Wed Episode #1990: 4Chan Exposed as Honeypot Trap, BigPharma’s Autism Plague, Greenland Grab—Mineral Bonanza or Scam

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the sixteenth of April.
You're of our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, today we're
going to take a look at the explosion autism and
even the mainstream media can't ignore it, but they can
spin it, and they are spinning this measles epidemic. And
the guy that We've got a lot of British tabloid

(01:06):
papers that are coming in with all kinds of over
the top claims about what is happening there, fear mongering.
It is exactly the same thing that we saw with
slight variations for COVID, and we to talk about the
parallels there. I want to talk about the fact that
the father met with RFK Junior and what he said afterwards.

(01:27):
I think he's getting a sense of betrayal and I
think we can see the betrayal that's there. We're going
to begin with the news, well, also get into some
updates on tariffs and other economic issues. And four chan
interestingly was hacked and it appears that it was set
up as a honeypop by US government agents and especially

(01:49):
Israeli intelligence four Chan, which was clickbait for people that
they could identify. Will be right back. Well, yesterday we

(02:10):
talked about how doge is something of a dodge Elon Muskin,
even the Daily callers saying, you know, they've taken their
goals down by eighty five percent, and how they have
triple posted stuff they have claimed to shut down contracts
or a finished et cetera, etc. There was never a

(02:31):
trillion dollars to take out of that anyway, as I
pointed out with unless you touch the warfare welfare state,
and they're not about to do that, you're going to
have to have some major reform. It's not going to
be an issue of waste. I've seen all this stuff before.
You know, the tax tax enough already. The Tea Party people,
well we got to be more efficient with governments, said

(02:52):
be careful what you asked for. I think Musc is
trying to make it more efficient. I think he's trying
to get rid of employees, and I think he wants
to replace similar artificial intelligence. That's a key thing. But
the Tea Party would never talk about what really needed
to be done. Taxes are too high, you know, like
that guy that runs for mayor all the time in
New York. The taxes are the rent's too damn high.

(03:15):
That's his campaign slogan. Well what do you want to
do about it? Do you want to cut spending or
do you want to increase taxes? Well, what do you
want to do about this? And where do you cut taxes?
Is it something that can be done with efficiency? No,
it can't be done with efficiency. And like I said before,

(03:35):
when you've got a government that's doing unconstitutional, tyrannical things,
I don't want them to be more efficient. Which brings
us to the IRS. The day after tax Day, over
twenty two thousand IRS workers have taken Trump's latest buyout offer. Now,
some had already taken them up on this, and what
they're saying is that they had one hundred thousand employees

(03:56):
at the IRS and previously, previously they had had five
thousand employees in the past three months. This is a
new offer. From what they're saying that Trumps put out there,
five thousand left in the past three months taking early
retirement or whatever. Another seven thousand were removed that were

(04:18):
probationary employees. So we're not talking about just twenty two thousand,
we're talking about another twelve thousand. We're talking about thirty
four thousand, which is about a third of the number
of employees of the IRS going away. We does that
mean that they won't be bothering us anymore? Absolutely not.
If you remember, as we were talking about the fact, well,

(04:39):
we want to hire another eighty thousand employees, they said.
But they also focused whenever you complain about that, we're
going to have an army of IRS agents. And everybody
wanted to imagine that they were all going to be
carrying a gun. No, it was still going to be
a small portion of them carrying a gun. Why do
we want to have armed bureaucrats anyway? And it's not
just the IRS, it's a lot of different bureaucracies. I

(05:02):
remember back in the nineties, either the Washington Post of
the New York Times had asked the question, why is
the Department of Education buying a lot of firearms, ammunition,
bulletproofess all the SWAT equipment. Why is the Department of
Education doing this? We found out not too long after

(05:26):
they asked the question. They show up one morning at
a family's home in the early dawn hours before daybreak,
they do a no knock rate on the family and
they dragged the father and the children out on the grass,
face down, guns in their backs and all the rest
of the stuff. Looking for the mom who had an

(05:46):
overdue loan. She had skipped out on the loan, and
she'd skipped out on the family. They didn't know where
she was, but they go in and they swat team
that family. That's why they have this type of thing.
So we should be very concerned about the arming of
the bureaucracy and about the fact that the bureaucracy is
an army. It's a massive number of people that are there.

(06:09):
And yet as people would talk about that and say, well,
eighty thousand armed people iOS ages, No, it wasn't going
to be all of them, weren't going to be armed.
And they kept saying, well, we're going to be focusing
on upgrading our computer equipment. Yeah, upgrading it to AI,
which is going to be even more intrusive, even more
surveillance of you. And it cannot only surveil all of

(06:34):
your economic activity, but of course it can make very
good judgments about what your politics and religion are, which
might have something to do with whether it audits you
or not that type of thing. So Musk is saying
that it was drastically reduced to costs and the size
of federal bureaucracy, arguing that it is bloated and inefficient,
and he's going to make it more efficient with artificial intelligence.

(06:57):
Do you want to make do you want to make
the East German Stasi more efficient? Do you want to
make the Gestapo more efficient? You get the idea. Do
you want to make Lenin's checka more efficient? Todate? About
two hundred thousand workers have left the two point three
million strong civilian federal workforce. They're an earlier buyout offer

(07:20):
and layoffs and resignations, but it's even bigger at the irs. Meanwhile,
we have, as I've talked about, this Islamic city in Texas,
we have John Cornyn. Now he's trying to get back
his conservative creds and he's calling for the FED to
investigate this Muslim that development said for possible religious discrimination

(07:42):
against Jews, oh and Christians also, he says. And the
issue is is that they are setting up their own
I mean it is it's not just that they want
to we want to support people's rights to associate. Do
they want to set up or religious community. They should
be allowed to set up a religious community. But it

(08:03):
goes beyond that. This goes to creating a shurial law community.
And that's the key thing, a completely different basis of
law the Trump administration. While we look at it. I
ended yesterday with a case of this guy who was
an immigrant from El Salvador and his name is Garcia.

(08:28):
They said that he was MS thirteen and they deported
him to El Salvador even though a trial had not
indicated had indicated that he was not a member of
the group. There was a federal informant, which you know,
these federal informants, just because they're anonymous and federal informants

(08:50):
doesn't mean that you can trust one of these say.
They've been known to lie to throw stuff out. He
accused him of being a part of the group in
New York, place that he never lived, and so there
indications that these charges were false. Now as to his
immigration status, that is not clear in any of these
cases that have been looking at. But the real issue

(09:12):
when we go back and forth, as I said, it's
kind of an interesting case because we've seen a lot
of judicial supremacy. Of course, it's been going on for
years where the Supreme Court will overturn the will of
Congress or of the president and so forth. And Trump's
first term, going back to immigration, even the fact that

(09:35):
Trump said I'm going to end DAKA that's deferred action
on childhood arrivals, said we're going to defer action, meaning
they're not going to enforce the law. That was the
law that was enacted by Congress. And Obama said I'm
not going to enforce it, and so there was a
problem with that. And then when Trump gets in, he
says I'm going to end DOAKA, and they he got

(09:57):
sued and went to the Supreme Court, and Supreme Court said,
you can't end that basis can you say that? How
can you say that a current president cannot end an
executive order of a previous president. And yet they said
that this is a kind of judicial activism that we
see where they overturn broad policy, or where you have
a district court judge set national policy or even international

(10:21):
policy overwriting the executive branch or the congressional branch. And
I don't support that, but what we see here appears
to be the executive branch jumping into a particular case
for an individual and overwriting and overturning and vetoing whatever

(10:41):
you want to call it. A determination by trial. We
have to have the rule of law, and so this
is a very different thing, and we have to understand
it's a different thing when the courts overstep their boundary
and they make policy, or they overstep their boundary and
they make law. Were in this particular case, the courts

(11:05):
are right and Trump is wrong. Now, I don't know
what the guy's immigration status is, but if he was
deported strictly on the basis that they thought that he
was MS thirteen, he was married to an American citizen,
had children here. And yet if they believe that he's
MS thirteen, perhaps they're using that association to override any

(11:27):
immigration protection he might have based on what he was
doing there. And here's the other thing they want to
say he's MS thirteen. He never had any criminal charges
brought against him, either in the United States or in Venezuela.
And so the court, the judge of the court had
examined this case and determined that he was not MS

(11:49):
thirteen and had said do not deport him. And the
Trump administration did anyway, and so the case was taken
up to the Supreme Court. In court said bring him back,
and Trump said, well, I can't bring him back. I
have no control, ignoring the fact that the US government

(12:10):
is paying El Salvador to take these prisoners. If you
pay them, you can control them. We see that with
everything that was what was happening with COVID. Trump was
paying the state governors, and they were paying the public
health officials to run this whole thing. They're making a
lot of money. They pay to put trainees in the

(12:30):
girls' bathroom and shower, or they pay to take them out.
And you do what the president says, depending on whether
it's a Republican or Democrat, they're paying to put them
in or paying to take them out. That's the way
this always works. That's the way they get around the
tenth Amendment. And so this is yet again a cynical
lie by the Trump administration saying I don't control it,

(12:52):
when in fact they are paying for it, and they
in fact do control it. And so the president of
El Salvador and they have this incredible maximum security prison,
a real hellhole, and they they're glorifying the fact that
they have created this thing, and it may be necessary

(13:13):
for the MS thirteen people. I am not singing any
pity songs for these people are part of MS thirteen.
They're ruthless, and I don't really If these people are guilty,
do the time hard time, I don't care. The issue is, however,
due process, and this doesn't just affect a guy who

(13:35):
whether or not he is a citizen, he still should
have due process, just like whether or not somebody is
a citizen or not. They should have free speech here
if they are well, I should say this. If they're
legally here, they have free speech. Should not be deported,
should not be prosecuted. That this guy is illegal, it's
a different issue, but that's not what this is about.

(13:56):
This is about They've made this. Both sides have made this,
and again know what his legal status is. I didn't
think about checking it until just now. But regardless of
what his legal status is, again, he has ties, a
wife and that type of thing here in America, regardless
of his legal status as an immigrant. This is all

(14:18):
about whether or not he's a MS thirteen, and it
appears to be clear that he's not. In MS thirteen,
and then it becomes about something else it becomes about
whether or not we're going to have the rule of law,
or whether or not the rules are going to come
out of some dictator's mouth. And that's what concerns me.
And this meeting in the Oval office that Trump had,
and again this is after there's been a trial determination

(14:40):
saying he's not MS thirteen. They've provided no evidence that
he was MS thirteen. As a matter of fact, that
seems to be evidence to the contrary, because no criminal convictions.
Then it goes to the Supreme Court, Supreme Court that
he was wrongfully deported, bring him back. Trump says, I
can't do anything about it. I have nothing to say.
The White House has disavowed Garcia as being wrongly deported,

(15:01):
despite admitting that he was booted from the country as
a result of a quote, clerical error. They say that
it was a clerical error that they deported him and
sent them and labeled him as MS thirteen, and yet
there was a trial. So that's a cynical lie and
it's inconsistent with what the White House is saying. The

(15:23):
move to boot him went against a twenty nineteen immigration
order blocking his removal to his home country on the
grounds that he would have been targeted by rival gangs
like Barrio eighteen, So there's some inconsistency on the judges
sign Why would he be targeted by a rival gang
if he's not in MS thirteen you might ask okay,

(15:44):
And there was an immigration order to remove him, so
there may be other immigration issues here. But again it's
not about the even about whether or not his immigration
status or whether or not even he's a gang member,
about whether or not he gets due process, and whether
or not the president gets to ignore that due process

(16:06):
if he ignores it for him, and if he ignores again,
if somebody is here legally as an immigrant, like these
students are who are protesting, and you don't have to
agree with him or disagree with them. And if they're violent,
that's a different issue. But they're trying to deport people
and arrest people because of speech, not because of violence.
You saw the picture of the young woman who was

(16:29):
surrounded as she's walking down the sidewalk, like a half
dozen agents who whisk her off. What has she done?
She'd written an op ed piece on the college newspaper.
You have to understand that the devil is in the details,
you know, and they mix this stuff up. They muddy
the water by pointing to people who did get violent

(16:50):
by people who did do vandalism and who did get
violent with people and that type of thing. But then
they go arrest people whose only crime was their opinion.
And when we look at this, what bothers me about
this photo op that Trump did with the El Salvador president,
president help president dictator, the two of them as dictators.

(17:15):
So we don't care what the court's determined, and somebody's
with a guilt or innocence, We're going to do what
we want to do to that person. Do you want
to live under a system like that? And so they're
cynically winking and nodding about, well, do you really want
me to release a terrorist into your country. I could
never release a terrorist into your country, that kind of stuff.

(17:36):
And the again who says he's a terrorist, Well, I
say he's a terrorist. We don't have to have a
finding and a trial to declare somebody a terrorist. You
do that in a country that's under the rule of law.
If you're under the rule of law, you have a
trial and you determine and you prove that this person
is a terrorist, and then you treat them as a terrorists,

(17:57):
go ahead and put them in that prison care. But
they're not a terrorist simply because you say they're a terrorist.
That's the issue here. If you're going to have rule
of law, you're going to have trials and due process,
if you're going to have determination made by the assessment
of Trump or this El Salvador dictator and say well,

(18:20):
he's a terrorist because I say he's a terrorist, Well,
then we live under a dictatorship. Because in a dictatorship,
the law comes out of the dictator's mouth. That's why
they call it that. It's like dictation. But we should
have the rule of law. And so as the Supreme
Court said, well, you need to facilitate his return, and
the Trump administration cynically says, well, we are facilitating his return.

(18:43):
What we just can't get him back. Yeah, they won't
send him back. They said, facilitate means that if we
we have made it possible. Government lawyers, this is a
Trump administration said yesterday, the Trump administration has complied with
the court orders based on their interpretation of the word facilitate.

(19:06):
They're changing its meaning and calling it an interpretation. This
is what lawyers and courts do all the time. They
said the administration has removed all barriers to allow for
his return, explaining that if he was if he would
show up at the US embassy, then they would let
him return. Ah, there's the rub. He's in a maximum

(19:26):
security prison because they paid for him to go to
a maximum security prison. But you know, hey, somehow he
escapes and he shows up at the US embassy, Oh well,
it would let him come in, right. And it's this cynicism,
this kind of cynicism, this mockery of the rule of
law that disgusts me about the Trump presidency. And it's

(19:50):
not just this, And I said from the very beginning,
he's going to present himself as a dictator, as a
strong man who's going to come after his enemies because
he doesn't want a return to the rule of law.
He complains about the lawfair that was against him, and yes,
you know it was unjust. But rather than take the

(20:12):
high ground and saying, look what they did to me,
this should never be done to anybody else, I'm going
to have legal reforms to make sure it doesn't happen
to anybody else. Instead of taking the high ground, Trump
goes really really low it's like, oh yeah, well you
see what I'm going to do to you. He's coming
from me. Don't you mess with me or my family

(20:33):
because we are a mafia. That's what he's doing. That's
what he's doing. So we're not talking about policy here.
We're not talking about some district court judges overturning congressional
or presidential policy and doing it on a international basis.

(20:54):
We're talking about a government under Trump that is cynically
mocking the rule of law, bringing this guy in from L.
Salvador to mock the rule of law. His wife told
a crowd of protesters outside the courthouse that her husband
was working hard. He said when he was taken into
custy in front of their five year old child, said

(21:16):
he's working hard to fill the American dream. And then
they took him into custy. He said. He was abducted
and disappeared by the federal government on March the twelfth.
So when Trump met with this L. Salvador president in
the Oval office, he says, any of the old Salvador

(21:36):
president said, any call for him to have his citizen
return would be preposterous. He says, I hope you're not
suggesting that I smuggled terrorists into the United States. Of
course I'm not going to do that.

Speaker 3 (21:52):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (21:52):
A dictator his laws in his mouth. Well, when we
want to talk about officious arbitrary people, Yes, government is
that way in many different ways, in many different areas.
Every branch of government can be that way. Let's go
to Hawaii, where it is very much that way. Yeah,

(22:14):
Blue Hawaii, deep blue Hawaii.

Speaker 1 (22:20):
Blue.

Speaker 2 (22:25):
I like that sports car. Yeah, where the Hawaiian county
is telling a homeowner that his thirty eight year old
house is actually illegal. These are officious bureaucrats want to
take his home. It is an amazing snaff who reported
by reason and he's having to sue the and he's

(22:49):
almost at the end of it here. You know, Hawaii
very much a paradise, except that the government is deep
blue and blue Hawaii. This guy's name is Osman. He
purchased a small seaside home in Hawaii twenty twenty one.
He had every reason to believe it was perfectly legal dwelling.
The home was first built in nineteen eighty seven. The

(23:11):
original owner had lived in it for years of that incident.
As a second owner, Osmond was purchasing the home had
recently the second owner that Osmond was purchasing the home
from Okay, so he would be the third owner, had
recently obtained a remodeling permit in twenty twenty to make
repairs and alterations as part of his due diligence. Osmond
had confirmed with the county that the remodeling permit was

(23:33):
valid for five years. An agent and appraiser working for
Osman also confirmed to the county that there weren't any
outstanding permit issues with the home. These people checked with
the county that everything was good on the permit, and
everything was good, he said. With those assurances, he purchased
a property property he continued partially completed remodeling work that

(23:56):
he had a permit for. County's assurances proved to for
Osmond little protection, however, from the bureaucratic nightmare, even though
he calls up and he gets advice, very much like
what happens with the irs. It's no defense to call
up the irs and ask somebody. If you get somebody
there some tax advice. If they give it to you,
I don't know if they give it to you anymore,
or they give it to you they say, well, that's

(24:19):
even if the irs told you that we might still
come after you. So it's that type of thing. At
the time that he purchased the home, the Hawaiian County
was in the process of setting a new electronic permitting
system to track building permits, and as soon as it
went live, all permits that have been open for more

(24:41):
than five years were declared null and void. They said,
but they're nice guys, so they're going to give you
a little bit of time to re up that. So
we're gonna have everything go void, all the permits that
are outstanding after we put them in our computer system,
unless you update this. It's five years old. And so
he doesn't know anything about this change. And so then

(25:05):
he finds out that because you know, they didn't notify
him that he needed to update it and do the permit,
go through the permit process again because they changed their
computer system. Now he doesn't have a permit. So in
early twenty twenty two, after he spent one hundred and
thirty eight thousand dollars in remodeling work, he called the

(25:25):
county to get a final inspection on some of the
completed work, but nobody would respond, so that was early
twenty twenty two. Finally, in July of that year, a
county official told him over the phone that, in spite
of passed assurances from them, his permit had expired. And
he said, oh, well what, But they said, oh, no,

(25:47):
it's not the twenty twenty permit that you're asking for,
but it's the permit for nineteen eighty seven. They maintained
that even though the guy had taken out a permit
in nineteen eighty seven, that they didn't have anywhere in
the records that he'd had a final inspection, and so
that expired and they wanted to take his home now.

(26:08):
The county asserted that even though the building permit had
been issued for the nineteen eighty seven home, no record
of final inspection. According to the county, the entire home
was now illegal. Bureaucratic nightmare. Getting a new building permit
was also easier said than done. When the original owner
of Ausman's home constructed the dwelling in nineteen eighty seven,
he could build it twenty seven feet from the shoreline.

(26:31):
Now you've got to go back forty feet from the shoreline,
so the entire home would have to be moved. Well,
you can pick up a home and you can move it. However,
if he moves it now, he's got to go through
a new building I think for the actual home itself,
and of course all the building code has changed as well.

(26:53):
This is a good illustration of why nobody can own
homes anymore. Right, everybody wants to talk about what has changing.
The fundamental issue, whether we're talking about tariffs where they're
talking about having a business, or they're talking about somebody
opening up a manufacturing concern, the fundamental issue everywhere is

(27:13):
government over regulation. They are making it through regulations like this,
They're making it impossible. This is how you will own nothing.
They'll regulate it out of existence to where you can't
afford it. They're regulating houses so they're so expensive we
can't build them anymore, regulating cars so they're so expensive

(27:35):
you can't afford them anymore. Everything in our life is
being regulated out of being able to own it, or
to construct it or whatever. They put regulations in. The
people manufacturing it put regulations on it that make it
so expensive that you can't afford to buy it. There's
just another example of it. No, No, you got to

(27:56):
get further away from the beach. No, no, no, everything
in your home now we've changed all the codes, so
you'd have to just tear it down. Not going to happen.
So he decided, well, I'm not getting where are these people?
So he sued them in court. Well, he first he
went to the Board of Appeals, and the Board of
Appeals cited, of course, with a bureaucracy. So then he
goes to court to district court, and they ruled in

(28:19):
his favor. Is it a happy ending? Well, the decision
entitles him to proceed with the work on his home
that he began four years ago. All he needs to
move forward is for the court to enter its judgment. Still,
says reason Ausman is not quite out of the woods yet.
The county has thirty days to appeal the decision after

(28:40):
the judgment is officially entered. He says that after the
court's decision, the county bureaucrats told him again that they
would still issue a notice of violation if he attempted
to continue his remodeling work or to reoccupy the house.
I'll take one way or the other. These guys are
going to get even with him one way or the other,

(29:01):
by hook or by crook. They will. We had a
situation like that in one of the places that we
one of our stores. It was it was unusual. You
know most of these strip centers that just make them
shelves one story. This shopping center was very different and
it was two floors and because of that, they put

(29:24):
sprinklers in all this other kind of stuff, which you know,
let's see we're talking about thirty five years ago. Was
way beyond code. Everything was way beyond code. And it
really bothered the fire inspectors when they came out because
they couldn't find anything wrong. And even to the extent

(29:45):
that we had some signs or part of a decorative
thing that we did and they were not illuminated. Instead
they were and it met code. They were signs that
would glow in the dark, had radium in them, but
they were up hie. You know, wasn't people wear radium
on their wristwatches anyway, but you know a lot of

(30:07):
different things like that. So they couldn't find anything. They
thought they had us with that sign, they didn't have
us with that sign, and they couldn't find anything. And
so what they did, and like most retail spaces, it
had a drop ceiling. You know, you have that grid
and you've got the tiles that are there. And so
they said, okay, well you've got we're gonna require that

(30:31):
you put these tiles on top. Take one of the time,
take a tile and put it on top of the
fluorescent light fixture, and so that if you have a
fire and the fluorescent light fixture melts, that will fall
into place. I'm thinking, that's about the dumbest thing I've
ever heard of my life. First of all, if the

(30:54):
fixture melted is made out of the same metal, essentially,
same thickness, same kind of metal as the grid itself,
the grid would be gone. But even if that weren't
the case, what were the chances that that fireproofing tile
would fall into place. It's just ridiculous. But we did
it anyway, and they said, okay, you're fine. They had
to find something, had to find something, and they will

(31:15):
keep These people keep coming after him by hook or
by crook. They're going to get even with him. He
beat him fair and square, beat him in court, but
they're going to get even with him. So what can
we learn from all this, Well, we can ask the elephants, right,
not the gop not the real elephants. Take a look
at what happened and send in San Diego when they

(31:38):
had the five point two earthquake the other day, they
had a bunch of elephants and you can start to
see the camera shaking here, and the elephants are alarmed. Okay,
first they run a little bit and then what is
their reaction, Well, they come back, they regroup. Something is happening,

(31:58):
something is shaking, something biggest companies, something bigger than us.
Maybe on the way it could be a t rex.
Remember that scene from Jurassic Park. We're there in the
car and the glass starts to vibrate, so it's like,
maybe there's a t rex coming. So whether they look
at how they get close together and they circle the baby.
They circle the baby, and they say, elephants do this

(32:20):
a lot. They call it a circle alert, you know,
or alert circle. And maybe that's what we need to do.
We've got to circle the wagons, circle the elephants. We've
got to protect the young. That's what they would do.
And I mean they're sitting there in that one elephant,
he's you know, looking back and forth, sweeping his trunk
or ground the grid. But so about forty thousand people

(32:42):
were poor that they felt the quake, along with a
herd of elephants, about five of them. And then I've
told you this for the longest time. What is going on?
What's really behind Greenland?

Speaker 1 (32:57):
Oh, to look all.

Speaker 3 (32:58):
Around at the patch upround Holless Mother Natjercy.

Speaker 2 (33:05):
So it's hard to busy.

Speaker 1 (33:09):
It's a miserable place to live.

Speaker 2 (33:14):
Yeah, Well, what did I tell you about all this stuff?
I said, they're going to get Greenland, as Trump is
said over and over again, by hooker by crook, right
one way or the other. We're going to get that place.
And I said, what they're going to wind up doing
is bribing the people with a phenomenal amount of money. Well,
now we've seen reports that they want to give each
and every one of the fifty six thousand residents ten

(33:38):
thousand dollars a year, you know, just and you vote
to accept us as your government. Y, that's pretty cheap. Actually,
that's only five hundred and sixty million dollars a year.
I mean, that's trump change for this federal government. It's
about the amount of money that they give to Columbia University.

(33:58):
We can get all of Greenland. So what they give
Columbia University. Columbia University is getting four hundred thousand. I mean,
we could get Greenland for a five hundred and sixty
thousand dollars a year bribe and way cheaper than Harvard,
which is nine billion dollars. So yeah, when it comes
to that kind of stuff, it's cheap bribery. Nevertheless, I

(34:20):
said that's number one step. Number one, US taxpayers are
going to pay to bribe these people to vote to
join America. That's their plan. The second part of their
plan is that after we own Greenland, Trump turns it
over to his crony billionaires to exploit. And now we
have the names of who those people are going to be.

(34:43):
And I think, really this is important because I think
it's the same pattern that these people are looking to
do here in America. Scott Bessant Lupnik, as well as
Doug Bergham, they are talking about how we can monetize
our assets here in this country. How they're going to
monetize the assets. They're going to turn them over to

(35:06):
State Street, Vanguard, and black Rock, which sure the people
who are partnering with this along with you know those
the three big funds there that have tens of trillions
of dollars between the three of them. They have their
own a piece of almost everything that can be bought
in the markets, in the stock markets and all the

(35:26):
rest of this stuff. And they're there as well, but
partnering with people who have invested in Trump. Yeah, they
call it a political donation. They're not about ideology, they're
about getting favors back and they're looking to make really
big money. So now we've got the names of some
of these cronies. This is research that was done by

(35:47):
The Guardian, but we could see the We could see
where this is headed without the details. It's kind of
like being able, you know. We could easily see where
all this COVID pandemic lie was headed, you know, the
lockdown and the vaccines. We could easily see it. I
don't either practiced it, they had done it for decades,
so we could see where that kind of stuff was
going based on their behavior. Your vaccine doesn't protect you,

(36:11):
Your vaccine protects other people. All those types of lies.
Your mask doesn't protect you, it protects other people. So
we knew where all that stuff was going, and we
can see where this has set it as well. But
now we have the details about what the vaccine is
doing to people, and we have the studies that prove
that the masks don't do anything, even though common sense
would have told you that based on their own virus paradigm.

(36:33):
They're inconsistent, logically inconsistent. You know, this is one thing
is I really hate you know, when you're watching a
movie about superheroes for example, right, isn't it awful? How
you know they create this arbitrary universe and then they
violate the rules and you really feel cheated by that,
don't you. You know, it's like, wait a minute, you
You've already built up this this world scenario, and in

(36:57):
your world scenario, that couldn't happen. You cheated on your
fictional story. Well, that's what these people do with the pandemic.
You know. They create a fictional world and then they
don't abide by the rules of that fictional rule. That's
what they would do. So some of Donald Trump's as
the Guardian, some of Donald Trump's biggest campaign donners and investors,

(37:20):
who collectively have hundreds of millions of dollars in financial
ties to the US president, our positioned to potentially profit
from the American takeover of Greenland, of course, raising even
more ethical questions around Trump's controversial pursuit of the Arctic territory.
The administration is in part aiming to secure rare minerals

(37:40):
that are essential for the US tech industry and national security,
and to potentially reopen oil and gas exploration. Mike Walls,
Trump's national security advisor and signal chat leaker. So this
is about critical minerals, This is about natural recent sources.

(38:01):
And now I guess Trump has made this. It never
was a national security issue, but I guess now with
his trade war with China, since China has cut off
these rare earth minerals that are necessary for computers and
other things, all this high tech stuff. Now that's been
cut off, you could say that it's a national security

(38:22):
issue and we got to find those minerals somewhere else,
and that's convenient, just lucky, I guess right. A Guardian
analysis of campaign finance records and corporate filing shows US
tech moguls who invested in mining companies operating in Greenland,
fossil fuel executives, and also crypto tycoons with their own

(38:46):
setup plans for the country collectively gave at least two
hundred and forty three million dollars to the president's twenty
twenty four campaign. Okay, so they give two hundred forty
three million dollars, and the taxpayers will contribute five hundred
and twice that amount, you know, more than twice cent amount,
five hundred and sixty million dollars a year forever, every year,

(39:07):
we will do more than twice as much as they
did for Trump's campaign. But we'll do it every year,
and then they'll get to they will socialize the costs
and privatize the profits, as they always do. Meanwhile, investors
bankrolling Greenland's mining interests also amassed three hundred and fourteen
million dollars worth of shares and Trump Media. This is

(39:28):
where the crypto, the crypto projects. This is where this
comes in. And we talked about that. You know the
fact that these Trump meme coins are perfect way for
people to launder contributions to him, aren't they. You can't
see a lot of the contributions that are being made,
but these were shares in Trump Media. Who knows how
much other stuff they put into the crypto. There's a

(39:52):
closed loop amongst these investors, billionaires, Trump and the crypto projects.
They said, these donations are investments or with particular outcomes
of mind. Of course they are. Of course they are.
Whether you're talking about Democrats Republicans, is always the same investments.
Among those who invested millions in Cobal Medals, a mining
company at the leaning edge of Greenland's modern gold rush

(40:17):
for minerals that are es central to companies. Uh, there's
major donors as well, like Zuckerberg and Sam Altman of
open Ai and Amazon's Bezos and many others from Silicon
Valley Marc Andreesen there as well. The top investor and
Critical Metals Corporation, which has a mining permit in Greenland.

(40:40):
The top investor is Hedge Fund Canter Fitzgerald. That's a
familiar name, isn't it. Oh yeah, Howard Lutnick that's his company.
Oh he doesn't. He stepped down from it, you know,
for a couple of years. Right, they'll come back and
take the golden reins when he's finished with it. So

(41:00):
at the center of this again is canterfae Gelgia just
kind of like the stable coin, who is it? Who
is it that is king of the stable coins? Well,
that would also be Howard Lutnick, and you know buying
so many treasury bills. You know, one of the key
purchasers of treasury bills is is Tether, that stable coin. Anyway,

(41:25):
Howard Lutnick led until January Critical Medals, which has the
mining permit in Greenland and has the top investor in
Critical Medals, just like Howard Lutnik is the top investor
in Tether, the stable coin that's backed by US treasuries,
so Critical Mother Medals. Other institutional investors include Vanguard, Black Rock,

(41:49):
State Street, the Big three guys, and Geode Capital, which
I also saw here. Among Greenland's bids, the loudest supporters
are the crypto tycoons who poured unparallel sums of money
into twenty twenty four Trump and Republican campaigns while labeling
Greenland and Investment Frontier. That's their terminology where they said

(42:14):
data centers essential to US artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency industries
could be built that kind of mining, the data mining
of artificial intelligence or the crypto mining of these other
data centers. Some of the same donors also want to
establish a largely autonomous, libertarian, utopian post state, as they

(42:38):
call it, for the tech elite in Greenland that could
be used to practice terraforming for a Mars colony. This
group is called Praxis and they have labeled their members
quote optimistic pioneers. There's a lot of different libertarian groups.
They've said, let's create an island state, or let's just
have a floating island somewhere out in the ocean that

(42:59):
is out an Internet national waters so can escape government regulation.
I can identify with that. But you know this is
this is up in Greenland. Critics say it's a colonialist
operation aimed at plundering wealth and resources from a weak
nation that is still linked to Denmark. Practice is already
backed by five hundred and twenty five million and includes

(43:21):
members of or donors to the Trump administration, such as
PayPal co founder Ken Howary, who co founded it with
Peter Teel and he has been nominated by the Way
for ambassador to Denmark. So the guy who Trump is
nominated from ambassador to Denmark is also part of this
libertarian group that wants to create a breakaway independent state

(43:41):
called Praxis and locate it up in Greenland. Interesting anyway,
they said what is unfolding in Greenland represents a circle
of grift, not a circle of alert. Right as the
elephants are doing. Put money into the Trump family bank
and money comes back to you in the form of
some government policy. Well that's an understatement. You know. Whenever

(44:04):
you invest in a politician is not just in Trump,
it's any of these politicians. You're gonna get at least
one thousand to one. I'm not talking about one thousand percent.
I'm talking about a thousand times your money bag. You
invest thousands, you get millions. You invest well, not thousands,
that's that doesn't put you in. But if you get
up in the millionaire now you got their attention. If
you invest millions, you get back billions, sometimes tens of billions.

(44:27):
The minerals found in Greenland are used for laptops, smartphones, weapons,
clean energy technology, electric vehicles, and elsewhere across the economy.
China controls seventy percent of the rare earth market, but
as I pointed out last week, they have night they
controlled nine percent, seventy percent of where the known resources are,

(44:49):
but in terms of the refined usable products, they've got
ninety percent of that market. And when they're just playing
that card against Trump in the trade wars, they just
play that card. Paul Berman, a natural resources researcher at
the University of Vermont who spent four seasons working there,
says it's extremely difficult and expensive to extract resources, and

(45:12):
the idea that a gold rush is possible is quote
almost completely pie in the sky. That's what David Bonson
said when I talked to him about that. He said, yeah,
that you know, they can't get anything out of that,
and when I interne if you remember when I interviewed him,
because it's not going to happen for their resources. And
of course the national security thing that dog doesn't hunt

(45:36):
because they have since World War Two had a military
base there, and the US government currently doesn't believe that
that's necessary for national security because they had over ten
thousand people there right after World War Two. They only
got two hundred now. So they have the permission to
use it, but they don't need to use it because

(45:57):
of other technology, and so the fact that it's needed
for national security as nonsense. But now it has become
something of a national security issue because Trump has managed
to get China to cut off our supply of rare
earth minerals. Oh that's interesting, but can they find it.
That's the key thing. My position is, never underestimate the

(46:18):
technology or the evil of these people. Right, No, no
reasonable person whatever do is fill in the blank? Right,
I can't imagine that anybody would ever do something so heinous.
You know, we talk about satanic ritual child abuse, or
we talk about other things that are even more even

(46:39):
stranger than that. Well, I can't believe it. Well, yeah,
you better believe that they do. There's no limit to
the evil that they're capable of, and there's really not
that much of a limit to their technology. Even if
there is a limit to their technology, they believe that
they can do anything with their technology, and they've openly
said it again and again. Mark and Reeson, for example,

(47:02):
there isn't any problem that can't be solved with technology,
and if the problem is created with technology, then the
solution is to add more technology. That's Mark and Reesen,
and he's part of this as well. Cobald holds permits
to extract cobalt, nickel, and platinum and is now valued
at three billion dollars. Its largest backer is the firm
and Dreesen and Horowitz. Mark and Riesen, who assisted the

(47:25):
Unofficial Department of government official efficiency Doge and Ben Horowitz.
They each donated two and a half million dollars to
a pro Trump superpack that gets you billions of dollars
the UH. It works that way every time. Bezos, Altman, Zuckerberg,
Bill Gates each donated a million dollars to Trump's inauguration,

(47:50):
And of course in video was just they missed the
boat with the inauguration. But they got the message. They
got the memo, you got to pay up this. It
only costs you a million dollars in Trump in your pocket, right,
So they went to the The Nvidia CEO goes to
the mar Lago million dollar plate dinner, black Rock, Vanguard,

(48:12):
State Street Critical medals. Other top shareholders are generally considered
be passive investors who have their fingers and pots all
across the economy, all across the world. But this guy
who has worked there before says, Greenland is quote littered
with the corpses of mineral investors. Some industry players, including
consultant Drew Horn, who is a former senior advisor in

(48:35):
the previous Trump administration's Energy Department, is regularly in the
media cheerleading the administration's greenland policy and touting the riches
that lie in the ground there. Well, here's the thing.
These companies can still make money even if they don't
get anything out of the ground, can't they When you

(48:56):
are dealing with stock market and all the rest of
the stuff, you can do pumping dump all the time.
Moderna made a lot of money for ten years without
any products, just with one happy story after the other.
And oh, I'm so sorry to inform you that all
that rosy picture that we had of that new vaccine,
the mRNA that was going to cure cancer, well you

(49:18):
know it didn't work and it's too dangerous, and say,
but we got something else it's even better, you know,
that type of thing. And so I they could keep
getting investors who had hope in what they were doing.
And so you can always run that game these crypto people, right,
I mean, you want to talk about mining in Greenland, Well,

(49:38):
at least in Greenland, there's real stuff there. It may
be difficult to get. But these people have been have
been selling people on mining with crypto. They have been
telling people to mine crypto coins and they show pictures
of gold coins or you know, the bitcoin thing on it.
They've been selling that thing for the longest time. Of course,
they can sell the idea that hey, there's the real

(50:00):
minerals there. Yeah, we know, and we can mine them.
That's an easy sell after you've sold people crypto mining
for the longest time. On Fox News, Horn touted the
significant significant opportunity for US investment in mining and energy production,
but industry observers with no financial stake remains skeptical, and

(50:20):
the event that a mining startup doesn't strike it rich
in Greenland, Horn will still receive his fees for his consulting.
You see, they don't have to prove, they don't have
to produce anything really, and so if there is something
there and if they can get it, it'll go to
his cronies. If there isn't anything there or they can't

(50:41):
get it, guess what, these guys will still make money.
This one guy who has been there before says, it
makes me wonder, is this just self promotion to get
investment money. We look around at this patch of ground. Yeah,
maybe it is. Who knows. On Rumble North American House, Hippo,

(51:04):
thank you very much for the tip, It says, good morning, David.
There's been a marked decrease in the Anti Canada rhetoric
and bellicosity. Since Trump and Carney spoke a few weeks ago, Yeah,
they moved on to the next crisis that they created
for time for at t I'm big Carney, as you know,
is a high level globalist, and Trump is a globalist too,
but only at the poser level. I have to wonder

(51:27):
if their telephone conversation started with Carney saying, Okay, don
and listen, sit down, and shut up. I further wonder
if Carney warned Trump of consequences to the US economy
or even Trump personally, if he didn't fall into the line.
Then occurred to me that Trump needs to fire Susie
Wiles as the White House Chief of Staff, replace her
with Musk's little boy. Little X gave Trump the best

(51:48):
advice he's ever received in his life. You need to
shut your mouth. He just keeps going and going doesn't easy.
He ever ready, Bunny, you know what is the crisis
of the day? What the what is the terriff rate
of the day? They need you know, they've got all
these market indicators. You know, you can go places, you
can find the price of commodities like gold, silver, platinum,

(52:09):
or whatever. You can trace it and see it going
up and down to the day. Well, you know, we
need to have that same type of thing or stocks.
We need to have the same type of thing about
Trump's ter frates, you know, so that you can track
us ter frates in real time, since they're changing almost
as quickly as the stock markets that are out there.
And it's the volatility that allows these sharks to profit

(52:33):
at the expense of others, and it's also going to
have big consequences for us. On Kick, Koalamos three sixty
gifted a sub Thank you very much, appreciate that. And
by the way, if you want to find us on kick,
we're talking about that, some people are having trouble finding it.
And if you need to not use any spaces on

(52:53):
David Knight Show. So it's David Knight's show, no spaces,
and you will be able to find it on Kick.
We're going to take a Q break and we'll be
right back.

Speaker 1 (54:37):
You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 2 (54:41):
Well, autism is exploding. You don't need me to tell
you that. Even the mainstream media is telling you that,
but they're spinning it. And what is concerning is that
the increase in autism is accelerating. Just like the deficit,
the curve has gone up in a steeper slope now
a seventeen percent increase between twenty twenty and twenty twenty

(55:06):
two seventeen percent increase. That's huge, And yet they want
you to freak out about measles. Would you rather have
measles or autism for your children? There is a lot
more evidence of the damage from autism, and it is

(55:26):
far more widespread than measles, and yet they want you
to focus on measles. So in twenty twenty, it was
up to one out of every thirty six kids in
twenty twenty, and now it is one out of every
thirty one kids. And let's put it in percentages, not

(55:48):
that you know when you look at this, it went
from two point eight percent to three point two percent.
It was a seventeen percent increase in just two years.
That's the bottom line. We start talking about fractions. That
gets a lot of people confused, like the Trumps. You know,
we were talking about that the other day. Travis was

(56:08):
what was it, Travis that they they had to change it. Oh,
it's the sandwich.

Speaker 3 (56:13):
Yeah, I forget which burger company it was, but they'd
take the third pounder off the menu because people kept
thinking the quarter pounder was bigger and it just wasn't selling.

Speaker 2 (56:22):
Yeah, they probably those people probably got jobs working for
Peter Navarro in terms of his terriff quotients. Right, we
got quotas and we got quotients. And the numerator is
you're cheating the denominator. It's the stuff you buy from us,
and that's what your teriff quota quotient is going to be. Right,

(56:44):
and then we're going to set up quotas for that.
That's crazy. But anyway, sticking to the they like to
quote these things. Now, the number for boys is one
out of twenty and in California, one out of twelve
point five in California. It's getting that bad. But the
bottom line is when we're talking about for boys, it's
much higher. Overall, it went from two point eight percent

(57:05):
to three point two percent, seventeen percent increase in just
two years. But for boys it is five percent five percent.
And if you're talking about kids in California, I don't
know if that's boys or if that's boys and girls
in California eight percent eight percent. If the vaccine companies
get their way, we're going to wind up having almost

(57:27):
every child with autism in America. And that's no exaggeration.
If they're going to stick these kids with seventy six
shots by the time they're eighteen, this is what's going
to happen. And it is front loaded. They do the
most of it when the child is really young and
the body is growing and adjusting in the immune system

(57:48):
is being set up. That's when they hit him when
they're the most vulnerable. And that's why we're seeing this
kind of stuff. Nobody else does that. If you go
back and you look at the CDC thing, you'll find
out that they are giving kids four or five different
dosages of things like MMR or all the rest of it,
and clustering these things together. You go in for a

(58:10):
doctor's visit and they give you six to eight shots,
and it's that clustering where all of these shots, regardless
of what they're giving it to you. We know that
they deliberately put adjuvants in things to irritate your immune system,
to try to get your immune system to attack what
they just put in. That's the theory behind it. But

(58:31):
all the stuff in every one of these vaccines has
got stuff in there to irritate your immune system. And
when you stack that stuff up and you keep doing
it over and over and over again, guess what causes
all kinds of immune diseases and many other things. The
prevalence of autism in the US rose approximately seventeen percent

(58:52):
of those two years, and for boys it is three
point four times more prevalent than for girls. Found that
it is more prevalent for Asian Pacific Islanders, Black and
Hispanics than it is for white people. Oh well, okay,
that can we get their attention with that? Can we
call it racist? So the level of autism among eight

(59:16):
year olds has been steadily increasing for decades without unbiased,
real research into the likely causes. And this is what
was so amazing. This is children's health defense. They're sticking
to the line, even though RFK Junior has abandoned this stuff,
and they're sticking to it. And what we saw with

(59:36):
the all of these heroes of the Ma of the Maha,
you know, all of these people who rose to the top,
and you know Jay Bodikara and RFK Junior and everything.
We saw them bow the knee and kiss the ring there,
as Senator Cassidy said, you will denounce everything that you

(59:58):
know is true or you're not going to get this
position and making them swear they're not going to take
a look at autism and all the rest of this stuff.
You're going to, you know, disavow that or you're not
going to get in. And then even some of the
people who were ready to disavow that, Dave Welden was
ready to disavow it as well. He thought he was okay,

(01:00:20):
he kissed the ring for Senator Cassie. But Trump's got
something else in mind. Trump wanted to bring in somebody
who's going to be able to add AI to the
mr Anda vaccines, and so you know he got blindsided.
But Trump brings in these people who have become i

(01:00:41):
think unjustified heroes of the anti vaccine movement, and you
know they were able to get elevated to this position.
He brings them in and they sell themselves out for power.
So the autism epidemic has now reached a scale unpresident
in human history because of the effect young But don't

(01:01:01):
you even suggest that we need to do any research
to figure out what's going on with this. It's an epidemic,
but it's an epidemic that nobody wants to talk about, right.
They want to talk about non epidemics like bird flu.
They want to talk about non epidemics like COVID, non
epidemics like measles. Oh, look, we have now tested and
identified seven hundred people. Anybody really died from this? Well,

(01:01:25):
they say that two children have died, but we Children's
Health Defense looked at it, and those children died from malpractice.
And first they had privately talked to the father and
he did not want to get involved in the back
and forth about pro vaccine or anti vaccine. He just

(01:01:46):
wanted to get out what the hospital had done to
his child, And so they talked about that. I reported that,
and then he's now directly speaking out because this has
gone on for so long. He was directly speaking out
against this. But Travis pull up the chart that's in
this article here showing autism from the nineteen seventies until

(01:02:10):
twenty twenty five, So talking about fifty five years, look
at that in the nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties, one
in ten thousand. It was so rare that they had
to have an explanation in rain Man as to what
autism was for the audience because nobody ever heard of
it before, nobody understood anything about it, and I had

(01:02:32):
never seen it either. Then in nineteen ninety five, it
goes from one in ten thousand, it goes to one
in one thousand. Oh, well, what had happened? Well nineteen
ninety five. In nineteen eighty six, they got their legal immunity,
and then they started sticking everybody with everything they could

(01:02:52):
think of, and autism goes up by a factor of ten.
Instead of one in ten thousand is one in one thousand,
now still very rare. I'd still never heard of it.
Then within another four years it doubles. It goes from
one in one thousand to one and five hundred, then
by two thousand, one and one hundred and fifty, by

(01:03:13):
two thousand and four, which is the first time ever
saw anybody that had it, one and one hundred and
twenty five, and so on. But you can look at
this curve and you can see that we have now
going back to twenty twenty, the slope has gone up significantly,

(01:03:35):
so it is increasing even more rapidly. So something that
was one in ten thousand in nineteen seventy is now
one and thirty one if they don't want to look
and do any research about this, and it's the people
who are pushing back against it. Are the people who
are running these autism Does that sound like the people

(01:03:56):
who are running the cancer institutes who don't really want
to find a cure for cancer, the cancer hospitals and
the cancer research institutes and all the rest of the stuff.
By the way, mentioning that makes me think of rncstore
dot com. RNC store dot com. That's where you can
get the book by Jobardgriffin. I've interviewed him on this

(01:04:18):
A World Without Cancer. Gedard Griffin was not afraid to
go out on a limb and talk about what people
had found with apricot seeds with B seventeen and so
you can read what he was. The doctor who told
him about it was afraid to go public with it,
but Jederard Griffin did go public with it. And you

(01:04:40):
can get that book there at rncstore dot com and
you can save ten percent off of the code night
and you can also get apricot seeds and if you
don't want to chew them, you can get it in
a pill form as well. B seventeen. That's what that
is try some of that stuff before you get him

(01:05:03):
involved with the cancer industry. My father, they've put down
that he died of cancer, but he did not dive
of cancer. He died of chemotherapy. First shot of chemotherapy
they gave him, he went into a coma, never came
out of it. He had had our heart valve and
that chemotherapy took his immune system down. They brought in

(01:05:23):
interns to take a look at him. So we've never
seen this kind of infection around a heart valve before.
It's like, well, you caused it anyway. They killed him,
So keep that in mind.

Speaker 1 (01:05:36):
Before we move on.

Speaker 3 (01:05:38):
I continually hear people use the refrain of oh, well,
they're just better at diagnosing autism now.

Speaker 2 (01:05:43):
Ah, that's what they Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:05:44):
Really from one in ten thousand to one and thirty one,
you think they're that much better at diagnosing it?

Speaker 1 (01:05:50):
They're really good, idiot?

Speaker 2 (01:05:52):
Are you? I know? They're really good, aren't they? And
believe it or not, Travis, that is the tack that
NBC does. They can't escape the fact the CDC is
going these numbers from one to ten thousand to one
and thirty one. So NBC does it, And whether they
do at an exact alibi. That's what they have put
out there.

Speaker 3 (01:06:11):
Except for the fact that none of us ever saw them.
You know, they were few and far between, Right, what's
the excuse they kept them locked up in the attic
or basement.

Speaker 2 (01:06:20):
That's right. And when you look at the CDC's owned data,
it's not they're saying, well, you know, they're better at
looking at it, because now they're calling even people are
high functioning with a little mild touch of autism or whatever.
They're just lumping that all together as autism. And yet
when you look at the CDC data, the CDC data
is talking about people who are severely impact of autism.

(01:06:43):
But again, go back to the example of that court case,
you know, where you have the two parents that vaccinated
their kids and they're in a divorce and the judges
pro vaccine. He says he found out about it. Who's
outrage whoever will give the vacts. I'll let you have
the cussy of they take the kids out, three kids
and the daughter they split it up for her. But

(01:07:04):
we also see that it is much more targeted towards
boys anyway. Right, But they split it up for her
because Shari had some known allergic issues. But they gave
all the catch up shots to the two boys, one
of them the older one. They both went into intensive care.
One of them came out after a few days. The
other one has never come out of it because he
has such severe autism that he's going to be in

(01:07:26):
a diaper the rest of his life. He doesn't even
completely blew him out, you know, he's not there anymore
for all practical purposes. But his father is having to
take care of him because now the mother abandoned them
after the mess that she created. And so that is
a clear case that is directly attributable to that. Now,
we saw that in a compressed time frame, and that's

(01:07:48):
what these poisoners that we call the pharmaceutical industries, what
they like to do is they like to do it
over a longer time frame so that they have plausible
deniability that they've actually poisoned you. That's the game. But
we know what it is. We do know what it is.
In five of the CDC's study areas, autism rates are

(01:08:09):
already higher among four year olds than they are with
eight year olds. Why is that because they keep adding
more and more vaccines. This is why the occurrence is
going up because they're adding more and more vaccines. It's
never enough for them. These people are so addicted to money,
to the love of money. They are so evil that

(01:08:29):
they can't get enough of the money, which means that
they can't vaccinate you enough. They will never be enough.
They will always be coming up with more vaccines and
pushing them harder and harder. And we're going to talk
about what they're doing to parents who don't get their
kids vaccinated as well here. But finishing up with this,
that was what you pointed out, Travis, is exactly what

(01:08:51):
they said, and that's what children's self defense attact. They
said that the data doesn't support the better diagnosis theory. CDC
and mainstream media suggest that this is about being able
to diagnose it better, or that they have pulled in
people who only are mild. And we see this in
the NBC News thing. Here's the headline. Autism rates have
risen to one in thirty one school aged children, says

(01:09:14):
the CDC report. And yet about five paragraphs down, they
say doctors are better than ever at identifying autism, with
awareness at an all time high, without a doubt, we've
become exceptionally efficient in this surveillance work. What a bunch
of nonsense. But that is the typical mainstream media spant.
That's what NBC is telling people in this article. And

(01:09:36):
so they go on to say NBC says there's a
lot of things that we do not understand as of
yet about autism, quoting an expert who runs an autism
group and he wants to keep this going, right, this
is a growth industry for him. Let's just call it
what it is. These people are willing to kill you,

(01:09:57):
to destroy your children so they can make money. That
is exactly what this is. There's a lot of things
that we don't understand yet about autism, but one thing
for certain is that vaccines do not cause autism. Well
if you can say that, If you can, how can you,
in the same sentence say we don't understand it, but
we know that it's not caused by vaccines. Well, then
you're a liar because you've already made up your mind

(01:10:20):
that you're going to ally with the vaccine companies that
are sending that are building your business of treating autism.
And we're seeing the same kind of stuff when it
comes to the heart attacks of kids who have been
given the COVID shot. Oh well, you know, let's set
up some foundations and we'll study this and we'll start
giving the what you call the things, the electroshock stuff.

(01:10:45):
You know, we'll put that in the schools, right, and
we'll do EKGs with all the kids who are going
to participate in sports. BOTA going to talk about the
root cause of it, because that's the pharmaceutical companies and
they've got enough money that they can bribe enough people
and high places, because how do people get in the
high places. They get into high places because they've already
sold out for the most part, are there. That's that's

(01:11:07):
what matters to them. And if it isn't how they
got there, then it becomes this worry that well, wait
a minute, I really like my comfortable life and all
the money that I've gotten. I don't want to lose
that by opposing this. So NBC says that people skipping
the shots, they go on they meet it. So first

(01:11:28):
they say, well, we're better at diagnosing it now, and uh,
I don't know what it caused, what causes it, but
I know that it's not the vaccines, And then they
pivot to measles. In this NBC article an NBC says,
the people skipping shots or what's causing this measles epidemic
a measles epidemic. Prove it and if it's true, So

(01:11:51):
what it's measles, it's not autism, it's measles. You get
over it. And do you want to talk about something
that's rare. The chances of dying from this stuff is
like your chances of getting autism before the vaccine schedule began.
So yeah, but if you skip it, guess what happens?
They might take your children. Because in Taxachusetts, big government Massachusetts,

(01:12:17):
that's exactly what they did. Massachusetts took custody of five
children after a doctor reported them to Child Protective Services
because they didn't want to vaccinate their baby. A snitch
doctor ratted them out to Child Protective Services. The Massachusetts

(01:12:39):
Department of Children and Families took custody of five children
after a pediatrician reported their parents for allegedly refusing to
vaccinate their nine month old baby due to religious beliefs.
They'd skipped out on guess what, twenty one shots? Twenty

(01:13:00):
one shots? They really wait these seventy six shots early,
So we're going to have to catch up this kid. Yeah,
he's twenty one shots overdue. We got to get this
autism started. The parents were homeschooling, and they were doing
this because they're Christians and religious, and so when they
looked at it, they said, Massachusetts is crazy. I'm getting

(01:13:23):
out of here. I'm going to Texas. And then Texas
authorities arrested them. Texas arrested them, what four for quote
familial kidnapping. Have you ever heard of that before? I've
never heard of that before. They because the family decided
that they were going to take their three kids. I

(01:13:43):
think it's three yods. Let's see the no five kids,
five kids, it's not I was thinking five total. No
that two parents and five kids. So they want to
take their five kids and move from Massachusetts to Texas.
And then they said, well that's kidnapping what talking about?
And Texas arrested them for that. So they declined vaccination

(01:14:05):
for their baby boy on religious grounds. And Massachusetts actually
even allows religious exemptions for this. We know we had
in New York and California. The clip that I've played
all so many times, I'm going to play it again,
Trump saying they got to get this shot. It's really
going around. They got to get the shot. Well, he
was saying that because you had ultra orthodox Jews in

(01:14:26):
New York and you had people in California that says, no,
I don't want to take it. I want I've got
medical exemptions, I've got religious exemptions and what No, you
got to get the shot. They really got to get
the shot. This measles thing, it's really going around, you know,
the type of thing twenty nineteen leading up to his
twenty twenty bio weapon that he was putting out. Well, Massachusetts, however,

(01:14:50):
still allows religious exemptions and you don't got to get
the shot if you've got a religious exemption on that.
But they came after them, nevertheless, and they still had
were they ratting pediatrician and the child Protective services. They
still picked these kids even though they were within the
law and refusing on religious grounds having this child vaccinated.

(01:15:13):
The doctor told us that if we didn't vaccinate, he
would have to report us, said the father. They noted
that the doctor's appointment said the child was completely healthy
quote unquote, and the baby quote just needed the shots.
It had nothing to do with anything other than you're
going to get the shots because I need that for
my practice. If I don't get my patients vaccinated, then

(01:15:36):
the insurance company cuts down on what they will give
me across the board and it could destroy my practice.
So I've got to poison your child so that i
can make money, folks, That's what this is about. So
the child, so called protective services left a notice on
the family's doorstep demanding a home visit, and the parents refused.

(01:16:00):
What followed was a dramatic escalation. The police allegedly surround
their apartment, banging on the doors and circling the property
for up to thirty minutes, leading the mother to hide
in the closet with the five children for a half hour.
The police and DCF we call them a lot of

(01:16:20):
places CPS came back in greater numbers the next day,
and so then the family said, let's get out of here,
let's go to Texas. They should have gone to Mexico
because Texas is where they got arrested. Authorities hunted down
the family after they left Massachusetts and arrested them in Whitney, Texas,
on March the eighth, charging them with five misdemeanor counts

(01:16:45):
each of kidnapping a minor by a relative. That's your parents,
both parents. This is not one parent kidnapping child because
another parent has been given custody or something like that.
And so with this, if they're found guilty, they could
get one year and one thousand dollars fine for each

(01:17:09):
of the five children. So each of these parents is
looking at five years and five thousand dollars if they
find them guilty. Her sister had claimed to the police
that the mother has a domestic violence history with the father,
but the children were found safe and unharmed in Texas
before being properly promptly taken to the custody of DCF.

(01:17:34):
The police there did not issue an Amber alert for
the children because they knew that the children were not
in quote imminent danger of serious modelly harm ORed death unquote.
So it's not about any allegations of that. It is
simply about the fact that they didn't want to be
forced to take a vaccine, even though Massachusetts state law

(01:17:57):
says that they are allowed religious exemptions. The so called
child protective services are going to kidnap the kids, so
they went to Texas. Then they got charged with kidnapping
to avoid CPS kidnapping their children, and so a constitutional
law strategist Ron Bouchard told The Boston Broadside. He said,

(01:18:20):
this is a blatant violation of fundamental rights on multiple levels.
By what authority has this family been apprehended? And for
what was there a warrant you'd have to go to
for a judge? What is you know? Show me the
crime habeas corpus runner anyway, and he says, and what
is familial kidnapping? This is all legal strategist, He says,

(01:18:44):
a family has a right to travel with their own children.
So the Massachusetts DCF is mandating supervised visits for the
mother who's reportedly been released on seventy five hundred dollars
bail after spending a month in jail seeing her children.
Other family took the children. She lost her home during

(01:19:04):
this disruptive series of events that has torpedoed her family.
The father, who is representing himself, is set to appear
in court in April. He remains in jail. He says,
I am a man under God and under God's grace alone. Yeah,
but he needs to have discernment about this criminal system,

(01:19:25):
and I mean criminal system who you go back and
look at better call Saul right, Well, these guys is
running drugs. You know, he says, you need a criminal lawyer.
He says, yeah, I know, but he says, no, I
mean a criminal lawyer. In other words, somebody like me.
He's a lawyer who's a criminal. You need a criminal lawyer.

(01:19:48):
He added that he had been and that's what this
guy needs and then necessarily need a criminal lawyer. But
he needs to have a lawyer because he needs to
understand how criminal. The justice system is not a criminal
justice system, it is a criminal justicism. The emphosis is
on the first salable there criminal justice system or criminal

(01:20:11):
justice system. He added that he has been defamed and demonized.
He said the DCF have harassed his family with quote
fear and intimidation tactics. They used unconstitutional, weaponized government agencies
against him, according to the local media as well and
because he was arrested and rated out as well in Texas,

(01:20:33):
a Texas Republican congressional candidate Ava Zolari said, I am
beyond disgusted to watch our God given freedoms, especially the
right to say no to medical mandates, being ripped away
by the greasy hands of government overreach. Because it was
Texas where he was arrested, extradited. But here's the thing,

(01:20:55):
this is not even a mandate. They ripped the kids
away even when they had no legal right to do so,
no right to do so. Talked about CPS for a
long time. Okay, so let's get back to this autism
thing briefly. One more thing we have and maybe you've
seen this, because this came out a few days ago.
It was a follow up interview Jenny McCarthy, who got

(01:21:19):
to be known for she was an actress or model
or whatever. She was on the view for a while
as well. She was the girlfriend of Jim Carrey, and
you've probably seen the clip of her and Jim Carrey
on Larry King Live railing about vaccines and autism. But

(01:21:40):
in a follow up to this, she just recently had
an interview where she talked about the campaign to discredit
her and the reason she got into all this is
because her child got autism from an MMR shot. McCarthy's
skepticism about vaccines began after her normal healthy toddler received
the mumps, measles and rubella the mm ARE shot. The

(01:22:02):
thing that they're working so hard to get everybody so
afraid about measles in Texas. Oh, the most contagious disease
in the world, and blah blah blah blah blah. Well
if it is, why isn't it all over Texas? Now?
All right? You know they use these things. They used
a situation in California, they used the situation in New
York and everything. Three or four people get measles. Well,
that means we've got to vaccinate everybody, no exemptions for

(01:22:25):
religious or medical reasons. But it's like, who died? Nobody died.
Did it spread everybody? No, it didn't spread Saturday everybody.
Were the four people in New York who got it?
Where they vaccinated? Yes, multiple times. So what is this about? Well,
you know what it's about. You've heard this program. The

(01:22:45):
two and a half year old of Jenny McCarthy, who
got vaccinated suddenly began suffering life threatening seizures that eventually
culminated in an autism diagnosis. After researching, McCarthy's actually found
that the MMR vaccine was quote clinically and published science
unquote linked to autism and some children. She said, my

(01:23:06):
son was one of them because it was after his
MMR when he is encephalitis turned to autism. Encephalitis, of course,
is an inflammation of brain tissue that can be caused
by vaccination. And you know, when we go back to Texas,
there was a guy there. I really liked this guy.
He is no longer in the Texas legislature. At the time,

(01:23:27):
he was in the Texas House of Representatives. His name
was David Simpson, who was out of was it Longview,
Long Street, Texas, I can't remember now, but he was
a solid guy conservative, but he also, you know, he
wasn't He understood the principles about liberty and that type
of thing. And so he had parents in his jurisdiction

(01:23:49):
who had children who had uncontrollable seizures because they were
vaccine injured. And the only thing that they could they
tried all these different pharmaceuticals that were supposed to control
the trembling and the seizures and everything. They couldn't find
anything that worked, and so they were desperate. People said
try medical marijuana. It was legal in Colorado. So they

(01:24:10):
these two families went there and it worked for their kids.
One family was wealthy enough that they could relocate to Colorado,
the other one wasn't. And they both talked to David
Simpson and told him about this, and he said, it's
just absolutely criminal that these families would be under threat
of arrest and imprisonment for using the only thing that works.

(01:24:33):
And so he was able to get through by appealing
to common sense and ethics and morality. He was able
to get through a medical marijuana exemption in Texas, which
doesn't recognize any medical exemptions for marijuana, but he got
an exemption and for this type of autism that Jenny

(01:24:55):
McCarthy's child had. And they still said, you've got to
try all the farmmaceutical remedies. And only after you've tried
all the pharmaceutical remedies and they don't work, can you
do this and we will authorize it at that point
in time. But again, they don't recognize medical use of
marijuana for anything other than that. That's the kind of

(01:25:17):
control that the pharmaceutical industry has on people. And so
she became a very vocal critic of the vaccines. And
that's one of the things that really bothered me too.
You know, you got the pharmaceutical industry which caused these
kids seizures. Most likely I can't see definitely, but we
see this happening over and over again, like we do

(01:25:38):
with Jennie McCarthy. So they mandate, you know, dozens of
these vaccines at early ages, and then when your child
comes down with this reaction and the only thing that
will help them is non pharmaceutical, they want to deny
you the treatment. Of course, we see this over and
over again now with things. So she published a book

(01:26:01):
that was called Louder Than Words, A Mother's Journey in
Healing Autism. She appeared on the Oprah Winfrey Show, and
she said, the interesting thing was is that Oprah Winfrey.
She pressured Oprah Winfrey, and Oprah Winfrey said, okay, we
can have you on, but you want to say this,
You're going to have to do it in a live episode,
she said. Oprah said that if it was taped, any

(01:26:23):
criticism of the vaccines would be censored. That shows you
how much control and how they own these networks. So
on the show, Oprah also had to read a quote giant,
long page disclaimer defending vaccines before she let her tell
her story, and then she went on. In two thousand

(01:26:48):
and nine, subsequent to that, she went on with Larry
King again, also live, and I'll just play for hi.
I'm sure you've seen this. This is a little bit
of what Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy were saying they
were dating at the time.

Speaker 4 (01:27:02):
What happened after nineteen eighty nine. It's twice as many
as anywhere else in thirty countries in the Western world,
But we give twice as many shots as any of
those countries.

Speaker 1 (01:27:12):
Why is that?

Speaker 2 (01:27:13):
If it's vaccination and you're not against vaccination, well what
are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that?

Speaker 4 (01:27:20):
Yes, I think we have to choose which you should.

Speaker 5 (01:27:23):
You should educate yourself.

Speaker 6 (01:27:24):
We want to empower parents to educate themselves. Do we
need to have the chicken box? Do we need the
heppatitis be shot on the second day of life?

Speaker 4 (01:27:30):
I don't think we can afford to assume that the
people who are charged with our public health any longer
have our best interests at heart.

Speaker 1 (01:27:40):
All the time.

Speaker 4 (01:27:41):
Parents have to have to make their own decisions.

Speaker 2 (01:27:44):
Why would a doctor not want to know more about
something that could save that could save a life or
prevent a disease. I don't understand the.

Speaker 4 (01:27:52):
AAP is financed by the drug Companiesical drugs are financed.

Speaker 2 (01:27:56):
By the drug companies.

Speaker 1 (01:27:58):
This is a huge business that scene.

Speaker 4 (01:28:00):
Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry,
thirteen billion dollars.

Speaker 5 (01:28:06):
In control medical schools.

Speaker 4 (01:28:08):
What we were asking is for them to take a
loss for the good of our children. That's a tough
sell in a boardroom.

Speaker 2 (01:28:17):
Yeah, of course that was two thousand and nine, and
those early early days. It is so so much worse
than that. So she said, I had about six months
of just enormous amount of parents going thank you, I'm
looking at as not being crazy now. But then she
this is what she recently said about what happened in
the aftermath of doing these live shows at Oprah Winfrey

(01:28:39):
Larry King.

Speaker 6 (01:28:40):
After that, things kind of got crazy, not immediately.

Speaker 5 (01:28:44):
I had about six.

Speaker 6 (01:28:45):
Months of just enormous amounts of parents going thank you,
I'm looked at not crazy now.

Speaker 5 (01:28:52):
People kept saying it was crazy.

Speaker 6 (01:28:55):
And then I had someone come to my organization, Generation
Rescue and say to me, listen, I was approached by
let's just say, a government agency to be hired. And
what I do is I set up pr campaigns to
go against the narrative. And I'm telling you privately because

(01:29:18):
I turned them down. But I wanted to give you
for a warning that it's happening, because they're going to
hire someone else. The only reason I said no is
because my child went through the same thing and I
didn't want to be part of it.

Speaker 5 (01:29:28):
And I was on, hold on, hold on, I have
chills all over my body. I need you to tell
me that whole thing all over again. Yeah, because the
shock almost didn't let everything sink in. And I if
I'm having that, somebody else is having it.

Speaker 2 (01:29:40):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:29:40):
Someone came to you.

Speaker 6 (01:29:41):
Someone came to me in person and said, I basically
am a pr agency, a very high echelon one, and
I was approached by a government agency to create a
narrative against you, and it's going to be called your
anti vaccine and I'm turned down the job. But I

(01:30:01):
wanted to privately and secretly like this. Why I couldn't.
We couldn't do an email, we couldn't do a phone call.

Speaker 5 (01:30:06):
I had to come to you.

Speaker 6 (01:30:06):
In person and let you know this that they're going
to come after you with and hard And I said, well,
how are they going to do that when I've clearly
said in every interview I'm not anti vaccine, Like I'm
just telling the story of my child of what happened
and how I'm getting him better, and he said, doesn't matter.
He said, doesn't matter. They're going to come after you
with everything they've got, and they've you know, they've got

(01:30:29):
the media on their side, so just to just this
is just a heads up. And I was like, well,
thank you very much. And I didn't believe them. I
was like, there's no way because I preface it in
my book. I've prefaceed it everywhere. You know, you didn't
even get scared. I didn't get scared.

Speaker 5 (01:30:43):
I would have a heart attack, I know. I didn't
get scared.

Speaker 6 (01:30:46):
I didn't get scared. You know what, when you feel
like you have your faith in your corner and truth
and truth, that's exactly right. So I'm a tough chick.
I'm from the South Side of Chicago. You know, I've
gone through enough. I think I went almost to an
all girl Catholic school, so you know, I think it

(01:31:06):
gave me a good armor. So when it started happening,
it didn't really hurt me until it started taking jobs
away from me. Because I was a single mother, still
trying to heal my son, pay for speech therapy ABA
and canceled. I was the beginning of kind of that

(01:31:27):
cancel culture. It didn't cancel culture wasn't even a phrase yet,
but I would get calls from certain jobs and be like,
we're taking off this campaign. So it was that that
was the hard part because I was a single mom.
If I was some rich bitch that didn't give a shit,

(01:31:48):
I it probably wouldn't have affected me.

Speaker 5 (01:31:50):
But it was just the job ask because sticks and
stones bring them, I don't care.

Speaker 6 (01:31:55):
But it was that kind of you know, And so
I just heavily relied on still right my books and
not giving up and still like going. You can try
to cancel me, but I'm still going to be here.
And now looking back, my son is twenty two years
old and I'm still here.

Speaker 2 (01:32:15):
Well I don't know how her son is, but isn't
that amazing, you know? And it's good that she was
telling that lady. I'm thinking about it. If I was
the interviewer and somebody told me that, you know, we
had somebody show up and said there's a government agency
that wants me to destroy you publicly, I'd say, yeah,
I sure, I understand that. She's like, wait a minute,
wait a minute, what I'm in shock? Say that again.

(01:32:36):
I mean, I would be like, yeah, me too, you know.
I mean, and when you talk about this, the canceling,
it's always coming from the cancel culture. Tie it back in, ladies.
The cancel culture is coming from government. It always has
and it always will. It's the government working behind the scenes,
using their proxies who are a private individual. You know,

(01:33:00):
pr agencies are using social media companies or whoever right
to come after you and to destroy you. You go
back and you look at the guy who exposed the
crack cocaine epidemic, Gary Webb, you know, Dark Alliance. He
wins a like he wants on an award. I don't
know if it's a pular servant. He won an award
for that. And so the government decided they didn't have

(01:33:20):
to destroy him. Howd they do that? They had like
a half dozen or more reporters of the La Times
set up to investigate him personally. Here's the man, I
want you to find something on him and destroy him personally,
and they did it, took him out for a while,
and then he surfaced again and said I'm back, I'm
going to fight this stuff. And shortly after that he

(01:33:43):
was suicided because I don't believe he killed himself. There's
always the people who said I'm going to fight them
who wind up committing suicide. Isn't that funny?

Speaker 7 (01:33:51):
You know?

Speaker 2 (01:33:51):
It's kind of like Aaron Schwartz, who you know, was
fighting SISA, SISPA act A, SOAPA, all these different things
that were set up to as a surveillance thing and
set up to have a public private surveillance network, which
is really escalating and feeding all of this censorship stuff.

(01:34:14):
He was going to fight that, and you know, they
came after him for bogus charges, saying that he illegally
access to computer system. The local officials said, there's no
crime here, no crime here, So then they brought in
a federal attorney who prosecuted him, put him in jail.
He's still very defiant, and then he supposedly committed suicide.

(01:34:36):
Her father, her name was, her husband, her name was
Carmine or Tease. I think she was a federal attorney
that were grooming her for higher office. And so this
negative publicity about what happened with Aaron Swartz, people said,
you drove him to suicide with your persecution, your prosecution.

(01:34:58):
Her husband said she didn't do that She offered him
a plea deal. All he had to do was say
this and walk away. She wasn't trying to send him
to prison jus. And then he removed that I don't
think you know. And this guy was tough. This is
not his first rodeo. He'd had situations like that before.
He had fought it many times. So you see, you know,
you want to talk about cancel culture. That doesn't even

(01:35:19):
get close to what it is. It's the government. It's
the government running this stuff. She said, it really didn't
hurt me until they started taking jobs away from me.
And that's the way they come after you. They deep
platform you, they de bank you. Now you know, sorry,
we're going to shut you down from PayPal. Why I
don't have anything. I just says, cancel your account immediately.

(01:35:43):
I've seen it over and over again. But folks, when
we come back, we're going to talk a little bit
more about vaccines. But I want to take a quick
break first, and then we come back, we're going to
talk about some updates on this Trump shot. Will be
right back.

Speaker 1 (01:36:48):
Joy listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 2 (01:36:52):
All right, welcome back, and yeah, we're dealing with something
right now. So I'd appreciate your prayers for this show
uh protection And just like yesterday we had Ryan, for
the love of the Road drives a eighteen wheeler and
he was having big issues with tires. And no matter

(01:37:12):
what happens in our life, it's always good for us
to ask God for protection, and many times we see
that happening and it is a real faith builder for
us and for the people that we asked to pray
for us. So I don't know the resolution of what
happened with Ryan yesterday, but we would ask that as well.

(01:37:32):
On Kick, Karen Carpenter says Washington State is trying to
pass a law removing all exemptions. All I bet they are,
I bet, and they won't be the last one either,
all these these Democrat run states. On Kick, Knights of
the Storm has gifted a sub Thank you very much.
I appreciate that. Well. When we talked about the Trump shots,

(01:37:54):
young adults continue to produce spike protein one year after
receiving the COVID vaccine. Yeah, you know we're talking about earlier.
You know, the seventy six shots the kids are going
to get. I think it's forty something that you get
by the time that you were nine months where they
wanted to come after that one child, and that includes

(01:38:16):
the COVID shots. Right by the time you're eighteen, they
want you to have four doses. Now this is what
CDC's chart. Had to look it up. They've now first
they added them. They they're now starting to multiply the
MMR shots on their pediatric vaccine schedule. So now by
the time you are eighteen, they want you to have
four Trump shots, four of the bioweapon mRNA trump shots.

(01:38:42):
And of course they can cause the body to continue
producing the spike protein much longer than expected. Well what
did they expect? I said this from the very beginning.
Oh so, according to Modernis on website, they're going to
and according to that little Dog and Pony show that
President Trump arranged for them, He brought them all in,
set them up. How long is it going to take you?
That's too long? How about you that's a little bit fast.

(01:39:03):
How about you MODERNA. We can do it right now.
As a matter of fact, we don't have to manufacture
the vaccine. We will make your body manufacture the vaccine.
Let's go with that. It was all set up and
that phony presentation, and I said Okay, so you're going
to have the body manufactured, and that's what their website said.
I said, so, where's the off switch for this? And

(01:39:25):
how is that different from let's say cancer, for example,
reprogramming your body to produce a spike protein. Is that
like producing a tumor? Or is that what these white
things that are growing in the veins are. Yeah, essentially
that there is no off switch, folks, and there now
multiplying it. Now they want to give your kid four

(01:39:48):
of these shots as part of the pediatric shots. Our
government and our pharmaceutical industries are themselves a metasta sizing
cancer and they're going to kill us all if we
don't go ahead. I am anti vax. I make no
bones about it. They may take me off the air,

(01:40:08):
but I'm not going to make any bones about it.
New York according to this report, headline says wasted over
four hundred and fifty million dollars on unused medical equipment
during COVID. I don't believe that at all. I don't
believe that at all. This is a report that's being
put out. In my opinion, they're talking, they're trying to

(01:40:29):
come after Andrew Cuomo. Why well, they're going to put
this report out because he got a lot of people sick,
they said, with a COVID thing and his policies, and
he resigned. Now he wants to be mayor again, So
now we've got to find some more stuff to criticize
him over. But it will also helped to give them
an alibi. They want to say that Cuomo bought four

(01:40:51):
hundred and fifty million dollars worth of equipment and didn't
use it. Except that I interviewed a person I forget
what her name was the book that you was called
Pandemic Nurse, and she said she was in Florida and
they in the hospital where she was, they weren't seeing
any this COVID stuff, but she kept hearing all these
news reports about how bad it was. He said, I
wanted to help. So where they were saying it was

(01:41:12):
the worst is in New York City, And so she
said she went to New York City and volunteered her
services as a nurse. Keep hearing that they're short on
staff and all the rest of the stuff, And she said,
I would waited for days before they'd even called me in.
I thought, what's the matter with them? Why don't they
call me in, I'm ready to help right now. And
she said, as they were taking her around, the physician

(01:41:34):
who was the head of the thing showing her said, yeah,
you know, nearly ninety percent of these people are going
to die from the ventilators they were using them. Now
they may have that. Maybe they're looking at New York
State and maybe it was in New York City where
they were killing people with ventilators. But this also might

(01:41:56):
be a something to excuse them to say that, well, no,
we actually didn't kill people ventilators. We didn't uilize them.
And that's Andrew Cuomo's fault. He bought these things four
and fifty million dollars. We didn't even use them. They
said ventilators, oxygen tanks, pulse oximeters, oxygen concentrators, infusion pumps.

(01:42:17):
The state here we got the state used just three devices.
That is absolutely not true. That is absolutely not true.
I don't know what their sources on this. This is
the Gold Report reporting this. I don't know what their sources,
but I can tell you that based on what I saw,
based on what I interviewed, whether it's woman who saw

(01:42:37):
this stuff, her credibility to me is far greater than
any report that is coming out that I think has
political motivations to try to undermine Andrew Cuomo for whatever reason.
I really don't care what their political games are. I
don't care whether it's Democrats or Republicans or whatever. I'm
not even in New York. They're saying it that now
sits unused in storage facilities, but they're saying that only

(01:42:58):
three devices were used. That is absolutely that out of
all these types of things you're talking about ventilators, oxygen tanks,
pulse oximeters, oxygen concentrators, and fusion pumps, all of those things,
only three devices of all of those categories. That's a lie.
That's a lie. And listen to the way that they

(01:43:18):
sell this, and this is another tell. All of this
gain of function, you know, and wu flu nonsense is
being sold by all the media, including the so called
alternative media, which is not really an alternative, it's alternative propaganda.
You know, how do you like your propaganda to serve?

(01:43:39):
Do you like it served from the left or from
the right. You know, it's a waiter, come up when
he dips the soup is on your left or your right.
When these people are dipping the lies. Do they get
on your left or your right side to do it
with proper etiquette. And so this is one person quoted
by the New York Posts. He's a QUOMO spokesperson. He said,
you can Monday morning quarterback now. But then we were

(01:44:03):
looking to save lives and doing nothing wasn't an option.
Though it was a real pandemic. No, it wasn't. And
we did everything that we could. We didn't know the
right thing to do, but we were trying. So don't
hold us responsible. It's China, it's the woo flu. And
so we're all now excused because we did the best

(01:44:26):
we hand, but everybody was going to die. Don't tell
me that nonsense. Now it was a lie. Then I
knew it was a lie. You knew it was a
lie if you listened. And they've been pushing that lie.
That's their alibi. That lie has become their alibi, and
it's become the foundation for them doing it all again.
And the media playbook for Measles looks exactly like the
COVID playbook, says Children's Health Defense. And they're one hundred

(01:44:48):
percent right, one hundred percent right. They said this time
the kids were the ponds last time, they started with
the elderly. Now they're starting with the kids and the
measles stuff. Children's Health Defense has it exactly right. Five
years ago we fought back as our government, big media,
big pharma orchestrated and executed a COVID nineteen fear campaign

(01:45:09):
that was built on lies, deception, and censorship. But there
is an upside to all of this, and that is
that had opened the eyes of millions more people to
the dangers of shoddily tested vaccines, regulatory agency hubris, and
one size fits all medicine. Well, I would also throw

(01:45:31):
in there that it also opened our eyes to fake
pandemics and it has opened my eyes to the whole
fake virus paradigm. The whole virus paradigm is fake, and
it is all designed to create panic. Called a panic demic,
or call it panic endemic. Right, they want to panic everybody,

(01:45:54):
and they do it through the media. You know, we've
seen the memes. A lot of people realize that the
memes that you know, the Amish never got COVID because
they don't watch TV. Right, the media would have you
believe that measles is a deadly disease, But any suggestion
that MMR vaccines are safer than measles infections is not

(01:46:16):
supported by facts. It's not even supported by the CDC's
own data, which I don't consider to be facts, but
they're they're just like inflation figures, unemployment figures or whatever else,
but their own data this proves. It shows that the
vaccines will killed far more people than the CDC. The

(01:46:36):
CDC says the vaccines have killed more people than the
CDC says measles killed. And all of this is dasia
flu same type of stuff. You got to be afraid
everybody's going to die. They can't even claim a large
number of people are even sick with it, but it's
a pandemic and we've all got to take their prescription,

(01:46:58):
which of course is an injection. And you can't have
anything else because if you talk about Vanessa Side or
whatever this respiratory thing is, you know anything else like
any other treatment. Oh, you know, that's that's not allowed.
All of these are telltale And when you look at
what the media is doing, as I said earlier, you

(01:47:19):
have these tabloid things out of the UK, The Mirror,
the Daily Mail. Here's the Daily Mail's headline exclusive terrifying
look inside a US town being overwhelmed by the world's
most infectious disease. Well, that's not exclusive. Did your government
minders tell you that that was going to be exclusive,
because everybody's reporting that, Daily Mail, Shame on you, you lying

(01:47:43):
prostitute whorees, just amazing and the dusty outskirts of seminole Texas.
Peter Hildebrand stands outside a gas station, his eyes red,
rim rimed red, and his voice cracking with grief. She
did not die of the measle, he says, of his
daughter Daisy. If there's one thing you should know, it's

(01:48:04):
that she was failed. In other words, this is the father,
the first one, the first reported death from measles. And
he showed the documents Children's Health Defense, Mary Holland and
the rest of them, and doctors reviewed that, reviewed the charts,
and she didn't die of measles. And her attending physicians said,

(01:48:26):
you know, the rash had left. It was medical malpractice
by the hospital. It was refusing to treat her by
the hospital. And he wants that story out. So Daily
Mail is going to call him a delusional Did they

(01:48:46):
look at the charts? No? Did they call in physicians
to look at the charts. No, did they do what
the government told them? Yes, this is like a PR
campaign like they were going to run against Jenny McCarthy.
This is their Their PR campaigns look like there's a
lot of factless assertions and allegations being propagated by the press.

(01:49:09):
Eight year old Daisy Hillebrand is the second child to
die in the escalating measles outbreak gripping West Texas. No,
she was the first. I think. Nevertheless, where the anti
vaccine conspiracy thinking has become rife. See, it was not
having a vaccine that killed her, and it was being
anti VAXs that killed her. And it's all a conspiracy theory. No,

(01:49:31):
it is a conspiracy and the Daily Mail is part
of that conspiracy. The death was confirmed by the CDC.
That's that. Oh, that's all we have to Fauci said,
So CDC said, So that's done right. Hildebrand, however, claims
his daughter's death was not caused by the virus, but
by failure in her medical care, a lack of proper treatment,

(01:49:53):
and prejudice against her faith. The family is Midnite and
they don't want these Daily Mail says they falsely claimed
the shots contained quote dangerous stuff and that big Pharma
used them to make money at the expense of people's health.

(01:50:14):
Oh and pharma shills like Daily Mail is paid to
lie about that. It's amazing. What a sloppy, obvious hit
job of lies this is. Hildebrand has determined, however, to
overturn the report that his daughter was killed by measles.
He recently met with r f K Junior during a

(01:50:34):
visit in the area earlier this month. Hildebrand says, he
that is RFK Junior didn't mention vaccines once, but he
was the nicest man I ever met. And then after
his visit, RFK Jr. Wrote on x quote the most
effective way to prevent the spread of measles is the

(01:50:55):
MMR vaccine. RFK And just betray this guy. He betrayed you,
your children, your grandchildren. She was my little girl, he
said softly, and they let her down, and so did
arf K Junior. And rf K Junior is letting you

(01:51:17):
and your children down, still pushing this MMR vaccine. Rf
K Junior knows the truth about this stuff. Why isn't
he stopping us instead he's feeding this And then you
see this again, like I said, the UK Mirror, here's
their headline inside the anti vax us town being overwhelmed

(01:51:39):
by the world's most infectious disease. Give me a break,
how pathetic this is. These people are trying a little
bit too hard. Don't you think residents are standing firm
on their decision not to get vaccinated, with many claiming
that the jabs contain quote dangerous stuff unquote and that
big pharma have only manufacture them to make money. Now

(01:52:03):
they're getting ready to roll out. You know, we talked
about how they're doing the same play with measles that
they did with COVID, right, and so we see how
they're using the press, how they're using them to to
demonize and to ridicule people. Well, Hollywood is getting ready

(01:52:25):
to do that same thing with COVID. There's a movie
coming out called Eddington. It's got a big cast in it.
You got Joaquin Phoenix and you know other people like
that that are pretty big actors. I'm going to play
for you the trailer for Eddington. And notice that this
trailer for Eddington, which has not been released yet, but

(01:52:45):
it's going to be released. And I can look at
this trailer and I can pretty much guess what's going
to be in and I used to do that for
a living, and it's going to be a well produced
film that is going to create a conflict between a
sheriff and a mayor, one of them pro vaccine, the
other one anti vaccine. And I'm telling you that this

(01:53:07):
is going to be used to demonize, to declare that
anybody that pushes back against the COVID stuff, we're all
crackpots and conspiracy theorists and all the rest of the stuff, which,
by the way, just every time you hear that, think
about the fact that the conspiracy theory was created by
the FBI to discredit people who said there was a
second shooter at the JFK thing. I'm perfectly happy to

(01:53:29):
have a label of conspiracy theorists or anti vas I
embrace those. Based on what these people have done, I
think those labels have been vindicated.

Speaker 6 (01:53:40):
Of course, they keep.

Speaker 2 (01:53:41):
Looking at that lab in Wuhan, China.

Speaker 3 (01:53:43):
If you look at that.

Speaker 5 (01:53:43):
Lab in Wuhan when that was established it.

Speaker 2 (01:53:46):
Was nineteen fifty six. Of course that would be or
Tom Hanks was born, the first celebrity with the virus.
Mysteries say the not nutty.

Speaker 8 (01:53:51):
Stuff twice the world about that because the people at
any ten blag.

Speaker 2 (01:53:58):
Guns your pay.

Speaker 7 (01:54:00):
It's not a coincidence. You are not a coincidence.

Speaker 2 (01:54:04):
You're not a content.

Speaker 7 (01:54:06):
And I am speaking now to deny by husband's announcement yesterday, which.

Speaker 8 (01:54:10):
Was extend of Mexico, despite its meager population, is quickly.

Speaker 1 (01:54:17):
I'm ready to continue leading and fighting the pandemic.

Speaker 2 (01:54:42):
Yeah, coming out in July. And so if you were
able to see that, I don't know some people listen
to the show, but if you see that they've got
some of the stuff that they're showing, the conflict and
everything that's in a little box taken by an iPhone
or cell phone or something like that and put up
on social media. They're pulling it all in to make
it so contemporary, so trendy, and they're going to use

(01:55:06):
all of their narrative powers and service of the state
and the pharmaceutical companies to discredit anybody who questions their
so called science. I can tell you that's where this
is going to go.

Speaker 3 (01:55:18):
That production company A twenty four makes nothing but pseudo
intellectual garbage.

Speaker 2 (01:55:23):
That's right. Didn't they do the Civil War?

Speaker 1 (01:55:24):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (01:55:25):
Nah, A bunch of other trash that morons who like
to believe their intelligent life.

Speaker 2 (01:55:30):
You go back and you I bet if somebody will
investigate these guys, you know, anybody listening welcome to go
investigat them. I don't have the time. I bet you
could probably find a lot of connections between them and
the CIA. You know, CIA isn't bragging about the fact
that Ink you tell, their venture capital firm has now
funded eight hundred different companies. And what are these companies
there for. They are there to set up data mining

(01:55:52):
and surveillance and all kinds of insane stuff, just what
you would expect the CIA to do, and they're bragging
about it, and it's escalating, escalating, just like the autism,
that kind of disease is escalating as well. Well, yeah,
I would bet that you can go back and you
can probably find a lot of connections with the CIA

(01:56:16):
or some other, if not that particular agency, some similar
function government agency that's there. Because we're going to talk
about four chan and what's been exposed with four chan
and the allegations made based on the hack that was
taken over the files that were released, it's kind of
interesting to see who is running even some of these

(01:56:38):
sites that I think were set up as a honeypot
to entrap people. I think that's what four chan is.
But anyway, I'll just go back to this Peter hillbrand.
He is now, as I said before, when Children's Health
Defense talked about his daughter who died after a measle's diagnosis,

(01:57:00):
but not from measles. They had doctors who went over
the records and they talked about all that stuff, and
then they talked to the family, but the family didn't
want to speak at that time. Well, now this has
gone on and he's had some time think about it,
and now he has contacted Children's Health Defense and he
wants to talk about it as well. I just get
so angry, he said. He talks about his child who
died from medical malpractice, not from measles, and then he

(01:57:26):
sees that the mainstream media is using this to push
the jabs and to attack his community there, Mennonites. And
so I'll just give you one positive thing here before
we go to a break, and this is from Xosa
News in the UK. Introducing a variety of natural foods
into your baby's diet sets your child up for stronger

(01:57:49):
immunity for life. Getting them shot, like, you know, four
dozen times before they're a one year old. That sets
them up for community problems all their life. But this
is something you can do that is positive. Introducing a
wide variety of plant based foods and the baby's diets
after the age of one speeds up gut microbiome maturity,

(01:58:11):
helping your child develop better digestion and stronger immunity from
an early age. Now, just make sure you don't inject
them with us. That's what they're saying too. In terms
of the allergies to peanuts and milk and things like that,
it's because these things are contaminations possibly that they get
through injections. If the first time the child is introduced
to milk or to peanuts is because they got these

(01:58:35):
types of proteins that were in the vaccines. If their
body encounters at the first time being injected in their bloodstream,
which is a lot of people who are anti vacs
from the very beginning, we're objecting to how it gets
introduced into the body. They said, you know, when your
body encounters things that can be harmful, you've got a

(01:58:57):
lot of different layers of protection that can mitigate that
kind of stuff. But when you inject something directly into
somebody's bloodstream, that doesn't work. And when you inject proteins
directly in as sometimes contaminates that they may not be
bad in and of themselves, but if that's the first
time that your child encounters those proteins, they can cause

(01:59:17):
them to have immune problems. So you want to start
introducing these things as food, as a wide variety of
food to help them build up microbiome maturity. Children who
consume diverse plant fibers develop higher levels of beneficial bacteria,
which reduce inflammation and protect the gut. Lining between twelve

(01:59:40):
and eighteen months is the most important window to introduce
a range of solid food, laying the ground work for
a healthy adult like gut by the age of twelve,
Local fiber rich foods like millet, banana, and rice work
best in supporting gut health. Expensive superfoods are not necessary
for strong gut development restraint. Active or processed replacement foods

(02:00:02):
damage gut bacteria balance, but breastfeeding combined with the verse
real foods, builds a more resilient long term gut foundation. Well,
there's some good news, some positive news of some things
that you can do. You don't have to rely and
you better not rely on these people who are public

(02:00:23):
health experts to protect your family and your health. They
aren't going to do it at all. We'll take a
quick break. We'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:01:16):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:01:29):
The common Man. They created common Core and dumb down
our children. They created common past track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(02:01:49):
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

(02:02:14):
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com. Let's

(02:02:57):
say we have on Kick of the Road says everything
went well, made it home this morning. Oh I'm glad
to hear that you made it home. Sorry that you
had the problem. Thanks for giving us an update. Let's
talk a little bit about what is happening again on
the home front homeschooling. This is Alex Newman, who does
a lot of reporting on education. He's very good. I've

(02:03:19):
had him on He's got a book about it as well.
He also writes for The New American, but he's got
his own book and his own his own site now
as well. But he says a lot of states are
now advancing tax funded choice quote unquote choice. Wasn't choice

(02:03:40):
in education? Good? Well, yes it is, but that's not
what we're talking about here. We're talking about government funding.
And what Alex Newman is trying to do is to
warn home schooling families about the fact that this is
a trap. I should have put in a Admiral ackbar.
It's a trap, right, This is what government money as

(02:04:01):
a trap for homeschoolers. And he talks about the fact
this is coming from UNESCO. Their own documents show that
they're trying to rope private schools and home schools into
the government system. This is what UNESCO is saying. You
can see their own documents. They want to expand so
called choice programs and universal government funding of education. Now

(02:04:25):
here's the parallel, right when we look at Trump getting
rid of the Department of Education, I've always wanted to
see the Department of Education gotten rid of. I want
to see the government out of the education business, especially
the federal government. I want to see the government at
the state and local level out of education, but especially
the federal government. They have no warrant for doing that
at all in the Constitution. And yet what are you

(02:04:49):
looking at with Trump. They're going to move the monetary functions,
the grants and all the rest of the stuff, giving
the money to states, giving the money to maybe private schools,
maybe even to homeschools, federal money. Right, all of that
grant making capability, all that cash, all the bribery and

(02:05:09):
subsequent blackmail when you don't do what they want, that
bribery and blackmail, all that massive amount of money, which
is the way the Department of Educations always work. Look,
they understand that they don't have any authority to even
exist under the Constitution. So how do they get people
to do what they want? Well, they give them financial
incentives to use no Child left behind or whatever else.

(02:05:30):
That was what George W. Bush was selling. So they
come up with one of their curriculum and they give
you financial incentives to use that. They would like to. Now,
since that's been so discredited and people see the results
of what's happened in the government schools, say oh, well,
you can do better. You can have you can start
your own charter schools or private schools or whatever, and
we'll give you the money to do that. We'll even

(02:05:52):
give money to the homeschoolers to do this. And what
they'll do is they'll push their curriculum again. It'll be
the same function you see, in the same way that
the evil that the Department of Education is doing is
really the bribery and the blackmail through the money, and
that function is not going to go away. They'll get
rid of the bureaucracy, just like they get rid of
the IRS agents and replace them with AI, They're going

(02:06:15):
to get rid of the Department of Education. Everybody cheers
Trump as a savior, and yet he'll take the money
granting functions and he'll put them in different places and
the money will still be coming from the federal government
to control education and wait and see, by oh, well,
Trump's going to help us with that. Well, you wait
and see what happens. I mean, just take a look

(02:06:35):
at what they do with the money again with the trainees.
You know, when it's Obama and Biden, they pay them
to put the trainees in the bathrooms and the showers,
or I'm going to take your money away. Then when
Trump comes in, he says, if you put them in
the showers in the bathrooms, I'm going to take your
money away. And it's back and forth, back and forth,
back and forth. Do you really want that kind of assistant?

(02:06:55):
Do you really want to be bribed and blackmailed with
your own mind money? Don't take the money and understand
that just as getting rid of the so called Department
of Education, but maintaining those functions, those supply lines of cash,
the strings that they're going to use to control you,

(02:07:18):
maintaining that is evil in the same way getting rid
of the so called education bureaucracy and transferring all of
that into private schools which are still going to have
the funding from government and the controls and the strings
and this is the curriculum we like for you to use,
and yadayadia. Doing all of that at the local level

(02:07:39):
is the same thing that they're doing at the federal
level of the Department of Education is making people think
that there's a change when they maintain the lines of control,
which are the money. Follow the money. It's always about
the money. I played that clip from what was that
movie Ted Cruze, Tom Cruise and Ted Cruise. I wouldn't

(02:08:02):
see that movie Tom, Show me the money, Jerry Jerry McGuire. Okay,
So I played that clip until everybody was nauseous of
it because I wanted to drive that point home. It's
about the money. It was about the money in twenty twenty,
and it's about the money with all this education where
you're talking about the federal level or the state level,
where you're talking about replacing this government bureaucracy of schools

(02:08:23):
with charter schools, private schools, homeschools. If they fund it,
they control it. Show me the money, he says. Idaho
one of the most conservative states in America. This says
Alex Newman just passed a major school choice quote unquote
school choice bill this year despite strong opposition from the
homeschooling community. Brad Little, the guy that we saw who's

(02:08:45):
one of the worst COVID tyrants. Again all these MAGA people. Well,
I wasn't Trump, it was the Democrat governors, you know,
those Republican governors like Brad Little and Mike Dowine in Ohio. Anyway,
Brad Little signed this in the law. The program will
offer five thousand dollars refundable tax credits to cover non
government education expenses. Same thing happened in Tennessee. I talked

(02:09:08):
about that, and he talks about it coming up here too.
At Tennessee. You know, they they had this subsidy bill,
economic subsidy for private schools, charter schools and things like that,
and one to push it out to homeschools, and the
homeschoolers resisted, and so they came up and they said,
all right, we'll offer you the Free Act. And we've

(02:09:30):
heard you. If you don't want to take the money,
well here's what we'll do. You support this bill for
educational choice and the government handing out money to people
which will be used to bribe and control and to
blackmail them. You support that, and then we will pass
the Free Acts, which says that if you don't take
the government's money, they don't you don't have to do

(02:09:50):
anything with them. You don't have to declare that you're
schooling your children, you don't have to do anything. What
happened We had Republicans. Five Republicans worked with the Democrats
to scuttle that in Tennessee. So we wound up with
the money going out to control education, just like UNESCO
the UN said to do, but not with the freedom

(02:10:12):
to be left alone to educate your own children in Tennessee,
says Alex. Alex Newman, not Alex Ownes and Tennessee lawmakers
recently approved universal ESA funds for families up to seven
thousand dollars per student, and Idaho it's only five, here's
seven thousand. Wyoming meanwhile expanded its program this year by

(02:10:34):
eliminating income restrictions for eligibility, but opposition is now growing
in Texas. Texas is the only major homeschool association that
supports government funding of home education. The lone Star state
is close to passing a major so called choice bill.
The bill would send billions more to government schools. Now,

(02:10:56):
let me tell you, I think that this is not
unrelated to what's going on with the fatalagu Lend people
and the schools of science and math and all that
stuff that Mark Hall is documentary Killing Ed. He talks
about what was happening with that organization, and I think
that it's not any coincidence that you've got a major
homeschool organization there that is, you know, pushing for more

(02:11:19):
money to go into these things. Fatalagu lend people that
Islamic cleric cultists. Of course, they were very clear to
try to make it a secular school, but they're still
bringing in people, paying them multiple times what they pay
American teachers bringing them from Turkey. Say what's their expertise?
And the American teachers are saying they don't even know

(02:11:40):
the math that they're trying to teach here, but they
pay them like double the salary, and then these guys
kick it back to the institute that's there. Mark Hall
documented that very well in Killing Ed. Well, we talked
about somebody that had to you know, was being attacked
in a lot of different ways. He had air this
computer and all the rest of this stuff. Anyway, it's

(02:12:02):
a great documentary. You should see it. But I think
it's nearly a billion dollars now that they're getting out
of Texas for these schools being run by this Islamic cult.
The galinists, and I think that that's one of the
reasons why this is happening in Texas. All the rest
of the homeschool associations and every other state are against

(02:12:23):
this money out there because they know that people are
going to accept that bribe and they know how it's
going to be used. These bills weren't pushed by homeschoolers.
They didn't originate from homeschooling. They're not organic to our
movement because they are the opposite of what homeschooling has
been about for the last fifty years. The books, these

(02:12:44):
bills are about controlling home schoolers. It is a scheme
to funnel taxpayer money to state approved curriculum providers. You see,
if they fund it, they'll define it state approved curriculum
provide and testing companies, while politicians pat themselves on the
back for helping homeschoolers. So you'll go in and they'll say, well, okay,

(02:13:09):
you're going to homeschool. We're not going to give you
any help unless you use this curriculum. And if you
use that curriculum, we'll pay for it and we'll give
you some other money through that type of thing. That'll
be the way that they incentivize it. They also singled
out Texas Homeschool Coalition, the only major state association backing
government funding for home education. They singled them out for

(02:13:30):
special criticism. They said, government strings, testing, state approved curriculum, etc.
Are the opposite of winning, the opposite of winning. And
all this stuff is going to still be there with
the Department of Education. Everybody's going to say, look at
that Trump got rid of the Department of Education. Well,
of course he put the woman who was in charge
of professional wrestling, and this getting rid of the Department

(02:13:52):
of Education is as phony as professional wrestling. That's probably
why he got Linda McMahon in. There. Close to one
hundred bills and twenty nine states so far this year
that would create, expand, revise, or change school choice programs.
You see, homeschooling is exploding, and so are the bills
to undermine it, to subvert it. One hundred bills in

(02:14:16):
twenty nine states to take over homeschooling by financial means,
that's what this is truly about. Well, Yenesco is encouraging
governments everywhere, says Alex Newman, to offer tax funding to
non state education providers. With government money comes government control

(02:14:36):
conservatives instinctively understood, says Alex Newman. The universal healthcare, Hillary Care,
the universal basic income were dangerous as well. Yet when
it comes to universal government funding for education, there has
been a shocking degree of naivete among Republicans and others.
Now in West Virginia, the governor there has signed a

(02:14:59):
parental Bill of Rights into law. In this headline in
this title from Christian Poust, they've got the wrong governor there.
The governor is no longer Jim Justice has pictured, but
it is now Governor Patrick Morrissey who signed the law
and signed this into law on Monday. Schedules take effect
on June twenty second. The bill outlines several examples of

(02:15:22):
rights that are quote reserved to the parent of a
minor child in this state. And again that's important to
say that they're reserved. They're not granted. You know, the
government doesn't grant rights. That's the foundation of our country,
that's the declaration of independence. Where endowed with these inalienable
rights by God, right by our creator, and so we

(02:15:47):
reserve these rights. And these are prohibitions to government to
not take away those rights. And among those are the
reserved to the parent of a minor child without obstruction
or interference from the state or any of its political subdivisions,
or any other government entity, or any other state institution.
These rights include the right to direct the education and

(02:16:10):
care of his or her minor child, the right to
direct the upbringing and the moral and religious training of
his or her minor child. The right to enroll their
children in either private schools, public schools, including religious schools,
or homeschool programs. The right to access and review all
school records related to their children. The right to make

(02:16:31):
healthcare decisions for their children unless they are prohibited by law.
Except for that last thing, except we're prohibited by law.
You have all these rights. You have wonderful rights, unless
we pass a law and say that you don't have
those rights anymore. Right anyway. One person who spoke about it,
a lawyer who is with a religious freedom legal group,

(02:16:54):
Alliance Defending Freedom, said in a statement that parents love
and know their child the best, and they have the
right and the duty to direct the upbringing and the
care of their children. And no world should the government
intrude on parenting choices just because it disagrees with the parents.

(02:17:19):
And I absolutely endorse that this is again. I'll play
this for you. This is something I did for the
printer rights and move amendment push for the federal level.
I did this back in two thousand and nine, and boy,
is it ever true and self evident Today certain truths
or self evident. We are endowed by our creator with rights.

(02:17:40):
Certain relationships are also inalienable. Family was the first institution
created by our creator, and the family is the fundamental
building block of every healthy society and every just government.
But government and family are two different authorities or spheres,
with different roles and different responsibilities. Each authority is uniquely

(02:18:02):
suited for a particular task and doesn't do the task
of the other well. Families have traditionally been assumed to
be acting out of love and the best interest of
its members, and have been left alone unless proven to
be abusive. But a new attitude has been cultivated by
those that believe children should be raised by the village
and not by their family. This approach to children and

(02:18:23):
their families has been spelled out in the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child. The UN Convention.

Speaker 7 (02:18:28):
Assumes government responsibility for all the needs of children and
transfers responsibilities and rights from parents to government. Government is
seen as capable of providing every want of the child
and as responsible for instilling correct values their values and
to children. Parents are mentioned in the UN Convention only
as problems for children to be protected from, or as

(02:18:50):
mere advisers to their children, so long as their advice
is not too strong or coercive. Children are encouraged to
form their values independent of their parents, but nowhere is
their ascent that they would ever need protection from a government.
This troubling document has been ratified as a treaty throughout
the world, with the US as virtually the only loan holdout.

(02:19:12):
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is
about sixteen pages. On the other hand, the Printal Rights
Amendment is only three short paragraphs. There's a simple restatement
of what is until recently been what every culture, every
government except authoritarian governments saw as the rights of parents.
The Parental Rights Amendment would strengthen the Constitution to protect

(02:19:32):
the family by explicitly stating self evident truths about an
inalienable relationship.

Speaker 2 (02:19:40):
If I out what you can do at parental rights
dot orger, yeah, and I don't know if that I
don't know if that's still is in operation. I haven't
looked at that for quite some time, but all the
stuff that I was talking about there, that's actually already happening.
As we talk about parental rights. The West Virginia Parents
Bill of Rights ensures that parents remain free to guide

(02:20:04):
the upbringing, the education, and the health care of their
children without undue government interference. And then they said, well,
in some other states, parents have sued local school districts
or various printal right issues, such as failing to inform
them that their child wished to identify as a member
of the opposite sex and all the rest of this stuff. Look,

(02:20:24):
if you've got a right to do this, don't surrender
your right to the state. Don't surrender your child to
the state. Some people decide that they will give the
education and the upbringing of their child to strangers who
work for the government. Does that seem like a wise

(02:20:46):
thing to do? You See, if you're going to talk
about I need to be informed about what you're doing
in the schools, well that's not a right. State education
is not a right. And if you're going to get
a handout of money from the state, just like that's
one of the reasons why Alex Newman is opposing this stuff.
If you're gonna say, well, I want the free education,

(02:21:08):
whether that comes in the form of a tuition subsidy
at a private school or religious school, or whether it
comes as a subsidy to your homeschool. Once you accept that,
you basically surrendered your rights. And if you put your
a kid and a government school, you have surrendered your
child to the state. You really have, and so you've

(02:21:31):
now turned the government has paid you for your rights
and given you the privilege of a subsidized or free education,
and they are not going to warn you about some
pedophile grooming your child into some transgender fantasy. They actually

(02:21:52):
support that, They actually support it. So again, it's good
that they have the printer rights stuff there, but don't
be lulled into a sense of security to think that
your wishes are going to be respected by a government
institution that you've turned your child over to be raised in.
It was last week that I played the clip for

(02:22:14):
you about Sean Duffy, who is now the head of
the Department of Transportation, and underneath the Department of Transportation
is the Merchant Marine Academy, and I thought it was
kind of interesting and actually surprised him. When he made
his speech to them, He's flattering them, telling you I'm

(02:22:36):
going to give you more money, and you're great looking people,
all the rest of stuff. And then when he mentioned
the fact that previously they had had this painting that
had been there since World War II, in the midst
of World War two in nineteen forty two, the painting
of some guys who their ship has evidently sunk in
their lifeboat and they see Jesus on the horizon. Well,

(02:22:59):
they didn't like that painting, and so that painting was removed,
he says, and we're going to bring Jesus back from
the basement. And now you have an attorney blasting the
people who cheered him. This attorney calls the people who
cheered him Christian nationalist insects. First, I'll play you what

(02:23:22):
happened when he gave the speech.

Speaker 8 (02:23:25):
And so I just I want you to know that
I understand the conditions here, and I am going to
fight my ass off to make sure you all get
to respect and the money that this academy deserves. And so.

Speaker 2 (02:23:49):
I divide again, not only small, not only strong, but
you are.

Speaker 8 (02:23:54):
A great looking bunch of young people.

Speaker 3 (02:23:57):
But answer.

Speaker 8 (02:24:03):
And so with that as you go, as you all
got into your prayers, God bless you make God jem
you say, by the canasma, could we could we bring
Jesus up in the basement.

Speaker 2 (02:24:16):
That's the biggest round. Okay, he's melting it.

Speaker 8 (02:24:34):
I know't worry about that.

Speaker 2 (02:24:37):
You got Jesus up right.

Speaker 1 (02:24:39):
Great, that was a lot of supplause for God.

Speaker 8 (02:24:42):
We are going to work on that together and funding
for the academy. May God bless you all stay safe.

Speaker 2 (02:24:50):
Now. I played that because I need to make a correction.
I said, Well, I wonder why Jesus is put in
the basement? I said, could it be because of Pete
Booty Gay sometimes called Booty Marx because his father spent
his entire career at Notre Dame praising the founder of
Italian Communism, Antonio Gramsey, who was the one who came
up with a strategy that we've seen used very very

(02:25:12):
effectively here in America to march through the institutions and
take them over from the top down and on and on. Well,
it turns out that it wasn't Pete Boutigue and the
guy who sued to get this taken out, Oh was
very upset, very upset to see that kind of response.
He's the one who called those midshipmen Christian nationalist insects.

(02:25:39):
Excuse me, I had to sneeze there, he and he
is an attorney for the nonprofit that pushed to relocate
the historic painting of Jesus there at the US Merchant
Marine Academy, to relocate it to the basement. Pull that up, Travis,
and there's a couple of pictures there, and you can

(02:25:59):
see the midshipman there. There's a picture of what it
looked like with them standing in front of that painting.
And then you see the painting with sheets over it,
you know. Pull that up. At first when he was
having his way, then whenever they would have a public

(02:26:20):
meeting or whatever, they would put the sheet over it
or whatever. Eventually they just moved it to the basement.
And so this guy who's out of this organization that
is set up, that's happy, he makes his living. This
is a guy who makes his living. His name is
Mikey Weinstein, and he is a bigoted anti Christian. He

(02:26:45):
hates Christ, he hates the Bible, and he has made
a career out of getting Bibles removed from people's desks,
from VA hospitals and all the rest of this stuff.
Anywhere there's a bi somewhere in the military. That's his specialty, right,
He's going to purge the Bible out of everywhere that

(02:27:06):
is military. And so he called these midshipmen, he called
them cowards and Christian nationalist insects, this bigot. And I
don't think they're cowards at all. I think the previous
people who ran the academy or cowards. But there is
a grassroots movement by the midshipmen themselves to resist this,

(02:27:30):
and they have a very powerful statement as to what
they think has been done to their generation. So his
organization he's making his living from is the Military Religious
Freedom Foundation, Except it's not about religious freedom at all.
It's about denying religious freedom to people. And again this

(02:27:51):
comes back to this whole thing about establishment. It's not
establishment if people freely exercise what they're doing, and if
they're employees of the government, they still don't lose any
religious liberty for that. You know, it's like punishing the
coach who silently praised or something like that. And you
have other organizations, the Freedom from Religion Organization, well, that's

(02:28:16):
not what the Constitution says. That's exactly the opposite of
why the Constitution says. Constitution says freedom of religion, not
freedom from religion. They are as opposed to the Constitution
as they are opposed to Christ, these people. And so
he accused the young Midshipmen of violating their constitutional oath

(02:28:37):
for applauding Secretary Transportation Sean Duffy. That just showed you there. No,
he's a lawyer. He knows what the Constitution says. He
knows the Constitution says freedom of religion. They did not
violate any oath. He is the person who is violating
the law that he is supposedly supposed to know about. Anyway.
So it was during the Biden administration that they moved

(02:28:59):
it to the basement. These Christian insects, as he says,
this Antichrist bigot. He has in the past he has
supported removing not only Bibles, but it was a case
that he took to force somebody to remove a sign

(02:29:23):
off of their desks that said not today Satan. So
you can't have that there. Yeah, that is And when
he was interviewed by the Christian Post, they said he
offered a nuanced definition regarding quote, the full nature of Satanism.
So he defends Satanism, he attacks the Bible, he attacks Christ,

(02:29:45):
and he calls these people filth, the ignorant, hateful, bigoted scum. Well,
I would say that's merely projection, except that he's not ignorant,
he's Satanic. So he is filthy, satanic, hateful, bigoted skin
That's what Weinstein is. He again was responsible for getting

(02:30:06):
this painting. Now it saw it before. That was nineteen
forty two, they're saying now in nineteen forty four. Either way,
during the middle of World War two, Christ on the Water.
He got it put into the basement after he fired
off a complaint letter in January twenty twenty three to
the Merchant Marine Academy, the superintendent there. First they covered

(02:30:28):
it with a curtain during official academy meetings. That's what
you saw there. So at the top of that pull
that back up there used to be that when they
would have a meeting, they would all be there and
that would be in the background. Then the first response was, well,
whenever we have a meeting, we'll put a white curtain
over it. Well, that wasn't good enough for this filthy, satanic,

(02:30:48):
hateful bigot Weinstein. He demanded that they put it into
the get it out of the room. So they moved
it to the chapel basement, which midship and noted when
they spoke to Fox News that year, they said, well,
the basement is prone to flooding, it'll probably be destroyed. Well,
that seems to be the idea, and so they said.

(02:31:12):
You know, Duffy was surprised, as you could see there,
he was surprised at how strongly people felt about that.
That was by far and away his biggest applause line to
bring Jesus out of the basement. Weinstein then called Duffy
a quote stray, feral dog, clearly bereft of any semblance
of morality, ethical standard, or constitutional legality. This guy is

(02:31:38):
big into projection, isn't he. He defines himself and he
accuses other people of that. Now he's the one who
doesn't have any semblance of morality. Ethical standards are constitutional legality,
he said. Obviously this is required for all. Maga felt
the ignorant, hateful, bigoted scum. Weinstein further implied that the

(02:31:59):
Merchant Marine Academy is anti Jewish because he's Jewish. Oh,
I'm going to play the race card. These are the
people who invented DEI. It's amazing to me they use
it now. They've been using it as people, and now
they're using it against people claiming anti Semitism. Always yeah,

(02:32:20):
I disagree with you politically or religiously. You are anti Semitic.
Bow before me. Never to the cheering, rabust throngs of
Christian nationalist midshipman, he said, and again, he said. In
his post on social media, he called them stinking pieces
of excrement Christian nationalist insects. This is a great lawyer,

(02:32:45):
isn't he so wonder to me that he could ever
win any case? He says. Move that giant Jesus painting
back to its original place of bloody controversy in that
huge secular conference room. What will happen if you do well,
f around and find out, he said, Now, I said,

(02:33:05):
The midshipmen are not cowardly. They're tired of the tyranny
of Antichrist bigots like Weinstein. Hundreds of midshipmen have signed
a petition calling for the painting to be moved back
to the auditorium. The petition, which was submitted to the

(02:33:27):
Merchant Marine Administration last Friday. Also explained why the image
of Jesus rescuing merchant mariners means so much of them,
especially in recent years. The petition says, we identify with
those sailors. Our generation has been trampled underfoot by a
country that has left us stranded out to sea with

(02:33:52):
no intention of saving us. Again, pull it back up
and show that picture. Our country has left us stranded
at sea with no intention of saving us. Maybe we
shouldn't be putting our trust in government, but in Christ,
so they said. Our government, schools, and in some cases

(02:34:14):
even our families have told us that we are not
worth the efforts. Specifically, during the COVID pandemic, we were
told that our lives were worth so little that they
could be put on hold for years. Our bodies were
not our own, but we belonged to the federal government
and to the Merchant Marine Academy Admissions, who could decide
what we must put into our bodies those difficult years,

(02:34:37):
and up to this very moment, only one thing has
proven to us time and again. Whoever comes to me,
I will never cast out. That one thing is Jesus Christ.
God of the universe and Lord of our lives, and
hundreds of them have signed that petition. The Merchant Marine's
vaccine policies under Biden with what they were referred to,

(02:35:01):
Jackson told, who's a midshipman? Said, well, I'm a member
of the Christian fellowship here, he said, I'm speaking for myself,
not for any group, not for the petition. He said
that the demographic at the Merchant Marine Academy skews nominally Christian,
but he pushed back against the idea that non Christian
midshipmen would find the Jesus painting alienating. He said, the

(02:35:21):
ideals of sacrifice, the ideals of love, compassion, and empathy,
these are ideals and traits that we as a culture
need to return to. Those ideas came from the Lord
Jesus Christ. You can't have the fruit of that, folks

(02:35:42):
without the root of it. You got people like Richard Dawkins,
people like Jordan Peterson. Many people look at it and say,
I don't like to see our Christian I don't like
to see our culture. I like the architecture and the
morality and the framework of men individual rights and all
the rest of these things that are there. I don't

(02:36:03):
like seeing that stuff swept away. Well, if you remove
the tree, you're not going to have the fruit. It's
just that simple. This student also suggested the enthusiastic response
to Dovey's speech earlier this month was an example of
young people showing that they are hungry for something more
than what the prevailing culture has offered. He said, moral

(02:36:25):
relativism has failed the country and the world more so
than any belief system ever really has. And I think
we're returning to objective truth. Objective truth. Well, one last
thing before we take a break here. That is the
interesting that they found a piece of paper that has

(02:36:48):
an eighteen hundred year old hymn on it, and it
even has a music. It's even got the notes. I
guess somehow they've discerned that. So the oldest Christian hymn
ever found is now being sung again. You've got a
couple of people gonna re record it. Chris Tomlin Ben
Fielding are going to do this and they're doing a
documentary about it. They call it the First Hymn. And

(02:37:11):
Chris Tomlin and Ben Fielding have done a song called
the First Hymn. But because it was preserved of both
words and musical notes. That's very unusual. You know, you
typically see David's psalms and things like that. It might
you might have a note, you know, sung to leaping
sheep in the in the pasture or whatever the song
would be. I don't remember the names of any of

(02:37:31):
the songs, but you know, I actually put that up
there because everybody at that point in time would have
known that. But you know, we're maybe about three thousand
years or so roughly. You know, since that time, those
songs have been lost. We don't know what those tunes were.
Kind of like, you know, putting the song to the
song to the tune of green Sleeves. All everybody would

(02:37:52):
know that today, But you know, three thousand years from now,
will let tune be lost? Who knows, probably have some
law firm claim that they've got copyright on it and
make it disappear. Anyway, They discovered this more than a
century ago, but they've only recently turned it into a
modern song, So I'm not sure when they say they
had the music to it, exactly what that was lyrics

(02:38:13):
to the him only fifty three words and the lyrics
and it was let all be silent, the shining stars
not sound forth all rushing rivers bestilled as we sing
our hymn to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as
all powers cry out and answer. Amen. Amen, might praise
and glory forever to our God, the only giver of

(02:38:34):
all good gifts. Amen. Amen. So the key part of
it is the fact that it's got the Trinity, the
Father of the Son, the Holy Spirit right there at
the center of it. And so this is key because
a lot of people have falsely claimed that the Trinity
is something that was invented at the Council of Nicea

(02:38:54):
and AD three twenty five. And yet here is something
that happened more than a century be for that acknowledging
the Trinity. And of course you can see it in
the Bible. You don't have to. It's not that this
is something new and novel that was invented by the
Council of Nicia. Know what they did was they affirmed it.

(02:39:14):
They affirmed the truth that was in the Bible because
of something that was novel, and that was the heresy
denying it. So they affirmed it against that novel heresy.
It wasn't that the affirmation was novel. Affirmation was there
not only in this song, it was you know, one

(02:39:35):
hundred years before it, but also in the Bible, and
so you know, that was one of the key reasons,
they said. You often hear that people say, well, that
was invented by the Council of Nicea, and the Emperor
Constantine forced this doctrine in the church. But the thing is,
here's the idea in a song from the previous century.
And again, you know, it was obviously older than that

(02:39:57):
piece of paper, and it was obvio in the Bible
as well. They said, what's so fun about this is
that the tune isn't the stodgy stuff that we often
associate with chanting monks. It's pop music. It's a kind
of melody you'd expect to hear at an ancient Greek
pub or some theater performance. Whoever composed this song was

(02:40:18):
trying to make serious Christian ideas and give them to
the masses. And I think that's fine. I think, you know,
it's important for us to use music that is accessible
to people, that is a style that they're going to do.
And of course, you know, we always do that, and
it really is about the lyrics more than anything else.
I just wonder if eighteen hundred years from now, if

(02:40:44):
Christ doesn't come back, we're still here. You know, people,
I wonder if they found any contemporary Christian music, if
they could find any doctrine of any sort in the
kind of contemporary Christian music that I'm accustomed to hearing
some of the churches that I visit. I don't think
they could identify any Christian teaching in it. They would

(02:41:06):
just simply be songs that you sing at a pub,
or that a girl would sing to her boyfriend. You know,
it's like Jesus is my boyfriend type of stuff that
seems to be where the Bulkok. Travis is nodding his head.

Speaker 1 (02:41:18):
Yes, so tiresome.

Speaker 2 (02:41:21):
Yeah, that is so yeah. Oh, one last thing before
I take a break. I thought this was a good essay.
This is from Relevant magazine talking about trusting God and
everything feels unstable. You know, we were talking about that
earlier with for the Love of the Road issues that
he had. Of course, we all have issues, and sometimes
it's something that is part of our work, or some

(02:41:43):
obstacle that's happened in the day. Sometimes it is long
persistent illness or death in the family or whatever. This
person said, I've been studying the topic of trust lately,
and what I've realized is that I attach a great
deal of my trusting God to my desire for things
to turn out the way I think they ought to
turn out. Yeah, we need to think about that. Faith

(02:42:05):
is not about demanding that God conformed to our timelines
or to our expectations. It's about learning to surrender the
outcomes that we can't control, which, in the end is
almost all of them. You know, when you look at this.
Yesterday I talked about Zionist Christians and Zionist Jews who
look at this and say, well, you know, I want

(02:42:27):
God to confirm my timelines and my expectations about what
politically is going to happen and geographically is going to
happen with Israel. And if he doesn't do it, I'm
going to make it happen myself. And most of the
time that doesn't work, doesn't pretty much all the time,
I'm going to ignore the clear moral guidelines that God
has given me, and I'm going to say I've got

(02:42:48):
a warrant here because of my interpretation of prophecy. I've
got a warrant here to kill whoever I want and
take that land. That is a self centered, god less,
faithless worldliness, a political worldliness that is we as Christians

(02:43:08):
need to oppose, and there have been Jews that have
opposed that as well. This is where a lot of
people get stuck, not in belief but in trust. You
can intellectually assent to God's existence, even his goodness, and
you can still live in quiet suspicion that He might
not show up for you when it matters. Can I
trust him enough to really start surrendering the outcomes the

(02:43:31):
way my life will go well? Proverb says trust in
the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on
your own understanding in all your ways, submit to him
and he will make your paths straight. And so we
look at this and we have an intellectual assent to it,
but can we really trust that. Can we acknowledge God's
version of making my pass straight most likely will not

(02:43:53):
line up with what I expect. He's got a different
ruler because he's the ruler. Right, Wait a minute, that's
not the path that we want to go. And it's like,
I don't know, it's my path. Faith is not about
predicting God's movements, you know, And your individual life and
the different things that you want to have in your
life or your prophetic understandings. It's not about predicting his movements.

(02:44:18):
It's about trusting his character, especially when you don't understand
his timing. And so there's one more illustration here. This
person says, you know, it's after a storm. I saw
a massive oak tree that had been uprooted. It was
a very tall, very wide, very mature oak tree, and

(02:44:40):
you'd expect it to be able to stand high winds.
And so she said, there was some people who were
working on it. She said, why would that thing fall over?
And the worker gave her a blunt answer and said,
shallow roots and ants. Shallow roots and ants. He says,
when you have often you'll have these shallow roots because

(02:45:04):
these trees are getting fed water by sprinklers, right, So
it's that convenience that ease, that comfort in their life
that causes them to have shallow roots. They don't have
to dig deep for the water. And so when you
think about that in our life, right, when God brings
difficulty into our life, we have to send we have

(02:45:24):
to struggle, and in that struggle we start to develop
deeper roots. And then he said, And then the other thing,
we found an injury in the tree. And that injury
in the tree, you had moisture come in, but you
also had ants that came in and they started eating
the wood from the inside. So let's the application of that. Right.

(02:45:50):
Many times, how do we get eaten from the inside.
Many times it's because there's unforgiveness on our part. Somebody
has injured us, just like there was an injury to
that tree, and that ants come in. That bitterness, that grieve,
that gives a way for demons, essentially to have their
way with us.

Speaker 1 (02:46:10):
Right.

Speaker 2 (02:46:11):
You know, you don't forgive others, God will turn you
over to the torturers, to the ants because of that injury.
And we have the ability to heal that injury. God
has that ability too if we submit to and we
can choose to forgive them. That removes that injury and
does not give place to the ants that are there.

(02:46:32):
So that is a very good image of what takes
that downy. The ants were even more insidious. They found
an injury in the tree that exploited the moisture, wore
the structure down from the inside out. And so many
times it's that injury that was done to us that
we can't forgive. That hurts us, that eats us from

(02:46:55):
the inside, and so as it is with the timing
in our life with things like that. It's those types
of things we have to trust to God. God will
either judge that or he'll forgive it, depending on that
person's relationship with him, because we all have things that
we need God's forgiveness with and it is all dependent
on our relationship with Him and with the Lord Jesus Christ.

(02:47:17):
We're going to take a quick break and we will
be right.

Speaker 1 (02:47:19):
Back defending the American dream. You're listening to the David

(02:50:03):
Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:50:05):
All right, welcome back, And let me just say I
want to talk about the four chan hack and what
we have learned from that. But before we do, I
just had Travis during that break. I said, can you
look up the price of gold? Saw that it went
up yesterday to like thirty two seventy something. I said,
is it maintaining that? And he looked at a couple
of different sites and one of them said thirty three

(02:50:28):
twenty three. The other one said thirty three forty one.
I don't know which of them is more current. Of course,
there's day to day throughout the day that it's constantly fluctuating.
But that's just astounding, and of course we can all
thank Trump for that and is chaos that he has
brought and we'll continue to bring. You know, that's the
thing that's so bullets for gold. But again, the key

(02:50:50):
thing about gold is to get outside of the surveillance issue.
And I want to thank Tony Ardban who's going to
be on the show tomorrow with us and Wisewolf Gold
where you can pick up gold and silver any small
or large amount. You can also get on a regular
savings program as we've talked about many times with Wolfpack,

(02:51:12):
anywhere from fifty dollars on up on a monthly basis
where he can do that just once. And you can
get to Wisewolf by going to David Knight not Gold.
I'll let Tony know that you came through us and
we really appreciate that. And I feel good about recommending
gold regardless of what happens to the price, because folks, privacy, financial,

(02:51:34):
transactional privacy, and this surveillance state that they're building is
absolutely priceless. You can't put a price on privacy. By
the way, preparing for stuff too. Let me just give
a plug to of the people who support the show
on a regular basis. Jack Lawson, Jacklawson Books, Civil Defensemanual
dot com that was out of stock for a while

(02:51:54):
and because of a snafu on the part of the
people that were handling the orders for m he's now
handling it himself. Got a new website, he's got a
new shipment and of all this stuff, it's now Insights
now in stock. Civil Defense Manual, two paper volumes. He
doesn't do it electronically because you know when it hits
the fan, you're going to need to have a physical

(02:52:15):
paper copy it. But it's got a lot of great
information about prepping and prepping in a lot of different ways,
whether you're talking about water, and he's got a free
chapter of that that you can check out at jackloss
and Books. Where you're talking about water or you're talking
about food preparation, and a lot of great tips about that.

(02:52:37):
And he also has tips about self defense and most
importantly about how to organize with people in your community,
the right ways to do it and the wrong ways
to do it, ways that are going to get you
tagged as some kind of a crazy extremists or put
you in the crosshairs of the government, and there's other
ways to do that. So he's got a lot of
wise advice about a lot of things there. He's got

(02:52:59):
a free chapter about water, free chapter about nuclear fallout
and that type of stuff. So they can find that
at jackloss and Books. And then finally, Jerald Slenty Trendsjournal
dot com. You can save ten percent off with the
code night at Trendsjournal dot com. Let's talk a little
bit about four chan and hacked. Now, four Chan, this

(02:53:20):
is a place that people have gone to for a while.
You know, they'll love to go there, and some of
these message boards that are there, they do memes and
all this kind of stuff. Well, it was hacked yesterday.
It was hacked by a rival site that has long
claimed that four Chan was run by a bunch of
government agents, and so they hacked the site. They got

(02:53:43):
a lot of emails, and they got a lot of
credentials of the anonymous moderators, and they said, look at
how many of them are government agents. And beyond that,
even more than the federal government. They found a tremendous
influence our I guess infestation might be the word from

(02:54:04):
Israel in there, you know, that was the even more
so than government agents. And of course we've always seen
the government set up honeypots for this kind of stuff,
you know, the ku Klux Klan and these things like
what was that Oloheim City or whatever. The people that
are involved in the Oklahoma state, these things are constantly
run by federal agents trying to entrap people, and this

(02:54:28):
appears to be one of those things as well. But
not just federal agents, but Israelis who are doing this,
and they were by far and away the most dominant
group Israelis running four Chance. It's been allegations for the
longest time, especially by this group that hacked it, that

(02:54:48):
they were all it was a Sojack party Syjack party
that push on pushed against this. They said the leaked
emails belonged to government agents, with some claiming that many
of the iPad dresses the four Chan moderators are located
in the Washington, DC area. Now, other people like Wired
or saying, well, we can't confirm that and so forth.

(02:55:08):
That is still what they're saying, but there may be
some evidence coming forthcoming out of this. The idea of
that four Chan is a government honeypot for law enforcement
has been a popular meme amongst soyjack users. The hack
exposed a significant amount of data, including source code, internal emails,
and the credentials of these moderators. The site was went

(02:55:33):
offline shortly after the hack, and as of the time
of this article, which was earlier today, the four chan
was still down. Now, there's been a lot of this
said in the past, there's been a lot of questions
about the people who are running this kind of thing,
and again, it looked like it was something that was

(02:55:53):
there to bait people, to get them to say things
that could maybe later be used against them. Isn't that interesting?
You know, we have seen Israeli intelligence running things like
Jeffrey Epstein in these you know, six honey pots, right,
and trapping people so they could be blackmailed later. Yeah. Perhaps,
so get people on there and with the encouragement of

(02:56:15):
the government agents or the encouragement of Israeli intelligence, they'll
encourage people to say things that could later be used
against them if they have a government job, or maybe
you just come back to them and say, well, you know,
I can put this out here and you'll lose your job.
What you said on four chen years ago, or you
can help me with whatever I want to do and
we'll keep it between us. That type of thing again,

(02:56:36):
a honeypot for blackmail. Four Chan is ostensibly anonymous internet
forum that functions in the dark underbelly of the web.
Says tech Crunch. Well, of course, you know this is
really dark, and the people put up really hateful stuff
like it's okay to be white, or Pepe the Frog,

(02:56:57):
or rage comics or woji speak of wojacks, for example,
this this one here, right, some people put this up
showing the China arbitrage that Trump has exposed, and here's
a wojack who is people TikTok is now telling people, hey,

(02:57:22):
Trump is going to go up on this stuff. And
you've got a lot of people been basically running arbitrage,
buying stuff in China, reselling it at really high luxury
brand prices, like a a hambag here, and they show
you buy it direct in China. You can get it
for a thousand dollars, or you can pay the people
who import it and put their name on it, and

(02:57:42):
you can pay twenty thousand dollars for it. But that's
a wojack that is there, so again, when you look
at what is behind this. They have been very controversial
for a long time, and because they say stuff like
it's okay to be white, they say, well, these people
are clearly racists. Well it turns out that this group. Seyjack,

(02:58:07):
also known as Shardi or simply the Party, is an
English language image board that was started in September twenty twenty.
It focuses on creating, posting, and sharing Seyjack memes, caricatures
derived from the Wojack theme that just meme, that just
showed you. The site was formed primarily by users who
left four Chan after it was locked in November twenty

(02:58:30):
twenty one, with many members identifying as Chud's, as jackers,
or as soy teens. These are a lot of new
things to me. Travis is laughing. I think he knows
some of these things there. The seu Jack Party gained
notoriety for his role in the hack of four Chan.
They dubbed it Operation soy Clips, and so there has

(02:58:53):
been a lot of allegation of Israel was the dominant
source of activity on four Chan board since twoenty and fourteen.
They found from these emails that they hacked into and
released you got any comment about that the whole culture. Yeah,
this whole culture. Again, it's the same thing that they

(02:59:15):
run every time. And you know, don't fall for these
types of things, right, Stuff like that is there to
entrap people. And some of the stuff that they did
was clever and to make a point because not everything
that is there is being run by the Israeli agencies,
intelligence agencies or a government. You know, that whole thing
about it's okay to be white. They said, okay, it's Halloween.

(02:59:37):
This is before we had to wear the mask. It's Halloween.
Put on a mask and put up posters that say
it's just okay to be white. No, it's not not.
In these Ivy League schools that are getting anywhere from
four hundred million to nine billion a year from US taxpayers,
it is not okay to be white. That have a
good day at talk to you tomorrow. The common man,

(03:00:14):
they created common Core and dumbed down our children. They
created common past track and control us. They're Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary, But
each of us has worth and dignity created in the

(03:00:36):
image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want

(03:00:58):
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #1990: 4Chan Exposed as Honeypot Trap, BigPharma’s Autism Plague, Greenland Grab—Mineral Bonanza or Scam

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Wed Episode #1990: 4Chan Exposed as Honeypot Trap, BigPharma’s Autism Plague, Greenland Grab—Mineral Bonanza or Scam

Stuff You Should Know