July 22, 2025 • 51 mins
In today's episode, we will be discussing Obama's coup, the passing of the recission bill, and touching on the Clinton email scandal. We will also talk about the Trump letter to Epstein and how little those on the right believe it.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Yes, welcome to the rated the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as we
discuss news, politics, current events, and so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Because three Burr broadcasting from Weabini Sloth Productions Mobile Studio.
Welcome to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm
your host, Ho Ho. So hey y'all's doing I hope
you're doing good? I really do. Today is an example
(00:47):
of where not the park, I mean it really is,
you know, doing the show on the mobile studio in
the semi, as I've said in the past, is not
exactly the best place to be doing the show. It
just isn't because a semi is not very soundproof on
the inside. And considering some of the places that I'm
(01:08):
parking on ramps, off ramps, rest areas, truck stops, there's
a lot of background noise here. They're just this, I
mean everywhere there's a motor run in somewhere. I mean
that's just commonplace there just is. Whether it be an engine,
whether it be an APU, a reefer, vehicles driving by,
(01:30):
there's always going to be some kind of background noise.
And this episode is just going to be an example
of that. There's only so much background noise that you
know the microphone is going to be able to eliminate,
so ahead of time, I do apologize for any background noise,
but we're going to do our best. So we've got
some things to talk about today. We really do some
(01:51):
things to get into. And let's see here, we've got
a grand jury of the Epstein files that they are
talking about releasing all of the information on that. We'll
get into that later. The Recision bill finally passed in
the Senate. We'll talk a little bit about that one.
I'm excited. We're going to be talking about the Obama
(02:14):
Biden coup against the Trump presidency that started in twenty sixteen.
We'll get into that. We're also going to be talking
about the fake Epstein letter that was reported on by
the Washington State Journal. We'll be getting into that one.
We'll also be talking about, Oh yeah, that's something related
(02:36):
to the oops. Didn't mean to click on that. We're
all just gonna be talking a little bit about the WNBA.
And let's see what else do we got here. Just
kind of scrolling through what I have in the newsfeed
and of which case, you can head on over to
thehohoshow dot com, click on the newsfeed tab, go into
(02:57):
one of the blog postings, into flip Board, and you'll
be able to get into the magazine for this episode
seven twenty one, twenty twenty five. Unfortunately, I won't be
able to actually put this in a blog post right
there on the website, theho hooshow dot com, but getting
(03:20):
into my Flipboard profile, you'll be able to find that
magazine again. That will be under today's date, seven twenty one,
twenty twenty five. Go ahead and check that out. There's
not a lot of articles in there, but it is
some good information all of my sources I do make
available right there. Go ahead and subscribe to that, and
(03:41):
you will not be disappointed. Let's see what else we got. No, no, no,
don't really care about that. Oh yeah, the FBI's botched
investigation into the Hillary Clinton emails. Will be talking a
little bit about that, and first we are going to
be starting right here. Yell's know, how I like to
(04:02):
start the episodes. I like to throw in a little
bit of ha ha, a little bit of funny, little
bit of humor, and my go to source for satire
news is the Babylonbie. Now this article I had to laugh,
but the headline, Oh dad, gummet, no thanks, get off there.
(04:24):
Headline media unconcerned with circulation to Biden's brain, deeply concerned
about circulation to Trump's ankles. Now, over the weekend, UH
Trump was having issues with a swelling of his ankles.
Apparently the UH the White House, they released some information
(04:46):
saying that he had some type of issues with his veins.
There was a a name that they used, vascular something
something something, and you know, that's what it amounts to.
And he's not having any heart issues, not any other issues.
You know that they've really been able to find. It
(05:06):
was just a vascular, you know, vain issues and that's
you know, what it amounted to. And it's pretty common
with people his age. Not a big deal. He's getting
treated for it, no issues. And the same people that
are whining and crying and oh, we gotta you know,
we gotta get rid of Trump. We got to remove him.
(05:27):
He's having health issues. The same people that are whining
and crying about this from Trump are the same people
that had no problem with any of the issues that
Biden has had in his absent presidency. Absent presidency, they
had no issues with all of the cognitive problems that
(05:48):
he was having, with him falling asleep and all this
other kind of stuff. They didn't have any issues with that.
But Trump has a little bit of swelling on his ankles,
and oh, holy crap, it is the end of the world.
We've got to, you know, remove Trump from office. I mean,
we can't be having this, right. I mean, it's just
(06:09):
it's ridiculous to me, it really is. You know, I'm
going to move my phone actually, because if I'm going
to be doing this whole you know, reading, it's really
going to be better if I have my phone in
a little bit better of a spot. So let me
go ahead and move that. All right, there we go.
That is much better. So yeah, that that article is
(06:30):
over there on the Babylon be and you know, so, yes,
that's one of the things that came out over the weekend.
You know, Trump's having some health issues. And I even
seen a picture of it, and I mean it's not horrible.
I mean it's not great, don't get me wrong. It's
definitely not great, but it ain't bad. I mean they're
able to treat it, not a big deal. I mean,
(06:53):
you research what the problem is and it'll even tell
you right there on you know, on your on your website, browser,
your search engine, you know some fixes, common fixes that
you can do to help remedy. Anyway, let's go ahead
and move on. The next article I want to talk
(07:14):
about is. Let's go ahead and get in this article
from Fox News FBI botched investigation in the Hillary Clinton's
email declassified documents allege. Now, look, we all know the story, right,
A lot of the stuff that we are you know,
this getting released nowadays is nothing more than just confirmation
(07:36):
of stuff that we already know. Because if you've been
listening to the program for any amount of time, if
you've been following other conservative talk shows, then you know
what's going on. You're ahead of the curve. If you
listen to you know, good news commentary, conservative talk shows
like this one, you're ahead of the game. You know,
(07:58):
you already know what's going on, right, because we've been
following this kind of stuff. I've been talking about it
for a while. This isn't anything new, This isn't any
kind of a surprise whatsoever. Again, this is just confirmation
of what we already know. But call me his decision
(08:19):
making process. It smacks of political infection. That's what the
article says. I'm sorry, that's what the article says. The
Senator Grassley said, and yeah, we're we're not surprised about
this because this is the thing, right, this is the thing.
They went through her emails. They found that she deleted
(08:42):
after the subpoena that she hand them over, deleted like
thirty thousand emails. She you know, destroyed government property, you know,
destroying hard drives, getting rid of you know, smashing phones,
all this other kind of stuff we you know, in
and blatant obviously destruction of property. I mean that's what
(09:06):
it was, destruction of public property. And it was to
hide evidence. I mean, everybody knows what happened, right, And
the FBI botched the investigation because they didn't want to
investigate her. One of the things that they that Hillary
Clinton said from the beginning was I'm not going down alone.
(09:27):
If I go down, I'm taking other people with me.
That's what she said. And I know this is something
else that I have mentioned many times on the program
in the past. Hillary Clinton wasn't the only guilty party.
I mean, if you remember correctly, the FBI did say
that they did find classified information on her hard drives,
(09:51):
on her email account, which was a private email account,
you know, Hillary Clinton at clinton dot com, whatever it was.
It wasn't her dot gov email account. It was her
personal email account, and that is extremely illegal. It is
(10:13):
somebody in her position she got a briefing as to
how you're supposed to handle classified information, and right off
the gate, I mean, right off the gate, from day one,
she used her private email address, and they found information
of classified found evidence of classified information that she had
(10:34):
in her private email address. And of which case, it
wasn't just her that violated the law. Everybody that sent
or even received classified information from Hillary her private email account,
every single one of them violated the same law. They
broke the same law, every single one of them. So,
(10:57):
I mean, every single person the sent or received classified
information from Hillary Clinton on her private email server, every
single one of them broke the law. And you know,
my guess is that basically everybody in the Biden administration
(11:21):
is guilty of this, from top to bottom, including Obama
and Biden, every one of them. I am sure, because
that was the email address that she was using. I
don't remember hearing anything that she even used her official
email account once from day one she was using her
(11:42):
personal private email. That being said, every single person in
the Obama administration is guilty of mishandling classified information. So
I don't know how much digging into this they're going
to do. I mean, I'm sure that they have, you know,
I don't want to say bigger fish to fry, but
(12:02):
other fish to fry, you know, other things that they
can do to you know, get the job done of
what we're wanting to see. But here, here's what my
question is, considering some of the stuff that is going on,
or okay, let me let me go about it like this,
What did they get al Capone for? Does anybody remember,
(12:25):
you know al Capone a very famous or maybe infamous
crime boss. What did they actually get him in? In
the end, it was tax evasion, right, tax evasion. They
didn't get him for his criminal enterprise. They wasn't able
to pin anything else on him. It was about tax evasion,
(12:50):
something clear, something clear to the point, something that was
obvious and something that they couldn't you know, you you
just can't wash it away, you know, it doesn't matter
how much you polish that turred. It's still a turd.
You could put sprinkles on it, it doesn't make it
a cupcake. It's a turd, right, I mean, clear, obvious,
(13:13):
concise and to the point. Now. Granted, and we'll talk
about this later on in the show. But there are
far worse things that Obama did while he was president,
things that were treasonous activities, and we'll talk about it.
And I know that you know that there are far
worse things that we can go after him for. But
(13:37):
this right here, something that is clean cut, undeniable. They
already have the evidence, They've already found it, and you
know in in previous investigations from the FBI, they've already
done the leg work. Not the only problem with this
is they didn't go after Hillary Clinton. They didn't go
(13:59):
after anybody when whever they had the chance to do it,
and they should have. They should have. They should have
gone after Hillary Clinton, hands down, But unfortunately it was
still the deep state that was in charge of everything.
Trump hadn't had any opportunity to get rid of the
bad apples and put in people that were, you know,
(14:19):
American loving, patriotic individuals. He hadn't had that opportunity at
this point, so it's understandable at least in some degree,
then nothing ended up happening. But what I am hoping
for is that with the information that is coming out
(14:39):
that does show a clear and obvious oh what's the word.
I'm looking for, pattern of activities, you know, behavioral patterns
that maybe they'll finally be able to get something done.
Now do I actually think that Oboma is going to
(15:00):
be thrown in jail over mishandling of classified information? No?
I don't think so at all, not in any way,
shape or for him. I just don't. I'm just gonna
be honest with you. Would I like to see it? Eh?
I don't know, yes, But I mean that just raises
(15:22):
other kinds of problems too, I mean, it just does
you know. I would like to see it. But he
is a former president. He does have Secret Service protections.
But if we treat him in the same way that
they treated Trump, well, then absolutely we can do. We
(15:43):
can throw him in jail and we can yank his
Secret Service protection. I mean, come on, that's what they
tried to do with Trump. I mean, granted, two wrongs
don't make a right, and I'm not saying that it does,
and none of us thought that it was right whenever
they were trying to strip Trump of his you know,
(16:03):
executive privileges of having circre service protection and you know
the other things that go along with the office. I mean,
we were upset about that. I don't want to be
too faced like the Democrat Party is. I mean they're
pretty too faced obviously, But you can still attack them
in other ways. You really can. You can still go
(16:26):
after him legal, and that's what I want to see
happen again. I don't care about all these investigations. In
a matter of speaking, I don't. I'm just going to
be honest with you. I don't care. What I do
care about is actually seeing some type of charges, some
purp walks, you know, something I need to check out. Okay, good,
(16:48):
we're still going very very good. Anyway, Let's go ahead
and move on the next thing I want to talk about.
Oh wait, I got it back out of that. Okay,
there we go. Let's talk about. Oh nope, nope, nope,
I don't care about that one. Uh yeah, this is
about the Clinton email inquiry. This headline from justinnews dot
(17:12):
com more declassified document show comy swayed by mysterious intel
reports to end the Clinton Clinton email inquiry. And yeah,
I mean we all know that it was true, you know.
I mean, here's the thing. Whenever it comes to this
Clinton email thing, none of it held any water, right,
(17:32):
none of it made any sense, because what did they say?
You know, uh, yeah, she was guilty. You know, she
didn't mean to do it. It wasn't her intention. But
yet every single thing that she did right after having
her email and the hard drives subpoened was a her
(17:52):
destroying evidence. That's a crime. Outside of the mishandling and
classified information. All of her actions outside of that was
to destroy evidence. So this way she didn't get caught.
Regardless of the information that they found or didn't find,
doesn't really matter. Her actions supports the claim that she
knew exactly what it is that she was doing. Now
(18:15):
here's the other thing that they don't really want to
talk about in that law about the proper handling of
classified information. Your ignorance plays no part in determining whether
or not you are guilty, because ignorance is not a defense.
I don't know if any in of you out there
(18:36):
have ever been pulled over for speeding. I have been Okay,
very close to where I live, there is a town
called Rochester that is very well known as a speed
trap whenever I was younger. It's not quite so bad today,
but it was very well known as a speed trap.
If you got a speeding ticket, the first question out
(18:58):
of anybody's mouth was Rochester. I mean, you can go
four mile an hour over the speed limit and get
a ticket from a Rochester cop. Yeah. I mean it's
pretty stinking ridiculus. I mean, five mile an hour over
the post of speed limit is kind of standard, right,
I mean we all do it. I mean it's not
(19:18):
exactly breaking the law, it's bending the law. I mean
that's how we justified. I know I do it too.
You know I do it too. But any cop will
tell you, oh, I didn't know what the speed limit was.
I didn't see the sign, YadA yadah, blah blah. Everybody
has tried to get out of a ticket at least
(19:38):
once in their life. I know I have. Maybe I'm
just speaking for myself, but I know I have. But
every single traffic cop will tell you the same thing.
Your ignorance of the speed limit does not protect you
from receiving a ticket. When you violate the law, it's
not going to protect you. And the same thing goes
(20:00):
for this with the mishandling of classified information. Nowhere in
the statue does it give any type of leeway for ignorance.
It's not in there. I've looked, it's not in there.
Your ignorance is not going to set you free. So,
regardless of whether she intended to do it or not,
(20:23):
regardless of her intentions, the classified information will still found
on her hard drive, in her email account, various other places.
Her ignorance is not a defense, and they chose to
ignore the fact that she broke the law and go
down the rabbit hole. Now again, I mean, we all
(20:44):
know why. You know, Hillary Clinton said to herself that
if I go down, I'm taking others with me. And
everybody knew what that meant. Everybody knew the position that
she had, everybody knew what administration she worked in, everybody
knew what that meant. So, I mean, this whole entire
thing of what they're talking about is a smoke screen.
(21:04):
And since we're talking about it, let's go ahead and
move into this story from the Daily Wire. And I
got a couple other headlines about this as well, but
the headline from the Daily Wire is it's time to
put Barack Obama in handcuffs. Another article that I have
is this one from newsmaxs fed fleets to Newsmac Obama
(21:28):
coup on Trump known since twenty seventeen. Let me go
ahead and give you a quick breakdown of what was
going on. Basically, it was from the very beginning, and
there are timelines that I have seen on this to
really do paint a very damning picture from the Obama administration.
(21:55):
But from day one, there was an organized attempt to
remove President Trump from office. And this came directly from
the Obama administration, directly from Barack Hussein Obama. According to
(22:17):
this information that has come out, according to a briefing,
according to a U what's that word I'm looking for?
According to a closed door meeting, that even the the
(22:38):
the Russia, the Russia Gate, all that was fabricated from
the Obama administration, every last bit of it, because intelligence
agencies knew from day one that know's there's nothing here,
There's no there, there nothing at all, that this is
completely wrong, that Trump didn't do anything wrong. There is
(23:04):
no evidence. They don't even have the capabilities as the
report said, they don't have the intentions nor the capability
to you know, sway the election one way or the other.
They don't have the ability, they don't have the intentions
that that's there's no evidence whatsoever that this is even
true at all. And then the day after this closed
(23:25):
door meeting of top officials in the Obama administration, then
the reports came out, the the dossier came out. All
of the you know, top ranking members of these various CIA, FBI,
all these guys all got their story straight and said, oh,
(23:49):
Russia Gate, every one of them. This was a this
was a directed it was a intentional This was very
much a coup against the Trump administration, against President Trump himself.
(24:09):
And this more or less started in the later twenty sixteen,
definitely in twenty seventeen, before Obama even left office. That's
what the report is saying, again, what's going to happen?
(24:30):
I don't know about you, and I've I've talked about that.
If I've said it once, I've said it one hundred times.
I don't care about more investigations. I just don't. I
don't care about investigations. I don't want I don't care
about any more, you know, Senator House hearings. I don't care.
(24:54):
I don't care about any special counsels. I don't care
about any special investigators. I don't care about any of that. Again,
all this information that we're finding out isn't any anything
more than confirmation of what we already knew. If you've
been paying attention for any amount of time, if you've
already been listening to conservative talk shows, then you already
(25:18):
know what's going on. None of this is a surprise.
You know what what is most frustrating to me? I
want you to think back. Okay, Now, I'm I'm not
exceptionally old. I mean, I'm getting up there. I'm you know,
forty six. You know I'm getting up there. I mean
(25:38):
I was born before the you know, the the the
no good gracious, I was born before the formation of
the Department of Education. All right, So I go back aways.
I remember whenever students were taught how to think, not
(25:59):
what to think, all right. But I remember the days
when at least we thought that government functioned in a
more constitutional way, that it was we the people that
picked that our representatives actually represented us. You know, I
(26:21):
remember a time not that long ago even where at
least you know, if it wasn't true, they they tried
to make you think that it was true, regardless of
whether it was or not. But they wanted you to
believe that government functioned for the people. And now what
(26:47):
do we have? Investigation after investigation about corruption and more
and more corruption about the fourth branch of government. And no,
I'm not talking about we the people, because we may
go to you know, government schools, but we're not part
of the government. Yeah, some more background noise going on.
(27:18):
We may have known something was wrong, we may have
known it for some time, but here recently, you know,
just this past decade. Really they don't even care what
we know. And that's the problem because they think that
(27:39):
they are so insulated that they are so protected. It
doesn't matter what you know. They're going to stay in power.
That's their mindset, right, that's their mindset. It doesn't matter
what you know. So what if you know that the
CIA killed JFK, who cares? What are you going to
(28:01):
do about it? Are you going to change the apparatus?
Are you going to stop the money flow? Are you
going to do anything about it? No, you're not, because
what they're going to do is they're going to blow
blow smoke up your ass. They're going to pass a bill,
they're going to give you a little bit of money.
They're going to quote unquote take care of you. All
(28:22):
the while, we the people are too stupid to understand.
We're too stupid to ask the question of why is
the cheese free mice? Are too stupid to ask that question,
and they get caught in the mouse trap. We wonder
(28:44):
why there's issues? I mean, good grief, man, So the
entire Obama administration, Obama himself an organized coup against press.
Isn't it Trump? What's going to happen? I mean, really,
(29:06):
that's the question. And that's a big one. If you
ask me, that is a oh man, that's that's a
that's a problem, isn't it? People? Information that we already knew,
Stuff that's already been made public, And if you've paid
any any attention for any amount of time, then you
(29:28):
already know what's up. You already do. I wasn't surprised
about this, why because well I already knew. I already knew,
and since I already kind of touched base on it
a little bit earlier talking about the funding getting ready
getting rid of the of the money stream. Finally, not
(29:48):
that long ago, the Recisions Bill finally passed a Senate.
I am assuming by now it has been on the
President's desk and he was able to sign it a
measly what nine billion dollars that its primary purpose was
to get rid of a lot of aid funding or
US AID funding, and it was to shut down the
(30:12):
government money, the taxpayer dollars that was going to PBS
and NPR. I'm so excited about this, I really am.
Kind of yeah, kind of, I'm sorry, it's it's very
much of a kind of I mean, come on, with
all of the waste, the fraud and the abuse that
(30:32):
DOGE has found during its its tenure, the stuff that
we that we know about, with all of that dollars,
and the only thing that they can do is past
a teeny a teeny weenie, you know, like what one
hundred I think it's like one hundred and fifty billion
(30:55):
dollars that they have found that they have receipts on
from DOGE or maybe like eighty somebid billion, and the
only thing that they can do is cut that small
teeny portion of it nine point whatever billion dollars out
of the budget. That's all that they were able to
(31:17):
resend and give back to the American people. That's what
they want to ignore that, Oh, we're stealing money from
the federal government. No, you're giving it back to the
American people. It was stolen from us from the get go.
We deserve it. It's our money. I want it now.
So a huge hit to PBS and NPR. You know
(31:40):
what's also funny is that all these places, okay, PBS,
NPR planned parenthood. They would have you believe that the
that the the money that they get from the government
only represents like one percent of their entire budget. That's it.
That's what they would more or less have you believe.
(32:01):
And it's like, okay, fine, Then if if the money
that you get from government only represents one percent of
your you know, your your fiscal budget, your yearly fiscal budget,
then why does it matter if you're getting any government
money whatsoever? What's the big deal? Cut it off. The
(32:22):
American people shouldn't have to pay for an abortion. The
government people should not have to pay for you know,
bias media coming out of NPR and PBS. Then let's
stop the flow. Let's shut off the Spickett. Let's cut
the hose. Let's give the money back to the American people.
If it's only one percent of your budget, then you
(32:44):
won't miss it when it's gone, Right, You're not going
to miss it when it's gone. I was listening to Oh,
who was it? Oh name? Oh, I'm trying to remember
what his name is. I don't remember. If I remember,
(33:05):
i'll let you know. But I was listening to Yeah,
that guy that I don't remember his name, and he
was asked a question from a liberal and it was about,
you know, this person being upset about the government no
(33:25):
longer giving money to Planned Parenthood, and his response was simple.
I want to paraphrase all of this because I don't
remember his exact words, but his response was awesome. Right,
he said, let's ignore the fact that there is no
constitutional right to have an abortion. It doesn't exist. But
(33:45):
let's ignore that. Okay, let's go beyond that. Let's ignore it.
Let's just pretend for a minute that it's in there. Okay,
you're mad that funding stopped for you to have an abortion,
but let's talk about the other things that are in
(34:06):
the constitution. You have the freedom of speech, the federal
government isn't going to buy you podcast equipment for you
to exercise your freedom of speech. You have the freedom
of press. The government is not going to finance you
(34:26):
to make your own newspaper. You have the freedom of religion.
The government is not going to give you money to
finance you to build a new church. And you have
the Second Amendment, the right of the people to keep
in bear arms. The federal government is not going to
buy you a gun. What makes abortion so special that
(34:53):
the government has to pay for it when the government
does not pay you to exercise any of your or
other explicit freedoms. That's a damn good question, right, And again,
I really wish I could remember the guy's name. I
don't remember it. When I do, I will let you know.
(35:15):
I'm sure it'll it will occur to me later, and
I'll make a post. I'll do that, I really will.
But yeah, what makes abortion the killing of unborn babies?
I mean, let's just admit to it, that's what it is.
What makes that so special that the government has to
(35:38):
pay for it? Whenever the government doesn't pay for any
for the exercise of any other freedom, doesn't pay for it, Oh,
you may get a tax credit. But that's not the
same as government giving you money and funding it. I mean,
you still have to pay even with the tax credit.
You know, even with the tax exempt status, you still
(35:59):
have to pay for it. You just get your tax
dollars that went into it back on some things, not
every I mean, I've never received the tax cut for
me buying a gun. It's in the constitution, hell is biblical.
But I ain't gonna talk about that right now. So yeah,
(36:20):
let's go ahead and move on. So PBS NPR is
now recession no longer. There, I'm happy, I'm excited. Where
are we at on time? H thirty six minutes? Sweet? Nice?
All right, So let's uh, yeah, here's this one. So
(36:43):
we talked a little bit. No, we didn't. Actually, Oh wow,
So I got two more things that I'm wanting to
talk about. Okay, both of them regarding Epstein. So if
you are aware, and both of these stories are related,
so I've got no problem talking about them at the
same time. So over the weekend, there was a story
(37:03):
that broke from the Washington State Journal and they claimed
that they saw received whatever a letter that you know,
President Trump wrote twenty years ago. It was like a
birthday card that President Trump wrote twenty someid years ago
(37:26):
to Jeffrey Epstein celebrating his fiftieth birthday. And this thing
was so ridiculous, so stupid, so ridiculous that, I mean,
nobody on the right is believing this. And apparently there
(37:47):
was a crude picture that was drawn of it, that
was drawn of a woman on this that President Trump
supposedly did with like part of his signature of some
of the carpets on this drawn female body, naked, drawn
female body. There you go. This story is so ridiculous,
(38:12):
so stupid that even Elon Musk was like, yeah, this
this no uh uh. And nobody on the right is
believing this story at all. It is so stupid, it
is so ridiculous. And the and the thing that kind
of cracked me up was WSJ. They claimed that they
(38:36):
don't even have the uh you know, the birthday card,
the letter, they don't have it, and it's all based
off of hearsay. And they were told before they even
ran the story that oh, yeah, this story is false.
You might not want to print that never happened. You
(38:57):
may not want to print it. This is not in
any kind of language that Trump has used. I mean,
like I said, people, this thing sounds absolutely ridiculous. I
mean it does. I mean I heard it. I heard
the transcript of this letter of this birthday card, and
it sounds so stupid it's not even funny. I mean,
(39:20):
I don't care if you use Trump voice to read it.
It still sounds stupid. It just does. And because of
this backlash, one of the things that came out from
the Trump administration was that they are going to release
all of the documents that they can regarding the grand
jury from the Epstein trial. That's what they're going to do.
(39:45):
Now this I'm actually kind of excited about. I really am,
because what we are going to see is the testimony,
the introduction of all the evidence that we never seen
in the trial itself, and we're going to be able
to see what they had and why it wasn't allowed
(40:09):
in as evidence in the Epstein trial, why it was denied.
That's what we'll see. And here's one of the things too,
and this goes back to evidence that we know existed
because it was evidence that was brought up in the
(40:29):
grand jury that for some reason they said, no, you
can't use that as evidence, one of which being the
Black Book. We know they had it. We know they
had it. It was brought forth as evidence during the
grand jury and they were told, no, you can't use this.
(40:51):
Why not? That's what I want to know. Why not.
It's a pretty simple question, right, It's a pretty simple question.
This is one of them pieces of evidence that they
would have you believe doesn't exist anymore, even though we
know it does. We have the flight log of all
(41:14):
the people that have flown on the on the whatever
the name of the plane was going out to Lalite
Louita Epstein Island. We had the flight log. We can
see who was on the plane, when they were on
the plane, where they came from, and where they went.
(41:37):
We have this information. All the information that the FBI
took out of the house on Epstein Island, we have.
You know that there's all this stuff that was retrieved, notebooks,
hard drives, cameras, all kinds of stuff. I mean, they
spent days out there gathering evidence, putting things in boxes
(42:02):
and sending them mainland, all kinds of things. And yet
they would have you believe that the only two people
that were involved in the sex trafficking of over a
thousand girls was only Maxwell and Epstein. The only two
(42:23):
people from start to finish, the transportation, the trafficking, the
illicit acts. That's what they would have you believe that
it was only these two people and nobody else. They
have no credible evidence of any third parties involved. Nothing.
The only two people from start to finish that were
(42:45):
associated with these crimes at all was Epstein and Maxwell.
Even though we have testimony, affidavits of young girls that
were freed, they have testified that, yes, there were other
people involved. I mean, hell, the pilots were involved in this.
(43:10):
They were transported onto plane. Right, That's moving a minor
past state lines. That's sex trafficking. That's illegal, that's a crime.
But yet there's no evidence to see here. Do you
think Jeffrey Epstein drove his own vehicle? Do you think
he ever took one of these miners with him? Sex trafficking?
(43:33):
He was, you know, he was being accused. They found evidence.
Is that what you really think? Granted, outside of those
of us that really pay attention don't really care about
(43:57):
the Epstein list. I mean, that's a sad state, right,
I Mean, there's just there's so many people out there
that don't care, you know, like what I think I heard,
like somewhere around like ten percent, you know, maybe fourteen
on the high side of the of registered voters, maybe
(44:18):
even Republican registered voters that actually care have any interest
in the Epstein files. You want to know why I care?
Thousands of girls sex traffic. Why can't their voices be heard?
(44:40):
Do they not deserve justice? And outside of that, how
about the over one hundred thousand children of illegals that
were snuck into this country, that were caught, that were
(45:03):
allowed to go with somebody whenever they didn't even verify
who this person was. Over one hundred thousand children they
don't know where they're at, that were brought into this
country sex slaves, child labor, and nobody seems to care.
(45:27):
For the same reason. This is a travesty. It should
not be allowed. And yet because it's not our children,
it's not your child that was taken, it's not my
child that was taken, nobody seems to care. There was
(45:51):
a movie that was released and this was released a
while back ago by Angel Studios. Jim cavisl starred in it,
actor who played Jesus in Passion of the Christ. The
movie was called Sound of Silence. No, I'm sorry. Sound
of Freedom not Sound of Silence. That was a song,
good song, Sound of Freedom. And when this movie came out,
(46:16):
I wanted to see it. I liked the premise of
the show. I liked what it was talking about, the
raising awareness of sex trafficking, child sex trafficking. I liked
what the movie was doing its purpose. I like Jim Caviezel.
He's a hell of an actor. His screen presence is amazing.
(46:36):
He is a passionate man. It took me a while
before I was able to watch that movie, it really did,
because the subject matter is so infuriating, so heartbreaking. How
(47:03):
can you know that information sit on your hands and
do nothing. How can you watch that movie and not
want to do something about it. There's a lot of
information that's been coming out, a lot of things that
(47:25):
is nothing more than confirmation of things that we already knew.
Not that long ago, most every American would have been
outraged and furiated. They would have shown up in pitchforks
and torches demanding something be done. Now it's commonplace. Nobody
(47:46):
bats an eye. It may be shocking, but it's not surprising.
We just celebrated our two hundred and forty ninth anniversary
as Americans in this country, we threw tea in the
(48:13):
harbor over three percent. Where are we at now? What
have we been accepting out of government? We know how
things are supposed to be ran. And if you don't,
then you need to get out the Constitution. You need
(48:34):
to read the Bill of Rights, you need to read
the federalist papers, the anti federalist papers. You please educate yourself.
We know how it's supposed to be done. It's high
time we demand better from government. We need to. I'm
writing a series of books. The first in the series
(48:57):
is Knowing the Declaration of Independent I am two drafts
into it. I got one more draft to go through
and then just kind of polish it up a little bit,
put the front matter or the back matter, and then
the thing will be available over on audible. No, not audible.
I'm not reading the thing and putting it out there
(49:18):
on audible. But it'll be available on Kindle, It'll be
available even in paperback over on Amazon dot com. I'm
kind of excited about it, be honest with you, got
a series of books getting it put out there. Knowing
the Declaration of Independence, Knowing the Constitution and knowing the
Bill of Rights are going to be the first three
in the series that will be released, and the first
(49:41):
one should be released in the next month. I don't
know how long it's going to take me to do
all the editing of this thing, but holy crap, hopefully
I'll have it done by the end of by the
end of August, that's what my goal is at any rate,
and then the end of the year for knowing the
Constant and then before the fourth of July knowing the
(50:05):
UH Bill of Rights. And I'm probably even want to
talk about the Federalist papers and that as well. A
good comparison between the two. Asking you the question, what
does America look more like? The Bill of Rights or
the Ten Pillars of Communism side by side, you may
(50:26):
be surprised which one America actually more represents. I'll give
you a hint. It's not the Bill of Rights. Yeah, shocking, right, Yeah,
we don't. We don't have much in common with the UH,
with the Bill of Rights or the Constitution of the
United States of America. Instead, no, we have way more
(50:50):
in common with the Ten Pillars of Communism from the
Communist Manifesto. What a travesty, what a traves Anyway, That's
all I got for y'alls today. That is it's y'alls.
Have yourself a great one and I will see you
and the next one. This has been the Ho Ho Show.
For more information, you can head to the Ho hoshow
(51:12):
dot com and for the merchandise store, you can head
on over to stink pickle dot com. That is s
T I n K P I k l e dot com.
Until next time,
Yes, welcome to the rated the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as we
discuss news, politics, current events, and so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Because three Burr broadcasting from Weabini Sloth Productions Mobile Studio.
Welcome to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm
your host, Ho Ho. So hey y'all's doing I hope
you're doing good? I really do. Today is an example
(00:47):
of where not the park, I mean it really is,
you know, doing the show on the mobile studio in
the semi, as I've said in the past, is not
exactly the best place to be doing the show. It
just isn't because a semi is not very soundproof on
the inside. And considering some of the places that I'm
(01:08):
parking on ramps, off ramps, rest areas, truck stops, there's
a lot of background noise here. They're just this, I
mean everywhere there's a motor run in somewhere. I mean
that's just commonplace there just is. Whether it be an engine,
whether it be an APU, a reefer, vehicles driving by,
(01:30):
there's always going to be some kind of background noise.
And this episode is just going to be an example
of that. There's only so much background noise that you
know the microphone is going to be able to eliminate,
so ahead of time, I do apologize for any background noise,
but we're going to do our best. So we've got
some things to talk about today. We really do some
(01:51):
things to get into. And let's see here, we've got
a grand jury of the Epstein files that they are
talking about releasing all of the information on that. We'll
get into that later. The Recision bill finally passed in
the Senate. We'll talk a little bit about that one.
I'm excited. We're going to be talking about the Obama
(02:14):
Biden coup against the Trump presidency that started in twenty sixteen.
We'll get into that. We're also going to be talking
about the fake Epstein letter that was reported on by
the Washington State Journal. We'll be getting into that one.
We'll also be talking about, Oh yeah, that's something related
(02:36):
to the oops. Didn't mean to click on that. We're
all just gonna be talking a little bit about the WNBA.
And let's see what else do we got here. Just
kind of scrolling through what I have in the newsfeed
and of which case, you can head on over to
thehohoshow dot com, click on the newsfeed tab, go into
(02:57):
one of the blog postings, into flip Board, and you'll
be able to get into the magazine for this episode
seven twenty one, twenty twenty five. Unfortunately, I won't be
able to actually put this in a blog post right
there on the website, theho hooshow dot com, but getting
(03:20):
into my Flipboard profile, you'll be able to find that
magazine again. That will be under today's date, seven twenty one,
twenty twenty five. Go ahead and check that out. There's
not a lot of articles in there, but it is
some good information all of my sources I do make
available right there. Go ahead and subscribe to that, and
(03:41):
you will not be disappointed. Let's see what else we got. No, no, no,
don't really care about that. Oh yeah, the FBI's botched
investigation into the Hillary Clinton emails. Will be talking a
little bit about that, and first we are going to
be starting right here. Yell's know, how I like to
(04:02):
start the episodes. I like to throw in a little
bit of ha ha, a little bit of funny, little
bit of humor, and my go to source for satire
news is the Babylonbie. Now this article I had to laugh,
but the headline, Oh dad, gummet, no thanks, get off there.
(04:24):
Headline media unconcerned with circulation to Biden's brain, deeply concerned
about circulation to Trump's ankles. Now, over the weekend, UH
Trump was having issues with a swelling of his ankles.
Apparently the UH the White House, they released some information
(04:46):
saying that he had some type of issues with his veins.
There was a a name that they used, vascular something
something something, and you know, that's what it amounts to.
And he's not having any heart issues, not any other issues.
You know that they've really been able to find. It
(05:06):
was just a vascular, you know, vain issues and that's
you know, what it amounted to. And it's pretty common
with people his age. Not a big deal. He's getting
treated for it, no issues. And the same people that
are whining and crying and oh, we gotta you know,
we gotta get rid of Trump. We got to remove him.
(05:27):
He's having health issues. The same people that are whining
and crying about this from Trump are the same people
that had no problem with any of the issues that
Biden has had in his absent presidency. Absent presidency, they
had no issues with all of the cognitive problems that
(05:48):
he was having, with him falling asleep and all this
other kind of stuff. They didn't have any issues with that.
But Trump has a little bit of swelling on his ankles,
and oh, holy crap, it is the end of the world.
We've got to, you know, remove Trump from office. I mean,
we can't be having this, right. I mean, it's just
(06:09):
it's ridiculous to me, it really is. You know, I'm
going to move my phone actually, because if I'm going
to be doing this whole you know, reading, it's really
going to be better if I have my phone in
a little bit better of a spot. So let me
go ahead and move that. All right, there we go.
That is much better. So yeah, that that article is
(06:30):
over there on the Babylon be and you know, so, yes,
that's one of the things that came out over the weekend.
You know, Trump's having some health issues. And I even
seen a picture of it, and I mean it's not horrible.
I mean it's not great, don't get me wrong. It's
definitely not great, but it ain't bad. I mean they're
able to treat it, not a big deal. I mean,
(06:53):
you research what the problem is and it'll even tell
you right there on you know, on your on your website, browser,
your search engine, you know some fixes, common fixes that
you can do to help remedy. Anyway, let's go ahead
and move on. The next article I want to talk
(07:14):
about is. Let's go ahead and get in this article
from Fox News FBI botched investigation in the Hillary Clinton's
email declassified documents allege. Now, look, we all know the story, right,
A lot of the stuff that we are you know,
this getting released nowadays is nothing more than just confirmation
(07:36):
of stuff that we already know. Because if you've been
listening to the program for any amount of time, if
you've been following other conservative talk shows, then you know
what's going on. You're ahead of the curve. If you
listen to you know, good news commentary, conservative talk shows
like this one, you're ahead of the game. You know,
(07:58):
you already know what's going on, right, because we've been
following this kind of stuff. I've been talking about it
for a while. This isn't anything new, This isn't any
kind of a surprise whatsoever. Again, this is just confirmation
of what we already know. But call me his decision
(08:19):
making process. It smacks of political infection. That's what the
article says. I'm sorry, that's what the article says. The
Senator Grassley said, and yeah, we're we're not surprised about
this because this is the thing, right, this is the thing.
They went through her emails. They found that she deleted
(08:42):
after the subpoena that she hand them over, deleted like
thirty thousand emails. She you know, destroyed government property, you know,
destroying hard drives, getting rid of you know, smashing phones,
all this other kind of stuff we you know, in
and blatant obviously destruction of property. I mean that's what
(09:06):
it was, destruction of public property. And it was to
hide evidence. I mean, everybody knows what happened, right, And
the FBI botched the investigation because they didn't want to
investigate her. One of the things that they that Hillary
Clinton said from the beginning was I'm not going down alone.
(09:27):
If I go down, I'm taking other people with me.
That's what she said. And I know this is something
else that I have mentioned many times on the program
in the past. Hillary Clinton wasn't the only guilty party.
I mean, if you remember correctly, the FBI did say
that they did find classified information on her hard drives,
(09:51):
on her email account, which was a private email account,
you know, Hillary Clinton at clinton dot com, whatever it was.
It wasn't her dot gov email account. It was her
personal email account, and that is extremely illegal. It is
(10:13):
somebody in her position she got a briefing as to
how you're supposed to handle classified information, and right off
the gate, I mean, right off the gate, from day one,
she used her private email address, and they found information
of classified found evidence of classified information that she had
(10:34):
in her private email address. And of which case, it
wasn't just her that violated the law. Everybody that sent
or even received classified information from Hillary her private email account,
every single one of them violated the same law. They
broke the same law, every single one of them. So,
(10:57):
I mean, every single person the sent or received classified
information from Hillary Clinton on her private email server, every
single one of them broke the law. And you know,
my guess is that basically everybody in the Biden administration
(11:21):
is guilty of this, from top to bottom, including Obama
and Biden, every one of them. I am sure, because
that was the email address that she was using. I
don't remember hearing anything that she even used her official
email account once from day one she was using her
(11:42):
personal private email. That being said, every single person in
the Obama administration is guilty of mishandling classified information. So
I don't know how much digging into this they're going
to do. I mean, I'm sure that they have, you know,
I don't want to say bigger fish to fry, but
(12:02):
other fish to fry, you know, other things that they
can do to you know, get the job done of
what we're wanting to see. But here, here's what my
question is, considering some of the stuff that is going on,
or okay, let me let me go about it like this,
What did they get al Capone for? Does anybody remember,
(12:25):
you know al Capone a very famous or maybe infamous
crime boss. What did they actually get him in? In
the end, it was tax evasion, right, tax evasion. They
didn't get him for his criminal enterprise. They wasn't able
to pin anything else on him. It was about tax evasion,
(12:50):
something clear, something clear to the point, something that was
obvious and something that they couldn't you know, you you
just can't wash it away, you know, it doesn't matter
how much you polish that turred. It's still a turd.
You could put sprinkles on it, it doesn't make it
a cupcake. It's a turd, right, I mean, clear, obvious,
(13:13):
concise and to the point. Now. Granted, and we'll talk
about this later on in the show. But there are
far worse things that Obama did while he was president,
things that were treasonous activities, and we'll talk about it.
And I know that you know that there are far
worse things that we can go after him for. But
(13:37):
this right here, something that is clean cut, undeniable. They
already have the evidence, They've already found it, and you
know in in previous investigations from the FBI, they've already
done the leg work. Not the only problem with this
is they didn't go after Hillary Clinton. They didn't go
(13:59):
after anybody when whever they had the chance to do it,
and they should have. They should have. They should have
gone after Hillary Clinton, hands down, But unfortunately it was
still the deep state that was in charge of everything.
Trump hadn't had any opportunity to get rid of the
bad apples and put in people that were, you know,
(14:19):
American loving, patriotic individuals. He hadn't had that opportunity at
this point, so it's understandable at least in some degree,
then nothing ended up happening. But what I am hoping
for is that with the information that is coming out
(14:39):
that does show a clear and obvious oh what's the word.
I'm looking for, pattern of activities, you know, behavioral patterns
that maybe they'll finally be able to get something done.
Now do I actually think that Oboma is going to
(15:00):
be thrown in jail over mishandling of classified information? No?
I don't think so at all, not in any way,
shape or for him. I just don't. I'm just gonna
be honest with you. Would I like to see it? Eh?
I don't know, yes, But I mean that just raises
(15:22):
other kinds of problems too, I mean, it just does
you know. I would like to see it. But he
is a former president. He does have Secret Service protections.
But if we treat him in the same way that
they treated Trump, well, then absolutely we can do. We
(15:43):
can throw him in jail and we can yank his
Secret Service protection. I mean, come on, that's what they
tried to do with Trump. I mean, granted, two wrongs
don't make a right, and I'm not saying that it does,
and none of us thought that it was right whenever
they were trying to strip Trump of his you know,
(16:03):
executive privileges of having circre service protection and you know
the other things that go along with the office. I mean,
we were upset about that. I don't want to be
too faced like the Democrat Party is. I mean they're
pretty too faced obviously, But you can still attack them
in other ways. You really can. You can still go
(16:26):
after him legal, and that's what I want to see
happen again. I don't care about all these investigations. In
a matter of speaking, I don't. I'm just going to
be honest with you. I don't care. What I do
care about is actually seeing some type of charges, some
purp walks, you know, something I need to check out. Okay, good,
(16:48):
we're still going very very good. Anyway, Let's go ahead
and move on the next thing I want to talk about.
Oh wait, I got it back out of that. Okay,
there we go. Let's talk about. Oh nope, nope, nope,
I don't care about that one. Uh yeah, this is
about the Clinton email inquiry. This headline from justinnews dot
(17:12):
com more declassified document show comy swayed by mysterious intel
reports to end the Clinton Clinton email inquiry. And yeah,
I mean we all know that it was true, you know.
I mean, here's the thing. Whenever it comes to this
Clinton email thing, none of it held any water, right,
(17:32):
none of it made any sense, because what did they say?
You know, uh, yeah, she was guilty. You know, she
didn't mean to do it. It wasn't her intention. But
yet every single thing that she did right after having
her email and the hard drives subpoened was a her
(17:52):
destroying evidence. That's a crime. Outside of the mishandling and
classified information. All of her actions outside of that was
to destroy evidence. So this way she didn't get caught.
Regardless of the information that they found or didn't find,
doesn't really matter. Her actions supports the claim that she
knew exactly what it is that she was doing. Now
(18:15):
here's the other thing that they don't really want to
talk about in that law about the proper handling of
classified information. Your ignorance plays no part in determining whether
or not you are guilty, because ignorance is not a defense.
I don't know if any in of you out there
(18:36):
have ever been pulled over for speeding. I have been Okay,
very close to where I live, there is a town
called Rochester that is very well known as a speed
trap whenever I was younger. It's not quite so bad today,
but it was very well known as a speed trap.
If you got a speeding ticket, the first question out
(18:58):
of anybody's mouth was Rochester. I mean, you can go
four mile an hour over the speed limit and get
a ticket from a Rochester cop. Yeah. I mean it's
pretty stinking ridiculus. I mean, five mile an hour over
the post of speed limit is kind of standard, right,
I mean we all do it. I mean it's not
(19:18):
exactly breaking the law, it's bending the law. I mean
that's how we justified. I know I do it too.
You know I do it too. But any cop will
tell you, oh, I didn't know what the speed limit was.
I didn't see the sign, YadA yadah, blah blah. Everybody
has tried to get out of a ticket at least
(19:38):
once in their life. I know I have. Maybe I'm
just speaking for myself, but I know I have. But
every single traffic cop will tell you the same thing.
Your ignorance of the speed limit does not protect you
from receiving a ticket. When you violate the law, it's
not going to protect you. And the same thing goes
(20:00):
for this with the mishandling of classified information. Nowhere in
the statue does it give any type of leeway for ignorance.
It's not in there. I've looked, it's not in there.
Your ignorance is not going to set you free. So,
regardless of whether she intended to do it or not,
(20:23):
regardless of her intentions, the classified information will still found
on her hard drive, in her email account, various other places.
Her ignorance is not a defense, and they chose to
ignore the fact that she broke the law and go
down the rabbit hole. Now again, I mean, we all
(20:44):
know why. You know, Hillary Clinton said to herself that
if I go down, I'm taking others with me. And
everybody knew what that meant. Everybody knew the position that
she had, everybody knew what administration she worked in, everybody
knew what that meant. So, I mean, this whole entire
thing of what they're talking about is a smoke screen.
(21:04):
And since we're talking about it, let's go ahead and
move into this story from the Daily Wire. And I
got a couple other headlines about this as well, but
the headline from the Daily Wire is it's time to
put Barack Obama in handcuffs. Another article that I have
is this one from newsmaxs fed fleets to Newsmac Obama
(21:28):
coup on Trump known since twenty seventeen. Let me go
ahead and give you a quick breakdown of what was
going on. Basically, it was from the very beginning, and
there are timelines that I have seen on this to
really do paint a very damning picture from the Obama administration.
(21:55):
But from day one, there was an organized attempt to
remove President Trump from office. And this came directly from
the Obama administration, directly from Barack Hussein Obama. According to
(22:17):
this information that has come out, according to a briefing,
according to a U what's that word I'm looking for?
According to a closed door meeting, that even the the
(22:38):
the Russia, the Russia Gate, all that was fabricated from
the Obama administration, every last bit of it, because intelligence
agencies knew from day one that know's there's nothing here,
There's no there, there nothing at all, that this is
completely wrong, that Trump didn't do anything wrong. There is
(23:04):
no evidence. They don't even have the capabilities as the
report said, they don't have the intentions nor the capability
to you know, sway the election one way or the other.
They don't have the ability, they don't have the intentions
that that's there's no evidence whatsoever that this is even
true at all. And then the day after this closed
(23:25):
door meeting of top officials in the Obama administration, then
the reports came out, the the dossier came out. All
of the you know, top ranking members of these various CIA, FBI,
all these guys all got their story straight and said, oh,
(23:49):
Russia Gate, every one of them. This was a this
was a directed it was a intentional This was very
much a coup against the Trump administration, against President Trump himself.
(24:09):
And this more or less started in the later twenty sixteen,
definitely in twenty seventeen, before Obama even left office. That's
what the report is saying, again, what's going to happen?
(24:30):
I don't know about you, and I've I've talked about that.
If I've said it once, I've said it one hundred times.
I don't care about more investigations. I just don't. I
don't care about investigations. I don't want I don't care
about any more, you know, Senator House hearings. I don't care.
(24:54):
I don't care about any special counsels. I don't care
about any special investigators. I don't care about any of that. Again,
all this information that we're finding out isn't any anything
more than confirmation of what we already knew. If you've
been paying attention for any amount of time, if you've
already been listening to conservative talk shows, then you already
(25:18):
know what's going on. None of this is a surprise.
You know what what is most frustrating to me? I
want you to think back. Okay, Now, I'm I'm not
exceptionally old. I mean, I'm getting up there. I'm you know,
forty six. You know I'm getting up there. I mean
(25:38):
I was born before the you know, the the the
no good gracious, I was born before the formation of
the Department of Education. All right, So I go back aways.
I remember whenever students were taught how to think, not
(25:59):
what to think, all right. But I remember the days
when at least we thought that government functioned in a
more constitutional way, that it was we the people that
picked that our representatives actually represented us. You know, I
(26:21):
remember a time not that long ago even where at
least you know, if it wasn't true, they they tried
to make you think that it was true, regardless of
whether it was or not. But they wanted you to
believe that government functioned for the people. And now what
(26:47):
do we have? Investigation after investigation about corruption and more
and more corruption about the fourth branch of government. And no,
I'm not talking about we the people, because we may
go to you know, government schools, but we're not part
of the government. Yeah, some more background noise going on.
(27:18):
We may have known something was wrong, we may have
known it for some time, but here recently, you know,
just this past decade. Really they don't even care what
we know. And that's the problem because they think that
(27:39):
they are so insulated that they are so protected. It
doesn't matter what you know. They're going to stay in power.
That's their mindset, right, that's their mindset. It doesn't matter
what you know. So what if you know that the
CIA killed JFK, who cares? What are you going to
(28:01):
do about it? Are you going to change the apparatus?
Are you going to stop the money flow? Are you
going to do anything about it? No, you're not, because
what they're going to do is they're going to blow
blow smoke up your ass. They're going to pass a bill,
they're going to give you a little bit of money.
They're going to quote unquote take care of you. All
(28:22):
the while, we the people are too stupid to understand.
We're too stupid to ask the question of why is
the cheese free mice? Are too stupid to ask that question,
and they get caught in the mouse trap. We wonder
(28:44):
why there's issues? I mean, good grief, man, So the
entire Obama administration, Obama himself an organized coup against press.
Isn't it Trump? What's going to happen? I mean, really,
(29:06):
that's the question. And that's a big one. If you
ask me, that is a oh man, that's that's a
that's a problem, isn't it? People? Information that we already knew,
Stuff that's already been made public, And if you've paid
any any attention for any amount of time, then you
(29:28):
already know what's up. You already do. I wasn't surprised
about this, why because well I already knew. I already knew,
and since I already kind of touched base on it
a little bit earlier talking about the funding getting ready
getting rid of the of the money stream. Finally, not
(29:48):
that long ago, the Recisions Bill finally passed a Senate.
I am assuming by now it has been on the
President's desk and he was able to sign it a
measly what nine billion dollars that its primary purpose was
to get rid of a lot of aid funding or
US AID funding, and it was to shut down the
(30:12):
government money, the taxpayer dollars that was going to PBS
and NPR. I'm so excited about this, I really am.
Kind of yeah, kind of, I'm sorry, it's it's very
much of a kind of I mean, come on, with
all of the waste, the fraud and the abuse that
(30:32):
DOGE has found during its its tenure, the stuff that
we that we know about, with all of that dollars,
and the only thing that they can do is past
a teeny a teeny weenie, you know, like what one
hundred I think it's like one hundred and fifty billion
(30:55):
dollars that they have found that they have receipts on
from DOGE or maybe like eighty somebid billion, and the
only thing that they can do is cut that small
teeny portion of it nine point whatever billion dollars out
of the budget. That's all that they were able to
(31:17):
resend and give back to the American people. That's what
they want to ignore that, Oh, we're stealing money from
the federal government. No, you're giving it back to the
American people. It was stolen from us from the get go.
We deserve it. It's our money. I want it now.
So a huge hit to PBS and NPR. You know
(31:40):
what's also funny is that all these places, okay, PBS,
NPR planned parenthood. They would have you believe that the
that the the money that they get from the government
only represents like one percent of their entire budget. That's it.
That's what they would more or less have you believe.
(32:01):
And it's like, okay, fine, Then if if the money
that you get from government only represents one percent of
your you know, your your fiscal budget, your yearly fiscal budget,
then why does it matter if you're getting any government
money whatsoever? What's the big deal? Cut it off. The
(32:22):
American people shouldn't have to pay for an abortion. The
government people should not have to pay for you know,
bias media coming out of NPR and PBS. Then let's
stop the flow. Let's shut off the Spickett. Let's cut
the hose. Let's give the money back to the American people.
If it's only one percent of your budget, then you
(32:44):
won't miss it when it's gone, Right, You're not going
to miss it when it's gone. I was listening to Oh,
who was it? Oh name? Oh, I'm trying to remember
what his name is. I don't remember. If I remember,
(33:05):
i'll let you know. But I was listening to Yeah,
that guy that I don't remember his name, and he
was asked a question from a liberal and it was about,
you know, this person being upset about the government no
(33:25):
longer giving money to Planned Parenthood, and his response was simple.
I want to paraphrase all of this because I don't
remember his exact words, but his response was awesome. Right,
he said, let's ignore the fact that there is no
constitutional right to have an abortion. It doesn't exist. But
(33:45):
let's ignore that. Okay, let's go beyond that. Let's ignore it.
Let's just pretend for a minute that it's in there. Okay,
you're mad that funding stopped for you to have an abortion,
but let's talk about the other things that are in
(34:06):
the constitution. You have the freedom of speech, the federal
government isn't going to buy you podcast equipment for you
to exercise your freedom of speech. You have the freedom
of press. The government is not going to finance you
(34:26):
to make your own newspaper. You have the freedom of religion.
The government is not going to give you money to
finance you to build a new church. And you have
the Second Amendment, the right of the people to keep
in bear arms. The federal government is not going to
buy you a gun. What makes abortion so special that
(34:53):
the government has to pay for it when the government
does not pay you to exercise any of your or
other explicit freedoms. That's a damn good question, right, And again,
I really wish I could remember the guy's name. I
don't remember it. When I do, I will let you know.
(35:15):
I'm sure it'll it will occur to me later, and
I'll make a post. I'll do that, I really will.
But yeah, what makes abortion the killing of unborn babies?
I mean, let's just admit to it, that's what it is.
What makes that so special that the government has to
(35:38):
pay for it? Whenever the government doesn't pay for any
for the exercise of any other freedom, doesn't pay for it, Oh,
you may get a tax credit. But that's not the
same as government giving you money and funding it. I mean,
you still have to pay even with the tax credit.
You know, even with the tax exempt status, you still
(35:59):
have to pay for it. You just get your tax
dollars that went into it back on some things, not
every I mean, I've never received the tax cut for
me buying a gun. It's in the constitution, hell is biblical.
But I ain't gonna talk about that right now. So yeah,
(36:20):
let's go ahead and move on. So PBS NPR is
now recession no longer. There, I'm happy, I'm excited. Where
are we at on time? H thirty six minutes? Sweet? Nice?
All right, So let's uh, yeah, here's this one. So
(36:43):
we talked a little bit. No, we didn't. Actually, Oh wow,
So I got two more things that I'm wanting to
talk about. Okay, both of them regarding Epstein. So if
you are aware, and both of these stories are related,
so I've got no problem talking about them at the
same time. So over the weekend, there was a story
(37:03):
that broke from the Washington State Journal and they claimed
that they saw received whatever a letter that you know,
President Trump wrote twenty years ago. It was like a
birthday card that President Trump wrote twenty someid years ago
(37:26):
to Jeffrey Epstein celebrating his fiftieth birthday. And this thing
was so ridiculous, so stupid, so ridiculous that, I mean,
nobody on the right is believing this. And apparently there
(37:47):
was a crude picture that was drawn of it, that
was drawn of a woman on this that President Trump
supposedly did with like part of his signature of some
of the carpets on this drawn female body, naked, drawn
female body. There you go. This story is so ridiculous,
(38:12):
so stupid that even Elon Musk was like, yeah, this
this no uh uh. And nobody on the right is
believing this story at all. It is so stupid, it
is so ridiculous. And the and the thing that kind
of cracked me up was WSJ. They claimed that they
(38:36):
don't even have the uh you know, the birthday card,
the letter, they don't have it, and it's all based
off of hearsay. And they were told before they even
ran the story that oh, yeah, this story is false.
You might not want to print that never happened. You
(38:57):
may not want to print it. This is not in
any kind of language that Trump has used. I mean,
like I said, people, this thing sounds absolutely ridiculous. I
mean it does. I mean I heard it. I heard
the transcript of this letter of this birthday card, and
it sounds so stupid it's not even funny. I mean,
(39:20):
I don't care if you use Trump voice to read it.
It still sounds stupid. It just does. And because of
this backlash, one of the things that came out from
the Trump administration was that they are going to release
all of the documents that they can regarding the grand
jury from the Epstein trial. That's what they're going to do.
(39:45):
Now this I'm actually kind of excited about. I really am,
because what we are going to see is the testimony,
the introduction of all the evidence that we never seen
in the trial itself, and we're going to be able
to see what they had and why it wasn't allowed
(40:09):
in as evidence in the Epstein trial, why it was denied.
That's what we'll see. And here's one of the things too,
and this goes back to evidence that we know existed
because it was evidence that was brought up in the
(40:29):
grand jury that for some reason they said, no, you
can't use that as evidence, one of which being the
Black Book. We know they had it. We know they
had it. It was brought forth as evidence during the
grand jury and they were told, no, you can't use this.
(40:51):
Why not? That's what I want to know. Why not.
It's a pretty simple question, right, It's a pretty simple question.
This is one of them pieces of evidence that they
would have you believe doesn't exist anymore, even though we
know it does. We have the flight log of all
(41:14):
the people that have flown on the on the whatever
the name of the plane was going out to Lalite
Louita Epstein Island. We had the flight log. We can
see who was on the plane, when they were on
the plane, where they came from, and where they went.
(41:37):
We have this information. All the information that the FBI
took out of the house on Epstein Island, we have.
You know that there's all this stuff that was retrieved, notebooks,
hard drives, cameras, all kinds of stuff. I mean, they
spent days out there gathering evidence, putting things in boxes
(42:02):
and sending them mainland, all kinds of things. And yet
they would have you believe that the only two people
that were involved in the sex trafficking of over a
thousand girls was only Maxwell and Epstein. The only two
(42:23):
people from start to finish, the transportation, the trafficking, the
illicit acts. That's what they would have you believe that
it was only these two people and nobody else. They
have no credible evidence of any third parties involved. Nothing.
The only two people from start to finish that were
(42:45):
associated with these crimes at all was Epstein and Maxwell.
Even though we have testimony, affidavits of young girls that
were freed, they have testified that, yes, there were other
people involved. I mean, hell, the pilots were involved in this.
(43:10):
They were transported onto plane. Right, That's moving a minor
past state lines. That's sex trafficking. That's illegal, that's a crime.
But yet there's no evidence to see here. Do you
think Jeffrey Epstein drove his own vehicle? Do you think
he ever took one of these miners with him? Sex trafficking?
(43:33):
He was, you know, he was being accused. They found evidence.
Is that what you really think? Granted, outside of those
of us that really pay attention don't really care about
(43:57):
the Epstein list. I mean, that's a sad state, right,
I Mean, there's just there's so many people out there
that don't care, you know, like what I think I heard,
like somewhere around like ten percent, you know, maybe fourteen
on the high side of the of registered voters, maybe
(44:18):
even Republican registered voters that actually care have any interest
in the Epstein files. You want to know why I care?
Thousands of girls sex traffic. Why can't their voices be heard?
(44:40):
Do they not deserve justice? And outside of that, how
about the over one hundred thousand children of illegals that
were snuck into this country, that were caught, that were
(45:03):
allowed to go with somebody whenever they didn't even verify
who this person was. Over one hundred thousand children they
don't know where they're at, that were brought into this
country sex slaves, child labor, and nobody seems to care.
(45:27):
For the same reason. This is a travesty. It should
not be allowed. And yet because it's not our children,
it's not your child that was taken, it's not my
child that was taken, nobody seems to care. There was
(45:51):
a movie that was released and this was released a
while back ago by Angel Studios. Jim cavisl starred in it,
actor who played Jesus in Passion of the Christ. The
movie was called Sound of Silence. No, I'm sorry. Sound
of Freedom not Sound of Silence. That was a song,
good song, Sound of Freedom. And when this movie came out,
(46:16):
I wanted to see it. I liked the premise of
the show. I liked what it was talking about, the
raising awareness of sex trafficking, child sex trafficking. I liked
what the movie was doing its purpose. I like Jim Caviezel.
He's a hell of an actor. His screen presence is amazing.
(46:36):
He is a passionate man. It took me a while
before I was able to watch that movie, it really did,
because the subject matter is so infuriating, so heartbreaking. How
(47:03):
can you know that information sit on your hands and
do nothing. How can you watch that movie and not
want to do something about it. There's a lot of
information that's been coming out, a lot of things that
(47:25):
is nothing more than confirmation of things that we already knew.
Not that long ago, most every American would have been
outraged and furiated. They would have shown up in pitchforks
and torches demanding something be done. Now it's commonplace. Nobody
(47:46):
bats an eye. It may be shocking, but it's not surprising.
We just celebrated our two hundred and forty ninth anniversary
as Americans in this country, we threw tea in the
(48:13):
harbor over three percent. Where are we at now? What
have we been accepting out of government? We know how
things are supposed to be ran. And if you don't,
then you need to get out the Constitution. You need
(48:34):
to read the Bill of Rights, you need to read
the federalist papers, the anti federalist papers. You please educate yourself.
We know how it's supposed to be done. It's high
time we demand better from government. We need to. I'm
writing a series of books. The first in the series
(48:57):
is Knowing the Declaration of Independent I am two drafts
into it. I got one more draft to go through
and then just kind of polish it up a little bit,
put the front matter or the back matter, and then
the thing will be available over on audible. No, not audible.
I'm not reading the thing and putting it out there
(49:18):
on audible. But it'll be available on Kindle, It'll be
available even in paperback over on Amazon dot com. I'm
kind of excited about it, be honest with you, got
a series of books getting it put out there. Knowing
the Declaration of Independence, Knowing the Constitution and knowing the
Bill of Rights are going to be the first three
in the series that will be released, and the first
(49:41):
one should be released in the next month. I don't
know how long it's going to take me to do
all the editing of this thing, but holy crap, hopefully
I'll have it done by the end of by the
end of August, that's what my goal is at any rate,
and then the end of the year for knowing the
Constant and then before the fourth of July knowing the
(50:05):
UH Bill of Rights. And I'm probably even want to
talk about the Federalist papers and that as well. A
good comparison between the two. Asking you the question, what
does America look more like? The Bill of Rights or
the Ten Pillars of Communism side by side, you may
(50:26):
be surprised which one America actually more represents. I'll give
you a hint. It's not the Bill of Rights. Yeah, shocking, right, Yeah,
we don't. We don't have much in common with the UH,
with the Bill of Rights or the Constitution of the
United States of America. Instead, no, we have way more
(50:50):
in common with the Ten Pillars of Communism from the
Communist Manifesto. What a travesty, what a traves Anyway, That's
all I got for y'alls today. That is it's y'alls.
Have yourself a great one and I will see you
and the next one. This has been the Ho Ho Show.
For more information, you can head to the Ho hoshow
(51:12):
dot com and for the merchandise store, you can head
on over to stink pickle dot com. That is s
T I n K P I k l e dot com.
Until next time,
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.