Behind the Donkey Mask

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, Welcome to the Grated, the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now. As we
discussed news, politics, current events, aid so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do the
Constitution because the free per broadcasting alive from weaponar Slaw

(00:36):
Production Studio B. Welcome to the Ho Host Show and
as always I'm your host. He ho, so HOI y'all's
doing I hope you're doing good. I really do so.
I have an announcement to make you see next week
Friday is quite possibly my favorite holiday, Halloween. I've always

(01:00):
I've been a fan. I really haven't. And it really
dates back to like whenever I was around five, maybe seven,
you know, right around that time frame because the first,
the very first horror movie that I ever seen was
Night Marri and Elm Street Part two, Freddy's Revenge, And yeah,

(01:22):
I was about five seven ish whenever whenever I watched this,
and it was over at a one of my brother's
friend's house, you know, him and his little brother, little brother,
and then me and you know, no way, hold on,
let me scratch that a little bit. So my brother

(01:45):
two and a half years older, one of his friends
and he had a little brother, and so you know,
we both went because I'm assuming my parents wanted a
parent's night, you know, I'm assuming that's what happened. And
while we were over there, you know, their parents got
the movie, and I don't know, you know, roughly how

(02:06):
long the movie had been out at that particular point
in time. They got it. They had satellite, I think,
or at least it was a pay per view I
know that much. And let me tell you what, that
movie absolutely scared them. But Jesus out of me, it
really did. I mean, it was just it was creepy.
I mean, think about it that long ago, you know,

(02:26):
around forty years ago. That was kind of freaky. You know. Now,
I don't ever remember actually having any nightmares from watching
the movie, but I'll tell you what I was. You know,
I was sure that different places that I went in
the neighborhood, I was certain that Freddy Krueger was going

(02:49):
to jump out from behind a tree, behind a bush
something like that, you know, that hole his the claws
coming out of the fingertips, and it just it got me.
I ain't gonna lie. I mean, I was young, so
of course it got me. So horror has always had
kind of a special place in my heart, and now
I mean it's it's one of the things that those

(03:10):
movies don't really scare me, but they are very entertaining.
I love suspense, I really do. And you know, like
I said, horror movies the genre in general has always
had a very special place in my heart. And so Halloween,
I love it, I really do. It's an awesome time

(03:30):
of the year, it really is. And so in honor
of that, during the lead up to Halloween, starting next
week over there on WSP radio dot com, there is
let's see let me, let me, let me look, because

(03:51):
I don't want to give you wrong information on this.
So starting Monday, October twenty seventh, at seven pm, Radio
Horror for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, and that is
going to start at seven pm Central, a collection of

(04:13):
remastered horror old time radio dramas is what is going
to be airing. And then on Friday, Halloween, October thirty, first,
it is going to be let me see what is
it called, it's hanked radio, I believe, going to be

(04:36):
playing that at seven pm. And then why did that
just oh no, wonder why? Starting at seven pm, and
then another playthrough for those that you know missed some
of the first episodes at nine thirty, so a playthrough

(04:56):
at seven and then a play through at nine thirty.
And of course those times are central. I'm sure if
you head on over to wsp radio dot com again,
that is wspradio dot com, and if you look at
the at the broadcast schedule for next week, I'm sure

(05:17):
that you'll get all those times in local. So I
definitely recommend heading over there checking that out. I'll be
listening to those two as well, because, like I said,
I am a fan of horror, and there is a
chat in there if you want to chat while the
show is going on. But anyway, that's what's going on
next week, interrupting your regularly scheduled shows to bring you

(05:39):
Halloween horror drama. It's absolutely amazing. I'm excited, I really am. Anyway,
let's go ahead and get into today's show. Now. I
tell you what, I absolutely love the title of this.
It cracked me up. It was funny Behind the Donkey
Mask is what I titled this episode of the podcast today,
and it cracked me up. It really Now, if you

(06:01):
want to follow along with the articles that I will
be using in the show. You can head on over
to the Hoo hootshow dot com. Just click on that
news feed tab and you'll see the blog with the
magazine in there. That'll take you over to flipboard. There
you go. And this is quite possibly the fewest amount
of articles that I have ever put in one of

(06:23):
the magazines for an episode. There's only eight stories in here.
That's it, because most of what we're going to be
doing is discussing these various topics and articles and just
kind of getting into the weeds a little bit. I
mean not excessively, but definitely getting into the weeds a
little bit. And the story that I want to start

(06:45):
off with is from town Hall headline. Even CNN is
calling out DIMS over this lie about Trump's White House project,
because you know, what they're doing is, you know, basically
just you know, they're really upset that President Trump is,

(07:08):
you know, with everything going on, that he is spending
time and money about this White House remodel. You know,
they really have a problem with a huge problem with it.

(07:29):
And the sad thing is, you know it's like, Okay,
this is not the first time there's been you know, remodeling, renovations,
updating of various things in the White House. This is
something that happens all the time. And according to a
list that I printed up because I was curious, it's like,
you know, how many times has the White House been

(07:50):
remodeled under whom? You know that? These are just the
things that I was kind of curious about, and so
I looked it up. And the original construs production for
the White House happened in ninete now I'm sorry, seventeen
ninety one to roughly eighteen hundred. That was the original
construction started under started under George Washington and John Adams

(08:19):
was actually the first occupant, but you know, there you go.
The second one was in eighteen fourteen, eighteen seventeen, after
the British set fire to the White House in eighteen fourteen.
That was under James Madison and then James Monroe. In
eighteen twenty four and eighteen twenty nine Monroe and then

(08:40):
Andrew Jackson. The addition of the south particle portico and
the north portroar whatever, So yeah, an expansion and refinements
of the exterior, and eighteen eighty one, during Chester A.
Arthur presidency, there was a Vatican style remodeling, an installation

(09:06):
of a large tiffany screen, gilding and more ornate interior
decor nineteen o two, and then subsequently early nineteen hundreds
under Theodore Roosevelt there was a major Classical style renovation
nineteen twenty seven and early nineteen twenties. I don't knows

(09:30):
if you got that right. During Calvige Coolidge, Calvin Coolidge's
presidency nineteen twenty nine, the West Wing fire. Under Herbert Hoover,
they did some renovation and repairs, arm sorry, remodeling and repairs.
Then nineteen forty two Franklin Deleanor Roosevelt the addition of

(09:54):
the East Wing and more office space nineteen forty eight,
nineteen fifty two, you under Harry S. Truman, I already
said that already nineteen sixty one. In early nineteen sixties
JFK did some restoration and redecorating, and then various presidencies

(10:19):
throughout the nineteen seventies and two thousands, you know, going
into you know two thousands, a series of smaller scale
but significant modifications, expansions or repurposing of rooms. Under Richard Nixon,
converting the pool room into the pressroom, modernization of services,

(10:44):
you know, plumbing, HVAC, wiring, and then Barack Obama from
two thousand and nine throughout his presidency doing all kinds
of different remodeling. And so whenever President Trump started doing
it in twenty twenty five, it wasn't like it was
unheard of something that has been done throughout the years

(11:09):
various presidents. My question is, what's the big deal now?
I mean, I do understand the question of, you know,
the remodeling. With the government shut down, is this really
what President Trump should be focusing on? And where's the
money coming from? And that's an actual good question.

Speaker 2 (11:31):
Where is the money coming from? Regarding the edition of
the ball room?

Speaker 1 (11:52):
Their most recent and der Trump? Okay, there we go,
asking a question because I'm really not even sure. So
let's see. Let's see the project was announced. White House

(12:20):
says that no taxpayer funds or federal appropriations will be
used for the ballroom. Funding is coming from private donors
and the President himself. So there you go. Question asked
and answered. And in which case, I mean, like, I
get it. You know, government shut down, everything going on,
you have the arguments over everything, and I'm not getting

(12:42):
into that today because I did talk about that during
yesterday's episode. But I mean, it's still an important question
to ask, It really is. But it's being funded through
private donations and President Trump. So even though I do
understand the question, I understand the skepticism, of course I do,

(13:09):
but it really is unfounded apparently because President Trump and
private donors are the ones whom are actually funding this ballroom.
And this article from town Hall that I mentioned earlier.
Even CNN is calling out Dems over this lie about
Trump's White House project goes back to a question that

(13:34):
was brought to Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt at a Thursday briefing.
In addition to the ballroom in the Rose Garden patio,
is the President looking at any other renovations or significant
kind of projects here at the White House? And Levitt responded,
not to my knowledge, no, but he's building a heart clearly,

(13:57):
and so his heart or I'm sorry, let me let
me try to do that again, because evidently I forgot
how to read there for a second. I apologize that
happens from time to time. Levitt responded, let me go
ahead and show you. Not to my knowledge, no, but
he's a builder at heart. Clearly, and so his heart
and his mind is always churning about how to improve

(14:19):
things here to White House grounds or here on the
White House grounds. But at this moment in time, of course,
the ballroom is really the president's main priority. And of
which case, everybody understood what Levitt was saying that when
it comes to remodeling and upgrading, updating the White House grounds,

(14:44):
she was saying that the president's top priority in that
renovation is the ballroom. However, because these democrats like to
fabricate different things and really put a negative spin on it,
he tried to make it sound like Carolyn Levitt said
that with everything going on, Trump's first priority is the ballroom,

(15:09):
and that just simply isn't true. And CNN even called
out them for saying that very lie, and that just
kind of cracked me up. It really did. It gave
me pause, you know, because this really is a very
good indicator that, you know, people just aren't listening to

(15:32):
mainstream media. They're not listening to them anymore. They have
really lost the confidence of the American people, they really have.
I mean, did where would CNN actually be in as
far as ratings goes if it wasn't for like airports
tuning them in and a you know a lot of
different places like that that play their programming all the time.

(15:56):
I mean, where would CNN ratings and viewership be if
it wasn't for places like that, Airports, subway places where
you have that. I mean, I've not been to a
lot of airports. I'm just going to be honest with you.
You know, generally I stay away from flying, not because

(16:19):
I have an issue with heights or planes or anything
like that. My issue is when is in the the
pure just blatant, in your face, stripping away of my
privacy going to an airport. I mean it's just as bad, actually,

(16:40):
I mean, like maybe it's even worse than do uy checkpoints.
And do uy checkpoints are not constitutional because you are
treated as though you are guilty until you prove yourself
to be innocent. Do Y checkpoints are unconstitutional. You're not
supposed to do that in the ATF. I mean, think
about how many how many terrorists or potential terrorists has

(17:04):
ATF captured since nine to eleven, and the number may
surprise you. Zero they haven't caught one terrorist. I remember
looking this up not that long ago. I mean it
was within the past year as far as how many
terrorists the ATF is caught during their you know, pursuit

(17:27):
to make you know, flight safer for all Americans. But
the number of personal property that has gone missing is huge.
The number of tablets, iPads, chargers, I mean, whatever personal

(17:48):
property that has come up missing from baggage and what
have you carry on luggage. You know, the amount of
stuff that has come up missing, that has been confiscated
and under the guise of public safety in public security
is staggering. So I mean, I don't I don't go

(18:13):
on planes. I've been on several throughout the years whenever
I was younger, and you know, before all this holy craps,
you know, started happening, you know, before the ATF really
got huge and hot and heavy and using different things
to really you know, because you know, it's not just

(18:34):
the it's the body scanners that I don't that I
have a problem with. It's like, I mean, like, dude,
you're you're wanting me to take off my shoes. You know,
you have restriction on water and all kinds of other
ridiculous things. It's like, dude, none of this really makes
any sense. You know, I believe it was Benjamin Franklin

(18:55):
that said that, you know, if you sacrifice freedom for security,
you will deserve neither and you will lose both. I'm
paraphrasing that. I don't remember the exact quote, but that's
what it was. I don't like it, but for CNN,

(19:21):
a quote news broadcast media company, to call out a
reporter for the lie that they said regarding Trump's top
priority says something. And it really is a good thing.

(19:43):
I mean, like I now, look, I'm not saying that
you should trust CNN. I'm not saying that you should
trust any of these mainstream legacy news organizations. I'm not
saying that at all. Please don't get me wrong. But
what I am saying is it's it's interesting how these
peop people are starting to change their tune and, you know,

(20:04):
calling out Democrats and reporters that are lying and purposefully
trying to mislead their audience and the American people. It's
interesting to me, knowing whom these people are nothing more
than talking heads for the Democrat left, nothing more than
the propaganda arm of the left wing government. Knowing that

(20:27):
to actually see CNN calling out a reporter that was
purposely misleading the American people. That says something, that says
something on how terrified they are with the with how
their audience has been shrinking over the past several years.

(20:47):
I'm sure their numbers are abysmal. It's it's kind of sad.
I mean, it really is. It's kind of sad, and
at least in some ways, maybe they are finally waking
up and understanding that they've lost the confidence of the

(21:09):
American people and maybe they need to do something in
order to get it back. I'm never going to just
turn on CNN. I'm never going to do it. I've
used their articles from time to time because it is
interesting to see what democrats and those on the left

(21:31):
are saying about various issues. A lot of the times
you see their headlines are purposely, purposely misleading, but it
seems as though they're kind of, at least in some ways,

(21:54):
getting their head out of their ass and starting to
exercise a little more discernment whenever it comes to the
information they're propagating they're putting out there for the American people.
I'm not saying trust any of these legacy news media companies,

(22:16):
but it really does indicate that, yeah, they're concerned they're
aware that they have lost face, they are aware that
people don't trust them anymore, and they're doing their best
to try to win that trust back. I'm not going
to fall for I don't care. I mean, there's all

(22:36):
kinds of different places out there that you can go
to and get your news and get information, you know,
get the when, the where, the what, the why, the how,
without getting all of this bias that comes out of
legacy news. I mean, look, I don't lie about what
type of show this is. You know, yes, I'm biased.

(23:01):
I am a constitutional conservative with libertarian leanings. I do
not classify myself as a Republican. I'm a constitutional conservative.
I am an originalist at heart. The Constitution's pretty clear,
pretty easy to read. I don't see where a lot
of arguments take place on different things and what they mean.

(23:24):
I don't understand it. It doesn't make any sense to me.
I mean, I understand what they're doing because you know,
like I mentioned during the last episode that the left
is really good about changing definitions in order to change
the meaning of something to be closer to what they
are actually wanting. But that's not how things are supposed

(23:48):
to work legally. You don't change definitions in order to
suit your needs. You just don't do that, you know.
I mean, it's clear, it's understood. It has been acknowledge
time and time again throughout the years that when you
are looking at a law and you were trying to

(24:08):
define discern what it is they were talking about, you
take the definitions from the time that the law was written.
You don't use an updated definition. You take it as
it was then, not as what the word means. So,
I mean, therefore, all this redefining of different words in

(24:30):
order to get the result that they're actually wanting is irrelevant.
They shouldn't be doing that, and that's been legally acknowledged
in you know, several different instances over the years. Absolutely,
it has been it's not a question, it's not a
legal question. It doesn't make any sense. And yeah, terminology
changes throughout the years. It really doesn't mean.

Speaker 3 (24:52):
Look at the word gay.

Speaker 1 (24:57):
It's a word that, throughout my lifetime is pretty much
much changed twice, you know, because originally gay meant happy,
and then gay kind of went to a little off,

(25:18):
as in, it's you're so happy that it's kind of
you know, creepy things are a little off. With you,
it is not quite right, you know, and then gay
turned into being homosexual, So I mean the definition has changed.
But if you're looking at something that was written in

(25:41):
a particular year, you have to look at how it
was defined then before you make any judgments as far
as whether this should or should not have been said
at all. That happens all the time. But when you're
speaking legally, as in laws, then how you define something

(26:09):
is important. And in law you can't just arbitrarily redefine
something to get the outcome that you're actually wanting. It
doesn't work like that. It just doesn't. Anyway. Let's go
ahead and move on. The next story that I'm wanting

(26:31):
to get into. This article comes from the Federalist. Let
me go ahead and get into it the headline. If
you care more about policing the right than fighting the left,
you're part of the problem. I mean, you know, and

(26:52):
this is kind of an ongoing theme, right because what
this article is talking about is what goes on all
the freaking time, because when the left does something wrong,
then it's classified as no big deal. You know, this
person said this, this person had blackface, this person did that.

(27:17):
I mean, all these other kind of things, all these
accusations that has been thrown out there, and they always
downplay everything as if it's no big deal, you know,
they apologize, let's move on, let's not continue to dwell
on something that happened in the past. This is the
type of rhetoric that we get out of the left
all the freaking time. But whenever somebody on the right

(27:43):
does something, which I mean sometimes has been just as bad,
if not worse, but you know, more times than not,
it seems as though what was done on the right
didn't even measure up to what somebody on the left did.
And yet we see the left handle it totally different.

(28:03):
We see democrats handle something that somebody did, said or
war on the on the right, they handle it a
lot differently than whenever their own does it, you know.
Like I said, I mean, this is a playbook that
the left have been operating for time, you know, for
for a very long time. This article continues. Historically, the

(28:28):
American left has operated under an unspoken rule no enemies
to the left. This principle, intended to preserve internal unity
in the face of political threats, discourages public criticism of
even the most of even the movement's most radical elements,

(28:48):
so long as they advance the left's overreaching goals of
acquiring and maintaining political power, winning elections, and discrediting Conservatives
and Christians in cultural sphere. That's how the left operates.
It doesn't matter what you do or what you did.

(29:10):
What only matters to the left is advancing their power
base winning elections. That's how they operate. And quite honestly,
the right doesn't operate in the same way. And the
sad thing is the right almost operates as a I
have to be perfect, no grace given to me, but

(29:33):
yet grace given to everybody else. This is kind of
how the right generally operates on this, you know, because
you have this person that said this extremely racist thing,
and this you know, on the left, and nobody bats
an eye, nobody cares, and even if they care, it's
an I'll apologize and will move on, you know, it

(29:54):
doesn't matter. This is something that we have seen time
and time again. But yet on the right, somebody says
something that you know, and I've seen this played out,
you know, quite a few different times. They'll say something
not necessarily blatantly racist or anything of that nature, and

(30:16):
a lot of times it was something that was taken
out of context, you know, kind of like the great
people on both sides that President Trump said, you know,
something that was didn't mean what they said it mean,
it was taken out of context. That wasn't the intention.
You know, even though when the left does it, it's
usually intention obvious. They meant to say it, they meant

(30:37):
it when they said it, and I was there when
they said it, and they don't care. But yet whenever
the right does it, when it was something that was
taken out of context, what do you usually see? You know,
the right apologizes left right and center, they take a
step back, They toned down the rhetoric. They they back

(31:03):
off of whatever policy that you know they're they're trying
to put through. In short, the right generally caves. The
Democrats are very very bad at actually calling out bad
actors on their own side. Ilhan Omar has said all

(31:25):
kinds of anti Jewish and anti American things over the years,
all kinds of things. Has the left called for any
type of accounting on that. No, she'll give an apology

(31:46):
that more times than not are just They're only done
because she feels as though they have to because she
got caught because somebody didn't like it. And then the
next day she basically says this thing doubles down or whatever.
It's ridiculous. But this is a type of behavior that
we see happen all the time, and this article is

(32:15):
talking about the uh do Yeah, here we go Democrats
and a Democrat and various Democrats who you know, enthusiastically
rally behind Canadas like Jay Jones, who openly fantasized about

(32:37):
political violence. The article continues, Republicans like JD. Vance or
conservative commentators like Matt Walsh are treated as if they
are complicit in extremism when they refuse to publicly condemn
young Republican members of a leaked group chat over a

(33:00):
handful of offensive jokes or the controversial opinions of right
wing media personalities like Chucker Carlson and Candice Owens. But
backing up a little bit, you know you've got people
that yeah, here we go. When leaked text messages revealed
that Virginia Attorney General candidate Jay Jones once wrote that

(33:23):
a Republican legislator deserved two bullets to the head and
that his children should die in their mother's arms. Prominent
Democrats have continued to offer their full support. It's accepted,
it's okay, it was just rhetoric, he didn't mean anything

(33:43):
by it. No need to get angry, no need to
demand that he stepped down, step out of the running,
all this other kind of stuff. It doesn't matter because
they care about power, they care about politics, and the
only time they demand that people step down is whenever

(34:05):
it's on the right. When it's on the left, they
don't seem to care. And it's very much of a
double standard. And look, I understand that, you know, the
whole double standard thing. It happens on both sides, absolutely,
so I'm not going to claim that it doesn't. I'm
not going to try to make that claim at all.

(34:26):
I promise I'm not making that claim. It does happen
on both sides. We've seen it. We can be an
adult about it. Yes, it does happen on both sides.
But the sop, the standard operating procedure on either side
are are different because Democrats don't care about what has happened.

(34:52):
All they care about is political power, and as long
as they are able to hold and maintain power, then
they don't see anything wrong with it. I mean, remember
back at all the Hitler and you know, Gestapo and
all this other kind of rhetoric that the left have

(35:13):
been spouting out, you know for years. They're okay with that,
even though it's it's intended purpose is to rile up
their base and you know, try to poke and prode
to get some type of violent outrage out of their

(35:34):
own base and you know, go after Conservatives and Republicans
and what have you. We've seen this play out. That's
their intended that's what they want. So they don't even

(35:56):
call out their own rhetoric. They allow it, they support,
they promote it. But whenever it comes to people on
the right going after their own for things that they
have done, most Republicans, you know, the standard operating procedure

(36:19):
is they take those kind of things seriously and they
have no problem removing one of their own from a
position from a committee, demanding that the person stepped down
for what it is that they did or said. So

(36:47):
how each party handles bad actors within their own party,
it says something because the left ignores bad actors in
their own party, and they are extremely quick to call
out somebody in an opposition party for what they did

(37:08):
all the while ignoring what their own party does. That's
standard operating procedure. But on the right, what you generally
see is they call out both sides of the aisle equally,
and the left or I'm sorry, the right seems to
really have a problem with you know, not just going yeah,

(37:32):
I said it, But why did you not have any
problem whenever this person said something far worse. I mean, one,
you're making a mountain out of a mole hill, but
the mountain was done by somebody on your side of
the island. You had no problem with that mountain, but

(37:54):
my little bitty molehill, which, yeah, I was wrong, I'll
acknowledge it. I shouldn't have said that. I acknowledged that too,
But you didn't care about the mountain. Why do you
care about my little bitty molehill? And hello, Dave over
there in rumbled, good to see us, or he said, yo,
I just stumbled in to hear zero notification. Sorry, I'm late,

(38:15):
start from the beginning joking. That's awesome. Yeah, you know,
I thought about sending you another text, and I'm.

Speaker 3 (38:22):
Like, hopefully it worked, I don't know, And.

Speaker 1 (38:25):
Then it just kind of snuck up on me and
here we.

Speaker 4 (38:27):
Are so yeah, so how the political left does things
with their own people whenever they step out of line,
say something they shouldn't.

Speaker 1 (38:39):
You know, it's very different on both sides. It very
much is. And the people that over politicize this type
of activity, you know, those that really go after the

(39:02):
molehill while allowing the left to get away with ignoring
the mountain, then you're absolutely part of the problem.

Speaker 5 (39:17):
You know.

Speaker 1 (39:17):
This is one of the reasons why I truly respect
President Trump, I really do. I respect him a lot
because he's not afraid to own his mistakes. He's not
afraid to acknowledge when he may be wrong. He's not

(39:38):
afraid to do that whatsoever. If he truly believes in something, yeah,
he'll defend it, he'll support it, he may even double down,
but he'll acknowledge when he's wrong. He's got no problem
doing that. I respect him a lot for that. And
another reason why I extremely respect President Trump is because

(40:02):
if you hit him, he will hit you back, and
he is relentless, and he'll hit you back twice as hard.
Don't go after Trump thinking that you're just going to
get another weak, apologetic Republican that is too afraid to,

(40:23):
you know, step out of line. They're afraid to be
called out by left wing media. Trump ain't like that.
When Trump has a position and he believes in that position,
he'll defend it. If he's wrong, he'll acknowledge it. But
if you punch him, he's going to punch you back
twice as hard. He ain't going to take anybody's crap.

(40:44):
I respect that. I wish more Republicans in the party,
more conservatives acted just like that instead of every time
they get a little bitty, you know, finger wave from
somebody on the right, I'm sorry somebody on the left.
You know, they coward They act like an abused dog.
They don't fight, they don't stand up for themselves, and

(41:09):
you know what ends up happening is like, you know,
you better apologize, and then they apologize and then they'll
still cancel them. That type of thing is ridiculous. I mean, like, dude,
I wouldn't apologize. It's like, yeah, I said it, who cares.
I'm not stepping down, I'm not backing down. I'm not
giving up. I'm going to defend myself and oh yeah,

(41:31):
by the way, if you want to call me out
for my Bravo Sierra. How about all this kind of
stuff that you just ignored that happened on the left.
I mean, you didn't care about that. Why do you
care about this? Turn the tables. We can't be afraid
to call that kind of stuff out. We can't be
afraid to stand up for what we believe in. That's

(41:54):
what we see happen all the freaking time, and people
that act like that, they're part of the problem. They're
not part of the solution. They're part of the problem.
Moving on, Wow, I'm only two articles into this. Holy crap.
All right, we're going to go ahead and take a

(42:15):
quick break. When I return, we are going to talk
about Mandanni Mom, Donnie Zoran. However you pronounce a guy's name,
I don't even care. Anyway, we're going to be talking
about him, some comments that he made, and you know,
just in a matter of speaking, I'm kind of frustrated

(42:47):
and concerned about the the political leanings that comes out
of major US cities. So this isn't just a New
York thing, This isn't just a California thing, This isn't
just an Illinois thing. This is something that we see

(43:08):
out of major US cities, no matter whether the state
that this city is in is right or left doesn't matter.
It's still something that I think is pretty concerning. And
I don't I mean, I just I don't have a
lot of faith in it.

Speaker 6 (43:26):
You know.

Speaker 1 (43:27):
It rubs me the wrong way. It's disheartening, it is unsettling.
I don't really like it. Dave put in here, he goes, Yeah,
Zoran the moron, don't get me started on him. That's
a good one. I like that. I'm going to use that.

(43:49):
I may have to call in if you do. Oh
about that. I'm not using the phone anymore, and I
haven't connected to my cell phone to the uh, to
the board.

Speaker 7 (44:04):
You know.

Speaker 1 (44:05):
I'll do that during the next show. I'm not gonna
try doing it now because I'm I'll end up screwing
something up. I don't want to do that, so I'll
end up doing it at some point. So uh, But
unfortunately today I will not be able to accept calls.
Next week though, I'll get that done. I'm excited that'll

(44:25):
end up happening. All right, So let me go ahead
and look at a song that I can play. Which
one do I want to want? Which one do I
want to do? This one? All right, So just a
few minutes and I will be right back. Look this morning,

(44:52):
son in my.

Speaker 7 (44:55):
Reach for my soda, tell you no lie and sorta
sorta where you go my last can now I'm slow?

Speaker 1 (45:05):
Sort the sort of feeling blue. What's a man supposed
to do? Fridge is empty.

Speaker 7 (45:21):
While its thing, This ain't living, This is a sin.

Speaker 8 (45:28):
Sorta sorta where.

Speaker 1 (45:30):
You go my last can now I'm slow? Soa sorta
feeling blue. What's a man supposed to do? Gotta get
myself together, Gotta.

Speaker 8 (45:43):
Find a way, this ain't right.

Speaker 1 (45:48):
Gotta make you do today?

Speaker 8 (45:53):
Sorta sorda where you go my last can now I'm slow?
So what's a man supposed to do?

Speaker 1 (47:38):
Have you ever had an ailment that a normal over
the counter remedy just couldn't fight? If this is the case,
then boy, have I got the solution for you. Tussin.
That's right, Tousin. Cough, Toussin, cold, Tousin, running, nose, Tousin
it you watery ice, Tussin, broken leg Toussin. Tussin is

(47:58):
the ultimate cure, guaranteed to stop anything that ails you.
Tousin available wherever OTC's are sold. Ah right, and we
are back So we're going to go ahead and dive
right into this talking about Zoran Mumdani's I don't even
know how you pronounce his name. Doesn't matter to me.

(48:20):
I don't care. I don't respect him enough to even
trying to figure it out doesn't matter to me. And
we are going to start with an article from Red
State Headline zoron Mundanti's nine eleven comments that shows he's
feeling himself and you can't fathom how bad is going
to get. Yeah, this is kind of how things end

(48:49):
up happening. He is a Muslim, and look, I know
I've talked about this during other episodes, and I'm pretty

(49:09):
sure I've made my point in doing so. But this
is kind of how it ends up happening. But first,
before I get into that, I am going to acknowledge that, no,
not all Muslims are bad. Obviously, you know, I'm not
about making those type of generalizations regarding a religious slash

(49:35):
political belief system. Not going to do it, Not going
to go there. I know several Muslims, Hindus, what have you. No,
they're not both the same. There's a difference between seven
eleven and nine to eleven. Oh that was bad. I

(50:01):
don't care. That was funny. There's a difference, right, there's
a difference. But not all Muslims are as they like
to say radical. You know, they're not ones that are
going to go out and actually do the things that
the Quran tells them to do. Not all of them

(50:25):
do that. And what we usually see end up happening
is when Muslims are in the minority, then they are
very docile. Right, They're like a domesticated dog. They'll follow

(50:46):
you around, They'll play by the rules there, follow the laws,
They'll do what they are supposed to do. This is
what we normally see whenever Muslims go into a different country,
whenever Muslims come over here. That's generally what we see.
When they are in the minority, they're very docile, they're

(51:09):
you know, they they respectable, all this other kind of stuff,
and that's a good thing. But when they start to
grow into a majority, you start seeing their actions change.

(51:32):
Because you know, Muslims here in my hometown, which we
do have, I've never had any issues with them. Good people,
business owners, just average everyday people. Don't have a problem
with them whatsoever. I'm not afraid for my life I'm

(51:54):
not afraid that something might happen, some type of an
altercation because we have a difference in beliefs and political beliefs.
I'm not, you know, not fearful at all. But the
same can't be said if you go up to Michigan,

(52:16):
because there are Muslim areas that they have instituted their
own rule of law in those areas, Sharia law. And
of which case, that's what generally ends up happening. When
Muslims are in the minority, they don't rock the boat,

(52:40):
they act docile within the rules and the boundaries that
are of that area. But when they start to become
the majority, then they start to impose their own rules,
their own laws, their own belief system them and the

(53:01):
more they are allowed to do with the more they
start to do, and the worse off it ends up getting.
And this is a common you know, a commonality things
that has happened throughout history numerous years. It's common. And

(53:30):
if you want an indicator about what could happen here,
you know, one, let's go to the extreme where Muslims
are in the majority in other countries Iraq, Iran, you know,
very very various places throughout the Middle East. You know,

(53:50):
they they have their own rules, their own way of
doing things, and it's not good. I mean, it really isn't,
you know. I Mean it amazes me how you have
you know, Democrats that are like, you know, hey, it's
the woke, this, that and the other. We're feminists, you know,

(54:11):
female rights, you know, pro LGBTQ, and you know, pro Muslim,
and they're always defending Muslims and defending you know, Hamas,
defending you know, the people in the Gaza, strip people
in Iraq and Iran. You know, they're they're always doing this.
But yet they, you know, they want to disassociate the

(54:34):
Muslims and those in these various places with the actions
that they do. I'm pro Muslim, I'm pro LGBTQ, even
though you know, Muslims in their own countries where they
are in the majority, they throw gays off of rooftop

(54:55):
after giving them a red bull and see if they
can fly. That's what they do. Democrats claim to be
pro the feminist movement and at the same time they

(55:17):
are pro Muslim, pro Hamas, pro what have you all
the while, you know, Muslims treat dogs better than they
do women. In a previous episode I talked about sharia law.

(55:39):
I discussed some of the tenants, some of the main beliefs,
the main rules in sharia law, indicating very clearly that
sharia law is not under any way, shape or form
compatible with the Constitution. And yet you have, as you

(56:02):
see in you know, Middle East countries where they are
the majority, they have instituted sharia law. And you see
how things are over there, and you see how the
political landscape and these other things, how they have changed

(56:23):
with an increasing population of Muslims over in Europe, they're
having issues. They're having a lot of issues, and it's
not good for the you know, the population of people
that have been there longer. Instead you have you know,

(56:45):
what you end up happening are these foreigners that come in,
whether legally or illegally, doesn't matter, practicing Muslims trying to
instill their own beliefs, their own laws, and trying to

(57:08):
even enforce them not just on their own people, but
on everybody. And things haven't turned out so good. They
just haven't. You know, European countries are you know, maybe
we shouldn't have done that. You know, they're they're rethinking

(57:30):
their position on letting these individuals in and we're having
the same thing happen here. I mean, dude, I don't
I know that nine to eleven, you know, the events

(57:50):
the World Trade Center is coming down. I know that
was twenty five years ago. And just like the Jews
of World War two, never again, we said that. Then

(58:18):
we came together as a nation. We understood the radical
element of the faith of Muslims, we understood the distinction.

(58:39):
And what we have happening in New York is something
that I'm not going to say it terrifies me, but
it very much makes me leary. I mean, you know,
not just the the policies that he's wanting to end,
you know, introduce, you know, with having government run grocery

(59:05):
stores that are going to have the unintended or maybe
it's the intended consequence of shutting down every single Maw
and Paul grocery store, because that's what's going to end
up happening, because it's going to be subsidized prices paid
for by taxpayers like you and me, and they're going

(59:27):
to be able to low ball everybody else, sell all
the products in the store at a lower price, shutting
down the competition. And when the competition's gone, then they're
going to check up the prices, because that's how shit happens.
That's how it happens, and of course that's how it happens.

(59:50):
There's many policies that mom Donnie has that just are
that are bad, and Dave, I would actually like to
have a conversation with you about this on next week's episode,
you know, let's get into it a little bit. Absolutely, So,

(01:00:15):
there's a lot of policies that this guy has that's
just that are anti constitutional, anti American. Not to mention
his actual beliefs. Now, I already acknowledged that, No, not
all Muslims are the same. No, I understand that. I

(01:00:43):
acknowledge that. But I'm learly about him, not because of
his politics, not because of his beliefs, but because of
his rhetoric what he says unapologetically. This article goes into
saying and let me go ahead and try to find

(01:01:04):
it here we go, okay, So let me go ahead
and get into this article a little bit. So, barring
something cataclysmic, Mamdani is going to be the next mayor
of New York City, and he's beginning to realize that
it's difficult to say the mask was ever truly on

(01:01:28):
with the thirty three year old communist Nepo baby that
has never held a real job. But with this, with
his latest moves, every bit of pretense is now dropping
to the side. After all, why should he care about
maintaining broad appeal when he's running in one of the
most left wing cities in the country, whose voters seem

(01:01:52):
more than content to hand him the keys no matter
what radical positions he takes. Understand that this goes beyond
general policy differences regarding rent control and government owned grocery stores.
Though the same Islamic radicalization we've seen in places like

(01:02:13):
London is now on the menu for the big city,
and Mamdannie is no longer afraid to show that's his goal.
There is actually a video. How long is this video?
I didn't actually even watch this particular one, but here's

(01:02:38):
more or less where he's going with this. All right,
So the post on X from Greg price Zorhan. Through
the years, my aunt stopped taking the subway after nine
to eleven because she did not feel safe in her hijab.
And the narrative here and this is you know again,

(01:03:01):
this is kind of sop. This is kind of what
ends up happening. But what was the rhetoric from the
right after nine to eleven regarding Muslims. You know, it
was not all Muslims are the same, Not all of
them have been radicalized, not all of them wished to

(01:03:22):
do harm and you know, to America and chant things
like death to America. Not all of them do that.
You know, those on the right publicly announced that very early.
Off there you go. But what came out of the left,
you know, it wasn't so much calling out the radical

(01:03:47):
element of Muslims. It was now Muslims here that are
not the radical element. And you know, maybe they didn't
even include that last part, but we don't want retaliation
happening because of what a few bad actors did. I mean,

(01:04:07):
wasn't it ill haan Omar? It was either Rashida Liiber
ilhan Omar. I don't remember which, you know she was
talking about nine to eleven. I was like, yeah, some
people did something. It's like, are you kidding me? And
the lack of public outrage was deafening. The silence was

(01:04:29):
deafening because you know, as a people, after the trade
centers came down, it was never again we can't allow this.
And here we have the biggest city in America, ground

(01:04:55):
zero of where this actually took place, twenty five years
after the fact, going to elect a Muslim who had
the gall who had the nerve to say my aunt
was the real victim of nine to eleven. Because that's
basically what he said, My aunt was the real victim

(01:05:17):
of nine to eleven because of the possible retaliation to
her and others like her. It's like, are you freaking
kidding me? That's what you're going to say that with

(01:05:41):
the three thousand, over three thousand that died in that tragedy,
a terrorist attack on US soil, and you're going to
tell me that the real victim wasn't them, wasn't their families,

(01:06:05):
wasn't those that were part of the cleanup that found
these bodies in the rubble, and their families, and you know,
just overall the aftermath that none of that mattered to you. Instead,
what you're saying is the real victims of nine to
eleven are the Muslims that live here in America because

(01:06:33):
they didn't feel safe going out in public looking like
a Muslim. That's your takeaway, that's who the real victim is.
And I mean I live in Illinois, right, I mean,

(01:06:53):
I'm not as far as it gets, you know, It's
not like I'm living out in California. I mean, I can't, dude,
I can't even imagine what those in New York City actually,
you know, felt the impact that had on them, you know,
not to mention just those in New York State, but

(01:07:14):
those in the city. I mean I can't. I can't
even imagine. And you know, I know that, you know,
that's nothing that we've ever actually discussed on this program,
uh talking to Dave over there and rumble, never talked

(01:07:34):
about it with him. But I can't even imagine the
impact that it had on those there. And I mean,
with the rhetoric that comes out of his mouth, how
can anyone, especially in New York City support a Muslim
that has the gall to say the real victim were

(01:07:58):
the Muslims? I mean, dude, how ridiculous is that. But
I mean, it's not the first time that we've seen

(01:08:20):
this type of thing. I mean, this isn't the first
time that we've had that kind of rhetoric. It isn't
the first time that you know, you've had Democrats downplaying
But yeah, I mean, I just I can't even fathom that.
I really can't. I'm just I'm just gonna be honest
with you. Let me go ahead and see if I
can play this, because because now I'm curious, I want

(01:08:42):
to use this moment to speak to the Muslims of
New York City.

Speaker 6 (01:08:47):
Hmm.

Speaker 1 (01:08:52):
I want to speak to the memory of my aunt HM,
who stopped taking the subway after September eleventh because she
did not feel safe in her head. Jab. So there

(01:09:12):
you go. Yeah. So, anyway, the more he feels comfortable
in his position, the longer we go down this road,

(01:09:34):
the more comfortable he will be with his views. And
I'm afraid that the more radical his views will become.
Not that his views aren't already radical, and he doesn't
already have these positions, it's just the aspect of he's
going to feel more and more comfortable letting those viewpoints

(01:09:57):
and positions out they put in here. He goes, Yeah, it
was a strange hard time for everyone. Yeah, I mean,
I mean, dude, I I can't even imagine. I mean,
I really can't. I mean, and it baffles me that
that this is taking place in New York City. I mean,
it really does it. Just it baffles me, absolutely baffles me.

(01:10:25):
So all right, we're gonna go ahead and move on.
And this next article I'm going to talk about from
Daily Caller. Yeah, there we go. This one. It kind
of ties hand in hand. And this is a topic
I get. But you know that I've I've talked about
numerous times on the show, you know, Dave, Dave asked

(01:10:54):
that's his takeaway. I'm not even sure what I said anyway. So,
you know, the kind of the theme of today's episode is,
you know, the mountain versus the mole hill. You know,

(01:11:14):
how the left treats their own treats different things, how
the right does the same thing. You know, it's about
optics that we see happening going on right now. You know,
that's kind of the theme of today's show. And of
which case, this next article from the Daily Caller, this
one kind of cracked me up, and you know, I

(01:11:35):
want to Yeah, this is very much of an FAFO
type of article. Right, you may have the freedom of
speech to say whatever you want to, but at the
same time, there may be consequences. Whether those consequences are

(01:12:00):
a violation of the law, or whether they or not
you know here, I gotta be honest with you on something.
You know. Back in my day, All right, look, I'm
older than Google. Yeah, I'm older than Google. Google. I'm
a gen Xer. I am one of the latch key kids.

(01:12:22):
I'm a young gen xer, but I'm still a gen
xer older than Google. Back in my day, going through school,
elementary school, junior high and really getting into high school

(01:12:45):
and throughout high school, I mean, it wasn't something that
you know, really gained traction. I mean it wasn't the
way of life of a lot of people even going
through high school. Yes there was computers, Yes we had
the interwebs, but it wasn't as huge as it is now.

(01:13:06):
And when you lipped off to people, when you called
somebody names, you may get into a fight. There may
be throwing of hands. Yeah, you can say what you

(01:13:30):
want to, you can call somebody names. You can have
your mama joke battle if you want to. But if
it gets too real, if the person you're lipping off
to you doesn't like what you have to say, then
you know, uh, you you may find yourself in an

(01:13:51):
unintended fight. You had to be careful, you had to
be more respectful. You had to learn sarca. You had
to learn how to say the worst possible threat you
could think of and say it in a way that
didn't sound quite as bad, you know, to be a

(01:14:11):
less blunt with certain things. We were an FAFO generation.
There was a time, you know, I was apparently I
decided that one of my friends was just going to
be the butt of every single joke I told. And

(01:14:35):
I like hours, several hours, I was just making jabs,
just just making jabs at them, you know, lipping off,
making jabs. I was just I'll be blunt. I was
just being a little shithead, I really was. I mean
I did everything to him but just get up in

(01:14:56):
his face and say, hey, will you punch me as
hard as you can? I mean, I did everything but that, right,
And he would have been justified if he would have
flat just laid off and laid hands on me, he
would have been justified in that. And I would have

(01:15:16):
asked it. I would have asked for it, asked it.
I would have asked for it, right. I mean, through
my actions threw me lipping off. I was asking for retaliation.
That's what I was asking for. I was faying and
I was begging to find out. I knew what I

(01:15:38):
was doing. He knew what I was doing. Why he
didn't haul off and hit me. I really have no idea.
I mean I told him about it after the fact,
whenever I was finally bored with it and done, I
was like, man, it's like, I give you credit. I
did everything, but just ask you to punch me. He's like,
yeah you did. I'm like, all right, well you want

(01:15:59):
to hit me?

Speaker 6 (01:15:59):
No?

Speaker 3 (01:16:01):
You done?

Speaker 1 (01:16:01):
Yeah, I'm done. Okay, cool, just several hours. That's what happened. Right.
So this this article from Daily Caller, lawyers argue anti
ICE protesters who allegedly threw rocks and fireworks didn't deserve

(01:16:24):
tear gas. That's what the lawyers argue. They foed, but
they did not deserve to fo. Or I'm sorry, yeah,
they fayed. They did not deserve to fo The article
even describes that protesters blocked Immigration Immigration Agency's path on

(01:16:49):
a road in Chicago, Illinois, on Thursday morning and began
throwing hard objects until chemical munitions were used to repel them.
They even got warned that hey, if you don't cease
and desist, if you don't stop, if you don't get away.
If you don't leave us the hell alone, we're going
to fire tear gas at you. They warned them. These protesters,

(01:17:23):
these rioters were throwing rocks, firing projectiles at them. They
were warned that if you don't okay, So they shot
the agents with commercial artillery shell fireworks. There you go.

(01:17:43):
That's in the report, in the article. And then they
had the goal to complain whenever these ICE agents did
something about it. I mean, dude, if if you walk
up to me and you punch me in the face,

(01:18:07):
you kick me in the balls, you otherwise assault me,
you have no right to dictate the terms that I
will defend myself. You can't just go up to somebody

(01:18:30):
and play and say we're going to play a game
of row shamboo, kick me in the balls, and then
say I'm done, I quit. No, h you're getting kicked
in the balls too. I'm going to beat the ever
loven crap out of you, and I don't even care
you started this. I'm going to finish it. Ye FA,
you're going to fo You have no right. You can't

(01:18:56):
just go How dare you you? How dare you retaliate
after I punched you in the face. How dare you retaliate?
You know that's not how this works. And if I
was part of the prosecution, I'm sorry, part of the
defense defending the ICE agents that you know, uh shot

(01:19:22):
tear gas at them, tear gas canisters at him. If
I was part of the defense, I would say, hey, look,
they asked to be tear gassed because they were warned
if you don't cease and desist, if you don't stop,
if you don't get away from us, you're going to

(01:19:43):
be tear gassed. And they refuse to leave. That's the
same as asking to be tear gassed. They asked for it.
I'm not going to disappoint if I I was on
the defense team defending the ICE agents that did nothing

(01:20:06):
more than carry out the promise that they made to
the to the protesters, because that's all they did. If
you don't stop, we're going to We're going to throw
two guys in there. They didn't stop. They asked for it.

(01:20:28):
That would be part of my defense. They asked for it.
I wasn't going to disappoint him. Nothing I can do.
My hands were tied. I told them the consequences of
their actions. They continue to do it knowing what the
consequences were. That's the same thing as asking for They
asked for a butt whooping and they got it. They

(01:20:50):
asked me to open up a candle whoop ass, and
I gave it to him. I have no sympathy for
these protesters. I really don't. And that actually brings me
to this next article from res Date. Pritzker shows us

(01:21:22):
who he really is and responds to important question on
ICE actions in Chicago. Well, they're doing everything by the book.

Speaker 6 (01:21:32):
Why does Chicago have the highest murder rate of all
the big cities.

Speaker 9 (01:21:37):
Well, we are not in the top thirty in terms
of our murder rate and book rate. Our murder rate
has been cut in half over the last four years,
and every year it's gone down by double digits.

Speaker 1 (01:21:48):
And if you look at all of the violent.

Speaker 9 (01:21:49):
Crime over the last four.

Speaker 6 (01:21:51):
Years, we've all gone to US cities seventeen point forty
seven per one hundred thousand populations. Chicago's number one over Philadelphia, Houston, Dallas,
San Antonio, Phoenix, Los Angeles, New.

Speaker 9 (01:22:02):
York, and San Diego. What I'm explaining to you is crime. Look,
you can pull statistics up. I'm explaining to you that
our murder rate has been cut in half. And very importantly,
Brett and you got to hear this very importantly, we've
been doing the things that are necessary to bring crime
down right. We've invested in community violence, interruption, we've invested

(01:22:23):
in police.

Speaker 1 (01:22:28):
Yeah. I tried to unmute myself and apparently I muted myself.
JBI Prisker was really pissed, was really upset, was very
very angry when the interviewer brought the receipts, murder per

(01:22:54):
capita is higher than all these other areas. And JB.
Brisker was like, we've cut murder rates in half. I mean, look, okay,
So here's the thing. This is a game that you
hear played all the freaking time. JB. Prisker is no different.

(01:23:17):
This happens a lot. This is what they do the
game that they play because they they undercharge various crimes
so that this way it doesn't appear to be what
it actually was. In other words, they fudge the numbers

(01:23:40):
to try to make it look like it crime isn't
as bad as what it actually is. You know, they'll
take an obvious murder one charge and they'll drop it
down to murder three manslaughter. This has come and practice,

(01:24:02):
this is what they do. JB. Prisker's line his ass
off and one of the things that Pritzker was talking
about doing, and I believe that there were others involved

(01:24:24):
with this as well. It wasn't just him, but he
was also talking about, you know, unmasking, calling out the
you know, various ICE agents, doxing them, all this other

(01:24:49):
kind of stuff, you know, making it illegal for these
ICE agents to enforce immigration laws. And of which case,
it's like, look, here's here's my stance, here's my point
of view. It is immigration law, federal immigration law. During

(01:25:10):
the Obama administration, they were very clear that states have
no right to deport illegal aliens because because it is
a federal issue, and that stance was supported by the
Supreme Court during that time. It's a federal issue, not

(01:25:35):
a state issue. In other words, they were ordered to
stand down, to do nothing, to allow these illegal aliens
to stay in the country, all the while breaking the law.

(01:25:57):
And I've made this point. If I've made it, if
I've made a one, I've made it one hundred times.
If these congress people in DC, if they truly have
a problem with the president or any administration enforcing immigration
laws and doing exactly what it is they're supposed to
be doing. Then there's an easy fix for that, and

(01:26:19):
that's right, a different law. They're not going to do
that because they love to have the power. Because what
normally happens, you know, whenever the left runs the show,
they get to pick and choose who is subject to
the law and who is not subject to the law.
So they like the law being there because then they

(01:26:41):
can hold anybody they want to accountable and ignore it
whenever their friends violate a law. That's how it ends
up happening. They really don't like the law being enforced.
What you see in Chicago, what you see in various
other US cities, is a clear indication that they know
that the laws there. They know that President Trump and

(01:27:04):
these ICE agents are doing nothing more than trying to
enforce federal law, but they are instead trying to stop
them from doing that. And here's my position. JB. Pritzker

(01:27:26):
and these other governors and various mayors that are trying
to stop ICE from doing their job, this is aiding
in a betting, arrest them, put them in jail. A

(01:27:46):
lot of them are calling for violent resistance to stand
in the way of ice agents doing their job. That
was what was at the heart of this protest. They're
doing it on purpose. Arrest them. It's aiding in a betting.

(01:28:16):
They are supposed to be enforcing federal law. I mean,
they're trying to write laws, local laws and state laws
to try to stop the enforcement of federal laws. It
doesn't work like that, people. The supremacy clause of the

(01:28:36):
Constitution is a thing. This is a power that was
specifically given to the federal government, and the state is
supposed to ensure that these laws are enforced. By ignoring them,

(01:28:57):
it's aiding in a betting. If it was me, I
would not be near as nice as President Trump is
being no way, no how. I'd arrest them and I
would continue to hold them in federal prison until something changed,

(01:29:25):
until the law was followed. But beyond that, here's something
else I would do. You see, Illinois has a budget problem.
And you know there's a lot of states out there
that do on the right and on the left, they
have huge budget problems, huge budget problems. Illinois operates in

(01:29:48):
a deficit. You know, that means they spend more money
than what they take in on taxes, they spend more
than they receive. So how is Illinois not bankrupt? Well,
I mean kind of in a way that they are.
But the real secret to their I guess you can
say success is that the federal government pays off that

(01:30:15):
remaining balance. Illinois operates in the red and they rely
on the federal government to make the difference to pay
the debts. That's how they continue to pay for the
things that they're doing. That's how they get the money

(01:30:37):
to pay for giving illegal aliens housing, free health care,
and all the other things that they're paying for. They
rely on the federal government. If the federal government said,
until you start following federal laws, you are no longer

(01:31:00):
going to receive federal money. Because again this is an
FAFO kind of argument. If you ain't going to play
by the rules, then you're not going to get the benefit.

Speaker 10 (01:31:16):
You know.

Speaker 1 (01:31:17):
That's like having a child living in your house. You know,
one of your children, one of your own flesh and blood.
You tell them that, you know, if you do these chores,
then you'll get an allowance. But the child refuses to
do their chores but still demand an allowance. Doesn't work

(01:31:42):
like that. If you ain't going to do what you're
supposed to be doing, then you ain't going to get
rewarded for it. I'm not going to reward you to
sit on your ass and play video games all day
that you're you're supposed to get. You know, you do
the work and then you get the allowance. This is

(01:32:09):
what we see playing out in Illinois and other places.
On top of that, you know, they're trying to stand
in the way of Ice doing their job enforcing federal
immigration laws, and still they demand that the federal government
come in and save their ass, to pay the deficits,

(01:32:30):
or that this way they can do the things that
they want to do. If you really want to stop
the activity from happening, if you want Eleanor to straighten
up one, put these people in jail. Put Governor Gravy
Sweats in jail. He's aiding in a betting. It is
against a law, that's what he is doing. I mean

(01:32:54):
you could also throw conspiracy into it, premeditation, conspiracy, what
have you. I mean, there's other things that you can do.
Lock his ass up and freeze the money. You're not
going to get rewarded for actively standing in the way

(01:33:16):
of the federal government from doing their job enforcing immigration laws.
You ain't want to do it. These Democrat cities and
Democrat controlled states will quickly change their tune if the
federal government actually does that. Now, obviously, I don't see
any of those two things happening. I'm just saying that

(01:33:39):
if you want it to stop, there's a pretty easy
way to do it. There really is anyway. Moving on,
We got the last two articles that we are going
to be talking about. But before we get into all that,
let me go ahead and play do do Nope, not

(01:34:03):
that one. Here we go just a few minutes and
I will be right back rolled into Monday.

Speaker 11 (01:34:29):
The engine just quick.

Speaker 5 (01:34:31):
Spent all my week leaning under that heard.

Speaker 12 (01:34:35):
Of the knuckles or busted grease stains on my jeans.
The truck won't starting and mocks my dreams.

Speaker 11 (01:34:49):
I checked, but I checked, plus prayed.

Speaker 12 (01:34:54):
The song got in the motors.

Speaker 5 (01:34:57):
Guns a week's worth of sweat.

Speaker 12 (01:35:00):
Nothing turns out right, this honk of jump stealing all.

Speaker 11 (01:35:06):
Man night, so something dumb. I know it inside, But
the answer keeps running, and it loves I had turned
keen nothing more.

Speaker 1 (01:35:18):
You'll sound the.

Speaker 5 (01:35:19):
South got the heavy heart and broken down blue.

Speaker 11 (01:35:34):
Brought a buddy over, said he'd take a look. He
shook his head side and cursed the book. We've tried
every trick under the sun, birt, We're.

Speaker 1 (01:35:48):
Losing this battle.

Speaker 11 (01:35:50):
The truck is won.

Speaker 12 (01:35:52):
Clean it over always wide.

Speaker 5 (01:35:55):
Open, anthy But I'm sucking my heart just staring chase
this drive.

Speaker 11 (01:36:02):
Wait, presson, got nothing to proof case? Body is broken down?

Speaker 8 (01:36:30):
Is something DM, I know it is, side but me
an answer?

Speaker 1 (01:36:36):
Keeps futing.

Speaker 8 (01:36:37):
Then it side's turned the king nothing.

Speaker 5 (01:36:40):
Goose, no sound soon got the heavy art and poking down.

Speaker 3 (01:36:46):
Do you work at any of the myriad of jobs

(01:37:14):
where you might have to sit on your bum all day?

Speaker 1 (01:37:17):
Well? If so, maybe you know what it's like to
suffer from the condition known as swamp ass. Well, if so,
have I got the solution for you. It's high monkey
butt powder. That's right, it's high monkey butt powder. You
can use an indoors, outdoors, work or play, or on
any occasion when you sit on your bum all day.

(01:37:38):
Don't let your buns get read. Use anti monkey butt
powder instead, available wherever anti friction powder is sold. No,
all right, and we are back. I apologize about that.
I forgot to turn the volume back down to unity
before started playing that track. Didn't mean to blow your
ear drums out again, I apologize. I had it turned

(01:37:59):
up for playing the audio on the clip that I played, So, yeah,
my bad. I apologize. So we are going to start
off this last segment by talking about Letitia James. Yeah,
so Leticia James, she is the one who campaigned on

(01:38:23):
getting Trump. You see, this is a fundamental difference between
the right and the left. You see, the left has
targets just like Leticia James. The left have targets. I
am going to run, I am going to seek election

(01:38:45):
by telling you that I am going to get Trump
because Orange Man bad and she went after him on
a I believe it was a.

Speaker 13 (01:39:01):
Let's see, let me scroll up because okay, so I
know I put that in here.

Speaker 1 (01:39:15):
No it's not there. Who did I ask? What did
I ask? Okay, here we go. So this was based
off of, or at least the accusation from Latitia James
was based off of the you know, overvaluing his his property,

(01:39:38):
his assets and defrauding the bank on getting various loans
and whatnot. That's pretty much what the what the arguments
were on the left. That's what it amounted to or
by Leticia James, that's what they amounted to. And this
was so ridiculous, It was so outrageous. One this is

(01:40:03):
how people do business, all right. And whenever this went
through appeals, you know, they were asked some pretty simple questions.
Has there ever been a case, ever been charges, ever
been a case brought forth where there was no victim,

(01:40:26):
where there was no crime, where the loan that was
received was paid back in full with interest and the
bank actually wished to continue to do business with their client.
Has that ever happened before? And of which case the
answer was no. They tried to find something for days

(01:40:56):
and they couldn't find one example day put in here
he goes no sound issues. Sounded good and level awesome.
I appreciate that, sir, so Leticia, you know, and and
basically during the appeals process, the the closing arguments from

(01:41:20):
you know, Letitia James for those that were going after
Trump basically amounted toude. Please don't sanction us for how
we handled this case, because you know, we have to
be able to represent our client to the best of
our ability. It wasn't us that, you know, really did that,

(01:41:46):
you know, just please don't sanction us. That's basically what
they're closing argument amount of tude, because this whole entire thing,
from start to finish, wasn't about President Trump's alleged crime
or you know, his his conduct. What happened, what he
did regarding the load, regarding the evaluation of his property,

(01:42:11):
none of it, no matter of that. Like I said,
that's how business is done. Whenever I bought this house,
there was an assessment of the property by the homeowner.
But before I was able to get the loan the

(01:42:31):
mortgage for the house, the lending institute they brought in
their own appraisal and they had the property evaluated. That's
how it happened day putenter goes, she's an awful human,
Yes she is. She had a Trump vendetta for no reason.

(01:42:52):
Republicans is too polite. I'm sorry. Ridiculous is too polite. Yeah,
let me try reading that again. She had a Trump
vendetta for no reason. Ridiculous is too polite, Yes, absolutely,
The fact that this thing is ridiculous is far too

(01:43:12):
of a polite word to put for what Letitia James
felt against President Trump. Because Trump derangement syndrome Orange man
bad is a real thing. Unfortunately, it's a real thing.
So the home that I'm in, you know, was evaluated
by the person that owned the home. But before I

(01:43:35):
was able to get the money to purchase the house,
my property had to be evaluated, had to be assessed
by the lending institute that was giving me the money
lending me the money. That's how it happens, that's how

(01:43:56):
loans are done. I can claim whatever i want to
about the value of my home. If I'm going to
put it up as collateral to get another loan, I
can claim it's worth whatever I want to. But the
bottom line is the lending institute that is giving me

(01:44:17):
the money, that is providing me the loan, and the
terms of said loan, it's up to them to make
sure that the property is evaluated at the right price.
You see what I'm saying here. The lending institution that

(01:44:44):
gave President Trump the loan, he wasn't president during the
time of this loan. But the lending institution that did that,
they weren't swindled, they weren't lied to, And obviously the
numbers that they came up with matched at least close enough.

(01:45:08):
It was high enough to say, yeah, we'll give you
the loan. Trump paid it back in full. There was
no Oh, there was no victim in this case. You know,
normally in crime, there's a victim. There's actual a civil dispute.

(01:45:29):
And this is what Letitia James accused President Trump of
was a civil dispute. But yet the quote unquote victim
of this wasn't a victim. The Lenning Institute didn't, you know,
not only just said that we weren't a victim here.
They were like, yeah, he paid back the loan. He

(01:45:50):
paid back the loan in full with interest, and we
wished to do business with him. Again. That's not normally
how these type of things happen. You know, normally, whenever
there is a civil dispute, the aggrieved party is the
one that wants to you know, that starts the whole
process from going you know, from going forward. You know,

(01:46:15):
I am person a person b did something against me,
So I'm going to talk to a lawyer and I'm
going to bring civil charges against that other party, not
criminal charges, civil charges. That's how that happens. In this case,

(01:46:41):
it wasn't the victim that brought forth charges in a
civil case. It was Letitia James, a prosecutor, were worse
than an ambulance chaser that went after Trump because of

(01:47:05):
a vendetta. Just like Dave said, that's what happened here
and what came out about Letitia James. Do you remember,

(01:47:31):
because they found evidence of mortgage fraud relating to numerous
properties and possibly even tax fraud and insurance fraud as well.
Why do I say that, because Leticia James for various properties,

(01:47:55):
she claimed that these houses, numerous houses, were her primary residents.
And if I remember correctly, there were three different houses
maybe more that Letitia James lied on the mortgage application,
lied on the you know, the the very legal document

(01:48:20):
about the mortgage. But not only mortgage fraud, but you know,
you get you know, lower mortgage rates if you're living
in the house, lower insurance rates if it's you that's

(01:48:41):
living there. This is the crime that she is being
accused of. The evidence has been found. She is guilty

(01:49:02):
as sin is really not even a question. Mortgage fraud,
possibly insurance fraud and tax fraud. This is what she's
facing right now. It's only one but you know, I mean,

(01:49:24):
I'm sure that if there's insurance fraud that they'll go
after her for that too. Tax fraud, who knows, you know,
because you get better interest rates, you get better insurance rates,
your taxes are different. So these are all the things
that she's facing. These are the things that she's facing.

(01:49:45):
And Letitia James this headline from red State. She shows up, Dad, gummet,
hold on, let me get rid of that. Get rid
of that. Nope, okay, So where did that come from?
Why was that there?

Speaker 13 (01:50:06):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (01:50:06):
Okay, there we go. Sorry my bad. I had something
screwed up on the thing. Anyway, So Leticia James shows
up to the courthouse, enters plea, and gives comically bad speech.
She basically says that this whole entire thing is a
witch hunt, politically motivated, you know, not acknowledging that she

(01:50:30):
did anything wrong, not acknowledging that she defrauded the people,
not acknowledging that she did anything, you know, committed any crime. Instead,
she's trying to say, spend this in such a way
making her the victim. So are you kidding me? Leticia James,

(01:50:53):
whom campaigned on Orange man bad. I will get Trump
if you elect me, if if you allow me the opportunity,
I will get that. Sob and she has the nerve
to say after caught committing a crime that has been

(01:51:13):
made public. You can see the document yourself. You can
clearly see how she has claimed permanent residency on numerous
properties and they all can't be primary residents.

Speaker 13 (01:51:25):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:51:28):
She got caught red handed. She has the nerve, the
gall the audacity to claim that she's the victim, that
it's politically motivated.

Speaker 3 (01:51:55):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:51:59):
Dave put in here a interesting take on this wire
fraud or you know, interstate wire fraud. Yeah, that's possible.
I hadn't even thought about that angle of it. Dave
also put in here, he goes hypocritical and fake. I

(01:52:19):
can't see how any reasonable human being supports her. Neither
can I. This is the hypocrisy that we see come
out to left all the freaking time. Orange man bad
the ends justify the means. Look at what he did,

(01:52:41):
all the while ignoring completely what I have done. Leticia James,
who obviously had a political, politically motivated reasonings for going
after Trump, campaigned on the I will get him. You see,
this is kind of what I was alluding to earlier.

(01:53:04):
The Left pick a target and then fabricate a crime,
because that's what Letitia James did in this instance, That's
exactly what she did. She had a target President Trump,
she fabricated a crime and then went after him. I mean,

(01:53:25):
let's be clear, let's be blunt. That's exactly what it
amounted to. In no other time in criminal or civil
history criminal history ever have have they gone to court
with less bringing forth a civil charge where there is

(01:53:47):
no victim and the victim wishes to continue to do
business with the accused. Because that's what happened in this case,
It's never happened before. Everybody knows it was a completely motivated,
politically motivated thing, period of a story. Everybody knows it,
everybody's aware of it. You just can't get away with that,

(01:54:09):
or I'm sorry not. You can't get around that, right,
You can't get around that. And then for her to
claim that, oh, what's happening to me is politically motivated, No, honey,
is called justice. You committed a crime. Now it is
time you pay for that crime. Dave Putiry goes other

(01:54:38):
than Fetterman from PA. There's not one reasonable Democrat. That's funny.
You mentioned that. That's funny. But I want you to
listen to.

Speaker 10 (01:54:56):
This. I want to thank all of you. I want
to thank each and every one of you. I want
to thank you for your prayers. I want to thank
you for your emails. I want to thank you for
your support.

Speaker 1 (01:55:16):
It has.

Speaker 10 (01:55:19):
It has it has strengthened my spirit and as and
it has anchored my souls.

Speaker 8 (01:55:30):
So I want to thank you.

Speaker 10 (01:55:33):
But this is not about me. This is about all
of us, and about a justice system which has been weaponized,
A justice system which has been been used as a
tool of revenge. This justice system which has been used

(01:55:55):
as a tool of revenge and a weapon against those
individuals who simply did their job and who stood up
for the rule of law and the justice system, which

(01:56:18):
unfortunately is nothing being used as a vehicle of retribution.

Speaker 1 (01:56:26):
All right, I yeah, so you get the point. Her
claim is that this is politically motivated. That's the claim.

(01:56:48):
Figured I'd share that with you. That clip goes on.
I couldn't stomach any more than it. I really couldn't.

Speaker 11 (01:57:05):
This isn't.

Speaker 1 (01:57:08):
Political retaliation. What's going on against Letitia James, against Komy,
against Bolton, and I really do hope more besides that,

(01:57:32):
this isn't political retaliation. These are crimes that have been
committed and these bad actors who thought that they were untouchable,
is finally and hopefully going to get their come up.
And now, look, I've mentioned this before that I am

(01:57:56):
extremely happy to see this. I get sick and tired
of investigations in hearings that don't go anywhere, that don't
result in arrests, jail time, and even finds. I'm sick

(01:58:20):
and tired of that kind of thing. I've had enough
of it. I don't care if I see another investigation.
I don't care at all. I want these people not
just to be indicted, even though that is a really
good start, Don't get me wrong. I want to see
criminal charges, jail time, and finds. That's what I want

(01:58:46):
to see. We can't stop at indictments. We can't even
stop at just having a courtroom hearing, because unlike President Trump,
where there was no evidence whatsoever to support the charges

(01:59:11):
that were brought forth against him, there is all kinds
of evidence at Comy, all kinds of evidence against Letitia James,
evidence against Biden, evidence against Hillary Clinton, evidence against Bolton.

(01:59:35):
There is evidence, real evidence, not fabricated storytelling, real evidence.
This is a good start. I want to see more

(01:59:56):
I very much and absolutely want to see more. All right,
last story, this article is from the Daily Fetched and that,
you know, hat tip to you, Dave. This was this
was absolutely kind of hilarious headline. Are you ready for this?
John Fetterman breaks with Democrats warns of rising left wing terrorism.

(02:00:23):
Senator John Fetterman, Democrat from Pennsylvania, highlighted a new study
this week on the rise of left wing terrorism in
the United States, warning that inflammatory political rhetoric could contribute
to further violence. You know, this is the thing that

(02:00:44):
a lot of people like myself, a lot of you know,
right wing alternative media sources, you know, a lot of
Republicans in general, has been talking about because it is
only a matter of time whenever some deranged lunatic picks

(02:01:11):
up a gun and fires a shot, because they have
been told through the rhetoric that comes out of the
left that it is justified and retaliation is a service
to the country, because that's in essence what we have
going on. And the shot has already been taken, an

(02:01:40):
assassination against an assassination attempt against President Donald Trump twice,
and the assassination of Charlie Kirk. It's only a matter
of time when the violent rhetoric gets acted upon by

(02:02:05):
some deranged lefty or just a deranged individual in general,
it's happened. This is what the left calls for, This
is what they have been calling for, and this is

(02:02:25):
coming from the mouths of leadership in the Democrat Party.
This is what they this is what they do. Their
calls for violence unchecked extreme rhetoric, label like labels as

(02:02:48):
Hitler or fascists, will foment more extreme outcomes. Political violence
is always wrong, no exceptions. We must all turn the
temperature down. That is John Fetterman on a post on
x and he even put up here a study left

(02:03:13):
wing terrorism climbs to thirty year high pust the graphic
on there. Now. I know I mentioned this in the

(02:03:36):
past that I really never paid all that much attention
to John Fetterman, you know, before he had his stroke,
never really paid that much attention to him, didn't really
know him from Adam. Just going to be honest with you,
all right, I'm not going to try to claim that

(02:03:57):
I am some smart, brilliant person that knew everything about
John Fetterman and holy crap, because no, that's just not true.
But from what other people are saying he has really
turned into a more moderate of a Democrat. I'm not

(02:04:22):
going to go so far as to say that he is,
you know, turning into a Republican or even a conservative.
I'm not going to make that claim. I'm not going
to say that. But there are things that has come
out of his mouth, positions and stances that he's taken
that don't sound like they're coming from a Democrat. Sounds

(02:04:44):
like they're coming from a moderate and independent and in
some cases, yeah, a Republican. I mean, when was the
last time, besides Fetterman, that you actually had the left,
somebody the left like, actually coming out and and saying

(02:05:05):
that this type of stuff is wrong. The political outrage,
the rhetoric, the things that they have been calling President
Trump and his supporters for over a decade. They put
in here, he goes every day, I'm called a racist, fascist, nazi,

(02:05:28):
boot licking Hitler. It's just insane and it is. You know,
the sad thing is you have you know, even after
President Trump's assassination attempt or the assassination attempt on President Trump,

(02:05:48):
even after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, even after these
horrendous acts of violence. How many Democrats, people on the left,
those that suffer from Trump derangement syndrome. How many of

(02:06:11):
them are calling to turn the temperature down? How many
of them are actually calling out the extreme rhetoric for
what it is, calling for political violence. How many Democrats
do you honestly see taking this kind of stance, because

(02:06:36):
I don't see it. I'm just gonna be honest with you.
I don't see it. They put in here you go see,
sounding like Tulsi Gabbert did years ago. Yeah, but outside
John Fetterman, I'm not seeing the leadership. Let me. Let

(02:06:58):
me be honest. Let me be clear. I'm not seeing
leadership of the Democrat Party calling out the rhetoric. Now,
I'm not going to say that there isn't anybody out
there that is, you know, calling it out for what
it is. I'm not going to say that, because I'm
sure that there are. You know, John Fetterman is an outlier,

(02:07:19):
and I have no doubt that there is others. But
when you're talking about the leadership, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren Hakeem, Jefferies,
Alexandria Cassio Cortez, the Clintons, the Obamas, when you're talking

(02:07:46):
the leadership of the party, do you hear them calling
out the rhetoric for what it is and them demanding
that the temperature excuse me, that the temperature be turned down.

(02:08:08):
That we need to stop doing this. We've seen the
consequences of said rhetoric. There are deranged people out there
that just look in some cases for an excuse to
do something, to act, to commit acts of violence. They

(02:08:37):
got to turn the temperature down. We got to stop
with the rhetoric. You don't see that coming out of
the left. You don't see that coming out of most
mainstream media people. You don't see this type of thing

(02:09:01):
coming out of you know, legacy news media. You just don't.
We need to turn the temperature down, absolutely all right.
So that is all I got for y'alls today.

Speaker 11 (02:09:15):
That is it.

Speaker 1 (02:09:18):
So all of next week, starting at seven pm Central Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday,
and Thursday, Radio Horror is available wspradio dot com again
dot is wspradio dot com check that out starting at

(02:09:40):
seven pm Central and then on Halloween seven pm Central
until it is over, which I believe is just a
little over two hours, and then there will be a
replay at oh what time did I think? I started
the replay at nine thirty Haunted Radio. You can hear

(02:10:01):
that over on w s P radio dot com. I'm
excited about it, I really am. So anyway, do me
a favorite, head on over to Stinkpickle dot com s
T I n k P I k l e dot com.
Pick yourself up some merch That is the best way
to support the channel, so you always have yourself a
great one and I will see you and the next one.

(02:10:24):
This has been the ho Host Show. For more information,
you can head to the hoo Host Show dot com.
And for the merchandise store, you can head on over
to Stinkpickle dot com. That is s T I n
k P I k l e dot com. Until next time,

(02:11:00):
four

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Behind the Donkey Mask

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

All Episodes

Behind the Donkey Mask

Stuff You Should Know