Are Arrests Coming?

In today’s episode, we are going to discuss the rebranding efforts of some companies. We will also talk about Trump’s push to stop mail in ballots and voting machines. We’ll also discuss the turnpike crash, Illegal immigration, and the FBI’s raid on John Bolton.

Email, Website & Other Links
[e-mail]
https://WSPRadio.com
https://TheHohOShow.com
https://link.thehohoshow.com/Rumble
https://link.thehohoshow.com/WSPChronicles
https://StinkPikle.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:07):
Yes, welcome to the rated the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as we
discuss news, politics, current events made so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do the
constitution because there burroadcasting alive from weapon I saw Production

(00:37):
Studio B. Welcome to the Ho Host Show And as
always I'm your host, Ho Ho. So how y'all's doing.
I hope you're doing good? I really do. We've got
some stuff to talk about today. Boy howdy. We're going
to be talking about the raid, the Bolton raid, the
FBI raid on Bolton, and and of course, you know,
we can't talk about that without throwing it a little

(00:59):
bit of hipocracy on the left, because that is just
blatantly obvious. We're going to be talking about some new information,
or at least, you know, information new to me about
the Florida crash and you know, some some stuff that
came out about that one. And to be honest with you,

(01:20):
I was pretty pissed off about this whenever I found out,
because you me, you know, we wouldn't get treated the
same note at all. And how it happened in Florida
is kind of beyond me. I really didn't expect this.
We're also going to be talking about d C statehood
and a couple other things that you know, or a

(01:41):
couple of things that President Trump is trying to do,
like getting rid of mail in ballots, and you know,
the usage of voting machines, like the dominion voting machines.
Who are also going to be talking about some rebranding
of a company. And even though you know, you know

(02:02):
they try to do this every single time, they've done it,
especially for the same reason as in you know, in
the name of wokeness, it's kind of backfired on them.
And that's exactly where we're starting today right now. Now,
y'alls know how I like to start the show. I
like to throw in a little bit of satire, a
little bit of ha ha am. My go to place

(02:24):
for satire news is The Bad bylomb Satire with a purpose,
or at least that's how I use it, satire absolutely
with a purpose. So this headline, and when I read it,
I absolutely had to laugh. Yeah, there we go. Waffle
House unveils successful brand strategy of just keeping everything the

(02:49):
same forever. And yes, this is talking about the recent
rebranding of Cracker Barrel. Now, for those of you that
are not aware, this rebranding effort has actually been going
on for quite some time since like the nineties, all right,

(03:14):
that's how long they've been trying to push, trying to,
you know, force Cracker Barrel to rebrand. Now, Cracker Barrel
is you know, it's a restaurant that's been around for
a while and it's you know, I mean, you've got
like a country store. You've got you know, like stuff

(03:37):
that you can buy nick knacks, different other things, and
then you can go into you know, their restaurant, have
a seat, great environment. It really is, you know, I mean,
everybody's I mean, I don't want to say everybody's familiar
with Cracker Barrel, but I'm sure there's a lot of
people out there that are. And if you haven't seen

(03:57):
the new logo, I mean, it's just it's ridiculous, really is,
you know, because they took they took out the cracker
and the barrel in the logo and they made it
just the words Cracker Barrel. That's it. Now. I don't
know as far as inside the store what they plan

(04:20):
on doing as far as making it more woke, but
I have no idea. I guess there's a push for
like five hundred I think, if I'm remembering my my
digits correctly, like five hundred different cracker barrels that are supposed
to be getting remodeled, and you know, see this new

(04:41):
brand change. And I gotta be honest with you, I
don't understand this strategy at all. You would think that
the left would would learn right trial and error. If
first you don't succeed, it's not you keep trying to
do the same damn thing.

Speaker 2 (04:59):
You know.

Speaker 1 (04:59):
But in this type of scenario with doing the rebranding,
how many times have we seen this actually work out
for the positive, for the better of a brand. I mean,
we've seen prices drop, you know, stock market prices and
whatnot drop. We've seen people just throw their hands into

(05:23):
the air and like, I give up. Whenever other companies
said done this, do you remember bud Light, it backfired
horribly on them and they had to go through a
complete you know, we got to get rid of the
woke in order to get our people's back, you know.
But I mean, you gotta look at who actually uses,

(05:46):
who consumes your product. Whenever you're thinking about doing some
type of a rebranding. I mean, you just got to
do that. You got to take in mind who your
audience is. You got to take in mind who your
clientele is. And I mean, let's be honest, especially in
the case of Cracker Barrel. Do you really think that

(06:08):
there's a lot of woke people that are going to
that restaurant and eating there or do you think it's
you know, primarily just regular every day people that like
a good home cooked ish meal, at least something that

(06:29):
reminds them of home, something that they would cook for themselves.
I mean, who is it the Cracker Barrel thinks their
clientel is. Because I can tell you this much, it's
not the woke people that's the clientel of Cracker Barrel.
It's not. I mean, and that's the thing too. I mean, look,

(06:50):
why don't they play the numbers game? You know, if
you're going to go to Vegas and you're going to gamble,
I don't recommend doing it because I mean, come on,
let's be honest. I mean, and it's the odds are
never in your favor, right, I mean that they're making
money hand over fist. They wouldn't be in business if
it was common practice, common you know, for people to win,

(07:16):
the house always wins, right. You know, Whenever I used
to work at a gas station back in you know,
married life. I worked at a gas station and there
was a young man that came in all the time
and would buy a scratch off tickets And it cracked
me up, right because he had this mindset. And you
see this a lot through people. They had this mindset

(07:37):
that they've somehow figured out the system. You know what
what number of tickets is they're currently in the book
that's left? You know what, what's the number that's on it.
Like they've somehow beat the system, Like they've somehow figured
it out, and like like somehow they've outsmarted the state

(07:59):
and they're going to be able to win. And I
asked the kid one time. I asked him straight up,
I'm like, look, let me let me ask you an
honest question, okay, because I really want to know, honest question.
Would the state put and produce and do all the
work necessary for scratch off tickets if they hadn't figured

(08:22):
out a way to get more money out of it
than what they give out in winnings, If they didn't
know they was going to make money off of this,
do you think they would do it? And the answer
to that question is obviously not. You know, of course

(08:42):
they wouldn't be doing it. Of course they wouldn't have
scratch offs if they didn't make it, if they didn't
rig it to where they wouldn't make money off of
it and not lose money. I mean, it's pretty stinking obvious, right,
It's pretty obvious. I mean, it's obvious to me. I'm
sure it's obvious to you. But for some reason, it's

(09:03):
not obvious to some companies who want to rebrand, and
I don't understand their reasoning behind it. I just don't,
especially whenever you have you know, like in this case,
they're catering to the you know, they're bending the knee

(09:26):
to the to the woke people for the woke agenda.
And how much of the population do they actually represent?
I mean, think about this. When bud Light rebranded, they
lost a lot of business. Why because they pushed away

(09:51):
the people who were actually loyal to their brand, and
they they basically push them to go somewhere else, try
something different, you know, and it doesn't take very long
to you know, change your habits. Whenever it comes to
consumption it doesn't take very long at all. And if

(10:17):
a company's going to rebrand, usually it's to get more clientele,
not to alienate clientele. I mean, that's generally why you
do it, and is what Cracker Barrel is doing, is
they're alienating the actual loyal clientele that they have, those
that actually like to go there, enjoy going there, and

(10:38):
are you know, the repeat business for people who really
don't show up anyway. I mean, do they really think
that they're going to have no backlash from the you know,
from conservatives, from Republicans, from mega people. Do they really
think there's going to be no backlash at all whatsoever.

(10:58):
It's ridiculous to think that, I mean, thinking back, I mean,
I see, you know, there's all kinds of instances where
different companies has done something stupid, making no sense whatsoever.
And I gotta be honest with you, I don't understand it.

Speaker 3 (11:18):
You know.

Speaker 1 (11:18):
It's like Aunt Jemima. They took the the Black Woman
off of all of their marketing stuff, one of the
things that made it iconic. They took the Indian off
of Land of Lakes and they kept the land. Of
course they did. That's a typical white thing to do right.

(11:39):
I love that joke, just saying the Uncle Ben's they
took Uncle Ben off of Uncle Ben's.

Speaker 2 (11:49):
I mean what.

Speaker 1 (11:53):
And in these instances, it's not like, you know, it
was anything wrong. It's not like it was done, you know,
as a racist kind of thing, you know, having the
Indian on Land of Lakes, having Aunt Jemima as part
of Aunt Jemima. I mean, it wasn't bad. I mean,
like you were, you know, in essence, what you had

(12:14):
is companies products that were proud of the heritage. And
that's why it was done the way that it was
Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben's, and yes, even Cracker Barrel. It

(12:36):
was honoring the heritage. It wasn't anything that was bad.
It wasn't anything that was racist. I mean, they kept
the Quaker on Quaker oats. But do you really think
that Cracker Barrel is going to gain clientele by rebranding,

(13:07):
you know, gain clientele from the woke community for rebranding,
do you think they're going to gain more than they
would lose from people like you know, they just hate
this kind of active And I mean, I gotta be
honest with you. Look, I do like Cracker Barrel. I
am a fan. I like their food, good food. I

(13:29):
love the environment, you know. I mean it's their restaurants
are awesome. I like looking around at the nick knacks
and some of the other stuff that they have because
it's neat, it's interesting. Some of the candies that they have,
and there's good stuff. I've bought some. Now, I mean,
I don't go. I mean, like, good grief. The last
time I've been to a cracker barrel, it's been a while.

(13:52):
Don't get me wrong, it's been a while. It's been
a hot minute since the last time I've been to
a cracker barrel. I mean it's probably been twenty years,
if not a little bit more since I've been to one.
I just don't normally go. I don't have one in
my hometown, and generally speaking, whenever I am in a

(14:12):
town that has them, I'm generally there for a reason
and is get in and get out. I don't see
a lot of them whenever I'm on the road driving,
I don't see them attached to, you know, truck stops
like I do Denny's. So, I mean, it's been a
it's been a hot minute since I've been to a
cracker barrel. But that's not to say given the opportunity,

(14:36):
given the chance, that I wouldn't go, because I absolutely would.
I like the restaurants, the environment, the food that they have,
the prices. They're not bad. I mean, it's not like cheap,
but it's not outrageous and expensive either, right, I mean,
it's a good middle ground type of thing. But do

(14:58):
you actually think that by bending the need to woke
Cracker Barrel is going to gain more business loyalty from
people than what they are going to push away? Because
I don't know about you, but for me, this type

(15:18):
of behavior from businesses, it ticks me off. You're doing
it for woke. They don't represent a very big part
of the agenda, or I'm sorry, not the agenda. They
don't make up a very large part of the population.

(15:39):
It's a losing course of action that they're taking, and
this type of stuff it ticks me off. I'm just
going to be honest with you. It ticks me off.
I don't understand the point. I don't understand even the
financial benefit of trying to do this. I mean, it
doesn't make any sense whatsoever. What type of backlash do

(16:02):
you think you're going to see out of Cracker Barrel,
And if you know anything more about, you know, the rebranding,
if they plan on like really changing the atmosphere inside
the restaurant, I'd like to know, because I really haven't
heard a whole heck of a lot, not from sources
that I truly think I could I could trust and believe.

(16:24):
I mean, of course, there's all kinds of satire on there,
this from the Babylon Bee, you know, aside. I mean,
I seen a mock up of a Cracker Barrel that was, like,
plain Jane, the most ridiculous thing that you had ever seen,
I mean, so bland, so like what it's like, there's
no way that can be true. But how far is

(16:48):
Cracker Barrel going to go in this effort to rebrand,
to bend the knee for woke? How far are they
going to go? How much of their identity are they
going to throw away in this rebranding effort. That's kind
of what I'm curious about. You know, are they going
to get rid of, you know, the shop on the inside,

(17:09):
How much of what is on the inside of the
restaurant itself are they going to get rid of? How much?
You know, how far are they going to go in
this effort to rebrand for Woke. I'm actually kind of
curious about it because so far changing the logo, they're
kind of taking people off. And it's not that they're

(17:29):
doing it. It's not that they are going through this
rebranding thing. It's not that they took the barrel off
of the logo. It's not that they took the cracker
off the logo. It's it's not that it's the reason
as to why. I mean, I'm old enough I remember
several different you know, PEPSI rebrands. They've done it several times,

(17:53):
but it's just been a rebranding, a rollout of a
different logo, different colors, this.

Speaker 2 (18:01):
That and the other.

Speaker 1 (18:02):
But it's never been for a reason of Woke. They've
done it because, hey, you know new time, we want
to change things up a bit, right. It's not that
Cracker Barrel is rebranding. It's not that bud Light has rebranded,

(18:23):
it's not that different businesses has gone through a rebranding.
It's the reason why. That's the part that's frustrating. That's
the part that makes no sense to me whatsoever. And
how many people loyal patrons to the restaurant. How many

(18:47):
are they going to lose in this effort to be
more woke. That's what I'm curious about. And if you
know any any more about you know, things that are
actually going on in the store, if they do plan
on doing, you know, just removing everything that makes cracker

(19:08):
barrel what cracker barrel is, let me know. Let me
know down in the comments, if you were over on
Rumble or if you are listening over on Spreaker otherwise,
you can send me an email ho Ho at theho
hosshow dot com.

Speaker 2 (19:21):
Let me know.

Speaker 1 (19:23):
Anyway, Moving on, this next article I wanted to talk
about is frustrating in a different way. This from Fox
News headline DC statehood debate intensifies as Trump flex's authority
over local police now here. Here's the thing. This is

(19:43):
where I question, Okay, has any of these people who
were crying about DC statehood? Has any of them actually
read the constitution? Honest question? Has any of them read
the Constitution? Do they know what it says about DC?
Because the fact that the matter is d C isn't

(20:03):
part of any state. It's not for them to gain statehood.
For DC to actually become a state, they would have
to make an amendment to the Constitution because our founding
fathers did not want d C to be within any

(20:26):
state or any other jurisdiction, because they did not want
any state to have that much control over the federal
seat of government. That's what it amounts to do. And

(20:47):
at first the land for Washington d C was taken
from two different states, and one of said states gave
your you know, one of said states got that property back.
And I mean, if anything, d C shouldn't be its

(21:10):
own state, it should go back to the state where
d C was taken from, right. I mean, that, in
all honesty, is what should happen if you're really going
to do the right thing in this. But DC should
not be a state. It shouldn't be a state. I mean,

(21:31):
if you're going to cry about all the people that
live there don't have the you know, they don't have
any representation. Look, it's been like this since the freaking beginning. Okay,
the United States of America. We're going on our two
hundred and fiftieth year. We just turned two hundred and
forty nine years old. It's been like that since the beginning.
It's not like it was, you know, a couple of

(21:52):
years ago when they decide to take statehood away from DC.
It's not the case, right, And that's almost how they're arguing, like, oh,
this is we're so surprised that DC doesn't have any
type of representation.

Speaker 2 (22:08):
No, you're an idiot.

Speaker 1 (22:10):
I mean, come on, man. And d C was never
intended to be the home of people. It's de seit
of government, you know, representation, different people that work there,

(22:32):
all these other kind of things that were supposed to
be moving in a constant state of flux, people in,
people out, people in, people out. That's how it was
supposed to be. You know, these representatives, their aids, their
staff are this other kind of thing. They're supposed to
actually come from the state that they are representing, right,

(22:57):
I mean that's how it was intended to be. D
C was never intended to have permanent residency. It wasn't.
I mean, things have evolved over the years, sure, but
that's not how it was intended to be. It was
never intended for permanent residency. And if you want representation,

(23:21):
then well, you know, maybe you should have a permanent
residency in one of the other surrounding states, or maybe
you should just shut up about it. DC is not
a state, and I understand the reasoning why d C

(23:42):
shouldn't be a state. Isn't a state, and it would
take a literal amendment to the Constitution to grant Washington
d C statehood. It really is that simple. I mean,
come on, do you really? I mean, how hard would

(24:04):
it be to make DC a state? Pretty stinking hard,
Pretty stinking hard. I mean Republicans don't want d C
to be a state. Why? Well, because d C is
full of freaking Democrats. I mean, come on, I mean
it kind of goes along with with the whole argument
of I don't want Canada to be a state. It

(24:26):
would be a Democrat state. I mean, let's just be
honest about this, right, No, we don't want that. No,
Trump is not serious whenever he claims that he wants,
you know, Canada to be the fifty first state. That's ridiculous,
it's stupid. I mean, let's be honest about this. Just
like Canada, d C would be a Democrat state. It

(24:48):
is a Democrat area, not a state, but it's run
by Democrats. I mean, let's be honest, what ninety six
percent of everybody in d C is a Democrat yeah,
pretty much. Moving on this speaking about Trump's and I'll

(25:12):
tell you what, what has gone on in d C
with you know, President Trump taking authority over the local
police and everything else. It's been a positive thing. It
really has been a lot of the citizens, especially whenever
you're talking about your average everyday person, not the politician,
not the you know, not your your news anchor or

(25:34):
you know, so called Oh what's that that That word
just flew right out of my head. Journalist. Yeah, not
the so called journalists. Everybody in d C is happy
about what's going on in d C.

Speaker 4 (25:51):
You know.

Speaker 1 (25:51):
The reaction is it's about damn time they've done something
to take care of the crime and make DC safe.
It's about stinking time. I've heard that many times over,
and it's no surprise, right, I mean, it's no surprise whatsoever.

(26:12):
But talking about some of the stuff that Trump is doing,
this headline from just a News talks about something else
that Trump is wanting to do. Headline Trump's push for
ending mail in ballots and voting machines means process likely
to fall on states. Now, I'll tell you what, I

(26:33):
was pretty happy to hear this, you know, whenever I
seen this thing. This was, This was awesome. Whenever I
heard Trump talking about this, I'm like about stinking time. Okay,
because even dating back to oh it was sometime during
a Bombas presidency, I'm wanting to say around two thousand

(26:54):
and eight. If I'm not mistaken.

Speaker 2 (26:58):
That there was a.

Speaker 1 (27:01):
Okay, I don't remember the name of it, bless you
say that it was a government think take. They researched
this and they wrote a report about mail in ballots
and they were like, mail in ballots is bad because
it is way too easy to commit fraud. And the
amount of mail in ballots that are rejected because they're

(27:25):
not filled out properly is exponentially greater than ones that
are actually done whenever you go in person and vote. Okay,
it's way too easy to commit fraud on mail in
ballots and it shouldn't shouldn't be allowed. This is a

(27:47):
report from Democrats during a Democrat administration, and even they
knew then that mail in ballots is risky, way too
easy to commit fraud. You can't have a safe, secure,

(28:11):
accurate election integrity with mail in ballots and with these
voting machines, the same type of thing, because all of
the safeguards that they claim are in place with these
voting machines, as in not being connected to the internet, this, that,

(28:33):
and the other. You know, none of it is actually
true because how many reports did we hear about machines
being actually, you know, hooked up to the internet, And
how many eyewitness accounts testimonies did we hear about machines
that changed the vote? I mean, how hard is it

(29:00):
to actually count ballance by hand? And I have the
same frame of mind as others that I have heard
that say that election day should be a national holiday
and if you're not going to be closed, I mean
it would be impossible to shut down the entire nation.

(29:26):
For those that do end up having to work, they
should get time allocated out of their schedule to go
and vote. And I mean really, whenever you take it
to consideration, you know, how long the polls are actually open.
It's not hard. I mean, all you got to do
is make a decision to actually go. All right, now,

(29:50):
I'm still four. You know, early voting, I've done that
several times. I'm a truck driver. I don't always know
if i I'm going to be home on election day,
So I mean sometimes you got to you gotta make
a plan to not be there. You know, you go
in for early voting there you go. Nothing wrong with that.

(30:13):
And one of the things that the left is trying
to say as a reason not to end mail in ballots,
it's like, oh, well, this means that, you know, service,
you know, people in the military overseas are not going
to be able to vote. What do their vote not
does their vote not matter? It's like, dide, are you
an idiot? Because there's a difference between mail in ballots

(30:34):
and absentee ballots. There's a difference. They're not the same.
You know, whenever you go in for an absentee ballot,
an absentee ballot, whenever you go in and vote early,
you know, those states that require it, you still got
to show id You still gotta you know, do a
signature match. You know where I'm at. Even though it's

(30:57):
Illinois and even though they're freaking retarded, you still got
to do a signature match. I mean, they do some
type of verification something at least, you know, but there's
a difference between requesting a ballot early voting and mail

(31:23):
in ballance. They're not the same. Your argument does not
hold water name that movie that was a good movie,
by the way, love that movie. Anyway, their argument doesn't
hold any water. There's absolutely no reason why we can't

(31:43):
do in person voting at the polls on election day,
it being a national holiday. They absolutely should do that.
One percent agree with it. And there's actually no reason
why they can't do counting counting by hand. Why not,

(32:07):
It's not that difficult. I mean, if you can't guarantee
I mean, you can't guarantee integrity in the voting process.
Either way you look at it. People may miscount, you know,
machines may get hacked, people may lie about who they are.

(32:38):
But that's also why there's that margin of error. If
it's too close, then they can call for a recount.
I mean, that's common practice. I mean there's already safeguards
in place for those type of scenarios. But actually this

(33:00):
argument goes beyond just ending mail in ballance and ending
voting machines. It goes it actually does go beyond that,
because one of the other things that they're talking about is,
you know, is forcing the federal rules regarding elections federal
elections to force every state to do this, you know,

(33:21):
imposing the laws forcing them to do. It's like, Okay,
illegal aliens aren't supposed to vote. You've got to do
you know, ID, you got to verify who you are,
voter ID signature verification. There you go. This is not
outside the scope of what they shouldn't be doing already anyway,

(33:43):
they absolutely should be. We want integrity. I mean, I
love it how those on the left like to whine
and cry about democracy when the truth it's anything. But
they don't want democracy. They want power. They don't care

(34:06):
what the people want. They only care what they want.
And whenever they always do those cries of this is
what democracy looks like. No, actually, you're wrong. This is
what power hungry politicians are going to do to hold

(34:27):
onto their power. It's not about democracy. Because if it
was about democracy, why are those in Congress and why
are people whom are so called journalists and the like,
why are they going against and trying to hold up
and put a stop to Trump's agenda. President Trump won

(34:52):
every single swing state, he won the popular vote. If
this is what democracy looks like, then dear damn job
and at actually you know, confirm Trump's appointees past the
laws that Trump's wanting past If this is what democracy

(35:13):
looks like, then why aren't we seeing democracy in action?
And this is also ignoring the fact that the United
States of America is not a democracy. It is a
constitutional republic. There is a difference, and our founding fathers
did that for a reason on purpose. It wasn't by accident,
it was by design. That's ignoring that. But if your

(35:36):
claim is democracy, then why aren't you acting like democracy
means something to you? I mean, just like in every
other scenario we have ever heard come out of democrats,
the only time they are in favor of something is
whenever it benefits them. Otherwise they ignore it. They act like, oh,

(35:59):
that's not what they really meant. This is an up
to date version of what it is that was in there.
They bastardized the Constitution, the Bill of Rights every time
you turn around. I mean, holy crap, it's ridiculous, it
really is. Before I take a quick break, do me
a great big favorite, head on over to stinkpickle dot com.

(36:20):
That is s T I N K P I k
l E. I couldn't spell it right. I had to
spell it my own right, my own way, which is fine.
But head on over to stinkpickle dot com. Check out
some of the products over there. There are some things
that I think you'll like, some neat designs, some concepts,
and there's quite a few of them that I'm actually,

(36:40):
you know, pretty happy about. And I am excited because
I do have an order coming very soon. I had
a screw up on one of the designs and it
took me a few days to be like, oh, yeah, okay,
fix that I approved that that new design on there,
Go ahead, go for it. But not all products they
have blame for it done, so there may be an

(37:02):
extended time at least early on in this process of
you getting your order back once you've headed over to
stinkpickle dot com s T I N K P I
k l E dot com and ordered something off of
the website. But you can check it out. See it's
just anything you like. And of course, if you have
any ideas on anything different products that you may want
the designs that you see over there to be on,

(37:24):
let me know. I can make that happen absolutely anyway,
just a couple of minutes and I will be Oh,
I do have a few more, a few different songs
in here. You know, some of the things that I
added back in April that I never did put on here,
that I have them in here now, and this one

(37:46):
is one of them newer songs. So take a listen
and I'll be right back.

Speaker 5 (38:09):
Rolled into Monday. The engine just quick. Spent all my
week leaning under that heard of it knuckles or busted,
grease stains on my jeans. The truck won't starting and
mocks my dreams. I checked the bets, I checked the plug,

(38:36):
prayed the song.

Speaker 6 (38:37):
Got in the motors, guns, a week's worth of sweat.

Speaker 5 (38:42):
Nothing turns out right, this hunk of jump stealing all.

Speaker 6 (38:47):
Man night sold and something dumb.

Speaker 2 (38:51):
I know it inside, but the.

Speaker 6 (38:54):
Answer keeps running, and it loves to have turned the
keen nothing more your sound South.

Speaker 2 (39:02):
Got the heavy heart and broken down Blue.

Speaker 6 (39:16):
Brought a buddy over, said he'd take a look. He
shook his head side.

Speaker 2 (39:22):
And cursed the book.

Speaker 5 (39:25):
We've tried every trick under the sun, but we're losing
this battle.

Speaker 2 (39:31):
The truck is won.

Speaker 6 (39:34):
Leaning over always w open and butt him, sucking my heart,
just staring at trees.

Speaker 2 (39:43):
This driveway press got nothing to proof. CA's body is
broken down. Bloo something it is, side answered jeep.

Speaker 3 (40:20):
Side Jean Nothings, No sound soon heavy.

Speaker 1 (40:52):
Have you ever sat down in the throne just to
find out that you are dangerously low on shift tickets,
making it to where you have to make a mad
dash to the store just to pick yourself up some
if this has ever happened, you pick up the number
one most rated toilet paper found in Uranus and use
what the professionals use, angel Soft. See, I'm just not
a fan of sung toilet paper. Some of them is

(41:12):
like putting a pedal between your nice rosie. Others like
John Wayne toilet paper, It's like using sandpaper. But do
what the professionals use. Use the type of toilet paper
that is the Goldilocks of brands. Angel Soft, available wherever
toilet paper is sold. No, all right, and we are
back now. Before I get into the main topic of

(41:33):
this segment, I want to start here. An article from
Fox News headline Gabbitt removes clearances from thirty seven officials
at Trump's direction over politicizing intelligence. Now, I got to
be honest with you on that. Oh yeah. The sub
headline former Obama administration DNI James Clapper among intelligence officials

(41:55):
accused of politicizing assessments now here's I gotta be honest
with you on this, Okay, why do some of these
people continue to have, you know, these different clearances and
why do they continue to get some of these briefings

(42:18):
that they get, you know, the access to classified information,
Because I really want to know, you know, even with
former presidents, you know, like why does Obama no longer
being president, why does he still have to have security
clearance and get different briefings on things? Why? I mean,

(42:42):
it really doesn't make any sense to me. Why does
some of these former intelligence agencies people, why do they
have to maintain their security clearance and why do they
continue to get briefings They shouldn't be doing this. I mean,
think about this. In the real world. You know, you
quit a job, you move on, you know, you don't

(43:06):
continue to get correspondence and you know, memos and behind
the scenes whatever from whatever company you just left. I mean, see,
this is why it doesn't make any sense to me,
because it's not relatable to how things are done in

(43:27):
the real world. So why do they continue to do
it in government? In politics? I got to be honest
with It makes no sense to me. In no other
industry would you expect this kind of behavior. I mean,
you're only a president for a maximum of ten years.

(43:49):
That's it, two and a half terms depending on you know,
whatever may it happened to your predecessor or whatever. You know,
you only have a maximum of ten years that you
can service president. You don't have any say in how
things are done. I mean, why why do these former presidents,

(44:15):
why do these former HEAs of state, directors of various agencies?
Why do these people need classified clearance if they're no
longer in the biz. It just kind of seems seems

(44:36):
ridiculous to me. And if you're going to say that
the reason is clear that, oh well, just in case
they end up going back into that some kind of role,
well then they can just reapply, right, I mean, that's
why not y'alls know, I'm a truck driver now before

(45:01):
back in the day, I've had my license for you know,
my CDL Class A CDL for nineteen years. And there
was a time not that long ago that you know,
like a has Matt for instance, you know, you get
your getting your has Matt was a pain in the ass.
You know, you had to go through some you had

(45:23):
to go through some red tape, you had to jump
through some hoops. You know, you had a test you
had to take, You had to you had to demonstrate
you had some type of working knowledge to at least
figure out things on your own. You had things you
had to know. You had to go through the you know,

(45:44):
your finger printing, and you had to get get the
ok from the FBI in order to have has MATT.
You know, there were some hoops you had to jump through,
and it was always understood that you just hold on
to it once you have it, you know, the HASMAT
endorsement on your Class A cdo because if you let
it lapse and then you tried to reget it, then

(46:05):
it was just as big of a pain in the
butt as it was before that. It was always easier
to just once you had it, to hold on to it.

Speaker 2 (46:14):
There you go.

Speaker 1 (46:14):
I mean that was that was just a practice, right,
that was the practice. Well, it's not really like that anymore.
I mean because now every time you renew your license
every and actually in some cases every year you got
to go with with HASMAT, you got to go through
training every single year in order for your HASMAT endorsement
to be valid. But every time you renew your license,

(46:39):
you had to go through the steps again. You had
to get refinger printed, you had to have your you know,
your background check, and man, I tell you what, you know,
that was kind of ridiculous. I remember one of the
jobs I got, one of my more recent jobs. I
don't think it was this one. No wait, maybe it
was this one, but my background check took time, and

(47:06):
it does, you know. I mean, it took like two
weeks for my background check to go through, two or
three weeks from a background check to actually come back.
And you know, I remember my boss at the time
was like, I've never had it take this long, and
I was like, hmm, well, it happens, it really does.

(47:30):
And it's not a warning sign. Just just to let
you know. I mean, that type of thing. Isn't a
warning sign? What sort of because more or less, what
happens whenever you're doing a background check on somebody, you're
pinging databases. That's what you're doing. It's like, does this
person's information pop up on different databases? And the more

(47:50):
databases you are in, the longer it takes for your
background check to go through. I've lived in multiple states,
multiple counties. I have been in multiple countries to multiple
provinces of these other countries. Five, my information is out there.

(48:12):
They know who I am. So the more places your
information is in, the longer is going to take for
a background checkuse Once they ping it, hey does this
person have any information in this state, well then they
got to go and check out, you know, check out
the information that's there. So obviously, the more places your
information is in, the longer it's going to take for

(48:34):
a background check to go through. That's just how it works, right,
That's just how it works. But now it's like you
got to go through just as big of a hassle
to keep your hazmat endorsement as you do to get
your hazmat endorsement. But that's just a little side story
into this, because I truly don't understand the reasoning by

(48:55):
which somebody who has been in the position is no
longer in that position. Why do these former intelligence officers,
people administrators, former presidents, vice presidents, whomever it may be,
why do they need to maintain their clearances? I mean,

(49:20):
I would argue that it goes against national security for
all these people to have their clearances. I'm just doing
that out there. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Help it make sense. Help it make sense. What's the reasoning?

(49:45):
If you have an idea, let me know, send me
an email. Ho at the Ho Ho Show dot com.
Because it doesn't make any sense to me, It really doesn't.
They need to. This is a practice that they need
to eliminate. Get rid of absolutely, and I'm off for it.
Get rid of these people's clearances because there's no reason

(50:06):
that they should have it whatsoever. We're moving on now.
I talked about this a couple episodes ago with the
whole accident that happened in Florida with the driver that
was an illegal alien that had his CDL given to
him by Gavin Newsom's Florida. This headline from CBS twelve

(50:29):
news failed tests fast departure. What we've learned about driver
in fatal turnpike crash. Now, there's a reason why I'm
bringing this one up because there was some new information
that I had found out about and I was like, Oh,
you got to be kidding me. I mean, you have

(50:50):
absolutely got to be kidding me. How can something like
this actually happen? It actually infuriated me. I was like, okay,
let me truck driver not a former truck driver, a
current truck driver.

Speaker 7 (51:09):
If this was me, as in, if I was.

Speaker 1 (51:12):
The dumbass truck driver that made an illegal U turn,
then this is how the police would have treated me
and handled the situation. Okay, because regardless of what they
may say, whenever you're talking to police, you are presumed

(51:35):
guilty until proven innocent. I would have been you know,
maybe not so much detained, but I wouldn't necessarily have
been allowed to leave if I had caused an accident,
especially on this scale. Okay, I mean think about this.

(51:56):
Cops show up, they seen the position of the truck,
They know what happens. It doesn't take an investigation. All
it takes is somebody who has eyes to see they
know what happened. There's no excuse this jackass can give
that would make this make sense, that would put him

(52:17):
in a positive light. This is clearly he is responsible
for the deaths of the people in that minivan, pure
and simple. It is what it is. It doesn't take
a genius to figure this out. The first two seconds
into this I knew he's guilty at very least vehicular manslaughter.

(52:42):
It's his fault. There's no two ways to look about it.
There's no, nothing, And whenever you are a cop arriving
on the scene, you look at what happened. You don't
have to get testimony from this person. You don't need
to get testimony from that person. You don't need to
ask witnesses. Your eyes can clearly see what happens and
there's no argument at all, And it doesn't matter what

(53:05):
excuse he gives. It doesn't change the fact of what
he did. Are you picking up what I'm throwing down?
So if it was me, at most I would have

(53:25):
been arrested pending I would have been detained and arrested
pending charges while they investigate and see what else they
were going to throw at me. And at very least
I would have been charged with improper lane usage, illegal

(53:45):
U turn, you know, those obvious things. But they sure
as hell wouldn't have let me leave the jurisdiction. That's
where I'm getting at. But apparently in this case they did.
They let the driver and his buddy that was with

(54:08):
him co driver. I have absolutely no idea they let
him leave and he hopped on a plane and went
back to California. That's what ended up happening. Why they
let him leave. I have absolutely no idea. If it
was me, if it was any other law abiding United

(54:31):
States citizens Class ACDL holder truck driver, there's no way
in hell they would have let him leave. But this
illegal jackass from India, they let him leave and go
back home to California. And apparently, from what I had heard,
he was trying to head home to India. I don't know,

(54:53):
but that's what I heard. But either way I look
at it. He hopped onto a plane, he went back
to California, and then whenever Florida decided what they were
going to do, what they were going to charge them with,
then they sent out a uh AN extradition and sent

(55:15):
US Marshalls to go arrest him. But how why did
you let him leave in the first place? Why did
you let him go in a situation this egregious, clear cut?

(55:36):
Why did you let him leave? I don't I don't
understand that. I'm going to be honest with you. That
pissed me off. You really did?

Speaker 3 (55:49):
Did that?

Speaker 1 (55:50):
Did that information aggravate you? Was you aware that Florida
just let him go? Let him hop on a train,
you know, just just let him go, I mean, regardless
of the hop on a plane, hop on a train,
jump into a rental car, whatever, because he ain't leaving
in his vehicle. Now it's part of a crime scene investigation.
But either way, are you as ticked about that as

(56:14):
I am? Here's one of the things. Here's one of
the reasons why US citizens are getting so sick and
tired of illegal aliens. Beside the point that they have
no respect for our sovereignty. They have no respect for
our country, they have no respect for our borders, they

(56:34):
have no respect for our culture, they have no respect
for our language. And this soob is a prime example
of that. We are sick and tired of Americans being
held to one standard, and these people who cross our

(56:54):
border illegally, who are not supposed to be here, who
are taking our jobs, who are living in our houses,
who are sending their kids to our schools, who are
being put on public aid, welfare, medicaid that we actually
are forced to pay for. Regardless of all of that,

(57:16):
they somehow get a free pass for breaking our laws.
We don't get a free pass. We commit a traffic violation,
We're given a ticket, We're expected to pay for it.
If we don't, our license is revoked, it's suspended. And
if we get caught driving again, we are arrested, processed,

(57:37):
and thrown in jail. We don't get a pass, we
don't get a free lunch, and yet illegal aliens somehow
can get away with all kinds of shits. And it's ridiculous.
That's why so many Americans are pissed. We've had enough,

(58:01):
we're fed up, you know. And this is another a
prime example. And I know I mentioned this a couple
weeks ago or a couple episodes ago, that this is
why it ticks us off. This type of stuff is
why we've had enough, and we don't even really have
much grace as to say that, oh, maybe go ahead
and stay for some of unless you just get rid

(58:23):
of the criminal element. No, I don't care anymore. You're
not a legal citizen. You're not an American citizen if
you haven't gone through the process of becoming an American.
If you don't care about our borders, you don't care
about our culture, you don't care about our languages, you
don't care about our sovereignty. No, get your ass out,

(58:46):
go home. This ain't your home.

Speaker 2 (58:48):
This is my home.

Speaker 1 (58:50):
You go to your home. We're done. This is why
so many Americans had this mindset because it's ridiculous us.
We're sick and tired of the We're sick and tired
of the double standard. We're sick and tired of the
favoritism from people who don't care about us, they don't

(59:15):
respect us. In many cases, they don't even like us,
and yet we're going to allow them to break the
rules whenever they hold American citizens to the highest standard possible. Okay,
it's infuriating, it really is. How in the hell can
Florida let this sob go on a plane and go

(59:42):
back to California. I just don't get it. I would
not have been treated that way. I would have been
locked up, and considering I am a buck driver and
I am a flight risk, they probably wouldn't even let

(01:00:03):
me out on bail. That too, the reality of it,
with the crime that severe, where it's so clear cut
as to what happened and why they wouldn't have let
me post bail and go home. Just throwing that out there.
But this worthless piece of shit illegal alien, they shouldn't

(01:00:29):
have a Class A CDL in the first place. And
here's another cacker. I don't remember if I've talked about
this on previous episodes, but he failed the sign tests. Okay,
I mean this is this is actually in here. Let
me let me find it, Let me find it. So
to do to do, to do, to do. Yeah, here
we go. So after the crash, investigators with the Federal

(01:00:53):
Motor Carrier Safety Administration tested the Jackasses English proficiency and
road sign skills. He failed badly, answering just two of
twelve verbal questions correctly and identifying one of four traffic signs. Really,

(01:01:16):
he can't demonstrate any type of proficiency with the language
at all. He failed miserably. I mean, dude, there's a reason. Okay,
English is like it or not, and I don't give
a shit what your position is, like it or not.
English is the official slash unofficial language of the United
States of America. It is because, as a Class A

(01:01:41):
CDL holder, part of the regulation is you are supposed
to be proficient in English. You are supposed to be
able to do this test in English.

Speaker 4 (01:01:51):
That is it.

Speaker 1 (01:01:52):
There is no different language that you can take it in.
You have to do it in English.

Speaker 2 (01:01:58):
Why.

Speaker 1 (01:01:59):
The is very very simple and easy to understand. You
go outside, you go driving down the road, you see
a sign, what's that sign going to say. I don't know,
but I know what language is going to be written.
And all across this entire freaking nation, all street signs,
all of that shit is in English. That's why you
have to be proficient in the language period to get

(01:02:25):
a class ACDL. And if you can't understand that, you
need to go back home. I'm not going to budge
on that because people like this guy, and really just

(01:02:50):
illegal aliens in general, You're putting other people's lives in danger.
You're putting people's lives in danger. And whenever I read
this article from American Military News, I was actually pretty

(01:03:14):
excited as well. This had like new I leegal immigrant
detention centers to open nation wide under new bill. Yes, yes,
three times yes. I was happy, and I believe this

(01:03:34):
is part of the big beautiful bill. I'm pretty sure
that's what this is in response to. But this needs
to happen. These people need to go, not just they've overstayed,
they're welcome, they never belonged here in the first place.
I'm sick and tired of the double standard. I'm sick

(01:03:54):
and tired of the protected cluss that they have. I'm
sick and tired of them being able to get away
with breaking our laws without any consequences whatsoever. I'm sick
and tired of it. They need to go home. They
absolutely need to go home. This headline from just a

(01:04:17):
News US immigrant population decreases for first time in fifty
years as Trump admin spurs max exodust. This is an
example as to I'm glad that mainstream media and different
pundits are you know, misrepresenting this. But they're basically saying

(01:04:45):
that regardless of the criminality, that they're going after everybody,
not just a criminal element, they're going after everybody, everybody
that is an illegal alien. They are going after all
of them. You need to you know, you might as
well just pack up your shit and move back home.

(01:05:11):
I am happy about this because this is the first
time where the misinformation is actually being you know, it's
an advantage to US citizens, it's an advantage to MAGA,
it is an advantage to Republicans who are sick and
tired of illegal aliens being here. Yes, they're going home.

(01:05:35):
They're packing up their crap, and they're taking their their
families and their kids with them because they don't want
to be caught up in these ice raids. They don't
want to go to Alligator Alcatraz, they don't want to

(01:05:56):
go to El Salvador. And the Left tells you that
if you're caught, this is where you're going to go.
And so instead of risking it, they're packing up their
crap and they're going back to where they came from.
Fan freakingtastic. I couldn't be more happy. I mean, I

(01:06:17):
know there was people out there that are, you know,
angry about the whole Alligator Alcatraz, But I mean it's
it's a name. All it's basically I mean, all it
basically is is a what was it an airport? I
think it was an airport that was repurposed to be

(01:06:38):
a detention center that kind of had some swamp land
around it where alligators were at and it was dubbed
Alligator Alcatraz. But here's the thing. I mean, I'm not
I'm not against it. I'm just going to be honest
with you. I'm not against it. I'm not against Alcatraz
in general. Put them there. I mean, what's the point

(01:07:01):
of a prison is to keep people there? Right, keep
criminals there to so that this way the criminal element,
your murderers, your rapists, your thieves, so that this way
they don't have an opportunity to escape and go back
into the general public. Is to protect the general public
from criminals. That's the whole point of a prison. That's

(01:07:23):
the whole point of these detention centers. It's like, hey,
you've overstayed, you're welcome. You need to go back home.
You can't stay, but we don't want you co mingling.
We don't want you to run away, we don't want
you to hide. So this is where you're going to stay.
I'm just going to be honest with you. I'm not

(01:07:45):
against it. Now. If they let the alligators in in
the barracks, if they let them in the prison cells,
that they let them in the community centers, then okay, sure, yeah,
I wouldn't necessarily be for that. It would make for
good pay per view television, right, but but I wouldn't
be for it. No, keep the alligators out from inside

(01:08:10):
the prison. But if they want to stay on the outside,
or they want to stay on the border, if they
want to stay on the other side of the fence line, okay, sure,
it'll make these people think twice about escaping. I uh,

(01:08:34):
oh my god, what was the chicken Heart. Chicken Heart.
That's it. So I like different comedy, Okay, I really do.
And I'm a fan of Bill Cosby's oldest you know,
older things that he's had. I know, Bill Cosby is

(01:08:56):
you know, one of them that, oh, we can't like
Bill Cosby because of the things he's done, you know whatever,
It doesn't change the fact that some of his stuff
was funny in his you know, stand up career, and
you know, Bill Cosby himself was absolutely hilarious. Now, my

(01:09:16):
parents had a an LP of one of Bill Cosby's
I don't want to say stand up routine, but it
had a collection of different uh. I guess you can
call him skits that he's done. I mean, I don't
really consider Bill Cosby's comedy as skits. I mean a
lot of them were stories. In my opinion, those are

(01:09:39):
the best comedians actor, those that don't have a skit,
but those that has a bunch of stories. And one
of the stories that Bill Cosby had was chicken Heart.
And this routine started off that his parents were leaving
him behind. He was still in you know, he was
young enough that he was still in a crib. So

(01:10:00):
this way he didn't you know, fall out and bust
his head. And his parents said, look, there's the floor
is covered in snakes, and he was like, snakes. I
don't see no snakes and you know they're invisible. And
if you so much a stick a toe out of
your crib, them snakes are going to bite your toe.

(01:10:21):
You're going to swell up and be dead until morning.
And it's scared. Do you ever loving crap out of them?
But it was an incentive to where he at least
had to pause before he broke the rules. That's the
whole point of the criminal justice system, to make the

(01:10:46):
punishment severe enough.

Speaker 7 (01:10:50):
To where you don't.

Speaker 1 (01:10:53):
Even consider doing the crime. That's what we've seen in
this society that it's okay to do a crime. You
can go in and you can rob any place you
want to. As long as you don't steal more than
nine hundred dollars worth of stuff, then it's okay. We're

(01:11:15):
not going to, you know, arrest you. We're not going
to go after you. We probably won't even confiscate what
it is that you stole. If you're not going to
have any punishment for committing crimes, then do you really
have crime? If people don't have a fear of getting

(01:11:44):
caught going to a prison that they're not going to like.
If it doesn't, if it's not any kind of a deterrent,
then do you still have criminal justice? Is it justice?
I can understand the reason why some people may be

(01:12:05):
against Alligator Alcatraz, but I'm going to be honest with you,
I'm not against it. There should be deterrents. I love
the name for the fear factor, regardless of whether it's
true or not. I mean, the left would have you
believe that, you know, the alligators walk in the hall.

(01:12:29):
That's not the reality. It's just got some swamp land
surrounding the the what used to be in airport, and
there's alligators there, but there's a fence separating the alligators
from the prisoners. They're not at risk of getting eaten

(01:12:50):
in their day to day lives. The only time that
they're going to be at risk because of the environment
is if they escape. But we don't want them to
escape anyway. Are their lives in danger? Only if they
put their lives in danger. It's kind of under the
same outlook, you know. I mean, I've seen several police

(01:13:12):
chiefs in different jurisdictions specifically, you know, a police chief
down in Florida, a police chief in Texas. You know,
if you break into somebody's house, our citizens have not
just the right, but I encourage them to shoot you,
to kill you. You don't belong in that house. And

(01:13:37):
it saves the taxpayers a lot of money not having
to prosecute you. If you don't do the crime, you
don't have to worry about that. I've listened to Steven
Crowder lot of with Crowder, and one of the things

(01:14:00):
that he said on his program numerous times, you know,
he wants more and more citizens to have a gun,
to carry a gun, to use it in self defense.
He wants it to be so commonplace that nobody wants

(01:14:27):
to break into anybody's house because you don't know what
may be on the other side of that door. They
want criminals not to attempt committing crime because they don't
want to risk their lives for the sake of an iPad,

(01:14:49):
for the sake of somebody else's jewelry, for the sake
of somebody else's TV. That right there would be a
huge deterrent in crime. You don't have to worry so
much about the criminal justice system not actually standing for

(01:15:09):
real justice. Instead, it would be handled in a different way.
So yeah, I'm not against alligator alcatraz. I see nothing
wrong with how they are doing it. Where they put

(01:15:34):
the detention center, I have no problem with it. I
want these people gone and it's a pretty clear deterrent
that's going to keep them from escaping if they think
they're going to get eaten by an alligator. I have
nothing wrong. I find nothing wrong with it. And see

(01:16:00):
talked about that one already. Let's go ahead and get
here real quick. This headline from the Daily Caller, Obama
judge blocks Trump admin from withholding funds from dozens of
sanctuary heavens havens whatever I can read, and this was

(01:16:21):
a There's another article I have here from justinews dot com.
Judge blocks Trump admin from pulling funding from thirty four
cities counties over sanctuary policies. And here again, I'm going
to be completely honest with you. I am completely for
this kind of thing. Not that the judge blocked the
Trump admin from doing it, or at least they're trying to.

(01:16:45):
It'll go to the Supreme Court. But the whole fact
that Trump did it in the first place, because here
you are going to violate federal law and you are
going to expect and demand federal funding as if it's
your right. I don't think so. Again, you want to

(01:17:09):
stop bad behavior, then you got to make punishments that
behave that they don't want, right, you know, you gotta
have something in place as a deterrent to keep people
from doing shit they ain't supposed to be doing. You
want to ignore federal immigration law. You want to stop

(01:17:30):
ice agents from doing their job. You want to dox them.
You want to be an environment that welcomes illegal aliens. Okay, fine,
I mean not me. I think they need to go
in there and they need to arrest everybody that has
these policies and put them in place. Arrest Governor Gavin Newsom. Hell,

(01:17:51):
yes he is. He's violating federal law. He's aiding in
a betting criminals. That's what he's doing. Arrest him, prosecute him,
throw him in jail. But you're going to break federal
law and then demand federal funding to do it, because
that's what's going on. You know, it's like openly violating

(01:18:16):
traffic laws. You know, you're driving on a suspended license,
you're you're driving a vehicle that you're not supposed to
be on the roadway, and then you're going to go
to the courthouse and demand that the courthouse pay for
the tires on your vehicle and for fuel to go
into your tank. You know, you're you're going to, you know,

(01:18:37):
give an invoice a bill to the to the government
to allow you to break the law whenever you aren't
supposed to be doing it anyway. I mean, in essence,
that's what we're talking about. It's like, this person ain't
supposed to be here, but yet you want the federal
government to pay for all these different programs that you

(01:19:01):
have in place that just in essence, gives money to
illegal aliens. No, that's counterproductive if you ask me, You're
paying a state that has policies in place.

Speaker 7 (01:19:29):
To aid in bed.

Speaker 1 (01:19:34):
Criminal criminals that participate in criminal activity. And then they
have the same gall to say that, oh, they're not
costing us any money. Well, I they're not costing you
any money, then why would you care about funding being canceled?
You can't. I mean, it's pretty freaking obvious, right. I

(01:20:01):
applaud Trump for this move to pull funding from these
various sanctuary cities. I think he needs to go farther. Absolutely,
I do. I think zero tax dollars given to any state, municipality, county, city, whatever,
that is going to blatantly violate federal law. Because that's

(01:20:26):
exactly what's going on. There's no other way to translate it.
There's no other message.

Speaker 7 (01:20:36):
You need to know.

Speaker 1 (01:20:40):
They're violating federal law. And then they are demanding that
the federal government pay for it. I robbed your house,
I want you to pay for the gas money. How
ridiculous is that? I mean, it's just outright stupid to me,

(01:21:05):
It really does. I mean, I think that these governors
and these mayors and everybody else you know, they need
to be arrested and thrown in jail for aiding in
a betting. But beyond that, if the people want these
policies to be enacted, okay, fine, but you pay for them.

(01:21:29):
Don't expect the government to come in and save your
ass because you're making a stupid decision. You have a
losing agenda. You can't make it on your own. We're
enabling this kind of activity by allowing federal tax dollars

(01:21:50):
to go and save the ass of all these people.
The federal government is allowing it to happen. Is this
what the American people want? Is this what you voted for?
I for me, I voted to send them all home
to get rid of him. Don't allow them to have jobs.
Go in, arrest the illegal aliens, and I would take

(01:22:13):
that a step further and start arresting the people that
hired them and the companies that allowed it. I mean,
isn't it ridiculous that Elon Musk, regardless of how you
feel about him with his doze and everything else that
you know, the back and forth between Trump, but he

(01:22:34):
actually was prosecuted by the federal government because he upholded
federal law. He wouldn't give illegal aliens jobs, and they
prosecuted them for it. It's like, are you kidding me?
You know, you're you're suing him because he wouldn't break
the law. This is kind of a damned if you

(01:22:55):
do and damned if you don't kind of a thing.
I mean, are you kidding me? But this this is
what we're firing, you know, this is what we're up against.
This is the kind of ridiculous, stupid shit that we're facing. Anyway, Yeah,

(01:23:15):
moving on, We're gonna go ahead and take a quick
song break. And when I return, what else we got
do do? Talked about the Florida crash. Oh yeah, we
got to get into the the hypocrisy on the left
regarding the Bolton.

Speaker 7 (01:23:37):
Raid.

Speaker 1 (01:23:39):
Yes, I'm excited, all right, So just a couple moments.
What other thing do I want to Yeah, let's do
this one. So just a couple of minutes and I'll
be right back.

Speaker 3 (01:24:00):
The acousticks smooth on my hands, all wrong. I line
it up and the game feels long.

Speaker 1 (01:24:12):
The balls just laugh as they roll away.

Speaker 4 (01:24:17):
I guess the pool gods ain't with me today, no
balls in the pocket, No matter of the que I'm
the king of the table till today.

Speaker 2 (01:24:28):
It's all true.

Speaker 7 (01:24:29):
I bringing like thunder, But this cattera like a ring.

Speaker 2 (01:24:32):
Each shot of disaster red.

Speaker 7 (01:24:34):
Is driving me insane.

Speaker 3 (01:24:41):
The eight ball wings like a nose, my dread. The
nine just spins and shakes its head.

Speaker 6 (01:24:53):
My buddy's grinning, Willa sweating chalk.

Speaker 7 (01:24:57):
It feels like I'm stuck in a cruel trick. Shot talk.

Speaker 2 (01:25:04):
The felts the desert and them dry. It's dust.

Speaker 6 (01:25:07):
The breaks are broken, the angles all rust.

Speaker 2 (01:25:10):
The wreck was ready, but my m's off course and
a fare this table feels cursed.

Speaker 6 (01:25:15):
Of course, don't falls in the pocket, no matter the queue.

Speaker 2 (01:25:19):
I'm the king of the table till today is all true.
A break lack thunder. But this scatter like rate, each
shot of this.

Speaker 7 (01:25:26):
Aster and is driving me insane.

Speaker 3 (01:25:40):
The juke box arms a melody off key, like it's
mocking this misery in me.

Speaker 7 (01:25:51):
My swagger's gone, my raffles.

Speaker 2 (01:25:53):
Got it all.

Speaker 7 (01:25:57):
I just can't get a single ball fall, No balls
in the.

Speaker 2 (01:26:04):
Pocket, no matter.

Speaker 7 (01:26:06):
I'm the king of the table till today's all true.
I'll bring black thunderbuckets.

Speaker 2 (01:26:10):
Scatter like raine.

Speaker 7 (01:26:12):
He shut a disaster and it's driving me insane.

Speaker 1 (01:26:31):
Have you ever had an ailment that a normal over
the counter remedy just couldn't fight? If this is the case,
then boy, have I got the solution for you. It's tousing,
that's right, tousin, cough, tousing, cold, tousing, running nose, tousin
its you, watery ice, tousing, broken leg toussin. Tussing is

(01:26:51):
the ultimate cure, all guaranteed to stop anything that ails you.
Tousing available wherever OTC's are sold. All right, and we
are back, Let's go ahead and get into it. I got,
you know, just this last segment. We got a few
things to talk about on here, and uh so, yeah,
you can head on over to the ho Host Show

(01:27:13):
at dot com. Click on that news feed tab and
they're there. You will see the blog post for today's
episode eight twenty three, twenty twenty five. Head on over
to there. You'll be able to see all the articles
over there on flipboard that I have used in the
show today and a few more that I haven't, you know,
good topics of conversation, information that I think is important

(01:27:35):
but didn't actually talk about on the show. I do
that all the time, you know, I'll throw all kinds
of articles in there, things that interest me, things that
I that I think are important but just may or
may not make it onto the show. I do that
a lot, usually found towards the bottom. But anyway, let's
go ahead and get into it. This first headline for

(01:27:56):
this segment from the Federal No One is above the
Law FBI raid's home of former National Security advisor John Bolton.
And this was actually something that Cash Bettel made a

(01:28:16):
post on I believe it was on X It might
have been true social but I think it was on
X but that's what he said during the lead up
to this raid on John Bolton's home, and I they
also they went into Bolton's Washington d C. Office as well.

(01:28:42):
Now there's a backstory on this, there really is, because
he did a and I believe this book was during
the Trump one point zero administration that he had a book,
had somebody ghostwrite it, and apparently there was all kinds

(01:29:03):
of stuff in there that shouldn't be in their classified
information and whatnot. And Bolton did not go through proper channels.
Because whenever you are, you know, being in the position
that John Bolton was in, if you write a book,
it's common practice. I mean, this is just how it's done.

(01:29:24):
This is how you're supposed to do it, especially considering
the information that you know, right, there's channels that you
have to go through before you publish a book, and
John Bolton ignored every single one of them. He was
actually told by the Trump administration Trump one point zero,

(01:29:46):
don't publish that book where you know, we need to
go through a you know, our assessment of it just
in case there's you know, just to make sure there's
no classified information in there that shouldn't be in there,
and Bolton completely ignored this. But you know, for some reason,
nothing happened. Now again, this was Trump one point zero,

(01:30:12):
where he didn't have the control and people didn't care
about his agenda during the first go around. But nothing happened.
The title of today's show, are we going to see arrests? Actually,

(01:30:40):
it's our arrests coming. That's the name of today's show.
And I gotta be honest with you, you know, wait,
hold on, hold on, hold on. Before we get into
that headline from just a News, FBI expands Bolton's search

(01:31:03):
to his Washington office. Just talked about that. From the
last headline, this one another one from the from the Federalist,
and this one I absolutely loved. I read this, I
laughed because it's it's yeah, of course, of course this
is what we're going to see, this kind of hypocrisy
coming from the left. But headline never trumpers who cheered

(01:31:26):
mar A Lago raid melt down at search of Bolton's house.
Of course they do. You know, there's a saying of
my generation has been worded in several different ways. You know,
my generation says, fafo fuck around, find out a nicer

(01:31:53):
way of putting that has turned about his fair play.
But one of the most common parlances that has been
used time and time again is don't start no shit,
won't be no shit. Don't start none, won't be none, right,
but obviously turn about as fair a play. I mean,
if you're going to do what they did to Republicans,

(01:32:20):
to Trump's administration, to Trump himself, don't be surprised whenever
those gears, when those levers of government are turned against you.
I mean, let's be honest. This is why the left
is so scared. This is why they're terrified, because they
know what they did. In a million years, they'd never

(01:32:47):
foreseen Trump winning the first time. They were able to
steal the election from him in twenty twenty. But they
thought they I mean, they did everything they popped possibly
could to keep him out of office. They thrown so
much crap onto him, trying to get people to not

(01:33:12):
support him, but it just didn't work. They tried everything
they could possibly think of. They never could have imagined
a world where Trump would have inked out of victory
considering how much they attacked him, and every attack just
seemed to strengthen not only his resolve as in President Trump,

(01:33:37):
but those who support him, you know, Trump was not
an insider. He's an outsider. Trump isn't a politician. He's
your average everyday Joe. He's a cultural icon that didn't

(01:34:01):
ask for this and didn't make any money doing it.
People see what he's doing, your average everyday American citizen,
your person whom is.

Speaker 3 (01:34:11):
You know.

Speaker 1 (01:34:12):
They're undecided on Trump, on how they feel about him,
but they've seen everything that was going on and they
were like, you know, yeah, I mean Trump said it
numerous times that they're going after you. I'm standing in

(01:34:34):
the way. Trump stood in the void. But the left
know what they did. They know that they broke the
law to do it, and now they're terrified that they
may actually get their comeuppings. So the question our arrests coming.

(01:35:02):
Are we going to see some people put in handcuffs,
purp walked, and see some jail time. Are we going
to see it? If we do see it, are we
going to see it just from no name who gives
a shit aids or or or are we going to
see it from people that actually matter?

Speaker 2 (01:35:24):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:35:33):
You know, we're familiar with scapegoats. We're familiar from you know,
with Patsy's and all these other kind of things. I mean,
we know how the game is played, right, We've seen it.
You know. Whenever the left says no one is above
the law, they're using that as an excuse to go

(01:35:55):
after Trump. The last thing they want is for them
to be held to the same standard, and not even
the same standard. I've talked about this previously on the show.
We don't have to make up crimes. We don't have

(01:36:15):
to make up new laws or reinterpret an old one
in order to arrest somebody. They did the crime, they
did it knowingly. I mean. Hell, whenever you know, Shift
and other people in the intelligence community was like, hey,
we want you to leak classified information to make Trump

(01:36:37):
look bad, they had backlash of hey, isn't that illegal.
What was the response, don't worry about getting caught. Don't
worry about it. You're not going to get caught, You're
not going to get arrested, You're not going to see
any prison time. Don't worry about it. You know, we
got this in the bag. We're going to win the
next election. Trump's never going to know any better. And
by the time they do know better, you know, ten fifteen,

(01:36:58):
twenty years down the road, statute of limitation is going
to be up and they're not going to be able
to do anything about it. So who cares. Don't worry
about it. That's why I mentioned during one of my
last episodes about not you know, there shouldn't be any
kind of statute of limitations, especially for government officials. And
that's exactly why people are able to do crimes without

(01:37:24):
any checks whatsoever, without any threats of criminality, because by
the time you find out about it, it's too late,
the statute of limitations has passed. They get away scott free.
I'm against that wholeheartedly. We don't have to make up crime.
We don't have to reinvent crime. We don't need to
reimagine laws or we got to do. All we got

(01:37:47):
to do is use the law as written and apply it.
That is it. These people on the left know that
they screwed up, and they're terrified that the truth is
going to come out. They don't care that we are

(01:38:08):
going to know about it. They're terrified that the administration
may actually treat them in the same way that they
treated Trump and Trump's administration. Because it wasn't just about
the threat of prosecution it was about fines, and it
was about the threat of prison, because that's what they

(01:38:30):
did to trump. They made up crimes, they made shit up,
they reinvented laws, they reinterpreted it in order to fit
what it is they were wanting to do. They're terrified,
not that the truth is going to come out, not
that the light is going to be shown on their
bad deeds. They don't give a shit about that. They

(01:38:54):
are absolutely terrified that they may actually get fined for
what they did, that they might actually lose money, that
they might got, they might get hit where it hurts
in their pocket book. They're afraid and terrified that they
may actually get sent to prison. I heard it said

(01:39:21):
not that long ago, you know, with the whole you know,
used to There's a lot of different ways that you
can parent kids, right, There's a lot of different ways.
And one of the ways that seemed to be getting

(01:39:42):
pushed out the door is corporal punishment spanking, And there's
a lot of different ways you can parent your children.
Some children respond to I'm disappointed in you, and that's

(01:40:05):
all it takes in order to correct bad behavior. But
that type of method doesn't work for everyone. Sometimes you
have to take it a step further. My parents were

(01:40:26):
not afraid to discipline me when I needed it. It
wasn't abuse, it was disciplined. If I did something stupid,
something I wasn't supposed to be doing, I'd get spanked.
And there's a reason for this too, right, I mean,
you know your parents don't do at least the good ones.

(01:40:47):
They don't do this because it makes them happy. No,
it's pain association. Because in the real world, if you
do something stupid, if you do something you're not supposed
to do, then there's going to be a real world consequence.
You know, if you're riding your bicycle, if you're riding
your motorcycle really really stupid and you do something you're

(01:41:10):
not supposed to do, you could get hurt, broken bones,
lose a limb, and hell, you may even die. That's
why you spank your kids. You give them this, this
association with doing something wrong with pain. There's nothing wrong

(01:41:34):
with it when used right. Why Because if you go
in to rob somebody, there may be a shotgun on
the other side of that door, and the criminal may
lose their life. That's a pain association or real word consequence.
Was screwing around that's why you do that. That's why

(01:41:54):
you discipline your kids, That's why you spank your kids.
You're trying to tell them that, look, there's real world
consequences for doing stuff you're not supposed to do. Sometimes
all you may have to do is say I am
disappointed in you. But as I heard somebody say not

(01:42:16):
that terribly long ago, that using or playing the shame
game only works when the person you are trying to
shame actually cares. If they have no shame in their actions,
then it isn't going to change their behavior at all.
These people have no shame. They know what they did,

(01:42:40):
and they really don't care that you know what they did.
The only way you're going to change this, the only
way you're going to stop this from happening again, is
by actually enforcing the laws that we have on the
books today. That's it. That's the only thing you can
do to stop the bad behavior. Arrest them, throw the

(01:43:02):
book at him, throw them in jail to the fullest
extent of the law. That's what terrifies the Left is
not what they did because in their minds, the ends
justified the means. They did it because Orange Man bad.

(01:43:26):
They knowingly broke the law. I mean during that even
know I talked about that whole you know, releasing of
classified information that they broke the law doesn't matter. I
know we're breaking the law. I know this is a crime.
I don't care. Orange Man bad. The ends justify the means.
You know, history will applaud us for breaking the law.
I mean, that's the attitude that they had. They want

(01:43:51):
to act as a martyr. Then make them a martyr,
Throw them in jail, shame them. Absolutely. Last headline before
we before we UH stopped the show, this headline from

(01:44:13):
Fox News. Judge who find Trump five hundred million gets
the books thrown at him. Absolutely, Judge and Gore gone
in in goron ingering that Judge failed to preserve a
single dollar of his original fine against President Trump. That

(01:44:34):
is absolutely hilarious. This is in the UH the case
of the you know, the appeals that was done where
he had that five hundred million, five hundred million civil
fraud penalty about the you know, the UH classification about

(01:44:57):
mar A Lago being as much as it was because
this was a thing, okay, because it was a you know, hey,
you know you you got this loan from the bank.
The bank was happy. Trump was happy. Trump paid the
loan back. There was no crime, There was no party
that was hurt through this. The bank wanted to do

(01:45:20):
the the you know, the bank wants to do more
business with Trump. Trump wanted to do more business with
the bank. But this person said that, oh, they they
illegally valued his home at whatever they did, the mar
A Lago home. And this whole thing is you know, stupid.
And the five hundred million dollar ruling that the judge placed, well,

(01:45:45):
that whole thing was thrown out. The whole entire thing.
Trump gets all his money back. Fan freakingtastic, and Letitia James,
I really do hope that it goes a step farther.

(01:46:07):
It may take special prosecutor because one judge is not
going to go after another judge. They are a you know,
it's a club, an exclusive club. It may take something more,
but yeah, a win, another win for President Trump. I'm

(01:46:27):
happy about it. I'm excited. Do me a great big favorite.
Head on over too Stinkpickle dot com s t I
n K P I k l E dot com. Check
out some of the products over there. You may see
something you like. Anyway, That is all I got for
y'alls today, have a great one and I will see
you in the next one. This has been the ho

(01:46:49):
Host Show. For more information, you can head to theho
Hostshow dot com and for the merchandise store, you can
head on over to stinkpickle dot com. That is s
t i n K p I k l e dot com.
Until next time,