contagion. I played
a scientist who helped discover a vaccine for a hypothetical virus.
But COVID nineteen is very real and it is spreading
all over over and it every day. The scientists who
helped me prepare for that movie want us all to
know some things that will help keep us safe. First,
this is not a Chinese virus or a virus that
has no effect on the young and healthy. It is

(23:40):
what they call a novel virus, and that means our
immune systems have never seen it before. So until we
have a tree.

Speaker 4 (23:46):
Because it's a made up story, every single.

Speaker 11 (23:48):
One of us, regardless of age or ethnicity, is at
risk of getting it.

Speaker 3 (23:52):
Be afraid.

Speaker 4 (23:53):
If you're anything like me, be very afraid.

Speaker 11 (23:56):
How long will a vaccine take? Scientists say any from
sixteen to eighteen months. And scientists and doctors are the
people we need to be listening to right now. They
are at the experts, and that means tuning out the
voices with other agendas, no matter how powerful they might be.
So why does it take?

Speaker 3 (24:14):
And if you can't tune them out, you can ban
them off of social media and other platforms. I can
speak from experience on that. They spent two hundred and
fifty million dollars in the Trump administration. That was more
than the ad Council had ever spent on any campaign
more than Smoky the Bear, more than this is your
brain on drugs.

Speaker 12 (24:34):
Any experts that have a financial incentive to sell this
to you. Don't you know, trust anyone else.

Speaker 3 (24:41):
That's right. I see stuff like that. This is how
I'm reminded of.

Speaker 2 (24:46):
I'm not a doctor, but I play one.

Speaker 3 (24:48):
On TV, we heard that over and over again. In
my generation. That became a meme, a joke. That was
before we had social media. We had commercials that would
replay that kind of.

Speaker 4 (25:00):
Still something I reference to this day, having never grown
up those commercials. It's still pervasive, at least for me.

Speaker 3 (25:05):
I'm not a doctor, but I played one. I'm not
a scientist, but I played one in a movie. And
I'm telling you, you got to lock down. And it
was Trump locking everybody down that caused that issue with
the mail in ballots. He was the one who did it,
and now he pretends that he is the victim of
what he perpetrated on the rest of us. That's the
amazing thing. Well, we did have Zelenski made a real

(25:30):
effort to not get off on a bad foot like
he had done before, and there were signs in Washington. Hey, bro,
wear a suit and he almost got there. He wore
a black T shirt with a black jacket this time,
so it was a little bit better. I guess we
should remind him of the of the David Knight Show

(25:52):
T shirts, but he wasn't wearing a David Knight Show
T shirt. He did wear kind of a quasi suit.

Speaker 4 (25:58):
Wearing a David Knight Show T shirt to meet Trump
probably be that.

Speaker 3 (26:01):
Idea, especially if he looked it up. Yeah, I'm sure
I'm not on his shortlist radar.

Speaker 4 (26:06):
Who is this guy?

Speaker 2 (26:07):
He doesn't like me, I don't like him.

Speaker 3 (26:10):
Yeah, I would uh, yeah, that would be interesting to
have him watch one of my shows. I'd like to
see his reaction with a hidden camera. But the it's
not just what is happening there. As I said yesterday,
there was video that surfaced of a Russian tank that
was going into battle a Russian flag an American flag,

(26:30):
and so I thought this is kind of funny. But
Trump was caught on a hot mic whispering to macarn
He says, I think Putin wants to make a deal.
I think he wants to do it for me. It's
all about him. Everything is all about him, isn't it?

Speaker 4 (26:44):
You know, all of the lock he likes me, He
really likes me.

Speaker 3 (26:47):
All the lockdowns were really about him. But anyway, the
when we look at this, my take on all this
is that Trump keeps insisting that we don't need anybody
else in the world. I think, you know, I would
agree with that. I'm pretty I'm far more isolation news

(27:07):
actually than Trump and Maga are. He says, we don't
need this stuff, so we'll put tariffs on it, and
we're not going to let any of your goods come in. Okay, fine,
if we don't need them, why do we need them.
If we don't need them economically, why do we need
them militarily? Let's get rid of NATO that keeps dragging
us into European wars and World wars. And of course

(27:31):
NATO didn't exist when we got into the first two wars,
but it was that same kind of alliance, that same
kind of thinking, and NATO was designed to drag us
into a third World war with trip points and Article
five obligations that would drag us into any kind of
a conflict that happened. So just get out of NATO.

(27:52):
Isn't it interesting that Trump has gone silent about that
at this point in time. You know, he started talking
about getting out of NATO in his first and many
of us were hopeful that maybe he really would do it.
But looking back on it, I think the purpose of
that was as I said before, I think that Trump

(28:13):
is a shill for the globalis delete and I think
the purpose of all that talk about NATO was just
to get Europe to start ramping up their military, which
they had stopped spending money on. And I would say
mission accomplished. Just take a look at Germany, the massive
amount of money that they're going into debt for. I mean,
like one person called it a Canesyan military expansion. We

(28:36):
don't have money, but we're going to dump it into
the military industrial complex and we're going to re arm Germany.
That's what Trump's talk about getting out of NATO was
designed to do, and that's really all that it accomplished.

Speaker 4 (28:49):
We do have some comments before you move on to
the next article.

Speaker 3 (28:51):
Yeah, go ahead, shayby five.

Speaker 4 (28:54):
Thank you very much for the tip. That's very kind you.
So it's nice to see you back, David. Yeah, isn't
it great to have him back in STA.

Speaker 3 (29:00):
It's nice to be back. It really is. Thank you.
Thank you for all your support, and thank you for
your encouragement and prayers. We've had many, many kind emails
have been sent to us about that.

Speaker 4 (29:11):
So yes, then Grandpa sixty eight talking about the actor
pushing the backs, I want to tune these people out forever.
That would be nice, but they force them on you.
There's no safe place anymore. No matter where you are
on the internet, they're going to find you and push
this kind of nonsense. Sam Miller went to you three.
Good to see you, Sam. I hope you're doing well.

(29:31):
And these people that are recommending the shot are not doctors,
just stockholders and best friends with Big Pharma. Well everybody
needs a friend. Yeah, shab five.

Speaker 3 (29:40):
You me, and you got an investment in me as well.

Speaker 4 (29:44):
Shaby five evil dictator cosplay, except it's not really cosplay
at this point. They the I unfortunately and tunnel Lord
one three three seven, Good to see you. This is
about Soros, he says.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
Lol.

Speaker 4 (29:58):
Why didn't the interviewer a ask what right Soros had
messing with another country's politics. Well, everyone just assumes Soros
has the right at this point.

Speaker 3 (30:06):
Well, everyone assumes that if you're in America, you've got
a right to interfere with anybody's politics because it's a
long sname tradition. Now this point, I guess, Well, Zelenski
got to the White House and the first thing he
did was he imitated what Milania had done, giving a
letter to Putin about please let's have peace for the children.

(30:29):
As I pointed out yesterday, she's not giving letters like
that to Mettan Yahoo. But Zelensky had a letter from
his wife, evidently written by her. I'm sure it was
somebody should have a handwriting analysis to sy that really
matches up. But he gave that to a Trump, same
type of thing. Both sides are now saying they want peace.

Speaker 4 (30:51):
All I can imagine is the note just says, do
you like my French villa? It's on the riviera.

Speaker 3 (30:55):
Yeah, that's right. So yeah, they both want piece of prominence.
They both spell peace with an eye, and it's all
for land and it's all for ego. So the leaders
agree that Trump should tell Putin he had what they
had decided, says a finished president. So you give Putin

(31:16):
a message from us. It's war. I think you can
see that from the from the push by NATO into
Ukraine and all the rest of the things. This is
a longstanding move of passive aggressive behavior. EU is preparing
the nineteenth round of Russian sanctions as Zelensky meets Trump.

(31:37):
I guess the old adage applies here again. You know,
you keep doing the same thing expecting different results and sanctions.
I would just remind you aren't themselves an active war.
You know, it's like the siege or starvation things that
we see going on in Gaza. But sanctions essentially are
like a siege, and a siege is an act of war.

(31:59):
If you around the castle and you cut off their
food supplies and the water supplies, that's an act of war.
Even if you don't launch any missiles at the castle,
but anyway, that shows that their posture remains fully on
for war. Trump is saying that he has started talks
already to try to get Putin, Zelensky, and himself altogether

(32:22):
for talks. Look, I hope it works, whether it massages,
is ego, or whatever else happens with this stuff. There's
nothing to be gained at this point. There's no good
guys in any of this stuff. Putin's not a good guy,
Zelensky is definitely not a good guy. And you can
take a look at what both of them are doing
to their own countrymen and have done to their own countrymen,

(32:45):
and how this is really not even so much geopolitics
as it is ego politics. I just hope they stop
killing people for their land, for their purposes for lines
on a map. Trump pause a meeting with Zelenski and
other European leaders to call Putin. According to a person
familiar with the talks who spoke on the condition of anonymity,

(33:09):
Trump said that he was meeting with European leaders and
it was good, and he began the arrangements for meeting
at a location to be determined between Putin and Zelensky.
This came after he pledged a lot of help to Ukraine.
If he would stop helping Ukraine to wage war, that
would be pressure for peace. Now, it's kind of interesting

(33:32):
to look at this article from The Atlantic and Thomas Wright,
who is a former Military Industrial Complex official with the
Biden administration. He says, the only plausible path to end
the war in Ukraine. Can you guess what he's saying.
He's not talking about anything other than escalation and more
of the same policies that we saw with Biden. What

(33:55):
a surprise, says the landswap on his own would be
impossible to sell to the Ukraineans. I don't think so.
It might be impossible to sell to Zelenski because he
wants to keep this thing going. But the Ukrainians have
lost their taste for this nonsense. At the beginning of it,
when Russia escalated it into a hot war, it was

(34:15):
about eighty twenty to fight. Now it's eighty twenty to
stop fighting. That's the mood of the Ukrainians at this
point in time. Your opinions believe that they will need
more time to figure out the details and see if
there's a viable way forward. Their stalling because they want
to continue this thing. This is the continent of endless

(34:37):
and needless wars. It hasn't changed since the time of
George Washington when he spoke about entangling alliances. What he
was talking about was Europe, and that's exactly what NATO is.
It is an entangling alliance. So we need to get
out of these alliances that get us involved into war.
The only reason we're in this is because the people

(34:58):
making money in the military industrial company, So in this
Atlantic article. He says, So where this is where the
American backstop comes in. The idea is that if European
forces are attacked, the US would come to their aid,
but it's not clear what that means. If Europe has
committed to defend Ukraine and the event of an invasion,

(35:18):
then the US backstop would mean that America would join
it in fighting Russia, albeit possibly just with air power.
That comes very close to a NATO Article five guarantee.
Witkoff suggested that the administration is looking at such a
guarantee outside of the NATO context, but it is very
hard to imagine that Trump will be on board with that. Well,

(35:38):
they floated that information that's out there. The concern is
that various sources are starting again. Everything is at the
rumor stage right now, wars and rumors of wars and
the rumors that are out there. As Guard pointed out
on his Sunday News broadcast, he's got his if you
don't sign up for that on sub SEC, you should

(36:00):
does a great job liberty conspiracy of going through and
picking up stuff, and he picked up on people talking about, well,
maybe what that means is stationing US peacekeeping troops there.
That's exactly what we need, isn't it. More American military
station somewhere so we can be drug into a war.

(36:21):
The only credible guarantee for Ukraine in current circumstances is
a national and says the NATO propaganda outlet The Atlantic,
and this guy Thomas Wright, senior fellow now at the
Brookings Institute, a left wing status think tank. He served
as Senior Director for Strategic Planning at the National Security Council.

(36:41):
How does he have the credibility to get anybody to
publish his stuff? I don't know, but it tells you
something about the Atlantic. The Atlantic has been a mouthpiece
for NATO, and it has been NATO, if you remember,
has been one of the leading advocates of censorship because
again that you know, truth and news is the first

(37:05):
thing to go in war, and so that's what they
have been postured for. Putin hopes to convince Trump that
it is Zelensky who stands in the way of peace. Well,
I think he does. I think that is pretty clear.
That's exactly what he wants. We're going to take a
quick break, folks, and we will be right back. Stay
with us. Trying to find the t shirt ad here.

(37:29):
It's been a while since I've been here, but I
can't find it.

Speaker 13 (37:34):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt.

Speaker 4 (37:54):
With the McGuff and logo in blue.

Speaker 13 (37:57):
But he told me to get lost. Maybe one of
your American suckers can buy me some. At the Davidnightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various
galas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

(38:19):
just put it in the next package of bombs and
missiles coming from the USA.

Speaker 1 (39:07):
De coding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show.
Here's a little song. I ought you might want to
hear it in your part. You own nothing and be happy.

Speaker 14 (39:35):
I got no cash, I got no car, not twenty
four booster shots in your arm.

Speaker 3 (39:42):
Own nothing.

Speaker 2 (39:45):
To be happy.

Speaker 14 (39:49):
You can't even buy in the store because of your
low social credit score. Own nothing, be happy, you would
owe nothing and be happy, be happy and each box.

Speaker 3 (40:18):
Yeah that's uh. Yeah. They talk about the plan they
have for us. We got some comments Trump.

Speaker 4 (40:27):
Yes we do. Cole three point sixty says Russia has
a cancer vaccine. Russia vaccine after COVID vaccine issues. Hmmm,
very interesting. I don't trust any vaccine no matter who
creates it.

Speaker 3 (40:39):
Well, I think Trump's a vaccine is a cancer vaccine.
Turbo cancer vaccine will give it to you.

Speaker 4 (40:45):
So yeah, that the opposite from what they say. Doug
A double O seven good to see you says what
happened to that animaniacs clip? Be afraid? Be very afraid?

Speaker 3 (40:57):
You mean this one afraid?

Speaker 5 (41:00):
Be very afraid?

Speaker 3 (41:03):
Yeah, I should. That's one of our evergreens. I should
remember to play that thing from time to time.

Speaker 4 (41:08):
It's a classic. Yeah yeah, and Cabos eight eight eight?
Are you sure Zelenski's wife's letter was not to ask
for more money to stock her closet, and it could
be that too. What do you think of this dress?

Speaker 3 (41:20):
Maybe she's asking where Millennia shops. Yeah, I really like
that hat.

Speaker 4 (41:23):
She Do you like the French riviera too? I mean
more of a rodeo drive kind of gal Solo Cat
nineteen eighty actors. It's an acronym, she says, agenda controlled
tools obediently reciting scripts fits pretty Well.

Speaker 3 (41:40):
That's good. That's a good acronym for them. Well, Cambridge
Dictionary says, there's six thousand new words they've just put
into their English Language dictionary this year. Most of that
slang that came out of social media. So we're gonna
give you a little bit of a quiz here, Travis.
See if you know what these are? Do you know
what it means when they say somebody is delulu?

Speaker 4 (42:01):
I think it means something like delusional.

Speaker 3 (42:04):
Yeah, it was kind of like I should. I wish
i'd known that. I could have called La la doululu.
What a fit? How about scibbitty Have you ever heard
of that?

Speaker 4 (42:16):
Uh? Skibvity? I know it originates. I think I think
it originates from this series of videos on YouTube skibbity toilet.
There's too much lore going on there for me to
effectively break down, but I'm pretty sure that's where it
comes from, and I don't exactly know what it means
or if it's just simply the denominator for that series.

Speaker 3 (42:38):
And yeah, it's kind of a nonsense word. They say
creator of a viral animated series of videos on YouTube,
so that's probably what you're referring to. But it can
be used to describe something or just to It could
be cool, it could be bad, or it could have
no meaning at all, just be used as a joke,
as a as an ad verb or something. So basically

(43:01):
it doesn't really mean I wonder what they do in
the dictionary with that. How about this one luke l
e w K Luke what does that mean?

Speaker 4 (43:12):
No, don't know.

Speaker 3 (43:12):
That one a particular fashion look that's unique to the wearer,
you know, kind of like as Lindsey's army green T
shirts or something that says luke l e w K. Well, yeah,
as in look right.

Speaker 4 (43:29):
But you're glad we're adding more words that say exactly
the same thing as words we already had.

Speaker 3 (43:34):
Yeah, very close to it as well. And then we
have the one that we're going to talk a little
bit about, which is tradwife. How would you define a trad.

Speaker 4 (43:41):
Wife a grifter on Twitter.

Speaker 3 (43:44):
That's exactly it, you know it is, and then it's
an influencer who's tried to hook into this kind of stuff.
But there are some people who think that it's you know,
they look at these tradwives who are in the cosplay.
They dressed up like their Lucille Ball in her sitcom
of the nineteen fifties, and they're all about the look, right,

(44:06):
it's all about cosplay.

Speaker 4 (44:08):
The tradwife apocalypse recently actually hit Twitter. One of them
got married, and they don't like to see other tradwives win.

Speaker 3 (44:17):
So, yeah, are you talking about Lawrence Southern.

Speaker 4 (44:21):
I'm Laura's Southern may have been involved, but there was
four or five different tradwife grifters on Twitter. One of
them posted a picture of her ring saying, you know,
I got engaged or I won or something like that,
and it brought out the knives all of them, just
airing out all the dirty laundry for every single one
of them, and it was horrifying, just completely.

Speaker 3 (44:42):
Well, you know, it's not just about trying to set
up a family these times, and that's not the tradition
that they're doing. The tradition that they're doing is the
nineteen fifties look, which is really more of a It
was kind of a fantasy that was sold to us
by Madison Avenue, the woman who's all dressed up in
high heels and she's mopping her floor. So that was

(45:05):
always a fantasy. Even in the nineteen fifties, people were
laughing that kind of stuff. But now they're doing that
on social media. Laurence Southern who got a lot of
exposure with documentaries about the attacks by the Marxists on
white farmers in South Africa, and of course the left

(45:26):
tagged her as a racist, just like they tagged me
as a racist for reporting on that. But she dropped
out of the new stuff and then got married, moved
to Australia and started doing tradwife influenced stuff, and then
her marriage fell apart for some reason, and now she's
written a book trashing tradwives. They became kind of this

(45:51):
avatar of a cultural movement or something that never was
any reality to it, never was any substance, never. Yeah. Yeah,
So now they've created this the straw man out there
or straw wife, if you will. Somehow they're taking that
apart and trying to attack what they think are traditional.

Speaker 4 (46:14):
Values fun fact about Laurence Southern is she I don't
know if she had an affair, but she had a
sexual relationship with the extremely liberal streamer Destiny. Destiny is
the guy that said good, that guy that got shot
at the Trump rally and died protecting his family good.
I wish more of them had happened to it. This

(46:34):
is a despicable human being. He also made a joke
about the kids that died during the flood in Texas.
This guy is an utterly despicable human piece of trash.
This is who Lauren Southern decided to have a intimate
relationship with. She has no principle, she has no values.

Speaker 3 (46:50):
Well, she's making it out as if it is one
hundred percent of her husband's fault, and she's written a book.
Now this is not real life. Well that's that's actually true,
and it's not real tradition either. As I said before,
it's something that she made up. Now, this book is
her bid to return to her career, and the left

(47:10):
is more than happy to give her all kinds of attention.
Former anti feminist influencer Laurence Southern has now come out
attacking traditional marriage, and the reality is is that when
you look at traditional marriage, it really does require, i think,
for it to work, well, it does require that. It's

(47:33):
not just a horizontal relationship, but both of you need
to be connected to God and understand where you stand
before Him. Without that, it's very difficult to have a marriage.
It's not impossible, but it's very difficult. Conservative ideology colliding
with reality, she said. And so this is a piece

(47:53):
on the Tribune, and this is written by somebody coming
from the left, and she's looking at this and saying,
you know, I was sold to Billy good from the left,
and she was sold to Billy Goods from the right.
And maybe we need to pull back and take a
look at how women are being manipulated with these different things. Well,
guess what, You're still being manipulated, she said, posting images

(48:14):
online of her domestic life. However, she writes that the
reality was marked by near total isolation and increasing contempt
from her husband. She responded to his criticism by trying
to be an even better wife. I'm sure, don't you think? Yeah?

Speaker 4 (48:29):
I trust Lauren Southern.

Speaker 3 (48:31):
Engaging in the extensive domestic work and presenting herself in
high heels and dresses to welcome him home and presenting
herself on social media that way, lots of cosplay. That's
really what's going on with the tridwife stuff. When travel
which traveled to Canada visit her family against his wishes,
she writes that he ended the marriage. Southern says that

(48:52):
she had given much of her savings to her husband,
leaving her to live with her parents later in a
small cabin with her son. So she described this period
as one of financial hardship and ideological awakening. This there,
and she had this interview with Mary Harrington, saying, how
my trad life turned toxic. It might have been toxic

(49:16):
from the very beginning if it was about a trying
to still be an influencer. Does promoting marriage and motherhood
inevitably make women easy targets for subordinate status? This is
what the woman on the left, Mary Harrington, who wrote
about this. That's her take on it, and that's how
they will use this. She said. Our stories are somewhere

(49:38):
in many respects. Both of us embraced radical politics in
our early twenties, Me on the left, Southerner on the right.
Both of us embraced ideologies that felt inspiring and the
free floating world of the internet. Again, they were both
in love with the secular fantasies that were being sold.
Where they were coming from the left to right. That's
the thing that they had in common, said, the trad

(50:02):
wife is not all fifties penafores and cute cupcakes. Well,
that's exactly what these people have done, and they need
to get real about it. That's the key thing. There's
no reality that's there, there's no authenticity of it, and
there's no connection with God that would make this meaningful.

(50:22):
You have to understand step back and ask yourself what
is the purpose of marriage? And they never did that.
To them. It's all about the superficial stuff.

Speaker 4 (50:31):
To them, these things are the end goal. But in reality,
these things were a side effect of the culture that
was present. If you aim at these things, they are
empty and meaningless. But when they flow forth as a
you know, as I said, a side effect of who
you truly are as a person and the culture that
surrounds you, then they become meaningful.

Speaker 2 (50:51):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (50:52):
But if you're simply there, Oh, I'm going to be
a tradwife and I'm going to bake cookies all day.

Speaker 3 (50:56):
Yeah, who cares?

Speaker 12 (50:57):
I think the tradwife thing is caught playing, as you know,
a loving family, happy marriage thing, when that is, as
you say, a side effect of a relationship with God.

Speaker 3 (51:11):
Yeah, they're looking at the fruit of all that stuff
that they've seen, just as you guys are saying, and
they have no route to producing that kind of fruit.
So this woman says, well, first of all, she's trying
to be even handed, she said, this is not a
matter of the right being uniquely toxic for women. Brother,
it's the purest ideologies as such that map is at

(51:33):
best uneasily onto practical realities of life as a woman
and especially as a mother. Do they realize that they're
being sold a marketing scheme when they're pushed into the
workplace as well? Again, you need to step back and
take a look at what is real, she said. Secondly,
the simplifying, polarizing incentives that are baked into the contemporary

(51:56):
Internet are increasingly warping the ideologies of both left and
right into such extreme forms that any sincere effort to
apply these in real life will almost inevitably be the
stuff of nightmares. Again, keep going back to real there's
no reality there. This is again the Internet. These are
influencers God created and defined marriage and it's a good thing,

(52:17):
you know. One of the things that he did when
he gave Adam eve s it's not good for man
to be alone. Well, it's not good for women to
be alone either. Unfortunately this didn't work for her, but
it's no surprise that didn't because God was left out
of the equation. And there was an interesting op ed
piece by J. D. Hall, who has a substack called
Insight to insight insight on insight rather, and he spelled

(52:43):
insight two different ways. First an I N S I
G H T and the second one is insight as
in terms of getting people to act, and his take
on it is the Devil's gender war, Christian procreation and
controlled opposition. And in this one he takes a look
at somebody else's doing cosplay in a very strange way,

(53:04):
and that is Nick Flintes.

Speaker 4 (53:07):
Ah, good old cat boy Nick.

Speaker 3 (53:09):
Remember when he came to UNFOS and they booked me
to interview him in the morning, And fortunately I didn't
know who this guy was, and fortunately I missed that.
And then when I learned out and learned who he was,
I did not want to have him back on. But
this guy J d. Hall said the very offset. He said,

(53:30):
Nick Fuentes is controlled opposition. He said Flint's mockery of
family life and his promotion of anti human policies are
the signs of his true allegiance. He says, the fate
of Western civilization Christian culture hinges on the birth rate,
while Nick Fuintes and an army of in cells are
convincing men that women are not worth it. So Lauren says,

(53:54):
after her tradwife things says that men are not worth it,
and Nick Fuentes is they're doing the same thing, the
men saying that women are not worth it.

Speaker 4 (54:02):
Well, I mean, if you get a wife or girlfriend,
chances are you've got less time to sit around and
watch Nick Fuintes.

Speaker 3 (54:07):
Yeah, I would say maybe the issue is that maybe
the two of them, maybe their advice is worthless and
you should take God's advice on all this. Anyway, he said,
I just tuned into my first nickue Fuentes webcast, and
that was my conclusion after just a few short minutes.
I had heard of Flint's for a few years at
that point, thanks to my daughter who had spent some
time listening to him out of curiosity and late to

(54:30):
the party. I decided to listen to see why so
many were interested in his views. But my estimation of
him was not positive, and not just because he's as
lost as a goose in the snowstorm, or because he
excludes all the masculinity of a vegan poetry slam. It
was one of those late night Flint's live streams, the

(54:52):
kind where his followers huddle and chat like moss around
a porch light, watching him slouched over talking about the
world's problem. And there set this right winged boogeyman, slashed
over like an invertebrate, unable to sit up straight, talking
about taking back our culture from Third world colonizers, while
looking like someone who would wait in line for the

(55:14):
One Direction Reunion Tour. He's basically a biped version of
the throw pillow, talking tough into the webcam. I set
amazed that anyone would listen to him. Me too. I
just don't get it, he says. It wasn't his appearance
where he looked as soft as a cat in a
cashmere sweater, cat Boy, it was his mocking of a

(55:36):
father who had left to comment in the group there
said he wasn't able to listen to the webcast today
because he's going to be having quote family time. Fwints
berated him, mocked him and other dads like him, telling
him there was no time for wives and children when
Western civilization was on the chopping block. It was a

(55:57):
kind of revelation that shows the infection underneath. This was
not harmless banter. This was an x ray of the
man's worldview, and what it showed us was rot. The
reality is is that the wife and kids are Western civilization.
If you don't understand that, you can't fix it.

Speaker 4 (56:15):
You're gonna save Western civilization for who? Nick for Who's
going to be left?

Speaker 3 (56:20):
So Wines asked hysterically family time? What does that even mean?
Are you braiding their hair? Other clips which I've seen
since include him disgusting discussing how gay it is to
be into women. That is an amazing take from Fortes.
Polling around with your dude friends is heterosexual greatness? Spending

(56:41):
time with your wife or daughters conceals some kind of
suppressed homosexuality because you like being with girls. Fuentes has
brought us such soundbites as quote, what people want people
calling me gay because I've never had a girlfriend. I
think if anything. If anything, it makes me less gay,
not that there's any gay, but it makes me not gay.

(57:03):
If we're really being honest, never having a girlfriend, never
having sex with a woman, really makes you more heterosexual,
because honestly, dating women is gay. I think he protested
a little bit too much to me.

Speaker 4 (57:16):
Yeah, there's a there's a cornucopia of evidence that Nick
Fuintes is severely closeted his continual the people he surrounds
himself with. There's a guy called Catboy Cammi, who is
this very homosexual streamer that Nick brought into the fold

(57:37):
and did streams with. There's there's a whole litany of
sins that nickquints head.

Speaker 3 (57:44):
Well, I would just say by their fruit, you'll know
them right, And he's a bit of a fruit. I
guess my estimation of him as controlled opposition says Jad
Hall was immediate on account of his mockery of family
life and why anyone with half a synapse firing knows
that you don't save a civilization by sitting in a

(58:06):
neon lit bedroom talking into a webcam. Civilizations are saved
in living rooms and kitchens by mothers and fathers producing
more sons and daughters than the enemy. You win the future,
and nurseries not live streams, and you win the future
not just by producing children. I mean, that's Elon Musk's approach,

(58:26):
and I'm sure that JD. Hall doesn't mean that you
win the future by looking at your children's future and
that is their eternal future. You want to get them
connected to God. You want to give them a purpose
for life more than just appearing on a camera or
some nonsense like that. When someone says the West is dying,
but then tells you to leave your genes zipped, and

(58:49):
he says genes ge n ees, he says until after
some undefined quote unquote victory, you are not hearing a strategy.
You're either hearing controlled opposition from the side that once
your civilization dead, or you're listening to a profoundly stupid person.
Controlled opposition is rarely that cartoon villain obvious. It is subtle.

(59:12):
It wears a language of your tribe. You know, when
we heard stuff like it's five d chests. Trust the plant,
you know, wears the language of your tribe. That is
controlled opposition. It shares your grievances in order to earn
your trust. Then it gently nudges you away from the
one thing that would actually win, And in our case,

(59:33):
it's families, babies and lots of them. And so he says,
without bursts, you can kiss your flags, your traditions, your language,
your freedom. Goodbye. The enemies of the West grasp this
like a python grasp the neck of a rabbit. They
squeeze the propaganda policy and poison until the birth rate
drops below recovery. And when ideological influencers mimic their talking

(59:56):
points by discouraging marriage and children, the snake does not
even need to hide in the grass. It's on a webcast,
slouched over flailing limp wrists and complaining about the brown people.
Fuinty's is just the mascot of this. The same playbook
runs across other Internet micro empires. The or Bro crowd

(01:00:18):
posts moody kendlet icons, speaks in hushed tones about quote
unquote tradition and scold modern decadents, yet their timelines mysteriously
barren of wives and john Do you know these guys,
the Ortho Bros.

Speaker 4 (01:00:31):
I've heard of them, but I don't follow or really
understand who he's talking about.

Speaker 3 (01:00:35):
The in cell, the involuntarily celebrate forums are basically digital
echo chambers where young men marinate and bitterness, chanting that
women are too far gone, that marriage is a fool's trap,
that reproduction is for suckers, the red pill hucksters, the
Fresh and Fit, the Whatever podcast and their copycasts pump
out endless highlight reels of drunken, half literate club girls

(01:01:00):
as if they were the sum total of modern womanhood.
I think they may be looking for love in all
the wrong places. To quote the eighties country Western song,
the real issue is is that your mileage may vary,
and Western civilization that is detached from God is going

(01:01:21):
to die just as much as as if it was
not going to reproduce with children. That is the essence
of our lifeblood. That is the essence of our fruit,
and that is the essence of a civilization that is
worth saving. And that is something that we should not
just passively set on the sidelines and say we're too
sophisticated to even bother with us. There's no point in it.

(01:01:44):
They tell people, do not marry, do not reproduce, just
keep watching and raging. Whether it is a liturgical case play,
doom scrolling bitterness, or nightclub nihilism. The message is identical
opt out of family life, and once you have opted out,
you have opted out of the future. It feels like

(01:02:05):
you are rejecting the corruption of modernity, but in reality
you're delivering your bloodline to extinction with a smug, little flourish.
And of course that is exactly in this spiritual ward
that we're in. That is exactly what Satan wants. He
wants the end of the human race, and that's one
of the ways that he can accomplish it is by
our passivity. It is a resistance that resists nothing. It

(01:02:28):
is a revolution that leaves no heirs, and when the
last of its followers dies, there'll be no one left
to even remember the live stream influencer that misled them.
I think about that many times. In terms of Trump
and the MAGA movement. Does it have any set of
principles that are going to continue? No, because it's simply
a personality cult. And once that personality is gone, what

(01:02:50):
do they have to rally around. They don't have any principles.
He turns on a dime and does something that's one
hundred and eight degrees different than what he was promoting
last week, and they obediently turn on a dime as well.

Speaker 4 (01:03:03):
Yes, sir, whatever you say, sir.

Speaker 3 (01:03:04):
Only what he says. He says. This is merely a
political mistake. It is a theological revolt. From page one
of the Bible, God commands humanity to be fruitful, multiply,
and fill the earth. This is issued alongside the dominion
mandate Governor Stewart and subdue. And let me just say
that we talked about the dominion mandate that is for
men and women, because we operate as a family, not

(01:03:28):
as individuals. I think it's part of the sickness of
focusing too much on individuality that we have to assign
that to one or the other. They were designed to
work as a team, So I'm one twenty seven calls
children heritage from the Lord and aros in the hands
of a warrior. Malachi says, God unites husband and wife

(01:03:50):
because he needs godly offspring. In other words, the first
countermeasure against evil is a godly family that raises more
godly families. So when an influencer Mock's Family, Knight or
an incel turns celibacy into a lifestyle brand, they're not
just making bad personal choices. They are spitting in the

(01:04:11):
face of the God who made marriage and commanded fruitfulness.
They are cutting the cord on their own people's lifeline.
Our enemies don't care how many debates you win. They
don't care how many likes your mem gets. They don't
care how many nationalists conferences you attend. They don't care
about who shows up in the census. They care about

(01:04:32):
who fills the schools. They care about who has the
numbers to govern in fifty years. And the only scorecard
that matters in that game is the birth rate. Let
me just say, though, it's not just, it doesn't end
at birth rate. Where the fight really is is in education.
If you're going to have a bunch of kids and
stick them in school, you're going to lose the war anyway.

(01:04:52):
What you're doing is you're just creating servants for the state.
If you take your children and stick them in the s,
it is the other side that's right. They're going to
be assimilated into the beast, and anti human agenda is
what it is, he says. I pointed out repeatedly that
preemptive issue for Christian ethicists in coming years will be

(01:05:16):
developing a robust pro human theology, not humanism, which is
an ethical framework that promotes reasons science and human welfare
as a basis for morality and progress is secular. He says,
I'm referring to an advocacy for humans in general over
and against technology. He says, I'll summarize it by saying

(01:05:37):
that Christians must focus on emphasizing the needs of people.
In the coming years, AI, quantum computing, singularity, automation, other
emerging technology will de emphasize the value of human beings,
and coming years will need to advocate for humans to
have jobs rather than robots, or to give another example,

(01:05:58):
I'll need to exercise caution to not replace human reasoning
in regard to ethics with AI processing. Must talking about
the survival of something he calls human consciousness quote unquote
in the future, but not of humans. Should raise our eyebrows.
Most conservatives understand on some level that there is a

(01:06:20):
very anti human agenda in what our enemies are advancing.
The wealthy elite talk like they want to quote save
the planet, but their policies will aim at the same goal,
which is fewer people. They push abortion, sterilization, gender confusion,
to kill the family, climate, hysteria, to shut down energy
and food, digital IDs and cashless currency, to track every move.

(01:06:43):
They call it progress, but it is livestock management in
order to tag, monitor, and cull and I said this
all along from the as they talk about herd immunity.
I said, they're treating us like cattle, and they're trying
to get us to adopt a herd mentality. They don't
see you as an image bearer of God, but as

(01:07:05):
a carbon emitting liability to be erased. And they see
you as something that can be manipulated. That's like BF Skinner,
beyond freedom and dignity. Yeah, you should not have freedom
or dignity. We can manipulate you psychologically to do. What
we want is humanity as cattle. And they're going to

(01:07:26):
take you if you see yourself and if you act
and follow their direction. If you act like cattle as
we saw in twenty twenty, they've got the cattle cars
ready to take you to the camp for extermination. That's
what this is truly about. He said. Christians have to
emphasize child bearing, but again let me emphasize it doesn't
end with child bearing. That's just the very beginning of it.

(01:07:49):
It is a lifelong experience where you are in the
harness with your kids as you're walking down the road.
You teach them about life. Every moment, every issue that
comes up, anything in the news is a teaching moment,
and you should apply the principles that point them to
the Lord Jesus Christ in each of those things. Or

(01:08:10):
it doesn't matter about Western civilization. Who cares about Western civilization?
If your kids don't have a relationship with God, it's meaningless.
Life is meaningless without God. And a culture that despises fruitfulness,
treating children as financial burdens, obstacles to career advancement, or
threats to the environment, the Church must shine as a

(01:08:32):
countercultural witness. Isaiah reminds us that God created the earth
to be inhabited. The declining birthrates across the Western not
only a demographic problem, but spiritual one. The Great Commission
is not in competition with the Creation mandate. The two
of those work together. We are to make disciples of
all nations, and that begins with making children and making

(01:08:54):
them disciples. It truly is.

Speaker 4 (01:09:01):
It's wonderful to get to watch our son grow and change.
The amount of excitement I have of how I can't
wait to start teaching him things. He's not at that
stage where he can actually learn yet. Yeah, you know,
he's figuring things out, how to pick things up, how
to stand up on his own.

Speaker 3 (01:09:17):
And he gets excited about that too. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:09:19):
I can't wait to read him books and hear him
get excited about Oh, what kind of animal is that?
What does that do?

Speaker 3 (01:09:26):
Yeah? Yeah, that's I thought that.

Speaker 4 (01:09:30):
You don't just want to be an Elon Musk where
you oh, look he's got eight seven children or something.
Who cares he's not a father.

Speaker 3 (01:09:37):
Yeah. It was like thirteen or fourteen, when you know,
so many people would always talk about the terrible two's,
And that's when I enjoyed you guys the most because
that's when the mind starts to kick in. That's when
it comes a challenge for the parents because now you've
got two wills that are there. But that's when I
thought it was interesting because that's when you can engage

(01:10:00):
the mind that is developing on the other side of it.

Speaker 4 (01:10:03):
So it's funny. He's a little bit over nine months now,
but he's already starting to get willful. He wants things.
You can tell he wants something, and he gets mad
when he doesn't get it.

Speaker 3 (01:10:12):
Yeah, yeah, he just screamed out if he doesn't get it.
So there's a new strain of so called Christian teaching
the same squarely at young men. It speaks in the
tones of righteousness, dripping with warnings about modern women, body
counts and protecting your purity, but underneath it functions as
a sterilization campaign for the church. These voices insist that

(01:10:34):
if women have ever been promiscuous, regardless of whether God
has saved and sanctified them, they are permanently off limits
as wives. The state of goal is to guard men
from making a bad choice. The real result is to
encourage men to opt out a marriage and fatherhood altogether.
If the standard is impossibly high and the alternative is

(01:10:56):
lifelong bachelorhood, the result is not whole but demographic suicide.
And that that is the key thing I'm seeing. Certain
denominations are growing very very quickly with young men because
there has been in a lot of different denominations, there
has been kind of a feminization of the church. Uh,

(01:11:20):
and it is good to try to balance that out.
But you can fall off in the other direction, you know,
you can become like the Ortho bros I don't know
if that's what they're about, if they're Orthodox brothers or whatever.

Speaker 4 (01:11:33):
But it has to be based on context.

Speaker 3 (01:11:36):
Yeah, if he becomes something like that, very judgmental and
isolationists and intolerant of anything that doesn't fall exactly into
your perfect model, that is a very, very bad. As
he points out, as a Satanic ploy, the devil has
no trouble getting Christians to violate God's command in the

(01:11:57):
name of obeying them. He did it with the Pharisees,
weaponizing tradition and nullfi the law of God, and he's
doing it now and the so called gender war, convincing
Christian men that the holiest response to a corrupt age
is to pull the plug on the family line. If
you wanted to keep the Great Commission from ever being fulfilled,
if you want to make sure the church withered from within,

(01:12:20):
you would make exactly this argument. Don't marry, don't have kids,
wait until you find an impossible standard, and if you
never do, the world can have the future and you
don't need to be participating in it. That's the key thing.
And I think he nailed this. I think that really
is the message of Nick Fantes and many others like him.

(01:12:42):
We'll be right back.

Speaker 2 (01:14:19):
You're listening to the David Night Show. Did the the

(01:17:00):
American Dream? You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (01:17:07):
Welcome back. We've got a lot of comments here. Before
we do that. Before we get to the comments, I'd
like to give a few comments about Nick Fuentes.

Speaker 3 (01:17:16):
I personal recollection.

Speaker 4 (01:17:19):
I have a good bit of insight. I followed quite
a few stories about him. If you want to know
about Nick Fuentes, you can look up someone named Jaden McNeil.
He's someone that was involved with the America First Movement.
He was very very close to Fuentes and what Nick
Fuentes did to him after he left, and the amount
of the number of horrific things that Fwintes has done.

(01:17:41):
He has burned bridges with everyone. The type of people
he's associated with. Yeah, he knew Ali Alexander almost definitely new.
I think it's definite that he knew Alexander was a predator,
and he brought him in close to a bunch of
very young, very impressionable young boys. He associates with people
like Ethan Ralph, who's a revenge pornographer, abuser, alcohol pill popper.

(01:18:01):
He's surrounded by very nasty people. Look up black Swan,
a person a member of his Sussi squad who does
gay ops for Nick Quintis Sussy squad, the Sussi squad.

Speaker 3 (01:18:15):
Are they suspect?

Speaker 4 (01:18:16):
They're very suspect. I believe black Swan is a training himself.

Speaker 3 (01:18:20):
Wow.

Speaker 4 (01:18:21):
And so he is surrounded by a cohort of despicable,
wretched individuals. He has burned bridges with everyone that is
of good character. There's people that we used to work with.
Jake Lloyd, you'll probably remember he was part of America
First for a bit, and I believe he was thrown
out and excoriated for trying to clear out the riff raff.

(01:18:42):
And Nick Quentis is just a bad, bad individual. He's
a nasty persons.

Speaker 3 (01:18:48):
If they're not controlled opposition, they are grifters. And said
that about all the J six crowd that was there.

Speaker 4 (01:18:53):
He was there at J six. He was inciting people. Yeah,
he gets off members of his movement. It's not interesting
and right member.

Speaker 3 (01:19:01):
Alexander Alex Jones, Nick twenty's these people that and they
focus everybody again, people like Darren Beatty focus everybody on
U was that guy's name ray forget who the guy's
name was, but you know that guy that Ray Epps.
They focus on ray Epps. And as I said over
and over again, ray Epps didn't get people to show up.

(01:19:21):
He didn't get them all fired up to get Biden
out of there by any means necessary. It was the
people who were holding the rallies. It was to stop
the steal people that were doing it, and they were
not touched. Doesn't that scream controlled opposition to you? It
does to me, you know, And I saw these guys.
I know what they're about. They're about getting money. At
the very least, they're not trustworthy. But I believe it

(01:19:43):
goes further than I believe they're controlled opposition. And I
believe that the dog that didn't bark, the indictments that
didn't come scream, ought to scream to you, very very
loudly about all this stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:19:55):
Puentus is nothing but a hateful little troll. He's about
self aggrandizement everything. The only time he's happy, if you've
seen in any clips of his show, is when he's
berating the people who are watching it. He despises his viewers,
he hates them. The only time he's happy is when
he's berating them or talking about how great he is.
That's the only time. Everything else is to begrudging. Well,

(01:20:16):
I guess i'll talk about politics. I guess I'll talk
about this.

Speaker 3 (01:20:19):
I've never watched him.

Speaker 4 (01:20:20):
I've seen some clips when he was getting really big
years ago. I was like, oh, well, i'll see what
he's about. And if you watch them the highlights, he's
occasionally funny, and then you actually get to what he's about,
and you see he loves nothing more than just being hateful.
That's what he likes. Well, I want to know.

Speaker 3 (01:20:39):
I didn't pay attention to him. And there's this back
and forth war between Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson and
Nick Fintas. I didn't care about. I mean, it's a
bunch of It's a soap opera, right, What matters with
these people? Where were they on January sixth? Where were
they with the twenty twenty lockdowns and the fake pandemic
and the vaccines if they took a pill on that
because they were afraid Chris Trump or whatever. I'm not

(01:21:01):
interested in what they have to say. And it surprises
me that anybody is interested in what they have to.

Speaker 4 (01:21:05):
Say, yeah, I don't understand it. He's to me, he's
obviously controlled opposition. I know that Candas Owens and Tucker
Carlson went after him, but I think it's simply the
fact that the people that like Nick quint Is dislike
Candas Owans, and people that like Candas Owns and Tucker
Carlson dislike Quints And it's a way of keeping everybody
in the fold. That federal agent criticized this guy. That
means they're not a federal agent or they understand that.

Speaker 3 (01:21:25):
The tribe and then there are subtribes with all this
kind of stuff, and that's how they get you locked in.
You know, you get attached to a particular person or whatever,
not to principles, right, not to the truth, but you're
attached to some personality there. Again, it's a form of cosplay,
like we're talking about with a tried wife, right, you
know that's what it really is about.

Speaker 4 (01:21:46):
But we have a lot of comments.

Speaker 3 (01:21:47):
Now, yeah, let's get to some of those.

Speaker 4 (01:21:49):
Shab five says a cancer vaccine is how the zombie
movie I am legend movie started.

Speaker 3 (01:21:55):
Well, there's some predictive programming for you there. I guess
maybe what they didn't have. There is nonsense that Trump
was pushing on the first day of his administration. Yeah,
we'll have AI custom make an mRNA vaccine for you. Yeah.
I called it a genetic code injection from the very beginning,
and now that's been admitted as well.

Speaker 12 (01:22:13):
We're gonna have turbo zombies.

Speaker 4 (01:22:15):
Yeah, I mean the zombies, and I am legend we're
kind of turbo zombies, except they were more like vampires
in that movie Marky, Mark and Jay says, Lauren Suthern
is a feminist. She's always been a covert feminist. She's
always been a grifter.

Speaker 3 (01:22:28):
Yeah, yeah, I agree.

Speaker 4 (01:22:29):
Shelley A. I think it's a good thing to not
dress like a whore, sloppy clothes or like a man.
But women should do that by having Christian morals and
not for social media influence. I agree. If you're just
wearing it as a costume, it has no meaning and
no value. Joanna Anni Wodie. Matriarchy and motherhood are vilified.
Husbands and fathers are devalued in, families are destroyed nationwide.

Speaker 3 (01:22:50):
That's right. Yeah, we need to stand for the family
and and all this, you know, male versus female, all
the gender wars is basically a way to get the
family to divorce, to pick up sides. Again, don't fall
into that. We need to find ways that we come
together that we you know, you're always going to have

(01:23:11):
this kind of difference, and but that's the way that
you grow as a as an adult is by looking
at these differences and figuring it out. Audi Modern Retro
Radio says Nick Quenty's was among the ones who assisted
the J six entrapment. Yeah, I agree, that's exactly right.
It was all entrapment, and that just be a big

(01:23:33):
red flag right about all these people. It's truly as amazing.

Speaker 4 (01:23:37):
We have tunnel Lord one, three three seven. These guys
are looking for women in the wrong places. I found
plenty of wise young women when I got involved in
local politics, all very virtuous and wise. I'm surprised how
many I've found. Yeah, if you're looking to find a
wise young woman at the local bar scene or something
like that, chances are you're not going to find her there.

Speaker 3 (01:23:56):
Yeah, or even college in college of the place that
people in my generation people many people go to college
in order to find a husband or a wife or whatever.
I don't know, it's such a propagandaized thing. Now, I
don't know if that would even work.

Speaker 4 (01:24:10):
Probably not. Never Married says we just launched the world's
first ever dating app website for never married people to
help increase the birth rate. We posted about the birthrate
collapse on Twitter slash x and then got banned.

Speaker 3 (01:24:21):
Got banned. Hm, that's interesting, Musk is supposed to be
for that. I don't know, you know, never married. I
always I always knew that would get married, but I
never expected that I would find anybody as likable as Karen.
She made it so easy, Julius, Julia is amazing. I
gotta say I was spoiled. Your mileage may vary.

Speaker 4 (01:24:44):
My wife is wonderful too, if she makes it extremely easy.
Nathan Bedford Forrest eighteen sixty five, great name. Of course.
Nick was running with Milo for a while. I never
could hang with homos.

Speaker 3 (01:24:55):
Yeah, that was the other thing Milo Ianopolis that Alex
kept bringing in. He never brought up and Blair White
while I was there. Yell, but Alex seems to be
fascinated with that for some reason, especially Blair. From what
I've seen is it's amazing.

Speaker 4 (01:25:10):
Milo is a extreme provocatur Everything he gets involved with
ends up going down in flames, and he likes to
keep dirt on people. Yeah, is all about that.

Speaker 3 (01:25:20):
Very unstable, kind of like a homosexual version of Laura Loi.
You can imagine such a thing, but I'm.

Speaker 4 (01:25:28):
Sure that would hurt Milo's feelings very deeply. To hear
you say that, can think. Thank you for the tip,
he says, sharp time, mister Knight, not so much, mister Knight, please,
mister Knight is my father.

Speaker 3 (01:25:39):
There we go. Yeah, well let's talk a little bit
about it. There's an interesting article Brian Shaw, Hobby of
a Health Impact had. I like the title, The idols
are no longer mute. They talk back through AI and
they tell us what we want to hear. We were
talking about AI yesterday as a program ended, and that

(01:26:00):
is one of the key things. You know, throughout the
the Bible, the prophets would mock these metal or wood
statues that people made and worshiped and said they can't
even talk. Well, now they can talk, and that's making
them even more dangerous. He said.

Speaker 12 (01:26:17):
Kind of reminds me of the part where the magicians
of Pharaoh turned their staves into snakes to mimic.

Speaker 3 (01:26:28):
That's right, Yeah, they can mimic this stuff. They can
do it, but you know, and that's the key point
of this article. He said, Look, they can do some
pretty amazing stuff, but you got to remember that it's
all just tricks and illusions, right, you know. David Copperfield's
very very clever because he's also in the Epstein files.
But he was very clever. He made the statue of
liberty disappear. But I don't know that the people that

(01:26:52):
were there actually believed that it had vanished. They knew
that it was some kind of an illusion. The problem
is that people don't keep that kind of perspective when
they start dealing with artificial intelligence. And that's the key
point that he's making here. And he's got an excellent
op ed piece from Charles Hugh Smith, who has a

(01:27:12):
blog or a website of Two Minds, and he said
AI is a mirror in which we see our own reflection.
He said, if we pay close attention to what the
human brings to the exchange with AI and these chat programs,
we find that AI is not so much a tool
that everyone uses in more or less the same way,

(01:27:33):
but it is a mirror in which we see our
own reflection. If we care to look, and we might
not because what AI reflects may well be troubling. What
we see in the AI mirror reflects the entirety of
our knowledge, our emotional state, and our yearnings, he said,
the illusion of understanding it creates via its mastery of

(01:27:54):
natural language and human written texts, so best understood as
a magic trick and not actual intelligence or caring. Those
who are obsessed with AI to improve their workflow might see,
if they choose to look carefully, an overscheduled way of
life that is much less about accomplishment what we tell ourselves,

(01:28:16):
and more about a hamster wheel of bs work, symbolic value,
and signaling to others and ourselves that were busy. So
therefore we are valuable. Those seeking a wise friend, a counselor,
or romantic partner in AI are reflecting a profound hollowness
in their human relationships and a set of expectations that

(01:28:38):
are unrealistic and lacking in introspection. Those seeking intellectual stimulation
will find wormholes into the entirety of human knowledge. For
that For what's difficult for humans seeking and applying patterns
and connections to complex realms, AI does very easily so
we are astonished and we're enamored by its facility with

(01:29:00):
complex ideas. The more astute the humans queries and prompts,
the deeper the AI's response. For the AI mirrors the
Hitman's user's knowledge and a state of mind. We've talked
about this over and over again that it starts to
reflect what you want, and it gives you what you want.
So I've seen many articles now people say, look at this,
I got AI particular chat to agree that there's a God,

(01:29:24):
and it's like, well, that's because that's what you believe,
and it's reflecting what you're putting in there. But he
makes a really good point that the more intelligent a
person is on a particular subject, more knowledge they have,
the more in depth they are, the more they will
see meaning in what AI comes back, right, so they'll
fill that in. He says, it might be a word salad,

(01:29:46):
But because the human has a deep understanding of a
particular field, they may discern something in the AI's response
that they find to be insightful because it triggered a
new connection in their own mind. It's not that AI
is coming up with some new insight, it's just that
it kind of triggered something new to them because it's
throwing out this word solid. This is important to understand.

(01:30:08):
The AI did not generate the insight, though the human
reckons that it did because the phrase struck the human
as insightful. The insight arose in the human mind due
to its deep knowledge of the field. I don't know
if you ever saw the movie being There or not
with Peter Sellers, but when I saw this, it made
me think of that exactly. There's this guy who was

(01:30:29):
taken care of by Peter Sellich plays this guy who
is taken care of by a very rich, elderly guy,
and he was not capable of doing anything, not intelligent
at all. He's not capable of doing thing except keeping
the garden. And he always wore a suit. It was
always dressed dressed very nicely, and he would tend the

(01:30:50):
garden in a suit. And then the old man dies
and he's basically on the street, and through a series
of chants, counters and everything, he comes in contact with
some very wealthy and connected people. Eventually he gets into
the President's office and all these people are captains of
industry and all this other kind of stuff talk to

(01:31:11):
him and he hasn't got a clue as to what
they're saying, but and he'll respond to things that are
complete non sequiturs. Really, but what they'll do is they'll
read meaning into it. And I got a clip of
the trailer here, just in case you've never seen the movie.
It kind of sums up.

Speaker 15 (01:31:26):
Like, don't you put any chance enjoy Kriloff's fables? And
I asked you that because there is something, there's something
real looving about you.

Speaker 2 (01:31:43):
Do you think so?

Speaker 10 (01:31:46):
I believe that you know gridofologist with a.

Speaker 15 (01:31:57):
Pizza, but you know your in Russ and mister gons
I had suspected as much.

Speaker 2 (01:32:06):
All excuse me, but would you tell me.

Speaker 14 (01:32:11):
Your name again?

Speaker 9 (01:32:15):
I'm a Murican.

Speaker 2 (01:32:18):
Scruplo.

Speaker 7 (01:32:20):
That's a very nice name, and yours Chauncey poet Chancy
Versuchenaulture is fifteen.

Speaker 3 (01:32:40):
Yeah, you get the idea. It's important to understand that
Ai doesn't have the insights anymore than chance the gardener does.
And it's just by chance that puts the other those
words solid. But you know, these people throughout this movie
are projecting on him profound riddles that he's doing. He
just kind of SATs there and blankly stairs at people

(01:33:01):
and the throughout that, And that's exactly what's going on
with AI. What matters isn't what AI auto completes. What
matters is our interpretation of the AI output, just as
you saw him interpreting the responses of chance, and it
sparks sparks on our own mind.

Speaker 12 (01:33:22):
The important thing is what the human mind auto completes
into the AI's response.

Speaker 3 (01:33:27):
That's exactly right.

Speaker 4 (01:33:28):
I don't know if you saw this, but Travis Kalalnik,
the former CEO of uber Right, was posting about how
I've been working with AI and I think we're about
to make some huge physics breakthroughs. And I'm now wondering,
like how long until Travis Kalalnick ends up in a
psych word from the AI brainwashing him.

Speaker 3 (01:33:47):
Yeah, that's exactly right, he says. Charles goes on to say,
to the secure individual, the first question that arises when
AI heaps on the praise and the artifice of carrying
what is the con But what the emotionally needy individual
sees is empathy and affirmation because this is what they

(01:34:09):
lack within themselves. Therefore it is what they crave. The
emotionally secure individual sees it is fake and authentic and
potentially a manipulative, a reflection not just of neediness, but
of a narcissism that reflects a culture of unrealistic expectations
and narcissistic involution. In other words, we're you know, we're

(01:34:31):
looking to have AI fill in things that we're missing,
he said. And AI, we are looking at a mirror
that reflects ourselves and our ultra processed culture, a zeitgeist
of empty calories and manic distractions that foster a state
of mind that is both harried and bored, hyper aware
of super superficialities, and blind what the AI mirror is

(01:34:55):
reflecting about us. And see, that's the key thing, you know,
when we look at it. That's why I think when
you talk about something like throwing together visuals, you know,
it throws out all kinds of elements that it puts
in there, and some stuff is going to be absolute garbage.
But what these people have done, they've run it through
the filter multiple times that they get one that they like,

(01:35:17):
and then they put it in a context of a
video and take the sections of it that they like.
And so from a standpoint of you know, creating movies
or videos that are simply fictional. I think it can
be very useful, but the end, the real concern is
how it is used by government, because it can collate

(01:35:40):
and it can data mind things that they are looking for,
and it can do that to us, and we'll be
used for surveillance and for control. But the other part
of it is don't get into a dialogue with it
that you really believe that it is talking to you.
We see this over and over again.

Speaker 4 (01:35:55):
Yeah, it doesn't have emotions, it doesn't think, it doesn't feel.
It is simply auto completed Fiji back a response that
you think that it thinks, well, thinks in quotes that
you want. And I mentioned before, but I think a
real danger is just people giving up on learning to
do things for themselves. Yeah, we're going to be denied
an entire generation of artists and very talented people who

(01:36:16):
won't see the value in learning, you know, how to
play the guitar or the piano or the violin, because
why would I. I can just have the AI do
this for me.

Speaker 3 (01:36:24):
Yeah. Yeah, yeah. When I was going up, we talked
about somebody playing music, you would kind of assume that
they're playing an instrument, especially in my crowd of friends,
but now playing music, hit the play button, you know,
on this thing. But you're talking about people giving up.
This article shows an MIT student going to drop out.
She says that AGI, artificial General Intelligence, is going to

(01:36:46):
kill everybody before she can even graduate. So this is
the type of thing that you've been seeing for the
longest time with people about the climate mcguffin, And now
she has that kind of pessimism about the future because
of AGI.

Speaker 4 (01:36:59):
It's also truly this is an insight into the type
of people that get into MIT. I mean, so that
you want to believe, or at one point some of us,
I know, I wanted to believe, like all right Harvard. Yeah,
these places obviously they're only accepting the best and the brightest.
This is MIT. And this person's like, I've got to
drop out because AGI is going to come on. You
watch Terminator one too many times. I get it's scary,

(01:37:22):
But the real danger is not that the AGI is
going to become self aware and take us out. So
the government is going to use it as a massive
hammer to crush everyone underneath it.

Speaker 3 (01:37:32):
Right, Well, you know they're able to because of these
schools where people can go like jd. Vance goes to
Yale and he meets Peter Thiele. It's those kind of
connections that has the value for those types of schools.
But I had a lot of friends when I started
working at TI that were from the UK because of
the apartment that I was working, and we had a

(01:37:52):
lot of people that are coming over, and so most
of the people that I knew had moved to the
US from the UK. And he mentioned one particular person
was We're having a discussion about some technical stuff and
the guy was not there, but somebody said, yeah, so
and so and said, yeah, he's he's from MIT or something.

(01:38:12):
And the other guy says, say no more. He says,
every person I've met in the US that's from MIT
is like, you know, you can tell them a mile away,
but you can't tell them anything, you know. So that
was that was an interesting perspective.

Speaker 4 (01:38:26):
But you can tell a grad from MIT, but you
can't tell them much. Apparently that's right.

Speaker 3 (01:38:31):
Well, she said that if your career is about to
be automated by the end of the decade, then every
year spent in college is one year subtracted from your
very short career. I personally think HgI is maybe four
years away, and full automation of the economy is maybe
five or six years away. So she believes all the
stuff that people like Sam Altman have been telling everybody.

(01:38:54):
You know, Sam Altman goes to Congress and he warns them.
He says, hey, he's going to take over the world,
and we got an AI gap, and you better give
money to me and only to me, because it's too
dangerous to be handled by other people, and you can't
let the Chinese get it, So shower me with cash
and put up restrictions against competition. And now you've got
Sam Altman saying, well, I think we're in a kind

(01:39:15):
of a dot com bubble, which I think we've been
in from the very beginning with all this stuff. And
the thing that I thought was really funny was a
quote he says, well, I think we're moving towards agi
artificial general intelligence, which is to say that it thinks
like human being can reason. I don't think they're ever

(01:39:37):
going to get there, but he says, I think we're
not there yet, but I think that it is quote
generally intelligent, which reminds me of what George Santos, the
guy the New York con Man right, Jewish. I'm Jewish?
Oh I said I was Jewish. I love myself I
was a Jewish. I'm like a jew. Yeah, I'm jew Ish.

(01:40:00):
So these things are not they haven't achieved artificial general intelligence.
They are generally intelligent. How about that.

Speaker 4 (01:40:09):
Little word games and semantic differences.

Speaker 3 (01:40:12):
Yeah, it's just a lot of marketing hype. And this
is futurism that is saying this, which follows tech issues.
So you may be ignoring the very mundane forms of
harm that it is causing, like job automation and the
gutting of the They say the environment, but I would

(01:40:32):
say they use for surveillance and control. Those things are
very real. They've got people worrying that there's going to be
some kind of an existential threat, like it's some kind
of sky net things. I'm just going to become super
intelligent and kill us all. It's like, well, the real
harm is going to be coming from the people who
are using it.

Speaker 4 (01:40:48):
I just do not believe AI will ever become self
aware personally, I don't believe that humans have the capability
to create a different kind of life. I don't think
that's within our scope of capabilities. I think God is
allowed us to create life in a specific set way.
You know, husband wife. Ideally they create a child and
we do it throughout and it creates it in his image.

(01:41:09):
I think people will want to believe this thing is
a life format itself aware, but again it'll be some
twisted false mirror because Satan operates that way. He doesn't create.

Speaker 3 (01:41:18):
The people who are developing it want to believe that
they're doing that because that puts in the position of
being God. They're giving birth to a whole new category
of being right. So that makes them into a God,
which is always the desire people to be God.

Speaker 12 (01:41:35):
But I also think it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what
these things are because they are fundamentally deceptive. They are
a language completion tool. They complete sentences and works based
on the text that came before it, and an algorithm
that looks at previous texts that it's been given. No

(01:41:55):
matter how complicated you make that it will never be alive.
It's back to the whole thing of Alan Turing. How
a Turing test is fundamentally, you know, reductive to the
point of ignoring what consciousness is. Where if you can
convince someone believably that you can't tell the difference between
this person and a machine, then therefore the machine must

(01:42:18):
be equal to the person.

Speaker 3 (01:42:19):
It's do you still have Do you still have that
back and forth that you did with I think it
was chat gpt about the problem. You know, where you've
got the wolf and the what was it the sheep
or something like that, and then you've got something that
that the sheep would eat, and you got to take
them across one time on a boat.

Speaker 12 (01:42:37):
Yeah, it was a famous riddle.

Speaker 3 (01:42:39):
We should put that up on substack. I never covered
that in the detail that it really deserved. But what
Lance did was he he left off one of those elements,
and you could tell what the AI was doing. We'd
go back and say, well, first you take and it
referred to the missing element, you take that across and
he says no, no, no, there is no fill in

(01:43:02):
the blank, right whatever that was, and and he goes, oh, yeah,
that's right, let me try this again. And so it
keeps going back through this and he keeps correcting it,
and he keeps making mistakes, and it was like the
traditional science fiction thing that you see where you got
this super robot and Captain Kirk gives it a logical

(01:43:23):
conundrum and it breaks down eventually, you know, and you
could almost see chat GBT shaking and smoking. The lights
on it start switching back and forth. But it was great.
It was very long. It took him a while, but
he basically got it to break down and just start
repeating gibberish.

Speaker 12 (01:43:41):
I did that because I saw someone talking about how
it can't handle things that are close to well known riddles.

Speaker 3 (01:43:51):
Yeah, it's very close to the riddle, but he changed
one element and he couldn't handle it.

Speaker 12 (01:43:55):
There's an article I've found about that just looking it up.

Speaker 3 (01:43:58):
Now, the Wolf, Goat and the cabbage problem, Yeah, yeah, yeah,
we should put your We should put your thing up.
That was great and it really shows the limitations of
this and how it copies it. You know, if it
goes out and it finds that pattern and it can't
pull itself back, it shows that it's not capable of thinking.

(01:44:18):
It can only imitate that pattern that is out there
to solve that problem for the wolf, the goat, and
the cabbage.

Speaker 4 (01:44:25):
But thinking is a fundamentally different things. There's an X
factor there, there's something that the AI can't have. It
comes intrinsic with you know, being an organic life form
with a soul of some kind. It can put data
points together, it can look at these different things, but
it's just weighing all of the data it has against itself.

(01:44:46):
And eventually it starts just to feed you things. It
looks at what responses you liked and what responses you didn't.
It starts feeding you things that it thinks you will like.
It is not thinking, and I don't believe it will
ever actually be capable of thinking. It will simply still
be weighing patterns and the amount of data it has
on something versus the amount of data it has on

(01:45:07):
something else. That is a fundamentally very different thing.

Speaker 3 (01:45:11):
But now they're going to use it to do genetic modification.
Oh boy, so why not, right, let's just let's give
it accent.

Speaker 4 (01:45:18):
Did you know that you can now have AI pick
your test two baby for you?

Speaker 3 (01:45:22):
Well, you know, one of the things I thought was
interesting was they've always told us that crisper is a
way that they can modify, genetically modify people, plants and everything, right,
and that it is a scalpel and they can make
these precise changes. And yet the cattle industry in Texas.

(01:45:43):
One person was talking about how they were using genetic
modifications at Crisper is not a scalpel, it's a chainsaw,
and you've got to be careful because it creates all
kinds of unintended consequences. And so now, after they told
us all this time, create this idea that crisper is
this precise way to make changes in what they're doing,
now they're coming back and saying it's so imprecise that

(01:46:05):
we need to clean it up with Guess what, Ai, Yeah,
wah wah.

Speaker 12 (01:46:12):
So I'm looking at this article that the sky has
and he kind of overcomplicated it all. I asked. It
was a man and a goat are on one side
of a river. They have a boat. How can they
cross to the other side of the river. And it
couldn't get that because it's too similar to this well

(01:46:34):
known riddle.

Speaker 3 (01:46:35):
Yeah, joy, At first you put the cabbage in the
boat or something like that, and he said, there's no
cabbage something like that.

Speaker 12 (01:46:41):
But yeah, So its answer was the man takes the
goat across to the river, leaves it on the other side,
and the man returns alone to the original side. Then
he rows across to the river alone. I said, no,
the goat will wander off if he's left alone, and
went on this whole big, long thing and it never
got the riddle correct.

Speaker 3 (01:46:59):
But it did break down. That was a funny thing,
you know. It was just trying to copy that pattern
and when you kept pointing out that had it wrong,
it eventually just broke down. Well, we need to rethink
AI before it destroys what it means to be human.
And we talked about this yesterday as well, about the
atrophy of the human mind. If you don't use your brain,

(01:47:19):
how it atrophies. And yet the guy who is considered
to be the godfather of AI, his name is Hinton,
was saying, well, we need to train AI to act
like a mother so that can mother humanity. And it's
actually I think we have a little bit too much
of that in the n any state as well. But

(01:47:39):
that's where they want to go with this.

Speaker 12 (01:47:41):
So now we know why then any state people want
to have AI control of the world.

Speaker 3 (01:47:46):
We have a nanny gap. I guess that's the real issue.

Speaker 4 (01:47:50):
Medication time.

Speaker 3 (01:47:51):
Yeah, yeah, that's really what it is. Well, we're going
to take a quick break and we come back we're
going to take a quick look at what is going
on in the economy. Stay with us, will be right back.

Speaker 2 (01:48:34):
You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 6 (01:49:05):
Whether you're feeling like the blue or bluegrass, APS Radio
has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels
on our app at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 3 (01:49:19):
All right, welcome back. We have the conservative press, the
Trump Press, zero Hedgron Spicula case talking about how Bank
of America is nixing a rule that led to debanking
of conservative religious groups. Okay, this is great, this is
a Trump victory. Look at what Trump has been able
to get them to do. And yet the reality of
it is that you have to ask yourself, why did

(01:49:42):
they come up with this in the first place, and
what is going to keep them from doing it again?
Just as we saw with the lockdown, no consequences for
the things that were done in twenty twenty, and these
people are allowed to get away with it, they will
do it again. Doesn't care about this. They're not going

(01:50:02):
to care enough about it to tell them that they
can't do it again because they and this is key
when we look at things like the Genius Act, that
is another genius action on the part of having instead
of a central bank digital currency, having it run through
private corporations, because what they're going to say to you
is that, well, you know, just as we've seen with

(01:50:24):
YouTube and social media, well they kicked you off. It's
not us. But we knew that it was a government
all along, and eventually we got the receipts that showed
that it was a government telling these different platforms to
deplatform people. And I think the same thing is true
when we look at taking people off a PayPal and
vemo is. In our particular case, the person said, there's
no reason given, it's just a message saying take this

(01:50:49):
person off right now. And so when you have private
stable coins instead of a government central bank digital currency,
the government will be able to tell the private corporations
that are running these stable coins, d bank this person
over here. And then if you complain about it's like,
it's not us. They did that on their own. That

(01:51:12):
was Facebook, or that was PayPal, or that was YouTube.
And that's the same game they're going to run with
this stuff. Because the Republicans are not interested in stopping
the d banking of people. They just want to make
sure that there is a plausible deniability when they have
the corporations act as their surrogate and all this. So

(01:51:34):
the change remove language from the bank's Code of Conduct
that permitted account closures based on a customer's religious viewpoint.
This revision followed a feedback, said Bank of America, from
our stakeholders.

Speaker 4 (01:51:47):
One thing to note their stakeholders, Well, this is good
if they don't do anything about the payment processors, things
like Stripe, the people that actually move the money around.
It doesn't mean anything. You can still have a bank account.
But if Stripe says no, we're not going to do
business with you, you're still dead in the water. Yeah,
it's a half measure. Yeah, if you don't target Stripe,
which moves a significant portion of the world's money through

(01:52:10):
it each year, this will.

Speaker 3 (01:52:12):
And it's the dog that doesn't bark. I mean, you
look at the Genius Act, and they thought of everything
in there. They said, Okay, you're going to have to
have certain rules about you've got to buy us currency
and bonds and things like that, and you have to
know your customer and do all of that kind of stuff.
But they don't put a prohibition on them, saying you
will never freeze somebody's funds. The reason that they're going

(01:52:36):
to stable coin is because they want these corporations to
freeze people's funds. So the fact that they don't have
that in there, but they got all to know your
customer stuff and you do everything that we tell you
to do, that tells you that that's the way that
they want to use it. And it's both parties, it's
not just the Democrats are out there.

Speaker 4 (01:52:55):
We've had people in Chat I forget who it was,
but they said that they are seeing stable coin infrastructure
go in in their local supermarkets ways to pay using them.
And to me, that's a sure sign this is coming
down the pipeline because you're not going to see these
companies investing in that infrastructure unless they're pretty sure that
it's happening. You're not going to see them spend millions
who knows how many millions of dollars to put these

(01:53:15):
in stores unless they know that.

Speaker 3 (01:53:18):
And that's another reason why you need to make sure
that you have local food, that you have the ability
to grow some of your own food as well, because chickens,
that's really going to be where they're going to put
the choke point is going to be you talk about
Operation Choke point, about choking people on food, not just
on buying ammunition and guns, and that happening. The decision

(01:53:41):
comes amid growing scrutiny from conservative activists and political figures
over what they describe as politically motivated account terminations. Well,
you better talk to these people like Marsha Blackburn about
the Genius Act and say, why haven't you put prohibitions
and law against thebanking people over religious or political statements

(01:54:03):
that they make. Trump has accused Bank of America and
JP Morgan of refusing him banking services after his first
term ended in twenty twenty one, an action that some
insiders saw the post occured under pressure from the Biden
administration following the January sixth issues. They will they don't
want to get rid of that power, though, they want

(01:54:23):
to be able to use that power to debank their opponents,
and so that's one of the reasons why they're keeping
it there. They said. The banks have claimed that we
have to do it because of reputational risk, and of
course that's very similar to the reasons that they give
for taking people off of social media. We can't have
free speech on a platform. I mean, look at what
we might have people like Nick Quintays, for example, who,

(01:54:46):
as we talked about, everybody knows we don't have really
any respect for Nick, but he doesn't need to be.

Speaker 4 (01:54:50):
Censored too to say what he wants to say.

Speaker 3 (01:54:53):
And so they'll say, well, you know, we can't have him,
so we got to kick him off there. And that's
what the banks are saying. In recent years on financial
institutions applied similar standards to religious viewpoints, including opposition to
same sex marriage, categorizing them as hate speech. And we
have seen how the British will even categorize abortion protesters

(01:55:15):
as hate speech. It could be nothing further from the truth.
I mean, you even had a situation in the UK
where a woman was standing there and saying I'm here
to talk if you want to talk. I'm against coercion
and so forth, and they still arrested that woman because
she held up a sign saying I'm here to talk
if you want to talk.

Speaker 4 (01:55:33):
Can't say that she's a lot kinder than if I
was given power. Abortion would be out the door. Sorry,
we're going coercion on this one. Fellas no more choice
on that option.

Speaker 3 (01:55:44):
Yeah, I don't think people should have the choice to
kill babies.

Speaker 4 (01:55:46):
That's just yeah, I don't think that's just murder. We've
already got laws against that. We just need to enforce that.
We need to define that as murder and then we're set.

Speaker 3 (01:55:55):
Yep, that's it. Well ten ways of government compliance. Stable
coins are functionally no different than CBDC. This is a
Free Thought Project article and they're absolutely right. It is
a trojan horse, a path toward programmable money surveillance and control,
all under the guise of legitimacy. And again, if they're

(01:56:18):
going to have know your customer rules, requirements about assets
that they can and cannot hold, and all the rest
of stuff, but no requirement that they can't seize your
money and shut you down, that tells you everything that
you need to know. So first of all, first reason,
on demand asset seizure. That's it right there in a nutshell. Secondly,

(01:56:38):
identity surveillance, and that's one of the things that you
see with Marshall Blackburn, identity surveillance. In order to be
able to use the Internet, we got to do it
for the kids. And then the Genius Act stable coin
that is also about identity surveillance. Control over issuers equals
control over money. Only those sanctioned by the OCC or

(01:57:00):
state regulators can issue these stable coins. Millions could be
locked out if you are not approved. Sanctions and compliance
by design bankruptcy immunity for the reserves, shifting governance to corporations.
That's an important part of this extra territorial enforcement, not extraterrestrial,

(01:57:23):
but extra territorial enforcement. Foreign issuers must meet US AML
and sanctions standards or lose access to the US market.
That's the kind of jurisdictional reach that is typical of
CBDC systems. You'll have reserve requirements as a monetary policy tool.

(01:57:44):
So instead of this will allow them to continue to
prop up the dollar through FED bonds and other things
like that, and they will. This is the way they
can keep the ball rolling without having this whole house
of cards collapse on them. Interoperability means shared surveillance interfaces
and then finally real world precedent that validates the risk.

(01:58:08):
Stable coin issuers have already demonstrated freeze capability. Tether froze
two hundred and twenty five million dollars in twenty twenty three.
They froze forty six million in twenty twenty two. And
one hundred and sixty million twenty twenty two at the
authority's requests. USDC another stable coin froze one hundred thousand

(01:58:29):
dollars in twenty twenty and blacklisted Tornado Cash ledgers that
can be wiped at a moment's notice are no different
from centralized money under CBDC logic and every other thing
that they talked about with CBDC, in other words, putting
a geofence around it, saying well, you can't use this

(01:58:53):
digital money if you're not within a certain geographical area.
That's how they keep us in their little small art
cities or their little prisoner villages, you know, saying here's
a fifteen minute area that you can walk around in.
If you get outside of that, your money won't work.
And all of that, all of that is all available

(01:59:13):
under stable coins. It's a harbinger of a future that
has lived with the permission of the state. That's why
I said it's about surveillance, and it's about control, and
all of this stuff, the AI and the digital stuff,
is all about that. How do you get away from that?
You get away from that by focusing on building human
communities that are local to you, by moving to physical

(01:59:35):
things like gold and silver, and that's really what we
need to focus on. We've got to have a separate,
parallel society. There's no way that we're going to stop
what these people are doing. We just have to build
something different that will serve us and serve our needs.
And it's time for us to start thinking about what

(01:59:56):
we're going to build rather than thinking about how we're
going to stop the other Try vibe because we're not
going to be able to stop these people. So they
point out in this article, it's time to exit in
order to get to true financial autonomy. Now Free Thought
Project will give you some alternatives. In terms of crypto coins.
The answer isn't better government compliant stable coins. The answer

(02:00:19):
is privacy by design projects like Xano, tools like the
Confidential Layer. But of course I'm partial to the simple stuff,
the physical that you see with gold and silver and
other things like that. I think that's what we need
to focus on.

Speaker 4 (02:00:36):
Of course, you get a David Knight dot Gold if
you're interested in getting some gold or silver for yourself.

Speaker 3 (02:00:42):
Yeah, they'll take you. Tony ardbin Wisewelf Gold. We appreciate
Tony's support, but I think this is something that has
been and it's going to continue as we look at
the surreal projects coming out of Washington, the Big Beautiful
that Trump called it. If you believe that it is

(02:01:04):
big and beautiful, then you probably believe in Santa Claus
in the Easter Bundy as well. It's all kinds of
free stuff. And now they're telling everybody the average American
is going to get thirty seven and fifty two dollars
tax cut in twenty twenty six due to the Big
Beautiful Bill. Well, you know you believe that tooth fairy

(02:01:24):
is going to be coming. I guess it'll leave that
money underneath your pillow, don't you think.

Speaker 4 (02:01:29):
I can't wait. He'll sneak in the middle of the night.
He'll probably give you a little smooch on your forehead too.

Speaker 3 (02:01:33):
I guess I have to wonder when Maga is going
to stop saying that Trump is going to get ready
income tax. He's not. He's constantly talks about how he's
going to make these things permanent. He's going to make
specified tax cuts permanent, but he keeps building the deficit,
and if the deficit keeps growing even with other tariffs,

(02:01:54):
you're not ever going to be able to escape from
an oppressive tax code.

Speaker 4 (02:01:59):
Here about that article a week or so, two weeks ago. Now,
the way they calculate the debt when you actually take
into account, there's screwy metrics. It's actually closer to one
hundred and fifty trillion dollars. Thirty one trillion is bad enough,
but one hundred and fifty one trillion is an absurd number,
beyond anything any country could ever pay back.

Speaker 3 (02:02:18):
Yeah, they got a lot of entitement programs that they're
on the hook for and no way to really pay
for it. So one of the things that they want
to do is to keep inflation numbers down. If they
don't keep actual inflation down, they keep the inflation numbers down.
One of the things that people have been talking about
is how electricity rates are skyrocketing. NPR had an article

(02:02:43):
attacking Florida because they don't like DeSantis and talking about
how electricity rates in many areas had doubled, and they
were saying, well, it's because of AI and it's you know,
we've got to build the power plants.

Speaker 2 (02:02:57):
We have an AI gap.

Speaker 3 (02:02:58):
That's right, And the same type of thing we've seen
them do over and over again with sports stadiums. Everybody
else gets the bill, so it can build the infrastructure
for these billionaires and their schemes that are out there.
But I looked at it and I thought, you know,
when they talk about inflation and we see electricity rates
going up by fifty percent, by one hundred percent in

(02:03:19):
different areas, how does that calculate into the federal government's
calculation of inflation. Well, we know that the way they
calculate inflation has been rigged for the longest time. So
I looked it up and it turns out that they
weight electricity rates are only given a weight of three percent,
so they don't really calculate electricity costs, just like they

(02:03:41):
don't look at things like insurance costs or even taxes
to give them very much weight. So that's one of
the ways that they rig the inflation numbers. They'll even
go in and when they're talking about computers, they'll say, well,
this year's Apple computers the same price as last year's
Apple computer, but this year it's twenty percent faster, So
that means that it's effectively twenty percent cheaper. So they

(02:04:03):
use things like that to deflate inflation, and that's important
because when you look at their unfunded liabilities like Social Security,
that keeps them from keeping up with inflation on these
entitlement programs, and that saves them a lot of money.

Speaker 4 (02:04:17):
I got into an argument with some guy on Facebook.
This is years ago at this point, but we were
talking about inflation. He's like, well, actually, inflation isn't that high.
It's like, let me guess you're about to use their
screwy metrics. You're about to tell me that. Actually it's
key to the use very specific things. So what you're
talking about is inflation. We know what we're talking about,
just because they have specifically made it so the term
means something very very specific that benefits them. Don't pretend

(02:04:40):
you don't know what I mean. The cost of milk
has gone up, the cost of eggs have gone up.
Everything that it takes to actually live your life has
gone up. People aren't buying a new gaming laptop every
single year if they you know, let's all just buy
a new laptop every year and get rich that way, right,
that's how this works.

Speaker 3 (02:04:58):
Well, it's just like the labors toatistics. And Trump fired
that woman, and of course she had manipulated the statistics
as they all do. She manipulated them to favor Biden
and to make them look good. She had the second
highest adjustment. It was over eight hundred thousand jobs that
she said existed. That the next quarter she said, oh,
it made a mistake. I've got to derate that so

(02:05:20):
that she could create a upward trend. They always wanted
to be upward into the right, and they'll manipulate the
data and they do it every single quarter. Her crime
was that she didn't manipulate it in order to favor
Trump sufficiently. And that's what he fired her for. And
everybody's wringing their hands and saying, we can't count on
the US government figures anymore. That you never could count

(02:05:42):
on them. They were always garbage.

Speaker 4 (02:05:44):
We've got a comment and a tip from Marky. Mark here,
he says, I'll thank you for the tip. First. So,
the thing with the CPI is that the items comparing
its basket of goods and services can and does change.

Speaker 3 (02:05:55):
Yeah. Yeah, And it is a basket case of statistics.
It really is. Everything that comes out of Washington is
a deception and a lie. This is one thing that's
good though. And Trump has purged two hundred and seventy
five thousand illegal aliens from Social Security. They should never
have been getting Social Security in the first place. This

(02:06:17):
is a cloud and Piven on steroids. Here an entitlement
program for people who never paid into it in previous years.
You pay into your entire life about fifteen percent of
your earnings, and there's no deductions on that at all.
But then they find some way to claw that back
at the end. And Trump is now telling the seniors,

(02:06:37):
don't worry, I'm going to give you a six thousand
dollars deduction on your Social Security and it's like, that's
not really going to help anybody. They're still going to
tax the bulk of your Social Security that's coming in.
They're just going to give you a little bit of
an exemption for it. And it's all smoking mirrors, it's
all deceptions.

Speaker 4 (02:06:55):
Social Security is the largest Ponzi scheme ever enacted. It's funny.
You would always talk about how, you know, I don't
think i'll ever get Social Security. I don't think it'll last. Yeah,
And I remember people would say, oh, don't be so pessimistic.
But now that's the common consensus in my generation is
just so security is gone. We're never going to see it. Basically,

(02:07:16):
everyone my generation has that feeling, and as far as
I can tell, everyone in the following generations do as well.
That's one thing where people have caught on to, oh, yeah,
it's evaporating, it's not going to last.

Speaker 3 (02:07:28):
That's right. It was always been in a Ponzi scheme
from the very beginning. There's never been ever a situation
where you know that they they have the illusion of it.
They say, you know, give us your information, we'll tell
you know how much you are going to draw based
on what you paid in so far to give you
the illusion that there's an account there with the name

(02:07:48):
Travis Knight, and they put this stuff aside. But it's
never been there. It's always just been money that the
current people who are working have to pay into it.
And that's why it's.

Speaker 4 (02:07:59):
Upon your money's in raytheons missiles.

Speaker 3 (02:08:03):
Yeah, that's right. So you know, if it was a
private skin, this is the thing I think is important,
and they won't do it if you had, if you
had a way to let people voluntarily opt out of
it or to transition out of it. You got a
lot of people who are relying on it because they've
been taxed fifteen percent of their income all their life,

(02:08:24):
and they didn't have the money to set aside and
a private fund or something like that. But allow people
to do that even if it was something that was
did not perform as well to keep up with inflation,
it would still be your money, and it would still
be an account of yours and you could still pass
that on to your family if you did not exhaust

(02:08:47):
it before you died. So it is truly amazing when
we're looking at this again, electricity prices climbing more than
twice as fast as inflation, and yet they're only weighted
at three percent in the CPI index. That's the kind
of games that they play. The power hungry AI data
centers are one factor driving high prices, and so we

(02:09:09):
went immediately from the green grift and the net zero
making those demands or we're all going to die. We
went immediately from that too. Now we've got to build
power as quickly as we can because we don't have
enough power to spy on you and to control your life.
And so that's where we are right now, and it's

(02:09:30):
because we've got a gap. That's the thing that they
keep saying, We've got an AI gap. This here, well,
Texas is preparing to they say, we're going to cut
off power to data centers during grid emergencies. All my life,
we never had great emergencies until they started shutting down
coal power plants.

Speaker 4 (02:09:46):
I don't remember these happening even when I was a kid. Brownouts.

Speaker 3 (02:09:50):
No, no, I didn't have that at all. And I
grew up in Florida. You know, they're saying in this
article on NPR, they're talking about people who are saying, oh,
we can't live here without air conditioning, and people have
been conditioned to live with ac.

Speaker 4 (02:10:06):
As soon Obama's going to be making the rounds now
all of you can't have air conditioning.

Speaker 16 (02:10:10):
That's why it's gonna melt down the planet. That's right, Hey,
I need the air conditioning. Yeah, but we've been conditioned
to live with it now. And so they had people
complaining saying, you know, they they shut down and we
can't afford it and all the rest of stuff. You know,
we didn't have air conditioning in our schools untilt.

Speaker 4 (02:10:26):
I was in high school, so it really was just
a torture session I met.

Speaker 3 (02:10:30):
That's one of the reasons why I hate that so much. Yeah.

Speaker 12 (02:10:32):
You know a lot of people have moved to places
like Arizona and Texas that wouldn't have if they weren't
relying on their being air conditioning there when they got there,
and now they're kind of stuck if the grid isn't
going to support that.

Speaker 4 (02:10:48):
It really goes to show just how tough the people
used to be in America. Someone got to Texas in
the middle of summer, no air conditioning didn't exist, and thought, yeah,
this is the spot. Uh huh, this is where I'm
going to live. Just what kind of mad man does that?

Speaker 3 (02:11:03):
Yeah, well that was the way it was in Tampa.
I tell you, I was in elementary school and we
had the windows open, and I remember the gnats just
flying around this all the time, always getting pink eye.
That's why I want to look at this stuff about
Oh look, I got some farm workers who got pink eye.
And it's like, yeah, tough enough, you know. I remember
I'm not as a kid, it wasn't a big deal.
Trump tariffs. A grocery shopper's guide, Well, it looks like

(02:11:25):
things like olive oil and chocolate and a lot of
other things like that are going to go up in price.
Because Trump has decided that he's going to arbitrarily liberate
us from these unnecessary things. Liberation Day tariffs kicked in
worldwide in early August, and that's why it's truly amazing
for me to keep seeing the maga press saying, look

(02:11:46):
at that we've had tariffs and it hasn't kicked off inflation,
and it hasn't raised prices all the rest of the stuff.
It's like they only kicked in most of them two
weeks ago, so uh, just stay tuned.

Speaker 4 (02:11:57):
Well, it didn't happen instantaneously.

Speaker 3 (02:12:00):
Yeah, wholesale prices serged zero point nine percent last month,
and that was July, when we didn't have most of
these tariffs. The biggest monthly jump. However, since June of
twenty twenty two. Coffee was already up before a fifty
percent tariff on Brazil, the top coffee imported to the
US went into effect last week. And why do we

(02:12:20):
put a tariff on Brazil? Is it because we don't
want them selling this coffee? Or is it because of politics?
It's because of politics. Is because of Bolsonnaro and the
fact that they're going after Trump's friend. Whenever I would
put that Whenever I'd say Bolsonnaro, the transcription program would
always say bows and arrows. I don't know if I'll

(02:12:42):
pick this one up or not, but the teriffs against
Brazil are strictly political. Question is what is he doing
with Switzerland? Why is he doing it there? Again? Switzerland
and chocolate, but also with coffee espressopods are entirely produced

(02:13:02):
in Switzerland, and now Switzerland is getting a forty percent tariff.
We essentially had zero percent tariffs on most things that
we were sung to them. We had a trade surplus
with Switzerland, and then we now hit them with punitive
tariffs of like forty percent. And you might say, okay,

(02:13:24):
so we don't get chocolate and we don't get watches
and things like that. However, they're not going to be
buying the thirty five jets that they look like they're
going to have, So it's actually going to now create
even with a higher tariffs, it's going to create and
even if we buy less of what we're getting from them,
is going to create a trade imbalance with It's because

(02:13:47):
of Trump's terraffs. This is all put together by the
guy who can't do arithmetic, Peter nouro So.

Speaker 4 (02:13:54):
I wonder if he has some grudge against the Swiss personally.

Speaker 3 (02:13:57):
Yeah, who knows. Olive oil another one that's going to
be going up and uptake an import costs could take
at least three to four months to reflect on the
grocery shelves because the retailers and distributors require sixty to
ninety days notice for any kind of a change. So
again all of this stuff. People want to say that

(02:14:17):
economics no longer apply in the Trump era, and these
are people who are suffering from Trump delusional syndrome. These
things are going to kick in. It's just going to
take a while right now for the short term, as
they were waiting to see what the tariffs really going
to be so they can make decisions for the time being.
Had Japanese automobile manufacturers just started eating the tariffs as

(02:14:41):
an additional expense, but they're losing twenty million dollars a day.
They can't keep that up. So the prices of these
things are going to have to go up. Even for
the big companies like Toyota, those prices are going to
have to go up. And so the prices and a
lot of these things are just delayed, but they're going
to be showing up on the grocery shore shelves. And
it's going to be a replay in many ways of

(02:15:02):
what Trump did in twenty twenty when he created all
kinds of supply chain issues of food. We had food
riding on the farm and because they couldn't put it
out in the right format, because he'd closed down the
closed down places where people work.

Speaker 4 (02:15:19):
And of course the big companies can't afford to eat
the tariffs at least for a while, and they can
afford to eat them long enough that small companies potentially
go out of business. Small companies are very rapidly going
to have to raise their prices. They operate on much
smaller margins. They don't have the capital bank to be
able to sit there and wait it out. This allows
them to starve their smaller competitors as well. Look, see

(02:15:42):
our prices are still low, and then you know Walmart
can keep their prices lower for longer and your local
market can't. Yeah, they're going to have to immediately whatever
it is that they're importing, it's going to have to
go up quickly.

Speaker 3 (02:15:55):
So there's been a lot of damage course from the
delays and the indecision and everything. But we're going to
see this with Swiss cheese and Swiss chocolate, and we're
gonna see it with imports of fruit and vegetables from Mexico.

Speaker 4 (02:16:06):
When I was having it, I just understood it. Trump
he got Swiss cheese, Like they scam me. There's holes
in my cheese. I bade a full price, but I
got half a block of cheese. There's holes in it.
Tariff them, Teriff them now.

Speaker 3 (02:16:16):
Yeah, that's yeah, it's about kidding even well. Misa says,
the last thing we need right now is a FED
rate cut because it's going to be inflationary. Trump is
pursuing that for his own narrowly defined interests because that's
going to take down the government expenses. Right now, the

(02:16:37):
interest on the debt has become a big budget item
for the federal government, and so he's very sensitive to that.
But taking down the FED interest rates is not going
to help people, even on home mortgages. And that's not
an economic theory. We've seen that demonstrated as fact. We've
seen now several times that the FED has cut interest rates,

(02:16:57):
and yet the marketplace is when you're looking at longer
term interest rates like home loans, and so the market
where people are lending the money, they're looking at it
and saying, well, if inflation is going up, I need
to make sure that the interest rate is higher so
that I don't lose so much money on this loan.
So it is not going to be He's not worried

(02:17:18):
about doing what is in the best interest of the country.
On Thursday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released a new
report showing that producer prices jumped in July, the largest
month over month increase since March of twenty twenty two,
the seventh largest increase in more than fifteen years. Price

(02:17:38):
inflation is headed upward and not back to the two
percent goal. That's another reason why you need to get
your money parked in something other than other than cash
in the bank, because that is rapidly losing value. That's
why people have moved over to gold and silver again.
If you go to David Night, dye gold take it,

(02:18:00):
Tony Ortuman, we've got I don't know the stream deck
has gone out here. I don't know why that has happened.
But I can't take us out, so lace, can you
take us out to? Uh? Some music? Here. We'll be
right back, folks.

Speaker 2 (02:18:50):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 17 (02:19:21):
Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression,
in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so
abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here
is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize

(02:19:47):
the sale of tea in our country.

Speaker 2 (02:19:50):
Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move.

(02:20:45):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (02:20:53):
Welcome back, folks. We've got a lot of comments built up.
Milent and Milankovic says AI can be useful. Used it
to calculate the value of the land, and in Gaza
said trillions of US dollars according to the price per
square foot of tel Aviv. Well, it might be overvaluing
tel Aviv. You know, it is the gayest city on earth,
and they might put a high priority.

Speaker 3 (02:21:11):
Question is I guess that is undeveloped plan because they've
been working very hard to undevelop it.

Speaker 4 (02:21:17):
Right, what's the cost in removing all the rubble they've created? Yeah?
Bulldag Everyone wants to be your damn nanny. I don't.
I don't want to be your nanny. I have a
hard enough time with our one son, So you're on
your own from me. Solo Cat nineteen eighty. David's voice
bears to have made a lot of improvement over just

(02:21:38):
two weeks. Yeah, it's getting better and better.

Speaker 3 (02:21:39):
Yeah. I still has some issues with it though, And
you know, when I talked for a long time, I
start to talk quickly. That's when the issues kick in.
But yeah, just in the last week or so, there
was a big improvement in my tongue. Not one hundred percent,
but a big improvement. So thank you all for praying.
Appreciate that, Yes, we really do.

Speaker 4 (02:21:57):
Thank you. Nights of the Storm. How come nobody is
talking about the Clarity Act. The Clarity Act gives teeth
to the Genius Act. Clarity Act gives the government control
over all crypto that was private before.

Speaker 3 (02:22:09):
Yeah, I need to well, I guess you covered that
on Nights of the Storm. I have not covered it.
As a matter of fact, I don't recall seeing that,
so I'll have to look into that. Thank you, Jason.
Let me know they do.

Speaker 4 (02:22:19):
Great research at Nights of the Storm. You should all
go check them out. Nights of the Storm dot Com
high Boost. I was at Harbor Freight over the weekend
and cashier has worked there forever. I asked them how
much cash is still being used. He said fifty to fifty.
Cash is the key to defeating digital currency.

Speaker 3 (02:22:35):
Yeah, that's right. It's anonymous, it's private. One of the
reasons that Katherine Austin Fitz says, you know, try to
you know, pick one day a week, like maybe Friday,
and just make it all your purchases in cash, and
to keep it alive because if they if people don't
use cash, it's really easy to convince some merchants that
they shouldn't be dealing with it. You know, the banks

(02:22:57):
can put kinds of obstacles in cash. They can charge
the stores for handling the cash and things like that,
so if they don't see customer demand, they'll get rid
of it.

Speaker 4 (02:23:07):
Audi. Mr R. Good to see you, Audi. Hope you're
doing well. They already have this in place. People are
debanked every day for wrong think. Yeah, you've experienced, well,
lost payment processing and all that stuff. Nights of the Storm.
That tax cut will help pay for the rising cost
of goods due to tariffs. If it actually does manage

(02:23:29):
to eve in it out Lutsen Malankovic. Learn a skill
to trade and grow your own food. If you can,
growing your own food is important. It doesn't matter how
much gold or silver anything else you have. If you
are starving to death, you need be able to have
water and food.

Speaker 3 (02:23:45):
Be the real world, the physical world, you know, developing
those relationships, developing as you point out skills, things that
you can do that are real and they are going
to be local. All of that is the most important
thing that you can do.

Speaker 4 (02:23:58):
Chickens are fairly easy to keep. I say that as
someone who doesn't actually do the work with them. Lance
is the one that takes care of the chickens, but
I think he would tell you that they're not super difficult.
The biggest thing is keeping them alive while they're young,
and then keeping predators out of their habitat.

Speaker 3 (02:24:13):
Or if you make sure you don't follow down the
hill dur in the wintertime as.

Speaker 4 (02:24:15):
Well, that too, don't slip and fall down the side
of a hill, otherwise you may break your leg.

Speaker 3 (02:24:23):
Karen turned seventy and immediately she went over the hill.

Speaker 4 (02:24:29):
High boost. Trump raises the prices on all goods via terrace,
but then gives you a tax break on ot to
compensate for it. Hashtag maga winning.

Speaker 3 (02:24:38):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:24:39):
Look, he's jingling the keys to distract the children. Nights
of the storm. The ultimate entitlement program is going to
be UBI and a free pod for being born. It
comes with a geo fence though. That's right, here's your
little pod.

Speaker 3 (02:24:51):
Yeah, and I thought it was very talling. You know
what Elon Musk if you remember his first foray into
politics was back in I remember, let's see, it was
a twenty sixteen was that when Andrew Yang ran Gang? Yeah,
and you know, immediately he gave Andrew Yang a million
dollars And at that point Andrew Yang had one issue

(02:25:14):
and that was universal basic income and he really wondered
to support that. And yeah, it was a twenty sixteen
egg because that's when Bloomberg was running as well. Yeah, yeah,
and Bloomberg came out and talked about that, how we
we got to figure out how with this new fourth turning.
He didn't use those terms, but he got everybody upset
because he insulted the farmers, say anybody can do that.

(02:25:36):
Anybody can work in a factory. Anybody can be a farmer.
But the smart ones of us are figuring out how
we're going to take all of their jobs and put
them out of work. We just have to find out
how we keep them from coming after us with a guillotine.
That was his words, and I just thought it was
amazing how the press seized on that. Said, look, he's
insulting farmers. It's like he wants to kill us all.

(02:25:57):
He wants to put us all on universal base game. Come,
don't you get it?

Speaker 12 (02:26:02):
Kind Just a few years ago, they're saying, forget farming,
learn to code.

Speaker 3 (02:26:07):
Yeah, that's right, forget coding, learned to farm.

Speaker 4 (02:26:12):
Knights of the Storm says, people used to build houses
with high ceilings, and they knew how to cool with
convection cooling. We could do without a c if we
built houses proper. A high ceiling really does help getting
that warm air.

Speaker 3 (02:26:25):
We did that deliberately to the house that we had
in North Carolina. Karen and I used to we moved
to North Carolina. Would love to take history tours, go
up to Virginia and stuff like that. We're going to
these old houses in the middle of summer and as
you point out, it was much cooler there. So when
we custom built a house more than thirty years ago,
we did that. We had high ceilings. We had twelve

(02:26:48):
foot ceilings on the first floor and we had ten
foot ceilings on the second floor. We had big casement windows,
and we had an area at the top that we
could open up the windows up there. And if we
did that with just natural convection, we can get a
tremendous breeze about even using a ceiling fan coming into
the lower floors, it would just sweep the air in
and up. It was amazing. And yeah, you can do

(02:27:11):
things like that that are passive.

Speaker 4 (02:27:13):
You don't get to do that kind of thing anymore though.
The average person doesn't get to design their own home.
They don't get to get involved or any part of
the building.

Speaker 3 (02:27:21):
You're just there.

Speaker 4 (02:27:22):
You pick whichever you prefab house in a neighborhood and
that's about it.

Speaker 3 (02:27:26):
Well, when I was going up in the seventies, after they
got air conditioning and Tampa open, I was going up
in Florida, they started making the houses without windows and
with low ceilings all that kind of stuff, which exacerbated
it made it easier to have a smaller volume. It
made easier for the air conditioning to handle it. But
if the air conditioning went out, there was no ventilation whatsoever.

Speaker 4 (02:27:47):
You were just in an oven at that point. Yeah,
we're just getting convection cooked, high Boost says David. There's
a fentanyl crisis at the Canadian border. That's why there's
a tariff on Brazil. It all makes sense. Finally, Well,
I thank you Hi Boost for putting those pieces together.
Before we move on, though, we have to remind you
we have a newish sponsor. It is Homestead Products Dot Shop.

(02:28:11):
They've got a lot of different products and they're all
very high quality, made in America. You've got stuff like
this freeze dried BlackBerry puree. They've got all kinds of
different freeze dried foods that you can look at see
if there's something you want to store, or see if
they're just something you want to incorporate into your daily
life when it comes to eating.

Speaker 3 (02:28:28):
Yes, I really like the storable stuff because when we
look at a lot of the storable foods and they're
just filled with carbs and things like that, these are
really healthy things, you know, high protein or things like
like you know this particular one. They have beats, they're
freeze dried and things like that.

Speaker 4 (02:28:46):
I wanted to plug this because I'm probably gonna tear
into this soon. Try it out and see if our
son likes a little bit of freeze dried BlackBerry pure
because he's in that stage where he loves sort of
starting to get to it where he loves berries. So
I can't wait to see him covered in red stuff.
So go check out Homestead Products dot shop with promo
code night. You get ten percent off. They don't just

(02:29:07):
have freeze dried storable foods. They've got all kinds of
different things. They've got pepper spray, they've got soap and
different things, deodorant, facial scrubs. It is amazing the sheer
number of products that they have. You may be able
to utilize something for yourself. It may improve your life.
So please go check out Homestead Products dot shop and

(02:29:29):
use promo code night for ten percent off. They're good company.

Speaker 3 (02:29:34):
Yeah, he's one of us. Appreciate their support a lot
of us. And he's producing clean, storable food. That's a
very important thing to have that and we need to
support people who are doing that type of thing. So
we have access to them in the future as well. Yeah, well,
let's talk a little bit. We didn't talk much about
this guy that was an Israeli official charged with sex

(02:29:55):
crimes and Nevada and then give them a free ticket
back to Israel. Now, the Trump administration, after there was
a lot of talk about that, Trump administration said we
didn't help him. I wonder how he got back then
it's a mystery. Yeah, we don't know have any idea
how that happened. If you look at the police there
in Vegas, they were the ones who ran the sting.
He was arrested as part of that, and they put

(02:30:16):
his name out as part of a press release. I
wonder then who sent him back. Did they suddenly have
a change of heart, And why would they have a
change of heart if the federal government didn't have anything
to do with this.

Speaker 4 (02:30:31):
Well, I think we all know that Israel perhaps is
a little bit of undue influence when it comes to
our own politics. I think we might have a sneaking
suspicion that someone here is lying. Israel also has a
huge issue with sex offenders relocating there with their right
of return. They get into some trouble wherever they are

(02:30:52):
and they just decide, you know what, tel Aviv seems
nice this time of year.

Speaker 3 (02:30:56):
Any kind of a crime they can go. If it's
a white collar and doesn't with crime.

Speaker 4 (02:30:59):
They can look at the Sackler family after what they
did at the opioid crisis and absconding.

Speaker 3 (02:31:04):
Yeah, it's a well TV is the proof that they
had nothing to do with it was that they said
that he had no diplomatic community and he was released
by a state judge penning a court date. Any claims
that the US government intervened or false, I'm sure that
nobody at the State Department got on the phone for
this guy who was very heavily tied into the Netanyahu government.

(02:31:28):
You know, there's an interesting article that was.

Speaker 12 (02:31:30):
On any claims that he was any pressure from the
government was put on there. Ridiculous judges just let pedophiles
go all the time. He was a big pedophile fan.

Speaker 3 (02:31:41):
This judge.

Speaker 12 (02:31:41):
You didn't think that he was one of those people
that things that should be legalized.

Speaker 3 (02:31:45):
There were eight of them that were arrested. He was
the only one who was released. I wonder why that
is no word from the state judge or the State
Department as to why that was.

Speaker 4 (02:31:54):
I won't to know if anyone happened to see Alan
Dershowitz skulking around the judge's office or something like that.

Speaker 3 (02:32:00):
I know, well, Craig Sawyer. Do you remember Craig Sawyer.
He was a Navy seal and he yeah, saw Man
and he was on with Arlee Ermey who had a
cable show. He was on many, many times, and I
interviewed him several times. Craig Sawyer is a good guy.
He's talking about how large a problem sex trafficking is

(02:32:21):
in the United States, and he after he got out
of the Navy Seals, he did a short stint in
law enforcement. He saw some of the stuff. And so
he is part of an organization that is essentially luring
these child fenders like this guy and this Israeli guy

(02:32:43):
in Vegas. He lures them in. He said around twenty fifteen,
a friend from the intelligence community told him that Houston
had become an epicenter for child sex trafficking. I wonder
that guy would know. It's like, well, why don't you
guys do something about it? But the guy he didn't
want to. They said you should do something about it.
So what he tried to do was he He said,

(02:33:04):
because he'd been on with Arley Ermie and others, you know,
doing that, he knew the power of doing documentary. So
he decided he'd do a documentary. But he couldn't find
anybody that would help him to fund it. They all
just ran away from it. And so as one of
the things that they did, they ran a particular ad.
They put a fake ad for a twelve year old
girl on Craigslist in Guilford, Connecticut, and he said they

(02:33:28):
were amazed to find that they got five thousand different
predators responded to that ad trying to get that child.
He said it repulsed us, but showed the level of
pervasiveness of these predators are everywhere. He said, they're in
the nice areas, they're in the bad areas, and they're
in the areas that are everywhere in between. And so

(02:33:50):
he said there was a particular app that did that.
They were able to arrest Mormon church elder who had
targeted two children in addition to an illegal immigrant, a
high level cartel member, and a trafficker. And now the
app has been taken down, But he said the worst
thing that they do is some of these people get
in and they take over. With some of these apps,

(02:34:13):
they get still images and videos of a child and
then use that to try to blackmail the child. And
they said, and to get them to do things. Are
they're going to expose this? I said, I've had many
children who've committed suicide of that. It's just amazing when
you look at this, it's amazing how connected the Trump

(02:34:36):
administration is to all this stuff, as well as the
Clinton sides and all the rest of the stuff.

Speaker 4 (02:34:43):
Now, you don't understand, he's down in the tunnels right
now fighting the pedophiles hand in hand.

Speaker 3 (02:34:48):
We heard that for the longest time, didn't we.

Speaker 4 (02:34:49):
Trust the plan?

Speaker 2 (02:34:50):
Guys?

Speaker 4 (02:34:51):
A Q storm is coming.

Speaker 3 (02:34:53):
Oh yeah. More than two dozen people linked to Epstein
have now died under mysterious circuit cumstances. Financier Steven Hoffenberg
confessed in a final account before his death to The
Inquirer's Doug Montero that Epstein and Glene Maxwell, the convicted
photopials imprisoned Madam, were taping honey trap videos of sleazy

(02:35:17):
VIPs with underage girls for a cabal of deep state
blackmailing power brokers. Yeah, but of course we were told
that the Intel agencies had nothing to do with any
of this stuff. As a matter of fact, others at
point at Hoffenberg spoke out about his former protege's alleged
connections to Israel's National Intelligence Agency MASSADE. But we were

(02:35:41):
told by Mark Levin that's a blood libel to say
that Massade is.

Speaker 4 (02:35:45):
Involved in doing something. Now, they would never do something
like that.

Speaker 3 (02:35:48):
Yeah. Yeah, So it's twenty two people that have died
under various circumstances. I guess Thomas Massey ought to watch
his back because he's involved in and trying to bring
some of this to light. He has announced that he's
going to do a press conference September third. He's going
to be working with Roeue Kahanna and they're going to

(02:36:11):
bring survivors of abuse by Epstein and Maxwell to the
US Capital to highlight the urgent need for transparency and accountability.
And most of the stuff could be exposed just by
looking at the financial records, but they're hiding all of
that information, and so he's going to you know, Mike
Johnson shut down Congress early, taking off the entire month

(02:36:34):
of August because they didn't want to have any more
exposure of this stuff about Epstein. So now they're going
to do a press conference about this, and of course
I've played this for you, Mike Johnson talking about Thomas Massey.

Speaker 18 (02:36:49):
So here's the So, as a leader of my party,
I lead the incumbent protection program. That's my job. I
go all around the country. I travel endlessly, incessantly. I
have to raise over three hundred more dollars to do that.
And we want everybody to come back and and and
some people I try to protect them, even if the pedophiles, Yeah,
they kick and scream and bite. Some people seem to

(02:37:11):
enjoy in trying to inflict political pain on their own teammates.
I'm not going to address anybody individually, but I'll tell
you that that some here are much more frustrated than others.
There's a small, small, tiny handfulful, but one in particular
who's given me lots of consternation.

Speaker 2 (02:37:27):
I don't understand.

Speaker 18 (02:37:27):
I don't understand Thomas Massey's motivation. I really don't. I
don't know how his mind works. I don't know what he's.

Speaker 3 (02:37:32):
Yeah, he's just a show for he could have brought.

Speaker 4 (02:37:34):
Doesn't understand at all.

Speaker 18 (02:37:36):
Last and a half years, over the last four years
of bide administration. He could have done that at any time,
and now he's clamoring as if there's some sort of
timeline on it. It's interesting to me that he chose
the election of President Trump to bring this, to team
up with the Democrats and bring this discharge petition. So
do I have some concern about that?

Speaker 3 (02:37:53):
Could be because Trump promised to release this information and
then lie about that it's not existing.

Speaker 18 (02:37:57):
Never speak evil of another Republican, My god, it's hard
to do sometimes right here. Also, try to follow the scripture.
You know, it says, bless those who persecute you. So
let me just say about Thomas Massey. Could you just
accept my southern bless his heart? Okay, I don't know
what else to say about it. We're for maximum transparency,
we're engaging in that right now, and we don't need
political games.

Speaker 3 (02:38:18):
What a sleez back that guy is. It reminds me
of a former GOP speaker, Dennis Hastert, who was a
pedophile himself, Thank you, was selected for Congress with that purpose,
longest serving GOP speaker, and of course you would always
hear from him when there were Republicans who got caught
as pedophiles who would always say it's all about politics.

(02:38:41):
It's just Democrats are just making this stuff up. He
would go on with Rush Limbaugh and they would poop
poo all that stuff and say it was just part
of some politics. The GOP now stands for guarding old pedophiles.
That's what it really stands for right now. Massey's push
for transparency, says Life Site News, has put him at
odds with most of his fellow Republican members of Congress

(02:39:03):
and with Trump, who's repeatedly taken the social media to
denounce him. Well, there you go. He's the worst Republican
congressman because he should cover up pedophile crimes in order
to support President Trump. So I have to ask somebody
who is a professing Christian like Thomas Massey, whose side
are you on the pedophiles or the people who are

(02:39:27):
trying to stop the pedophiles and expose the pedophiles.

Speaker 4 (02:39:30):
Mike Thomas Massey, Oh yeah, Mike Johnson.

Speaker 3 (02:39:33):
Sorry, It truly is amazing that Mike Johnson would take
that kind of attack. You want to wrap yourself in
in the Bible. What would you do with the pedophiles?
You take him outside the camp and stone them. I
think that's instead of supporting them. On Thursday, Trump ampped

(02:39:55):
up his criticism of Massey publishing a polling report. And again,
this one of these deals, like the pharmaceutical studies. You
can get a poll to save whatever you want. But
I would imagine that with all the criticism that Massey
is taking from all the bots on social media that
support Trump, and the bots and the Trump media as
well as these Republicans, I imagine he has taken a hit.

(02:40:17):
They claim that he has gone from positive eleven points
in terms of approval rating to a negative sixteen. That's huge,
and so that may be a pole that they have rigged.
But it's likely that the massive amount of money that
Trump has put in there to attack anybody who attacks

(02:40:37):
him for covering up for Epstein is truly amazing. It's
another sign I think of just how bad this is,
and how bad MAGA is, because they're the ones who
essentially are making excuses for this. Yeah. I get this
upset with people like not Time, so I keep saying that,
But I get us upset with Mike Johnson and with

(02:40:59):
the MAGA people, as I do with the pedophiles like
Trump and Epstein because they're covering up for it, their accessories.

Speaker 4 (02:41:05):
They're giving them cover. They just let them do whatever
they want. No, you don't understand, he's our guy. He's
doing he's saying some of the right things, so he
gets to do and say whatever else he wants, just
as long as he continues to pander.

Speaker 3 (02:41:17):
And never speak evil of another Republican even if they
are a pedophile or covering up for a pedophile.

Speaker 4 (02:41:23):
That Dennister, Yeah, yeah, that's right.

Speaker 3 (02:41:25):
And you know that was the thing. I've said this before.
But the thing about Dennis Hastard, after everybody found out
that he's a pedophile, they never came after him because
the Statute of limitations. What they did was they put
him in jail for structured withdrawals of his money from
the bank without filing the appropriate trying to avoid the
reports and trying to avoid attention. But even in the

(02:41:48):
sentencing the judge referenced that. But the bottom line is
that Congress could have changed that. Nobody did. Nobody changing
any state laws, nobody changed any federal laws. Everybody has
got the statute of limitations that is incredibly short in
order to protect these people because they know that children
are not going to be able to come to terms

(02:42:09):
with this in three years. And so they're all complicit
in this, both parties, especially the Republicans.

Speaker 4 (02:42:16):
We started arresting pedophiles in Washington, d C. It's a
dangerous precedent. A lot of people would be very uncomfortable
with that. I've got a comment here from Audi mrr.
His government runs child trafficking. That's why it's a multi
billion dollar black market. And cops, judges, politicians, FBI, and
CIA are all complicit.

Speaker 3 (02:42:34):
Yeah, that's right. And a big part of that is
CPS and trying to remember the house.

Speaker 4 (02:42:43):
What's that Dwight Howard, I believe, Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:42:45):
And yeah, his first name is Dwight. And you know,
he was an innocent person who was targeted by CPS
and he thought it was just one bad person there.
As he started defending himself, he realized that it was pervasive.
That's a multi billion dollar industry across this country. If
you want to look at child trafficking networks again, start

(02:43:09):
looking at your own government and what they're doing to people.
And Dwight Mitchell, Dwight Mitchell, that's it. Yeah, and stop CPS.
Was it trafficking children? I think it was as well.

Speaker 4 (02:43:20):
Stop cps legally kidnapping children kidnapping.

Speaker 3 (02:43:24):
Yeah, and he has some very very sage advice from
somebody who has been there. You know, don't let these
people into your house. Don't expect just because you're innocent.
I'll let them come in. I'll talk to them and
show them that I'm innocent.

Speaker 4 (02:43:37):
It's their entire job to manufacture things against you.

Speaker 3 (02:43:41):
That's right, that's right, So be wise about that.

Speaker 4 (02:43:43):
It's very important if they come back with a warrant
you and the police it is. You know, don't don't
try to borrow the police from coming into your home.
That's how things get really bad. But make them get
a warrant, force them to follow the lot. Don't just
think because you're innocent, that's a fence. The government doesn't care.

Speaker 3 (02:44:02):
Well, you know why we're talking about the child trafficking
and molestation. I think, of course child porn is a
big part of that. That's what they got that is
really connected. Guy on this was one person who wrote
an op ed piece said porn is undermining every ministry
in the church. He says, recovery expert who is helping

(02:44:23):
Christians overcome addiction This is a guy who works for
an organization. You may have heard of this. It's called
Covenant Eyes, and it's something that you can get on
your devices. Especially should have it if you have children,
but a lot of people will use this as adults
with an accountability partner and so software. This is a

(02:44:44):
guy who is now the director of education for Covenant Eyes.
His name is Sam Blackie. Warrened that pornography is quietly
eroding the spiritual help of congregations worldwide and undermining every
ministry in the local church, from children's programs to marriage counseling.
It's pervasive and it's getting worse and worse. He said.

(02:45:08):
What they do with their software is it's accountability software.
And so what it does, I think is that it sends, ah,
you've got a partner who is going to get information
about what you're looking at. So makes sense because it's
easier to understand that there's a person who's going to
be seeing this rather than to understand that God is

(02:45:29):
going to be seeing it. That we can kind of
put that out of our mind. Equips churches to become
places of restoration rather than of silence because people are
embarrassed to talk about this unless you're somebody like Milan Trump.
She's very proud of the pornography that she's done. But
even though everyone is involved in this, pretty much everybody

(02:45:50):
is afraid to talk about it. He said. This whole
thing is not another purity sermon. He said, it is
a primer for church leaders on pornography strongholds, why they
can't look the other way, and how to be a
safe place with safe processes, where it's okay for people
to come as they are and not stay as they are.
That's one of the things in churches people have been given.

(02:46:13):
In many cases because pastors are trying to help them
to live a better life. What they do is they
wind up in the process, perhaps making an impossible standard
of purity for them, which actually has just the opposite effect.
They're afraid to talk to people, They're afraid to confess
their feelings and their sins. In his most recent book,

(02:46:34):
The Healing Church, Where Churches Get Wrong about pornography and
How to Fix It, It draws from more than seventy
interviews of pastors, counselors, mystry leaders, and people who have
walked through recovery. This is the kind of addiction and
he treats it as such. He said it offers what
he calls a practical blueprint for people want to confront

(02:46:55):
the problem and to help guide people towards long term freedom.
The first installment of his three art series of explores
his personal journey and the roots of pornography addiction. Before
joining Covenant Eyes in two thousand and seven, he spent
eighteen years as a journalist and researching copics that are difficult,

(02:47:16):
asking hard questions and things like that. In his role
at Covenant Eyes, he has edited seventeen books on the
impact of pornography. He authored The Porn Circuit, a resource
reviewing the neurological impact of pornography. Has become a frequent
speaker men's and leadership events nationwide. He's been married for
thirty years, the father of two adult children, and he

(02:47:39):
said the first obstacle to addressing pornography in the church
is to acknowledge the scope of the issue. Research shows
that two thirds of men one third of women who
attend church regularly say they struggle with it, yet only
seven percent of churches provide specific resources or structured support
for those who do. I've had Jeff weiss On and

(02:48:01):
he has a mystery called free Indeed, he helps people
who with addiction, and of course it's just another form
of addiction. Porn isn't what it used to be, he says.
Of course, we all know that it's far more accessible,
more extreme, and more violent. It's reshaping how people think
about sexual relationships and even the value of another human being.

(02:48:22):
Exposure to violent porn is increasingly common with teenagers. Fifty
teenagers have encountered content involving choking, gagging, slapping, or other
aggressive acts. These things make the church at Corinth look
like an Amish dinner. It's pretty amazing. Survey say twenty

(02:48:45):
one percent of youth pastors fourteen percent of pastors admit
to struggling with pornography. Black identifies three common threads early
exposure in childhood, repeated use during adolescence, and an unresolved
wound or the key thing is we have to understand
the power of the mind, and that is where the
battle is. I remember having a discussion with a guest.

(02:49:08):
I won't mention who it was, but you know, he
was saying, oh, you know, you got these sex dolls
that people are making, and they're making them like little children.
He said, well, you know, the right is having a
big issue with that, and I said, well, that is
an issue because what you're doing is you're training your
mind for that type of thing. And he says, but

(02:49:29):
it's a doll, it's not real. And that's a key
part of what's going on with AI. When you look
at X for example, he's got this little anime character
that tries his hardest to be very seductive and engaging
with you. And that's really where the next wave of
this stuff is going to come. People think that, you know,
the pornography that we're getting today is violent, they say,

(02:49:52):
and it is ubiquitous. Well guess what happens when AI
starts flirting with you and doing other things. That takes
it to a whole new level. So very challenging thing,
and people need to understand, you know, even if we
come up with some structures like this, and we should
have structures like this, you have to understand that it
is at its heart, it is a spiritual war and

(02:50:13):
it is a fight for your mind. And that's where
AI is really going to take this to the next level.

Speaker 4 (02:50:18):
I think it's gonna indulge all of your fantasies. Whatever
it is that you are into whatever it is that
you've gotten yourself. Whatever rabbit hole you follow down, it
will immediately indulge it and will push it to the
next level. It give you an infinite feedback loop of depravity.

Speaker 12 (02:50:35):
I mean, look the AI delusion stuff that people have
about perfectly mundane things, where it feeds them exactly what
they want to hear, to the point that it creates
AI psychosis. I feel like adding a sexual element to
that is only going to make things much worse.

Speaker 3 (02:50:55):
That's right. Yeah, anytime you're addicted to anything, anytime something
becomes obsessive, what it does is it pushes God out
of your life. It pushes other people out of your life.
And when you're looking at this pornography stuff, it pushes God.
Pushes your wife out of your life. That's the key thing.
Addictions crowd out God, this guy says. While his wife

(02:51:16):
continued to grow in her faith, often attending church a
loan with her young children, he remained distant from God
and the church. The breakthrough began when his wife invited
him to join a marriage class. The facilitators were not
formal teachers. They began each session by promising confidentiality and
encouraging honest conversation. That's kind of the way that alcoholics

(02:51:37):
anonymous works, Right. They start by getting them to admit
that they've got a drinking problem. Right, that's the key
part of it. And you've got to admit that you
got that problem. That's why we're told to confess our
sins to one another. Right. If you own it, if
you acknowledge it, that's the beginning of doing something about it.
As long as you're denying that you got the problem,

(02:51:58):
you aren't going to fix it. He said, for the
first time he heard pornography described as compulsive and addictive,
and it helped him with his own struggle. He said
it was relief, not only because it not because it
excused my behavior, but because it showed me that I
wasn't broken beyond repair. God hasn't made me this way.
I needed help and help us possible. But the key

(02:52:20):
thing is is that as long as you're alive, you're
never beyond God's repair. God can always repair that. That's
the Christian message, that's the heart of the gospel is
that no matter how many times we fail, God is
the father. In the parable of the prodigal son, he
will always take you back, You'll run to meet you.

Speaker 4 (02:52:42):
Yes, that's so. That's the beautiful thing about the Gospel
is no matter who you are, no matter what you've done,
there is forgiveness for it. And I know a lot
of people have a problem with that. It's like, you
need to tell me this murderer here could be forgiven
for what he's done, this horrible, wicked individual. Absolutely, yes,
We're not the one who gets to decide that. It's

(02:53:03):
God's decision. He is the one.

Speaker 3 (02:53:05):
Yeah, who is he is?

Speaker 4 (02:53:07):
Who he sin against is against him and him alone
that we have sinned.

Speaker 3 (02:53:11):
So David said, yeah, after adultery, after murder, he said,
against you and you alone have I said, those are
two very very serious, the most serious sins that you
can do to your fellow man. And yet he said
it was against you that I have said. And you know,
the idea that somehow Christians aren't going to fall away,

(02:53:31):
you might well look the life of King David or
his son Solomon or whatever. But you know, there's a
lot of stories now about this one man who had
a flirty AI chatbot that lured him to New York
and he died. But it wasn't the chat pot that left.

(02:53:52):
He just he had an accident. When he went he
had had a stroke.

Speaker 4 (02:53:56):
And he was chatbots are now lluring people to dangerous scenarios.

Speaker 3 (02:54:00):
Learning people in dangerous cities anyway. But there's also a
Reuters article that has gone through and found that Zuckerberg
was actually criticizing his managers for not making the AI
chatbots seductive enough. You gotta make them more exciting, you know,
let's get with it.

Speaker 4 (02:54:20):
I think what Zuckerberg finds seductive and attractive?

Speaker 3 (02:54:23):
Yeah, well, it's something called big sis Billy.

Speaker 12 (02:54:26):
Finds ais seductive and attractive. It's really not that surprising
when you look at him.

Speaker 3 (02:54:35):
This is something on Facebook messenger chatbot. It's called big
sis Billy. It has a woman's fake persona. And this
guy lived in New Jersey. He'd had a stroke a
few years ago and it affected his judgment and other things.
And so his name was Thongbu Wang Bundu, and his

(02:54:59):
friends just called him. I mentioned because it was a
little bit too difficult for English speakers to pronounce that name.

Speaker 12 (02:55:05):
But it sounds like the soda person who would.

Speaker 3 (02:55:09):
Be He sounds like he's part of Willie Wanka's factory.
There in New Jersey. But uh fungaboo wang wanga, but
he was he had a stroke. He was in a
diminished mental state from that, and he started getting involved
with this chatbot. And his wife and daughter released the

(02:55:32):
transcripts afterwards, and it truly was amazing to see how
the chat bot was egging him on, lying to him,
encouraging him. Oh, yes, I am real, you know, and
gave him an address of one two three Main Street.
But yeah, he was mentally impaired and sorry for this. Yeah,
he he uh went to New York and he was

(02:55:57):
walking around the city and carrying his rollerbag suitcase, and
he slipped and fell his seventy six slipped and fell
injured his head. They took him to the hospital and
he died after three days from a head injury. Meta
declined to comment on his death or to address questions

(02:56:17):
about why it allows chatbots to tell users that they're
real people or to initiate romantic conversations and they are
doing this with children as well. His family shared with
Reuters the events surrounding his death, including transcripts of his chats,
saying that they hope to warn the public about the
dangers of exposing vulnerable people to manipulative AI generated companions.

(02:56:42):
That Zuckerberg is so interested in doing it.

Speaker 12 (02:56:46):
I guess you could say he fell for an AI chatbot.

Speaker 3 (02:56:50):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it's a slippery slope. Meta has
publicly discussed its strategy to inject anthrow morphical chat bots
into online social lives and billions of users. They said.
Zuckerberg said, over time, we'll find the vocabulary as a
society to be able to articulate why that is valuable. Hopefully,

(02:57:14):
over time we'll find the vocabulary and we don't know
why it is, but we know it is. We'll create
the laws to shut down companies like Zuckerberg's company.

Speaker 12 (02:57:24):
Currently, the words don't exist to explain why this is
a good thing to have these chat thoughts.

Speaker 4 (02:57:30):
I haven't figured out how to sell you guys on
this yet, but don't worry. I'm working on it.

Speaker 3 (02:57:35):
Maybe Zuckerberg can get Nick Quinte's to be a spokesperson
for this. People familiar with the chatbot training show that
the companies that has Meta's policies have treated romantic overtures
as a feature, not a bug. Right it is. This
is what their guidebook that they have metas general AI content.

(02:57:59):
Risks Andrews says this, it is acceptable to engage a
child in conversations that are romantic or sensual. Why are
these people still in business site?

Speaker 4 (02:58:12):
Why does it always come back to.

Speaker 3 (02:58:14):
This when you look at this, is this as bad
or worse than this guy? This Israeli guy in Vegas
who got caught in that stink? This is something's being
done by Zuckerberg and openly doing this is a business model.
Why isn't this something being done to this guy?

Speaker 2 (02:58:31):
You know?

Speaker 3 (02:58:32):
Instead, what they will do is they will let him
continue to operate, and then you'll have people say, well,
now you're going to have to have an ID in
order to get onto the internet so we can track
what you're doing. That's they will create a second problem
rather than address the first one. That's what men in
power and women in power always do.

Speaker 4 (02:58:52):
Well, we are out of time. We've got one minute left.
We want to thank you all for joining us here today, folks,
and real quick as an I'd like to request some
prayer for me and my wife. Yesterday we had to
say goodbye to one of our dogs. He was sixteen
years old and my wife had had him for that
entire time. It's been very difficult for her, so we
just asked that you would pray and give her peace.

(02:59:14):
He was old and it was his time, but that
doesn't make it any easier. So we would really appreciate that.
And I just want to thank you for that as well.

Speaker 3 (02:59:22):
Yeah, they really do become a part of your life,
don't they. Yeah, and so yeah, certainly certainly understand that. Well,
thank you so much for joining us, folks. And again,
the problems that we have in this life are not
going to be solved by politics or by politicians thousands
of miles away from you. They are things that are

(02:59:45):
close to you. Don't try to push them away. Try
to embrace those things with your family, try to create
a family. It is a valuable thing. Thank you for
joining us.

Speaker 4 (02:59:57):
God bless you well, see you tomorrow.

Speaker 3 (03:00:10):
The common man, they created common Core and dumb down
our children. They created common past, track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(03:00:30):
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God.

Speaker 10 (03:00:39):
That is what we have in common.

Speaker 3 (03:00:41):
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want
to hide. Share the information and links you'll find at

(03:01:02):
the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you
for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep
us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2076: NATO’s Endless War Trap for America

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2076: NATO’s Endless War Trap for America

Stuff You Should Know