July 24, 2025 • 45 mins
In today's episode, we are going to look a little deeper into the Trump letter hoax. We are also going to go a little deeper into the implications of the treasones activities of the Obama administration. We will also touch on the 3rd party option. Is it a good idea or suicide for the Republican party?
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Yes, Welcome to the show, grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida. So join us now if
we discuss news, politics, current events at so much more
so through the airwaves and strapped in as we do
the constitution because the three Bird broadcasting from weapinar saw
(00:36):
Production's mobile studio. Welcome to the Ho Host Show and
as always I'm your host, Ho Ho. So hey, y'all's
doing I hope you're doing good. I really do. So.
There's a couple of things. And by the way, again
today is an example of where not to park because
I am again in a rest area pretty darn close
(00:57):
to the interstate, so you are going to hear some
vehicles going by. There's not a lot I can do
about that. I do apologize, but there are some things
that I'm wanting to talk about. Some things that well,
a mistake that I had made on the last episode
where I was talking about the article that the drawing
(01:18):
came from that Donald Trump supposedly did even though the
whole thing has been debunked and it's like it didn't happen.
And yeah, I had said that that article came from
the what I say, Washington State Journal. That's not true.
It was at Washington State Journal. It was Wall Street
(01:41):
Journal ws JAN. How did I screw that up? I
don't know. I have no idea. I couldn't tell you.
But it was Wall Street Journal. That was the newspaper
that published that article. Even after that, it was you
know that they were told by the White House, that
(02:02):
they were told by Trump the you know, talking to
the owner. They knew that it wasn't true. They knew
that it was Bravo Sierra, but they decided to go
ahead and publish it anyway. And I found out some
more information about that. I really did, because I remember
seeing a picture I guess you can say, of the
(02:26):
article now here. Here's where it kind of gets interesting. Okay,
the Wall Street Journal said that they didn't have a
copy of the actual letter. You know, they didn't have
a copy of it, letter, postcard, whatever it was, birthday card,
I don't remember, but they didn't have an actual copy
of it. But what they had was basically a transcript
(02:50):
from somebody else who did have it. So it's completely
unconfirmed anyway, you know, that's why they they claim, like
you know, sources said, and that's what they're reporting on.
And you know, a lot of news organizations they do
things like that, trying to get around the whole deformation thing.
You know, we're making this claim based on what sources say.
(03:14):
They don't give up their sources, and there you go.
They just claim ignorance that oh, we had no idea,
we didn't mean to ruin this guy's reputation or whatever.
But that's that's their workaround. I mean, that really is
That's how all of these people do it. You know,
it's never then to say it. It's always sources say
(03:35):
sources that knows, sources from this, that and the other place.
You know, that's how they always try to get around it.
This time, I don't see them being able to get
around it because before the story even published, the White
House and Donald Trump said, oh yeah, by the way,
(03:56):
this is false. I mean not to mention. I mean,
all you gotta do is use a just a little
molecule of common sense to know that, oh, yeah, you know,
this might not be right, that this may be completely fabricated,
completely made up, because you know, like I said in
(04:16):
the last episode, the writing doesn't match Trump. He's never
used language like that, he's never done that, and no
history of it whatsoever. You know, when we're talking about
a guy that's been in the spotlight for a long time,
it's not like even twenty twenty two years ago, he
(04:38):
was an unknown commodity. He was known, people knew who
he was. And it doesn't sound like him, nor does
it sound like him in any you know it. He's
never sounded like that, you know. So, like I said,
it only takes a little bit of thought, a little
bit of analytical thinking, to go this thing is completely
(05:00):
we made up. And you know, ever since this whole thing,
you know, came out that it was like, you know
that they've been getting slammed left and right. Nobody's believing it.
The only people that are even giving it any type
of credibility at all are people on the left, and
even they're like, well, you know, I can't I know that, no,
(05:23):
uh uh. And I do remember seeing a picture of this.
I didn't give it any weight, I didn't give it
any credence. I figured the whole thing was, you know,
just kind of false anyway. But today I actually found
out where that image came from. And I had to
laugh whenever I seen this, because this image was actually
(05:48):
fabricated by Brendan Dilly, if you're familiar with him, the
Dilly Show, the Meme team, the Dilly three hundred, you know,
that's who made this. And then he posted it over
there on X and from there it just blew up.
I mean, holy cow, everybody is like, oh, is this
(06:10):
what it is? Wow? This thing looks absolutely fake. I
mean you can see you know where it was. You know,
the autograph was photoshopped on there. I mean, the whole
thing just looks ridiculous. And I mean just the thing
blew up from there, absolutely hilarious. And I mean, like
I said, whenever this thing first came out, I didn't
(06:30):
give it any credence. I remember seeing the picture, but
I really didn't give it any second thought. It was
just like, yeah, okay, I knew the thing was made
up anyway, so I really didn't look into it. I
didn't research it at all. I was just like, yeah,
this thing's full of crap anyway. But yeah, looking into
it a little bit more, it's like, oh, holy crap,
(06:52):
that's where that image came from. That made it so
much funny because Brendan Dilley did this as a troll.
You know, he was making a joke, and basically he
was making fun of the whole thing, you know, and
more or less what it amounted to was, you know,
this is what they're claiming is out there. You know,
a postcard, a birthday card from Donald Trump written to
(07:18):
Oh holy crap, that just like went up a lot,
but you know, but written to who's his face? Written
to Jeffrey Epstein. And that's where this whole thing came from.
And he's like, Okay, well, if it's actually out there,
I'm going to go ahead and just kind of make
(07:40):
something up of what it would look like, you know,
kind of a you know, if it actually was real,
this is what it would actually look like. And that's
what he did. And him making this just really took
the absurdity of what the Wall Street Journal was actually
claiming to a whole new level. And that's that's what
it amounted to. It's like, dude, if this is a
(08:03):
true story, this is what it would look like. And
this looks completely stupid. It doesn't make any sense. It
doesn't match, you know, the writings of Trump. This doesn't
match anything of what he would say. This isn't how
he talks, this isn't how he writes, this whole thing
is completely ridiculous, and that's what he was pointing out.
(08:26):
You know, that's why he wasn't trying to say that
this is true and this is it. He was making
fun of it. And why people didn't catch onto this
is beyond me. I mean, whenever I seen it, I
didn't make I paid it no, never mind. I mean
I really didn't. You know, I seen the image before
(08:48):
I even did the show, you know, the last episode.
I seen the image then, but even still, the whole
thing made no sense. I didn't believe it at all,
and I really didn't even look at the image. But
after looking at it, oh wow, that's hilarious. It really
(09:10):
really is. That was absolutely hilarious. But here's one of
the things too. Now we all know that this type
of stuff happens, we all do. And what came out
about the same timeframe that this Wall Street Journal article
came out, Well, that is this information about the you know,
(09:38):
the coupe. I mean, I talked about this during the
last episode too, but you know, I got to put
more gravity behind it, because I really didn't do it
justice by talking about the implications, by talking about the
actual gravity of this because this really is huge, and
(10:01):
of course I'm talking about Obama orchestrating the you know,
the a coup from the highest levels of government, you know,
from the President of the United States of America. Now,
if you've paid attention to the news at all, you
may have a little bit of an idea on the timeframe. Okay,
Now I don't remember the time frame right off the
(10:21):
top of my head, I really don't, but it was
a you know, at first in this and we're talking
about like early early December is what we're talking like
the first week of December, okay, because the the the
presidential briefing, you know, they came out and said that no,
(10:43):
you know that that there's no you know, there's no links,
there's no nothing putting together Russia or President or you know.
At there it wasn't President Trump, it was President elect
Donald Trump. And this was you know, December twenty twenty sixteen,
(11:08):
I think, yeah, twenty sixteen. And then all of a sudden,
they yanked that information out of the daily briefing. They
had some type of a meeting with him in top
cabinet officials, Obama and top cabinet officials, and then next thing,
(11:30):
you know, and now we're getting into you know, December
seventh and whatnot. That's whenever all of this stuff came out,
and they basically said that they put this information together
at the request of the president. Then Obama, Barack Obama
(11:52):
is the one who ordered these things to be put together,
and he ordered this and he even ordered you know,
the the placement of the uh the dossier that was
actually paid for by Hillary Clinton. You know, there's a
lot of ties into this. But what this is basically
(12:13):
saying is this was not a peaceful transition of power.
In fact, there was no transition of power. If you
guys remember, you know, during Trump's first presidency, you had
you know, so many different people that were like, oh, well,
you know, they hid information from Trump. They didn't and
(12:36):
you know, they didn't let him in on all of
these security briefings. You know, they kind of kept kept
things hidden from him. I mean, this is information that
came out and there was even talks at the you know,
like from I forget who who the cabinet member was,
but there was even talks that if something happens like oh,
(13:00):
let's say Trump order some kind of a strike on whomever,
I forget who it was at the time, but they
were like, don't do it beforehand, you have to go
through me. And that right there is another example of
a coup. That is an example of treason. That's exactly
(13:21):
what that is. And even the acts that Barack Obama
took with putting together Dotsier and everything else in order
to undermine Trump on the way into the office and
make his first term very much of a nothing burger,
taking the knees out from underneath them to where he
wouldn't be able to accomplish his goals. That's what that was.
(13:44):
It was treasonous activity. It was treason. It was started
under Barack Obama, continued under Biden, and so many different
people all along the way has spoken about them going
(14:05):
after Trump, and I'm not I'm not even talking with
like all the law fair and whatnot that happened during
Biden's presidents. I mean, that's bad enough, but with the
you know, just how they treated him, you know, not
including him in security briefings, not letting him, you know,
in on what was actually going on, so that this
(14:27):
way he can make a fully informed, educated decision, but
with also saying that no, if he orders this, you're
not going to do it first check in with me.
That's treason. I mean the president, like him or hate him,
he is the commander in chief. He is the one
(14:49):
in charge the h n I see as they say
he is, like him or hate him, that's who he was.
And so many from people in the military, in his cabinet,
you know, people that were you know, hangovers from I
(15:09):
mean hangovers not exactly the right word, but you know
people that were just held over from the Obama administration.
You know, people that were just in the position and
Donald Trump decided to go ahead and keep them or
at least, you know, kind of used them for a time.
So much stuff has come out over the past you
(15:31):
know what eight years. Yeah, over the past eight years,
so much stuff has come out as far as what
happened during the early days of his presidency, and it
was treason from the highest levels of government. It was
(15:52):
not a peaceful transition. It was treason. Now I know
what everybody's thinking, because I'm thinking it too, you know,
I'm very much thinking it. And that is what are
we going to see as far as people being held
accountable for what they did? And like I had pointed
(16:14):
out yesterday or the day before whenever the last episode was.
As I pointed out, then I don't really see anything happening.
I'm just I'm just being honest with you. I don't
see anything happening. I don't see anybody being held to account.
I really don't. And it's sad. It's frustrating, it really is,
(16:37):
because these are This is activity that should not be allowed.
It should not be tolerated. It really shouldn't be I mean,
this is just it's treason, Okay, it's absolutely treason. Now.
The reason that nothing's going to happen is because it's
(16:58):
the Republicans that are doing on it. I mean, granted Biden, no,
I'm sorry, not Biden. Trump may have the intestinal fortitude
to do something about it. But it's not just him, right,
I Mean, that's not the only person that we're actually
worried about. I Mean we have you know, so many
(17:19):
Republicans that are you know, in Congress that you know,
they're the ones that are doing some of the you know,
doing some of the investigations, you know, having you know,
subpoenas and talking to people and whatnot. You've got Pambondi,
You've got you know, the FBI and yeah, they may
be investigating stuff, they may be digging up information, and
(17:42):
that's where we've gotten all the information that we have
right now into this is from the FBI with documents
that they've been able to uncover and has pointed to,
you know, some of the people that are involved in this.
But either way, you still have that whole accountability thing
(18:04):
because this is treason, This is wrong, This should not
be tolerated. These are things that are had that happens
in a Banana republic, and not even a Banana republic.
I mean, this is something you would expect to hear
coming out of you know, uh, Cuba. This is stuff
you would expect to come here coming out of Russia,
(18:28):
not out of the United States of America. I mean,
this is ridiculous. I mean, you know, and this is
something that I even talked about yesterday. It's like, dude,
you know, not that long ago things made sense, right,
you know, not that long ago we thought that government
was operating in the people's best interests. We didn't know
(18:52):
just how bad things were, and things have been pretty
bad for quite some time. We just didn't know it.
And really for the past what forty fifty you know,
fifty years at least, things have been pretty bad. We
just didn't know it. They covered it up. And now
(19:13):
we've reached a point where the deep state doesn't care
if you know what it's up to, because they have
grown in power so much that they can protect themselves.
And that's where we're at today. Is anything going to happen?
(19:33):
I don't know, and I don't you know, And I'll
even rest on what I had said on the previous
episode that I don't see anything happening to Barack Obama
outside of you know, him more or less getting I mean,
not necessarily arrested. I mean maybe arrested. I'd be nice
if he gets arrested, but it would probably be one
(19:54):
of them things that he's under house arrest. I mean,
he ain't going to prison. I mean, let's be honest.
And he wouldn't go to prison for the same reason
that they wouldn't put Donald Trump in present unless they
actually took a Secret Service protection away from him, which
if you didn't like the idea of them doing it
to Trump, then it wouldn't be a good idea for
them to do it to Barack Obama. It just wouldn't
(20:16):
be regardless of whether you like him or you hate him,
it doesn't really matter. Yes, who is treason us? But
he still deserves Secret Service protection because there are things
that he knows that should not fall into the wrong hands.
I mean, let's be honest. That's why former presidents get
Secret Service protection. They learn things, things that you just
(20:40):
don't want other nations finding out about. So I get that.
Do I think that Barack Obama should be arrested. Yes,
they arrested Trump. Why not arrest Obama? And Obama is
as it looks right now, allegedly want to throw that
word in there, but as it looks right now, as
(21:04):
per the evidence that was uncovered by the FBI, treason.
Do I think he should be arrested? Yes? Do I
think Biden should be arrested? Yes? And many others to do.
You know, the list of people that were part of
(21:24):
this conspiracy is pretty big. Do I think they should
be arrested? Absolutely? Do I think they should be tried? Absolutely?
Do I think they should be found guilty? You bet
you do. I think they should go to prison. Well,
(21:50):
with the people on the higher ups, like Barack, like Biden, No,
that's not really feasible to send into prison it's just
not house arrest. Okay, absolutely their own house. No, I
(22:11):
wouldn't put him in their own house. I'd more or
less put him in some type of a boarding house. Why,
you know, why, why would you want to arrest somebody,
penalize them for doing bad things, and allow them to
go in their house. I mean, you know, Barack Obama
has a lot of money. Biden has well, at least
(22:34):
he had a lot of money speaking arrangements and everything
else that he did. Absolutely, he had a lot of money.
There was a lot of things in his house. He
can pick a house which one he wants to serve
his time in, which shouldn't be any small number. Do
I think he should be able to go to his
own house where he's got all the amenities that he
(22:59):
could possibly ask for. No, No, what kind of punishment
is that? I mean the worst thing about that is well, no,
I can't even say that about the worst thing, because
I mean, he can still do speaking arrangements. He would
just have to do them on zoom call. Give him
(23:20):
or put him up in a small apartment, a single
room at a boarding house, a halfway house, something like that.
That's what you should do to the guy, that's what
you should That's exactly what you should do to Barack Obama,
to Biden, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton, That's exactly
(23:42):
what you should do to these people. Arrest them, convict
them based off of the evidence. House arrested at a
boarding house, limited internet at excess. Why should they be
(24:02):
able to make money off of what they have done,
the laws that they have broken, allegedly, the treason they committed.
Why should they be able to get rich off of
causing irreputable, irreputable doing harm to this country? Why should
(24:29):
they be awarded for that or rewarded for that? No?
Hell no, I mean, I'm just being honest with you.
House arrest, boarding house, not their own house, a boarding house,
a halfway house, something like that. Keep them together. Hell,
I don't even care if they do that. But reward
(24:52):
them for the activity that they did, know, because that's
why house arrests under any house. You know that. Okay,
he's going to go to Martha's vineyard? Is that really
a bad thing? Is that really a you know, you
need to sit down and think about what you did.
There's consequences to actions that. No, No, that's not a
punishment there's not a punishment at all. I mean, I
(25:18):
agree that they need to do something absolutely, I don't
care who it is. They need to do something. Something
needs to be done, and they need to do something
that is extreme enough to be a deterrent so other
people don't try to follow in their footsteps, right. I mean,
(25:40):
that's why you have punishment for crime in the first place.
That's why the punishment is supposed to fit the crime.
It's not supposed to be a smack on the wrist. No,
how was that a deterrent? It isn't. The punishment needs
to be bad enough to where people don't dare do
it again. People don't dare following their footstuffs. I mean,
(26:03):
the last ten years, if it's taught me anything, it's
that these people are corrupt and you are never going
to stop the bad actors from doing bad things if
you don't punish them for doing it. If all you're
going to do is do investigation after investigation, If all
(26:27):
you're going to do is look into it, it doesn't
matter what you uncover, but you don't do anything about it,
it's pointless. It is a waste of time, it is
a waste of money, and it is. It is stupid
to do that kind of stuff, you know, and I
don't even care about statute of limitations. Did that stop
them from going after President Trump? Noah did not, because
(26:50):
they rewrote the rules. We don't need to rewrite the rules.
We don't need to rewrite the rules. This is one
of the things that even was talked about, what this
whole treason things, having these misdemeanors and whatnot that they
have done for a long time. You can put a
(27:11):
lot of you know, going back, even back beyond the
statute of limitations, as long as it proves what's that
word I'm looking for, If it proves a pattern, that's
what it is. If it proves that they have a
pattern of doing these kind of things, you can go
back as long as that pattern is present. You don't
(27:34):
need to stay within the statute of limitations. You can
bring this stuff up. You might not be able to
convict him of it, but follow the law. Absolutely. There's
still a lot of things they can do and a
lot of things that they still should do. Absolutely. Yeah,
(27:58):
those are just a couple of things that I wanted
to bring up talk about a little bit more, a
little bit more in depth, so that this way you
had a little bit better of an idea of just
how serious this actually is. You don't think about it
this whole you know, letter that was written to Jeffrey Epstein,
And what was the other thing that came out around
(28:19):
the same timeframe, You know that that last weekend there
was something else that came out to I don't I
don't remember what it was. But the left is notorious
for doing this kind of thing. They really are. They
are notorious for giving you something ridiculous in order to
(28:39):
take your mind off of the important thing that actually happened.
They brought up this whole picture doodle that Trump did
in order to clog up what people was talking about,
so that this way they weren't talking about the thing
(29:02):
that mattered. And what's the thing that matters? Barack Obama
having information dug up on him treasonous activities to try
to cripple Trump's effectiveness during his first term. And I've
(29:22):
even heard something else that I mean, I'm going to
be honest with you, I don't agree with it, But
the argument can still be made that President Trump can
use this as grounds by which to run in twenty
twenty eight. Yeah, now I'm going to be honest with you,
(29:45):
I don't I don't agree with this. I really don't.
Because he was still elected, he still served his term.
Regardless of you know, the coup, the military coup and
how they you know, cut the legs out from underneath them.
That still doesn't change the fact that he did serve
a first term. And I, you know, I really don't
(30:08):
think that would be a good idea. I mean, yeah,
would it be nice, absolutely, you know, but I don't
think they should go ahead and do it. I really don't.
And I don't even know as if Trump would want
to go what would want to stay in office for
an additional four years, you know, into twenty thirty two.
(30:28):
I don't think Donald Trump would want to would want
to do a third term. I mean, that's that's kind
of ridiculous, it really is. You know, show them how
things should be done, show them how, you know, show
the people what conservatism actually looks like. Allow him to
(30:51):
clean house, allow him to shine a light on the Republicans,
the ones that are rhinos, get them out of office.
And then in twenty twenty eight, you have so many
people on the Republican side of the aisle the maga
people that are over there that could step in and
(31:14):
be the next president. I mean, we've got so many
people that could do it, right, I mean, yeah, you
still got Ron DeSantis, regardless of how you think of him.
Whenever he you know, was trying to be president, he is.
He does a great job in Florida, and I think
(31:35):
he could do a great job as president. You know,
I did vote for him during the primary in twenty No,
not twenty sixteen. I voted for Ted Cruz in the
primary twenty sixteen. Oh good grief. What what year was that,
twenty twenty No, not twenty twenty, must have been twenty
(31:55):
twenty four. That yeah, yeah, Ron DeSantis, you know, twenty
twenty four. Yeah. I mean I think he can do
a good job. He's proven himself worthy. I mean you
look at what he's done in Florida. Excellent candidate. And
of course, I mean you have the person who you know,
Vance jd. Vance would be a great president. You know,
(32:19):
you look at what he does, you look at how
he talks. I mean he's almost like a you know,
like a like a junior Trump in a matter of speaking.
Kind of cracks me up. But another person that I
think would be a great candidate, and that's Donald Trump Junior.
And I don't like the idea of you know, families
(32:41):
doing this. You know, we had enough Bushes in office.
There's other there's been other prominent families. I don't like
that idea. I really don't. But Donald Trump Junior seems
to be more conservative than in his dad. And that's
(33:02):
saying something right, and that's ignoring some of the other
people that's in the the Trump family. I mean, let's
just say, after President Trump we get eight years of Vans.
How awesome would that be? Right, That'd be pretty stinking awesome.
(33:23):
And then who else she got in the lineup? There's
so many, you know, who do who do the Democrats have?
I mean, really, who do the Democrats have? Kamala Harris
that's a joke. Bernie Sanders is getting way too old
for the for the you know, for the presidency, Alexandria A. Cassio, Cortez,
(33:47):
el hand Omar. I mean, them are some of the
people that would be you know, possibly front runners. Of course,
you got JB. Prisker, Gavin Newsom, other people like that,
people that have torn up and destroyed the states that
they are in the states that they are over and
the states that they govern. I mean, they have name recognition,
but would would you really want to I mean, dude,
(34:09):
as somebody who lives in Illinois JB. Prisker, Yeah, no,
the guys a train waiting to happen. I'm sure the
same thing could be said about Gavin Newsom. Who in
the right mind on a national scale, seeing how these
people have run their own states, who in the right
(34:32):
mind would vote for them on the national stage, Who
in the right mind wild vote for Alexandria Cassio Cortez.
I mean, good grief, dude, really no, God no, Please know,
the Democrats don't have anybody in the bullpen. The Republicans, however, do.
(34:56):
But what's more pressing on the Republican side isn't necessarily
forming a third party. I know that it sounds good.
I know it sounds good. I mean I've even talked
about it before myself in the past. But what's more
important than trying to start a third party? Because i mean,
(35:17):
let's face it, in the short term, all you're doing
is giving votes to the Democrats. That's all you're going
to do. That's all you're doing. That's it I mean really,
I mean, think about it, Ross purot. What happened Bill
Clinton was elected. He took just enough votes away from
(35:39):
the Republicans that the Democrat was able to win. And
that's what would happen. That's why I say it's a
bad idea. What do we need to do instead? Reclaim
the Republican Party, Get rid of the rhino Republicans. Get
(36:01):
rid of them in the primary. That's it. Get people
who are maggi Republicans, promote the ever loving hell out
of them, make them to where they are a formidable
(36:23):
not contestant. That's not what I'm you know, a formidable rival.
Give them as much airway as you possibly can, give
them enough interviews on various conservative talk shows. Conservative podcasters
utilize social media, get their name, get their face, get
(36:43):
their platform out there, and make them a force to
be reckoned with. And get rid of the rhinos. That's
what we need to do. We need to not start
a third party, but reclaim the Republican Party for what
they are supposed to be, an opposition party to the Democrats, conservatism.
(37:09):
That's what the Republican Party was supposed to be, that's
what it was founded as and I believe, if I
am remembering correctly, Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president.
That's what we need to do. Not start a third party,
(37:31):
but reclaim this one. And if the person who lives
in your district isn't Maga, if they are a Rhino,
then get somebody else in there. Instead of running on
a third party, run as a Republican and let them
(37:56):
know who and what you are, what you stand for.
Do the hard work. That's the only way we're going
to get rid of the rhinos. And that's due the
hard work. That's it. That's what we need to do.
Not start a third party because the only thing that's
going to do in the short term, especially in the
short term, and then who cares about the long term
because you've destroyed every chance you have of being relevant.
(38:19):
But all you're going to do is hand it over
to the Democrats. And why in the hell would you
want to do that now, especially now? Why would you
want to do that to them? Why would you want
to do what the Republicans do? Why would you want
to do what the Cubs do on a yearly basis,
(38:40):
snatch defeat from the hands of victory. That's what happens.
That's what Republicans are known for doing. Do they seize
the moment, No, they don't seize the moment. They snatched
the defeat from the hands of victory. That's what the
Republicans are known for doing. They may love being in office,
(39:04):
but they do not know what to do with power.
And the sad thing is is because there's too many
of them that are righting. No Republicans that actually want
what the Democrats want. They want the same thing. Get
rid of them, run them out of office, run them
(39:28):
out of DC, get them out of there, put people
in their place that are truly maga and then maybe
we can finally get some stuff done. I mean, I
know the Recisions package passed barely. I mean it went
down to the wire, it really did, and it passed
(39:49):
by a very slim majority. It very much did nine
billion dollars and they couldn't even get everything in there
passed across the finish line. Nine billion dollars. This is
a stupid The whole system is corrupt. We need to
do it. We can to fix it. But why would
(40:11):
we want to hand victory over to the Democrats. Whenever
the Democrats are in shambles right now? They really are.
I Like I said, they got nothing, They got nobody
in the bench, a bunch of people that I mean,
how well do you really think Gavin Newsom would do
(40:33):
on the on the national stage? How good do you
really think JB. Pretzker would do on the national stage?
How well do you think AOC would do on the
national stage. I'll hand Omar Rashida to leave. How how
(40:55):
good do you really think these people would do on
national stage? I don't think they do very good at all.
I really don't. I mean, Ilhan Omar is out because
she's not a natural born citizen, but AOC, Gavin Newsom, JB. Pritzker,
(41:24):
how good do you actually think any of them would
do on the national stage. Why would you want to
start a third party to give Democrats a victory? I
wouldn't want to do that, not at all. What MAGA
needs to do is quit messing around, actually put up
(41:50):
good MAGA candidates to get these Rhino Republicans out there.
Maybe if we actually have somebody that is MAGA and
maybe then we could even go to not just battleground
states but red states. No I'm sorry, not red states,
Blue states, Democrat controlled states, and maybe we could actually
(42:12):
put up a fight. Not just put up a fight,
but when how awesome would that be to turn California
from a bright blue state into a bright red state.
I'd even settle for purple. I mean, I can tell
(42:33):
you this living in Illinois. You look at the map.
Illinois's a red state. It's only a couple hot spots
to vote for JB. Prisker. If we actually had a
constitutional form of government here in Illinois, There's no way
(42:56):
in hell JB. Prisker would have actually gotten elected. But
how awesome would it be in a state like Illinois.
In California where you have so many people outside the
metropolitan areas that don't want JB. Pritzker, They're not Democrat.
They we are Republican down here, I mean, and I'm
(43:18):
sure that California is a lot the same way. You know,
outside of the you know, the cities, the hotspots, the
rest of the state, if it's anything like Illinois, is
probably republican. I've not actually looked at a map over
in California. I've not looked at a map of New
York as far as how the rest of the state
(43:40):
outside of like you know New York City, outside of
LA some of the others outside of Chicago, I know
how they are, But these other states, I don't know.
I've never actually paid that much attention. So if you're
out there in these other states, or maybe you've looked
at it, let me know, send me an email. Ho
(44:01):
Ho at the ho Ho show dot com. I'm actually
kind of curious to know. Anyway. That's all I got
for y'alls today. I just wanted to kind of dive
a little deeper into a couple of the topics that
we talked about yesterday to really let you in on
this is worse than you may have originally thought. This
is really bad. The optics on this is horrible. And
(44:24):
the real question is are we actually going to see
anybody being held accountable for what they did? And I
truly do hope so, because if you're not going to
do anything about it, why in the hell are you
going to shine a light on it? It makes no sense.
It's a waste of time, it's a waste of money.
(44:46):
Instead of investigating, what we need to start doing is
arresting and prosecuting. That's what we need to see. Now.
There's people that are talking that we are going to
see that, but I'm going to warn you right now
hold your breath. You may be holding it for quite
a long time. Anyway, y'all, have yourself a good one
and I'll see you in the next one. This has
(45:09):
been the ho Host Show. For more information, you can
head to the Ho Hosshow dot com and for the
merchandise store, you can head on over to stink pickle
dot com. That is s t i n K p
I k l e dot com. Until next time,
Yes, Welcome to the show, grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida. So join us now if
we discuss news, politics, current events at so much more
so through the airwaves and strapped in as we do
the constitution because the three Bird broadcasting from weapinar saw
(00:36):
Production's mobile studio. Welcome to the Ho Host Show and
as always I'm your host, Ho Ho. So hey, y'all's
doing I hope you're doing good. I really do. So.
There's a couple of things. And by the way, again
today is an example of where not to park because
I am again in a rest area pretty darn close
(00:57):
to the interstate, so you are going to hear some
vehicles going by. There's not a lot I can do
about that. I do apologize, but there are some things
that I'm wanting to talk about. Some things that well,
a mistake that I had made on the last episode
where I was talking about the article that the drawing
(01:18):
came from that Donald Trump supposedly did even though the
whole thing has been debunked and it's like it didn't happen.
And yeah, I had said that that article came from
the what I say, Washington State Journal. That's not true.
It was at Washington State Journal. It was Wall Street
(01:41):
Journal ws JAN. How did I screw that up? I
don't know. I have no idea. I couldn't tell you.
But it was Wall Street Journal. That was the newspaper
that published that article. Even after that, it was you
know that they were told by the White House, that
(02:02):
they were told by Trump the you know, talking to
the owner. They knew that it wasn't true. They knew
that it was Bravo Sierra, but they decided to go
ahead and publish it anyway. And I found out some
more information about that. I really did, because I remember
seeing a picture I guess you can say, of the
(02:26):
article now here. Here's where it kind of gets interesting. Okay,
the Wall Street Journal said that they didn't have a
copy of the actual letter. You know, they didn't have
a copy of it, letter, postcard, whatever it was, birthday card,
I don't remember, but they didn't have an actual copy
of it. But what they had was basically a transcript
(02:50):
from somebody else who did have it. So it's completely
unconfirmed anyway, you know, that's why they they claim, like
you know, sources said, and that's what they're reporting on.
And you know, a lot of news organizations they do
things like that, trying to get around the whole deformation thing.
You know, we're making this claim based on what sources say.
(03:14):
They don't give up their sources, and there you go.
They just claim ignorance that oh, we had no idea,
we didn't mean to ruin this guy's reputation or whatever.
But that's that's their workaround. I mean, that really is
That's how all of these people do it. You know,
it's never then to say it. It's always sources say
(03:35):
sources that knows, sources from this, that and the other place.
You know, that's how they always try to get around it.
This time, I don't see them being able to get
around it because before the story even published, the White
House and Donald Trump said, oh yeah, by the way,
(03:56):
this is false. I mean not to mention. I mean,
all you gotta do is use a just a little
molecule of common sense to know that, oh, yeah, you know,
this might not be right, that this may be completely fabricated,
completely made up, because you know, like I said in
(04:16):
the last episode, the writing doesn't match Trump. He's never
used language like that, he's never done that, and no
history of it whatsoever. You know, when we're talking about
a guy that's been in the spotlight for a long time,
it's not like even twenty twenty two years ago, he
(04:38):
was an unknown commodity. He was known, people knew who
he was. And it doesn't sound like him, nor does
it sound like him in any you know it. He's
never sounded like that, you know. So, like I said,
it only takes a little bit of thought, a little
bit of analytical thinking, to go this thing is completely
(05:00):
we made up. And you know, ever since this whole thing,
you know, came out that it was like, you know
that they've been getting slammed left and right. Nobody's believing it.
The only people that are even giving it any type
of credibility at all are people on the left, and
even they're like, well, you know, I can't I know that, no,
(05:23):
uh uh. And I do remember seeing a picture of this.
I didn't give it any weight, I didn't give it
any credence. I figured the whole thing was, you know,
just kind of false anyway. But today I actually found
out where that image came from. And I had to
laugh whenever I seen this, because this image was actually
(05:48):
fabricated by Brendan Dilly, if you're familiar with him, the
Dilly Show, the Meme team, the Dilly three hundred, you know,
that's who made this. And then he posted it over
there on X and from there it just blew up.
I mean, holy cow, everybody is like, oh, is this
(06:10):
what it is? Wow? This thing looks absolutely fake. I
mean you can see you know where it was. You know,
the autograph was photoshopped on there. I mean, the whole
thing just looks ridiculous. And I mean just the thing
blew up from there, absolutely hilarious. And I mean, like
I said, whenever this thing first came out, I didn't
(06:30):
give it any credence. I remember seeing the picture, but
I really didn't give it any second thought. It was
just like, yeah, okay, I knew the thing was made
up anyway, so I really didn't look into it. I
didn't research it at all. I was just like, yeah,
this thing's full of crap anyway. But yeah, looking into
it a little bit more, it's like, oh, holy crap,
(06:52):
that's where that image came from. That made it so
much funny because Brendan Dilley did this as a troll.
You know, he was making a joke, and basically he
was making fun of the whole thing, you know, and
more or less what it amounted to was, you know,
this is what they're claiming is out there. You know,
a postcard, a birthday card from Donald Trump written to
(07:18):
Oh holy crap, that just like went up a lot,
but you know, but written to who's his face? Written
to Jeffrey Epstein. And that's where this whole thing came from.
And he's like, Okay, well, if it's actually out there,
I'm going to go ahead and just kind of make
(07:40):
something up of what it would look like, you know,
kind of a you know, if it actually was real,
this is what it would actually look like. And that's
what he did. And him making this just really took
the absurdity of what the Wall Street Journal was actually
claiming to a whole new level. And that's that's what
it amounted to. It's like, dude, if this is a
(08:03):
true story, this is what it would look like. And
this looks completely stupid. It doesn't make any sense. It
doesn't match, you know, the writings of Trump. This doesn't
match anything of what he would say. This isn't how
he talks, this isn't how he writes, this whole thing
is completely ridiculous, and that's what he was pointing out.
(08:26):
You know, that's why he wasn't trying to say that
this is true and this is it. He was making
fun of it. And why people didn't catch onto this
is beyond me. I mean, whenever I seen it, I
didn't make I paid it no, never mind. I mean
I really didn't. You know, I seen the image before
(08:48):
I even did the show, you know, the last episode.
I seen the image then, but even still, the whole
thing made no sense. I didn't believe it at all,
and I really didn't even look at the image. But
after looking at it, oh wow, that's hilarious. It really
(09:10):
really is. That was absolutely hilarious. But here's one of
the things too. Now we all know that this type
of stuff happens, we all do. And what came out
about the same timeframe that this Wall Street Journal article
came out, Well, that is this information about the you know,
(09:38):
the coupe. I mean, I talked about this during the
last episode too, but you know, I got to put
more gravity behind it, because I really didn't do it
justice by talking about the implications, by talking about the
actual gravity of this because this really is huge, and
(10:01):
of course I'm talking about Obama orchestrating the you know,
the a coup from the highest levels of government, you know,
from the President of the United States of America. Now,
if you've paid attention to the news at all, you
may have a little bit of an idea on the timeframe. Okay,
Now I don't remember the time frame right off the
(10:21):
top of my head, I really don't, but it was
a you know, at first in this and we're talking
about like early early December is what we're talking like
the first week of December, okay, because the the the
presidential briefing, you know, they came out and said that no,
(10:43):
you know that that there's no you know, there's no links,
there's no nothing putting together Russia or President or you know.
At there it wasn't President Trump, it was President elect
Donald Trump. And this was you know, December twenty twenty sixteen,
(11:08):
I think, yeah, twenty sixteen. And then all of a sudden,
they yanked that information out of the daily briefing. They
had some type of a meeting with him in top
cabinet officials, Obama and top cabinet officials, and then next thing,
(11:30):
you know, and now we're getting into you know, December
seventh and whatnot. That's whenever all of this stuff came out,
and they basically said that they put this information together
at the request of the president. Then Obama, Barack Obama
(11:52):
is the one who ordered these things to be put together,
and he ordered this and he even ordered you know,
the the placement of the uh the dossier that was
actually paid for by Hillary Clinton. You know, there's a
lot of ties into this. But what this is basically
(12:13):
saying is this was not a peaceful transition of power.
In fact, there was no transition of power. If you
guys remember, you know, during Trump's first presidency, you had
you know, so many different people that were like, oh, well,
you know, they hid information from Trump. They didn't and
(12:36):
you know, they didn't let him in on all of
these security briefings. You know, they kind of kept kept
things hidden from him. I mean, this is information that
came out and there was even talks at the you know,
like from I forget who who the cabinet member was,
but there was even talks that if something happens like oh,
(13:00):
let's say Trump order some kind of a strike on whomever,
I forget who it was at the time, but they
were like, don't do it beforehand, you have to go
through me. And that right there is another example of
a coup. That is an example of treason. That's exactly
(13:21):
what that is. And even the acts that Barack Obama
took with putting together Dotsier and everything else in order
to undermine Trump on the way into the office and
make his first term very much of a nothing burger,
taking the knees out from underneath them to where he
wouldn't be able to accomplish his goals. That's what that was.
(13:44):
It was treasonous activity. It was treason. It was started
under Barack Obama, continued under Biden, and so many different
people all along the way has spoken about them going
(14:05):
after Trump, and I'm not I'm not even talking with
like all the law fair and whatnot that happened during
Biden's presidents. I mean, that's bad enough, but with the
you know, just how they treated him, you know, not
including him in security briefings, not letting him, you know,
in on what was actually going on, so that this
(14:27):
way he can make a fully informed, educated decision, but
with also saying that no, if he orders this, you're
not going to do it first check in with me.
That's treason. I mean the president, like him or hate him,
he is the commander in chief. He is the one
(14:49):
in charge the h n I see as they say
he is, like him or hate him, that's who he was.
And so many from people in the military, in his cabinet,
you know, people that were you know, hangovers from I
(15:09):
mean hangovers not exactly the right word, but you know
people that were just held over from the Obama administration.
You know, people that were just in the position and
Donald Trump decided to go ahead and keep them or
at least, you know, kind of used them for a time.
So much stuff has come out over the past you
(15:31):
know what eight years. Yeah, over the past eight years,
so much stuff has come out as far as what
happened during the early days of his presidency, and it
was treason from the highest levels of government. It was
(15:52):
not a peaceful transition. It was treason. Now I know
what everybody's thinking, because I'm thinking it too, you know,
I'm very much thinking it. And that is what are
we going to see as far as people being held
accountable for what they did? And like I had pointed
(16:14):
out yesterday or the day before whenever the last episode was.
As I pointed out, then I don't really see anything happening.
I'm just I'm just being honest with you. I don't
see anything happening. I don't see anybody being held to account.
I really don't. And it's sad. It's frustrating, it really is,
(16:37):
because these are This is activity that should not be allowed.
It should not be tolerated. It really shouldn't be I mean,
this is just it's treason, Okay, it's absolutely treason. Now.
The reason that nothing's going to happen is because it's
(16:58):
the Republicans that are doing on it. I mean, granted Biden, no,
I'm sorry, not Biden. Trump may have the intestinal fortitude
to do something about it. But it's not just him, right,
I Mean, that's not the only person that we're actually
worried about. I Mean we have you know, so many
(17:19):
Republicans that are you know, in Congress that you know,
they're the ones that are doing some of the you know,
doing some of the investigations, you know, having you know,
subpoenas and talking to people and whatnot. You've got Pambondi,
You've got you know, the FBI and yeah, they may
be investigating stuff, they may be digging up information, and
(17:42):
that's where we've gotten all the information that we have
right now into this is from the FBI with documents
that they've been able to uncover and has pointed to,
you know, some of the people that are involved in this.
But either way, you still have that whole accountability thing
(18:04):
because this is treason, This is wrong, This should not
be tolerated. These are things that are had that happens
in a Banana republic, and not even a Banana republic.
I mean, this is something you would expect to hear
coming out of you know, uh, Cuba. This is stuff
you would expect to come here coming out of Russia,
(18:28):
not out of the United States of America. I mean,
this is ridiculous. I mean, you know, and this is
something that I even talked about yesterday. It's like, dude,
you know, not that long ago things made sense, right,
you know, not that long ago we thought that government
was operating in the people's best interests. We didn't know
(18:52):
just how bad things were, and things have been pretty
bad for quite some time. We just didn't know it.
And really for the past what forty fifty you know,
fifty years at least, things have been pretty bad. We
just didn't know it. They covered it up. And now
(19:13):
we've reached a point where the deep state doesn't care
if you know what it's up to, because they have
grown in power so much that they can protect themselves.
And that's where we're at today. Is anything going to happen?
(19:33):
I don't know, and I don't you know, And I'll
even rest on what I had said on the previous
episode that I don't see anything happening to Barack Obama
outside of you know, him more or less getting I mean,
not necessarily arrested. I mean maybe arrested. I'd be nice
if he gets arrested, but it would probably be one
(19:54):
of them things that he's under house arrest. I mean,
he ain't going to prison. I mean, let's be honest.
And he wouldn't go to prison for the same reason
that they wouldn't put Donald Trump in present unless they
actually took a Secret Service protection away from him, which
if you didn't like the idea of them doing it
to Trump, then it wouldn't be a good idea for
them to do it to Barack Obama. It just wouldn't
(20:16):
be regardless of whether you like him or you hate him,
it doesn't really matter. Yes, who is treason us? But
he still deserves Secret Service protection because there are things
that he knows that should not fall into the wrong hands.
I mean, let's be honest. That's why former presidents get
Secret Service protection. They learn things, things that you just
(20:40):
don't want other nations finding out about. So I get that.
Do I think that Barack Obama should be arrested. Yes,
they arrested Trump. Why not arrest Obama? And Obama is
as it looks right now, allegedly want to throw that
word in there, but as it looks right now, as
(21:04):
per the evidence that was uncovered by the FBI, treason.
Do I think he should be arrested? Yes? Do I
think Biden should be arrested? Yes? And many others to do.
You know, the list of people that were part of
(21:24):
this conspiracy is pretty big. Do I think they should
be arrested? Absolutely? Do I think they should be tried? Absolutely?
Do I think they should be found guilty? You bet
you do. I think they should go to prison. Well,
(21:50):
with the people on the higher ups, like Barack, like Biden, No,
that's not really feasible to send into prison it's just
not house arrest. Okay, absolutely their own house. No, I
(22:11):
wouldn't put him in their own house. I'd more or
less put him in some type of a boarding house. Why,
you know, why, why would you want to arrest somebody,
penalize them for doing bad things, and allow them to
go in their house. I mean, you know, Barack Obama
has a lot of money. Biden has well, at least
(22:34):
he had a lot of money speaking arrangements and everything
else that he did. Absolutely, he had a lot of money.
There was a lot of things in his house. He
can pick a house which one he wants to serve
his time in, which shouldn't be any small number. Do
I think he should be able to go to his
own house where he's got all the amenities that he
(22:59):
could possibly ask for. No, No, what kind of punishment
is that? I mean the worst thing about that is well, no,
I can't even say that about the worst thing, because
I mean, he can still do speaking arrangements. He would
just have to do them on zoom call. Give him
(23:20):
or put him up in a small apartment, a single
room at a boarding house, a halfway house, something like that.
That's what you should do to the guy, that's what
you should That's exactly what you should do to Barack Obama,
to Biden, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton, That's exactly
(23:42):
what you should do to these people. Arrest them, convict
them based off of the evidence. House arrested at a
boarding house, limited internet at excess. Why should they be
(24:02):
able to make money off of what they have done,
the laws that they have broken, allegedly, the treason they committed.
Why should they be able to get rich off of
causing irreputable, irreputable doing harm to this country? Why should
(24:29):
they be awarded for that or rewarded for that? No?
Hell no, I mean, I'm just being honest with you.
House arrest, boarding house, not their own house, a boarding house,
a halfway house, something like that. Keep them together. Hell,
I don't even care if they do that. But reward
(24:52):
them for the activity that they did, know, because that's
why house arrests under any house. You know that. Okay,
he's going to go to Martha's vineyard? Is that really
a bad thing? Is that really a you know, you
need to sit down and think about what you did.
There's consequences to actions that. No, No, that's not a
punishment there's not a punishment at all. I mean, I
(25:18):
agree that they need to do something absolutely, I don't
care who it is. They need to do something. Something
needs to be done, and they need to do something
that is extreme enough to be a deterrent so other
people don't try to follow in their footsteps, right. I mean,
(25:40):
that's why you have punishment for crime in the first place.
That's why the punishment is supposed to fit the crime.
It's not supposed to be a smack on the wrist. No,
how was that a deterrent? It isn't. The punishment needs
to be bad enough to where people don't dare do
it again. People don't dare following their footstuffs. I mean,
(26:03):
the last ten years, if it's taught me anything, it's
that these people are corrupt and you are never going
to stop the bad actors from doing bad things if
you don't punish them for doing it. If all you're
going to do is do investigation after investigation, If all
(26:27):
you're going to do is look into it, it doesn't
matter what you uncover, but you don't do anything about it,
it's pointless. It is a waste of time, it is
a waste of money, and it is. It is stupid
to do that kind of stuff, you know, and I
don't even care about statute of limitations. Did that stop
them from going after President Trump? Noah did not, because
(26:50):
they rewrote the rules. We don't need to rewrite the rules.
We don't need to rewrite the rules. This is one
of the things that even was talked about, what this
whole treason things, having these misdemeanors and whatnot that they
have done for a long time. You can put a
(27:11):
lot of you know, going back, even back beyond the
statute of limitations, as long as it proves what's that
word I'm looking for, If it proves a pattern, that's
what it is. If it proves that they have a
pattern of doing these kind of things, you can go
back as long as that pattern is present. You don't
(27:34):
need to stay within the statute of limitations. You can
bring this stuff up. You might not be able to
convict him of it, but follow the law. Absolutely. There's
still a lot of things they can do and a
lot of things that they still should do. Absolutely. Yeah,
(27:58):
those are just a couple of things that I wanted
to bring up talk about a little bit more, a
little bit more in depth, so that this way you
had a little bit better of an idea of just
how serious this actually is. You don't think about it
this whole you know, letter that was written to Jeffrey Epstein,
And what was the other thing that came out around
(28:19):
the same timeframe, You know that that last weekend there
was something else that came out to I don't I
don't remember what it was. But the left is notorious
for doing this kind of thing. They really are. They
are notorious for giving you something ridiculous in order to
(28:39):
take your mind off of the important thing that actually happened.
They brought up this whole picture doodle that Trump did
in order to clog up what people was talking about,
so that this way they weren't talking about the thing
(29:02):
that mattered. And what's the thing that matters? Barack Obama
having information dug up on him treasonous activities to try
to cripple Trump's effectiveness during his first term. And I've
(29:22):
even heard something else that I mean, I'm going to
be honest with you, I don't agree with it, But
the argument can still be made that President Trump can
use this as grounds by which to run in twenty
twenty eight. Yeah, now I'm going to be honest with you,
(29:45):
I don't I don't agree with this. I really don't.
Because he was still elected, he still served his term.
Regardless of you know, the coup, the military coup and
how they you know, cut the legs out from underneath them.
That still doesn't change the fact that he did serve
a first term. And I, you know, I really don't
(30:08):
think that would be a good idea. I mean, yeah,
would it be nice, absolutely, you know, but I don't
think they should go ahead and do it. I really don't.
And I don't even know as if Trump would want
to go what would want to stay in office for
an additional four years, you know, into twenty thirty two.
(30:28):
I don't think Donald Trump would want to would want
to do a third term. I mean, that's that's kind
of ridiculous, it really is. You know, show them how
things should be done, show them how, you know, show
the people what conservatism actually looks like. Allow him to
(30:51):
clean house, allow him to shine a light on the Republicans,
the ones that are rhinos, get them out of office.
And then in twenty twenty eight, you have so many
people on the Republican side of the aisle the maga
people that are over there that could step in and
(31:14):
be the next president. I mean, we've got so many
people that could do it, right, I mean, yeah, you
still got Ron DeSantis, regardless of how you think of him.
Whenever he you know, was trying to be president, he is.
He does a great job in Florida, and I think
(31:35):
he could do a great job as president. You know,
I did vote for him during the primary in twenty No,
not twenty sixteen. I voted for Ted Cruz in the
primary twenty sixteen. Oh good grief. What what year was that,
twenty twenty No, not twenty twenty, must have been twenty
(31:55):
twenty four. That yeah, yeah, Ron DeSantis, you know, twenty
twenty four. Yeah. I mean I think he can do
a good job. He's proven himself worthy. I mean you
look at what he's done in Florida. Excellent candidate. And
of course, I mean you have the person who you know,
Vance jd. Vance would be a great president. You know,
(32:19):
you look at what he does, you look at how
he talks. I mean he's almost like a you know,
like a like a junior Trump in a matter of speaking.
Kind of cracks me up. But another person that I
think would be a great candidate, and that's Donald Trump Junior.
And I don't like the idea of you know, families
(32:41):
doing this. You know, we had enough Bushes in office.
There's other there's been other prominent families. I don't like
that idea. I really don't. But Donald Trump Junior seems
to be more conservative than in his dad. And that's
(33:02):
saying something right, and that's ignoring some of the other
people that's in the the Trump family. I mean, let's
just say, after President Trump we get eight years of Vans.
How awesome would that be? Right, That'd be pretty stinking awesome.
(33:23):
And then who else she got in the lineup? There's
so many, you know, who do who do the Democrats have?
I mean, really, who do the Democrats have? Kamala Harris
that's a joke. Bernie Sanders is getting way too old
for the for the you know, for the presidency, Alexandria A. Cassio, Cortez,
(33:47):
el hand Omar. I mean, them are some of the
people that would be you know, possibly front runners. Of course,
you got JB. Prisker, Gavin Newsom, other people like that,
people that have torn up and destroyed the states that
they are in the states that they are over and
the states that they govern. I mean, they have name recognition,
but would would you really want to I mean, dude,
(34:09):
as somebody who lives in Illinois JB. Prisker, Yeah, no,
the guys a train waiting to happen. I'm sure the
same thing could be said about Gavin Newsom. Who in
the right mind on a national scale, seeing how these
people have run their own states, who in the right
(34:32):
mind would vote for them on the national stage, Who
in the right mind wild vote for Alexandria Cassio Cortez.
I mean, good grief, dude, really no, God no, Please know,
the Democrats don't have anybody in the bullpen. The Republicans, however, do.
(34:56):
But what's more pressing on the Republican side isn't necessarily
forming a third party. I know that it sounds good.
I know it sounds good. I mean I've even talked
about it before myself in the past. But what's more
important than trying to start a third party? Because i mean,
(35:17):
let's face it, in the short term, all you're doing
is giving votes to the Democrats. That's all you're going
to do. That's all you're doing. That's it I mean really,
I mean, think about it, Ross purot. What happened Bill
Clinton was elected. He took just enough votes away from
(35:39):
the Republicans that the Democrat was able to win. And
that's what would happen. That's why I say it's a
bad idea. What do we need to do instead? Reclaim
the Republican Party, Get rid of the rhino Republicans. Get
(36:01):
rid of them in the primary. That's it. Get people
who are maggi Republicans, promote the ever loving hell out
of them, make them to where they are a formidable
(36:23):
not contestant. That's not what I'm you know, a formidable rival.
Give them as much airway as you possibly can, give
them enough interviews on various conservative talk shows. Conservative podcasters
utilize social media, get their name, get their face, get
(36:43):
their platform out there, and make them a force to
be reckoned with. And get rid of the rhinos. That's
what we need to do. We need to not start
a third party, but reclaim the Republican Party for what
they are supposed to be, an opposition party to the Democrats, conservatism.
(37:09):
That's what the Republican Party was supposed to be, that's
what it was founded as and I believe, if I
am remembering correctly, Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president.
That's what we need to do. Not start a third party,
(37:31):
but reclaim this one. And if the person who lives
in your district isn't Maga, if they are a Rhino,
then get somebody else in there. Instead of running on
a third party, run as a Republican and let them
(37:56):
know who and what you are, what you stand for.
Do the hard work. That's the only way we're going
to get rid of the rhinos. And that's due the
hard work. That's it. That's what we need to do.
Not start a third party because the only thing that's
going to do in the short term, especially in the
short term, and then who cares about the long term
because you've destroyed every chance you have of being relevant.
(38:19):
But all you're going to do is hand it over
to the Democrats. And why in the hell would you
want to do that now, especially now? Why would you
want to do that to them? Why would you want
to do what the Republicans do? Why would you want
to do what the Cubs do on a yearly basis,
(38:40):
snatch defeat from the hands of victory. That's what happens.
That's what Republicans are known for doing. Do they seize
the moment, No, they don't seize the moment. They snatched
the defeat from the hands of victory. That's what the
Republicans are known for doing. They may love being in office,
(39:04):
but they do not know what to do with power.
And the sad thing is is because there's too many
of them that are righting. No Republicans that actually want
what the Democrats want. They want the same thing. Get
rid of them, run them out of office, run them
(39:28):
out of DC, get them out of there, put people
in their place that are truly maga and then maybe
we can finally get some stuff done. I mean, I
know the Recisions package passed barely. I mean it went
down to the wire, it really did, and it passed
(39:49):
by a very slim majority. It very much did nine
billion dollars and they couldn't even get everything in there
passed across the finish line. Nine billion dollars. This is
a stupid The whole system is corrupt. We need to
do it. We can to fix it. But why would
(40:11):
we want to hand victory over to the Democrats. Whenever
the Democrats are in shambles right now? They really are.
I Like I said, they got nothing, They got nobody
in the bench, a bunch of people that I mean,
how well do you really think Gavin Newsom would do
(40:33):
on the on the national stage? How good do you
really think JB. Pretzker would do on the national stage?
How well do you think AOC would do on the
national stage. I'll hand Omar Rashida to leave. How how
(40:55):
good do you really think these people would do on
national stage? I don't think they do very good at all.
I really don't. I mean, Ilhan Omar is out because
she's not a natural born citizen, but AOC, Gavin Newsom, JB. Pritzker,
(41:24):
how good do you actually think any of them would
do on the national stage. Why would you want to
start a third party to give Democrats a victory? I
wouldn't want to do that, not at all. What MAGA
needs to do is quit messing around, actually put up
(41:50):
good MAGA candidates to get these Rhino Republicans out there.
Maybe if we actually have somebody that is MAGA and
maybe then we could even go to not just battleground
states but red states. No I'm sorry, not red states,
Blue states, Democrat controlled states, and maybe we could actually
(42:12):
put up a fight. Not just put up a fight,
but when how awesome would that be to turn California
from a bright blue state into a bright red state.
I'd even settle for purple. I mean, I can tell
(42:33):
you this living in Illinois. You look at the map.
Illinois's a red state. It's only a couple hot spots
to vote for JB. Prisker. If we actually had a
constitutional form of government here in Illinois, There's no way
(42:56):
in hell JB. Prisker would have actually gotten elected. But
how awesome would it be in a state like Illinois.
In California where you have so many people outside the
metropolitan areas that don't want JB. Pritzker, They're not Democrat.
They we are Republican down here, I mean, and I'm
(43:18):
sure that California is a lot the same way. You know,
outside of the you know, the cities, the hotspots, the
rest of the state, if it's anything like Illinois, is
probably republican. I've not actually looked at a map over
in California. I've not looked at a map of New
York as far as how the rest of the state
(43:40):
outside of like you know New York City, outside of
LA some of the others outside of Chicago, I know
how they are, But these other states, I don't know.
I've never actually paid that much attention. So if you're
out there in these other states, or maybe you've looked
at it, let me know, send me an email. Ho
(44:01):
Ho at the ho Ho show dot com. I'm actually
kind of curious to know. Anyway. That's all I got
for y'alls today. I just wanted to kind of dive
a little deeper into a couple of the topics that
we talked about yesterday to really let you in on
this is worse than you may have originally thought. This
is really bad. The optics on this is horrible. And
(44:24):
the real question is are we actually going to see
anybody being held accountable for what they did? And I
truly do hope so, because if you're not going to
do anything about it, why in the hell are you
going to shine a light on it? It makes no sense.
It's a waste of time, it's a waste of money.
(44:46):
Instead of investigating, what we need to start doing is
arresting and prosecuting. That's what we need to see. Now.
There's people that are talking that we are going to
see that, but I'm going to warn you right now
hold your breath. You may be holding it for quite
a long time. Anyway, y'all, have yourself a good one
and I'll see you in the next one. This has
(45:09):
been the ho Host Show. For more information, you can
head to the Ho Hosshow dot com and for the
merchandise store, you can head on over to stink pickle
dot com. That is s t i n K p
I k l e dot com. Until next time,
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.