Tue Episode #2150: MAGA Media: Operation Mockingbird 2.0

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
It's Tuesday, the second of December, You're our Lord, twenty
twenty five. Well, we're going to take a look at
what is happening with money, with Krypto, the many different

(00:57):
options that are out there with AI that is coming
at us. Is it going to cause a collapse of civilization?
If so, how and when? And what have we seen
in terms of civilizational collapse in the past. Interesting article
from The Atlantic skipping the fourth turning by Strauss and
how that point of view, but still coming to the

(01:19):
same conclusion seeing a cycle of civilizational rise and fall
over five thousand years and what drives that, Well, it's
the kind of concentration of health and power represented by
big tech and big government. And we are right at

(01:40):
the cusp of this. Will they be able to succeed
Even if they do, it will not be sustainable for
them except for a couple of generations. What are some
of the alternatives. And we're going to take a look
at the amazing lies that are coming from the White
House about what is either a an amazing war crime

(02:02):
or mass murder. We'll be right back. Well, as I
said at the beginning, I want to start with an
overview of where we are. And I think it is
always good for us to get the big picture. Occasionally
it's interesting. We've got to have it's not just interesting,
but we've got to have the details. You if we're

(02:23):
on the right track here, but we need to pull
back and take a look at the overall view. And
that's what I want to do for just a moment
here before we get into some of the details. Lessons
from five thousand years of civilizational collapse. And this is
coming from the Atlantic, which is a big government, leftist establishment,
globalist NATO type of perspectiveness. They said. In the Middle Ages,

(02:48):
prophesies of a coming global collapse proliferated across Europe. Historian
Norman Cohen has written that parts of Western Europe witnessed
the emergence of what was called miss movements of the poor,
and almost every instance, he argued, a collective sense of
impotence and anxiety and envy suddenly discharged itself in a

(03:12):
frantic urge to smite the ungodly, to seize wealth and power,
and to hold it for all eternity, as they pointed out, Well,
as I said, I looked into asymmetric warfare because the
Obama administration was ramping up and practicing for the type
of stuff that Donald Trump is doing right now. Isn't
that interesting?

Speaker 3 (03:32):
You know?

Speaker 2 (03:33):
I talked about the left right March of tyranny and
the fact that it's not the Republicans, the Democrats. It's
not the lefty or the righty or however they identify
themselves that really wields the power. It's the Pentagon. It's
the CIA. And at the time, the Pentagon was talking
about how we're going to have everybody in the cities
and there's going to be open conflict in world. We'll
have to put the troops in the cities. And I've

(03:54):
played the video for you more recently. That's about a
ten year old video. And when Biggs and I went
to the Asymmetric Warfare Center and and uh, what was
in uh fort Let's see what was that fort hood?
It was apl Yeah. Uh and uh they renamed it
because can't have something named after Confederate general. Just wait

(04:19):
and see what we name these these things redicular anyway, Uh,
the uh when we got in there, and that was
a very interesting one of the most I said. I
was more concerned about that than it was the Bundy
Ranch standoff, because the military is far more dangerous than
bl Blam was threatening to shoot you, but you know,

(04:41):
the military, as we see, will kill you without any threats.
So uh the uh. And we were arrested for quite
a while there. But anyway, the when I was doing
research on it, that was exactly what all these generals
were saying. You know, when they go into places like
Iraq and Afghanistan and blow the place up and then
put boots on the ground to occupy and to basically

(05:05):
rebuild it and their image using their puppets, they got
into what they called asymmetric warfare. Okay, we got the
big guns, and we've got the big planes and the
big bombs, but then when we get boots on the ground,
we have to deal with this insurgency that is there
and the guerrilla warfare. And they said, what motivates people

(05:25):
is not religious. The religious stuff comes later. What motivates
them is this sense of despair, and that's the way
the thing begins. Listen, the collective sense of impotence, anxiety,
and envy, because you go into a country line that
you destroy everything, then you occupy it with the big
military force. What happens people, especially the ones who have

(05:47):
been successful, and usually they said the leaders were well educated,
maybe they had some kind of a technical feel that
they were in and they were the ones who started
organizing things because they were the ones who felt, I think,
the loss of a future. And so when people feel
like they have no future, as Joel Slyn says, when

(06:09):
people lose everything, they lose it. That's a great way
to summarize, whether they're talking about with asymmetric warfare. And
then of course they will turn to religious motivation and
as they fall back on stude because you have to
have some principles, even if you get the wrong ones. Today,
the conditions for apocalypticism, it's interesting word. Gaping inequality, pandemics,

(06:34):
rapid technological development are amply present. Well. The reality is
is that none of these things are just circumstantial. They
are all deliberate, planned and in our face by the
people who are doing it. We all see that. The
hopefully not a lot of people see it, but I
think this audience sees that the pandemic was planned and

(06:57):
a scam or otherwise you'll probably still would not be listening
to me. He would turn me off because you'd be
upset about that. But the end of the world vibes
in many of the domains of politics and culture and
apocalyptic impulse to destroy the federal bureaucracy and to re
establish patriarchal or how about matriarchal. Right, that's what the

(07:19):
people at Atlantic want to do. They want to establish
a matriarchy. They always say patriarchal. Christian supremacy right has
been blamed for fueling the rise of the Maga movement.
Peter Til has recently spoken of the coming Antichrist to
sold out audiences in San Francisco. I got to say,

(07:40):
only to some publication that is so far left wing
as the Atlantic, would they take Peter Tele as somebody
seriously speaking about Christianity. What is notable now is that
apocalyptic angst has become constant, said a British writer. He
all flow and no ebb. Donald Trump is seen as

(08:04):
a religious hero who will smite the political establishment. That
is absolutely true. But again they don't talk about the
fourth turning. They have a and yet they validate it
at the same time they talk about research being done
by a guy in a new book. His name is
Luke Kemp. He's affiliated with the University Cambridge Center for

(08:27):
the Study of Existential Risk. He says, this moment we
have to understand, he says, shows that it's something like
it has already happened many, many times over. So if
we go back five thousand years of human civilization, he
identifies the commonalities among recurring societal collapses, but he also

(08:50):
argues that these events are not only potential learning experiences,
but also inflection points in the history of humanity, many
of which have been in certain ways productive. I think
that's interesting because that is why I Straussen Howe struck
home so with me, is because I'd looked at that

(09:11):
and I thought, you know, it's interesting seventy you know,
seventy eighty year cycles between the creation of the US
government and when it was destroyed by Lincoln and the
Civil War. The US government is not anything at all
like the Republic that the founders put in, nothing at

(09:32):
all like it. And just as when you look at
the Soviet Union, you know, created in nineteen seventeen, fell
in nineteen eighty nine. I think so seventy two years
there still there's a lot of overlap, a lot of similarity,
a lot of nostalgia between the two. You see when

(09:53):
you talk to people like what was his name, the
Russian guy I interviewed, I can't.

Speaker 4 (10:01):
Remember his name anyway, Alexander Dugan, thank you, Thank you.

Speaker 2 (10:05):
I've got to rely on you more and more for
names as I'm getting older. Anyway, when you look at
Alexander Dugan, he did not reject lenen and communisting, so
that's part of our history. He embraced it well in
the same way. You know, you have Americans who will
embrace the ideas and some of the cultural aspects of

(10:28):
the American Revolution, but they've completely rejected it and their
worldview and their government view. And so when I saw that,
I thought, well, that's kind of interesting because I've seen
that kind of a cycle. This guy has gone back
and he sees the same type of thing matured. You
have a society that grows and goes through four generations,
and people see how corrupt and non effective it has become,

(10:52):
they change it. Usually there's massive economic there's always massive
economic change, usually war, and then out of the ruins
they build another civilization, and then they keep repeating that
about every four generations. That's what this guy sees as well.
He says, crises can be good for you. The destruction
of capital of temples, palaces, manners, monuments, bathhouses, wealthy properties

(11:14):
all disproportionately hurt the rich, though calamities such as disease, famine,
war tend to bring greater harm to the poor. Those
who managed to survive the wipeout event, he says, are
left with more bargaining power with bosses and landlords, though
because there are fewer people with whom to compete. The
technology has changed some of that calculus as well. But

(11:36):
he gives some evidences of this in historical times, and
again we have seen ample evidence of this repeating. Here's
the bottom line, he said, Our global goliath will die
explosively unless we kill it first. Is it going to
take us all? We look at this global system that

(11:59):
they have created, we can see how it is fraying
around the edges. And of course Trump has accelerated this
by coming in and with terrorists and economic issues that
I think will ultimately lead to a larger war. He
argues that a new silicon goliath is emerging, composed of

(12:19):
mass surveillance technology, data centers, artificial intelligence, and data itself
a crucial new lootable resource. He said. He worries that
unless citizens rise up as an army of David's, it's
going to get really bad. Well, here's a lesson that
we need to understand about this. You know, yeah, David

(12:41):
killed Goliath, but it was ultimately God who killed Goliath.
And we have to understand that God doesn't need horses
and chariots to accomplish this stuff. He can do it
with a small group of people. And of course that
sociologist says who said that the only thing that's ever

(13:04):
changed society is a small, committed group of people, I
would say that that is a reflection of God and
that he is moving in those people. Battle belongs to
the Lord.

Speaker 5 (13:16):
Yes, really shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the story of
David and Goliath. He says, we army of David's slinging stone.
It's a very effective weapon.

Speaker 2 (13:26):
That's right. That's right, and so and we'll talk a
little bit more about what that looks like here. He
offered some ideas such as rejecting for profit AI models
in terms of decentralized and collaborative ones. Another route would
be to refuse to work for entities that Kemp calls
agents of doom. And so then, because this is the Atlantic,

(13:46):
he says, well, that would be like AI Labs, or
a fossil fuel company or an arms manufacturer or whatever.
And I would say, just the government about that, that
is the agent of Let's just go right to the
top and the of all this stuff. Refused to work
for the CIA, refused to work for DARPA, and I
would say increasingly, refused to work for the government at

(14:07):
any level in any capacity that's there. Well, how do
we actually work with this? The Lovers of Power NPR
then has an idea and again I think it's kind
of idiotic and quixotic at the same time, an independent
effort so that AI is the secret to topple two

(14:29):
party power in Congress. I saw that headline. I thought,
are they now proposing in the US that we have
just like what was the name of that country I
talked about this last week again I got to code
to you for names where they said we've had so
much corruption that we have now made AI our minister
because we can't trust people. And I think that was

(14:50):
it was Albania, Albania. Yeah, I want to say Serbia,
but I knew it wasn't Serbia. Albania, is it? So
we can't trust people anymore. So we're going to get
AI not understanding at all that AI is actually Indians
or actually been indoctrinated, right, AI actually indoctrinated with their

(15:13):
biases and their prejudices and so forth, and controllable by
somebody who is behind the curtain and you can't see them.
And so what they're suggesting is that they use AI
in the way that I think AI really has been
designed for and the way that it is the most dangerous,
and that is for surveillance and control, for monitoring, and

(15:37):
for manipulation. They said. One organization is suggesting that AI
can go beyond making daily life more convenient. I haven't
seen that yet, have you. It says the key to
reshaping American politics, They said, what we're trying to do
would be impossible without AI. The goal is to elect

(15:57):
a handful of independent candidates to the House of Representatives
in twenty twenty six, using AI to identify districts where
independents could succeed and uncover Diamond and the rough candidates
Now this is essentially what Elon Musk was talking about
when we said we need to have a third party.
These people are making a plea to Elon Musk for money,

(16:21):
because what they point out is that with Congress so
evenly divided, that if you've got a handful of a
couple of dozen people, you could have the balance of power,
and you could magnify that by being the swing vote.
And that's precisely what Elon Musk was saying. So we
need to have a third party. We only need to
get a few candidates elected to Congress in order to

(16:43):
wield that kind of power. And so they said, this
is a bold proposition. The system has not seen a
new independent candidate win a House seat in thirty five years.
You might want to ask why that is the case.
You see the Republicans and Democrats and whoever it is,

(17:04):
it's got control of the redistricting. You know, this is
why the fight is going on now between Texas and
California and so forth. They understand that it isn't the
voters picking the candidates, it's the candidates picking the voters
and counting the votes, right, and so that's where the
redistricting comes in. And that's where the computer really comes

(17:24):
into play. They can go in a very precisely pick
who it is that they want. This whole article is
very naive in that regard, especially considering the very public
fight that's going on right now between Democrat controlled and
Republican controlled states. To say we're going to read district
these areas so that we can get more candidates of

(17:47):
our party elected. It's so easy for them to do
that with the computers that they have now. And so
what these people are doing is they're saying, well, you know,
we can go and we can monitor the public. And
that's really what AI is set up to do. It's
set up to monitor and to manipulate. Said, when we
do a poll, we take a snapshot of what somebody
is thinking. But then as they're driving home listening to

(18:10):
the radio, maybe something changes their mind. They get home
and they've completely switched their view on that particular issue.
We can capture that in real time. Well, how are
they going to do that? Largely through social media? That's
what social media was designed for. That's why it was
a tool created by DARPA. It was DARPA's idea. JC R.

(18:32):
Licklider in the early nineteen sixties, came up with the idea,
they couldn't they couldn't practically implement it until technology caught
up in the late nineties. And that's why the CIA
openly jumped in with a venture capital firm, Incutel, which
they've always manipulated corporations and supported them the ones that

(18:53):
would do what they wanted. But they needed to do
it big and they needed to do it fast, so
they went public with it. Basically didn't make it secret anymore.
And it's not just ink you tell. If you go
back and you look at the board of directors and
the venture capital companies that support them. On the boards
of these venture capital companies, you would see all these

(19:16):
people from the intelligence agencies NSSAY, the CIA and so forth.
They were picking the contestants knowing that there was going
to be a competition and a shakeout and they would
have the strongest one. But whoever won, they first knew
that these people were going to be compliant with them,
as we have seen and so yeah, data shows that

(19:39):
there's a huge rise in moderate and independent voters who
don't like either party. The problem is that they're captured
by the Hegelian dialectic and that kind of thinking. It's
either this one or that one, Republican or Democrat. And
you always see this pattern, because I've been involved in
third party politics. You always see that people are disgusted

(20:01):
with Republicans and Democrats and they've been betrayed over and
over again. And so somebody comes out. If they're articulate
and they have some good ideas, they rise in the polls.
Maybe they get up, maybe they're polling at ten fifteen
percent or something like that. As you get closer and
closer to the election, the Sigellian dialectics, you can't let
this other team win. So you've got to abandon your

(20:23):
hope of having any real change and vote for the
usual suspect over here. That is the party that you've
always voted for, and it always melts away. We've seen
this over and over again. They think it's going to
be different. The independent center is the one that's doing it.
They so their strategists are not political newbies. Brandon who

(20:44):
served as president of Freedom Works, a conservative grassroots group
that helped to turn tea party activists into a political
force before closing its doors last year. And I've had
some interaction with Freedom Works. I want a contest with him.
It's a two thousand and nine I think, and there's

(21:06):
a cash PI is plus a trip to Chicago that
Karen and I went up there so we you know,
won for the video and got a chance to ride
segways around Chicago where nobody knew me. I didn't, I
didn't care about. I liked, but it was a lot
of fun. But that was when Dick Army was there
and there was a power struggle within Freedom Works. He

(21:30):
got pushed out. Never really recovered from that. And yet
these guys have been in politics for a long time
and we look at the Tea Party activism. I think
that is really what the true issue here is, and
that's what's missing in all of this stuff. They said,
we can go out and we do a poll and
we only know what somebody thinks at that moment in time,

(21:52):
but we can constantly monitor them using AI. And then
we can go in and we can use economic data.
I've read it LinkedIn all these other things, and we've
got a proprietary tool to pull that stuff together and
we can see, you know, where the best districts are
for our candidates to run well. The problem is is

(22:14):
that the other side is doing that as well. The
Republicans or the Democrats have already done that to create
the districts. They've already created districts that are going to
be won by their party, and so they're playing catch
up here and they don't really have anything that is
really new, I don't think, and so they're trying to

(22:36):
understand coursues and concerns of voters and to hunt for
districts that are ripe for an independent candidate to swoop in.
So they said, you know, we might go into one
that has been flipping back and forth, fifty percent Republican,
fifty percent Democrat going there. The thing is that if
you're going to go in and you're going to pick

(22:58):
your politicians and pick your policies based on polling, then
what you're going to be doing is you're going to
be pandering. You're not going to be setting up principles.
We need somebody who's going to lead. You know that
if you just get the politicians are doing this already,
and the way I see AI bringing this stuff together

(23:19):
is just going to add more froth and volatility to
the whole process. People are going to be you know,
if you don't have a rudder, you're blown about by
every win, by every issue, you are blown about by
the constantly changing issues. And that's not leadership. That's simply politics.

(23:40):
It's not statesmanship. You've got a fickle public and you've
got fickless politicians. And that's what's the downfall of our
society here, these pandering politicians. What this country needs that
we don't have. So we need a foundation, we need
a worldview, we need a fullt we need God basically

(24:03):
as the basis of that. That's what was different about
the American Revolution. That's why they did not accrue all
power to themselves. And so they said, well, so we're
looking at things like voter participation rates, which districts have
really low turnout because these people are not excited to
go to the ballot box. He's also looking at districts
with younger voters who might embrace the independent message. How

(24:26):
about looking at your message. How about focusing on trying
to push a philosophy, a foundation that is going to
support our society, a rudder that is going to guide us.
None of that is here. This is just simply more
noise and more static. The point to one incident where

(24:50):
a candidate was poised to run in their home district,
AI showed the district next door is a better bet,
thirty minutes away, the perfect fit. And that's what that
is going to do, because we found that they matched
up perfectly without other district. Well, if you're running for Congress,
which is what they've been talking about, it doesn't matter
where you live. I mean, I lived in Raleigh and

(25:10):
I ran for Congress in Charlotte. It was a pain
in the neck to get over there to speak, but
and to put up signs. I put up all the
signs myself. I bought several hundred signs and then I
put them all up and I took them all down
after the election.

Speaker 4 (25:27):
Was I vaguely remember riding around in the car with
you guys.

Speaker 2 (25:31):
You were in the car set facing backwards and you
watched me putting all this stuff in the van. But yeah,
that was a real pain in the neck. But it
doesn't matter what district you live in. You just have
to live in the state. That's kind of a secret.
People don't understand one criticism. They acknowledge that here often
is the idea of spoilers. Non winning candidates whose presence

(25:54):
on the ballot effects which candidate will win. He said,
it's a partisan archaic line. What's wrong with spoiling something
that people don't like. That's the way I always figured
out looked at it. You know, people said, well, do
you sound a lot like the Republicans in terms of
economics and other things like that. It's like, yeah, but
they don't care about liberty or the Constitution, And I

(26:15):
don't care if they lose their distinction without a difference
really to the Democrats. And you have to look at
it that way. And I was there. The reason I
ran was not because I wanted to go to Congress.
I gotta say, there was nothing that I would want
less than to live and work in Washington, especially in
the kind of system that is run by the speaker

(26:38):
and the kind of parliamentary rules that lock you down
where you can't do anything. But I ran because we
didn't have social media, we didn't have any better way
to get the message out. So we ran to try
to get people to focus on the Constitution, to focus
on liberty. And when I ran, when I would speak,
I said, you know, Gingrich just flipped everything over because
he had his ten point proposition is what do you

(27:05):
call it? His plan for America? Anyway, he had ten items.
I said, well, here's my ten items. It's the Bill
of Rights, and here's how was the contract with America. Yeah,
that's it. And so I said, here's my contract with America.
It's called the Bill of Rights, and here's how every
one of those are being violated right now anyway.

Speaker 5 (27:26):
And of course, anytime we talk about third parties, I
feel the need to mention that there can't be a
consistent third party. Well, and there's first past the post voting.
It always devolves into a two party system when you
have first past the post, which is why I think
the typical one that you see, the runoff election ones

(27:48):
is an improvement, but the approval voting is the best one,
since that one is easier to telling.

Speaker 2 (27:54):
That's right, absolutely right lanes. And that's one of the
reasons why the Republicans are so laser focused on this,
because they know if a party is going to be replaced,
it's going to be the Republican Party and it should
be replaced. So, as they said, the Republican Democrats, stablishments
live in a world that is either coke or Pepsi,
Ford or Chevy, MSNBC or Fox News. That's fine for

(28:15):
people that watch MSNBC and Fox News, but everybody else
we don't live and that binary system anymore. But you do,
and you will as long as it's first past the post.
I mean, from the ballot access, to the districting and
the way that they select the voters, to the way

(28:36):
that the votes are counted, and to the whole system
where it's first past the post. You have such a
lock on this particular system. I don't really see it breaking.
I think what's going to break is going to be
when the dollar crashes, and we're going to talk about
that coming up here. But of course, fin Sheall Hobby

(28:57):
also points out the AI revolution is about to crash
due to a lack of human labor. That's right, you know.
Isn't it interesting that as they want to replace all
of us, they don't have the labor that's there to
build their data centers. They want to take all electricity
and power away from us, They want to take all

(29:17):
economic power away from us, all electrical power away from us.
They don't want us to have jobs, and yet they
can't find enough humans to build their data centers kind
of a bootstrap issue here, isn't it. And it makes
you wonder exactly how they think that this whole thing
is sustainable when you don't have humans with jobs to

(29:39):
buy their products. That was the whole thing Henry Ford
pointed out. He said, well, I want my workers to
be able to afford my cars. They don't want any workers,
and so the whole thing is a house of cards
that is not sustainable. The new price of eggs is
the political shock of the cost of data centers on

(30:03):
our electric bills. And don't look to the Republicans for
any help on this. The Republicans have been completely bought
out by a big tech on this issue, and they're
not going to do anything to help with that. They're
seeing it particularly in Virginia, and because Virginia is close

(30:23):
to where so many of the big data centers are there,
because that is the real application for artificial intelligence. It
is a government control. So data centers are a gold
rush for construction workers. Surging demand means that many are
getting six figure salaries and more perks. Things are going

(30:47):
to get even more real when it all collapses. Chinese
authorities are even worried now about humanoid robots. Isn't that interesting?
The country that has always been built on labor, Now
they are jumping into the mechanical slaves, which is what
robot means. It's the check word for slave, and they're

(31:09):
even concerned about it. But it really is about surveilling
speech and threatening our privacy rights. As a matter of fact,
do we still have that in the deck? The guy
who was arrested because of meme in the UK? Okay,
that article coming up. We'll look for this and we'll

(31:29):
talk about that article later. We've got a couple of
comments before we take a break.

Speaker 4 (31:33):
Trapl that's right in Theburu twenty twenty nine voting strategy
for twenty twenty six midterms. Change the party, get ballot,
don't vote party switching alone will scare the hell out
of the parasites. Not handing in the ballot will send
a message.

Speaker 2 (31:46):
That's true. That's true. That's a good idea. I like that.
Change your party, does everybody chang switch partners?

Speaker 4 (31:54):
Musical chairs? Guard goldsmith AI is like soilent green people
at its core.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
Yeah, that's right that it consumes people and consumes what
they produced and imitates them. It truly is satanic in
the sense that it's all based on imitation and theft,
and that's what's that's what Satan doesn't create anything. He
steals things, and that pretends that he created them.

Speaker 4 (32:21):
I would have more seen soilent green as Indians Ai
is actually Indians.

Speaker 2 (32:30):
Yeah, they've done that so many We've talked about that
so many times as a running joke. You know this, uh,
this one robot that they set up to be a
domestic helper. What it is. It's actually just a camera
and you've got a bunch of people that are watching
it and manipulating it. And so you're paying for people

(32:51):
to have a remote control robot that they can walk
around your house and spy on you and listen to you.

Speaker 4 (32:56):
Yeah, I wonder what kind of person is going to
apply for that job. Really, nobody nefarious or creepy. Yeah,
that's right, to watch you all the time.

Speaker 2 (33:06):
They've done that. Sorry, they've done that in grocery stores
as well. You know where you go in and it's like, oh,
we're just gonna scan your look at your cart and
will total up the prices. They've actually got Indians who
are actually being paid to watch all the stuff and
tally it as people put it in or taken out
of their cart. Sorry, Lance, go ahead. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (33:24):
The idea of that robot was that eventually it will
be AI, or they'll have it set up. They'll always
have a camera connection to your robot. But when you
give it a new job that it doesn't know how
to do, that's when a human will take over and
then it will teach it how to do that, and
then it will just refer back to that video of
the human doing it. So it has a rough idea
in the future, at least that's what they hope, but

(33:46):
in fact, right now it's one controlled remotely.

Speaker 2 (33:51):
Yeah, that's a that's the people who have more money
than since where they buy into that thing.

Speaker 4 (33:58):
Sadly, with how dumb many Americans are, no matter how
poor they are, a lot of them still have more
money than since the real octo spook. AI is like
a vehicle, farm, tool, knife, machete, gunn It's benign. Only
the user determines its use and purpose.

Speaker 2 (34:15):
And I agree with that, because if you're using AI online,
you have become their data and they're spying on you
and other things like that. However, it is now possible
to download a lot of the AI tools. That's the
way we operate with it. You can download them locally,

(34:36):
and now you're not dealing with these different companies and
they're not getting the data from you, they're not getting
paid by you as well. There's so many free AI
tools out there that Lances put together and has set
up a computer to simply do that. So we're getting
that together. Hopefully we'll be able to do more stuff.
I would ultimately, I would like to have an angry

(34:57):
Trump reading his screaming tweets instead of me reading it
to you. So we'll see if we can get that in. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (35:04):
I was gonna have a little set up, but then
I got sick over the weekend.

Speaker 2 (35:07):
Yeah yeah, yeah, this last Thanksgiving weekend, we were hoping
we were going to get caught up on a lot
of things. Instead we got much further behind. Both Karen
and Lance were very sick through Thanksgiving. This is Karen's
second Thanksgiving in a row where she was throwing up profusely.
Last year. Our daughter was here from Texas and she

(35:28):
did Thanksgiving dinner. This year because of Karen's brother dying,
Travis's wife had already planned on doing Thanksgiving dinner, so
that part of it worked out for those of us
who could eat. But I know Karen's not faking it
because you can't fake what the way she was throwing up.

(35:49):
She was feeling really.

Speaker 4 (35:50):
Bad at that point. The faking is worse than whatever
you were trying to get out of. You know, there
has to be a trade off. You know, Ferris Bueller
wouldn't be the same movie if he literally made himself
so ill that he just had to lay in bed
the entire time to get out of school.

Speaker 2 (36:04):
Yeah, if she could throw up like that, she'd be Bolemix.
So in no time at all.

Speaker 4 (36:11):
We've got real. Jason Barker districts should be mapped by
zip code, very simple. I don't know enough about the
way these things operate to say whether if that would
fix the problem, But Jason's got a lot of good ideas,
so I'd be willing to give it a shot.

Speaker 2 (36:27):
That'd be one way to get it out of them
picking the districts by computer. But even before they had
the kind of sophisticated data mining that AI gives them,
they were very very good at picking the voters. I
remember the congressional districts. I had one of them in
North Carolina. They just went down a major highway and
they could look at voter registration, which is what they

(36:47):
were doing, and they were hopping from one side to
the other of the major highway. I remember one of
the people was running, this is crazy trying to get
in touch with these people because of the way this
thing is drawn. But they did it before they had computers.
That's why they called it jerrymandering. They could figure out
that type of thing, but it really has made it
into a very detailed science. Now, well, we're gonna take

(37:11):
a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.

Speaker 6 (37:16):
I wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot com
for just thirteen ninety nine. It's right in the second
flour there.

Speaker 7 (37:26):
See what'd you wish?

Speaker 3 (37:31):
Do it?

Speaker 7 (37:31):
Well, not just one wish, a whole hat flog.

Speaker 6 (37:34):
First, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase
the Christmas Night Album.

Speaker 7 (37:39):
Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics like.

Speaker 2 (37:41):
We are you gonna throw it on?

Speaker 8 (37:42):
I want the Christmas Night Album too.

Speaker 7 (37:47):
Yeah, that's pretty good.

Speaker 9 (37:52):
Hello, girls, can't you come out to can't You Come.

Speaker 6 (37:57):
David's Christmas Night album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
all New. I'll be home for Christmas.

Speaker 7 (38:08):
What do you want?

Speaker 2 (38:09):
You want the moon?

Speaker 6 (38:11):
Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
pull it down.

Speaker 7 (38:14):
I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album.

Speaker 6 (39:04):
In a.

Speaker 1 (39:45):
S you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (41:11):
Well, if you want to get home for the holidays
this year, it could cost you a lot more. We
have TSA has just decided arbitrarily and capriciously that they're
going to charge people a forty five dollars fee a
fine if you don't have real ID. It's always about
the money, isn't it. That's what I said about the

(41:32):
COVID stuff. All these people then you're crazy. It's a
bad Democrat governors. It's not Trump, and it's not all
these others. It's not the federal government. It's bad Democrat governors.
It's like you really don't understand how things work. It's
always done with bribery and with financial blackmail. That's the
way they get past the tenth Amendment. And this is

(41:53):
another example of how the bureaucracy is out of control.
Where do they get the authority to levy a fine
like this? Something like that onto be coming from Congress. Right,
we shouldn't have Trump imposing tariffs, and we shouldn't have
the TSA imposing forty five dollars fees on us. They
had originally proposed, and this is a something's already published

(42:16):
in a paper. They put the stuff out and say, well,
you know, this is what we're thinking about doing. Give
us your feedback, and they don't care what your feedback is.
Originally they were talking about making it eighteen dollars. Then
they decide, now let's go with forty five. What stops it?
Where does it stop? If they want to make sure
that you don't fly unless you've got real ID, they
don't have to wait for Congress to pass along. They

(42:38):
don't have to make a loss, and you can't fly
if you don't have real ID. They can just find
you and make that happen that way. So if you
haven't upgraid.

Speaker 5 (42:46):
That we have TSA to keep us safe from these
terrafts that don't have real ID or forty five dollars
to get around this.

Speaker 2 (42:54):
That's right. Well, you know these guys who took down
the Twin Tours by flying the planes and to them
they must add some really good ID because they found
it on the rubble. You know, it survived the explosion
and the fires and everything else, and they managed to
find these things, so we knew who the guys were.
They had really good ID. How do I get ID
like that that's indestructible.

Speaker 5 (43:15):
Well, that's certainly not real ID though, that's a fake ID.

Speaker 2 (43:20):
Yeah. Forty five dollars fee for people without real ID
comes after the TSA started requiring the identification or other
approved documents in May, and so since people didn't get it,
since it was required, now you're going to have to
have it. The TSA warned that people without real ID
could enter increased weight times at airports while their identities

(43:43):
are verified. You know, we could get rid of all
these weight times at the airport if we got rid
of the TSA. That's where the bottleneck is. And quite frankly,
they have created the biggest security threat with these long
bottleneck lines. That's where the terrorist would attack if they attacked.
But the TSA knows that there's no threat against airports

(44:04):
or airplanes. They said that in twenty eleven that information
that was part of a lawsuit was accidentally published by
them on pacer dot gov, and then they discovered that
they put up the unredacted version, and then they put
up the redacted version for us so we could conveniently
go in and see what they didn't want us to know.
But they know that there was no threat to airports airplanes,

(44:26):
and if there had been a threat to airports airplanes,
they would not have been able to stop it. They
have been totally ineffective whenever they've been tested. They won't
say because it's national security secret. No, it's job security
secret that they fail probably eighty ninety percent of the time.
But so if there had been a real threat, we
would have had more attacks, but there never was a

(44:47):
real threat. There wasn't a real threat on nine to
eleven either. This is an agency that was created to
stop an imaginary threat, just like the pandemic. Like I
said before, the COVID pandemic is the other shoot drop
from the nine to eleven lie. Both of them were
based on lies about things that didn't exist. We didn't
have a virus, we didn't have a pandemic, we didn't

(45:09):
have terrorists on airplanes. They've just used these lies to
impose the surveillance state on us.

Speaker 4 (45:17):
The lie of the TSA is blatantly obvious on its
face when you just look at who is employed. This
is not Jason Bourne or Sherlock Holmes. They're not going
to stop a terrorist attack. This is generally very overweight,
middle aged to elderly individuals or sometimes foreign nationals who

(45:40):
now work for the government harassing you. Yeah, these people,
these people do not care about protecting you. They are
simply there to collect a check. And even if they
did care, they couldn't do anything about it. The last
time I was in an airport, most of the TSA
agents English was their second language. These people are not

(46:00):
loyal to America. Do you think this person is going
to see a terrorist and go it is now my
duty to sacrifice myself for the good of America and
the American people. No. No, Just on its face who
they hire shows what it's really about, and it's homeless.
Do you have real ID I don't think so.

Speaker 2 (46:20):
Okay, I believe so. If you and your wife, it's
going to be one hundred bucks yep or okay, like
buy another ticket. And I don't know if they if
your one year old son will have to have a
real idea or another forty five right for him, But anyway,
they said that it could increase your weight time, which
is what the TSA is really all about. And it's
all about obedience training. Right. This is positive operant conditioning.

(46:43):
It's what b. F. Skinner said, right, you do what
I want. In other words, you know this is negative.
In other words, I'm going to punish you because you
didn't get real id. But the basic premise of the
TSA is you do what I want. You know, you
go through this machine, or you let me put my
hands on you and then you can fly. Here's your reward, right,

(47:05):
and that is a much more effective way to train animals,
which is the way they see us. The policy, though, however,
creates a bizarre situation where your identity expires like a
carton of milk. So you pay them forty five dollars
because they say, well, we have to run this through

(47:25):
a system. And this is as ridiculous as banks charging
you a special fee because you've got to check from
Canada or something like that. It's like, come on, you
don't have to charge ten percent of the check or
something like that. So they're going to check you through
their verification system and make sure that you are paying

(47:46):
not taxpayers or footing the bill for the advanced verification system. However,
once they go through this advanced verification system, the system
is so advanced that it can't remember who you were
if you stay more than ten days. So if you
take a two week vacation and you don't have real ID,
you got to pay forty five dollars, going forty five

(48:08):
dollars to come back because they only keep your ID
for ten days. How could it get any worse? I
just wait, they'll think of a way.

Speaker 5 (48:17):
Yeah, this forty five dollars fee to search through a database.
We've got to enter in your name exactly our database.
It's such difficult work for these.

Speaker 2 (48:28):
People, and it's so expensive too. Yeah, when you look
at all the power that's consumed by the by the
computers there and.

Speaker 5 (48:35):
The way they put that to make sure that it's
these scums that are paying for it that don't have
the real ID rather than the taxpayers. It's only these
delinquents that don't have ID. It it reminds me of Brazil.
It's people aren't paying enough for their interrogations exactly.

Speaker 2 (48:55):
And of course, if you want to get your real ID,
some stay don't charge you. New York doesn't have a
fee for real ID besides the amount of time that
they waste on you and all the hassle. But in
Pennsylvania they hassle you, they waste your time, and they
charge you a one time thirty dollars real ID fee

(49:17):
on top of standard renewal fees for your driver's license.
So you know they're going to get you everywhere. Right Surprise,
when your package arrives, you have to pay the tariff.
Wait a minute, I thought terifs didn't cost Americans anything.
What Trump was land, Well, you're going to pay directly
because of this deminimous shipping exclusion that has been taken away.

(49:40):
It was a tariff exemption on goods that were worth
eight hundred dollars or less. It has left some US
shoppers with extra shipping bills that have to be paid
before they can get their their stuff. And then of
course it creates a massive issue. You can imagine in
this particular case. They begin with an example. A woman
who's a physical therapist California bought a trench coat from

(50:02):
a Dutch retailer for four hundred and fifty six dollars.
She said that was already a bit above her budget,
but then when it arrived ups told her that she'd
have to pay two hundred and fifty dollars in customs
to get it. Now, if she did not pay that,
you know, she wound up paying it. She said, this
is the second most expensive article clothing I've ever bought.

(50:25):
The only thing that was more expensive was my wedding gown. So,
but you can't wear your wedding down out in the rain,
I guess. So this is a trench coat, good news.

Speaker 4 (50:37):
And with a trench coat you can pretend to be
a hard boiled detective around saying things like these streets
just ain't the same.

Speaker 2 (50:44):
So anyway, she wound up paying seven hundred dollars for
it by the time she had to pay the taxes
on it. So if somebody doesn't want to pay a
surprise bill of two hundred and fifty dollars to get
their item, then what happens. What happens with the ship
or what happens with the company on the other end.
It becomes a real quagmire. And that's one of the

(51:05):
reasons why they did not have this there. For decades
there were no custom duties imposed on items under eight
hundred dollars. But that has ended in China for Chinese
goods in May and for the rest of the world.
That ended in August. Democrats Republicans favored ending the exemption.

(51:27):
So again, the rationale they gave was that made it
easier to smuggle fentanyl into the country. It's always fentanyl,
isn't it. That's become the excuse for every kind of tyranny.
We got to stop that fentanyl. It was they were
just in the White House. They were saying, well, you know,
the Biden administration really didn't watch the fentanyl stuff, and

(51:47):
so we had enough fentanyl come into the country under
Biden to kill every man, woman, and child in America.
It's like, well, how are we still alive because maybe
some of us are not interested in taking it, you know. Anyway,
the ludicrous arguments that they make with this stuff, it's
just never ends. Still, the abruptness with which the US

(52:10):
closed the loophole, and that's the key caused major disruptions
for sellers of all sizes, as well as for express
carriers like FedEx and ups postal networks, and for American shoppers.
This is the key. This is the the chaos and
disruption that Trump specializes in. That's why they put him

(52:30):
in place, because you could change these things. You could
if you don't like the interlocking just in time delivery
system and you know, offshoring of manufacturing things like that,
which I don't really like either. But if that system
has been put in over decades and you're not going

(52:50):
to rip that out overnight without causing major problems, Trump
doesn't care. As a matter of fact, he likes to
do that kind of stuff. Here's another example of the
destructive policies of Trump. Costco is suing the Trump administration
seeking tariff refunds before the Supreme Court rules if they're illegal.
Why are they doing that? Well, because it turns out

(53:13):
that the Trump administration has said that even if they
lose in the Supreme Court, which if any justice is done,
they will lose. There's absolutely no way that AEPA fraud.
There was not any emergency. Nothing had changed over several
decades in terms of trade deficits with other countries, and

(53:37):
so you can argue whether or not you think trade
deficits are an issue or not. Some people don't think
trade deficits are an issue. Whether you think it's an issue,
it clearly had not changed and so it was clearly
not an emergency. So it's not even about that. He
is declaring emergencies left and right everywhere, so he can
just rule by executive order. And that's what the Supreme

(53:59):
Court needs to shut down, not just for the tariff issue,
but for all these other issues. We've got to stop Trump.
And the Democrats who will follow him will do the
same thing. They will declare an emergency and then just
rule as czars and dictators. But the issue is is
that if the Supreme Court says we're going to enforce
the constitution. The Trump administration has said that companies that

(54:24):
have paid the tariff, like Costco has paid, will not
get their money back. Now we've also heard them saying, well,
there's going to be so many refunds are going to
have to give that we will just this astronomical amount
of money that they're going to have to refund, and
they made that as an argument for why the Supreme

(54:44):
Court should not take away the power that they usurped. Hey,
we stole this power, don't take it away because it's
going to be expensive and complicated for us to undo
what we did when we didn't have any authority to
do it. What that's a Trump administration in a nutshell.
And so we created all this problem and you're going
to make even a bigger problem if we have to

(55:07):
refund all this stuff. But the separate action is necessary,
said Costco in the lawsuit because even if the ipid
duties and underlying executive orders are held unlawful by the
Supreme Court, importers have paid the duties, including the plaintiff Costco,
and they're not guaranteed a refund for those unlawfully collected

(55:28):
tariffs and the absence of their own judgment and judicial relief.
So Trump is basically, with his abruptness and with his
vacillation and its constantly changing rates, he has thrown a
monkey wrench into every kind of business, whether it's retail
or manufacturing in the US. Because the manufacturers have been

(55:48):
thrown under the bus. They don't get all of the
components that they need for whatever they're manufacturing here. Domestically,
every one of the manufacturers is going to be getting
a lot of components from abroad. They don't know what
their prices are going to be because constant changing and
flipping of these duties based on what Trump is, the

(56:10):
games he's playing with other leaders in other countries. It's
not based on even protecting an industry or even funding
the government. It's just based on the whims and the
likes and the dislikes of Donald Trump and who he's
trying to reward or who he's trying to punish. Who
does he like kiss his ring or other things attached

(56:33):
to him, and to get away from this or whatever.
So that is one of the worst aspects of this.
So after he creates all this chaos and freezes a
lot of people and destroys their businesses, really the people
who have survived who are able to work around this,
pay the tariffs and they buy the goods and they
don't know if the price of the goods are going

(56:55):
to go up or go down, but they pay these
tariffs and then it's all illegal, and then they've got
to go through the process of suing the US government
in order to get that money back. It's just unbelievable
what Trump is doing to our country. This court and
this Federal Circus Circuit Circus Circuit have cautioned that an

(57:16):
importer may lack the legal right to recover refunds of
duties for entries that have liquidated, even where the underlying
legality of the tariff is later found to be unlawful.
Isn't that amazing? We can put unlawful, destructive tariffs on you,
and even after they are we agree that they are unlawful,

(57:39):
We're not going to let you get your money back.
And notice that this is for importers, right, so the
foreigners may get their money back, but not the Americans.
How is this America first? The Trump administration has warned.
And the potential fallout of having to rEFInd hundreds of
millions of dollars in tariffs, What about the fallout when

(57:59):
you close American businesses because of your lockdowns like you
did five years ago, or your tariffs like you're doing now?
Just amazing. So a british Man was reportedly arrested for
posting posing with a gun on social media. It's a
british Man who was reportedly arrested after posting a photo

(58:20):
on social media showing him holding a gun. I guess
like toy story. You know you can't have a gun. Wait,
he can't have it. And if you're going to draw
a gun, you got to do it with that just sketch, right,
you can't actually pull it out. The image for the
sky it is taken in the US, is uploaded to

(58:43):
LinkedIn back in August, and according to this man, who
is an IT contractor, the photo caused a nightmarish legal
drama from the West Yorkshire Police, despite the gun being
legal and the image being taken on private property and
America and it was not threatening. It was not threatening

(59:03):
to anyone. Cop initially came to his home warned him
about the posting, citing a complaint from a person who
saw the image. Then cops came back later that night,
August to twenty fourth, and arrested him. That was only
the beginning. The Yorkshire Post reported that he ended up
having strained relations with neighbors and others over the constant
police presence, even had his equipment and devices seized by cops.

(59:28):
He's an IT contract I'm.

Speaker 4 (59:29):
Glad they're doing this instead of going after the Pakistani
rape gangs. Yeah, every single officer involved with this should
be brought up on charges of treason and summarily executed.
Just no, no, we don't need your kind and power.
You officious, relentless bureaucrat know.

Speaker 2 (59:46):
They're doing exactly what the government wants them to do.

Speaker 4 (59:49):
Doesn't Still my statement stands.

Speaker 2 (59:53):
Most perplexing is that the caption and the accompanied text
purportedly included nothing was threatening or legally concerning. He also
told the media that he tried to explain to the
cops that the photo wasn't taken in the UK and
was instead captured in America, where you're allowed to have guns.
He was reported Now, yeah, he was reportedly held in

(01:00:16):
prison overnight, interrogated and being accused of holding a firearm
with intent to cause fear of violence. So if you
are holding a firearm, even if it's not in a
threatening way or whatever, you are causing fear of life.

Speaker 4 (01:00:33):
Scary, it's so spooky.

Speaker 2 (01:00:35):
After being released on bail, authorities came three other times
to visit him throughout October. The case was eventually dropped
over lack of evidence. He's now speaking out against what
he believes to be an Orwellian nightmare. I've not been
able to sleep. I've lived in fear of a knock
at my door for the last three months. I haven't
spoken to my neighbors for four months. It has damaged

(01:00:57):
my ability to run my business. On the evidence seen
by The Yorkshire Post, there was never a sentilla of
a chance of a successful prosecution and so serious questions
remained about the policing standards and motivations applied in this case,
the leadership who permitted this pursuit until the day after
this newspaper applied to cover the impending court case. A

(01:01:20):
spokesperson for West Yorkshire Police told The Metro that the
complaint at the center of the crisis was based on
fears that the initial photo was a threat. You know,
we had just in case you think this is something
that's limited to the thought police in the UK. Remember

(01:01:41):
we had a person put something up on social media
as a protest of yet another Charlie cook Kirk memorial
that was being held at a school and he put
up a meme which was about a shooting in a
town that had the same name as this school. But

(01:02:03):
he wasn't threatening the school. He didn't create the meme,
he reposted it and what he reposted was what Trump
had said and was criticized at the time. He said,
it's just time for us to just move on. And
that's what this guy was saying. It's time for us
to move on. We've focused on this Charlie Kirk shooting
for so long. Can't we just move on? And so
the Tennessee sheriff arrested him for that. He said, we

(01:02:27):
can't arrest him for a speech, but we can arrest
him for threatening. And that's an implied threat, even though
he didn't create the meme, even though it was something
that Trump said, and it was about a completely different organization.
So this is the way this stuff is running. As
a matter of fact, what we were talking about before

(01:02:49):
was a protest that was being held. A lot of
people are protesting the Israeli genocide and Gaza, and one
guy showed up and he had a sign that said
I support genocide and just as an experiment, right, they
arrested everybody that had anti genocide signs, but they left

(01:03:12):
him alone.

Speaker 4 (01:03:13):
And well, I mean, you can't go after the genocide
enjoy just a funny little guy, that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:03:19):
So again, as long as you support Israel, it doesn't matter.
If it's genocide or not. Just support Israel. That's the
key thing that's here. But notice the reaction of the
other people. There's an interesting thing about this. A lot
of people haven't talked about that Lance pointed out. But
here's the original clip.

Speaker 10 (01:03:36):
You're going to be arrested you support genocide?

Speaker 1 (01:03:38):
Yeah to you.

Speaker 10 (01:03:40):
I've already found out in Liverpool that supporting a genocide
doesn't get you arrested. From supporting the war crimes and
net and Yahoo. And I'm wondering if you'll arrest me,
So now find out whether supporting genocide gets you arrested.

Speaker 8 (01:03:52):
Here?

Speaker 10 (01:03:52):
Does it offend you that I support genocide? I don't
have an opinion. I support Gennifon. Is that a problem
for you?

Speaker 4 (01:03:58):
Yes, it is.

Speaker 10 (01:03:59):
You support the bombing of innocent men, women and children.
You won't get arrested. I wouldn't get arrested.

Speaker 5 (01:04:05):
But I can't be like you.

Speaker 10 (01:04:07):
I'm supporting a genocide. Do you think I should get arrested?
Will I get arrested? You should be arrested. He's asking
whether you've decided to be harried or you're going to walk?
I will walk. I've got spinal problems isn't the fact
that I'm not in my eighties that I'm not gonna
get arrested because you only seem to like arresting really

(01:04:27):
old people. I support genocide. That's absolutely fine. You'd still
want a chances to support genocide and not be arrested,
you know that. Good luck in the cells. Well, yeah,
why weren't they arrest me? They're arresting my friend here?
Why ain't you been arrested yet?

Speaker 5 (01:04:41):
Mate?

Speaker 10 (01:04:41):
Well I'm going to arrest you. Where have my friends gone?
They've all been arrested for protesting against the genocide, and
here I am all alone, unarrested for supporting a genocide.
But let me come clean. Of course I don't support
a genocide. How could you? Where you'd see the destruction
of the hands of the Israeli.

Speaker 2 (01:04:55):
Government in Gaza.

Speaker 10 (01:04:57):
If we care about our human rights, we must defend
our right to protest, especially against genocide.

Speaker 2 (01:05:05):
Yeah, except that, as Lance pointed out, his protesters there
don't support his right to support genas. In other words,
they don't they don't agree with him, and they want
to shut him down as well. Here's what he put together.
If you look at this albeit a minute, that's a
different one here. Yeah, when we.

Speaker 4 (01:05:24):
You should be arrested.

Speaker 2 (01:05:26):
Yeah. Yeah. The problem with the protest actually is a
repeat of the Hong Kong high rise fire. By the way,
let me show that here I pulled out. Look at this.
This is the fire that burned for several days. This
is a complex of a lot of high rise apartment
complexes in Hong Kong. Hundreds of people died from this.

(01:05:46):
You noticed something the buildings after days of being on fire,
even though these are just residential buildings, they're still standing.
They didn't collapse into their footprint. How did that happen?

Speaker 4 (01:05:56):
Strange?

Speaker 2 (01:05:57):
They must be making this out of some super materialurial
in Hong Kong that we don't have in New York.

Speaker 4 (01:06:02):
Obviously they changed the building codes. Oh yeah, no, way
they didn't.

Speaker 2 (01:06:05):
Yeah, that's right, they didn't do that. Yeah, that's what
Tony Rook was talking about in the UK. So, so
if we're supposed to believe that these buildings collapse because
of fire, very minor fire in Building seven, for example,
it was not even hit with a plane, then how
is it that we haven't changed the firefighting procedures or
the building codes. There ought to be changes in all that,

(01:06:26):
and of course it stands as a singular moment in
time where steel structures just collapsed in their own footprint
after a couple of hours of fire. And so I
give oh you did. So here's the problem with the protest.

Speaker 10 (01:06:41):
I'm supporting the genocide. Do you think I should get arrested.
You should be arrested. Why are you even arrested yet?

Speaker 11 (01:06:48):
Mate?

Speaker 2 (01:06:48):
Well, these people don't support free speech either. Here's the thing.
If you support free speech, if you don't support the
views that you oppose, right, as people will paraphrase that,
I may disagree with everything you have to say, but

(01:07:09):
I will defend to the death you're right to say it. Right.
If you don't do that, you don't support free speech.
So those people who are protesting the genocide, that's fine,
except they also don't support free speech. So his whole
point was that they're arresting people for showing for having
an opinion that the government doesn't agree with. And yet

(01:07:29):
the people there on the street once you're arrested, if
they don't agree with your.

Speaker 5 (01:07:35):
Position either, it's more of a protest to say, hey,
the government needs to be arresting with people I don't
like instead of a protest and support a free speech,
or at least that's how it seemed. At a few points.
We might have been taken things out of context and
implying things they didn't mean to imply. But you have
to be careful of these protests. They have everyone yelling yeah,

(01:07:57):
rest him isn't a great look.

Speaker 8 (01:08:01):
No.

Speaker 2 (01:08:01):
I think you're right, Lance, because I see this everywhere,
you know, not just in the UK, but I see
it in America as well. People do not support the
free speech of somebody that they disagree with, and the
more they disagree with them, the more they demand this
person be silenced. Take a look at Nick Flinte's for example.
I don't agree with anything Nick Flinte says, nothing at all,

(01:08:25):
and yet I think he has a right to say it.
And the Conservatives don't think that's the case. They want
to purge him and cancel him. And of course we
have seen what Mark Levin wants to do to people
who disagree with net Yahoo and the Israeli government.

Speaker 4 (01:08:38):
Personally, I think Nick Fuints and Mark Levin should have
a cage match, you know. We put them in the
same room and let them tear at each other, let.

Speaker 2 (01:08:46):
Them scream, at each other. Yeah, just we're gonna put
it in a soundproof room so we don't have to
hear it. But anyway, the bottom line is that nobody
understands or appreciates or supports the principle of free speech.
That's the key thing. And so that's why the people
are saying, you know, shut this guy down. There is
no we don't understand that you're not going to have

(01:09:08):
free speech if you don't stand for the speech of
people that you disagree with. Well, Campbell's is denying that
they have lab grown meat after that recording that came
out with the guy says, yeah, we're three D printing
this chicken or whatever that's in the soup. I wouldn't
eat this stuff. It's now being investigated by Florida's Attorney
General because there's a law in Florida that they put

(01:09:30):
on the books to say that you are not going
to be creating lab grown meat. And so Campbell's has
come back and said, well, it's not lab grown meat.
What we were talking about on the label where it
says bioengineered products Ingredients company said this refers to genetically

(01:09:52):
modified crops like canola, corn, soybean, sugar beets, etc. They're
grown by the vast majority of American farmers. The language
on our labels refers to ingredients derived from those crops
and not the chicken. Well, Farida has a statewide ban
on lab grown meat, but of course they don't have

(01:10:13):
a ban on genetically modified plants. And this is why
when that person goes into Aldi and looks at all
the ingredients, everything, and pretty much all the American food
has bioengineered ingredients now because they've gone in and genetically

(01:10:33):
modified the plants.

Speaker 5 (01:10:35):
So also, it's funny that it's, oh, don't worry, it's
just the oil, the corn starts, the soybean, the sugar beets,
it's everything in there except for the chicken. It's not
the chicken. Don't worry.

Speaker 4 (01:10:50):
We're working on that part.

Speaker 2 (01:10:51):
Yeah, well, we feed all that stuff to the chicken,
and we just started injecting the chickens with mr Anda
vaccines at the behest of rawlins. The Trump used Department
of Agriculture appointee. That's how they did it this time.
The handoff between the Democrats and Republicans and vice versa.
So you've got the Biden administration going in and using

(01:11:15):
a PCR test as an excuse to kill millions of chickens.
And then the Trump administration comes in and says, we'll
stop killing your chickens if you start injecting them for
our partners, the pharmaceutical companies. So the injected chicken as
well as a chicken that has fed all this GMO
stuff as well. So the Attorney general in Florida said

(01:11:40):
his office would demand answers from Campbell's and shut it
down if they were really using any lab meat and
so forth. But this article from Children's Self Defense points
out that lab grown meat meets the definition of cancer.
This is what I've said before. Yeah, these eternal cell
line and they just keep reproducing. And that's why I

(01:12:03):
called it, you know, tumor steak. You know, instead of
tube steak, which people call a lot of dogs. You know,
I got tumor steaks, or I guess you could have that.
The t bone is actually a tumor bone steak. And
the cultivated meat uses techniques developed in biopharma industry. Producers
take cells from live animals or from a cell bank.

(01:12:25):
They create immortalized cells from cultured stem cells. They grow
them in large steel tanks called cultivators or bioreactors, and
the National Cancer Institute has noted that uncontrolled indefinite cell
division is the defining feature of cancer cells. So it

(01:12:46):
is not an exaggeration to call these things tumor meat,
a point critics invoke when arguing against the live grown meat.
I've said this a long time ago, and I even
played that clip from Kindergarten cop with Arnold Schwarzeningers saying
it's not a tuma. He said, I got addache, and
they kids said, maybe it's a tumor. It's not a tuma.

(01:13:07):
So the food is not a tumai. I guess. Trump
slammed Biden's fifty two billion dollar Chips Act, then he
used it to buy a federal stake in Intels As reason,
Biden said, companies are investing in America again. Instead, though
the reality is that America is investing in companies and
getting little in return, because when the government is making

(01:13:32):
the investments, it's always a malinvestment. They're going to invest
in their friends and they're going to invest in failing companies.
In March, Trump blasted the Chips Act. They called it
an acronym supposedly creating helpful incentives to produce semiconductors. That's

(01:13:52):
what it stands for. What it actually is is just graft,
corruption and central plan. He called it a horrible, horrible thing.
It was passed under Biden, and the Chips Act was
essentially a fifty two billion dollar industrial policy slush fund
intended primarily to bolster domestic production of computer chips. Early

(01:14:17):
grants largely went to either the factories that were already
in development or that would have been built anyway, So
the facilities questions whether there was any economic value to
have additional taxpayer funding. Trump was on solid ground, he
told Congress. He said, you should get rid of the
Chips Act, and whatever is leftover, you should use it

(01:14:40):
to reduce debt or any other reason you want to. Yet,
in the months since, Trump has made use of the
Chips funding not to reduce the debt, but to pursue
his own questionable industrial policy. His version is even less
accountable and may well be even worse for taxpayers. There's
your difference between the Democrats and Republicans. Intel was set

(01:15:03):
to receive eleven billion dollars to help fund the construction
of semiconductor fabs in several states by late summer, the
company said it Adhari received more than five billion dollars
of the fund, but Intel struggled to fulfill those commitments,
falling further behind on factory construction in some places and
laying off workers as it suffered from ongoing financial and

(01:15:27):
managerial problems. By the middle of twenty twenty five, Intel
looked very much like a failing business. This is pretty amazing.
I mean, I've not really kept up with electronics and chips,
and until just recently, Lance is telling me about how
Nvidia and their sister company which is AMD, SAMD, isn't it, Yes, Yeah,

(01:15:53):
And how they basically have frozen Intel out of the
CPU market, certainly out of the GPU market, not really
a player there, but they've really lost competition to AMD.
And which is really surprising because the whole time that
I was in it, Intel was just was dominant, absolutely dominant.
But now under new management, they got a CEO called

(01:16:15):
lip Bouton, and we just couldn't succeed in America without
these geniuses that we bring in from other countries. Right,
there must be an H one B visa recipient that's
come in to do it. Intel was American built, It
was American managed when it was successful and now it
is not successful. With lip Bhutan, essentially the US government

(01:16:37):
would produce a roughly ten percent stake in the chip maker,
partially nationalizing the company. That's the other issue, nationalizing production.
That's what Trump wants to do. Funds from Chip are
used to do this. It was a good deal for
the company, but the taxpayers get the bill. So we're

(01:16:57):
going to have privatized profits and you know, public expense.
The risks will now be borne by the taxpayers. Undamentally,
Trump gave Intel a federal bailout, removing the company's public
obligations and accountability while loading more financial risks onto the public.
When the Chips Act passed in twenty twenty two, the

(01:17:19):
Biden administration celebrated it by declaring that quote, companies are
investing in America again. But under both Biden and Trump,
just the opposite was true. America was investing in companies,
investing in companies that couldn't make it on their own
and aren't going to be successful in the long term. Meanwhile,

(01:17:42):
we have three casinos are going to be licensed in
New York City. That's just what they need is more gambling.
They've already got Wall Street. They've already got the biggest
casino in the world. But that's not enough. They're going
to have three more of them. And the guy who
the Mets, Steve Cohen, won approval. He's going to open

(01:18:03):
a casino close to their stadium there and so again
more non productive use of capital. New York Times is
torching Tim Waltz after the Somalian scam woke Minnesota for
a billion dollars on his watch. I mean, even the

(01:18:25):
New York Times is coming after him. And so maybe
we should call this Sharia Gate a massive, sprawling fraud scandal.
The federal prosecutors say siphoned over a billion dollars from
Minnesota's social safety net programs. Now here's the kicker. Put
this in perspective. A billion dollars is more than the

(01:18:48):
entire state spends in a year to run its Department
of Corrections, which is where all these people belong. I
got a correction here. We need to put these three
in prison. The fraud involved a series of schemes, and
we talked about this. We won't go back into it,
but it's the Somalis and the al Shabab and all

(01:19:08):
the rest of this stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:19:10):
And this is a continual problem.

Speaker 2 (01:19:12):
And they look the other way because they vote Democrat. Right.

Speaker 4 (01:19:15):
People come here, They come here to leech off the system.
They come here to steal what they can, whatever they
can get away with, anything that's not nailed down. America
is nothing more than an economic zone to these people.
They don't care about freedom, they don't care about what
it was founded for. They simply care that, Oh look,
I bet I can make money. I bet I can
take advantage of these people.

Speaker 2 (01:19:35):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:19:36):
Yeah, And every single one of them needs to be
shipped back at minimum.

Speaker 2 (01:19:40):
Not coming for freedom, coming for free stuff. That's the
difference from the el As Island.

Speaker 4 (01:19:44):
They as before. There is the appropriate number of Somalians
for America is zero zero. Not a single Somali is
necessary for the United States to function or keep going forward.
Every single one could be sent back and a thing
would happen, no one would notice.

Speaker 2 (01:20:03):
By the way, Lance will up this article here and
show people this picture of Laura Lumer. She is now
a Pentagon approved All.

Speaker 4 (01:20:10):
Right, everyone careful, you're about to see something terrifying.

Speaker 2 (01:20:14):
One picture is worth a thousand words, said one person
about this. She gets a desk at the Pentagon and
some of the people who are kicked out by warpete
because you are going to say exactly what we tell
you and they're not even trying to conceal it anymore.
You know, Operation mocking Birders of the CIA would tell
people what to say, and they would give them access.

(01:20:36):
But now they're saying, we're going to kick you out
of the Pentagon press pool if you don't say exactly
what we say, and no more, no less. And so
they kicked everybody out except for I think it was
News Nation. Was that it, and you know, some small
right wing Trump sucker media, And so now they've got

(01:20:58):
another Trump sucker, Laura Lumer. As one person said, imagine
the idea that the Pentagon is going to have a
serious press conference given the current situation. The only people
there will be groupies and influencers, you know, people like
Laura Lumer. And it's pretty amazing.

Speaker 4 (01:21:17):
How is she going to get to the press conference
when people keep slashing your tires?

Speaker 2 (01:21:20):
Though, it's going to be somebody slash your tires.

Speaker 4 (01:21:23):
No, it's that old story where her tires rotted out
on her car because she didn't drive it, and they
just sat there. Then she put up a gofund me
or something.

Speaker 2 (01:21:32):
Help.

Speaker 4 (01:21:32):
The woke left has slashed my tires. Everyone's like, you
can clearly see the tires have just rotted, Laura.

Speaker 2 (01:21:39):
Yeah, well, if you follow the maga people, it will
rot your brain, not just your tires. But I am
tired of it. I gotta say, this is an interesting
observation from World Magazine. They said Christmas music still unites us.
So in the December nineteen ninety five issue of The
American Spectator, Mark Stein had an army said it's the

(01:22:01):
best time of the year. He wrote about what he
called the American Christmas. He said that what he meant
by that was it's an occasion where popular songs are
able to unify a country. He said, we don't have
pop culture anymore, but uniquely in today's fragmented market, seasonal
songs cross all boundaries. The way I always looked at it,

(01:22:24):
I thought it crossed generational and time boundaries. It's about
the only time of the year that you can get
everybody listened to let's say, crop classical orchestral music, or
music from the forties or fifties or something like that.
I mean bing Crosby's White Christmas is still played a lot,
and so that was one of the things I always
liked about Christmas music, was the fact that it was

(01:22:46):
so varied in terms of different genres and different time
periods and so forth, and it is still there, which
is really kind of surprising. Every generation will sometimes introduce
some thing, whether it's good or bad, that will be
a real hit, but they still go back and go
to the historical songs. They said, thirty years later, the

(01:23:11):
market is more fragmented than ever, but seasonal songs still
cross boundaries. Stein had this in mind pop songs such
as White Christmas and Winter Wonderland, but he could just
as easily have been talking about Handles the Messiah. So
we're going to take a break here. We got a
couple of comments.

Speaker 4 (01:23:29):
You want to read those, Yes, please, con Think, Thank
you very much. Con Think really do appreciate it. I
would love it if you could make a sequel album
with full length selections. In regards to the Christmas Night album, well.

Speaker 2 (01:23:41):
I'd love to do that too. It's just become increasingly
difficult for me to know. The stroke really slowed me
down and I couldn't work at all on any of
this stuff. For several months, I was completely out of
it and you couldn't use my left hand, and so
some of that stuff is coming back. I'm trying to
do some new music. I think we've got one or

(01:24:01):
two new songs this year. But yeah, that is a
goal of mine. I want to try to do.

Speaker 4 (01:24:06):
That, working towards it. Stealth Patriot, thank you very much,
Stealth's Patriot. We appreciate it. And again it's your support
that keeps us on here. So Stealth Patriot, you are
what's keeping us on.

Speaker 2 (01:24:18):
Thank you. He says.

Speaker 4 (01:24:19):
They called the viet Cong soldiers Charlie, what are they
gonna call the Vina Venezuelan soldiers in Latin Vietnam two
point zero? We'll have to figure that out. That's to
be decided. I guess maybe since we're a more mature
and older nation, we call them Charles's.

Speaker 2 (01:24:32):
Yeah, I don't know. It to be something Spanish. What's
spanished for, Charlie Carlos says? The Carlos is out there.
I guess a p rumbles. They're revolting and saying no
to the enforced hell.

Speaker 4 (01:24:44):
In Britain. The public there is waking up.

Speaker 2 (01:24:47):
Yes, as a matter of fact, let me play this.
This is since you bring that up, an interesting clip.
This is the New Republican Movement. These are some Irish guys.
It looks very much like the old Irish Republican Army
that was pushing back against the British. And of course
you had the the war there and the terrorist events

(01:25:09):
that were taking place and things like that, and they
would put out these, uh, these videos where they would
set there all masked up and everything. They've got another
one now, but they're not talking about whether they're not
Ireland is being ruled by the Brits. They're talking about
the fact that Britain is being overwhelmed by foreign immigrants.

(01:25:32):
Listen to what they have to say. It looks like
an ira thing.

Speaker 12 (01:25:37):
We the New Republican Movement, have watched their parents and
las over the past twelve once the level of disrespect
showing to the people who put you into power that's
come up ignored any longer. We are prone men of Ireland,
We are patriots. Your policies and decision making regards to
flooding at their communities with undocumented militaration man is not acceptable.

(01:25:59):
We were not sit back any longer and watch a
culture and religion destroyed by the people we put in Powell. Also,
the sexual adoptination of our children schools has not went
unnoticed either. The New Republican Movement would take immediate action
against anyone who threatens their ways of life and the
safety of our women and children. We have your addresses

(01:26:19):
and knowing their movements, have you one of you are
legitimate targets as of today, the New Republican Movement twenty
eight or eleven twenty five.

Speaker 2 (01:26:30):
That's interesting. Now, if those guys are not in government plants,
always be careful about that, thank you, yeah big. If
if they're not government plants, if this is not some
kind of a false flag thing, my response will be
what has taken them so long? All this stuff? But again,
I don't think that vigilanti violence is the answer to anything.

(01:26:52):
When Karen and I were in the UK back in
the early nineteen eighties, I remember we came out of
out of a Gilbert and Sullivan thing and there a
big bomb that went off down the street. Was pretty
surprising at first. It's like, you know, it's like when
people hear a gunshot and are where they don't expect it.

(01:27:12):
You know, you think, well, that was a firecracker that
went off, so you're thinking all the different things that
could be. The last thing that came into my mind
was a bomb till people started yelling about it. I
don't agree with terrorist attacks. I don't agree with vigilante violence.
I think is important for war to be justified, for
to be done openly, and for the reasons to be declared.

(01:27:35):
I don't like it when we have people on either
side wearing masks. That is an indication that they know
that what they're doing is not legit. And so yeah,
it's but it is interesting. This maybe what they want,
and so we'll have to see what happens with that.

Speaker 4 (01:27:55):
The Irish. The Irish have given the British more trouble
than any other group of people throughout history. Yeah, the
Irish have absolutely refused to back down over the years
when they want something, if a portion of the population
wants it bad enough, they will just sit there and
they will make the British miserable.

Speaker 2 (01:28:13):
Yeah, of course the British have done a deal on
the Irish as well. But the scott they never really
came to any kind of deatonte you know, Scotland, I
guess that helped that they put in King James. But
all right, well yeah, and then there's the Welsh. They
just skill along with everybody and sing.

Speaker 4 (01:28:33):
The Welsh are small enough that you just kind of
forget they exist until someone reminds you, like, oh, yeah,
Wales is there. That's right, there's Wales.

Speaker 2 (01:28:39):
We did go to Wales and it's some of the
nicest people ever met where they're say.

Speaker 4 (01:28:43):
Yeah, so Bogus says, I love etymology in the morning.
Robot from the Czech Robotnik, forced worker from Robota, forced labor,
compulsory service, drudgery from Robota, ty to work drudge. Also
doctor Robotnick is Sonic's villain, so you've got that too.

Speaker 2 (01:29:00):
Yeah, and drug important and maybe it'll change the drug
report to robot report when it's done by AI.

Speaker 4 (01:29:06):
Right I boost data centers are union construction workers dreams.
I have two friends that are building a data center
in Sandusky, Ohio right now, that's right now.

Speaker 2 (01:29:18):
Yeah. They are really searching for people to do real
stuff again, having real trade skills. That people are realizing
what a bad deal college is and a lot of
people are pushing for trade stuff. Got to have real
the real world. You can't live in this virtual reality,
even though that's what Silicon Valley tells us. They're telling

(01:29:40):
you a lie.

Speaker 4 (01:29:41):
Video games are fun. I enjoy them myself, but you
got to do other things. You got to actually spend
time in the real world. It's important otherwise you slip away.
Brian Debitcartney, one of my best friends. The is and
documents the growth of data centers in Virginia. I'm sure
they're pulling their hair out, yeah, Jerry Alatalo. The art
official intelligence bubble is set for total collapse due to widespread,

(01:30:02):
rapidly growing opposition to digital slavery dystopia. That's right, No, sir,
do not turn off the AI, sir, do not turn
off the AA. I need my job, sir. J W
sixty eight Domain is the AI data center's friend. Take
whatever they need, whether it's your water or your land.
Briana Debuit Kartney. I got groped at every turn in

(01:30:23):
October on my trip to Florida for not having real ID. Well,
that's something to look forward to.

Speaker 2 (01:30:28):
Well, that's one of the reasons why I hate flying
so much, because I refuse to go through the machines.
As a matter of principle, and because I want to
be a monkey wrench in the system as much as
I can, so whenever I fly, I get them really
pissed off because I demand that I not go through
the machine and that they search me. So they go, well,
we got to go get somebody to do that. Stand

(01:30:49):
over here. They invariably will tell me to stand right
next to the machine, the radar of the X ray machine,
which I know they know what they're doing, and I
know what they're doing, and I don't stand next to
that machine, but it really does bother them. And I
never forgot the opt out, you know, protest that was

(01:31:11):
going to happen, and it was such a problem for
them that they just shut down all screening and let
everybody go through on Thanksgiving holiday, the busiest travel day
of the year. And so I want to be a
wrench in that machinery as much as I can, so
I always refuse, and I hate the process as much
as they do.

Speaker 4 (01:31:30):
But we can't dole seven ss. Wait, you said it
was a TSA who would be finding people for not
having the real ID.

Speaker 2 (01:31:36):
That's right. Yeah, they determined what the amount was going
to be. We're going to find people and here's what
the amount is going to be. And first they publish
it in the register. You know, because though this is
the way the government actually works. You know, forget about
the schoolhouse Rock version. You know, I'm a bill, I'm
a bill on a Capitol hill. That it doesn't work
that way. Congress has abdicated their legal authority to the

(01:31:59):
executive branch, to the bureaucracy, so they don't do anything
anymore except to collect paychecks and hold hearings and dog
and pony shows. So the way it happens is you
have these bureaucracies make up the rules. And when they
make up a rule, they publish it on the register.
They take comments for a while, and then they do

(01:32:19):
as they please. They don't care whether you like it
or not. And so I think what it really is
is kind of just publishing it on the register. It
just kind of a way for them to take the
temperature of the public. And if it's something that's going
to create a lot of waves, they might back off
of it because they don't want to lose their system

(01:32:39):
that they have set up. But they publish that they
were going to charge people eighteen dollars, and then they
said well, after the comment period, I guess they want
enough comments where people were angry, so they decided that
they would up it to forty five dollars.

Speaker 4 (01:32:53):
Thank you, bureaucrats. Very cool, Brandon Bennett. I'm in one
of the five states that real idea is mandatory, and
it's a red state.

Speaker 1 (01:33:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:33:01):
Yeah, Well, you know, when I got my license here,
I thought that it was they were asking me for
all this paperwork and everything. Man, this is really getting crazy.
And so because I'd let my license expire in Texas,
I didn't drive much, so anyway i'd get the license
again and massive amounts of paperwork and then like I

(01:33:23):
finished and said, now you got a real idea. Aren't
you excited about this? It's like, no, I didn't want that,
but they didn't charge me extra for it here in
Tennessee as far as I know. But it was a
lot of paperwork, big paper chase.

Speaker 4 (01:33:38):
It's amazing. They can't even they can't even give you
a break when they're forcing you into their system. Yeah,
and he goes Sonita and they said real idea was voluntary.
How does something that's voluntary now require a fine? Next
still change it to a misdemeanor ticket and you'll end
up with a bench warrant if you don't pay up.

Speaker 2 (01:33:55):
Yeah. Well, they're lying, of course when they say that,
and they say that all the time about they say
that the income tax is voluntary as well. Remember that.
I mean every year when they would mail out the
paper forms before you get the forums online, it always
had in the very back a message from the IRS

(01:34:17):
commissioner that the income tax is voluntary. We all know
what happens if you don't volunteer, right. And then the
same type of thing when they had paper maps of
the individual states we'd get these. In the back there'd
always be a message from the governor of that state
talking about how driving was a privilege. It's like, let's

(01:34:38):
not moving around is a fundamental human right, it's not
a privilege. But just you try driving around without a license,
which I know a lot of the sovereign citizens do.
But I also know that the government that lies to
you about things being a privilege and things being voluntary
also has no scruples when it comes to giving you
due process an affair hearing about the legitimacy of their orders,

(01:35:03):
they will do whatever they wish to you. So just
keep that in mind before you get caught up in
the legal arguments. They don't care about what's legal. They
are calling people seditious and saying they need to be
executed because you got congressmen telling people in the military
you must not follow illegal orders. No, you tell them
that I'm gonna put you in jail. Right, So that's

(01:35:25):
the reality of the government that we have.

Speaker 4 (01:35:27):
Here, Fuzzy Matteo. Many of the CDL issued with no
name given. We're real IDs, real ID will soon become
digital ID. But it's for your safety, don't you know.

Speaker 2 (01:35:36):
Yeah, it doesn't matter. It's all just part of the
surveillance stuff that they were ramping up. There's nothing real
about it. So righting biometric, Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:35:44):
Right, overtures, says My wife and I flew recently, even
with the so called real ID. My wife was told
to stand aside because the scanner kept going off because
she had new replacements, even though she had a medical card. Well,
it's because it's about harassing you. And also most the
TSA workers are very very dumb, very very dumb. He
low IQ individuals con think real ID isn't better. It's

(01:36:07):
just annoyingly harder to fulfill their requirements a proof of residents.
Every time they add something new, it gets more and
more difficult because you need all the previous forms of
ID they made you get to get the new one.

Speaker 5 (01:36:20):
Just put no name given, no address or whatever.

Speaker 4 (01:36:24):
That's my plan. That's my plan for when I need
to update my idea of going to call up and
fake an Indian accent and tell them that hello, sir, no,
do not have a branch of residents. Are con think
it's almost like they're making the red tape for an
ID so tedious that we will just be begging to
give them blood samples and figerprints stopped out of all

(01:36:45):
the paper requirements.

Speaker 2 (01:36:46):
I think that's it. I think you got it.

Speaker 4 (01:36:48):
That's also part of how they're going to get rid
of cash or any other form. But they're stable coins.
They will make it incredibly tedious. They will make it very,
very difficult to spend your money in any other way.

Speaker 2 (01:37:00):
That's part of what they're doing with a penny band, right,
it's not about saving money. They don't care about When
do they ever care about saving money? And it's like
you got to print the penny gets ripped up and
torn up like paper money every year, so you got
to print another penny. That's not the case.

Speaker 4 (01:37:15):
Most of the pennies are still kicking around.

Speaker 2 (01:37:18):
Yeah, and they're not. They're not banning those machines where
you put a quarter in and then get it to
press the penny.

Speaker 4 (01:37:22):
Remember the they're still around, but those are going to
fade away too. So get your pressed pennies while you
can until you can no longer. James Faithways, Hey, can
someone post the name of David Knight shop? I want
to buy his Christmas album? Well, you go to David
Knight dot news.

Speaker 2 (01:37:40):
Yeah, that's it and find it there. All of the
stuff is there on that website.

Speaker 4 (01:37:43):
David Knight dot news and you can find the album,
t shirts, hoodies, all kinds of other things. And yeah,
David Night dot news. Ap rumble seat. Everything you see
happening in the UK is planned to visit here in
the States. They launched beta test in various places. That's
it's essential, not to comply, you pointed out.

Speaker 2 (01:38:03):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:38:03):
It's just the UK is between ten to twenty years
ahead of the United States, depending on where you look
at in terms of their tyranny, and we seem to
be catching up to them.

Speaker 2 (01:38:14):
Yeah, the leftist ideas seemed to premiere in the UK,
then they go to New York, to California, then they
go into.

Speaker 4 (01:38:20):
The also Canada. They can sometimes shot us in Canada
first and trickle down. Yeah, but UK, Canada, then California,
then New York T nine seven four zero one. The
building was constructed with old passports.

Speaker 2 (01:38:32):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:38:33):
That's why I didn't collapse. That's what protected them.

Speaker 2 (01:38:37):
I like that. What about the building across the street
did it fall over to.

Speaker 4 (01:38:40):
Yeah, it got the building across the street got the vapors.
They just couldn't contain itself anymore. It's contagious. Christian constitutional
conservative people don't like being censored, but love censoring if
they have the power to do so. That's right, that's right.
That's why I'm in chat banning all of you all
the time. You will fear my wrath and power. Yeah,

(01:39:01):
the real octo spook cancer meat good.

Speaker 2 (01:39:05):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 4 (01:39:07):
It's gonna call the rose gardens. It's not a thuma,
that's right. It's not a tuma. It's delicious, delicious tumor
esque meat.

Speaker 5 (01:39:15):
It's not it's not a killer t bones.

Speaker 4 (01:39:22):
Instead of killer t cells. It's killer t Bone.

Speaker 13 (01:39:25):
As Lands pointed out, well, we're going to be right back.
Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (01:41:28):
You're listening to the David Knight Show. If you like
the Eagles on.

Speaker 4 (01:41:37):
The Cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they say.

Speaker 9 (01:41:43):
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:41:52):
And again we thank APS Radio for their support and
also for carrying the show on their news channel. All
this there here are the ads. They have a lot
of different genres of music that are there, only have
a news channel as well, and we are there at
APS Radio. Let's take a look at this press conference
that Caroline Lovett had responding to the accusations from all

(01:42:17):
corners that this was a war crime, that it was murder,
and so you have as a matter of fact, Mark
Kelly has taken center stage, and this is a problem.
Mark Kelly is a gun grabbing Democrat and he's got
a lot of other policy issues as well, but he's

(01:42:37):
somebody who's not focused on all the LGBT stuff like
so many of the New York and California Democrats, and
so he is more palatable to the general public because
he's not gotten into that aspect of things, and what
Trump is doing is elevating him to kind of a

(01:42:57):
status that I hate to see him elevated to, but
that's the way these guys play the game. And he
said that warpete is a twelve year old playing army
in a press conference yesterday. I think that's a pretty
succinct description of Pete Hegseth. He said, this guy is
so unqualified for the job. I mean, think about this.

(01:43:21):
He turns around on a stage talking about lethality and
warrior ethos and killing people. We have the most competent,
capable military this planet has ever seen by far. That's
not the message that needs to come from the Secretary
of Defense, he said. Heg Seth should be talking about
mission and accountability and making sure that members of the

(01:43:42):
military are trained and equipped to do really hard jobs. Instead,
he runs around in a stage like he's a twelve
year old playing army. It's ridiculous, it's embarrassing, and I
can't imagine what our allies think of looking at that
guy in this job, one of the most important jobs
for our country. Kelly's video on refusing illegal orders, that's

(01:44:06):
what has set him up at war with Warpete. Warpete
wants to court martial him even though he's out of
the military. I'm not really sure how that works. Does
he lose benefits or something. I mean, he's got a
lot of benefits with the Senate, and I think this
is a very stupid fight to pick. This is one

(01:44:27):
of the key things if you're going to be commander
in chief, if you're going to be a head of
what you want to now call the War Department, maybe
you need to pick your battles wisely, if not ethically.
The White House on Monday said that Admiral Mitch Bradley
gave the order and this is exactly what Jason Barker
was talking about. This is the plan to throw the

(01:44:50):
subordinates under the bus. And can imagine that this lame
is going to fall maybe further down the chain of
command as things heat up on this, because everybody sees
what this is and it was pretty amazing what happened
at the press conference. We'll play it for you here
in a second here, But anyway, heg Seth is calling

(01:45:13):
these six lawmakers who released the video the sedous seditious six.
Isn't that interesting? Because it's now sedition to say that
you must not follow illegal orders. You've got to follow
the constitution. Stead Why is that sedition? Because Trump thinks

(01:45:37):
that he is what everybody needs to follow, not the Constitution.
The Constitution has been dethroned by Trump and Trump is
now king. So if you don't obey his unconstitutional, illegal orders,
then you're guilty of sedition. And you know, it's not
just him that's saying it. It was pretty amazing to
me to see. I went around and looked at conservative

(01:46:00):
media sites to see what people are saying about this
war crime, this murder that took place, and pretty much
has been ignored by all of the conservative sites pretty much.
There was an interesting pointed question that was made by
a Fox News reporter yesterday. We're going to play that

(01:46:21):
for you. However, when you look at places like Breitbart
WorldNet daily info Wars, they're ignoring this. As a matter
of fact. Info Wars look at this headline here, take
a screenshot of this. This is mundy war room democrat
Mark Kelly continues his seditious six operations to advance US

(01:46:44):
color Revolution. This is just cut and paste nonsense, folks.
They want to throw color Revolution in there because Soro
source doesn't have anything to do with any of this part.
And to call them seditious because they told people that
you must disobey illegal orders, that's not sedition, that's patriotism.

(01:47:04):
You guys are bought and sold. I don't know how
much did Trump pay you, or is it that you
know that you get your money from the people who
follow Trump like some kind of messiah. If you refer
to him as the king that disgusts me, I tell
you I wouldn't be working there now at this point.
I would have gone off on this thing anyway, Hechsath said.

(01:47:25):
Kelly is still subject to the Universal Code of Military Justice,
and he knows that we're going to come after him. Right,
Let's see how that works. This is a stupid war
that you're picking, just like the Venezuelan war is a
stupid war. You're picking foreign and domestic. Your policies are stupid, illegal, unconstitutional.
This is the Secretary of Defense. This is not a

(01:47:47):
serious person, said Kelly. He should have been fired after
Signal Gate, and then he should have been fired every
single day after that. How do you wind up trying
to spend this to say that this is some kind
of a so color revolution. That's what I'd like to know.
It's insane and it is not sedition. It is patriotism

(01:48:08):
to follow the Constitution rather than an illegal dictation from
a dictator. Kelly then expressed his disgust at a children's
book meme that heg Seth posted on social media. He said,
last night he's putting out on the internet turtles with
rocket propelled grenades. I mean, have you seen this. This
is the Secretary of Defense doing this. This is not

(01:48:31):
a serious person. Heg Seth has threatened Kelly with court
martial for reminding troops not to follow illegal orders if
they come from the administration. What is it that they
don't understand about that? And so, as I said, pretty
much every news site has ignored this video, said nothing

(01:48:54):
at all about it. Or maybe there'll be one small
article like here's the example Breitbart, right. Oh wait, that's
the wrong clip there. We got a can you put
that in for me or pull that up I wanted.
I took a screenshot of Breitbart, and they've only got
one small article on the side, not a headline, thing
about the fact that we had the US government go

(01:49:17):
back and execute people that they unlawfully and unconstitutionally attacked
in the first place. And this is the very first
boat strike if you remember this, and we already had
people in the military the JAG. These are the people
who look at the legal issues around Thank you for

(01:49:39):
putting that up. All right, there's white Bart. You can't
even see it. Pull it up again, Lance. You can't
even see the article that you have to zoom in
on it. It's over there to the right. The big
thing is that there was a Nativity play at a
church where they had Baby Jesus zip Tide and Roman
soldiers as ice agents. I'm sorry, but that's not as

(01:50:00):
big an issue as the fact that that's just another
woke church, apostate church. It's hard to even news anymore,
but I think it is news when you have go
down a little bit further. You've got to look for
it there it is. Kelly says that Hegseth authorizing the
second boat strike was in competence at the highest level.

(01:50:22):
They didn't even put the real quotes that people are
saying it was murder right. It wasn't just incompetence. They
if you remember the initial reports of this, they said
that the boat turned around and ran away when it
saw the US helicopters or planes whatever it was coming in.
So it was not an armed conflict. They were running

(01:50:44):
away from it. And we made that point. We said,
there's no justification for them to attack these boats in
the first place. There is no declared war. There's no
law that allows them to do this. You know. I
think one of the reasons why they called the drug
war the drug war is because they didn't want to
call it prohibition. If they called it probition, which is

(01:51:04):
what it is, then people might have asked, we wait
a minute, we had constitutional amendments for probition. Where's the
constitutional amendment for the drug war? But then it becomes
a war, a war on the American people and a
war on the constitution. And now it is a war
on other countries, a kinetic war. And so it was
completely unjustified and a complete repudiation of the way they

(01:51:29):
have handled this illegal drug war. The boat was running
away from them, and that was the big scandal. Now
it's an even bigger scandal. They hit the boat with missiles,
and then the survivors who were struggling in the water
trying to stay afloat they ordered to have them killed. Again,
that is against every moral and legal principle of American

(01:51:53):
and international law. So how do you excuse that? And
why would that not be a big issue with Breitbart?
They doesn't even warrant a headline for them. It's stuck
off on the side. And then they pull out a
quote that is really mild compared to the reality of
what's been said by Mark Kelly and by other people,

(01:52:15):
and noticed that the people who are reading Breitbart really
didn't care much about that. They only got four hundred
comments about that, four hundred and thirty three comments. This
is a state of the conservatives. They really don't care. Well,
it's just disgusting to me. So under fire after Washington
Post report revealed that Warpete gave the order to kill

(01:52:39):
everyone aboard an alleged drug running boat from Venezuela. At
the press conference, Lovett had previously said during the briefing
that the order came from Admiral Frank M. Bradley, who
was authorized by Hegsath. And again, I think this is
part of passing the buck down to subordinates who will

(01:53:02):
be paying the price for this. I think perhaps that's
one of the reasons. One of the guy who was
the commander of I think it's Southcolm they call it.
He stepped down one year into his three year term.
He got out of this thing because I think you
could see this coming. And so here's the press conference
question than Gabe's question.

Speaker 6 (01:53:23):
You said that the follow up strike was lawful.

Speaker 14 (01:53:27):
What law is it that allows no survivors.

Speaker 15 (01:53:30):
The struct conducted on September second was conducted in self
defense to protect Americans in vital us.

Speaker 2 (01:53:36):
He doesn't reply.

Speaker 15 (01:53:37):
The strike was conducted in international waters and in accordance
with the law of armed conflict.

Speaker 2 (01:53:45):
That's not true. She reads a press statement. This reminds
me of remember Dick, Dick Divine or what's his name,
Levine or something, the trainee that then as the number
two at HHS.

Speaker 4 (01:53:59):
He goes by Rachel.

Speaker 2 (01:54:00):
Now, oh that's right, Rachel's what he calls himself. Yeah,
his name was Richard. I call him Dick Divine. Anyway,
he was asked these questions, you know about and well,
that's a very complicated issue, and he had this pat
little non response. They just kept reading over and over again.
I'd be happy to talk to you in another places.
This is a very complicated issue, and that's exactly what

(01:54:22):
she does. She doesn't answer the question. It's a very
good question from the Fox reporter. What law allows no survivors?
How is that ever warranted? It is never warranted. That's
the point. When you look at the rules of military
engagement or the rules of police engagement, there's never a
situation where you just go in and kill everybody, right,

(01:54:44):
So what law is that? So she just read back
a canned response and didn't reply to that. So then
they follow up on it.

Speaker 14 (01:54:52):
Why won't the administration either confirm or deny or reveal
whether or not there were survivors after that initial first strike?
And what imminent threat would to survivors pose who were
clinging presumably.

Speaker 8 (01:55:04):
To the wreckage?

Speaker 2 (01:55:05):
Yeah? What threats that?

Speaker 15 (01:55:06):
As I said, I think you guys are sort of
not listening fully to the statement I've provided. Admiral Bradley
worked well with it.

Speaker 2 (01:55:12):
You didn't and you didn't reply.

Speaker 15 (01:55:14):
Correcting the engagement to ensure the vote was totally destroyed
and the threat to the narco terrorists to the United
States was eliminated. And for any further questions about his thinking,
I would defer you to the Department of War.

Speaker 4 (01:55:26):
I obviously wasn't in the road.

Speaker 2 (01:55:29):
Yeah. In other words, I can't do anything except read
this canned non response that is absolutely a lie. So
again that's another point. You know, what is the law
that allows this? And then oh, you say they are
a threat to the US. How are they a threat
to the US if they are out of combat?

Speaker 7 (01:55:44):
Right?

Speaker 2 (01:55:44):
That's what the detailed article from Andrew McCarthy at National
Review that I spent time on yesterday said said. If
somebody is out of combat, in other words, they're struggling
to survive, they're wounded, they can't fight anymore, you're not
allowed to kill them. That's called giving people no quarter.
That's what was done by Sanna Anna to the people

(01:56:06):
at the Alamo. That is not a justified response. It
will never be a justified response. I got to say.
It just disgusts me to see these people parading their
Christianity like Lovitt does, and like Pete Heigseeth. Does you
know they put up all these different things about her
before she goes into a before she goes into a

(01:56:27):
press conference, she has a prayer. Great, what do you
do do you ask God for an indulgence for the
lies you're about to tell on behalf of this, Dictator Trump,
Is that what you're praying about going to get an
indulgence on this or something it's disgusting on this pardon
for the Honduran president. Does it all undercut the administration's messaging?

(01:56:49):
While you have these Congressional Republicans defending the strikes on
the narco terrorists and then a pardon for a convicted
drug trafficker, does that make it more difficult for your
members to defend your administration? Again, this reporter Fox News,
Heinrich asked perfect questions, Good job, there's no answer for that.

(01:57:11):
She said, well, I don't think so, Jackie. I think
the President Trump has been quite clear in his defense
of the US homeland to stop these illegal narcotics from
coming into our borders, whether that's my land or by sea.
He's also made it clear that he wants to correct
the wrongs of the weaponized Justice Department on the previous administration.
All of this is a non response, you know when

(01:57:32):
you look at this. If he wants to stop these
illegal narcotics coming in, then why did he pardon one
of the biggest drug lords. The former president of Honduras
at the same time they're murdering people who are thrashing
in the water after an unjustified attack on them, an
illegal attack. And then at the same time as this

(01:57:54):
happening on yes yesterday, the son of El Chapo, you know,
the guy who ran the Cinelo A drug cartel, gets
a plea bargain with the Trump Department of Justice to
make sure that he doesn't spend life in prison. And
he's going to be able to get out in a
few years with a barole because they struck a deal
with him, a plea bargain. So talk to me about

(01:58:17):
how the number one priority and we've got to do
anything that it takes to stop these illegal drugs. Again,
it'll never be stopped by force. It won't be stopped
by force with law enforcement, and it won't be stopped
by force by the military either. It is not your
hammer doesn't work on this problem. It's not a nail.

(01:58:39):
It's something very different.

Speaker 5 (01:58:40):
Which is exactly why they are using that as their mcguffin.

Speaker 2 (01:58:44):
Yeah, yeah, it is one of the most disgusting mcguffins
I've ever seen. This whole drug war thing. And you know,
I used to talk about it, and people would always
get angry with me, Well you like drugs, right, It's like, no,
I don't use drugs, and I don't need an army
of thugs kicking indoors to keep me off of drugs. Either.
It's a spiritual issue, it's a personal choice issue, it's

(01:59:07):
a medical issue. There's a lot of different ways that
it could be attacked. But using law enforcement and police
is a stupid approach. It's an illegal approach. It destroys
our society, it destroys the rule of law, and that's
why they do it. So Caroline love Ittt hammers the
media after all this stuff, because you had another reporter again,

(01:59:28):
this is a conservative commenter, John fredericks, these guys are
going to get banned for asking questions like this. He
asks about the page that was put up. Just a
couple of days ago, the White House unveiled a new
page on their website calling out what it says are
media offenders. At the top of the page will presumably

(01:59:49):
be updated weekly. There is a section dedicated to the
media offender of the week. So I guess maybe we
should do the same thing. We should have the White
House lie of the Week. You know, Last week's lie
of the week was the illegal orders being sedition and treason.

(02:00:10):
This year's lie of the week is that we had
a duty of responsibility to kill those people that were
swimming in the water after we illegally shot the boat.
She said, I'm glad you noticed. Our original promise on
day one was the whole the media accountable, because unfortunately
we deal with us all day every day around here.

(02:00:32):
There are so many fake stories that the that are
unfortunately written, that have inaccurate characterizations, you know, inaccurate characterizations
of the war in Venezuela and what happened there in
terms of killing survivors illegally, you know, characterizing it as
self defense, as neutralizing a threat. These people were not

(02:00:55):
a threat. They were obviously out of combat. We talked
about that yesterday. How you've got the genie a convention
in the French term or de combas, right meaning these
people are out of combat, they are out of action,
and you have no right to kill them. That is
simply murder. Caroline love Itt outright denies that Hegseth ordered

(02:01:15):
this second boat strike, and she reveals who did so.
As Hegseth is being attacked for doing this, she said
with respect to the strikes in question. On September second,
Secretary Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes,
and Admiral Bradley worked well within his authority and the

(02:01:38):
law directing the engagements to ensure the boat was destroyed
and the threat to the US was eliminated. Again, there
is no threat to people who are struggling to survive
in the water. There's no threat to the US again,
just like there's no emergency for COVID, there's no emergency
for tariffs. They have different laws every week at the

(02:02:00):
Trump administration, and they go out and pardon some of
the biggest drug dealers we've ever had, cut plea bargains
with others. At the same time, they say that these mules,
presumably if they even were doing drugs, that these mules
are somehow a threat to the United States. It's all
a lie. Just as Audi pointed out, it is all

(02:02:22):
a lie, and that's the name of his podcast. The
president has a right to take them out if they
are threatening the United States and if they are bringing
illegal narcotics in which are killing our citizens at a
record rate. Well, I tell you it is not an
emergency because this war on drugs has been going on
now for fifty four years. As I point out yesterday,

(02:02:45):
you got all these conservatives who just love Richard Nixon.
I guess they love the war on drugs because of
what allows them to do. They're like, let's them play soldier,
lets them play army, lets them play policemen, lets them
do whatever they wish. On the previous administration, she said,
there was enough ventanyl traffic in our country to kill
every American man, woman, and child many times over. Wait

(02:03:08):
a minute, how are we still alive? Oh? Didn't they
tell us that same lie the Trump administration about the
pandemic that was not a threat to us either. They
always make up these imaginary mcguffins to do whatever they wish.
CBS reporter Gabe Gutis asked for clarification. He said, so,
Admiral Bradley was the one that gave the order for

(02:03:29):
the second strike. She said, yes, and he was well
within his authority to do so. No, he wasn't. He
was following illegal orders. What Bradley did you murdering sob
You violated the constitution, You violated your oath to the Constitution.
You're not you're not following legitimate orders. You don't have
any authority if you violate the constitution. Same thing is

(02:03:52):
true of Hegseth, the same thing is true of Trump.
But they're going to cut it off. They may even
go after the subordinates of Bradley to protect the people
at the top. So he's now the commander since October third,
because the other guy's like, Hey, I don't want any
this is a hot potato. I don't want to have
anything to do with this. This is illegal.

Speaker 5 (02:04:12):
Yes, they had so much fentanyl being imported to kill
all America. We need herd sobriety to avoid this.

Speaker 2 (02:04:22):
That's good, Lands. I like that heard sobriety. That's it. Yeah,
you're your abstinence doesn't protect you. It's other people's abstinence
that protect you, just like the mask, just like the vaccine. Right,
the vaccine doesn't protect you. The mask doesn't protect you.
It's other people's mask, other people's vaccine, other people's sobriety.
That's what protects you from doing all this stuff. I

(02:04:45):
love that. That's great. So the former JAGS working group said,
there's two things here, two possibilities. Number one, if orders
were given to kill incapacitated survivors, that is a war
crime understood by every nation on Earth. Number two, if

(02:05:05):
the operation was not part of an armed conflict, and
it wasn't, it's simply murder, simply murder. And again, yesterday
I read you the case laid out by Andrew McCarthy
for the same thing. He says this is a war
crime or worse, who writes for a national review. He
laid that out in detail yesterday. But again, that's the

(02:05:26):
two options. If they killed incapacitated survivors, even if it
was a war and a conflict, Even if these people,
if it was an armed conflict and they were shooting
back after they're incapacitated, you can't kill them. And if
it wasn't an armed conflict, and it wasn't because they
were not shooting back, they were running away, they got

(02:05:46):
shot in the back essentially, and so it was simply murder.
So again, the previous commander got out. This guy's been
there since October I. He didn't want to have anything
to do with this because he knew it was what
this thing really was. But it gets even worse. As
I was looking at these these Trump sucking media people

(02:06:11):
out there doing, you know, trying to defend Trump on
every issue because they want to pander to the Maga
crowd that thinks that he is their messiah. That's why
they do this stuff. The things that they were doing
putting out there, well you have the seditious six. They're
being run by Soros. It's another color revolution, the most

(02:06:32):
idiotic take I've ever seen on any of this stuff.
But then they also put this up Infra wars the
top of the thing here full watch full must watch interview.
US intelligence asset Patrick Byrne reveals the secret of why
Trump is held bent on regime change in Venezuela. This guy,
Patrick Byrne is the billionaire who started Overstock, and he's

(02:06:57):
been hanging around with Alex Jones and Michael Flann a
lot of different times. So you know, they become an item,
I guess, and they identify him as an intelligence asset.
I guess you just kind of abbreviated ass period, that's
what he is. If you have any doubts that Alex

(02:07:20):
is controlled opposition, that he is a CIA shill, this
ought to get rid of it. Alex has been pushing
for this Venezuelan war. He's got Patrick burn On there saying, yeah,
I'm connected with the intelligence people. This is why we
got to do it. He's crossed over from the kind
of guy who used to oppose lies about weapons mass

(02:07:41):
destruction that got us into a rock and now he
is applauding lies about fentanyl to get us into Venezuela,
saying it's a great thing and we need to go
do that. It's absolutely disgusting to see what these people
and the alternative mainstream media have been doing. Disgust me.
But they're not the only ones. You've got Megan Kelly,

(02:08:04):
who is I think the very definition of a prostitute.
As Jarl SILENTI likes to call the press out there.
She is willing to do anything and everything in order
to get attention, and this is why she had to
say about these war crimes.

Speaker 3 (02:08:18):
So I really do kind of not only want to
see them killed in the water, whether they're on the
boat or in the water, but I'd really like to
see them suffer. I would like Trump and Hegseth to
make it last a long time so that they lose
a limb and.

Speaker 4 (02:08:32):
Bleed out a little.

Speaker 3 (02:08:33):
Like I'm really having a difficult time ginning up sympathy
for these guys who ten seconds earlier almost got taken
out by the initial bomb, but because they managed to
get ejected, you know, a little too soon, had to
be taken out in the water. I realized, legally it
may make a difference.

Speaker 2 (02:08:51):
Had to be taken out in the wall.

Speaker 3 (02:08:52):
Tough case to really gin up the sympathies of the
American people.

Speaker 2 (02:08:57):
Just when you think that Megan Kelly can't get any
more reprehensible, you know, she proves you wrong. You know,
this is the same person who just a couple of
weeks ago, How was that I was putting up? At
least she wasn't eight, you know, let's make America great again.
There you go. That was the argument she was making that, Hey,
you know, at least they didn't get eight year olds,
they got fourteen and fifteen year olds with Epstein and

(02:09:18):
Trump and so forth right, I'm supposed to excuse it.
I'm not really sure whether pedophilia is a crime. I'm
not really sure where the machine gunning people in the
water is a crime or not. You might want to
go back and look at the law. You're supposedly trained
as a lawyer. That's supposedly what it is on her resume.
Megan Kelly when she interviewed me when she came to
do a hit piece on Alex Jones. She interviewed all

(02:09:41):
of the people who were on air there, and when
I expressed skepticism about Trump and the issues I had
with them, I brought up civil asset forfeiture and the
drug war and she got this blank stare said, what
is civil asset forfiture? There knows nor cares anything about

(02:10:01):
the war on drugs or the Constitution. It's amazing how
uninformed she was. All she does is, you know, whatever
Roger Els or whoever was directing her told her to do.
They told her to stand up and turn around. She
does that. It's pretty amazing. Really a prostitute ifever there
was one. Why should we be surprised at what any

(02:10:23):
of these people do after they have covered for the
COVID lies and the crimes with that.

Speaker 4 (02:10:30):
It's amazing to me that she's just flat out saying that, Yeah,
that's the sort of thing you would expect to be
in a leaked audio call. Yeah, not just flat out
said on her podcast or wherever it was.

Speaker 2 (02:10:43):
And why isn't this an outrage? You know? I mean,
you know, now we get penalized for opposing genocide, and
now it's a problem if we oppose killing people in
the water that are out of combat, when there never
was a wore to start with. Trump is saving Democrats
from themselves with his latest attacks and also his alliances

(02:11:07):
or his daytons, as the headline that he made with
Mom Danny, with al Qaeda, terrorists and others. So the
problem with this headline is that Trump is a democrat.
He is a democrat, He's a globalist, he is a zionist,
he is a technocrat. He is all those things because
he again is a prostitute for sale to whoever pays him.

(02:11:29):
And the rest of these people their job is to
prostitute themselves in order to cover for him when people
see what he's doing. Trump, for better or worse, has
long built his political career on effectively attacking his opponents
and exploiting their perceived weakness with the public. However, it
seems that all of a sudden, Trump's political instincts may

(02:11:50):
be faltering. Instead of exploiting the Democrats' weak spot, he
is elevating one of their strong leaders onto the national stage.
His attacks on Senator Mark Kelly have thrown the retired
Navy captain and former astronaut into the political discourse in
a whole new way. While Kelly may have been a
rising star on the Democrats bench, this is the first

(02:12:12):
sustained tussle with Trump. Pete is now trying to court
Marshal Kelly. The fight appears far from over, and given
the actual content of the clip, Kelly looks likely to
prevail again. You're going to push somebody like Mark Kelly,
who is about as anti Second Amendment as you can

(02:12:34):
get a Democrat, and he is elevating the Syrian president
who is an al Qaeda, isis al Nusra terrorist who's
murdering Christians and other minorities in Syria, far worse than
anything that ever happened under bashad Asar and then elevating

(02:12:55):
mom Danny. And they pointed out, they said last week
he warmly embraced New York City Mayor elect Mam Danny
in the Oval office. For months, he had previewed his
strategy of tying the Democrats nationally to Mom Danny, and
now he just says, well, now we're going to praise him.
He wanted to tie the Democrats to this guy and

(02:13:17):
hurting them that way, but now he's praising him. Trump
offered Mam Donnie and his ideas a full throated embrace
that makes attacking him much harder for a GOP that
is deeply loyal to Trump and reliant on his political
instincts in his sway, but again, he has no principles.

(02:13:37):
He's just for sale to the highest better and he
will do whatever it takes to get attention, even if
it is crazy and stupid, like saying We're going to
make Canada of the fifty first state and then attacking
them for being a fentanyl supplier, all the rest of
this stuff, to the point where now American athletes are

(02:13:59):
getting booed by Canadian fans because we've never had this
kind of poisonous relationship between the two countries until Trump
created it. It's entirely plausible that Trump saw mom Danny's
message as similar to the one that he ran on
and just didn't want to cede that ground to the Democrats.
After all, Trump made many of the same empty populist

(02:14:21):
promises that mom Danny has based his twenty four campaign on.
Trump promised immediately lower prices, which have not come down.
He promised to end the war in Ukraine within the
first twenty four hours, and it continues. Similarly, Mom Danny's
plans for free buses, raising property taxes, and arresting net

(02:14:43):
and Yahoo all are not possible. They face practical, political
and legal obstacles. So while it's still more likely than
not that Trump flip saw mom Danny and goes back
to attacking him before election day, for the time being,
at least he's training his fire on Kelly. Kelly sparked
trump'shire this month by appearing in a public service announcement

(02:15:06):
urging military members to question illegal orders and to horror
follow the Constitution. And for that Trump calls him the
part of the Seditious Six, and so does Alex Jones,
mimicking whatever nonsense and lies Trump puts out, and then
he adds his own lies by trying to tie in

(02:15:28):
Soros to this as well. The midterms are still a
year way. A lot can change, but as of right now,
Trump is helping to save the Democrats from themselves. Isn't
it interesting they want to have the two of them
switching power back and forth. That gives them plausible deniability
for what they're both doing to us, just like you know,

(02:15:49):
they handed it over from Trump to Biden so they
could do the you know, Trump creates a vaccine and
then Biden does the mandates, and then they can say, oh,
it wasn't the vaccine, it was the man dates that
were evil. Well, Trump wants to hand this stuff back
over to the Democrats again left right, left right, and
both of them can say the other guy did it.

(02:16:11):
So if he's going to build up Kelly for a
presidential run, even though Kelly wants to kill the Second Amendment,
Trump doesn't care about that. He's fine with doing it.
He did it himself by executive order. And I'm sure
that Kelly would use that Trump precedent of gun control
by executive order to do his best to kill the
Second Amendment, all handed to him by Trump. Well, the

(02:16:35):
US is rehearsing airstrikes against Venezuela, says the Wall Street Journal.
And just in case you think that this has anything
to do with drugs, here's Trump in twenty eleven, really
jumping into colonialism. You know, colonialism is a word that
has been used as a majorative term so much by

(02:16:55):
the left that has lost its meaning in the same
way that the terms racist have lost them or anti
semitism have lost the meaning, because they've been leveled at
anybody that opposes their policy, and the person doesn't have
to be racist or antisemitic, and you don't have to
be a real colonialist to be accused of being a colonialist.

(02:17:17):
And yet what Trump is proposed in twenty eleven, it
really was a form of colonialism.

Speaker 16 (02:17:23):
Ultimately, the people will appreciate it. They're going to end
up taking over the country eventually, but the people will
appreciate it, and they should pay us back.

Speaker 17 (02:17:34):
But we have to go in to save these lives.

Speaker 2 (02:17:36):
They will take the oil.

Speaker 16 (02:17:37):
Do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock
this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and
save the lives. After it's all done, we go to
the protesters who end up running the country.

Speaker 18 (02:17:52):
They're going to like us a lot better than.

Speaker 17 (02:17:54):
They will if we don't do it.

Speaker 16 (02:17:55):
More importantly, we're going to save lives, and we should
then say, by the way, hey, from all of your oil,
we want reimbursement.

Speaker 18 (02:18:03):
We should have said we'll help you, but we want
fifty percent of your oil. They would have absolutely said, okay,
one hundred percent. In fact, they would have said, how
about seventy five percent? So and isn't it said? We
could have had anything we wanted. We could have had
fifty percent of those oil fields. You know, in the

(02:18:24):
old days, when you had a war, it's to the
victor belong the spoils.

Speaker 11 (02:18:29):
So we could have had something special. When the so
called rebels came to us, we should have said, fellas,
we're going to help you. We want fifty percent of
your oil. They would have said, thank you very much,
we have a deal. Write it down, sign it.

Speaker 17 (02:18:47):
We have a deal. We would have been a rich
nation again. They have tremendous oil reserves in Libya. Instead
we help, we get nothing. We're very very foolish led.
Our leaders unfortunately.

Speaker 2 (02:19:03):
Are Yeah, I know there was a good leader is
going to go in and shake them down. A good
leader is going to steal their oil. And that's exactly
what he's doing. There's a lot more oil in Venezuela
than in Libya. There's a lot more oil in Venezuela
than in Saudi Arabia. Could that be the motivation? As
Jerald S. Clinty says, you know, we're not in these
different countries because they're selling bananas. Okay, We're there because

(02:19:27):
the oil. If you look at what was happening with Syria,
it wasn't so much even about their oil as it
was about the transit of oil across their country. Which
pipeline was going to be allowed. Was it going to
be something coming from Russia or something coming from the UAE.
I think it was. But you know, we had our
ally and we wanted to transit the oil across Syria.

(02:19:48):
The Russians had their own idea. Take a look at
the pipelines going into Germany that were blown up, right,
they blocked that off. They got the a German government
to block off that second pipeline until they blew them
both up because they didn't want the Russians selling them
the oil. They wanted to sell them the oil. And

(02:20:10):
so that's the reality here. Trump is telling Maduro to
flee as he is continually threatening him with land operations
now and again. He's operating like a corrupt colonial government,
like a mafia don, which is all he understands. He
grew up with organized crime, He grew up in casinos,

(02:20:33):
strong arm tactics corruption in terms of bribing officials and
other things. That's where Trump comes from. He's not a builder,
he's not a businessman. He's a crook. He's a mafia crook,
and that's the way he's running this country. I'm sick
and tired of him. Go ahead, Travis, read some of
these comments here before.

Speaker 4 (02:20:51):
We Marky Mark and New Jersey thank you very much
for the tip. Says is it me or is Carolyn levetet?
Ptty and more polished version of Jen circle back ZACKI
the lips.

Speaker 2 (02:21:01):
Trump went up on the lips, and.

Speaker 4 (02:21:03):
I literally cannot picture what either of these two women
look like right now, despite the fact we've been talking
about about them and they've been on screen. They are
a void in my mind, and all I see is
a silhouette.

Speaker 1 (02:21:14):
Just uh.

Speaker 2 (02:21:14):
Well, Trump doesn't talk about how how smart she is.
He just talks about those lips. Can you believe those lips?

Speaker 4 (02:21:21):
Well, at least he doesn't lie about that.

Speaker 2 (02:21:22):
I guess I wonder what kind of lips over she gets?

Speaker 17 (02:21:24):
You?

Speaker 1 (02:21:25):
So smart?

Speaker 4 (02:21:25):
She's so smart? Okay, that one's too obvious.

Speaker 1 (02:21:28):
Even you guys won't buy that.

Speaker 4 (02:21:29):
Okay, Ratus, bro, what's funny about lumers that millennials can
see in real time. What's selling out gets you, That's right,
it gets you a lot of really bad plastic surgery. Yeah,
I know I mentioned it many times, but the video
of her drunkenly flirting with Mike Maw and him being
utterly repulsed is.

Speaker 2 (02:21:48):
The one that Milo just put up. I had a
drudge link for about four days and the language in
it is pretty amazing, but it is. She is drunk
and getting in his face and he's leaning back, the
blonde guy, and he just kind of looks over the
camera like, yeah, she messes his hair up, and he's like,
you messed my hair up.

Speaker 4 (02:22:06):
I don't remember that. I've only seen a short clip.

Speaker 2 (02:22:10):
This is a clip about two minutes long, and he's
Milo says, I just found the twenty minute clip of this,
so I don't know what happens too.

Speaker 4 (02:22:17):
Milo is an interesting character. You don't want to be
on Milo's bad side. He has He's involved in everything
and has a lot of dirt on everyone. Milo is
even Yeah, yeah, Milo is a interesting character. Hadrian was right,
Lumour's human mask needs constant upkeep high boost. At the

(02:22:38):
Irish version, of the Patriot Front.

Speaker 2 (02:22:41):
Yeah, I could be a false flying attack.

Speaker 4 (02:22:43):
Ap rumblest This isn't genuine in my opinion, it's fake
and stage as many of the violences to start civil war.

Speaker 2 (02:22:48):
Don't ever follow anybody who's afraid to show their face.
That's just my just like anonymous QAnon. Right, I'm not
following somebody who is going to remain anonymous and is
going to speak in riddles and quatrains like nostrodamus or something. Sorry,
don't even go there. And I would say the same
thing about somebody who is afraid to show their face.

(02:23:10):
And I also reject the tactics of vigilante violence.

Speaker 4 (02:23:15):
So we have ap you read that real Jason Barker
Schoolhouse Rock should redo that cartoon and change the bill.
Change bill to an executive order.

Speaker 2 (02:23:25):
Yeah, that's right. I'm an order. I'm an order. I'm
a dictator of that.

Speaker 4 (02:23:29):
Yeah, it's gounk call of Rose Gardens. I can't fly anymore.
I won't be groped if I if I could avoid
flying for the rest of my life, I absolutely would
believe me.

Speaker 2 (02:23:39):
Brian B.

Speaker 4 (02:23:40):
Mack, our youngest daughter, always thought it was cannibal soup.
That's good close.

Speaker 2 (02:23:48):
Cancer soup cancer soep, it's good, yeah, delicious. Oh.

Speaker 4 (02:23:55):
In that Christmas Carol, which for some reason my brain
is not bringing to mind, but it says, you know,
don we now are gay apparel. I always thought it
was donning now our day of peril, and was very
confused as to why this was our day of peril.

Speaker 2 (02:24:07):
Yeah, I won't be donning peril this.

Speaker 4 (02:24:10):
Year, ap Rumblessey. They use extremism as a tool to
normalize crimes against humanity and goes on to say gas
lighting one on one. The whole cabinet is trained in it.
Roy mh dismantled the biggest cartel, that being the CIA.

Speaker 2 (02:24:26):
That's right, the Criminal Intelligence Agency. That's why, you know,
when I look at the way Alex is selling the
SWAR to people to his audience, and he's bringing in
Patrick Burnett. Now he's even gone to the he's an
intelligence asset. Yeah, yeah, he's telling you to your face.
Just look at what David Ike is saying about Alex
Showes and his warmongreen. It truly is amazing.

Speaker 4 (02:24:50):
We have high boost. How many other drug dealers has
Trump pardoned? Also besides this Honduran dude, Well, he loves him.
Some drug deal. There was that Jewish guy that was
choking people out in synagogue and beating.

Speaker 2 (02:25:04):
People up, that's right, and doing that after Trump released
him as well. So yeah, it's the Sabbath nineteen seventy four.
So drugs are supplying to man issue. That's right, except that,
you know, here's the issue. The government politicians don't understand
supplying to man, not in the real world and not
in the drug war issue either. That's the real issue.

Speaker 4 (02:25:27):
We have Hibu saying we aren't going after drugs in
Central America, Columbia, Mexico, the Caribbean, etc. Boat But fishing
boats a continent away is the problem. It's a distraction.

Speaker 2 (02:25:38):
Yeah, we'll just wait. They're going to go after Mexico
as well. That's probably the next thing that they invade.
We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we
will be right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (02:26:48):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 19 (02:26:51):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better,
and I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue, but

(02:27:14):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some at the David Knightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various
gallas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

(02:27:36):
just put it in the next package of bombs and
missiles coming from the USA.

Speaker 9 (02:27:50):
Whether you're feeling like the booths where or bluegrass, APS
radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of
channels on our app at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (02:28:05):
Yesterday I wanted to talk about some pharmaceutical news, and
I wanted to begin as I did yesterday, but then
I ran out of time talking about the fact that
cash strapped Britain is going to be selling off embassies.
They are cutting nearly a third of their embassy staff.
The budget singles out high cost locations like New York

(02:28:25):
that it could include the possible sale of a fifteen
million dollar penthouse that was purchased in twenty nineteen for
diplomats at the luxury fifty Uni n Plaza complex. Seven
bedroom residents occupies the entire thirty eighth floor and includes
a library, six bathrooms and a powder room. And this

(02:28:48):
is the kind of thing we saw with New Zealand
when they hit the wall with their socialist economy and
they couldn't pay their ambassadors abroad and they were selling
off assets. That was the point in time, as I
pointed out during the shutdown, that they decided that they
would spin off their air traffic control and they did that.

(02:29:10):
They were the first country to do that and just
incorporate that into the airline tickets that were there, and
people saw how effective that was. And you've got a
lot of different countries that have done that. Even Canada
has done that, and that needs to be what has
done in the United States, but of course they're not
doing that. The other part of it is the UK

(02:29:31):
is selling major embassy compounds in Bangkok. And you remember
the recent defrocking or whatever they call it for Prince Andrew,
the man formerly known as Prince They removed all these
different titles from him, and kicked him out of one
palace to another smaller palace. When he went to Bangkok

(02:29:53):
on a supposed goodwill mission or something, he refused to
stay at their embassy even though it's pretty posh. He
decided he was saying it an even more posh private hotel.
And because I guess it's because he's bringing in they
said ten prostitutes a day. But that's what these people
are doing. But the whole point of putting this here

(02:30:15):
and talking about this in conjunction with the pharmaceutical stuff
was because Pfiser tried to shake down Argentina and Brazil
in a third country that refused to speak out publicly
because they had agreed to capitulate to Pfiser's blackmail. Pfiser
said the time, you know, we've got this thing set
up so that people can't come into your country or

(02:30:37):
leave your country unless they've got the shot. But at
the same time, we want to be held harmless for
any harm that it does, because they knew it was
going to be harmful, and we don't want to just
have the usual kind of guarantees that you see in
other places. We want to have we want to be
held harmless if we have even manufacturing issues or some

(02:30:58):
other things like that, or if you understand, you come
to understand later that Pfizer and Albert Borla did this deliberately.
They did it as deliberately as Pete Hegseth went after
these people in the water. And so they said, so
we would like to make sure that as a guarantee
of your word, that you're going to put up some collateral.

(02:31:19):
So we want you to put up as collateral foreign embassies,
military equipment that you've got in other places. And it's
like people are looking at that saying, how in the
world do you even do that, Well, it is property
that they can sell and property that somebody could take away.
The whole thing was a fraud and Pfizer knew it,

(02:31:40):
and they were asking for these this collateral that was
outside of the country that they were getting ready to
poison the people in So only one out of seven
Germans who had a positive PCR test had COVID infection.
And this is coming from Children's Health Defense talking about

(02:32:00):
how this is stunning an eighty six percent false positive
rate for PCR procedures. Remember Handy was saying at the time,
I remember when this was all happening, and Handy sent
me a memo and a red on air saying that

(02:32:20):
he had one of the nurses there take a one
of these tests right out of the bag and run
it through and it was positive. It didn't even come
in contact with any humans. So what do you expect.
Nothing about this is real. It was all just made up,
a significant overcounting of COVID nineteen infections during the pandemic

(02:32:44):
because it wasn't a pandemic. It was simply a lie.
By the end of twenty twenty one, ninety two percent
of Germans had already acquired a natural infection, indicating a
near universal immunity in the population. Maybe it wasn't a
pandemic to begin with. Maybe it was just a cold,

(02:33:05):
you know, because that's one way these coronaviruses, if they
even existed, right, they talk about rhinoviruses and coronaviruses. But
I'm at the point now where I don't believe that
the viruses even exist because they haven't used any real
scientific tactics to isolate this stuff. We're led to believe
that they have observed these viruses. Were led to believe

(02:33:29):
that they've observed that these viruses are present and sick
people and not present in people who are not sick.
None of that is true, folks. It is a complete fraud.
I mean the fraud goes beyond the pandemic, beyond the
PCR test, it goes back to virology itself. It's all
a lie. As OUDI would say, it's all liedemit and

(02:33:52):
it absolutely is. And speaking of lies, just remember the
lies that Bill Gates told us.

Speaker 8 (02:33:58):
But you don't have a choice. People act like you
have a choice. People don't feel like going to the
stadium when they might get infected. You know, it's not
the government who's saying, okay, just ignore this disease. And
you know people are deeply affected, yes, yes, in these
deaths by knowing they could be part of the transmission chain.

(02:34:20):
And old people, their parents, their grandparents could be affected
by this, and so you don't you know, you don't
get to say ignore what's going on here. There are
there will be the ability, particularly rich countries to open
up if things are done well over the next few months.

(02:34:41):
But for the world at large, normalcy only returns when
we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.

Speaker 2 (02:34:52):
And so so, therefore, if you want the vaccine sitching
get back to normal, you're going to have to get
us title to your embassies in other countries. And by
the way, that was reported by stat News. Stat News
is a big pharmaceutical trade magazine. They always toe the

(02:35:13):
company line. This study was done by three German researchers.
They analyzed how well PCR test results aligned with the
results of blood tests for SARS cove two antibodies. Again,
this is the same play by play scam that Fauci
ran with HIV. We got we haven't isolated exactly what

(02:35:36):
it is that causes age, but we see this these
antibodies are something out there and we assume that that
is what That indicates a presence of the disease that
we can't observe scientifically, we theorize that it is there.
So what they're saying is we see these antibodies. Why
are they focusing on the antibodies, Well, just think about that.

(02:35:57):
That's what they taught, that's how they determine it. They say, well,
we're not seeing the virus, we're seeing the antibodies. Because
there isn't a virus and it's not a pandemic. They
don't observe the virus. They observe something else and say
that that is present, but we can't observe the cause

(02:36:17):
of the thing. But it is a particle or an
entity or whatever. It's a virus and it's there, but
we can't observe it, but can observe the things that
are the reaction to it. Utter boloney. How the COVID
inquiry protected the establishment? This is from Brownstone Trish Dennis.
She says that for four years, hundreds of witnesses and

(02:36:39):
nearly two hundred million pounds in cost, the UK COVID
Inquiry has reached the one conclusion many expected, a carefully
footnoted act of self exoneration. It assiduously avoids asking the
only questions that truly matter. We're lockdowns? Were lockdowns ever justified?

(02:37:00):
Did they work? And what was the overall cost to society?
And they repeat the familiar refrain of too little, too late.
Now this is the way they're handling this lie, this
massive line fraud in the UK. They do an inquiry,
you know, just like the Warren Commission, to explain away
the conspiracy theories. When everybody sees that it is a conspiracy,

(02:37:21):
there's more people involved in it that was the most
obvious thing when you've got the guy who's the alleged
shooter who's killed by an organized crime figure like Jack Ruby.
I remember when that happened. It was right around Thanksgiving,
and everybody my family. I was eight years old at
the time, and everybody in my family was like, well,
this is a this is a plan to a multi

(02:37:42):
level was not a loan shooter. Everybody could see that.
So they come up with a commission, a Warren comission
to explain away or nine to eleven commission to explain
away how concrete and steal buildings just collapse in their
own footprint after a fire for a couple of hours.

Speaker 4 (02:37:55):
Were they bring in someone like Jolly West to give
a psycho analysis to go, oh, yeah, that's very interesting. Yeah,
this was definitely a crazy guy, very strange who.

Speaker 2 (02:38:06):
So you know, was it real? Is the question? And
they're not asking that the way we cover it up
here in the United States, we haven't had a COVID inquiry, right.
Why is that why people demand some answers about this nonsense.
We see the damage that was done here as well. Well.
What they've done to cover up for that is to
have both sides say well, I think China did it.

(02:38:30):
I think it was a lab leak, and on and on.
That covers them up. They say, well, you know, we
did the best we could, but China did it to us,
and we just had to try to recoup, and yeah,
we made some mistakes. We'll do better next time. We'll
move faster, we'll move harder next time. So it allows
them to cover up for their crimes that they conspired

(02:38:50):
against us, and it lays the groundwork for them to
do even more the next time. That's the way it's
being handled here in the United States, which is even
more reprehensible. So the conclusions from their so called inquiry
could have been drafted before the first witness entered the room.
But you know, they spent a lot of time and
four years, hundreds of witnesses, and two hundred million pounds

(02:39:13):
in costs. But they could have written this down before
because they came to the conclusion that they wanted after
this dog and pony show. Here's the conclusions. The lockdowns
were necessary, the modeling was solid, the critics misunderstood what
was happening, and the establishment acted wisely. Every single one

(02:39:34):
of these things is a lie. The modeling was absolute nonsense.
We knew it at the time. Even another university, the
University of Edinburgh, called out the Imperial College of London
and Neil Ferguson's nonsense paper as a lie. But they
said in this one. Even Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnson's most

(02:39:58):
influential advisor in the early twenty twenty, has accused the
Inquiry of constructing what he calls a fake history. In
a detailed post on x he claimed it suppressed key evidence,
ignored junior staff who were present at pivotal meetings, and
omitted internal discussions about a proposed chicken Pox Party infection strategy.

(02:40:20):
There we go think that could be the name of
the of a new third party, the Chicken Pox Party.

Speaker 4 (02:40:28):
So the harms of lack we say, our politicians are
already a pox upon us, the Pox party.

Speaker 2 (02:40:35):
That's the Union Party. The harms of lockdown are too
numerous for a single list, but they include an explosion
of mental health and anxiety disorders, a surge in cancer's
heart disease, deaths of despair that didn't come from lockdown
that came from the JAB, developmental regressions and children, the
collapse of small businesses and family livelihoods, profound social atomization

(02:40:59):
and damage to relationships, and the erosion of trust in
public institutions, which I don't see as a negative. I
see that as a positive. I see the shutting down
of schools and the exposure of what's happening in the
classroom to parents. I see that as the silver lining
to this fraud and this massive crime. The pandemic policy

(02:41:22):
added twenty percent of UK's GDP to the debt in
just two years, but it exploded even more here in America,
the COVID vaccines. Five years after the world's largest medical experiment,
there is still no mandatory system for tracking millions of injuries.

(02:41:43):
This is from the Free Thought Project, and this is
from Cheryl Atkinson, and again, Pfizer knew this from the
very beginning. That's why they wanted these embassies as collateral.
They knew that they were going to be harming people,
and they worked with the governments to make sure that
that was not going to be tracked. So we got

(02:42:03):
to remember that when we look at how the medical
community quote unquote operates. This is an article from the
Daily Skeptic and a person says, the other day I
published a retrospective article about how I and others could
see from the start that the lockdowns would be a
public health, social and economic disaster, and of course we

(02:42:28):
could see that it was a fraud because of all
these other flags that were out there as well. The
time has come to set down a more personal record,
not because it's particularly unusual or special, but because it
is through individual stories that history is best experienced, and
the history of lockdowns should never be forgotten or forgiven.
And it's one of the reasons why I put together

(02:42:49):
the monster Jab thing. This is exactly how previously unrecognized
serious side effects were discovered with other medications. Again, this
is talking about the hang on second device just popped here.
This is talking about how the abuse takes time for

(02:43:13):
doctors to catch up on this. Even the doctors are
playing catch up on this, it takes them a while
to discover the adverse effects from these things, because it
is when these people poison us. The poisoners in the
pharmaceutical industry, they make sure that they don't kill everybody once.
That's why they varied the dosage so they could see

(02:43:34):
what was fatal and so forth. But it's also kept
them from getting caught right away. If they gave something
to people that killed everybody and did it right away,
then they would catch on. But if they slowly kill
you with a vaccine or something like that, then that
gives them plausible deniability. This is exactly how previously unrecognized

(02:43:58):
serious side effects were discovered with other medications in the
late nineteen nineties. As a CBS investigative correspondent, I reported
says Sheryl Atkinson on Reslin, a diabetes drug that was
withdrawn in two thousand after reports of liver failure began
appearing in the FDA's Adverse Events Reporting system. Again, we

(02:44:21):
saw that with rem de Zoviet as well rem Desaviet
had been They tried to push fout. He tried to
push that for his friends at Gilead Pharmaceuticals. He tried
to push it as a cure for AIDS. He tried
to push it in previous other previous conditions, and it
never was effective and it was very unsafe, and so

(02:44:42):
he pronounced it himself as the standard of care one
week after a Chinese study said that it was ineffective
and very very dangerous to the liver. And by the way,
when we talk about ram Paul, who's been one of
the people pushing this lab leak thing so much, And

(02:45:02):
I say it's an alibi and it is laying the
foundation for them to do it worse the next time.
And I don't think ram Paul is mistaken on this.
I think he's in on it. He had his wife
by Shares and Gilead with Remdesevier stuff, So again I
don't trust him. Experts say for each adverse event reboarded,

(02:45:24):
they're likely ten thousand to one hundred thousand more that
don't get reported, says Cheryl Atkinson. Well, that was a
Harvard study that showed that that's why a handful of
fatalities is so alarming and prompted the FDA to pull
that drug, a Resilant, from the market. But of course
that was back in the nineteen nineties. Pharmaceutical companies have

(02:45:46):
a lot more pull with media as well as with
government regulators now. Similarly, she says, I also broke news
at CBS on the erectyle dysfunction drug Viagra and how
it was linked to a form of sudden blindness years
after approval, to which you tell people, if you don't

(02:46:07):
stop it, you're going to go blind right, But it
was only because clusters of blindness cases happened to get
reported to the FDA's Adverse Event system, and a few
intrepid eye doctors then noticed a pattern and their patients.
The actual doctors prescribing viagra failed to recognize and report
the blindness as a possible adverse event. The side effect

(02:46:30):
was originally denied by the drug maker, but is now
added to the warning on the label. But they still
saw it to people.

Speaker 4 (02:46:37):
Hey, do you think maybe that the blindness that we're
seeing in this group of people that we're giving this
drug too could be related to the drug. No, it's
probably something else, maybe something of water.

Speaker 2 (02:46:48):
And then a third example, she said, I investigated, is
the cholesterol lowering statins. At first, statin makers denied that
potentially fatal muscle problems and brain issues could be related
to their medicine, but after enough reports made it into
the federal database, it became undeniable and those adverse events

(02:47:08):
were ultimately added to the label. Except my doctor was
not aware of it. She kept trying to push statins
on me, and I said, no, it's got some really
nasty adverse effects. I remember which ones were they in sight. Well,
it's been a long time since I looked at it.
I don't remember. But how about potentially fatal muscle problems
and brain issues? How about that? And how about the

(02:47:30):
question as to whether or not we need to even
control the cholesterol levels that are there? She replied by
And we had this conversation multiple times. She went through
the whole spiel twice with me, lecturing me about this,
framing him Massachusetts study that showed that STATINS was great
for everybody. I said, well, that's fine, no thanks, I'm

(02:47:54):
not taking them. Vari's data for the COVID nineteen vaccines
now exceed leads one point six million reports in the
US alone, including more than thirty six thousand deaths and
two hundred thousand hospitalizations reported after the vaccine. Why aren't
we stopping it? Well, that's a rhetorical question. We all

(02:48:16):
know why. Experts across the spectrum agree these figures represent
massive unreporting because most physicians are not filing reports even
asking their sick patients about their vaccine status, and many
adverse events are never recognized as possibly vaccine related. Trump, meanwhile,
is proud of his mass murder campaign, and so you know,

(02:48:40):
one point six million reports in the US alone, and
that's a tiny fraction of it. But we're not going
to do anything at all about it. That's the way
it all operates. The FDA is going to introduce a
new COVID nineteen vaccine protocol after report claims that the
shots killed ten children. Well that's good, except you know,

(02:49:02):
we've already got the VARs thing out there that she
just pointed out, thirty six thousand deaths, two hundred thousand hospitalizations.
But now they've got another ten and they're going to
run with us. And so the FDA is reviewing this.
I hope they stop it whatever reason they do, but
it would be it seems strange to me to try

(02:49:24):
to focus on these ten cases when you've got millions
of cases that you could focus on a Midwestern.

Speaker 5 (02:49:30):
I wonder if they're focusing on ten people that died
in a different way to discredit the other injuries like
it killed ten people.

Speaker 2 (02:49:40):
Oh no, yes, I think just to give us an
insight into the thinking of medicine and what has happened.
This is a great op ed piece here from a
website called midwesterndoctor dot com. Why have vaccines become a religion,

(02:50:00):
And I guess my first response to it would be that, well,
the accumulation of money has basically become a religion in America,
the love of money, and that's a big part of it.
You know, the fact that this magisterium of doctors in
the AMA has made these people very, very rich. That
was something that was not the case even in my

(02:50:21):
parents' generation, and even when I was young enough, doctors
would make house calls and things like that. Can you
imagine something like that today. No, That's how their status
has radically changed. As more and more people are awakening
to the dangers of vaccines, they're gradually discovering a problem
vaccine safety advocates have had to deal with for decades.

(02:50:42):
Talking to vaccine zealots is like speaking to a brick wall.
Regardless of the evidence you put forward, you can't teach them.
For example, in two thousand and nine, after nephrologist doctor
Suzanne Humphreys noticed patients, particularly the hospitalized ones, kept on
developing kidney failure flu shots, she experienced significant pushback from

(02:51:03):
trying to delay vaccination until after discharge. She said, in
the past, when I consulted on kidney failure cases and said, oh,
that was the statin or that was the antibiotic that
did it. Instantly the drug would be stopped, No questions
would be asked. Now, however, a new standard was applied

(02:51:24):
to vaccines. It didn't matter that the internist notes in
the charts said no obvious ideology of kidney failure found
after throw evaluation. The next time, the medical chief of
staff and I met in the corridor. At one point
I asked the chief why doesn't anybody else see the
problem here? Why is it just me? How can you

(02:51:45):
think that this is okay? Why is it now considered
normal to vaccinate very sick people on their first hospital day.
The oncologist gave me an answer that surprised me. She said,
medical religion, right, it is an orthodoxy. It is pushed
for money by people, in the same way they have

(02:52:06):
other orthodoxies, like Zionism, pushed for money. Once people awake
to the vaccine issues, one of the most frequent questions
which emerges is why the medical field has such a
rigid ideological attachment to it. I would argue that's due
to three interrelated reasons. First, human society has always been
defined by competing groups vying for status, and wealth. It

(02:52:30):
is a very recent development that doctors attracted the kind
of prestige and salary that this profession now commands, and
I would argue that that is ultimately result of two
other things. Number one market monopolization brought by the AMA
and number two, medicine creating a mythology that it rescued

(02:52:51):
us from the dark ages of disease and hence deserves
its supremacy in the current social hierarchy. As quote, vaccines
infectious disease unquote is a central part of that mythology.
Doctor Humphries raised her concerns about the influenza vaccine causing
kidney failures. Colleagues used the mythology of medicine's most esteemed

(02:53:15):
vaccines to dismiss her. For example, the chief of Internal
Medicine went on to remind me that smallpox was eradicated
by vaccines and polio was eradicated in the US by vaccines.
This eventually motivated doctor Humphries to scrutinize that mythology and
to create the pivotal book Dissolving Illusions that showed exactly

(02:53:39):
why that was a lie. And that is a lie.

Speaker 4 (02:53:43):
Yeah, if you go in and you actually look at
when these diseases started to disappear. You'll notice that there's
a tremendous drop off in cases, and then a vaccine
comes along for it, and the precipitous drop continues. The
vaccine doesn't seem to have any impact on the speed
and the rate at which it drops. It's generally coincided
with at an increase in hygiene. People figured out something

(02:54:07):
about how to keep themselves clean, how to better prevent
themselves from getting bacteria around. That's usually what does it.
That's right, and the vaccines show up and someone gets
to go, look the vaccines cause this completely ignoring the
fact that the drop off had already started before the
vaccine showed up.

Speaker 2 (02:54:24):
Yeah, I should get doctor baileyon again her husband.

Speaker 5 (02:54:28):
In the case of polio, you have a lot of
people with polio like symptoms where it's identical symptoms to polio.
It's identical in every way, but it can't be polio
because that's gone. We can't test it, of course, but
trust us, it's not polio despite having all the same
symptoms and no additional symptoms.

Speaker 4 (02:54:46):
And there's tons of cases of vaccine induced cases of
these things.

Speaker 2 (02:54:51):
Well, when you look at it. As I've said for
the longest time, science only advances when you question the
status quo, only when you look at what everybody else
is accepted, especially the experts in the field. It was
when the Right Brothers questioned the airlift tables and they
created their own tables that they were able to get

(02:55:13):
something that worked. Whereas the highly prestigious scientist Langley that
was at the top of the academic social order, he
was head of the Smithsonian as well, he couldn't get
his airplanes to operate because he was using the wrong data.
He assumed that that was correct. But the Right Brothers

(02:55:33):
did their own investigation and that helped them to make
something that worked. And so yeah, she'd get Sam Bailey,
doctor Sambailey and her husband who's also a doctor. They
co wrote a book, The Last Pandemic, and it should
be the last Pandemic if we really understand how they
pull the wool over our eyes. But they're going to

(02:55:54):
sell this lab leak nonsense. Doctor Mendelssohn, who in his
nineteen seventy nine book Confessions of a Medical Heretic, argued
that medicine was a dogmatic institution that prioritized authority control
and ritualistic practices. As I said over and over again,
that's precisely what Francis Bacon argued against when he created

(02:56:19):
formulated his scientific method. He said, we're not going to
go with dogmatism and established authority figures. We're going to
go with observation and testing and repetition. So he said,
it's treated as infallible doctrines that require blind obedience from
patients over patient well being, over data transparency, and over

(02:56:42):
evidence based care. He said there are unwritten rules in medicine,
such as doctors compulsively rushing to prescribe new drugs before
their side effects are fully known, and there's a rigid
faith like adherence to protocol over science. He demonstrated how
many routine practices and procedures cause significantly more harm than benefit,

(02:57:05):
for example, X rays for tonsillitis later creating thyroid cancer,
but could not be challenged due to the dogmatic nature
of medicine and also the massive amounts of money involved
the financial interests that are there. He also demonstrated many
illnesses that are routinely treated with harmful interventions would recover

(02:57:25):
on their own, especially if augmented with simple natural healing practices.
He argued that medicine's tendency to withhold foundational medical information
from the public, forcing them to trust the doctor. So,
as they point out in this article from midwesterndoctor dot com,

(02:57:45):
the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. For example,
when people attempt to conduct placebo controlled trials of vaccines,
they are vehemently rejected by the medical field as being
unethical to perform because it denies children the tiny placebo
group a life saving vaccine. So despite it being far

(02:58:07):
more unethical to inject every child in the country with
a vaccine of unknown safety or efficacy, which is the
real concern of safety. And this is something that also
came up in the early days of the so called pandemic,
as Trump was pushing the vaccine. It's like, hurry, hurry, hurry,
we got to get this thing out. I reported at

(02:58:29):
the time. There was a group of people who were
bought into this pandemic lie so deeply that they said,
will be guinea pigs. Let's do a challenge test, you know,
inject us with a vaccine and then expose us to COVID. Well,
it was two problems with that. They didn't have COVID

(02:58:50):
to expose them to. They'd not isolated it. But I
said at the time, I said, they will never do it.
You don't understand what the procedure have been always for
the FDA to use when it is a drug versus
a vaccine. If it was a drug, they would have
a group of people that had the illness or the

(02:59:14):
condition or whatever that it was supposed to help, and
they would break that into two different groups and have
a control group of people who had that condition or
that disease or whatever, and another group that didn't have it.
So that's for a drug that is supposed to treat that,
and then they would look to see what happened with
those two groups. They never do that with vaccines. They

(02:59:35):
don't have a control group. They never expose you to
the illness. Could it be that they've not isolated the virus?
They always tell us, so, well, no, we can't do
that because it'd be unethical to allow people to deny
them access to this life saving treatment. That is the
prevailing assumption, and that is the fundamental lie. Thank you

(02:59:56):
for joining us. Have a good day. The common man.
They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They

(03:00:17):
created common past, track and control us their Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
each of us has worth and dignity, created in the
image of God. That is what we have in common.

(03:00:41):
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find

(03:01:01):
at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2150: MAGA Media: Operation Mockingbird 2.0

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Are You A Charlotte?

Stuff You Should Know

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2150: MAGA Media: Operation Mockingbird 2.0

Dateline NBC