Tue Episode #2086: Palantir CEO Pushes Technocratic Republic

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
In a world of deceit, selling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the one of September,
Ye of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, today we're
going to try to be a little bit more structured
in our show. We're going to give you the headline
news at the top of the hour, and then we're
going to go into more depth and the rest of
the hour in these different times topics. First hour, we're
going to begin with the tariff setbacks. This time it

(01:05):
wasn't Trump chickening out, but it was a court telling
him to tap out. But Trump is chickening out on
the mRNA vaccines. Apparently he's made some noise about this,
and of course you've got Peter Navara, the father of
the ventilator, that is trying to move himself back and
claim this all went bad because of Fauci and the

(01:25):
Chinese and gain a function nonsense. In the second hour,
we're going to talk about technocracy and the Antichrists that
are there. Alex Carp's book The Technological Republic amazing glimpse
into the dark heart of this movement. So we're going
to talk about that, and I put a substack editorial
up today, but I'm going to go over that, and

(01:46):
then the third hour we're going to talk about Ukraine,
about the shooting control. I guess we could call the
gun control shooting control and Trump's police state and his
inimicable style. We'll be right back, stay with us. Welcome back, y'all.

(02:13):
Let's let's start out with the headlines for the pharmaceutical
and tariff articles that we've got. Go ahead, Trump, go ahead,
Trump not quite sorry. That means insult you.

Speaker 3 (02:26):
As far as tarifs goes. We've got a federal appeals court.
Appeals Court ruled against Trump's tariffs. Here's what could happen next.
Is from CBS News. Mody meets with Putin and g
after Trump and postes fifty percent tariffs on India. That's
from Fox. Indian officials call for intervention after US blocks
foreign trucker visas. That's from Zero Hedge. India is not
happy car rides and handholding. Putin, Mody and g send

(02:49):
Trump a message at China summit.

Speaker 2 (02:51):
Yeah, this whole thing is backfiring big time, just like Biden.
It's almost like it was a plan like one two punch.
Let's see, how can we discredit the entire Western financial
system dollar in particular?

Speaker 3 (03:01):
And no one is happy about this. It's not good
for anyone. US trade allies confused after Trump's tariffs suffer
legal setback. This is from the South China Morning Post. Yeah,
they're not the only one that's confused. The Supreme Court
has expanded Trump's power. Now he is seeking more than
from the Washington Post.

Speaker 2 (03:19):
Now we have the yeah, pharmaceutical stuff. Yeah, Trump has
got doubts. He's calling on the pharmaceutical companies to quote
justify the success of the vaccines that he's been breaking
out for five years.

Speaker 3 (03:33):
Since that s what success is? More like it?

Speaker 4 (03:35):
Yeah, how do you define success?

Speaker 3 (03:37):
We've got the trillion dollar biotech industry is facing failure
and it's because of COVID injections.

Speaker 4 (03:42):
Maybe that's why he's pushing back on it.

Speaker 2 (03:44):
Maybe it's it's not like he's afraid that everybody's gonna
grab the guillotines and come after him.

Speaker 4 (03:49):
But maybe that's the.

Speaker 2 (03:50):
Real issue, is that the biotech people are circling their
train in terms of money they need to.

Speaker 3 (03:56):
The scam has run its course. Everyone's caught on.

Speaker 2 (03:58):
Yeah, so let's push the lambling.

Speaker 3 (04:00):
Yeah, you don't want to be the last person out
of the pyramid scheme. COVID vaccine's unleashed profound harm, a
new peer reviewed paper says is from Children's Health Defense
CDC must create medical codes to track COVID vaccine adverse events.
Advocacy group says.

Speaker 2 (04:16):
All about that they never even bothered to set up
a number so they could track these things.

Speaker 4 (04:21):
Yeah, I had no intention.

Speaker 2 (04:22):
The easiest thing in the world to say, Okay, here's
the number that we're gonna use if there's going to
be any any harm from the COVID vaccines.

Speaker 4 (04:30):
Never did it.

Speaker 3 (04:31):
Never did it, never even bother It's the simplest thing.
It wouldn't take any effort at all. It goes to
show just how committed they are to not giving you
any info about how harmful These are. Not the slightest
bit we've got. Michael Crichton's unheeded warning of biotechnology catastrophe
from the Brownson Insty. Michael Crichton was incredibly prescient with
what he wrote about when it comes to cloning and

(04:52):
biotechnology in general.

Speaker 2 (04:54):
I've talked about Jurassic parks. The lessons from that people
writeing me stop move on something else. Is like, yeah,
but we're going to go back, and it's not my
take on it. Somebody else's taken on it.

Speaker 3 (05:06):
So you've got breaking Federal court reopens case of twenty
four year old who died of COVID vaccine induced mile
carditis from Children's Health Defense.

Speaker 2 (05:13):
And this is not really what it appears to be.
I'm afraid, but you know, hope springs eternal. And so
we're going to talk about what that was. How he
brought a case saying that they're prevarications about Corminatti versus
the finer bio intech labeled vaccines.

Speaker 4 (05:34):
How that was.

Speaker 2 (05:36):
You know how we had talked about that many times,
how they used that to try to play these games
with legal immunity. Well, he said, you messed up here,
and I've got you. But also exposes the the fact
that the military was so deeply at the core in
the center of this from the very beginning. Yeah, there's

(05:56):
always a military operation.

Speaker 3 (05:58):
Yeah, you could see that in the way they came
in and also said, well, if you can't pay for
this to those countries in South America, we'll just take
some of your military bases. How would that work for you? Yeah,
very strange. What does Pfizer need with a military base?
Fired CDC director refuses to vacate post after over vaccine policy.
Then enough is enough. What a CDC resignation letter reveals

(06:19):
from the Brownson Institute The Dauntless Dane Exposed to the
dark side of HPV vaccines. Another from the Brownstone Institute,
RFK Junior says Texas Maha legislation's model for other states
to follow from just the news. Then this opinion, this
is the one that I saw last night that got
my blood boiling. We ran the CDC Secretary Kennedy is
endangering every American's health. Is an opinion piece and it's

(06:40):
on the New York Times.

Speaker 2 (06:43):
Yeah, and this is from a guy that is he's
kind of the Sam Britton of the CDC. This is
a guy who's heavily into bondage and kinky sykes and stuff.
He's been one of these guys has been fired. His
first name is Demetrius, I think or something. He has
been featured in the news before because of his extracurricular activities.

(07:05):
And he's one of the people who walk down on this, well,
let's begin with the doubts that Trump may be having.
And this is coming from the Epic Times, and they
don't criticize Trump. Typically, Trump calls on pharmaceutical companies to
quote justify the success of the COVID nineteen vaccines. Trump
on September first, yesterday said that pharmaceutical companies, including finders,

(07:26):
should make public information that they've shared with him about
the COVID nineteen products. He says, it's very important that
the drug companies justify the success of their various COVID drugs.
I think he is starting to get a little bit
of cold feet about some aspects of this. Whether they're
worried that they're going to be brought up on the
national criminal charges. I don't think that's going to happen,

(07:48):
it should, or whether they just are looking at how
much damage the vaccines have done to the pharmaceutical business.

Speaker 4 (07:57):
That may be it.

Speaker 2 (07:58):
Peter Navara isating this alibi that they have come up
with the idea that this was a gain of function
virus that got out of the lab and it's due
to the Chinese and de Fauci listen to this.

Speaker 4 (08:11):
This is gout.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
Just remember Peter Navarro is the guy who leaned so
heavily on Ford and General Motors, told them to shut down,
don't make any more cars, just make ventilators. They've got
to get ventilators out of everybody. And the pullmonologists were
looking at and saying, we've never done that for respiratory diseases.
Why are they doing this? And he killed so many people,

(08:32):
About ninety percent of the people who got on these
ventilators died.

Speaker 5 (08:37):
Fauci when he was sitting Fauci that SOB knew for
a fact that that virus came from the Wuhan lab.

Speaker 4 (08:46):
He knew that this guy so he had.

Speaker 5 (08:49):
Funded the gain of function research in that lab, and
he had already begun to design a cover up. And
we know that from the emails he sent.

Speaker 2 (08:59):
And this is their cover up of researchers.

Speaker 5 (09:02):
Academics trying to get their support to push that come
from nature theory. And that's the biggest lie of omission
in American history, because if he had simply owned up
to the fact that that thing came from the lab,
we could have pressured the Chinese to give us the

(09:23):
genome sequence.

Speaker 2 (09:25):
Oh you didn't have it, allowed us to you didn't
have it.

Speaker 4 (09:27):
How'd you make the vaccine.

Speaker 5 (09:28):
The vaccine rather than the crap we wound up getting. Again,
Trump got lied to about that, not just by Fauci,
but by Pfizer, the drug company. In what way they
didn't disclose the side effects of that and they weren't
clear with him.

Speaker 4 (09:45):
They made him he.

Speaker 5 (09:46):
Was a victim, was a true vaccine.

Speaker 2 (09:48):
Our savior didn't know what was going on. He was
totally owned by these people. Yeah, that's that's the difficult
line that they have to walk. He's not only the
Savior of the West, but he's also the dupe of
the establish wishment and all the corporations that deceived him.
And he couldn't see through any of that. And so
Peter Novarro, it's just this guy. You know, you're going

(10:09):
to tell this to God one day, Peter, You're going
to have to explain all the people that you killed
and how you knew about this. This is all just
so ridiculous. And as he's saying, they could have given
us the genome sequence, guess what. Nobody isolated that. That's
what Christine Massey found out. She said, nobody isolated this
supposed virus that everybody was creating spike proteins of that,

(10:32):
everybody was creating vaccines for. Nobody had isolated the virus,
and that's what led her down the rabbit trail to
ask them. They said, we never do that. Oh, you
never isolate the virus that you're creating a vaccine for.

Speaker 4 (10:45):
No.

Speaker 2 (10:45):
No, Well have you done any real science? Do you
even know that there is a virus that's there. That's
the fraud of rology. And that's why as we keep
this thing going, it's.

Speaker 4 (10:55):
Important to keep it going.

Speaker 2 (10:57):
People need to see the fraud of the pharmaceutical companies,
and they need to see the fraud of the so
called science quote unquote of virology. That's the key thing.
That's the next domino to fall. I hope you can stand.
The Chinese had the password the entire time. They could
have just given us that and we could have created
the vaccine in an instant and immediately cured it.

Speaker 4 (11:19):
That's right. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (11:20):
I still think back to the Little Dog and Pony
show that Trump arranged orre He had everybody setting around
the table and goes around the table, how long is
it going to take you?

Speaker 4 (11:29):
That's too long?

Speaker 2 (11:30):
How about you? That's faster? But that's not quick enough. Finally,
they're all arranged and descending order right in terms of
how quickly they can get this out. He gets to
the moderna guy, we can do it right now, because
we make your body a factory for the vaccine.

Speaker 4 (11:45):
Okay, we'll do it.

Speaker 2 (11:46):
I'll give you billions of dollars I need to, like,
you know, tens of billions of dollars.

Speaker 3 (11:50):
He gave to them so completely and utterly, without morals
or scruples in any fashion, Unlike those other guys. They
might have a little bit left, don't worry, We'll do
it for you.

Speaker 4 (11:58):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (11:59):
The the lab leak thing was something that the alternative
media like Alex Shows and other people were selling everyone
at the beginning of this fake pandemic, and now that
has been adopted as the perfect alibi.

Speaker 4 (12:13):
Isn't that interesting?

Speaker 2 (12:15):
The perfect they talk about controlled opposition is now the
perfect alibi for what they did. We tried, you know,
we did our best, and yeah, okay, we killed a
lot of people, but it was it was worth it,
said Paul Offitt, the vaccine promoter. Myocarditis being epidemic now
amongst young children and athletes and things, that's worth it.

(12:36):
We had to do that, and we just rushed this
out because we had to respond what the Chinese were doing.
And so this, you know, blaming the Chinese, blaming Fauci,
claiming that it came from the lab. Right, It's like
the monster, the Frankenstein monster that came out of the
lab that not only covers up for their cynical plots

(12:58):
and lies at the beginning, but it also bolsters the
next pandemic because you've got to do better next time.
Next time, since they did this to us once, they
could do it again deliberately. Let's just say this time
if we don't want to go have a pretext for
war with the Chinese, we said it was an accidental leak.
But next time that they do something like this, whether

(13:19):
it is anything that's real or not, they can claim
that it was the Chinese. And then that's the reason
been going to go to war, isn't it. Because releasing
a bioweapon like that, it's like dropping a nuclear bomb
on people, So it not only covers their butts for
the past, but it prepares their plans for the future.
That's what's so reprehensible about it.

Speaker 6 (13:41):
Very weak attenuated yeah virus with a very low amount
of agivant in it. Prump's looking at it basically sugar
water for folks, Can we take a little bit of
an attenuated, microwaved or radiated of a deal as a
freaking legally. That's why Trump is taking control of process.

Speaker 2 (14:00):
Absolutely totally lying, and he has exactly the same perspective
as Paul off It right, it was worth it for
you to take the vaccine, the sugar water, whatever happened
to you. And it was worth it for you to
go to January the sixth, whatever happened to you. Because
he makes money off of this and gets a bigger audience. Reprehensible.

(14:22):
And of course Trump never stops with all this stuff.

Speaker 6 (14:26):
And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the
father of the vaccine because I was the one that
pushed it.

Speaker 7 (14:31):
I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before.

Speaker 6 (14:35):
I wouldn't exactly stay there. They're in love with me.

Speaker 7 (14:38):
The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind.
All of the countries of the world who are now
getting the vaccine or soon will be getting it.

Speaker 2 (14:48):
Yeah, and he's still been pushing this is recently with
scherl Ikinson too.

Speaker 3 (14:52):
Fast and in hindsight, based on what we know now,
what would you have done differently?

Speaker 7 (14:56):
Well, I think they're doing studies on the vaccines and
we're going to find out.

Speaker 2 (15:00):
And yeah, maybe now we'll find out.

Speaker 4 (15:02):
Huh, But I really had it.

Speaker 7 (15:04):
Five years later, vaccine's done, and I got them done
very quickly, in record time.

Speaker 4 (15:09):
Could you skip the testing?

Speaker 7 (15:10):
Democrats love it, you know, the Democrats love it and
the Republicans don't. It's very interesting, the vaccines, they love it.
I have a friend of mine who said to me,
why don't you talk about the vaccine what you did
with He's a Democrat, but I'm sure he voth me.

Speaker 4 (15:25):
I'm sure he did because you're a Democrat too.

Speaker 7 (15:27):
It was the most incredible thing that.

Speaker 2 (15:29):
Look, he's saying, we're going to have to just the
guy have to justify the success of their various COVID drugs. Trump,
you didn't do due diligence with all this stuff, and
you threatened anybody who did. All the shutdowns and the
bannings and the firings that happened under your regime. It
continued under Biden's regime. Trump said he wants companies to

(15:51):
show the information, says show it now all upper case
to the CDC in the public. Clear up this mess,
all upper case one way or the other.

Speaker 4 (16:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (16:02):
Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment. Modernity did
not return the inquiry. HHS and CDC did not respond
to requests for comment, says Epic Times. So once you
asked the Pentagon, there were the ones who ran this
military war against Americans and the rest of the world.
It's just amazing to me how he's going to reinvent himself.

(16:23):
We've seen this over and over again. The alternative media
has done it. They tried to reinvent it for it,
and they said stop talking about it, and you come
out against it. And so now he's finally listening to them.
He finally listened to them well into the campaign before
he stopped talking about it. Then he stopped talking about it.
Now he's going to oppose the vaccine as if he

(16:43):
had nothing to do with it. He's the father of this.
Under Trump, in twenty twenty, the government launched Operation Warp
Speed spent north of twelve billion dollars on the part.
They spent more than that. Trump has repeatedly praised Operational
Warp Speed. Operation Warp Speed. People say one of the
greatest achievements in the in politics or in the military,

(17:04):
said Trump as recently as August twenty sixth. That was
last Wednesday in the cabinet meeting. So he's still blowing
his whistle, his trumpet, I guess. And yesterday he said,
I hope Operation Warp Speed was as brilliant as many
say it was. You're the only ones saying it at
this point, he says, if not, we all want to

(17:26):
know about it.

Speaker 4 (17:27):
And why. Yeah, I have no idea. What I did.

Speaker 2 (17:30):
You know, he was the father of the vaccine. He
took control of it. He told the FDA to prove it.
I don't want any delay, I don't want any testing.

Speaker 4 (17:36):
You do it now.

Speaker 2 (17:38):
And now it's like, well, now we've got to figure
out what happened with us. If I had nothing to
do with it, I know nothing.

Speaker 3 (17:44):
When it's you know, the greatest success owner's ever seen. Oh,
it was ill him all the time. Now the second
people are questioning it, we better find out who's responsible
for this. We better find out what these people were
up to.

Speaker 2 (17:54):
Well, as they say, success as many fathers, but failure
is an orphan and this guy is the has tried
to portray himself as a singular father of what he
portrayed as a success. But now that it is a
failure and they can't cover it up, he wants to
distance himselves here.

Speaker 3 (18:17):
I want names, addresses.

Speaker 4 (18:19):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (18:20):
A former federal official who was now an adjunct professor
at Pepperdine University told Epic Times in a message that
Trump quote was showing an openness to allow data to
drive the answer. Oh okay, Well he didn't care about
data before. He didn't want it collected, right. Let me
tell you this, to me smells like a move to

(18:44):
cover up, not only to cover up his culpability and
his responsibility for all this stuff, but I think this
is a move to cover up what's going on with
the Mr and A. I think especially because when I
got to this point here where I see that Senator
Bill Cassidy of Louis, there is nobody that is more
of a cheerleader for big pharmaceutical companies. I mean, this

(19:06):
guy is totally owned by them. And so if Senator
Cassidy is coming out and saying, yeah, we need to
find out what happened to COVID vaccines, this is all
about rehabilitation.

Speaker 3 (19:17):
We've got Bill Cassidy and the vaccine kid over here.

Speaker 2 (19:20):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, this is a game that they're playing. Look,
when you want to cover up something, right like the
jfcas assassination or the nine to eleven, that you create
a committee, you commission to study this thing. They did
the same thing already in the UK to cover up
the what they did, the government did to people and
necessarily how they kill people, Matt Hancock and the rest

(19:42):
of them, they created a COVID commission and it was
a complete whitewash. And I've seen them do it before
with Climategate, for example, once the emails were released because
some Russians hacked them to expose and to embarrass the
UK government. Once they were released, and they said, hey,
our models don't work. We've got to figure out how
we're going to hide the fact that temperature has declined

(20:05):
instead of going up. Once that hit, it was bombshell
and the only way for them to pull that back
was to do a climate Gate commission, which came in
and completely whitewashed it. Said, oh, we've looked at it
now and these were taken out of contact some bomb
bombla and so That's what I think is happening with this.
I don't think that Trump is moving with. The whole

(20:27):
thing has been a lie from the beginning. This Lablique
thing is a lie and an alibi, and I think
now they've got to go bigger because it's hurting the
pharmaceutical companies. They don't have to worry about going to
jail because the Democrats and Republicans have both owned this thing.
They are both deeply embedded into this like they are

(20:48):
Jeffrey Epstein. So they're not going to start sending each
other to jail over this. However, the public has awakened
to the pharmaceutical fraud and so they got to claw
this back. So Bill Cassidy, chairman of the Senate Health Committee.
Remember he's the guy that would veto anyone who had
any concerns really about vaccines for the most part, he said,

(21:11):
we know what the data says and where it is
coming from, so the CDC and HHS can make the
best decisions. It is a whitewash that's going to be
coming folks, no question about it in my mind. So
when we look at the trillion dollar biotech industry is
facing failure because of COVID injections.

Speaker 4 (21:32):
This is from the expos in the UK.

Speaker 2 (21:34):
They said the industry is trying to bypass safety testing
and regulation. That's what this is about from the very beginning,
and it's profiting from lightly regulated areas such as animal
veterinary care and biotech food processing. Here in the US
lightly regulated. So you've got Brooke Rawlins at the USDA.
She has just as soon as she got installed by Trump,

(21:58):
she approved an MR and a vaccine for all of
our food supply, for chicken, for pork, for beef. And
lets you tell you something right there about the fact
that has trumpily had it come to Jesus moment, No,
not yet. The biotech food processing launching a fight back
through opinion pieces in corporate media. And so this article

(22:21):
catalogs how large large media companies like The Washington Post,
New York Times, and Wall Street Journal have recently engaged
in a charm offensive for the biotech industry. And this
is happening because in Japan, another study has come out
quote significant increase and excess deaths after repeated COVID nineteen

(22:45):
vaccination in Japan. Japan bought into this lie of the
pandemic and bought into the Trump Shots more than any
other country in the world, and they're now paying the price.

Speaker 3 (22:58):
One thing that I noticed is a lot of them
bought into it, but a lot of them are also
very questioning of it. So while it seems like they're
more willing to question was actually done to them than
a lot of other people. They didn't buy into the hype.
They believed in the technology, but when it showed that
there were problems with them, that people were being harmed,
a lot of them woke up and were able to say,
there's a problem with this and we need to assess it.

Speaker 4 (23:18):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (23:19):
It's very different from what you see in America, where
it's still you know, the people that bought in no
matter how many people died, no matter how many people
get sick or get injured by.

Speaker 4 (23:26):
It, they just keep bullheaded and go down.

Speaker 3 (23:28):
I'm going to go get my next booster.

Speaker 4 (23:30):
Yeah, whereas the.

Speaker 3 (23:30):
Japanese seemed to be capable of actually going there's a
problem here. We got to figure out what's going on.

Speaker 2 (23:36):
And somebody, well, they're running studies and they're following the evidence,
and they had they had destroyed a couple of million
of these vaccines when they discovered two different batches over
a million each, and they discovered they said, black particulates,
and the vaccines that they said reacted to magnets.

Speaker 4 (23:55):
What does that tell you.

Speaker 8 (23:56):
It's also just that I don't think they have that
same level of propaganda that we see here, Not just
you know, the vaccine immunity thing, it's the constant push
from the media, just commercial after commercial after commercial, controlling
the media narrative through essentially roundabout bribery.

Speaker 2 (24:19):
Yes, I think they're far more not that they're perfect,
but I think they're far more oriented towards actual science
than we are here in America. And I think they're
less tribal in terms of partis and politics than we
are here. Japan received on average three point six doses
per capita by March twenty twenty four, compared with two
and a half doses per capita in New Zealand. For example,

(24:42):
this article is from New Zealand. Around eighty percent of
the population was vaccinated. The average figure equates to a
range between zero and up to eight COVID mRNA shots
per person. Can you imagine getting eight of these things?
Japan four now has the highest rate of excess death

(25:02):
in the world. From January twenty twenty to March twenty
twenty four, there's been a cumulative excess three hundred and
fifty thousand deaths, or twenty seven hundred and thirty excess
deaths per million. This rate is three times higher than
the US, where mr Anda vaccination uptake was significantly lower,
and two times higher than New Zealand, which is much

(25:24):
higher than the US. The preposterous fourteen million Lives save
claim that is being promoted by the World Health Organization
and Donald Trump has now been downgraded to somewhere around
two and a half million, which is still a lie.
So this is a Trump pushing these who figures. Corporate

(25:45):
biotech is launching a fight back, and it's trying to
protect its markets by placing opinion pieces and the biggest
legacy media. For example, on August nineteenth, the Wall Street
Journal opinion column headline read this RFK Junior's misguided war
on mRNA and they called it an effort to quote

(26:06):
carnish a promising technology in a move that could damage
US innovation. Yeah, we can make a lot of money
off of this, that's Wall Street Journal.

Speaker 3 (26:15):
Then there you put any restrictions or restraints on what
we might do to the American people.

Speaker 4 (26:20):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (26:21):
How do you raise any safety concerns. We should be
free to experiment on whoever we want, whenever we want,
however we want.

Speaker 2 (26:27):
Right about the same time, on August the fifteenth, Washington
Post had an opinion piece said, here's the headline, I
witnessed Operation warp speed. Trump's refusal to defend it is baffling.

Speaker 4 (26:39):
Right.

Speaker 2 (26:40):
It's ida now discredited three year old study which claimed
that COVID nineteen vaccines saved three million lives in the US,
and describe the development of COVID nineteen vaccines quote as
a master stroke of American competition. Yeah, that's how we
compete in America. We had tens of billions of dollars
to companies to make whatever they want, regardless of how

(27:03):
dangerous it is. Then you had the New York Times
on ped Peace on the eighteenth of August. He's all
clustered within just a couple of days of each other.
It led with this headline, America is abandoning one of
the greatest medical breakthroughs. It laments how HHS has decided
to wind down twenty two mRNA vaccine development projects that

(27:25):
were started under BARDA, and it has been a defeat
of them to some degree. That Monarez, who was put
there in my opinion, by the by Trump or the
people within Trump's organization, administration, regime, whatever you want to
call that. Myths of clouds and criminals. They were the
ones that I think put up Dave Wolden as a

(27:49):
signal to their base and then took him out and
put this woman who was deeply embedded into the into BARDA,
into ARPA. H put her in at the last minute
and then rubber stamped her through very quickly before there
was any discussion about it. Everybody talked for a long
time about Dave Olden. Oh, this is a positive sign.
This guy is a skeptic about vaccines and folks, we

(28:10):
should all be skeptics about science. We should all be
skeptics about politics. Science only advances when people are skeptical,
and we're only safe when we're skeptical of the politicians.
Trust no man, said Patrick Henry. But bind them down
by the chains of the Constitution, And we should bind
down these scientists by the chains of observation, experimentation, and

(28:34):
being able to reproduce and to be able to see
with transparency of what they're doing. So biotech is really
only profiting when it can skip all with testing. And
so this is a challenging moment for them, and they've
got to do a lot to try to regain people's trusts.
That's what concerns me about our K Junior. He said

(28:54):
that from the very beginning, he said, I'm here to
restore people's trust in these institutions. Trust these institutions. These
institutions were unconstitutional from the very beginning. You should never
trust something like you shouldn't trust the CDC. You shouldn't
trust the FDA. They are untrustworthy, they're illegal, unconstitutional organizations.
You should never trust anything that's government, especially when the

(29:16):
government has violated its own fundamental law, which is to
enforce the Constitution. So again, as we said about the
medical codes, this is an advacy advocacy group that is saying,
at least create some medical codes so that we can
track the adverse effects. You haven't done anything to track this.

(29:36):
And of course, before all this stuff happened, while RFK
was still at Children's Health Defense, and he had Del
Bigtree who was there with I can they had done
a challenge to the CDC. They said, you got legal
immunity back in nineteen eighty six, and you set up
the very's system where people could report adverse events, and

(30:00):
all percent of those are being reported. But what have
you done with that information? You were supposed to use
that information to improve vaccine safety. What did you actually do?
And they stonewalled on that for a long time, and
finally when they refused to give any information, give any documents,
and finally they just admitted, we've done nothing for over
thirty years. We've done nothing about vaccine safety, and here

(30:20):
we are again. They didn't even bother to set up
a code to track the adverse effects of COVID. Medical
codes are used worldwide to standardize medical data reporting and
for the purpose of tracking disease patterns and populations. The
codes are also necessary to track the safety of drugs
and vaccines, including adverse events. A code specifically for adverse
events due to COVID nineteen vaccine should have been created

(30:43):
in twenty twenty. It was a new type of vaccine
that had never been used in humans before. None of
the pre existing vaccine adverse codes would do, and yet
they didn't So there is an organization called React nineteen
represents people been injured by these Trump shots. They submitted
a petition to the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics

(31:06):
earlier this month to say, can we please at least
assign a number so that we can start to count
these things. The lack of dedicated codes for this is
significant consequences for patient's clinicians, researchers, and policymakers alike. The
whole thing was designed to lie and cover up. Do
you think that this sack of bricks Peter Dunbara is

(31:29):
going to get to the truth about all this stuff
or is he just lying to us yet again?

Speaker 4 (31:34):
It's just amazing.

Speaker 2 (31:35):
COVID vaccine inquiry records are recorded under vague categories, if
they're recorded at all, said the organization that's there, And
then we get to Michael Crichton should have the Jurassic
Part theme. I love the music from that. It's actually
a good movie too.

Speaker 1 (31:52):
Was it.

Speaker 3 (31:52):
It's one of my favorites. Actually, just an incredible film.

Speaker 2 (31:56):
Well, the character Jeff Goldblum's character in Malcolm the Mathem,
the way he puts it, he said, genetic power is
far more potent than atomic power and potentially even more destructive.
That's what these people are playing around with, and they
don't want you to see any of the adverse effects.
I think in time what we're going to look at

(32:16):
is the kind of horror that we saw with the
nuclear tests, where they put soldiers close to nuclear tests
so they could have radiation follow them and use them
as guinea pigs, right, except we all got to be
the guinea pigs for this links to Trump. For a
long time, his novels and films depicted catastrophes caused by

(32:37):
technology going berserk and beyond the control of his human creators.
For instance, in the seventy three movie Westworld, Crichton's story
depicted an interactive amusement park replicating an American old West town,
and we all know how that went. And so that's
the common theme that people have the illusion of control

(33:00):
in terms of science and these things that they're doing,
but they always seem to lose the control. The destructive
consequences of human attempts at manipulation are all but inevitable.
He declares his stance about this explicitly in his introduction
to his two thousand and two novel Prey, which is
about biology based nanotech. Did you guys ever read that?

Speaker 4 (33:22):
Yeah, that's really good. Yeah it was. Yeah.

Speaker 8 (33:26):
Michael Crichton has a tendency to put really annoying children
in the books, Like whenever he has a child, it's
always just the most obnoxious character. Yeah, and Prey was
no exception. But other than that, if you ignore those parts,
it's a fantastic novel.

Speaker 2 (33:41):
And of course you can see that in Jurassic Party.
That's a good observation. Yeah, that's another one of his themes.
I guess, the lack of control in science, getting out
of control, thinking that's in control when it's not.

Speaker 8 (33:54):
In control of science or children.

Speaker 3 (33:57):
Maybe it's a subconscious thing, maybe even directed, just putting
a child there to show you this is who it's
really going to impact, Like maybe you'll be okay, but
there's a child here and this is what you know
down the pipeline. This is who it's really going to
have an impact on.

Speaker 2 (34:12):
Well, he was very explicit in the introduction to Jurassic
Part in terms of the fact that things were getting
out of him very very quickly, and that there wasn't
really any understanding of the potential downside to it. There
was no scientific review of this stuff, and that was

(34:33):
what he was very concerned about. That's why he even
has his characters say, well, just because you could do
it doesn't mean that you should do it. And he
was talking about how things are rapidly advancing. And I
think he wrote before Crisper came out, and it was
shortly after Jurassic Part that Crisper either was developed or

(34:55):
was popularized to the extent that what he had predicted
started coming true. That it's going to become easy year,
and everybody's going to start to do this. The total
system we call the biosphere are so complicated, he says,
we cannot know in advance the consequences of anything that
we do. This is a powerful argument for caution, he said.
He drives us home in a number of weighs. Many

(35:15):
chapters in Jurassic Park are titled control in one way
or the other to make his theme more explicit. The
people sitting in control centers on the Dinosaur Island only
have the illusion of control, which disappears when the computer
fails or unexpected things happen, he said.

Speaker 4 (35:32):
Again.

Speaker 2 (35:33):
The mathematician character Malcolm, speaking for Crichton, calls himmond a
quote great fool for his overconfidence and calls the island
quote an accident waiting to happen. Malcolm debunks the grand
vision of science, that is the dream of total control.
Another problem of human ignorance about nature. And Michael Crichton,

(35:54):
before he died, took on global warming. Excuse me, how
to sneeze there? He took on global warming, and that
tarnished his image with Hollywood and the intelligency of there.

Speaker 4 (36:09):
But he was absolutely right about that as well.

Speaker 3 (36:12):
You don't come after their sacred cows. They get really
upset about that.

Speaker 2 (36:15):
Again, that's the theme of human ignorance about nature. Even
the dinosaur experts didn't really know much about the dinosaurs.
Their knowledge is just limited to skeletal remains in speculation.
For example, the dinosaurs turned out to be much faster
than expected and much smarter. So in Jurassic Park, Crichton
is obviously not just worried about dinosaurs. It mentions the

(36:38):
presumably fictional company biosins development of a genetically modified Rabi's
pathogen which can infect people by inhalation. Someone foolishly attempts
to transport it by a bag on a plane. But
here in the real world. In twenty twenty three, Yale
Engineering proudly announced the development of an mr Anda covid

(36:58):
vaccine with nanoparticles to be inhaled. There we go, that's
a bioweapon. Nanoparticles, all, all of this, this whole thing
from the beginning, folks, has been a bio It's not
a not a virus. It is a bioweapon, vaccine, nanoparticles,
and the rest of this.

Speaker 8 (37:15):
Yeah, it's the whole We finally created the torment nexus
from the sci fi classic don't create the Torment Nexus.

Speaker 3 (37:25):
They spend all this time and these novels, as Lance
pointed out, going through reasons why you shouldn't do this.
They show dystopia after dystopia, and the scientists sit down
and go, well, that's an interesting idea.

Speaker 2 (37:35):
Yeah yeah, and the engineers, the engineers look at it
and say, yeah, we can make that.

Speaker 3 (37:40):
We can that's an interesting problem. I bet I could
solve it.

Speaker 4 (37:42):
Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 8 (37:43):
Pray is a good novel. It's of a type with
that other techno thriller by Daniel Suarez Kill Decision, where
it's about a AI controlling autonomous drones.

Speaker 4 (37:58):
HM. Well.

Speaker 2 (38:00):
A federal court has reopened the case of twenty four
year old who died from the Trump shot and specifically
from myo carditis caused by which we just had Paul
offit come out and say well, it's worth it. It's
a small price to pay when some of you die, right,
Not for him or his family. A federal court has

(38:22):
reopened the lawsuit against the Department of Defense because this
is a Department of Defense bio weapon. The shot that
trumping out was from the beginning a military operation against
the American people. And we've seen this before. We've seen
the military I think was it off the coast of
San Diego where the Navy sprayed some stuff or whatever,

(38:43):
and it was, oh, don't worry, it's harmless. We just
want to track if we wanted to do a bio weapon,
how it would propagate and that.

Speaker 4 (38:51):
Type of stuff.

Speaker 2 (38:51):
So the military is constantly doing stuff like this, and
it was always from the very beginning a military operation,
and we had medical martial law that was part of
this in terms of preparation. This is filed by the
family of George Wats junior, twenty four year old college
student who got the Trump shot in twenty twenty one

(39:12):
because Biden. The other part of the tag team had
made it a requirement to get the Trump shot in
order to go to college, and he immediately got sick
and subsequently died. So the lawsuit is against the Department
of Defense. A judge at earlier a year ago September
twenty twenty four, dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that the federal

(39:33):
government enjoys sovereign immunity. See there's somebody's got the pharmaceutical
companies have got legal immunity. The government has got sovereign immunity.
You don't get immunity to anything from these vaccine shots.
What you get is death and disease. That's what you get,
which protects it from lawsuits. However, Ray Flora is, the
attorney who's representing his estate, challenged the dismissal argued that

(39:58):
the PREP Act. Under the PREP Act, only a three
judge panel has jurisdiction to grant or deny a motion
to dismiss. So if you're going to play by the
PREP Act, says his lawyer, then you're going to have
to play by the PREP Act, And that says that
you can't do it with a single judge. It has
to be a panel of three. The three panel judge

(40:20):
will now consider this, and what do you think is
going to happen? You're gonna have any problem getting a
unanimous three panel judge to throw this out. I don't
think that's why I said, don't get your hopes up.
But the good thing about this is that it sheds
light on the legal prevarications, the lies, the games that
they were playing, and it sheds light on the fact

(40:40):
that this is centered on the Department of Defense. That's
the advantage of all this stuff.

Speaker 3 (40:46):
Another thing to note about this is that the judge
Nichols is completely unfamiliar with this. He dismisses it. The
lawyer points out, no, you need a three judge panel.
He goes, oh, well, you're right. Oh I didn't know that.

Speaker 4 (40:57):
He brings it back in.

Speaker 3 (40:58):
Yeah he's got no clue. Yeah, sure, bring it back.

Speaker 2 (41:01):
Well, all who cares about that? I mean, we're making
this stuff up as we go along.

Speaker 3 (41:04):
I guess I should have bothered reading it.

Speaker 4 (41:05):
Huh.

Speaker 8 (41:07):
So I just meant you get away with everything.

Speaker 2 (41:11):
Yeah, that's right. So this is all about the interplay
between the Emergency Use Authorization, the EUA, and the games
that they played. Saying we're going to approve Cormanati when
they didn't have any And what they said with the

(41:31):
approval was they said that they were identical, but that
they were legally distinct from each other. Right, So they're saying,
the Pfizer Biointech vaccine, which was the only thing that
we had here in the United States, the vaccine that
has that label on it is functionally identical to Cormanati,

(41:52):
but the labeling is different. So legally they're distinguished. They're
different from each other, even if in reality they're not
different from each other. And so they are hammering this
home and saying, yeah, but you gave him the one
that had the legally distinct label of Pfizer bio intact.
It didn't have the label that said Cormonati, so you

(42:14):
didn't give us the one that was approved. I think
this is a very important case because it exposes that
I had from the Children's Health Defense. I had one
of her name was I forget her first name, Myers
is her last name. She's of the Oscar Meyer family
is where her family owned that company. But anyway, she's

(42:35):
with Children's Health Defense. And she came on and talked
about the games that they were playing, how they would
make this legal distinction based on the label when it
was functionally identical, and how they were trying to get
it approved, pushing really hard to get approved and part
of the childhood vaccine schedule because once they did that,
it got the stronger immunity of the nineteen eighty six

(42:57):
Act in the sense that they could didn't have to
rely on emergency use authorization. And so you know, now
that the emergency use authorization has been removed, they still
have it on the children's vaccine schedule, so they still
have that protection that is there. After after their son died,
his family sued the DoD and Lloyd Austin, in his

(43:20):
official Capacities Defense Secretary. The DoD oversaw the development and
the distribution of the COVID vaccines under Operation wark Speed,
which was a military operation, folks. According to the lawsuit,
the DoD quote capitalized on quintessential bait and switch fraud
using the fact that Corminatti was FDA approved. The Bolsters

(43:41):
claim that the Pfizer Bio Intact Emergency Use Authorization and
vaccine was safe and effective, but there were two different things,
and they played that game with everybody. There's one exception
to this prep act, and that is if the person
who was injured can prove that the vaccine maker or
the person who administered vaccine engaged in wilful misconduct. And folks,

(44:04):
they did. The Pentagon engaged in a wilful misconduct. Trump
Biden engaged in wilful misconduct.

Speaker 4 (44:11):
They all did.

Speaker 2 (44:11):
All the public health officials they knew and they did
it anyway, it was wilful misconduct. It was fraud by
the vaccine companies. And that is the thing that takes
this out of that that is the perhaps if we
can get that, that should be the achilles heel for
all this stuff. We'll see the family alleges that the

(44:32):
DoD engaged in wilful misconduct by continuing to distribute only
the stockpiled version of the EUA Pfizer shot. Well, the
interesting thing is is that as this Monarez person has
been kicked out, and again I don't know that it's
really over the vaccine or if it's over the personal

(44:52):
issues with RFK Junior. When he told her to fire
some of these people and she refused to do it,
then he fired her and then they walked out in sympathy,
Except that they haven't gone she has refused to vacate
her post. It's kind of interesting how these people are saying, no,
you can't fire me. First time we saw that was

(45:14):
with the Consumer Financial Protection Board and the first the
very first guy who'd been head of it. This thing,
this monster that was created by Elizabeth Warren and I
think it was Barney Frank. They created this thing, and
the very first person when he stepped down, the number
two said now I'm the director, and Trump said no,
I get to appoint the director. So they had to

(45:34):
fight about that. I think he won that one and
should have. Actually they just should shut it down. Montereza's
ouster was announced by HHS on August of twenty seven.
They said she's no longer director of the CDC, and
yet her attorney responded to that, saying that he represents
her and the director continues to fill that role. She's

(45:57):
still this is she's kind of like often from the
office face right, So if a fire breaks out, check
to see where she has been that the fire breaks
out of the CDC building. So this guy this letter
that really set you off. So this guy, Dmitri dus Coloccus,

(46:21):
I guess we could call him a Dmitri Caca Locus.
Like I said before, he's another Sam Britain. He's a
bondage and kink guy. Consider this its charged that he
can no longer serve an environment. That quote treats the
CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that
do not reflect scientific growding. He said they're designed to

(46:43):
hurt rather than to improve the public's health. Yeah, right,
So he wrote this big thing about how wonderful the
vaccines are and how you should never question people in
authority like him, especially if they're in the bondage in kink.

Speaker 4 (46:57):
Right, you should just do whatever they say.

Speaker 3 (47:00):
You see someone like me, you should just bow your
head of virtual eyes and know that my pronouncements are
from on high and you should treat them as you
know law. Yeah, anything I say, if it comes out
of my mouth, it's correct.

Speaker 2 (47:11):
This Brownstone up at Peace quotes some of the things
he said, and they summarize it by saying, if you
question the safety of these things, the timing, the number,
or the necessity of vaccines, then that condemns the country
to Darwinian misery. At Quinnaham, So they just need a
rubber stamp whatever the pharmaceutical companies say, and you need

(47:35):
to be just fine with whatever the CDC rubber stamps.

Speaker 4 (47:39):
So RK.

Speaker 2 (47:40):
Junior is saying that Texas is MAHA legislation is a
model for other states to follow. He said, food manufacturers
in this country have now agreed to remove none synthetic
petroleum based dies from their food.

Speaker 4 (47:54):
Are you kidding me?

Speaker 2 (47:56):
We've had this problem with vaccines and mRNA and you're
focusing on die We need to focus on the people
who are dying from the m r and A nano
weapons that are out there. I think he's got his
priorities mixed up. But we want to take a quick
break here because I still want to get into some
of the tarifsuff and we've got lots of comments. Lance

(48:18):
is very busy. Over the weekend, he wrote an automated
script to go through and let him collect these things
off of multiple streams. So very impressive what he's been
able to do here. But let's let's go through these, Travis.
You can read these.

Speaker 3 (48:32):
Yes, we've got Patty wax as the virus came from
UNC Chapel Hill. It got moved to Wuhan burn your
baby blue t shirts.

Speaker 2 (48:39):
Well, they were engaged. I'm not convinced that the virus
is real I or really not. You you isolated and
then show it. It showed me the isolation if they
haven't isolated this, let's stop all this stuff about gain
of I think the gain of function is dangerous at
the very least, it's a waste of money and they
should stop it. But it's part of the bigger bioweapon
thing them to make these bioweapon vaccines. But I don't

(49:03):
think that there was ever a virus. And I know
that they were engaged in a lot of this stuff
and they have focused on that, but I don't believe
that whole prominence of it.

Speaker 3 (49:12):
Now we've got Yona Andy Wodie says Patty Wax knows
all about doctor Ralph Barrick, MD, and has gained a
function bioweapon work at the Research Triangle Park and UNC
Chapel Hill. There's a lot of shady stuff that.

Speaker 4 (49:23):
Got the places.

Speaker 3 (49:24):
Cesspool for sure, just a bad area.

Speaker 4 (49:27):
We live not too far from there.

Speaker 3 (49:28):
It's such it's a real shame because it's a very
very pretty area. UNC has got a lot of very
pretty campuses. However, it's a cesspool Patty Wax says, it's
also insane. There may or not be viruses, but there
are always experiments, and there are always biolabs, yes.

Speaker 2 (49:44):
And that needs to be stopped. And again it did stop.
In twenty fourteen. He had Alison Young, I think it
was with the USA dated a long Xosa, talking about
all the accidents that they'd had and all the diseased
animals that have been released into the wild. One of
the biggest ones was down at the National Primate Center

(50:04):
in Louisiana, and they found that the equipment was careless
and faulty, and people were getting sick and all the
rest of this stuff. And I remember I covered that extensively.
And so they shut it down in twenty fourteen. And
I don't know whether it was Congress or the Obama administration,
but Obama was present at the time they shut it

(50:27):
down in twenty fourteen. One of the first things that
Trump did was to bring back gain a function research
like that. In twenty seventeen.

Speaker 3 (50:35):
We're going to research function bigly, very bigly. Francine Steve
Evs says, read the contagion myth, and he also says,
read doctor Mark Bailey's a farewell to virology and read
the Final Pandemic. Yeah, yes, yes, going to Andy Woodie
says a virus is real if you believe, have faith.

Speaker 4 (50:56):
It's like the Peter Pan effect.

Speaker 2 (50:57):
Right, I do believe all that it's all a collap
for the fairy fran scene.

Speaker 3 (51:03):
How many people really died from the shot? Two millions?
That's again we don't know. They haven't even been keeping track.
They haven't been created a number to track the adverse effects,
so there's no way of telling.

Speaker 2 (51:13):
They want you to think that if you got a
relative that died after these, it's just the same game
they've been running for decades, they don't. They want you
to think that you are the outlier. This isn't happening
to anybody else, So maybe it's not even what you
think it is. Right, whether it's SAIDs or whether it's SADS,
Sudden infant death syndrome or sudden adult death syndrome, they
want you to feel like you are this is something

(51:35):
that didn't happen to anybody else, So maybe that's not
really what Maybe your eyes are deceiving you.

Speaker 3 (51:41):
And because the effects are so buried and strange, it
makes it hard as well, because Oh, well, who knows.
Maybe this weird, strange thing that's happening with you isn't
due to that. Maybe it's something else. It presents all
kinds of different weird stuff. Now we have nad Lander
Moderna told everyone that it was a modified DNA therapy,
but people don't even know what DNA is anymore. Well,

(52:03):
sure sounds good. B. L. Houghton says at Francine Bummer,
I lost two colleagues at work who both promoted the jabs.
One just dropped over and the other got turbot answer.
Sorry to hear that.

Speaker 2 (52:15):
Yeah, I don't wish that on anybody, even the people
who were real in your face about it.

Speaker 3 (52:21):
I mean, Scott Adams comes to mind. Yes, I feel terrible.

Speaker 2 (52:24):
I feel bad for Scott Adams, but you know he
I will still talk about what he had to say
because it's a good example of the kind of ignorance
of prejudice that was out there.

Speaker 3 (52:33):
Yeah. B. L. Houghton says, I believe my dad passed
from the J and J shot as he went downhill
quickly after taking it, and he had a constant burning
sensation in his neck that prevented him from resting or
enjoying life.

Speaker 4 (52:46):
I'm very sorry to hear that.

Speaker 3 (52:47):
Biale Houghten. Patty Wack says, However, I thought Japan was
the one that put them on the side and didn'td
miminister them. Saw black things squiggling in the tubes. That
started after a while.

Speaker 2 (52:56):
Yeah, that's right, starting after a while, and again they
interacted with magnets. So that was that was something that
sounded a lot like the graphic and just disappeared.

Speaker 4 (53:07):
All of a sudden. They just shut down, didn't talk
about it anymore.

Speaker 3 (53:11):
We also now have uh Solo Cat nineteen eighty. Don't
destroy the vaccines, hold them for evidence.

Speaker 4 (53:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (53:20):
By the time you hold them very long and you
don't refrigerate them, you started getting those black pristiculars that
are out there.

Speaker 3 (53:25):
Yeah, whatever's going on with that? B L Hoten for sure.
At Francine, I retired and they told us we had
to take it and show proof of VACS. I said,
no way, and I never looked back. I should have
let them fire me, but I was ready to go anyway.

Speaker 4 (53:38):
Yeah, good god, glad you take it.

Speaker 3 (53:40):
Yeah, very glad you didn't take it.

Speaker 2 (53:42):
That's the thing we knew. You knew I knew, we all,
most of the people in this audience knew this stuff.

Speaker 4 (53:48):
Don't tell me.

Speaker 2 (53:49):
That I know that Peter Navara is not the brightest
ball out there, but don't tell me that he didn't know.
Don't tell me that Trump didn't know. Don't tell me
that all these people didn't know. They knew, they knew.

Speaker 3 (53:59):
It's somehow just the most intelligent people in the world
who keep falling for these scams. I don't get it. Yeah,
we've got cletus five five five. The smoking gun here
is when RFK Junior himself said that Trump was paid
one hundred million from Big Pharma to do what he did.
Be my Valentine. Such a shame that Japan was not
worry of the COVID shots shots. The country suspended vaccines

(54:22):
decades ago for children hunder two, and sid's rate went
down to zero after assuming SIDS went back up to
where it was defy tyrants seventeen seventy six. I don't
know all the reasons why they wanted seventy percent of
the population to get jet but I do know it's
a very sinister reason.

Speaker 4 (54:39):
Depopulation, depopulation control.

Speaker 3 (54:42):
All the reasons for everything.

Speaker 2 (54:43):
Yeah, sinister, and of course you know, it was very
effective for them to move the Overton window for control
in terms of being able to lock down nationwide, and
all the countries did it all at the same time.
We're going to talk about that later. What is developing
here is kind of a meta constitution for global governance,
not global government, like they have a particular capital somewhere,

(55:08):
but this is going to be kind of under the radar,
and it's going to be over all. The governments will remain.
They will be there as plausible deniability for the governance
that is there. So you have national governments, but there
will be global governance that will run by these organizations
like World Health organization, by trade organizations, by the banks,

(55:28):
by the corporations and that type of thing. That's what
we're going to talk about later in the show.

Speaker 3 (55:33):
Yeah, defive tire at seventy to seventy six. Oh no,
read that one, Spencer DeLong, David and Travis. Did you
see the big jump in gold prices over the weekend?
It broke its thirty five hundred and ounce high from April.
It peaked at thirty five sixty three Friday night, And
is that thirty five forty eight at the start of
the show. Gold also broke a recent record by breaking
the forty an ounce wall. It peaked at forty one

(55:55):
point seventy three and it's currently at forty one point
twenty five. I did see stuff.

Speaker 2 (55:58):
About it's up like thirty four this year, and I
just had someone a couple of weeks ago send me.
They weren't Kenya listener, and I don't want to attack them,
but it was they They showed the charts, and you know,
people will do this with a bitcoin and say, look,
you know, whenever it's got a having or something like that,
you know, whenever it goes to one of these particular stages,

(56:19):
it drops and does this, and we see these charting patterns, and.

Speaker 4 (56:23):
There are a lot of people who do that. A
lot of people do that successfully.

Speaker 2 (56:26):
I just I'm not into the gold situation for trying
to do a market timing. And this person said, I said,
gold has hit its peak, and it hasn't.

Speaker 4 (56:35):
You know.

Speaker 2 (56:36):
He said, it's going to be a strong dollar from
here on out. All the fundamental things that have made
the dollar a week politically as well as financially are
all still there and it's only going to get worse.
And when we see what's happening with the tariff stuff,
I think that it's going to get worse, and you
need to look at something that is outside of their system.
And when we get into this article talking about the

(56:59):
kind of medical institution for global governance, you realize how
hidden and how complicated and this whole structure is and
how complex. You're not going to fight this system, and
you're not going to be able to take it apart.
It may collapse on its own at some point. However,
you've got to work on a system that is parallel

(57:20):
and outside of it. And so you want to have
something that is physical, not digital, and you want to
make sure that you've got something that has held true
value over centuries and millennia, I should say. And that's
where gold is. And by the way, people are still
saying that they think silver is going to do even

(57:40):
better than gold for a lot of different reasons. But
I think gold is really the play the bet against
this global governance system they're trying to impose on people.
By the way, go to Tony Ardman, go to David
Knight tyed gold. I'll take to tony Ardiman's wise well
of gold, and you can pick up gold and silver

(58:01):
there at Tony's site.

Speaker 3 (58:03):
Yes, good investments, and they're also physical that you can
keep on you. It's not something that's going to evaporate
when you know, if power goes down. Spencer DeLong Silver
also broke a high of forty. I meant, oh, yeah,
because Anovante seventeen to seventy six has a three judge,

(58:23):
a three panel judge, Yeah, a divided mind. The shadow Boxer.
A lot of mixed messages caused fear made it impossible
to see patterns that would help to figure out the scam.
They were all over the place, people saying all kinds
of different things.

Speaker 2 (58:41):
Yeah, it's a constant chatter that's out there, isn't it,
and so be able to recheck that. My first project
that I did in engineering when I was still a student,
it was a military project and they had spread spectrum
radar antennas and what they were do is they would
pick up a jaming signal that might be somewhere, and

(59:04):
they would when they pick up the jaming signal, they
would adapt the antennas in this array so they could
effectively put a knull where that was coming from and
that's what you have to do in your real life.
You got to identify where the propaganda's coming from and
put a knull there in terms of you know, polar response,
so you don't pay attention to that, and you have

(59:26):
to be able to distinguish a little bit of what
is true and what isn't and good place to start
with that is the truth. And if you look at
the principles of God's word, that kind of clues you in.
You can see some of the people who are adamantly
opposed to that, and that is going to bear really
bad fruit. So you can kind of look at that

(59:46):
and mark that.

Speaker 3 (59:47):
Yeah, and it's not just the mainstream media in these
places where you see all these weird nonsense mixed messages.
Just a few years ago, remember there was that hole,
you know, they're putting snake venom in the water, things
like that from well, what's that guy's name, I can't
remember whatever his name is, Peters, Stu Peters, Yeah, that was,

(01:00:07):
it's Stu Peter and st Peter.

Speaker 2 (01:00:13):
Stupid doographer tries, Yeah, that was again, that was one
of these things to just discredit all this stuff, and
they run that through the controlled opposition. They want to
discredit when somebody starts to get close to it, sometimes
they deny it. Sometimes they cancel you. Sometimes they put
somebody out there who makes it look really stupid. And

(01:00:37):
there's a person that I used to have on and
when I was backing in for worse, and he said, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:00:44):
To introduce Alex once.

Speaker 2 (01:00:45):
He said, Alex makes the truth sound unbelievable. It's like
that's exactly his role. He makes the truth sound unbelievable.

Speaker 3 (01:00:54):
He does a good job at it. Yeah, you've got
super not five thousand. There's no immunity for mass murder.
That's yeah, it shouldn't be. Sadly, it seems like they
continually get away with it.

Speaker 4 (01:01:04):
But they're all partners in crime. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:01:06):
Like I said before, this is like murder on the
Express And if you haven't seen the spoiler alert, I
get the Christy's novel. They have all these people and
they all look like they've got motive an opportunity to
kill this person on the train, and then at the
very end you find.

Speaker 4 (01:01:20):
Out they all did it.

Speaker 2 (01:01:21):
They all took turns with a stab on this person
so that they were all guilty. That's what happened with
the COVID thing. They all took turns taking a stab
at you, at the public with their needles.

Speaker 3 (01:01:32):
They're all in it together. They're all equally guilty. If
one of them goes down, they all go down.

Speaker 4 (01:01:36):
The murder on the warp Speed Express.

Speaker 3 (01:01:40):
We've got fran scene before the pandemic. I had a
can of lye cell on the label. There was the
viruses which it killed, and coronavirus was among them. I
should have kept it.

Speaker 8 (01:01:50):
Cure the whole time, exactly. Only you had gotten to
the CDC with this. They didn't need the genome password
from the Wuhan lab. They could have just used your
lisol spray.

Speaker 4 (01:02:02):
Yeah, that was the thing. People were wearing gloves.

Speaker 2 (01:02:04):
They're afraid to touch the gas pumps and all the
rest of this stuff. I said at the very beginning
of it, we've gone OCD. The entire country is.

Speaker 4 (01:02:11):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:02:11):
One of the things to me that always made it
I was just if this was going to be a problem,
it was as contagious as they said it was going
to be, Surely we would have just seen the homeless
dropping dead on the side of the road, right. They've got,
you know, poor immune systems. They're usually wrecked by drugs
and alcohol. They've got no sanitation, and yet they were fine.
Your your meth head, your you know, heroin head on

(01:02:32):
the side of the road, continued to beg for money,
the same as always. They were totally fine. Pasanovante seventeen
seventy six. A truck carrying vials of MODERNA m aren't
wrecked on a highway outside Morgantown, West Virginia, during CONVID.
Well that's a good at least they didn't make it
to its destination. Hopefully that means some people didn't end

(01:02:52):
up getting it. Has an Avante seventeen seventy six. The
highway was shut down. The highway patrol called in the
DoD careful, don't breathe this, don't get this in your
respiratory system. N Max. Trump is saying it's from China,
so that's probably not true. Whatever Trump says, I believe
the opposite. That's a fair place to start. China, China,

(01:03:16):
they gave us the virus. Very bad people, original babe.
There was no virus, never been isolated in pure form.
No virus to this day has ever been isolated in
pure form. Viruses are a line. That's what I believe
Yona Anni Wodi. Just doubt yourself. Don't doubt their lives.
That's right, don't doubt the man behind the curtain. Shadow boxer.

(01:03:38):
Covid DNA was discovered in silico, meaning in a virology
software like Photoshop and installed into the fake PCR test.

Speaker 4 (01:03:45):
And that interesting.

Speaker 2 (01:03:46):
You know, they have m vitro, they have I think
m vivo meaning they it' send live organism.

Speaker 4 (01:03:52):
And then they have in silico, which.

Speaker 2 (01:03:54):
Means in the computer. Yeah, it's a computer virus. There
you go, that's a help.

Speaker 8 (01:04:01):
My computer's got COVID viruses are in fact computer virus.

Speaker 4 (01:04:05):
That yeah, they're all in soul.

Speaker 3 (01:04:06):
WeGo, n Max take the shot. Shut up and don't
ask any questions. Be a good little citizen. That's right.
Don't ask any questions. Defy Tyrant seventeen seventy six DK.
You don't believe in virus three, But you say gain
a function is dangerous. You can't use gain of function
on something that's imaginary.

Speaker 2 (01:04:24):
Well, they have isolated bacteria and things like that. And
as a matter of fact, that the thing that got
out in that lab there in two lane was burke
Holderia pseudomalii. Is the name of the thing, and it
was only found in the soil in one or two places.

Speaker 4 (01:04:45):
They brought it.

Speaker 2 (01:04:45):
In to make it more virulent, and I believe that
they can do that. I think that that is something
that they can do to bacteria.

Speaker 8 (01:04:55):
And fire weapons are in fact real.

Speaker 2 (01:04:58):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you can weaponize biological things. And some
of this other stuff is weaponizing nanotech. Okay, you call
that gain of function, right, it may be synthetic and artificial,
but you can weaponize it and you can make it
stronger like mRNA.

Speaker 3 (01:05:16):
We've got original babe, says at Nmax. Those white fibers castings,
I think someone needs to check to see if they
contain spider silk DNA. They started that in coats, and
they do all kinds of weird things with genetic modification
of animals.

Speaker 4 (01:05:31):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:05:31):
We're going to get some very strange.

Speaker 2 (01:05:33):
And that's the other part of what the gain of
function stuff is, right, it's genetically modifying DNA and other things,
which is what the mRNA stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:05:41):
I'm going to be very concerned if I see a
goat climbing the walls.

Speaker 4 (01:05:46):
Well, they can actually a lot of cases.

Speaker 2 (01:05:48):
These mountain goats are pretty good there's a lot of
videos of goats climbing walls.

Speaker 8 (01:05:53):
Maybe they've been genetically modified with spider DNA.

Speaker 3 (01:05:57):
That's how they managed it. Audi m Are, I've been
having gold Slash Silver ship to me every month for
over a year now.

Speaker 2 (01:06:03):
That's good, good, that's why. Well, I'm glad you're doing that.
We're gonna take a quick break and we come back.
We're going to talk quickly about terrorists and then only
get too far behind schedule. And oh yeah, Producer Pee
for the love of the Road gifted a sub on
kick yesterday.

Speaker 4 (01:06:19):
Thank you very much.

Speaker 2 (01:06:20):
I appreciate that, and I want while we're talking about that,
I just want to thank everybody for last month. We
made goal and we didn't have to do a matching
funds thing at the end of the month, So I
just wanted to thank everyone. Thank you so much for
your generous contributions. Yes, thank you and donations. We're going
to take a quick break and when we come back,
we are going to talk about terraffs.

Speaker 1 (01:07:28):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:07:32):
And while we let's finish up too on the contributions.
I want to thank four names here checks that we
got at the very end, Wayne and Danielle b thank
you very much. That was incredibly generous. I appreciate that.
Helen t Rodney d and t K from Ohio. Let's
talk a little bit about the tariffs. And on Friday,

(01:07:53):
we had a federal appeals court ruled against Trump's tariffs,
and this is the second time he's lost. Uh, this
is an appeals court, but he also lost by a
trade organization. The court ruled that Trump overstepped his authority
by declaring national emergencies in order to justify the terraffts.
The ruling does not apply to all of his terifts,

(01:08:15):
but it does limit his ability to impose them in
the future. And the response of Trump was to say,
this is going to destroy the future of America, best
sent than others were saying. It's going to be very
embarrassing for America with our enemy or with our trading partners.
Because again, this was not set up as a means

(01:08:37):
of funding the government. They can't they're spending too much money,
and it was not set up to protect a particular industry. Now,
there have been some of the tariffs that were set
up that way, and those are going to be allowed
to stand, they come under a different authority. But the
reciprocal terifts, that again the brainchild, if he could call it,
the brain of Peter Navara, these reciprocal terars that had

(01:09:00):
absolutely nothing to do with any tariffs that they charged.
Is this idiotic formula they came up with. Those reciprocal
tariffs were targeting particular countries. They weren't trying to save
a particular industry or bolster it, and they weren't trying
to fund the government. They were just at war with
other countries, basically at war with the entire world to

(01:09:21):
one degree or the other. And if you look at it,
what Trump's reciprocal tariffs, so called reciprocal tariffs, they were
not reciprocal, and they put tariffs on countries that had
no teriffs at all, on American goods, countries that we
had a trade surplus with that we were selling more
to them than they were buying from us. He put
tariffs on all those. So there wasn't any reciprocity. There

(01:09:43):
wasn't any rationale for any of this stuff. And it
is going to be embarrassing because they may have to
issue refunds to these various people and it's going to
be very expensive for them to go through that process
as well. He's claimed the authority to bypass Congress and
imposed sweeping tariffs on these formed products. Now Federal Appeals

(01:10:04):
Court has thrown a roadblock in his path. This has
been going on for several months. It was brought by
several different states and five small businesses that were harmed,
especially by his indecision and his vacillation. That's there, but
it is a hallmark of what Trump has sought to do,
not just in a massive way at the beginning of

(01:10:25):
this second term, but that's what he was doing with
the medical martial law, creating a fake emergency in order
to issue dictates. So the US Court of Appeals to
the Federal Circuit rule Friday the Trump went too far
when he declared national emergencies to justify terrafts on nearly
every country on Earth, and even on the McDonald Island

(01:10:47):
that is filled with penguins and no humans. On Friday,
he lashed out, called the Appeals Court highly partisan and
noted that the tariffs are still in effect because they
are until they gave I think until October fifteenth for
the Supreme Court to make a ruling before they would
shut those down as part of the month's long legal

(01:11:09):
battle of these tariffs from various states and small businesses.
The appeals court decision was focused on these tariffs that
were imposed in April on most trading partners, but they
didn't roll out until the beginning of August. That's why
when you look at the pro Trump press, they try
and say, say, we got these tariffs, and we haven't

(01:11:31):
seen a lot of inflation. Well, we've seen some and
we've seen some price increases because of the teriffs, but
for the most part, the terriffs didn't go into effect
until August the first, and a lot of them that
even went into effect August the first, there's already contracts
that run out there three months to four months at

(01:11:52):
a time. It's kind of like you have with commodities,
you know. It's one of the things that farmers do
with the Commodities Market Exchange in Chicago. They will sell
the products in the future so that it helps to
even out fluctuations and even out the market. And so
a lot of that stuff is baked in and you're
not going to really see the effects of this stuff
until you're out three or four months out. So on

(01:12:15):
April the second, what he called Liberation Day, what I
call April Fool's part, due impose the so called reciprocal
terrafts up to fifty percent on some countries, with a
ten percent baseline tariff on almost everyone else.

Speaker 3 (01:12:29):
He's liberating us from our money.

Speaker 2 (01:12:31):
Yeah, that's what it was, you know. The President later
suspended these terrafts for ninety days to give countries time
to negotiate trade agreements with the US. He justified the
taxes under the nineteen seventy seven International Economic Emergency Economic
Powers Act IEEPA called i EPA. Soundl likes be the

(01:12:52):
Gonzales by the clearing longstanding US trade deficits to be
a national emergency. They are not an emergency. Are they bad? Yes,
but they are not an emergency. And the question is,
even if something is bad, as the arbitrary, capricious, and
vacillating policy that's not strategic, is that a remedy to

(01:13:17):
a bad situation?

Speaker 1 (01:13:18):
No?

Speaker 4 (01:13:19):
The real reality.

Speaker 2 (01:13:21):
Trump is absolutely manic about trade deficits, but he doesn't
care about the spending deficits of the federal governments. Matter
of fact, he's pushing his big, beautiful bill to create
trillions more in debt. This is the insanity and the
double think of Trump and his followers.

Speaker 4 (01:13:38):
That are out there.

Speaker 2 (01:13:40):
In February, he'd invoke the law to impost tariffs on Canada, Mexico,
and China, saying that illegal immigration drug trafficking amounted to
a national emergency. And we all know that there is
not a massive amount of fentanyl coming in from Canada. Mexico, yes,
but not Canada, so it doesn't apply to all tariffs.

(01:14:01):
His levees on foreign steel, aluminum, and autos were imposed
under a different regulation after the Commerce Department investigations concluded
that imports in these industries were threats to US national security.
And again you can argue what form of taxation we
should have. I just don't want to have all the.

Speaker 4 (01:14:20):
Above, which is what Trump is giving us.

Speaker 2 (01:14:22):
He's giving us think of the ex plus teraris, all
the rest of this stuff. I think, and I've said
in the past, I thought that tariffs is a better
way to do it than an income tax. I still
think that, but not the way that Trump is doing this.
These were focused on particular industries by the Commerce Department.
I'm not for government protectionism. I don't think the government

(01:14:42):
should be picking winners and losers.

Speaker 4 (01:14:45):
It is.

Speaker 2 (01:14:45):
It invites corruption, which we have seen whenever's been done,
and it subverts the marketplaces out there. But these have
the added problems of being done illegally, done with a
phony emergency, and.

Speaker 4 (01:15:02):
Arbitrary.

Speaker 2 (01:15:02):
You know, when Trump could get upset with China, that's it,
I'm adding another forty percent to your tariffs, you know,
just like that. And it's that kind of capriciousness and
arbitrary noss being able to rule like a dictator that
is so abhorrent with these policies. This is beyond arguing
whether or not tariffs are a good form of taxation
or not. It's about the somebody acting as a dictator,

(01:15:26):
and that's what's really dangerous about this. Nor does it
include tariffs that Trump imposed on China in his first
term that Biden also kept after a government investigation conclude
that China used unfair practices to give their own technology
firms an edge of arrivals from the US and other
Western countries. Well, of course they did. One of the
biggest things though, that has given them an edge is

(01:15:48):
not necessarily the tariffs. I mean, tariffs are part of
the China price But again understand that when we look
at the Paris Climate a Cord from twenty fifteen that
the Obama administration signed US onto. That Paris Climate Accord
basically takes the US wants to push the US in
Europe into a net zero situation where we have no energy,

(01:16:10):
but it allows China and India, the biggest polluters, to
continue to accelerate creating cheap and dirty power plants using coal.
Coal can be done cleanly, but it's expensive to do
it cleanly, but they don't impose that requirement on them.
They can build as many cheap and dirty power plants
as they want. And so what they've done is this

(01:16:32):
climate agenda has given a much bigger advantage to China
than they ever had with the China Price, which is
about violating intellectual property, currency manipulation, trade, terrace manipulations, and
slave labor. That was already a big advantage, but what
they've done with the climate stuff is much much bigger

(01:16:53):
than that.

Speaker 3 (01:16:53):
So if you really want to impact the Chinese, which
you should do is say all right, we're not accepting
any more Chinese students into our elite schools. We're not
going to let you come in get trained here, come
to work for our companies, steal their you know, ideas,
and then send them back to the mainland. This happens
over and over and over again every single year. There's
stories about it. You want to impact the Chinese say no,

(01:17:17):
you don't get to come here, you don't get to
come to school here, you are untrustworthy.

Speaker 2 (01:17:22):
Well yeah, that might be a way to subvert them,
actually inculcate them with the liberal values and dei and
send them back home to take kind of deft.

Speaker 3 (01:17:32):
To see which one is stronger, the communist Chinese brainwashing
or the liberal well.

Speaker 2 (01:17:37):
Story for Texas instruments, you had to be an America
in order to work in the areas where they were
doing defense contracts, and so they're trying to push me
into that, and I didn't want to get into it.
But when you got into consumer electronics, which is really
where the state of the arts stuff was, it wasn't
really in defense.

Speaker 4 (01:17:55):
You know, in.

Speaker 2 (01:17:55):
Defense they had the code for cruise missiles. It was
like fifteenth thousand lines of fortrain code. This is a nightmare.

Speaker 4 (01:18:03):
I don't know. Thanks, don't throw me in that briar patch.

Speaker 2 (01:18:06):
But the uh so, it's not necessarily state of the art.
But state of the art was in the manufacturing of
the consumer goods and things like that. And in that
you had lots of people from foreign countries, China, especially
China and Taiwan. As a matter of fact, the guy
who worked for like thirty years or something for Texas Instruments,
and then Texas Instruments started getting away from manufacturing and

(01:18:29):
semic conductors, so he quit and he went back home
to Taiwan and he started Taiwan Semiconductor TSMC. I think
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company the biggest one that's out there,
the one that's getting billions of dollars now from Biden
and from Trump to build factories in the US. So
again that is you know, you talk about technology transfer.

(01:18:52):
That's one of the ways that it's done. The administration
to argue the courts had approved Nixon's emergency use of
tariffs and the economic chaos that followed his decision to
end a policy that linked the US dollar to gold
another fallout from Nixon's Brettonwoods to where they delinked the
dollar from gold. And so because of that, as I've

(01:19:13):
always said, government will create two problems rather than fix
or admit even to the first problem.

Speaker 4 (01:19:20):
So he breaks the.

Speaker 2 (01:19:22):
Link to gold, and then he creates the emergency use
of terriffts because he created the emergency. In May, the
US Court of International Trade in New York rejected Trump's
Liberation Day terrorists.

Speaker 4 (01:19:37):
They said they exceed the.

Speaker 2 (01:19:38):
Authority granted to the president under the Emergency Powers law.
In reaching this decision, the Trade Court combined two challenges,
one of them by five businesses and one by twelve
US States into a single case. Now they appeal that,
and the appeals Court has ruled, yes, you did not
have an emergency, and so it's going to have to

(01:19:59):
go to the Supreme Court, and it may wind up
where they get remaids to the entire world. The Appeals
Court wrote in at seven to four ruling that it
seems unlikely that Congress intended to grant the president unlimited
authority to impose terrors.

Speaker 4 (01:20:12):
But if he has to.

Speaker 2 (01:20:14):
Get it from Congress, I am sure that he can
get squeaker mouse Johnson to rubber stamp anything that Trump
wants where they can get through the Senate. Again, that's
another question, but certainly the House will give him whatever
he wants. The government has argued that if Trump's tariffs
are struck down, it might have to refund the import
accidents collected, delivering a financial blow to the US treasury. Yeah,

(01:20:36):
they would kind of get ready to send all this
stuff out rather than paying off some of the real deficit,
you know, not the trade deficit, but their spinning deficit.
Rather than paying that off. Trump and Bessett were already
planning on giving everybody a stimmy check again, So I
should love him.

Speaker 4 (01:20:54):
Do you love me?

Speaker 1 (01:20:54):
Yet?

Speaker 3 (01:20:55):
Here we had plans for this already. Getting the government
to disgorge anything is of worderline impossibility.

Speaker 4 (01:21:01):
That's right. They'd like to keep stolen property.

Speaker 2 (01:21:03):
That's why they do with civil asset forfeit all the time,
so they get a link at this as like a
global civil asset forfeiture program where they take your stuff
without any legal justification or do process. Right, mister Trump
does have alternative laws for imposing import taxes, but they
would limit the speed and the severity with which he
could act. In other words, he couldn't just go on

(01:21:24):
social media and say, Okay, that's it, I'm adding another
forty percent to China, and if you say anything else,
I'm going to up it again, you know.

Speaker 4 (01:21:33):
It's a you'd have to go through the legal process.
Imagine that.

Speaker 2 (01:21:37):
So the Trade Actor in nineteen seventy four restricts tariffs
to fifteen percent and only one hundred and fifty days
on countries with which to the US runs big trade deficits.
So he could do it, and he could do it temporarily.
It's kind of like the see, tariffs and sanctions are
like war, and so what they've done is they've given
the president and the war powers actors and other things

(01:21:59):
that the ability to take military action, but only for
a limited amount of time, and then Congress needs to
get involved. And so it's the same thing with war
as it is with tariffs. The administration could also invoke
levies under the Trade Expansion Act of nineteen sixty two,
as it did with foreign steel aluminum automobiles, but that

(01:22:20):
requires a Commerce Department investigation and cannot be imposed at
the president's sole discretion or his whims. He can't do
a late night attack on a particular country because he
doesn't like the leader. US trade allies are confused about
all this stuff. After these legal setbacks, It's like, how

(01:22:41):
can this be our trading partners must be dazed and confused,
said a senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute,
a veteran US trade negotiator. Many of them entered into
framework deals with US, and some of them are still negotiating. Yeah,
but you know, this is an embarrassment, and it's not
embarrassment to the US, It's an embarrassment to Trump in

(01:23:04):
his administration. The Supreme Court has now expanded Trump's power
on many occasions, and he's still seeking more. When you
look at the fight going on between him and Federal
Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. One of the things I think
is the most important thing about that story is the
fact that when I talked about it, and I didn't
realize at first of what was happening. But the guy

(01:23:26):
who he's put in in the Housing Authority, I guess
FHA or some Federal Housing authority, Pulty of Pulty Homes.
He's a netbo baby, and he has talked about how
he's going to use artificial intelligence to mind people who
are violating FHA laws. And guess what he's been doing.

(01:23:47):
That's why you see, as I said, there's a certain
symmetry here to the people that Trump is investigating. You know,
he's coming after a lot of people from mishandling documents
or not doing things properly on business forums, which are
the primary avenues that they came after. People came after

(01:24:08):
Trump the first time through of the lawfair that they did.
In terms of Poltie and these investigations, it was kind
of stright.

Speaker 4 (01:24:17):
I looked at it.

Speaker 2 (01:24:18):
I didn't say anything on the air, but when I
first looked at it, this guy must have an army
of people to investigate Letitia James and her mortgage mortgages
that she took out in her forms, and then to
look at Lisa Cook and find out that she took
out multiple loans, which is fraudulent, multiple loans claiming that
they were going to be her primary residence, and they

(01:24:39):
were in different states and they were not her primary residence.
She even rented one out right away, and so she
did commit fraud. But the very concerning thing about this
is the fact that Poulty is using artificial intelligence to
go through the records and define this kind of stuff.
This is what has always been dangerous about this. I've
said this for the longest time. When the NSA put

(01:25:01):
up the data center, in. I think it's Bluffdale, Utah.
It's out in the middle of the desert where they
don't have a lot of power, and they certainly don't
have a lot of water, which they need to cool
these places off. And they started storing everything out there
for the day that they would have sufficient computer power
to be able to go through and mine all the

(01:25:23):
information about you and me that they've scraped off.

Speaker 4 (01:25:26):
Of the Internet.

Speaker 2 (01:25:28):
And so now that day is here with artificial intelligence.
We saw that with Doge. Remember, I said, the very
concerning thing about Elon Musk's vision here is that he
wants to get rid of the people and these various
regulatory agencies and people on the irs and stuff like that,
and use AI to audit all of us all the
time and look at the smallest details of our lives.

(01:25:49):
And of course AI will get some of that wrong,
but people be cowed down and say, oh a, I
said it, so don't argue. It's science, right. And that's
what he's doing to Trump's enemies right now, auditing them
with artificial intelligence. I find that very concerning this. Hearkens
back to Stalin's slogan, bring me the man and I'll
find the crime. Right, bring me my political enemies, and

(01:26:12):
we'll send them over to artificial intelligence and it will
go through their past and every document you can find
on them, and it'll find a crime. Because we're all
committing full needs, whether we realize it or not, because
there's so many of them out there. So there's already
been a lot of places where the Supreme Court has
back down on Trump as he's accruing power, and everybody

(01:26:36):
should be concerned about that except squeaker of the house mouse.
Johnson is not. He's just going to let him do
anything he wants. And as one person said, this is
a challenge to what I think heretofore would have been
regarded as a core power of Congress. But again, Johnson

(01:26:56):
wants him to do whatever he wishes. As a result
of all of this, you have India and China coming
together with bricks because I remember they're right at the
center of bricks, right, Russia, India, China, that's the ricky's
inside the brickies, and so they're all working together. They

(01:27:18):
had a meeting where they all came together. You had
India's Modai coosing up with Putin and she in a
statement that they put out jointly talking about how Trump
is bullying them, and quite frankly he is. Now a
lot of people will cheer that, but it is bullying.
And if you're going to weaponize your financial system, don't

(01:27:40):
be surprised when people create another financial system parallel to it,
the same thing that we as Americans need to start
working on. They've been working on this for quite some time.
And so they got together and Putin made a point
of taking she around in his limousine as a had

(01:28:00):
broken protocol by putting Putin in the beast they anymore right?

Speaker 4 (01:28:07):
They they call the car the beast, so it's a.

Speaker 1 (01:28:13):
Getting the beast.

Speaker 2 (01:28:15):
Yeah, So these tariffs, these taxes are a geopolitical power
play in order to bully and he's doing the same
thing that Biden did, and that is one of the
biggest threats to the United States. And it is also
like a bipartisan tag team match. Biden puts the sanctions
out there, and that was the first attack against the

(01:28:39):
Western financial system, and then Trump comes along and does
the terriffs. How bull headed can you be to bully
people that way? Of course, you're going to create and
energize another alternative system and They're more than happy to
do it. Indian Prime Minster Modei held warm meetings with
Russian President Putin and Chinese president She They don't call

(01:29:00):
it bricks for nothing. Modi was pictured having friendly exchanges
and holding hands with both leaders as he emphasized that
India sees itself as a partner of China rather than
as a rival. Modi never criticized Trump of the US
outright his warnings he's warming up to US adversaries as
a clear rebuke, though, amid India's tariff strikes with Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:29:24):
Like how they see, Yeah, we're allies. Yeah, they're both
trying to destroy the American economy in their own ways.

Speaker 4 (01:29:29):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:29:29):
They're allied against us, against Trump and against Biden. Trump
imposed fifty percent tariff on Indian goods beginning last week.
She also stopped short of naming Washington, but condemned bullying
behavior by countries during his summit address. But of course,
the key thing is that it's a bigger threat. These
tariffs are not as big a threat as the moves

(01:29:51):
against the H one B Visus. You know, when you
look at the commercial driver's licenses and things like that,
they have freaked out about that because of the accident
that happened in Florida and a couple of others they
reported last week. You have the Apartment of Transportations say
we're going to look very closely at the people who
are getting commercial driver's licenses who are coming from other countries.

(01:30:12):
And you know, even had was it Florida Lance that
that video was we were talking about that it was
highway patrol arrested several people. They showed the videotapes to
the news. These guys are sitting there and they've got
earplugs in and they have unbuttoned their shirt so they

(01:30:33):
got a phone in there and can see what they're
looking at on the test, and they've got somebody who
is watching, like doing your FaceTime with them and giving
them the answers for what they need to put down.
And so these guys doing it and the rest of them.

Speaker 8 (01:30:49):
But these are immigrants that don't speak any English at all.
They just use the phone to FaceTime someone in the
parking lot outside or wherever who is going to give
them the answers in their language. And this was a coordinated,
organized mass fraud thing that was going on. The video,

(01:31:10):
said Jacksonville. Will have it on the board tomorrow. Yeah,
I assume Jacksonville, Florida.

Speaker 2 (01:31:15):
Yeah, and so this is something's happening. So there's a
lot of chatter about how they got to stop this,
so much so that people that were high officials in
the Indian government freaked out and contacted the American govermanents
that don't shut that down. You had to understand how
big this is.

Speaker 4 (01:31:32):
This is huge. It's like forty percent.

Speaker 2 (01:31:34):
Of their economy is money that is being sent back in.
We had the same situation in Mexico when they said
we're going to clamp down on the money that's being
transferred back into Mexico from people who are here illegally.
It's even bigger in India. And that is a bigger issue,
quite frankly, than the manufacturing stuff. It's the labor that's

(01:31:54):
coming in here, taking our jobs and sending the money
out of the country. That is a much much bigger
issue than any of these trade deficits. And Trump is
not really focused on that.

Speaker 3 (01:32:07):
Yeah, and that's specifically something that India brags about. They say,
this is a huge part of our economic plan is
sending people out to get jobs in foreign countries and
then just send the money back.

Speaker 2 (01:32:16):
Yes, yes, And the in officials call for intervention if
the US blocks foreign trucker VISUS. And this is again
in response to what we saw in Florida, this guy
who's twenty eight years old, that was caused the death
of those three people when he did the illegal U
turn across the interstate system there. Since his arrest, two

(01:32:37):
point two million people have signed a change dot org
petition calling for desantists to commute his sentence if he
gets convicted. They are hanging together, they said. The majority
of the signatures appear to come from Indian nationals. There
are approximately three point two million Indian migrants in the
USA today, and they are allowed and encouraged to support

(01:33:00):
their own people.

Speaker 4 (01:33:01):
We are not.

Speaker 2 (01:33:02):
You know, even when their own people are doing something wrong,
they close ranks behind them.

Speaker 3 (01:33:06):
Good place to start, just start tracking the ip of
everyone that signs that petition. Ah, have another one, out
the door, out the door, out the door.

Speaker 1 (01:33:15):
Goodbye.

Speaker 4 (01:33:15):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:33:16):
Well, in response to the because again you know, this
is putting their ethnic identity, we say that because it's
putting their ethnic identity ahead of the real threat to
everybody's lives. I mean it could have been Indians who
could have been killed in that car. They need to
think about that. In response to the federal halt on
the trucker VISUS, political officials in India have taken a

(01:33:38):
great interest in the situation, and so you have one
of the ministers in the Indian government spoke out on this.
They took particular offense to the requirement that migrant truck
drivers be required to speak English. Can you imagine, you know, yeah,
you shouldn't have to learn Hindu or whatever they speak

(01:33:58):
in India if you go there to drive a truck,
I guess. And so you have. An Indian politician has
Simrot Badal asked the country's foreign minister to intervene in
US politics in order to protect Sikh truck drivers in
America after her gender Singh's arrest. She is particularly incensed

(01:34:20):
by the requirement the truckers speak English.

Speaker 8 (01:34:23):
There was I don't know if it'll be in English.
I kind of doubt it.

Speaker 2 (01:34:27):
Yeah, yeah, no, probably not. She said this though she
said Punjabi and Sikh drivers make up twenty percent of
the US trucking industry. Any mass level action against them
would have detrimental effects on trucking families and would be
discriminatory in nature. Considering the fact that Punjabis have built

(01:34:48):
and sustained trucking logistics and trucking networks over the decades.
I don't know how we would have managed just Americans.

Speaker 3 (01:34:56):
I've infiltrated and taken jobs from and scammed the system,
is what I'm hearing. And how dare you try to
clean up the damage that's been done. All these people
act like they are entitled to come to the United States, Yeah,
and scam us for our resources.

Speaker 2 (01:35:12):
It'll work for less money. This is they said. The
reason truncking companies are looking for migrant workers is because
they take twenty to thirty percent less pay. And they
can do it because for six hundred dollars a month,
an Indian can live a very high lifestyle anywhere outside
the two main cities of Mumbai or Delhi. They said,

(01:35:32):
a luxury lifestyle would be if you had one thousand
dollars a month or more. Right, So that's why they're
doing it, and that's why they're sending the money back there. Yeah,
but she overstated the influence of the Indians on this.
They said, if you look at all foreign born drivers together,
it makes about eighteen percent of the US truck and fleet,

(01:35:55):
but again that's about twenty percent, and so that is
those are jobs that taken from Americans, and those are
jobs that are given to people in many cases don't
speak English. As we saw in Jacksonville, only four percent
of drivers are from India. The situation changes in California, however,
where mass immigration is subsidized and migrant truckers make up

(01:36:15):
nearly half of all those employed in the state, and
they get their license in California and they go to
the rest of the country. That's what the guy that
was in Florida that kill those people, and he had
a California commercial driver's license. So we've seen this story
before with Mexico and the money that is sent out
of the country in terms of what is going to India.

(01:36:42):
Without feeding on these remittances from America, India would lose
out about one hundred and forty billion dollars, which is
about thirty percent of their entire annual tax revenue. That's
equivalent to that, So they would lose about a third
of their tax revet is q much about a third
of their tax revenue.

Speaker 8 (01:37:01):
There's money that's flowing out of America.

Speaker 3 (01:37:04):
That's right, that's right, the United States. Whell it empowers India.

Speaker 2 (01:37:08):
Yeah, they need their own apac all right. They just
take out the eye for Israel and change it to India.
They can buy politicians and get them to support that
foreign country at the expense and against the interests of America.

Speaker 4 (01:37:22):
They can follow that same lead.

Speaker 2 (01:37:23):
Well, before we take a break, let's see what we
got here in terms of comments.

Speaker 3 (01:37:27):
Yes, well start want to say thank you to B. L. Houghton.
I see that he's gifted ten subs in chat on Rumble,
So thank you very much, Stealth Patriot, thank you very
much for the tip. That is incredibly generous. The politics
of today's the politics of today is Trump throws feces
against the wall and seas if it sticks, the wall
is Scotus and the feces are his executive orders.

Speaker 2 (01:37:50):
Yeah, he definitely believes. And don't ask for mission before
you do it. Go ahead and do it and see
if they stop you.

Speaker 3 (01:38:00):
Yeah, better to ask forgiveness in permission, I guess.

Speaker 4 (01:38:04):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:38:05):
A Rachio has subscribed on kick Well, thank you very much, Rachia,
thank you, thank you very much. Nights of the Storm
starlink will be the backbone for our technocracy. That's why
they are rushing to get all these data centers put in.
Musk is a huge technocrat. He's definitely involved in it.
Jerry al Atalo, there's no statute of limitations in America

(01:38:25):
for the crime of mRNA injections mass murder. Well, it's
an entirely new crime. Basically it's never been tried.

Speaker 2 (01:38:31):
Well for murder, there's not a standard limitations. So and
the fact that this was mass murder. The question is, though,
who is going to again, they have got everybody involved
in this. This is mass murder on the warp Speed Express.

Speaker 4 (01:38:46):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:38:46):
Who isn't tainted by this? Who would actually be willing
to prosecute? Yeah, we have b sue. The homeless were
fine and when they were forced to wear mask it
lifted one out of the trash can. That's right. Yeah,
that's right, Chris Constitutional conservative. The tariffs are not reciprocal.
These tariffs are levies on us, that's right.

Speaker 4 (01:39:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:39:07):
Yeah, that's the other big fiction, you know, And that's
why I say this is why the people who are
selling that narrative in order to support Trump are ignoring
the fact that businesses cannot lose that kind of money forever.
It's a massive amount of money that's being lost by
Japanese automakers on a daily basis, are losing millions of dollars. Yeah,
they cannot stay in business that way. They're going to

(01:39:28):
have to raise prices. They can handle that over the
short term and over the short term when a lot
of these things have not kicked in, and when they
have been slow to pass those costs along, you've got
everybody saying, look, it's free money. You know, Beware when
anybody tells you that there's a free lunch, especially when
they're doing it to suck up to Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:39:49):
What's the old thing. If you can't find the sucker
at the table, the sucker is you Nibaro twenty twenty nine.
When gold reaches a high enough value, the federal government
will not allow private ownership of gold FDR. History has
been rhyming since petulant Trump's first pestilence.

Speaker 2 (01:40:05):
Yes, but it's going to be harder for them to
take the gold from you. Then it's going to be
for them to take the stable coin or the bitcoin
and the rest of this stuff. It's going to be
much harder to take the physical stuff from you than
it is going to be. I just take a look
at the drug war, you know, that's the other part
of it. I think that you know, we had not
had we'd had alcohol prohibition and people had shut that down,

(01:40:28):
but we hadn't had the kind of long run prohibition
like we have had with drugs, and physical drugs have
been illegal for a long time and they haven't been
able to put a dent in it.

Speaker 3 (01:40:40):
Yes, Audi, Mr R. I love the meme that says,
if the Constitution is ignored by government because of an emergency,
the government will continue creating emergencies. Yeah, if you let
them do it for a specific reason, they'll just keep
generating that reason. Stealth's patriot, Thank.

Speaker 4 (01:40:54):
You very much, stealth patriot, Yes, thank you.

Speaker 3 (01:40:56):
Oh that's the other one, original bait. We already read that, babe.
They're also stopping coal use here but selling our coal
to China for power production.

Speaker 2 (01:41:05):
That's rights they are. We are exporting coal to China
because if you burn it dirtily, dirtily, if you burn
it without doing any cleanup in China, that's not a problem.
And you get a lot of these people who are
true believers in this climate change nonsense, and I said,

(01:41:25):
this is crazy. This is just a transfer of wealth
and manufacturing to China. Because if you want to talk
about global warming, if you want to say that doing
this activity is going to cause global warming, then you
can't rubber stamp it for India and China because it's
still going to cause global warming if it's there. It's crazy.

Speaker 3 (01:41:48):
Yeah, Epstein Island says and Max tariffs are so good
that I dread grocery shopping tomorrow.

Speaker 4 (01:41:54):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:41:55):
Prices have gone up bigly, bigly, Christian constitutional considerati. The
ro An Empire only put tariffs on exotic goods they
themselves could not produce. Ybu twenty twenty nine. Give me
your four year olds, Nina generation. I will build a
socialist state of Vladimir Lenin.

Speaker 4 (01:42:13):
That's the key. It's education, absolutely, it's the key. Yeah,
the real I've all understood it.

Speaker 3 (01:42:20):
Yeah, it's just it's the method of attack that is
most successful for these people. The real octo spook AI
will in the near future replace the irs.

Speaker 4 (01:42:30):
Yeah, the artificial income system.

Speaker 3 (01:42:34):
All our income is going to be artificial.

Speaker 4 (01:42:36):
All your income belong to us.

Speaker 3 (01:42:38):
Lant says, I think AI will be used by the irs.

Speaker 4 (01:42:42):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:42:42):
There's going to be one or two bureaucrats right at
the top.

Speaker 2 (01:42:46):
Yeah, that's what the whole doge thing is about, minimizing
government employees and maximizing governance. Knowing everything that you're doing.

Speaker 8 (01:42:55):
They'll be able to use just the single most officious
bureau and get rid of all the rest of the
reasonable ones.

Speaker 4 (01:43:04):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:43:04):
Yeah, we've got Christian constitutional conservative tariffs are a sales
tax on us we cannot write off. Yeah, n Max,
I'm sure AI can be used for good, but has
far more than various potentials.

Speaker 2 (01:43:18):
And the issue is that becomes a tool, a weapon
of evil people. You know, when we look at what's
going on the technocracy, it really is the arntelect war
that Hugo de Garris talked about. You know, his book
was the premise, because he's not a Christian, he thinks
that he's creating a godlike intelligence. And he would always
ask people, you know, would you do that if you

(01:43:39):
thought you're going to create this godlike intelligence? Would you
still do it even if it's going to kill all humanity?
And he said all the scientists who would ask would
say yes. He asked that The only time he got
a no answer was at a Christian conference that I
was speaking at. And but you know that that is
the hubris that it appeals to people with that. But

(01:44:00):
his premise with the Art like War was that people
are going to realize what the technocratic elite are doing
and say we don't want that, We've had enough, and
start to come for them, and so they would weaponize
their technology against us. And that's exactly what these guys
are plotting. That's what Alex Karp is really plotting in
his Technological Republic.

Speaker 4 (01:44:20):
He wants a strong, vicious government.

Speaker 2 (01:44:24):
He talks about hard power is a subtitle of it,
and that's what he wants.

Speaker 3 (01:44:30):
Nice of the Storm says, I don't think AI is
capable of being good or evil. It's a powerful tool
being wielded by evil people. I guess you could program
it to do evil things on its own. It is
a tool just like any other the same way you
know a gun is a tool. It can be used
for great evil, it can be used for good.

Speaker 4 (01:44:47):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:44:48):
Now AI is different in the sense that you know,
garbage in, garbage out they loaded up with bad data
and things that are evil. It makes it a bit
more unwieldy and difficult to parse, but at its core,
it is still a tool. Yes, the real Octo spook.
The only punishment of foreign government slash business is driving
their prices up to an American consumers start becoming unable

(01:45:09):
to even afford the cost of these products, effectively kill
Americans purchasing power to stop form businesses slash manufacturing from
selling products.

Speaker 4 (01:45:17):
Yeah, what is that.

Speaker 3 (01:45:18):
Saying, bite your face to spite your nose or something
like that. Yeah, Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard.
I hope you are doing well. The tariff story always
seems to get people using terms like the best form
of tax, et cetera, comparing different forms of theft.

Speaker 2 (01:45:33):
Yeah, you got me, You got me. There's not a
good form of theft. I would just say, you know,
lesser of evils, And of course, the lesser of an
evil is still evil. And that's the key thing. You know,
we look at it when you want to when you
have a tax, and this is one of the things
I've noticed, you know, when they do it, the value

(01:45:54):
added tax that they would put on the European countries,
they would actually tax their people more heavily than in
America and I always thought it was interesting because they
could get away with that in the sense that it
was it didn't have the kind of transparency that the
income tax did. I thought, why is it that in
America they have this complicated thing and you've got to
fill out all these forms and do this. And it

(01:46:16):
came to the realization that it was more important for
the American government to get that intelligence about you. That
was before they had computers and social media and the Internet,
that they could scrape information, They could glean intelligence about you,
They could get you to incriminate yourself, and many other
things like that. And they were willing to even put
up with less tax money, especially because they could engage

(01:46:40):
in deficit spending without any consequences for the longest time
with this stuff, whereas in Europe they would add a
tax every time it changed hands, and the cumulative effect
of these taxes were huge. But that's you know, when
you start to look at this stuff, it starts to
show you what the priorities of government are. And of

(01:47:00):
course in America they haven't had to have any fiscal
accountability for many, many decades, and so it's all about
how they can weaponize it against you. When we look
at the tariffs, the tariffs like the vat things or
sales taxes or something like that. We're done with anonymity.
But now all that is coming to close.

Speaker 3 (01:47:21):
With just regular computers, we have Nights of the Storm.
AI has no soul, so it's not capable of being evil.
The people who program it and use it are evil. Yeah, right,
as he said, it's a tool, and evil people can
use the tool for evil, and good people can use
the tool for good. Birdhouse Blues. Well, not that there
are any good people, but that's a that's a topic

(01:47:41):
for a different time. President Trump is scheduled to make
a TV announcement from the Oval Office today at two
pm Eastern Time related to the Department of Defense.

Speaker 4 (01:47:49):
Question mark, I wonder it's going to change the name.
It's a war.

Speaker 3 (01:47:54):
It's a war department. We're going to war.

Speaker 4 (01:47:56):
We'll always won. We all at war.

Speaker 3 (01:47:58):
What we were honest about, what we were doing, we won.
It's not about defense, it's about war. Guard Goldsmith, the
National Emergency Idea for the nineteen seventy seven statute Trump
used for imposing tariffs definitely deceives using the aura of
military when there is no declaration of war, so no
real enemy. And the judge who ruled against Trump didn't
bother reading the Constitution and blasting the entire need you
to scroll down the entire nineteen seventy seven statute for

(01:48:22):
Emergency blocks of trade just insane. A pres can't declare
an emergency quote unquote.

Speaker 2 (01:48:28):
And that's the key thing, right, if a president can
declare an emergency, and then with an emergency he's got
special powers.

Speaker 4 (01:48:35):
What's wrong with that approach?

Speaker 3 (01:48:37):
Hmm?

Speaker 2 (01:48:39):
And that's basically what Trump has caught on too. You right,
wait a minute, I can declare emergencies and then I've
got special emergency of powers.

Speaker 4 (01:48:46):
I just declared myself a dictator.

Speaker 3 (01:48:49):
We have n max. Then you found trashed masks everywhere
on the ground, et cetera. What happened to the dangerous
toxicity and disease spreading on the masks? No one cared.
That's right, they're just discarding these highly toxic things all
over the place, just where there you go.

Speaker 2 (01:49:03):
They blocked me from going into the bank when all
this stuff is happening because wouldn't wear a mask. They
called the security guard out and he came out and
talked to me, and he had that strung underneath his notice.
I said, you don't even believe it, you got it
under your nose. And he didn't say anything. He just
kind of goes from side to side, like, does anybody
see me? And he pulls up over his nose.

Speaker 3 (01:49:19):
Darn, he caught me.

Speaker 4 (01:49:20):
He caught me. It was such fraud. It's so stupid.

Speaker 3 (01:49:23):
Real quick. I've been seeing in chat that apparently Owen
Schreyer has been fired from Info Wars from being too
anti Trump.

Speaker 2 (01:49:33):
That's right, yeah, people, you know Alex will go ranting
against Trump and then he'll callow it back, you know,
because he knows what his audience is. He's done that
so many times. He's been all over the place with Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:49:46):
Yeah, but one he's just consistently inconsistent. Trump does something
that he thinks his audience might not like and he
has to go out and rant and rave.

Speaker 2 (01:49:54):
Well, yeah, you know, after telling you that the vaccine
with sugar water, then he told you that the vaccine awful,
and then he comes back later and he says, see,
I told you all this stuff. I'm always right, you know,
because he's on both sides of the issue, just like
he's on both sides of Trump, and so after telling
everybody to take it because it was Trump and you
could trust the vaccine that was coming from Trump, then

(01:50:15):
he comes back and tells you how dangerous it is,
but he still doesn't connect it to Trump in any way,
shape or form. And that's an old, old story. Yeah, Yeah,
you gotta gotta suck up to Trump because that's what.

Speaker 3 (01:50:29):
That's what we gets you. That's where the bread is buttered.
That's where the that's where they make the money. If
you get rid of the Trump audience, now there's not
much left. That's the problem is, in my opinion.

Speaker 2 (01:50:41):
Audience he got so incredibly wealthy off of Trump and
off of pushing Trump and hyping Trump. He knows where
his bread is buttered, and he's going to continue to
push that no matter what Trump does. I mean, look
at what happened in twenty twenty. We had the entire
country lockdown. Supply chains were broken, there were destroying food
on farms. They couldn't put him in the place. Nothing

(01:51:03):
nothing that Trump did to the constitution, to the economy,
to individuals, to our health, nothing that he did. And
then they topped it off after the election with all
this January the sixth stop the steal stuff that was
against their own base. Trump and Alex. I mean, there's
absolutely nothing that these two guys won't do.

Speaker 3 (01:51:23):
Yeah, it's to their own people. The grift that keeps
on grifting.

Speaker 4 (01:51:27):
It's just amazing.

Speaker 3 (01:51:28):
But good luck to Owen, I guess, yeah, good for him.
We always he was always a really nice guy with me.
You know, I have no ill will towards him. Hopefully
everything goes well for him.

Speaker 2 (01:51:38):
Yeah, good for him, Good for him. There is life
after Alex and info Wars. You know, there isn't any
job that is you know, as people have said, there's
no indispensable people to any organization. You can always be
replaced in your job, and there is no indispensable employer.
And we need to understand that the next time they

(01:51:59):
tried to black mail us into taking a kool aid injection,
there's no indispensable employer. I've talked to many, many people
who stood up for principal and refuse to take that,
and they have all done as good or much much
better than they did. And I think that God honors
people who do that for that right reason. I think,

(01:52:20):
you know, God honors those who honor Him, and so
if that's your reason for doing it, that's especially important,
and you should be able to stand on that promise
and not worry about it.

Speaker 4 (01:52:30):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:52:31):
I also saw people saying in chat, no way, you
guys didn't know. It's like, no, we don't. We don't
follow info wars that closely at all.

Speaker 4 (01:52:37):
When did that happen?

Speaker 3 (01:52:38):
I think they said it happened yesterday.

Speaker 4 (01:52:42):
Yeah, I don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:52:44):
Well, as he said, look to.

Speaker 2 (01:52:46):
Him, yeah yeah, it's yeah, Info Wars is Alice is
going to be there, and he's It's amazing when you
look at this one and a half billion dollar lawsuit,
what a bunch of non instence that was.

Speaker 4 (01:53:01):
I mean, you know, as.

Speaker 2 (01:53:01):
Part of the trial, it came out that Alex had
somebody sent him this donation of millions of dollars, and
they said, you got an eight million dollar bitcoin donation,
didn't you? Well it was nine million. That's in the trial.
Nobody talked about it. I couldn't imagine. It's amazing to
me how the mainstream media didn't even pick up on that.

(01:53:22):
The people who hated Alex and wanted to attack him.

Speaker 3 (01:53:25):
Well, probably because you know, they make so much money
over there from far from the farm industry. They said, oh,
well nine million, who cares, that's chump change.

Speaker 4 (01:53:33):
Yeah, it was Trump change.

Speaker 3 (01:53:35):
They're so divorced from reality that, yeah, there's that nine million.

Speaker 2 (01:53:39):
But you know, one and a half million dollars nowhere
close to that. When you see this this first thing,
what was the Onion trying to buy the property in
Alix's dad who was independently wealthy, multimillionaire, and his dad
put up like three million and the Onion put up
one and a half million, and they awarded it to
the Onion because they said the people in Connecticut said

(01:53:59):
we won't take our share because we want to shut
down info Wars, and so then they appealed that and said, no,
you've got to go for the most money, and we
offered you the most money.

Speaker 4 (01:54:08):
You know.

Speaker 2 (01:54:08):
So again it's not a one and a half billion.
It might be like a three million dollar hit that
they take, but we'll wait and see what happens either way.
He's already had his next place where he was going
to broadcast, was already set up. He was ready to
just transfer everything over there. And he has made so

(01:54:29):
much more money than at ever cost him, including the
big legal fees that he had to pay to keep
his sources of money where he stashed that secret. In
spite of all that, he still made out like a
bandit off of all this stuff. And he knows that
he can do that because he is because of the
people who are following Trump. Well, we're going to take

(01:54:51):
a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:55:00):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 9 (01:56:34):
Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 1 (01:57:57):
Analyzing the Globalist Next, now the Deep Nuts Show.

Speaker 3 (01:58:14):
Welcome back, folks. We've got a lot of comments which
I'm gonna try to get through quickly. Here it says
China Christian constitutional conservatives. So China and India seem to
be immune from global warming. Yeah, funny how that works.
And Max, Yes, one small bag at the grocery store
is fifty dollars. Used to be a cartful? Was that much?
Thanks Trump? Yeah, groceries have gotten enormously expensive.

Speaker 4 (01:58:36):
Right.

Speaker 3 (01:58:36):
Overture terrorifts just reveal how much of our food is imported.
We do import a ton of food.

Speaker 4 (01:58:41):
That's like bananas.

Speaker 2 (01:58:42):
Are we gonna put tariffs on bananas so we can
have a banana industry, have the right climate for most
of those and even if we did, you still got
to start the farm, right. It's like the whole thing
about the.

Speaker 3 (01:58:53):
We can't even be a banana republic.

Speaker 4 (01:58:56):
Banana Republicans.

Speaker 3 (01:58:57):
Yeah, we've got epigeons is at Whistler Lance. That's why
they fired all the irs employees.

Speaker 4 (01:59:04):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:59:05):
They're going to replace them all with robots and max
problem is the opportunistic American companies will raise their rates
appropriately with the tariffs. Yeah, they're not going to see there.
They're gonna just raise everything. They'll take that opportunity as
soon as they can. Brandon Bennett. Now I can watch
Owen again, whatever he shows up. Pezivantes Pezzonovante seventeen seventy six.

(01:59:27):
Owen got fired by aj Owen. It is a badge
of honor, Knights of the Storm. Alex re Ward's Owen
with the rest of his life off for Labor Day.
That's what we got for Christmas.

Speaker 2 (01:59:40):
Yeah, yeah, I have a permanent holiday.

Speaker 3 (01:59:44):
Epstein Island. Last week Owen abruptly ended a show and
it was ads for over an hour. Huh hmm, very strange.

Speaker 4 (01:59:52):
Yeah, b L.

Speaker 3 (01:59:54):
Hoten, what happened last Wednesday?

Speaker 2 (01:59:55):
Alex has been known the third temper dangels like Crump
you know, Epstein Island. It was one day I came
out of the office and this water fountain was completely
destroyed and wrapped off.

Speaker 3 (02:00:08):
Remember that, I don't that might have been before my time.

Speaker 2 (02:00:11):
And I asked, no, no, it wasn't. But I asked somebody,
I said, what happened to the water fountain? Was just
torn up, I mean, smashed up anything on the floor,
wrapped off the wall. Somebody said, Alex got mad.

Speaker 4 (02:00:22):
Figure.

Speaker 3 (02:00:23):
So Belle Hopton says, what happened last Wednesday? Owen? And
Epstein responds Owen had breaking news and was stopped. Epstein
Island says Owen literally seemed to walk off the set.
Harrison maybe next well, yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:00:40):
I hope you keep this job.

Speaker 3 (02:00:42):
Got a family, yeah, Harrison really like Harrison, will respect Harrison.
He's a very We found the doctor we take our
son to through them. He was very kind to recommend
the doctor, so we really appreciate that. He's been a
very good friend. Just a very very kind and nice individual. Yeah,
his family is very kind too. The pigeon at Guard Goldsmith,

(02:01:03):
he starts too early for Alex. I think aj would
constantly interrupt on in the afternoon, never interrupts Harrison.

Speaker 2 (02:01:11):
Well, that was the other thing I told Alex when
he started pushing this stop to steal stuff. After he
did the first time, I said, I don't want you
coming in here and doing that anymore in front of
my crew.

Speaker 4 (02:01:21):
And that really got him angry. If they've been a
water fountain, it would have been endangered. At that point
in time.

Speaker 2 (02:01:26):
You could see the steam coming out of his ears
and he goes, you know, you can't tell me that.
It's like He's like, well, you know, you can either
talk about stop the steel or you can have me here.
So he decided he would talk about stop the steal.
I want to thank the people who have support us.
These are self contributions that came in at the end
of the month. Janice W. Ryan F Thank you, Ryan, Gregory, I,

(02:01:52):
Lisa Kay, Gretchen c. These are all people that we
see all the time supporting this constantly.

Speaker 4 (02:01:59):
Marco V. William R. Ronald H.

Speaker 2 (02:02:03):
Susan L. Thank you, and Kevin M. William W. Maurice W.
Joseph R. Amy B and Kelly K. Thank you all
so much. I appreciate that that helped us to reach
our goal by the end of the month. I put
up a op ed over the weekend. We got it

(02:02:24):
up late last night actually, and it's about the new
book from Alex Carp called Technological Republic, and it is
his vision of governance, and it is really an eye opener. Again,
remember that Alex Karp is like Peter Teel, is now
part of the Bilderberg Steering Committee, and he is a

(02:02:47):
a globalist of the first order. And it's always interesting
to see what these people say, you know, when you've
got Klaus Schwab out there, uvol Harari or whatever. But
certainly Alex Karp ap Pallenteer, like Peter Teel, you should
pay attention to these guys because they're the ones who
have a great deal of political and financial power. And

(02:03:09):
so it is the Technological Republic. I subtitled the review
here called it the twenty first century Jeremiah, about the
purpose in life by man who is richer than Solomon
and wealth and information, but lacking Solomon's wisdom, and that's
really what it is. It's Jeremiah that, like Jeremiah the prophet,

(02:03:30):
he's weeping about the state of society and what he
thinks is wrong with it. And his subtitle about it
was hard power, soft belief in the future of the West.
And that's exactly how we fight these people. They do
have hard power, and if our belief system is soft,

(02:03:51):
they will win. We need to harden our belief system.
And if you look at this guy, it's actually like
I said, when I've many times, I said, when you
look at evil Harari and his disgust for God and humanity,
I find it to be very encouraging.

Speaker 4 (02:04:10):
Because this is this is.

Speaker 2 (02:04:11):
Somebody who's literally shaking his fist at God and uh.
And I've seen what happens throughout history when people shake
their fist at God like this. So I'd rather have
God on my side than uvil Harari. Be where the
guy is, he's going to go up in flames like
the Orgy Domet the.

Speaker 4 (02:04:32):
Burning Man thing.

Speaker 2 (02:04:34):
So I said, if you don't know who Alex Karpet
is in the societies in which he travels, you'll be
clued in from the start. By the praise that's given
to him in this book. He's got quotes from Jamie Demon,
General Mathis, and many others in the military industrial complex.
Bankers love this guy. The military industrial love complex loves him.
He's a big hit and he's a regular their club.

(02:04:55):
The Builderbergers. The cart begins this by decrying the sh
shallowness and the fleeting nature of what Silicon Valley pursues.
That's why I said it first reminded me of you know,
Solomon and Ecclesiastes. He's saying, you know, all of life
is vanity. Uh, all of Silicon Valley is vanity, vanity
and uh. And yet when you look at his solution,

(02:05:18):
what he wants is a much stronger, much more activist,
much more violent government. And this is the guy who's
running Pallateer, that is a data mining company for them.
He's the eyes and ears our searching for meaning and life,
and but he's looking in the wrong places. Karp is

(02:05:38):
in a way emblematic of our times. His surveillance and
data mining company, Pallateer, gives him a tremendous amount of information.
But that is itself the disease of our time that
we are so overcome with details and factoids that we
can't see the forest for the trees. That is what
Pollanteer was designed to do. But if God is not

(02:05:59):
the reference point, the blind are leading the blind. The
dedication of his book is about heart. He says to
those who seek to move the hearts of others and
know their own. And then he follows that up with
a quote from Gutta. You never touch the heart of
others if it does not emerge from your own. And
yet God says through Jeremiah, so the heart is deceitful

(02:06:23):
above all things, and desperately wicked. Who can know it well?
The fear of the Lord is beginning of wisdom, said Solomon.
You won't find the fear of the Lord in his
book Technological Republic, neither in the book or in his ima,
imaginary society that he wants to build. Can you imagine
how his elitist friends would react to a book if
he called it the Theological Republic and they call it

(02:06:46):
Christian nationalism, and you know they would freak out like
vampires when you hold a cross up. It is required
reading to get a read on the hearts of the
man who the men who seek to exercise hard power
that he references in the subtitle of this book. He
is a true believer in big government. He believes that
government is what made the West and Western civilization great,

(02:07:10):
and he laments the fact that government is not quote
innovative enough anymore. This is a quote from the book.
He says, a moment of reckoning has arrived for the West.
The loss of national ambition and interest in the potential
of science and technology and the resulting decline of government
innovation across sectors from medicine to space travel to military software,

(02:07:34):
has created an innovation gap.

Speaker 4 (02:07:37):
He sees gaps everywhere.

Speaker 2 (02:07:38):
That's his favorite term, because when he goes to Pentagon,
he can say, you've got a gap in this area
with China. I can fill it. If you give me
a lot of money. I can fill that gap.

Speaker 3 (02:07:47):
For a few billion dollars. The gap to be filled for.

Speaker 4 (02:07:50):
A few dollars more fistful of dollars.

Speaker 2 (02:07:53):
The state has retreated from the pursuit of the king
of large scale breakthroughs. This is a Karp talking that
gave rise to the atomic bomb and the Internet, seeding
the challenge of developing the next wave of path breaking
technologies to the private sector, a remarkable and near total

(02:08:13):
placement of faith in the market. Karp hates the marketplace,
He hates the private sector. He loves all things government.
I've never seen a more statist person in my wife
says when I talk about this, you know, he talks
about the loss of national ambition. You know, the founders

(02:08:34):
of this country saw ambition as a character flaw, and
it was they were very worried about a government that
will be led by ambitious politicians. And when Abraham Lincoln
became president, that was the key criticism in the early
stages of Lincoln was that he was very ambitious. That

(02:08:55):
was considered to be a disqualification. Now Karp wants to
see all of government being ambitious. He said, you know,
that's the quote that I just read to you. Notice
that the first contribution of government innovation that he mentions
is medicine. Yet Operation warp Speed is one of the
greatest failures of Western civilization that came from in order
to borrow his characterization, a remarkable and near total placement

(02:09:18):
of faith not in the marketplace, but in the government.
And so it's anesthetical. The government has not been the
basis of Western civilization. It's been anathetical to that. If
you read rosewalder Lane's book That Discover Your Freedom, you
should read that to your kids. By the way, it
describes the rise of Western civilization as being one of

(02:09:41):
freedom and of restraint of government. I would agree with
Karp that the atomic bomb is an innovation of government
and yet another reason why hard power has to be restrained.
Government preachers like Karp never justify what the evil government does.
They merely point to another, presumably more evil government and

(02:10:02):
the gap that we have with them in some area,
whether it's nuclear bombs, artificial intelligence. So let's be as
evil as the monsters that we fight, so he can
even surpass them. Perhaps Karp speaks of an innovation gap,
with innovation being large scale projects. Does he not see
the large scale innovation of Operation Warp speed, decades of

(02:10:25):
preparation to impose it, innovations that made our legal foundation,
as well as medical innovation to create the bioweapon that
killed far more people worldwide than the atomic bomb killed
in Hiroshima or Nagasaki combined. Karp's worship of government is
undoubtedly how he sells his detalitarian schemes to government officials
scheming for power. He's been very successful in selling the

(02:10:48):
idea of government as God to the government. It will
be harder to sell the idea to the public, whom
he seeks to stomp in the face with a jackboot
of government forever. My view of government and innovation is
exactly the opposite of his view.

Speaker 8 (02:11:04):
I was just going to say, it's a much easier
sell for the person wearing the boot than the person
that's the face getting stepped on.

Speaker 4 (02:11:09):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:11:11):
The government is not essential to innovation. It is essential
to making people like Carp rich. America did not become
wealthy and the quality of life improved because of government innovation,
but because of private innovation and the free market that
Krp despises. He actually competes in a market where, whether
he acknowledges or not, it is an elite market of

(02:11:33):
just a few people who control the vast wealth of America.
Karp's market is the Pentagon and the intelligence agencies to
which he sells. The development of the first flying plane
is an interesting refutation of Karp's idea of government being
essential to innovation. Why did Langley, a celebrated government scientist,
receive government resources for his attempts to create a flying machine.

(02:11:57):
As secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, Sam Langley secured funding
from the US War Department when it was the War Department,
including a fifty thousand dollars grant in eighteen ninety eight.
Equipment to about one point eight million dollars a day
due to the innovation of the Federal Reserve that devalues
a dollar to develop the the aerodome project that he

(02:12:19):
called his flying machine. The support included access to government
facilities and personnel to assist in the experiments. But despite
all of this, Langley's manned flight attempts failed. In nineteen
oh three, he was beaten by two homeschool bicycle mechanics
without a penny of government subsidy. They were not even

(02:12:43):
educated by the state. Perhaps that's the reason for their success.
Government's innovation was to use their invention to drop atomic
bombs to destroy cities and civilians. That's what the government
brought to it. They weaponized it, and after they were
able to do that, the government was more than willing
to buy it from them when their guy could not

(02:13:03):
produce the goods. So he's got it divided into four parts.
The first part. I'm just gonna go through this quickly
instead of reading the entire op ed piece again, you
can find it on substack.

Speaker 4 (02:13:13):
What's our substack address.

Speaker 3 (02:13:16):
At David Knight Show on substack. I have dropped the
link to the article on substack in the rumble chat.

Speaker 8 (02:13:23):
David Knight Show again Davidnightshow dot substack dot com.

Speaker 2 (02:13:28):
Okay, all right, Well, the first part he talks about
the software Century. He titles it Lost Valley. That's how
he refers to Silicon Valley as the Lost Valley. I
would agree with that, but I also see it as
the uncanny Valley. Increasingly so for him, history begins post
World War II with the creation of the military industrial

(02:13:50):
complex and the national security state. Along with that the
massive subsidies to be had by those like him who
serve this beast. And so that's where he sees a
you know, he thinks that that was the pinnacle, not
the nadir, of our society, the creation and national security State.

(02:14:10):
In part two of his book, it is titled the
Hollowing Out of the American Mind, he argues that there's
a systematic attack and an attempt to dismantle any conception
of American or Western identity during the nineteen sixties and seventies.
I would agree with that, but Karp ignores the role
of the CIA. These are the people that he serves,

(02:14:31):
the people that he has empowered with his tool Palleteer.
They're the people who invested in Palateer as well with
their venture capital firm in Cautel. It was a CIA
that was instrumental in orchestrating the dismantling of society and
of the family. So again he has another valid criticism

(02:14:55):
where he talks about our digital society inventions that changed
our line but did not improve our lives. In his
third part of the book, he gets to the palunteer
corporate philosophy based on quote, lessons we can learn from
the social organization of honeybee swarms and flocks of starlings
quote unquote. This is a hive mentality. As Lansa has said,

(02:15:19):
everybody says nothing good ever comes in swarms. Get these
these swarms of drones or whatever.

Speaker 4 (02:15:27):
It's not anything good ever.

Speaker 2 (02:15:29):
And I don't like I heard mentality, But he actually
he holds up as examples of good things the conformity
experiments done by Milgram and Ash and others. In the
late nineteen fifties and early sixties. I've talked about them
many times. The Milgrim experiment where you were told to
harm somebody by a person who's in authority, and typically

(02:15:51):
about two thirds of time they can get person to
do that. The Ash experiment where they have a group
of people who are influencing you, the person who is
an authority. But he thinks both of those things are great.
And it's not surprising because I've long argued that it
was the purpose of the Internet envisioned by a darpest
psychologist jcr Leicklier, and social media created with venture capital

(02:16:16):
from the deep spooks. And he actually references jcr Licklider.
He thinks the guy who is great, I don't. Karp
has a more cynical view that the experiments quote exposed
the feebleness of the vast majority of human minds when
confronted with the threat of authority. There you go, BF Skinners,

(02:16:37):
Beyond freedom and dignity taken to the next level. Part
four is a call to action, a call to build
the technological republic that he wants to see happen what
the rest of us would call a dystopian technocracy. Volunteer
is the embodiment of everything that Christians must resist and evade.

(02:16:58):
Don't forget that this is truly a war. It is
a war against your mind. There is no neutral territory
where you can set this one out. Don't get feeble
knees when you're confronted with the threat of authority. Get
on your knees to the ultimate authority and pray for
the destruction of this tower of Babel technocracy. You know
the we already have a lot of people. Well, you

(02:17:20):
know when the Antichrist comes, thanks is going to get
really bad. It may escalate in intensity, but everything may escalate.
But we already have Antichrist. The spirit of Antichrist has
been here for two thousand years and it's been a
spiritual war. It's been a cold war for a very
long time. And the question you don't have to wait

(02:17:42):
for some event to happen, some eschatological event to happen.
It's here now. You know, what are you doing about it?
This cold war may turn into a physical It's a
cold war, a spiritual war, and it may turn into
a hot war and may turn into a physical war.
There's something to be fighting about right now. I end

(02:18:03):
the review by saying, I'll never forget the scene from
the movie Patent where a patent played by George Scott
is defeating Rommel in a tank battle. He looks at
his field glasses and he said, Rommel, you magnificent. You
make this a bastard. I read your book, Carp, you

(02:18:23):
magnificent bastard. I read your book, and I also read
God's book, and it speaks about people like you. There
is nothing that is new under the sun. Folks who've
got our marching orders. The question is what are we
going to.

Speaker 1 (02:18:36):
Do about it?

Speaker 2 (02:18:37):
And we need to understand who our enemy is. You
can't fight a war if you don't know who the
enemy is. If you don't know what their tactics are,
if you don't know what their goals and their strategies are.
You have to know this. And so it's important for
us to understand where these people are coming from and
what they want out of all this stuff. And if
we don't pay attention, they will be able to make

(02:19:00):
our lives very miserable. Of course, they're not going to
win in the end. They're allied against God and his
anointed Christ. But you know, we don't have to let
them have such an easy victory in the meantime over us. So,
as I said before, you know, the meta constitution system
that is coming up is really a system of world government,

(02:19:23):
of world governance. It isn't going to have as I
said before, it's not going to necessarily be a capital,
you know, where they're going to set up a building
and fly a flag and all.

Speaker 4 (02:19:33):
The rest of this stuff.

Speaker 2 (02:19:34):
It's going to be this shadowy network of organizations and
rules that are created by banks, trade organizations. It'll have
the veneer of science and necessity on it, and.

Speaker 4 (02:19:49):
This is what we have to fight.

Speaker 2 (02:19:50):
There was a great article that I would recommend our
expos A News about the meta Constitution system. It is
a system of world governance through standards, best practices and
technical guidance. The kind of stuff that the World Economic
Form and the World Health Organization have been putting out there,
the kind of stuff that we saw during the twenty

(02:20:10):
twenty pandemic. That's a good example of it. That's how
they got everybody everywhere to do the same thing all
the same time. And they would use these non governmental
agencies to put this stuff through, to set up these
practices and tell us what the science was, and then
they'd run it through these bureaucracies without running it through
your elected officials. That's the purpose of empowering the so

(02:20:34):
called public health officials. The system sits above the law
in the most literal sense. It shapes economic behavior more
powerfully than the legislation. It achieves binding authority not through
the popular mandate, but through systematic embedding of compliance requirements
in the essential infrastructure that modern economy, that life depends on.

(02:20:56):
And so in this piece here, what they do is
they lay this out and talk about many of these
international organizations that set up these best practices and set
up the so called science, and understand that it is
global governance, not government. And that's what I really want
to stress the idea. This is a shadowy government of

(02:21:19):
webs of relationships and networks that operate not necessarily in
the background, but over and above the legal system that
you see. They will maintain that to give you the
illusion of control. They will maintain these show elections and
all the rest of the stuff, even if the elections
were honest. These structures are going to be the things

(02:21:41):
that actually govern us. There is no world parliament for
this system. There is no global constitution, no international elections.
Yet it governs more comprehensively than most democratic states, shaping
economic behavior across every sector in jurisdiction through mechanisms that
operate entirely above legal authority. It achieves total compliance through

(02:22:03):
technical infrastructure embedded in the essential systems of modern economic life.
Through accreditation networks, through the financial plumbing, through digital identity systems,
through audit processes, through data governance frameworks and government procurement platforms.
Every sustainability report, every procurement tender, every financial transaction, every

(02:22:27):
digital credential becomes visible as an enforcement action for a
comprehensive system that shapes global economic behavior without requiring a
single vote, without your knowledge, without your permission. Power flows
above this legal authority through the sequences that they outline here.

(02:22:47):
They have a couple of examples. They talk about the OECD,
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. They determine what
gets measured. ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, creates technical
standards that ensure that measurements are interoperable globally. You know,
we were talking earlier, Travis about the code for COVID

(02:23:12):
adverse effects. You know, if you want to control something
you create a code for it. We saw that in
New York State they got the ISO to create a
code for the credit card companies for people who were
in the gun business, retail or hotel. So once they
create that code, now they can track those people. They've
identified them. If they don't want you to track something,

(02:23:34):
they don't create a code for it, but they want
something that's tracked so they can try to shut it
down and control it. They create a number for it,
and then you have a lot of different organizations they
go through in this HASSE is another one model process
or the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis transforms the
measurement data into algorithmic governance through integrated assessment models at

(02:23:58):
link environment, economy, population, security, and health. Then you've got
a lot of different alphabet agencies under that which are
not government agencies, they're international standards agencies surveillance and data
collection feed this through global monitoring systems, climate monitoring, public
health surveillance, economic tracking, and social measurement or all things

(02:24:21):
like that. Democratic bypass through technical authority, politicians received THEASA
model outputs as a scientifically neutral advice. This is what
we saw during warp speed right that appears to emerge
from objective analysis rather than from political choice. The technical

(02:24:43):
complexity and the institutional authority make challenging its recommendations appear
to be anti scientific and irresponsible. So this is something
that came out of pseudoscience and pseudo data analysis. We've
got science on our side. The politicians just bowed down
and let them do it. And the way that they
enforce this is through things like accreditation through the banking

(02:25:07):
system and capital allocation like Black Rock and others. And
it is a very subtle system. And that's why I
say I think the importance of gold is not to
try to time getting in or out of the market.
It's about getting into a separate system. This is a

(02:25:29):
termination that's been made by Russia, India, China to get
out of this system because of its unlocking controls. And
the same thing is true of us. Just as they
lock down all of Russia's investments in their system, they
can do the same thing to any person that they
don't like in the future as well. It's a government

(02:25:52):
knowing controlling what can be known. A good example of
this is something that's put out by Mark Karney and
the elect and he put out his value statement, he says,
to rebuild the social contract means that we need to

(02:26:12):
focus on common values and beliefs. So we need to
change those in order to rebuild the social contract that
he talks about. And he says beliefs and values are
not fixed, but they are nurtured. That says belief and
so this is what these behavioral scientists all believe. They

(02:26:35):
believe that you don't have freedom and dignity. They don't
believe that you're creating the image of God. And they
know that if they are persistent in their manipulation and
their propaganda, especially to young children, that the value systems,
beliefs and values that they want to destroy, that they
seek to replace what they call the social contract. They

(02:26:58):
know that that is nurtured, that it is something that
is taught and caught, and that they can nurture that
with propaganda that is repetitive that continues all the time. Finally, again,
as I emphasized before, it'll be global coordination. That's what
I mean by global governance. And it'll be done without

(02:27:21):
a government seat. It'll be done without a government flag.
There won't be someplace in Brussels or Washington where they
fly a flag. It's going to just be this network.
And we see elements of it in Builderberg and these
other structures that these guys create where they ouprate under
Chatham House rules. We see this all the time. Technical neutrality,

(02:27:46):
mass their political control, and private authority is going to
exercise public power. This is how these constructs are coming together.
So when you look at Peter Teel and his series
it's coming up on the Antichrist, I think it is
very interesting that he wants to talk about a Christian

(02:28:08):
eschatology that's been out there for a while in concept
and say that, yeah, the Antichrist will come selling peace
and safety, and so be careful to people who offer
you peace and safety. You want to have the people
who few war and endangerment, you know, like him and
Alex carp And furthermore, he says, and they will do
it to say they have to control artificial intelligence. So
while a lot of people are looking at artificial intelligence

(02:28:30):
and saying this will kind of concentrate massive amounts of
power in the hands of evil people, he says, no,
what we need to do is have no regulation whatsoever
on artificial intelligence. And you can see his fingerprints all
over the big beautiful bill that Trump got put through
because one of the things that was part of that
that eventually got pulled out because a lot of states

(02:28:52):
are pushing back against it. They want to have a
moratorium against any kind of regulation at the state level
for over a decade, So no regulation for AI because
it wasn't going to come out of Washington. The whole
purpose of stopping states was because they knew that they
had control of Washington. So when to use Washington to
stop any state regulation of artificial intelligence. So here's a

(02:29:13):
guy saying the real hallmark of an antichrist beast system
is to try to stop artificial intelligence. He's exactly the opposite.
It was kind of a Hans are we the baddies moment.
He had an interview with somebody and the guy actually

(02:29:34):
called him out on that. He says, well, there's some
people that think that you are who you're the person
that you're talking about here, And he was kind of
caught in the headlights for a while there with that.
But again, as we see the pushback against this, we
see that Putin and she and MODAI are all coming
together to try to create a different financial system. This

(02:29:55):
is what has to be done by individuals in America.
We need to start gaining our independence and our self
sufficiency by learning skills, by creating community at the local level.
That's the only way that we're going to fight this.
I think it's going to be effective.

Speaker 3 (02:30:12):
This also goes to show just how I see some
people perennially saying, Oh, Putin's a good guy, he's trying
to save the world. I don't believe that. I think
he's more than willing to engage in his own world
orders so long as he's one of the people that
gets to be on top of it.

Speaker 4 (02:30:26):
Yeah, he's a KGB guy.

Speaker 3 (02:30:28):
Yeah, they're all in it for themselves. They might have
differing end goals, but their methods of operation are fairly
the same across the board.

Speaker 4 (02:30:37):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 3 (02:30:38):
Just because he's not friendly with specific people we don't
like here does not mean he's a friend to us.

Speaker 2 (02:30:44):
It's kind of interesting, and speaking of who the friends are,
it's kind of interesting. This British politician who went to
work for Silicon Valley for about a decade.

Speaker 4 (02:30:53):
His name is Nick Klegg, and he just.

Speaker 2 (02:30:56):
Had an interview with I think it was a Guardian
where you're talking to them about what he saw in
Silicon Valley and the way it's reported by futurism, says
Meta defector. He worked for Facebook for Meta issues, a
devastating psychological takedown of the technocrats and the CEOs that
are running everything in Silicon Valley. He said. He's a

(02:31:21):
former Meta executive who left the company at the started
this year. He's had a lot of experience in different
things before jumping ship to the tech world. He was
a deputy Prime Minister of the UK. He was a
leader of the UK's Liberal Democrat Party. Now, to give
you an idea of what this is, this is kind
of as close as are going to get to say
a libertarian party. They're about free market and they focused

(02:31:43):
on civil liberties. They were also though, caught up with
climate nonsense and really supported EU membership over Brexit and
independence and things like that. However, he rose into became
a Deputy Prime minister because of being able to get
into the debates and Nick Clegg was there with the

(02:32:06):
Labor and the Tory party person and he offered another
opinion that was there and got very very popular, got
a sizable chunk of the vote, and so they had
to include him in the government that was there. But anyway, again,
like I said, they did focus on the marketplace and
private property and civil liberties. Not saying that I agree

(02:32:29):
with him, but that's really kind of their position, wasn't
when you hear liberal democrat, wasn't like Nancy Pelosi. Liberal
Democrats a very different label. His new book is How
to Save the Internet, and he took aim at the
noxious culture in San Francisco, the tech bro Denisens, with
whom he begrudgingly rubbed shoulders during a stint at Meta
from twenty eighteen until this year. He said, you'd think,

(02:32:52):
wouldn't you that if you were immensely powerful and rich
like Elon Musk and all these other tech bros and
members of that podcast community, that reflect on your good
fortune compared to most other people. Kind of like Rockefeller
right when he was asked by the reporter, you're the
richest man in the world, how much is enough? And
Rockefeller said just a little bit more. It's never enough.

(02:33:13):
They're never satisfied. Instead, Clegg sees he said, they cry
about being persecuted in Silicon Valley. Far from thinking that
they're lucky, they think that they think they're hard done by.
In other words, that they're victims. He says, I couldn't
and still can't understand this deeply unattractive combination of mchismo

(02:33:36):
and self pity. It's a cultural thing, he said. And
he was a person, by the way, I said before
they were committed to civil liberties, except that he led
the charge to kick Trump off of Facebook in tween
twenty one after the January sixth situation. So much for
a commitment to free speech right. So again, all these

(02:33:58):
labels and parties and positions that they have are just
marketing positions that they take. If you're accustomed to privilege,
he said, equality feels like oppression. He also charged it
the self styled freethinkers of Silicon Valley are actually clingingly conformist.

(02:34:18):
Everyone wears the same clothes, they drive the same cars,
they listen to the same podcasts, they follow the same fads.
It's a place born of an immense sort of herd
like behavior. Sounds like high school.

Speaker 8 (02:34:32):
There's no group of people that are more conformists than
people that really want to be seen as anti conformists.

Speaker 2 (02:34:40):
That's right, it's the whole disney.

Speaker 8 (02:34:44):
I'm the resistance because I, you know, have the flags
and present the popular stuff. Therefore, I'm against the establishment
because I do everything I'm told.

Speaker 2 (02:34:55):
Yeah, they're virtual signaling to be a part of this
new club that they just had formed. And you see
that all the time. I've seen it all my life
with teenagers who, you know, in a desire to distance
themselves from their parents and create their own culture, they
become so incredibly heard like and conformist to each other.

Speaker 4 (02:35:12):
As a joke, I thought that as a teenager. Anyway.

Speaker 2 (02:35:16):
The funniest thing he said is that Silicon Valley is
a place that prides itself on challenging orthodoxy, conformity, and
conventional wisdom. Yet in many ways it's the most conformist
place I've ever lived in my life, which is exactly
what we were talking about. With Alex Karp's point of view.
The guy is an unbelievable statist and conformist. He is

(02:35:37):
absolutely in love with raw power and with the ability
to kill people. And he's talked about that as well.
You know, we'll decide who the bad guys are that
will kill a very dangerous person. He has far more
power than someone like Evil Harari, who is just sitting
on the sidelines carping and throwing his opinions out there.

(02:35:59):
Alex carp can actually get missiles thrown at you and
many other people as well.

Speaker 8 (02:36:05):
This carp is carping, and it's a lot more dangerous.

Speaker 4 (02:36:08):
That's right. That's right.

Speaker 8 (02:36:10):
He's good at it.

Speaker 2 (02:36:11):
Yeah, that's right. So yeah, let's take a break. You
want to cover some of the time.

Speaker 3 (02:36:17):
Let's take a look at the comments that we've got
got Epstein Island. Nobody talks about Trump and Bill Gates
having an off camera meeting at the White House last week,
shortly after Trump praised Operation Warp Speed Neighbor twenty twenty nine.
Bill Gates has the solution to seeing the forest through
the trees by cutting down all the trees.

Speaker 4 (02:36:34):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:36:35):
Yeah, the ultimate carbon sink is a tree, right, and
they want to cut them down, and then he wants
to bury it because he doesn't want anybody to use
the lumber for anything.

Speaker 3 (02:36:43):
You know, you get no use out of it. We've
got bulldog. One thing left have over everyone is they're
very organized. Yeah, and they have a lot of different
organizations and they're very good at getting people in places.

Speaker 2 (02:36:57):
Well, you know, Satan has this entire structure hierarchy, and
and he has.

Speaker 4 (02:37:03):
The power to reward those who serve him.

Speaker 3 (02:37:05):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 4 (02:37:06):
That's I think that's their superpower as Satan.

Speaker 8 (02:37:10):
Also, they are a lot more coordinated with things like
you know, rules for radicals, march through the institution, a
continual push to get their people in these institutions.

Speaker 2 (02:37:23):
They have been able to take over all the institutions
from the top down. I've had people when we're speaking
at roulags and stuff come up.

Speaker 4 (02:37:30):
To me and say, how in the world did they
do that in the world.

Speaker 3 (02:37:34):
Indeed, Well, there's also the fact that people on the
right tend to be more individualist and people on the
left tend to be more collectivist, and as such, they
are generally better at organizing for a collective goal, whereas
the right tends to want to be just left alone.
They don't want to have to deal with it, like
I just want to run my life. I don't want
to tell you how to run your life.

Speaker 2 (02:37:52):
And it's also that for them this life is all
that they've got, and so you know, they they be focused, desperate,
so this is not all that we have, you know,
It's like it's important to be able to provide for
yourself and your family.

Speaker 4 (02:38:06):
But we don't worship and serve that they do. They do.

Speaker 8 (02:38:10):
Yeah, I think the next comment is talking about that.
But it's not necessarily a bad thing to be, you know,
individualistic and all that. It is ultimately what you want.
It's just sometimes that I can get in the way
of you know, coordinate effort.

Speaker 4 (02:38:26):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:38:27):
Audi Mr R, responding to n Max, says Americans don't
necessarily need to organize, especially since we know that government
infiltrates every movement. The key is to all of us
collectively as individuals, no slash exercise our rights.

Speaker 4 (02:38:41):
Yes, absolutely right.

Speaker 3 (02:38:42):
We are all dead. Thank our FK for the pandemic
of anti Semitic speech MAV twenty two. Fyi, the anti
semitism algo AI is supposedly going live this week. That
means it probably went live last month. N Max. Threeyears ago,
gold was only eighteen hundred dollars. Wish I had bought
a bunch then it would have doubled in value.

Speaker 4 (02:39:05):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:39:06):
Yeah, Well again, the way you look at it is
the American dollar has dropped dropped in half, and when
you look at you know what a dollar would buy
versus gold would buy one hundred years ago. It truly
is amazing to see the effect of the Federal Reserve.
And Trump doesn't want to fix that. He just wants

(02:39:26):
to control the problem. Make it something that answers to him.
We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:41:07):
Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (02:41:17):
Welcome back, folks. Want to give you a brief overview
of what we're going to be covering in these last
twenty ish minutes. We're going to be talking about that,
the Las Vegas shooting. To start. We've got headlines here.
Jason al Dean revisits Las Vegas tragedy in his Essenal performance.
That's from US Fox News. Trey Goddy calls for disarming
young white males in wake of Catholic school shooting. Malania

(02:41:39):
Trump wants to monitor you and your family's mental health
and your home to stop school shootings.

Speaker 4 (02:41:43):
Yeah that's the one that's new.

Speaker 3 (02:41:45):
Yeah, these people are all cut from the same cloth.

Speaker 1 (02:41:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:41:49):
We've got Tim Walls Way's emergency legislative session on gun control.
Good old Tim Walls. Pope calls for end pandemic of
arms after Catholic school shooting. Thomas Massey introduces repeat of
Gun Free School Zones Act and briefly, if we have time,
we're also going to look at Ukraine. There'll be no
peace in Ukraine until washingtonmits to itself it has lost

(02:42:10):
the war. That's from the Free Thought Project. Zelenski threatens
new deep strikes into Russia. That's from RT. Russia backs
China on global governance reform, and that's from Marti as well.
Trump unveils another eight hundred and twenty five million arms
sale to Ukraine while talking peace. That is from Zero Hedge.

Speaker 2 (02:42:27):
Well, you know they're trapesing out Travis, all the usual
suspects that have pushed this stuff been useful to their agenda.
And that's why there's this US magazine profile of Jason Alden.
He was at the Vegas shooting. I think he was
actually performing at the time that the shooting commenced. And
he goes back to recount his Saturday Night Live tribute

(02:42:50):
to the victims. And why would a country and Western
conservative get on Saturday Night Live. Well, because he weid
his pants and went full gun control after that shooting.
And that shooting was one of the most obvious false flags. Ever,
in terms of the lies and things that were put
out there that were improbable and impossible that happened.

Speaker 3 (02:43:12):
Yeah, there's a thing about it that makes any sense
at all.

Speaker 2 (02:43:14):
And then Trump jumped in on that with his bump
stock prohibition by executive order to set a new precedent
for gun control to be done by pronouncements from the president.

Speaker 8 (02:43:25):
And so in this thing, that was how he was
able to remove the window and get all that equipment
up to that hotel room was because of a bump stock.

Speaker 4 (02:43:34):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:43:34):
Yeah, again, as I said, it's one of the craziest
narratives about a shooting, but it had a purpose and
you can see the purpose and how Trump used it
to assert the ability to do gun control by executive order.
And it is amazing to me to see how Jason
Alden recovered from that and basically has this big hit.

(02:43:56):
Not in a small town of the lords. We got
guns and we're going to protect ourselves in a small town.
He's got a place that he built, a very expensive
place right in the center of Gatlinburg as well. Every
time I go past that, just shake my head. It's
like it's amazing to me to be able to see
people that are just completely reinvent themselves and spend around
want to, you know, one hundred and eight degrees away

(02:44:18):
from what they did without ever apologizing for what they did.

Speaker 3 (02:44:21):
It's important to let people grow and change and learn,
but they have to actually show that they have grown
and are not just changing the direction of their grift.
People are people something.

Speaker 2 (02:44:33):
Everybody can make a mistake and you have to own it.

Speaker 3 (02:44:35):
And it's not enough to just go one day, you know,
I'm for Trump the next day without saying anything, without
condemning anything or admitting you or wrong, just go and
exact opposite direction.

Speaker 2 (02:44:46):
Yeah, I see it with some of these high profile
pastors who get caught some kind of big moral failure
like a you know, sexual thing or something, and they'll
take a leave of absence and then they'll just kind
of come back and I'm back.

Speaker 4 (02:45:00):
Aren't you glad to have me back? You know? It's like,
let's talk about what just happened here.

Speaker 2 (02:45:04):
I mean, there is forgiveness if you own up to it,
but you need to own up to it. Trey Goddy,
we talked about this last week. I have a clip
of it. I'm going to play since work short on
time here saying it's always young white males, and even
as his co host corrects him on that, said, no,
there's been other training shootings as well and not males,

(02:45:26):
he still doubles down on that.

Speaker 4 (02:45:28):
Another one of.

Speaker 2 (02:45:29):
These people who completely reinvents himself and has actually controlled opposition.

Speaker 4 (02:45:34):
Then we come to the Millennia.

Speaker 8 (02:45:35):
A comment about that I thought was really good. It's
the media can't decide whether to respectfully refer to the
shooter as a trans woman or to disrespectfully say it's
a white male.

Speaker 4 (02:45:51):
Yeah, Jake Tapper was.

Speaker 2 (02:45:53):
I played that clip last week where it's like, oh,
we got to make sure we use the right pronouns anything,
we want to honor the pronoun preferences of this crazy,
hateful murderer.

Speaker 8 (02:46:02):
I have both of those on the board to show
the difference.

Speaker 2 (02:46:06):
Yes, yes, Well we're going to move on though, because
I want to go quickly in this millennia. Trump wants
to monitor you and your family's mental health in your
home in order to stop school shootings. This is from
bian Shaw Hobby at Health Impact News. Isn't it interesting
how the Trump people are fully on board with some

(02:46:28):
kind of a mental system of red flag gun laws
and things like that, as we saw with Trump, now
we see it now with Milania Trump. And of course
who's going to administer that. Well, it's going to be
their technocrat bros. Right, they're going to do this, Brian says.
After the horrific mass shooting, Melania Trump announced her support
for quote behavioral threat and now assessments across all levels

(02:46:51):
of society. Who are you to set in judgment of
our mental health? This is some kind of a pre
crime nightmare that the Trump family wants to put on
the hoypoi, right, hoypooi beginning in our homes, she said,
and extending through school districts, and of course, she said

(02:47:13):
social media.

Speaker 4 (02:47:15):
This.

Speaker 2 (02:47:15):
Of course, the question is what the standards will be
for judging what is good, bad and mental behavior. More
than likely they will use predictive analysis software, which has
been around for almost a decade. It has been used
by the US foster care system with CPS to justify
taking children away from their parents. Just had a story
about that last week in Greenland. They would come after

(02:47:35):
the native into its there and say that they were
not fit to be parents and take their kids away
from them. And we had the situation where as a
young woman who was pregnant and she had the assessment
was done on her, and it's become so bad there
that they passed a law there in Greenland to stop it.
And yet the Danish authorities continued in her case to

(02:47:58):
do it after the law had passed. And what they
did was they did an evaluation. They looked at her history.
She was abused by her father, so on the basis
of her being abused, they said she's.

Speaker 4 (02:48:08):
Not going to be.

Speaker 2 (02:48:11):
We're not going to allow her to be a parent,
and told her they were going to take the baby
away when it was born, and they did about an
hour's after the baby was born. This is what Trump
and Millennia would like to have happened here. CPS using
predictive analytics software, the label parents is unfit even before
the baby was born. And he covered this seven years

(02:48:32):
ago in Health Impact. He said, there's a recent report
from jan Eastgate, president of the Citizens Commission on Human
Rights International, involuntary psychiatric commitment of the homeless a dangerous,
costly failure. You know frequently talk about how during the
Reagan administration it took a lot of people who had

(02:48:52):
been committed because they had been evaluated and they were
committed because they had mental illness, so because they were
addicted to drugs or whatever, and they just released them
on the streets, and that was why you had this
big surge of homeless people. Now there's a lot of
people that are homeless that are not drug addicts, that
are not mentally crazy, but because of financial as system

(02:49:15):
especially it's happening in California right now. But a lot
of this is government policy that we're not going to
institutionalize people. And here's the key, folks, It's like everything else,
it comes back to whether or not the government can
honestly assess these things. As I said about the red
flag laws, the issue is, if somebody is crazy, you

(02:49:39):
don't just take their gun. I mean, they still got
access to other guns. They could take a knife, they
could take a club, they could use their automobile to
run people down. If somebody is crazy, that'd be confined,
but you better give them due process. I've said for
the longest time that in principle I support capital punishment,
but in practice, when you look at the way our

(02:49:59):
government is run, I have some real problems with the
way our court systems are set up, so that's you know,
that's always there as a caveat. I mean, you're going
to talk about these principles, but then you have to
have an honest system that's going to implement this stuff.
And this is something when we talk about red flag
laws and things like that. Now Milania is taking it

(02:50:22):
to the logical conclusion that well, we need to be
the ones to evaluate each and every one of you
to see if you're likely to commit a crime, and
if you are, then we're going to do something to you.
Do see how dangerous that is. It's absolutely horrific what
the Trump people are ushering in. As you've got people
who are standing on the sidelines applauding them because it's

(02:50:44):
in their financial interest to applaud them.

Speaker 8 (02:50:47):
So yes, it seems like no matter how bad the
president is, the first lady is worse. You got you know,
Hillary Clinton pushing healthcare control from the government, and now
we've got this from Maloonia.

Speaker 2 (02:51:02):
Yeah, that's right. And one American town, says Brian Senior
Systems told that they could not sing gospel songs or
pray over their meals in their community center because it
was a public building. Only after an extensive lawsuit. Were
their rights vindicated? And of course this is not even
during Trump's pandemic. Trump did that to everybody again with
the pandemic.

Speaker 4 (02:51:22):
But it's a.

Speaker 2 (02:51:22):
Difference between the free exercise religion and establishing a religion.
The fact that the public building doesn't make any sense
at all. One child was told they couldn't give pencils
to her school friends that had the word Jesus printed
on them. Crying, she asked her mom, why does the
school hate Jesus. Well, the answer from the mom should be, well,

(02:51:46):
it does hate Jesus, but I send you there anyway.

Speaker 4 (02:51:48):
Why do you send your child to?

Speaker 8 (02:51:50):
Yeah, I mean it's like that good thing to talk
to your child about why the school does in fact
hate Jesus.

Speaker 2 (02:51:56):
Yeah, yeah, out of the mouth of babes, right, These
young kids get the message their religion is treated the
same as a curse word. Understand that Hollywood has turned
Jesus's name into a curse word. They have done it deliberately.
They don't do it to Buddha, they don't do it
to Muhammad. As a matter of fact, we had a
Japanese friend who said is a Christian and said even

(02:52:20):
in Japan. You know, people are swearing at Jesus. You know,
they're not swearing by Buddha or whatever it is that
they follow. You know, they use Jesus's name as a
curse word. She said that was one of the key
things that made her pay attention. Why are they swearing
at someone that they don't believe in? Right and anyway,

(02:52:41):
these children are being taught at a very early age
keep your religion to yourself. It's dirty, it's bad. And
so this is he goes through and he traces this
to the deliberate strategy of some psychologists as well as
the educational society. You just need to understand how important
that is and get your kids out of that. Tim

(02:53:03):
Waltz then has an emergency legislation session on gun control
because it's never enough. Right, the question is when is
he going to have an emergency session to stop the
gender gas lighting of children which drives them insane. He's
not going to do that at all. And in Minnesota,
they have some of the most strict gun control laws anywhere.

(02:53:26):
They are ranked as the fourteenth strictest in the nation.
They have red flag laws, they have universal background checks
for handgun sales. They have a concealed carry permit requirement,
they have gun storage laws requirement, they have a bump
stock van, and they have a ban on so called
glock switches and many other things. They've enacted basically everything

(02:53:51):
that they can think of, and yet they gaslight children
on this gender thing and drive them nuts.

Speaker 8 (02:53:58):
So the post while everywhere it turns it into a
fully automatic gun.

Speaker 2 (02:54:02):
Yeah, that's right. The Pope has called for an end
to the pandemic of arms. Isn't that interesting because when
we had the other fake pandemic, they were trying to
get into your arms. Now they're trying to take away
your arms, trying to get into your actual arms, not
the weapons. Interesting to see this, you know, just to

(02:54:23):
understand that maybe a diocese will in some conservative areas
might try to protect the kids at school, but certainly
the Catholic Church is not going to do that. They're
not going to have any school security or defense that's
going to be there. That's the key thing. And so
again another fake pandemic, just like the other pandemics. How

(02:54:45):
many dozens of Christians, by the way, were slaughtered by
Muslims this last week for being Christians. Does the Pope
care about that. No, he ignores that. He ignores that,
and he's not going to defend the children in the
Catholic schools either. He announced the quote logic of weapons, Well,

(02:55:05):
the logic of weapons is that you can use them
to protect kids. That's the logic that he doesn't want
to acknowledge.

Speaker 8 (02:55:12):
Meanwhile, Phill hates all forms of logic.

Speaker 2 (02:55:16):
Thomas Massey has introduced a repeal of the Guns Free
School Zones Act. I remember when this is done back
in the nineties, actually it was nineteen ninety. It was
done under George hw Bush. I mean we talked about
it if you had a firearm within a thousand feet
of a school, and you could have that. If you're
driving by and you've got a pistol under your seat
or something, you're violating this federal gun law. It was

(02:55:40):
set up to entrap people, but it's also intimidated a
lot of schools from not being able to not protect
their own children. So Thomas Massey has introduced a bill
to repeal the Gun Free School Zones Act of George hw.

Speaker 4 (02:55:55):
Bush.

Speaker 2 (02:55:55):
They always find these Republicans to push this stuff through,
don't they able to get it through the Republican When
they can't get it through with a Democrat. Gun owners
America praise Thomas Massey's push, saying Congress needs to ab
abandon the failed federal gunfree school policy and armed teachers
who are willing to do it and are willing to
get trained. I couldn't support that anymore strongly. That is

(02:56:20):
absolutely the way that needs to go real quickly. We
just got a couple of minutes. I want to talk
about Ukraine because you've got a couple of different editorials.
One of them came from Daniel mcaddams with Ron Paul Institute.
Other people are saying the same thing. There can be
no peace in Ukraine until Washington admits to itself that
it has lost the war, that it is at war

(02:56:40):
with Russia. And as Daniel McCadam says, if you are
going to arm one side of a war, you can't
present yourself as a neutral arbiter in order to have peace.
And that's exactly what Washington is doing. Funding one side
of a war between other nations nullifies the funding nations neutral.
In other words, you can't pretend that you're neutral if

(02:57:02):
you were giving weapons to one side in the war,
which is what Trump is doing. Trump has positioned himself
as arbitrator and peacemaker between two warring governments, and that's
the problem Daniel McAdams of The Ron Paulins pointed out
several months ago in an interview. He said, Washington, it's
like having a boxing match and the referee starts punching

(02:57:24):
one side, And of course Trump did punch back. After
the meeting that he had with Putin, he sent more
arms to Ukraine. It's been clear from the beginning to
anyone that's being honest with himself, this war was never
between Ukraine and Russia. There's always a war between Washington
and Russia, fought by Ukrainians on their land but funded

(02:57:47):
and directed by Washington. Began in twenty fourteen with the overthrow.
But when Washington says this just happened, well it didn't
just happen. It was something that was deliberate. And also
in Syria, they tried to get the military basis that
Russia had in Syria and then the one that they
had in Crimea home to Russia's Black Sea Fleet for

(02:58:12):
over two hundred and forty years. They are not going
to give up that base. That is clearly the situation
and so when you.

Speaker 4 (02:58:22):
Look at.

Speaker 2 (02:58:24):
This situation, as you said, they need to come to
terms of this because Russia is gaining more territory every
day if they want to do something about it. But
you know, one of the things that Trump has thrown
out there, as soon as he has the talks, he
comes back and he throws another eight hundred and twenty
five million dollars worth of arm sales to Ukraine while

(02:58:45):
he's out there talking piece.

Speaker 4 (02:58:47):
He's not serious about this stuff.

Speaker 2 (02:58:49):
And it's what we've seen from Trump in one issue
after the other, this difference between what he says and
what he actually does, and how the two are at
diometrically opposite to each other. The criminal is going to
interpret this as another act of US escalation given the
long range capability. These things are three three hundred and

(02:59:09):
fifty extended range attack munition missiles that are part of
this massive eight hundred and twenty five million dollars and
it is all being done for the profits of the
military industrial complex. It's going to be paid for by
Denmark and Netherlands. They're going to pay for the weapons
that they buy from the American arms manufacturers to keep

(02:59:31):
this thing going. And finally, you have Ukraine pretending that
it's got long range missiles that it developed on its own.
They can go sixteen hundred miles into Russia. And yet
the British presses pointed out that looks exactly like some
British missiles that were done. And they just had a
massive scandal involving the company that controls those missiles in

(02:59:57):
Ukraine in terms of corruption. So back to the usual stuff.
But that's it for today. It's all the time we've got.
Sorry I didn't get a chance to get to the
last group of comments here, but thank you, have a
good day, see you all tomorrow. The common man, they

(03:00:23):
created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created
common past track and control us. They're Commons project to
make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
each of us has worth and dignity created in the

(03:00:45):
image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they

(03:01:06):
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2086: Palantir CEO Pushes Technocratic Republic

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2086: Palantir CEO Pushes Technocratic Republic

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal