Tue Episode #2116: Tomahawks for Peace: More Trump War Lies

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
You know, a world of deceit, Telling the truth is
a revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
it's the fourteenth of October, Year of Our Lord, twenty
twenty five. Well, today we're going to take another look
at the Trump insurrection. Of course, in California we have
some new gun control legislation. What is the prize? And

(01:01):
yet it's going to be interesting to see how the
Supreme Court handles this because one of the things that
they have said is that commonly used firearms are protected
while they're going after the number one firearm, and that's
the glock. Of course, that phrase is not in the
Second Amendment, and that was added, interestingly enough by antonins Kalia,

(01:25):
the so called originalist. So we're going to see how
this works out. But there's also some very fascinating news
about Cutter that we didn't get to yesterday as well,
and how that interfaces with the Trump family and the
pushback by many people within MAGA. So now they've got
yet another issue that they're at odds with that Trump,

(01:47):
not the vaccine, not the pandemic. But one by one
they're starting to see who this guy is we'll be
right back, stay with us. Well, in Portland they've had

(02:13):
a protest, which you wouldn't have a protest like this,
I guess, I guess except in Portland or maybe Austin.
We have nude cyclists joining the anti ice protests as
it's raining in Portland, and I guess they're protests naked tyranny.
Did you think that's a I guess if your if

(02:34):
your goal was to be as obnoxious as possible, I
guess that works better than the crazy costumes that they're wearing.
No costume at all is probably the anyway, the trading
insults with counter protesters. Who's showed up to sing the
Star Spangled banner and carried a large banner of Charlie Kirk.

(02:54):
There he goes, our patron saint of the right. Now.
The protests have only intensified in recent day as a
Trump administration doubles down on his portrayal of Portland as
an urban dystopia controlled by far left radicals, a narrative
denied by many locals in state and city officials. Well,
I think that we would all agree that that's an

(03:16):
accurate characterization. I would say that is a radical left dystopia.
I've been there, and yet the means does not justify
the end. And you're not going to end that with
military force or with police from the federal government. The
problem with Portland it's a spiritual one, it's a mental one,

(03:38):
and you can't fix that. This is the way these
people want to live. You just need to let them
go their own way. But you don't want to destroy
the constitution trying to fix that. This is like nation building.
As we've said before, you can't put something there that's
not there. So the counter protesters, some of whom were
Trump branded garb, numbered in the dozens. They were flanked

(04:01):
by American flags an image of Charlie Kirk standing in
front of a white cross with one arm raised in
a fist. Is that what? I don't think that was
really about the fight fight fight. Thing that was not
is it was like, prove me wrong, Let's have a discussion.
They don't get it. They have reinvented Charlie Kirk in

(04:22):
their own image, haven't they. Across the street, a phalanx
of protesters the post administration's immigration policies danced and jeered
despite a Pacific Northwest downpour. The two sides. She heeled
obscenities at each other through microphones. This is about how
beneficial these protests are. You know, you can show up

(04:43):
and it reminds me of the Monty Python skit where
the guy pays to have an argument and he spends
the whole time arguing about whether or not he's paid
enough to have an argument. Federal agents stood watch from
the roof of the federal building where they occasionally we
shot pepper balls into the peaceful crowd throughout the afternoon
and into the evening. And see, this is the other

(05:06):
thing too. I totally disagree with these people in Portland
about everything, and yet they have a constitutionally protected right
to air their a grievances, if not everything else. And
so the reality is is that if you're going to
allow the federal government to overrule that and say, well,

(05:29):
we don't care that they have a constitutional right to
redress their agreementces, we're going to kick it off with force.
We're going to shoot these people with pepper balls and
the rest of the stuff. We saw that at January sixth,
and a lot of people thought that was reprehensible. How
do we go over such a short period of time
and these people have completely had their memories wiped if

(05:51):
they ever could remember anything. I've never seen anybody with
such short term memories and no ability to see trends either.
As the MAGA people, It's just amazing all the stuff
that was done to them. They're now cheering to make
this a precedent that will be used by the next tillery,
by the next Obama, by the next Biden. Can't you

(06:12):
people see this. It's just amazing to me. The shot
protesters of pepperballs. You know, I really disliked these these protesters,
but I really really dislike the shooters who are doing this.
That's enough to make me want to protests, but not

(06:32):
in the way that they are. To be naked is
to be as vulnerable as you can be, said one person.
And that's what we're saying. We're not afraid, So that's
how these people think.

Speaker 3 (06:42):
What it really gets me is that it says to be
naked is to be as vulnerable as you can be,
said a lease important resident who asked that her last
name not be used due to privacy concerns.

Speaker 2 (06:53):
And it's irony.

Speaker 3 (06:56):
You think the irony would have killed her right on
the spot.

Speaker 2 (07:00):
That's good Joe's Yeah, I miss that. ICE protesters, your
MIC's not on lanes? Yeah, go ahead, what'd you have
to say?

Speaker 4 (07:11):
Saying the wisest man at the newest speech hides not
his body but his face.

Speaker 2 (07:20):
Yeah. Anti ICE protesters have called for the immigration facility
to be shut down, an idea that the city appears
to be considering. Last month's city officials warned the building's
owner that ICE might be violating its conditional use permit
by holding detainees longer than it was agreed. The US
General Services Administration has operated the facility since twenty eleven

(07:42):
as a processing center where immigration officials can check in
with asylum seekers and immigrants. According to the permit, the
federal government cannot hold detainees there for more than twelve hours.
Mayor Keith Wilson said the agreement has been repeatedly broken
between October one, twenty four last year when Biden was

(08:03):
there and July twenty seventh. So they said ICE made
clear these detention limitation commitments to our community, and we
believe they broke those policies more than two dozen times.
I'm proud of our team for conducting a thorough, thoughtful
investigations that's going to be the technicality in which they
want to try to move to close this ice facility.

(08:24):
And again, my orientation is, I'm all about local control.
I'm all about division of power. I'm all about state
and local control versus centralizing everything under the federal government.
Number one, Number two, the Constitution. We have to have
a standard. We have to have an objective standard, and
the government, especially the federal government, especially the president, needs

(08:48):
to be held to that standard, needs to be subjected
to that standard. So Trump, as we're looking at his
idea of what law is a weapon to be wielded
by him against his personal enemies, he again has urged
Pam Bondi to take action. And this I talked about

(09:09):
briefly yesterday. I thought it was worth going back to
look at it again because WND, he used to be
Worldinget Daily, talks about this and is absolutely completely skips
over the complaint that Trump has. He says, it was
biden'sbi and we got to do something. January sixth, twenty

(09:31):
twenty one, Trump is still president for another couple of weeks,
and he, as well as Trump media like WND, pretend
that he wasn't president. They pretend that it was Biden
who was president. And when you look at the Biden
FBI agents who they accused, I think rightfully so of

(09:55):
being agent provocateurs and then of abusing the law. Why
are they abusing their law legal authority right now and
why are they acting as agent provocators? And they are
They sit on a building and they start shooting pepper
balls the people who are peaceful, like that guy who

(10:15):
was a priest, and he was a priest who's a pastor.
It's a Presbyterian pastor, incredibly liberal, and he's basically killed
the church that he took over there with his abortion
and LGBT support. But he was not doing in terms
of the political aspects there. He was not doing anything.

(10:35):
He was not even yelling insults at the people, and
they shot him in the face with a pepper ball.
And I just have a real problem with the people
on the right who cheer that because it's going to
happen to them, and they like to say fafo. Well,
you know, the same thing applies to you. When you
support the government doing whatever it wishes without the restraint

(10:58):
of the law, you're going to FAFO yourself. So Trump
called out Pam BONDI because she's not acting to do
something about these two hundred and seventy four FBI agents
that were with the Capitol crowd on January the sixth,
and W and D won't point out that Biden was

(11:19):
not president, that Trump was president at that point in time.
They go along with the farce. He says, all upper case,
the Biden FBI placed two hundred and seventy four agents
into the crowd on January the sixth, and again as
he was pushing people to this, as he was fleecing
them of their money and pushing them to this pointless protest.

(11:42):
That's all waning was pointless. That's why I said on
December the fourteenth, I said, it's pointless at this point
because they have failed to get a hearing. They failed
to make their case to the state legislatures. There were
four state legislatures that were controlled by Republicans. Whether it
was a razor thin margin, could have made the case
if they thought there was fraud, they could have gotten

(12:02):
a second set of electors officially sent by that state,
rather than just one set of electors from each state.
So I said, there's really no point in it, and
there's no point in Alex Jones had stopped to steal
except to make money. So I got fired, but I
truly believe that and I would do it again. Chris Way.

(12:24):
Chris Ray lyed to the American public, said Jim Hawff
at the Gateway Pundit, he set up the good American
patriots who attended January sixth protest. Well, you might want
to take a look, Jim at Trump himself. He's the
one who set people up, He more than anybody, and
Alex Jones to stop the steal. The two of them

(12:46):
sent people there. You can get angry at the FBI,
and you can get angry at what Biden did after
the fact and how he abused his authority, and you
can get angry at Ray Epps and all the rest
of the stuff. But the people who sent them there
were Alex Jones and Donald Trump, and they made millions
off of people, in the case of Trump, hundreds of
millions off of the supporters that they put in jeopardy.

(13:08):
And then Trump left them twisting in the wind while
he pardoned the white collar criminals that were friends of
Jared Kushner, some of the biggest white collar criminals ever.
So he previously called out Pambondy as quote all talk
and no action unquote over the progress on investigations and
FBI Director James Comy, Adam Shift, and Letitia James. So

(13:31):
now she has moved to enforce his personal vendettas. But
just notice that this is really for your consumption. If
you're president, do you really communicate with your attorney general
via social media posts? Seriously, I didn't see I didn't
check my feed yesterday or something. Right. No, you're going

(13:54):
to talk to them right in person. So this is
for you. This is not for her. Pam I have
reviewed over thirty statements and posts saying essentially the same
old story as last time. I'll talk, no action, nothing
is being done. What about Comey, Adam, Shifty, Schiff, and Letitia.
They're all guilty. You need to get them locked up.

(14:17):
And so that's what he's doing with this as well. Well. Meanwhile,
Bondi says that federal deployment to Memphis, where they're not
being fought by the Democrat governor this there or mayor
this there, they have racked up over five hundred arrests
and they're very proud of the fact that they have
seized one hundred and forty four illegal guns. Let me
ask you under the Second Amendment, Travis, what guns are

(14:40):
illegal under the Second Amendment.

Speaker 3 (14:42):
I've yet to find one.

Speaker 2 (14:44):
Yeah, none, none, There's no such thing if you pay
attention to the Constitution, Our Attorney General, Pam Bondy, there
is no such thing as an illegal gun. But of
course Trump touts this as a victory. Because Trump himself
is nothing but a New York City Democrat. He has
pushed gun control, he has established new precedents for gun control.

(15:04):
Gun control done by the president with executive orders by
the bureaucracy underneath him, not even by the Congress, violating
the Constitution, but by the President and his bureaucracy. And
so yet again he forgot.

Speaker 4 (15:18):
Just illegal politicians.

Speaker 2 (15:21):
That's good. That's good. We should make a T shirt
of that. That's really good, Bondi said. We've been making
arrests left and right, and we've succeeded one hundred and
forty four illegal guns just in the short time that
we've been in Memphis. It doesn't take long to violate
the Constitution. It's a new issue, said Trump. And it's
called crime. We stop crime, and they allow crime. They

(15:45):
want crime. Yeah, it is a new issue for the
federal government to address crime, because it's not in the
constitution for them to do that whatsoever. We've been saying
this for the longest time. All the FBI agents that
you're so upset about that got involved in all these
things against people, these plots and conspiracies and setting people up,
covering up for the government, as well as occasionally doing

(16:08):
an investigation. That's there because part of it is because
it began as a violation of the constitution and it
remains a violation of the constitution. And they've used this
in the most insidious ways. But what do you expect
when you start with a by ignoring the law, What
do you think the FBI is going to do after that?

(16:28):
And so it is a new issue because we never
did want the federalization of the police, and this is
what Trump is doing. And I'm absolutely amazed at just
how little is being said by conservatives about this. I
mean even with John Bird Society, they waited a while
before they said anything about it, and then they did
an excellent article on it, and since then I haven't

(16:50):
seen anything else about it. They've moved on to other issues.
They were the ones who sixty years ago were saying,
support your local sheriff. Let's not federalized law enforcement. This
is the essence of what they were always fighting, and
yet they don't care. They're just going to look the
other direction. So that brings us to the gun issue

(17:11):
in California. A Second Amendment showdown. California bands glock handguns
and a major challenge to the Second Amendment. This is newscum,
new scam, nuisance, whatever you want to call him. Gavin
signed the long anticipated Responsible Gun Manufacturing Act, a law

(17:33):
that may now trigger a major challenge under the Second Amendment.
The law banned the glock semi automatic handguns that are
favorite of American gun owners, including supposedly La La Harris.
And so when she had to build up her creds,
she claimed that she had a glock. Of course many

(17:55):
of us did not believe. Just like when she was
Attorney General California, she was locking up marijuana users left
and right, and then she claimed, yeah, when I was
in college, I was doing blah blah blahs, smoking joints
and listening to a group that didn't exist when she
was in college.

Speaker 3 (18:15):
So I think it was public enemy or maybe nwa.

Speaker 2 (18:18):
I don't know. Yeah, anyway, well.

Speaker 4 (18:20):
Maybe she meant her bodyguard carries a clock.

Speaker 2 (18:26):
That's right. These people have bodyguards, they don't need guns.
One of the most ambitious gun bands since the Supreme
Court ruled in the District of Columbia versus Heller that
gun ownership is an individual right. So this may actually
backfire against California because certainly the Heller decision backfired against Washington,

(18:47):
d c. And that Heller case. If you recall, they
had an off duty cop was Heller, and they came
after him. Actually he was fighting them because he wanted
to be able to carry his weapon when he was
off duty. They said he couldn't do it, and so
he took at the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court
recognized the fact that what everybody knows, and that is

(19:09):
that the Bill of Rights is about individual rights. It's
not about collective rights. You know, the ninth and tenth
Amendment talk about the division of power and are there
to keep the federal government from consolidating power. I mean
Madison looked at the Constitution and said, wow, I think
they're going to do things like, you know, use the
Commerce Clause or the general welfare clause to give themselves

(19:30):
a blank check to do anything they want, and we
don't want that. So the ninth and tenth Amendment are
there to restrain the federal government and to demark lines
of authority and power. But the other eight are all
about individual rights. They're all about individual rights, and so

(19:50):
it was an absurd position. They'd been taken by the
Supreme Court for the longest time saying that the Second
Amendment wasn't about individual rights. As a matter of fact,
I remember having you know, Andy. I won't mention his
last name, but Andy. At the video stores. We had
a kid who we met him because he was running
from the police because he's skateboarding at the shopping I say,

(20:11):
come on, come in here, will I you? You know?
So anyway, we became friends and he was a good kid.
He was number two in his class. He was a
salutarian in his class. But he would argue with me
about the Second Amendment and say, no, that was written
for the national Guard. Said, you realize national Guard didn't exist.
Then the National Guard is not the militia and all

(20:33):
the rest of the stuff. But that's how they went
down this path, and that's why that's the legal fiction
that they created to say that the Second Amendment was
not an individual right, but it is patently obvious to everyone.
And finally the Supreme Court admitted the obvious because of
the Heller decision. Antonin Scalia stressed to the Second Amendment
protects all types of firearms quote in common use at

(20:55):
the time unquote for lawful purposes such as self defense. Well,
the phrase in common use of the time, which they
have so focused on, is not in the text. He
made this up. He threw that in. And so now
this has become the point of contention. Well, was this
in common use of the time? And yet if you

(21:18):
look at this, they want to go after the most
commonly used guns that are out there, not just the
AR fifteen, but now the glock, which is This article
from zero Hedge points out the glock is the AR
at fifteen is estimated one in twenty Americans own an
AR fifteen, but the glock is even more popular. In

(21:41):
twenty twenty one alone, they produced five hundred and eighty
one thousand hand actually five hundred and eighty two thousand
if your round up, and in twenty twenty two, four
hundred and sixty five thousand, so they're douring about a
half a million a year. It is also the weapon
of choice or an estimated over sixty five percent of
law enforcement agencies. Lala Harris then bragged that she had

(22:05):
a glock her cherished companion. It became apparent that she
was losing men generally in the campaign made a ham
handed effort to reinvent Harris. In a softball interview with Oprah,
she declared that she is a gun owner and said
if somebody breaks into my house, they're getting shot. When
liberals like CBS's Bill Whitaker expressed shock at her new

(22:27):
gun toting persona on the campaign trail, he asked if
she actually fired it. She did her best Rooster Cogburn,
and she said, well, a gun that ain't loaded ain't
no good for nothing. And since she's shooting blanks too,
she ain't no good for nothing either, is she.

Speaker 3 (22:45):
That also still doesn't answer that as a non sequitur.
That doesn't answer the question.

Speaker 2 (22:49):
No, that's right, And the reality is is that when
she was attorney general in California, she fired filed an
amicus brief to say that the District at Columbia could
prohibit an off duty cop from carrying a gun for
his own protection. So she was in support of the
handgun band and DC that was overturned by spring Court
and Heller.

Speaker 3 (23:09):
It's truly amazing how dumb Kamala Harris is. I think
she may be the dumbest candidate we have yet seen.

Speaker 2 (23:18):
I saw a cliff. I didn't put it in the deck,
but I thought it was funny. She was somewhere and
she was kind of walking around and making statements, and
somebody said she is falling down drunk, and boy, certainly
did seem like it. So I don't know how much
of it is stupidity and how much of it is
the fact that she seems to be constantly drunk.

Speaker 3 (23:36):
Column a columb you know, maybe they're both feeding off
each other.

Speaker 4 (23:40):
And I know, with all these major politicians, we have
to wonder, so is he senile? Is she an alcoholic?
What's going on with these people?

Speaker 2 (23:49):
Are they stupid? Or are they evil and controlled by
the globalist? Yeah, that's exactly.

Speaker 3 (23:53):
Right, answer all of the above.

Speaker 2 (23:56):
That's right. Gun control advocates have been chipping away and
the concept of in common use at the time by
arguing that a variety of popular weapons like the AR
fifteen cannot be considered in common use at the time
of the ratification of the Second Amendment. So yeah, those
those guns didn't exist there, so they're not allowed for

(24:18):
you to have a modern gun. So they're got to
go back to muzzle loaders and Scalia, however, joined Justice
Clarence Thomas in twenty fifteen. In the dissent, Thomas had written, quote,
several courts of appeal have upheld categorical bands on firearms
that millions of Americans commonly owned for lawful purposes, and

(24:40):
such rulings are non compliance with our Second Amendment precedents.
And that's the problem. You know, even people like Clarence Thomas,
who I think is the best one on the Supreme Court,
and they just don't take the Constitution as written and
they believe that they're setting precedents that have the effect

(25:03):
of law. I think that's a very dangerous idea because
we've had the liberals have for the longest time treated
the Constitution as a living document quote unquote, and by
that they mean that they can change it constantly without
truly amending it. According to what the Constitution says. There
is a process for amending the constitution, they ignore that

(25:27):
and decide to do it their own way. So that's
all just a misdirection.

Speaker 3 (25:33):
There's a you reminded me of a very famous copy
pasta that floats around the internet. It's a making fun
of the well, the Founding Fathers only intended you to
use the weapons of their time. And I've pulled up
says I want to musket for home defense, since that's
what the Founding Fathers intended for. Ruffians break into my house,
What the devil? As I grab my powdered wig in
Kentucky rifle, blow a golf ball size tole through the

(25:55):
first man. He's dead on the spot. Drama pistol on
the second man miss him entirely because it's smooth board
nails the neighbor's dog after to resort to the cannon
mounted at the top of the stairs littered with grape
shot tally ho lads. The grape shot shreds two men
in the blast and the sound and extra shrapnel set
off car alarms. Fixed Bannett and charge the last terrified
rep scallion. He bleeds out, waiting on the police to arrive.

(26:16):
Since strangular Bannett wounds are impossible to stitch up, just
as the founding fathers intended.

Speaker 2 (26:23):
That's right, and that's the way you handle the swat team, right,
the cannon with a grape shot. Well, there's another aspect
to this. The Democrats have been pushing really hard against
glock switches, which are already illegal. It can be attached

(26:44):
to the rear of a glock slide to make the
pistol shoot fully automatic. Such switches are already unlawful. They're
now going after the gun itself, confirming that the objective
of these early moves were to ban the semi automatic
weapons themselves. As a matter of fact, the text of
the bill says a machine gun convertible pistol as any

(27:05):
semi automatic with a cruciform trigger bar that can readily
be converted by hand or with common household tools into
a machine gun by the installation or attachment of a
pistol converter as specified. And pistol converter as any device
or instrument that, when installed in or attached to the
rear of the slide of a semi automatic pistol, replaces

(27:28):
the back plate and interferes with the trigger mechanism, thereby
enables the pistol to shoot automatically more than one shot
by single function of the trigger. Well, the reality is
is that if you completely redesign any gun, you can
do all kinds of things to it. But is the
gun as it is is not fully automatic. And this

(27:49):
has always been a confusing point for liberals. They don't
understand the diff between semi automatic and automatic.

Speaker 3 (27:57):
It's a fully semi automatic, right.

Speaker 2 (27:59):
I think it's ever really been clear in their minds
what the difference is. Semi automatic meaning course that you
have to pull the trigger each time. The legislation makes
repeated reference to any weapon, they can be equipped with
a pistol converter. Thus the glock switches are unlawful, criminals
still use them. Thus the gun itself falls onto the
category as a machine gun convertible weapon. The Supreme Court

(28:22):
has fueled these laws by repeatedly turning down reviews of bands.
Stays like Illinois outlawed some of the most commonly used
rifles and magazines in America, and so they said, perhaps
now the Supreme Court will hear it. Kavanaugh has said
the Court is likely to grant cert and the next

(28:43):
term or two to some gun issues. This would be
the one to start on absolutely well, before we take
a break, we've got a couple of comments here.

Speaker 3 (28:52):
Yes we do KWD sixty eight. So as I pointed
out the Cutter base we are allowing to be built
here to a maga, they said, that's right, trust it, yeah,
trust our dear leader.

Speaker 2 (29:05):
It's amazing when you look at all of the different
aspects of Cutter and the Trump family, and what Trump
has said in the past about Cutter truly is amazing.
But they were his go to people to make this
deal work. Evidently, you know they were harboring Hamas, and
I said from the very beginning, I said, if you

(29:25):
want to get the leadership of Hamas, they're not in Gaza,
they're in Cutter. And eventually the Israelis did go there
and get them. But you know, for two years it
killed civilians.

Speaker 3 (29:39):
Wantonly atomic dog says I saw a video of the
naked protesters that it's been a rough year for videos.
I think the goal was to have Ice be stricken
blind by their corpulent naked bodies. That's right. You can't
arrest which you can't see KWD sixty eight. That woman
is all about her privates.

Speaker 2 (30:00):
I see.

Speaker 3 (30:02):
Citizen of Americaca. So we got some ghetto rat put
a full atto switch on his glock. Now that pistol
is illegal, I don't think so. You know how many
law enforcement officers carry glock forty caliber? Not as many
law enforcement officers carry forty anymore. With the improvements in
ballistics technology, nine millimeter has basically bridged the gap into
what forty used to be, and as such as it's
much more common caliber, they've switched back to nine mil.

(30:25):
From what I've read and seen, well, I'll defer to
your expertise on this. Forty used to be a lot
more popular because it was a good uh. It had
a little bit of extra power on nine mil and
more stopping power. But now nine mills uh, just as
good from what I've heard. I'm not an expert, but
I do like to do a little bit of research
here and there. But they switch on the glock real

(30:48):
octo spook. If these state governors and mayors were not criminals,
this would not have to be done. My AR fifteen's
go full auto with a simple trigger, drop in module
then in a minute or two. This all has nothing
to do with anything other than criminals and government wanting
to Second Amendment removed.

Speaker 2 (31:01):
Yeah. Yeah. The problem I have is that the presidency
is gone full automatic. That's whatever he wishes get down.

Speaker 3 (31:08):
He's got the pen.

Speaker 2 (31:08):
So it's the government. I mean, they just completely ignore
the Constitution they swore to uphold as a condition of
their authority. So they're still in office, they still have
power to use against us, but they have no legitimate authority.
That's the key when you look at this, because as
a Christian, we are to obey legitimate authority. That's not

(31:29):
our government.

Speaker 3 (31:32):
Denver Adaway says Glocktoberfest. Yeah, that's right, Zox have Oxy's
here is what is needed in the Constitution. Any weapon
availed by a government against its people shall be availed
of its people.

Speaker 2 (31:44):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (31:45):
Yeah, you would think that shall not be in friend
in fringe would be simple enough. It takes a real
genius to twist into something it isn't. This is why
I have the Supreme Court does not see in judgment
of the Constitution.

Speaker 2 (32:02):
They're not about the Constitution.

Speaker 3 (32:03):
They're not above the Constitution.

Speaker 2 (32:04):
They have taken it as well.

Speaker 3 (32:06):
They've somehow taken on this role of oh, we're the arbiters,
and if we say something is unconstitutional, we'll get to
around a twisting our words into something else.

Speaker 2 (32:16):
Well, whenever they say they're going to interpret the Constitution,
it's like it's not written in another language. That's one
of the reasons why we don't want to have two
different languages of official languages, right because you don't want
there because our American government has already done that in Panama.
They came up with a memorandum of understanding and the
Spanish version for the people in Panama is completely different

(32:37):
than the one that they filed as in English. You
don't want to be able to play that kind of game,
but unfortunately, that's kind of what the Supreme Court says.
We have the English version of the Constitution that you
and I can read, and then we have the version
that's in the head of the Supreme Court, which we
can't read. We try to read the teed leaves on that,

(32:57):
but we.

Speaker 3 (32:57):
Can't impossible to pars bra stopper one one. One who
would have ever thought that shall not be infringed should
be hard to understand. That's what I'm saying. It takes
a real real genius to twist it into something.

Speaker 2 (33:11):
Yeah, and that means around the edges right, gradually moving
the boundary, you know, infringing on somebody's property rights. That's
really the picture that you have there.

Speaker 3 (33:22):
Again, that's why you don't just blindly trust the Supreme
Court their interpretation. Trust your own eyes. If you think
you have a different interpretation of the Constitution the Supreme
Court does, Chances are you're right and they're wrong. They
just have the power to do what they want. KWD
sixty eight. Biden was in office for COVID lockdowns too.

(33:43):
That's right, it was all that nasty Biden. He did
it all, officer, take him away, Trump Burger. The gun
companies will never stop selling to the cops, just the public.

Speaker 2 (33:53):
Yeah, that's right. Well, you know, I think when you
look at it again, Biden and Trump both little puppet
of the globalists, and they were there simply for pr purposes,
the left right march of tyranny. And you had be
Garrison absolutely got that right. Well, we're going to take
a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back. Stay

(34:14):
with us.

Speaker 5 (34:24):
H m hm.

Speaker 6 (34:35):
H.

Speaker 2 (35:01):
You're listening to the David Knight Show. If you like
the Eagles, the.

Speaker 3 (35:10):
Cars, and Huey Lewis and the news.

Speaker 7 (35:13):
They say the You'll Love the Classic Hits channel at
APS Radio, download our app or listen now at apsradio
dot com.

Speaker 2 (35:25):
All right, welcome back. Let's take a look at some
of the things that Trump has said about Cutter, and
of course in the past. In twenty seventeen, Trump made
it very clear what he thought about Cutter. And let's see,
I've got it here in the decks. There we go. Wait,

(35:46):
that's his golf course.

Speaker 5 (35:47):
Nation of Guitar, unfortunately, has historically been a funder of
terrorism at a very high level. And in the wake
of that conference, nations came together and spoke to me
about confronting Qatar over its behavior. So we had a

(36:10):
decision to make. Do we take the easy road or
do we finally take a hard but necessary action. We
have to stop the funding of terrorism. I decided, along
with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, our great generals and

(36:33):
military people, the time had come to call on Guitar
to end its funding.

Speaker 8 (36:42):
They have to end that fund.

Speaker 2 (36:45):
Except what they were doing was harboring the people of
a Moss, which evidently he was against. But of course,
all that was before they made the deal for the
golf course and Trump a new Trump golf course five
and a half billion dollar beach side project announced for Cutter.
They have also given them access to US military jets,

(37:10):
and a part of that is a base in the
United States, and that has been a bridge too far
for several on the right. Laura Lumer, who had no
problem with Trump doing lockdowns, mass murder injections and assassinations
of foreign leaders, bombing countries without any decoration of war,
doing gun control by executive order, all that, she had

(37:31):
no problem with it. But you put a military base
of some Arabs in the United States and she has
a big problem with it.

Speaker 3 (37:38):
I worked very, very hard to call herself Jewish, and
if the Muslims take over, she's going to have problems.

Speaker 2 (37:45):
She's not Jewish. She's as Jewish as the guy was
the guy in New York, Oh Santos, She's a Jewish
as George Santo. She's Jewish. She's aspirationally Jewish, like Beato
or Warick was aspirationally Hispanic. Play the card there. But anyway,

(38:06):
the reality is is that bases like that have been
done for other countries so they can train on these
very complicated weapons systems. But it begs the question. It's
not so much the base as it begs the question
why are we giving this terrorist, this country that harbors
terrorists like Amas, why are we giving them access to

(38:29):
state of the art jets. That's the bigger issue. Well,
I think the issue is is that you've got a
golf course. That's there. You also have Cutter that intervened
for Trump to make this deal go through, and that
was the key thing for him. He wanted to look good,
so he's willing to give jets to terrorists in order
to look like a peace president. As I get the

(38:52):
Peace Prize because I gave state of the art jets
to terrorist nation. There you go.

Speaker 3 (38:57):
This is another one of those things whereas I'm sure
some people, oh, but you were talking you're not for
Israel in Gaza, and now you're complaining about himas Yeah,
there aren't any good actors in this scenario. They both
have their problems simply that Israel has orders of magnitude
more firepower and they are able to at will just

(39:18):
demolish Gaza if they wish they had been doing so.

Speaker 2 (39:22):
That's right, that's right. Absolutely, Well, mister Peace Prize himself
is now talking about Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, and you're
gonna throw some tomahawks at him, the tomahawk chop. Trump
is considering sending long range Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine.
Asked by reporter of the Air Force one whether he

(39:43):
would provide keV with tomahawks, he said, well, we'll see.
I may again. It's just what mood he's in on
a given day, just like the tacos, you know, the
Trump tacos. So now we're gonna do the tomahawks and
always chicking out type of thing as opposed to tear us.
He's going to have that same kind of on again,

(40:05):
off again issue with the tomahawks. And why should that
be a unilateral, autocratic decision by the president. Shouldn't Congress
have something to say about that? Well, of course, Congress,
as long as the Republicans have a majority, is not
going to do anything other than what Trump says, because
that's what squeaker mouse Johnson does. He does whatever Trump

(40:27):
tells him to do, so they're not going to push
back on Trump. But also it will be his unilateral
decision as so whether or not he wants to get
closer to provoking World War three, we'll see. I May.
He says it would be a new step of aggression,
and he said, as Zelensky said, he'll meet with Trump
and Washington on Friday for talks that will include the tomahawks.

(40:51):
Trump's attitude of Russia's hardened in recent months as he's
become impatient with Putin's lack of cooperation in reaching a
ceasefire deal with keV. I might tell them, that is Russia,
that if the war is not settled, that we may
very well send tomahawks to keV. We may not, but
we may do it. Trump always chickens out one way

(41:14):
or the other. This is why I say his way
of negotiating is just incoherent, and it's the kind of
thing that gets us into really big wars when people
don't know what's going on in terms of war. That
is the same kind of chaos and uncertainty that he's

(41:36):
inflicting on economic markets and on our small medium sized businesses.
When he starts doing that with something as important as
war that could easily set off World War three, he's
an idiot and a tyrant. In September, Peskov has dismissed
the threat of tomahawks, saying they wouldn't be able to

(41:57):
change the dynamic of the war. And remember when we
talked about that. The issue is we don't have that many,
and they've only got a limited amount that they can
do each year, and so you know, they could quickly
exhaust They could be very damaging to start with, but
they would quickly exhaust their supply. It wouldn't be a
sufficient quantity of them to really make a difference. However,

(42:20):
in his comments on Sunday, Peshkov noted that if the
Tomahawks were launched at Russia, Moscow would not be able
to tell whether they were carrying nuclear warheads. Former Russian
President Dmitri Medvedev then doubled down on this. On these comments,
he said, how should Russia respond exactly? He said, the

(42:41):
delivery of these missiles could end very badly for everyone,
and first of all for Trump himself. Meddeev and Trump
have sparred online before. It was comments by Medvedev and
August that led Trump to say that he had ordered
two nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia. This is
what I mean. This is the kind of you know,

(43:03):
schoolyard bullying tactics that are idiotic. You made some comments
on Twitter. Well, I'm going to move some nuclear carriers
close to Russia. You know, where does this start and
when does it stop? So it's the start of Russia's invasion.
In twenty twenty two, Zelensky has made multiple requests for

(43:24):
long range missiles as it weighs striking Russian cities from
the front lines the grinding conflict. Ukrainian cities, including Kiev,
have repeatedly come under heavy Russian bombardment with drones and missiles.
Russia has particularly targeted Ukraine's energy infrastructure as winter approaches,
causing widespread power cuts. Last month, Trump's Special envoy to Ukraine,

(43:48):
Keith Kellogg, suggested the president had authorized strikes deep into
Russian territory, calling Fox News, there's no such thing as
sanctuaries from attacks in the Russian war. Well, does that
also apply to the USA? You know, we think that
we're not going to be touched by any of this stuff.
And of course they don't have to fire a nuclear

(44:10):
missile at the United States to inflict a great deal
of harm. Our very very fragile infrastructure is an open
target for anyone who wants to mess with the US,
and that includes Russia. China, even the drug cartels that
Trump wants to pick a fight with at the Venezuelans.

(44:30):
It's a very very vulnerable system. We have a porous border.
Anybody could do this as a terrorist aack, and so
he's pushing us into very dangerous territory. As a matter
of fact, that's another reason to pay attention to Jack
Lawson's book, The Civil Defense Manual at jacklowsonbooks dot com,

(44:51):
because again, everything that's being done is making our fragile
infrastructure even worse. Well, you're talking about the climate mcguffin,
where there's shutting down reliable, affordable power, or we're talking
about AI where they're going to have such large demands
that the burden of building out the infrastructure is going
to fall on you and I, but of course the

(45:13):
number one priority for power will be them.

Speaker 6 (45:16):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (45:16):
And then at the same time, we had this other
leg of this, which is that we're picking fights with
all these different people when we have such vulnerable infrastructure
so easily to take it down. So again, uh, there's
a storm coming. It was QAnon. He's like to say that,
but actually the guy who's starting the storm is their
own guy. So yeah, the storm is coming.

Speaker 3 (45:37):
What was that thing that like WWG one something.

Speaker 9 (45:41):
I don't know where we go, one we go all
or no idea whatever meant? I just see them spamming
this and all the church storm is coming. That one
trust the plan, just meaningless slogans for they played vacuous,
empty people.

Speaker 2 (45:56):
They played dry as Alexander Dumont has three musketeers, he
should sue. That's right. Yeah, where we go, one we
go all. It was like all for one, one for all,
was what he said. There's a little bit more concise,
right in that.

Speaker 3 (46:09):
Case, she's be able to get them all in one lawsuit.

Speaker 2 (46:11):
Yeah. American intelligence has been shared with Kiev. Has enabled
strikes and important Russian energy assets, including oil refineries far
beyond the front line. Going to multiple Ukrainian and US
officials familiar with the campaign, and you think you deserve
the peace prize? What an idiot this guy is. The
previously unreported support has intensified since Midsummer and has been

(46:34):
crucial in helping Ukraine carry out attacks that Biden's White
House discouraged. Kiev's strikes have driven up energy prices in
Russia and prompted Moscow to cut diesel exports. Into import fuel.
Trump has deepened his support for Ukraine as his frustration
with Russia has grown. The US Intelligence Agency helps Kiev

(46:58):
shape route planning, altitude timing, and mission decisions, enabling Ukraine's
long range one way attack drones to evade Russian air defenses,
said officials familiar with the matter. And of course it's
US intelligence that gets us involved in one war after
the other, that we lose, that we wind up making
the situation much worse than it was before we got involved.

(47:22):
These three people familiar with the operation said that Washington
was closely involved in all stages of planning. Of course,
a US officials said Ukraine selected the targets for long
range strikes. Washington then provided intelligence on the site's vulnerabilities,
but others involved and brief from the operation said the
US had also set out target priorities for Ukrainians. One

(47:44):
of them described Kev's drone force as an instrument for
Washington to undermine Russian economy and to push Putin toward
a settlement. Trump has been open about his disappointment with
Putin since he rolled out the red carpet for his
Russian counter part and Alaska summit that made little tangible progress.

(48:05):
This is a factor in Trump's shift and support of
deeper strikes to the people. Well, I guess the question is,
if you've got somebody who comes to you and says
that he wants to broke or a peace deal while
he's arming the other side and helping them to shoot
missiles into your country, would you really trust somebody like that?
Putin's a lot of fool. You'd have to be an
absolute fool to trust somebody who is a duplicitous dealer

(48:28):
like Trump. Washington has long shared intelligence and characters assist
in attacks on Russian military targets and to provide advanced
warning of Russian missile and drone strikes. The Biden administration
improves strikes with US high mars and attack ems. I
guess ATACMS, I guess I would pronounce that as attack

(48:50):
ems inside the Russian region bordering Ukraine after North Korea
deployed troops there to bolster Moscow's forces. Has not acknowledged
a direct role in the Ukraine's strikes on Russian energy facilities. However,
you know, going back long before Russia invaded Ukraine, you

(49:12):
had Lindsay Graham and John McCain, go there. I've played
the clip before for you where Lindsay Graham said to
the Ukrainians that were symbol next year we got to
go into Russia. We got to get Putin. Now, why
would you deal with a country like that? And does
he understand what's going on? Does Putin understand what's going
of course he does. The growing operational support from Trump

(49:35):
administration storically contrasts with the earlier in the US president's
second term, when he briefly halted intelligence sharing a military
aide to Kiev to pressure it into talks with Moscow.
Zelensky said the Ukraine was working with US intelligence primarily
to defend ourselves, and Ukraine's recent success in deep strikes

(49:56):
is mostly because of technological upgrades to drones, increased domestic production,
which is allowed keV to launch more at once. Our drones,
our drone missiles and some missiles are getting better. We
have more uses and we have greater production, he said. Well,
White House officials said the war never would have happened
under Trump presidency. Well, yeah, fine, but Trump can't stop it.

(50:20):
Is that kind of interesting that, just like inflation, wars
take on a life of their own it's very easy
for our government to start inflation, but once it happens,
you can't pull it back in It's very easy for
the government to start a war that it can't stop,
and that is exactly what is being done in both
fronts by this Trump administration.

Speaker 3 (50:42):
Yeah, whether you generate the hate falsely at the beginning,
once a country has been engaged in a war with
another country, the hate becomes real. Oh yeah, you've seen
you know, your best friend, your brother, who knows who
die at their hands and they've seen the same exact thing.

Speaker 2 (50:59):
Yea, when it's soldiers that's happening to that galvanizes you.
But when they start killing attacking civilians and you start
killing children and you're digging children out of the rubble, uh,
then it really gets deep. That's why it's so difficult
to stop these things after they get kicked off like that. Well,
we got some comments.

Speaker 3 (51:18):
Once you grab those, that's right, Patty Wax. As the
deep state says, all you have to do is wait
out max eight years and another sucker comes into power.

Speaker 2 (51:27):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (51:28):
The true power behind the throne is bureaucracy.

Speaker 4 (51:32):
Though that Trump isn't doing everything they want currently.

Speaker 3 (51:37):
Is a real good sucker, real Jason Barker, there are
many frames by the manufacturers that use glock slides. They
will never track them all down. That's right. You'll always
be able to get the glock, put the gonzo on it.
Bronx stopped.

Speaker 2 (51:50):
Well, take any probition. You can't stop the alcohol, you
can't stop the pot, you can't stop the opioids. You
can't fill in the blank. Right, Probition just doesn't work.

Speaker 4 (51:59):
They definitely won't be able to stop the three D printers.

Speaker 3 (52:01):
Yeah, Bronx stopper one one one. All the P ninety
lowers and kids out there making up all those scary
ghost guns, Jason, that's right, the P ninety very spooky
out the MRR. Justice Soto my air proved that she
was all in with the COVID agenda. The Supreme Court
is clearly compromised too. Yeah, there's not an element of
our government that doesn't have at least infiltration. I would

(52:24):
not be surprised if they were all in on it,
if you make it past a certain level tone of
lord than three three seven in the Supreme Court put
Japanese Americans in internment camps in World War Two. M Yep, Yes,
it's is.

Speaker 2 (52:38):
PECS also said that you can't exercise your religion freely
in school, right. I don't believe a thing the Supreme
Court says. They decided that they would determine when life
begins and on.

Speaker 3 (52:50):
And on, and they have been wrong on all of it.

Speaker 2 (52:53):
And they defined redefined a marriage after uh, you know,
it's been around for eternity, basically for all practical purposes
since creation, and they decided they would redefine it.

Speaker 4 (53:05):
What arrogance the constitution, things like what a woman is.
These aren't difficult to determine. When they have these big, long,
rambling speeches to justify why they can't just say what
a woman is, it's clear that they aren't, you know,
applying common sense to the laws and trying to give

(53:25):
you an honest take on it.

Speaker 2 (53:27):
That's right, And that she was that way. Ketanji Brown
was that way going in. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (53:33):
She had the longest opening monologue of any Supreme Court
justice ever. Yeah, and it was by a long shot too,
despite her having the I believe either the least impressive
were one of the least impressive records for any judge
you know that has ever been appointed to the Supreme Court,
she felt the need to ramble and monologue longer than
any of the other ones.

Speaker 2 (53:53):
Ever, the judges only need one qualification. It doesn't matter
how many times they've clerked for some Supreme Court justice
or how many different degrees and honors they've got. Do
they believe and honor and respect the Constitution or not?
That's the bottom line. And so yeah, I would. I would.
It's too bad that we didn't get to enter in
Apolitano on but it would only be in one out

(54:15):
of nine people.

Speaker 3 (54:16):
Yeah, there so sadly, Yeah, we have a tunnel lord
one three three seven. Oh, snap Cutter is putting a
base in Idaho. That's not good. Idaho has been trying
to pass the Domestic TERRORCE bill for the last five years.
I wonder if they'll try to do a false flag
in Idaho to get that bill passed. They're gonna take
out our strategic potato reserve.

Speaker 2 (54:37):
Yeah, you knows. Maybe it'll turn the base into a
golf course for Trump after they leave.

Speaker 3 (54:43):
How thoughtful of them. Tunnel word continues while on the
top of the Mountain home base in Idaho during committee hearing,
where one of the commanders from the base we're talking
at the state legislator. He said, they can remotely control
jets from the base in Idaho.

Speaker 2 (54:56):
Ah, there we go. Yeah, we You know. The interesting
thing is we we know that they could do that
when we look back at Operation Northwoods. That's what they
were talking about doing at the time. And they've been
able to remotely control planes to fly them forever. I
mean that was back in the early sixties, and so
we didn't really see the remote control drones and things

(55:19):
like that until after nine eleven. But prior to that,
how do you think they got all the pictures that
they had of crashing commercial airlines to test them for
safety and see what happened. They would put crash test
dummies in the airplanes and they would fly them and
then crash them, and you know, then take the footage
that was and the cameras that always seemed to be

(55:41):
able to survive. The joke is, why don't you make
the whole plane out of whatever it is that you
make that camera case out of it, we'll be better off.
But you know they would do that. They were not
There wasn't a pilot that flew that into the ground.
They were doing that remote control, but I don't know
what happened, clearly the planes, whether there were planes or
whether the projections of planes or whatever. We've had a

(56:03):
lot of different ideas about that. I leaned toward the
idea of advanced explosives put on the building, even more
so than directed energy weapons. But whatever happened, I think
we can be certain that the government is lying to us,
and because of the way they use it, I think
they're the ones who did it.

Speaker 3 (56:22):
It's pack. So wait, there's only one major carry of
the old glock over here, and that is the Australian police.
Not as popular in Australia or is there some specific
reason are more people not allowed to buy it? I
know Australia has some fairly strict gun laws, so I'm
not up on what they are. So Fran scene, it's amazing,

(56:44):
like Biden leaving weapons and war engines in Afghanistan went
without any more noise. Well, they just assumed we're back
to business as usual. Oh they like us again.

Speaker 2 (56:54):
Yeah, weapons, war engines and massive palettes of cash left
behind there Afghanist. Why couldn't it be me not to
mention the people that helped the US military that they're
left their stranded.

Speaker 3 (57:07):
So it's the US government treats al Qaeda better that
it does its own citizens. It does, and it's not
even close.

Speaker 4 (57:17):
Yeah, they're trying to take away our weapons while they
give them massive stockpiles of great.

Speaker 3 (57:22):
Weapons, Dad sixty eight. Why can't they train and Cutter?
Why do we need to train them? Why are we
involved in every pissing contest in the world. We are
bringing peace laughing emoji that's right.

Speaker 2 (57:34):
Yeah, Well, because these wars, just like these contracts with Cutter,
are about making money for the military industrial complex. It
doesn't have anything to do with protecting this country. It's
about making the military industrial complex rich. So it's about
for love of the road, good to see you. I
hope you're doing well.

Speaker 3 (57:53):
National Association for Gun Rights had a good post on
Instagram recently showing an old Sears or jcpenny ad for
guns you could order and have it to your door.
We used to be a real country. We used to
be a real country that was really about things.

Speaker 2 (58:05):
Yeah, and you used to be able if you're going
on a hunting triplet's say, shoot pheasant in South Dakota
or something like that, you could carry the gun on
the plane with you, and the stewardess would help you
to put it into the coat rack that was there
by the front door.

Speaker 3 (58:19):
Well, you know, then we had all those hijackings by
those pheasant hunters South Dakota or wherever.

Speaker 2 (58:26):
Got to keep the pheasants in line.

Speaker 3 (58:28):
The pheasants are revolting citizen of AMERICAKA, because when there's
so many unhinged individuals committing such mass atrocities on a
daily basis, the obvious choice is to relieve the law
abiding citizen of the right to defend himself. Exactly. Well,
don't you know, once you outlaw guns in Chicago, everyone
in oblock will turn them in and the feuds will stop,

(58:50):
They'll stop killing each other. It'll just work. It just works.
Christian constitutional conservative. That statement verifies that DC is directing
this war with Russia. Nibaru twenty twenty nine. Every business
Emperor Trump's ever run, he's run into the ground, either
by a bankruptcy or legal laws. Yeah. I wouldn't put

(59:10):
him at the helm.

Speaker 2 (59:12):
Yeah, a lucky loser. That was the book that I
still haven't read it yet. That's the book that got
him so upset that he sued not only the New
York Times that it was also the publisher of that
book fifteen billion dollar lawsuit.

Speaker 3 (59:28):
A Penguin Penguins. The one that's coming in nine might be.

Speaker 2 (59:31):
But that tells you that they were with a target
I think lucky loser. Yeah. Are we done here with Yeah?

Speaker 3 (59:39):
Yeah, we covered all the comments.

Speaker 2 (59:41):
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we
come back. I want to talk about these bannergy battery
energy storage site things and the fact that none of
the this is kind of like the COVID stuff. None
of this stuff has been tested. They don't even have
a standard for one of these batteries should be and
this is something that should concern everybody. This story is
about what's going on in Massachusetts, but it's happening across

(01:00:04):
the country. Here in Tennessee. The TVA is wanting to
put these battery energy storage sites all over the place
to back up their unreliable so called renewables of solar
and wind. So we're going to talk about that when
we come back. Stay once. We'll be right.

Speaker 1 (01:00:20):
Back analyzing the globalists next move. And now the David Nutshell.

Speaker 2 (01:01:47):
If you like the.

Speaker 7 (01:01:48):
Eagles, the cars, and Healey Lewis and the news, they
say the horror You'll love the classic hits channel at
APS Radio, download our app or listen now at apsradio
dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:02:07):
The deadly grid battery fallacy that's been exposed in Massachusetts.
Let's just go back for a moment, though, and I
take a look at what Dan Rather was saying in
the early eighties about global warming. Yeah, Dan Rather of CBS,
Well you can trust them, can't you?

Speaker 6 (01:02:23):
Concern about rising temperatures on plattered earth heated up a
hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized
about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the
warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of
coal and oil, and in recent months, as David Colhane reports,
research has uncovered facts to support that theory.

Speaker 10 (01:02:44):
Many scientists claim that the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere
has been rising over the past one hundred years, that
the great sheets of pack ice in Antarctica are melting
at a much more rapid rate than previously. Finally, that
the sea level has been rising increasing swiftness over the
past forty years. If these scientists are correct, about twenty

(01:03:05):
five percent of Florida would be flooded along with low
lying areas all over the world. Climate changes could produce
widespread disruption of agriculture. The American farm belt might be
too dry and the wheat and corn crops would have
to move to Canada. Scientists blame the odorless, colorless carbon
dioxide gas for these potentially dangerous changes around the planet.

(01:03:26):
It is the greenhouse effect. The gas allows sunlight to
filter down and warm the earth, but like the glass
of a greenhouse, the carbon dioxide tends to trap heat
so that it cannot rise into space. The scientists maintain
that the coal, oil and gas we've been burning for
one hundred years have produced more and more carbon dioxide

(01:03:46):
and helped overheat the earth now.

Speaker 2 (01:03:49):
And of course that's how the insanity began. And here
we find ourselves today with our power being shut down
all of the world. You know. That's how they said.
Scientists have discovered facts to support the theory. So the
theory came first, and then they went in search of
the facts. And bring me the man, and I'll find

(01:04:10):
the crime. Bring me the theory that we're going to
use to shut down power across the globe, and I'll
supply you with some rigged facts and of course, the
man to do that was the man himself, Michael Mann,
who did that. But an alert in Massachusetts from a
watchdog group has blown the whistle on the Department of

(01:04:31):
Environmental Protection there for issuing potentially catastrophic guidance for building
grid scale battery facilities. They're specifying a standard which was
meant for small batteries, making some of the rules deadly
wrong when you scale it up to the size of
a grid. It turns out that this fallacy is widespread nationally,

(01:04:52):
making their warning much more important. Massachusetts is rushing an
enormous grid battery build out that's being driven by their
twenty twenty four Energy Act. Something like thirty five hundred
megawatts of battery projects are to be built around the
state in the next two years or so. This is

(01:05:12):
a massive mal investment and it is going to make
us poor. It's going to leave us in the dark
when we have governments that are doing this. A forty
foot long tractor trailer sized battery is typically just one megawatt,
So if they want thirty five hundred megawatts, think about
setting up thirty five hundred tractor trailer loads that are there.

(01:05:35):
And that's what we're talking about. These are huge batteries,
and we know the technology involved. We've seen it spontaneously combusting,
burning people in their cars when they're trapped in it.
Because of the same people that gave us electric cars,
that would be really super geeky fund to make sure
that even the doors are under software control and so

(01:05:56):
people get trapped in these cars when they set on fire.
Energy Act required the Massachusetts bureaucracy to issue safety guidance
for this buildout, which you did in August. Policy director
of the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance just blew the whistle. He
said the battery guidance lacks the juice to deal with

(01:06:17):
mass projects. The focus is on the National Fire Protection
Association's standard eight five to five. It is a standard
for the installation of stationary energy storage systems. As he
points out, this standard is only for small batteries, not
for the giant batteries, forty foot long batteries and the
battery complexes that are about to flood Massachusetts. He said,

(01:06:39):
by way of scale, this NFPA standard eight five to
five is limited to batteries with a storage capacity of
fifty kilowatt hours. But we're talking about batteries that have
one megawatt hour, he said the max of fifty kilo
wat hours or less. Such a battery might be used

(01:07:00):
for emergency blackout protection in an office building. However, each
of the state's Energy Act batteries is likely to have
a capacity of four megawatt hours or more so, anywhere
from one to four megawatts. Giant batteries that are eighty
times larger than the standard eight five five allows are

(01:07:22):
not adequately covered by the standard. Unfortunately, as of yet,
there are no national standards for batteries of this scale.
This kind of reminds me of Operation Warp Speed, doesn't it.
You know, we're going to rush this thing out. We
haven't tested it, we don't know what it's going to do,
but you better you're going to get this in a
big way. The government is constantly doing this. That's the

(01:07:42):
way they run all this, Just like Trump's fake it
till he makes it authority to do all these things.
They rush out there with this stuff and then say
stop me. Applying this standard will be catastrophically wrong. The
standard says that when there are multiple batteries, they should
be three feet apart, so that if one burns it
will not ignite its neighbors. That tiny spacing would provide

(01:08:04):
no protection at all in the case of these giant
batteries that are being mandated the battery energy storage sites, bess,
the greatest risk of these huge batteries is that a
single battery burning has potential to set the entire complex
on fire. This is not a theory. We have seen
this in several places Canada, Germany, France. We've had the

(01:08:28):
electric buses, which again these are large batteries, but they
are not as big as these battery energy storage site things.
So those large batteries, once they started and caught on
fire spontaneously in some cases, burned down entire depots, every
single ev bus. And it happened in Munich, and it

(01:08:51):
happened in I forget the other place in Germany, happened
in two places in Germany, happened in France, and they
had a situation in Canada as well, and so they
did and these places were burned down, every single bus
at the complex because one of them caught fire. They
went back to diesel. And so now they want to
do something it's even bigger and concentrate all these things together.

(01:09:14):
What could go wrong.

Speaker 3 (01:09:16):
One of our listeners, North American House Hippo drives a bus,
and you said they had one of their electric buses
catch fire. And thankfully it was when it was an
empty lot. It was basically the only one sitting there,
so it only managed to believe damage one other bus.
But this is happening. It's common enough that our listener
who just drives, happens to drive a bus and they
have electric buses there, one of them just goes off.

Speaker 2 (01:09:36):
Yeah. Well, we've seen pictures of electric vehicles that spontaneously
can bust in parking garages and things like that. This
is a known problem with lithium batteries. The technology is
not ready yet, and these people are pushing this in
an inappropriate way. It's extremely expensive, it's very dangerous, but

(01:09:57):
of course that's what government does all the time.

Speaker 4 (01:09:59):
China had very amusing solution to this. I put the
video in the deck a while ago that we haven't played.

Speaker 2 (01:10:05):
Yeah, go ahead and play that.

Speaker 4 (01:10:09):
So just shoot your burning battery out.

Speaker 2 (01:10:15):
Like a rocket. Yeah, got ejector We've got a safety
issue just to eject the battery, and.

Speaker 4 (01:10:20):
Now it becomes a safety issue for the next person
beside you. It's not your safety issue anymore.

Speaker 2 (01:10:26):
That's the ultimately kick the can down the road. He
checked the flaming battery down the road as well.

Speaker 3 (01:10:32):
Whoever's next to you, that's their problem now.

Speaker 2 (01:10:35):
Yes, so yeah, this this whole thing is it's been
a scam forever and people need to wake up to it.
That's been one of the good things about Trump. He's
not only said that, but he has actually taken some
action in the second term to do that. So hopefully
they'll continue unless somebody with some deeper pockets gets a

(01:10:55):
hold of him. The American Clean Power Association has a
fact sheet. They say that, and they refer to the
same standard, but they never mentioned the fact that the
standard is set up for a fifty kilowat hour limitation
even worse features a grid scale battery background photo, and
it's not about that at all. The deeper question is

(01:11:17):
why the standard has not been issued for a giant
grid scale battery. There is a grid scale battery building
boom that is going on, and while recent legislation is
rapidly phasing out lucrative studies for wind and solar, it
left untouched the similar subsidies for giant batteries. Maybe they're

(01:11:38):
not coming up with a standard because they don't want
you to know that there's a problem. That might be
the issue because there's a lot of money still to
be made in this thing. So, as I pointed out
yesterday briefly, there's a huge spike, especially in the UK,
with the copper cables that are being stolen from the
charging places for the evs. And when they take the

(01:12:00):
copper cable, it leaves you stranded. They get the copper
strands and you get stranded. A couple of years ago,
the Telegraph carried a piece reporting that the International Energy
Agency was warning of the need to step up the
mining of lithium, copper and nickel if the international net
zero targets are to be met. The problem is, if

(01:12:21):
we get the net zero, we don't have any way
to process those minerals because we can't do any manufacturing
about power, and so they're kind of cutting this whole
thing off. So think about today's growth sectors, renewable energy generation,
electric vehicles. The one thing they all have in common
is an insatiable appetite for copper. It requires three times
as much copper to generate the same amount of electricity

(01:12:42):
on a solar farm as it does in a gas
fired power station, nearly eight times as much if you're
using offshore when and so the price rises are not linear,
they have gone exponential. Trump's latest one tariff on China
have caught. There's a significant drop, but there's a limit

(01:13:04):
as to what customers will pay for copper. So but
evidently not if you are if you are a thief
in the UK, and they have a lot of stories
there about people who just show up. One guy shows
up first, he clips everything, then he disappears. They het
him on the video camera. So first he clips the

(01:13:25):
cables and he walks off into the woods, and then
the same guy comes back later with a truck to
grab the cables. So he doesn't park his truck there,
but then he he comes up very quickly. The irony
is is that he's got an ev truck as well,
which I don't know he's got the kind of getaway

(01:13:46):
car that he needs with that, but the met he
hasn't thought this thing true all the way.

Speaker 3 (01:13:50):
Yeah, it's silent, they can't hear you're coming.

Speaker 2 (01:13:52):
So this is we're talking about a tremendous amount of
money that is stacking up and a tremendous percentage of
these stations that are being attacked in the UK. Al
Gore's got a new startup to track fossil fuel emissions
by satellite and by artificial intelligence, and so what he's
talking about, folks, and this is the real threat. With AI,

(01:14:15):
He's now got a way to correlate this to see
what you're doing because of artificial intelligence. And so what
he's doing is going to use satellite and AI to
determine where there is greenhouse gases. They said there's no
way to track CO two, but of course we all
exhale CO two animals do. It's not a problem, it's necessary,

(01:14:38):
it's a good thing. But they're going to track methane
as well, and these are they're not going to be
sniffing it. They're going to be looking at it with
their companies called Climate Trace that use the satellites to
monitor the location of heat trapping methane sources. He expanded
his system to track the source and the plume of
pollution from tiny particles often referred to as soot on

(01:15:02):
a neighborhood basis for twenty five hundred cities across the world.
And then this article from ap news propagates the lie
that I've been pushing back against for thirteen years now.
This was something that was going on North Carolina, the
particulate matter two point five that the EPA was involved in,

(01:15:24):
and if you call the report that did at the time,
there were we living in North Carolina in Research Triangle Park.
The EPA had a facility there and they hooked people
up to They had filtered out the carbon monoxide so
it wouldn't kill them outright, but they hooked them up
directly to the tailpipe, almost directly to the tailpipe of

(01:15:45):
a diesel, and they had searched for people who had
either respiratory or cardiac issues. And we had one of
the researchers that was there noticed that they had to
take people to the emergency room, and he started doing
research on it, and he found that they were actually

(01:16:07):
looking for people like that, and they were trying to
set the standard up. They already had a standard, and
they were exposing people to seventy two times the amount
of pollution that was in the standard. And as this
is all happening, and of course the group that I
was with sued them and tried to get this to stop.
Trying to get her temporary restraining war on it because
they said that there was not informed consent, that they

(01:16:29):
were dangerously experimenting on the people who had signed up
for this, and they were. But the reality is is
that you had Lisa Jackson, who was Obama's Secretary of
the EPA or secretary of the EPA, whatever the position is.
She ran the EPA. She went on a Capitol hill
and she had a back and forth little dog and
pony show that they had arranged with a Massachusetts congressman

(01:16:54):
who has now become a Massachusetts senator rewarded for this
little betrayal of the American people. And they had this
little dialogue going back and forth. You could tell because
he stepped on her lines and read some of her lines,
and then she had to backtrack. The whole thing was
planned and scripted. And she said, I'm not talking about
people getting sick from pollution. I'm talking about people dying.
And we got more people dying from this fine particulate

(01:17:16):
matter than are dying from cancer and heart disease. It's
the number one killer that we have in our country.
It's like, oh really, and so if that were true
and you are exposing people to this at a level
that is seventy two times what you say is safe.
What does that say about you? So?

Speaker 4 (01:17:36):
Well, wasn't it seventy two times the thing that they
said was life threatening? And they exposed people that they
had specifically screened for respiratory issues to something that was
seventy two times above their life threatening level.

Speaker 2 (01:17:48):
That's right. And of course the people didn't die. That's
the other thing. That a couple of people got sick
and had to be taken to the hospital, but nobody died.
So the whole thing was a lie. They were criminal
and they're tent but the reality is that they exposed
that it's not the dangerous thing that they say that is.
But here we are thirteen years later, and associated press,

(01:18:09):
the associated propaganda people say particle pollution kills millions of
people worldwide each year. No, it doesn't. Tens of thousands
in the US according to scientific studies and reports. Oh yeah,
that's what science says. Well, it's total bs. Gore's coalition
will use three hundred satellites, thirty thousand ground tracking sensors,

(01:18:32):
and AI to track one hundred and thirty seven thousand
sources of particle pollution, with four thousand of them categorized
as super emitters. It's difficult before AI, said Gore, for
people to really see precisely where this conventional air pollution
is coming from. So now he's going to have some
AI hallucinating the climate. MacGuffin for us when it's.

Speaker 4 (01:18:54):
Over, could see the effects of this. But here I
made a map and I drew a whole bunch of
lines on it. Yeah, the other lines on it, so
you can see where all the stuff that I want
you to be afraid of is.

Speaker 2 (01:19:05):
That's right, just like COVID, just like the other mcguffin. Right,
you can't see this except on the news. But if
you look at the news, you can clearly see there's
a pandemic. And if you look at his screen here,
you can clearly see this killing everybody again, particular pollution
that kills almost nine million people every year, said Gore
in a video interview. And they just repeat that lie

(01:19:25):
so top of you. En Court has claimed that all
governments must fight CO two. They have a legal duty
under international law, they said. But CO two is actually
also the gas of life. It is very very important
both to animals and to plants. So the Climate Depot

(01:19:50):
chief Mark Morano sees this as an act of desperation
from the UN. He says, facing the instrumentable collapse of
their global climate agenda, with the helming majority of nations
not even trying to pretend to meet the climate obligations anymore.
The UN High Court has ruled that nations are compelled
and have no choice but to comply or to pay

(01:20:10):
repatriations and defund climate justice programs. See, that's the thing.
Everybody can see where this all leads. Now. We could
see where it was going to lead forever, but now
they can actually see the effects kicking in. It may
be too late for them to pull back, but they're
trying to pull back, very very much so, and so

(01:20:31):
the UN is getting very desperate in terms of this.
Let's cover a couple of comments here and let's take
a break.

Speaker 3 (01:20:39):
That's right, k towd sixty eight. I read that the
IDF is continuing to destroy tunnels and blow up buildings
as they withdraw quote. I wouldn't be surprised, trump Berger
warp speed was the greatest achievement in human history.

Speaker 2 (01:20:53):
Clown mog that's right.

Speaker 3 (01:20:57):
Another quote from our wonderful leader. It's goun call of
rose gardens. How are you gonna go golf where people
were starving? That would be bad for my posture and
inevitably my swing. Well, when you're a complete psycho and
you don't care, I suppose it's not that big a deal.
K towd sixty eight. Trump says we need to send
troops back to Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 (01:21:18):
Oh boy, yeah, yeah, how's that? And give him a
peace price for that long right.

Speaker 3 (01:21:23):
Back to Baghdad.

Speaker 2 (01:21:24):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:21:25):
Christian, constitutional, conservative and Australia civilians can buy handguns, but
only for specific, highly restricted purposes like sport or target shooting,
and they must meet strict licensing requirements. Winning a handgun
for self defense is not a valid reason and is illegal.
That's right. If someone is going to hurt you, you
just have to take it Abu twenty twenty Ninete controlled
aircraft have been around longer and far easier to control

(01:21:46):
than any remote controlled vehicle. Gun laws are written to
protect the aristocracy, not the general public. K towd sixty eight.
Man down the road has an EV he charges in
his garage. I keep expecting to see nobody. I would
have that in my house.

Speaker 4 (01:22:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:22:02):
No, I remember the first time I saw a house
in the news. House burned down in North Carolina, not
too far from were It was a Nissan leaf that
they were charging in their garage and caught fire and
burn the entire house.

Speaker 3 (01:22:13):
Now they're just not safe.

Speaker 2 (01:22:15):
Well, I mean, look at New York. Look at how
many fires they've had, and a lot of people have
died from recharging the well, they weren't recharging them even
evidently those electric scooters.

Speaker 3 (01:22:25):
Yeah, they just have those Liftian batteries in it. And
you know, you're expecting these people to not abuse them,
not damage them, which is an insane thing to ask
when it's not their property. They are going to do
stupid things for them, and the battery housing is going
to get damaged.

Speaker 4 (01:22:41):
Got in one of these battery ejection systems and watched
their neighbors.

Speaker 3 (01:22:46):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:22:47):
They got that idea from James Bond. Right, whatever you do,
don't touch that switch, said Q Right.

Speaker 3 (01:22:55):
I have pressed the button. You accidentally pressed the button,
you know, just all of a us. And how hard
is it to reattach the batteries kW sixty eight Dan,
Rather forget the impending ice age. We are warming now
same scientists who said ice age was coming two years before.

Speaker 2 (01:23:13):
That's right, he is right there. And the cusp of
the change that was when they did the about face
and said no more cooling, now going to warming. Thanks
for pointing that out.

Speaker 3 (01:23:26):
In just a just a singular lifetime, they have changed
the story. Who knows how many times. Francine, I don't
believe in the solar system anymore, said I want to, But.

Speaker 2 (01:23:36):
Well, I guess I don't know. We're talking about the
solar system to back up your house or are we
talking about the solar system that actually the sun that
actually affects the climate, that's the driver of the climate.
I do believe in the solar system.

Speaker 4 (01:23:48):
I thought you were about the solar systems which photo
do work well in small scale.

Speaker 2 (01:23:55):
Yeah, that's that's what they're for. That's what they're you know,
that's your your lifeline off of the big grid system.
And of course you don't even have to have a battery.
The battery is always the issue. You know, if you
could live with just having power when the sun is
shining in your house, you know, that would be one thing.
But getting off of the grid is a good use.

(01:24:16):
But when you make this scale it up to the
size that we need for the grid. It doesn't work.
It's not scalable. That's the real issue with the solar
power stuff we have.

Speaker 3 (01:24:28):
KWD sixty eight Rachel Carson silent spring in sixty two.
Birds didn't die. No ice age, no acid rain, no
ozone hole, no warming, plenty of lies. Sox box o's
remember that video of the guy trapped in the elevator
with his moped battery. Yeah, that was a that must
have been terrifying. I don't remember if he survived or not.
KWD sixty eight. California needs to put those batteries in

(01:24:49):
the forest to finish them off.

Speaker 2 (01:24:53):
Well that's the other thing too. Somebody said the headline
one of these things was arsonist burns down the climate
fear agenda because they found out the large Palisades fire
in California was not because of global warming. The caught
or the guy confessed that he had done it as arson,
and they really had doubled down on that. See, all

(01:25:14):
these fires are all about climate change.

Speaker 3 (01:25:17):
It was a crazy person who'd been talking to chat
GPT and talking about how, oh it felt so good
to burn a bible or something like that.

Speaker 2 (01:25:26):
So yeah, I guess we could blame it on AI,
not on climate change.

Speaker 3 (01:25:31):
It's peck soait. Thank you very much, appreciate the tip. Says,
please call climate change by its absurd new name coined
by Al Gore. I believe global boiling. Think about how
delicious all the crab in the ocean will be once
we're finished.

Speaker 2 (01:25:44):
It's a climate mcguffin. That's what it really is.

Speaker 3 (01:25:47):
KWD sixty eight. We have to build the battery to
see what's in it. Number twenty twenty nine. As with
most things, Massachusetts, the legislature will change the law to
fit the battery grid.

Speaker 2 (01:25:58):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:26:00):
Multiple cargo ships full of cars have sunk because of
battery fires. Yeah, we've covered at least two of them
since the spring. Huge h We're locto spook. We elected
Trump to lockdown borders into port criminal invaders. Nothing has changed,
that's right. Citizen of Americaca says, suck on another thing.

Speaker 4 (01:26:18):
With all the big publicity of these ice raids and
all that you've got, it's not effective. He's not actually
doing anything to stop immigration. We're still you know, incentivizing
these people, still massive illegal immigration. He's just also adding
a bliss State Police state to it.

Speaker 2 (01:26:36):
Yeah, we've still got the pot of gold there to
draw them in.

Speaker 3 (01:26:39):
Citizen America CO says, suck on this tailpipe, that's right,
that's what they were having you do.

Speaker 2 (01:26:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:26:45):
There was a video of it where they had like
little masks over the.

Speaker 3 (01:26:49):
Pipe directly connected.

Speaker 2 (01:26:52):
It was utterly ridiculous. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:26:54):
Yeah, the type of thing that I think would just
about make anyone nauseous. Yeah, just of the smell and
the Yeah, just sounds disgusting.

Speaker 2 (01:27:04):
Yeah. Yeah. Imagine if you had anything in sufficient quantity
will kill you, including water. So on the same basis
as the way they do this so called tests, they
could use it to claim that all water has to
be eliminated, and that's probably coming to it. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:27:18):
I mean when I briefly had my motorcycle in Austin,
sitting around in traffic in the summer heat with just
the exhaust coming out of you, I thought I was
going to be sick quite a few times.

Speaker 2 (01:27:29):
Just yeah. I know, I drive a convertible in Austin.

Speaker 3 (01:27:33):
So and of course with the amount of trucks they
have there in Texas, that's just piping the exhaust directly
in over the top of the convertible. Yeah, real Octo
Spook read that one. Real Octo Spook haven't read this one.
Attacking CO two the Gas of Life for All Life
is simply paying attention to detail in their war on we,
the people in All Life. K TOWD sixty eight car
manufacturers making internal combustion vehicles that seem to be making

(01:27:54):
ev and easier sale. Even Toyota is producing a lot
of garbage.

Speaker 2 (01:27:58):
Now, yeah, that's right. So we're going to take a
quick break and we're going to take a look as
we're talking about what's happening with the excuse for a
civil war here, the war within. We had a back
and forth over the weekend with George Stephanopolis and J. D. Vance.

(01:28:18):
They got into a fight over Tom Homans. I want
to play that a little bit for you and talk
about what that really tells us. We'll be right back.

(01:30:02):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (01:30:12):
This is the end, beautiful friend, this is the end,
My only friend, the end, Oh love brands the end.

Speaker 2 (01:30:35):
Of the same.

Speaker 11 (01:30:37):
Basta no say.

Speaker 9 (01:30:43):
No sa rise, the end.

Speaker 11 (01:30:47):
I'll never look get to your eye.

Speaker 12 (01:30:53):
Okay, sorry, I said crisis and we're going to straighten
that one by what the same with going to take
over the republic and this is going to be a
major part for some of the people in this room.
That's a war too, It's a war from within. I
told people we should use some of these dangerous cities
as training grounds for our military.

Speaker 3 (01:31:16):
Can you it's your what.

Speaker 8 (01:31:21):
So sad?

Speaker 5 (01:31:26):
Just read.

Speaker 11 (01:31:30):
Also strange.

Speaker 2 (01:31:34):
It uh just read h yeah, exactly, so we have

(01:32:05):
when we look at this, you're losing credibility. It's JD Events.
By the way, that clip you got that up yesterday
on X right, the that we just played.

Speaker 3 (01:32:15):
The trasplit to you of the text that implied that
you were going to up.

Speaker 2 (01:32:20):
Okay, well we'll get it up, folks.

Speaker 3 (01:32:24):
It's done. It's ready.

Speaker 2 (01:32:25):
I ask as Travis to buget and we have a
failure of well we have here is to communicate. That's right,
and it happens over and over again. Well, I also
had in the deck here here we go. ABC cut
the feed on JD. They were arguing back and forth
as to whether or not Tom Homan actually accepted a

(01:32:49):
bag with fifty thousand dollars cash in it in exchange.
We're agreeing to do some contracts with the people who
were giving him the bag of cash, and so jd
Vance was asked point blank by George Stephanopfolis if that
happened or not, and why they aren't doing anything about it,
and listen to the evasion that goes on with jd Vance.

Speaker 13 (01:33:10):
I don't know what tape you're referring to, George. I
saw media reports that Tom Holman accepted a bribe. There's
no evidence of that. And here's George, why fewer and
fewer people watch your program and why you're losing credibility
because you're talking for now five minutes with the Vice
President of the United States about this story regarding Tom
Holm and a story that I've read about, but I

(01:33:31):
don't even know the video that you're talking about. Meanwhile,
low income women.

Speaker 2 (01:33:36):
He is not interested to be second to bribe, right.

Speaker 13 (01:33:37):
Chuck Schumer have shut down the government. Right now, we're
trying to figure out how to pay our troops because
Chuck Schumer has shut down the government. You were focused
on a bogus story. You're insinuating criminal wrongdoing against a
guy who has done nothing wrong, instead of focusing on
the fact that our country is struggling because our government's
shut down. Let's talk about the real issues, George. I

(01:33:58):
think the American people benefit much more from that than
from you going down some weird left wing rabbit hole
where the facts clearly show that Tom Holman didn't engage
in any criminal wrongdoing.

Speaker 8 (01:34:09):
It's not a weird left wing rabbit hole.

Speaker 3 (01:34:11):
I didn't send you.

Speaker 2 (01:34:11):
I can say the thanks don't show it if you
haven't looked at the facts.

Speaker 5 (01:34:14):
Fifty thousand dollars, as was heard on an audio tape
recorded by the FBI in September twenty twenty four, and
you did not answer the question thank you for your
time this morning.

Speaker 3 (01:34:23):
No, I said that I dozed up.

Speaker 8 (01:34:25):
Next We'll be right back.

Speaker 2 (01:34:28):
Because it had gone on for quite some time, so
Vance began by saying he was asked about that. He say,
accepted fifty thousand dollars in cash September twenty twenty four.
He's got the exact date. The FBI has got an
audio tape of it. And what was not mentioned in
the back and forth exchange either of them was that
the fifty thousand dollars wasn't some payment that was sent,
So you know, maybe that was I don't know what

(01:34:50):
they were sending that to him for But they gave
it to him and a grocery bag that was filled
with cash. That's not suspicious at all, the JD Vance.
And we know that Tom Homan can't be a bad
guy because he's part of their administration. He doesn't need
to be investigated. He's part of the Trump administration. He
shouldn't be vetted with a this stuff. So Vance began

(01:35:14):
by saying, Tom Homan did not take a bribe. The
reason you guys are going after Tom Holman so aggressively
is because he's doing the job of enforcing the law.
That's a question mark, he says. I think it's really preposterous.
He's a good man. I think it would be a
much more interesting story about why it is that Tom Homan,
who is simply enforcing America's immigration laws, is getting constantly

(01:35:34):
harassed and threatened. Stephan Offers said, well, I'm not sure
you answered the question. Are you saying that he did
not accept the fifty thousand? Well, he didn't take a bribe,
did he accept fifty thousand? I'm not sure that in
the course of Tom Holman's life he has been paid
more than fifty thousand. Dollars for services, So did he
take it? You know you hear if you listen to

(01:35:55):
what JD. Vance is saying, he has just destroyed his
entire credibility. First of all, he says, he's sure the
guy is not guilty, but he doesn't know anything about
the facts of the case. How can you be sure
that he's not guilty if you don't know anything about
the facts of the case. And when somebody makes an
allegation that there is corruption, you don't care to investigate. Instead,
you're going to say, well, I know he didn't do it,

(01:36:16):
so we're not going to look STEPHANOFFA said, I'm asking you,
did he accept the fifty thousand who's caught on the
surveillance tape? Did he accept that or not? Vance says, George,
I don't know what you're talking about. Did he accept
fifty thousand dollars for what? Stephanoff has said he was
recorded on an audio tape in September twenty twenty four,
an FBI surveillance tape accepting fifty thousand dollars in cash?

(01:36:41):
Did he keep that money? Vance said, accepting fifty thousand
for doing what? George, I'm sure that he gets paid
frequently in a grocery bag full of cash, right, whatever
he does.

Speaker 3 (01:36:53):
Who hasn't been paid in a grocery bag full of
fifty thousand dollars before?

Speaker 2 (01:36:57):
Letty?

Speaker 3 (01:36:58):
Who have not been paid in a grocery bag?

Speaker 2 (01:37:01):
Actually, that was one of the things about Sparrow Agnew
was that he was getting suitcase I think it suitcases
of money, at least that he dressed it up a
little bit better than a grocery bag, I know. But
he's getting massive amounts of cash given to him.

Speaker 3 (01:37:12):
There's also the fact that with inflation, fifty grand really
isn't even that much anymore, Like it's a life changing
amount of money for you or I. Yeah, it's a
massive amount for us. But you think that a government official,
you know? So the guy who aren't keeping up with
inflation is all I'm saying.

Speaker 2 (01:37:27):
So the guy who said, if the president does it,
it's not against the wall, it's not illegal or whatever.
That guy Richard Nixon got rid of Spiro Agnew, his
vice president, because he was accepting massive amounts of cash
of the table in his office. But this administration is
even worse, far worse. They don't even want to look
at it. We know, there's no issue here accepting fifty

(01:37:49):
thousand for what George.

Speaker 3 (01:37:51):
I was actually about to say. This interaction here reminds
me of a scene from Futurama. There's a very famous
one where Richard Nixon comes back and he's a head
in a jar, but he's still run for president and
he gets on the debate and the question is would
you steal the candy from a baby? And Richard Nixon
just start he starts sweating. He's like, well, a question
is very vague. It doesn't even say what kind of

(01:38:12):
candy it is. At least I wouldn't hurt the child,
you know.

Speaker 2 (01:38:16):
Yeah, this is what he keeps saying. Fifty thousand dollars
for what? Is it illegal to take fifty thousand dollars
for services? Yeah, if the services are going to be
promises of government contracts, the FBI hasn't prosecuted him. Well,
that's because you put in people like Cash Mattel, who
also doesn't have any credibility, just like you, just like

(01:38:38):
Pam Bondy, just like Dan Bongino. None of these people
have any credibility, and so they're covering for each other
with this stuff. Just they covered for Trump of the
Epstein stuff. I've never seen any evidence that he's engaged
in criminal want wrongdoing. Nobody has accused Tom of violating
or crime. Did he accept fifty thousand? Honestly, George, I
don't know the answer to that question. Stephaniels says, So

(01:39:01):
you don't what was caught on the tape. You're saying
right now, you don't know whether or not he kept
that money. George, I think the American people have benefit
much more from that than you going. If you talk
about real issues and he goes all the different problems
that we're facing right now, you should talk about that
instead of talking about Tom Homan's integrity. Clearly, we know

(01:39:22):
that we don't want to talk about corruption and the
Trump administration, even when it's right in your face. And
so again that was where we picked it up, where
he said, well, it's not a left wing rabbit hole,
that's what he said. And so yeah, and as I
point out the other day, we have barcodes for politicians.
That's exactly where we are with these people. Let's take

(01:39:43):
a look at what is happening in the in the
various manifestations of the church in various places, especially the
Church of England. This is an amazing thing that's being
done in the Canterbury Cathedral. And of course, so we
understand why this is happening if you look at the
people behind it. See if you can pull up this

(01:40:05):
guy who is the artist responsible for this graffiti all
over Canterbury Cathedral. The guy's name is Alex Vellis. He
is the alleged artist behind all this, and he is LGBT.
He's got his special pronouns and all the rest of
the stuff there he is. Yeah, scroll down and you

(01:40:26):
can see he's in a dress actually, so.

Speaker 3 (01:40:29):
Be warned, folks. This is hard to look at.

Speaker 2 (01:40:31):
Yeah, yeah. And then we have the graffiti itself. Pulled,
the graffiti up that they've put on. I don't know
if that's permanent or if it's removable. They put that
up as some kind of a vinyl thing.

Speaker 3 (01:40:43):
You think they would assume at least use water soluble
paint something like that. Maybe their hatred runs so deep
that they don't care.

Speaker 2 (01:40:52):
One person said, are you joking? Canterbury Cathedral, one of
the holiest and most beautiful buildings in the UK, has
been graffiti. He'd even worse. The church approved it and
probably paid this guy a lot of money to do it.
They say they worked with the marginalized communities to do this.
Person says, shame on you for this, except when you

(01:41:13):
look at this happened just a day or so after
the newly appointed Archbishop of Canterbury, who is a woman.
I don't know if this trainy art project is something
that she approved or not, but I don't know if
she's a lesbian or not. It looks like the LGBT
has become pure Antichrist. This is these are the people

(01:41:38):
who have focused the attack on Christ. And that's exactly
what this graffiti is. The graffiti questions God's goodness from
an artist who identifies as an agender goblin. In other words,
no gender, genderless agender, he's an add gender atheist.

Speaker 3 (01:41:58):
The right idea and what you do withs.

Speaker 2 (01:42:02):
And so again, this is the state of the Church
of England. And when you look at the Canterbury Cathedral
from the outside, it truly is amazing. There's nothing like
this that be built today by anyone anywhere. They have
graffiti the inside this thing like it's some kind of
a subway station or something. The new exhibit a Canterbury

(01:42:22):
Cathedral features graffiti questioning God's goodness. It prompted JD. Vancy,
Lon Musk and others to claim the Church of England
is humiliating itself. The art exhibit is titled Hear Us.
The highlights minorities while posing difficult questions to God. Well,
it's because God had said, not hear us. He said,

(01:42:42):
this is my beloved son. Hear him. But they don't
want to hear him. So the questions things that were
put up there are you there? Why did you create
hate when love is far more powerful? And again this
guy not only calls himself a gender, but he identifies

(01:43:03):
as a queer vegan uses They then pronouns other messages
include does everything have a soul? Do you regret your creations? Illness? Sin?
Others said, why all the suffering if you made us
in your own form? Why the violence and the killing storms?

Speaker 3 (01:43:21):
You know, he wrote a book with these questions, gave there's.

Speaker 2 (01:43:25):
An entire book that I give you those answers. But evidently, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:43:31):
Go to a church that isn't run by the England
then you might actually get some answers to these questions
that you start writing on the walls of the church.

Speaker 2 (01:43:41):
Yeah, and culture said, and they wonder why Christians don't
bother going to churches anymore. As a matter of fact,
the former chaplain to Queen Elizabeth the Second said he
was shocked by the graffiti. He said it belongs more
to the architecture of a car park than to a
modern church. He said, there is nothing left at the
center of the Church of England, the God mocking graffiti

(01:44:01):
and its most prominent church indicates decay, rebellion and anger.
He said, how is this congruent with the art of
a cathedral. It's undermining. It has a different kind of
esthetic dissonance, and they said, He said, that doesn't help
with a quest for God. They're not looking for God.
They're trying to fight with God, and they're trying to

(01:44:23):
fight with his people. The cathedral graffiti comes a week
after the Church of England announced Sarah Mulally as the
first female Archbishop of Canterbury. The insolation of this woman,
who has openly affirmed abortion and homosexuality, prompted some within
the Global Anglican Communion to claim that the Church of

(01:44:45):
England has been given over to apostasy. I would say
that's a pretty safe conclusion, but all is not dead.
In the church. We have a great story that went viral,
and this was a a woman who was delivering pizza
and she shows up at this this house is where

(01:45:08):
a pastor and his family lives, and she's got the
wrong order. And I'll let you see what happened.

Speaker 4 (01:45:15):
Okayil I'm sorry, I'm getting old. I saw sixty seven.

Speaker 14 (01:45:23):
It's not sixty seven or fifty seven.

Speaker 15 (01:45:25):
You remember sixty seven, So fifty seven sixty seven.

Speaker 2 (01:45:29):
I screwed up.

Speaker 14 (01:45:30):
I'm sorry.

Speaker 4 (01:45:31):
I'm on my way back to get it right now.

Speaker 8 (01:45:33):
I will bring it back.

Speaker 14 (01:45:34):
I think we can make it work. Hey, don't for
one second feel bad. Well, I'm we love you and
Jesus loves you, and we hope you have a great knight.

Speaker 3 (01:45:46):
Don't feel bad for one second.

Speaker 15 (01:45:47):
We're having a great knight.

Speaker 4 (01:45:49):
Thank you.

Speaker 8 (01:45:50):
Okay, you're welcome. You're very much loved. You know that,
do you know Jesus?

Speaker 2 (01:45:56):
Yeah? Yeah? Yeah? Are you living Jesus.

Speaker 14 (01:46:00):
I'm difficult than girls.

Speaker 15 (01:46:04):
Come here, we're going to pray for this really nice lady.

Speaker 2 (01:46:08):
What's your name?

Speaker 14 (01:46:09):
My name Susannah, omnil girl?

Speaker 15 (01:46:14):
Do you love this lady?

Speaker 8 (01:46:15):
Right here?

Speaker 15 (01:46:16):
Let's pray for here. Can I put my hand on
your you want to come over, ye and your name
one more time. Susannah, Jesus, we thank you for Susannah,
and Lord, I thank you that we cross baths tonight.
In fact, Lord, she's more important than any of these
orders tonight, because you matter to her and she.

Speaker 3 (01:46:34):
Matters to us.

Speaker 13 (01:46:34):
What.

Speaker 14 (01:46:34):
I just pray you would bless her. I pray that
you would open the windows of heaven over her and
bring any healing she needs to her body in the
name of Jesus, any financial need to her, Lord and God,
that she would encounter you and live for you and
follow you at everything she has Jesus name, Have a
great night, bless you.

Speaker 2 (01:46:57):
Take care. That was.

Speaker 3 (01:47:03):
Yeah, it's a lot, a lot nicer than most of
what we get to cover on this show. Yeah, a
lot more wholesome. I guess it's the term that a
lot of people would use nowadays, but they actually also
the article points out, set up a go Fundme for
her as well, and raised I believe it's thirty four

(01:47:26):
hundred dollars thirty four thousand, thirty four thousand. I left
off as zero. Yeah, math is not math was never.

Speaker 2 (01:47:32):
My takes care of her eighty two year old mother.
It's had a lot of problems. Yeah, so I said
in the GoFundMe. Uh, she's one of those people. It's
spent her whole life putting others first. She's currently the
full time caregiver for her eight two year old mom

(01:47:53):
as well as trying to earn money delivering pizzas. So
she's it's a great story.

Speaker 12 (01:48:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:48:01):
Yeah, she's truly exemplifying being a good child, working at
something that we all think of as just this. You know,
oh get delivering pizzas. That's for teenagers. You do that
as your first job and then you move on to
it something bigger and better. But she's doing what she can.

(01:48:21):
She's not ashamed, she's working how she has to working.

Speaker 2 (01:48:25):
Truly wonderful and so as that's happening, you know, we'd
take a look at this Canterbury Cathedral and the comical
nonsense that is there. You know, that's the real life
that's happening there. And it's even more real when you
look at what is happening in Pakistan and Nigeria. This
particular story in Pakistan, this is a pastor who dies

(01:48:47):
three days after he was finally acquitted on blasphemy charges.
That he had been locked imprisoned for thirteen years for
blasphemy charges in Pakistan. At one point they'd given him
the death sentence, but because appealing, that had not been
carried out yet. But the thirteen years in prison was
a death sentence for this guy. It already had two

(01:49:07):
minor heart attacks. They did everything they could to torture
him in prison, and finally he was vindicated. The charge
again was blasphemy. And this is you look at this
and yes, this is coming from Muslims. It's happening, but
you can certainly see this that is in the pipeline
with many Western societies when we talk about the fact

(01:49:30):
they want to limit and punish what people say in
terms of conversion therapy, they want to call it. And
so we have Colorado and other jurisdictions of Virginia had
its own law that got struck down. They're working very
hard to try to criminalize the free speech and the
free expression of religion. And this is what it looks

(01:49:51):
like when they get it what they want. The guy
who is a false in prison for thirteen years, he
died of cardiac arrest just three days after his acquittal.
He returned home after being cleared by high court, but
he collapsed before his family could make arrangements for medical care.
That asked that he could get medical care the entire
time that he was there, but they would not give
it to him. Again this is Pakistan. He was arrested

(01:50:15):
in July of twenty twelve after a local cleric Muslim
cleric had accused him of sending text messages that insulted
the mother of Islamic prophet Muhammad and yeah, I guess
the mother of all false religions. Wait a minute, he
insulted his mother. He had two minor heart attacks while

(01:50:36):
in custody. He was repeatedly had repeatedly petitioned for bail
on medical grounds, arguing that the prison conditions were inadequate
and had worsened his condition. He was also tortured in
custody to confess sentenced to life in prison, but they
nearly executed him as part of this. They also added

(01:50:59):
that charged to it, he had at least forty seven
hearings that were scheduled between his conviction and his final release.
Each one was adjourned without resolution, so they kept bringing
him in and stringing him along with this, so called
legal system that was there despite medical warnings, including a
twenty nineteen doctor's note that a third heart attack could

(01:51:21):
be fatal. He remained in custody until his acquittal last Thursday.
Three years earlier, a session's court had escalated his punishment
to a death sentence, though that was not carried out.
So again, this is how some people take their religion seriously.
Some of them take it seriously enough to help others.

(01:51:42):
Others take it seriously enough to face death. And these
clowns that have been spoiled rotten in the Church of England,
with all the money that they get, it's just amazing.
Nigerian Christians are seeing, of course, an increase in killings
and kidnappings. It doesn't stop and it just keeps escalating. Germany,

(01:52:03):
by the way, has a war on Christianity, and part
of that is the open border and the hatred of
the Islamic people that are being brought in. But it's
also the collapse of Germany's faith. Germany's open border experiment
has unleashed a wave of anti Christian hatred, fueled by
imported Islamic intolerance, protected by left wing politicians and ignored

(01:52:24):
by cowardly media, leaving the once Christian heart of Europe desecrated, demoralized,
on the brink of spiritual collapse. You know, is Friedrich
Nisi who said God is dead. We have killed them.
He said, no, what they did was a killed God
in their hearts. And that was done back in the
eighteen hundreds. The whole idea of higher criticism everything was

(01:52:48):
something that was started in Germany, and we see the
fruit of it in the Weimar Republic corruption and in
the rise of Hitler. And now we see it continuing
in Germany with the persecution of Christians bringing in Muslims
and large numbers.

Speaker 3 (01:53:07):
A thing that's worth noting is that when Nietzsche said
God is dead, that was sort of a lament on
his part. You know, we have killed God, and now
what do we do?

Speaker 2 (01:53:16):
Now?

Speaker 3 (01:53:17):
That's right, you know, whereas these you know, the average
person who says that thinks Nietzsche is celebrating that we've
killed him. We can now engage in our truly rational pursuits.
Our minds are free from this superstition. Even Nietzsche, who
you know they quote, they're misquoting him because he was
terrified of this.

Speaker 2 (01:53:35):
What I lost the foundation of their society. They lost
the moral foundation of it, which we have as well, and.

Speaker 4 (01:53:42):
Wanting the fruit and not the root. Was that said,
don't tell the servants there is no gone, they'll steal
the silverware.

Speaker 2 (01:53:50):
Yeah, I don't know that was I remember that quote. Yeah,
So you know they say this hatred has been important,
and yet there's enough hatred in Germany Christianity to start with.
Remember the family homeschooling family that fled from Germany was
given asylum here that Biden, of all the millions of
people they came in illegally, he didn't try to deport them. Instead,

(01:54:13):
he wanted to focus on this Christian homeschooling family that
had been given asylum that were really politically persecuted. They
were going to have their children taken away and they
might have been put in prison themselves if they went back.
And so you have German attacking homeschoolers, they attacked the
opposition party AfD. Immigration has created new tensions around Christianity

(01:54:34):
and public life, a diplomatic understatement for the Islamic contempt
towards Christians that has now taken root in German street
schools and neighborhoods. The same leftist politicians who opened the
borders have now criminalized dissent. They label anyone who points
to this correlation as Islamophobic. They have burned bibles, they

(01:54:55):
have decapitated statues, they have destroyed confessionals. Many church building
have now closed their doors, and so the German Bishop's
Conference called the pattern open hostility against Christianity. These attacks
are not merely material damage, but an assault on belief
itself and a disruption of religious life. They demand systematic prosecution.

(01:55:19):
I noticed that the response from the Christians there. They
decided when they came along and burned their bibles and
they decapitated their statues, they would just close the church.
Except the churches are not closing in Nigeria. Even though
their homes are being burned and the people are being
decapitated by the Muslims, they still hang tough. Tells you

(01:55:43):
everything you need to know about the state of the
church in Germany. Germany's political class is so quick to
condemn offenses against other faiths, has met the persecution of
Christians with silence and bureaucratic indifference. Fred Mertz publicly mourned
the rising anti Semitism, but no comparable outcry came for
the desecration of churches or the harassment of Christian faithful. Meanwhile,

(01:56:07):
public officials and left leaning media outlets continue to frame
such acts as isolated vandalism or the product of youth
delinquency misguided youth. The closure of churches like Saint Antonios
is more than a local tragedy. It is a symbol
of Europe's spiritual collapse as Germany's Christian heritage is desecrated,

(01:56:29):
as leaders remain paralyzed by political correctness. Well, they're not paralyzed.
They want this to happen. That's exactly what they want
to happen. Unless the West finds the courage to defend
its own faith and heritage, Germany's fate will soon be
all of ours, that's right. Meanwhile, in the UN, the UNESCO,

(01:56:52):
which is the educational branch of the UN, they have
gone straight for homeschooling. The amazing thing this is an
article from Alex Newman, and the amazing thing I think
about all this is that the guy that's running this,
is coming up with guidelines for education and is coming
up with tactics to attack homeschoolers is a guy who

(01:57:16):
was the education minister in North Korea authority.

Speaker 4 (01:57:25):
Yeah, well, perfect resume for what they want him to do.

Speaker 2 (01:57:29):
That's right. I've literally called these schools re education camps
the longest time. My friend who went to West Point,
when he came back at Tampa and I introduced them
to some of my college friends, I said, we were
incarcerated in an institution for several years together. What And
I said, yeah, I'm talking about the schools. But yeah,

(01:57:51):
that's the way I viewed it as a re education camp.
But it didn't stick with me at least I don't know.
This guy was Guang Charl Chang. He is the education
head of the former head of the education ministry in
North Korea, and so what he's doing is he's calling

(01:58:11):
for the enforcement the UN Convention on the Rights of
the Child. Remember that's what I did back in two
thousand and nine, I think it was I did the
for Theprinal Rights dot Org. They're trying to get a
small constitutional amendment and that would protect parents as being
the ones that the children belong to. And the Republicans

(01:58:35):
are not interested in that at all. They don't say
it out loud like Melissa Harris Perry does that you've
got to get over the idea that your children belong
to you. They don't. They belong to the village. Hillary
has said that, she said that as a PSA for CNBC.
But the Republicans aren't doing anything to stop it. They

(01:58:58):
could easily encode that law, and I would think that
that would be a winning cause for them. You know
who wouldn't like to wrap themselves a mom and apple pie. Well,
evidently not the GOP. They're guarding our pedophiles now. So
the calls for total control are clear portrayed as mandatory.
Governments must implement oversight mechanisms such as registration and evaluations,

(01:59:22):
and demand more regulatory capacity, he says. And so this
is all about controlling what is taught, because if you
control what is taught, you control what is thought. That
is the key issue, and it all goes back to
this idea. The UN Convention on the Rights of the
Child is where this idea comes that your children don't
belong to you, that these minor children can make these

(01:59:46):
decisions and they We haven't ratified the UN Convention on
the Rights of the Child in the United States, we're
not bound by it legally. But as I pointed out
in two thousand and nine. You've got judges, and you've
got schools and all these government institutions that act as
if that is what the law is. And so they're

(02:00:07):
constantly saying that's the whole basis of them pushing this
gender gas lighting on very young children. And to say
that the parents, and we've seen this over and over
again in places like California, the parents must not be
told what we were telling the kids in terms of
changing trying to change them from a boy to a
girl or vice versa. You can't tell the parents. And

(02:00:28):
so we've had a lot of Christian teachers who push
back against that, who have sued them over that. But
that is really where the fight is in so many
different ways. And so again they will use all the
terms about socialization, quality, education, all the rest of stuff
being violated, talk about socialization. That discussion should be over

(02:00:51):
after twenty twenty, after they locked down the country, after
they put masks on the kids, after they told them
to be six feet apart to me about socialization.

Speaker 3 (02:01:04):
So there's also the fact that it's the worst kind
of socialization. It's uncontrolled, unmonitored, Lord of the Flyes style,
and you know you cannot expect a well balanced person
to come out of that sort of center. They're going
to have issues of some kind.

Speaker 2 (02:01:22):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:01:23):
Children need to be watched, guarded and corrected.

Speaker 2 (02:01:27):
It's a very artificial environment that children are raising when
you put you know, thirty kids in a classroom with
one adult, an.

Speaker 3 (02:01:34):
Adult they don't like and don't respect.

Speaker 2 (02:01:37):
And an adult who can't punish them. You know, this
guy is all against corporal punishment. Don't tell me they
don't have corporal punishment. And in the North Korea, right,
so you know.

Speaker 4 (02:01:47):
It's surprised that they had capital punishment.

Speaker 3 (02:01:49):
Grand Schools Al Saudi.

Speaker 2 (02:01:53):
Yeah, so you know they're talking about how they have
to respect diversity and all the LGBT stuff. We really
think they allow LGBT in North Korea. I don't think so.
So they said they promote mandatory training from government for
parents who wished to homeschool. Well, you know, Kar and
I already had that mandatory training. They didn't have an

(02:02:14):
option to opt out of school when we were in school,
and so we both went through the mandatory training when
we were children, so we don't need to do that again.
As a matter of fact, that was a motivating factor
for us to do homeschooling. But the reality is is
that it is really about character. And you've got somebody

(02:02:35):
else saying this now, which is kind of interesting. I
think that and this is actually coming from FTC Northern
and to say, the hidden crisis in our classrooms. Why
education without character is failing America. And this is actually
on zero Hedge, This is not on some Christian site.
And I got to say, and as I said for

(02:02:57):
the longest time, and as others have said, character is education.
The rest of this stuff is just you know, it's
vocational training. But character is the basis and should be
the basis of education. That's what R. L. Dabney said
back at right after the Civil War. He said this
whole idea of government run schools. He goes, that's fine

(02:03:21):
if you're going to do vocational training or something like that,
but character is really education should be first and foremost
about character, which means that it's going to be about
somebody's worldview and their religion. And we know that government
should have no involvement in that because government should not
be picking a religion to promote. Now we have seen

(02:03:41):
which religion they want to promote, is the anti God,
LGBT religion that they have chosen to promote. So again,
this article from zero Hedge goes through all of this
and the failing even by their own metrics that they
want to train people in terms of reading, writing, and arithmetic,

(02:04:02):
for example, they said, even in that area, they're failing.
But the biggest failure that we have is in character.
John Dewey shifted education from a focus on character formation
toward utilitarian aims. While some aspects of his approach, like
critical thinking, retain value, has broader impact contributed to treating

(02:04:23):
values as socially constructed and relative. Yeah, the moral relativism
and the post modernism, rather than objectively discernible truths that
we're worth pursuing. The ancients understood something that we've forgotten
in traditional time. Academia was designed to help human beings

(02:04:44):
comprehend what is true, good and beautiful. Makes me think
of Roger Scrutin. And we've got an interview coming up,
and our guests is on the line right now, and
we're going to talk about this very thing. And I'm
really looking forward to talking to Anthony Frieda, who is
an artist that I've admired his work for a very

(02:05:05):
long time. He's done covers for Jerald Slinty and he
has worked done artwork for Info Wars as well. And
he has changed his focus and he is still involved
with politics, I think, but he is moving his focus
to some projects to support Christianity and he's had a

(02:05:25):
change in his life. And we're going to talk to
him about his new book that is coming out, The
Thought Crimes of Anthony Freda, which he has. They they're
going to come for the memes and all the rest
of the stuff. We know that. We know that they
set up the Coalition for Content, Providence and Authentication for
that very reason. Memes and artwork are very profoundly powerful.

(02:05:50):
And so we're going to take a quick break and
when we come back, we're going to be joined with
Anthony Frieda. I'm looking very forward to uh to talking
to him and finding out what is what he's up
to and find out about his new book. Will be
right back.

Speaker 6 (02:06:27):
H H.

Speaker 2 (02:06:54):
You're listening to the David Night Show. All right, welcome
back and joining us now is Anthony Freda. He's got
a new book that's coming out. We're going to talk
to him about that, The Thought Crimes of Anthony Freda
and he's been very successful as an artist, and he's
his art is full of very important critiques of the

(02:07:21):
of what we see politically. He's actually had in his
art put on display at the nine to eleven Museum
and Memorial in New York City, and he's on the
same page as we are, I think about nine to eleven.
His tenure tenure with Info Wards as an illustrator and
writer fully cubmented his place in the world of controversial

(02:07:42):
alternative news, and he's been very vocal about his role
in that space. And so that's where I got to
know Anthony, as well as his work with Charles Splinty
and Trend's Journal. So thank you for joining us, Anthony.
Good to see you again.

Speaker 8 (02:07:57):
Great to see David, and thanks for having me beautiful set.

Speaker 2 (02:08:02):
Well, Thank you, thank you. Yeah, I always wanted to
talk to you about your background here, and there's a
whole other aspect of your background that I wasn't aware
of now that you're getting into Christian art and you've
got a project with that as well, and to go
fundme to help realize that project. But let's let's talk
about your personal journey here. You you began doing copy

(02:08:26):
stuff for the advertising industry, and you began helping them
to sell. Joe Campbell, talk a little bit about that
and how you got from there to where you are now.

Speaker 8 (02:08:39):
Yeah, so it's quite a journey. I've been doing it
for forty years, so I'll give you the contensed version.
But yeah, I got out of art. I had this
dream of becoming this, you know, famous, prosperous, thriving artist,
and I just wasn't prepared. I mean I went to
Proud It four years of training and in art and

(02:09:01):
painting and drawing, and I was pretty proficient and I
was pretty confident, but they really didn't train you how
to make a living as an artist. So I sort
of figured it out of my own. My own. Now
I have to make a living doing this. So crossing
that threshold from academy into the professional world for any
artist is a is a scary time. I mean, I

(02:09:21):
teach seniors now at FT and it's my way of
giving back because I know how scared they are, so
I try to sort of pivot that.

Speaker 2 (02:09:31):
And I think it's a scarier time right now than
ever has been. I Mean, we look at AI and
a lot of people are just content to throw a
prompt at AI and take whatever it gives them. What
do you think about that? How is that going to
affect art?

Speaker 8 (02:09:43):
Well, I think it's going to be not just art,
it's going to I mean, I think it's designed to
create a post human future where the roots do all
the work and they work twenty four hours a day.
And I mean the transhumanist you know, elevator pitch or
Elevator to Hell pitch, is that the robots everything for
us and we have the freedom to do whatever we

(02:10:05):
want and they'll give us a basic unit of income.
I don't think it's going to work out that way,
but that's their utopian, posthuman transhumanist future. Yes, I had
my class yesterday. The kids were crying. They were literally
crying because they just went to school for four years
to learn how to be an artist and now anyone
who has an AI program can do what they do.

(02:10:28):
So it's very demoralizing to the creatives. But I mean
the same thing goes for the guys who remember they
say to learn to code, like not anymore.

Speaker 2 (02:10:37):
Yeah, they're putting themselves out of a job, that's right. Well,
the other part of it is though, and I think
we'll get to this and we get to where you
are right now. The machine has no soul. It's going
to put things together statistically, and it can copy and
paste and throw things against the wall. And in a sense,
it's a sophisticated version of a chimpanzee, right, And so

(02:11:01):
there is still going to be a niche there, I
think for the human soul, communicating truth and beauty. I
think that's really the issue there, and that's what we
have to focus on. And I think that that's going
to be pretty obvious to people. You know, there's a
lot of things that AI can do, especially I think
in the art aspect, because it can hallucinate and it

(02:11:23):
looks like it's, you know, having a drug trip or whatever,
and that can be useful in art or even in
music to some degree. But when you look at the
kind when I look at it for music, for example,
the thing about AI is that you can't precisely get
it to do what you want. You know, it can
get like eighty percent there or eighty five percent there,

(02:11:43):
which is not good enough for art. As many people
have said, art is never finished, simply abandoned. At some point,
you've got to stop tweaking it and just go do
something different the next project or whatever. And I think
that's the problem with AI. It just throws this stuff
out there in people's a that's good enough. I think
there's going to be a qualitative difference that people will

(02:12:05):
be able to tell that last fifteen or twenty percent
that is there. Yes, I agree with you, Yeah, that's
my hope.

Speaker 8 (02:12:14):
But I think you're right. Listen, our advantage moving forward
is the robots don't laugh, they don't cry, they don't love.
That's right, They're not connected to God. In fact, I
think it's the opposite that I think. I think I
have this idea that just as the Holy Spirit is
this unifying force and universal force of good and God,

(02:12:39):
the adverse the into that Yang is this unifying force
of darkness which informs and which has basically a cauldron
for this AI to be created, and we're in coorninating
it by giving it prompts and giving it life. But
that spirit is a dark spirit, and I sense that,
and I feel that it's an anti human spirit.

Speaker 2 (02:13:01):
But so Elon Musk agrees with you as well. He said,
we're summoning the demon. Yeah, maybe we're can pay attention
to what he's saying about that.

Speaker 8 (02:13:12):
Some of these guys who are atheists say, this is
something here that mathematics doesn't you know, describe or define
its something beyond mathematics. So what's going on? They don't
even know. The guys who created it don't even know how,
you know, these systems arrive at the decisions that they
make to certain points. It's called black box technology, right
that they it's it's it's opaque, but robots understand it.

(02:13:37):
But they might have but they understand us though. That's
the problem, Like we don't understand how they do what
they do, but they understand us. I mean, they have
so much big data about humanity and what moves us
and influence us that it's a lopsided uh relationship.

Speaker 2 (02:13:56):
That's why it's such a good fit for the government,
because the government knows everything about us. But the government
itself is by design a black box that black boxes
labeled national security. We can't tell you, we'd have to
kill you.

Speaker 8 (02:14:09):
Right, so exactly. Yeah, So man, I could talk about
AI for hours.

Speaker 2 (02:14:14):
But yeah, yeah, but let's go back to your story.
You were you were doing started working at an ad
agency as you gun out trying to start.

Speaker 8 (02:14:22):
Working at it. Yeah, I was a young man, you know,
young man. I listed it after money and Woman, and
I was in my twenties, and I became very successful
working for Fortune five hundred companies, and I was I
was in advertasing about ten years and I started to

(02:14:42):
learn and see all the psychological tricks and manipulations, you know,
informed by the ideas of Edward Burneis. And he was
a master of mass psychological manipulation, right, and that was employeed.
He was contracted right the government and by ad agencies.
It's a long story, but those ideas worked because people

(02:15:07):
respond positively to certain stimuli negatively to other stimuli. Like
we're pretty predictable animals. And once you break that code,
you're trying to sell something, and you're smart and clever,
you can figure out a way to do it. But
I got really turned off. I was working on the
Joe Campbell ad campaign, and in those days, they were,

(02:15:27):
you know, paying us a lot of money to do
this stuff. And I was just enamorated with the money.
And I bought a condo in Manhattan, and I thought
I was like living on top of the world. And
then so I kind of got lost in that world
of money and success. And then the FTC determined that

(02:15:49):
our campaign was illegal because we were using cartoon camels.
They said, well, we were marketing cigarettes to children. So
I sort of had a moral crisis. And I didn't
become an artist to sell cigaretting kids, right, And I said, you.

Speaker 2 (02:16:03):
Know, maybe the job professor, because they sell poison the
kids all the time.

Speaker 8 (02:16:09):
Well, that's what they're on in the story. So I
had this crisis has come to Jesus moment. I said,
that's it. I'm done with advertising. I'm not going to
sell my soul to the devil. So I was still
you know, now, I'm a young man in my thirties.
I was pretty naive politically at that time. And I said,

(02:16:29):
I'm going to work for the good guys, right, I'm
going to work for New York Times and the New Yorker.
And I started working for, you know, all these mainstream
publications as an editorial illustrator. And I worked for the
outbed page of the New York Times, which is like
a premier showcase for thinkers and for I kind of
like where the elite speak to each other.

Speaker 2 (02:16:51):
Sure, and.

Speaker 8 (02:16:54):
I was again, I was on top of the world,
and I'm working like the best place for an illustrator
to be. I was doing articles for them on a
regular basis, and then I got to see how the
sausage is made there, and the the art director and
the editor told me that every single war that goes

(02:17:14):
through here has to be vetted by the State Department.
And I said, I said, I thought, you know, you're
the fourth ward You're I said, that's like Proud of
the World has to be the State Department. They said,
that's that's how it is. So my naive ta started to,
you know, unravel. At that point, I started to become

(02:17:34):
a little more educated about how the world really works.
And I feel silly now saying that, but I thought
The New York Times was this like beacon of truth
and objectivity. I mean, I couldn't be more wrong. But
so I got an assignment to do. It was not
that piece right before the Iraq War, penned by the

(02:17:56):
then Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, and it was outlining
all the lives that we know now that took us
to that war. And I illustrated the piece and then
I had another moral crisis. This guy said to myself.
My god, I went from selling cigarettes to kids to
selling war.

Speaker 2 (02:18:15):
This is the first.

Speaker 8 (02:18:17):
I didn't think I could do worse than that, but
I did. So I had another another, you know, time
to question what am I doing with my life? What
are my life choices? What do I really what do
I really want to do with my skills and my
my whatever gift Guy's given me and my passions, And
I mean, I love to create imageries. It's the only

(02:18:39):
thing I'm good at. So I wanted to stay in
that lane. So right then, it was about the time
that these seminal alternative news sides started coming out, like
info Wars, and there was a few others and trans
journal and I reached out to them. And because I figured,

(02:19:01):
these guys are exposing the lies of the mainstream media
that I used to work for and of the advertising
agencies that used to work for. So I wanted to
bite the hand that fed me. So I started. I
started working for people and the health freedom movement and
people and the liberty movement and people and all these
different movements, you know, people like you included, and and

(02:19:26):
I've been there ever since because I do think there
are there are good people out there who are trying
to get to the truth of the matter about all
these issues, and journalists and activists and filmmakers and writers,
and I've worked for a lot of them and they're
my heroes. So and then politically I got I was

(02:19:52):
on the contract for the RFK campaign when he was
running for president because I believed that doing his his
work to expose the vaccines and the dangers of pharmaceuticals.

Speaker 2 (02:20:04):
Right, So.

Speaker 8 (02:20:07):
I still have a hand in the political realm, but
I'm basically working for people who I think are the
good guys. You know that I can sleep well at
night now, David, because I think I'm worrying for people,
or at least trying to tell all the truth. You know,
It's like it's not equivalent, like when like when people
get fined for like the way they went after Alex

(02:20:29):
or whatever he said, like the New York Times and
CNN tell lies of much greater magnitude every day and
nobody get sued. And and by the way, their lies
lead to wars that kill millions of people, their lies
sell products that kill millions of people, like and they're
never held accountable. And then and they're not the difference

(02:20:50):
between them and say what independent journalists who is that
they're purposely trying to lie to you. They know they're
lying to you. You know, it's one thing to make
a mistake in the in the you know, the search
for the truth. We're not always going to be perfect.
But there's a big difference to somebody who's purposely knowing
to lie to you, to hurt you and your children,

(02:21:12):
then somebody who's just trying to figure out in real
time what the hell's going on, because it's very confusing.
We've been lying to so much about so about everything
that people become so skeptical that, you know, I think
it Unfortunately, it fosters this environment where nobody believes anything,
and that's who we're at now. Nobody believes anything, so

(02:21:33):
they come up with one hundred different theories of how
Charlie Kirk was killed, right, because nobody believes the official story,
and we can never get to the bottom of anything
because everybody has their own theory about what happened, and
there's no universal truth anymore. We're in the post truth age,
and I think that's the truth is going to be

(02:21:54):
the greatest, most valuable commodity in the future.

Speaker 2 (02:21:58):
Here's what you need. Here's the fundamental truth. Government lies,
it always has, always will for his own interest. So
if you understand that whatever the government says or the
official press says with a healthy dose of skepticism, I
think that's the most important thing. You know, you mentioned
the fact that you realize that they had to get
the approval of the State Department for what they were

(02:22:19):
saying at the New York Times, and of course we
know about Operation Mockingbird and the rest of this stuff.
I thought it was really amazing, the disingenuous astonishment, the
fact that Hegseth openly said, well, you're going to have
to get approval for anything that you release. I don't
like that, but that's not anything that's really different. The
only thing that's different about that is that they're going

(02:22:41):
to own it and say it out loud, rather than
doing it behind closed doors. I had a friend who
worked at the Pentagon, and he worked for the side
that was vetting movie scripts. If they liked your movie script,
if it was complementary of them and their agenda, they
would give you access to military equipment that you could
use to film movie. If they didn't like it, you

(02:23:01):
didn't get that equipment, and that might sink your movie
because the expense of trying to get that equipment. Otherwise
they provide it at a reduced cost or for free.
So that kind of thing has been going along for
a very long time.

Speaker 8 (02:23:13):
Yeah, I mean I'm still surprised. I remember, I'm older.
I remember Frank Church the Church Committee here, and it's
like he had the receipts, he proved it back in
the seventies, and nobody cared. It's like it did nothing.
They just went back to business as usual.

Speaker 2 (02:23:28):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 8 (02:23:30):
I mean, you know, thank God for him and his work,
but I mean, you really didn't do anything in the
big picture.

Speaker 2 (02:23:36):
Yeah, And all this stuff about the heart attack gun.
As I've said before, that was really a distraction because
the whole thing began because from their inception, the CIA
and the NSA were spying on Americans without a search warrant,
which you know takes us. We've been fighting that thing
going up to you know, twenty twelve, twenty thirteen at
Snowed and all the rest of the stuff. So the

(02:23:57):
result of that was still the result of the Church
Committee hearings was the Faiza Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
which they then used to give themselves legal cover to
do what they've been doing from their inception, which was
to spy on Americans with that search warrant, as Ran
Paul says, you know, spying on mister and missus Verizon.

(02:24:17):
You know, you go to one judge and a secret
court that nobody knows about, and you get legal cover
to violate the Constitution. So they always turned this stuff
to their own advantage.

Speaker 8 (02:24:28):
Well yeah, and I speaking of that subject, I worked
one of my heroes, William Binny, and I had the
pleasure of working on a documentary about William. I met him,
just a great guy and he is. I mean, we
quit because he said the systems he designed to spy
on potential terrorists would be being used to spy on everybody. Yeah,
and that's against the oath he took, and that's illegal,

(02:24:51):
and he said he's not gonna do it. So what
do they do they be? I raided his house and
arrested him on the false pretenses and false charges. Yeah.
But yeah, so just get back to my journey. Yeah,
so done of those track. After the RFK thing, I
worked for him for a year and it was a
great experience, and I got to see just how dirty

(02:25:14):
the Democrats are. I mean, Republicans basically left him alone.
You know, Trump will make some you know, nasty comments
now and then, but the Democrats actively tried to destroy
him with lawsuits and moles and people doing dirty tricks.
And it was a constant, relentless assault on him that

(02:25:36):
really opened my eyes again. I mean I was naive again,
like whenever I underestimate how evil these people are and
how they are to be corrupt and to use the
power they have or abuse any power they have in
the courts, in the media, in academia and tech, I mean,

(02:25:56):
which they control those institutions unfortunately, And it just it
sickened me. It's sick of me, the way that they
smeared him and lied about him and sued him and
tried to play dirty tricks with ballots and just on
and on and on. So so then I got that
made me realize that the battle isn't political, This battle

(02:26:20):
is spiritual. So I had I wanted to move from
the temporal plane into the spiritual plane with my work
and got back to my Christian roots. I was raised
a Catholic and I had a personal experience with my
my fiance started having seizures. One night we were watching

(02:26:42):
actually there was the Albama movie. Uh, it was like
an apocalyptic Obama movie, Leave the Leave the World behind,
which have to be a foreboding title because my my
girlfriends were watching this. She says, my heart hurts and
I don't feel right. And I said, I said, maybe
this anxiety from this Obama show is you know, screw

(02:27:05):
Obama's not watched this as upsetting you. And then she
just went into seizures. And she was street healthy, she
was extremely there was nothing, no pre existing condition. She
just started composting and seizing and just went thousand yards
stare and stopped breathing. And I'm not a doctor, but

(02:27:26):
I think breathing is pretty important. And I didn't know
what to do with David. I felt so inadequate and helpless.
I had no idea what to do. I should I
do chest compression? I didn't know. I didn't know what
except to call nine one one and I just held
her and she was in this in this state of

(02:27:49):
a comotose state. I don't know she was dying. I
thought she was dying, and then she came out of it.
From a brief moment with this, from this look of
just terror and fear to this this calm and this
peace came over her and she started laughing. Hmm, And

(02:28:11):
I thought of was this all a joke? But she's
not that, She's not that kind of person. And she
and she was laughing, and her whole faces and the
whole body was just relaxed, and she was at a
place of peace. And then she clinched back and went
back into this convulsive state. And I believe like she
went to the other side. I believe she was. She

(02:28:33):
was at peace with God for a brief period, and
that it just wasn't her time, or she just got
sent back, or I don't know obviously what happened, but
it was. You had any recollection of that, none, none
of any of it. Your brain doesn't remember that stuff,
probably protect you. But it was extraordinary and it reawakened

(02:28:59):
my faith. And that was a year and a half ago,
and thank god she's healthy now. Seventy five percent of
people who go through when she went went through, it
was a brain bleed, seventy five percent of the people die.
That happens too. So she was colma. She had a
long convalescence, but thank god she's healthy now. Yes, and

(02:29:21):
it brought both of us closer to God, and it
made me want to dedicate my work to the Lord.
And every piece I do now is a devotion to God.
Every stroke of my pen is a meditation of prayer,
and I want to lean into that as much as
I possibly can.

Speaker 2 (02:29:41):
That's great. You know, before you came on, we were
talking about what's going on in Canterbury Cathedral and that
used to be the basis for why people would make
these elaborate cathedrals was out of a devotion to God
and wanting to honor him. And of course, depending on
what gifts He has given us, we can all have
differentferent ways that we can do that. And you know,

(02:30:03):
whatever your job is, you can always do it in
a way that you've tried to honor God. And yet,
what do you think about did you see that that
story where they paid somebody to do graffiti on the
interior walls of Canterbury Cathedral. Did you see that?

Speaker 3 (02:30:20):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (02:30:21):
To me, it's it's worse than graffiti, it's mis vandalism.
But you know, it's like it's so funny because these
things that were created in the so called Dark Age.
They couldn't make those today. It's because of what you said.
It's because they weren't doing it for the profit motive, right,
They were doing it the profit motives, you know, spelled differently.

(02:30:46):
And that's the only way humans can create something like that.
Your heart and soul has to be in it. I mean,
you go into those cathedrals and you feel the presence
of God, you feel the presence of the highest achievement
nity is capable of. And they did it in the
so called Dark Ages, like with none of the tools
and the technology we have, Like it's it's astonishing, And

(02:31:09):
it's just just the amount of time and human labor
and life force and sacrifice and artistry and craftsmanship and
skill that went into those things. Just that alone is
enough to uplift your spirit. They're uplifting edifices and monuments
and and today we have monuments like the nine to

(02:31:30):
eleven Monument, which is a it's a black box, it's
a hole. It's like a giant urinal. You go to
it's the you know, that black Box memorial, and it's
just like a spinning, sucking hole to hell, no lights,
and it's just there's nothing uplifting about it. So you

(02:31:52):
want to jump in and kill yourself and be sucked
into hell. So that's the feeling I get when to
go there, And I think in some ways it's appropriate
considering that we know what happened there. But it's just
the answer to everything I think is just we had

(02:32:13):
to try to live like saints. I mean, if everybody
lived to the to the better angels, the whole world
would overnight become a better place. Everybody's trying to fix
go into all these marches and protests and all this nonsense,
and it's like, fix yourself first.

Speaker 2 (02:32:29):
If you fix you.

Speaker 8 (02:32:30):
And you just just be a good person, that's it.
Don't lie, don't cheat, don't steal, don't hurt your neighbor.
That alone, there'll be no more crime, right Why would
they be a crime? Crime is based on the human
doing something that he knows is spinful and knows is illegal,
and those is wrong. So instead of trying to fix
the world from the outside, you got to you gotta

(02:32:53):
fix it inwardly, you know, get closer to God and
understand that the infinite power and glory of God is
not a separate thing from you. It's within you. That
light is within you, and you just need to accept
it and let that connection grow and become stronger with

(02:33:16):
everything you do, and every good thing you do makes
it stronger. You feel closer to God from every good
thing you do, every good work you make.

Speaker 2 (02:33:24):
And I agree, yeah, yeah, it's a very powerful sermon
that they actually wound up doing as a lecturer as
to what is wrong with our society. I think because
when you look at the graffiti, not only did they
go into a place that was beautiful and uplifting and
they essentially tear it down with their ugliest stuff that

(02:33:45):
they put on it. And the most the ugliest thing
about what they were putting on there with their graffiti
was what it actually said. It was a rage against
God and his creation, every bit of it. And that's
really kind of os us where our society is. So
the Church of England is still setting the foundation for England,

(02:34:06):
it's just setting a Satanic foundation that is there.

Speaker 8 (02:34:10):
And absolutely, yeah, I mean that's a that's a purposeful defilement.
It's like putting the cross upside down. Like everything they
do is a version like the pentagram that the original
five point star was supposed to represent the five wounds
of Christ, and so the Satanists inverted it and turned
it into the pentagram. So those symbols are very important,

(02:34:34):
and imagery is important and they know that, and they
use it to their Satanic purposes.

Speaker 2 (02:34:42):
Yes, and the.

Speaker 8 (02:34:44):
Defilement of God and dishonoring of God and the and
we see the you know the result. Just look around you.
I mean it's like there's demons everywhere, and the demons
in ipla places and low places, and you know, a
society rots from the top down. I think it starts

(02:35:05):
with these people who just who design these so called
utopias for us, like the AI post human utopia. I
think they hate themselves, the misanthropes, and they project their
hatred self hatred onto humanity. And then if they can
destroy humanity, they can somehow destroy the parts of themselves

(02:35:26):
that they hate. Like in a Youngie and shadow sort.

Speaker 2 (02:35:28):
Of, I agree, Yeah, especially when you look at the
transgender stuff. The purpose of that is to take very
young and impressionable people, or maybe even somebody who's an
adult and that's very impressionable, like Christopher Beck who was
a Navy seal that they pushed into becoming a training.
But it's to train them to hate their body, to
hate themselves, and then to engage in self mutilation. And

(02:35:53):
so I think that is truly the satanic aspect of it.
Tell us little bit about your project Jesus Jesus Park
that you're working on. You've got to go fundme attached
to that as well, But tell us about that. I
think we've got a picture lance of that you can
show the audience of that.

Speaker 8 (02:36:10):
So free is that I just started, Yeah, I had this.
I had this dream. Is this vision David of of
this park and this beautiful sort of pastoral natural setting
with trees and rocks, and and I've done a lot

(02:36:36):
of imagery of Christ, and I wanted to create the
face of Christ out of all natural materials, like his
crown of thorns would be actual trees, like you know,
so the scale would be enormous, like his face might
take up a half acre or more. But it'll be
a place of a contemplation, a place of prayer, is

(02:37:00):
a place of peace, and for me to be a
labor of love and a devotion to God. And they
say it came to me in the dream download and
I just feel like I feel like I have. I
have to make this thing and while I still I'm
still young enough, which might be So that's what I'm

(02:37:26):
working on right now. And I do need some funds
to realize it, talking to some some churches and to
have land and trying to find the right spot for it.
But I think it would be an incredible lasting monument

(02:37:48):
and shrine really that I hope that people can enjoy.

Speaker 2 (02:37:53):
And so you'll be able to see the picture that
we've got. That'd be like an aerial view that people
will be.

Speaker 8 (02:37:58):
Able to see in my vision. You know, I've done
models of it and it's I mean, if it's on
a slight slope, you should be able to make out
his face from the ground, but you won't be able
to at the full picture. So maybe you know from
a drone shot or something like that, but you'll be
able to see what it is. And it looks great

(02:38:20):
in my dream, you know. Now I just have to
make it real.

Speaker 2 (02:38:23):
Have you got any You haven't got a sight for
it yet, but are are you angling for any particular
geographical area that would have Well.

Speaker 8 (02:38:31):
I live, Yeah, I live on Long Island and there's
this beautiful shrine out on the east end of Long
Island called Our Lady of the Island, and they have
I think about one hundred acres of land and there's
a full twenty foot marble sculpture married there's an outdoor
church that I go to there and it overlooks the

(02:38:52):
Great South Bay. It's just an incredible spot and they
have a lot of land there. So so I've reached
out to them. I don't know if it's going to
work out, but you know, there's a lot of logistics
and jobs, so it's going to take some planning in
a little time. But but I'm determined. So if I
have to at some point just buy a small piece

(02:39:15):
of land, maybe upstate New York, you can get an
expensive land. Whatever I have to do, you know, I'm
going to make this happen.

Speaker 2 (02:39:24):
Yeah, it's great. Well, you know, in Tennessee, land is
fairly cheap and they have a lot of unusual sites
for people to come see, so you might get a
lot of traffic there if you put it further south.

Speaker 8 (02:39:34):
But that's a good idea. I don't know much about it,
but I'll take it right down Tennessee. Why not.

Speaker 2 (02:39:40):
Yeah, instead of people going to see Rock City, they
can see the Jesus Park. That's there. Where can people
find the GoFundMe? How do they find that?

Speaker 8 (02:39:51):
You can find all of my thought crimes on if
you got just Anthony Frieda dot com Anthony fr dot
com like this links to all my projects there.

Speaker 2 (02:40:00):
Okay, good and and your book is not out yet?
Is it Thought Crimes of Anthony Frieda? Is that out yet?

Speaker 5 (02:40:07):
No?

Speaker 8 (02:40:07):
That's not, But that was the title was inspired by
an actual crime that was happened because of my artwork.
I did a book cover for C. J. Hopkins, who
wrote this book, The Rise and Full of the of
the New Normal, and I did a take off of

(02:40:29):
the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich that cover,
and I put the COVID mask with a little with
a swastika barely visible behind the mask, the COVID mask.
And they decided to charge him for disseminating Nazi propaganda
in Germany. And I got to go to he was

(02:40:49):
facing like the years in prison.

Speaker 2 (02:40:50):
Yeah I remember that.

Speaker 8 (02:40:52):
Yeah, So that was my book cover and all he
did was tweet that cover to get to get and dieted.
So that's a literal crime that I've been involved with
as an accessory.

Speaker 2 (02:41:05):
So they can't use the symbols of the Nazi re game,
but you can act like Nazis, and that's okay, right.

Speaker 8 (02:41:11):
No, right, no, But it's selectively enforced because you know
they're stern and magazines in Germany they'll show Trump in
full Hitler regalia all the time. That's just that's fine.
And if it's for the purposes of the left, they
get a pass. And CJ is not even a right
wing guy. He's just one of these guys who there's

(02:41:33):
a skeptic, he questions everything. Yeah, so it's kind of
ironic that they're using this illegal subversion of their own laws,
which is something the Nazis would do to prove that
they're not Nazis. You know, it's like, uh, there's a
lot of ironies there. But anyway, he has his ongoing
legal battle with them, and in Germany they don't have

(02:41:55):
double jeopardy like we do. So they charged him and
he went to trial and he was acquitted, and now
they're going to charge him again with the same crime.
Just kid, they can charging. They can keep coming until
they get the border they want.

Speaker 2 (02:42:08):
Wow. Wow, And it's not a new incident of anything.
It's for the same exact thing. Right, Well, we just
had somebody that was arrested here in Tennessee for a
meme that he put up and they got him in,
you know, two million dollar bond to get him out
of jail. And again it was because and we see
this kind of censorship is going on both the left

(02:42:30):
and the right. This was about the fact that this
guy didn't like Charlie Kirk or conservatives. And so there
was a school that was going to have an event
donnor Charlie Kirk, and he put up a meme that
he didn't even create, that other people had created. It
was a picture of Trump and it was a quote
about what Trumpet said about a school shooting, and it

(02:42:52):
said we got to get over this and move on.
And so he put that up as his comment about
the Charlie Kirk shooting. And because the place that he
did it was something that Perry, Idaho or something was
where the high school was that where the shooting had been,
and this was in Perry County, and they said, well,
you were trying to intimidate people here in Perry County

(02:43:15):
by using this meme that you didn't even create. And
so the sheriff arrested him for that two million dollar bail.
We're seeing free speech attacked everywhere, every country. Every political
philosophy is coming for speech because especially when we're looking
at memes or political commentary like you do, it's very

(02:43:35):
very powerful. They wouldn't be coming after it otherwise.

Speaker 8 (02:43:39):
Yeah, definitely. Well, I'm pretty certain he's going to win
that lawsuit, because that's that's rageous. I'm used as censorship
and I've been. I mean, I know you've been through
it too, just constantly. He platformed and demonetized and do
this and do that, and and by the way, everything

(02:44:01):
that I was, you know, censored for, turns out I
was right about.

Speaker 2 (02:44:05):
That's right.

Speaker 8 (02:44:06):
I was right about all of it, every single thing
I said. It was mostly about COVID. And then I'm
also fairly certain I was put on a domestic terror
list because Biden had a list of anyone who questioned
the COVID narrative was put on a list. Yeah, and
I would high profile about that. So, I mean, I'm
considered potential violent. They use the word violent, potential violent

(02:44:30):
domestic extremist terrorists if you were questioning COVID.

Speaker 2 (02:44:35):
That's right, Yeah, because they say that, you know, speech
is violence, and I say no, censorship is violence, and
the people who use and enforce censorship are the ones
who usually do resort to violence. But the other you know,
like arresting this guy. The sad thing is is that
you see that both sides the political spectrum, and I'm

(02:44:56):
talking about not just the politicians. I'm talking about the
grassroots people are cheering this kind of censorship if they
don't like what you have to say. We have lost
the understanding of the importance of free speech in our society,
and that includes America's not just in Europe, but it's
in America as well. People don't realize that these tools

(02:45:17):
of tyranny will be used against them eventually and have
already been used against them in many cases, and they
still are cheering this on. It's truly amazing. Get around it.

Speaker 8 (02:45:29):
Yeah, oh no, I've never seen the country so divide
it there's no room. That's why, you know, the Charlie
Kirk thing was so symbolic, because if you're not going
to talk, you're going to kill each other. And people
it's like, because they don't want to talk, they want
to kill And what is that? I mean? If you,
I know you're a great student of history, like, where

(02:45:51):
does this go? It goes one place called civil war,
That's where it goes. It's like, this is nothing new.
We've seen it thousands of times before, all throughout history.
This when there's a divide of this extreme nature, where
there's no communication, you're either good or evil, either with
me or against me, it leads to civil war. I mean,

(02:46:12):
I don't know how close we are to it, but
unless something radically changes, which I don't see any evidence of,
we're in some perilous times here.

Speaker 2 (02:46:21):
I agree. I agree, yeah, we have. We've lost our foundation.
You know, we've lost our foundation in terms of the principles
that made the West great. And we've lost our foundation
because we turned our back on God. That's what we
were talking about earlier, and that truly is the foundation
as the Lord Jesus Christ. And once we turn away
from that, we are adrift as a society. And so

(02:46:45):
even though we used to have guns everywhere, now the
guns are being turned on each other and being used
on us. And there's a lot of different aspects to it.
I think the heavy use of drugs is a part
of that. I think that even plays a role actually
in the technocrats. I had been told years ago that
when these guys would go hang out at the Burning
Man thing that they were dropping you know, LSD and

(02:47:08):
they were also taking what was that d MT or
something where they come in contact with machine elves. And
the interesting thing about this is that you hear from
the same people who are in different geographical areas. They
start talking about how they had the same types of encounters,
and they're channeling technology from these entities that they're coming

(02:47:29):
in contact with. And you can have people in radically
different places that have the same experiences that are there.
They even call them psycho knots, not nuts, but knots,
like an astronaut or something.

Speaker 8 (02:47:41):
And so that's yeah, it's interdimensional travel, I think. I mean,
they're opening a portal to Hell, for lack of a
better word. I mean, this tells another dimension, heavis dimension,
our plane is dimension, and those drugs somehow, I don't
know how it works. I can't even come close to
explain it. But it makes the veil between the dimensions permeable,

(02:48:07):
and they're able to permeate it with these substances, and
it's a dark energy and we're seeing it, and that's
connected the whole a I think we were talking about before. Yes,
and these drugs are facilitating it, and you're totally right.
But the other things when you turn away from God,
I mean Deeparktropa said, you leave a God shaped hole.

(02:48:27):
So what do you fill that hole with? You're going
to fill with drugs or porn or woke is or
something or satan. You know, it's like it has to
be filled because that's part of our human makeup that
we have to have something to believe in. So if
you don't fill with God, the alternatives are anti human

(02:48:50):
and they're satanic and they're dark. You're taking something that
should be filled with light and you're filling with darkness.

Speaker 2 (02:48:57):
That's right, absolutely well, you know it's kind of interesting.
Now use this quite a bit to h to attack
the pharmaceutical companies. I'd call them pharmakia because that's the
Greek term that's using. The New Testament frequently was transferred
translated as sorcery because people would include these lucinogenic drugs

(02:49:17):
as part of their spiritual experience and that type of thing.
That's very old thing. But also it talks about how
the pharmachia and the great men of the world would
not repent of their murders. That's how I was using
it for the pharmaceutical companies, and I thought it really fit.
But that really is what we're seeing. And with all
the technology that we've gotten, all of this idea about

(02:49:40):
how we are so scientific and materialistic and we don't
believe anything unless we can measure it well that we
have seen over and over again is simply not true.
The people that we disagree with are more than willing
to pursue by faith a lot of different things. Where
they talk about the climate change agenda or the pan
to make they accept a lot of stuff on the

(02:50:02):
basis of faith. It's just what they have faith in.
They have faith in these institutions, they have faith in
people who have credentials that say that they're a scientist
or an authority and something. So it's just a difference
in what they have faith in. But I think it's
very important what you're doing in terms of artwork that
gets to people on a different level than just talking

(02:50:24):
to them straight about the facts. You know, whenever we
can engage the emotions, and art does that, and you know,
movies do that. And Christians are starting to learn to
use the tools of movie making, and so I think
there's going to be some very important work that is
done there. But gradually the Christian movie industry is picking up.
But I think there's so much that's been lost in

(02:50:45):
terms of art work that would move people. I think
that what you're doing is very important.

Speaker 8 (02:50:51):
Well, thank you, David. Yeah, it's speaking of film. I
started working with a film production company. I think you're right.
The answer is to create a parallel need economy that
is in accordance with our values and then the values
of Western civilization and Christendom, the things that we have
faith in, things that we believe in, and a lot

(02:51:14):
of it's been sort of kind of hokey, kitschy stuff
up to this point, but we're trying to create with
man Alive Media group. This group i'm working with right now,
we're working on a film about World War One. We're
going to do a film about Joan of Arc and
we're trying to make them very high minded and to
the best of our ability, great pieces of art. Because

(02:51:35):
you're right, art speaks on a different level than just
there's a conversation. With some kind of conversation. It's like,
you know, poetry or prose. It's like it's something that
engages our mind in a different way and hopefully opens
up and our mind to this conversation. But we have

(02:51:55):
to be able to talk, and censorship is the enemy
of all of us, because then we're not talking, and
if we're not talking, we're probably shooting each other.

Speaker 2 (02:52:04):
Because so we make peaceful change impossible, we make violent
change inevitable. As Kennedy said, that's right, and I think
it's very important. You know, for the longest time, Christians
have retreated from the arts and they feel like the
best way to engage people is with a didactic aspect,
and of course there's value in that, but there's another

(02:52:25):
way to reach people, and that is by showing them,
you know, and portraying as a narrative. I just talked
to the author of Flags of Our Fathers, who's just
done a book on Vietnam. He spent ten years in
Vietnam talking to people there. And his name is James.
Was it James Bradley. I think it was Bradley or Bradley.

(02:52:47):
I'm sorry, I can't remember his last name, but very
interesting guy. And when he did this book, you know,
his previous books were nonfiction but he wanted to do
a fictional book because he said there was so many
any facets and so many different things that he had
to use fictional characters to bring them together. And so
not only does it engage our emotions more so if

(02:53:09):
we have a narrative story, but it also allows us
to pull together the relevant things in a way that
we couldn't if we had to stick to exactly what
the true story was. And Hollywood knows that for the
longest time go see something's based on true event, they
always change it, always begin this is based on a
true story, but the actual characters are fictionalized and so forth.
They always do that. And so I think it's good

(02:53:33):
the kind of projects that you mentioned there, when we're
talking about people living their life according to Christian principles,
I think that's probably the best way that that can
be done, rather than going in to the Bible and
then fictionalizing that. That always kind of rubs me.

Speaker 8 (02:53:48):
The wrong way.

Speaker 2 (02:53:49):
Yeah, trying to rewrite it.

Speaker 8 (02:53:51):
Yeah, it doesn't have to be didactic or so blatant,
like I mean, there was great Christian authors, you know,
and C. S. Lewis, and they were they were coming
up with their own mythology to sort of mirror Christian
themes without you know, saying literally, this is Jesus and
this is what happened. So, you know, Christianity to me

(02:54:16):
is a myth. That's true, yes, but we need to
create alternative myths to reinforce that myth, to bring people
to us, because it's just so boring to just you know,
tell the same story, even in brilliant filmmakers' hands, like
it's been done and it's so it's it's just going
to turn a lot of people off. But if you
do it in a way that's creative and original and

(02:54:37):
interesting and unexpected and entertaining and edifying, something different. Now,
Now it's the work of art on its own, not
just pastiche and not just biblical scripture translated into film.

Speaker 2 (02:54:52):
That's right. I remember the film critic Brian Godawa, and
he actually was able to do a film. I think
it was called To End All Wars. I'm not sure
about that, but it took place in American soldiers in
Japanese in term of prison camp during World War Two.
But his his whole idea is that very much like
you know, I think it was C. S. Lewis who

(02:55:13):
said that the Christian myth is the greatest myth and
it's real. You know, he doesn't mean that it's fictional.
He just means by myth, he means an epic story.
And so that was kind of Brian Goodawa's take on it.
He said, you know, every one of our really the
stories that really resonate with people always have a redemptive

(02:55:34):
arc in the story, and and he did a really
good job with that, and he also would kind of
draw that out in his film reviews that he did.
But that that I think is something that, you know,
if we're not going to be able to fight a
culture war, if we don't have culture. Someone said, I
think that's exactly true. Right, We're going in unarmed, right, I.

Speaker 8 (02:56:01):
Mean, yeah, it's staying the obvious, but yeah, I mean
we got listen, you know, it's on us, you know, Yeah,
I think it incumbent upon Christians of people who are means,
people who are creative, people who have talent or something
to give, like put it towards the cause, because the
other side certainly is you know, the Satanists and the
demons and the Lunatics and the Islamicists and the Marxists

(02:56:26):
like they're all on board. You know. You just watch
Netflix and there's messaging in every single thing they do,
so all anti Christian, anti mail, anti white, anti American,
and it's just I mean, it's so ham fisted, but
they shoehorned into everything. A story does nothing to do
with what they're talking about those you know, white people

(02:56:46):
are bad? What does that have to do with the
comedy I was watching? So you know, we could do
it more artfully. There's so many great artists and writers
out there that are Christian and we need to come
together and build these teams. And that's what I'm trying
to do in my own little way.

Speaker 2 (02:57:05):
That's great. So the best place for people to find
out how they can get your book when it's available,
and also to find out about the Jesus Park if
they want to get involved in they go fund me,
we need to go to your website, Anthony Frida, and
that is f R E d A dot com right,
so yes, for them to find you. Anthony has always

(02:57:25):
been great talking to you. I only had a chance
to meet you once and that was up at Jerrol's
event four years ago and his occupy piece thing. And
so when I saw that you had a book out there.
It's like, oh yeah, I definitely love to talk to
anything about that. You've got a great story to tell
and it's been a great journey that you've been on.
I really want to thank you for the work that

(02:57:47):
you have done. It's been very important and look forward
to a lot more to come from you in the future.
Thank you so much for joining us.

Speaker 8 (02:57:54):
Thank you, David.

Speaker 2 (02:57:55):
All right, thank you. Let me before we run out
of time, let me get to some of the comments
that are up here. And as Lance, my producer, said,
Jesus used parables and analogies. That's right, So we're following
in the right way when we use those type of
things as well. Some one of his favorite ways to
get a point across was to use a parable a

(02:58:18):
story about something. And in most cases, I think there
was at least one or two that were not fictional,
but they were all giving a story there. And so
crash and splash seventy five says the average lifespan of lithium
minor thirty years. So enjoy your battery, I said, like

(02:58:41):
a lot of these things, cobalt as well coal cobalt
is being dug out of the mines by young children
operating at slave wages and a situation that kills them.
So yeah, that is we have to understand this. Behind
a lot of this stuff, car insurances now hire to
pay for than battery burns, says Jolson's and Guard Goldsmith,

(02:59:04):
good to see the Guard. Liberty Conspiracy says. Last year,
the very US government bureau tasked with promoting EV travel
banned EV buys and scooters from being brought into their
Colorado building for fear of fire. That's right, Jason Barker,
nice the storm, good to see you. He says. AI
is good for memes, but not for real art, meme

(02:59:27):
images and music, and that's really what it does. I mean,
a meme just kind of picks up on a theme
and imitates it, and that's precisely what AI is. But
the real danger of AI is not that it's going
to become some self aware sky neet thing. I think
the real danger is that it is a very effective
tool for pulling together data and for doing searches and

(02:59:49):
surveillance that can be used to control us. That's really
where the devil is in that detail. Thank you so
much for joining us. Have a good day. The common man.

(03:00:14):
They created common Core and dumb down our children. They
created common Past to track and control us. Their commons
project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary,
But each of us has worth and dignity. Create it

(03:00:36):
in the image of God. That is what we have
in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they

(03:00:57):
want to hide. The information and links you'll find at
the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you
for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep
us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2116: Tomahawks for Peace: More Trump War Lies

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2116: Tomahawks for Peace: More Trump War Lies

Stuff You Should Know