Tue Episode #2081: Trump Orders Jail for Flag Burning — First Amendment Shredded - The David Knight Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen,
it's Tuesday, the twenty sixth of August. You have our lord,
twenty twenty five. Well, Donald Trump is doing his best
to remake our country and his image, unfortunately, and so

(00:58):
today we're going to begin with some of the novel
and unusual things that he's decided to do. And actually
some of this may cause people to think and examine
and discover. For example, the war that he has now
with this Federal Reserve board of governors trying to move
Cook one of the governors. He's actually right, she did

(01:20):
break the law, but she hasn't been charged. And the
question is who's got jurisdiction here? And she is asserting
that she's independent of all this because the Federal Reserve,
she says, it's private. Isn't that interesting? Who knew? So
discovery may be interesting, and it also brings up questions

(01:40):
about an executive order that Donald Trump wants to have
one year in prison for people who burn the American flag?
What should we do with politicians who burned the American constitution?
Stay with us we'll be right back. Well, Donald Trump

(02:11):
yesterday signed an executive order. Actually I think it was Monday, Yeah,
Monday that he signed the executive orse. Today is was
yesterday losing Tiger? Which day of the week it is
already and only two days into it. I only got
to choose from anyway, he signed the executive order, and
listen to what he had to say about that.

Speaker 3 (02:32):
Lastly, sir, this is an executive order on flag burning.
It charges your attorney general. Would you listen to this?
This is a very flag burning all over the country.
They're burning flags all over the world.

Speaker 4 (02:43):
They burned the American flag, and as you know, through
a very said court. I guess it was a five
to four decision. They called it freedom of speech. But
there's another reason, which is perhaps much more important. It's
called death. Because what happens when you burn a flag
is the area goes crazy. If you have hundreds of people,

(03:05):
they go crazy. You could do other things, you can
burn this piece of.

Speaker 2 (03:08):
You mean, like January six, But.

Speaker 4 (03:10):
When you burn the American flag, it incites riots at
levels that we've never seen before. People go crazy in.

Speaker 5 (03:19):
A way both ways.

Speaker 2 (03:20):
Trumpe ne riot.

Speaker 4 (03:21):
Crazy for doing it. There are others that are angry,
angry about them doing it? Do you want to discuss that?

Speaker 6 (03:28):
Sure?

Speaker 3 (03:29):
What the executive order does or charges your Department of
Justice with investigating instances of flag burning and then where
there's evidence of criminal activity, that where prosecution wouldn't fall
afoul of the First Amendment and instructs the Department of Justice.

Speaker 7 (03:43):
To process or engaged in the right as a flagburn.

Speaker 4 (03:47):
And what the penalty is going to be. If you
burn a flag, you get one year in jail, No
early exits, no nothing. You get one year in jail.
If you burn a flag, you get and what it
does is in sight to write out they use that language,
by the way, did the insight to riot? And you
burn a flag? You get one year in jail. You

(04:09):
don't get ten years, you don't get one month. You
get one year in jail. And it goes on your
record and you will see flag burning stopping immediately, just
like when I signed the Statute and Monument Act. Ten
years in jail, have you heard any about beautiful monuments?
Everybody left town, they were gone. Never had a problem
after that. It's pretty amazing we stopped it. But this

(04:31):
is something that's I don't know. In a certain way,
it's equally as important. Some people would say it's more
important because the people in this country don't want to
see our American flag burned and spit on, and by
people that are.

Speaker 2 (04:45):
You have burned and spot on the First Amendment.

Speaker 4 (04:48):
They're paid by the radical left to do it. You
talk to these people, they don't even know. Half of
them don't even know what they're doing this. I don't
know they gave me money to do this. I see
the same things did they banded people that are trying
to destroy a nation that's not working because I think
our nation now is the most respected nation anywhere in
the world by far. You saw that with the European

(05:10):
leaders on Friday. You saw that with NATO where they
agreed to go from two percent no pay to five
percent fully paid up, trillions of dollars paid, where they
respect your president to a level that they jokingly called
me the president of Europe. They called me the president
of Europe, which is an honor. I like Europe, and
I like those people. They're good people to great leaders.

(05:33):
And we've never had a case where seven plus really
twenty eight essentially thirty five thirty eight countries were represented here.
The other day, thirty eight European countries were European and
other countries were represented, and it was a great meeting.
But your country is respected again. I say it all

(05:54):
the time. One year ago, our country was dead. Everybody
said it. We had a dead we were not going
to survive. Now we have the hottest country anywhere in
the world. So it's an honor to be involved in
this group. Has a lot to do with it.

Speaker 2 (06:09):
Right behind me, it's hot. It's like the babes at
my beauty contests. It's one hot country. Yeah. Well, you
could hear that. This is something that he's very passionate about.
And you know, it's kind of interesting to me, Travis,
that so many people will get so passionate about flags.
Think about it. You know, the Pride flags and the
Palestinian flags, Israeli flags, American flags. It is something that

(06:33):
people are really really passionate about. I'm passionate about principles
by the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment. That's
what I hate to see destroyed, burned, trashed. And as
Trump was saying, you know, they pay the radical left
is paid by these people who do this kind of stuff.
Who's paying you, Trump to shut down First Amendment rights

(06:55):
of protests and protect a foreign country like Israel. They're
the ones coming after our First Amendment and you've been
their puppet and you've spat on the Constitution one way
after the other. What should we do with people like him?
It's amazing to me.

Speaker 8 (07:11):
Yeah, just the fact that he says the riots are
triggered by the flagbirning and not as an outshoot of
a riot that's already ongoing is ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (07:19):
Well, if you listen to his nonsense, it's very similar
to the nonsense that was spouted out by Joe Biden
in the left about January sixth. Oh, this is a riot.
It was an insurrection, and it was started by Trump
and so forth. And if you could blame anybody for
starting it, be Trump, Alex Jones, whatever. But nevertheless, it
was not a riot. It was not an insurrection. I mean,

(07:41):
you had some people who went overboard and they could
have been punished, but that was not what Biden and
the Democrats did. They went after people who were just
there because they did geo fencing, and they found the
people who were there and they prosecuted them, and even
as I point out a situation where two elderly men
and one of them's son that they need to go

(08:03):
to the restroom, and the doors are opened there in
the Capitol building, and they walked over to the police
officers and asked them who a restroom is? They said,
right inside, going here. They went in there, they used
the restroom. They came out and there was a female
cop and she tried to direct them onto the house floor.
I said, no, no, no, we don't want to go further,
and we just wanted to use the restroom.

Speaker 8 (08:21):
They left.

Speaker 2 (08:22):
They were indicted by Biden. And it's just kind of
over the top nonsense that both Trump and Biden are
mirror images of each other. They're just different clubs, but
they think the same way. That's why they're both selected
to be there. It's professional wrestling. So one year in jail,

(08:43):
he said, no early exists, no nothing, and it goes
on your record. Oh no, my permanent record.

Speaker 8 (08:49):
You're never going to escape this.

Speaker 2 (08:51):
Yeah, that's right. By the way, you know, don't criticize
nt Yahoo either, you know, don't burn Yahoo or an
American flag, you know, don't burn in their comments, don't
burn him a effigy for sure, or you're going to
get the same kind of treatment. They don't care about
the fact that Harvard was getting nine billion with a
B dollars worth of taxpayer money from Washington d C.

(09:16):
The only care that Harvard was allowing people to protest
a foreign country that was paying the politicians like crump here.
So the executive Order instructs the Attorney General to prosecute
those who burned us a great the American flag. So
here's a new federal crime. As I say the other
day when we were talked yesterday, when we were talking

(09:37):
about the federalization of the police, as a reason, pointed
out there were only three crimes in the constitution, which
kind of says that they did not envision that the
federal government would have police. As a matter of fact,
nobody had police at the local level. You had a
sheriff and you had the community that was armed, and
that was how order was kept. But now they're inventing

(10:01):
crimes to go after people. And this is just more
of Trump's vendetta. He says, this main clube is not
limited to this is what the order says, violent crimes,
hate crimes, illegal discrimination against American citizens, or other violations
of American civil rights. Well, those are all crimes in
and of themselves. Whenever you see this kind of hate

(10:22):
speech nonsense. They tried to tie it in to things
that were already crimes. Violent crime has already been a crime.
And again it goes back to what Biden did. If
somebody physically assaults or breaks and enters or destroys property
or whatever in January sixth, some did that was already
a crime. You don't need to then extend that to

(10:45):
everybody who was present, which is what they did. So
both the Republicans and the Democrats have the ridiculous hate
speech rules that are in direct conflict with the First Amendment.

Speaker 8 (10:58):
That's a militarizing the police force does nothing if you
aren't actually going to enforce the laws. It's just a
tool of oppression. At that point, we have laws on
the books for basically all of these things already, they
just absolutely refuse to enforce them.

Speaker 2 (11:11):
That's right, that's right. When people talk about having a
constitutional convention, it's like, well, the problem is the politicians
and the very politicians.

Speaker 8 (11:20):
Want to give Nancy Pelosi the chance to.

Speaker 2 (11:23):
Write a new constitution. Yeah, that's right. Does have a
new constitution written by people like Nancy Pelosi and Donald
Trump and Mike Johnson who have absolutely no respect for
the Constitution. They sort of uphold as a condition of
their authority, and so these people ignore it. And you
don't want those kinds of people who have no character
to write some new controlling document that's going to be

(11:45):
the foundation. So to the Supreme Court, this is struck
down three decades ago, nineteen eighty nine. There's a Supreme
Court case. As he said, it was five to four,
and so some of the conservatives are saying, oh, wait
a minute, you know that means but you know, it
was all of the conservatives on one side and all
the liberals on the other side, and the tiebreaker was Scalia,

(12:08):
who stood with the First Amendment. And so they said,
it's not a clear cut decision at all. I remember
a time when about the only thing that the left
got right was the free speech issue, and that was
one of the few things that they got right. And
they did get that right, but it was because they

(12:29):
were protesting the war and things like that, and they
wultn't to be able to do that. They have now
completely abandoned that, and many conservatives have as well as
we're going to point out here, though some conservatives have
gotten a little bit of a spine here to take
on Trump and actually talk about the fact that this
is in conflict with not only the Supreme Court, but

(12:50):
actually the Constitution itself. So in a few times, the
Supreme Court got something right, and we'll see what happens
with that. They said. The justices said that the First
Amendment protects expressive conduct such as burning the American flag.
Justice Kennedy, in a separate concurrence, acknowledged the rulings on popularity,

(13:11):
but he wrote, quote, the flag protects those who hold
it in contempt. And the converse of that is that
you've got people like Trump who hold the Constitution in
contempt but worship the flag and talk about desecration and
how we should honor this thing. It's like a religious
relic to them, and it is kind of a state religion.

(13:32):
That's one of the things. I guess it's always kind
of turned me off of the flag stuff. People get
so precious about the flag that are their symbols, and
that of course can be the LGBT people, and you know,
they paint their their paint, their rainbow colors on a
crosswalk and then if somebody comes along and protest it
by doing a burnout on it. Yeah, don't burn the

(13:56):
flag and don't burn out. Don't burn out the rainbow crosswalk.
Are you going to get in trouble? But that was
the protest as well. But these people have their symbols,
and their symbols are sacred to them. It's a religion
to them. And I guess that's one of the reasons
why I could never really get into the Pledge of
Allegiance and flags and things like that. It was because

(14:17):
it was too much. I saw the reverence and the
religiosity that was being attached to it, and it's like,
I'm not going there anyway. They called it freedom of speech,
Trump said, But there's another reason, which is perhaps much
more important. It's called death again. Really, death is the reason. Yeah,
he would love to give the death penalty to people

(14:40):
who do things that he doesn't like. That's the kind
of guy that he is. How about your executive order
for fake emergencies.

Speaker 7 (14:47):
Death is the reason burning flags is making you unsafe? Yeah,
this order to burn the flag that doesn't protect you,
burning the flag that doesn't hurt you, That hurts your neighbor.
So therefore, yeah.

Speaker 2 (14:58):
Yeah, and we have to all be safe, right, so
get rid of your liberty because safety comes first. And
I guess the question is, you know, when we talk
about death, this is the guy who killed untold millions
of people in this country and the world with his
mRNA vaccine that he still touts. How does he get

(15:19):
off talking about death? Why hypocrisy? So the Chief Council
of Fire, which is a national free speech group, they
work a lot at universities because that's where they really
hate free speech there. And the Trump administration Fire said
while people can be prosecuted for burning anything in a

(15:41):
place that they are not allowed to set fires, the
government cannot prosecute protected expressive activity, even if many Americans,
including the President, find it quote uniquely offensive and provocative.
And so this has been a pet peeve of his
for years, talking about flag burning, and a lot of

(16:02):
people talked about that as well, who said I would
never burn a flag because to them, the flag represents
things like the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution.
It's not a club or a power trip like it
represents obviously to a Trump.

Speaker 8 (16:21):
The other thing is just the people that generally engage
in flag burning are usually the most despicable memories of
the left wing. So it makes it very easy for
Trump to come in and do this sort of thing
because you see the type of people that are engaging
in and you go, oh, well, these people need to
be punished.

Speaker 2 (16:37):
And that's what it is. It's virtue signaling to his base.
Its professional wrestling, but it's also doing exactly the same
thing that Biden did to the J sixers. He's doing
it to the other tribe. The Order describes the flag
as quote the most sacred and cherished symbol of the
United States. What utter nonsense the constitution you SE's War two,

(17:00):
you traitor, that's what is the sacred cherished symbol of
your authority? And you don't have any he called x.
It calls acts of desecration. See that's why we're talking
about this. Like I say, religious relic, I reject the
cult of the omnipotent state. When I saw that in
the Libertarian Party's statement, you know, with principles, they had

(17:23):
me right there. It's like, you guys get it. It
is a cult. It is a cult of the omnipotent state.
And I'm disgusted with that. I will not pledge allegiance
to that cult because it's not about the Constitution. I
pledge allegiance to the Constitution, but not taking these politicians
or these political parties. Says it is uniquely offensive and provocative,

(17:46):
a statement of contempt, hostility, and violence against our nation. No,
it's against your administration. That sounds like nation, doesn't it.
But yeah, so the politicians who burn their bill rights
should be impeached at the very least. Trump is an

(18:07):
international war criminal for what he's done with the mRNA jabs,
but he'll never be indicted, even let alone punished in
this life.

Speaker 8 (18:16):
Yes, we want to burn the people that are in prison,
the people that burn the symbol of the country, but
not the people that are actually destroying the substance of
the country.

Speaker 2 (18:25):
Yeah, the principles and killing people. You want to talk
about death? What hypocrisy. So a lot of conservatives surprisingly
have pushed back on Trump on this, saying this is
garbage in media Heighte, which is a left winging publication
that is always antient. Trump on every issue picked up
the tweets of some people who pushed back on this.

(18:47):
I'm not even engaging with any of this stuff on
Twitter anymore. But Casey Maddox said I anticipate significantly more
flag burning in the weeks ahead. Jesse Kelly said I
would never in a million years harm the American flag,
but a president telling me I can't has me as

(19:08):
close as I'll ever be to the lighting one on fire.
I am a free American citizen, and if I ever
feel like torching one, I will. This is garbage. This
reminds me the seen from a Wooty Iswen movie where
he is he's out of his emblement in New York
and he's driving a car like around La or so.
I think it's Annie Hall or something, and he gets

(19:31):
pulled over by a cop and the guy gets gets
real officious with him, and so you know, he finally
pulls out his license and he's about to hand it
to the cop. He just tears it up in the
CoP's face. Well, since you put it that way and
he just tears up, That's the way I feel about
this order right here.

Speaker 7 (19:47):
What were you going to say, Lance, I'm just going
to say that we have a lot of comments in
our chat that are much the same as what you
were just saying. People that are so annoyed with this
that it's like, I don't burn flags, but if they're
going to tell me that I can't, in that case,
it's more patriotic to do it.

Speaker 2 (20:08):
Yes, exactly, it is. And that, along with what he's
doing with Epstein guarding his pedophile, guarding our pedophiles a gop.

Speaker 8 (20:17):
It also reminds me of that old far Side comic
where the guy is standing on the corner with his
wife and he looks eb and he sees a sign
that says absolutely no chainsaw juggling. Says, well, now I
really want to.

Speaker 2 (20:29):
Yeah, burning the American flag is legal, said Brad Palombo,
First Amendment Protected Act. I agree it is offensive, but
we do not need safe spaces or coddling from the president,
especially one who claims to stand for free speech. The
Telegraph's Nick Gardner called the order brilliant, but Eric Ericksson,

(20:52):
I'm surprised that he pushed back disagreed. He said, this
is actually not brilliant. Well, I agree with the sentiment.
He said. It is unfortunately well settled constitutional law that
burning the flag is a matter of free speech, and
the executive does not get to create crimes. That's the
other part of it. Like I said, this is creating
a new crime that's not in the Constitution. It is

(21:14):
a clear violation of the First Amendment. I don't think
that the Supreme Court decisions are the law of the land,
but this is a situation where they actually got it right. Scalia,
in writing about this is actually his son. Scalia is
dead now, but his son put out a quote from

(21:35):
him about this decision. Scalia said, you should be in
no doubt that patriotic conservative that I am, I detest
the burning of the nation's flag, and if I were king,
I would make it a crime. King Trump, right, this
is Scalia from the grave, all of these leftists calling
him King Trump, and that really got to Trump. But

(21:57):
of course Scalia had him pegg. But as I understand
the First Amendment, said Schoolliat, he guarantees the right to
express contempt for the government, the Congress, the Supreme Court,
even the nation and the nation's flag. And so that
is ed Wheelan says, to the fullest extent possible. Sounds aggressive,

(22:22):
but it actually means within the bounds permitted by law.
He is a legal expert, and so he's saying it
sounds like he's really beating his chest here like he's
back at the world at the WWE Wrestling But in
reality that's actually kind of a legal claim down. So yeah,

(22:44):
other people Christopher Rufo got it, I think did not
quite get it right. He says, I'm sympathetic to the
argument that burning the American flag has protected speech, but
right now we're putting people in prison for spin their
tires over the Pride Flag. So it might be a
good idea to have the debate about which symbols are

(23:06):
sacred to the America, to America today, Chris, you got
it one hundred percent wrong. There's no symbols that are sacred.
If the substance of the Constitution and the Bill of
Rights is not respected, you don't even have a rule
of law. Instead of saying, well, because they're putting people
in jail for the Pride Flag desecration, we should put

(23:27):
people in jail for desecrating our symbol. That's what he's saying.
What absolute tribalism, That's that's what's wrong with conservatism today.
Christopher Rufo, you just showed us exactly what the problem is. Oh, well,
the left is doing X, which is wrong. So we're
going to do X as well. And of course that's
the same thing that the Democrats do with everything that

(23:50):
Trump does, as soon as he does the gun control
by executive or La La Harris the next day or
so came out said I'm going to do the same
thing when I become president. And so they're mimicking each other.
And it's the left right march of tyranny that we
see over and over again, especially because of all this tribalism.

Speaker 8 (24:07):
It's really funny. You have to be incredibly wrong to
give Brad Palombo a win on anything. Brad Palombo, I
don't know who he is. Gay con pseudo conservative commentator
got caught on Instagram following account that was full of
nothing but like high school boys sports teams or something,
and people pointed out and he immediately unfollowed and deactivated

(24:28):
his account for a while or something like that. So
he's a weird, creepy guy like Colombo. Oh one more thing,
one more underaged boy.

Speaker 2 (24:37):
Yeah, Michael Knowles, it's so clear cut. Why was the
decision five to four the first time around? Even stranger?
Why was it all the liberals Pluscally on the side
defending flag burning while the Conservatives, led by Renquist, were
on the side defending its prohibition. Again more group think,
this time for Michael Knowles, just like you saw it

(25:00):
from Christopher Rufo. Yeah, it used to be like I
said before, that the liberals respected First Amendment for their
own purposes because they had a lot of things that
they wanted to protest. But many of these conservatives were
just fine with things like the drug war, things like
the TSA, things like searches without warrants, things like civilized

(25:21):
set forfeiture. So there's a lot of problems with the
conservatives not respecting the Constitution. And many of the objections
here are coming from this kind of quasi religious dedication
to a sacred relic, okay, and the tribalism that it
represents as well. That's what we're talking about. Don't burn
my pride flag, you know, don't burn my American flag.

(25:44):
They hold these symbols as sacred and yet not the
principles that we see behind it or the authority for
their office. So it's now desecrating the American flag. He
wants to make that a crime that will not hold up.
One person said, there's going to be a lot of
people who are doing this out of spite, and he

(26:04):
goes and there's not any of them are going to
have their convictions upheld if they get them, if they're
charged by the Trump administration. Let's look at what some
of the people are saying. First, one is Guard Goldsmith.

Speaker 8 (26:14):
Heke Guard, Good morning, Guard. He says, Hi, everyone just
burning the flag this morning for heat cheaper than fuel oil.

Speaker 2 (26:20):
Especially if you can get it from China.

Speaker 8 (26:22):
You can get it real cheap from China. It was
funny years and years ago. I remember walking into a
Walmart for something and I walked past this, you know,
the closing section.

Speaker 6 (26:33):
There was this.

Speaker 8 (26:34):
Giant, giant pair of American flag shorts with a big
old tag that says made in China. It's like this
five X pair of shorts of the American flag. He's like, well,
if that doesn't symbolize America today.

Speaker 2 (26:45):
I don't know what the Chinese think about. You make
it five xs.

Speaker 8 (26:50):
N's of the storm says, burn a Maga hat instead.

Speaker 2 (26:52):
That's right.

Speaker 8 (26:53):
That's not illegal yet.

Speaker 2 (26:54):
That's right, that's right, that's you got the right idea.
That's the word. The protest needs to be focused on Maga.

Speaker 8 (26:59):
And honestly, that might make people more upset these days
than if you burn the American flag it might be
a dear symbol to them.

Speaker 2 (27:06):
Well, they certainly care more about their movement and Donald
Trump than they do about the country or the constitution.

Speaker 8 (27:11):
Or maybe get a Q symbol or something like that. Yeah,
lou G four liberty. We're all these flag burning triggered ryots.
Am I missing this activity?

Speaker 1 (27:21):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (27:21):
I think we all are. As I said earlier, the
flag burning doesn't start the riot. The flag burning is
usually a symptom of a riot in progress. Yeah, it's
you know, it's the opposite the other way around, Dad
guy twenty four. Where's all this flag burning? Is there
some epidemic of flag burning? I'm not seeing. Apparently we've
all missed it. Brandon Bennett, Bye bye First Amendment.

Speaker 2 (27:44):
Yeah, you know, the thing is, you know we have
When I was in college, there were so many riots
and all the rest of this stuff and demonstrations, and
there was flag burning that was happening everywhere, and then
they started making clothing out of it, and I thought
that was actually kind of a protest as well. But
then you know, now that's be kind of thing, you know,

(28:05):
like you point.

Speaker 8 (28:05):
Out it's all over the place. Louji for Liberty again
says this will dovetail with this antisemitic speech law. Soon
you're not gonna be able to burn an Israeli flag either.

Speaker 2 (28:16):
Yeah, well, certainly not in Harvard because they're gonna turn
they want their nine billion dollars, and so they're going
to do whatever Israel says, just like Trump will do
whatever Israel says.

Speaker 8 (28:29):
That's right, geesebusters, Good to see you, geesebusters. Hope you're
doing well, he says, burn Trump flags, that's right. Brandon Bennett.
I have a flag in the backseat of my car,
and I love my country, and for some reason now
I want to burn it. Absolutely no chainsaw juggling Mama
Ce nineteen ninety six. Now I know I'll get rid
of that flag in my basement. Now I know how

(28:51):
I'll get rid of the flag of my basement. I've
been storing possum king black Rock is buying up utility companies,
They're buying up everything. There's nothing black Rock isn't getting into.

Speaker 2 (29:02):
Yeah, they're going to burn down our society and he's
fine with that.

Speaker 8 (29:05):
Well, you know, they're probably his good buddies over there.

Speaker 2 (29:08):
Oh, they are because he wanted to give them the
Panama Canal. I haven't heard anything about that for a while,
have we. You know Panama Canal and Canada is a
fifty first state in Greenland. I mean, this guy is
just one traveling you know, conflict wrestling show.

Speaker 8 (29:22):
He didn't go over the canal. Maybe we can take Greenland. No,
not Greenland, Canada. Maybe Canada. I don't know if they want.

Speaker 2 (29:28):
He learned very well at the at the behest of
McMahon terms of WWE. They were close friends and he
knew exactly how to keep the public's attention.

Speaker 8 (29:38):
Lou g for liberty. Too properly disposed of a flag?
You burn it? Yeah, isn't that right after it's been
you know, used for a long time and it's old
and dirty. I think they burn it in the military.
But yeah, in a sort of ceremony, Yeah, on a
pyre or something. Bulldag. Flags are a form of idolatry.
People worship flags. They should work God's words. That's what

(30:01):
I feel about it.

Speaker 2 (30:02):
I hate this religious air to all this stuff. Right,
only secular state cult.

Speaker 8 (30:08):
Christ is the only king. He's the only one that's
worthy of worship.

Speaker 2 (30:12):
But Trump thinks he is king, and Scalia mail. If
I were king, or if I was somebody like Trump
who thinks of he's king, I would do this exact
same thing.

Speaker 8 (30:23):
He knew him a Syrian girl. Of course, Trouble will
uphold the flag over the Constitution. He marches under the
flag and sees it as a source of power. The
Constitution only holds him back. Yeah, it's a source of constraint.

Speaker 2 (30:35):
It's like that picture of where he's hugging the flag
and kissing it. You know, it's like remember that, that's
a Yeah.

Speaker 8 (30:42):
They're burning my girlfriend. Why would they do this? Karen
Carpenter twenty seven ag I wonder if Trump is selling
a Trump American flag made in China. Of course, Oh,
I'm sure. I'm sure there must be.

Speaker 2 (30:54):
Oh yeah, Well I don't.

Speaker 8 (30:56):
Check his website, so I wouldn't know.

Speaker 2 (30:58):
From burning the First Amendment, which is what he's really
doing to essentially bringing corporate socialism in a maga hat,
which is the way that it is described by Reason magazine.
Trump says he paid zero for the government's eleven billion
dollar stake in Intel, but he's wrong. He paid for it,
and it is a very dangerous and evil idea, one that,

(31:24):
by the way, was has been floated by Bernie Sanders.
This is why I said, you can take a New
York City democrat like Trump out of New York, but
you can't take the socialism out of him. He's it's
burned in there. We overthrow elected governments in Iran for
doing the same thing, didn't we. You know, in Iran,

(31:45):
they took over the elected government there back in what
was it nineteen fifty three, I.

Speaker 8 (31:50):
Think fifty three on Operation HX.

Speaker 2 (31:53):
Yeah, they elected a guy that wanted the nationalized the
oil industry that was there. So they did a coup
and they took this guy out and they put in
the shaw of Iran, which primed to the country in
terms of blowback that we wound up with the Ayatola.
Trump negotiated a deal last week for the US government
to take a substantial ownership stake in an American company,

(32:13):
says reason Trump's despite his assurances, Trump's socialistic transaction is
a terrible deal, not only for the parties involved, but
for the entire US economy. And just like what he
is doing with the military as police in DC and
saying he's going to do that in one city after

(32:35):
the other. He has also said that he is going
to do this with other companies and other industries as well.
He is trying to remake our country. He sees himself
as some kind of an FDR or Lincoln, and quite
I agree with him on that. I think he is
like FDR or Lincoln, and I would consign them to
the hell that's reserved for these types of politicians.

Speaker 8 (32:56):
So when I went and got in my haircut, the
barbershops in the serreat to be fairly conservative. On the wall,
they had a painting and it was Donald Trump, Abraham Lincoln,
and Ronald Reagan sitting in barber chairs getting their haircuts,
and I was like, yeah, that's about right.

Speaker 2 (33:11):
Well at least they were. Well, they're probably doing with
passing cards each other with their toes like the dog's
white poker. It's my great honor to report the US
is now fully owns and controls ten percent of Intel,
he said on his social media thing. He said, and
I paid zero for Intel, all uppercase screaming it's worth
approximately eleven billion dollars all goes to the USA. Why

(33:36):
are stupid people unhappy with that? Well?

Speaker 7 (33:40):
How much is this going to cost the American people?

Speaker 2 (33:42):
Yeah? Yeah, yeah. There's no such thing as a free launch,
but a Democrat don from New York City thinks that
there is. Under terms of the agreement, the US government
will make an eight point nine billion dollar investment in
Intel common stock, said the company. The government's equity stake
will be funded by the remaining five point seven billion

(34:04):
dollars in grants previously awarded but not yet paid to
Intel under the US Chips and Science Act, and three
point two billion awarded to the company as part of
the Secure Enclave program. The eight point nine billion dollar
investment is in addition to the two point two billion
dollars and Chips grants Intel has received to date, making

(34:27):
for a total investment of eleven point one billion dollars.
You see, the Chips thing is an idea that was
put out there by Biden and by Bernie Sanders, who
We're going to have the government start to subsidize these industries,
and that's a big part of the problem. These grants
were proved under Biden before leaving office. Biden's administration rushed

(34:49):
to finalize these grants even as Intel was the worst
performing tech stock in twenty twenty four. Malinvestment is always
one of the harbingers of socialism, you know, they always
I wouldn't say harbinger is actually one of the characteristics
of socialist governments. They always malinvest the money that they

(35:12):
put in. So the government actually agreed to less than
initially allocated when the company failed to hit certain milestones,
but instead of rescinding those grants, as Trump reportedly threatened
to do, instead he demanded a tenth of the business
as a result, making the US government Intel's largest shareholder,
another one hundred and eighty degree flip flop, like he

(35:34):
did with Epstein and the documents. Right, I'm going to
get rid of that Chips Act and these subsidies, he
tells the Conservatives, who should be opposing this stuff, but
don't because it's Trump. And then he turns around and
does the same thing. The Chips Act funding was first
floated by Bernie Sanders. Trump and his allies are now

(35:54):
issuing talking points that could have come from the socialist
senator himself because they are socialists themselves. They're fascists. Economically,
the US government insists on dishing out taxpayer money to
private companies. If they do that is there any reason
that it shouldn't. As a US Secretary of Commerce, Howard

(36:16):
Lutnick says, get a piece of the action. This guy
is the poster child for corrupt, crony capitalism that is
really in the mold of the Chinese Communist Party. Lutnik
and the people in the Trump administration. The most immediate
risks that Intel's decisions will increasingly be driven by political

(36:39):
rather than commercial considerations, said Scott Lenna Cocony of the
Cato Institute. I'm not sure how to pronounce his last name,
so I'll just refer to him as the Cata Institute.
As I've said before, when you merge government with religion,
what you wind up with or church or whatever. What

(37:01):
you wind up with is government. When you merge government
with corporations, what you wind up with is government. Government
always smothers and destroys whatever you think is going to
come in and help, he said. With the US government
as its largest shareholder, INTEL will face constant pressure to

(37:22):
align corporate decisions with the goals of whatever political party
is in power, the same way that when you ally
government with churches, the churches will feel the pressure to
align with the politicians and they will also be rewarded
if they do, punished if they don't. So again, when
you mix a company, a corporation with politics, you're going

(37:44):
to wind up with a political company that is going
to be making these decisions not based on economic reality
or the desires of customers. Know, the government becomes their customer.
Intel's US based competitors might find themselves a disadvantage when
buying for government contracts or subsidies, winning trade or tax

(38:04):
really for complying with federal regulations. Private capital might in
turn flow to Intel and away from leaders and innovation
in the semiconductor ecosystem, not for economic reasons, but because
Uncle Sam now has his thumb on the scale, picking
the winners and the losers. White House National Economic Council

(38:27):
Director Kevin Hassett told CNBC on Monday that he is
quote sure, at some point there'll be more transactions, if
not in this industry, then in other industries. And as
I said at the beginning of this, it's just like
the military, police and DC. Now we're going to go
to other cities, and they're going to go to other companies,
other industries, and they're going to start partner becoming partners

(38:52):
and taking over chunks of them, just like the Chinese
Communist did. And guess what, just like in Chinese Communist
part you're going to have the leaders of the government
are to be making special money off of this stuff.
You talk about insider trading, They're going to be getting
kickbacks and everything else. Trump has made several such deals

(39:12):
just since re entering office in January. Of course, you know,
leaning on Nvidia and AMD, We've never ever had the
federal government take a share in a corporation like this before,
and we've never had the federal government putting an export
tax as they've done on Nvidia and AMD. You know,

(39:33):
all of this stuff about tariffs was supposed to be
because we were going to have help manufacturing and that
means helping exports in this country. And now Trump is
putting a export tax on what is produced in this country.
It's absolutely insane and inconsistent everything he does. And of
course he bought into a rare earth mineral mind in

(39:59):
the US MP minerals four hundred billion dollar government investment
made by the Department of Defense, which is now its
largest shareholder. I will make deals like that for our
country all day long, said Trump because I don't I
don't support the constitution right anyway, the Republicans won't likely

(40:21):
be in power forever. In time, a Democrat president will
have the same influence on Intel and on other companies
and other industries. And here's the key takeaway from this.
I like this quote. An economist at the Competitive Enterprise
Institute Ryan Young said, both parties are forgetting a cardinal

(40:41):
rule of politics. Don't give yourself powers that you don't
want your opponents to have. How many times have I
said that? You know, look at what Trump is doing
when he goes out and he does gun control by
executive order. That's the power that he's put on the
table aft for La LA to pick up and use.
And they do that over an over again. So don't

(41:02):
give yourself powers that you don't want your opponents to have.
So as this is all happening now, Trump is working
on commandos going to Mexico, and Ken Klippenstein has been
the one who has been reporting on this, and he
has a very long article about time that he has spent.

(41:22):
The people who's talked to at Special Operations Command North.
These are people who were previously working on the Arctic
keeping that secure from the Russian threat, I guess, and
al Qaeda. You know, you never know what Elchi is
going to show up in the Arctic. And so now
they've been repurposed. They've been up there looking for a
mission because nothing is happening up there, right, so I

(41:45):
need to justify it. Well, now Trump has given him
a mission and he's going to repurpose it to go
after the cartels. And I'm telling you that the cartels
are going to start attanking infrastructure here or politicians or whatever.
And if they don't, I think that the Trump administration
of the people in power in Washington will do a
false flag to say that it's from them, so they

(42:06):
can roll out this plan that I showed yesterday that
the Pentagon has been talking about how the coming wars
are gonna be fought in the cities against civilians. Trump
designated international cartels as Enemy number one. The Arctic was
traded for Mexico. Northern Command, officially responsible for the defense

(42:27):
of America, was established in November twenty thirteen, long after
nine to eleven, and unfortunately for them, every other geographic
fighting area had already been taken. It's not head to
go to the Arctic. But now they get to go
to Mexico. So lacking terrorists to kill or counterinsurgencies to fight,
Soak North was assigned every task under the sun, a

(42:50):
roller coaster of missions that somehow contributed to quote defending
the homeland against unconventional threats. On the walls of new
headquarters are maps of the Arctic Circle from Alaska to Greenland.
In the midst of Sock North planners or commandos meeting
Russian spetsnets as they made their way south through the ice.

(43:10):
Then came Trump, and the Arctic maps were rolled up
and put away. As the border in Mexico became a
top priority, defending America would no longer be a femeral
or a contingency plan set in some mythical future. The
military was ordered to deal with the immediate threats of
illegal immigration, drugs, and cartels. But we're going to take

(43:31):
a quick break. When we come back, you're going to
see that the Defense Department. This is another thing that
Trump wants to say. He wants to take it back
to the War Department, and so we're going to talk
about that when we come back. It's actually a little
bit of truth in advertising. As Lance said when we
were talking about laughed about it, and it's a bit
more truthful to call the War Department.

Speaker 6 (43:52):
We'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (45:29):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 9 (45:34):
Wait a minute, where am I sorry, Jefferson.

Speaker 10 (45:38):
The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank Fiat currency
used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.

Speaker 11 (45:46):
This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.

Speaker 10 (46:00):
Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed
up the All New David Knight Show Commemorative Coin. Now
patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.

Speaker 9 (46:14):
They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.

Speaker 2 (46:32):
Well, it looks like we have an interesting thing that's
going to be coming up. We have a battle to
take over the Federal Reserve that Trump is involved in,
and he's been trying to find a cause to remove
power I talked about this last week, trying to invent
a crime in terms of what he had to say
to Congress about the remodeling of the Federal Reserve, which

(46:55):
in of itself, I think it's a crime to spend
that kind of money. But because he got some of
the details, they want to come after him on the details.
Even though nobody in Congress cared about James Clapper lying
to you about surveillance of the American people. But now
he has a real crime. As I also said at
the time, this female governor, black female, first one to

(47:17):
be in the Federal Reserve, and her name is Cook,
and she took out two loans almost at the same time.
I think they were two months apart, and in both
of them she said they were going to be her
primary residence, except one of them was in Georgia and
the other one was I think Michigan or Minnesota or
something like that. And so it was a lie about

(47:38):
one of them. As a matter of fact. The one
in Georgia she then put up for rent. So there's
a paper trail that shows that she lied on her mortgage.
One the question is is this something that the federal
government is going to be involved in I don't know
who actually has jurisdiction there. She has not been charged,
and she's denying that she did anything wrong. Also a liar.

(48:02):
But think about the fact that you got the Central Yeah,
you got one of these people in charge of the
bank of banks here, the Central Bank, and they're lying
on their mortgage application, which is crime for other people
to do it. So she says that she has not
been charged of the crime. She didn't commit a crime,
and she says, I'm not leaving. Trump has sent her

(48:25):
a notice that she has now been I don't know
relieved the duty or how we phrased it or whatever.
But it's going to be interesting this back and forth,
and she, in making her case says, well, we're private,
you have no jurisdiction over me. So I think it's
going to be an interesting discovery as part of this.

Speaker 8 (48:43):
A lot of people are like, wait a minute, what
what do you mean all of those conspiracy theorists.

Speaker 2 (48:49):
He said, the Federal Reserve is private, and now you
got one of the Board of Governors is going to
make a big fight with Trump over it being private,
and it'll be interesting. Of course, the left will come
out and say, yeah, it's private and that's a good thing.

Speaker 8 (49:02):
That's what we need. We've got a lot of comments here.
Shaubrey says that sacred piece of cloth is more rights
than the people talking about the flag burning, right, Yeah,
and dp Io says, listen to what they say, don't
pay attention to what they do, and you will be happy.
That's right. Just trust what they say, ignore their actions,
turn your brain off and it'll all be fine. Nights

(49:23):
of the storm. Good to see you, Jason, if you're
doing well. I foresee that by the end of the
day there will be a trend of flag burning videos
on Twix, Twitter, slash X. Yeah, we'll have to wait
and see. Maluten Malankovic. Bailing out Intel was a horrible idea.
It's just a grift for Israel. Now it's an Intel,
an Israeli company, I do.

Speaker 2 (49:42):
I don't know. They've got got an Asian CEO. I
think that he chrisized that's the lead up to all
this stuff, and that was softening them up for the takeover,
because you know, if you if you push back against Trump,
you know that he's in that you're in his sites.

Speaker 8 (50:01):
Yeah, yeah, makes it very clear who he's going after.
He's not subtle. I boost how did Trump buy Intel
with what money? Was there money in the sixty six
y six bill to buy private industries? Who sits on
the board. Is there a conflict of interest when the
government sets laws and owns a company.

Speaker 2 (50:17):
Yeah, there is. Yeah, there's absolutely no way. Again, if
we go back to the ninth and tenth Amendment, there
is no authority for the government to do this. So
therefore they don't have that authority. And it's a bad
idea because it is socialism, as we see put out
there by Bernie Sanders.

Speaker 8 (50:34):
And socialism does not lead to good outcomes nights of
the storm. So my taxes are paying for processors, but
I can't afford a decent video card for my PC.
That's good the future grand.

Speaker 2 (50:46):
That's absolutely the case.

Speaker 8 (50:48):
Yeah, he says.

Speaker 2 (50:49):
All the money will go to the few people, and
you'll own nothing, not even a PC.

Speaker 8 (50:53):
Right, you'll get one of the You'll get a chrome
book from now on. I was a big AMD fan
back in the youth. Half the price of a Pentium
and faster Birdhouse blues? Does this help or hurt Elon's
neuralink chip design?

Speaker 2 (51:09):
What were you to say was not AMD.

Speaker 7 (51:12):
Oh just well, I guess he's comparing it to pentium.
But just the whole thing of AMD versus in video.
When people get all tribal about one or the other
and then they're run by the same family, the same
family owns them. They're run the CEOs are cousins.

Speaker 2 (51:32):
Yeah, it's well, you're gonna wind up like in China,
where the same quote unquote family, the mafia is going
to own everything of any importance.

Speaker 8 (51:42):
Never go against the family. Niburu twenty nine. Emperor Trump's
main goal is to destroy the USA, just as he's
destroyed every business he's ever Pilford, Well, he's doing a
good job. Yeah, Solo Cat nineteen eighty. The Yankee Pledge
of Allegiance is an oath to an idol, a double sin.

Speaker 2 (52:02):
That's right. And you realize that when you know they
softened it by the time I was in school. They
softened it in nineteen fifties they added under God. But
if you take that out of the Pledge of Allegiance,
you have and it was put together by the Grand
Army of the Republic, which was the kind of the
union of the Union soldiers, who you know, it is

(52:22):
kind of their their club, and you know it's one nation, indivisible, right,
and you're pledging allegiance to that. They wanted that, and
they wanted the government schools to teach their version of history,
and just prior to World War Two, the protocol was
that you were to do the pledge with your right

(52:42):
hand extended out, palm down. Does that look familiar that
it's like a Nazi salute? Right? Well they changed that
to put your hand over your heart, right because of
the Nazis, And then in the nineteen fifties they added
under God to soften it. But we know where it
came from, and you know what the spirit behind it is.

Speaker 8 (53:01):
It's a not often that you have to retire a gesture,
you know. But the Nazi's got rid of that one.
You can't name someone Adolph anymore, you know. They managed
to get rid of quite a few things. Solo cat
oh No Defy Tyrants, seventeen to seventy six. Governor of
Florida Ron de Santis implementing a new stand with Israel
license plate with star of David on it. Wonder who

(53:23):
is ruling over us?

Speaker 7 (53:25):
Wow, it's gonna be a extra penalty to rear end
that one destroying the star of David.

Speaker 2 (53:33):
Yeah, like that.

Speaker 7 (53:35):
It's called just rear ending. It's also a hate.

Speaker 8 (53:37):
Crime, calling my lawyer right now solo cat nineteen eighty
Because the left called Trumpet fascist early on for no reason,
he is now inoculated against the accusation now that he
is being a fascist.

Speaker 2 (53:51):
Yeah.

Speaker 8 (53:51):
They've been screaming it for years at this point, and
the left considers anyone right of Stalin a fascist. It's
very reminiscent of Herbert mark Use. His entire thesis was
that if you're not continually pushing leftward, you are immediately
in danger of falling into fascism. So anyone that does
not push further and further left immediately has to be

(54:13):
attacked as a fascist.

Speaker 2 (54:14):
Yeah. Yeah. And then, as a Soli Cat said, that
is inoculated him. That's the real vaccine. He's got this.

Speaker 8 (54:26):
They tried to impeach him and failed, so he's safe
from that. They ran him through the court system and
inoculated against any sort of criminal prosecution because of that,
the streaming fascists. So now when he's doing fascist things,
you really, ah whatever.

Speaker 2 (54:39):
And they've inoculated him from being impeached as well. I mean,
the Democrats could come out and they could impeach him
for a lot of the unconstitutional things that he's not.
This is just the latest one. But you know, they
could come after him for some real substantive charges. But
because they came after him for a bunch of nonsense,
the first time he's been inoculated against impeachment that as well,

(55:01):
and the tribal fall in line behind him in support.
He's speaking about how the leftists move. All the sub
college students have to pretend to be leftists in order
to succeed. This is a Northwestern University survey that was done.
They surveyed fourteen hundred and fifty two interviews with students
at several different colleges over a period of two years.

(55:23):
Eighty eight percent said that they pretended to hold more
leftist views and they truly endorse to succeed socially or academically.

Speaker 7 (55:31):
I mean, this is a surprise to anyone at this
point that the colleges are extremely yeah biased and controlled
by hardcore leftist interests.

Speaker 2 (55:43):
Yes, but this is kind of the human nature. This
is why Rod Dreyer wrote his book Lived Not by Lies,
which was a title that SOLDI Knitsuen had for his
final essay before he was kicked out of Soviet Union
loved not by lies. And in that so then it's
and said, you know, because of pressure from above and

(56:05):
because of peer pressure, you know, the Milgrim experiment and
the Ash experiment. Because of those kinds of pressures, we
live by lies, but just don't believe them yourself. At
the very least, if you don't have the courage to
push back against that, at least don't start to believe
it yourself, because you realize that as you and so
do the left. You know, it's this whole thing about
the more you repeat this stuff, eventually you can get

(56:28):
yourself to believe it double thinking. They assimilate you that way.

Speaker 8 (56:31):
I also think it has to do with the fact
that college is so expensive. If you're paying this much
money for something you don't believe in, that, you're going
to psychologically reject that on some level. You're going to
have to start rationalizing, like there's got to be something
here that's truthful in evst.

Speaker 2 (56:46):
Well, I mean, it's tuition has just exploded. I said before,
when I went to USF back in the late seventies,
my books cost more than my tuition did had to
have a lot of books, and even buying them you
used it was more than the tuition. But the government
has subsidized tuition to get it so expensive. Anytime the

(57:09):
government subsidizes something, it gets more expensive. And the first
exhibit of that is what's happened to tuition at colleges.
But this is also nothing new. When I was in college,
I had to take some core courses and I don't
even remember what the subject was, but the very first class,

(57:31):
the guy got up and started, you know, lecturing us
about how wonderful Marx and Lenen were. And it wasn't
a course on Marxist and Leninu's ideas. It was not
supposedly a political course, but he was going to make
it a political course. And so I just walked straight
out there the first class and dropped the class, just
removed it, because it's like, there's no way that I'm

(57:52):
going to play his game, and I know that he's
going to flunk me. And that's what these students are saying.
Seventy eight percent of students said that they self censor
their beliefs surrounding gender identity. Seventy two percent do it
on politics, sixty eight percent on family values. More than
eighty percent said that they had submitted class work that

(58:12):
misrepresented their views in order to align with professors. For many,
this has become second nature, an instinct for academic and
professional self preservation. And that's what Rod Dreer said in
the preface to his book. He said he'd had people
who had immigrated to America from Eastern Europe, and they

(58:33):
had come from communist countries and to tolitarian countries, and
they were very concerned about what they were seeing in America,
that people were self censoring themselves. And Rod Dreer, who
was working in academia, I think he said, had other
people say that they will speak in hush tones when
they're in a restaurant, thinking that somebody is going to

(58:55):
hear them, that knows them and is going to get
them in trouble at the university. And it's like, I
don't want to have anything to do with this. That's
like that it's a detlitarian Marxist system and it is
thoroughly permeated the universities. When it comes to gender ideology.
For example, eighty seven percent of students identified as heterosexual
and said that they believe that there are only two genders.

(59:15):
Seventy seven percent said biological sex, not gender identity, should
be recognized in areas like sports, healthcare, or data collection,
but they would never voice these opinions in public. This
is what's so wrong about our university system that is
so heavily subsidized by the government. So living by lies, Yeah,

(59:39):
they truly are. That's a way of life. So a
lot of back and forth about Trump's hands, and of course,
if you can find that article there and pull up
the picture he had a few days ago, very awkwardly,
it looks like evidently he did it himself because he
didn't even try to blend it out, and he tried
to cover up a bruise on it hand. And then

(01:00:01):
he showed up in the office as he's doing these
executive orders about flag burning and with no makeup on.
He's got his one hand covering the other hand. But
when he moved it away, people could see that was
deeply bruised. Well, look at those pictures. People are saying, oh, yeah,
he's dying and all the resta stuff. It's like I
saw that on my dad. For the longest time, he
was on blood Thinner's he had cardiac issues. He had

(01:00:23):
had a blood clot when he was in his early
forties that caused him to go blind in one eye.
So they kept him on blood dinner. All of the
whole time I knew him, he was on blood dinner,
and he would get bruises that would look like that
that were very bad, just over nothing. He didn't even
remember hitting anything, And so you know, there may be

(01:00:44):
some They've always said that he has some circuitary issues,
which obviously are the case with his swollen ankles, and
he's seventy eight years old. But anyway, both his friends
and enemies are getting all excited about this, a lot
of speculation about it. I think that, uh, it is,
and he's got it on his other hand as well. Uh,

(01:01:06):
this is just something that is part of old age
that is there. And the real issue is not his hand.
I think they've talked more about his hand than they
have the executive orders that he signed with a with
a bruised hand, And that's the problem that I have
with him.

Speaker 8 (01:01:25):
Yeah, I'm looking at the picture for the down this
article where they are comparing the ankles of Vladimir Putin
and Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (01:01:30):
Is it? Yeah?

Speaker 8 (01:01:34):
This is well, we're doing forensic analysis on the ankles
of world leaders. Look Putin's and very normal ankles, Trump's
thick and swollen ankles. What does this say.

Speaker 7 (01:01:46):
Which world leader has the best ankles?

Speaker 2 (01:01:51):
Yeah, that's exactly what they've tried to do. So Trump's
physician says that the bruising is consistent with minor soft
tissue irritation from frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin.
That's not true. There's something else going on, and it's
it's probably one of these bloodthending medications that are there.

Speaker 7 (01:02:09):
People are just so eager to shake his hand that
they go a little overboard as everyone always wanting to
shake his hand one after another.

Speaker 2 (01:02:18):
You know, remember when when Trump got into that arm
wrestling thing with Macron, you know, this first term. You know,
he shakes his hand and the two of them were
grimacing and Macron starts laughing about you. So, yeah, he
likes to give people really firm handshakes as a sign
of how powerful he is. I think as part of

(01:02:38):
that is ego. But yeah, that is what they do
focus on. And you know, but this is finally before
we just kind of general news here, let's before we
get into something else. He's talking about changing the Department
of Defense to make it the Department of War. And
it was always called the Department of War until nineteen

(01:03:00):
forty nine. And so after World War II, we created
the National Security State, which has not provided security for
the nation. Instead, what it has done it's this got
us involved in one war after the other that we
were not attacked, and so they've been using the military
as a international police force. And it's not about the

(01:03:24):
defense of this country. But we were talking about it,
and we were laughing about it, as Land said, well,
at least they're going to be honest about it for
a change, because that's what it truly is about. It's
not about defending this country. It's simply about getting us
involved in wars. And that's not how you defend the country.
You defend the country by keeping us out of wars.
But such it's so focused on wars. I thought it

(01:03:46):
was kind of indicative of the lies that we've been
told by the Pentagon since World War II. And you
know this they called the Defense Department and all the
rest of this stuff. But it reminds me of Dave
Pells routine of what you said about Trump, he said,
this guy is truly amazing. He says, he'll he'll come

(01:04:06):
out of these enclaves. These elites are right, and he'll
tell you won't believe what they're talking about doing in there,
and he'll tell you all the stuff they're going to do.
And then he said, and then the SOB will go
back in and do it himself. He'll join them. He
told you what they're actually doing. And I thought, that's
that's exactly right. So he's gonna tell us, Yeah, it's
a Department of War and we're going to have some
more wars. It's, you know, not the Department of Peace.

(01:04:29):
So we're going to take a quick break. When we
come back, we're going to talk about what's going on
with Israel. Uh, there's some information that's come out, of course,
there's also been a couple more attacks, and uh, there's
not really any question, folks, that it is genocide. The
own their own statistics at the idea of the Israeli

(01:04:50):
Defense Force show that it is a genocide, and it
probably manipulated those as well to make it look not
quite as bad as it is.

Speaker 8 (01:05:00):
Jump out to the serious topics. So let's finish off
with the comments that we have. Don't frag me Bro
says PCs are going to go away when the net
required biometric access, the PC will be a dummy terminal
and all apps will be remotely served, all data saved
only online. That's gonna alien poop evolution. You can build
awesome PCs to rent video games on. That's right. You're

(01:05:23):
not going to own anything, Nights of the.

Speaker 7 (01:05:25):
Digital version of the own nothing and be happy.

Speaker 8 (01:05:29):
Agenda except think video games are so bad you can't
even be happy anymore. Knights of the Storms reponding, don't
frag me Bro. I went, I want went to get
a land card at Walmart about a year ago, and
they didn't have hardly any PC parts available. Everything was
for tablet or cell phones. Slash accessories.

Speaker 2 (01:05:47):
Yeah, people, no radio shack anymore.

Speaker 8 (01:05:50):
Actually, there is a radio shack nearby and severe Ville.
That's where I had to send my wife out. She
was out running errands and one of the cables that
got shipped here was faulty, so she went and picked
it up at radio shack.

Speaker 2 (01:06:02):
I want if they sell any components that you built
stuff from it.

Speaker 7 (01:06:05):
That's the thing. They mostly just sell like phone accessories.
These days. Yeah, there was that one radio shack in
Texas that had the sign for radio shack at least
for a while, but it was owned by a local
you know mom and pop that had components. But every
other radio shack is just some Well.

Speaker 2 (01:06:29):
The problem is is that, you know, kind of the
component stuff in the hobbyist industry where you build stuff
on boards that was kind of killed by very high
level integrated circuits and so, you know, people just started
getting circuits that would do functions as opposed to you know,
we used to do wirewrap boards where we would you know,

(01:06:51):
get sockets and we'd put the components in the sockets
and then we'd connect them all using wirewrap because you
could undo that pretty easily rather than solder.

Speaker 12 (01:07:00):
Bad stuff is gone places like Fries Electronics, and there
was that, like I said, one small mom and pop
shop that closed right before we moved out of Texas
that had like Arduino and other hobbyist.

Speaker 7 (01:07:15):
Stuff like Fries carried and all is now gone. You
can only get that online anymore.

Speaker 2 (01:07:22):
I don't think there's a Fries.

Speaker 8 (01:07:24):
Pretty sure they went they went out of they all
went under.

Speaker 2 (01:07:28):
Yeah, probably because they were some components. Yeah, probably because
of lockdown of Trump.

Speaker 8 (01:07:32):
Yeah, it all, it's all going away, bulldog. The governments
want you worshiping them. Wait until the United Nations makes
it mandatory. That's right. Audi, m r R. Good to
see you. Audi. Hope you're doing well.

Speaker 2 (01:07:45):
Retro radio.

Speaker 8 (01:07:46):
Yeah, I just saw an article at MSN that Memphis, Tennessee,
is among the cities that President Trump tends to send
more troops to resolve high crime.

Speaker 2 (01:07:53):
Of course, it's run by Democrats.

Speaker 8 (01:07:55):
As I predicted over a year ago, Trump is turning
the US into a perpetual police state occupied by I
need to scroll that downlands occupied by its own military,
and it will never cease.

Speaker 2 (01:08:07):
That's right. Once they take the power, they're not going
to give it back.

Speaker 8 (01:08:10):
Nibaru twenty nine. It's all right to rear end that
Florida license plate as long as you have a rainbow
symbol on your vehicle. That's right. You need a gay
license plate up front if you're going to hit the
Israeli is license plate in the back.

Speaker 7 (01:08:24):
Okay, one diversity points.

Speaker 2 (01:08:28):
We're gonna take a quick break, folks, and we'll be
right back.

Speaker 1 (01:09:22):
You are listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:09:26):
Well, Israel has done a double tap strike on Gaza's
NASA hospital, killing journalists and then also rescue workers. And
when we talk about double tap strike, do you remember
the video called that They called it collateral murder. It
wasn't collateral damage, but it was collateral murder. The video

(01:09:48):
of the people in the gunship I think one thirty
ghost ship or something. But they had recorded the video
where first they shot up an area where there was
a guy at camera and they recorded that and then
they waited until clearly marked ambulance came and as they

(01:10:10):
were as they grabbed the cameraman and other people who'd
been shot in the first attack, they then put them
in the ambulance and then they shot up the ambulance.
And that was leaked by Wiki leaks, and that really
was the thing that set the government on fire to
go after Julian massage. They called it collateral murder. Well,

(01:10:31):
similar things just happened. The Associated Press said the initial
strike was at ten ten am guds the time, hit
the fourth floor of the hospital, which was a surgical
operating room and a doctor's residences, killing at least two people.
Once rescue workers and journalists arrived at the scene. A
second strike hit, killing eighteen more people, a double tap

(01:10:55):
attack that was caught on video. There's really Outlet nine
magazine published the investigation last month. They said the IDF
has adopted using double tap strikes as a standard procedure
in Gaza. They said the video of the double tap
strike on Nasser Hospital is footage of murder quote unquote

(01:11:16):
again collateral murder. According to Reuters, the initial strike killed
one of its contractors, a cameraman who was killed in
near a live broadcasting position operated by Reuters on the
upper floor of the hospital. And this is an article
from anti war dot com. They said they have a
photo account with Reuters and they've used many of this
photograph of this guy in his work. The Israeli newspaper

(01:11:39):
Heretz reported that the Israeli military said that the initial
strike targeted a camera, which they claimed was a Hamas
camera that was being used to observe IDEA forces. They
say that Israeli tank shells struck the area, then another
one was fired to make sure the camera was destroyed. Nettanna,
who later claimed that double tap strike was a tragic mishap.

(01:12:03):
So first they said, yeah, it was people who were
taking pictures for the other side, you know, just like
at Harvard or whatever. The other four journalists that were
killed in the Israeli attack on the hospital we're mentioned
here freelancers for Associated Press or for some of them
work for Middle East IE or Al Jazeera or whatever.

(01:12:24):
But Israeli forces killed sixty four Palestinians in Gaza over
twenty four hours, the last twenty four hours. This is
a running update that's done every day on anti war
dot com. If you go there you can see how
many dozens of people have been murdered the last Over
the last day. In terms of civilians, Israeli forces killed
sixty four Palestinians wounded two hundred and seventy eight over

(01:12:47):
the previous twenty four hour period, as relentless US backed
Israeli attacks continue across the Strip. Among the dead were
nineteen Palestinians killed while attempting to get food at the
aid sites and Netna who has It's now been reported
from an Israeli newspaper that he has shut down seven

(01:13:10):
ceased fire deals, deals that have been agreed to by
the other side, and yet he's shut them down, including
very early on when they could have released hostages. This
is one of the reasons why you have so many
people in Israel who are protesting Netanyahu. Over the course
of the war in Gaza, Israel has repeatedly dug up
roadblocks to cease fire deals with Hamas, even when the

(01:13:34):
Palestinian group accepted its conditions. According to senior American and
Israeli officials interviewed by The Program, Israel blocked a ceasefire agreement.
In the program is Israel's Channel thirteen investigative program he blocked.
Israel blocked the ceasefire agreement on seven different occasions during

(01:13:55):
nearly two years of its devastating military campaign against the Gainstgaz.
Officials said Neatna, who was chiefly responsible, often bowing to
pressure from far right ministers, including bezil El Smotrik and
National Security Minister Edemar Ben Gvir. A spokesperson for the
US State Department, Matthew Miller under Joe Biden, said that

(01:14:18):
at the start of the war in October of twenty
twenty three, Hamas was ready to release some hostages. We've
been trying to get through to the government of Israel
to tell them that, Miller said, but Washington could not
get anyone there. To take us seriously, referring to the
Israeli leadership, I don't think they wanted to have that end.
Smotrick has told the Idea of Chief that anyone who

(01:14:39):
does not evacuate Gaza City can die of hunger or
they can surrender. Israel's Channel twelve also reported that Natanyahu
has said that he has Trump's full support for the
planned offensive to take over Gaza City, but that he
has limited time. Smotrick has told the head of the
Israeli military that anyone who remains in Gaza City after

(01:15:01):
an Idea of evacuation order can die of hunger or surrender.
You can besieged them. Simtric reportedly told the IDEF Chief
of Staff, whoever doesn't evacuate, don't let them no water,
no electricity. They can die of hunger or surrender. This
is what we want and you are capable of doing it.

(01:15:21):
There have been a lot of apologists here in America
for Israeli policy who have said, that's not what's happening.
This is just the fog of war and other things
like this, or as Huckabee cynically said, well you know,
they're getting rushed by a bunch of these people, and
so they get scared in a panic and they fire

(01:15:42):
into the crowd. That's what's happening. No, that's not what's happening.
Many people who are there said that they shot people
who were fleeing, shot them in the back. But this
is policy, this siege, policy of starvation is their policy,
and they're not even quiet about it. It's just that
it's not reported by American media for the most part,

(01:16:03):
or the Trump administration's Zionists will put it in a
different light. Eighteen Palestinians starved to death in Gaza over
three days due to Israeli siege. So this is something
that's happening on a regular basis. Then we have US
Ambassador Kushner. Is that a familiar name, Well, it turns

(01:16:23):
out that that's Jared's dad. He's now triggered a diplomatic
fight with France because he's ambassador there, demanding that France
do more for Israel. Charles Kushner, the convicted fell father
of Jared Kushner, pardoned by President Trump then in his

(01:16:44):
first administration and then appointed as US Ambassador to France,
triggered a diplomatic fight on Sunday by writing a letter
to the French government, accusing them of not doing enough
for Israel.

Speaker 8 (01:16:59):
Not that they're not doing enough for us.

Speaker 2 (01:17:01):
Yeah, exactly, that's a point. It's like, who's the ambassador,
who's the loyal to On the eighty first anniversary, he
said of the Allied liberation of Paris, which ended the
deportation of Jews from French soil, I write out of
deep concern over the dramatic rise of anti Semitism in France,
and so here we go. I would say that in reality,

(01:17:26):
people like Kushner are actually making anti Semitism great again.
That's what they're they're doing.

Speaker 8 (01:17:33):
Yeah, these are the these are the ambassadors for the
Semitic people. They have trouble, they have problems. Not that
most of these guys are actually from the Middle East, if.

Speaker 2 (01:17:43):
You want to know, if you want to know why
people are getting upset about this. And actually there was
a an i Bet piece on RT and they said
net Yahoo may be winning this God's awar, but he's
losing the war of public opinion. And that's absolutely true.
That's what John Stewart said. I don't agree with John
Stuart anything except that he said that. He said, you know,

(01:18:06):
his situation he said, I want to see Israel succeed,
and they're poisoning people's opinion about Israel with a sustained
attack against civilians.

Speaker 7 (01:18:15):
We've got some videos on the board about both of
those things, one of John Stewart talking about Gaza and
one of Yahoo talking about the massive bought armies that
the Palestinians are mobilizing to completely drown out little Israel's

(01:18:36):
tiny amount of media control.

Speaker 2 (01:18:40):
Yeah, let's play that first. I'll go to the John
Stewart genocide and Gaza video.

Speaker 13 (01:18:44):
I feel like I'm watching something that is so self
evidently inhumane and horrific, and to be told that I
have to shut.

Speaker 2 (01:18:56):
Up because he's going to be getting a letter from.

Speaker 13 (01:18:59):
J by speaking out, I would say the opposite.

Speaker 8 (01:19:04):
I think not.

Speaker 13 (01:19:05):
I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish
state much more at risk with this type of action.
I think they're the ones.

Speaker 14 (01:19:13):
That are.

Speaker 13 (01:19:15):
That are being anti If you want to define Mett
Yahou with the definition of anti Semitism, would probably have
to bomb himself. How is the world not stepping in
and stopping this atrocity? I don't understand this in any
way shape.

Speaker 5 (01:19:32):
I mean it's boggling my mind. It's worse than just
not stepping in.

Speaker 15 (01:19:35):
It's our weapons that are that are that are enforcing
this siege, that is enforcing this mass starvation. Eight in
November of twenty twenty fourth, then like eight months ago,
the International Criminal Court the issue to warrant for the
arrest of Benjamin Antenna, who for the war crime of starvation,
right eight months ago, eight months ago, and the United
States responded by trashing the International Criminal Court, even under Biden,

(01:19:59):
and then under Trump imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court.
And so the message to Israel was very clear, you
can get away with worse.

Speaker 5 (01:20:07):
And so then for almost three months in early this year.

Speaker 15 (01:20:10):
Israel cut off all food, all medicine, all water into
the Gaza.

Speaker 8 (01:20:15):
SA wasn't it's a siege.

Speaker 13 (01:20:17):
It's a military siege.

Speaker 15 (01:20:18):
Yes, that we are deeply complicit in. It could not
happen without.

Speaker 2 (01:20:23):
Us, and they openly talk about it.

Speaker 13 (01:20:25):
We use our leverage. Surely, the United States can't believe
that this is in the best interest of the region.
And when Donald Trump said something like finish the job,
what job is he talking about?

Speaker 5 (01:20:38):
What does that mean?

Speaker 15 (01:20:39):
Well, I mean the Trump plan made it pretty clear
the mass expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza, and that
is official Israel.

Speaker 13 (01:20:46):
Do you believe in the people of Israel would would
second that there must be a robut there there are.

Speaker 15 (01:20:56):
There are many Israelis who are appalled by this.

Speaker 5 (01:20:59):
Absolutely.

Speaker 15 (01:21:00):
But the problem is when a leader like Natagnyah who
can get away with this again and again and again,
it actually makes him stronger.

Speaker 5 (01:21:08):
The way to weaken NATANYAHUO.

Speaker 15 (01:21:11):
At home will be to show Israeli's that when Natayah,
who does these brutal things to the Palestinians, it actually
that there are consequences, not human consequences, in human lives.
I don't want in Israeli to die, but there have
to be some consequences.

Speaker 5 (01:21:25):
So Israeli see that this is not good for them.

Speaker 2 (01:21:30):
Yeah, well, you know what Jared Kushner's dad says, as
anti Zionism, as anti Semitism, plain and simple. That was
in the letter that he wrote to the French government.
Now there's actually people like him that are responsible for
us more than anyone else. And when we look at
what they're saying, we need to get the message out

(01:21:51):
to more people in Israelthough there's been a lot of
pushback Neatna, who was barely elected. He had to have
three different elections before he could put together parliamentary coalition
to govern. And there's been a lot of pushback in
Israel against these policies. But Netanya, who's very worried that
people are going to see more information showing what he's doing,

(01:22:11):
so he's responding against the bots.

Speaker 14 (01:22:15):
The propaganda walh.

Speaker 2 (01:22:17):
Look, it's a propaganda war. Well, he knows it's a
propaganda war because that's what he's doing.

Speaker 14 (01:22:20):
To put it mildly, I think there are vast forces
that are raided against us, among other things, the algorithms
of the social network that are driving a lot of
everything else, you know, and people who really know, and
they're the foremost, foremost people in this field in the world,
they're telling me that about sixty percent of the responses

(01:22:42):
on the social media are bots. They can categorically say
they're bots.

Speaker 2 (01:22:48):
Yeah, yeah, absolutely. So you know what do we do
about this? Well, one of the.

Speaker 7 (01:22:52):
Ways we've got vast forces a raid against us with
all these bots, as though the Palestinians are you know, yeah,
putting out massive bought forms to drown out anything that
they could possibly do with their media control.

Speaker 2 (01:23:08):
Well, he's got some really high powered cybersecurity people like
that pedophile, but they just sent back to Israel. That's
what we got to have him. He's going to fight
the bot armies for exactly. But they also have the
ad L and their CEO Jonathan Greenblat kind of said
the quiet part out loud. Listen to this. Think about this.

Speaker 16 (01:23:30):
The national symbol, let's say, of Rizbola, is a rifle.

Speaker 2 (01:23:35):
That's what's on their flag.

Speaker 16 (01:23:36):
The national symbol of Iran the Islam Cup.

Speaker 2 (01:23:38):
Could be Iran got to burn those flags. That's what's
on their flag.

Speaker 16 (01:23:42):
The national symbol of Israel is the shield. It's the
Star of David. The symbol of our people is not
and of war. It's an instrument of defense. The thing
that most embodies are entire ethos is not harming others.
It's again creating a better world. This is fundamental to

(01:24:05):
our tradition for thousands of years. And so the idea
that our national anthem would be the tippo would be
the hope, I should say our it's the Israel's national anthem.
So the idea that our national anthem would be the
oura the hope, I should say our it's the Israel's
national anthem.

Speaker 2 (01:24:24):
Yeah, he's just like Jared Kushner's dad.

Speaker 8 (01:24:26):
No loyalty in the United States.

Speaker 2 (01:24:28):
No loyalty.

Speaker 8 (01:24:30):
It's a matter of what he can extort and pull
for the United States, how much he can take from
the American people while bullying them and causing them to submit.

Speaker 2 (01:24:40):
Yeah, our country. And I thought it was kind of
interesting when he says it's a shield. It was kind
of the coat of arms of the Rothschilds. That's the
cultic signal symbol they call the Star of David. But
I said, Trump, and this is going back to Charles
Kushner's letter to the French government. Trump and I have
Jewish children and share Jewish g children. I know how

(01:25:01):
he feels about anti Semitism. Yeah, it's misplaced loyalties all around.
As a reminder, you know, Kushner was jailed because he
had hired a prostitute to seduce his own brother in
law and arranged to secretly film the encounter as part
of a witness intimidation scheme. Reports Information Liberation and guess

(01:25:23):
who the prosecutor was in that Chris Christie Christi better
watch his back. It's going to get the Bolton treatment
pretty soon.

Speaker 7 (01:25:32):
I can play the video in this article if you want.

Speaker 2 (01:25:34):
Yeah. Well, firstly he says, is that the one with
Chris Christie talking about the prosecution.

Speaker 5 (01:25:41):
He said, one got yard because Frankly hums it down.

Speaker 8 (01:25:45):
He's the one who fired you.

Speaker 7 (01:25:48):
Yes, and you believe that, right, You believe that because
there's history between the two of.

Speaker 17 (01:25:52):
You, between me and his father, not between me and him.

Speaker 8 (01:25:55):
You can understand why he takes it personally.

Speaker 17 (01:25:57):
Yes, And though would you.

Speaker 6 (01:25:58):
Separate your experience if your father has been put in
jail from the prosecutor who put him in jail.

Speaker 17 (01:26:01):
If my father was guilty, I would mister Kushner pled guilty.
He admitted the crimes, and so what am I supposed
to do as a prosecutor. I mean, if a guy
hires a prostitute to seduce his brother in law and
videotapes it, and then since the video tapes with sister
to attempt to intimidate her from testifying before, do I

(01:26:22):
really need any more justification than that? I mean, it's
one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted
when I was a US attorney, and I was used
attorney New Jersey, Margaret. So we had some loathsome and
disgusting crime going on there.

Speaker 8 (01:26:37):
When you managed to discuss Chris Christie, you've truly achieved something.
You've set new lows.

Speaker 2 (01:26:42):
Can you imagine somebody doing that? Yeah, I can, somebody
like Jeffrey Epstein. And here we have another connection with
all of this stuff, right, the Kushners and the Epstein's
and the Trump's all together with all that.

Speaker 8 (01:26:55):
It's a big club. And you ain't in it. Thankfully,
you can be thankful you're not in it.

Speaker 2 (01:27:00):
So he was, you know, he played guilty, and he
was convicted and jailed, but given a full unconditional pardon
by Trump at the end of his first term, and
then at the beginning of his second term, Trump made
him US ambassador to France. Now he is lecturing foreign

(01:27:20):
countries as though he is a beacon of morality, and
he is representing the interest of a different country as
American ambassador, he's representing the interest of Israel. All of
that is what we're seeing from Trump administration. If you
thought the job of US ambassador was to represent the
interests of the US, you would be wrong rights, information liberation,

(01:27:42):
absolutely right. Now, his concern is Israel, as you point out,
Travis Chris Menahan says that quotes Mike Huckabee, who said
to the Israelis, you are the chosen people. If someone
is angry at God, he will be angry at the
people who re present him. I think this is a

(01:28:02):
real problem. This is why I pushback against Christian Zionists.
I'm sorry, but what they're doing in Gaza is not
representative of God and is not representative of what He
wants them to do. And you've got people like Huckabee
who think that they can force God's hand to do
what they want to do, which is to come back
and take them away so they don't have to die.

(01:28:23):
And they're more than willing to cheer the mass murder
of civilians another part of the world, hoping that that
will result in them not having to die. I'm absolutely
disgusted with their theology and their politics, and I got
to say that is not Christianity, and I got to
say that to non believers because this is a disgusting

(01:28:45):
perversion of Christianity that these people are teaching.

Speaker 7 (01:28:48):
Play the video if you want of Huckaby of this.

Speaker 2 (01:28:54):
Oh yeah, sure, go ahead.

Speaker 18 (01:28:55):
The ambassador has a very interesting view of anti semitisms.
Us who grew up in America there was anti Semitism.
Of course, I experience, of all experienced that. The ambassador
has a very interesting view of Then he says, people
are you can't understand that the Sempis's if people who
are anti Semitic, it's because they're against thought, against the

(01:29:18):
Banchelid and we are represented his people, and that's why
they're anti Semitic. Otherwise that doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 19 (01:29:28):
Interesting view, it's interesting you. It's another view that since
we could say it's the chosen people, So people are
who are you?

Speaker 2 (01:29:37):
What are you?

Speaker 19 (01:29:38):
Were taking big shots chosen people?

Speaker 20 (01:29:44):
And that's part of it is that because you are
the chosen people, given a chosen place for a chosen purpose.
And if someone is angry at God, he'll be angry
at the people who represent him. So I tell people
anti Semitism is irrational. There's no reason for it unless

(01:30:10):
you understand the spiritual reason, which is what I believe
is that the heart of it. It is not the
left versus the right, It is good versus evil. It
is the creator versus those who rebel against the creators.

Speaker 2 (01:30:27):
Yeah, well, being descended from Abraham, even if they are,
there's some question about that. But even if they are
descended from Abraham, that does not give them a pass
to fight against God and his Messiah. And that's the
real spiritual issue that's there. And Hikabee has lost his way.

Speaker 8 (01:30:47):
Yeah, there's no bloodline that gives you a free pass
on murder.

Speaker 2 (01:30:51):
That's right aside, those who follow Christ are his chosen people,
and He has chosen. That's made very clear in terms
of the Bible. That's the true issue. You know, don't
think that just because you are a particular ethnic group

(01:31:11):
that God honors that and excuses whatever you do. There
is no salvation outside of Christ, and not all of
Israel is Israel. And they just illustrate that it was
always the people who were faithful to God. It was
always a part of Israel that followed God and a
part of a larger part of Israel that did not

(01:31:31):
follow God all throughout the Old Testament. I think within
the next two to three weeks, Trump said, You're going
to have a pretty good, conclusive ending to all of this.
He said in the Oval office. And so I remember
Smotrix said, you can do whatever you want, kill as
many people as you want. We've got to do this quickly, though,
and that's the marching orders that they got. This is

(01:31:52):
a collusion that is coming from our ZIONUS president. Yeah,
do whatever you want to these people. This is mass
murder of civilians and that is the essence of what
genocide is truly about. And as I said at the
beginning of the program, it says really data itself that
shows that eighty three percent of the guy's of war
dead are civilians. When we talk about whether or not

(01:32:14):
a war is justified, we have a lot of different
aspects to that. Number one, where we attacked, okay, check
that mark off. But number two, did you try to
avoid civilian deaths by trying to limit this to combatants?
And of course we lost our way in World War Two,
both sides did, and we've been attacking civilians everybody has

(01:32:36):
since then. That's unjust. Even if it has now become
the standard in commonplace, that is still unjust. And then
the third thing I would mention is that you want
to try to your purpose of your war is to
stop the killing, especially of civilians, and so you should
try to stop the war early, and you should try

(01:32:56):
to avoid killing civilians, but that's not what they have done.
Figures from a classified Israeli military intelligence director at database
show that at least eighty three percent of Palestinians killed
with civilians, with Gadza Health authorities recording fifty three thousand
deaths by May. Despite public statements asserting lower civilian losses,

(01:33:17):
Israeli government and army spokespeople claimed a one to one
or a two to one civilian to combat ratio combatant ratio,
but the classified data reveals a much higher civilian share.
Figures in the database show eighty nine hundred named fighters
dead or probably dead, with seventy three hundred and thirty

(01:33:38):
certain and fifteen hundred and seventy probable. They lie NonStop,
said one person, both the military echelon and the political echelon. Well,
I mean that's it. When you look at any government statistics,
whether they're talking about unemployment figures or talking about inflation,
they lie about everything, and so these numbers are probably

(01:33:59):
not as bad as reality. The reality is probably worse.
Human rights groups argue that the data bolsters the genocide claim.
Experts note that an eighty three percent civilian kill rate
in Gaza is exceptionally high, comparable only to Rwanda in
a couple of other places like that, rising to more
than eighty six percent if probable deaths are excluded. So

(01:34:22):
we've always called Rwanda a genocide, but you know this
is not allowed to be called a genocide because you
do that. That's a blood libel, says Mark Levan.

Speaker 6 (01:34:32):
I think so.

Speaker 2 (01:34:33):
The Army database says eighty three percent the Gaza dead
were civilians, a proportion of civilian slaughter that has few parallels,
even in modern time, where it has now become relatively
acceptable to target civilians and civilian areas. Israeli forces killed
four aid seekers near Gaza City, so at a hospital

(01:34:55):
and witnesses. These are people who were trying to get food.
Israeli forces kill them as they were traveling through a
military zone south of Gaza City, and the deaths add
to the growing coal of Palestinians killed while seeking food
as parts of the Gaza Strip plunge into famine and
Israel's military camps up activity in northern Gaza ahead of

(01:35:18):
a planned offensive to seize the largest city there. A
new Hampshire democrat who also appeared Sunday on Face the
Nation said that the Israeli blockade in Gaza is quote
a shameful black mark on humanity, that the world has
allowed this to happen, and that Israel is allowing this
to happen. Netanya, who is the point at which the

(01:35:41):
obstruction is happening, she said, he needs to look at
what he is doing and change his position. The four
Palestinians were killed when troops opened fire on a crowd
that was headed to a site run by the Israeli
backed American contractor Gaza Humananitarian Foundation, or GHF. It occurred

(01:36:04):
hundreds of meters away from the site, said eyewitnesses. The
gunfire was indiscriminate. They said the shooting happened while many
people fled. Some people fell to the ground after being shot.
The Israeli military and GHF did not immediately respond to
requests for comment. Since GHF first began operating nearly three
months ago, the UN says hundreds of Miusettings have been

(01:36:27):
shot and killed by Israeli defense forces and foreign military
contractors at or near its aid sites, and we've had
one former marine who is working for GHF as a
contractor has gone on record talking about the murder of
civilians who are trying to get food, that he saw
it happening all the time. Of course, we've had a
lot of doctors who have volunteered to help people talk

(01:36:50):
about not just a double tap strike with bombing or
missiles on a hospital, but double tap strikes on children,
and physicians say, shot once in the chest and then
while they were down, they hit them a second time
in the head to make sure they were dead. And
these were children. More than two thousand pal Stings have

(01:37:10):
been killed more than thirteen five hundred wounded while seeking
aid at food distribution points or along the convoy routes
used by the UN and other aid groups. According to
Gaza's health ministry, that is there. Well again, nettnaw Whuo
is winning in Gaza, but he is losing public opinion

(01:37:32):
in the West. And this is why they are pushing
so hard to destroy our First Amendment and using Trump
to do it. And of course Trump has no respect
for the First Amendment. It is simply about the tribal
politics that he supports. We are going to do. You
want to do some of the comments before we.

Speaker 8 (01:37:49):
Take a break, talking about college students, censoring themselves Nebaru
twenty twenty nine, nineteen seventies. All the unemployable college Marxist
graduates went into teaching and.

Speaker 2 (01:37:58):
Politics, so many of them got jobs at USF.

Speaker 8 (01:38:02):
What those degrees are only good for indoctrinating the next
generation of people, dougle ug playing the game to get
good grades. Yeah, and then you got to play the
game to keep your job. And you got to play
the game and play the game. Play the game, Doug
to double O seven. If you want to pass your classes,
you have to give the right answers quote unquote answers.

(01:38:25):
The left is right, Brian de McCartney. Blood thinners are
toxic and do not address the issue. That's right, aud
E m R. R.

Speaker 2 (01:38:33):
Soud.

Speaker 8 (01:38:33):
Americans are going to see that the US military's existence
is not about protecting us but occupying us permanently. Yes,
Knights of the Storm that bruises from him backhanding the
first Amendments.

Speaker 2 (01:38:47):
That's good.

Speaker 6 (01:38:47):
I like that.

Speaker 8 (01:38:50):
Don't frag me bro. US government will use World War three,
world War three as a meat grinder to get rid
of more men that might push back and organize a revolution.
You know, the World wars were just as you said
a meat grinder. They got rid of a lot of
very good fighting stock of Europe and a lot of
people that would have stood up and said no.

Speaker 2 (01:39:08):
Well all else fails, They take you to wars. Gerald
Sentia says Trends Research and trans General Transgeneral dot common. Yes, yeah,
take you the same place. But yeah, code night save
ten percent.

Speaker 8 (01:39:22):
Yeah, Niabaru twenty twenty nine, changing the title to War
Department in preparation for Trump's war with China beginning in
twenty twenty seven. Yeah, maybe we can have another boxer
rebellion Brian dev McCartney.

Speaker 7 (01:39:33):
But the whole Defense Department thing was aspirational at best.
But is it a good thing that they're no longer
playing lip service to us being the good guys that
are just defending ourselves.

Speaker 8 (01:39:47):
No, what, No, just the war Department.

Speaker 2 (01:39:49):
Now we can get this. Now, we can get rid
of this term national security that they've used as a
magic incantation to do every criminal, unconstitutional, secretive thing that
they can imagine.

Speaker 8 (01:40:01):
No more defense, only War's angry tiger's den Israel has
become a monster that the US feeds purely devilish.

Speaker 2 (01:40:09):
Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, we become the monsters that we fight,
don't we. I mean, it's amazing to see them enacting
the same policies that the Nazis did.

Speaker 8 (01:40:20):
And so callously, carelessly, completely unfeeling a Syrian girl, I
believe NETANYAHUO is facing corruption charges if he stops being president,
and according to it is really law, you can't get
rid of a wartime president. So we can expect war
for the rest of Netanyahu's life. Yeah, well, that's been
the plan for a long time. When you see all
the countries they want to invade and take over destabilize.

Speaker 2 (01:40:42):
Oh yeah, he's been going after Iran forever. And if
you want a permanent war, go after Iran. You will
never subdue an area of that size. And people that
has a level of ad management that they do.

Speaker 8 (01:40:57):
Don't frag me. Bro Radio Shack used to have everything
you need to build remotely activated.

Speaker 14 (01:41:01):
I ed.

Speaker 8 (01:41:02):
Oh, well, you know, you learn something new every day. Yeah,
don't go building IED's folks.

Speaker 2 (01:41:10):
Oudi m r R.

Speaker 8 (01:41:11):
The journalist who wrote the article and the Starving Children
of Gaza, was directly targeted and killed by Israel.

Speaker 2 (01:41:17):
Yeah, yep, we gotta get rid of those bots. Everybody
is a bot. If they don't say what. Who wants
them to say, Well, we're gonna take a quick break
and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:42:57):
Is what I'm listening to. The David Night Showing, No

(01:44:10):
Analyzing the Globalist Next Move.

Speaker 21 (01:44:23):
And now the David Nut Show, Elvis the Beatle and
the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies
channel at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 8 (01:44:39):
Welcome back, folks. Thank you for still being here with us.
We really do appreciate it, and of course we thank
APS Radio as well. I want to take this to
plug briefly. We can thank you all enough. You've want
to go to Davidknight dot news. You can see all
the avenues of support for the show.

Speaker 2 (01:44:54):
There.

Speaker 8 (01:44:55):
There is subscribe star dot com, forward slash the David
Night Show where you can sign up monthly and it'll
send the payment automatically. There's cash app sell Bitcoin. There's
the po box which is David Knight, Peobox nine ninety four,
Kodak Tennessee three seven seven six four. Hey, I got
it right. You can also go to Trends Journal dot com.

(01:45:15):
As you mentioned, with promo code Night, you get ten
percent off That works out to be about two fifty
a week, which is cheaper than a cup of coffee
at this point, so you're getting a great value for money. There.
There's David Knight dot Gold, which Tony rdburn has kindly
set up. He's got Wolfpack where you can sign up
for a monthly subscription and get gold or silver. It's
a good way to get outside the Fiat monetary system.
There's urnc store dot com where again with promo code Night,

(01:45:38):
you get ten percent off their products. They can help
you with your health and hopefully stay outside of the
medical industrial complex.

Speaker 2 (01:45:45):
And not only health products, but also books that you
get like Jedickgriffin's A World Without Cancer, very important to
educate yourself.

Speaker 8 (01:45:52):
Then our newest sponsor here is Homestead Products dot chop.
They've got all kinds of different high quality made in
America products that they work very very hard on. This
is Bellium black tea. It looks like very high quality
ta I'm not a t expert by any means, but
it's a herbal remedy for the common cold, as it says,
bronchiness and other inflammation of the upper respiratory tract. And

(01:46:13):
again that's Homestead Products dot shop or ten you get
ten percent off with promo code night as well. So
go to Homestead Products dot shop. They have a numerous
number of products that you might need in your life,
might want, and you can support a good business which
is very very pro liberty.

Speaker 2 (01:46:31):
Like the products that they do too. They've done some
very unique and useful things. You know, when you look
at a lot of these prep products, most of them
are just starch or whatever. Yeah, it's all just it's
very healthy and very thoughtful.

Speaker 8 (01:46:44):
I'm a little congested right now, so I'm curious to
see if this tea would help. And of course you
cannot forget Jacklossanbooks dot com where you can get the
Civil Defense Manual. It's a two volume set. It's designed
to be large so you can read it, and it
has a ton of info in it. It's also only
in book form because when the Internet goes down, if

(01:47:06):
it goes down, you're not going to have access to it.
You want to have a hard copy of it. You
want to learn to start, how to defend yourself in
your community, how to find water, how to protect your supplies.
You don't want to be caught in a scenario where
you don't know how to do these things. You don't
want to be put in a scenario where you have
to make some kind of choice where it's either your
family or someone else. You don't want to be put
in that situation. You don't want to be the guy

(01:47:27):
has to make that immoral choice.

Speaker 2 (01:47:29):
Great practical advice on self defense, on organizing your community,
as well as on medical and food issues as well.
So great source.

Speaker 8 (01:47:39):
Yeah, Jacklawson books dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:47:42):
Yes, Well, as we look at what is ahead, let's
talk about ai Elon Musk is out. He's, you know,
his very first involvement that I was aware of. I'm
sure that he became a multi billionaire getting these government
contracts by greasing the poems of politicians, no doubt about that.
But the first public, like large donation that he made

(01:48:02):
was a million dollars to Andrew Yang when Yang was
running for president, and his key issue and only issue
at that point in time, Yang's was was universal basic income.
And Musk is adamant about that and still is. He's
still talking about it, except he's now changed it from
universal basic income to universal high income. I think of

(01:48:27):
reminds me of George Carlin, who said they call it
the American dream because you've got to be asleep to
believe it. If you believe that this is going to
be high income, you must be high in order to
believe that.

Speaker 7 (01:48:40):
We're going to print money. We're all rich. I mean,
we just give a little bit of money when you
can make everyone a billionaire.

Speaker 2 (01:48:47):
That's right, that's right. So both Musk as well as
Sam Altman talking about that. Sam Altman's talking about how
we can just give everybody trillions of tokens. And he's
already made the rounds with his orb where you look
into it and it gets a biometric data sample of

(01:49:08):
your retina, and then in exchange for that, he gives
you a little token of some crypto worthless crypto that
he's invented and has absolutely nothing behind it.

Speaker 8 (01:49:17):
Oh, real quick, before you move on to get a
comment from Night to the Storm, here says, is David
Ever going to get doctor LaGuardia on his doomsday Book
of Medicine would be a fantastic opanion to Jack Lawson's
book set. So I just want to.

Speaker 2 (01:49:28):
Well, I have to Yeah, let's look that up. I'm
not familiar with that. So thank you Jason for mentioning
that we'll have to look that up. Yeah. Good, so
it's hard to say exactly what that moment is, but
there will come a point when no job is needed.
You can have a job if you want it and

(01:49:50):
sort of a personal satisfaction, but the AI will be
able to do everything and do it better than you,
says Elon Musk. Click this is what George Gilder said
about Silicon Valley. He said they are neo Marxists, just
like Carl Marx fantasized and said with the Industrial Revolution,
we have so much material wealth and manufacturing capacity that

(01:50:11):
there is no need for anybody to be poor. We
just need to make sure that the government can redistribute
income to people adequately. And that is now what the
people that George Gilder calls the neo Marxist of Silicon Valley.
That's what they're selling everybody, and it is a lie,
just like it's a lie that the universal income is
going to be high. If they give you something, it

(01:50:34):
will be very basic, a very basic life that's going
to be there anyway. That's the way they're selling this. Now,
that's the way that Sam Maltman is doing it as well.
Musk has framed this not as a handout but as
a societal adaptation to technological progress, a way to create

(01:50:54):
a prosperous star Trek future rather than a negative terminator one.
Well Bloomberg was harping on the same thing as well,
Michael Bloomberg when he ran for president, and he was saying,
we have to do it so they don't come after
us with guillotines. So the terminator future is where humanity
rises up and comes after the the artellect masters that

(01:51:16):
are out there, the artificial intelligence masters. Os Hugo de Garis,
he had it spot on at the very beginning. He
realized that it was going to be a war of
the human elites against the rest of humanity, and they
were going to use artificial intelligence as their weapon. Society
could become fragmented. Individuals could suffer from depression as they
no longer feel a meaning or a purpose in their lives.

(01:51:38):
Said Elon Musk As if your job right now that
so many people have is working at a fast food joiner,
does that give meaning to your life? That's not giving
means to life. But meaning in our lives is not
based on the job that we have. It's based on
our relationships with people that we have, and our relationships
with God the things that give us meaning, and we

(01:52:02):
should not be looking to people like Elon Musk, Michael Bloomberg,
Sam Altman, or Trump for clues about what is meaningful
in life. These are people who have absolutely no meaning
in their life. They have focused, and they're very good
at it. They have focused on accumulating money. And what

(01:52:24):
is the profit a man to gain the entire world
and lose his own soul? That question of two thousand
years ago has never been more appropriate to ask each
and every one of these would be masters of our
lives here. So if the computer can do it, and
the robots can do it, and they can do everything
better than you, then does your life have meaning? Well,

(01:52:47):
it's clear that our life has no meaning to Musk
to the rest of these billionaires, they think that they
should be our masters, and they think their life is meaningless.
Tech leaders say that revenue can be shared under a
massive wealth redistribution system. Suddenly, an idea that was once
seen as a socialist policy that would reward idleness is

(01:53:10):
one of Ai Boom's hottest acronyms. And I just see
this as yet another socialist utopian experiment like the Aneida
community up in New York or whatever. Sam Altman says
he now thinks that instead of money, everyone could get
an ownership share and whatever the AI creates that would

(01:53:31):
allow the wealth accumulated by AI to be spread across
the population, he said, calling the idea universal extreme wealth.
There we go, ue w sounds like an Arab country.

Speaker 7 (01:53:43):
Well, he's even nicer and more generous than musk who
only want us to have high wealth. This guy's going
to give us extreme wealth.

Speaker 2 (01:53:52):
That's right. Yeah, so we go from basic to high
to extreme. He imagined the scenario in which every human
is given a trillion tokens as a basic unit of
information that large language models use each year to buy
or to sell or treat as personal wealth. And he's
already been doing this, as I said with his little orb.
Mark Benioff, CEO Salesforce, has said that up to half

(01:54:15):
of the workforce at his company is now AI. He
is an evangelist for universal basic income and said in
The Pandemic that he saw the COVID nineteen stimulus checks
from Trump as a model for broader income distribution. That's
what I said. At the same time in twenty twenty,
I said, this is programming for people. It is it

(01:54:39):
is moving the overturn window. Now here's the questions. Okay,
and this is a good, good question to ask these people.
If jobs are obsolete, then we have to assume that
raw materials mind themselves, that no one is needed to
form that energy is free and unlimited. And yet that

(01:55:00):
is not the case for their data centers, is it?
In this scenario, How does anyone get paid anything? Who
is paying whom and with what money are they paying?
Where does the electricity come from to power the AI? Well,
of course it'll be the Federal Reserve and tariffs, right,
all this magic stuff, magic money, And this is the

(01:55:22):
magic monetary theory of the technocracy is that we are
all just going to have universal income, whether it is basic, high,
or extreme, it's just all going to show up someday.
And we've been saying this from the very beginning. You
go back and look at what Henry Ford said. He
said he wanted to with mass production to make the

(01:55:42):
cars cheaply enough that the people who worked in his
factory making the cars could afford to own a car.
But if we don't have any jobs, who are they
producing stuff for and who are they giving it to? Well,
I think the obvious answer is to the few people
who own everything, all the robots will be working for them.

(01:56:02):
They will not be working for you. Their task is
going to be to control and to contain you, to
make sure that you don't learn anything useful. And that's
where the AI has a very unique role in terms
of its psychological aspects of control, keep you from having
any aspirations, to keep you from doing anything different, to

(01:56:23):
pacify you. And that's why these universal welfare programs are
so dangerous. When you go back, and I've mentioned this before,
Charles Murray and his book Losing Ground, talking about how
damaging the War on Poverty had been to families and
poor communities, and how devastating it had been creating dependency

(01:56:44):
and all the rest of this stuff that was used
for welfare reform by the Reagan administration. That was philosophically
what they referred to. But now even Charles Murray, who
wrote the book Dumbing Us Down, now he is a
cheerleader for universal basic income, which is nothing other than
welfare done universally. Musk's groc said that Elon Musk Universal

(01:57:07):
high income theory suggests that advanced AI and automation could
eliminate the need for traditional jobs. That's what the writer did.
He asked Groc, how silly is Musk's universal high income theory,
and it said, well, it is a bold and speculative
idea that incites both intrigue and skepticism. Whether it is

(01:57:29):
silly depends on how one evaluates its feasibility. Economic implications
are underlying assumptions. The silliness likely stems from the lack
of a concrete plan. Musk's predictions, spanning from twenty sixteen
to twenty twenty five, remain vague on implementation. How do
we fund universal high income? How do we manage societal transition?

(01:57:51):
How do we address inequality during the shift? Without specifics
at risks being dismissed as utopian optimism, especially given his
track record of ambitious and sometimes delayed promises. That's his
own large language model summing up the man, which is

(01:58:11):
and he said, if no one is working, tell me
who is going to be paying the taxes and who
is buying what and with what money? And Groc says
that is a good question. It highlights a potential circular
logic flaw in the universal high income concept, especially in
a fully jobless scenario where Ai handles all production and

(01:58:34):
then Mish writes here Altman, Musk and Benioff describe a
world in which everyone is useless. Everyone gets free money,
but where does the money come from? Again, this is
the technocrafts version of the modern monetary theory or the
magic money tree. Let's assume that tempers of the people
are not useless. How do they get paid from the

(01:58:56):
free money that they give to everyone else. This doesn't scale,
and no one can say where the money will come from.
We'll see all of the money, all of the wealth,
is to come from all of us and go to
the handful of billionaires that want to own everything. This
is a socialist mecca. No one has any money, no

(01:59:18):
one gets paid, everyone shares the wealth. It's kind of
like the paraphrase of the criticism of the communists. So
they would say, well, the Soviet Union, they pretend to
pay us, and we pretend to work. Except I guess
nobody's going to pretend anymore. So there's not gonna be
any payment, and it's not gonna be work. No one

(01:59:40):
can explain how anything gets produced, because like in socialism,
nothing gets produced. That's the hallmark of it. It's just
like you take a look at some of the Scandinavian countries.
They have been living off of the accumulated capital of
previous generations prior to socialism. They're getting poor and poor

(02:00:02):
as time goes on, and that is going to happen
to all of us.

Speaker 8 (02:00:05):
And of course many people have pointed out that the
US has basically been bankrolling their military budget through NATO
many of these European countries that have practiced socialism, so
that's another thing they're not having to pay for themselves.

Speaker 2 (02:00:17):
That's right. Yeah, just wait until they start paying for that.
Things are going to go down really really quickly, especially
Yea and Germany's borrowing. Fred Mertz is barring money in
order to build a military machine again in Germany. That's
the outcome of these policies.

Speaker 7 (02:00:33):
This is a something about the I can't remember which
country it is. One of the ones that everyone holds
up is oh, look they've got all these, you know,
very socialist policies of free healthcare and all that, and
yet they're doing fine. So surely socialism will work. But
if you look at it, the actual amount of money
that they spend per person on these government handout programs

(02:00:58):
is less then we're currently spending purpose in America currently,
it's just that less people are taking advantage of these
socialist things there, and that they don't have all the
same socialist stuff that we have here. So it is
actually less socialists in terms of the actual amount of

(02:01:22):
money being spent.

Speaker 2 (02:01:24):
Yes, well, these people are under no illusions. They know
exactly what they're doing. If you look at Cloward and Piven,
they pointed out that the purpose of the welfare state
was to collapse society so they can build their authoritarian
structure after that. And it wasn't happening quickly enough for
the people in America, so they wanted to open up
the borders and bring people in from other countries and
put them on the welfare state so they could collapse

(02:01:45):
the system. This is all about collapsing the system, and
this is about these guys coming out on top afterwards.
That's one of the reasons why they're pushing this so much.

Speaker 1 (02:01:53):
Well.

Speaker 2 (02:01:53):
Ian Milk Gilchrist says death is not the opposite of life.
The opposite of life is the machine. He's a British
psychiatrist and this is coming from Xos, a news out
of the UK. He says, We've become very good at
seeing the parts, but we completely lost sight of the whole.

(02:02:15):
Paul Kingsnorth's book Against the Machine is due to be
published in September. The book is an account of the
technological cultural matrix that is enveloping all of us, from
the first Industrial Revolution to the rise of AI. This
book shows how the hollowing out of humanity has been
a long game and how our very soul is now

(02:02:35):
at stake. Against the Machine is a spiritual manual for
dissonance in the technological age, and I think that J. R. R.
Tolkien has a great deal to talk to us about
that as well. That was one of his themes that
he always kept arkening back to.

Speaker 8 (02:02:51):
You could tell that Tolkien was very much a man
of the soil, the earth. He liked agriculture and agrarian societies.
He did not enjoy the industrialization of the world. You
could see just the way he wrote about the Shire
and the Hobbits, and how it's from their perspective. You know,
there's other characters that you do follow, but the majority

(02:03:12):
of the book is generally spent with the perspective of
a Hobbit and you know, he devotes that much time
to it because he loves those characters the most. He
sees them as you know, the true you know, uh
sees himself in them.

Speaker 2 (02:03:27):
Yeah that's humanity.

Speaker 8 (02:03:28):
Yeah yeah, and I think it gave the humanity. It's
funny as a kid, you know, you read Lord of
the Rings and you're like, oh, it'd be great to
go on an adventure like that save the world. As like, oh,
it'd be nice to live in the Shire, would be
so nice to live in a just a small town.

Speaker 2 (02:03:42):
See. That's it. They're enjoying the natural benefits that God
gave them and the labor of their hands, you know,
the tobacco that they grow and smoke and all the
rest of the stuff. And uh, that was something that
Jefferson would have agreed with Tokien on. He said that
we are not going to be able to sustain the
kind of society, the free society that they had put

(02:04:04):
together without it being an agrarian society. He was very
much opposed to industrialism. He saw the machine taking away
people's souls as much well. Scientists say that they have
now created talk about a machine, scientists say they've now
created a new form of life. They claim, this is
their phrase, it is more perfect than the one that

(02:04:25):
nature made. Well, Nature never made any life. Nature is
not a conscious thought. There's not any intelligence there. It
has to be an intelligence, conscience that manufactured. And this
is all about DNA. And it's amazing to me to
see how people who are involved in DNA and look

(02:04:46):
at this code and how complex it is. They spend
decades to try to decode a small part of it,
and then, of course did they get it right. You know,
we've heard for the longest time the Human Genome projects
said so much of the DNA there is just chunk.
That means that they don't understand what it is.

Speaker 8 (02:05:03):
No reason for it, throw it out.

Speaker 2 (02:05:05):
And that's something that should alarm us even more as
they start messing with something that they quite obviously don't
fully understand. Nature did not make anything. God created us.
God created our world. There was an intelligence there. And
when God created the world, they want to say, well,
this is much more perfect than the DNA that we

(02:05:25):
have right now. Well, God created the world. He pronounced
it very very good. What that means is that it
was perfect. God has now changed the world twice. We're
now in the third revision. We've had the fall as
well as the flood, and in both of those he
cursed us. And so what we're seeing now is not

(02:05:46):
what he originally created, but he is going to restore that.
Scientists at the Medical Research Council's Lab of Molecular Biology
say they've engineered a bacteria whose genetic code is more
efficient than any other life form on Earth. They call
it Sen fifty seven. They could call it meaning synthesis,

(02:06:07):
but they're going to break it down. That's why end
they could just call it original sin. Maybe there's a
bioengineered strain of E. Coli. Yeah, and they's great. That's
the first thing they want to do is create more E. Coli.
That's that's your scientists for you today. They say it
uses seven less codons than the than all life on Earth.

(02:06:29):
A codon, put simply, is a three letter sequence that
is found in DNA and RNA, which delivers instructions for
amino acids, a fundamental building block of life. All of
this is a code. All of it is design. And
you know, it's amazing when they look at this. I
grew up where biology it was all about skeletons. It

(02:06:52):
was all about you know, comparative anatomy was Oh, look,
there's the similarity between different skeletons. That means that evolved
one from the other. It's like, now you don't have
any transitional forms. Now they look at this and they
look at DNA, and what utter fools they have made
of themselves to think that this is a complex computer

(02:07:13):
code that has error correction all the rest of the stuff.
But it just happened.

Speaker 8 (02:07:18):
They say that it's just kind of appeared.

Speaker 2 (02:07:21):
One. Yeah, all life on Earth uses sixty four codons,
and they've been able to do this Ecoli bacteria with
fewer ones. So they say it's better and more efficient.
When you look at this and you look at some
common features between different animals, you might say. Another way
that you might look at that is to say it
looks like they've got a common designer. But they won't

(02:07:43):
say that. And of course this is not just animals,
but it's also plants that have this DNA coding in it.
They realize, they said, that evolution had not resulted in
perfect efficiency. Since some of the codons were clearly redundant,
was there room to trim some thing? So in twenty ten,
a team of twenty four researchers detailed the steps to

(02:08:05):
take to create the world's first synthetic bacteria cell, and
it took them fifteen years. Then in twenty nineteen, genetic
researchers in Cambridge University reworked an E. Coli strain down
to sixty one codons, showing they could do it with
less than the sixty four. But now they've taken it

(02:08:25):
even further to make send fifty seven. The researchers went
through the painstaking process say this, of altering over one
hundred and one thousand lines of genetic code, first in
theory and then in practice. Yeah, they want you to
believe if you stopped to think about it, one hundred
and one thousand lines of code, if you saw a

(02:08:46):
computer program like that, would your first instinct be, well,
I think that just happened by accident, or would you
say somebody wrote that this is I mean, these people
are utter fools to try to push this, and don't
let them fool you to believe that one hundred one
thousand lines of code could just happen spontaneously and accidentally.

Speaker 7 (02:09:05):
And also so they don't know enough about this to
say that they can improve it authoritatively, Like for a
long time you mentioned chunk DNA of half of it.
We don't know what it does, so it's junk. It
doesn't do anything. And then they are slowly realizing more
and more that no, the junk DNA is extremely important.
If they had trimmed the fat quote unquote with DNA,

(02:09:28):
would they have gotten rid of the junk DNA and
created some cancer prone abomination.

Speaker 2 (02:09:34):
Yeah, that's exactly right. Ye who knows what they're going
to create.

Speaker 8 (02:09:37):
Knights of the Storm has a good comminators. They used
to talk about the missing link between the various humanoid species.
The fact is there is no link between any type
of species.

Speaker 2 (02:09:45):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 8 (02:09:46):
They continually would talk about, Oh, look there's Lucy, there's
piltdown man, there's this, there's that, and all of them
are continuous.

Speaker 2 (02:09:52):
When you look at DNA, it's a very complicated code
which tells you that it was created by intelligence. And
when you look at it's not just intelligence that we
see there, but it's also things like irreducible complexity if
you look at different animals. And this is what I
always enjoyed with the answers and genesis curriculum. Folks, have
you got kids, grandkids, You need to get that stuff

(02:10:13):
and talk to them about it, because, as I said,
it was as dull as paint drying for them to
point to skeletons and stuff. That's not the biology that
is the reality of life. The reality is that if
you start to look at these animals as irreducibly complex,
you start to see the true functionality that's built into them.
And it truly is a wonder if you look at

(02:10:34):
the reality of what's there instead of looking at the
dead skeletons. If you look at, for example, the woodpecker
and the things that make it unique. It's got a
beak that's very hard, and it has shock absorbers for
its brain because it's going to beat its beak against
the tree. It's got feet that allow it to hook
on vertically while it's doing all of this stuff. And

(02:10:56):
then once it drills a hole, it's got a very long,
sticky tongue to go through and to get the insects
out of there. If you take away any one of
those aspects, you've now got an animal that doesn't work.
So it's not only designed at the lowest level of DNA,
but that DNA creates a unique set of features that

(02:11:17):
creates a unique functional animal like a woodpecker. Same thing
you see with a giraffe, for example. If you stop
and think about the giraffe as high as its head
is and the hydraulics involved in all of this. Once
a giraffe bends down to try to get a drink
of water, for example, all that blood is going to
rush to its brain. But there is a special device

(02:11:40):
that only the giraffe has that will stop that from
causing it to black out from the rush brain of
blood coming to its brain. You see these types of
things all through nature, and each and every creature is
uniquely designed, irreducibly complex. So there's so many things in
nature that God has created that show his handiwork and

(02:12:03):
showed the design that's there. But these people say, well,
we definitely went through these periods where we were like, well,
will this be a dead end or will we see
this through? They said, you can start to exploring what
will life tolerate again, thinking that life and nature are
these things out there that have intelligence and the ability
to design things. And they said, we found out that

(02:12:27):
life still works well in the beginning, it wasn't life.
But in the beginning it was logos, right, And when
we look at logos, logos, that actual word talks about intelligence.
And if you look at the Greek word, it's also structure.
It's things like word and reason and rationale and logic

(02:12:50):
and argument. All those were involved there because that's what
embodied what God was. In the beginning, there was logos,
and logos was with God, and logos was God. That's
what the Bible teaches us. And Logos was life. Christ
was life, and the light of man. This is these
people who are operating in darkness. Well, Brian Shall Hobby

(02:13:13):
has something along the same lines. He says, what is
the difference between life and lifeless? Has new technology actually
improved our lives? And in it he talks about First
Corinthians and the example that is there, And if you
look at that article, as we can pull that up,
he's got a picture of people playing musical instruments. Because

(02:13:36):
that's the analogy that Paul uses when he writes to
the Corinthians. Even in the case of lifeless things, he says,
that makes sounds such as a flute or a harp,
they have anyone, how will anyone know what tune is
being played unless there's a distinction in the notes. In
other words, these musical instruments are lifeless things. The flute

(02:13:56):
has no life in it, the heart has no life
in it. But it's the person who has lifefe who
makes these things come to life. And that is the
analogy for artificial intelligences. It does not have any life
in it. It is a fake intelligence. It's being animated
by either actual Indians. It's going to be used by
the governments and the technocrats are going to be behind

(02:14:18):
this to control you. And what they're trying to do
folks right now is they're trying to create a mythology
that these machines are intelligent, that they're self aware, that
they're a new form of life, that they are evolving,
and all the rest of this stuff, because they don't
want you to see the man behind the curtain pulling
the levers like the Wizard of Oz. And so our job,

(02:14:42):
your job as well as mine, is to pull back
that curtain and to show these people are moving the
levers so we do not get deceived by what This
is a big part of this, as Brainshaw Hoby points out,
this worldview that they're selling you of AI predicated on
this long evolutionary worldview that they've been putting out. He said,

(02:15:05):
The predominant belief in Western culture that is fueling this
current generative AI spending frenzy and creating perhaps the largest
financial budget of modern times is the belief in Darwinian evolution.
You know, maybe what we should do is instead of
maybe the way we ought to refer to this AI,

(02:15:25):
since it's a bubble, maybe we ought to call it
the bubble of Babel, because it is very much like
the Tower of Babel. It is something that first of all,
allows people of different languages to be able to communicate
more effectively with each other, which is what really was
going on with the Tower of Babel. And it also

(02:15:46):
is mankind trying to play God, trying to play God
saying that we're going to create this new superintelligence and
all the rest of this stuff. So, as he points out,
Darwinism has conditioned the generals their life today in Western
culture to believe that electronic technology is constantly evolving and
improving life and improving the world. Is that really what

(02:16:10):
is happening in your life? So it's higher forms of
human beings have not evolved in the real world, in
spite of the rapid advancement of electronic technology of the
last couple of centuries. Superhumans only exist in fantasy, such
as the Zionists controlled Marvel Studios and their blockbuster movies
in the past couple of decades, portraying superhumans as they

(02:16:32):
condition their audience to accept eugenics and Darwinism through propaganda entertainment.
Of course, there's a lot of different bad subtexts that
were in the Marvel movies, aren't there. I mean, when
you look at X men and stuff that is like,
you know, well, we are super We're better than everybody else.
And there was this LGBT analogy that they were pretty

(02:16:53):
obviously trying to stick in there.

Speaker 8 (02:16:56):
I've always found it a little bit silly because they'll
look at it like, oh, well, this is an example
for this, Like what's kind of a bad example. And
you've got a kid that might turn into a nuclear
bomb at any moment, you know, maybe you need to
reset valuate that.

Speaker 2 (02:17:08):
Yeah, it's all predicated on this idea that we're going
to evolve. That's where these superhero supposedly come from. And
of course, he points out Marvel studios. If you remember,
partnered with Pfiser and Trump to distribute the Pfiser COVID
shots during COVID, especially in Israel, and as I point
out many times, Netanyahu hates his own people. He partnered

(02:17:29):
with Pfiser and said, we will get collect data and
use the Israelis that he was governing, will use them
as labrats if you put us at the front of
the list and give us the shot first. I mean
he offered up his own people. Think about that as labrats.
No wonder that he has no problem pushing genocide against

(02:17:50):
other people. So he points out Darwinism has developed into
the belief system of transhumanism, because of course it's just
the next evolutionary step to merge with machines and the singularity, right,
and that is what's fundamentally behind it. And you need
to stop and pull back and think about the worldviews

(02:18:11):
that are being sold to you through things like entertainment.
You know, you can go back and look at Star
Wars and you can see a lot of Buddhism that
is involved in that, you know, becoming one with a
force and all the rest of that stuff that so
many different philosophical and religious elements in that that you
need to be able to identify instead of just naively
and passively consuming entertainment. It's fine to to, you know,

(02:18:35):
look at it as a superficial level, but especially if
you have children, you need to address some of the
underlying things that are affecting the way that they view
the world, and you need to address those things specifically.
And so we have had Hollywood selling us the idea
of transhumanism and the singularity. Of course they've been selling

(02:18:57):
us this whole idea of UFOs and all the which
is also something else that has grown out of this
Darwinian evolutionary mindset. The concept of transhumanism, belief that biological
humans can integrate with electronic computers to create a new
quote unquote species, was introduced by the World Economic Forum
around twenty sixteen as part of their Fourth Industrial Revolution,

(02:19:21):
and the term transhumanism, I think was actually coined by
Julian Huxley, brother of Oldest Huxley. This brave new garbage
that they've been trying to sell us. And whenever I
look at their Fourth Industrial Revolution, the way Klaus Schwab
would say, it'd always be the forced Industrial Revolution, Like

(02:19:43):
you would say.

Speaker 8 (02:19:44):
It whether you like it or not.

Speaker 2 (02:19:46):
Yeah, And so this is what they say in their video.
I didn't get the video because it's about eleven minutes long,
but about four and a half minutes into it, they
say design is critical today because it is the first
signal of human intention. Well, design is not just humans
at design. Of course, God designs as well. The whole

(02:20:08):
point of recognizing intelligent design is to recognize that something
was done intentionally. You know, when you look at a car,
you know that somebody intentionally had an intention and deliberately
made that car. And so design is when you see
design when you can understand that there is intention and

(02:20:29):
not just random factors that have come together for something.
That's the cue.

Speaker 7 (02:20:33):
Yeah, I'm reminded of the whole thing with SETI with
I looking for intelligent life, and they found just a
single repeating frequency, and I believe they later found out
that was due to some astrological thing of some sorts.
Are yeah, pulsing at a steady rate. But it's like, oh, look,

(02:20:55):
because it's on a set timer, that must mean that
it had a creator bhind it. And yet they will
look at all this and say, oh, no, it's just random.

Speaker 2 (02:21:05):
Yeah, because it had this fixed period in terms of
the signal. That was basically what Equasar was was this
rotating rock that had a polarized tips that were rotating,
and because that rotation, it was sending out electromagnetic signal.
And when they saw a repeating, consistent pattern of a

(02:21:27):
signal as simple as that was, they said, oh, this
is a sign of life. They're trying to communicate with us.
And yet they at the same time, they would ignore
what was going on with their own DNA. You know,
you look at the complicated code in your DNA, and
they're still doing it. Even to this day, they still
ignore that, and they're still looking for some kind of
extraterrestrial intelligence that is not really very intelligent.

Speaker 8 (02:21:50):
Just this utter refusal, just no, there can't be a god.

Speaker 22 (02:21:54):
I can't anything anything other than that, right, it's too
horrifying to contemplate for them, the fact that there's something
that would always be above them, something that you know,
the perfect being, something that is perfectly intelligent, per and
just they want to be the smartest person they or
at least the potential to become the smartest person, Like well,

(02:22:14):
maybe even if we find aliens, they might be smarter
than us now, but I can eventually become as smart
as them.

Speaker 8 (02:22:19):
With God, that's out the window. There's no chance of
that ever.

Speaker 2 (02:22:23):
Half un if ever there was a time when there
was no thing, there would still be nothing. But Krick
and Watson discovered DNA, said well, we can see the
design here. So they weren't so stupid and rebellious that
they would ignore that. So they talked about pan Spermi. Oh,
there's some aliens or something that went throughout the universe
creating life. It's like, you know, that would be called

(02:22:46):
God if that was really true, and it would have
to be self existent.

Speaker 7 (02:22:50):
They're desperate for there to be aliens, like the whole
SETI thing. Looking at a single repeating pulse as sign
of intelligence is just as ridiculous as looking at this
complicated code. Well not quite as ridiculous, but almost as
ridiculous as looking at this complicated code and saying, oh,
it's just random. It's they have to have the aliens

(02:23:13):
and not God, no matter how ridiculous the logic jumps
that are required for that.

Speaker 8 (02:23:20):
That's right, and still it only moves the problem back
one step. Like even if you were to find out, oh,
we were created by aliens. Where did those aliens come from?

Speaker 6 (02:23:29):
Yes?

Speaker 8 (02:23:29):
Are there more aliens and then more aliens?

Speaker 2 (02:23:32):
Well, Brian shaw Hobby takes it in an interesting direction.
He says, the descendence of Noah must have had too
much knowledge of the evil world system and whatever technology
they use before it was destroyed by God in the flood.
So once more God had to intervene to prevent Satan
from taking over the world. As you divide the world
up into smaller ethnic and language groups and scattered them

(02:23:53):
across the world, well that's what is now being reversed
by AI. Think of the knowledge that was lost at
the Tower of Babbel, which was the last time the
world had a singular world government and a singular world language.
People before the flood lived to be almost one thousand
years old. In the knowledge and wisdom that they would

(02:24:13):
have passed on from generation generation is truly unfathomable today. Yeah,
when you stop and think about it, if you didn't
have diminished physical and mental capabilities that come with age,
think about how intelligent I mean we've talked about this
with octopus for example. You know the fact that they
only live like what three years or something? But look
at how incredibly smart they are. They could be They

(02:24:37):
could be a real threat with a longer lifespan. Well,
that certainly is true of humans, isn't it.

Speaker 8 (02:24:41):
Yea, if we had an octopus that lived to be
eighty years old, they might be a problem. You couldn't
contain it no matter what you did.

Speaker 2 (02:24:47):
So long and thanks for all the fish, right, yeah,
he writes, It's highly unlikely that these people needed any
of the electronic technological crutches that we use today, with
the thought of recording any of their communication even have
been entered into their minds, he said, I wonder or
did they have such perfect photographic memories so that knowledge

(02:25:10):
and wisdom would pass down from generation and generation, increasing
human power and ingenuity with each generation, without the use
of modern technological crutches that we have today. I mean,
stop and think somebody like Einstein or somebody like Newton.
Imagine if they live to be a thousand years old,
what they could have put together. It truly is amazing.
But it also makes me think when he puts it

(02:25:32):
this way with brianchall, how he does you know, did
they need to have anything any crutches to remember this stuff? Right?
We congratulate ourselves because we've created computers and other things
like that as crutches. It makes me think of the
Christopher Nolan movie Memento, right where you get this guy
who's lost his ability to create new memories, and so
as things are going on, he's leaving notes everywhere for

(02:25:54):
his later self to come back and discover, and so
the post it's kind of become his memory. That's really
kind of what we're doing with computers now, isn't it.

Speaker 8 (02:26:02):
Yeah, we've replaced our own ability to even think and reason,
not just the ability to form new memories, but everything
turning it over. Just hey, I've mentioned this before, but
on Twitter now anytime I look at anything, there's someone
in the comments at Groc. What does this mean at Groc?
Summarize this for me at Grock? Is this real? Are
you guys just fully happy to turn it.

Speaker 2 (02:26:24):
To become the arbiter of what is true or not?
I mean, like I said, as well, you know, we've
had situations. I've seen a couple of different videos that
have been put up where somebody says, look at this,
I went through with AI and I got it to
admit such and such, and some of them are to
admit that there really is a god or whatever. It's like,
is that you're you're going to hang your hat on

(02:26:45):
what AI said.

Speaker 8 (02:26:46):
Yeah, there's also just the fact that AI wants to
give you the answers that you want. That does eventually
it will kind of suss out and figure out the
way you're trying to push it, and it will even
if to backpedal or you know, go back on what
it said, it will start going back and doing that
because it wants to keep you utilizing the system.

Speaker 2 (02:27:08):
We just have to keep in mind that this is
not intelligence. It's illusion. That's what the eye stands for.
It's artificial illusion, and you know, you can enjoy it
and you can use it for entertainment, just like people
look at David Copperfield who says he's going to make
the statue of liberty disappear. Well, he didn't make the
statue of liberty disappear. It appeared to disappear for the

(02:27:32):
people who were standing in a particular spot. But it
was an illusion. And so you know, we can we
can be entertained, we can be fascinated by illusions. You
know how in the world they do that. We can
do the same thing with Ai. We can say, how
in the world could it put this kind of stuff together,
and just don't let it become a reference source for

(02:27:54):
you and don't fall into the idea that this thing
is real. Understand there is a man behind the curtain,
and that man is trying to steal everything in your
life from you and from your descendants, and he's trying
to imprison and kill you. That's the way to properly
understand this, that the Wizard of Oz is truly evil
and the Wizard of Ai. And I think also the

(02:28:16):
fact that you know, when we look at the original
Tower of Babbel, it stopped when God changed the languages here.
But I think what we're going to have with this bubble,
the bubble of Babel, I think that's going to burst.
That's the way this thing is going to come down,
and it's going to be financial and in many other regards.

(02:28:37):
It's going to have massive implications for us. I think
when this artificial bubble that they have built collapses. Brian
schaw Harby says, these people have failed to acknowledge that
it was their master who corrupted the world from the perfect,
original design and the original intention of the Creator. Yeah,
they are serving the Master who has been the enemy

(02:28:59):
of humans from the Garden of beaten On. In opposition
to modern teaching on Darwinism and technology that promotes things
like eugenics and transhumanism, the teaching of the Bible clearly
shows that the physical world is wearing out and will
soon be destroyed by fire and then replaced. In the beginning,
as hebrews, a Lord, you laid the foundation of the earth.

(02:29:22):
The heavens are the work of your hands. They will perish,
but you will remain. They will all wear out like
a garment. You will roll them up like a robe.
Like a garment. They will be changed, but you remain
the same, and your ears will never end. The day
of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens
will disappear with a roar, and the elements will be

(02:29:45):
destroyed by fire. That's what we need to keep in mind.
The concepts of transhumanism in the Fourth Industrial Revolution presented
by the World Economic Forum almost ten years ago. There's
been a notable chain and the presentation of transhumanism since
the introduction of cht GPT. We now have software that

(02:30:07):
is very, very energy hungry and not sustainable quite frankly,
unless they take everything from us. And they're in the
process of doing that. Your electricity rates and are soaring everywhere.
This is actually AI and the data centers are becoming
a bigger threat to your ability to have electricity and

(02:30:27):
power than actually the climate mcguffin was. It's rolling out
much faster with that because they want it for control.
There's now widespread belief amongst the public that a computer
powered by AI can completely replace man, which means that
they no longer even need a transhuman you know. Just

(02:30:47):
think about this. The fear of our AI takeover folks
is based on the lie of evolution. It's based on
the lie of man becoming God. This is why you
don't need to fear what is happening, because it's all
a lie. And so just understand where your future lies.

(02:31:08):
It does not God is the one who's going to
control the future. And all of these dire predictions about
taking your jobs and taking everything away from you or
AI that is going to be doing this, or that
it's really going to be the humans behind it. We
need to be aware of the humans and how they're
going to use this. But it's not going to be

(02:31:29):
ai AI will be their artificial illusion for tyranny. The
idea that human like robots can now replace humans is
a common theme in both corporate and alternative media these days.
Brian Schall Hobby says, I've tried my best for the
past few years to show how fake this belief is.
But the propaganda and the deception of two hundred years

(02:31:50):
of Darwinian academics has almost completely blinded the eyes of
the current generations alive today on planet Earth. As I
said before, it's also that Darwinism also includes the UFO
illusion and Project Bluebeam or whatever they're going to do
with that. Communications and language or characteristics of life that's

(02:32:10):
created by God. Lifeless things created by man need human
intervention for them to have any meaning at all, just
like a musical instrument that by themselves does not have
the power or the ability to communicate or to make music.
And again that quote that I read you before, saying
that a lifeless thing like a flute or a harp
needs somebody to breathe life into it. He says, So

(02:32:33):
unless you speak intelligent, intelligible words with your tongue, how
will anyone know what you're saying? You'll just be speaking
into the air like an AI chatbot. That's hallucinating. When
one considers the truth that are being written here, it's
very easy to see that people's false beliefs and AI
and robots replacing humans would be the same as if

(02:32:54):
people started worshiping musical instruments attributing consciousness to those instruments
if they were playing themselves. Can a player piano replicate
humans so that human musicians are no longer needed to
create music? You know? We get to that in some
regard with MIDI, which is the way I do the

(02:33:14):
music that I do. There's recorded instruments and if you
look at the MIDI controllers, that actually looks like the
piano role that you have on a player piano. But
it's telling the instrument how to play and what to
play and the timing that it's going to play. But
still there has to be a human that's going to

(02:33:36):
create the instrument and a human that's going to program it.

Speaker 7 (02:33:39):
I saw something of a guy talking about how AI
is going to kill creativity, and the quote he ad was,
you can give AI fifty one hundred years of blues
and never get rock and roll. It's as more and

(02:34:00):
more of more and more people offload their thinking and
creative processes to this stuff. Those talents are going to
become rarer and rarer and go away. But this thing
isn't really creative. It isn't Yeah, it's not truly creating
the music.

Speaker 2 (02:34:18):
It's imitating.

Speaker 7 (02:34:19):
It's altering and parodying what already exists.

Speaker 2 (02:34:23):
It's like Disney, it's cannibalizing the creative efforts of people
in the past. I do have to say though, that
you know, sometimes you can use some of these elements
and computers or artificial intelligence. Sometimes it can be used
in a different way, in a creative way. And I
would say, you know, when we do it with music,
there's programs out there like Suno where you just give

(02:34:45):
it a prompt and you say, give me something in
this particular style with these instruments, and I'll just go
through and create some derivative piece of work, which usually
is not very good. But the other thing that you
can do with it is you can and not so
much Ai. I was talking about Midi. That really wasn't Ai.
But now they have brought AI in to be able

(02:35:06):
to actually sing words. But you still program it, you know,
which is still still your lyrics. It's still you doing
the midi, but now for the first time, rather than
having a large choir that somebody has recorded that's singing
or or this, you know, some other syllable and not
really singing anything of any intelligence, now you can get

(02:35:28):
it to actually do the lyrics. And I've been playing
around with that, and there is a tremendous amount. When
you look at that, you realize just how much is
done effortlessly by somebody who can sing. If you can't sing,
then it becomes even more difficult than learning to sing
in many cases, because you wind up with strange pronunciation

(02:35:52):
and other things like that, and you have to do workarounds.
And that's the key. These programs as they stand right
now give you the ability to go in and to
change it and find detail. So you give it the
words and it pronounces the words, and then when it
gets the pronunciation wrong or it gets the inflection wrong,
you go in and micro manage that. So it can
be a lot of work, but it can also give

(02:36:14):
you access to a creative process that you couldn't have
if you couldn't sing, or if you were somebody who
wanted to put together a large ensemble, but you couldn't
afford to hire the musicians to do it. And now
you can do that with a great deal of work
on your own. But anyway, he said, to be just
as foolish to think that, you know, when we look

(02:36:35):
at AI and we think that it's actually thinking, it
would just be be just as foolish as thinking that
the instruments are playing themselves. They don't play themselves, and
yet we are looking at that. He goes on to
say that when you look at lifeless, the word that
was used there in Greek was essentially the word for

(02:36:57):
soul as life, but it has an A in front
of it, right, just like we see atheist is somebody
who denies that there's a guy to put the a
in front of it, right, And so it was a
word that had an A in front of soul to
deny that it had a soul, that it had life.

(02:37:17):
And he said, uh, these lifeless things a man made
instruments or tech tools that have no soul. And that's
exactly what AI large language models are.

Speaker 7 (02:37:28):
Yah yuess, you could say that's the A and AI.
It's against intelligence, it's anti intelligence.

Speaker 2 (02:37:34):
That's right. Yeah, it's just like atheistic. It is ah intelligence,
lifeless without a soul by itself. Even if it contained
all of the digitized information in the world, it can
do nothing. It needs masters, It needs the humans who
create it and operate it in order for the program
to be useful. And that's that's the real issue. The

(02:37:56):
evil masters, the wizards of Ohs that are pulling the
string is behind the curtain. That's what needs to be exposed.
We need to realize what this is. We don't even
know how it works. We need to know who is
working it. That's the key thing. People wrongly ascribe life
and consciousness to AI. So, as he points out again

(02:38:18):
going back to the idea of soul, I've said many
times when we look at psychology, right, uh, these are
atheists who refer to the soul and they study it.
You know, psychology is literally the study of the soul.
Except these are people who deny that you have a soul.
And he said Western culture completely ignores the existence of souls.

(02:38:38):
They reduce man to a physical entity that operates like
a computer, like how technology works. And just like you
see that, especially in bef Skinner's work, he believes that
people are souls they're not committed, they're not creating the
image of God, and he can control them like he
does a machine. And that's what his behavioral psycholog is

(02:39:00):
ultimately about. It's about controlling people like he would control
a machine. And that's what's so dehumanizing about it. And
that's why he calls his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity.
You can you know, you can take those things away
from people, but you can't separate them. Life is now
defined by ease and comfort, which is mistakenly interpretated as wealth.

(02:39:27):
This is this false belief, says Brian. That is not
only the false belief that technology is making our lives better,
but the ignorance of the masses as to what life
actually is that is empowering the technocrasts today as they
spend trillions on AI and waste our natural resources to
make us poor, to make us their servants. That's why
I say, you know, when Elon Musk talks about the

(02:39:50):
fact that will you have meaning in your life if
you don't have a job, they really don't understand what
life is, and they understand what gives meaning to life
is that many times, Counting used to always talk about
the politics of meaning you know, politics gave meaning to her,
and we don't need to envy those people, and we
don't need to emulate them either. We should transcend them.

(02:40:13):
And the way that we do that is with God
and our connection to God. Technology is lifeless. It doesn't
produce anything. You can only be powered by those who
have life and a soul. Even things like genetic engineering.
He said, if you look at GMO fruits and vegetables,
they only alter a plant within its kind. Genetic engineering technology,

(02:40:37):
for example, has never taken a seed from one specie
and modify it to evolve into a completely different specie.
That's what they're trying to hint that they're doing.

Speaker 8 (02:40:48):
It truly is amazing, but yeah, and again that's the
essence of evolution. They are like, oh, we started as
a single cell thingy and now we're here and that's
where everything came from. And it is just the most
absurd theory. There's not a single instance of it being proven,
being shown. There's not a single missing link a bridge

(02:41:12):
between two things like oh, look it's changing from this
to the other thing.

Speaker 2 (02:41:16):
I got to the point where I used to like
National Geographic they had great nature photography, but the problem
was that they would just hammer you over and over
and over and over again with this evolutionary mindset, and
it's like it's just absurd, and I'm tired of hearing it.

Speaker 7 (02:41:36):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:41:36):
It was like a school hammering down transgender pronoun.

Speaker 8 (02:41:40):
And they continually get away with this because they'll conflate
natural selection, you know, they'll call it micro evolution, where
something has within its own genetics a vast array of
different things that it can potentially alter itself slightly. It
selects for you know, oh, these you know finches over
here have a different beak because they eat snails and
they have to have a stronger beak to crack through
the shell versus these finches over there that don't do that.

(02:42:02):
But the finch is still a finch. It's not even
changing from a finch into a sparrow or a hawk.
It's still an exactly exact same type of bird.

Speaker 2 (02:42:11):
They play games of their definition too, the case of
the I don't know finches maybe at the Grand Canyon,
and they said, well, our definition of a specie is
something that will mate with each other. And so we
got these two different populations of finches on the Grand
Canyon that have not come in contact with each other

(02:42:32):
and so they're mating. Songs have changed slightly to the
extent that one group will not mate with the other group.
Therefore they have evolved into another specie by definition. So see,
there we have evolution and it's absolute nonsense. I mean,
it's still physically identified identical to each other.

Speaker 8 (02:42:52):
And it's just because, like you said, they play these
definitional games where again it's natural selection, but they'll call
it something like microevolution. That still joining the idea. Well,
if this is actually evolution, and then if it's happening,
that means macro can happen. But it's a completely different thing.

Speaker 2 (02:43:08):
Yeah, it's molecules, man, it's completely different than microadaptation.

Speaker 6 (02:43:14):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (02:43:14):
The key difference is there's not new information being added.

Speaker 8 (02:43:19):
It's information being lost.

Speaker 7 (02:43:20):
Yeah, it's information that was already there or information that's
discarded because it was no longer useful. Like fish that
go blind because they are generations growing up in a
cave that doesn't have any light, so they're wasting calories
on eyes that they can't use. So after a while
they stop having eyes with the children because the ones

(02:43:43):
that didn't have eyes reproduce more so that's just information
being subtracted to better fit the environment that they're in.
It's not new information. The fish isn't growing legs, it's
getting rid of its eyes.

Speaker 2 (02:44:00):
Yes, right. And it's like you hear them talk all
the time about superbugs evolving in response to some kind
of a poison. Well, that is not a new bug
that is evolving. What's happened is that some of them
have you know, there's variation within this population and some

(02:44:23):
of them, just as we see when we have vaccine
poisons injected into us, we see that it affects some people
differently than it affects others. Some people has no effect
on some people, it kills them or gives them very
serious things. This is one of the things that makes
it difficult to pin this down, that kind of individual variation.
And so what happens is with these pesticides, for example,

(02:44:46):
they kill out a large portion of the original population,
but some of them are not affected, and the ones
who survived that then multiply and now you've got a
new population that's not affected by that poison. So it
did not evolve into some kind of a super bug
or a super rodent or something like that. It's just

(02:45:07):
we need to understand that when they're constantly hitting us
with these lies about molecules demand evolution. But speaking of lies, again,
that's the key thing. Take control of your children's education.
The purpose of your education is to point them towards God.

Speaker 8 (02:45:25):
So many people that will say, well, you know, Genesis
doesn't really matter one way or the other if it's this,
you know, even if God used evolution is not that
big deal. So it sets the foundation for the entire Bible.
If you cannot trust the beginning of it, why can
you trust any of it?

Speaker 2 (02:45:39):
That's right.

Speaker 8 (02:45:40):
It sets the tone. It's you know, it's where you start,
and you can trust it.

Speaker 2 (02:45:45):
It fits the facts better than either constantly evolving theories.
The theories are what evolving. Well, I just want to
encourage people to look at homeschooling and so along those lines,
here's another exams the parental replacement centers that are being
disguised as schools in Chicago. And this is an article

(02:46:10):
that's on the New American. Actually I think Alex Newman
had it. It was a reprint from another organization that putting
this together fighting this. They call these things the sustainable
community schools that should give you an idea of where
this is coming from. The un Chicago's government school system
is doubling down to take over more and more functions

(02:46:32):
that were once reserved for families, voluntary associations, and churches.

Speaker 7 (02:46:38):
Before we move on to a new topic, do you
want to get to the comments?

Speaker 8 (02:46:43):
Oh yeah, oh yeah, we've got a lot. Yeah, we've
got a woots. Thank you very much, a woots. We
appreciate it again. It's your support that keeps this show going.
We can of thank you all enough for doing that.
Says so great to see all the nights together. Would
you consider interviewing Brian Burlettick?

Speaker 2 (02:46:59):
Do you know who he is?

Speaker 8 (02:47:00):
Don't know who that is. That's one of the problems
with doing the show is we have very little time
to actually learn about other people.

Speaker 7 (02:47:07):
Look at it.

Speaker 2 (02:47:08):
Yeah, yeah, or you can send us an email to
David Knight's show at ProtonMail dot com.

Speaker 8 (02:47:14):
Yes, Nights of the Storm. I've been seeing paid ads
on twigs that are showing people shopping in markets and
gaza supposedly. Ask yourself, why are they paying for ads
to show them having food?

Speaker 2 (02:47:25):
I wonder if that's some Israeli bots. Maybe that's maybe
that's why they need to get that guy back.

Speaker 8 (02:47:30):
From Las Vegas out their nation that Gaza has trouble
with that is known for having a lot of cyber
security or cyber warfare units. I want to say there
could be could be one of those.

Speaker 7 (02:47:42):
You don't understand they're losing the propaganda war because Gaza
has so many boughts. They have right vast forces a
rat against us. To quote net and Yahoo. Gaza and
Palestine are manipulating the media to an extreme extent with
their fingers in every media outwit.

Speaker 8 (02:48:03):
Yes, Knights of the Storm. You can't represent God and
deny Jesus at the same time.

Speaker 2 (02:48:09):
Yes, true, It's amazing that Hukabe doesn't know that. Like
I said, you mix politics with the religion and sometimes
you just go pure politics chan with other religion out.
That appears to be what Mike Kakabe's done. He's thrown
out christ for his Zionist politics.

Speaker 8 (02:48:22):
Tonal Lord won three three seven. That's just a twisting
of the doctrine that Jesus spoke of the world hates
Christians because they hate God. Yeah, talking about Hukabees again
just because oh well, they hate Jews because they hate God, No,
they hate Christians, minute man militia. I think everyone would
be shocked by how many people support UBI, even people

(02:48:43):
I consider like minded. Yeah, I've seen a lot of people.

Speaker 2 (02:48:46):
I was amazed because I knew that was exactly what
the stimulus check was about. And what was amazing to
me was how quickly people latched on to that dependency.
They wanted that stimulus check to continue.

Speaker 8 (02:48:59):
They loved it, they got a taste for it, and decided, well,
you know what, my job treats me like garbage. They
don't respect me. I'm not contributing anything meaningful and mostly
pushing numbers around on a spreadsheet or sending emails that
don't matter to people that don't matter all day. So
why on earth would I go back?

Speaker 2 (02:49:14):
It was like some kind of drug that you know,
first time you try it, your hook, you know. That's
that's the way.

Speaker 8 (02:49:21):
It was, like, wait a minute, I don't have to
go to this corporate hell scape where it's an hr
nanny state, and you'll just pay me to stay home
whatever you need me to do. Fine, I'll wear a mask.
Even don't frag me, bro. Even Darwin stated that if
you cannot find any transitional fossils and the theories incorrect.
None have been found.

Speaker 2 (02:49:42):
That's right. And of course the other thing that was
really a problem for him, and Michael Bayhy wrote a
book called Darwin's Black Box, and he said, even in
the eighteen hundreds, and when we went to the British Museum,
remember they had that little display that was set up
on the side, and it was Darwin's inst months and
his desk and things like that, and he had to

(02:50:03):
examine things he had just like a handheld magnifying glass.
I said, no wonder he thought that life was coming
spontaneously out of water. You know, how many tools to
be able to even observe from the British Museum, Yeah, yeah,
But he said that one of the problems that bugged
him in his theory was the eye of the human

(02:50:25):
eye and every eye of every creature. You know, how
could something even he could understand with his limited tools
that he had, he understood how complicated the eye was,
because how is it adjusting the size of the iris
in response to light and all the rest of stuff.
He said, how could that happen just by random chance processes?

(02:50:46):
So to him, that was this black box that really
was a stumbling block for him with his theory of evolution,
and Michael Bahey wrote an early work talking about intelligent
design from that standpoint, and that's what he toddled. It
was Darwin's black box, which is what intelligence is really about.

Speaker 8 (02:51:05):
Can't get it figured out? Yeah, don't I read that,
Knights of the Storm responding, don't frag me, bro says.
Darwin also recanted his entire theory later in life. They
don't mention that in school.

Speaker 2 (02:51:15):
Yeah, yeah, sorry, guys, I was wrong transition, transactional fossils
and all the rest of the stuff. And he was
very much tied in with the Huxley's or tied in
with him. He was tied into Gen X's cousin that
type of thing. He also had a club that was
called the X Club, which.

Speaker 8 (02:51:35):
Also it wasn't his I want to say. His father
was a preacher and he just had a huge chip
on his shoulder about God in general, and so he
set out to want to disprove it and would have
done anything basically, well.

Speaker 2 (02:51:47):
You know, there's a lot of people who, especially in
those days, would get into the clergy as a profession,
and they were very cynical and disbelievers and that they
just wanted to get into it to make money. It's
just a way. So you know, you could look at that.
If you're a family member, you see it as a hustle,
you know. And I think you bother have had that

(02:52:07):
same situation with Jerry Folwell of his son, you know
who kind of left.

Speaker 8 (02:52:12):
But anyway, we've got alien poop. Evolution says a giraffe
is just a horse that wanted leaves.

Speaker 2 (02:52:18):
David duh Well marketing inheritance. Yeah, he just kept going
for those higher leaves. Each generation they stretch their neck
a little bit more.

Speaker 8 (02:52:26):
Yeah, it's such a stupid concept. Brian dev McCartney. The
heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth
his handiwork, Psalm nineteen one. That's right, The heavens declare
his righteousness, and all the people see his glory, Psalm
ninety seven six. Audi Eric Clapton said in nineteen ninety

(02:52:46):
seven that computers will hurt musical creativity and skill today.
He's right. There are AI artists quote unquote that think
they are on the same level as Beethoven. Well, you know,
a little delusion now and then.

Speaker 2 (02:52:59):
Yeah, I guess it's because they're decomposing.

Speaker 8 (02:53:04):
I was gonna say it's because if you listen to
the stuff they create, you'd think they were deaf. But
alien pop evolution and evolving limb would be a dead prey.
That's right, that third leg that's going to help you
go faster.

Speaker 2 (02:53:18):
You know. Well, that's one of the arguments that ken
Ham would make. He said, you know they even in
German they call bats flying mice, right defleeder mouse and
says a flying mouse, he said, And so we have
evolutionists to say that bats are evolved from mice, and
he said, that doesn't make any sense. As they're starting

(02:53:39):
to develop wings, and what is the special power of
a mouse? They can squeeze into anything. If they start
developing useless wings that don't allow them to fly, but
make it harder for them to get into things, they
become more vulnerable to predators. Rather than it has to
all happen all at once, and that's.

Speaker 8 (02:53:57):
The great My favorite example is out of the flowers
and the bumblebees. These two separate systems that are intrinsically linked.
They all they both have to exist at the same time,
or neither one gets to exist.

Speaker 2 (02:54:10):
Well, I just think about sexual reproduction, right, just in general,
you have to have two complementary organisms, male and female
to have sexual reproduction. I guess that's one of the
reasons why they're working so hard on this gender stuff, Right,
They've got to get rid of sexual reproduction. Maybe they
get their factories and their artificial wombs, then they can

(02:54:32):
remove that stumbling block. That another one of the stumbling
blocks for Darwinism.

Speaker 8 (02:54:37):
Finally perfect true Darwinism just hasn't been tried yet.

Speaker 2 (02:54:41):
Yeah.

Speaker 8 (02:54:42):
Knights of the Storm describing the difference between the concept
of natural selection versus evolution. Yeah. Natural selection, of course,
as we talked about, is just you know, the area
has specific traits that are more useful there, and so
the animals that have those traits to do better and
produce more offspring, and therefore eventually they become the dominant

(02:55:04):
and eventually only type of that creature there.

Speaker 2 (02:55:07):
That's right. Let's talk about the evolution of schools right now,
and look at the deadly form that is taking under
this new plan, Chicago will be expanding from twenty quote
unquote sustainable community schools unquote to almost twice as many
for next year. The twenty twenty five to twenty twenty
six school year. The announcement on August fourth by Chicago officials,

(02:55:29):
union bosses, and government education chiefs came even as the
district faces a staggering budget hole of seven hundred and
thirty four million dollars. This is a bankrupt system, folks,
with bankrupt ideas. The idea behind sustainable community schools is
to provide what government educators refer to as more services,

(02:55:53):
even wrap around services. Yeah, this is a government that
wraps around you like a book constrictor isn't it. Under
the so called village model, everything from mental health and
dental health to nutrition and quote family well being becomes
the government school's responsibility. Think of them as parental and

(02:56:14):
church replacement centers within the institutions. Everything for children, but
the bedtime stories and the good night hugs for now
become the responsibility of the state. Even parents can receive
myriad services from the government schools as they become the
new community hub, more access to resources for jobs, housing,

(02:56:37):
said radical left wing mayor Brandon Johnson at a press
conference announcing this massive expansion of the controversial program, as
if it were government's job to feed and to house
the population. The school graduated about two thirds of its
victims in four years. Those students are victims of this system.

(02:56:58):
But the Illinois State Board of Education data shows that
even though two thirds of the victims graduating four years,
the school did not have one single student that was
proficient and either reading or math on standardized tests. Isn't
that amazing? So they're graduating these victims, but they can't
read and can't write proficiently.

Speaker 8 (02:57:19):
Yeah, sure, go out into the world.

Speaker 2 (02:57:21):
Fine, How they graduated without even basic proficiency is anything?
Remains a mystery? Well not really. They said they squandered
four thousand dollars more in taxpayer money per student, which
is pretty amazing when you look at this. I mean,
they're spending like, I don't know what it is now.
A few years ago, some of the school districts that
were the most left winging and wasteful, we're spending like

(02:57:45):
twenty four thousand dollars per student. So that's a significant
increase that you're putting in there. They said they couldn't
produce even a single student proficient in any core subject,
worse even than traditional government schools. Almost eighty percent of
students were chronically absent at the academy as well showing

(02:58:09):
up there. This is why I say to people who
are afraid to take on homeschooling, folks, you can't possibly
do worse than the government in terms of any of
these aspects, in terms of reading or arithmetic or anything
else like that. There's no way that you could do worse.
Even if you've struggled in school, you can do better,
and many things out there to help you to do that.

Speaker 7 (02:58:31):
Academically, yes, eighty percent were chronically absent, but it certainly
didn't seem to help the twenty percent that were regular attendees.

Speaker 2 (02:58:39):
That's right. Yeah, the twenty percent who are there all
the time still didn't know how to do math or
how to read proficiently.

Speaker 8 (02:58:45):
And that should have been the ideal scenario for them
because most of the other students are missing, so they've
got more time to hone in on and spend time
with these kids that are there.

Speaker 2 (02:58:53):
Well. You know, one of the things when we talked
about James dobbson the other day, I think one of
things that he really got right was he said, you know,
when he's talking about discipline and things like that, he said,
what is your purpose in discipline, He said, your purpose
in discipline is to show the children what a good
father looks like, so that they see.

Speaker 8 (02:59:12):
That, yeah, it's God. It's something that's come.

Speaker 2 (02:59:19):
To prepare them to understand the good father that God is.

Speaker 8 (02:59:23):
It's something that I've been thinking a lot more about
since we've had our son, and just how I want
to make sure that he can see God's love.

Speaker 1 (02:59:32):
Through my action.

Speaker 2 (02:59:33):
Well, the government wants to replace God and replace them.

Speaker 8 (02:59:39):
They can try, but they can never succeed. There is
no replacement for God. There's no replacement for the family.
We really do appreciate you all joining us here today.
We cannot thank you enough for your support. We'll see
you all tomorrow. God bless you all have a wonderful
rest of your day.

Speaker 2 (03:00:00):
The common man, they created common Core and dumb down
our children. They created common past track and control us.

(03:00:23):
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.

(03:00:46):
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose they want
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank

(03:01:08):
you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2081: Trump Orders Jail for Flag Burning — First Amendment Shredded

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2081: Trump Orders Jail for Flag Burning — First Amendment Shredded