June 28, 2025 • 71 mins
On today’s episode we are going to talk about the end of the 12-day way. We’ll talk about Americas’ involvement, the cease fire, and how this is NOT a lead-up to WWIII. We will also talk about a Supreme Court ruling, the Democrat nominee for NYC mayor and more!
Email, Website & Other Links
hoho@thehohoshow.com
https://WSPRadio.com
https://TheHohOShow.com
https://link.thehohoshow.com/Rumble
https://link.thehohoshow.com/WSPChronicles
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.
Email, Website & Other Links
hoho@thehohoshow.com
https://WSPRadio.com
https://TheHohOShow.com
https://link.thehohoshow.com/Rumble
https://link.thehohoshow.com/WSPChronicles
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, Welcome to the show, grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida. So join us now, as
we discussed news, politics, current events at so much more,
but through the airwaves and strapped in as we.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Do because there.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
The're broadcasting live from Weapini Soft Production Studio B. Welcome
to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm your host,
Ho Ho say.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
Hey, y'all's doing I hope you're doing good? I really do.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
We've got some stuff to talk about today, Holy cow.
A lot has happened this past week, like a lot.
A lot of stuff has happened this past week. Let's see,
we've got excuse me. We're going to be talking about
some information about the twenty twenty election. We're going to
(01:10):
be talking about Hunter Biden. We're going to be talking
about well, the big beautiful bill, the hold up of
that in the Senate. We're also going to be talking
about the election, the primary election in New York City
for the mayor.
Speaker 4 (01:31):
That's a train rack. Holy cow.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
We're going to be talking about a white house, not
a white house, a Supreme Court ruling. But first, let's
talk about the Twelve Day War. Let's talk about Iran let's.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
Get into that now.
Speaker 3 (01:51):
You all know how I like to start the program. Normally,
I start off with some haha, some humor, some satire.
In my go to worse for satire news is the
Babylon b This headline whenever I read it, it cracked
me up.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
I had to laugh. I thought it was funny. Let's
just put it that way. I thought it was funny.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Headline, Ayatola proudly announces I Ran has destroyed fourteen bunker
buster bombs with its nuclear facility. Yeah, I had to laugh.
I thought that was funny. I really did. The article
continues says some stuff, and yeah, it's it's worth the
read if you like satire news. It really is. It's hilarious.
(02:38):
But anyway, let's go ahead and start the show.
Speaker 4 (02:43):
Now. I'm a little fuzzy on timeline. I'm just going
to be honest with you.
Speaker 3 (02:49):
But I think it was either like Saturday morning or
it was Saturday night. I think might have been Saturday
night that they sent up some B fifty two stealth bombers.
(03:14):
Some of them went out west going to wherever, and
they were the decoys. They were very much the decoys,
and a bunch of them carrying two of these bunker
buster bombs each left and went east heading to Iran
(03:34):
from Adam, Missouri heading to Iran, and the uh, what
was the name of the mission? Oh, holy cow, what
was the name of the mission? Hammerhead or something.
Speaker 4 (03:46):
I don't know. Yeah, I don't know. I had it.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
It was written down or not written down, but it
was on the screen and now I don't see it.
Speaker 4 (03:57):
But whatever their operation they sent them east back.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
And I mean, this was a pretty big operation, it
really was. I mean this operation was was pretty big
because there was.
Speaker 4 (04:12):
A lot of aircraft that went out there, some f
thirty fives, other a lot of aircrafts providing support.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
The Navy was over there launching, and is what they
did is they did an attack on three different nuclear facilities,
and the biggest one being that mountain photo for do whatever.
I don't know that that was the big one, okay,
And they dropped like fourteen total, twelve of them going
(04:48):
to this one side, if I'm remembering my numbers correctly,
But fourteen total bunker buster bombs.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
That is man, that's hard to say. Bunker buster imps,
bunker buster bombs, bunker buster bombs. That's a tongue twister.
But that's what they did. They dropped.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
They dropped the buttload of them. Okay, they got in
and out without losing a single plane. I mean basically
they got in and out before Iran even knew what
the heck was going on. I mean, that's more or
less the truth of I mean, do you do you
understand the significance of that. Of that alone, this whole
(05:30):
entire mission went off without a hitch, no leaks. They
were very tight lipped on information.
Speaker 4 (05:39):
Where it went, you know how how you know, everything
was communicated. They were very tight lipped about.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
It, and it wasn't until after the fact that it
was like, yeah, we did it. I remember listening to
the uh uh President Trump's announcement of it, letting everybody
know what happened and basically saying that, yeah, their nuclear
(06:05):
facilities were I mean this it's devastated.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
Okay. Now some of the.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
Uh, some of the talks, you know, because there's a
lot of talking going on, and some people are like,
you know, well, their their nuclear material that they had
was you know, either it was there or you know
that there's no real clear indication as to whether they
actually destroyed it. So they can still get it, they
(06:34):
have access to it. But I'm going to be honest
with you, that's not really a concern for me. It
really isn't.
Speaker 4 (06:40):
Now. In my last show, what was the name of
that show, War and Iran?
Speaker 3 (06:46):
It was it was more or less talking about how
this could you know, how Iran getting nuclear weapons, you know,
enriching uranium to weaponize level was bad because we are
already had the information that they were enriching uranium beyond
the point that you would need for any type.
Speaker 4 (07:08):
Of civilian or medical use.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
We knew this, and we also knew that the only
reason why they would be weaponizing or enriching uranium to
this point was to get weapons.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
Grade uranium to make a nuclear warhead.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
They had all the materials together, everything that they needed
to make a nuclear warhead and launch it at their targets.
That was the intel that we had.
Speaker 4 (07:39):
That's what we knew.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
And of course, like I said in that in my
last episode, that's bad because we knew that they actually
did it. They would launch it Israel obviously, but their
next target, we feared, would be the United States of America.
They don't like us, and so President Trump, he did
(08:05):
something about it.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
They were f owen. President Trump was.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Like, now you're going to find out, fa fo, I
did that wrong the first time, FAFO they.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
Were messing around.
Speaker 3 (08:24):
President Trump's like, well, now you're going to find out.
And is what he did. He took them from the
ability of getting nuclear weapons making nuclear weapons from like
a week out two weeks out to obliterated their ability
(08:47):
to win rich uranium. Whether or not they have the
uranium doesn't really matter. I mean in the grand scope,
in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't really matter.
So what if they still have the nuclear U material,
The uranium doesn't matter because they can't do anything with it.
(09:07):
That was one of the things about the mission that
they had take away their ability to enrich the uranium
to weapons grade.
Speaker 4 (09:17):
That was part of their mission. They succeeded. There was
a lot of a lot of people that were kind
of upset about it. Everybody was like, oh, this is
going to be you know, this is going to end
up being World War III and all this other kind
of stuff.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
And I'm gonna be honest with you, I never I
never believed that.
Speaker 4 (09:37):
I really didn't. And here's why. Let me tell you why.
Whose our two major adversaries right now. Russia, Okay, well,
they already had their hands full with Ukraine. I'm not
worried about them.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
And they also know that if they end up attacking us,
considering how drained their MILLI terry is right now with
their ongoing war against Ukraine, they don't really stand a chance.
And that was a hint about what we can do
if we actually put our minds to a president willing
to actually do something about it peace through strength. There
(10:20):
was a demonstration of our ability. That's another of what
that was. So I'm not worried about any type of
of them at all. I'm not worried about China because
China's economy is in crisis mode right now. It just is,
(10:45):
you know, Chinese, China's economy.
Speaker 4 (10:47):
Is not doing very well. You know, yes, they have
the manpower and I mean, yeah.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
They have the stuff to do it, but they don't
really have the money to fund anything.
Speaker 4 (11:00):
So I'm really not concerned about China.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
How about retaliation against ira you know from Iran? Okay,
that one's at least on the table, But let's let's
be up front and honest about something. Because Israel, with
their strikes which were very strategic, strategical, very strategical. They
were strategic critical things that they were hitting. I mean,
(11:28):
Israel took out Hamas, they took out Hasbellah, the two
biggest allies that Iran has to where Iran was basically
left doing everything on their own.
Speaker 4 (11:42):
Israel had air superiority over Iran. They took out UH,
they took out Iran's ability to really fire off a
lot of weapons they took out They crippled Iran. I mean,
let's just be honest. Israel crippled Iran. One of the.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
Reasons why we were able to make it, make the
strike so effective.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
After the strike, it was okay, now let's do peace.
Speaker 3 (12:20):
And another big story about all this was that, you know,
the the leaked intelligence briefing that basically said that the
strikes were ineffective, you know, maybe took their ability to
get a nuclear warhead back like maybe a month. And
(12:43):
that was a huge Like really, I mean, that's what
your story is going to be, that it really was ineffective.
Here's a couple of things to know about that leaked briefing. One,
it was leaked, and according to reports and some headlines
that I've read, cash Bettel is going after the people
(13:05):
who leaked that because that was totally unacceptable. Some Democrat
that doesn't like the administration, doesn't like Trump is a
friend to Iran, is like, yeah, we're just going to
leak this information to make Trump look incompetent. But the
sad thing is the or at least not the sad thing.
The good thing is the bonus was.
Speaker 4 (13:27):
We had the goods. We had the goods.
Speaker 3 (13:33):
President Trump wasn't trying to hide anything. Pete Hegseth was like, yeah,
we took him out. Look at the pictures.
Speaker 4 (13:43):
Here's some testimony from people in the know.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
Here's some of what the pilots saw, and it's like, uh, yeah,
we destroyed those facilities. They no longer have the ability
to enricheranium. Very in the story. Wasn't even a question
from people that were exercising half of their brain.
Speaker 4 (14:06):
It wasn't a question.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
As to how devastating this attack really was. These bombings
not even a question. But not only was there not
a not only was there not an American life lost
during this operation. According to reports, Now we don't know
(14:28):
how true these are, but according to reports, there wasn't
even any Iranians in a loss of life in that aspect,
Evidently these places were empty. I don't know how much
of that I believe I was going to be honest
with you, I really don't. I mean, you would think
that there would be somebody there doing something, some type
(14:49):
of research whatever. There's been some information that I've heard
floated around out there that.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
Possibly speaking, there was enough of a warning that.
Speaker 3 (14:59):
Was given to which I don't even think I'd buy
this would either, just to be honest with you, because
of some of the other reporting that happened that they
were in and out, not a single shot fired at all.
Because you would think that if a warning was given
to these facilities to you know, hey, they're coming, they're
almost there, you would think that their first course.
Speaker 4 (15:21):
Of action would be to try to shoot down the planes,
which considered there be fifty two bombers, you know, stealth,
they really wouldn't be able to do that, but that's
beside the point.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
You would think that that would be their first call,
their first course of action. But that's not what ended
up happening. But according to all reporting that there was
no loss of life, that it was an attack on
a facility to end Iran's ability to enrich uranium to
(15:56):
weapons grade. And the attack was completely successful, completely successful.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
I heard a.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
You know, there was people that were mad about it,
saying that, oh, it was ineffective and all this other
kind of stuff.
Speaker 4 (16:16):
And like I said, I mean.
Speaker 3 (16:18):
I just you look at you look at all the
intel from places that matter, and yeah, this was extremely effective.
And President Trump was like, Okay, we're done, no more fighting.
Let's put an end to this. And he orchestrated a
(16:41):
cease fire. And this is where things get kind of
kind of funny. I'm just I'm just gonna throw that
out there. Things kind of get funny. So he started
a I got I got something to pull up. You
guys are going to hear some audio, and I'm just
gonna be honest. This is my I freaking president. Yeah,
(17:04):
I'm sure you alls have heard about this, you know,
him on his way to Marine one.
Speaker 4 (17:10):
The interview.
Speaker 3 (17:11):
The questions that reporters were asking in What Trump said
in response to one of these questions absolutely hilarious. Whenever
I heard about this, I'm like, are you kidding me?
Trump actually said that, oh I have to listen to this.
Speaker 4 (17:24):
It was hilarious. But Trump orchestrated a ceasefire. It was like, okay,
so we're going to have a winding down. Iran is
going to start immediately, and then Israel. And that is
only because of active operations that they were doing that
they needed to, you know, bring people back from and whatever.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
And apparently Iran, you know, right after the announcement of
this ceasefire, Iran fired a missile at least one one
missile that didn't really hit anything, It wasn't at a
critical location, and it might have been an accident.
Speaker 4 (18:00):
Really have no idea. Israel responded with launching.
Speaker 3 (18:05):
A lot of missiles back, and Trump was not happy
about this. He was not happy about this at all.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
Check out this interview.
Speaker 5 (18:19):
I do they violated, but Israel violated it too. Israel,
as soon as we made the deal, they came out
and they dropped the load of bombs the likes of
which I've never seen before, the biggest load that we've seen.
I'm not happy with Israel. You know, when I say, okay,
now you have twelve hours, you don't go out in
the first hour.
Speaker 4 (18:39):
It just drop everything you have on them.
Speaker 5 (18:41):
So I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with
Iron either. But I'm really unhappy if Israel's going out
this morning because the one rocket that didn't land, that
was shot perhaps by mistake, that didn't land.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
I'm not happy about that.
Speaker 5 (18:55):
You know what, We basically have two countries that have
been fighting so long and so hard that they don't
know what the fuck they're doing.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
Do you understand that?
Speaker 3 (19:12):
Uh yeah, So that actually came out of the President's mouth.
Whenever I heard that, I was like, a holy crap,
I mean, holy crap. President Trump was not happy about that.
Speaker 4 (19:23):
He wasn't happy about that at all.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
And here's kind of the thing too, because you, I mean,
you have all right, let's just break a few things
down for you real quick. You have a lot of
people that are like, oh, President Trump's in the pocket
of big money, is you know, especially Elon And it's like,
did you read anything.
Speaker 4 (19:41):
About the Big Beautiful Bill?
Speaker 3 (19:43):
You know, I did a whole show about did a
whole show about it talking about the fifty wins that
were in there. And these weren't fifty wins to Elon Musk.
In fact, it was bad for Elon Musk, bad for
his business. And you're going to say that he's in
the pocket of big money. Some people are like, oh,
(20:03):
he's in the pocket of Israel. Really, he just put
a smack down on him. He told them to cease
and desist. And what was I what was Israel's response
to that? Yes, sir, as soon as they were told,
(20:25):
they turned their planes around and they went back home.
Speaker 4 (20:28):
And you're going to say that Israel is in control
of the President Trump.
Speaker 3 (20:32):
Does that make any sense looking at what has gone
on having that kind of a point of view, does
that make any sense whatsoever? No, of course it doesn't.
Two countries that have been fighting for so long, they
don't know what the fuck is going on.
Speaker 4 (20:58):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
I heard about that, and I was like, oh, Trump
must be mad.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Oh I was.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
I was like, wow, uh Trump just dropped the F bomb.
Holy crap, And I love it. People that are like, oh,
that's not presidential, that's bad, YadA YadA, blah blah. It's like, dude,
President Trump, I mean, can we just put it this way.
The general rules of being a politician just don't. They
(21:38):
don't affect him. They just don't. And one of the
reasons why is you know, I mean, I don't know
about you, but especially me being a conservative, I look
at what has happened with President Trump. The attacks, I
mean ten years of endless attacks of him having to
(22:03):
defend his position, defend himself.
Speaker 4 (22:07):
You know.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
They went after his money, somewhat successful, but they failed.
They went after his property, they failed. They went after
his reputation. It failed.
Speaker 4 (22:23):
He got shot in the ear. They tried to kill him.
They failed.
Speaker 3 (22:32):
The legal battles, they failed, the thirty four felony counts
that weren't actually felonies.
Speaker 4 (22:41):
Yeah, that failed. It failed.
Speaker 3 (22:46):
Every attack they've had on him, it failed. He started
off as a cultural icon on TV, in movies, being
sung about in songs all the freaking time, a cultural icon,
(23:06):
became president less attacks. He didn't take a single penny
in his salary. His business took a hit. But people
look at Trump and they see themselves.
Speaker 4 (23:25):
I mean, that's really what it boils down to. People
look at Trump and they see themselves.
Speaker 3 (23:30):
I don't know about you, but I see what Trump
has done, and I'm like, yeah, I would have done that.
Speaker 4 (23:37):
I probably would have even done worse.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
I mean, you look at Hillary Clinton, Oh yeah, I
would have made sure that she was not just investigated,
that she was prosecuted.
Speaker 4 (23:51):
You're damn right, I would have.
Speaker 3 (23:57):
After doing something that not only helped the United States
of America but Israel as well. And for Israel to
just completely throw a temper tantrum over one rocket that
didn't hit anything significance, one of them, one rocket and
they go over there in force, and it's like, dude,
that no, you're not to quit throwing a temper tantrum.
(24:20):
Go get your go sit in a damn corner. And
for him to say what he said, Yeah, he's the
blue collar billionaire. I mean, it's just I don't know
about you, but I look at Trump. I look at
(24:40):
how he's handled things. I look at how he has responded,
what he has been able to accomplish, and it's like, wow,
I would have done the same thing, if not worser,
much more worser.
Speaker 4 (24:56):
Absolutely. I mean, I'm just I'm just going to be honest,
honest about that. He resonates with the American people because
he's not a politician. He's just a.
Speaker 3 (25:11):
Guy, the head of a movement to where people that
have been disenfranchised for years finally have a home in Maga.
Isn't that more or less what this whole thing amounts to.
(25:36):
There's been enough light SHD and it's like, Yeah, we
need to call these people out. We need to put
an end to the corruption, we need to stop the
wasteful spending.
Speaker 4 (25:48):
We need to do this. I mean, it's not a question,
it's an answer. It has to be. There's it's got
to stop.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
President Trump can only do so much, but it's up
to the American people to actually make sure that what's
going on, what he's wanting to do, what he's trying
to do, what he's trying to accomplish, make sure it
actually sticks. So the twelve day war is over, I'm
(26:21):
not concerned about any escalation in the war War three.
I'm not concerned about Russia. I'm not concerned about China.
I'm not concerned about a retaliation from the nation of Iran.
But my only concern is this, the sleeper sells that
Iran has on American soil.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
That's my concern. Now, Ice.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
And these federal officers has actually done a lot arresting
a lot of Iranian nationals illegal aliens and detaining them
or shipping them back home, because I mean, according to
(27:10):
some reports, there's like a thousand sleeper cells here, and
that part is kind of terrifying crap.
Speaker 4 (27:24):
Sorry about that. I forgot to mute my phone.
Speaker 3 (27:28):
Let me go ahead and do that real quick, what
would you stop it?
Speaker 4 (27:35):
There we go?
Speaker 3 (27:40):
But that that's my only concern though. It's the possibility
of sleeper cells being activated and wreaking havoc in these
sanctuary cities, the loss of life that could possibly happen
from it. That's really my only concern. But I know
that the administration is doing their best with these you know,
(28:02):
with these ICE agents, these other federal officers that are
that are trying to arrest illegals, making you know, making
them accountable. We're seeking justice, They're making headways. They're actually
have done quite a bit. We know that there's a
lot of Iranian nationals here. We know that they could
(28:23):
be sleeper cells, they could do something. That threat is
ever present. The four year open border of Biden was
a train wreck, was horrible for national security. We have
no idea how many people are here, but we do
know that there's a lot of terrorists and all this
stuff was just allowed to happen by the Biden administration.
(28:49):
It's kind of ridiculous, in all honesty, it's very much ridiculous.
Speaker 4 (28:56):
So the twelve day war, is that right? Twelve day
war is that? It is that?
Speaker 1 (29:06):
What it was?
Speaker 4 (29:07):
Twelve day war? Yeah, twelve day war is over.
Speaker 3 (29:13):
I'm not expecting any kind of retaliation from Iran other
than the sleeper cells. I don't see the you know,
they've been decimated. Iran has been decimated, So I don't
see any kind of retaliation. The sleeper selles is my
only concern.
Speaker 4 (29:32):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
But if we allow ICE agents to do their job,
get rid of these illegal aliens, to track them down,
to find them where they are, to arrest them, and
to get rid of them, put them in jail or otherwise,
then problem solved, right, problem solved. Not worried about Russia,
not worried about China. Yeah, win win, be about this,
(30:00):
I really am. Well, what did you think about the strike,
the precision that was demonstrated, the uh, some of the
reporting that came out. Let me know what you think
down in the comments below. Of course, you can email
me ho Ho at the ho Ho show dot com.
(30:21):
We're gonna go ahead and take a quick break, right,
quick play some music, let me get some uh some
articles taken down, and then well not articles taken down
to close some tabs and bring up some new stuff,
getting ready for what we're going to talk about next, which.
Speaker 4 (30:35):
Is, oh yeah, yeah, the uh oh wait, no, that's
not it. Hmmm, where'd it go? There?
Speaker 6 (30:48):
It is?
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Do do do? Do do? Looking at some of my
articles here, Yeah, well, I got two different things I'm
kind of wanting to talk about next, because I wanted
to talk about the the the the the auto pen,
that whole scandal which is which is kind of blowing
(31:09):
up on the left right about now very much is.
And I'm also wanting to talk about the the the
the Democrat race for mayor of New York City. What
has happened there? Holy crap.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
I think I think I'll start off with the what's
going on with the auto pen? We'll talk about that
right after this, just a couple of minutes, and I'll
be right.
Speaker 7 (31:34):
That Oscar walk these dusty trails with a stride.
Speaker 8 (31:41):
So full of pride, A man built tough from.
Speaker 7 (31:45):
Him to toe. Nothing he had to hide below his knee.
Speaker 8 (31:50):
He'd had some strife, a leg nod of his own.
Speaker 7 (31:55):
But every step he took in life, you'd never see
him on leather boots and iron wheel. His spirits never
flag or fields and farms.
Speaker 4 (32:12):
He till the.
Speaker 8 (32:12):
Ground beside an old plows drag.
Speaker 7 (32:16):
Folks would whispered on the street, how does he stand
so tall? But Oscar just grin ear to ear.
Speaker 8 (32:24):
I'm stronger than you all. Oscar boots keep moving.
Speaker 6 (32:33):
On, no matter what comes down through the night so
dark and cold, or the sun baked golden ground. He's
got a harder, solid bronze and a mine, sharp and vast.
Oscar shows us every day the future is not the past.
Speaker 8 (32:58):
He drove an old Ford pick up truck, a rusty
butted ran, hauling every loading dream this.
Speaker 7 (33:07):
Mighty simple man.
Speaker 8 (33:10):
Kids would gather around his feet just to hear him
talk about the days he fought in one the life
within his walks. He's let gonna slow his spirit down.
Can't keep a good man still every morning up at dawn,
(33:34):
flowing through sheer will, worn out jeans and callous hands,
an emblem of pure grit. Oscars story traveled far, a
fire that never quit.
Speaker 7 (33:52):
Oscar boots cheap, moving.
Speaker 8 (33:53):
On, no matter what comes down through the night so
dark and cold, or the sun baked golden ground.
Speaker 6 (34:03):
He's got a hard a solid bronze.
Speaker 8 (34:06):
And a mine.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
The sharp and vast.
Speaker 8 (34:09):
Oscar shows us every day the futures, not the past.
Futures not the past.
Speaker 4 (34:27):
Do you work at any of the merit of jobs
where you might have to sit on your bum all day? Well,
if so, maybe you know what it's like to suffer
from the condition known as swamp ass. Well, if so,
have I got the solution for you. It's high monkey
butt powder.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
That's right, it's high monkey butt powder.
Speaker 4 (34:46):
You can use an indoors outdoors work or play, or
on any occasion when you sit.
Speaker 3 (34:51):
On your bum all day. Don't let your buns get read.
Use anti monkey butt powder instead, available wherever anti friction
powder is.
Speaker 4 (35:00):
Oh right, and we are back.
Speaker 3 (35:04):
So the story I wanted to get into now is
about the auto pen. We've had a lot of stuff
come to light. We've had a very damning, a very
damning testimony in front of the Oversight Committee, the House
Oversite Committee.
Speaker 4 (35:24):
Things just really don't look good. It really doesn't.
Speaker 3 (35:27):
Basically, we've come to find out that there was a
person that was behind it, that they didn't have any
contact with Biden, that it was other people in the
administration that basically gave the clearance the okay the go
ahead to use the auto pen. Nothing that actually directly
came from Biden, and that person wasn't even able to benefit.
(35:53):
And this, this one actually kind of cracked me up,
especially with some of the trust that they some of
the stuff that they put President Trump through, and other
people in his administration not granting him executive executive immunity.
There's a technical term for it. I don't remember what
it is, but that's what a mounts to executive immunity
(36:13):
forcing him to go ahead and give the testimony.
Speaker 4 (36:19):
And things are looking pretty bad for the Biden administration.
Speaker 3 (36:26):
Now the Democrats are like, hey, you know, we can't
look in the past.
Speaker 4 (36:29):
We gotta move forward into the future. YadA yadah, blah blah.
Speaker 3 (36:32):
Let's just ignore everything that happened from the previous administration
and let's move forward. And it's like, really, that's the
type of thing you're going to say, after the years
of attacks on Donald Trump, after all of the you know,
going after him legally with the multiple felonies and everything
that you try to charge him with, you're actually going
(36:55):
to use that type of language.
Speaker 4 (36:56):
Now, Well, of course they are about the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3 (37:01):
If they can't be two faced if they can't be hypocritical,
then they wouldn't have anything.
Speaker 4 (37:06):
That they could do right now that we're supposed to
have somebody else testify, and after this person kind of
seen what happened to the last person that testified, he's like, oh, yeah, no,
I'm not doing it. I don't remember the name.
Speaker 3 (37:25):
Of this person, but he's basically the the work husband
of Jill Biden, so you can just imagine what kind
of stuff he is aware of and he knows about.
And the House Oversight Committee actually issued a subpoena for
this guy to come forth and testify, and it was
(37:48):
like two weeks from now, I think, like somewhere around
July sixteenth is whenever, like the date that I remember
hearing as far as when he is subpoened to come
and testify, which I don't quite understand why it's going
to take so freaking long to get him there. He
was already set up to testify, and then he refused.
(38:09):
Why not issue something and force him to testify? Like, now,
I don't understand the delay. I'm just going to be
honest with you, but everything on this looks bad for
the for the Biden administration, and it really is a
constitutional crisis. That's that's what it amounts to. Because the
(38:33):
auto pen is supposed to be used more or less
during a time whenever something serious is going on. The
president is not at the White House, and the president
himself authorizes the use of the auto pen, that's how
it's supposed to be used.
Speaker 4 (38:51):
But that's not how it was used.
Speaker 3 (38:52):
There was numerous times when the president was present at
the White House or the auto was used.
Speaker 4 (39:02):
Why didn't he sign it himself?
Speaker 3 (39:06):
If everything is so much on the up and up,
why are they hiding what happened? I mean, the fact
of the matter is Democrats know that they screwed up
with this.
Speaker 4 (39:17):
They absolutely do.
Speaker 3 (39:18):
They're aware of it. They're fully aware of it. What
I want to know is what's going to come of this.
Speaker 4 (39:30):
I'm sure that's a lot of the question.
Speaker 3 (39:32):
I'm sure that's the biggest question that a lot of
people are asking right now. I mean, let's gather all
the information, be open with the American people, let them
know what the heck happened.
Speaker 4 (39:47):
And here's the thing.
Speaker 3 (39:49):
When you elect the president, you're not electing the administration,
You're not electing his aides, you're not electing other people
besides the president. The power was given to the president,
not necessarily the office of the president. It was given
to the president. That's a clear distinction in the Constitution,
(40:09):
not the office of but the individual that is the
president of the United States of America. So you look
at all the things that was signed using the auto pen,
which was a lot of things. Most everything that was
signed by the bid in in the Biden administration was
done by the auto pen.
Speaker 4 (40:28):
You can look at it. You can see it. They
already know which ones were signed by the auto pen
and which ones were not. It's a staggering number, it
really is. But you look at the people that.
Speaker 3 (40:43):
Were appointed to different positions that is supposed to be
appointed by the president, and it wasn't. The bills that
were signed, the executive order that were signed. What's the
(41:04):
legality of it? How much of these things can completely
be overturned. I mean, you want to talk about a
constitutional crisis going on, this is it. This isn't being
perpetrated by the Trump administration. This was done by the
Biden administration. The power is granted to the president in
(41:33):
the Constitution in the United States of America doesn't give
that power as a blanket to the entirety of the
executive branch, the entirety of his administration. It was given
to a person. It was given to an individual. That's
how the wording is. If he was not competent enough
to sit in the chair, to be in that position,
(41:55):
he was supposed to be removed. It was their their duty,
it was their job to do so twenty fifth Amendment.
But instead they wanted to protect the president, protect his legacy,
and now you have Now they have a problem. But
(42:21):
I want to know the repercussions. I want a ruling
on this by the Supreme Court, and I.
Speaker 4 (42:28):
Don't I don't think the Supreme Court really has an
out on this. I'm just going to be honest with
you because with how serious this is, the possible backlash,
I mean, I can understand at least that they don't
want to, you know, basically put the entire administration at
(42:50):
you know, like on the chopping block, just like basically
undo everything that had happened the previous four years. I
understand if they don't want.
Speaker 8 (42:57):
To do that.
Speaker 3 (42:57):
But at the same time, dude, if there's no percussions,
if there's no backlash, then what's to stop the.
Speaker 4 (43:04):
Next Joe Biden. The next administration that.
Speaker 3 (43:12):
Squanders steals the presidency for themselves.
Speaker 4 (43:17):
I mean, isn't that, in essence what happened. The administration
under Joe Biden stole.
Speaker 3 (43:23):
The presidency out from under the president. I mean, let's
be honest, that's exactly what happened. This is a rhetoric,
that's this.
Speaker 4 (43:34):
Is what happened. I don't know whether way to put it.
The administration stole the presidency from Joe Biden, and Joe
Biden was too mentally incompetent to do anything about it.
Where's the fallback? I don't really care about these oversighting.
(43:58):
I mean, we already know. I mean, let's just be honest.
We already know. We do.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
We may not have some fine details that they haven't uncovered.
Anything that is a shock is not surprising. We all
pretty much knew what was going on from the get go.
We seen the mental decline of Biden.
Speaker 4 (44:17):
It wasn't a surprise. We knew what was going on.
It wasn't a surprise. I mean we've seen him.
Speaker 3 (44:22):
Start late, leave early, go to Delaware all freaking weekend,
you know, starting at like four o'clock in the early afternoon,
coming back on Tuesday.
Speaker 4 (44:34):
I mean, he was an absent president.
Speaker 3 (44:38):
His administration was a joke. We just celebrated the one
year anniversary of the Biden collapse, well not really collapse,
but his epic showdown between Trump with where the whole
thing was had a light shined on it.
Speaker 4 (44:54):
The debate.
Speaker 3 (44:59):
If these people are forced to answer to what they
have done, there's nothing to stop them from doing it again.
What part about this do they not understand? That's what
I want to know. What part about this don't they understand?
If all they do is nothing, let it happen, no repercussion,
(45:19):
no fallout, no accountability, what's.
Speaker 4 (45:22):
The stuffing from doing it again? They're just going to
keep on keeping on. They're just going to keep on
doing bad behavior and expect to get away with it
because that's how business has been done.
Speaker 3 (45:37):
And I don't find that acceptable, just being honest with you,
I don't find that acceptable at all.
Speaker 4 (45:47):
So the Supreme Court did a ruling, and this is
actually kind of strange the ruling on this, because is
what the Supreme Court was basically ruling on was the.
Speaker 3 (46:06):
Whole birthright citizenship. That's what they were supposed to be
ruling on, but instead they didn't actually make a ruling
about birthright citizenship. Instead, what they made a ruling on
was about limiting the ability of federal judges to issue
universal injunctions.
Speaker 4 (46:27):
That's what they put a stop to. It was supposed
to be ruling on birthright citizenship, but they didn't make
any kind of ruling on birthright citizenship. I mean on
that aspect. They were very very vague, and I actually
don't understand that.
Speaker 3 (46:47):
So this headline from NPR, yeah, yeah, yeah, use an
NPR what is birthright citizenship and what happens after the
Supreme Court ruling? Well, after the Supreme Court issued a
ruling on a ruling that limits the ability of federal
judges to issue universal injunctions, but didn't rule on the
legality of President Trump's executive orders on birthright citizenship.
Speaker 4 (47:10):
I don't understand that. I mean, isn't that what they
were trying to make a ruling about what? I don't
get it.
Speaker 3 (47:23):
But the thing continue because this is where things kind
of get interesting as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 4 (47:29):
The article continues.
Speaker 3 (47:30):
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two immigrant rights
organizations whose members include people without legal status in the
US who have had, or will have children born in
the United States after February nineteenth, twenty twenty five. According
to court documents, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs,
William Powell, Senior counsel at the Institute of Constitutionality, Constitutional
(47:55):
Advocacy and Potential or I'm Sorry and Protection at George
Town Law, says his colleagues at CASA, Inc. And the
Asylum seekret Advocacy Project think that the class action approach
we will be able to get complete relief for everyone
who would be covered by the executive order.
Speaker 4 (48:18):
Here's what makes no sense to me. It is a
national class action lawsuit on a Supreme Court ruling that
(48:41):
limits the ability of federal judges to issue universal injunctions,
limiting the power of federal judges saying, Hey, stay in
your lane, and here we have this national class action lawsuit.
Speaker 3 (48:59):
Really, I'm definitely not have to read more on this
on this ruling figure.
Speaker 4 (49:07):
You know, look at.
Speaker 3 (49:08):
The the things that were written on it from the
Supreme Court and it gets some get some perspective on this.
I mean, dude, this article comes from NPR. I don't
trust NPR as far as I can throw them.
Speaker 4 (49:26):
I just don't.
Speaker 3 (49:29):
So I definitely want to get into this more, but
it is. It does kind of impress me that finally
they've made some kind of of a decision to smack
these federal judges in place.
Speaker 4 (49:43):
And this wouldn't be the only ruling that has done this.
And it's high time these judges.
Speaker 3 (49:50):
Stop doing the crap that they're being told by the
Supreme Court that they're not supposed to do. For some reason,
these Supreme Court, or I'm sorry, these federal judges think
that they have more power than the Supreme Court.
Speaker 4 (50:01):
I mean, hello, have you not read the Constitution? Do
you not know anything about the supremacy clause? Hello? I
mean if you got separate but equal branches and there
is one of those branches that gave you power, how
do you have the ability to limit No?
Speaker 3 (50:33):
I mean, let me let me put it to you
like this, Okay, you've got This is like a parent
saying to their child, I brought you into this world,
I'll take you out. I mean, isn't that what we
got here? Parents make children? And I don't know about
(50:57):
your debit. My dad told me that, hey, you know
what I brought you into this world? I'll take you out.
Speaker 4 (51:01):
It ain't going to matter to me none. I'll make
another one that look.
Speaker 5 (51:03):
Just like you.
Speaker 4 (51:06):
FAFO, Go ahead, son.
Speaker 3 (51:10):
This is like that same verbiage being told to the
parents from their children. How does this make any sense whatsoever?
I mean, I could only imagine the look on my
dad's face if I would have told him I brought
(51:31):
you into this world, I'll take you out.
Speaker 4 (51:36):
Go ahead? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 3 (51:40):
I mean, is that the stance that the Federal Court
has out of control of children, thinking that they're going
to put the Supreme Court in its place, And they've
been allowed to continue as they have, unchecked, mostly unchecked.
Speaker 4 (51:59):
And even if even whenever you have a ruling like
this that kind of puts the smack down on them,
what ends up happening? Do they take a chill pill?
Do they cease and desist? Do they stop with the
craziness and the antics?
Speaker 3 (52:12):
No, it seems like more time than not, what we
have going on is they double down. They continue to
do the same craft that they already have done. They
don't stop. They don't relinquish control. They don't relinquish power.
I mean, you don't have power.
Speaker 4 (52:31):
I mean it's as ridiculous as trying to rob a
bank with an obvious water pistol filled with water, good
old fashion h two oh, distilled, not even filled with
skunk stuff. I had a movie on my mind and
I'm like, no, I'm not going to go there. It
(52:52):
was a good one. I think it was The Boy
that Could Fly. Do you remember that movie? The Boy
that Could Fly?
Speaker 3 (53:00):
You know, the the end of it was entertaining to me.
The bully that wouldn't let the kid go, you know,
the younger brother of the sister who kind of liked
the boy they could fly, you know, the go around
the block in his in his his big wheels.
Speaker 4 (53:18):
That was hilarious.
Speaker 3 (53:20):
And the bully that stopped him and wouldn't let him
go all the way around the block. And he's like, yeah,
at this time, my gun's filled with p and he
shoots him in the face with anyway, Yeah, trying to
rub a bank with an obvious water pistol filled with
distilled water, thinking you're going to get something, thinking you're
going to actually rob the bank and get away with it.
Speaker 4 (53:42):
I was like, are you serious right now? I mean,
is that really what you're going to do? You have nothing,
no power, no authority. I don't get it, don't.
Speaker 3 (54:01):
These judges are out of control and it's high time
they get put back in their place.
Speaker 4 (54:06):
It just is. It is, all right, let me see here.
What else am I wanting to get to today? Oh yeah,
the self described democratic socialist who could be New York
(54:26):
City's next mayor.
Speaker 3 (54:30):
We're going to talk about that right after this. Just
a couple of minutes and I'll be right.
Speaker 9 (54:34):
Back, walking down the street with a smile. So koy,
feeling like a king, not a single decoy. But then
it slips out, silent but deadly. Everyone around just looks
at me dreadfully in the elevator with a loaded mask,
(54:54):
silent escape. Sure it was in first class, trying to
act cool like nothing's wrong, but everyone knows. It's a
stinky song, silent but deadly, creeping through the air. People
holding thoses everywhere, moments.
Speaker 7 (55:14):
Of peace torn of hard.
Speaker 9 (55:18):
All from the art of silent far in a crowded room,
I let one go, hoping no one notice. But it's
the show. Faces start to twist and turn. Maybe next
time I'll be more concerned. Oh the shame, the awkward
(55:40):
dance playing with fate in the fart romance wish and
I could just disappear, but laughter breaks out, conquering the fear,
silent but deadly, creeping through the air, popullholding noses everywherewhere.
(56:04):
Bonemans of peace, a.
Speaker 2 (56:07):
Pie all from the art of a silent far, of
a silent far, of a silent far.
Speaker 4 (56:37):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit?
Are you tired of walking by family members and crop
dusting them? Well, if this has ever happened to you,
might I introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs. Tampon's
brand butt plugs is that particular type of butt plug
that allows you to walk in public in confidence no
one that you're not going to accidentally crop does some
(56:59):
by the Tampa's brand butt plugs now with the plastic applicator.
Not just for women anymore. Tampa's brand butt plugs. And
we're back.
Speaker 3 (57:08):
So we are going to start off this one with
talking about the mayor race in the primary, the mayor
race in New York City. And let me just say,
as a warning to anybody living in New York City,
get out, get out now, because if he actually does get.
Speaker 4 (57:30):
Elected, holy crap. I mean that.
Speaker 3 (57:44):
I want you to think about this. A Democrat socialist
just beat the the incumbent, and Andrew Cuomo as a
Democrat nominee. Now mean, granted, this could be a huge
(58:04):
win for Republicans.
Speaker 4 (58:05):
It really could be.
Speaker 3 (58:08):
You know, those people that are kind of more centrist,
of those that are, you know, the classify themselves as independent,
they may run to the Republican side during the election.
Speaker 4 (58:21):
They absolutely could.
Speaker 3 (58:22):
I mean, this could be a huge win for Republicans
in New York City. I very much could be. But
let's think about this for a second. The Democrat Party
just elected a Democrat socialist as their nominee for mayor.
Speaker 4 (58:51):
This is a guy.
Speaker 3 (58:54):
Who wants to shut down the police. He wants to
defund the police.
Speaker 4 (59:08):
In a city where a lot of things has already
been decriminalized. It's catch and release on all kinds of people, not.
Speaker 3 (59:15):
Just illegal aliens, I mean criminals too, violent criminals, cashlest bail,
all this kind of crap going on. And now it's
defund the police. Shut down, shut down police departments, defund them.
And if that wasn't bad enough, one of the other
things that he's also talked about doing is closing down prisons,
(59:38):
letting these people back into the population that have already
been locked up.
Speaker 4 (59:43):
Are you kidding me? He's wanting to nationalize grocery stores.
Speaker 3 (59:54):
Not okay, not not necessarily nationalized grocery stores. What was
it he was wanting to make a th federal grocery
store that just so you know that, you know that
mab paul places other grocery stores would not be able
to compete with, to run them out of business, and
then who knows what would actually happen to the price
(01:00:15):
of groceries at that point.
Speaker 4 (01:00:17):
I mean, that's one of the.
Speaker 3 (01:00:18):
Things he's talking about doing. This is an absolute disaster.
I mean, this tells you where New York City is
at right now.
Speaker 4 (01:00:30):
Either the only ones that are left in their party are.
Speaker 3 (01:00:36):
Wack a doodles, that too many people have actually gone
to the right, which I guess is possible. I don't know,
but looking at how many illegals that are still there,
and it's like, I don't know about that. I'm actually
(01:00:57):
kind of curious to see what ends up happening.
Speaker 4 (01:01:02):
With this race. I mean, this could be a huge,
a huge.
Speaker 3 (01:01:06):
Benefit for for Republicans in New York City. We may
get another Republican governor would be That would actually be
pretty cool. There's quite a few people that are talking
about running on the independent ticket that are actually Democrats,
(01:01:26):
which would be nice because it could possibly split up
the uh, you know, the Democrat ticket, making it more likely.
Speaker 4 (01:01:34):
For a Republican to win. But again, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (01:01:40):
When it comes to New York City, I don't have
a lot of faith in how they do things.
Speaker 4 (01:01:46):
I just don't. But this is.
Speaker 3 (01:01:49):
Concerning to me. This shows where the Democrat Party is.
I mean, this is the biggest city in the United
States of America. Is this a forecast as to where
the Democrats are going?
Speaker 4 (01:02:08):
How concerning is this to you?
Speaker 3 (01:02:11):
Do you think this is going to end up being
a huge win for Republicans in the mayor race.
Speaker 4 (01:02:16):
Do you think that's possible?
Speaker 3 (01:02:19):
Because I don't know. I mean, it is possible. I
think it's possible. Is it actually going to pan out?
I have no idea. Is this guy going to actually
become mayor? I don't know. But if he does, I
would warrn everybody in New York, especially if you are
a conservative, get the hell out.
Speaker 4 (01:02:38):
Right now.
Speaker 3 (01:02:39):
I mean, I just don't see this ending well for
New York at all, especially if this guy does actually
end up winning, if the Republicans are able to rally
together get the vote of Independence and Republicans, then there's
(01:03:00):
a chance, absolutely.
Speaker 4 (01:03:01):
But if that ends up falling through, then oh boy,
I don't I don't like it.
Speaker 3 (01:03:08):
Not a good thing, not a good thing at all.
Let's go ahead and move on to this headline. This
is something that I have been hearing about for a while.
A lot of echoes into this, and there really isn't
any question anymore. I mean, I know that the Democrats
(01:03:29):
would have you believe that, oh no, everything was good
and fair and legal and everything else, and now it's
there's definitely been some information come out that, yeah, no,
things weren't really all that cut and simple. I got
a couple articles here, one of which, oh wait, let.
Speaker 4 (01:03:51):
Me get rid of that one. Get rid of that one. Okay.
I got two articles here.
Speaker 3 (01:03:59):
One from Just the News and the other one from
the Daily Fetch. Let's go ahead and look at.
Speaker 4 (01:04:08):
Yeah, let's look at this one from the Daily Fetched.
Speaker 3 (01:04:13):
Cash Battel exposes FBI cover up. Chris Ray lied about
the twenty twenty election. There's been a lot of information
come out about this over.
Speaker 4 (01:04:25):
Recent weeks, and.
Speaker 3 (01:04:28):
Yeah, definitely undermining the confidence in the twenty twenty election.
Let's go ahead and look into this article. So FBI
official Cash Battel has produced evidence that he claims provide deproves.
Former FBI Director Christopher Ray failed to complete a thorough
investigation into potential fraud during the twenty twenty US presidential election.
(01:04:55):
According to Pateel, Ray shut down an investigation into an
alleged Chinese interference interference during the election.
Speaker 4 (01:05:04):
Now here's one of the things.
Speaker 3 (01:05:04):
That I heard that there was like a butt ton
of false IDs.
Speaker 4 (01:05:12):
That were provided to Chinese foreign nationals to sway the election. Thousands.
Speaker 3 (01:05:25):
Let me see if I can find that number. I
don't see a number in this one. Let me look
over to the just a news article.
Speaker 4 (01:05:35):
And I'm not seeing a number in this one either.
This is actually a bit longer of an article. Holy crap. Yeah,
not seeing a number. But there was a lot. Li
was bit that way, There was a lot. Let's actually
get into this just a news article on this one.
Let me look in.
Speaker 3 (01:05:52):
Okay, so Patel Bongino say, prior FBI leaders hit evidence
of Chinese interference in twenty twenty election.
Speaker 4 (01:06:00):
He chose play politics.
Speaker 3 (01:06:03):
FBI Director Cash Mattel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino alleged
Tuesday that the bureau's prior leadership chose to play politics.
Speaker 4 (01:06:12):
And isn't that just pitiful?
Speaker 3 (01:06:18):
The hit evidence from the American people of a Chinese
plot to hijack the twenty twenty US election with.
Speaker 4 (01:06:25):
Fake mail in ballats.
Speaker 3 (01:06:26):
I forgot to mention that when fake mailed in ballots
for Joe Biden. The two FBI leaders statement came a
week after Just the News reported Patel turned over the
Congress earlier this month. A long hidden intelligence reports That's right,
it was a long hidden intelligence reports raise it concerns
that China had mass produced fake US driver's licenses to
(01:06:50):
carry out a scheme to swing the twenty twenty elections
to Biden with fake mail in ballast.
Speaker 4 (01:06:57):
So yes, it wasn't just about fake US driver's license
it was also about fake mail in ballots. Are you
still going to sit there and tell me that the
twenty twenty election was free and fair, that there was
no shenanigans happening, no fraud, no nothing.
Speaker 3 (01:07:22):
Whenever, bit by bit, month by month, we're finding out
the opposite is actually true.
Speaker 4 (01:07:38):
And you wonder why we want to.
Speaker 3 (01:07:40):
Get rid of illegal aliens in this country today? You
wonder why the American people in mass are coming out demanding.
Speaker 4 (01:07:58):
Election integrity laws, things like you know, I don't know,
proving your citizenship, showing an ID, things like that.
Speaker 3 (01:08:07):
And I mean, it never made any sense to me.
Why the Democrat Party, why anybody, I.
Speaker 4 (01:08:15):
Mean, with with how things are. It's like, dude, I
got to show an ID to buy cigarettes, to buy alcohol,
to get a bank account, to get a loan, to
to fly on a plane. I've got to show ID
to do so much. But yet they want to claim that, well,
(01:08:35):
you know, black people don't do any of that stuff.
It's racist to have voter ID laws. We don't want
to do that. They don't want to do the littlest
thing necessary to give the elections integrity instead, And I mean, okay,
let's look at it honestly, if you don't want these
simple basic measures to be put in place to give
(01:08:58):
elections integrity, there's only the one reason that.
Speaker 3 (01:09:01):
You don't want to do that is because you plan
on cheating. I mean, isn't that what it boils down to?
If you are running away from voter id laws. It's
because you plan on putting people in place that are
not citizens, don't live in the place where they're voting,
(01:09:25):
or are voting in place of dead people that are
not supposed to be on the voter rolls in the
first place. That's what it amounts to. And we've had
evidence of all three of those happening, significant evidence.
Speaker 4 (01:09:44):
But yet they're trying to tell us that there's nothing
to see here. Uhhah.
Speaker 3 (01:09:50):
Actually expect me to believe that more information coming to
life that hijack the twenty twenty election in favor of
Joe Biden.
Speaker 4 (01:10:12):
Okay, So that's really all I got for y'alls today.
That is it. Do me a favor.
Speaker 3 (01:10:19):
Head on over to the Ho host Show. Go ahead
and subscribe to the newsletter over there. Hit me up
on social media sites like X let me see, I'm
looking that up right now. It's either the Ho Ho
Show or the Ho Ho Show. I don't it's Ho
Ho Show at Ho Ho Show over there on X.
Speaker 4 (01:10:36):
Anyway, that's all I got for y'alls today. Y'alls have
yourself for a great one and I will see you
in the next one. This has been the ho Host Show.
For more information, you can head to the ho Hostshow
dot com and for the merchandise store, you can head
on over to stinkpickle dot com. That is s t
i n k p I k l e dot com.
(01:10:57):
Until next time, the assist at
Yes, Welcome to the show, grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida. So join us now, as
we discussed news, politics, current events at so much more,
but through the airwaves and strapped in as we.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Do because there.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
The're broadcasting live from Weapini Soft Production Studio B. Welcome
to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm your host,
Ho Ho say.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
Hey, y'all's doing I hope you're doing good? I really do.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
We've got some stuff to talk about today, Holy cow.
A lot has happened this past week, like a lot.
A lot of stuff has happened this past week. Let's see,
we've got excuse me. We're going to be talking about
some information about the twenty twenty election. We're going to
(01:10):
be talking about Hunter Biden. We're going to be talking
about well, the big beautiful bill, the hold up of
that in the Senate. We're also going to be talking
about the election, the primary election in New York City
for the mayor.
Speaker 4 (01:31):
That's a train rack. Holy cow.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
We're going to be talking about a white house, not
a white house, a Supreme Court ruling. But first, let's
talk about the Twelve Day War. Let's talk about Iran let's.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
Get into that now.
Speaker 3 (01:51):
You all know how I like to start the program. Normally,
I start off with some haha, some humor, some satire.
In my go to worse for satire news is the
Babylon b This headline whenever I read it, it cracked
me up.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
I had to laugh. I thought it was funny. Let's
just put it that way. I thought it was funny.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Headline, Ayatola proudly announces I Ran has destroyed fourteen bunker
buster bombs with its nuclear facility. Yeah, I had to laugh.
I thought that was funny. I really did. The article
continues says some stuff, and yeah, it's it's worth the
read if you like satire news. It really is. It's hilarious.
(02:38):
But anyway, let's go ahead and start the show.
Speaker 4 (02:43):
Now. I'm a little fuzzy on timeline. I'm just going
to be honest with you.
Speaker 3 (02:49):
But I think it was either like Saturday morning or
it was Saturday night. I think might have been Saturday
night that they sent up some B fifty two stealth bombers.
(03:14):
Some of them went out west going to wherever, and
they were the decoys. They were very much the decoys,
and a bunch of them carrying two of these bunker
buster bombs each left and went east heading to Iran
(03:34):
from Adam, Missouri heading to Iran, and the uh, what
was the name of the mission? Oh, holy cow, what
was the name of the mission? Hammerhead or something.
Speaker 4 (03:46):
I don't know. Yeah, I don't know. I had it.
Speaker 3 (03:52):
It was written down or not written down, but it
was on the screen and now I don't see it.
Speaker 4 (03:57):
But whatever their operation they sent them east back.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
And I mean, this was a pretty big operation, it
really was. I mean this operation was was pretty big
because there was.
Speaker 4 (04:12):
A lot of aircraft that went out there, some f
thirty fives, other a lot of aircrafts providing support.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
The Navy was over there launching, and is what they
did is they did an attack on three different nuclear facilities,
and the biggest one being that mountain photo for do whatever.
I don't know that that was the big one, okay,
And they dropped like fourteen total, twelve of them going
(04:48):
to this one side, if I'm remembering my numbers correctly,
But fourteen total bunker buster bombs.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
That is man, that's hard to say. Bunker buster imps,
bunker buster bombs, bunker buster bombs. That's a tongue twister.
But that's what they did. They dropped.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
They dropped the buttload of them. Okay, they got in
and out without losing a single plane. I mean basically
they got in and out before Iran even knew what
the heck was going on. I mean, that's more or
less the truth of I mean, do you do you
understand the significance of that. Of that alone, this whole
(05:30):
entire mission went off without a hitch, no leaks. They
were very tight lipped on information.
Speaker 4 (05:39):
Where it went, you know how how you know, everything
was communicated. They were very tight lipped about.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
It, and it wasn't until after the fact that it
was like, yeah, we did it. I remember listening to
the uh uh President Trump's announcement of it, letting everybody
know what happened and basically saying that, yeah, their nuclear
(06:05):
facilities were I mean this it's devastated.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
Okay. Now some of the.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
Uh, some of the talks, you know, because there's a
lot of talking going on, and some people are like,
you know, well, their their nuclear material that they had
was you know, either it was there or you know
that there's no real clear indication as to whether they
actually destroyed it. So they can still get it, they
(06:34):
have access to it. But I'm going to be honest
with you, that's not really a concern for me. It
really isn't.
Speaker 4 (06:40):
Now. In my last show, what was the name of
that show, War and Iran?
Speaker 3 (06:46):
It was it was more or less talking about how
this could you know, how Iran getting nuclear weapons, you know,
enriching uranium to weaponize level was bad because we are
already had the information that they were enriching uranium beyond
the point that you would need for any type.
Speaker 4 (07:08):
Of civilian or medical use.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
We knew this, and we also knew that the only
reason why they would be weaponizing or enriching uranium to
this point was to get weapons.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
Grade uranium to make a nuclear warhead.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
They had all the materials together, everything that they needed
to make a nuclear warhead and launch it at their targets.
That was the intel that we had.
Speaker 4 (07:39):
That's what we knew.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
And of course, like I said in that in my
last episode, that's bad because we knew that they actually
did it. They would launch it Israel obviously, but their
next target, we feared, would be the United States of America.
They don't like us, and so President Trump, he did
(08:05):
something about it.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
They were f owen. President Trump was.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Like, now you're going to find out, fa fo, I
did that wrong the first time, FAFO they.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
Were messing around.
Speaker 3 (08:24):
President Trump's like, well, now you're going to find out.
And is what he did. He took them from the
ability of getting nuclear weapons making nuclear weapons from like
a week out two weeks out to obliterated their ability
(08:47):
to win rich uranium. Whether or not they have the
uranium doesn't really matter. I mean in the grand scope,
in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't really matter.
So what if they still have the nuclear U material,
The uranium doesn't matter because they can't do anything with it.
(09:07):
That was one of the things about the mission that
they had take away their ability to enrich the uranium
to weapons grade.
Speaker 4 (09:17):
That was part of their mission. They succeeded. There was
a lot of a lot of people that were kind
of upset about it. Everybody was like, oh, this is
going to be you know, this is going to end
up being World War III and all this other kind
of stuff.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
And I'm gonna be honest with you, I never I
never believed that.
Speaker 4 (09:37):
I really didn't. And here's why. Let me tell you why.
Whose our two major adversaries right now. Russia, Okay, well,
they already had their hands full with Ukraine. I'm not
worried about them.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
And they also know that if they end up attacking us,
considering how drained their MILLI terry is right now with
their ongoing war against Ukraine, they don't really stand a chance.
And that was a hint about what we can do
if we actually put our minds to a president willing
to actually do something about it peace through strength. There
(10:20):
was a demonstration of our ability. That's another of what
that was. So I'm not worried about any type of
of them at all. I'm not worried about China because
China's economy is in crisis mode right now. It just is,
(10:45):
you know, Chinese, China's economy.
Speaker 4 (10:47):
Is not doing very well. You know, yes, they have
the manpower and I mean, yeah.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
They have the stuff to do it, but they don't
really have the money to fund anything.
Speaker 4 (11:00):
So I'm really not concerned about China.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
How about retaliation against ira you know from Iran? Okay,
that one's at least on the table, But let's let's
be up front and honest about something. Because Israel, with
their strikes which were very strategic, strategical, very strategical. They
were strategic critical things that they were hitting. I mean,
(11:28):
Israel took out Hamas, they took out Hasbellah, the two
biggest allies that Iran has to where Iran was basically
left doing everything on their own.
Speaker 4 (11:42):
Israel had air superiority over Iran. They took out UH,
they took out Iran's ability to really fire off a
lot of weapons they took out They crippled Iran. I mean,
let's just be honest. Israel crippled Iran. One of the.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
Reasons why we were able to make it, make the
strike so effective.
Speaker 4 (12:12):
After the strike, it was okay, now let's do peace.
Speaker 3 (12:20):
And another big story about all this was that, you know,
the the leaked intelligence briefing that basically said that the
strikes were ineffective, you know, maybe took their ability to
get a nuclear warhead back like maybe a month. And
(12:43):
that was a huge Like really, I mean, that's what
your story is going to be, that it really was ineffective.
Here's a couple of things to know about that leaked briefing. One,
it was leaked, and according to reports and some headlines
that I've read, cash Bettel is going after the people
(13:05):
who leaked that because that was totally unacceptable. Some Democrat
that doesn't like the administration, doesn't like Trump is a
friend to Iran, is like, yeah, we're just going to
leak this information to make Trump look incompetent. But the
sad thing is the or at least not the sad thing.
The good thing is the bonus was.
Speaker 4 (13:27):
We had the goods. We had the goods.
Speaker 3 (13:33):
President Trump wasn't trying to hide anything. Pete Hegseth was like, yeah,
we took him out. Look at the pictures.
Speaker 4 (13:43):
Here's some testimony from people in the know.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
Here's some of what the pilots saw, and it's like, uh, yeah,
we destroyed those facilities. They no longer have the ability
to enricheranium. Very in the story. Wasn't even a question
from people that were exercising half of their brain.
Speaker 4 (14:06):
It wasn't a question.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
As to how devastating this attack really was. These bombings
not even a question. But not only was there not
a not only was there not an American life lost
during this operation. According to reports, Now we don't know
(14:28):
how true these are, but according to reports, there wasn't
even any Iranians in a loss of life in that aspect,
Evidently these places were empty. I don't know how much
of that I believe I was going to be honest
with you, I really don't. I mean, you would think
that there would be somebody there doing something, some type
(14:49):
of research whatever. There's been some information that I've heard
floated around out there that.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
Possibly speaking, there was enough of a warning that.
Speaker 3 (14:59):
Was given to which I don't even think I'd buy
this would either, just to be honest with you, because
of some of the other reporting that happened that they
were in and out, not a single shot fired at all.
Because you would think that if a warning was given
to these facilities to you know, hey, they're coming, they're
almost there, you would think that their first course.
Speaker 4 (15:21):
Of action would be to try to shoot down the planes,
which considered there be fifty two bombers, you know, stealth,
they really wouldn't be able to do that, but that's
beside the point.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
You would think that that would be their first call,
their first course of action. But that's not what ended
up happening. But according to all reporting that there was
no loss of life, that it was an attack on
a facility to end Iran's ability to enrich uranium to
(15:56):
weapons grade. And the attack was completely successful, completely successful.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
I heard a.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
You know, there was people that were mad about it,
saying that, oh, it was ineffective and all this other
kind of stuff.
Speaker 4 (16:16):
And like I said, I mean.
Speaker 3 (16:18):
I just you look at you look at all the
intel from places that matter, and yeah, this was extremely effective.
And President Trump was like, Okay, we're done, no more fighting.
Let's put an end to this. And he orchestrated a
(16:41):
cease fire. And this is where things get kind of
kind of funny. I'm just I'm just gonna throw that
out there. Things kind of get funny. So he started
a I got I got something to pull up. You
guys are going to hear some audio, and I'm just
gonna be honest. This is my I freaking president. Yeah,
(17:04):
I'm sure you alls have heard about this, you know,
him on his way to Marine one.
Speaker 4 (17:10):
The interview.
Speaker 3 (17:11):
The questions that reporters were asking in What Trump said
in response to one of these questions absolutely hilarious. Whenever
I heard about this, I'm like, are you kidding me?
Trump actually said that, oh I have to listen to this.
Speaker 4 (17:24):
It was hilarious. But Trump orchestrated a ceasefire. It was like, okay,
so we're going to have a winding down. Iran is
going to start immediately, and then Israel. And that is
only because of active operations that they were doing that
they needed to, you know, bring people back from and whatever.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
And apparently Iran, you know, right after the announcement of
this ceasefire, Iran fired a missile at least one one
missile that didn't really hit anything, It wasn't at a
critical location, and it might have been an accident.
Speaker 4 (18:00):
Really have no idea. Israel responded with launching.
Speaker 3 (18:05):
A lot of missiles back, and Trump was not happy
about this. He was not happy about this at all.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
Check out this interview.
Speaker 5 (18:19):
I do they violated, but Israel violated it too. Israel,
as soon as we made the deal, they came out
and they dropped the load of bombs the likes of
which I've never seen before, the biggest load that we've seen.
I'm not happy with Israel. You know, when I say, okay,
now you have twelve hours, you don't go out in
the first hour.
Speaker 4 (18:39):
It just drop everything you have on them.
Speaker 5 (18:41):
So I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with
Iron either. But I'm really unhappy if Israel's going out
this morning because the one rocket that didn't land, that
was shot perhaps by mistake, that didn't land.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
I'm not happy about that.
Speaker 5 (18:55):
You know what, We basically have two countries that have
been fighting so long and so hard that they don't
know what the fuck they're doing.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
Do you understand that?
Speaker 3 (19:12):
Uh yeah, So that actually came out of the President's mouth.
Whenever I heard that, I was like, a holy crap,
I mean, holy crap. President Trump was not happy about that.
Speaker 4 (19:23):
He wasn't happy about that at all.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
And here's kind of the thing too, because you, I mean,
you have all right, let's just break a few things
down for you real quick. You have a lot of
people that are like, oh, President Trump's in the pocket
of big money, is you know, especially Elon And it's like,
did you read anything.
Speaker 4 (19:41):
About the Big Beautiful Bill?
Speaker 3 (19:43):
You know, I did a whole show about did a
whole show about it talking about the fifty wins that
were in there. And these weren't fifty wins to Elon Musk.
In fact, it was bad for Elon Musk, bad for
his business. And you're going to say that he's in
the pocket of big money. Some people are like, oh,
(20:03):
he's in the pocket of Israel. Really, he just put
a smack down on him. He told them to cease
and desist. And what was I what was Israel's response
to that? Yes, sir, as soon as they were told,
(20:25):
they turned their planes around and they went back home.
Speaker 4 (20:28):
And you're going to say that Israel is in control
of the President Trump.
Speaker 3 (20:32):
Does that make any sense looking at what has gone
on having that kind of a point of view, does
that make any sense whatsoever? No, of course it doesn't.
Two countries that have been fighting for so long, they
don't know what the fuck is going on.
Speaker 4 (20:58):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
I heard about that, and I was like, oh, Trump
must be mad.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Oh I was.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
I was like, wow, uh Trump just dropped the F bomb.
Holy crap, And I love it. People that are like, oh,
that's not presidential, that's bad, YadA YadA, blah blah. It's like, dude,
President Trump, I mean, can we just put it this way.
The general rules of being a politician just don't. They
(21:38):
don't affect him. They just don't. And one of the
reasons why is you know, I mean, I don't know
about you, but especially me being a conservative, I look
at what has happened with President Trump. The attacks, I
mean ten years of endless attacks of him having to
(22:03):
defend his position, defend himself.
Speaker 4 (22:07):
You know.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
They went after his money, somewhat successful, but they failed.
They went after his property, they failed. They went after
his reputation. It failed.
Speaker 4 (22:23):
He got shot in the ear. They tried to kill him.
They failed.
Speaker 3 (22:32):
The legal battles, they failed, the thirty four felony counts
that weren't actually felonies.
Speaker 4 (22:41):
Yeah, that failed. It failed.
Speaker 3 (22:46):
Every attack they've had on him, it failed. He started
off as a cultural icon on TV, in movies, being
sung about in songs all the freaking time, a cultural icon,
(23:06):
became president less attacks. He didn't take a single penny
in his salary. His business took a hit. But people
look at Trump and they see themselves.
Speaker 4 (23:25):
I mean, that's really what it boils down to. People
look at Trump and they see themselves.
Speaker 3 (23:30):
I don't know about you, but I see what Trump
has done, and I'm like, yeah, I would have done that.
Speaker 4 (23:37):
I probably would have even done worse.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
I mean, you look at Hillary Clinton, Oh yeah, I
would have made sure that she was not just investigated,
that she was prosecuted.
Speaker 4 (23:51):
You're damn right, I would have.
Speaker 3 (23:57):
After doing something that not only helped the United States
of America but Israel as well. And for Israel to
just completely throw a temper tantrum over one rocket that
didn't hit anything significance, one of them, one rocket and
they go over there in force, and it's like, dude,
that no, you're not to quit throwing a temper tantrum.
(24:20):
Go get your go sit in a damn corner. And
for him to say what he said, Yeah, he's the
blue collar billionaire. I mean, it's just I don't know
about you, but I look at Trump. I look at
(24:40):
how he's handled things. I look at how he has responded,
what he has been able to accomplish, and it's like, wow,
I would have done the same thing, if not worser,
much more worser.
Speaker 4 (24:56):
Absolutely. I mean, I'm just I'm just going to be honest,
honest about that. He resonates with the American people because
he's not a politician. He's just a.
Speaker 3 (25:11):
Guy, the head of a movement to where people that
have been disenfranchised for years finally have a home in Maga.
Isn't that more or less what this whole thing amounts to.
(25:36):
There's been enough light SHD and it's like, Yeah, we
need to call these people out. We need to put
an end to the corruption, we need to stop the
wasteful spending.
Speaker 4 (25:48):
We need to do this. I mean, it's not a question,
it's an answer. It has to be. There's it's got
to stop.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
President Trump can only do so much, but it's up
to the American people to actually make sure that what's
going on, what he's wanting to do, what he's trying
to do, what he's trying to accomplish, make sure it
actually sticks. So the twelve day war is over, I'm
(26:21):
not concerned about any escalation in the war War three.
I'm not concerned about Russia. I'm not concerned about China.
I'm not concerned about a retaliation from the nation of Iran.
But my only concern is this, the sleeper sells that
Iran has on American soil.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
That's my concern. Now, Ice.
Speaker 3 (26:50):
And these federal officers has actually done a lot arresting
a lot of Iranian nationals illegal aliens and detaining them
or shipping them back home, because I mean, according to
(27:10):
some reports, there's like a thousand sleeper cells here, and
that part is kind of terrifying crap.
Speaker 4 (27:24):
Sorry about that. I forgot to mute my phone.
Speaker 3 (27:28):
Let me go ahead and do that real quick, what
would you stop it?
Speaker 4 (27:35):
There we go?
Speaker 3 (27:40):
But that that's my only concern though. It's the possibility
of sleeper cells being activated and wreaking havoc in these
sanctuary cities, the loss of life that could possibly happen
from it. That's really my only concern. But I know
that the administration is doing their best with these you know,
(28:02):
with these ICE agents, these other federal officers that are
that are trying to arrest illegals, making you know, making
them accountable. We're seeking justice, They're making headways. They're actually
have done quite a bit. We know that there's a
lot of Iranian nationals here. We know that they could
(28:23):
be sleeper cells, they could do something. That threat is
ever present. The four year open border of Biden was
a train wreck, was horrible for national security. We have
no idea how many people are here, but we do
know that there's a lot of terrorists and all this
stuff was just allowed to happen by the Biden administration.
(28:49):
It's kind of ridiculous, in all honesty, it's very much ridiculous.
Speaker 4 (28:56):
So the twelve day war, is that right? Twelve day
war is that? It is that?
Speaker 1 (29:06):
What it was?
Speaker 4 (29:07):
Twelve day war? Yeah, twelve day war is over.
Speaker 3 (29:13):
I'm not expecting any kind of retaliation from Iran other
than the sleeper cells. I don't see the you know,
they've been decimated. Iran has been decimated, So I don't
see any kind of retaliation. The sleeper selles is my
only concern.
Speaker 4 (29:32):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
But if we allow ICE agents to do their job,
get rid of these illegal aliens, to track them down,
to find them where they are, to arrest them, and
to get rid of them, put them in jail or otherwise,
then problem solved, right, problem solved. Not worried about Russia,
not worried about China. Yeah, win win, be about this,
(30:00):
I really am. Well, what did you think about the strike,
the precision that was demonstrated, the uh, some of the
reporting that came out. Let me know what you think
down in the comments below. Of course, you can email
me ho Ho at the ho Ho show dot com.
(30:21):
We're gonna go ahead and take a quick break, right,
quick play some music, let me get some uh some
articles taken down, and then well not articles taken down
to close some tabs and bring up some new stuff,
getting ready for what we're going to talk about next, which.
Speaker 4 (30:35):
Is, oh yeah, yeah, the uh oh wait, no, that's
not it. Hmmm, where'd it go? There?
Speaker 6 (30:48):
It is?
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Do do do? Do do? Looking at some of my
articles here, Yeah, well, I got two different things I'm
kind of wanting to talk about next, because I wanted
to talk about the the the the the auto pen,
that whole scandal which is which is kind of blowing
(31:09):
up on the left right about now very much is.
And I'm also wanting to talk about the the the
the Democrat race for mayor of New York City. What
has happened there? Holy crap.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
I think I think I'll start off with the what's
going on with the auto pen? We'll talk about that
right after this, just a couple of minutes, and I'll
be right.
Speaker 7 (31:34):
That Oscar walk these dusty trails with a stride.
Speaker 8 (31:41):
So full of pride, A man built tough from.
Speaker 7 (31:45):
Him to toe. Nothing he had to hide below his knee.
Speaker 8 (31:50):
He'd had some strife, a leg nod of his own.
Speaker 7 (31:55):
But every step he took in life, you'd never see
him on leather boots and iron wheel. His spirits never
flag or fields and farms.
Speaker 4 (32:12):
He till the.
Speaker 8 (32:12):
Ground beside an old plows drag.
Speaker 7 (32:16):
Folks would whispered on the street, how does he stand
so tall? But Oscar just grin ear to ear.
Speaker 8 (32:24):
I'm stronger than you all. Oscar boots keep moving.
Speaker 6 (32:33):
On, no matter what comes down through the night so
dark and cold, or the sun baked golden ground. He's
got a harder, solid bronze and a mine, sharp and vast.
Oscar shows us every day the future is not the past.
Speaker 8 (32:58):
He drove an old Ford pick up truck, a rusty
butted ran, hauling every loading dream this.
Speaker 7 (33:07):
Mighty simple man.
Speaker 8 (33:10):
Kids would gather around his feet just to hear him
talk about the days he fought in one the life
within his walks. He's let gonna slow his spirit down.
Can't keep a good man still every morning up at dawn,
(33:34):
flowing through sheer will, worn out jeans and callous hands,
an emblem of pure grit. Oscars story traveled far, a
fire that never quit.
Speaker 7 (33:52):
Oscar boots cheap, moving.
Speaker 8 (33:53):
On, no matter what comes down through the night so
dark and cold, or the sun baked golden ground.
Speaker 6 (34:03):
He's got a hard a solid bronze.
Speaker 8 (34:06):
And a mine.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
The sharp and vast.
Speaker 8 (34:09):
Oscar shows us every day the futures, not the past.
Futures not the past.
Speaker 4 (34:27):
Do you work at any of the merit of jobs
where you might have to sit on your bum all day? Well,
if so, maybe you know what it's like to suffer
from the condition known as swamp ass. Well, if so,
have I got the solution for you. It's high monkey
butt powder.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
That's right, it's high monkey butt powder.
Speaker 4 (34:46):
You can use an indoors outdoors work or play, or
on any occasion when you sit.
Speaker 3 (34:51):
On your bum all day. Don't let your buns get read.
Use anti monkey butt powder instead, available wherever anti friction
powder is.
Speaker 4 (35:00):
Oh right, and we are back.
Speaker 3 (35:04):
So the story I wanted to get into now is
about the auto pen. We've had a lot of stuff
come to light. We've had a very damning, a very
damning testimony in front of the Oversight Committee, the House
Oversite Committee.
Speaker 4 (35:24):
Things just really don't look good. It really doesn't.
Speaker 3 (35:27):
Basically, we've come to find out that there was a
person that was behind it, that they didn't have any
contact with Biden, that it was other people in the
administration that basically gave the clearance the okay the go
ahead to use the auto pen. Nothing that actually directly
came from Biden, and that person wasn't even able to benefit.
(35:53):
And this, this one actually kind of cracked me up,
especially with some of the trust that they some of
the stuff that they put President Trump through, and other
people in his administration not granting him executive executive immunity.
There's a technical term for it. I don't remember what
it is, but that's what a mounts to executive immunity
(36:13):
forcing him to go ahead and give the testimony.
Speaker 4 (36:19):
And things are looking pretty bad for the Biden administration.
Speaker 3 (36:26):
Now the Democrats are like, hey, you know, we can't
look in the past.
Speaker 4 (36:29):
We gotta move forward into the future. YadA yadah, blah blah.
Speaker 3 (36:32):
Let's just ignore everything that happened from the previous administration
and let's move forward. And it's like, really, that's the
type of thing you're going to say, after the years
of attacks on Donald Trump, after all of the you know,
going after him legally with the multiple felonies and everything
that you try to charge him with, you're actually going
(36:55):
to use that type of language.
Speaker 4 (36:56):
Now, Well, of course they are about the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3 (37:01):
If they can't be two faced if they can't be hypocritical,
then they wouldn't have anything.
Speaker 4 (37:06):
That they could do right now that we're supposed to
have somebody else testify, and after this person kind of
seen what happened to the last person that testified, he's like, oh, yeah, no,
I'm not doing it. I don't remember the name.
Speaker 3 (37:25):
Of this person, but he's basically the the work husband
of Jill Biden, so you can just imagine what kind
of stuff he is aware of and he knows about.
And the House Oversight Committee actually issued a subpoena for
this guy to come forth and testify, and it was
(37:48):
like two weeks from now, I think, like somewhere around
July sixteenth is whenever, like the date that I remember
hearing as far as when he is subpoened to come
and testify, which I don't quite understand why it's going
to take so freaking long to get him there. He
was already set up to testify, and then he refused.
(38:09):
Why not issue something and force him to testify? Like, now,
I don't understand the delay. I'm just going to be
honest with you, but everything on this looks bad for
the for the Biden administration, and it really is a
constitutional crisis. That's that's what it amounts to. Because the
(38:33):
auto pen is supposed to be used more or less
during a time whenever something serious is going on. The
president is not at the White House, and the president
himself authorizes the use of the auto pen, that's how
it's supposed to be used.
Speaker 4 (38:51):
But that's not how it was used.
Speaker 3 (38:52):
There was numerous times when the president was present at
the White House or the auto was used.
Speaker 4 (39:02):
Why didn't he sign it himself?
Speaker 3 (39:06):
If everything is so much on the up and up,
why are they hiding what happened? I mean, the fact
of the matter is Democrats know that they screwed up
with this.
Speaker 4 (39:17):
They absolutely do.
Speaker 3 (39:18):
They're aware of it. They're fully aware of it. What
I want to know is what's going to come of this.
Speaker 4 (39:30):
I'm sure that's a lot of the question.
Speaker 3 (39:32):
I'm sure that's the biggest question that a lot of
people are asking right now. I mean, let's gather all
the information, be open with the American people, let them
know what the heck happened.
Speaker 4 (39:47):
And here's the thing.
Speaker 3 (39:49):
When you elect the president, you're not electing the administration,
You're not electing his aides, you're not electing other people
besides the president. The power was given to the president,
not necessarily the office of the president. It was given
to the president. That's a clear distinction in the Constitution,
(40:09):
not the office of but the individual that is the
president of the United States of America. So you look
at all the things that was signed using the auto pen,
which was a lot of things. Most everything that was
signed by the bid in in the Biden administration was
done by the auto pen.
Speaker 4 (40:28):
You can look at it. You can see it. They
already know which ones were signed by the auto pen
and which ones were not. It's a staggering number, it
really is. But you look at the people that.
Speaker 3 (40:43):
Were appointed to different positions that is supposed to be
appointed by the president, and it wasn't. The bills that
were signed, the executive order that were signed. What's the
(41:04):
legality of it? How much of these things can completely
be overturned. I mean, you want to talk about a
constitutional crisis going on, this is it. This isn't being
perpetrated by the Trump administration. This was done by the
Biden administration. The power is granted to the president in
(41:33):
the Constitution in the United States of America doesn't give
that power as a blanket to the entirety of the
executive branch, the entirety of his administration. It was given
to a person. It was given to an individual. That's
how the wording is. If he was not competent enough
to sit in the chair, to be in that position,
(41:55):
he was supposed to be removed. It was their their duty,
it was their job to do so twenty fifth Amendment.
But instead they wanted to protect the president, protect his legacy,
and now you have Now they have a problem. But
(42:21):
I want to know the repercussions. I want a ruling
on this by the Supreme Court, and I.
Speaker 4 (42:28):
Don't I don't think the Supreme Court really has an
out on this. I'm just going to be honest with
you because with how serious this is, the possible backlash,
I mean, I can understand at least that they don't
want to, you know, basically put the entire administration at
(42:50):
you know, like on the chopping block, just like basically
undo everything that had happened the previous four years. I
understand if they don't want.
Speaker 8 (42:57):
To do that.
Speaker 3 (42:57):
But at the same time, dude, if there's no percussions,
if there's no backlash, then what's to stop the.
Speaker 4 (43:04):
Next Joe Biden. The next administration that.
Speaker 3 (43:12):
Squanders steals the presidency for themselves.
Speaker 4 (43:17):
I mean, isn't that, in essence what happened. The administration
under Joe Biden stole.
Speaker 3 (43:23):
The presidency out from under the president. I mean, let's
be honest, that's exactly what happened. This is a rhetoric,
that's this.
Speaker 4 (43:34):
Is what happened. I don't know whether way to put it.
The administration stole the presidency from Joe Biden, and Joe
Biden was too mentally incompetent to do anything about it.
Where's the fallback? I don't really care about these oversighting.
(43:58):
I mean, we already know. I mean, let's just be honest.
We already know. We do.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
We may not have some fine details that they haven't uncovered.
Anything that is a shock is not surprising. We all
pretty much knew what was going on from the get go.
We seen the mental decline of Biden.
Speaker 4 (44:17):
It wasn't a surprise. We knew what was going on.
It wasn't a surprise. I mean we've seen him.
Speaker 3 (44:22):
Start late, leave early, go to Delaware all freaking weekend,
you know, starting at like four o'clock in the early afternoon,
coming back on Tuesday.
Speaker 4 (44:34):
I mean, he was an absent president.
Speaker 3 (44:38):
His administration was a joke. We just celebrated the one
year anniversary of the Biden collapse, well not really collapse,
but his epic showdown between Trump with where the whole
thing was had a light shined on it.
Speaker 4 (44:54):
The debate.
Speaker 3 (44:59):
If these people are forced to answer to what they
have done, there's nothing to stop them from doing it again.
What part about this do they not understand? That's what
I want to know. What part about this don't they understand?
If all they do is nothing, let it happen, no repercussion,
(45:19):
no fallout, no accountability, what's.
Speaker 4 (45:22):
The stuffing from doing it again? They're just going to
keep on keeping on. They're just going to keep on
doing bad behavior and expect to get away with it
because that's how business has been done.
Speaker 3 (45:37):
And I don't find that acceptable, just being honest with you,
I don't find that acceptable at all.
Speaker 4 (45:47):
So the Supreme Court did a ruling, and this is
actually kind of strange the ruling on this, because is
what the Supreme Court was basically ruling on was the.
Speaker 3 (46:06):
Whole birthright citizenship. That's what they were supposed to be
ruling on, but instead they didn't actually make a ruling
about birthright citizenship. Instead, what they made a ruling on
was about limiting the ability of federal judges to issue
universal injunctions.
Speaker 4 (46:27):
That's what they put a stop to. It was supposed
to be ruling on birthright citizenship, but they didn't make
any kind of ruling on birthright citizenship. I mean on
that aspect. They were very very vague, and I actually
don't understand that.
Speaker 3 (46:47):
So this headline from NPR, yeah, yeah, yeah, use an
NPR what is birthright citizenship and what happens after the
Supreme Court ruling? Well, after the Supreme Court issued a
ruling on a ruling that limits the ability of federal
judges to issue universal injunctions, but didn't rule on the
legality of President Trump's executive orders on birthright citizenship.
Speaker 4 (47:10):
I don't understand that. I mean, isn't that what they
were trying to make a ruling about what? I don't
get it.
Speaker 3 (47:23):
But the thing continue because this is where things kind
of get interesting as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 4 (47:29):
The article continues.
Speaker 3 (47:30):
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two immigrant rights
organizations whose members include people without legal status in the
US who have had, or will have children born in
the United States after February nineteenth, twenty twenty five. According
to court documents, one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs,
William Powell, Senior counsel at the Institute of Constitutionality, Constitutional
(47:55):
Advocacy and Potential or I'm Sorry and Protection at George
Town Law, says his colleagues at CASA, Inc. And the
Asylum seekret Advocacy Project think that the class action approach
we will be able to get complete relief for everyone
who would be covered by the executive order.
Speaker 4 (48:18):
Here's what makes no sense to me. It is a
national class action lawsuit on a Supreme Court ruling that
(48:41):
limits the ability of federal judges to issue universal injunctions,
limiting the power of federal judges saying, Hey, stay in
your lane, and here we have this national class action lawsuit.
Speaker 3 (48:59):
Really, I'm definitely not have to read more on this
on this ruling figure.
Speaker 4 (49:07):
You know, look at.
Speaker 3 (49:08):
The the things that were written on it from the
Supreme Court and it gets some get some perspective on this.
I mean, dude, this article comes from NPR. I don't
trust NPR as far as I can throw them.
Speaker 4 (49:26):
I just don't.
Speaker 3 (49:29):
So I definitely want to get into this more, but
it is. It does kind of impress me that finally
they've made some kind of of a decision to smack
these federal judges in place.
Speaker 4 (49:43):
And this wouldn't be the only ruling that has done this.
And it's high time these judges.
Speaker 3 (49:50):
Stop doing the crap that they're being told by the
Supreme Court that they're not supposed to do. For some reason,
these Supreme Court, or I'm sorry, these federal judges think
that they have more power than the Supreme Court.
Speaker 4 (50:01):
I mean, hello, have you not read the Constitution? Do
you not know anything about the supremacy clause? Hello? I
mean if you got separate but equal branches and there
is one of those branches that gave you power, how
do you have the ability to limit No?
Speaker 3 (50:33):
I mean, let me let me put it to you
like this, Okay, you've got This is like a parent
saying to their child, I brought you into this world,
I'll take you out. I mean, isn't that what we
got here? Parents make children? And I don't know about
(50:57):
your debit. My dad told me that, hey, you know
what I brought you into this world? I'll take you out.
Speaker 4 (51:01):
It ain't going to matter to me none. I'll make
another one that look.
Speaker 5 (51:03):
Just like you.
Speaker 4 (51:06):
FAFO, Go ahead, son.
Speaker 3 (51:10):
This is like that same verbiage being told to the
parents from their children. How does this make any sense whatsoever?
I mean, I could only imagine the look on my
dad's face if I would have told him I brought
(51:31):
you into this world, I'll take you out.
Speaker 4 (51:36):
Go ahead? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 3 (51:40):
I mean, is that the stance that the Federal Court
has out of control of children, thinking that they're going
to put the Supreme Court in its place, And they've
been allowed to continue as they have, unchecked, mostly unchecked.
Speaker 4 (51:59):
And even if even whenever you have a ruling like
this that kind of puts the smack down on them,
what ends up happening? Do they take a chill pill?
Do they cease and desist? Do they stop with the
craziness and the antics?
Speaker 3 (52:12):
No, it seems like more time than not, what we
have going on is they double down. They continue to
do the same craft that they already have done. They
don't stop. They don't relinquish control. They don't relinquish power.
I mean, you don't have power.
Speaker 4 (52:31):
I mean it's as ridiculous as trying to rob a
bank with an obvious water pistol filled with water, good
old fashion h two oh, distilled, not even filled with
skunk stuff. I had a movie on my mind and
I'm like, no, I'm not going to go there. It
(52:52):
was a good one. I think it was The Boy
that Could Fly. Do you remember that movie? The Boy
that Could Fly?
Speaker 3 (53:00):
You know, the the end of it was entertaining to me.
The bully that wouldn't let the kid go, you know,
the younger brother of the sister who kind of liked
the boy they could fly, you know, the go around
the block in his in his his big wheels.
Speaker 4 (53:18):
That was hilarious.
Speaker 3 (53:20):
And the bully that stopped him and wouldn't let him
go all the way around the block. And he's like, yeah,
at this time, my gun's filled with p and he
shoots him in the face with anyway, Yeah, trying to
rub a bank with an obvious water pistol filled with
distilled water, thinking you're going to get something, thinking you're
going to actually rob the bank and get away with it.
Speaker 4 (53:42):
I was like, are you serious right now? I mean,
is that really what you're going to do? You have nothing,
no power, no authority. I don't get it, don't.
Speaker 3 (54:01):
These judges are out of control and it's high time
they get put back in their place.
Speaker 4 (54:06):
It just is. It is, all right, let me see here.
What else am I wanting to get to today? Oh yeah,
the self described democratic socialist who could be New York
(54:26):
City's next mayor.
Speaker 3 (54:30):
We're going to talk about that right after this. Just
a couple of minutes and I'll be right.
Speaker 9 (54:34):
Back, walking down the street with a smile. So koy,
feeling like a king, not a single decoy. But then
it slips out, silent but deadly. Everyone around just looks
at me dreadfully in the elevator with a loaded mask,
(54:54):
silent escape. Sure it was in first class, trying to
act cool like nothing's wrong, but everyone knows. It's a
stinky song, silent but deadly, creeping through the air. People
holding thoses everywhere, moments.
Speaker 7 (55:14):
Of peace torn of hard.
Speaker 9 (55:18):
All from the art of silent far in a crowded room,
I let one go, hoping no one notice. But it's
the show. Faces start to twist and turn. Maybe next
time I'll be more concerned. Oh the shame, the awkward
(55:40):
dance playing with fate in the fart romance wish and
I could just disappear, but laughter breaks out, conquering the fear,
silent but deadly, creeping through the air, popullholding noses everywherewhere.
(56:04):
Bonemans of peace, a.
Speaker 2 (56:07):
Pie all from the art of a silent far, of
a silent far, of a silent far.
Speaker 4 (56:37):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit?
Are you tired of walking by family members and crop
dusting them? Well, if this has ever happened to you,
might I introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs. Tampon's
brand butt plugs is that particular type of butt plug
that allows you to walk in public in confidence no
one that you're not going to accidentally crop does some
(56:59):
by the Tampa's brand butt plugs now with the plastic applicator.
Not just for women anymore. Tampa's brand butt plugs. And
we're back.
Speaker 3 (57:08):
So we are going to start off this one with
talking about the mayor race in the primary, the mayor
race in New York City. And let me just say,
as a warning to anybody living in New York City,
get out, get out now, because if he actually does get.
Speaker 4 (57:30):
Elected, holy crap. I mean that.
Speaker 3 (57:44):
I want you to think about this. A Democrat socialist
just beat the the incumbent, and Andrew Cuomo as a
Democrat nominee. Now mean, granted, this could be a huge
(58:04):
win for Republicans.
Speaker 4 (58:05):
It really could be.
Speaker 3 (58:08):
You know, those people that are kind of more centrist,
of those that are, you know, the classify themselves as independent,
they may run to the Republican side during the election.
Speaker 4 (58:21):
They absolutely could.
Speaker 3 (58:22):
I mean, this could be a huge win for Republicans
in New York City. I very much could be. But
let's think about this for a second. The Democrat Party
just elected a Democrat socialist as their nominee for mayor.
Speaker 4 (58:51):
This is a guy.
Speaker 3 (58:54):
Who wants to shut down the police. He wants to
defund the police.
Speaker 4 (59:08):
In a city where a lot of things has already
been decriminalized. It's catch and release on all kinds of people, not.
Speaker 3 (59:15):
Just illegal aliens, I mean criminals too, violent criminals, cashlest bail,
all this kind of crap going on. And now it's
defund the police. Shut down, shut down police departments, defund them.
And if that wasn't bad enough, one of the other
things that he's also talked about doing is closing down prisons,
(59:38):
letting these people back into the population that have already
been locked up.
Speaker 4 (59:43):
Are you kidding me? He's wanting to nationalize grocery stores.
Speaker 3 (59:54):
Not okay, not not necessarily nationalized grocery stores. What was
it he was wanting to make a th federal grocery
store that just so you know that, you know that
mab paul places other grocery stores would not be able
to compete with, to run them out of business, and
then who knows what would actually happen to the price
(01:00:15):
of groceries at that point.
Speaker 4 (01:00:17):
I mean, that's one of the.
Speaker 3 (01:00:18):
Things he's talking about doing. This is an absolute disaster.
I mean, this tells you where New York City is
at right now.
Speaker 4 (01:00:30):
Either the only ones that are left in their party are.
Speaker 3 (01:00:36):
Wack a doodles, that too many people have actually gone
to the right, which I guess is possible. I don't know,
but looking at how many illegals that are still there,
and it's like, I don't know about that. I'm actually
(01:00:57):
kind of curious to see what ends up happening.
Speaker 4 (01:01:02):
With this race. I mean, this could be a huge,
a huge.
Speaker 3 (01:01:06):
Benefit for for Republicans in New York City. We may
get another Republican governor would be That would actually be
pretty cool. There's quite a few people that are talking
about running on the independent ticket that are actually Democrats,
(01:01:26):
which would be nice because it could possibly split up
the uh, you know, the Democrat ticket, making it more likely.
Speaker 4 (01:01:34):
For a Republican to win. But again, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (01:01:40):
When it comes to New York City, I don't have
a lot of faith in how they do things.
Speaker 4 (01:01:46):
I just don't. But this is.
Speaker 3 (01:01:49):
Concerning to me. This shows where the Democrat Party is.
I mean, this is the biggest city in the United
States of America. Is this a forecast as to where
the Democrats are going?
Speaker 4 (01:02:08):
How concerning is this to you?
Speaker 3 (01:02:11):
Do you think this is going to end up being
a huge win for Republicans in the mayor race.
Speaker 4 (01:02:16):
Do you think that's possible?
Speaker 3 (01:02:19):
Because I don't know. I mean, it is possible. I
think it's possible. Is it actually going to pan out?
I have no idea. Is this guy going to actually
become mayor? I don't know. But if he does, I
would warrn everybody in New York, especially if you are
a conservative, get the hell out.
Speaker 4 (01:02:38):
Right now.
Speaker 3 (01:02:39):
I mean, I just don't see this ending well for
New York at all, especially if this guy does actually
end up winning, if the Republicans are able to rally
together get the vote of Independence and Republicans, then there's
(01:03:00):
a chance, absolutely.
Speaker 4 (01:03:01):
But if that ends up falling through, then oh boy,
I don't I don't like it.
Speaker 3 (01:03:08):
Not a good thing, not a good thing at all.
Let's go ahead and move on to this headline. This
is something that I have been hearing about for a while.
A lot of echoes into this, and there really isn't
any question anymore. I mean, I know that the Democrats
(01:03:29):
would have you believe that, oh no, everything was good
and fair and legal and everything else, and now it's
there's definitely been some information come out that, yeah, no,
things weren't really all that cut and simple. I got
a couple articles here, one of which, oh wait, let.
Speaker 4 (01:03:51):
Me get rid of that one. Get rid of that one. Okay.
I got two articles here.
Speaker 3 (01:03:59):
One from Just the News and the other one from
the Daily Fetch. Let's go ahead and look at.
Speaker 4 (01:04:08):
Yeah, let's look at this one from the Daily Fetched.
Speaker 3 (01:04:13):
Cash Battel exposes FBI cover up. Chris Ray lied about
the twenty twenty election. There's been a lot of information
come out about this over.
Speaker 4 (01:04:25):
Recent weeks, and.
Speaker 3 (01:04:28):
Yeah, definitely undermining the confidence in the twenty twenty election.
Let's go ahead and look into this article. So FBI
official Cash Battel has produced evidence that he claims provide deproves.
Former FBI Director Christopher Ray failed to complete a thorough
investigation into potential fraud during the twenty twenty US presidential election.
(01:04:55):
According to Pateel, Ray shut down an investigation into an
alleged Chinese interference interference during the election.
Speaker 4 (01:05:04):
Now here's one of the things.
Speaker 3 (01:05:04):
That I heard that there was like a butt ton
of false IDs.
Speaker 4 (01:05:12):
That were provided to Chinese foreign nationals to sway the election. Thousands.
Speaker 3 (01:05:25):
Let me see if I can find that number. I
don't see a number in this one. Let me look
over to the just a news article.
Speaker 4 (01:05:35):
And I'm not seeing a number in this one either.
This is actually a bit longer of an article. Holy crap. Yeah,
not seeing a number. But there was a lot. Li
was bit that way, There was a lot. Let's actually
get into this just a news article on this one.
Let me look in.
Speaker 3 (01:05:52):
Okay, so Patel Bongino say, prior FBI leaders hit evidence
of Chinese interference in twenty twenty election.
Speaker 4 (01:06:00):
He chose play politics.
Speaker 3 (01:06:03):
FBI Director Cash Mattel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino alleged
Tuesday that the bureau's prior leadership chose to play politics.
Speaker 4 (01:06:12):
And isn't that just pitiful?
Speaker 3 (01:06:18):
The hit evidence from the American people of a Chinese
plot to hijack the twenty twenty US election with.
Speaker 4 (01:06:25):
Fake mail in ballats.
Speaker 3 (01:06:26):
I forgot to mention that when fake mailed in ballots
for Joe Biden. The two FBI leaders statement came a
week after Just the News reported Patel turned over the
Congress earlier this month. A long hidden intelligence reports That's right,
it was a long hidden intelligence reports raise it concerns
that China had mass produced fake US driver's licenses to
(01:06:50):
carry out a scheme to swing the twenty twenty elections
to Biden with fake mail in ballast.
Speaker 4 (01:06:57):
So yes, it wasn't just about fake US driver's license
it was also about fake mail in ballots. Are you
still going to sit there and tell me that the
twenty twenty election was free and fair, that there was
no shenanigans happening, no fraud, no nothing.
Speaker 3 (01:07:22):
Whenever, bit by bit, month by month, we're finding out
the opposite is actually true.
Speaker 4 (01:07:38):
And you wonder why we want to.
Speaker 3 (01:07:40):
Get rid of illegal aliens in this country today? You
wonder why the American people in mass are coming out demanding.
Speaker 4 (01:07:58):
Election integrity laws, things like you know, I don't know,
proving your citizenship, showing an ID, things like that.
Speaker 3 (01:08:07):
And I mean, it never made any sense to me.
Why the Democrat Party, why anybody, I.
Speaker 4 (01:08:15):
Mean, with with how things are. It's like, dude, I
got to show an ID to buy cigarettes, to buy alcohol,
to get a bank account, to get a loan, to
to fly on a plane. I've got to show ID
to do so much. But yet they want to claim that, well,
(01:08:35):
you know, black people don't do any of that stuff.
It's racist to have voter ID laws. We don't want
to do that. They don't want to do the littlest
thing necessary to give the elections integrity instead, And I mean, okay,
let's look at it honestly, if you don't want these
simple basic measures to be put in place to give
(01:08:58):
elections integrity, there's only the one reason that.
Speaker 3 (01:09:01):
You don't want to do that is because you plan
on cheating. I mean, isn't that what it boils down to?
If you are running away from voter id laws. It's
because you plan on putting people in place that are
not citizens, don't live in the place where they're voting,
(01:09:25):
or are voting in place of dead people that are
not supposed to be on the voter rolls in the
first place. That's what it amounts to. And we've had
evidence of all three of those happening, significant evidence.
Speaker 4 (01:09:44):
But yet they're trying to tell us that there's nothing
to see here. Uhhah.
Speaker 3 (01:09:50):
Actually expect me to believe that more information coming to
life that hijack the twenty twenty election in favor of
Joe Biden.
Speaker 4 (01:10:12):
Okay, So that's really all I got for y'alls today.
That is it. Do me a favor.
Speaker 3 (01:10:19):
Head on over to the Ho host Show. Go ahead
and subscribe to the newsletter over there. Hit me up
on social media sites like X let me see, I'm
looking that up right now. It's either the Ho Ho
Show or the Ho Ho Show. I don't it's Ho
Ho Show at Ho Ho Show over there on X.
Speaker 4 (01:10:36):
Anyway, that's all I got for y'alls today. Y'alls have
yourself for a great one and I will see you
in the next one. This has been the ho Host Show.
For more information, you can head to the ho Hostshow
dot com and for the merchandise store, you can head
on over to stinkpickle dot com. That is s t
i n k p I k l e dot com.
(01:10:57):
Until next time, the assist at
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.