Bombshells

In today’s episode we are going to discuss the Epstein memo, we will also talk about the testimony of Joe Biden’s doctor along with a ruling by the Supreme Court. We will also talk about the Big Beautiful Law and how the some lesser courts are trying to stop it.

Email, Website & Other Links
[e-mail]
https://WSPRadio.com
https://TheHohOShow.com
https://link.thehohoshow.com/Rumble
https://link.thehohoshow.com/WSPChronicles

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:08):
Yes, Welcome to the show, Grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida to join us now as
we discuss news, politics, current events. Had so much more,
but through the airwaves and strapped in as we.

Speaker 2 (00:23):
Do constitution because.

Speaker 3 (00:26):
Three burroadcasting from WEAPONI Slaft Production Studio B. Welcome to
the Host Show and as always I'm your host. HO hosts.
So Hey, I was doing I hope you're doing good.
I really do. We've got a lot of stuff to

(00:48):
talk about today. Boy howdy. We We're going to be
talking about the uh, well a little bit about the
big Beautiful Law, some of the stuff that has happened
from there, some judge over reach and whatnot. We're going
to be talking about what the Supreme Court has said
about a couple of things. We're gonna be talking about
the uh Joe Biden's doctor that didn't well, I mean,

(01:15):
he showed up because he was subpoena, but did he
really testify? I did know, not really. But we're also
going to be starting off right here with Jeffrey Epstein.
A memo that came out. I think it was a
two page memo that came out, and I mean, ho,
this thing I I smell. I smell Bravo Sierra. I

(01:41):
really do. I smell bullshit. Absolutely I do that none
of this makes any sense whatsoever. Let's go ahead and
get into it right now. So the the first I mean,
there's like several articles that I have on this, and
of which case you can head on over to the
hoo host Show dot com. Just cli on that news
feed tab and you'll see the magazine over there on flipboard.

(02:04):
Check that out. All the articles that I will be
using in the show today is over there. So this
article from well, let's start with this one. Let's start
with this one. No wait, that's not it, all right.
So this headline article from the Daily Fetched headline Tucker Carlson,

(02:28):
Department of Justice is covering up Epstein crimes and it's
not about Trump. That hm. All right, So you know what,
let's start here because the memo that was released basically
says that there isn't any evidence to move forward with

(02:51):
anybody else. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. There is a video
that released a video, like eleven hours of it. They
released a video, and even though they released a video,
there's actually reports out now that the that the video
was tampered with, it was modified and the uh, the

(03:17):
video doesn't actually show because this was like the only
camera that was working in that wing, and the video
doesn't actually show the door that goes to where Jeffrey
Epstein's cell was. It shows something different. And like from
what I seen that this camera angle doesn't really show

(03:38):
a whole heck of a lot. I mean, it just
my opinion, but it really didn't. But at any rate,
this report that came out basically said that, you know,
even though Jeffrey Epstein was charged with I mean, it
hadn't gone to trial. Get if I remember correctly, he
was in a detention center and that that's when he

(04:00):
killed himself. But there was a sex trafficking that was
in that and apparently from the h from what I read,
you know, like over a thousand people were sex traffic
but there wasn't any evidence to charge any third party,

(04:25):
as in, they didn't have any evidence to charge anybody.
The only people that were the only people that were
actually charged was Epstein himself and then whatever the hell
her name is Maxwell, that's it. The only two people
that were charged sex trafficking over one thousand people. But

(04:49):
yet there wasn't any evidence to charge anybody else with this.
You mean to tell me that they want us to
believe that Epstein and Maxwell found transported, had the physical

(05:17):
relations with drugged, housed, transported, moved from place to place,
everything that went along with it. You mean to tell
me the only two people that were involved in this

(05:37):
from start to finish, over a thousand people were Epstein
and Maxwell. That's it. That's what they want us to
believe through this memo that was released. I don't buy it.
None of it makes any sense whatsoever. I just got

(05:59):
to be honest with you. None of it makes any sense.
You know, the the uh, the injuries that he has
doesn't make sense with a suicide unless he had like
actual bone damage, you know, osteoporosis or whatever. And there
isn't any talk about that whatsoever. None of that information
has come out. And we do know. And also because

(06:22):
they would, they would have us believe that there is
no list, there is no blackmail list, and in which
case that raises another question. How did Epstein get his money?
He was a financier, whatever the hell that means, But
how did he get his money? How did he get rich? Why?
You know what was it he was selling that got
him the money that he got. They would have you

(06:46):
believe that there wasn't anybody involved, even though during the UH,
during the pre trial, the you know, the the grand
jury or whatever it was. You know, they you know,
there was a black book. There was the judge wouldn't

(07:07):
allow it to be admissed and to be admitted as evidence.
The judge wouldn't allow it. So that's different than saying
that the black Book didn't exist. The black Book did exist.
They had it in their possession. The judge wouldn't allow
it to be admitted as evidence. Where's that black book?

(07:30):
What information is in there? I mean, all this is
important information, isn't it?

Speaker 4 (07:37):
All?

Speaker 3 (07:37):
This is information that we should have. None of it
makes any sense, not at all. And I honestly, I
don't know what game they're playing at. I'm going to
be honest with you. I have no idea. So you
know this headline that I had talked about just a
moment before from the Daily Fesh Department of Justices covering

(07:59):
up the Epstein and it's not about Trump, okay, so
they're covering up the crimes apparently. I'm going to be
honest with you. I think there's more to it than that.
But they said, according to this memo, that they didn't

(08:20):
have enough evidence to every decision that they were making
on this, as far as the you know, through the
investigation with the with the hold on there, with the
the investigation with the going after other people, that it
was all based off of the information that they had.

(08:42):
That's interesting because according to Tim Burchett this headline from
the Washington Examiner, Tim burches says that Biden administration destroyed
Epstein files, and of which case I I can believe that,

(09:03):
I absolutely could. I mean, you know, they destroyed the evidence.
You know that that would help them figure out where
the drugs came from. You know, with the with the
bag of cocaine that was found at the White House.
They destroyed that evidence. They got rid of it before
or after testing. We have no idea, but either way,

(09:23):
look at it, that information is gone now. They destroyed
the evidence. I mean, why wouldn't we believe that the
Biden administration destroyed evidence surrounding the Epstein files. I definitely
find that very easy to believe. So this memo said
that the decision that they've made not to go after

(09:46):
anybody else is based off of the current information and
evidence that they found. Apparently they had an exhaustive search
both physical and digital records and basically couldn't find anything
that would implicate anybody else's. That's what the report says.

(10:07):
That's what the report says. But again, I think there's
more to it than that. I really do this headline
from just the news, this one, this one is I
don't know how much truth is behind this one. Let
me just be honest with you on that. I didn't
actually see the uh Dan Bongino talk about this, but

(10:32):
at any rate, here you go Bongino Mull's resignation if
Pam Bondi won't leave the Department of Justice. Now, this again,
to me, is kind of telling, and it really does
go to what most Americans want, right, I know it
goes to what I want because I don't really give

(10:55):
a shit about another investigation. I just don't. I don't care,
you know what. There's been enough information get released about
so many different things that I really don't care about
any more investigations. I mean, we don't need to find
out just how deep the rabbit hole goes. Who cares

(11:16):
about Wonderland? Alice doesn't have any business being there in
the first place. I don't want any more investigations. What
I want to see is people get handcuffed, purp walked, arrested.
I want to see a picture. I want to see
some trials. I want to see some people go to jail.

(11:41):
That's what I want to see. I don't give two
shits about another investigation. I've had enough of investigations that
don't go anywhere. I'm sick and tired of investigations. I
want to see some purp walks. I want to see
some people handcuffed. I want to see some people humbled
with having karmas smack them square in a freaking face.
That's what I want to see. I don't know about you,

(12:02):
that's what I want to see. I'm sick and tired
of investigations just for the sake of an investigation. I'm
sick and tired of a congress a congressional hearing just
for the sake of having a congressional hearing. If they
don't have the power to arrest anybody and put them
in jail and actually charge them with the crime, what's

(12:24):
the point of wasting more taxpayer dollars on a hearing
on an investigation. I mean, really, what's the point and
the FBI, under the toolage of Cash Betel and Dan Bongino,
they really have been going doing a lot of work,

(12:45):
doing a lot of investigation. I mean, is it any wonder?
I mean, do you really think that it's just a
quinktin that thousands of people surrounding sex trafficking, child trafficking,
thousands of people have been arrested. I mean, is it

(13:10):
an association with the Epstein files? I have no idea.
And like I said, there may be something bigger going
on here. There may be, and I don't know. I'm
not privy to any insider information. I have absolutely no idea.
But what's one of the way to, you know, one
of the ways that law enforcement may use to go

(13:34):
after somebody to you know, kind of give them a
little bit more rope to hang themselves with, you know,
no pun intended. What's one of the things that they
do try to get them to relax, make them think
that they've taken the pressure off of them. So, I mean,
I have absolutely no idea. I don't know what's going

(13:56):
on here. I really don't. There may be something bigger
at play, and We're just not privy to it. I'm
trying to get something up and going right here, Okay,

(14:20):
there we go, and let's see if this will work now,
because it doesn't seem to work, and of course it
ain't gonna work, well, it doesn't matter. So what do
you think about all this? What do you think about
this memo that got released? What do you think about

(14:41):
the no third you know, not enough evidence to charge
any third party, That all this information is based off
of all of the digital and physical information that they have.
They're not going after anybody, that Epstein killed himself, that
there was only two people that were involved from start

(15:02):
to finish with this sex trafficking with over a thousand people,
that there's nothing to see here. Let's go about our day.
What is it you guys think about this? Because I'm
kind of curious, I really am, you know, and like
I said, based off of this just a news thing

(15:23):
with you know, the Bongino mulling over resigning if Pambondi
doesn't leave the Department of Justice, because everything is really
predicated off of that, isn't it isn't everything predicated on
what pam Bondi decides to do. I mean it really is.

(15:46):
You know, the FBI can only do so much. The FBI,
as the name suggests, is about investigating. They don't have
anything to do with prosecution. They don't have anything to
do with actually trying a case, nothing at all. Everything
that they do really does it goes towards an investigation.

(16:08):
And the whole point of an investigation is to charge
somebody with a crime. So if they're not going to
get charged with the crime, what's the point of the investigation.
But they've been doing a lot of work. I mean,
did you know that they've found thousands of the over
one hundred thousand children that they lost at the border.

(16:32):
They don't know where they're at. They cannot confirm their
location under the Biden administration. That's how you know. Like
one of the last numbers I heard was like over
eighty thousand, and then I heard over one hundred thousand,
and it's like, holy crap, one hundred thousand children that
have been lost from the border because the federal government

(16:56):
didn't care enough about making sure that they were with
their families and weren't being sold to slave labor in
the in the sex trafficking. Over one hundred thousand kids
and they've found several thousand people, several thousand children that

(17:21):
previously were lost under the Biden administration. I mean, that's
that's awesome. I believe the number I heard was like
over two thousand people that they have arrested that are
being charged with sex trafficking, moving kids, women whatever. This

(17:48):
is what the FBI has done. Again, I have no
idea if this is in association with the Epstein files,
with that sex traffic ring. But do you really think
it's a coincidence. I don't know. I mean, it's possible, sure,

(18:09):
but I don't know. I mean, in a matter of speaking,
I would like to believe that there's more going on
than what meets the eye. And if Dan Bongino is
mad about this, if he is ticked off, if he
is actually contemplating resigning his position at the FBI, and

(18:35):
of which case, I've also heard that if Dan Bongino goes,
Cash Betel is going too. I mean, he's thinking of
resigning right along with Dan Bongino. That's one of the
other things that I heard. And if this is the case,
this does not bode well for the Department of Justice,
does not bode well for Americans getting justice at all,

(19:00):
with all the Bravo sierra that's been taking place over
the past decade and beyond. It doesn't bode well. It
really doesn't. And I again, I don't know how much
truth is to this article. I really don't. I don't
know if Bongino is actually talking about resigning. That's just

(19:21):
what the article says. The article goes on to say
that the FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino is reportedly mulling
his resignation if Attorney General of Pam Bondi does not
step down amid reports of disagreements between the two over

(19:41):
the Epstein case. A Daily wire first reported Bongino's deliberations,
citing a source close to Bongino. Independent journalist Julie Kelly
subsequently corroborated the reporting, citing sources h huh. The reports
follow Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche earlier in the day

(20:06):
denying any disagreement between Bongino, Bondi, and FBI Director Cash
Bettel over the leak memo that included there was no
evidence Epstein engaged in a widespread blackmail. Okay, fine again,
I ask you again, I ask you where did he

(20:27):
get his money? He's a financier. How did how did
he get rich? What was it he was actually peddling?
What was it he was selling? And if they were,

(20:48):
you know, if Bongino was upset about this, if he
was tacked off about this, why is there information that
you know? What was that not an accurate report of
the information that the FBI has uncovered that they have found?

(21:09):
I don't know. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields has also
denied reports of a rift in the Trump administration over
the handling of the Epstein investigation. Interesting. President Trump has
assembled a highly qualified and experienced law and order team

(21:29):
dedicated to protecting Americans, holding criminals accountable, and delivering justice
to victims. This work is being carried out seamlessly and
with unity. Any attempt to sow division within this team
is baseless and distracts from the real progress being made
in restoring public safety and pursuing justice for all. Okay, fine,

(21:56):
So it seems as though President Trump isn't saying that
they're any riff, But I I'm just gonna be honest
with you. I do believe I think that there is
more going on here. Maybe this is a ploy to
get people comfortable so that this way, they can you know,
catch them in the act, so to speak, and while

(22:19):
we're you know, while we're in that subject, you know,
talking about this. There was people that were victims of
Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell that has come forward and has

(22:42):
stated and equivocally that there were other people involved besides
just Epstein and Maxwell. This is according to her testimony,
her Affidavid whatever, it was a victim, there were other

(23:03):
people involved. Are we just supposed to ignore her somebody
who was a victim saying that she was passed around
to people, not just Epstein, not just Maxwell? Do she
was victimized by multiple people? I mean, are we supposed

(23:24):
to ignore her testimony being a victim herself? I mean,
apparently that's what they want us to do. But I
do think there's more going on here. I really do.
I think there's more than what meets the eye. I
would like to believe that they are working towards something.

(23:50):
I think that President Trump is trying to leverage as
much as he possibly can to get people on board
with his agect. I mean, there's a lot that's been
going on in Washington the past several months, a lot.

(24:11):
I mean, dude, I never would have thought, never could
have possibly dreamed that the big Beautiful Bill would have
actually become law, that the you know that Congress would
ever pass it would ever pass such a bill. And
we're going to be talking about, you know, a little

(24:32):
bit on the big Beautiful law coming up later in
the in the episode. But I think there's more going
on here than what meets the eye. I really do
kind of a wait and see, but I'm getting impatient

(24:53):
with seeing only investigations, no trials, no significant arrests, no
significant arrest at all. And I do have something to

(25:14):
talk about a little later. I'm going to be talking
about this after the Well when am I bringing this up?
When did I put this in here? I'm going to
be talking about this after I bring up Joe Biden
and his doctor and whatnot. But yeah, I want to
know what you think about this memo that was released

(25:35):
regarding the Epstein files. I want to know what you think.
What have you heard, What information has come out that
you are maybe privy to, What type of information doesn't
make any sense to you? I mean, does two plus
two equal potato as they would have us believe, or
do you think there's more going on here than what
meets the eye. Do you think that possibly there trying

(26:00):
to get those involved to lower their guard so that
this way it makes it easier for them to get
Do you think that this is a leveraging tactic that
the Trump administration is using to get people to fall
in line and do the bidding of the people, Because
I really have no idea. Have you ever heard anything

(26:22):
more regarding Pam Bondi and Dan Bongino cash bertelliny than people?
What have you heard? Let me know down in the comments,
send me an email ho Ho at the ho Ho
show dot com. We're gonna go ahead and take a
quick break. Whenever return, we are going to be talking
about the Biden administration, the doctor that kind of failed

(26:47):
to actually testify. Just a couple of minutes, I'll be
right back.

Speaker 2 (26:53):
Walking down the street with a smile.

Speaker 5 (26:55):
So KOI feeling like a king, not a single tea
cooy the gun and slips outside but deadly.

Speaker 6 (27:01):
Everyone around just looks at me.

Speaker 5 (27:03):
Dreadfully in the elevator with a loaded mask, silent escape.

Speaker 6 (27:13):
Sure it wasn't first class, trying to act cool.

Speaker 5 (27:16):
Like nothing's wrong, but everyone knows it's a stinky song.

Speaker 2 (27:20):
Silent, but deadly creeping.

Speaker 5 (27:23):
Through the people holding noses everywhere, Moments.

Speaker 2 (27:31):
Of peace torn of hard.

Speaker 6 (27:35):
All from the art of the silent far.

Speaker 5 (27:44):
In a crowded room, I let one go, hoping no
one notice.

Speaker 6 (27:48):
But it's the show. Faces start to twist and turn.
Maybe next time I'll be more concerned.

Speaker 5 (27:55):
Oh the shame, the awkward dance, playing with fate in
the fart row mans wish and I could just disappear,
But laughter it breaks out, conquering the fear.

Speaker 6 (28:11):
Silent but deadly creeping through the air.

Speaker 5 (28:17):
People holding noses everywherewhere, moments of peace torn apart, all
from the art.

Speaker 6 (28:28):
Of a silent far, of a silent fart of a
silent far.

Speaker 3 (28:55):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit?
Are you tired of walking by family members and crop
dusting him? Well, if this has ever happened to you,
might I introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs. Tampon's
brand butt plugs is that particular type of butt plug
that allows you to walk in public in confidence no
one You're not going to accidentally crop does somebody. Tampon's

(29:19):
brand butt plugs now with the plastic applicator.

Speaker 1 (29:22):
Not just for women anymore, Tampon's brand butt plugs.

Speaker 3 (29:26):
All right, and we are back, So we're going to
be talking about this whole thing about Biden's doctor. He
was subpoena. Okay, okay, let's go ahead and rewind a
little bit, give you a little recap about what happened.
So this is all revolving around I guess you could

(29:48):
say the twenty fifth Amendment about Joe Biden not actually
being competent enough to be president. And if you remember Whenever,
what was a guy's name that was you know, he

(30:09):
did the whole questioning Biden about the classified information in
his report. He said that you know, yeah he did it,
but he's not competent enough to stand trial, and he
wanted to leave it at that. You know, let's not
do anything. Yes, he mishan handled classified information. It was

(30:30):
found in multiple different places, but there's nothing to see here, yeah, okay,
And he's not mentally competent enough in order to stand trial.
You have all of this going on regarding the you know,
the auto pen as in how present was Joe Biden

(30:50):
during his four years in office? And so many things
that were signed by Joe Biden wasn't actually signed by
Joe Biden, was signed by somebody else in the administration
using the auto pen, including most of every single pardon,

(31:16):
in most every single executive order. I mean, in fact,
there was a report that came out and I talked
about it on this program that the only actual pardon
that Joe Biden signed himself was the pardon of Hunter Biden.
And considering his mental acuity, considering there's been all kinds

(31:43):
of evidence brought forth in testimony that's been given that
says that Joe Biden was an absent president, how much
of what went on during the Biden administration is actually oh,

(32:07):
what's the word I'm looking for? How much is? How
much of it is actually legal? How many of the
pardons are actually legal? How many of the executive actions
that were signed are legal? How many of the laws
that were signed by the auto pen are actually legal?

(32:32):
How constitutional is the actions that we've seen. That's a
huge question, and it's a question that needs to be answered.
It really does. And one of the ways to answer
this question is to interview and discuss Joe Biden's mental acuity. Now,

(33:00):
I really didn't think they would necessarily do you know,
go about doing it the way that they did him.
And I had no I'm not surprised that nothing came
of this, of his of his questions, that he failed
to answer any of the questions. I'm not surprised whatsoever,

(33:22):
because you know, they first they told him that you're
going to testify. They had, you know, they had questioned
somebody else, and that testimony, that questioning didn't go very well.
It didn't you know, it wasn't under a good light
by any stretch of the imagination at all. And this

(33:42):
guy's like, okay, look, I want executive privilege if I'm
going to talk, you know, because or I'm you know,
executive privilege because I don't want to talk. I don't
want to give my testimony. I do not want to
stand before Congress and give my testimony regarding the health
the mental acuity of one Joe Biden. I don't want
to do it. And the Trump administration goes, no, there

(34:07):
is no executive privilege for you. And why would they
give him executive privilege? I mean, I want you to
think back. You know that there was a guy, what
the hell was his name, Steve Bannon? Maybe I guess
you know, somebody who was like, no, I'm not testifying
executive privilege. It was given to me by you know,

(34:29):
the president. I don't have to, nor am I going
to testifying, of which case he was thrown in jail
for not testifying whenever executive privilege was revoked. So I mean, hey,
turn about is fair play. And this is the thing
that they don't want to acknowledge. This is the thing
that they don't want to talk about. This is the
thing that they don't want to give any credence to whatsoever.

(34:52):
You know, it's okay for the Democrats to break the
rules into enforce rules as they see fit, but for
a Republican does it? Oh hell? Oh hell no. So
Steve Bannon didn't want to, he didn't want to testify.
He had executive privilege. They revoked his executive privilege. That

(35:13):
threw him in jail. And this right here is pretty
stink and important. This is a starting point. How gone
was Joe Biden? What did the doctor know? And when
did he know it? That's the question, right, what did
he know? When did he know it? Because everybody knows

(35:36):
that Joe Biden wasn't all there upstairs. He was the
most absent president that we have ever seen in American history,
bar none, hands down, not even a question. He is
the most absent president, the last to show up, the
first one to leave, took extended breaks all the freaking time.
We have yet to see a visitor log of his

(35:57):
home in Delaware, where he spent most of his time.
What was he doing up there, what was going on?
How many doctors showed up, what type of treatment was
he receiving? What is going on? I mean, this is
quite possibly the biggest scandal in American history, bigger than Watergate.

(36:20):
The American people deserve answers, and so this doctor said,
I'm not testifying, and they subpoenaed him. So he showed up,

(36:49):
and every answer, every response, every response to every question
he was asked was him pleading the fifth which I
got to be honest with you, I don't quite understand this.
I really don't, because it's not like it's not like

(37:12):
the people don't know, right, and it's not like there
wasn't people that were in the know. People were in
the know, and I figured is what they would do
is be like, oh, well, you know, I don't have
to give this information because of hippo laws right, patient
client confidentiality. No, no, you know, because hippa didn't mean

(37:39):
Jack Diddley squat during the pandemic? Have you been vaccinated?
And none of your damn business hippo laws. Oh know,
you're going to tell me we have the right to
know what happened to my body, my choice and whatever
whatever evidently doesn't apply. Okay, okay, but that's not the

(37:59):
direct went He just said, I pleave the Fifth And
what is the Fifth Amendment is to protect somebody against
self discrimination. So obviously he thinks as though he did
something wrong, that this that his testimony, his answers would
have led to some kind of criminal proceedings for him,

(38:23):
which I don't necessarily understand because that's not really the
drive of this investigation, and it's not to prosecute or
go after the doctor. This is a fact finding mission
in order to find out just how legitimate anything that
happened under the Biden administration was. I mean, that's more

(38:43):
or less what this whole entire investigation is to find
out the legitimacy of the presidency of Joe Biden. Because
he was un present, he wasn't there, he was absent
when he did show up. It was a joke, It
was a disgrace. He was a laughing stock. What did

(39:06):
you know? When did you know it? In? His response
was to plete plead the fifth. He refused to answer
the questions, claiming that his answers would incriminate him in
some kind of a crime. I seen this article from

(39:36):
Blaze Media, from the Conservative Review part of Blaze Media.
Maybe I should I should say that better headline, Republicans
should offer Biden's doctor immunity under these circumstances, and of
which case, I'm going to be honest with you, I
completely agree with that they should offer him immunity because

(39:58):
I mean, let's be honest, this doctor is not the
target of the investigation. It's the Biden administration. It's Biden,
it's what happened. It's the people that actually covered it up. Yes,
the doctor may have been in on that, but again,
you know, he's not the most relevant person that was
involved in this. I mean, let's be honest. They should

(40:24):
offer him immunity, And I completely agree with this headline.
They should absolutely offer the doctor immunity because here's the
thing here, Pips, here's a dirty little secret. If they
do offer him immunity. He can't plead the fifth he can't.

(40:56):
They offer him immunity. Any information that comes out he
can't be held accountable for because he has immunity to it. Now,
the only kicker here is he's got to be completely
honest and forthcoming with all of the information. If he
hides it, then that could take the deal off the table.

(41:21):
If he's not honest, if he's not open, if he
holds back information, then you have issues. But if he's
honest and forthcoming with the information, then Grandham immunity. We
don't care about this doctor seeing necessarily jail time. I

(41:46):
mean I don't. I don't know about you, but I
really don't care if this doctor sees any jail time
for his participation and the Joe Biden mental acuity cover up.
I don't care. There's way bigger fish to fry. Who
cares about a little bit of minnow up against all
the sharks that are in the water that were actually

(42:09):
wanting to take out, against all of the things that
really should be removed. Because if Joe Biden is found
to have been gone, why didn't they enact the twenty

(42:33):
fifth Amendment? Why didn't they bring Kamala Harris as to,
you know, replace Joe Biden. Why did they keep him
in office? Why did they let the auto pen do
all of this stuff? What's to constitutionality? What's the backlash
of having an absent president? I mean, the fact of
the matter is everything's at steak. You think of all

(42:58):
the pardons, you think of all the cover up, you
think of the Russia Gate, you think of everything, so
many people, and it doesn't stop with Joe Biden. That's
the thing. It doesn't stop with Joe Biden. There's more
people involved in this. It goes higher than just Joe Biden.
There's more involved in this, more people, more things that

(43:23):
were covered up, more people that are involved in this,
more things that they did. It goes well beyond Joe Biden.
And this doctor is just one step along the way
to uncover this information, to get the truth and to
possibly hopefully in the American people need to demand this

(43:44):
some type of recourse, because if we don't have it,
then what the hell's the point. I say, give the
doctor his immunity, force him to testify, and if he
doesn't testify, if he doesn't answer the questions, if he

(44:06):
doesn't answer honestly fully throws ass in jail consequences to
their actions, because if the Democrats can do it, then
why can't the Republicans? Turn about is fair play?

Speaker 5 (44:27):
It is.

Speaker 3 (44:31):
According to Just the News Scott Perry, Congress is not
done with the Biden doctor after the Fifth Amendment invocation,
and of which case I agree with that go after
the guy, go after him, find out just how deep
the rabbit hole goes. Interesting stuff, very interesting stuff. All right,

(45:07):
we're going to go ahead and take another Oh wait, no, no, no, no, no,
no or not or not speaking of I guess recourse.
And I heard this a while back ago, And I
tell you what, I'm excited. And I really hope that

(45:31):
there's more to this than just an investigation. What have
we been talking about this whole episode? Repercussions, recourse, jail time,
people getting arrested, and purp walked. And I was excited
in part whenever I read this headline from MSNBC headline,

(45:51):
I'm on Cash Betel's enemies list. Just as I expected.
The retribution has begun. Is it really though? Is it
really retribution? I don't think so. New investigations of John
Brennan and James Comy are just the latest examples of
a troubling trend under the second Trump administration. The troubling trend. Really,

(46:16):
what's so troubling about this? The fa FO, You know
what I mean from my day one of the you know,
one of the things that we said, you do the crime,
you do the time. These people did things that went
beyond law enforcement. They lied in some cases, they planted evidence,

(46:42):
falsified information, they manipulated evidence, they destroyed evidence, they planted evidence,
They simply lied about things in order to try to
get the outcome they wanted. All in an attempt to
attack Trump and make to where he wasn't eligible to

(47:03):
run in the election. That's what they did. People are
we forgetting what they did and they're thinking that you
know that this is retribution, like it, this is the
same that what they did to Trump. No, it's not
the same. Thirty four counts of you know, thirty four

(47:24):
felon accounts. Bullshit, there wasn't thirty four felon accounts. They
were misdemeanors. They elevated him to felony charges just so
they can actually do it, and it was a huge
nothing burger. He won those in appeal, the money that
they took to him, you know, lying and saying that

(47:46):
Marhilago is only worth eighteen million dollars. Yeah, that was
a joke. Everybody knew it was a joke. It was stupid,
it was ridiculous. The attacks on President Trump has been
relentless on going. And they think that just because they
did all these things to go after President Trump is
somehow we're going to do the same thing and going

(48:07):
after our political adversaries. And of which case that's not
the case. It is not. It's a lie. This investigation
into Brennan, from the FBI into Brennan and the James Comy,

(48:29):
this is a retribution. This is justice. They did what
they did, falsified information, planted evidence, all kinds of other things,
and all these acts are actually illegal. They made up
crimes in order to go after Trump. We don't have

(48:57):
to do that to go after them. And again, like
I said before, I'm glad that there's an investigation going on.
I am I'm happy about the investigation, but I also
don't give a shit about the investigation. We have enough
information as it is already we know. I mean, what

(49:19):
has actually happened for most of the investigations that we've
seen over the past several years, it's been nothing more
than you know, this thing that you thought was going on,
well it was, and you know, kind of worse than
what you thought. Maybe not so worse, but it was.
It was definitely going on. You were right. I mean,

(49:42):
this is how deep the rabbit hole went. I mean,
most of the time, all we got was just you know,
information that we already knew that have come out in
hints and whispers, you know, came out publicly, full on display.
I mean that's most of the time. That's all we've got.
And over the past several years, isn't new bombshell information

(50:04):
that came out. It was, Yeah, everything you thought was
going on, well it actually kind of was, well we
knew this already. Yeah, well you know now it's confirmed.
No no, no, no, it was confirmed already. The information came
out already. You just didn't want to own up to it. Well,
now we can't ignore it and we have to own

(50:24):
up to it. That's all that's happened over the past
several years with every investigation that they've had. That's all
it's amounted to. Do I want the investigation, eh, No?

(50:46):
I don't care. We know they did wrong. This information
is already out there. Why don't we purp walk them.
I want to see these people go to jail. It's
not enough to have another fucking investigation's arrest somebody for
crying out loud. Yes, I'm happy they're investigating. Yes, maybe

(51:06):
you know this information will get released on mainstream media
to where these people, these knuckleheads, these libtards out there,
can't ignore the information and just wash it like it
never actually happened, because that's what they do. But so
in your face and out there that they can't deny

(51:28):
the fact, the truth that this actually happened. Is that
the best we can hope for, no arrest the sons
of bitches, make an example out of them to where
nobody dares in the future to do the same thing
that they did to go after President Trump. That's the
most we can hope for. And that's what I think

(51:49):
we the American people are demanding out of this. I
know that's what I want. I don't care about another investigation.
It's nice, sure, throw it out there to the libtards
can no longer deny that it happened. But at the
same time, if all they're going to do is waste
the American people's money and another investigation without actually arresting

(52:10):
him and throwing his ass in jail. Then what was
the point? What's the point? Hopefully we see more come
out of this than just another just another just governments,

(52:30):
and I will be right back.

Speaker 7 (52:34):
Oscar walk these dusty trails and with a stride so
full of pride. A man built tough from him to toe.
Nothing he had to hide below his knee. He'd had
some strife, a leg nod of his own.

Speaker 2 (52:50):
But every step he took in life, you'd never see.

Speaker 7 (52:55):
Him Leather boots and iron wheel his spirits, never flag
or fields and farms. He till the ground beside an
old plows drag. Folks would whispered on the street, how

(53:15):
does he stand so tall?

Speaker 2 (53:18):
But Oscar just grin ere to here. I'm stronger than
you all ostars boots keep moving on.

Speaker 8 (53:30):
No matter what comes down through the night so dark
and cold, or the sun baked golden ground.

Speaker 2 (53:38):
He's got a hard, solid bronze and a mine, sharp
and vast.

Speaker 7 (53:44):
Oscar shows us every day the future is not the past.

Speaker 2 (53:54):
He drove an old Ford.

Speaker 7 (53:55):
Pickup truck, rusty butt it ran hauling every loading dream,
this mighty simple man.

Speaker 2 (54:06):
Kids would gather.

Speaker 7 (54:07):
Around his feet just to hear him talk about the
days he fought in one the life within his walks.

Speaker 2 (54:21):
He's let gonna slow his spirit down.

Speaker 8 (54:24):
Can't keep a good man still every morning up at dawn,
flowing through sheer will, worn out jeans and callous hands, an.

Speaker 2 (54:35):
Emblem of pure grit.

Speaker 7 (54:38):
Oscars story traveled far, a fire that never quit.

Speaker 2 (54:48):
Oscar boots keep moving on.

Speaker 8 (54:51):
No matter what comes down through the night so dark
and cold, or the sun baked golden ground.

Speaker 2 (54:59):
He's got a hun, a solid bronze.

Speaker 9 (55:02):
And a mine.

Speaker 7 (55:03):
The sharp and vast Oscar shows us every day the.

Speaker 2 (55:08):
Futures, not the past. Futures not the past.

Speaker 3 (55:26):
Have you ever had an ailment that a normal over
the counter remedy just couldn't fight? If this is the case,
then boy, have I got the solution for you.

Speaker 10 (55:33):
It's tousin, that's right, Tousin cough, tousing, cold, tousin running, nose, toussin, itchy,
watery ice, toussin, broken leg.

Speaker 3 (55:45):
Tousin. Tussing is the ultimate cure, all guaranteed to stop
anything that ails you. Toussin available wherever OTC's are sold.
All right, and we are back, we're gonna be talking
about the Supreme Court, some of the stuff that's going on,
and uh, you know, the the wins. We've definitely had

(56:05):
some wins. And we're also going to be touching base
on a couple of things with the Big Beautiful Law.
Isn't it nice to say that, the big beautiful Law.
It's pretty nice. It's pretty it really is. It's pretty nice.
I'm excited about I really am. I'm freaking excited about.

(56:26):
I don't care about the debt that that's coming up
from that, I really don't. I'll tell you why. I'll
get into that, but first let's talk about this. The
Supreme Courts immigration dividing line comes more clearly into view. Yeah,
so yesterday in this uh, in this case gnome verse

(56:50):
do I don't know who Doe is. Maybe Doe is
John Doe. I don't know. That's ridiculous. Anyway, the Supreme
Court stayed another district court injunction in a case involving
more than five hundred thousand immigrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti,
and Nicaragua who have been allowed to stay in the
country under a Biden era humanitarian people program giving them

(57:14):
temporary protected status in light of the conditions in their
home countries. Ah huh, So the seven to two decision
from which only Justice Katanji Brown Jackson and Sonya Soda
Mayor dissented following the court's similar decision regarding temporary Protective

(57:38):
status for about three hundred and fifty thousand Venezuelans. In
that case, a California judge treated the TPS program as
a one way ratchet in which Trump was not allowed
to undo what Biden has done by the same means,
including an extension of the program handed down by a
previously impeached Homehand Security Secretary Alejandro Majorcis on January seventeen,

(58:00):
twenty twenty five, three days before leaving office. Huh serious thing? Okay?

Speaker 8 (58:06):
Uh?

Speaker 3 (58:06):
Isn't aiding in a betting against the law? Doesn't the
president have an obligation to enforce the laws that were
passed by Congress and not making an executive order saying
that we're not going to do that? Wouldn't that be
classified as an impeachable offense? And why is it that

(58:27):
whenever a president fails at his duties and then the
next administration comes in and says we're going to undo
that failure and actually enforce the law. Why is that contentious,
because isn't that what's actually going on? I would say, yeah,

(58:53):
that's exactly what's going on. The previous administration opened the
border wide and let people into this country, giving them
protect a class status, giving them, you know, temporary whatever.
But the whole point of the temporary thing is it's
supposed to be temporary. So a stay on this decision,

(59:26):
they can carry on doing their actual job. That's awesome, right,
that's amazing. And then we have this one. Now, this
isn't necessarily Supreme Court related. This is regarding a federal judge,
but headline, and this is out of Fox News, by

(59:48):
the way, federal judge holts Trump's plan to cut funding
for sanctuary states that refuse to cooperate in of which
case I am all for this absolutely. I am again.
You know that this is aiding in a bedding, in
any any other court of law, Aiding in a betting
is a crime. You know, you help out somebody that

(01:00:11):
had committed a crime, You help them hide from authorities,
to get away, to avoid prosecution, arrest, what have you
that's a crime. It's called aiding in a betting And
and why is it? And this, this is really one
of the things that irks me. This is one of
the things that really pisses me off. Why is it?

(01:00:34):
And I live in Illinois. Lafornia is what we generally
call it. Yes, my state fucking sucks, But why is it.

Speaker 11 (01:00:47):
That.

Speaker 3 (01:00:50):
Okay, let's say you live in Florida. Let's say you
live in Indiana. Let's say you live in a red state.
Why is it that your tax dollars need to be
stolen from you in order to fund illegals? Because it

(01:01:11):
really irritates me that my tax dollars goes to a
sanctuary city aiding in a bedding. They don't belong here,
they're not supposed to be here. They ignored our law,
they ignored the sovereignty of America. They cut the line.

(01:01:37):
They just and they expect just to be able to
do whatever the hell they want to. Like, it's okay,
why is my tax dollars going to that? I mean,
what we have here, And I want to be perfectly

(01:01:58):
clear on this. This is modern day slavery. Yeah, it is.
I mean, it's it's hilarious because the left would have
you believe that the jobs that illegals are taking or

(01:02:18):
jobs that Americans don't want. Do you realize, Oh man,
do you realize? Okay, So one of the place there
was like what a meat packing plant that they came
in and raided, and then they had a job fair
the next day and all the people that were American

(01:02:42):
citizens that were filling out applications to get a job,
Like the place was packed with people trying to get
a job. But wait a second, I thought you said
that the only jobs that illegals are taking or jobs
that Americans don't want. How is it that Americans filled
up this job fair to replace the jobs of the

(01:03:03):
illegals that were taken into custody that were arrested and
you know, deported. How can both of those be true?
That doesn't make any sense to me. How can both
of those be true? I thought they said, Well, the
fact of no matter is they're lying their ass off
to you. I know people that own construction companies that

(01:03:26):
can't compete, so many of them have closed doors, closed
their business down because they can't compete because you have
illegals that are doing the job, that are willing to
work for less and therefore they can charge less do

(01:03:47):
the work, and Americans are not able to get the job.
They're not able to do the work because they can't compete.
I mean you basically have you know, Congress people that
are like, if you deport all the all the illegals,

(01:04:07):
who's going to wipe my ass? And yeah, that was
something that was said during Congress of all places, and
she was even like, you know, not to be crude,
but if you if you get rid of all the illegals,
I'm going to be forced to wipe my own ass.

(01:04:31):
Not that I want that job. I'm just saying they
look at them as slave labor. Who's going to do
their landscaping, who's going to move their yards, who's going
to you know, clean their house? He's going to do
their dishes, who's going to wash their kids? Who's going
to do all this? If we depour all the illegals.

(01:04:52):
I mean, I've said it before, I've talked about this
on this program before, but if you get rid of
all the illegals, there's a lot of things that's going
to happen, and all of them are good. Good. The
cost the price of everything is going to go down.
More money for Americans, more aid, more medicare, The price

(01:05:19):
of food is going to go down, the price of
homes is going to go down. It's nothing but positive
things for Americans. I mean, I don't care about your nationality.
I really don't. I don't care what race you are

(01:05:40):
doesn't matter to me. But what I do care about
is if you're an American? Are you an American? If
you are, then great. You know. One of the things
that the that the left is trying to say that is, oh,
they're even talking about and even taken away citizenship from people. Well,

(01:06:02):
yeah they have. I'll confirm that right here, right now. Yeah,
they've taken away people citizenships and deported him. But oh yeah,
by the way, here's the thing that they're leaving out there.
They're taking away citizenship from people whom have lied on
their applications that if they were to tell the truth,

(01:06:26):
that they would have told the truth on their application
forgetting citizenship, then their citizenship they never would have got
it in the first place. In one sense, And in
one such instance, the guy was in sex trafficking and
then he admitted that he was a sex trafficker before

(01:06:49):
he applied first citizenship and they revoked him, they took
it away. I mean, okay, hello, you get a job,
you lie on your application, and the business finds out
about it, they can terminate you for lying on the application,

(01:07:10):
especially whenever your answer is what got you the job
in the first place to lie. I mean, if your
employment was based off of a lie that was discovered, yeah,
you're going to lose your job. Why should somebody's citizenship

(01:07:35):
be any different. I'm all for this, get rid of them.
I'm actually right now, with everything that I have seen,
with the attacks on ice, with the attacks on local
law enforcement, with all of this crap that's going on,
I'm all for it to get rid of every single

(01:07:57):
one of them. Send them back home, and I don't
even care. If the countries don't want to let them back,
then put them on a boat, wave by and send
them on their way. The heck with them, I don't
even care. And the countries that don't want to take
back their own citizens, than fine. You get no more aid.

(01:08:17):
I don't like aid going to these places anyway, but okay,
you're getting no more funding. Why should we pay for
these people twice or what? You don't want to take
your your citizens back, those that came over here because
you're a shitthole country. Okay, fine, you get no funding period,

(01:08:38):
none at all. Nope, done, spick it, shut off, cut
the hose. We're done not doing it. You want aid
from the United States of America, but you're not going
to take your citizens back. Okay, fine, no more money
for you. We should do that anyway, regardless of whether
they take back the citizens. I don't care. But they

(01:09:00):
don't want to take them. Okay, fine, get a nice, big,
beautiful ship, give them a parachute, see you, bye bye.
What more do we owe these people nothing? I'm all

(01:09:25):
for it. I would not be against that whatsoever. Get
rid of each and every single one of them. I
am all for it. So you want to be a
sanctuary city, you want to stand in the way of
ice doing their job. Okay, fine, no more federal funding.

(01:09:47):
I'm not paying for you to put an illegal in
a hotel. I'm not paying for you to put an
illegal in the emergency room taking up resources from American citizens.
I'm not paying for your programs to take care of
especially whenever we got veterans on the street actually in

(01:10:11):
need of assistance, we owe them something. We do not know.
We do not owe jack shitt to an illegal alien.
Get rid of all of them, throw them out, put
them in a catapult, put in that on the other side,

(01:10:34):
parachute drop. I'm good with that. I'm good with that, absolutely.
I am this one. This one's actually kind of interesting.

(01:11:02):
This headline from the Daily Signal, Supreme Court tells judge
to fall in line. I mean, we've been here. This
is not the first type of ruling that we've heard about,
this type of thing. I mean, these are things that
we hear about all the time. You know. They like
to say that, you know that the right don't want

(01:11:25):
to follow the rulings of judges whatever, yank yank, okay,
but you know, and they don't want to call it
a constitutional crisis whenever they ignore the Supreme Court. But yet,
you know, the old constitutional crisis, what was it a

(01:11:46):
constitutional crisis whenever the Supreme Court said that you can't
dissolve somebody student loan debt. No, they were okay with it.
But the like to ignore the Supreme Court all the
freaking time. So this headline, Supreme Court tells judge to

(01:12:08):
fall in line in polite but firm judicial language, The
Supreme Court made it clear on July third that Massachusetts
Federal disrep Court Judge Brian Murphy wouldn't get away with
dodging the stay the Court had issued against him in
an important immigration case. According to the Court, Murphy is

(01:12:29):
bound by the prior order and cannot enforce an injunction
that our stay rendered unenforceable. Murphy's misbehavior comes as no
surprise given that he's one of President Joe Biden's midnight judges. Again,
is this somebody that wasn't actually appointed by Joe Biden

(01:12:52):
and can have his job taken away from him? I
would say so, but anyway, the article continues. Senator Chuck Schumer,
Democrat in New York, rushed him through the Senate during
its lane duck session after the twenty twenty four election,
with Murphy's nomination barely YadA yadah blah blah whatever. On

(01:13:14):
June twenty third, the Supreme Court granted the US Justice
Department's emergency request for a stay in Department of Homeland
Security first DVD. The Court's order issued over the entirely
predictable and banal dissent of Justice Soda Mayor and other
people Kegan Katanji Brown Jackson stayed Murphy's April eighteenth injunction

(01:13:40):
pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States
Court of Appeals for the first But okay, let's put
it this way. Murphy made another ruling and said that

(01:14:02):
the stay of this ruling only applied to that one ruling. Basically,
she did the same thing again, saying that it was
okay that the stay only affected that ruling, not the
rulings of that nature, saying you can't make this ruling

(01:14:25):
even though Murphy knew damn good and well what the
stay was actually intended. The federal judge ignored it, saying, yeah, no,
we're gonna go ahead and do it again, the same
thing that Joe Biden did. Should we be surprised? Now
here's my question, what's going to happen to this judge?

(01:14:49):
Is anything going to happen to this judge? Can this
judge be prosecuted? What's the repercussions on this? Let me
make this clear, We're not going to get any change
of activity. We're gonna see nothing stop. We're not gonna

(01:15:11):
see the left tone it down. We're not gonna see
the left do the right thing all of a sudden.
We're not going to see the left cease and desist.
What we There needs to be consequences to their actions.
If all you do is say I'm disappointed and you
go sit in the corner, they say, no, what's the repercussion?

(01:15:36):
What are you gonna do about it? You're gonna count
to three? What happens when you get the four? Nothing? Okay?

Speaker 9 (01:15:41):
Great?

Speaker 3 (01:15:41):
Cool, you're just gonna sit me down for another talking.
You're gonna smack my wrist. Here's my wrist? Nothing? Okay?
And do you actually do you honestly expect the left
to do anything different? Do you actually expect them to
suddenly do the right thing? Why would you? And if
you do, your you're an idiot. You aren't, you're you're

(01:16:03):
you're beyond stupid. If you actually think that they're going
to magically change their behavior and do the right thing,
be constitutional. You're an idiot. If that's what you think,
you're stupid. Remove all the warning labels and let nature
take its course. If you have to have a warning

(01:16:25):
label on a baby stroller saying take your baby out
of the stroller before you put it, fold it up,
and put it in this trunk of your car. You
don't deserve to have kids take the clothes off of
the child before you put the clothes in the washing machine.
You're an idiot. Preparation h's is not to be taken orally.

(01:16:52):
You deserve that. If there is no repercussions, if there
is no finding out to them fucking around, they're going
to continue to fuck around. Can I be any more clear?

(01:17:20):
I mean, that's that's kind of the message on today's episode.
If there is no FO, all you're going to get
is a lot of f aie just saying you want
something different. Maybe you should encourage better behavior. How do

(01:17:42):
you do that? Oh, you gotta punish bad behavior instead.
All we do is reward bad behavior, and we punish
good behavior for some reason. That's what That's what we
seem to do. That's what we do. So we're gonna
switch gears a little bit, and when I return, we

(01:18:06):
are going to talk about the UH a little bit
on the the the big beautiful Law, and a little
bit about some of the stuff that was passed and
a federal judge stepping in and going we don't like this.
So just a couple of minutes, I'll ride back.

Speaker 8 (01:18:27):
I grew up fast in a small, quiet town. Saw
mom a cry when Dad wasn't around baseball games and
empty chairs. I blamed him for never being there. He'd
come back home.

Speaker 4 (01:18:47):
I still of.

Speaker 11 (01:18:48):
Sand, a distant stair and a trembling hand.

Speaker 8 (01:18:52):
The anger built up inside of me as he slipped
away silently. Then you don't understand the battle sea fall
a solder sign fan of pricet ball.

Speaker 4 (01:19:06):
Now I've seen the fire, the flies. Now I see
my father sacrifice.

Speaker 8 (01:19:21):
I signed up young, followed his track four tours later,
Still ain't come back and dusty lands under foreign skies.

Speaker 9 (01:19:30):
I found the truth that his weary eyes let us
read with a heavy heart.

Speaker 4 (01:19:37):
Knowing now why he fell apart. Call the spine comrads
fault and calling the silent call.

Speaker 3 (01:19:46):
I stare at old photographs the.

Speaker 9 (01:19:49):
Man he was, the warriors path, tears powful, the love
I missed for the hero and my father's fast.

Speaker 8 (01:20:09):
He didn't understand the battles he falls, the soldier's.

Speaker 6 (01:20:16):
Life and the press it ball.

Speaker 4 (01:20:22):
Now I've seen my father sacrifice. Didn't understand the battles
he fought, The soldier's.

Speaker 3 (01:20:30):
Life and the press it fought.

Speaker 4 (01:20:32):
Now seen the fire on the front side. Now seeing
the fathers.

Speaker 11 (01:20:40):
Sacrifice, I signed up.

Speaker 8 (01:20:56):
He followed his track four tours later, still ain't come.

Speaker 11 (01:21:03):
Back, Dusty lands under four and skyes I.

Speaker 4 (01:21:11):
Found truth that it's weary, Let us weary, let her
thread with a heavy harm. We now why he felt harm.

Speaker 9 (01:21:32):
Let's fly and comrades fall going his silent call.

Speaker 3 (01:21:42):
And have you ever sat down in the throne just
to find out that you are dangerously low one shift tickets,
making it to where you have to make a mad
dash to the store just to pick yourself up some
if this has ever happened to you, Pick up the

(01:22:04):
number one most rated toilet paper found in Uranus and
use what the professionals use, angel Soft. See, I'm just
not a fan of su toilet paper. Some of them
is like putting a pedal between your nice rosie. Others
like John Wayne toilet paper, it's like using sandpaper. But
do what the professionals use. Use the type of toilet
paper that is the goldilocks of brands. Angel Soft available

(01:22:25):
wherever toilet paper is sold. All right, and we are back.
So last segment, we're going to be talking about the
big beautiful Bill, The Big beautiful law. Actually, because there's
been some confusion on this, there's been some misconceptions about this,
and I'm not really going to be talking about that,

(01:22:47):
but just that it's a good thing. Yeah, I mean, overall,
this is a good thing. And I'm gonna be honest
with you. I really don't care about some of the
debt that will be secured from you know, that will
happened as a result of this. Let me ask you

(01:23:07):
a question. What did you assuming you voted for Trump,
what did you vote for? Why did you vote for
him as president the United States of America? Did you
vote for a secure border, more border wall, more security, more,

(01:23:29):
you know, to basically shut down the border and stop immigration?
I did? Did you vote for the illegals that are
here to be deported and sent back to their country
of origin? I did? Did you vote for the swamp
to be drained for some accountability? Did you vote for

(01:24:00):
defunding the waste of fraud and the abuse? And I mean,
are these some of the things that you're voted for?
Because I know I did. Newsflash, this stuff costs money.
I don't know if you're aware of this, but it does.
I mean, if you're going to enforce laws. You need
law enforcement officers that cost money. If you want to

(01:24:27):
shut down the border with a border wall in different technologies,
whenever a wall isn't really feasible. All these things cost money.
They do. I voted for this, and I knew going

(01:24:48):
into it that doing this would cost money. I'm not
an idiot, so I I upset that you know, they
need to, you know, increase the debt limit. I'm not shocked,
especially knowing that on the way out the door, Biden
spent every freaking or at least Biden's administration spent every
dollar that they could, so there wasn't money left over

(01:25:12):
for Trump to enact his policies. I mean, that's what
they did. I'm not surprised that they did that. So
I knew that they would have to get funding from somewhere.
They would actually have to do this, and of which case,
go for it, because in the long run, I know
that this will benefit American people. It will benefit me.

(01:25:33):
It will make it to where my tax burden is
going to be less. It'll make it to where I'm
not paying for stupid shit that I don't want to
pay for. I knew this going into it. Why are
there so many people out there that are shocked about, Hey,
this is going to increase the debt. Well, yeah, President
Biden spent all the money he possibly could on the
way out the door, or at least administration did. And

(01:25:54):
of which case, if I'm going to if the president
is going to do what it is, the president was
supposed to do what he campaigned on, do the things
that I voted him in office to do, and force
immigration laws, shut down the border, drain the swamp, get
rid of the waist to fraud in the abuse, find

(01:26:14):
this shit out, get it, cut it. I knew it
was when hey costs money, I'm not surprised. One of
the other things this bill is going to do is
save the American people from the largest tax hike, the
largest tax increase twenty two percent that this nation has

(01:26:38):
ever seen. Did you actually want your taxes to increase
twenty two percent? I didn't. I want my taxes to
go down. I mean, holy shit, we threw tea in
the harbor over three percent, and now everything is taxed

(01:27:02):
multiple times and then some and and you wanted our
taxes to go up twenty two percent more? What the
hell I mean? Really is that? What you wanted, and

(01:27:29):
I know this is only half the battle. It is
because next on the agenda is the the recisions, and
of which case I believe next week is whenever the
uh the Senate is supposed to vote on this. Hopefully

(01:27:55):
they do something. I'm not I don't know. I don't
I'm not real hopeful that they will. It's probably going
to be an aspect that the President is probably going
to have to run out the clock and do it
a different way. But regardless of all of that, what
I'm actually afraid might happen is another continuing resolution, because

(01:28:17):
have they done the twelve appropriation bills that they're supposed
to do. We're still operating under Nancy Pelosi's budget. They
haven't passed a budget in over a decade. I mean,
holy crap. All we've seen year after year is an
omnimus bill or a continuing resolution. We haven't seen twelve
appropriation bills. They keep on making the bills bigger and

(01:28:39):
bigger to fund more and more things, and the American
people keep getting screwed. This is no longer the pandemic.
We need to get rid of pandemic spending. Holy shit,
why do you think inflation was so bad. And one
of the things that this bill did was defund Planned Parenthood.

(01:29:06):
Boy howdy, I thought this was absolutely hilarious. I thought
it was great. I was happy about it, absolutely I am.
But there was a federal judge that went in and
he blocked the defunding of Planned Parenthood, or at least
that's what his attent is to do. And in which case,
under what grounds they try to say that, oh, this
is unconstitutional to block their funding, and of which case.

(01:29:30):
I had to laugh about this, I really did. It's like,
are you really telling me that somehow you know, not
only is it a constitutional right that you kill your babies,
that the Constitution says that the American people have to be,
you know, forced to pay for it in the form
of taxes. Really, are you shitting me? And I seen

(01:29:54):
a video of I think it was Dnesse Desusan, So
I can't take credit for this. This was the Neesta Suset.
He was talking with somebody and he was like, Okay, look,
let's ignore for the fact and let's just say that, okay,
find an abortion is a constitutional right even though you
can't find it anywhere in the constitution. He can't find

(01:30:14):
it in the Bill of Rights, no other amendment. It's
not in there. But let's just assume that it is.
You're going to put it into the same category as
the freedom of speech, the freedom of press, the freedom
of religion, and the Second Amendment. You know, with guns,
you're going to put it in that same category. So
why is it that you, being a woman wanting to
kill your baby puts you in such a higher place

(01:30:38):
of status that the government has to be forced to
pay for you to have an abortion. You have the
freedom of speech, be it. The federal government doesn't buy
you a microphone, doesn't buy you a mixture, It doesn't
buy you a radio station. The government doesn't fund you
to have that. Personally, No, you have the freedom oppressed,

(01:31:02):
but yet the government doesn't buy you a newspaper to
where you could do your own publication. You have the
freedom of religion, but yet the government doesn't fund your churches.
So why is it that with all these things? And
by the way, the other one that I thought was
funny was, you know, you have the Second Amendment, the
right of the people to keep in bare arms, but

(01:31:24):
the government does not buy you a gun. So what
makes a woman the ones to kill her baby so
special that the government should pay for it, even if
you're going to go to the absurdity that it is
the constitutional right that you kill your baby. What makes

(01:31:45):
it so special? Government doesn't fund any of the other
rights in the Bill of Rights. But yet you think
because you're special and you want to kill a baby,
that the government should fund that. And not to mention
you know that that I've heard this argument too, so
many different times. In fact, Planned parenthood makes us very

(01:32:07):
argument itself that well, the money that they get from
the federal government, it's it's minuscule, it doesn't amount too much.
And I've heard this argument time and time again, like
who cares about voter I d you know, it's it's
it's it's minuscule. It's not enough for fraud. You know,
who cares about the government funding of Planned parenthood? It

(01:32:28):
doesn't amount to what two percent of their income? And
then and of which case, my response to that is okay, fine,
so it doesn't. So if all you're doing is buying
any racer with the with the money you get from government,
then you can do without any racer. We'll go ahead
and stop the funding. If if if fraud isn't a thing.

(01:32:49):
And then then let's have voter I D. If illegals
aren't voting in federal elections, in fine, we'll do voter
I D. We'll stop them from actually doing with this,
will enforce the laws that we actually have on the
books instead of ignoring them as we have been doing.
We'll go ahead and we'll do that. If all you're

(01:33:11):
buying from your government money planned Parenthood is to buy
an eraser, then you don't need that eraser. It's a
nothing burger. We'll just stop the funding. Not a big deal.
But that's what they tell us it. Oh you know,
it's uh, can't you know it's it's uh, it doesn't
amount to much. We're not actually doing much with that

(01:33:32):
money anyway, It's not it doesn't amount to anything. Well,
then fine, then it doesn't matter if we get rid
of it and we stop paying for it. Oh no,
Heaven forbidden. So this judge, after the passing of the
big beautiful bill, he wanted to block defunding Planned Parenthood. Okay,

(01:33:55):
here's the thing. This was isn't an executive action. This
was Congress actually doing their job. That this wasn't the

(01:34:16):
president to an executive order. This wasn't, you know, a regulation.
This wasn't some type of an action by an administrator,
by somebody in the EPA, the FDA. You know, This
wasn't any of that. This was a law that was

(01:34:36):
passed by the House, passed by the Senate, signed into
law by the President of the United States of America.
This is a law. What are you arguing the constitutionality
of a law? Will you have no grounds by which
to force the government to spend money? You don't have

(01:35:01):
any grounds. And oh yeah, by the way, you don't
actually have the authority to stop this. This has to
be taken to the Supreme Court. A law that was
written by Congress one branch, a law that was signed
by the President two branches. You don't belong to the

(01:35:22):
Supreme Court. This federal judge has no grounds here. If
you have a problem with it, you need to take
it to the Supreme Court. That's not what they're doing here.
That's not what they're doing here. He is obviously exceeding
his authority by trying to say that, oh, he can
do this. No, you can't. You have no grounds, you

(01:35:44):
have no leg to stand on. I don't know if
this is a blow knee amputation. I don't know if
this is above knee amputation. It doesn't even matter. I'm
not even going to call you Oscar Meyer. My blowney
has a first name. Shut up, you have no standing.
Stop it a federal judge thinking that they are going

(01:36:07):
to affect law, affect foreign policy like they have been
trying to do from the bench. And it's not even
a Supreme Court justice doing it. It's a federal judge.
What the hell? And why doesn't Congress do anything to
stop these people? It was Congress that formed these district judges.

(01:36:31):
Why don't they put them in their place? I mean,
the Supreme Court's already slapped them down numerous times, but
yet they ignore every time the Supreme Court does it.
There's a lot of good things there's going to come
out of this big beautiful bill. No tax on tips,

(01:36:53):
no tax on overtime, And even though they had to
go around way of doing it, it is going to
save a butt ton of money for people that are
on Social Security in the form of different types of
tax credits, effectively no tax on Social Security. I like

(01:37:17):
how they're you know, they're crying and whining and complaining
about oh about all the people that are being removed
from Medicare, and it's like, dude, the people that were
taken off of Medicare are illegal aliens that are not
supposed to be on Medicare anyway. It's already against the
law for them to be able to be on Medicare
in the first place. All this did was closed a

(01:37:40):
loophole to say, hey, you're not getting the freaking money. Yes,
it didn't lose funding. It made it to where people
that are not supposed to have it anyway are no
longer going to be receiving it. And I consider that
a win. I mean more money to go to places

(01:38:02):
that it's actually supposed to be going. I mean the
people that the law was intended to help. The money
is actually going to go to them. Fantastic, that's a
win I consider to win. Do you consider to win,
because I do, absolutely, I do. This money shouldn't be
going to the places is not supposed to be going to
in the first place. Right, those are the people that

(01:38:25):
are getting kicked off of Medicare. That's the funding that
Medicare is losing. It is not losing funding. Not a
single person who is supposed to be receiving the money,
who's getting the funding. Not a single person is getting
left out. In fact, this will allow more people who
is supposed to be getting to aid and the support,

(01:38:46):
the support they deserve or should be getting according to
the law. The law was never put in place, Medicare
was never designed for. Social Security is not made for
people that are not Americans, said Azen that have not
paid into the system. As I said before, these illegals,

(01:39:09):
this is nothing more than modern day slavery. And the
Democrats her perpetuated slavery the first time, are doing it again.
And there's too many people out there that are too
blind to understand it, too blind to see it, too

(01:39:31):
stupid to understand it, too blind to see it, too
deaf to hear it. It's modern day slavery. It's not
humane to open your borders and let these people in.
There is a right and illegal way to do it,

(01:39:52):
and that's the way it should be done period. I
really hope I see some prosecution coming out of things.
I don't know what to think about about Jeffrey Epstein
memo that was released. I don't know what to think

(01:40:13):
about the stupid shit that these federal judges are doing.
I don't really care about more investigations. What I want
to see is Purp Walk. And I really hope Pam
Bondy and the Department of Justice actually has the intestinal fortitude,

(01:40:34):
the Cajonahs, the marbles to do it, to do something,
to arrest, to Purp Walk, to try, not try, as in, oh,
let's try to do this, you know, the little engine
that could no, no, no no. A trial, that's what
we need to see. And if not, then they are

(01:40:54):
failing the American people in the story. That's the way
it is. Anyway, That's all I got for y'all today.
That is it. Starting Monday. Actually a little programming news here.
Due to a schedule change that I have had at work,
I am actually going to be able to implement a schedule,

(01:41:17):
an episode schedule, a show schedule that is closer to
what I have been wanting to do for some time.
I mean I've been wanting to do for quite some time,
to do a Monday through Friday, you know, five days
a week, one hour show. And now I'm going to
be able to do that because one week I'm going
to be working from the shop, the next week I'm

(01:41:39):
going to be on the road. So it's going to
be on a two week schedule. So starting Monday, July fourteenth,
on a week that I am home, it is going
to be a show Monday, Wednesday and Friday on the
Home Studio, and then the next week when I'm out
on the road, there will be a show on Tuesdayday

(01:42:00):
and on Thursday. These shows are going to be getting
released at five thirty pm, so in one hour on
those five shows. Of course, the home studio is going
to be live broadcast on Rumble and of which case
available as a podcast after the fact. Monday, Wednesday, Friday

(01:42:25):
five thirty pm, Tuesday and Thursday. Tuesday is going to
be done on the on the mobile studio. Thursday is
kind of a toss up, It just depends whether that
one will be a mobile studio or a home studio.
And then Saturday, at the same time normal time, eleven
am Central will be on the Home Studio. So every

(01:42:50):
other week Monday, Wednesday, Friday, the next week Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday.
I'm excited about this new schedule, something closer to what
I've been wanting to do for quite some time. I
hope you're as excited about it as I am. Head
on over to the ho Host Show dot com. Check
out the newsfeed. You can, you know, get all the

(01:43:11):
articles that have over there. Everything regarding the podcast is
over there the ho Host Show dot com. I'm all
over the place. On social media, can check out those
links as well. Ho Host Show on X the ho
Host Show on True Social. Anyway, that's all I got
for y'alls today. Have a great one and I'll see
in the next one. This has been The ho Host Show.

(01:43:32):
For more information, you can head to the Host Show
dot com. And for the merchandise store, you can head
on over to Stinkpickle dot com. That is s T
I n K P I k l e dot com.
Until next time, the