Wed Episode #2112: Pandemic Treaty for Global Slavery

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen,
It's Wednesday, the eighth of October of Our Lord, twenty
twenty five. Well, today we have some news. We've known
for the longest time that these mRNA shots are causing

(00:57):
turbo cancer, but now they have actually found they've actually
found the fingerprints you know what it is producing in
cancer tumors. Yeah, the evidence keeps getting stronger and stronger,
and yet there is no accountability for these people, only
excuses from conservatives for this, and so we're going to

(01:21):
take a look at that as well as the updates
on Epstein integrity.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
I guess we could call it. It's an integrity test.
It's like a litmus test.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
I think if you look at what these people in
the Republican Party are doing, I think it's a litmus
test on their integrity. And also the war within talk
of civil war, as well as the legal battles that
are taking place as Trump is creating a police state here.

Speaker 3 (01:49):
They'll be right back stay with us.

Speaker 2 (02:10):
Well, Japan has issued an alert as the COVID vaccine
quote unquote vaccine it's a bioweapon, folks. They found the
spike in breast cancer tumors. This is a patient who,
by the way, never had COVID. So for the people
who want to believe that there was some virus out
there called COVID, this is strictly the shot that is there. Now,

(02:32):
this is one person. But when you look at the
studies and how they manipulate the studies, and we'll talk
about that coming up as well, more information about how
the studies were manipulated to hide the harm of aluminum. Yeah,
we'll give you a placebo here. Well, the placebo's got
aluminum in it. Why would you put aluminum in a placebo? Right,

(02:55):
just to mask the symptoms that come from the aluminum
that's in the vaccine. This industry is just so incredibly
evil and so based on the love of money. And
yet we have Caroline Lovett out there who is saying,
you know, Trump is going to reduce the price of
drugs one two hundred three hundred percent.

Speaker 4 (03:17):
Is definitely committed to fixing and improving our healthcare system.
You saw it again last week when he had one
of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world coming.

Speaker 3 (03:27):
Into the over international criminal.

Speaker 4 (03:29):
To lower drug prices by two hundred, three hundred, one
hundred percent in many cases for various types of drugs
for American patients. That is a huge fix to a
broken system that has been ripping off the American people
for far too long.

Speaker 2 (03:43):
So yeah, well, you know who she got that from
is that they were charging us one hundred percent, two percent,
three hundred percent more than they were other countries on average,
because even though we were giving them tens of billions
of dollars of subsidy, that didn't really matter.

Speaker 3 (04:01):
You know.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
They see American suckers and American dollars out there, and they're.

Speaker 3 (04:04):
Going to rip us off.

Speaker 2 (04:05):
And they did that through the entire first administration of Trump,
and he did nothing about it. But I don't know,
how do you how do you reduce something by one
or two hundred or three hundred percent? Travis, Is Albert
Borley going to pay us to take his his poison?

Speaker 5 (04:20):
No, what she means is that they're going to bring
back a bribery to take the vacks.

Speaker 3 (04:25):
Yeah, there you go.

Speaker 2 (04:26):
It's it's all you know, It's just uh, he gets
paid off with him when he gives them your money.
That's why it works with Trump. So they discovered traces
of pfizers so called vaccine the spike protein inside cancer tissue.
The shockwaves to the world of oncology and is raising

(04:47):
new fears about the SHOT's potential role in fueling tumor growth.
The startling case is documented in a study led by
doctor Sano, MD, PhD and professor of dermatology and the
Ho Chai Medical School and a globally recognized cancer and
immunology expert.

Speaker 3 (05:06):
And so this is this is.

Speaker 2 (05:08):
Japan where they had in the past they destroyed over
two batches of over a million each because they saw
these these vials as I all think of these vaccine vials,
I think it was spelling it.

Speaker 3 (05:27):
As uh, you know, they as evil, these vile Yeah,
that's right.

Speaker 2 (05:32):
But anyway, they evidently didn't keep them cold and they
started getting black particulates.

Speaker 3 (05:37):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (05:38):
Then they found out that they interacted with magnets, so
they threw away two different batches. Has happened over two
different periods of time, each batch over a million of them.
It was also in Japan where the news first broke
about the biodistribution of these this toxic bioweapon that doesn't

(05:59):
stay in the arm, that had spread all over the body,
and that it accumulated primarily in genitals. So this is
all coming from Japan. They've actually done some good research there.
This is published in the Journal of Dermatological Science. According
to doctor Santo's report, an eighty five year old woman
who previously was treated for breast cancer and was in

(06:22):
remission developed a new skin lesion just weeks after her
sixth dose of the Pfizer mRNA. The tumor cells tested
positive for the spike protein, but it tested negative for
nucleocapsid protein, which is a marker that they said would
indicate natural infection. They said they point strongly to vaccine

(06:47):
derived spike rather than a spike from an infection, and
she was never sick with anything never tested positive. The
spike protein was found inside the cytoplasm, even inside the
nuclei of the cancer cells. The timing is equally concerning.
The new metastasis appeared within a month of her sixth

(07:07):
dose of phizer. While the study is a single case report,
the implications are massive. As the authors warned, this show
for the first time that mRNA quote unquote, vaccine spike
protein can lodge in tumor issue and may alter the
biology of cancer cells. They said, it makes the tumor
is more evasive to immune system, It disrupts crippling natural

(07:31):
cancer defenses. Hormone receptor effects are possibly interacting with estrogen
signaling in terms of breast cancer. Other experts are previously
warned about vaccine contamination and the long lived spike expression.
In other words, it doesn't have an off switch. I
said this from the very beginning when they were talking

(07:52):
about how we're going to turn your body into a
vaccine producing. Your body going to produce the vaccine, and
that's supposedly a feature, and I said, well, we need
to stop and think about what they're doing to your
body and what stops that protest that process? Right, it
just keeps going and going, And we have now found cases.

(08:14):
One nurse is about a month or two ago cover
the story. For fifteen hundred days they've since her vaccine,
she is still producing the spike protein. The spike protein
that does so much damage. That's what this mRNA was
set up to do, and it just keeps propagating.

Speaker 3 (08:32):
There's no off switch.

Speaker 2 (08:34):
Raises disturbing questions about how long the spike lingers in
the body. Well, it doesn't just linger in the body,
it's continually being reproduced in the body, and what it
does to vulnerable tissues and whether it could accelerate or
transform cancer progression. For now, the evidence is clear. An
elderly woman's cancer metastasists tested positive for the spike protein
directly after repeated Peiser vaccinations and not from an infection.

(09:01):
So COVID shots and boosters have pushed the risk of
six cancers up, and the cancers that have the highest
risk are breast, coorectal, gastric, lung, prostate, and thyroid cancer
across all vaccine types and.

Speaker 3 (09:18):
All age groups.

Speaker 2 (09:20):
This is a study of massive study that was done
in South Korea that is cited by the Children's Health Defense.
It said mainstream medical commentators claim that findings are flawed. However,
in plain terms, both major COVID vaccine platforms, in other words,
both MODERNA and Pfizer of the ones that were selected

(09:41):
by Trump, appear to be carcinogenic. Set epidemiologist a medical oncologist,
Angus Dalgleish told The Defender that the study bills on
other recent findings, but is the first to show that
seed DNA, which is non mRNA and mr ANDA vaccines

(10:01):
are associated with cancer risk, suggesting that the spike protein
is directly percinogenic. The data comes from eight point four
million people in South Korea's National Health Insurance Database. Researchers
tracked patients for years for a year rother after dividing
them in vaccination status groups, and found that the overall

(10:23):
cancer risk with those who had given shots was twenty
seven percent higher. For breast cancer, the risk was twenty
percent higher, twenty eight percent higher for coorectal cancer, thirty
four percent higher for gastric cancer, fifty three percent higher
for lung cancer, and sixty nine percent higher for prostate cancer.

Speaker 3 (10:43):
This is a.

Speaker 2 (10:44):
Large study eight point four million people. COVID mRNA vaccines
produced by Feizer Moderna showed and paid for by Trump
and cheered by Trump showed a twenty percent higher overall
risk of cancer were the most closely linked to the
higher risk of breast, colorectal, lung, thyroid cancers. Non mRNA

(11:07):
COVID nineteen vaccines known as c DNA vaccines, which includes
Astrazenica and Johnson and Johnson shots, we're associated with They
forty seven percent higher overall risk of cancer. And so
those are ones that we're not using in the US.
But so about a quarter to fifty percent depending on

(11:28):
which one of.

Speaker 3 (11:29):
These you get.

Speaker 2 (11:30):
Meanwhile, the CDC and of course the MAHA people will
cheer this says the COVID nineteen vaccination is now up
to each individual. In other words, we know this is
killing people. We know this is giving people turbo cancer.
Some people are dying suddenly from heart issues. But they
will not stop it. They will not stop the fraud.

(11:51):
They will not stop the poison.

Speaker 3 (11:53):
As a matter of.

Speaker 2 (11:53):
Fact, Trump is one of the fraud pushers, the fake
vaccine that he's out there.

Speaker 3 (11:58):
You talk about fake news.

Speaker 2 (12:00):
How about your fake vaccine, Donnie. They will not stop it.
They will keep it going. They just say, well, we're
not going to force you now and pat themselves on
the back. Except that's not true either. They are still
forcing vaccines, not the COVID vaccines, but they're still forcing
other vaccines in Trump's military. So push up, Pete and

(12:21):
the donn are not stopping vaccine indates for the military.
So informed consent is back, said the CDC's acting director
on social media. No, it isn't this is misinformed consent.
It's a very different thing. You're lying to people.

Speaker 6 (12:37):
If informed consent was gone. As he's admitting, every single
doctor that pushed this has violated their oath. They should
be stripped of their title, their degree. They should be removed.

Speaker 2 (12:49):
And this guy, the CDC, he should be You know,
where's the major shutdown of the CDC? The biggest vaccine
pusher because they make money selling these vaccines to people,
the middleman and all this stuff. They were the ones
who were behind removing any consent, so especially in disinforming people.
Around forty four percent of people aged sixty five or

(13:11):
older still got a vaccine so called vaccine late last
year or early this year, late twenty twenty four or
early twenty twenty five, About fourteen percent of adults aged
eighteen to forty nine, thirteen percent of children, and ten
percent of healthcare workers received a vaccine during that time.

Speaker 3 (13:31):
Folks.

Speaker 2 (13:32):
This is worse than decimation, right. Decimation was when there
was a Roman legion that had exhibited a cowardice or
something like that. They would pull the entire group in
and they would kill every tenth person that was decimated.

Speaker 3 (13:51):
Well, this is this is the lowest.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
One of these is ten percent, and you got thirteen
percent of children, ten percent of healthcare work workers thirteen
percent children. It's just amazing fourteen percent of those eighteen
to forty nine.

Speaker 6 (14:06):
Isn't interesting that healthcare workers are the lowest percentage on
this list. I wonder why so many healthcare workers look
at this and said, no, I don't think so.

Speaker 2 (14:16):
And why do you have people aged sixty five or
older people who are getting SOCID security. They really push
it to people are getting SOID security because that's going
to help us with the budget. It's all about money,
isn't it. We don't want to pay people social security.
I got a vaccine for you, you know, soilent genetic
code here right, the soilent greed is what it should

(14:37):
be called. The FDA recently withdrew emergency authorization for the
COVID nineteen vaccines, but it cleared the shots for people
who are at least six months old who have one
or more risk factors, as well as for people sixty
five older. So kill the babies, kill the social security recipients.
And again this is fraud. It is a bioweapon, and

(15:01):
they're not banning it. And that should tell you everything.
The fact that we keep seeing these studies and this
double think from the MAGA people. I look at this
as I think, yeah, the Epstein stuff tells you Trump's character,
but this is a lot worse because of what it's
doing than the number of people that are involved, just
the magnitude of the crime. Even under Trump, religious objection

(15:24):
to flu shot results in a service member's dismissal from
the military. And this is from WND, which has always
surprised me, as WND it's one of the biggest cheerleaders
for Trump. I mean, they're in the Breitbart category out there.
WorldNet Daily said some members of the US military, even
under President Trump and War Secretary Pete, are being ejected

(15:46):
from the service for filing religious exemptions from taking vaccines.
The main focal point of that report was technical Sergeant
William Tony Oslin, who feared his Christian religious beliefs might
jeopardize his military career. Unfortunately, that reality has now come
to pass. On October the fifth, he was kicked out

(16:08):
of the service his last day in uniform after a
two year battle over the flu vaccine. Because look, if
you have a religious objection to these vaccines based on
the connection of abortion and testing, and that type of
thing that applies to all the vaccines. It's not just
a COVID thing. Even though he feels a great deal
of disappointment, Ozln expressed gratitude for the individuals he believes

(16:31):
were put in his path by the Lord to assist
him and others who have been treated unairly. For example,
he said, the beginning of September, when my separation date
was approaching, some awesome people got my story to Under
Secretary of the Air Force Matt Lomer's office, and he
arranged a thirty day extension while my case is being reviewed.

Speaker 3 (16:52):
He said.

Speaker 2 (16:52):
He's submitted a religious accommodation request in September twenty twenty
two for the COVID nineteen, influenza, typhoid, anthrax, and tetanus vaccines,
maintaining his objections to each based on his sincerely held
religious beliefs that his body is a temple of the
Lord and need not be subjected to vaccines, many of

(17:13):
which are tested and or developed with the use of
aborted fetal cells. Once the military's COVID nineteen mandate was
rescinded in January twenty twenty three and OSLN was cleared
of being forced to take that particular shot. The flu
shot was the next one up to be adjudicated. The
chaplain explained, I do have a sincerely held religious belief, which,

(17:37):
according to Air Force policy and federal and state law,
is all you need for an accommodation to be granted.
Yet two years later he has been denied accommodation and
forced out the military. I just have to say, you know,
we see all this stuff out look at the military
under Pete Haig's efis so Christian and so forth, are
they really And when you look at this whole idea

(18:00):
that everybody's got to get the vaccine right, it's based
on herd immunity. Well, if they are enforcing it this tightly,
what do they have like nine to nine point nine
to nine percent of the people vaccinated with these different vaccines.
And you tell me that that doesn't get you the
herd immunity. Herd immunity is just a herd mentality. As
I've said all along, there is nothing. If the vaccine
worked and if the virus virology was real, you would

(18:25):
be protected. But the real red flag with all this
stuff was the fact that they're telling people, and you
don't have natural immunity if you have, supposedly, according to
their own universe and their theory and their virology, if
you have been infected with something and you get immunity
to it, it's because your immune system has been trained
to work with that. And that's precisely what the purpose

(18:48):
of the vaccine is is to train your immune system.
And so they're saying that if your immune system has
been trained by the real thing, that's not sufficient. It's
got to be trained by their imitation of the real thing.
So none of this stuff, folks, passes the sniff test.

Speaker 3 (19:07):
It just you don't have to get in the details.

Speaker 2 (19:10):
Of how this embeds itself in the different parts of
the nucleus and the DNA. You don't have to worry
about that. Just look at it from the big picture,
and it's a hard pass on all of this stuff.
The current administration tells American public that therefore religious freedom,
he said, and no one should have to choose between
the religious beliefs and their livelihood. While saying this, the

(19:31):
administration is allowing the opposite to happen. They're allowing religious
discrimination to happen, he said. I have three grandsons, and
I'll make sure that none of them serves in a
government that violates the very Constitution is supposed to protect
and uphold. We have reached a time and a place
in this country to where the government has stolen power
from its creator and has claimed a power that it

(19:53):
was never granted. This is what is happening under Trump
and Hegas's Department of War. He lamented, I was surprised
to see that on WND, but I'm glad they put
that in there. That needs to be said. And what
is it going to take to wake up these Trump
suckers everywhere? I can't just can't imagine that anyway. Aluminum

(20:14):
aluminum vaccines. I try to tell you that it's not
a problem, right, And of course we had Alex saying, well,
you know, this is not the bad vaccine that Bill
Gates wants out there. Trump's got a good one that
he's doing in the back here, and you can take that.
It's basically sugar water, right, just got a little bit
aluminum and mercury and some other things like that, which
Alex was telling people the truth for a couple of

(20:35):
decades about harm with that. But then for Trump, you
can take it. Well, like lead, aluminum is a highly
neurotoxic metal. We'll therefore expect vaccines containing aluminum adjuvants to
cause neurological harm if the aluminum enters the nervous system
in neurotoxic amounts. The aluminum in the adjuvant is important

(20:57):
for listing a strong immune response to non live vaccines,
and their efficacy is related to their toxicity at the
injection site. Well, it's taking calls. I had somebody question
me on this and what we're talking about. They'd never
even heard of the word adjuvant. They didn't understand what
it was. It's very important to understand that. Because they

(21:20):
knew that their vaccines were not effective, they said, Oh,
they'll be more effective if we agitate the immune system.
That's what the adjuvants are there for. So let's set
the immune system on fire. Well, sometimes that doesn't stop,
it just continues. You wind up in an autoimmune disease
something like that, and the or will do it more often. Right, Well,

(21:45):
if you look at the vaccine schedule, they keep hitting
people at the same vaccine over and over and over again.
It's not just COVID that they do that, so it's
important to antagonize your immune system. Sometimes that goes crazy.
Immune reactive cells engulf particles of the aluminum adduate and

(22:06):
distribute their load throughout the body, including to the brain
where they are killed, releasing their contents into the surrounding
brain tissue where they can produce an inflammatory response. The
precise mechanism of action is not so important, but the
data that we have on the harms is important, and
they have been systematically distorted. In October twenty sixteen.

Speaker 3 (22:28):
And this is an article from Brownstone, By the.

Speaker 2 (22:30):
Way, my research group complained to the European ombudsmen about
the EMA's mishandling of their investigation into the suspected serious
neurological harms of the HPV vaccines. In his reply, the
ma's executive director, Guido Rozi, stated that the aluminum agevents

(22:51):
are safe. Their use has been established for several decades.
In other words, she said, it's just like sugar water.
Come on, you can take a little bit of aluminum
for the pharmaceutical company, and that their substances are defined
in the European pharmacopia. So he gave the impression that
the aluminum aguvants in the HPV vaccine are similar to

(23:12):
those used since nineteen twenty six. However, the adjuvant in
Gardasil Merks vaccine is amorphous aluminium hydroxy phosphate sulfate, which
has other properties than aluminium hydroxide, which is what Rosie
was mentioning. However, its properties are not defined in the pharmacopia,

(23:32):
so they just they will say, well, it's just almin
this that, and it's not you know, it's just like
you look at nitric oxide is different from nitrous oxide,
or CO two is different, Carbon dioxide is different from
carbon monoxide. They're very different substances. Hope it's just carbon, right.

(23:54):
We hear all the time from the climate people. Well,
randomized trials document the toxicity of the aguments. As an
expert witness for the LA law firm Whisner bomb I
have read one hundred and twelve thousand pages of confidential
Merk study. If Merk's aluminum agement causes serious neurological harms,

(24:15):
one would expect it to see more harm with the
Gardaicel nine than with the quadravalent Gardasil, because it contains
five more HPV antigens and more than double as much
of the aluminum adjutant, and he said, and this is
what we see. So in other words, they go through
and they've got there's a new version of garda cell.

(24:38):
Maybe it's a ninth one, I don't know. They call
it Gardicel nine, and it has more aluminum than the
earlier ones dead and the European Medical Association Medicines Association,
the regulatory group that's like the FDA, they look at
the aluminum and say, well, it's this other aluminum and

(24:59):
it's ampletely different aluminum. That's part of what's going on
with fluoride as well, when they put it in the water.
They talk about one form of fluoride, but it's another
form of fluoride that they put in the water and
they're both harmful. Anyway, These three trials have compared these
two different gardaseel shots, but two of them are so small,
only a thousand patients in total, with only three serious

(25:21):
adverse events. They don't shed light on this. The third one, however,
was large, with a total of fourteen thousand females. This
is why I say, you know, when you look at
the increase in cancer from the South Korean study that
was eight point four million. You know, eight and a
half thousand would be a large study for pharmaceutical stuff,

(25:43):
but eight and a half million it is really large.
MRK has not been keen to reveal what they found,
but in the published trial report the New England Journal
of Medicine, there was no mention of any serious harm.
But on page twenty seven, just before the last page,
and a supplementary appendix on the web which few people

(26:03):
ever find and read, it was revealed that there were
more serious adverse events and females receiving Gardisil nine than
those who.

Speaker 3 (26:11):
Received gardasil as expected.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
More patients on Gardisil nine than on gardasil experienced nervous
system disorders because it's got a lot more in aluminum.

Speaker 3 (26:22):
I'll have to take a drink here a second.

Speaker 6 (26:24):
Sorry, all that talking.

Speaker 2 (26:29):
Yeah something, I don't know what it is, Okay, lubricated
the throat there. It's not likely that the five additional
enegens that are responsible for the increased toxicity of Gardasil nine.
It's far more likely that it is the larger dose
of aluminum magiment that is responsible for the harm. So
it's a very adjust event itself. In most of these vaccines. Merk,

(26:51):
glaxosmith Klein and the EMA called the toxic aluminum management
of placebo, and girls recruited to Merks trial were told
that half of them would get a placebo. This is
fraud because the placebo group was still getting aluminum in
their placebo. So it's not a placebo. And we've seen

(27:12):
this with other stuff as well. I think it was
in some of the trials that they did for the
so called COVID vaccine that the placebo was a meningitis vaccine,
and so it's not a place it's not sugar water.
It's something that in and of itself could have some issues,
and they do that to statistically mask the harm. This

(27:34):
is fraud as fraud is defined as a deliberate intent
to deceive, which is what Trump does when he talks
about the vaccines all the time. According to Merk's own definition,
an aluminum adjuvant is not a placebo. A placebo has
made it look exactly like a real drug, but is
made of an inactive substance such as starch or sugar.

Speaker 3 (27:56):
So, yeah, the.

Speaker 2 (27:57):
Vaccines, by the way, Alex, in case you don't know
by now or not you play cebo, you are the
placebo sixty minutes says exposed the vaccine court failures, but
critics accuse CBS of misleading on the vaccine injury. So
on Sunday night, CBS ran a thing on the vaccine Court,

(28:18):
but in the context of it, they tried to pretend
that it's very rare for anybody to ever have to
go to be injured by vaccines.

Speaker 6 (28:24):
This is part of their standard practice when it comes
to these sorts of things. Once you can't deny it anymore,
you just start to downplay it.

Speaker 3 (28:31):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 6 (28:32):
Okay, it happens, but it's rare.

Speaker 2 (28:34):
And you know, when you look at the fact that
the pharmaceutical companies give about thirteen billion dollars worth of
money every year to the media people, that buys a
lot of friendly coverage.

Speaker 3 (28:44):
It really does.

Speaker 2 (28:45):
I mean, that's as big as all the exports that
we've lost to China for the soybean industry that was
twelve billion. But the pharmaceutical companies are shoving in thirteen
billion to push their product. Isn't that amazing? Bigger than
all of the soybean production, which is a huge part
of the agriculture. And we'll talk about that coming up.

(29:06):
How Trump is concerned about his soyboy Javier Malai and
Argentina and not the farmers. They don't care about that
at all. So, goaded by Trump's tariffs, the European pharmaceutical
industry is now pivoting to the US. And that was
what Caroline Lovitt was, Caro lying, I should say, care

(29:27):
who's lying?

Speaker 3 (29:28):
Love?

Speaker 2 (29:28):
It was talking about that there three hundred percent. Most
recent move, the UK's giant AstraZeneca announced September twenty ninth
the direct listing on the New York Stock Exchange, just
months after pledging fifty billion dollars of US investment by
twenty thirty. The UK headquartered into end of the vy

(29:50):
over dropped its London listing in July to trade solely
on Nasdaq, while Swiss giants Roche and Novartis unveiled expansion
plans in the US worth twenty three billion and fifty billion.
Francis Sanofi has likewise committed to at least twenty billion
dollars in American projects through twenty thirty. So if they

(30:12):
will commit to building buildings which Trump likes, and these
things are highly automated, they're not going to create a
lot of jobs other than construction jobs. So they'll commit
to doing that and producing the poison in the United States.
Trump will let them not be subject to the one
hundred percent levee. If they don't set up a factory
in the United States, they'll get a one hundred percent

(30:34):
levee and a tariff on everything they bring in from abroad.
So put a footprint here and then Trump has a
physical building that he can stand in front of and
boast about how he's brought manufacturing to America, manufacturing of poison.

Speaker 3 (30:50):
It's great. Uh, we're winning really big, right.

Speaker 6 (30:54):
I think I'm tired of the winning.

Speaker 2 (30:56):
I'm really tired of this kind of winning, So they said.
The trend of companies shifting stock exchange listings from Europe
to the US depends largely on where their core business
is located. An astrozenicu's case, US revenue in the first
quarter of twenty twenty five made up roughly forty two
percent of sales.

Speaker 3 (31:13):
So these people are.

Speaker 2 (31:15):
Making most of their sales and nearly all their money
because they've been charging US three hundred percent more than
they charge everybody else. We are not their most favored nation.
They operate like a government. They are above the governments.
They are the governments are just their tail. And so
this is why they're moving to the US. Britain spends

(31:39):
far less on medicines overall, only nine percent of its
healthcare budget, compared to fifteen to seventeen percent in France
and Germany. I wonder what it is in the UK.
I should look that up. I mean in the US.
In the UK, drug companies have to hand back a
large share of sales under government rebate schemes.

Speaker 3 (31:57):
But we don't do any of that stuff.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
Now Trump is going to do a little bit of that,
and he's supposed to be a hero after ignoring it before.
Following the September thirtieth deal in which Peiser agreed to
cut medicaid prices to match those and other developed nations,
a Swiss firm said that other European firms may follow
with similar many deals. So there's no penalty for the

(32:22):
fact that they gouged us for year after year after year.
And here's the example, seventeen thousand dollars per month for drugs.
How sky high prescription prices take a toll on patients.
A multiple scrossis patient Sarah said, if I were ten
percent less mean or ten percent less stubborn, I'd probably

(32:44):
be dead now.

Speaker 3 (32:45):
A year long battle.

Speaker 2 (32:46):
To obtain the medication that could alter the course of
the incurable condition and extend her productive life for years.
Diagnosed at age thirty seven, she's such experienced symptoms of
this disease of the central nervous system, which can include
numb this weakness, troubling, trouble walking, vision changes, and slurred speech.

(33:06):
She said, I felt like my eyes had fallen out
of my head. But then they came up with a
thing that was supposedly going to save her. I don't
know if this stuff works or not. They had a
pharmaceutical drug, but it would have cost her nine thousand
dollars a month.

Speaker 3 (33:21):
She said.

Speaker 2 (33:21):
This is an addition to the five hundred dollars per
month that she was already paying out of pocket for
other medical expenses. And when you look at what they're
doing to us, you know, Trump is the key thing
about this soybean thing is the fact that they've been
really really late to the party. They still haven't done
anything to help the soy farmers. And they knew this
is going to happen because It happened in the first

(33:42):
Trump administration when he was trying to adjust trade balances
with China, and so they didn't have this ready to go.
And even after it happened, they've been extremely slow to
react while they still channel money to Argentina, which is
using that money to align them to sell to.

Speaker 3 (34:03):
China.

Speaker 2 (34:03):
A strange thing that Avier Malaya is put forth as
some kind of a libertarian economic genius, and yet he
has been his country has been taxing exports. Why in
the world, if you support free markets, how in the
world could you justify taxing exports, not even imports, but exports.

(34:27):
And so they dropped the export tax, which lowered the
price of their soy to China, after we gave them
twenty billion dollars after Trump's tariffs wiped out a twelve
billion dollar business here in the US. So they haven't
done anything to help the soy farmers that are there
and got everything to help their competitors. So when she

(34:51):
became unable to walk more than ten feet, she left
her home in Maryland, moved in with her retired mother,
and considered applying for disability. Trump's most favored nation prescription
drug pricing initiative has begun to lower some prices. Many
fully insured, chronically ill patients find themselves fighting two battles.
One is to fight to overcome the disease and its

(35:14):
effects on the body and mind. The other is to
overcome the bureaucratic obstacles and try to afford these drugs,
and they believe were going to bring them relief. You know,
when we look at this nine thousand dollars per month
makes me think of the story I covered yesterday with
insurance companies in California charging people six thousand dollars a
month to insure their homes. Even in northern California, where

(35:37):
they've got a lot of rain, they don't have the
kind of fire risks that they do in southern California.
The big insurance companies, the big pharmaceutical companies, and Trump's
terraces favoring big business over small business are the means
by which they are transferring all the wealth from us
to themselves. This is how they do that. You will

(35:57):
own nothing, and you'll be happy because as you own nothing,
they're stealing everything from US. Insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies.

Speaker 3 (36:05):
Trump.

Speaker 2 (36:06):
It's just amazing to see how they're locking down and
destroying small businesses and allowing this type of stuff to
continue on.

Speaker 6 (36:14):
It is what I'm about to say with saying he
shouldn't have done it. It was wrong, But I saw
so many people saying, I can't believe Luigimanngoni did what
he did. I can't believe he would do that. Really,
have you not seen what insurance companies do. You're forced
into getting insurance, They put the gun to your head
and say you're going to get it, and then they

(36:35):
will work as hard as they can, harder than they
would ever fight for you to make sure they don't
have to pay out when you need them.

Speaker 2 (36:41):
That's right, And that company, United Healthcare, was the worst
about it. Yeah, the worst of all the insurance companies
in terms of the nine claims, far far, far higher
than the number two person. And they are one of
the ten largest companies in the world.

Speaker 6 (36:57):
That's how they become so incredibly proper offitable. Yeah, they
make sure that they do everything they can to not
pay out. You go in, you assume that, all right,
we have a business deal here, I'm going to pay
you and then when I need this, you are going
to provide the service and then they do everything they
can to make sure they never have to hold up
their end of the bargain. So again, let me say,

(37:18):
shouldn't have done it. Murder is wrong. Yeah, However I
completely understand the anger he felt.

Speaker 2 (37:25):
Yeah, when you harm people and you make peaceful change impossible,
you make violent change inevitable.

Speaker 3 (37:30):
We just what JFK said.

Speaker 2 (37:31):
And we had a friend in North Carolina who had
for years and years, decades, had paid in North Carolina
Blue Cross bous shield. Then he got brain cancer and
they refuse to give him a penny. It's just just amazing,
you know it was. But that's the way these guys roll.

Speaker 5 (37:47):
And I've mentioned this before, but I saw when that
happened with Luigi Mangione and the CEO, the guy they
got to replace him immediately after it. The very first
thing he says is that we to focus on reducing
I forget exactly how he phrased it with some corporate speech,
but we need to reduce our expenditure on unnecessary claims,

(38:12):
just saying that we need to do more of what
we're doing than the other guy killed. We need to
restrict the payouts that we're making to the people that
we have commitments.

Speaker 3 (38:22):
To that's right, going to double down on it, that's right,
you're right.

Speaker 7 (38:27):
Well.

Speaker 2 (38:27):
Health educator at the University of Alabama, Birmingham was fully
insured and her Sure improved the treatment, but the copay
was eighteen hundred dollars per month, so she paid one
thousand dollars for twelve pills while continuing to search for alternatives.
She said, companies price their drugs really high, the insurance

(38:48):
company battles back by only covering seventy percent or eighty percent,
and then there is this gigantic copay she found and
insured did not count the eighteen hundred dollars monthly copay
toward her annual out of pocket deductible either. That's truly amazing.
And again, these two work in tandem. The insurance companies
work in tandem with the pharmaceutical companies. You know, they

(39:10):
make this stuff so expensive that people go, oh, I've
got to have insurance. And then when you have the insurance,
you wind up with these thousands of dollars a month
in copay that doesn't even apply towards your deductible. Well,
the pandemic agreement that you've heard so much about, James
Orgusky has always been at the forefront of doing research
on this, and he's still there, and he's pointing out

(39:31):
that the WHO power to commentary resources from sovereign states.
They are still working to change its tireless. I mean,
they've got one job, and they're going to do that fully.
As long as we're in the Pandemic Accords, the Pandemic Agreement,
and the amendments to the IHR. They're working on this
and they're going to have some new ones coming out

(39:52):
in May of next year. We've beaten them back time
and time again, and they are relentless. That's their entire
full time job is to use the WHO in order
to be able to govern us through a global public
health institution. The accords will give the WHO increased powers,

(40:12):
allowing it to declare emergencies and to commandeer resources from
sovereign states. Sounds like Trump with his war within. He
is arbitrarily declared emergency about anything and everything, and then
he can.

Speaker 3 (40:25):
Do whatever he wishes.

Speaker 2 (40:26):
That's the way that the WHO Pandemic Accords won't go work.
It also includes clauses on misinformation and disinformation, which will
allow for censorship of any dissenting voices. So the public
won't be given a chance to know that they're being
lied to. So again it's coming up. Yet again. They

(40:47):
have been beaten back, but they will not give up.
The agreement is in the process of being negotiated again
and prepared for signature and ratification at the seventy ninth
World Health Assembly in May of next US and so
we'll be having James Muguiski on again as we get
closer to that date to tell everybody what is going on.

(41:10):
Jeffrey Tucker and as the Brownstone Institute had an article
talking about the Trump lockdown and so called pandemic, calls
it the coup, the calamity, and the conspiracy. He said,
hardly anyone has fully come to terms of what it's
transpired over five years. I got to say, you know,
it may sound like a broken record, because I just
can't get over the fact that this happened and that

(41:32):
nothing has happened in response to it. These people committed
the worst global crime and they got away with it completely.
And not only that, but you have people who see
that it was a crime, and they make excuses for
them because they're part of their political cult. Most currencies
in the world took a twenty five to thirty five

(41:52):
percent haircut, except for in the Far East. That's a
technical description that obscures what actually happened and the measures
by which most people in the world hold the liquid
part of their worldly possessions, that is, the money that
they earned through hard work and savings was robbed by
a quarter and more. And who was the robber, Well,

(42:15):
it was Trump. Who's the pharmaceutical companies?

Speaker 3 (42:17):
Right? Where did it all go? After all?

Speaker 2 (42:21):
The wealth didn't sink into the ocean. It was transferred
from one group to another. It went from the poor
and the middle class to the elites in well connected
industries and government. It was simply sucked away from one
sector to another, achieving in a matter of a few
years what would have been impossible in normal times. And
that is the function that Trump serves. He is the

(42:44):
accelerationist for this wealth transfer and for this takedown of
the middle class throughout Western society. At least that's his job.
Here in America. The forced transferred wealth went from small
business to large from from physical enterprise to digital, from
storefronts to online, from citizens to government connected contractors, from

(43:09):
workers to leveraged capital, from families to corporations from savers
to deeply indebted government and so on. You're perfectly free
to believe that this was all a mistake, just bad policy,
that the world panicked because of a pathogen, and the
central banks ran the printing presses out of compassion for suffering.

(43:29):
Legislators rained fresh paper on the population, which we used
to buy hardware and digital gadgetry, while fostering addiction to
online entertainment. Governments criminalized small business while they subsidized large ones.
And nowhere was that more obvious than with PPP that

(43:50):
was supposed to bail out with small businesses. Instead, Trump
changed the definition of what a small business was, and
more than fifty percent of the money went to just
five percent of the large corporation.

Speaker 3 (44:00):
It was a massive.

Speaker 2 (44:01):
Transfer of wealth from those on Main Street that Trump
had said were non essential to the people on Wall Street,
who he believes are essential because they're essential to his
goals of becoming wealthy and powerful. Governments criminalize small businesses
and subsidized large ones. Never forget that the shots that

(44:23):
everyone thought would save us made us sicker than ever.
Surely it was an earnest attempt that was gone wrong. Yeah,
and that's the kind of excuse that we see over
and over again. He mentions that not to make an excuse,
but to point out the.

Speaker 3 (44:36):
Absurdity of this.

Speaker 2 (44:38):
He said, you can believe that all this befel people
all over the world at the same time via a
series of pathetic misjudgments. In other words, yeah, pay no
attention to the fact that Trump and Trudeau and Macaroni
were all doing the same thing at exactly the same time. Yeah,
it was just they were making the same mistakes, and
they were rolling out it out gradually. He could be

(45:00):
more realistic, and you could see that this was not
a mistake at all. It was entirely intentional, the unfolding
of a dark scheme hatched by an indescribably sadistic ruling class.

Speaker 3 (45:12):
Yes, that's right.

Speaker 2 (45:14):
Indeed, if this had been an accident, you would surely
have heard something someone apologized by. Now there's also the
planning that was involved, and he says, yeah, we had
an event two to one, We had Crimson contagion, the
lesser known, and many others. It all started. It was
nine to eleven, Dark Winter. I wish people would go

(45:35):
back to Dark Winter. The only person I saw go
back to That was RFK Jr. In his book about Fauci,
Chapter twelve, and I'll give him that he did a
great job of laying out the germ game.

Speaker 3 (45:47):
Nonsense. Do you really believe all this.

Speaker 2 (45:51):
Was a coincidence, says Jeffrey Tucker. It looks for all
the world to be the most far reaching industrial reset
in world history. It worked, and it is still working,
and there has been no consequence at all for the
people who pulled this off. The World's most powerful industry,
History's richest and most insidiously influential industry is pharmaceuticals. There

(46:15):
are no close competitors, not even in the storied munitions manufacturers,
the shippers, and the slave traders of the past. And
he's absolutely right, and we should think of the pharmaceutical companies,
the pharmakeya that way. They're far worse than the military
industrial complex in terms of their ability to manipulate things.
They're worse even than the massive slave trade that made

(46:38):
the British Empire wealthy. They seemed to be to have
everyone on the hook, media, academia, medicine, professional associations, and
the population in general. Before COVID, this was not obvious,
But today it should be obvious to anyone who is
paying attention. He says, speaking for myself, it took two

(47:00):
years for me to fully realize the role that pharma
and modified mRNA played. Here, he said, the first clue
should have been the deprecation of natural immunity, exactly.

Speaker 3 (47:10):
What I said before.

Speaker 2 (47:12):
If you're going to say that natural immunity doesn't work,
then you have no basis at all for your story
about vaccines. That made no sense at all. The whole
point of vaccine is to train your immune system the
way we be trained if it was exposed to the
actual disease. And so if they're going to take that away,
the whole thing collapses like a house of cards and

(47:35):
lies that it is. And I believe that virology is
nothing but a lie. So the next clue should have
been the removal of the shots from Jay and Jay
and Astrogenica that used a dentovirus based vector technology, if
only to cobble together an mRNA monopoly. And here this
is important because he points out that mRNA is such

(47:57):
a key technology for them. And what was it that
Trump did on his first day in office? The second
time he held a big conference about how they were
going to set up Stargate. Remember that he had a
big Japanese bank, and he had Larry Ellison who he
was working with to give Ellison control of all media,
the Ellison family and TikTok as well as CBS and

(48:20):
other things. But they were there to push MR and
A technology along with artificial intelligence. And he points out,
he said, what's really the focus of this stuff? He said,
it was so absurd that I didn't believe a guy
who called me and told me about this. He said,
I personally received a call from a major player in

(48:41):
the pandemic planning early on who explained the game plan.
It was so absurd that I didn't believe him, and
I hung up. I should have taken him seriously, he said.
Evidence is mounted of the raw power of the MR
and A platform. They truly imagine a transhumanist future in
which every illness requires a fix that can be monitored

(49:04):
using digital technology. This is what they were selling on
Trump's first day back in office, the Stargate project. We're
going to take a look at you with AI. We're
going to custom make some kind of a genetic shot mRNA, which,
by the way, five years ago they were denying left
and right that mRNA was a genetic modification. Now they're
boasting about it anyway. They truly imagine a transhumanist future

(49:27):
where digital technology is used to gut not only natural
biology and free will, but also privacy and genuine health.
It's not implausible at all to view this technology as
an extension of the eugenics ambition of a century ago.
And who is the guy at the very epicenter of this,
Donald J.

Speaker 3 (49:47):
Trump?

Speaker 2 (49:48):
Open your eyes, folks, Come on, pay attention. Look at
this stargate thing that should tell you everything about him.
It's even more important than his cheerleading, his incessant cheerleading
of the the mRNA COVID shots. The bioweapons industries that
were driving the agenda are more powerful than any government
in the world, indeed more powerful than all the governments

(50:10):
of the world. Yes, they are all on the same page,
and they've all got this trans humanist agenda. It's not
just strictly about money. The recent press conferences which the
otherwise resilient and strong Trump was deferring to Pfizer's Albert Borla,
as if Borla were his boss, should have shown you everything.
RFK Junior can only look on the scene with disdain,

(50:34):
and he was just quietly in the background, going along
with all of it. This is another op ed piece
from Brownstone talking about the lost vocation of medicine. It's
gone from a calling to a commodity. And this is
a medical doctor, Joseph Farren, who wrote this, and he
is he's sad to see what has happened to his profession.

(50:57):
He said, what was once a vocation has been stripped
of its has been rebranded, reframed, reduced until it barely
resembles a profession. I entered with such hope. Medicine today
is a business enterprise. It's a big business. It's consolidated.
It's the mergers that have happened, and it's the accountants
have taken over the hospitals from the doctors. Patients are consumers,

(51:20):
doctors are providers, and healing has been crowded out by
billing codes, liability fears, and the suffocating weight of bureaucracy.
The vocation has been replaced by a job. A job
can always be abandoned. And he goes and that's what
haunts me the most. He said, didn't happen overnight, but
it really accelerated with all the COVID stuff. And that's

(51:44):
the real role of Trump is as an accelerationist. He's
here at the tail end of this fourth turning to
make sure that we own nothing. Let's take a look
at some of the comments here.

Speaker 6 (51:56):
Yeah, again I've mentioned before, but just about everyone for
my generation that I'd ever spoken to in the medical
fields that specifically said they wanted to be a doctor
because they make good money never mentioned the fact like, oh,
I want to help people, I want to help people
get better, I want to heal them. Doctors make a
lot of money. Yeah, that's it. It's gonna call a

(52:18):
rose Gardens.

Speaker 2 (52:19):
Let me before you go on, Yes, thank you for
the Tip's gonna call a rose Gardens. I had a
very good friend in high school, smart guy, and he
became a doctor, and he became a pediatrician and.

Speaker 3 (52:34):
He got out of.

Speaker 2 (52:35):
It because he couldn't stand to see kids die.

Speaker 6 (52:39):
Yeah, it's a it's a lot easy. It's one of
those jobs where it's a lot easier to maintain it
and do it. If you don't have that level of
care for people, it's got to be extremely difficult to
care deeply about someone be invested in helping them get
better and just not see it work especially. Yeah, but

(53:02):
thank you skunk Hollow Rose Gardens, who really do appreciate it,
says this show rules. Thank you again. Knights of the
Storm and for the Love of the Road have both
gifted a sub on Kick. Thank you very much, Denver Addaway,
and of course Knights of the Storm. You can find
their show on Kick and Rumble as well. It's they've

(53:24):
got a multiplation. You go to Knights of the Storm
dot com. They've got the full schedule and breakdown of
where you can find the shows and what shows and
what time. So go to Knights of the Storm dot com.
Denver Ataway. Trump is saving the US money by giving
Pfizor seventy billion dollars. That's right, what a deal. It's
thet the deal. Out of the deal. We're gonna make
them rich and they're gonna love us steal. Actually, Guard

(53:47):
Goldsmith again Liberty Conspiracy. You can find Guard Goldsmith live
at six o'clock PM on Rumble. Guard Goldsmith on substack
as well, says Lovett. As Trump increased the prices of
all other imported drugs. Yeah, it's gonna call a rose gardens.
Indian Maid was forty dollars, US was five hundred and ninety.

Speaker 2 (54:08):
Yeah, this is the thing, you know, it's just amazing
how they're portraying this as a victory. And I played
you that guy I've even I've forgotten his name now,
but out of the UK. Remember, Oh, this is just great.
You just saw Trump make Vizor commit suicide, financial suicide.
It's like, you're so and it's all about Q stuff.

(54:28):
And the number seventeen just keeps coming up again. Yah,
and Q is the seventeenth number in the alphabet. It's like,
now it's your iq Pal.

Speaker 3 (54:37):
On kick.

Speaker 6 (54:37):
Spencer DeLong is gifted a sub Thank you, Spencer, and
Steve eb says, Wow, toxic unhealthy drugs are going down
in price. That's right, Oh boy, you can get your
poison on cheap for winning Guard Goldsmith Tariff's raising prices
versus one corporate crony company KWD sixty eight. Trump calls
the worst people great men Schwab and pharmaceutical CEOs Bill

(54:59):
Gates the that's right, Denver Addaway get a look at this,
and he's got an article linked to there study published
first of October. It's only a four person temporal observation
disease pathology, that kind of thing. Denver addway long persisting
SARS cove two spike specific CD four plus T cells
associated with mald disease and increase cytotoxicity post COVID nineteen

(55:20):
b T tailor two four six. So the virus has
not been proven to exist. How can there be a
spike protein.

Speaker 2 (55:26):
That's right, Well, well, spike protein can be synthesized. I
can say that that is the that is the virus.
I mean they are saying that the spike protein is synthesized,
said this is this is what you would see on
the virus. So we're going to reproduce part of the virus.
It still doesn't because they have a spike protein that
they are injecting and making your injecting m RNA to

(55:47):
make your body manufacture that spike protein, which causes so
much problem. That doesn't mean that there was a virus
that had the spike protein. They haven't isolated, they haven't
proved it. They put out a genetic code saying this
is what it is. Even though then they say that
they haven't isolated. So look at that conundrum that's there.

(56:07):
But the spy protein is real and they've got your
body program to make it if you take the vaccine.

Speaker 6 (56:15):
Denver Adaway. mRNA vaccines were always associated with cancer risk.

Speaker 2 (56:19):
I thought, yeah, spent for ten years Moderna couldn't get
a product to prove because of the really bad adverse
effects that they had. It took Trump coming in and
saying We're going to sweep everything aside for them.

Speaker 6 (56:32):
Spencer DeLong, Good morning everyone, I have to miss the
show live today. Everyone want to chime in to say,
my local school district in rural Ohio. Rural Ohio is
trying to pass a one point five percent income tax
on the ballot next month, on top of the thirty
five percent property tax increase I got hit with just
last year. I mean they say this to say that
even if you aren't involved in your local school, to
stay informed of what they are doing. They're always scheming
for new ways to take more of your money. Have

(56:53):
a great day, everyone in God bless Yes, let's cover
the rest of these when we come back.

Speaker 2 (56:58):
Okay, great, all right, We're gonna take a quick break, folks,
and we will be right back.

Speaker 1 (57:03):
Stay with us defending the American dream. You're listening to

(59:46):
the David Knight Show.

Speaker 6 (59:50):
Welcome back, folks, We've got more comments. Patty Wax says,
I thought that doctors no longer have the hippocratic oath
of do no harm in their certification. Did they change that?

Speaker 3 (01:00:01):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:00:01):
Actually that came from Galen, a different Greek position, But yeah, no,
they I don't know. Certainly they don't follow that in
terms of the practice. They don't care if they harm
you or.

Speaker 6 (01:00:14):
Not, whether it's still there or not. It's effectively gone.

Speaker 3 (01:00:16):
By the way.

Speaker 2 (01:00:17):
You know, while we're talking about all this stuff, make
sure that you go to RNC stores dot com, RNC
store Singular, RNC store dot com and take a look
at the products that they have there. Or you're talking
about turbo cancer that's there, but cancer is everywhere anywhere,
a lot of different things that are in our environment.
And take a look at the africot seeds. If you
had questions about whether or not that is something that

(01:00:38):
has worked for other people, take a look at the
book by GEdward Griffin, A World Without Cancer. He put
it on the line for a doctor who had had
a lot of experience treating people and successfully with apricot seeds,
who had cancer and the doctor came to him and said,
I know that you'll do this. He said, can't do it,

(01:01:00):
un they've taken my license.

Speaker 6 (01:01:02):
So yeah, and of course use promo code Night for
ten percent off at rncstore dot com.

Speaker 3 (01:01:09):
Yeah, we have.

Speaker 6 (01:01:11):
Mister Palm ten eleven says Gold and Silver up again today, yipie,
thanks David and Tony Wise.

Speaker 2 (01:01:18):
Well, well, we don't make it go up, and we
do is like Jerald Slinthy says, we can't predict the
timing of things, but we can look at trends and
we can look at what's real and what's not real.
And that's the thing with gold and silver. It's real,
it's private, it's physical. And when you look at everything
the government is doing, and you know, why would you
want to store your money in a fiat currency that

(01:01:43):
is under their control. That's the key issue.

Speaker 6 (01:01:46):
Yes, and of course go to Davidnight dot gold if
you would like to get in on wolfpack be my Valentine.
Years ago, our pastors twin boys went in a different
branch of the military. They were both given all the
childhood vaccines upon entering, even though they already had them
all a children, they don't care you're just gonna get
loaded up and you will comply be my valentine. They

(01:02:06):
had health issues afterward.

Speaker 2 (01:02:09):
Well, you know, you look at the anthrax vaccine. They
pushed on everybody after the false fag anthrax attack associated
with nine to eleven to prepare the way for all
this stuff, and they eventually shut that thing down. But
they'll just choose the military as guinea pigs. They have
no respect for the people in the military. They're expendable.
They treat them like animals. As a matter of fact,

(01:02:31):
there's the quote from Henry Kissinger, which I think is real.
Some people say, well, we don't have him saying that
publicly or whatever. Just treated the military like animals and
that's the way they treat them like livestock.

Speaker 6 (01:02:44):
Yeah, opossum king. Pfizer will fill the skies with vaxing
drones possibly and talking to a possemking attack and skun
color Rose Gardens fireable needles for vax defense. That's right,
a small flaschette round, wouldn't that be fun? Scun collar
res gardens they use a salt like pellet in fatty

(01:03:04):
tissue pocket behind a cow's eer to vax. That pellet
can blow gun out of a drone at US the
future Denver Adaway adjumants are a neurotoxin which result in
various forms of autoimmune disease down the line, most often
months years, classic eugenics. That is, that's why some of
these vaccine injuries are so incredibly hard to diagnose. They

(01:03:25):
don't show up immediately. They can wait, as you said,
months or years. It can be a long term battle.
Your immune system can eventually just lose.

Speaker 2 (01:03:33):
And even when you have a alignment in terms of
the explosion in the children's vaccine schedule and explosion in autism,
they won't pay any attention to that. They'll tell you
that it's something else.

Speaker 3 (01:03:49):
It'll taste them all or lovely.

Speaker 6 (01:03:52):
So we have KWD sixty eight says, does it make
the shot safer if you pronounce aluminum like the British do.
That's right, it's all min It's much safer. S A
Miller one two three eighteen year old cheerleader died suddenly
at practice, friend of my grandsons, just two nights ago.

Speaker 3 (01:04:08):
So sad.

Speaker 6 (01:04:09):
I'm so sorry to hear that. I'm so sorry for
their family.

Speaker 2 (01:04:11):
You've never heard of anything like this, and you know
they can use these vaccines and kill our children and
family members and things, and there's no consequence for them
at all. It's just the just because of how loved
Donald Trump is by one group, now hated.

Speaker 3 (01:04:30):
He is by the other group.

Speaker 2 (01:04:31):
And these two groups hate each other so much that
the other, the one group hating him, makes the other
group love him even more.

Speaker 3 (01:04:38):
So. It's it's pathetic. It's it's pathological. Really, it's it's
a Stockholm syndrome.

Speaker 6 (01:04:46):
Really, Bulldog, I get thrown out of doctors' offices if
need be. That's right, Molly Brown Dog. Every vaccine ever tested,
quote unquote was tested against either another vaccine or solution
of adjuvants, both which have their own associated adverse side effects.
That's how they make it look so.

Speaker 3 (01:05:06):
Bad, how they mask it.

Speaker 6 (01:05:08):
Yeah, it's got the same base level as this other thing. See,
it's not bad, except for the fact the other thing
was already horrific, Molly Brown Dog. So the new vaccine
adverse effects always look comparable to those in the control group. Yep, Yeah,
we need to scroll, Bulldog. Ask your doctor if he

(01:05:29):
is following CDC, and wow, protocols went treating you denver
adaway all State screwed over the insured homeowners after Katrina.
When they needed immediate relief, they fool people into signing
claims away for a few grand that's right now, Let
the WHO and CDC treat you through your doctor. Aud

(01:05:50):
the mr R. It was an artist attempt at mass
depopulation talking about the vaccines, and it's still going on.
User name zero one, two, three, four, five, seven, eight
nine people re elected the guy who caused toilet paper hoarding.

Speaker 2 (01:06:07):
It's kind of a scenario where it hits the fan,
isn't it. Yeah, he made that happen.

Speaker 6 (01:06:13):
Bull dog. The doctors have killed half the people. I know,
very sorry to hear that. Jerry Alizalo, who do you
expect will soup down and buy up all the farms
after Trump terrors force a ton of American farmers into bankruptcy.

Speaker 3 (01:06:25):
Bill Gates in China probably? And Black Rock Yeah? Blackrock yeah,
three big.

Speaker 6 (01:06:30):
Players, none of them with good intentions for the American people.
Doug Lug. Nurses that care for their patients are way
better than nurses that are only there for the money. Yeah,
and it's becoming fewer and further between. That's a I
made some harsh comments about nurses that upset some people.
I'm sure if your family member is a nurse, they're
one of the good ones. But many, as I've said before,

(01:06:52):
most of the people in my generation who went into nursing,
who went into being a doctor, did it for the
money and because it's a good way you get prestige.
People see that you're a doctor or a nurse and
they go, oh, you're a doctor's thank you.

Speaker 2 (01:07:05):
Well, when I was in the hospital, I had a
couple of really real several really really good nurses and
that really stood out because they were so good. And
I had one guy that was really really sadistic. I
guess it's about the only way that you could put this,
but he was He was a piece of work. He

(01:07:25):
had already decided that he was going to transfer to
under the hospital. He didn't really care. But I was
kind of a special project.

Speaker 6 (01:07:35):
Dougalug Nurses or the NIBERU twenty twenty nine. The two
deadliest practices among humans are war and healthcare. Be my
Valentine fear affected people that were fooled by the COVID pandemic.
Now it is harder to convince people that they were
fooled and so saw box saws. It's now called the
hypocrite oath.

Speaker 2 (01:07:54):
Yeah, well, let's take like talking about hypocrites. So take
a look at the update on the Epstein name because
it really doesn't matter. It really does show us the
character of these people. The President's refusal to rule out
pardoning Glaine Maxwell for her sex trafficking conviction has sparked
fury within the MAGA movement. A lot of those people

(01:08:16):
on x that have large social media followings have reacted
with anger after Trump said he would consider pardoning Gallaine Maxwell,
who's now serving twenty years in prison. And just think
about the fact that he's willing to take such a
hit with his own base. What does that tell you

(01:08:36):
about who controls him? The backlash of Trump's remarks the
latest example of discontent by the administration's handling of the
case involving Epstein, a wealthy financier who died by suicide.
If we believe that, you probably believe what Trump tells
you about things as well. Initially, the White House had
ordered a review of the case and said that it

(01:08:58):
would publish names and evidence of out ep Scenes associates.
We all know this, doj FBI memo said, however, there
was no client list and that no further charges would
be brought. Well, we just had Pam Bondy go before
the House Oversight Committee. Then to September they released thirty

(01:09:18):
three thousand pages of documents really to the to Epstein
flight logs, court filings, emails, and of course the birthday
book that had the contentious picture that Trump had drawn
and signed. But some lawmakers said this wasn't enough, and
a petition has been filed to release all Epstein files.
And you got Mike Johnson doing everything he can, shutting

(01:09:42):
down Congress a week early when they had a month off,
and then refusing to seat a newly elected out of
after a special election, a newly elected female Democrat who
would vote for the release of this stuff. He's pulling
every trick in the book. But this is Pam Bondy
as she he's giving more lies about the list.

Speaker 8 (01:10:03):
Where you made a public claim that the Epstein client
list was quote sitting on my desk right now for review.

Speaker 3 (01:10:09):
End of quote.

Speaker 8 (01:10:10):
You then produce already public information and no client list
at a major media event hosted the White House Attorney General. BINDI,
why did you publicly claim to have the Epstein client
list waiting for your review and then produce nothing relevant
to that.

Speaker 7 (01:10:23):
Claim, Senator Senator Dervin, if you listen to my entire
clip on that, I said I had not reviewed it yet,
that it was sitting on my desk along with the
JFK files, the Martin Luther King files, and I said
I had not yet reviewed it. And if you've seen
our memo.

Speaker 3 (01:10:42):
On Fantasy, we see excuse me.

Speaker 7 (01:10:46):
Our memo on Epstein clearly points out that there was
no client list. Our July sixth NEMO.

Speaker 8 (01:10:52):
Going back to the Epstein files, according to another whistleblower
who made a protected disclosure to my office, pushed the
FBI to review approximately one hundred thousand Epstein related records
on an arbitrarily short deadline in March, and the FBI
was directed to flag any documents that mentioned President Trump.
Nothing came of that review until July, when DOJ and

(01:11:14):
FBI released an unsigned memo stating quote, there's no incriminating
client list. Why was the July seventh memo unsigned?

Speaker 7 (01:11:24):
The July seventh memo came from the FBI and the
Department of Justice Director Patel answered those questions very clear,
and you know, Senator Durbin, I find it very interesting
that you refused repeated Republican requests to release the Epstein
flight logs in twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four.
You fought that did you take money from Reid Hoffman

(01:11:46):
campaign donations, who was a huge Epstein friend? Why did
you fight for years? Why did you fight to not
with disclose these Yeah?

Speaker 6 (01:11:56):
But what about you?

Speaker 3 (01:11:58):
You covered up for them too, so says I can
cover up for them.

Speaker 8 (01:12:02):
Wish to produce those logs, and I asked her to
put it in writing, and she never did.

Speaker 7 (01:12:07):
I think Senator Blackburn would quarrel with you on that.

Speaker 8 (01:12:09):
I will quarrel with you is to read somebody that
you mentioned.

Speaker 7 (01:12:12):
I never heard of Hoffman.

Speaker 8 (01:12:14):
So who gave the arder to flag records related to
President Trump?

Speaker 7 (01:12:21):
To flag records for President Trump?

Speaker 8 (01:12:24):
To flag any records which included his name.

Speaker 7 (01:12:28):
I'm not going to discuss anything about that with you.

Speaker 2 (01:12:32):
Yeah, because I could get incriminated with this. I'm going
to tell you that it came from me. Well, uh,
you see how they play this game. It's like, yeah,
but you covered up for Jeffrey Epstein yourself, and you
got and you got somebody that gave you money that
was a pal of Jeffrey Epstein, read Hoffman. Well, Pam,

(01:12:55):
what about Donald Trump, who was his best friend for
fifteen years? Uh? You work for that guy. He's the
one who gave you your job, your total uh control
of you financially. And so when they asked Trump about
it again, he plays as if he doesn't know anything
at all about this. He plays dumb when they ask
him about Gallainne Maxwell. I haven't heard that name?

Speaker 3 (01:13:17):
Who who is that? I don't know?

Speaker 4 (01:13:22):
And yeah, they rejected today fueled by Blaine Maxwell.

Speaker 2 (01:13:26):
To overturn her conviction.

Speaker 4 (01:13:27):
That means her only chance of getting out of present
part from you?

Speaker 2 (01:13:31):
Is that something you?

Speaker 9 (01:13:32):
Who are we talking about?

Speaker 10 (01:13:35):
Uh?

Speaker 9 (01:13:36):
You know, I haven't heard the name in so long.
I can just said I'd have.

Speaker 3 (01:13:39):
To take he's such a bad liar.

Speaker 9 (01:13:41):
Have to take a look.

Speaker 3 (01:13:42):
Did you reject that?

Speaker 1 (01:13:45):
And what happened?

Speaker 3 (01:13:45):
Remember that foursome? Yeah, well I'll take a look at it.

Speaker 8 (01:13:49):
I'll speak to you.

Speaker 9 (01:13:50):
I will speak to the DJ. I wouldn't consider it
or not considered. I don't know anything about it, so
but I'll speak I will speak to the deal. I
don't know I mean, I have to speak to the DJ.
I'll look at it. I'll I have a lot of
people have asked for pardons, so I call him puff
Daddy his sp for a pardon. But yeah, I mean,

(01:14:12):
I'm gonna have to take a look at it, and
I have to ask DJ.

Speaker 3 (01:14:15):
You knew her really, really well.

Speaker 9 (01:14:17):
She was even asking for it.

Speaker 2 (01:14:18):
Frank didn't know she was asking for a pardon. He
just never saw anything. But what's that name. I haven't
heard that name in a long time. Who has all
anybody who's talking about around him? And he's gonna he's
gonna kick this down to Pam Bondi again.

Speaker 3 (01:14:34):
Well, you know, she's gonna have.

Speaker 2 (01:14:35):
To be very careful when she testifies because she's putting
her neck in a noose every time she goes to
testify before Congress. If they're gonna play this game with
James Comy, try to lock him up for lying to Congress,
so she's playing that same game there. So then you
had Laura Lumer, who was the Chief Advisor to the President,
evidently on the behalf of MAGA. She said, I strongly

(01:14:58):
advise against anyone lobbying the Trump administration of the DOJ
to pardon Gallainne Maxwell. Do not do it, I repeat,
do not do it. Well, she seems to have heard
of Gallaine Maxwell. I don't know why hasn't Trump heard
of her.

Speaker 6 (01:15:12):
It's very strange when Laura Loomer is the voice of
reason in.

Speaker 3 (01:15:16):
A room, just tells you just how gone the deep end?

Speaker 2 (01:15:22):
Patriot Princess Maga account with over twelve thousand followers, I
guess that's a lot of for Newsweek, that's a lot
of influencer. I guess said, like or not, Epstein is
a red line for many of us back in June. Well,
I get you know, but it wasn't a red line
for them when Trump locked everybody down and pushed the poison.

(01:15:42):
But this was a red line. There's so many red lines,
you know. Pick one. Another account said it better be
worth losing his entire base if he chooses to pardon Maxwell.
Trump will destroy his reputation, well't representation, and will loose
his entire shills and apologists included. And that's the way

(01:16:03):
he put it. Instead of lose, it puts loose and
it better be worth loosing his entire base.

Speaker 3 (01:16:12):
Loosing. You got some explaining to do here.

Speaker 6 (01:16:14):
It's like people don't understand that this is his second term. Yeah,
even if.

Speaker 2 (01:16:20):
He does, and they don't understand the fifteen years that
he spent with Jeffrey Epstein, and they don't see the
pictures of the four of them together, and the look
that Milania is giving Jeffrey Epstein is just.

Speaker 6 (01:16:32):
He doesn't have to care about any of this. Sure,
he may be talking about running again, I personally don't
think he will. I think that's just a ego thing.
Oh wouldn't it be great if I did? Wouldn't you
all love it?

Speaker 2 (01:16:43):
A lot of this stuff is just to create controversy,
so wag the dog approach. You know, you don't have
to necessarily, He's not above it, But you don't necessarily
have to start a war in another country, which I
think he's in the process of doing. In order to
distract attention from the things that you don't want people
paying attention to, like this Epstein thing, you can just
throw out nonsense like we're going to take over Greenland,

(01:17:04):
I'm going to run for a third term. That works
equally well with Trump to say stuff like that. It
completely changes the narrative.

Speaker 5 (01:17:11):
Maybe he just has a really bad memory and that's
why he can't remember the notes that he wrote to Epstein,
the birthday letters or who has Lane Maxwell.

Speaker 2 (01:17:20):
Is, yeah, well right there. They should take that. The
Democrats should take that and say, okay, well, I guess
we'll do the twenty fifth amendment. If it is he
suffering from dementia so badly they doesn't remember his best friends,
we have to do the twenty fifth on him.

Speaker 6 (01:17:36):
If Joe Biden had made a comment like that, with
as much evidence that he knew someone as there is
with Trump, everyone would have been all over him. They
would have been pointing out the insanity of it and
either saying he's lying or making jokes about his declining
mental faculties.

Speaker 2 (01:17:51):
Yes, well, this is Newsweek article. So they focus on
somebody I have not heard of before. Warren Carpenter, a
MAGA figure who previously worked for the Michigan gu said,
this is not what I voted for. It's the freaking opposite.
So you voted for the guy who is the pharmaceutical
tool and did lockdown as a mass murder for you
voted for that then, and this surprised you because you

(01:18:12):
thought he was going to be on your side with
the Epstein stuff. Well, we have an Israeli official remember
this from a couple of weeks ago. He was caught
in a sting in Vegas. He was there for the
Black Act conference. He is a cybersecurity official from Israel,
very highly placed there, and he was caught in this
pedophile sting that was run. They go online and pretend

(01:18:34):
that they're kids, and then with these people who think
that they're talking to a kid, arranged to meet them.
When they show up, they find that it's law enforcement there. Well,
the other seven or eight people that were part of this,
they all got arrested. But this guy, who is an
official in Israel's cybersecurity agency, even after he was arrested
in the child sex sting in August, he's now been

(01:18:57):
indicted by a Clark County grand jury Friday, six weeks
though after he was mysteriously allowed to flee the US
back to Israel. How did that happen? Well, Tom Alexdronovich,
who helped guide israel cybersecurity policy, was representing Israel at
the Black Hat USA conference in Vegas.

Speaker 3 (01:19:18):
He was one of.

Speaker 2 (01:19:19):
Seven people swept up in a major multi agency sting
operation targeting pedophiles soliciting sex acts with miners. According to
court records, the thirty eight year old Alexandrovitch allegedly committed
the felony offense of using computer technology in an attempt
to lure a child into sexual abuse. That particular crime

(01:19:39):
encompasses children under sixteen. The next day, he posted a
ten thousand dollars bond and fled the country. Online court
records show that Alexandrovitch is expected to appear on October fifteenth.
Good luck with that for an initial arraignment, as being
represented by a This is what's interesting. His lawyer, David Chesnoff,

(01:20:03):
has been appointed to a position on the Homeland Security
Advisory Council by Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:20:08):
And so.

Speaker 2 (01:20:10):
He's got some friends in high places, doesn't he? This pedophile?
Imagine a pedophile with friends and high places in Washington.
Who would have thought that would happen? And again Trump
is at the epicenter of this. It is worse than
the six degrees of separation with Kevin Bacon. Now, all
these people, all these pedophiles, they're directly connected to Trump.

(01:20:31):
In this particular case, there's one degree of separation. You've
got his lawyer is going to be the guy that
was appointed to the Homeland Security Advisory Council by Trump.
Why is an alleged Israeli high level government pedophile being
represented by a Trump nominee. Chesnoff also represented an Israeli

(01:20:51):
dual citizen who pleaded guilty to lying about the bidens
taking a five million dollar bribe from Barisma. Again, he
is at the epicenter of all this corruption. This is
a guy that they can work with. That's why they
put him in at DHS in any event, says as
their head. According to the indictment, Alexandrovitch quote wilfully and

(01:21:16):
unlawfully and knowingly arranged to meet an undercover FBI agent
who he believed was under sixteen, with the intent to solicit, persuade,
or lure them into sexual conduct through online apps such
as WhatsApp and Pure. Pure is an app that allows
users to date, play and misbehave anonymously.

Speaker 3 (01:21:38):
They call it Pure.

Speaker 2 (01:21:42):
As the news broke six weeks ago, the office of
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu reflexively denied Alexandrovitch had done anything wrong,
claiming that quote the employee, who does not hold a
diplomatic visa, was not arrested and returned to Israel asked,
except that he was arrested, so that was a lie

(01:22:04):
as well. It's not clear why or how he was
allowed to return to Israel, which has a reputation as
a haven for pedophiles who prey on American children. Citing
a Jewish watchdog group, a twenty twenty CBS News report
found that in just the previous six years, more than
sixty Jewish Americans who had been accused of pedophilia had

(01:22:26):
fled to Israel, taking advantage of Israel's right of return
law that lets any Jewish individual in the world enjoy
instant citizenship and not pay any penalties for any crimes
that they're accused of, especially pedophilia. You have the Daily
Skeptic out of the UK in terms of talking about
what's going on with Gaza and Trump putting Tony Blair

(01:22:50):
at the top, and of course in the UK where
Daily Skeptic is their take on this, does Trump really
not realize how globally toxic Tony Blair is? I would
say to them, you don't know Trump, then, do you?
He hangs out with toxic people like Jeffrey Epstein and
so forth, and Netan Yahoo. Tony Blair is just another one.

(01:23:14):
Why would they think that he would care about that? Well,
as part of this back and forth that I played
for you, Pam Bondi coming back to the Sheldon White
House and saying, well, you know you you get money
from Rid Hoffman, who was with Jeffrey Epstein on multiple occasions,

(01:23:36):
multiple occasions. I wonder how many occasions Trump and Stain
were together. And you know, so you look at this
and the hypocrisy, it's just unbelievable on the side of
these people. Meanwhile, Zero Hedge asks, did the FBI director
Cash Bettel just lie to Congress? What is going to

(01:23:58):
happen when the next Democrat comes and they're going to
keep playing this game? And you know when Biden escalated
it to come after Trump, Trump is now escalating it
higher than Biden dead, and the next time it changes hands,
it's going to get even higher. And all these people
like Cash Betel, Pam Bondi, Dan Bongino were out there

(01:24:18):
lying up one side and down the other to the
American people and to Congress. Maybe they could get to Israel.

Speaker 3 (01:24:25):
I don't know what.

Speaker 2 (01:24:27):
To have any choice connection to have a writer return,
they better be making some plans to get to some
country where they're not going to be extradited by the
next president of the Democrats. Recently, FBI Director Cash Mattel
made two presentations in front of Congress, testifying one day
at a Senate hearing in the next day in front
of a House Judiciary committee. Listening to the hours of

(01:24:49):
testimony was an exercise and understanding misdirection and propaganda and
coming on the heels of the indictment a former FBI
Director James Comey for lying to Congress, one has to
ask whether FBI Director Patel's studied omissions constitute lying as well.

(01:25:10):
In other words, you know when you're under oath. I
don't know what they put him under oath there, but
if you're testifying in court the whole truth and nothing
but the truth, right, the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing about the truth, well he's it, has studied omissions,
and so he's deliberately in a sense lying by not

(01:25:31):
telling them everything. You know, kind of like James Clapper,
are you spying on the American people?

Speaker 3 (01:25:37):
Uh? Oh, not deliberately. It was an accident, really was well.

Speaker 2 (01:25:43):
Patel came under harsh criticism by some of the Democrats
and attendants specifically about his alleged politicization of the FBI
and his alleged failure to release what's been called the
Epstein Black Book, charges that he vigorously denies. None of
the critics and attendants even broached what appears to be
Patel's real omission, which involves the white collar crimes being
committed with impunity by state and federal court judges across

(01:26:08):
the US. These crimes involve civil asset forfeiture also known
as theft, as well as untimely death, which is also
known as murder. And it just shows, folks that the
Trump people and the Department of Justice are business as usual.
They're not going to do anything about civil asset forfeiture,

(01:26:31):
and they're going to let this drug on war on
drugs metastasize into a full blown civil war as well
as a war with Venezuela, at least the excuse for
a war with Venezuela. Well, we're going to take a
break real quickly. Got a couple of comments here.

Speaker 6 (01:26:48):
That's right, mister inquisitor says, thank you for saying that, David.
I'm a vaccine injured veteran. I suffer every day because
of the anthrax vaccine and I can't get the proper
care because they won't acknowledge its impact.

Speaker 3 (01:27:00):
So sorry over again.

Speaker 6 (01:27:03):
Yeah, ap rumble seat. Weren't many of Epstein's compatriots already
given immunity during previous investigations and evictual That's what Gilaine
is arguing.

Speaker 2 (01:27:13):
Yeah, yeah, they had four people that were specifically named,
and it said and others as well, and she said,
well that's me.

Speaker 3 (01:27:19):
I'm others.

Speaker 2 (01:27:21):
I'm the other one that was evolved in procuring young
girls and delivering them to Jeffrey Epstein. And of course
you have all these girls that they were convicted of trafficking,
and the question is to whom there were no guys? Yeah,
there's no clients. According to Pambondi, these people are such
amateur liars. I just it's repulsive to think that anybody

(01:27:46):
could support somebody like this, you know, I kind of
expect that from them. What is amazing to me is
that people make excuses for them.

Speaker 3 (01:27:53):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (01:27:54):
People have become so either stupid or jaded that they're
willing to look past it.

Speaker 3 (01:28:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:28:00):
Are they amateur lawyers or are they just so good
that they don't waste more effort than.

Speaker 3 (01:28:05):
They need to with their lives.

Speaker 5 (01:28:07):
Can you call them amateurs?

Speaker 6 (01:28:10):
Look, man, the American people will buy anything. I'm not
going to put in any more effort than necessary.

Speaker 3 (01:28:14):
I would say they're not amateurs lance.

Speaker 2 (01:28:16):
I would say that they are professionals, as in the
oldest profession because they have prostituted themselves, haven't they. It's
it's not just Ela Maxwell, it's Pam Bondi who's prostituted herself.

Speaker 3 (01:28:26):
In a political sense.

Speaker 6 (01:28:28):
Audi m r R. So this is all theater, folks.
Epstein files will never be made public by our crupt government.
I agree as well.

Speaker 2 (01:28:37):
But what is being made public. It's a streissand effect, right,
they need to rename that. They need to call it
the Epstein effect. This this, what Trump is doing and
what Mike Johnson is doing, is significant because it shows
who they are, and it shows how desperate they are
to cover up the stuff that they know is there
and to cover up for pedophiles. It defines his care.

(01:29:00):
That's what I think is one of the reasons why
this is something that is difficult for MAGA to get past,
because it is such a character defining thing. They can't
make excuses for this. You know, they can try to
make excuses for him, Oh, he was deceived by Fauci
and all the rest of this stuff, but they can't
come up with a plausible excuse for why he pivoted

(01:29:21):
on this, just like he has pivoted on the war.
Now he's all for war. He came in as a
peace candidate and he just turned on a dime like that.

Speaker 3 (01:29:30):
Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and
we will be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:30:21):
You're listening to The David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (01:30:25):
Here news now at apsradionews dot com, or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 10 (01:30:34):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(01:30:57):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
America suckers can buy me some. At the David Knightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various
gallas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

(01:31:19):
just put it in the next package of bombs and
missiles coming from the USA.

Speaker 2 (01:31:34):
Well, folks, let's take a look at the war within
as a Trump calls it. Some people are calling it
a civil war that he's trying to accelerate us into.
And one of the problems that I have with this
is not just the fact that it's a police state
approach that is militarizing or federalizing the police, militarizing the
police as well, but also that he's giving these radical

(01:31:57):
Marxists a platform by which they can stay and sound
like Patrick Henry, this is not winning when you make
the other side look good. You know it was Russe
Lundball used to say, I take phone calls from you
to make me look good. So he would have people
come in who were in opposition to him, but they

(01:32:17):
didn't really have a good case to make. So Chicago
Mayor Brandon Johnson is now creating ice free zones to
impede the immigration arrests, and he's sounding like a founding
father in terms of pushing back against the standing army.
In recent weeks, federal agents used several city owned properties,

(01:32:38):
including parking lots near Harrison and Kedzie and a vacant
lot at forty six and Demon. He said a staging
sites for immigration enforcement. Such use of city property underminds
community trust runs counter to Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance, which
insures at all residents, regardless of immigration status, can live, work,

(01:32:58):
and seek services without fear. Johnson, a bloviated says breitbarton
and look, this is another one of these deals. Like
the guy that interviewed yesterday, David Beto, when he's talking
about FDR, he said he did some things that were
so over the top that he was opposed by other
Democrats even though they agreed with the direction, you know

(01:33:20):
what he really wanted to do. They said that the
end did not justify the means. We don't have people
like that anymore, and so we don't have any Republicans
that will oppose Trump because they're concerned about the means
that he's using. You can agree with the overall end,
but the means that Trump is doing is it's just
counterproductive and it is destroying the constitution. Going to have

(01:33:45):
a lot of really bad fruit from this. So I'm
against the federalization of the police. I'm against masked police
going around with a chip on their shoulder and getting
violent with anybody who looks at them sideways. That has
no place in America, and that is not the way
to clean up this open border's mess, which Trump tolerated

(01:34:06):
and exacerbated in his four years in office. And he
did exacerbate it. He did not build a wall. He
didn't do anything to deter immigration. As a matter of fact,
the first six or seven months people had hurt him
talk tough, so immigration took a plunge because of his
tough talk as a candidate. But when they realized that
he was a paper tiger on all this, that's when

(01:34:28):
they started organizing the caravans. And so he himself was
counterproductive in all of this. And there are many things
that he could do to interdict as a deterrent rather
than a direct confrontation of people coming in. And they
could also remove the welfare magnet that is there for people,
and many other things like that that they could do
instead of this jack boot thug approach. But that's what

(01:34:52):
Trump wants. He loves force. He's an authoritarian thug, and
that's what he wants. And so the authoritarian thug roach
that he has taken this fascist approach, this dictator approach,
that is working against him, and it's working against our country,
and it is there, I believe, deliberately to try to
accelerate us into a civil war. And the other side

(01:35:15):
is out there allowed to pose as defenders of the constitution,
which they certainly are not. And I don't think that
there is any when you look at the nullification aspects
of this and local versus federal. Clearly the federal government
has jurisdiction in terms of immigration stuff under the Constitution.

(01:35:39):
But they said, we have a rogue, reckless group of
heavily armed, masked individuals roaming through our city that are
not accountable to the people of Chicago. Bingo, He's exactly right.
I can't believe that Trump has got me agreeing with
Brandon Johnson, the Chicago mayor, but he's exactly right. These
masked federal cops our rogue, reckless, heavily armed, masked and

(01:36:04):
it's disgusting to see that this is Trump's idea of
what law enforcement should be, he said, will not tolerate
ICE agents violating our residents' constitutional rights, nor will we
allow the federal government to disregard our local authority. Well,
that's right. You know they should be standing for this now,
whether or not they will. And again, you know, Trump

(01:36:26):
has put these people in a place where they can
take the high road because he has gone so low.
ICE agents are detaining elected officials, tear gassing protesters, children,
and Chicago police officers, and abusing Chicago's residents. We will
not stand for that in our city. With this executive order,
Chicago stands firmly and protecting the constitutional rights of our

(01:36:49):
residents and our immigrant communities and upholding our democracy.

Speaker 3 (01:36:54):
Well, again.

Speaker 2 (01:36:57):
He is Brightbart's take on this is that he is
escalating his dangerous, violent rhetoric. And is that dangerous and
violent to say that you don't want to have heavily
armed and armored thugs going around recklessly acting as rogues
with masks on their faces, bullying people on the streets.

(01:37:19):
Is that the problem or is a response to that
a problem?

Speaker 3 (01:37:24):
They said?

Speaker 2 (01:37:25):
He is claiming that Americans on the right want a
rematch of the Civil War and that Trump has declared war,
and the people of Chicago and the people across America,
I'm afraid he's right.

Speaker 3 (01:37:37):
I'm afraid that he's right.

Speaker 2 (01:37:39):
Legal battles are raging over five in five states over
the National Guard deployments. And again, Trump is like FDR,
doing his best to destroy any remnant or manifestation of federalism,
doing his best to destroy the Tenth Amendment, the Constitution

(01:38:00):
Passe commatatis act. Some government officials have alleged that he
is exceeding his legal authority by disregarding certain limits that
Congress placed on his ability to federalize a national guard.
Congress set limits on the president's ability to federalize the
National Guard, specifically requiring either an invasion, rebellion or a
danger of rebellion, or an inability by the president to

(01:38:22):
execute the law with regular forces. The law has already
come up in lawsuits from California, Oregon in Illinois and
could resurface depending on how state and local governments respond
to these future deployments. And so this article from zero
Hedge goes to a city by city. So we got Portland,
we got Chicago, we got Washington, d C. We've got Memphis.
All these different places. This is already happening.

Speaker 3 (01:38:46):
State of Oregon.

Speaker 2 (01:38:46):
In the city of Portland acknowledged activity outside of an
ice facility that was again blocking it in a crowd
of protesters over the weekend, but they denied that it
was the kind of protests that justified federal intervention. US
District Judge Karen Immergut, who was appointed by Trump, agreed

(01:39:10):
when she issued a temporary restraining order on October the fourth,
She recounted incidents such as individual shining flashlights on drivers
and setting up makeshift guillotine. While these incidents, she said,
were inexcusable, she said they are nowhere near the type
of incidents that cannot be handled by regular law enforcement forces.
In other words, this is not a justification for Trump

(01:39:33):
to send in the army. The shining flashlights on our faces.
You know, they set up a mock guillotine over here,
so send in the army.

Speaker 5 (01:39:41):
I mean, how is setting up a moss guillotine inexcusable?
Isn't that just free speech? I mean, clearly, it's not
an intention to use it. I wouldn't think. I don't
imagine it's a functioning guillotine.

Speaker 3 (01:39:54):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:39:55):
Well, yeah, it's kind of like you see that picture
all the time of the noose that somebody put up
as part of the protests on January the sixth, and
the left loves to use that picture, and so, you know,
people put stuff up like that, But if it's you know,
they couldn't have actually probably was not sturdy enough to
actually hang pins.

Speaker 3 (01:40:16):
So it was just a protest.

Speaker 2 (01:40:17):
It wasn't an actual implement that they were going to
hang anybody. And I don't think this guillotine was actually
going to work either. But anyway, the administration has also
violated the Tenth Amendment, she said, by unlawfully attempting to
federalize the troops. She said, because the president is federalizing
the Oregon National Guard absent constitutional authority, his actions undermined

(01:40:39):
the sovereign interest of Oregon as protected by the Tenth Amendment.
The case became even more complicated when the administration tried
to deploy members from the California National Guard to Portland.
That too was blocked by Immergoot in a subsequent order.
And of course it allows somebody like Newscam, new scam

(01:41:00):
what everyone to call him, nuisance governor nuisance. It allows
him to take the high road and to push back
against this. It's like, let's not make these guys look
like heroes. And that's what I always said about what
the left was doing to Donald Trump with all this
law fair that was obviously idiotic. But now Trump is
doing idiotic things and these people can pose as defenders

(01:41:21):
of the Constitution, which.

Speaker 3 (01:41:23):
They clearly are not.

Speaker 2 (01:41:25):
They're just posers, but it lets them pose that way.
Then Chicago, by October the fourth, heg Seth had invoked
Section one two four h six to federalize three hundred
members of the Illinois National Guard. As in Portland, heg
Seth also tried to federalize troops from another state, this
time Texas and bring them to Illinois. Illinois lawsuit has

(01:41:47):
argued that Trump can't use federal troops for civilian law
enforcement because of a law known as the Posse Commatatis Act,
which prohibits such use. However, the Trump administration argued that
doesn't prevent the from using troops to protect federal assets
such as an ice facility. Well, we're seeing all kinds

(01:42:08):
of abuse. I mean, it's not just the issue with
the three hundred troops and some of them propelling out
of black helicopters and sticking guns in the face of
residents that are throwing flash grenades and all the rest
of that stuff. To me, it's so incredibly outrageous. That
was the actual implementation of what we were always concerned

(01:42:30):
about when we saw them practicing in the cities and
they were say, Oh, don't worry, we're not going to
use the military in the cities. We just practice where
we're going to be fighting. So it's like, so that
was a dimission that they're practicing to do that. Now
Trump is saying that out loud. Yeah, we're going to
practice in the cities because that's where we're going to
be fighting. We got a war within and I want

(01:42:51):
you generals and admirals to be on board with this
or else you're out. How is this not outraging the
people on the right. It's just another example of Trump
delusion syndrome. These people are so deluded that they can't
see that Trump is doing openly what we knew that

(01:43:11):
Obama was doing quietly behind the scenes. And it's even
more reprehensible when he does it openly and you don't
say anything about it as a matter of fact. You know,
take a look at this picture. This is snipers on
the roof of the building shooting rubber bullets the crowd
down below. Isn't this amazing? You know, this is what

(01:43:31):
we want here in America. We want snipers up on
the roof and black and masks shooting on people who
are protesting down on the ground. Protests have occurred in
an ICE facility near Chicago. The lawsuits said the protests
would be a flimsy pretext. They said for sending in troops.
ICE continues to operate the facility to process the hundreds

(01:43:52):
of individuals that it has detained in recent weeks. It
hasn't deterred them from operating. So you're going to use
that as a flimsy pretext to send in the army.
And then in Memphis, ten Trump has initiated a multi
pronged approach in Memphis, where violent crime was six times
higher than the national average in twenty twenty four. Yeah,
I worry about Memphis. I mean, you know when you

(01:44:14):
go back to Texas and you drive, we have to
drive through Memphis with the interstate there, and they have
shootouts on the interstate. Even going through Memphis. The crime
is really bad there. Yeah, but it is still I
don't think a federal issue.

Speaker 6 (01:44:29):
You can see the best pro shop pyramid.

Speaker 3 (01:44:31):
Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 2 (01:44:33):
In twenty twenty four, the city ranked first in the
nation for per capita violent crime as well as for
property crime. And so Trump's approach is to send in
the National Guard, but it's unclear whether they have started
operations in the city. He's got the support of the
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee, which you know a lot of
people in the conservative states. They're going to give carte

(01:44:56):
blanc to Trump to do whatever he wants. So we
could wind up getting this worse than the people in
the Democrat areas and then finding Washington National Guard troops
remaining the nation's capital nearly two months after Trump initially
deployed them over concerns that he had there. Well, while
all that is happening, and you've got all this kinetic drama,

(01:45:17):
you know, which is what they talk about the Special Forces,
for example, they could do ssyops when they would go in,
or they could do kinetic stuff jumping out of airplanes
or groppelling out of helicopters and that type of stuff.
That's the kinetic stuff. So Trump has got this, you know,
ultimate fighting contest thing going on with the troops. But
at the same time, when you look at him complaining

(01:45:38):
about tariffs and the economic impact that trade imbalance has
on us, and you look at him talking about getting
out the immigrants, the utter hypocrisy of this is truly astounding.
And this again was surprising to see this from WND.
They have focused on this H one B visa thing,
and they're getting pretty upset with Trump for doing nothing
about it. Seven and a half million foreign permits issued

(01:46:03):
in twenty twenty four, while seventeen million Americans were left
without jobs. While millions of our people search for jobs
and settle for part time work, the government is quietly
flooding the labor pool with foreigners. And you got billionaires
like the one we talked about yesterday. He says, well,
you know, the people coming in from India and other
places for the H one B thing, they're not competition

(01:46:24):
for you. You're dishwashers, you Americans, you're dishwashers. These people
are coming in for tech jobs. That's not for you,
that's for them. In twenty twenty four, only one and
a half million new jobs were created, yet seven and
a half million work permits were approved a six million
workers surplus. Add to that three point six million retirements,

(01:46:45):
four point nine million new graduates, and six point seven
million unemployed, and the total climbs to over seventeen million
Americans left behind. Biden's Bureau of Labor Statistics lied about
the job market, but the math is undeniable. Elizabeth Farah
exposes the truth and calls out President Trump to act

(01:47:06):
now and report that they put up on their website. Well,
good luck with that. Uh, it's all just it is
the theater, and he doesn't really care what happens to
us as Americans. He's there to serve the billionaires who
want to bring in cheap labor. Trump said he is
considering invoking the Insurrection Act in Portland. Trump on Monday

(01:47:27):
toll reporters at the White House that he's considering invoking
the Insurrection Act in Portland. He said, well, the protests
that are there over ice facilities, and I've got a
video about that here it is right here.

Speaker 7 (01:47:42):
Planning to in act that would be a.

Speaker 9 (01:47:46):
Very long.

Speaker 3 (01:47:50):
Yeah, Well it's been invoked before.

Speaker 9 (01:47:52):
As you know, if you look at Chicago, Chicago is
a great city, which there's a lot of crime, and
if the governor can't do the job, will do the job.
It's a very simple They probably had fifty murders in
Chicago over the last five six seven months. Many people
were shot, and then the governor gets up and he says, well,

(01:48:14):
we can handle it. They can't handle it. They don't
know what they're doing. The mayor is grossly incompetent. He's
at a four percent approval rating.

Speaker 2 (01:48:21):
But you don't have anything.

Speaker 9 (01:48:23):
I said, a four percent lowest approval.

Speaker 3 (01:48:24):
Rating constitutional lower than even Debasio.

Speaker 9 (01:48:27):
Which is hard to believe in New York. I thought
Deblasia would always maintain that record. But the Chicago guy
is even lower. So I think that, uh, we want
safe cities. If you look at DC, you would right now, Mark,
you could go out, take your family out to dinner.
You could walk right down the middle of the street.
There is no crime in DC. What I got here,

(01:48:51):
this place was a raging hell hole where people would
come from Canada, people would come from other places and
end up getting shot. Nobody's being shot. The National gunsment unbelievable.

Speaker 1 (01:49:04):
Ye.

Speaker 9 (01:49:04):
I mean they are strong.

Speaker 3 (01:49:06):
Tough guys, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:49:09):
I prefer dangerous liberty and not having a standing army
to the illusion of security, and I don't know if
what he is saying is true. He lies constantly. Even
if every word that he said was true, even if
it was a violent hell hole and you couldn't walk
down the street without getting shot, which I think is
an exaggeration, yet was pretty bad, but it wasn't that

(01:49:29):
bad even if that were true. And even if it
is now one safe, I still oppose him for doing this.
He does not have the authority to do this. And
let me tell you something, It is much more dangerous
to enable a guy to have that kind of authority
a federal government to have that kind of authority that
is not under the constitution, and to throw away the.

Speaker 3 (01:49:48):
Rule of law.

Speaker 2 (01:49:49):
That is the most dangerous thing you could do. The
worst gang that we could have is the gang that
thinks that it's doing the right thing and that has
the authority to do whatever it wishes without any control
or legal restraints. He said, Portland's been on fire for years.
So far it hasn't been necessary. But we have an
Insurrection Act for a reason. If I had to enact it,

(01:50:10):
I would do that. If people are being killed and
courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were
holding us up. Sure, I'd do that. I mean, I
want to make sure that people aren't killed as he
is shooting boats out of the water in Venezuela without
any evidence whatsoever. So he's open to invoking the Insurrection Act.

(01:50:31):
So when he commented on this judge that he appointed,
he says, so you have a judge that has lost
her way, that tries to pretend that there's no problem. Well,
the problem is is that Trump is pretending that there's
no constitution, that there's no tenth Amendment, and that there's
no Posse Comitatis Act.

Speaker 3 (01:50:50):
That's the problem.

Speaker 2 (01:50:51):
The Insurrection Act that they're talking about is from eighteen
oh seven, a federal law that allows the president to
nationally deploy the US military or to federalize troops to
quell what the president deems to be an insurrection against
the United States. And again, some scattered protests around an
ICE facility that doesn't even shut down the ICE facility

(01:51:16):
is not an insurrection. Trump has florded with invoking the
Insurrection Act before. During the twenty twenty four campaign, he
said he would use a law to suppress unrest, and
at the end of his first term in office, some
of his supporters urged him to invoke the law to
try to hold onto power after he lost the election
to Biden. So this is an article from mother Jones

(01:51:39):
that was put up by Drudge, asking is it time
for soft secession? I say it's always time for that.
This is wargaming how blue states could use their economic
clout to stand up to Trump's agenda, starting with California,
and I heartily approved this. I got to say, you know,
I had my first program back in August of twenty seventeen.

(01:52:03):
I was at Info Wars. The very first guest that
I had was somebody who again, twenty seventeen was the
first year that Trump was in office, and there were
already several people on the left who are pushing for secession,
and that was my very first guess, you know, what
can I do to help you? Because I'm always for
people having self governance, and it was good to have

(01:52:27):
somebody on the left saying this, because whenever you talk
about secession and the right of self governance, which is
the basis for the existence of the United States in
the very first place, whenever you talk about that, everybody' say, oh, well,
you are for slavery or whatever right, they'll always bring
that back. And it'say, no, that doesn't necessarily follow from
that's a spin that they put on the Civil War anyway.

(01:52:49):
In twenty thirteen, a venture capitalist Tim Draper launched a
six California's ballot initiative. The upshot was there was some
forty million people, more than the population of the twenty
smallest states combined. California was too big, too diverse to
be efficiently governed. I agree one hundred percent with that,

(01:53:10):
And I think that the United States is too too
large to be efficiently governed. And I think that the
even if the politicians were not completely bought and sold,
I think that it would still be unworkable to have
one representative for what is it now, seven hundred and
fifty thousand residents. I think that's an absurdity. So I

(01:53:32):
think it's true at the federal level, but it certainly
is true at California as well.

Speaker 6 (01:53:35):
I keep saying it, But different people generally seem to
like being governed in different ways. Yeah, yeah, Americans, you know,
generally in the past have loved liberty. They fought very
hard for it. Other countries have not. They haven't wanted it,
they haven't desired to put in the effort to get it.
That's why, again, the absurdity. I don't like democracy, but
the absurdity of exporting it, even if it was the

(01:53:58):
perfect system of government, some people don't want it. Yeah,
they have to want it themselves. The population has to
want it. If they like a monarchy, you cannot force
democracy on them.

Speaker 2 (01:54:09):
You can't impose a love for self governance. They got
it or they don't have it. That's all of our
nation building, the flaw behind all of that thinking.

Speaker 5 (01:54:18):
I know someone who lives in upstate New York, and
he's constantly complaining because he's conservative about New York City
influencing all of New York's politics, and if you're in
New York, you will get whatever New York City wants,
even though most of New York is actually pretty conservative.
And his thoughts was that once any city reaches a

(01:54:40):
certain size, it should become its own district, kind of
like DC.

Speaker 3 (01:54:44):
But that's a really good idea.

Speaker 2 (01:54:46):
I think that's exactly right because you see that in
state after state. You know, you look at Virginia and
it's the suburbs of Washington along with Virginia Beach, which
is a heavy federal military presences there. Those have those
two urban centers have washed out the votes of the
rural areas in Tennessee. Here Nashville and Memphis a real

(01:55:08):
counterweight to the rest of the state that is here.
And we saw this at a local level when we
lived in North Carolina. The community that we were in
neighbored Chapel Hill, where the University of North Carolina Chapel
Hill is, and you had a lot of people who
were part of that university mindset.

Speaker 3 (01:55:27):
I guess we could say.

Speaker 2 (01:55:28):
That had moved into that county and they were able
to take over the county government and they started putting
restrictions on farmers, making it impossible for them to do
their job and other things like that. And the way
that they did it was prior to them coming in
and changing the structure of the county government, you had

(01:55:51):
regional representation within the county, so a county commissioner would
be attached to a particular geographical area, and since they
were all clustered in one corner of the county, they
could not run the county. And so what they did
was they pushed and in the name of fairness. They
pushed the idea that everybody would be able to vote

(01:56:12):
for every councilor so you would run at large. And
once they did that, they put up a slate of electors.
And because they had a lot of people in that
one little corner there and the rest of the county
was sparsely populated, mainly with farmers, they were able to
get complete control of the county government. And so that's
really what is happening on a state by state level.

(01:56:32):
That happened in a kind of a microcosm there. So
he puts this ballot on and what he wanted to
do was to break up California into six different areas
and make them all separate states, and one of them
around the Bay Area. He was even going to name
it Silicon Valley, the state of Silicon Valley. Anyway, he

(01:56:56):
was able to get seven hundred and fifty three thousand signatures,
but that was enough to get on the ballot in California.
And then after the twenty sixteen election, when people started
pushing back against Trump, and like I said, in twenty seventeen,
I was able to talk to somebody that was part
of a California secession movement. He was able to get
the ballot on the initiative, the initiative on the ballot,

(01:57:19):
I should say, But the day before the ballots were
to be printed, the state Supreme Court blocked the measure.
They said, what do we do about things like water
treaties and things like that? So we're not going to
split up California, said the California Supreme Court. So they
took the initiative off the ballot even after they got
on there. That's why I say, you know, the way
they control the ballot, usually by the political parties, means

(01:57:41):
that democracy is not really functional, and we don't really
want to direct democracy anyway. When republic, who in republic
where you have people who are under the law and
under the constitution. Draper tapped into something that's now excruciatingly felt.
The assignment of two senators per state, no matter its population,

(01:58:01):
was always deeply flawed, says Mother Jones. Now this is
a leftist mindset which is itself deeply flawed. And I've
talked about this before as well. It's a fundamental misunderstanding
of the structure of our government to think that senators
should be directly elected. That needs to be taken out.
That was done, by the way, by a lot of

(01:58:23):
politicians who had been in the Grand Army of the
Republic who hated any state power whatsoever. These are veterans
of the Civil War and they were now in authority,
and so they wanted to crush once and for all
the power of the states and centralize as much power
as they could in Washington. That's why we had the
Constitutional Amendment for the direct election of senators. Prior to that,

(01:58:46):
senators were always directly appointed by the state government. Because
the senators were there and this reason had two per state,
regardless of the population. They were not there to represent
the people. They were there to represent the state. The
state needed to have representation as a power base. They
need representation in Congress. The House of Representatives was so

(01:59:11):
named because it was there.

Speaker 3 (01:59:12):
To represent the people.

Speaker 2 (01:59:13):
And if you look at the Tenth Amendment, it says
that the power is not delegated by the states or
by the people are held by them, right if that's
not delegated to the federal government. So they envisioned a
separation of powers and that was reflected in the bicameral
legislative body that we had. One was to represent the

(01:59:34):
power of the states. The other represent the power of
the people. And so the liberals don't understand that, they
don't care about that, and they just you know, again,
that's the reality. But it would be good for us
to have smaller, more accountable legislation that's there, and also
to be able to have some control. So what they're

(01:59:58):
talking about is what can we do economically to assert
our control. Well, we've seen a lot of this stuff
in terms of their car BRG regulations. They've exerted a
lot of bad, unwanted pressure on people by coming up
with the California Air Resources Board that comes with all
kinds of higher standards of emission and things like that.

(02:00:20):
And you've got nine states that slavishly follow whatever California does.
And that's what the left is talking about doing. Here, says,
you know, when we look at the economic cloud, the
California has a massive amount of agricultural cloud. For example,
if California were alone, it would be the fifth largest
food producer in the world, and it produces three quarters

(02:00:43):
of the fruit that we eat here in the United States.
And then we look at the tech sector, six hundred
and twenty three billion dollars in the tech sector. So
they said, let's know that economic weight around like they
throw their car regulations around, and they said, we've already
seen some examples of this. They don't mention the car thing,
but they do mention the fact that you've got several

(02:01:04):
Democrat states that came together in a coalition to push
back against the vaccine stuff. So as RFK Junior moved
slightly in the direction towards having no mandates for vaccines,
you had California and several of the left coast liberal
states came together and said, now we're going to have
a coalition that mandates these vaccines even if the federal

(02:01:26):
government doesn't do it. So they can come together and
they can use their power in an anti freedom way,
which is what they always have been doing. They're always
against our freedom, and so they're suggesting that they do
more of that. But look, this is a tactic that
could be used by conservatives as well. Come together and
a coalition between different states. Again, going back to Senator Nicely,

(02:01:48):
that was one of the dreams that he was trying
to work on. He said, if we can get Tennessee
to have gold reserves and some other things, he said
there's some other states here in the South that people
are looking at that saying, we're looking at some uncertain
economic times and we need to start setting things aside to.

Speaker 3 (02:02:07):
Help provide for that.

Speaker 2 (02:02:08):
He said, if they were to follow some of the
same paths that he was trying to get Tennessee to follow,
then we could have a regional cooperation where people could
back up this fiat currency nonsense that's going to implode
on us. And so you can do it in a
positive way as well. It's not just you know, we
see it being done by California and Oregon and Washington
and Hawaii. We see them doing it in an anti

(02:02:29):
freedom way. But we need to pay attention to this
and the mechanism of it and say we could do
the same thing and do it in a positive way. Unfortunately,
people are only concerned about coalescing around a politician or party.
They're not interested on the right in terms of coalescing
around principle anymore. The left, actually, I guess you could

(02:02:52):
say they're more principled. I just don't like their principles.
I oppose their principles, but they stick to them far
more than the right does because they don't have a
charismatic figure on the left that everybody's going to slavishly
devote themselves to. So while this is all happening, Russia
is mocking. They said civil war is coming to the US.

(02:03:13):
A Russian lawmaker, by the way, got up and said,
we should take advantage of their existing differences. We should
drive them not only to an economic shutdown, but to
a political shutdown as well. Now, this guy who is
there as a former KGB agent, he's now a Russian lawmaker.
He said civil war is brewing in America, and he
called Trump dumb. He claimed differences between the two US

(02:03:38):
political parties are quote entering a phase of being impossible
to resolve, and that the Kremlin should interfere, he said.
He said he doesn't treat claims that a civil war
in America is coming as a conspiracy theory. In reference
to the Republicans and Democrats, he said they're currently using
political repressions against each other in the most proactive way. Yes,

(02:04:00):
we agree with this analysis. I mean we can see it.
We can see how both Republicans and Democrats not only
hate each other, but they are escalating the hatred, accelerating
the coming civil war by doing things that are intended
to antagonize and accelerate all this. They will never agree
about my immigration. We've heard it from their statements. Of course,

(02:04:21):
we should take advantage of this unsolvable situation, he said.
They accuse us of meddling in their political affairs, and
he said, we haven't done that, but we should.

Speaker 3 (02:04:33):
So.

Speaker 2 (02:04:33):
The UK has suspected that this guy, whose name is
Lugovoi a former KGB officer. They accused him of being
one of two men responsible for the murder of ex
Russian spy Alexander Levinenko in London in two thousand and six.
This is the guy who died after ingesting radioactive plutonium,

(02:04:55):
which is believed to have been administered by a cup
of tea. I think there's somebody else that thought that
they had hit him with an umbrella while he was
walking down the street.

Speaker 6 (02:05:04):
Is that the same guy? I don't know, because there
was one where I'm pretty sure that they jabbed him
with an umbrella that had a little bit of some
kind of radio in the tip and into his calf.

Speaker 3 (02:05:18):
Yeah, this is the guy.

Speaker 6 (02:05:20):
They've changed the stories.

Speaker 3 (02:05:22):
Not my cup of tea anyway. Yeah, maybe Russia's.

Speaker 5 (02:05:25):
A common assassination of radioactive stuff. Seems like that would
be hard to try.

Speaker 2 (02:05:32):
Yeah, yeah, he said, we should further pit them, that is,
Republicans and Democrats against each other. He said, we shouldn't
be shy about it. They accused us of interfering in
their elections, and we should say that we aren't, and
we really aren't.

Speaker 3 (02:05:45):
But we should.

Speaker 2 (02:05:48):
So, he said, we are developing our propagandistic activities in
a positive sense in Europe and America, and we should
intensify it even more. He said, so he believes the
civil wars coming.

Speaker 3 (02:05:58):
I believe for it.

Speaker 6 (02:06:00):
I'm not too sure what he could do to heighten
the tensions. What more could you have one side that
wants to trans children, mutilate them and murder babies on
a mass scale. You can't until they.

Speaker 2 (02:06:12):
Agree to sad And now we've got the other side
that wants to send the army and all the cities
that opposed them, And so it's like, okay, what do
we do?

Speaker 5 (02:06:18):
I mean, as far as pushing this Marxist divide goes,
what more are they going to do that the Nation
of Israel and that and Yahoo aren't already doing?

Speaker 3 (02:06:26):
Yeah? Yeah, yeah, the uh to me.

Speaker 6 (02:06:29):
It's just the Left has become ontologically evil. Every policy
they advocate for is at its core evil, and you
cannot give into that. People will talk about this where
oh we need to come to some sort of consensus. No,
I'm not going to give an inch to these people.

Speaker 3 (02:06:45):
You can compromise on these types of There.

Speaker 6 (02:06:48):
Is no compromise on abortion, there is no compromise on
trans trans kids. And until they give up on those,
the left has gone insane and there is no there
is no doing business with them. They have to back down.

Speaker 3 (02:07:03):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:07:04):
Well, we're going to take a quick Well, go ahead
and read some of the comments.

Speaker 6 (02:07:07):
Bro, Thank you very much.

Speaker 3 (02:07:09):
Thanks Bro.

Speaker 6 (02:07:10):
We really do appreciate it. As criminals of the constitution.
What it undermindes America. Notice constitution is for foreigners and illegals.
Where's the constitution for the citizens?

Speaker 2 (02:07:19):
Well, that's the same type of thing we see in
the UK. They have a two tier system.

Speaker 6 (02:07:23):
You know, we'll follow the very angry when he stabbed you,
you've made him very angry.

Speaker 2 (02:07:28):
Yeah, but the same standard doesn't apply to both sides.
But that's the thing, you know, I would say, and
I have said that, you know, I think we ought
to have the rule of law and due process for
anybody who is in America, because if the government is
allowed to get rid of that for a certain class
of people, guess what they're going to expand the class
of people that they get that they love not having
to follow the rules, And so we always want to

(02:07:49):
make the government follow the rules for everybody. But you're right,
they do have a different standard. They have they have
a preferential standard here in the US, just like in
the UK.

Speaker 6 (02:08:01):
Ghost Van twenty five says, both sides use the same thuggery.
It's just not the Democrats turn right now, that's right.
Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail. Jim and
Jim Nike. Perhaps someone can come up with a twenty
point plan where police and sheriffs so the rest, well
rest criminal invaders and turn them over to Ice and

(02:08:23):
ice Guard military will not have to Well, the.

Speaker 5 (02:08:27):
Thing is, it's like with the lockdown stuff, where the
solution that they're pushing is the exact same thing that
they've been wanting to do for other reasons for so long.
You can tell that that's not the real solution when
there are also obvious solutions that could be done. Like
arresting and deporting the people that you know what I

(02:08:49):
mean is deporting the people that got arrested for other
crimes instead of just letting them go as we see
all the time.

Speaker 2 (02:08:55):
Well it's a catch and release that they do all
the time, and a lot of that is coming from
the federal g as well. You know, the model that
the founders had, which is a good model for peace
and safety. You know, they called them peace officers at
one point in time, and this is what Sheriff Mack
will talk about with the Sheriffs and Police Peace Officers Association.

(02:09:15):
That the model was that you would have an elected
sheriff that was directly accountable to the people and they
would have a very small group of deputies. Same type
of thing they did at the federal level. For the army,
you know, they would have a permanent navy because the
Navy is not going to be able to just like
the Air Force, the Navy cannot impose martial law on

(02:09:37):
people and make that effective. You have to have boots
on the ground. So they did not want to have
a standing army, but they did have an officer corps
that was there that could help to organize and people
in a situation, and so that was the idea kind
of behind the sheriff and if there was an issue,
they'd get together the posse, the local community to take
care of that. When you look at someplace like Chicago,

(02:10:00):
it's kind of I think it I'd be treated just
like the.

Speaker 3 (02:10:02):
Hole in the Wall gang.

Speaker 2 (02:10:04):
You know, this is a no go area where you've
got the gangs that are in charge of this area,
just like Butch Castiday and Sunday Skids. In the old
the Wall gang, they had this one area and you
don't go in that canyon. And so if that's going
to be the way Chicago is going to be, if
you don't have the residents who are upset enough about
it then to do something about it and push back again.

(02:10:26):
Another Western movie, The Magnificent Seven, you know the Mexican
peons that had enough of it, and so they go
get some guys to train them as well as to
come fight with them. But it was mainly they could
went to them not to say hey, will you come
in and take these guys out for and saying no,
will you train us how to fight these bandits that
have taken over our community. If they don't care about

(02:10:47):
that in Chicago, we shouldn't care about it. We just
kind of put a wall up and you know, kind
of like escape from New York. You know, this is Chicago.
This is the whole wall gang. But we do not
want to destroy the constitution in order to try to
make these people safe when they don't care about it. It's
the same thing you were saying, Travis, about going into
another country and trying to make it safe for democracy.
If the people in Chicago don't want safety, we can't

(02:11:10):
give it to them. But what is happening is when
they went into that apartment building. You saw the elderly
black lady in Chicago, where there is a lot of
crime and there's a lot of shooting rival gangs, but
she said she'd never had a gun stuck in her
face before, not until the federalized militarized police came to
Chicago repelling out of helicopters.

Speaker 6 (02:11:31):
Yeah, Honor Seeker, I wonder how many of those ICE
agents are actually foreign mercenaries explaining the need to cover
their face. And you do not trust such a homeland
military build up with so many willing participants.

Speaker 3 (02:11:41):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:11:41):
Another thing to consider is just when you make citizenship
a benefit of joining the military. It's a very dangerous precedent.
You can get a lot of people that have no
loyalty to the country or the constitution, the Ruld, the land.
They simply want to be granted access to the country
and its wealth.

Speaker 2 (02:12:00):
And then having to rely on mercenaries for your military
is another harbinger at the end of an empire.

Speaker 3 (02:12:07):
I think, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:12:09):
We have a Syrian girl. Actually, I can't come down
flat footed against federal intervention in these cities. They are
criminal and way over the line. Seems like the FEDS
do have a responsibility in the face of rogue cities
that won't protect US citizens.

Speaker 2 (02:12:23):
Well, again, I don't think that you can give self
governance and peace to people who don't value it. And
I think what they're doing is they're using this to
take it away from those of us who do value that.

Speaker 6 (02:12:35):
Ap rumble seat. The same was done during manufactured riots
in twenty twenty. These are paid goons, just as before,
to usher in martial law. They're not genuine protesters. Practically
all of it is engineered, that's.

Speaker 2 (02:12:46):
Right, Yeah, it's kabuki theater. So you know, Trump is like, well,
if you guys do this. You know, we're got to
send in the federal troops. And so you've got Soros
and company that are paying them to do exactly that.
Both sides are pushing us, accelerating us into a civil war.

Speaker 6 (02:13:00):
For the fourth turning, you could see that in the
riots there was a cohort of people that showed up
to cause violence, to throw bricks, and there was a
cohord of people that were just there to riot and
loot stores. And generally they had different objectives and they
engaged in it in different ways. You could see that
the two different groups generally had different types of people
in them, and they did different things, and they were

(02:13:24):
there was.

Speaker 2 (02:13:24):
An aspect of that would January the sixth too, which
I told people to stay away from it because you
look at these mass protests. Did they ever change anything? No,
they don't. And instead, you know, if you're there, you
always run the chance that some group is going to
come in with their own provocateurs, whether it's the government's
provocateurs or it's another NGO group that's got provocateurs.

Speaker 6 (02:13:47):
Yeah, we have for love the road. It is the
military's job to protect American foreign domestic criminals and foreign
invaders not police and sheriff.

Speaker 5 (02:13:56):
No, that's Jim Nike, Okay.

Speaker 6 (02:14:00):
Jim Nike says it is the military's job to protect
America form the best criminals and foreign invaders, not police
and sheriff. And then I guess, for love the road
says not inside the country though. That's why Washington, whoever
it was, said we shouldn't have a standing army.

Speaker 2 (02:14:15):
Yeah, I would suggest that you take a look at
what the founders say. I'll let them speak to you
on that issue. As Madison said, when they oppose a
standing army, he said, the weapons of defense abroad have
always been used as instruments of tyranny at home, and
so we do not want to have a standing army
under any circumstances. My problem is is that many of
these police forces that are set up by the cities

(02:14:37):
that are answerable to the city administration and not directly
elected by the people. They are armed bureaucrats, and I
view them as a standing army in and of themselves.
But it's even worse when it is done by the
federal government, which is totally unaccountable and not from that area.
I think it's a very dangerous thing. And there was

(02:14:58):
a sense that the founder had that, Yes, government is
there to try to preserve safety in order, but who
protects us from the government, who watches the watchers? How
do we keep these people in line? How do we
make sure that they don't become the gang, they don't
become the criminals, and they don't become the oppressors. And
if you want to take a look and what our
government has done in the name of the war on drugs,

(02:15:20):
it is not an exaggeration at all to call them
a criminal gang. It is a definition of what they
have become.

Speaker 6 (02:15:29):
Ghost Man twenty five, twenty four years of making the
American citizens the enemy has led us to the most
dangerous time ever in our history. Thank you Bush family
for your trojan horse of the patriot actiones. We owe
the Bushes so much, don't we.

Speaker 3 (02:15:43):
I saw.

Speaker 2 (02:15:46):
Today, I saw yesterday on Twitter somebody had an interview
going back to the early two thousands of young Tucker
Carlson talking to Britney Spears about politics as if she
knew anything about it. And I really trust this president.
I think we all need to get behind them Bush Well.

Speaker 6 (02:16:03):
I mean, Britney Spears is known to have such good
judgment She's completely sane and rational.

Speaker 3 (02:16:08):
Both of them pushing the Patriot Act.

Speaker 2 (02:16:09):
And at that time, you know, Tucker Carlson was working
for the man and telling everybody, don't look at Building seven.

Speaker 3 (02:16:14):
I'm not gonna play your clip at building seven. Yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:16:17):
Oh, I don't know if we could play that. Guard
Goldsmith says, ice snipers shoot pepper balls at head of
man peacefully protesting. He he links the link there in
chat high Boost does I'll play Devil's Advocate David if
a government is Darren Linton Dooty's does the Fed not
have the authority to do what is necessary? No?

Speaker 2 (02:16:38):
No, it's not there to It's just like it doesn't
have the authority to do something. If you are saying
something that is not true, you know, who makes them
the authority to decide that's not true? Who makes them
the authority to decide how states could act? We either
have sovereignty or we don't. We either have free speech

(02:16:59):
or we don't. That type of thing. I don't want
to see the government doing all this stuff. And it
bothers me. A great deal used to be when I
was a kid, people say, well, you know, don't make
a federal case out of this. We make a federal
case out of everything. Every time we see a problem,
we want the government to fix it.

Speaker 3 (02:17:15):
Number one.

Speaker 2 (02:17:16):
Number two, we don't want the state or local government
to fix it. We want the federal government to fix it.
How's that working out for us?

Speaker 6 (02:17:24):
It's not c JP rumble. Yes, we would like to
secede from New York City up here in New York State.
Good luck with that. Y'all deserve it. You all deserve
to be free of that albatross. Well, I suppose it's
more of a giant dead rat.

Speaker 3 (02:17:39):
Well, I think it's a great idea. You just have
it set up.

Speaker 2 (02:17:41):
Once your population gets to excise, you're now a state.

Speaker 6 (02:17:46):
You become your own thing.

Speaker 3 (02:17:48):
It could be something for them to aspire to.

Speaker 6 (02:17:51):
Baringer seven to seven. We already have military's police, which
is no place in a free society. Real Jason Barker.
It can always get worse, though, real Jason Barker. General
welfare of citizens is a tragedy of the commons. I
want to be responsible for my own welfare. Anything else
is not freedom.

Speaker 3 (02:18:07):
I agree.

Speaker 2 (02:18:08):
Well, we're going to take a break and we come back.
We're going to talk about some of these issues. Should
religion have influence over political decisions? Well, study a poll,
not a study, but a poll shows that over half
of adult Americans agree with a statement that religion should

(02:18:30):
not be able to influence political decisions. The question is
do they realize what is really happening here. We're going
to talk about that when we come back. Stay with us.
We'll be right back. Really listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (02:19:38):
If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Heuey Lewis
in the news, they say you'll love the classic Hits
channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now
at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 6 (02:19:55):
Starts with physical fitness and appearance. If the Secretary of
War can do regular hard pt.

Speaker 3 (02:20:01):
So every member of our joint force.

Speaker 6 (02:20:03):
It's completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in
the halls of the Pentagon and leading commands around the
country in the world. It's a bad look. It is
bad and it's not who we are.

Speaker 3 (02:20:14):
Yeah, it's not who we are. So there you go.

Speaker 2 (02:20:19):
That's he's gonna whip everybody into shape one way or
the other. Well, don't buy the lie. This is an
article from ken Ham. Over half of the US adults
claimed that religion should not quote influence political decisions. Well,
you know when Jefferson talked about the wall of separation,
you know that they love to talk about in terms

(02:20:40):
of suppressing religious expression. It was in response to a
letter from some Danbury Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut, and they said,
you know, there's been a lot of claims by your
opponent the previous election, John Adams, saying that you were
going to engage in religious repression. And he said, no,

(02:21:01):
there is a wall of separation that separates the churches
from the federal government. The reality is is that the
Supreme Court in the mid twentieth century put that wall
around churches. Jefferson was talking about that wall being around
the government. It's there to restrain the government. We want

(02:21:21):
to get the government out of church, but we don't
want to get God out of politics. So as he
points out here, this is the two thousand and five
State of Theology Survey, sorry twenty twenty five. It's published
by Lillionaire Ministries and LifeWay Research. LifeWay Research is the
LifeWay Books that used to have Christian bookstores and they

(02:21:43):
were one of the biggest ones. They were associated I
think with the Southern Baptists. But there's one statement in
the survey, says Kenhem, rewarded from previous years that I
wanted to focus on, and it's about politics, he said.
Survey respondents were asked to whether they strongly agree, somewhat agree,
what disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement, and

(02:22:04):
they could also select not sure. Statement was Christians should
not allow their religious beliefs to influence their political decisions.
Over half, that is, fifty four percent of US adults
agreed with the statement. Filtered for those with evangelical beliefs,
the numbers dropped, but only to twenty nine percent. That
means that one out of three supposed evangelicals do not

(02:22:26):
believe that their religious beliefs should impact their political decisions.
And they don't understand what a truly biblical worldview is.
And I would say they also don't even understand what
the term evangelical means. It really means to proclaim, to
proclaim good news. But it was a proclamation and they're saying, well,
we need to just keep quiet about that, right.

Speaker 5 (02:22:46):
Oh, so, I don't think they understand what the word
worldview means. That's right, it doesn't affect how they treat
the world.

Speaker 2 (02:22:53):
Yeah, he says, ironically. At the same time, ninety five
percent of that same group believe that a statement quote
the Bible has the authority to tell us what we
must do unquote, he says, So the Bible has the
authority to tell us what to do unless that is
a political decision, and then we put politics above God. Well,

(02:23:14):
he says, there is no neutrality. As Jesus said, whoever's
not with me is against me. Whoever does not gather
with me scatters.

Speaker 3 (02:23:24):
He says.

Speaker 2 (02:23:24):
Politics is legislated morality. Let's understand that, and morality is
the result of your worldview. Leftists legalize the murder of
unborn children, They legalize a genital mutilation of children and teens.
They legalize the perversion of marriage and sexuality because of
their worldview, because of their religion. They believe that absolute

(02:23:48):
personal autonomy is the highest good, and they legislate in
accordance with this belief. They are not neutral, nor are
they parking their religious beliefs at the door. When they vote,
when they propose legislation, or when they sign bills into law.
They are actively employing their religion and the decisions that
they make.

Speaker 3 (02:24:07):
And this is one thing that.

Speaker 2 (02:24:08):
We always need to be aware of, you know, just
when you go back to the statements of Supreme Court
making there's a wall of separation. We've got to separate
church and state and all the rest of this stuff.
What they're really trying to do was to suppress the
expression of religious views, and that's what this is really
about as well. They want to tell you that it's

(02:24:30):
okay for them to follow what they believe is right
and wrong, their morality wherever they get it from, but
it's not okay for you to have a view. It's
not okay for you to talk about that. If you do,
you're accused of being a Christian nationalist, which is supposedly
something that's bad. Again, this is a term they've created
that they believe they can use in a pejorative sense.

(02:24:51):
But it's another one of these things like an assault
rifle or hate speech. It's a weaponized term that really
is just a debating tactic. So he says Christians have
to do the same thing. We can't leave our Christian beliefs,
our biblical worldview at the door when we engage in
politics as a citizen or as a politician. We are

(02:25:12):
not neutral, and neither is the sphere that we are entering.
We are to seek the good of the nation that
we're in, and to use our influence as salt and
light for such a time as this, as we do
the King's business until he returns. Christians should neither be
above politics, so they make no impact on the future
of this country. In other words, we're going to stay

(02:25:32):
in our cloistered area, in our ivory tower, or whatever
he says. Neither should they be so involved in politics
that their entire hope is wrapped up in elections and legislation,
because what that does is that gets you to do
things like use as tax as a talking points USA
and Charlie Kirk, did they bring in a homosexual as

(02:25:55):
part of their presentation about the culture war? He's on
our side. Embrace this guy if he's a Republican. No,
you don't compromise your principles for political gain either. We
recognize that what happens in the White House matters, but
that God is sovereign. A good example of this is
how homeschooling is being attacked. One particular one in a

(02:26:19):
main town is very interesting. One American town takes starts
a war against homeschooling and to an enraging extreme. This
is from the Gold Report. They said, we've had a
lot of pushback against homeschooling, as it explodes when some
people saw what was happening in the schools because of lockdowns,

(02:26:40):
that helped to further the homeschooling. And they said, there
have been a lot of things that have been proposed
to try to stop this. Special exams, demanded, invasive interviews,
physical exams, odd requirements for homeschool teachers, and much more.
At times. In one case, state officials rejected a college
diploma submitted by a home school teacher because it was

(02:27:01):
written in Latin. I guess you would reply to that,
ignoramus enter alia, you're ignorant. Among other things. Now, one
main town is going to an extreme an attempt to
bar those who are connected with homeschooling from serving on
a local public board. Town officials in Dexter, Maine are

(02:27:22):
considering a proposal that bars homeschool co op leaders and
private school employees from serving on the local school board. Now,
all this is in reaction to a particular individual who
was a leader of the town's only homeschool co op.

Speaker 3 (02:27:38):
She was able to get.

Speaker 2 (02:27:39):
On the school board and they were very angry about
what she was doing. And so they got so angry
that they recalled this individual. They had a recall election
and got her thrown off the board, and that wasn't enough.
They decided, well, we don't ever want to have any
of these homeschoolers on the school board again. So they
passed a general law that is very broad and it

(02:27:59):
could be interpreted. It's written so broadly that it is
going to invite a lot of lawsuits for that town
in terms of defending the First Amendment. As one state
representative said, it exposes this town to significant liability. The
plan should be dropped and officials should recognize the right
of all Dexter citizens to serve their local public schools.

(02:28:20):
The right way to approach this is if you don't
like a particular individual, you can recall them as they did.
Instead of what they're going to do is prohibit anybody
that checks some of the boxes that she did from
ever even running for office. And so they don't want
anybody has anything to do with co op, homeschooling or anything.
The ordinance is very broad sweeping in not just paid employees,

(02:28:42):
but also volunteers, former leaders, even homeschooling parents if they
work together. It defines a co op as any organized
group of parents and guardians who collaborate to provide educational
instruction or services to their children who are being educated
at home. If you participate in something like that, you
can't run for office.

Speaker 3 (02:28:59):
In this town.

Speaker 2 (02:29:00):
So they said, the apparent assumption that those individuals can't
be in the best interest in public schools is at
heart a baseless and narrow minded one.

Speaker 6 (02:29:10):
Also, look at the way they phrase that the individuals
cannot have the best interests of the public schools. That's right,
doesn't mention the children.

Speaker 3 (02:29:18):
And its life of its own.

Speaker 6 (02:29:21):
Yeah, I say, you know, they're wrapping the children in
with the public schools. But they could, if they really
wanted to have phrased it, say the children within those
It's about the public school system. It is about the
system itself, the teachers keeping their jobs, their pay raises
the establishment, and it is simply the way they were things.

Speaker 2 (02:29:44):
We said that over and over again with these different things.
It becomes about protecting the institution. What is in the
institution's best interest. We saw this, for example in the
UK everything was help the NHS or what during the
COVID lockdown. That was the way they were selling it
to people. It wasn't like help your neighbor, or you know,
we've got to get through this and survive. For the
people that thought that it was a real pandemic, it

(02:30:05):
was about protecting the NHS, and so you see them
circling the wagons to protect these institutions because that's all
they really care about.

Speaker 3 (02:30:13):
We need to.

Speaker 2 (02:30:13):
Understand there's a huge difference between school and education. Those
two things are not necessarily even connected. And especially when
we look at the librarians. We have a trailer here
of a little thing called the librarians.

Speaker 5 (02:30:33):
I'm doing a criminal investigation into some of your staff.

Speaker 6 (02:30:38):
Essentially, the librarians are my suspects.

Speaker 9 (02:30:42):
Have you a real love of people, books and learning, You.

Speaker 1 (02:30:46):
May well consider the vocation of a librarian.

Speaker 9 (02:30:50):
It dawn on us that we would come under attack.

Speaker 3 (02:30:57):
All these film awards. This thing is made.

Speaker 5 (02:30:59):
We have librarians who are misunderstanding what is healthy and
good for children.

Speaker 6 (02:31:03):
When I was first attacked, student's mother was calling me
a pornographer, pedophile and glomer of children. Sounds good to me.
The mother sounds just and righteous.

Speaker 3 (02:31:18):
There's never been a movie more vital say the books.

Speaker 5 (02:31:21):
I was asked to be removed, and I would not
remove them.

Speaker 1 (02:31:24):
We're going to pull books off the shelves, stamp color purple.

Speaker 6 (02:31:29):
Yep, there's your nudity right there.

Speaker 3 (02:31:31):
GARRIVM Garri, this book was bad.

Speaker 5 (02:31:35):
I would like to know how the history of the
KKK is pornographic.

Speaker 7 (02:31:41):
We have a movement within America that has decided that
school boards are now where they want to push their agenda.

Speaker 11 (02:31:47):
This stuff is coming in and it's probably already there.

Speaker 2 (02:32:00):
You need to just give your money to the libraries
and public schools to shut.

Speaker 6 (02:32:03):
Up for a different kind of superhero. How pretentious and disgusting.

Speaker 5 (02:32:07):
The former students reach out to me that have.

Speaker 6 (02:32:09):
Told me books this book is gay, I'm going to
speak out. Also. Notice it's a very specific phenotype. They
all are very similar.

Speaker 5 (02:32:17):
Do not get to pick our reading material.

Speaker 7 (02:32:19):
It is ours.

Speaker 4 (02:32:21):
You're trying to arrest library.

Speaker 7 (02:32:23):
You're a fascist. You're a fascist.

Speaker 11 (02:32:27):
I cannot imagine my face on the wanted poster and
my friends being taken away in handcuffs.

Speaker 4 (02:32:33):
I can You're coming for teachers and librarians, and they
know it.

Speaker 3 (02:32:37):
This is a schedule.

Speaker 6 (02:32:39):
Our goal is to spread this into others communities.

Speaker 5 (02:32:42):
This is about taking away rights.

Speaker 11 (02:32:45):
I'm here today to implore you.

Speaker 6 (02:32:46):
You don't have the right to pedal smut to children run.
This can't be America, he says in his African tribal
colored garb.

Speaker 3 (02:32:58):
Librarians.

Speaker 6 (02:33:00):
Yes, I'm sure it's how pretentious, how self serving, how
disgustingly self obsessed.

Speaker 2 (02:33:07):
And of course it's making all the rounds. You see
all the awards that's been given at the film festivals.

Speaker 6 (02:33:12):
And if it wins an award at Sundance or south
By Southwest, chances are it's the biggest piece of trash.

Speaker 2 (02:33:18):
Well, this is an article from those on zero Hedge
from armageddon pros. Give me your children's genitals or give
me death, says Patricia Henry, your local public school librarian.
As frontline soldiers in the fight to protect and to
preserve our sacred democracy, trademarked frumpy metal puzzle and largely childless,

(02:33:40):
public school librarians are doing all they can to keep
child training propaganda flowing directly into the malleable minds of
their charges, saving our sacred democracy from deplorable mothers who
won't surrender their children's hearts and minds to the state,
except they have surrendered their kids to the state. You know,
we need to stop this stuff, but we also got to.

Speaker 3 (02:34:02):
Get our kids out of there first.

Speaker 6 (02:34:03):
And see this, See the type of people that are
teaching in schools that are the librarians, Immediately go, I
can't put them in there. It's not worth it.

Speaker 2 (02:34:14):
So this is from the movie The Librarians. They say,
librarians emerge as the first responders and the fight for
democracy and First Amendment rights. As they well know, controlling
the flow of ideas means control over communities. And so
they will control the ideas. They will control the communities,
they will control the horizontal, they will control the vertical,

(02:34:35):
and they are in control of what you see. It
is the outer limits here right in Texas. The cross
List targets eight hundred and fifty books focused on race
and lgbtqia plus stories, triggering sweeping book bands across the
US at an unprecedented rate. Somebody is always going to
decide what is going to be taught to the kids,

(02:34:57):
and so question is you can have a Marxist, lesbian,
or transgender who's going to be teaching, deciding what your
kid is taught, or you can decide what's going to
happen with that.

Speaker 5 (02:35:06):
Also, I'm so sick of these people calling a not
pushing this to children a ban. It's not banned. They
just aren't giving it to children. They aren't pushing it anymore.

Speaker 3 (02:35:19):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:35:20):
We ban alcohol for children, we ban driving for children,
we ban gun purchasing for children. There's a lot of
things that we ban for children that are not appropriate
for them. We should ban government schools. That's the next
one on the list. As tensions escalate, librarians connect the
dots from heated school and library board meetings nationwide to
lay bare the underpinnings of extremism fueling the censorship efforts.

(02:35:43):
Despite facing harassment, threats and laws aimed at criminalizing their work,
the librarian's rallying cry for freedom to read is a
chilling cautionary tale. Well, of course, these women can read
whatever books they want, but they can't read certain things
to the children.

Speaker 3 (02:36:00):
And isn't it.

Speaker 2 (02:36:00):
Interesting how upset these town councils get when you actually
start to read to them. While these librarians are giving
to the kids. You can't use that kind of language here.
You can't show those kind of pictures there, Oh really,
but you can show them to an eight year old
kid from sea to sign Shining Sea. No child is
free unless they are up to their bigoted little eyeballs

(02:36:21):
and child training porn and critical race theory furnished by
their local library. Well, the New York Times is all
on board with this book. They say at school board
meetings in different states, librarians are accused of grooming children
through pornographic material.

Speaker 3 (02:36:36):
Well that's what you call.

Speaker 2 (02:36:37):
It when you show kids pornographic material. Most of the
supposedly problematic themes deal with race, sexuality, or gender. Picture
books have even drawn heat for depicting naked children, animals,
and statues.

Speaker 3 (02:36:50):
Well that's what they arrested.

Speaker 6 (02:36:53):
Imagine that those.

Speaker 3 (02:36:53):
People in Vegas for.

Speaker 2 (02:36:55):
Yeah, so you know, I wonder if these librarians ever
banned Bibles out of their libraries.

Speaker 3 (02:37:01):
You think they maybe they would.

Speaker 6 (02:37:03):
Would they allow theology books in there?

Speaker 5 (02:37:05):
Yeah, and I'm sure all of the nudity is, of course,
just statues like that one that they showed. It's not
stuff like we've seen before where they couldn't show it
at the town council meeting because that was inappropriate for
a town council meeting. But you know, giving it to
small children, that's fine.

Speaker 2 (02:37:22):
Yeah, Yeah, this is very biased documentary.

Speaker 6 (02:37:24):
Obviously, Margaret Atwood did irreparable damage to the psychology of
a very specific type of woman. They got absolutely one
shot by The Handmaid's Tale, and they cannot be recovered.
You just have to kind of corral them and keep
them away from the rest of society. You don't let
them have any power, You don't let them do anything

(02:37:47):
of note. You get to read your awful books of
zero value and just be yourself. But we're not gonna
let you near children. We're not gonna let you teach
them anything. You can't be trusted.

Speaker 2 (02:37:58):
Yeah, I think it's funny that Karen was an extra
in The Handmaid's Tale.

Speaker 3 (02:38:02):
She didn't know what the movie was about casting.

Speaker 2 (02:38:06):
It was a horrible experience that lasted one day, and
so I'm not going back to this and I'm standing
in the sun all day and standing in slightly different
places because they're going to piece together and composite the
different shots to make it look like it was a
large crowd of them. But you know, she heard that
Robert de Vall was in town. He was doing a

(02:38:26):
movie in Durham. They were shooting. It's like, okay, well
there's an opportunity to get on this. I'll try that.
That ought to be fun, it'd be interesting, and it
was anything but And then we found out what the
what the movie is really about. Never saw the movie,
but we just found out what it was about after that. Anyway,
at stake our first moment rights. This is The New
York Times talking and support of the Librarians, and the

(02:38:50):
Librarians are shown as the vanguard of efforts to protect
the First Amendment right. That one of these school employees
appears on screen and identity camouflaginge underscores a level of
hostility that they can face right. Several of the women
featured in The Librarians were fired for refusing to remove
books from the shelves, or sometimes merely asking questions about

(02:39:12):
the directive to do so. The sense of emergency makes
the profiles encourage all the more heartening, says The New
York Times. From its superb opening credits sequenced paying tribute
to card catalogs of your to its sharp selection of
vintage clips and intimate reportage, the librarians is a well
crafted as it is profoundly alarming. I would add piece

(02:39:34):
of propaganda for the record, says this article here. The
sun zero Hedge Weimar era Berlin was a hotbed of
cultural revolution style transgender ajiprot from the history of sexuality
and law. They said, by the inter interwar years, the

(02:39:54):
years between World War One and two, adopting the term
transvestite to characterize gender variant expressions and identities had become
a possibility. Sexologist Magnus Hirschfield coined this popular label with
a bulky nineteen to ten study on the theme, publishing
numerous case histories to help distinguish transvestism from older ideas

(02:40:17):
of inversion or a third sex. New magazines were aimed
at the same sex desiring or trans identifying readers, magazines
such as girlfriend or Friendship. They seized on this and
similar labels for their potential to broaden the claims of
sex gender minorities to the full rights of legal citizenship.
So again, this is the Weiermar Republic, this corrupt republic

(02:40:40):
between the two wars in Germany, and this is really
where we are right now. Germany began pushing back against
Christianity well before the other nations did. It began with
academics and higher criticism saying, well, we're going to criticize
the Bible. That that happened even before evolution came out
to criticize the Bible because we know better, and so

(02:41:03):
we're going to come up with textual criticism, or we're
going to say that the nations that are named in
the Bible don't exist, never have exist, And of course
that was refuted by archaeology and things like that. But
then it continues to go in the direction as a
Niche said we have killed God, and by that he meant,
even though he didn't believe in God, he meant that

(02:41:25):
they had basically removed any plausible foundation for morality. And
what you wind up with is a kind of sexual
perversion that they had. In the Weimar Republic and the
Viymar era, queer and trans politics were closely intertwined. Cross stressing,
while not strictly illegal, fell under the mischievous and nuisance laws,

(02:41:46):
and many of these individuals found themselves vulnerable to arrest
under Germany's anti homosexual paragraph one seventy five. And they
call that a form of persecution anyway, this person writing
this article says, I don't know how long parents will
continue to abide the training and doctrination of their children

(02:42:06):
in government facilities whom they presumably send to public schools
expecting to learn math. But it can't be forever. So
maybe the public school librarians, if they keep it up,
might in reality instead of their own imaginations. They might
really become the martyrs of democracy. In other words, they
might actually do some good by showing people how evil

(02:42:26):
this whole system is. It could backfire like the lockdowns did.
They're currently pretending to be for social accolades from the
literal wine moms, so we'll see what happens with that.
There was an interesting article and when I saw this headline,
I thought, no, there's no way this is the case.
But this is from Brian shall Hobby at Health Impact

(02:42:47):
News and he actually brings the receipts for this, and
I'll tell you what this says. I think it needs
to be covered. Erica Kirk's evangelical Christian orphanage in Romania
was in an area that was linked to child trafficking.
And you know, I started reading this and seeing how
much has been happening. In Romania in terms of child trafficking.

(02:43:10):
Of course, you think about it. You know, why did
Andrew Tate choose Romania to go to. There's something definitely
rotten in the state of Denmark there and he did
the research with this and they found that when she
was seventeen years old, she got involved in setting up

(02:43:31):
a Romanian orphanage that supposedly was working with Christians and
the military that was there. And yet at that NATO base,
Romanian journalists had exposed that this NATO base is being
used to traffic and to prostitute children. And even the
individual who did a video with her from that military

(02:43:51):
base was one of the known individuals who was involved
in that, and so it's very suspicious. Brian Shaw Hobby said.
When I saw the story in my news feed this
weekend about Erica Kirk's past ties to Christian orphanage that
she helped to start in Romania, specifically in an area
Romania well known for child sex trafficking and oregon harvesting,

(02:44:12):
and specifically to Israel, I began to search to see
if I could get more information. When my initial searches
on the US based search engine sites all returned a
full page of fact checking websites trying to debunk this story.
I knew right away that there was something to this.
Otherwise the fact checking websites would not have even bothered
to addrust the story. This is news that they don't

(02:44:33):
want made public. I am not unfamiliar with the topic
of using Evangelical Christian orphanages outside the US to traffic children,
he said. Now, I remember years ago there's a lot
of talk about adopting kids out of Romania as well
as Russia. For a short period of time it would happen,
and we were looking at it because it was so difficult,
if not impossible, to adopt here in the US, and

(02:44:56):
at the time we had been unable to have kids.
People telling them us, well, they're doing a lot of
adoptions out of Romania or out of Russia or whatever.
We looked into it, it's like, well, no, I'm not
so sure that in Russia they're not taking these kids
away from their parents. And a lot of these kids,
you know, had parents that you know, were political enemies
of the system or whatever, so we were kind of

(02:45:18):
concerned about that. Also in Romania and China, it was
a bit different because we understood what the situation was there,
the parents were surrendering their kids because of the one
child policy. Now, you know, adopting a child in that's
kind of a situation was not going to change, not
going to encourage the one child policy. As a matter
of fact, it was the adoptions by Americans that actually

(02:45:41):
embarrassed the Chinese to the extent that they stopped that.
And in the case of our daughter, she was abandoned because,
like a lot of other kids who had medical issues,
she had hydro and cephalis at birth and water on
the brain, and so they abandoned her for that. A
lot of kids were abandoned because it had a cleft
palace and the Chinese government would not help people with it,

(02:46:03):
and they were so poor they couldn't afford to have
the operation. So Americans, you know, they abandoned them and
put them in orphages, and that's where our daughter was put.
And so, you know, when you look at a situation
like that, they have to be very careful whether you're
adopting domestically or whether you're adopting foreign and you have
to be careful about whether or not this child has

(02:46:26):
essentially been kidnapped by the government for whatever reason and
kind of trying to think about that from a perspective
about what is best for the child. So I don't
categorically embrace adoption or categorically condemn it. I think Brian
saw Hobby does at some point kind of fall in

(02:46:48):
the camp of categorically opposing adoption because there have been abuses.
So while the corporate news, he says, is trying hard
to squash this story about Erica France France, I guess
how you pronounced her name before she married at Charlie Kirk.
Here are two good sources that have done an investigative
report on her past, including her parents' connections to the

(02:47:08):
US military, to the US government, and to Israel, as
well as translating some Romanian publications into English. So in
an interview that she claimed that she and her husband
and her mother, Laurie, moved from Ohio to Arizona due
to her mother working with Homeland Security and the Defense Department. Meanwhile,
her divorced father, Kent, who also lives in Arizona, headed

(02:47:32):
the military industrial complex Giant Raytheon's Israel branch. Erica won
the Miss Arizona beauty contest and competed in Trump's owned
Miss USA pageant. Less than a year after finishing her
reign as Miss Arizona and competing in the Trump owned
Miss USA pageant in twenty fourteen, Erica stayed. In an

(02:47:54):
interview with the Arizona Foothills Magazine, she said, over the
past two years, we have gone global with our Romanian
Angels project. We've teamed up with a US Marine Corps
to joint sponsor an orphanage in Constanta, Romania. I absolutely
love working with the military, so I feel blessed that
we can do this on a continual basis through Arizona

(02:48:15):
I'm sorry, Antonio Placement Center in Costanta, Romania. This timeline
places her Romanian Angels program likely begun in twenty eleven
or twenty twelve, which seems odd since it was apparently
soon to be closed.

Speaker 3 (02:48:31):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (02:48:31):
Strangely, no record of its official closure date can be
accessed on the internet. This her European offshoot abroad, evolved
from an NGO charity called Everyday Heroes Like You in
the US that she founded at the tender age of
seventeen in two thousand and six, until her Romanian Angels

(02:48:53):
program was reportedly shut down in twenty eleven or twenty twelve,
not long after it was opened. Why because in all
probability it risked exposure as part of the global child
trafficking scandal that was gripping Romania. And again, you know,
why is it that Andrew Tate would go to Romania
of all these different countries.

Speaker 3 (02:49:14):
The Sky is absolutely a.

Speaker 2 (02:49:16):
Human trafficker, engaged in sex, slavery, among other things. September
of twenty ten, an Al Jazeera article said dozens of
people from Romania's eastern town of Tandarai are to go
on trial accused of sending children to the UK to steal.
According to the UN Children's Fund, about eighty thousand children

(02:49:40):
from Romania live in institutions or with substitute families, away
from their parental care. Following an investigation by Romanian and
UK authorities, Tandarai, a small town in the east of
the country, has become the center of an international investigation
over alleged child trafficking. The people are about to go

(02:50:01):
on trial accused of training children to become criminals and
sending them to Britain to carry out crimes. So I
guess that's where Fagan relocated to out of Oliver Twist
artful dodger. They got a whole community training people to
be pickpockets, I guess. October twenty eleven, The New York

(02:50:22):
Times detailed a human interest expos focusing on the valiant
efforts of one brave Romanian woman who dedicated her life
to rescuing young girls from the child sex trafficking epidemic
ravaging in and around Constanta, where Erica's program operated, So
she goes, her program is right at the epicenter of

(02:50:44):
this massive child trafficking program there, while Romania's child trafficking
hub is identified by international media in both Tenderaie and
nearby Constanta, where Erica, barely out of adolescence, set up
shop with the our own orphanage charity operation, remember seventeen
years old. What are the odds that it's right where?

Speaker 3 (02:51:06):
And when?

Speaker 2 (02:51:07):
The locals become so fed up seeing children disappearing from
their orphanages preyed upon by evangelical charity missions fronting large
scale criminal trafficking rings that Constanta residents complained to the
local police. They said Constanta in twenty ten and eleven
apparently provided a safe haven for barbarism amidst a child

(02:51:29):
trafficking epidemic of orphans gone missing and winding up as
child sex slaves in UK, Israel and remote private islands,
like you know one person who did that. Haretz published
an article as far back as December of two thousand
and one titled Romania probe's Israeli adoption agency link in

(02:51:52):
organ trafficking. So it was not just sexual trafficking, but
extracting organs from them as well, extracted by rape and
sodomy to Israel and UK and other places around the globe.
And this is where Erica chose to set up shop.
Very suspicious to say the least, and she was seventeen
years old at the time. For the pedophilia scourge in

(02:52:15):
Romania to have grown so egregious by twenty ten and
eleven that the local residents in that region registered formal
complaints to legal authorities that were reported in The New
York Times and Al Jazeera that various foreign evangelical charities
were disappearing their local orphan population at an eye popping,
highly visible rate. It has to have been pretty horrific.

(02:52:38):
The notorious child trafficking ring grabbing world headlines in twenty
ten and eleven was grotesquely flourishing at exactly the same
time and place when Erica was running her joint Christian
US Marine Corps charity operation. It was at the very
height of Constanta's negative pedo exposure that Erica's charity was
apparently shut down. So he says, if you think all

(02:53:02):
these factors are simply happenstance, think again. Yet today's legacy
media fact checkers insist that Erica's Romanian Angels operation back
in twenty ten, eleven, and twelve was all squeaky innocence
and evangelically clean. Think again, He said, what are the
odds that this seventeen year old girl, Erica, living an
upscale Scottsdale, Arizona in two thousand and six would suddenly

(02:53:26):
become the founder of an international five oh one charity
NGO project called Everyday Heroes Just Like You. Of course,
unlike her mother, she happened to be working with the US,
who happened to be working with the US Department of
Defense and Homeland Security. Erica freely admitted in an interview,
while her divorced father was also an Arizona resident, was

(02:53:49):
busy founding the US military Industrial complex, giant Raytheon's Israel Division.
Right away, we know that Erica was groomed within the
cabal system to protect Zion Israel under the cloak of
evangelical Christians that aggressively recruit and exploit Christian Zionists for
the Jewish States cause. This wonder woman, Erica, or more

(02:54:11):
accurately wonder Girl, as she was still a teenager in
two thousand and six, was already reportedly employed as a
model and entertainment casting director. She's obviously been groomed for
bigger and better things to come, like her marriage to
Charlie Kirk after both of them meeting where else but Israel.
And then there's the NATO connection. He said, I found

(02:54:34):
Erica's video where she's creating a video about Romanian angels.
It's mostly about giving gifts to kids, but she thanks
Colonel Otto Busher US Army, US Marine Corps. Erica Kirk,
known by her maiden name at that time, thanks Otto
Buscher in the Romanian Angels video. A search for Otto

(02:54:56):
Buscher brings up articles in Romanian about the sex trafficking
of children. This is the NATO connection. Journalist Ian Spanu
presents the revelations of a former translator of the American
military base there. She is Anna Maria Nishiu, who claims

(02:55:16):
that a real brothel operated in this military unit were
underage girls brought here to satisfy the desires of some soldiers.
Anna Maria Nishu notified the Prosecutor's office about this brothel
on the premise that the military base on the premises
of the military base, and although there was an extensive
investigation carried out by the American and Romanian authorities, the

(02:55:37):
agreement that had been signed in two thousand and one
between the two countries was invoked. In that agreement, Romania
had ceded the right of investigation of the American military
to the USA. Among those who would have benefited from
the services of the girls would have been the commander
of the Black Sea Area Support Team Base Auto Busher,

(02:56:00):
the guy that she did the video with, helped by
his right hand senior adjutant platoon leader Lloyd Sparks. The
document contains absolutely incredible information and details, which the author
of the complaint, Anna Maria Nishu, argues with concrete evidence
which under normal circumstances would have led to convictions with

(02:56:23):
long prison terms. However, since we're talking about military interests
the US, NATO, US and NATO, there are forces that
always try to put the matter on the back burner.
And of course there was a talk given in the
military base thereful Fort Bragg that there was a drug
and prostitution ring that was operating out of that and

(02:56:44):
what blew that up was some of the competition. They
had a couple of people that were killed.

Speaker 6 (02:56:49):
Yeah, it was like something out of Scarface. Yeah, the
way it was going back and forth, just the number
of people that were dying from special forces.

Speaker 2 (02:56:56):
And so you got some special Forces guys decided there
was set up a drug and prostitution ring and they
were often their competition or people found out about it,
and so you know that kind of stuff can happen
in the US. Can you imagine in Romania where it's
at the very center of a child trafficking area that's
there and that's where she and her parents happened to

(02:57:18):
set this in goo up international non governmental organization set
up by a seventeen year old. Yeah, right, Just so
happens that our parents are knee deep in NATO, the
military industrial Complex, and Homeland Security and Department of Defense.
Romania is in the first place, not only in delivering
girls from human trafficking networks in the EU, but also

(02:57:40):
for trafficking women for NATO soldiers has happened in Kosovo, Kuwait,
Bosnia and Herzegomenia. The Daily continues the series about the
allegations regarding the existence of brothel of the American military
base there, with documents of the offers that they made
for girls services, and they found on a computer belonging

(02:58:01):
to another employee of the base who translated the commander's
messages to prostitutes, which even included the amounts that he
paid for services. So I just put this out there
because we should always know who these people are. And
it's when you look at this, there's a lot of
I think a lot of trust that's being misplaced in

(02:58:24):
these people. Virginia, meanwhile, has had one of their bands
on conversion talk therapy for miners struck down. This is
the same type of thing that is happening in Colorado.
They also did it in Virginia. And it's to say
that you can counsel kids to think that they're in
the wrong body, but if you tell them anything other

(02:58:45):
than that, you were prohibited from that. And so they're
doing that to Christian counselors. That's why they use the
term conversion, and they use the term therapy because they
want to harken back to times when people were using
electro shock against kids like that.

Speaker 3 (02:58:59):
Let's take a look.

Speaker 6 (02:59:00):
Virginia has been thoroughly overrun by leftists. Oh the DC area.
That's absolutely right, skunk Collo rose gardens. Thank you very much.
He says, have a great day, everyone, and I echo
that sentiment.

Speaker 3 (02:59:12):
Yes, thank you, Audi m Our.

Speaker 6 (02:59:14):
Civil war will only happen if Americans are dumb enough
to take de bait. Prairie Flower. Seventeen fifty local libraries
and local clinics are asking for photo ID on file
in the name of safety. Soon they'll make people take them. Craziness.
I went to get a library card when we first
moved to Texas and they required three forms of ID
and I just said, now I'm done, boogeyman, catch up.

(02:59:37):
Government schools shouldn't exist. I agree, and that's a good
sentiment to end the program on. I hardly agree with
that government schools must be abolished.

Speaker 2 (02:59:46):
Yes, we must have the separation of school and state.

Speaker 3 (02:59:51):
That's what needs to be separated.

Speaker 6 (02:59:52):
And the separation of librarians, children.

Speaker 3 (02:59:55):
Way far away from each other. You all have a
good day. Yeah, the common man.

Speaker 2 (03:00:12):
They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They
created common Past to track and control us. They're Commons
project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.

(03:00:33):
But each of us has worth and dignity created in
the image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want.

Speaker 3 (03:00:43):
To take away.

Speaker 2 (03:00:44):
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

Speaker 3 (03:00:55):
It's time to turn that around.

Speaker 2 (03:00:56):
And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #2112: Pandemic Treaty for Global Slavery

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

All Episodes

Wed Episode #2112: Pandemic Treaty for Global Slavery

Dateline NBC