Episode 350: Port Arthur

The Port Arthur massacre was a tragic mass shooting event that occurred on April 28-29, 1996, at the Port Arthur Historic Site in Tasmania, Australia.

It is considered the deadliest mass shooting in modern Australian history and was primarily responsible for the draconian gun laws that followed. 

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/TheFactHunter
Website: truthernet.com
Email: [e-mail]
Snail Mail: George Hobbs PO Box 109 Goldsboro, MD  21636

Show Notes:
Port Arthur
http://thedarktruth.org/2016/03/09/port-arthur-massacre-mossad-operation/
East Palestine https://x.com/rawsalerts/status/1928946954236506538?s=46&t=ytitK_qmWZMvJd0lLKbt-g
Remember June 8th, 1967, the anniversary of the USS Liberty 
Bone drugs https://x.com/americareal3/status/1928441640022397385?s=46&t=ytitK_qmWZMvJd0lLKbt-g
FDA  https://youtu.be/BgWun8AkUWs?si=LhC88m9_ybyQGLX4

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
The following presentation is Del Marvis Studio's production.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
You're listening to the fact Hunter Radio Network. Here is
your host, George Hobbs.

Speaker 3 (00:17):
Welcome back truthseekers from around the world. It's time for
another edition of the fact Hunter podcast as we record
on this Tuesday morning, June third, twenty twenty five. Hope
this finds you well. Everybody had a great weekend and
we are finally having some very nice weather. We had
a lot of rain last week. As I mentioned on

(00:37):
my substack. Please do check out our substack. It's a
substack dot com backslash the fact Hunter. Check out the
website sugarnet dot com. Questions, comments, concerns. Maybe you'd like
to join the podcast. It is the fact Hunter at
mail dot com. We have a lot to talk about today,
so we're just going to jump right into it several

(00:59):
times before we jump into Port Arthur. In something I'll
say ahead of time, this is a subject that I've
looked into for a long time, but it's not something
I've really taken the time to deep dive. And there's
so many conflicting stories on this, and I've been getting
emails for many years from listeners in Australia. So this

(01:23):
will probably be a part one and I'm hoping later
in the summer early fall. We're trying to get a
subject matter expert author on the podcast who can delve
a little deeper from that area with a little more knowledge. Right,

(01:44):
I'm very familiar with things in the United States, whether
it be nine to eleven Waco, Oklahoma City, but I'm
not as familiar as Port Arthur or let's say the
seven to seven right July seventh train bombings in I
say it was two thousand and five or two thousand
and six. I remember being in Iraq watching it on

(02:06):
the news. So we're going to do our best. But
there's a lot of things going on in the world
that needs our attention, so we're going to jump right
into it. President Trump has tasked software giant Pallentteer with
a job of creating a national database containing private information
on all citizens. Now, let's not fool ourselves. This has
been going on since the days of the early days

(02:30):
of the FBI Jadgar Hoover, right, But this is next level.
This is kind of a prelude to the Social credit score,
the official the public disclosure of you know, we're going
to be keeping tabs on you. Right, And this was
published by Jeffrey Greider now theendegins dot com. So Donald

(02:55):
Trump was re elected last November, software company called Palatine
has come up in the conversation over and over. Back
in the early days of the scandemic, Pallenteer was tasked
by Trump to create a tracking database of Americans who
have taken the vaccine and more importantly, those who refused.

(03:16):
Last December, we showed you the connection between Pallenteer and
the mysterious and still unexplained drone sightings. Right. That's interesting.
That's something we didn't get to deep into, and this
author's making the connection that maybe it's the database in
the drone sightings. If I was going to make one

(03:36):
of those cheesy mid nineteen nineties Christian prophecy movies, I
would put Pallenteer right in the middle of the action
as the wealthy, evil doing corporation bent on destroying humanity. Remember,
we were promised by Trump this new golden age of America,

(03:58):
but instead we're getting this technocracy once again. As I
not so boldly predicted, all of these things that were
promised to us over the summer and into the fall,
have not come about. The only thing that has happened
is really the expansion of well number one, I should say,

(04:21):
the manipulation of the stock markets, the corporations growing larger.
And that's something that we've noticed too. We've rarely, and
I mean rarely, eat at a corporate fast food restaurant.
And that's not because I'm sticking it to the man.

Speaker 2 (04:41):
Bro.

Speaker 3 (04:42):
No, it's just like small business. Right, I owned my
small business. I knew that the ability to feed my
family rested within the failure or success of my small business.
You know, you care, you pay particular attention the people

(05:03):
who work for corporate entities like McDonald's and KFC or
in this you know, in this case, Arby's. They truly
don't care. But what's even more interesting, you know, some
of these folks are making like four times what we
made when we were you know, going through high school
or just out trying to make ends meet. Right, I

(05:26):
was working two jobs when I was young and married. Uh,
there's just it's funny. So I'm just a quick you know,
I'm sorry to get off topic. But we were out
and about in Milford, Delaware yesterday and it was late
we had nothing set up for dinner, and our daughter said, hey,
let's just get Arby's today. I mean, who could turn

(05:47):
down curly fries and it's been a long time, why not?
So we get to this fairly new Arby's that was
just built off I think one p thirteen down in Milford.
Anybody who's been down to the beaches in Delaware knows
that road. But there was no line at all. We
pull up. We were there for three minutes in front
of the little speaker box before someone finally answers welcomes

(06:11):
me to Arby's. It took four times to get my
order through for all three of us. It's difficult. Apparently
we were told to pull around. We paid the thirty
two dollars for three mails at a fast food restaurant,
and we were told to park because it was going
to be a while. Mind you, we were the only

(06:32):
people there. And I can't stress enough how little we
eat at fast food restaurants. I can count on my
hand to the number of times a year we do.
So it was we timed it. It was either eleven
or twelve minutes before they finally got our order out.
It was completely wrong and I am the type of person. Honestly,

(06:53):
I will email a business if they do things very
well as my as I do when things get screwed up.
But I knew it was they don't care. They truly
don't care. But in this day and age, you know,
this golden era, we are so far away from it.
And I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but man,

(07:16):
how everything has collapsed since twenty twenty. You have people
and I share this with friends and listeners. Again, there's
a Dunkin Donuts that we pass all the time. They
have huge signs up. You know, we are looking for employees.
We started eighteen dollars an hour. Boy, could you imagine
all of us? You know, my age in the eighties,

(07:39):
we were delivering papers. We were getting up at five
o'clock in the morning, rolling up the papers, getting on
our bicycles, you know, hitting them, you know, throwing them
as we drive by. Mom gets a phone call ten
minutes before we catch the bus. Mister Jones said his
paper was wet. You need to get to another one.
I'd have to hop on my bike. The struggles were real, man.

(08:03):
And now you know somebody made such a you know,
astute thing, you know, post yesterday on social media. How
you know, the these soft times create soft men, and

(08:24):
then that creates hard times, and we are in those
hard times. Not everything is out of balance, everything is
out of whack, everything is teetering. And again we're promised
all of these things from people who will never ever
have any type of accountability. Right, we are promised a

(08:44):
new golden age. Everything's going to be fixed. And we
hear it every two years or every four years, you know,
insert whatever local or state level or federal government level election.
We have gone from extremely bad to very very horrific
in the Delaware state governor position, someone who made a

(09:06):
huge post about pride month. Of course, pride is the
sin that befell Satan Lucifer, but it's championed in this
evil world, and our governor made a huge post about it,
created this whole bench, all these high ranking people within
the state that will spend all types of time and

(09:29):
taxpayer money coming up with this LBGTQ base for our state.
It's evil. It's evil, and we have made a conscious
effort to step away from many secular things. Right, And

(09:53):
we were taught there was a time and age in
this country where values and morals were and taught. Now
everything is askewed. But now you know, as you all
know I think was May seventh, you have the real
ID requirements becoming a law here in the United States.
Now Trump has tasked Pallentteer with a taking separate databases

(10:16):
containing information on American citizens and using their foundry software
to compile it into one big, beautiful database. In short,
the very person we elected to keep us safe from
this sort of thing is the very person who was
forcing it upon us. How is that for irony? And again,
you know, we lost a lot of listeners because we

(10:38):
talked bad of Trump. And even though I quoted Psalm's
one eighteen eight over and over endlessly, people still put
their blind faith into someone who genuinely it will be
very much a part of the downfall of America over
the this year, in the next few years, as he
was in twenty twenty empowering corporate America and all the

(11:02):
very small, tiny victories people will blow out of proportion.
So now he's tasked a private company, which you know,
he's giving hundreds of billions of dollars to to come
up with this foundry software to compile it into one big,
beautiful database like his big beautiful bill. Right. In short,

(11:23):
the very person we elected to keep us safe is
the one again forcing it on us. So again from
the New York Times, they say, in March, President Trump
signed an executive order calling for the federal government to
share data across agencies, raising questions over whether he might

(11:45):
compile a master list of personal information on Americans that
could give him untold surveillance power. And they expanded Palatine's
work across federal government in recent months. If you recall,
the company has received more than one hundred and thirteen
million dollars in federal government funds since Trump took office

(12:09):
just four months ago, including additional funds from existing contracts
as well as new contracts with Department of Homeland Security. Right,
They're not protecting DHS, isn't protecting us from foreign entities?
That this is the big surveillance state. This, all of

(12:30):
these things that we are suffering from are things we
begged for under duress. Right nine to eleven. Please take
our freedoms as long as you keep us secure. Twenty twenty,
Please take our freedoms as long as you keep us healthy,
as long as you keep us safe. By the way,
those numbers from DHS and the Pentagon does not include

(12:53):
that eight hundred million dollar contract that the DoD was
awarded last week, which has not been spent as of yet.
Representatives of Palenteer are also speaking to at least two agencies,
Social Security and IRS about buying its technology. According to
six government officials and Palateer employees with knowledge and discussions,

(13:18):
the push has put a key Palentteer product called Foundry
into at least four federal agencies, including DHS and HHS.
So while they are adopting this Foundry again, which organizes
and analyzes data, it paves the way for Trump to

(13:41):
easily merge information from different agencies and to create a
next level Big Brother. Right, this collection of personal details
of American citizens is not just a pipe tream. The

(14:03):
Trump administration had already sought access to hundreds of data
points on citizens and others through government databases, including their
bank account numbers, the amount of their student debt, their
medical claims, and any disability status. Trump could potentially use
such information to advance his political agenda and policing immigrants,

(14:25):
punishing critics, and you know, so on and so forth.
Privacy advocates, student unions, labor rights organizations have fought laws,
lawsuits to black assets, questioning whether the government could weaponize
people's personal information, on and on. But that's the gist

(14:47):
of it, and again another huge overstep on our boundaries.
And what will be done with it or about it? Nothing?
Nothing will be done about it. That's the way the
cookie crumbles. Another big story we really need to talk
about is last week the FDA approved Maderna's next COVID

(15:15):
jab and it is a COVID mRNA injection that had
no placebo controlled trial. So please warn your family, your friends,
those who are still taking part of this massive science experiment.

(15:37):
And that's putting it nicely. This authorization appears to align
with their so called evidence based approach to COVID nineteen vaccination.
According to Maderna, the US Food and Drug Administration has
approved next Spike, a new vaccine against COVID nineteen, for

(15:57):
use in all adults sixty five and older, as well
as individuals age twelve to sixty four with at least
one or more underlying risk factors. According to the CDC,
the FDA's approval of next Spike is based on results
from a randomized observer blind active controlled Phase three clinical trial.

(16:23):
Maderna expects to have next Spike available for eligible populations
in the US for the twenty five twenty six respiratory
virus season, which means in about two months, alongside SPIKEFAX
and RESVIA. So there you go, And according to the FDA,

(16:50):
Maderna is only planning to begin Phase four, which is
randomized observer blind with placebo controlled study and adults aged
fifty to sixty four, not until November thirtieth, twenty twenty five.
And these jobs will already be three months old by them,

(17:12):
and they won't have the final results until January of
twenty twenty seven. So why is the FDA allowing these
jobs to go out when the results of these trials
won't become public for two more years. Meanwhile, the trial
used to justify this approval was not placebo controlled. Instead,

(17:33):
it was merely compared to Nextpike to Maderna's previous COVID
nineteen shot. This means the FDA fully licensed next Bike
for broad use without ever having seen placebo controlled safety
data in the exact population now being targeted. And this

(17:56):
approval directly contradicts a recent public statement by an h
eighth spokesman, who told the Washington Post quote all new
vaccines will undergo safety testing and placebo controlled trials prior
to licensure, a radical departure from past practices. It didn't happen.
And based on this extremely disappointing and dangerous development, it

(18:18):
can be assumed that biofarm complex, the biopharmaceutical complex we
should say biopharmaceutical complex, still exerts majority control over our
regulatory agencies. And doctor John Campbell, who is the SME,
the subject matter expert on this, did a about a

(18:44):
I think this is about a fifteen minute clip. Normally
I don't play clips this long on a podcast, but
it's very important and again please share it with family, friends,
and loved ones who are still subjecting themselves to these vaccines.
Here is doctor John.

Speaker 4 (19:01):
Well Well, and welcome to this talk. Now, the FDA
in the United States has just approved a new vaccine,
an mRNA maderna vaccine with known serious adverse events and
known multiple other adverse events. This is disappointing. To put
it mildly, I think we have to assume that the
American bureaucracy and the FDA is more of an oil

(19:25):
tanker which is going to take a while to turn around,
rather than a sailing yacht which can tack quickly. Let
me immediately give you the evidence for this claim.

Speaker 2 (19:34):
Here we are here.

Speaker 4 (19:35):
This is the letter granting biological license application approval, and
really quite a concerning event. Now this is the this
is the vaccine here m N spike. Now she probably
worked out from this. This is an mRNA vaccine that

(19:56):
produces spike protein. I know, I know the lipid nanoparticles
will go everywhere.

Speaker 2 (20:03):
I know.

Speaker 4 (20:05):
Serious adverse events of this vaccine from the manufacturer's own information,
serious adverse events were reported by two point seven percent
of participants who receive this new vaccine. The comparative vaccine
it was two point six percent. So the new vaccine
two point seven percent serious adverse events, the older vaccine

(20:28):
that disreplacing two point six percent, and of course the
presumably this is a vaccine to combat JN one variant.
Now let's just so basically, the FDA has just approved
a preparation here with two point seven percent incidents of

(20:48):
serious adverse events. I would not dream in clinical practice
of giving a treatment that had a two point seven
percent risk of serious adverse events unless there was a
really big risk. There was a really big risk benefit analysis.
So if the patient's about to die of something, of
course it's an acceptable risk. But for any benefit you

(21:09):
would get from this two point seven percent, I just
find this amusing that this could possibly be authorized.

Speaker 2 (21:19):
We already know.

Speaker 4 (21:20):
We already know from other studies the high incidence of
adverse events. So this, for example, is all adverse events
reported to VARs. We see the massive increase when the
MRINA vaccines were rolled out.

Speaker 3 (21:38):
This is the.

Speaker 4 (21:40):
Domestic data with deaths after the roll out of the vaccine. Again,
massive increase in the VERARS reporting, and this is related
to influenza vaccine. One hundred and eighteen times more adverse
events were reported compared to influenza vaccine. So how this

(22:02):
can be approved is rather a mystery to me, I
must say, but it is now. Fortunately we've got this information.
Here is the this is what you call the packet insert.
It's what the nurses and doctors can see when they
give this. So we're able to get quite a bit
of relevant information here. This is in the public domain.

(22:23):
I put the link to it, of course, and it
tells us quite a lot of interesting facts which I'm
about to sort of try and summarize a little bit
because it's a bit complicated. Let's start off with that. Now, well,
that's where we got this information from here to begin with,
and that's the medium follow up of eight point eight months. Now,
of course eight point eight months medium follow up is

(22:44):
not enough to tell us about other adverse events such
as potential malignancies, for example, So it's a pretty short
follow up in terms of that. Participants received either this
MYRNA one two eight three, which is the new one,
or this mRNA one two seven three, which is the

(23:05):
which is the old, the old Maderna vaccine. Now, the
key thing here is, obviously you can see that what
they're doing here is comparing their new vaccine with the
old vaccine. Not a placebo, not a placebo, So the
comparing one one of their vaccines with another one of
their vaccines and saying, oh, isn't this good. We're getting

(23:27):
we're getting a we're getting benefit from it. This is
the clinical trial here. Again, you can read that for yourself.
It's all there. It's the clinical trial. This is the
Maderna report, which is just the industry report on the vaccine.
Here's this more on the study details. And now there's

(23:48):
some interesting things on this that I'm not going to
cover in this video. We'll probably cover it later. There's
one I'm concerned about related to pregnancy, but I'm not
going to cover that now. That's actually on this one. Yeah,
but we'll stick to the basics on this one. First
of all, So, I mean, this is what they're claiming,
that nine point three percent higher relative vaccine efficacy compared

(24:11):
to but you know, protecting against what you know that is,
so you know that the claim the claiming a slightly
higher rate of protection. But let's let's go on and
look at some of the side effects and contraindications that
this vaccine has. Admittedly that the manufacturers emitting have contraindications,

(24:35):
do not use m N spike to individuals or the
known history of severe allergic reactions. This is not concerning
at all. This is universal. It would always be the case.
You never give something obviously, never give a drug to
something that a patient's allergic to, obviously, So that's not concerning.
This is concerning myocarditis and pericarditis. Increased risk of myocarditis

(24:58):
and pericarditis confirm risk has been highest in males twelve
to twenty four years of age confirmed, but I wouldn't
have it even mold. Onset of symptoms typically in the
first week following vaccination, typically in the first week following vaccination.
This is for my carditists specifically, although some individuals with

(25:18):
my charditists and or pericarditists following administration of mRNA covid
vaccines have required intensive care support. See see the way
They put this almost as a throwaway, although some individuals
with myocarditis or pericarditists following administration of mRNA covid vaccines
have required intensive care support, and they go on. Available

(25:41):
data suggest individuals typically have resolution of symptoms within a
few days with conservative management. So yes, some people have
been admitted to some people have been admitted to all
though some individuals of MICA acts of peras following administration
have required intensive care support.

Speaker 3 (26:01):
There you go. I'll put the link in the show
notes if you want to listen to the entire fifteen minutes.
But I think those seven minutes you get the gist
of the dangers and once again the throwaway. Oh, by
the way, yeah, you may have a heart attack or
you may have required intensive care support. This is next
level evil. This is not healthcare. This is not healthcare whatsoever.

(26:27):
This mRNA technology is to healthcare what abortion and assisted
suicide is to healthcare. It's evil. So please share this
information with your family and friends. Another concerning bit of
news that I'd like to share with you all, And
this has come to light in the recent days, and
I've mentioned this for the last year and a half.

(26:51):
I was boots on ground last March February March, whenever
it was femus toxic cover up on rabl as cancer
clusters become top concern in East Palestine, Ohio. Written by
Lance Johnson, this was published yesterday. The Biden Administration's FEMA

(27:14):
deliberately concealed environmental and human health harms posed by the
Norfolk Southern Train derailment and illegal vent and burn operation
in East Palestine while residents suffered in ignorance. Newly released
FOIA documents expose a chilling betrayal. Federal officials knew the

(27:37):
toxic plume unleashed in February of twenty three carried long
term carcinogenic threats, yet they silenced the whistleblowers, avoided public engagement,
and manipulated data to downplay the crisis. Now has cancer
cluster's threat in the community. The EPA's riked testing methods

(27:59):
and FEMA's negligent stand exposed in a scandal of corporate
collusion and government moufeasance. So some of the key takeaways
here these documents reveal FEMA internally acknowledged cancer risks and
toxic exposure while publicly dismissing residence health concerns. Whistle Blowers

(28:22):
prove the EPA falsified contamination reports, raising detection limits to
claim non detect results for deadly chemicals. Independent experts confirm
the vent and Burn released one hundred and nineteen interesting
number nine to eleven backwards cancer causing chemicals with contamination

(28:46):
still as of today spreading through those waterways of basements
which we talked about in depth last year. Right, I
showed you on a map where that waterway led to.
FEMA instructed officials to have community meetings, leaving residents without
answers or aid. Right, and now that this is coming

(29:10):
out after the lawsuit has been settled, that's how evil
our government is. This is how evil our government is.
You better understand that our government is a corporation, and
its loyalty is to other corporations before they're loyalty to you.
And if you don't get that, I don't know what

(29:31):
else to tell you. I cannot help you at this point.
When the Norfolk Southern train derailed in February of twenty three,
the Biden administrations EPA and FEMA rush to declare I'm sorry.
East Palestine's safe, despite the illegal vent and burn of
vinyl chloride, which of course is a known carcinogen that

(29:53):
sent a toxic mushroom cloud over the town. But internal
emails and contractor reports buried until now tell a different story.
FEMA's own risk assessments admitted the occurrence of a cancer
cluster is not zero. Yet officials were told to dodge
public meetings. Quote I've been advised best not to engage

(30:14):
with the public, wrote a FEMA appointed coordinator in a
damning twenty twenty three email. Meanwhile, the EPA orchestrated a
two part deception. First, it inflated the thresholds for chemical detection,
allowing it to claim contaminants like pfas forever chemicals run
detectable even when levels were one hundred times higher than

(30:38):
safety limits. Second at cherry Pick data ignoring hotspots where
air knifing cleanup efforts spiked pollution by almost two thousand percent.
So what happened was the EPA rigged the rules to
erase contamination. That was stated by a whistleblower named Scott's Smith,

(31:00):
who was a veteran environmental tester who is his analysis
was one of the many parts that exposed this fraud.
So the EPA's narrative collapsed under scrutiny from experts like
doctor George Thompson, a toxicologist with fifty five years of experience,
quote the burn released chemicals threatening cancer in twenty eight

(31:24):
different organs, he warned. He slammed the EPA's premature all
clear as reckless. Residents reported ninety five new symptoms from
hair loss to seizures, yet the agency dismissed them. Forensic

(31:44):
engineer Stephen Petty added that the wind shifted during the burn,
leaving the entire neighborhood unmonitored, was even more alarming. Nearly
half the contamination was never cleaned. An anonymous expert review
that polluted sediment left in creek banks as permanent recycling projects,

(32:05):
leaching into groundwater in basements with every storm. Quote, this
isn't just negligence, it's a death sense. So you know,
with this class action settlement looming, the East Palestine's residents

(32:26):
faced a system rigged in favor of big corporation and
its government enablers. It's it's discouraging, it's sad. The fight
is far from over. The community is suffering, ignored by
FEMA and the government that was sworn to protect them,

(32:48):
buried by the EPA. And again, folks, this is a
stark reminder of what happens when corporate profits trump human lives. Right,
these cancer or clusters are emerging, and you know, if
you look, I went back at that six hundred million

(33:10):
dollar settlement resulting from the Norfolk Southern train derailment. It
offered varying compensation amounts to residents based on their proximity
to the derailment site. The settlement, which was already approved
by a federal judge back in September of twenty four,
aims to address property damage and health related issues stemming

(33:32):
from the accident. So if residents were within two miles
and you know, as soon as you cross the border
from Pa into East Palestine, it was within one hundred meters,
one hundred yards, one hundred meters whatever the accident was.
It's crazy how it was just over like, how is
this not intentional?

Speaker 2 (33:51):
Right?

Speaker 3 (33:54):
And I think from the spill point to the middle
of the city of the town itself, if it was
about two miles. So we're just going to cover the
folks in that general vicinity now. And I've told you
before these numbers sounded great, right. It was seventy thousand

(34:16):
dollars per household. They allotted some money for health related issues,
but they couldn't claim them any further. They were just
providing X amount of dollars to cover health expenses. Now,
the compensation decreased with distance. So let's just say, for instance,
a person who lived three and a half miles away
with reported symptoms might receive fifty six hundred dollars. So

(34:42):
it's important to note that these amounts are subject to
adjustment based on individual claims. Additionally, any prior assistance received
from Norfolk Southern, such as relocation support and those initial
thousand dollars payments, are deducted from the final settlement amount.

(35:05):
And again, out of that six hundred million, the attorneys
who represented we're going to receive almost a third of that.
It was like one hundred and sixty five million dollars.
And the catch is this, you know who's going to
turn away? And I said, many of these families are
living paycheck to paycheck. These families are going to take

(35:28):
that money, and when they start to get sick, they're
going to end up spending tenfold what they were given
on medical expenses. It's it's terrible. It is truly terrible.
So I wanted to keep you up to date for
that one thing. I'm not going to get into. This
is more of a reminder. June the eighth, which I

(35:50):
believe is Sunday. If I'm not mistaken, let me pull
up my calendar. But yes, next Sunday, this coming Sunday,
June the eighth is the anniversary of the USS Liberty.
Remember the Liberty. June eighth, nineteen sixty seven, our American
servicemen were attacked by the Israeli military. Over two hundred

(36:14):
American servicemen were either killed or wounded by Israeli machine guns, rockets, torpedoes,
and it represented our greatest naval loss since World War II.
And you know, it was truly the heroic actions of
the sailors prevented the Liberty from being sunk with all

(36:38):
hands loss. And remember the Admiral. Anytime you know, the
Medal of Honor is issued, it's a huge deal. It's
done in the White House. Media is there. The Admiral
of the Liberty was giving the Medal of Honor in
a closed door ceremony with only a few people present
because they didn't want Israel to be seen in a

(37:00):
bad light. So remember the Liberty. If you have not
heard those podcasts we did interviewing those heroes back in
June of twenty one or twenty two, please go back
and check out that podcast. So we're going to get
into today's main topic. And again we could talk, i

(37:24):
mean all day long about everything that's going on, but
the Port Arthur massacre. And again it's something that I
was familiar with, but I have never done a super
deep dive. And it was a mass shooting that occurred
on April twenty eighth, nineteen ninety six at Port Arthur,
which is a tourist town in the Australian state of Tasmania.

(37:46):
Now again it's interesting that date we talk about April nineteenth,
The Feast of Mullock to May first. That is that
time of sacrifice, so it falls in line with that
right between April nineteenth and May first, and by the way,
we're giving you the official narrative first, then we'll get
into what we believe probably happened. The perpetrator his name

(38:10):
was Martin Bryant and the official numbers was he killed
thirty five and wounded twenty three. Known as the deadliest
massacre in modern Australian history. Now, I think there was
one two or three years ago. I think it was
called the wym Bella shootings, and we'll talk about that

(38:31):
at some point as well. That's that's interesting in a
sad way, of course, but it's just the background behind it.
But what is similar to the Port Arthur massacre is
something we talk about here all the time, whether it's
the King Soups shooting on March twenty second, where just

(38:52):
a few days prior, the headline of the Denver Post was,
you know, gun Bill dead upon arrival. Then you had
the March twenty second King Soup shooting, which also has
many questions to be answered. But a day or two
after that incident happened the gun law was passed with

(39:12):
no problem, so two of Brian's victims were known to
him personally and were killed at Seascape, which was a
bed and breakfast property. The majority of his victims were
killed in a shooting spree at the Port Arthur Historic site,
which is a very popular tourist destination. It's said that

(39:33):
he used two semi automatic rifles as he began his
attack at a small cafe before moving into a nearby
gift shop, killing twenty people indiscriminately in a short amount
of time. Many others were killed at the site's car park,
including several children. After killing its four occupants, Bryan stole
a vehicle at the site's toll booth and drove to

(39:54):
a nearby service station, where he killed a woman and
abducted her partner. He continued to fire at passing vehicles
before finally returning to Seascape with his hostage, who was
then killed. He is at fired to the property, but
was captured the following morning. Bryant pleaded guilty to the killings.

(40:15):
He received thirty five life sentences without paroles something like
one thousand and thirty six years. His motives have been
subject of great debate.

Speaker 5 (40:26):
But.

Speaker 3 (40:28):
You know the big asterisk here. The massacre led to
a reassessment of Australia's gun laws by the newly elected
Howard government. The National Firearms Agreement between state and federal
governments was announced within two weeks of the massacre, establishing

(40:50):
heavy restrictions on the use of automatic and semi automatic weapons.
They created a gun buyback program, national gun Registry and
a waiting period for firearm cells. And it's interesting that
this happened very shortly so the Howard government. When they

(41:15):
say the Howard government, that refers to a federal government
that was led by Prime Minister John Howard. And I'm
sure this date is just a coincidence. March eleventh, nineteen
ninety six, three eleven thirty three, and it was made
up of members of a Liberal National Coalition. I just

(41:36):
find that very interesting that this new government takes over
by this guy named John Howard. I know very little
about him. I know he was a big part of
the Young Liberals Right. Obviously I assume a left wing
guy using the term liberal right. I don't know much

(41:59):
I need to do who I need to look out
his early and personal life just to see if there's
any things I see English Scottish Irist Methodist family. That's
something I'm gonna have to take the time to do
some research on. But I think it's not probably a
coincidence that this government took over March eleven, thirty three

(42:22):
and then five weeks later you have this just awful
slash historic event happened that changed the trajectory of Australia.
And if we just go back four or five years ago,
you look at the countries that had the most tyrannical

(42:44):
COVID measures, and they are Canada, they are New Zealand,
they're Australia, and for the most part, these are countries
that have limited means to defend themselves. And it's sad
is that, you know, I personally think that the measures

(43:10):
that we saw here in the United States weren't too
far off from what we saw north of the border
and in New Zealand and Australia, but we still caved
as a whole. But this, I will tell you, this
gun buyback program that they did, I want to say
it was about close to half a billion dollars that
they ended up passing out in these buybacks. But we'll

(43:34):
talk a little bit about and again, this Port Arthur,
if you recall, that's a former prison colony and it's
a popular tourist site in southeastern Tasmania in Australia. Let's
talk a little bit about the perpetrator, Martin Bryant, and
Martin checks a lot of the blocks when whether it
be Sir Han, Sir Han, people involved in things like

(43:59):
the ok bomber. Timothy McVeigh right that they had unique
person obviously, they had unique personalities and raised some flags mentally.
But Martin Bryant is currently against serving thirty five life
sentences one thousand and thirty five years without the possibility

(44:21):
of parole in Risden Prison in Hobart, Tasmania. So he
was the first child of Maurice and Carlene Bryant. Although
his family's home was in Lena Valley, Bryant spent some
of his childhood at their beach home in Carnivarn Bay,
adjacent to the Port Arthur Historic Site. In a twenty

(44:41):
eleven interview, Bryant's mother recalled that when he was very young,
she would often find his toys broken and that he
was an annoying and different child, which to me, that's
a little unusual. I don't know if I would call
my child annoying, right what I say, my child had

(45:03):
some issues, sure, But to call your own flesh and
blood annoying, I find that a little weird. Maybe I'm
over analyzing it. I don't know. Psychiatrist who examined Bryant
told the family that he would never be capable of
holding down a job because he would aggregate, sorry aggravate
people to such an extent that he would always be

(45:25):
in trouble. In nineteen seventy nine, at age twelve, he
was hospitalized at Royal Hobart Hospital from an injury caused
by a firework accident, and while he was in the hospital,
he was actually interviewed by a local TV station. And
there's a few people who think that this interview raised
a flag within certain organizations and said, hey, that kid,

(45:48):
maybe somebody we can mold into carrying out something later
in life. But locals recall abnormal behavior by Bryant, such
as pulling the snorkel from another boy while diving cutting
down trees on a neighbor's property. At school, he was
disruptive and sometimes violent, who suffered severe bullying by other children.

(46:12):
Bryant was described by teachers as being distant from reality
and unemotional. After he was suspended from primary school in
nineteen seventy seven, psychological assessments noted that he tortured animals.
Bryant returned to school the following year with improved behavior,
but he persisted in teasing younger children. He would be

(46:34):
eventually transferred into a special education center at Newtown High School.
That's interesting Newtown, but it's new space Town, not Newtown,
where he deteriorated both academically and behaviorally throughout his remaining
school year. So here is a person and adolescent that
showed these uh obviously had an intellectual disability when he

(46:59):
left school in nineteen three, who was actually assessed for
a disability pension because they said, this guy's never going
to be able to hold a job. Psychiatrists wrote, quote,
he cannot read or write, He can only do a
bit of gardening, watch his TV. Only his parents' efforts
that prevent further deterioration. They said he could be psychophrenic.

(47:22):
His parents face a bleak future with him, And again
that's also sad to say you're going to have a
bleak future with your child. Your child is your child period.
Brian did receive a disability pension, though he worked as
a handyman and a gardener, holding menial jobs, and an
examination after the massacre, forensic psychologist Ian Joblin found Brant

(47:46):
to be borderline mentally disabled with an IQ of sixty six,
equivalent to an eleven year old. They said he was
had conduct disorder ad D and Asperger's possibly, and it
goes on and on. He prefended a wealthy woman. I'm

(48:09):
not going to get into those things. But what is
interesting is that he has provided he Bryant has provided
conflicted and confused accounts about what led him to kill

(48:30):
thirty five people. And this is one of the signs
of like this mk ultra type of manipulation. Right, Sir
Han Sir Hand came out and said, I don't really
remember anything the entire week, it might have even in
two weeks leading up to that event. And people who
are subject to that type of control say the same

(48:53):
type of things, Right, I don't quite remember, or they
give conflicting reports. The first article I want to read
is false Flags and the Port Arthur Massacre. This story
written by Mary Maxwell on the twenty first anniversary, which
would have been April twenty eighth, twenty seventeen, and she

(49:16):
notes that that date was the twenty first anniversary of
the killing of thirty five people in or near Port Arthur, Tasmania.
In twenty sixteen. There was quite a buzz for the
twentieth anniversary, but in twenty seventeen all was quiet. And
the author notes that they have a false flag series
ongoing and the cases dealt with Operation Northwoods, Operation Desert Storm,

(49:43):
which was assisted by April Gilaspie. We talked on that
early on in our podcast Days the Lies. But I
think April Gillespie, I'll i'll disagree with the author here.
She was duped by Bush. If you remember April Gilassbie,
she was the first female ambassador in a Middle Eastern country,

(50:06):
Saddam Hussein in you know, late July twenty six, twenty
seventh of nineteen ninety went to April Glassby, she was
the ambassador to Iraq, and he said, listen, these Kuwaitis
are slant drilling our oil. They owe USMANI this and
that I'm going to go and take our oil back,
right and and but he said, I want to know

(50:29):
first what's the United States thought on that? Because we
don't want to, you know, we don't want any problem
with the United States. So April Glassbi goes to George H. W.
Bush and he says, quote, what happens with Kuwait and
Iraq is between Kuwait and Iraq. So April Gilaspie, you know,
confers that to Saddam Hussein, so he rolls into Kuwait.

(50:53):
And then that's when all the lies start, right, US
military shows Saudi Arabia these falsified aerial spy images that
the Iraqi military was assembled on the border of Saudi Arabia,
so Saudi would give us the thumbs up to drop

(51:14):
into Saudi. That was a lie. Then you had Niria
al Sabah, that huge lie about the Iraqi military throwing
babies on the grounds. It was a big lie. It
was a false flag. It absolutely was.

Speaker 2 (51:29):
So.

Speaker 3 (51:31):
And then of course she talks about Operation Port Arthur,
and she starts by putting it into perspective with other
false flags. Again, and a false flag set up. An
overseer causes a harmful incident to take place and claims
the incident was wearing the flag of a foreign or
a desirable group. This naturally justifies the actions against them.

(51:54):
Some of the best known false flags was the firing
on Fort Sumter by parties unknown that started the war
but between the States in eighteen sixty three. Of course,
the big one we've talked about the sinking of the
USS main that got the Sparish Spanish American War underway
in eighteen ninety eight. I recall my father, born in
eighteen ninety nine saying that he was embarrassed in school

(52:18):
having to wear a soldier costume because he was the
tallest boy in the class. It was a fifteenth anniversary
celebrating that war, and that is kind of weird when
you hear something like that celebrating the war, and I
think that's something as you get older and a little
wiser and you start to look back at things that
are celebrated, it is a little odd as to the

(52:41):
spoils of that war. The official historian in the US
State Department says, quote. US victory in the war produced
a peace treaty that compelled the Spanish to relinquish claims
on Cuba and to seed sovereignty over Guam Puerto Rico
in the Philippines to the United States. The United States

(53:01):
also annexed the independent state of Hawaii during the conflict. Thus,
the war enabled the United States to establish its predominance
in the Caribbean region and to pursue its strategic and
economic interests in Asia. Of course, my dad was not
embarrassed about the wars having been started by a false flag,

(53:24):
as he would never have known that sort of thing.
He was just shy about the costume. The next famous
false flag need to market time stamp here, excuse me,
all right, was the sinking of the RMS Lusitania nineteen
seventeen and the Reichstag fire in Berlin of nineteen thirty three.

(53:44):
The former helped America into the Great War. What a name.
We've noted before that some people have said Port Arthur
was Australia's nine to eleven, but chronologically it's more correct
to say that nine to eleven was America's Port Arthur.

(54:06):
So let's think about this for just a moment. Apparently
there are people in this world who were so high up,
if you could call it that, that they can script
an event and make it happen. They get people to
carry it out by specific instructions, and some others get
caught up into it, typically as victims go back to

(54:28):
the firing on Fort Sumter. All that was required was
for a few volleys to be heard, and then there
could be speculation that the South had done it, and
then war was declared. As for the sinking of the
American Navy ship the Main in the harbor of Havana, Cuba,
all that was needed was an enemy. The medium ogul
of the day, Randolph Hurst, is credited with stirring up

(54:50):
emotions in his newspapers, and before you knew it, there
was a war against Spain. Right to hell with Spain?
Remember the main was the war? Do you reckon that?
Maybe the ship was given that name in the first
place with an eye to events down the line, because

(55:13):
to hell with Spain? Remember the Vermont, Well, that just
wouldn't cut it. Speaking of South America, we learned a
couple of years ago from a list of admitted to
false flags, that the nation of Columbia suffered particularly awful case.
There was a series of murders in Colombia, part of
the ongoing armed conflict in that country between the government

(55:35):
and guerrilla forces of the FARC and the ELN. Members
of the military had poor or mentally impaired civilians lured
to remote parts of the country which offered them work,
killed them, and then presented them to authorities as guerrillas
killed in battle. So that was an effort to inflate

(55:55):
body counts and receive promotions or other benefits. That's the
level of evil that we deal with in our world.
But then we saw from the admitted to Northwoods memo,
dressing up as the bad guy is the standard office procedure.
So at this point we must pause to note the

(56:16):
admitting to factor does not make much of an impression
on people. Right. Why because by the time it comes out,
it never follows a way of punishment, whether it's vaccines,
false flags, you name it. The ordinary joes like you
and I will get arrested and thrown in the gulags

(56:39):
for life if it were us. But because it is
from the powers that be, there is never any accountability.
Right of course, we never expect a group to punish
itself when it comes to misdeeds.

Speaker 2 (56:52):
Right.

Speaker 3 (56:53):
We heard for a year that Hillary was going to
get locked up.

Speaker 2 (56:57):
That didn't happen.

Speaker 3 (56:59):
Right. We heard rumors of certain individuals like Fauci getting
locked up, that never happened. He's enjoying his pension. But
the false flag deceptions usually end and gain with the elites, right,
But when the killers and the killed are both in

(57:21):
the same nation, nothing seems to happen. It's just ohum city.
So what really happened? According to the author? So the
author Andy mclahan I believe is pronounced authored a book
entitled port Author Enough is enough. We really haven't got
much knowledge of how it was planned out. We mostly

(57:43):
spent our ink knocking down the official story as being ludicrous.
Port Arthur qualifies as a false flag to the extent
that violent activity took place and it was all down
to one man right at the time, the twenty eight
year old Martin Bryant, the intellectually handicapped no police record,

(58:03):
described by friends as a general soul. Now again, go
back to Wikipedia. You'll hear stories about psychiatrists saying that's
why I always say, I read the official narrative first, right,
how he tortured animals, how he did this, how he
did that. Because as someone is new to a subject,
where's the first place they go? They go to Wikipedia.
So by the time they're done reading the Wikipedia page,

(58:25):
they have formed an opinion of the author of the story.
So the author says this case is not a strong
example of a false flag. The nation didn't proceed to
declare war on Martin Bryant or on low IQ citizens,
but on gun ownership. We realize that the case we

(58:50):
make is missing many parts. Conceivably, one could give a
more generous interpretation of the events of April twenty eighth,
nineteen ninety six. Say the capture of Bryant was a
case of mistaken identity. Police got the story wrong and
then never bothered to pursue any other possibilities. I'm not
so generous to believe that. I think many bits of

(59:13):
the nineteen ninety six court case and follow up studies
speak of a conspiracy. So let's speculate on what really happened.
I think Martin was chosen as a child as part
of the Tavistock stuff run by doctor Dax in Tasmania,

(59:33):
to play some role later, maybe as a real killer.
I think the father, Maurice Bryant, was bumped off in
nineteen ninety three, and that Martin's employer and benefactor, Helen Harvey,
was bumped off in nineteen ninety two as a way
of getting control over Martin. Now, remember Martin's being handled
by Tavistock is documented, but the murders of Maurice and

(59:56):
Helen no proof whatsoever. On the day of the massacre,
Martin did not have to perform any shooting, but only
wait in the Seascape cottage to carry out what was
drilled in advance. This consisted of his reading a script. Meanwhile,
back at the Broad Arrow Cafe, someone else, it may
have been more than one person, carried out the shooting

(01:00:19):
of twenty more people. The same man then drove up
the road and killed some more and then drove further
up the ski I'm sorry, drove up the road to Seascape,
which was a bed and breakfast. It is seldom mentioned,
but Stuart Bady explains in his book Quote a Gunsmith's

(01:00:40):
Notebook on Port Arthur that the man alighted from his
car before going into the driveway at Seascape took shots
at four cars passing by. Beatty deduces, since one of
the road victims was the wife of a Canadian embassy staffer,
that she was meant to be killed, and that this

(01:01:00):
was aimed at exciting the people of Canada to pass
gun control laws right now. She didn't die, she was
only wounded in the hand. By the way, Beady's book
exists only in electronic form and his cataloged as one
of the holdings of the State Library of Tasmania. That

(01:01:20):
is the same library that hosts the Maxwell McLachlan book,
which is the one they're talking about now. Now, there
are other speculations that have been put forward about the
day's event on April twenty eighth, nineteen ninety six. One
is that a prominent member of the Tasmanian Police who

(01:01:41):
never officially came to work that day, which we'll talk
about it a little bit, was in fact inside Seascape
supervising the events. All it would take is a short
interrogation of him as to why he is not on
record that day. This would be followed up by a
question of all his colleagues as to what they knew

(01:02:02):
of him or saw of him that day. Up until
this point, those cops as individuals had no form for
stating their opinion about this. Surely they can't come forward
to the media as there is no such media right
any official media anymore. Another speculation is that a cop
inside Seescape supervising events, could have escaped the fire the

(01:02:26):
next morning by exiting when it was still dark, or
by helicopter and that place was loaded with helicopters, or
simply by boat. The east side of seascape is on
the water. Personally, I have taken the easy way out
of dealing with Port arth by false flag by concentrating

(01:02:48):
on legal matters. The logical deduction is that the people
who plan nine to eleven and the people who plan
the Port Arthur massacre are the same. Yes, those people
most likely part Arthur was a tryout for nine to eleven.
Other tryouts for nine to eleven included the nineteen ninety

(01:03:08):
five bombing of the Murrah Building, nineteen ninety three bombing
of the World Trade Center, the nineteen ninety two crashing
of an LL plane into the wall of an apartment
building in Amsterdam. Many writers say that the main person
of the massacre was to take away the guns from
gun owners in Australia. Certainly that mission was fulfilled, but

(01:03:31):
that day's events and the aggressive cover up in bamboozling
of the public also sent set a precedent. It was
a job well done and must have made it easier
for authorities and mediate a plunge in regarding such events
as the Boston Marathon bombing of twenty thirteen and Columbine,

(01:03:55):
which again right, that was another event April twentieth. In
that time. From in those cases, with the exception of
Sydney and Boston, we're seen off the culprit. The blame
was on nut jobs, right, These just crazy people, and
you can't have guns and crazy people in the same country.

(01:04:16):
So by now the planners of massacres must be feeling
assured that folks will accept any crime if it is
chalked up to a person with mental illness. They also
talk about a group SACPAV. That's a group similar to

(01:04:39):
Homeland Security. It is a federal Australian overseer. Basically, it's
a special operations group like a special forces for police.
The acronym stands for Special Advisory Committee for the Protection
Against Violence. I noticed during this Sydney siege that the

(01:05:01):
Australian Defense Force and the Australian Police both said that
their policy was hands off, as the State Police of
New South Wales was capable of handling it. But the gunman,
Manharan Monas had said, Australia is under attack. Isn't that
enough to allow the army to be called in. It

(01:05:22):
would be good for the public to get clued in
as to who was supposed to protect them or get
clued in as to who's supposed to massacre them as
the case well b Now we also go to The
Dark Truth in their article from March ninth, twenty sixteen,

(01:05:43):
the Port Arthur Massacre of massad operation. And I know
that there's a lot of people who were not even
aware of the Port Arthur massacre because it's an event
that happened outside of the United States. That's the one
that seems to get all of the attack again, an
event that created all sort of gun control, and one

(01:06:05):
could certainly draw comparisons between Port Arthur and Sandy Hook
in that outcome. That could be if the president and
the US governments had their own way, but there were
This is what I wanted to mention some of these
findings by authors and experts, including some of the police themselves,

(01:06:25):
that really go against the official narrative. Now number one.
On Sunday morning, two hours before the murders, ten of
the senior managers of Port Arthur were taken to safety
many miles away up the East coast for a two
day seminar with a vague agenda and no visiting speakers. Right.

(01:06:48):
We hear often in many of these type of situations
false flags, whatever you want to call it. And again, yes,
people get hurt and killed in false flags that there's
either an operation going on, a practice run of some tooint.
You get what I'm saying, right, And this was the
same thing, whether it's the atf right, they had a

(01:07:10):
meeting that day April nineteenth, nineteen ninety five, similar thing
right that these senior managers Port Arthur, they had a
two day seminar, so they were out of the area
Number two. Also, just before the shootings, the only two
policemen in the region were called away on a wild
goose chase. They were sent to the coal mine at

(01:07:32):
Saltwater River to investigate a heroin drug stash, which turned
out to be soap powder. So this was too far
for them to get to the Broad Arrow Cafe in
time to be of any use. Had the policeman remained
at Donnelly, he would have closed the swing bridge to
prevent the killer from escaping the peninsula. So again did

(01:07:57):
Martin Bryant with an IQ of sixty six or this
decoy probably not. And there's something we hadn't mentioned yet,
and that is the big mortuary truck that was provided. Now,
before the massacre, there was a specially built twenty two
person capacity mortuary truck that was built. It attracted some
derision at the time, but its effective use at Port

(01:08:19):
Arthur was on question. After the massacre. It was advertised
unsuccessfully for sale via the Internet, then converted for another purpose.
So without the foresight of Port Arthur, why build it
when had it proven its worth? Number four Martin Bryant

(01:08:40):
was never properly identified as the gunman. A young woman
who waiter lunch near the gunman just before one point
thirty said he had a freckled face. Graham Collier, the
wounded ex soldier who had the best opportunity to observe
the killer, said he had a pock marked or acneed face.

(01:09:01):
Neither description fits Bryant, who had a smooth complexion. Graham
Collier says that it was not Brian who shot him
in the neck. Number five illegal photo. On thirty April,
the Hobart Mercury printed an old photo of Martin Bryan
on the front page. This was illegal because at that

(01:09:22):
stage some of the witnesses had not yet been asked
to identify the killer, and the photo would have become
fixed in the minds of witnesses. So when one witness
was asked to describe the clothing word by the gunman,
she described the clothing on the photo versus what she'd
really seen. The Mercury newspaper, however, was not prosecuted for

(01:09:45):
breaking the law, and of course that entity falls under
Rupert Marta the News Corp. So Rupert Murdoch, someone who
was certainly on the world stage number six. Missus Wendy Skurr,
a nurse tour guide, an ambulance officer, rang the police
at one thirty two pm to report the shooting. She
and other medics then cared for the injured and the

(01:10:07):
dead without any police protection for six and a half hours.
Who ordered the armed police to stop at Tarana where
they had a barbecue. Even the police who arrived by
boats where stones throw away from the main crime scene
in the cafe, also failed to come in to see
what was going on. Was this lack of protection meant
to increase the trauma of the survivors, right, There's always

(01:10:30):
something going on with the military or the police when
these events happened right number seven, Three more shots were
fired at Port Arthur at six point thirty Well Bryant
was at Seascape? Who fired those shots? Number eight? Same question,
different answer. At a recent forensic seminar in Queensland where

(01:10:54):
Tasmanian Police forensic gun Inspector Gerard Dutton gave a lecture,
the first question came from mister Ian mcnivin. He asked
if there were any empirical evidence to link Martin Bryant
to the Broad Arrow Cafe. Sergeant Dutton immediately closed the
fifteen minute Q and A and would not reply. When

(01:11:15):
mcnivin managed to say, quote, I have here Graham Collier's
police statement, Sergeant Dutton threatened him with arrest, called security
agents and escorted mcnivin out of the building. So when
you know he was. When Dutton was asked the same
question in America by a doctor to Semini, he replied

(01:11:36):
that there is no evidence that linked Bryant to the cafe.
Yet a police videotape exists which proves that the police
had an excellent opportunity to get DNA samples and finger
prints of the gunman. The video briefly shows the blue
sports bag on a cafe table. The gunman had carried

(01:11:57):
his three rifles in this bag and let after it
right next to his drinking glass, his solo soft drink, cam, knife, fork, plate,
all that other stuff. So the question is why did
police fail to take DNA samples and fingerprints from his cup,
from his knife, from his fork. These questions should be answered.
According to the official story, Bryant first killed David and

(01:12:21):
Sally Martin at Seescape Cottage, then went to Port Arthur.
Yet two policemen have reported seeing a naked woman with
black hair screaming and running from one building to another
at se Escape well into the afternoon. So if Sally
Martin was dead, who was this woman? Number eleven proof

(01:12:42):
of other gunmen in Seescape Cottage. While Bryant was calmly
talking to police by telephone in the cottage during the siege,
and the conversation was recorded, someone else fired an SKK
rifle twenty times. In the transcript. The gunfires recorded as coughs,
but an electronic analysis of one of the cough shows

(01:13:04):
that was an SKK shot. And again the very convenient seminars.
So on that particular Sunday morning, some twenty five specialist
doctors from the Royal Australian College of Surgeons from all
over Australia had attended a training course in Hobart and
their last lecture was on a terrorist attacked and gunshot ones.

(01:13:30):
They stayed on to take care of the wounded victims.
Just another coincidence, right there you go. There's a couple. Also,
more than seven hundred reporters from seventeen nations came to
a seminar in Hobart. They were asked to arrive during
the weekend as the seminar was due to begin early
Monday morning. So how convenient was it to have seven

(01:13:52):
hundred reporters on the spot churning out their anti gun
and disarmament propaganda to the whole world. Quote, there will
never be uniform gun laws in Australia until we see
a massacre somewhere in Tasmania where the words of Barry
Unsworth New South WALESE New South Wales Premier in December

(01:14:15):
of nineteen eighty seven at a conference in Hobart prophecy
or planning, you make the call number fifteen. If we
don't get it right this time, next time there is
a massacre and there will be then they'll take all
of our guns off of us. That was the Deputy
Prime Minister Tim Fisher in May ninety six. Who is

(01:14:37):
the they who would order the removal of our guns?
Did Fisher let slip that gun confiscation had been ordered
by the nWo number sixteen no respect for the law.
The law demands that a coronial inquiry must take place
when foreign nationals are killed or when anyone dies in

(01:14:59):
a fire at Port Arthur. Several foreigners were killed and
three people died in the fire at Seascape. It's evident
that the massacre was planned to happen on the ferry,
which selled to the Isle of Dead every day. The
victims were to be eighty elderly American tourists who had
come into coaches, but the plan went awry because the

(01:15:21):
sailing time of the ferry had changed from one thirty
to two. So again, the author believes that the Arthur
massacre was a setup, a false flag to ban guns
in Australia. And you know, we've talked about most everything
else that's listed, and it is something I believe worthy

(01:15:47):
of your time. I'm sure I'm going to get a
lot of emails from the good folks down Under, and
I welcome your feedback. And again, this isn't meant to
be an all encompassing podcast because whether it's nine to
eleven or Oklahoma City, you have to choose certain aspects
of these events and magnify them. And since this is

(01:16:09):
the first time that we're formally, you know, putting this
incident under the microscope, it's important that we talk about,
you know, the people involved, Martin Bryant's the new government
involved the location, of course, which was a very touristy vacation.
There just have to be drills going on, meetings set

(01:16:31):
up so people weren't in their normal places. And again,
what a person with a IQ of sixty six have
been smart enough to see this to be all planned?
I don't think so. Joe Viles, author of Deadly Deception
of Port Arthur, has always stated that the Port Arthur

(01:16:51):
massacre was a Masad operation. Now, the author originally denied
that scenario because it was never any known links between
Port author and the Israeli intelligence organization known as Massat. However,
over the years, I think people are starting to lean

(01:17:14):
that way. Joe Viles as a v I a L. L. S.
If you'd like to check out his work. Was also
on stage known as Airy Ben Manesh and even wrote
a book titled The Prophets of War under that name.
So you know, these people boasted the exploits of these

(01:17:39):
intelligence operations very similar to let's say, the dancing Israelis Right,
mister Viles understandings of the Port Arthur massacre were unique
and comprehensive to the extreme. Even had knowledge of the
actual gunman that was denied to all other Australians. He

(01:18:00):
demonstrated this knowledge after reading Graham Collier's police statement referring
to the remarks made by Graham that the gunman had
a pitted or again acne marked face, and the question
was always how could Joe differentiate without knowledge of Graham
Collier actually saw and remarked about. So you know, this

(01:18:22):
is a very interesting subject. I do believe that any
event that happens on the world stage doesn't happen without
a nod from the New World Order. It just doesn't happen.
So Cia Masad involvement would not surprise me one bit whatsoever.

(01:18:47):
So I encourage you to take the time to research
us more and again, if you are a subject matter
expert in the Port Arthur massacre false flag conspiracy, and
you'd like to share your information with this us an
email thefact Hunter at mail dot com. But what we
do know is it's the same storyline every time. Right,

(01:19:11):
there's drills, people in power, you know, the police and
everything are engaged in other things. Oh, you got to
go check out. There's heroin. We found those people went running.
All of these things that happened that day would have
not been planned by this individual. This was a Again,

(01:19:32):
you got to look for the signs your March eleventh,
you're thirty three. Your new government comes in. They have
to have their people in place in order to carry
them out for the nwo's plan to be carried out.
And this again you're looking twenty nine years ago. So
there you go. Thank you all for listening today. We'll

(01:19:54):
see you next Tuesday at eight pm Eastern Time for
another edition of The Fact Hunter. Pray that you're well.
God bless you all have a wonderful rest of your week,
and remember to keep your head on a swivel. And
until we meet again, my friends, we will see you.

Speaker 2 (01:20:13):
I know it's been a strug gone. I don't know
you've had some pain. I know you feeling tied. Tell
down all the way. Yeah, I know you.

Speaker 1 (01:20:30):
Feeling you smile ain't the same. I saw where to
go from you.

Speaker 2 (01:20:41):
I feel like you've lost your way.

Speaker 5 (01:20:47):
Don't give it, no, don't give it. Never is home.
Don't let call the primise. It ain't done yet, he's gone.

Speaker 2 (01:20:57):
I'm plaid. Why it's a way got up? May me come?

Speaker 6 (01:21:06):
Why wait?

Speaker 2 (01:21:08):
God y called?

Speaker 7 (01:21:17):
I can see the street beside you. Childs are putting
up five. Oh, you're stronger than a thing you are. Yeah,
you're gonna be all right.

Speaker 5 (01:21:32):
You're accepting a dead found.

Speaker 2 (01:21:37):
Beautiful. You're shoving ride.

Speaker 6 (01:21:41):
Yeah, you're living, breathing, moving, You can hold your head
a pie. Don't give up. No, don't give in. Never
loose home. Don't they gone on the prime me? Ain't
done against God or clay?

Speaker 5 (01:22:02):
Why some waintail the god of Mabe come, don't give up, No,
don't give in. You never lose home. Don't let go
on the primise. It ain't unlife. It's worth living. What's
a way tail the god of baby colt?

Speaker 8 (01:22:26):
Why surprise down? God up steaming cold? Oh? Yeah, what
surpray down the god baby come, oh, yeah, got team call, Oh, don't.

Speaker 2 (01:22:56):
No, don't give in, So do the goal of.

Speaker 9 (01:23:01):
The primise, Ma Doney's got a plane waits a god
of if it comes, and don't give up.

Speaker 2 (01:23:12):
No dog giving any.

Speaker 10 (01:23:14):
Help, but never the soul. Don't let go of the trimes.
It ain't done, Lovers for living wats the god of.

Speaker 2 (01:23:26):
Y coors ah, the god of needs cos WHA's done?
The god of a coach.

Speaker 3 (01:23:49):
You're listening to the Fact Hunter Radio Network.

Speaker 2 (01:23:55):
Just the facts, ma'am.