Government Overreach

In today’s episode, we are going to discuss the FCC, weather they can, and should, censor lies. We are also going to talk about the Freedom of the Press at the pentagon. We’ll also discuss Trumps plan for H-1B visas.

Email, Website & Other Links
[e-mail]
https://WSPRadio.com
https://TheHohOShow.com
https://link.thehohoshow.com/Rumble
https://link.thehohoshow.com/WSPChronicles
https://StinkPikle.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.

Thank You for Listening, 

For All Things "The HohO Show"
Email, Website & Other Links

[e-mail]
WSPRadio.com 
TheHohOShow.com
The HohO Show / Rumble
WSPChronicles
StinkPikle.com / Merch Store

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, Welcome to the show, grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as
we discuss news, politics, current events, and so much more,
but through the airwaves and strapped in.

Speaker 2 (00:21):
As we do.

Speaker 3 (00:24):
Because there.

Speaker 2 (00:33):
B're broadcasting live from Weapini SAFT Production Studio B. Welcome
to the host show and as always I'm your host.
Hell sah y'alls doing I hope you're doing good? I
really do. I've got a few things to talk about today.
We're going to be talking about who the next candidate
for president and the Democrat Party is going to be,

(00:54):
and should you be afraid or at least a little
bit quivering? Maybe I don't know. Anyway, we're going to
be talking about the the end of H one B Visus.
We're going to be talking about the freedom of press.
But first we're going to be talking about FCC regulations.

(01:18):
So let's go ahead and get into that. So I
got a headlined from Al Jazeera. I'm probably mispronouncing that
I don't care, it doesn't matter. And this one, it
kind of at leads to a question is it something

(01:41):
the FCC can do? Is it something the FCC should
be doing? And of course, what we're talking about is
ABC canceling Jimmy Kimmel Live. That's what we're talking about.
Does the US Communications Agency have power to regulate Kimmel's speech?
And that is from this article from Al Jazeera And

(02:03):
I read this article and I was like, Okay, it's
got some points in here, says experts say that the
FCC may have overstepped in calling for action over Jimmy
Kimmel's comments about Charlie kirk murder. Okay, getting into it,
The article continues, did Federal Communications Commission FCC Chairman Brendan

(02:25):
Carr overstepped the bounds of government oversight when he called
for action against late night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel.
Kimmell prompted conversation. I'm sorry, let me try that again.
Kimmell prompted conservative criticism when he spoke about the sub suspect. Wow,
I'm having a hard time reading today, the suspect in

(02:46):
the September tenth assassination of conservative activists Charlie Kirk on
his show on ABC, Jimmy Kimmel Live. On in September
fifteenth monologue, Jimmy Kimmel said, we hit some new over
the weekend in the Mega Gang, trying to characterize the kid,
I'm sorry, this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything

(03:08):
other than one of them. He also aired a clip
showing Trump's brief response to a question about Charlie Kirk,
and he talked about the ballroom, and then hours before ABC,
which is owned by the Walt Disney Company, pulled Kimmel
off the air, car appear to on conservative commentator Benny

(03:31):
Johnson's podcast, saying the broadcasters are entirely different than people
that use other forms of communication. I want to stop
right there. Carr clearly said that broadcasters are entirely different
than people that use any other form of communication. I

(03:55):
talked about this on the last episode. Don't just have
the ability as a broadcaster to say whatever the hell
you want to you don't. Now, Look, we can argue
the constitutionality of the regulations of the FCC in general.
We can do that, but I mean, the bottom line

(04:17):
is that's a different type of conversation. What we're talking
about right now is whether or not the FCC has
the ability to put pressure on ABC or any other
broadcasting network and any other you know, radio show in general.
Do they have the right to do it, and unfortunately,

(04:39):
I'm just going to go and say yes, yeah, let
me go ahead and continue with this a little bit more.
There is another part of this that I was wanting
to touch base on. I gotta scroll down into the
article a little bit. Holy crap. Mm hmmmmmm. Where is it? Well,

(05:09):
at any rate, doesn't matter. We can argue about the
constitutionality of the FCC whether they have the right to
do this or not, because I mean, let's face it, Okay,
broad broadcast is different than narrowcasting. You know, ABC is
different than Fox News. Fox News doesn't broadcast like ABC does,

(05:35):
you know, And I talked Tobim, I talked about this
on the last episode. You know, because as a broadcast channel,
all you need is an intended something to receive the
signal and then you've got the programming free of charge.
You're not paying for a subscription fee, unlike you know,
serious XM satellite. You know, you got to buy the hardware,

(05:58):
you gotta buy the intene you gotta buy the radio,
and then you are or at least something to receive
the signal, and then you got to pay for a subscription.
So with ABC, with Celestial Radio with NBC, it's a
different dynamic because these you don't have to pay for
a subscription. All you need is the hardware and then

(06:22):
you can listen to it. No subscription requires, So they
operate under a different set of rules. Now, according to
the rules, what Jimmy Kimmel did is was a violation
of SEC regulations. I don't remember what regulation it was.

(06:43):
Let me let me, let me ask. Let me see
if I can ask what SCC regulation. Wow, I can't
spell Jimmy Kimmel. Brain and let's see, eh, I don't know.

(07:17):
I know, I read about this the other day, and
you know, let me let me just ask the Let
me ask a flipboard because I know it's like one
eight it's like one eight five or one eight six
sub section whatever. I don't remember. I mean it's in there, summer.
But anyway, I mean he he lied, Okay, he was telling,

(07:44):
he was giving information to his audience, and granted he
was pandering to his audience. His audiences a bunch of
left wing individuals. He was pandering to his audience, and
instead of telling his audience the truth about the political
affiliation of the assassin, he lied and apparently that goes

(08:07):
against FCC regulations. You can't do that now. I mean,
you could argue whether you know, Jimmy Kimmel is a
you know, a news commentator or you know, a journalist
or whatever, but the fact of the matter is he
still it was. There was a word they used in

(08:29):
the article. Let me go ahead and get back to it.
Get off of that, Get off of that. Yeah, there
was a word that they put in there. I don't
remember what the word is. But oh wait, I scrolled
down way too far. Holy crap. Okay, there we go

(08:49):
back in the article. I'm supposed to news distortion. That
was a word that they used, or that's the words
that they used to describe what he did, news distor
he was lying because it went against what they already
knew at the time. So, I mean, I guess the
real question shouldn't be whether or not that they have

(09:11):
the ability. The FCC has the ability to cancel a
show for spreading misinformation, for lying to the American people
about the news about what happened about the facts of
an active investigation of facts of a case. Whether or
not they whether or not they can, that's a different

(09:31):
argument because according to the regulations they do. Now here's
my thing. Okay, I'm not going to say that I
don't think they should do anything about it. I'm not
going to say that because as a conservative, as a Republican,
we have lived underneath the thumb of Democrats for quite

(09:54):
a while, right, I mean, it's always the heavy hand
of government. They you know, whenever they are in power,
they are unapologetically very harsh on things. They do whatever
they can to, you know, put Republicans and conservatives into
a corner, make it to where we can't do Jack
Ittaly's quite about it, and they they force their agenda

(10:16):
on the American people. So I'm not going to say
that the SEC shouldn't be doing anything too broadcasters that
violate FCC regulations because i mean, hey, those rules are there.
You apparently don't have any problem with these rules, because

(10:37):
if you did, you know, you would have changed them
during the four years of the Biden administration. You would
have changed them during the eight years of the Obama administration.
You would have changed them already if you actually had
a problem with it, But you didn't. So I mean, really,

(10:57):
the Democrats problem isn't that the FCC stepped in and
did something about it. The problem is, holy crap, we're
being held to the standard that we have held conservatives
to for quite some time. But I mean, you know,
here's the thing though, too, It's not like in their
eyes it even mattered, right, because these broadcasters are you know,

(11:20):
left wing propaganda people, and that's all in the mouse
who they're not. You know, they're not journalists. They don't
really care about the news that you know, hat tip,
Dan Bongino. It isn't about the story. They are trying
to tell a story. That's what it amounts to. They
never thought in a million years they would actually be

(11:45):
held to a standard to where they would have to,
you know, they could be hurt by their own regulations,
by their own policies, because they believed that they were
the ones in power. They believe that well, Republicans are
too much of a pushover to actually do anything about it.

(12:08):
And that's pretty much what it amounted to. They never
thought for a million years they would be held to
account for what they've done. They don't like it because
they're actually being hurt by it. That's what it amounts
I already talked about during the last episode, you know,
with how Jimmy Kimmel is costing ABC money and they were,

(12:29):
you know, happy to go ahead and end his contract early,
which I mean, that's pure speculation. I have nothing to
really back what I said other than the fact that
I know that, you know, Jimmy Kimmel Live loses more
money for ABC than what than what Steve Colbert was losing.

(12:55):
So I mean, it's only speculation. I'll admit to that.
It's speculation. But it makes sense, doesn't It makes sense?
Why would they continue the contract of somebody that is
a drain in the millions annually. I mean, it's ridiculous.

(13:19):
On how much money they actually lose on Jimmy kim Alive,
it's ridiculous. So should the FCC be able to do
what they're doing? In all honesty, I would say no.
I mean I don't, I really do. I am a
small government person. I really am. Okay, I'm a small

(13:44):
government person. The federal government has a handful of things
that they are supposed to be doing. It's called the
enumerated powers. That's what they have. Outside of that, they're
not supposed to be doing it. It's supposed to be
in the hands of the state and the many many municipalities. Yeah,

(14:06):
that's where it's supposed to be. The federal government has
only a handful of things they're supposed to be doing.
They're not supposed to be doing all this other kind
of crap. It belongs in the hands of the state.
I think that a lot of the rules and regulations

(14:28):
that come out of Washington is complete buckus. It's complete
horse crap, and it is very much overreach. It is
Should the SEC be doing it? Should a lot of
different agencies be doing the crap that they're doing? No,

(14:48):
absolutely not. I would be all four stopping them from
doing all this kind of crap. But I mean here's
the thing though, too, And this is this is the
the ha ha point of the whole thing, right, the
heavy thumb of government that the Democrats have been putting
on Republicans and conservatives. I want them to feel what

(15:12):
that's like. Maybe I'm vindictive, maybe I'm a horrible person.
I don't know. But here's the thing though, I mean,
when when they regain power, not if, but when it'll happen.
I mean the pendulum will swing the other way. That's
always how it goes. What's going to happen if we

(15:33):
just dismantle it and then move on. No, if we
want anything to change their behavior, I mean, I don't
care about what they think. I don't even care about
what they talk about. It's their actions that concerns me.

(15:54):
If we don't change their perspective, if we don't give
them something to be afraid of, then the next time
they come into power, they're just going to do the
same od, same O. So what we dismantled the SCC,
they're just going to re establish it again and then
off to the races. They're doing the same thing, and

(16:14):
they are going to do to us what they've always done.
That's just the way that they operate. I want them
to feel what they've been putting us through. And here's
the thing to you. I mean, I'm not talking about
just empty retaliation. That ain't what I'm talking about at all.

(16:35):
You know, I've talked about this before, Other people have
been talking about it. It's not just me that's saying this.
I mean, they went after Trump, they impeached them twice,
five indictments, thirty plus quote unquote felonies, and it was nothing.
It was made up shit charges. That's all it amounts to.

(16:57):
It was fake it was ridiculu. They didn't have the
authority to even go after Trump on most of the
stuff they went after them on. And in order to
go after them that win after Trump, we don't even
have to break the law. Why not, I'll get into it.
We don't have to break the law. We don't have

(17:19):
to fabricate anything. We don't have to lie about Jack
because they broke the law. They fabricated information out of
thin air to go after Trump. That's what they did.
This isn't really, this isn't retaliation the Conservatives are wanting
against Democrats, those that win after Trump, those that have

(17:40):
gone after a lot of Conservatives, a lot of Republicans.
That's not what we're wanting. What we are wanting is
not retaliation. Its accountability. That's what we want. Accountability. And
I'm not going to be satisfied until I see it.

(18:01):
Who's going to be honest with you? With all the
information we have about so many different people out there, politician, judges, lawyers,
attorney generals, all kinds of people in government. With the
information that we have, how are they not in prison?
I mean, really, who is Letitia James that lied on

(18:27):
the on her mortgage thing? In her tax thing, and
it's like, dude, you lied. You claim that this residence
and three others were your primary residents. You are getting,
you know, discount on mortgage rates, discounts on insurance rates,
discounts on all kinds of crap. You are committing fraud,

(18:49):
pure and simple. Your name is right on there. And
if you're too stupid to understand what it is you signed,
then how are you in the position in the first place.
There's no good answer here. She's guilty of sin based
off of all the information that we have. Arrest her,
ass what's the hold up? What's the hold up? We're

(19:13):
not looking for retaliation, We're looking for accountability. That's what
we're looking for. I want the Democrats to feel the
same thing that we're feeling. And I don't want to
fabricate anything. I just want to hold them accountable. That's it,

(19:35):
hold them accountable. Should the SCC have the power to
do it, No, but that doesn't change the fact that
they do right now, just throwing out out there. Not
in a million years, the Democrats wouldn't have ever thought
that they would actually be held to account for anything
that they said, for any regulation that they broke. That's

(19:59):
what they're mad about. They're not mad that they said it.
They're not mad at Jimmy Kirk. Jimmy Kirk, Holy crap,
they're not mad at Jimmy Kimmel. They're not mad at
him at all. They're just mad that they're being held accountable.
That's what they're mad at. That's it. That's all it

(20:20):
amounts to. I have another article in here from a
Black America web. They're not allowed to do that. Trump
once FCC to re evoke license of broadcasters always Trump. Ugh,
oh yeah, let's make it sound like Trump's just being
a viddictive animal instead of actually, you know, calling these

(20:41):
people out for the crap that they've been doing forever.
They're not allowed to do that. Actually, yeah, they are
read the regulations. It's in there. It's in there. It
doesn't take a lot of a Google search to find
that out. Anyway, We're going to go ahead and take
a quick interluding. When I get back, we are going
to be talking about the freedom of press and why

(21:02):
exactly I am bringing that up. So just a couple
of minutes, let me go ahead and grab a song.
Let's do this one just a few minutes and I'll
be right back.

Speaker 3 (21:27):
Rolled into Monday. The engine just quick. Spent all my
week leaning under that good of the knuckles or busted
grease stains on my jeans. The truck won't starting and
marks my dreams. I checked the butts, I checked, plus prayed.

(21:55):
The song got in the motors, guns a week's worth sweat.
Nothing turns out right, this hunk of jump stealing.

Speaker 4 (22:06):
All my nights sold and something dumb.

Speaker 5 (22:10):
I know it is side, but the answer keeps running,
and it loves I had turned the keen.

Speaker 3 (22:17):
Nothing moved your sound. The South got the heavy heart
and broken down.

Speaker 6 (22:23):
Blue brought a buddy over, said he'd take a look.

Speaker 5 (22:39):
He shook his head side and cursed the book.

Speaker 3 (22:43):
We've tried every trick under the sun, but we're losing
this battle. The truck is won.

Speaker 5 (22:53):
Clean over, always wide open any but I'm sucking my heart.
Just stay in that RaSE, this drive waitress gotten nothing
a proof case by He is broken down something dom

(23:33):
I know it is inside, but the answer keeps unting.

Speaker 2 (23:37):
Then it loves sidswer the King. Nothing moves no sound.

Speaker 4 (23:43):
Soon got the heavy heart and.

Speaker 1 (23:45):
Broken downdo.

Speaker 2 (24:15):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit.
Are you tired of walking by family members and crop
dusting them? Well, if this has ever happened to you,
might I introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs. Tampon's
brand butt plugs is that particular type of butt plug
that allows you to walk in public in confidence, no
one that you're not going to accidentally crop does somebody?

(24:38):
Tampon's brand butt plugs now with the plastic applicator. Not
just for women anymore. Tampon's brand butt plugs. All right,
and we are back. So we're going to start off
this segment by talking about an article from The Hill
headline head Sex. Then, man, I'm having issues headsex. Nope,

(25:00):
didn't get at that time either. Heg Seth's purchase of
service members cheering Kirk killing comes under heavy scrutiny. I
talked about this in episodes past with you Know a
hat tip and Andrew will Kyle the Wilcom Majority History

(25:26):
of Today Forget Tomorrow. That's his line about how the
Democrats operate. They don't want you to remember what they
did last week. They don't want you to remember what
they did last month. They don't want you to remember
what they did last year, the last presidency. Nothing. They

(25:49):
don't want you to remember any of that, because I
seem to remember a purge of the military from the Democrats.
They wanted to get rid of Christians, they wanted to
get rid of Conservatives, they wanted to get rid of
all kinds of people, and they did it under the

(26:11):
guise of the vaccine mandate. But there were all kinds
of articles that were written pointing out how the how
the military was purging themselves of conservatives, full on attack.

(26:40):
And I didn't hear one of these sons of bitches
on the left. I didn't hear any you know, liberal
news outlet, which is you know, most main mainstream legacy
news outlets. Didn't hear any of them argue about it.

(27:01):
None of them stood up for Conservatives or Republicans, none
of them stood up for Christians, none of them stood
up for anybody. They didn't stand up at all. In fact,
they cheered what was going on. I seem to remember
that it wasn't that long ago. But while I'm talking
about Pete Hegseth, Hey, I said his name right, Wow,

(27:22):
look at me, I can speak. Here's an article from
TNR Trump breaks out whips. There we go, Trump breaks out. Nope,
Trump breaks with own defense department over reporter restrictions. We're
talking about the First Amendment on this one. Trump breaks

(27:43):
with own defense department over reporter restrictions. There we go.
Holy crap. Is it just me or am I having
a hard time talking today? I don't remember that being
the actual Well, I guess that is the actual headline
from a new republic dot com. Now. I don't know

(28:06):
if y'alls have heard, but Pete Hegseth and I'm not
exactly sure when this actually happened, but he issued a
memo I guess some official something or another to the
news reporters that you know that cover the Pentagon, saying

(28:27):
that every single article you write has to go through
him and it has to be approved, regardless of whether
any of the information goes against national security, is you
know anything, Everything has to go through me. That came
out of Pete Hegseth and I don't remember when exactly

(28:51):
that happened, but that happened. And according to an interview
with Donald Trump, or at least him addressing reporters, he
didn't agree with that. And I'm gonna be honest with you,
I don't agree with that either. I really don't. Now,
as a journalist, I think that they really should adhere

(29:14):
to what a journalist is supposed to do. Report the news,
the information, the wind, the where, the what, the why
the how. Leave the commentary to the commentators. That's what
they should be doing, every last one of them. These
journalists over there. Keep it to the facts, the wind,

(29:35):
the where, the what, the why the how. I hate
it whenever these people put their own spin on things.
I hate it whenever they ignore huge chunks of the
information because it doesn't fit the narrative that they're trying
to tell the American people. I hate it when they
do that. I really do. It's irritating. It's it's dishonest.
It goes beyond dishonest because they have a reach to

(29:58):
talk to all kinds of and it's like, dude, what
are you so afraid of what you're doing that you
refuse to tell the truth? I mean, is is that
where we're at right now? Is that what the Democrat
Party has become. They're so afraid to be honest about
what they're doing, they have to lie about everything. Have

(30:21):
you ever known a habitual liar. Have you ever known
anybody like that? I have. It's frustrating. It is so frustrating,
you know. I mean you could ask the person whenever
he's got the sun shining in the room, it is
blatantly obvious that it is a bright sunny day, and

(30:44):
he's going to tell you that it's cloudy, raining and
it's just been overcast all day, no chance of sunshine,
while he is literally standing in a sunbeam that is
blinding him to the point to where he has to
wear glasses a hat, and he's still That's the Democrat Party.

(31:04):
That's what they do, man, I mean, that's how they operate.
It's all about the narrative. They hide from the truth,
they hide from the facts. That's why in an argument
they don't debate facts, they debate feelings. I mean, that's
why they do that. I mean, it's really hard to
argue feelings. It really is, boy howdy, is hard to

(31:28):
argue feelings. I mean a lot of the times we
see Republicans sticking to facts and information and the truth
about things, and the Democrats they're like, oh, well, I
feel I feel this. I feel that I don't give
a shit what you believe. Water is wet, fire burns.
That's all there is to it. Your feelings are irrelevant.

(31:54):
They are sorry, but they are facts are facts. As
Andrew Wilke used to say, that your feelings cannot outweigh
the strength of my argument. I'm sure I got some
of that quote wrong. I'm paraphrasing it, of course, but
it's true. I mean great, a perception's reality. Everybody knows

(32:17):
that just because I'm experiencing something here doesn't mean that
you are experiencing something different over there. There's a lot
of economic and whatever variance is throughout the rest of
this nation, not everything is going to be the same.
It's impossible to say that. But these people have, these reporters,

(32:45):
they have the freedom of press. I wish they would
honor what it is they're supposed to be doing. A
journalist report on the facts, the when, the word of what,
the why, the how, lead the commentary to the commentary.
That's what they should be doing, pure and simple. If
they did that, we would be in a lot better

(33:06):
a place, lot better of a place as a nation.
We really would be. And I really don't like the idea,
regardless of who it is, of any administration, trying to
forcibly limit what these journalists are going to do. Now,
don't get me wrong, if you're going to be in there,

(33:29):
be a journalist, if you're going to be a propagandaist,
if you are going to lie about everything to suit
your needs, then you don't need to be there. You don't.
There's a lot of different people that have been reporting

(33:50):
in the White House and the Pentagon for far too long.
They think that it is their constitutional right to be there. Bullshit,
it's not. You don't have a to be in the
in the White House. There's not a violation of your
First Amendment right if they kick you out. But if
you are going to irrespond, if you're going to be

(34:12):
irresponsible with the information that you are given, then you
shouldn't be there and they should kick you out. And no,
I'm not using double speak. I'm not because you know,

(34:32):
you get the information, they get other information, more information.
They should be able to talk about that. And like
I said, as long as they are doing their duty
being a journalist, the when, the where, the what, the why,
the how what they print should be completely and totally
up to them. That's the constitution, that's what it says.

(34:53):
You have the freedom of the price. That would be
some government overreach. If if Pete hegg Seth, why am
I having problems with his name today? Holy crap. With
p hegg Seth actually issuing that order that they can't
report on anything unless it goes through him, that is

(35:16):
an overreach. And I don't like that idea at all.
I don't like the idea of any administration specifically telling
reporters what they can and cannot report on period. I
don't like it that right there, as far as I'm concerned,
that is government overage. That is a violation of the constitution.

(35:37):
It is. It's a violation. I don't care what administration
does it. I don't. I don't care. It doesn't matter.
And I like Pete hegk Seth, I mean so far.
I like what he's done. I really do. But on
this one don't agree with him, not at all. He
needs to be careful he does anyway. Let's go ahead

(36:01):
and move on. Now. This next article going to talk
about comes from Obsessed. Now. I've never heard of Obsessed.
I really don't. I've seen the headline. I thought it
was hilarious. It cracks me up. Let me see if
it cracks you up. Now, this one. I was impressed,
I really was. I had to laugh whenever I read this,
and after I read the article, you'll see why stars

(36:23):
boycott Disney premiere in free speech protests. These people are
so ticked off at ABC for you know, canceling Jimmy
Kimmel Live, for basically firing him as far as what
it looks like right now. And of course it is
Disney that owns ABC. So you have all these people
that are talking about boycotting Disney, and of which case me,

(36:46):
as a conservative, as a Republican, I'm like, that's funny. Shit,
I mean, why is that so funny? As a conservative?
Why is that so funny to me? That you have
Democrats that are talking about boycotting Disney over what they

(37:07):
over what ABC did to Jimmy Kimmel. Dude, I I'm
in my mid forties, Okay. I grew up watching a
lot of Disney shows, you know, I grew up watching
a lot of it, you know, and Disney, nickelode and

(37:30):
other places like that. I mean these were you know,
Sesame Street another one, you know. I mean there were
several channels that you could watch several different programs that
you could watch that. As a parent, you felt safe
and you felt comfortable just allowing your child to sit
there in front of the TV. And I'm not recommending

(37:52):
this as a parenting tip. I'm just saying that they
felt comfortable putting them in front of the TV, letting
him watch some entertainment while the parent takes a nap
or does some chores that they need to get done
around the house and not really have to be like
every second on the kid, right. I mean, that's how

(38:12):
it used to be. You could feel comfortable doing that
because it wasn't propaganda, you know. I mean you have
count Chocula, you know one two, ah, you know, I
mean it was it was just pure simple entertainment, nothing bad.

(38:36):
They wasn't trying to indoctrinate your kids with Bravo Sierra.
I mean, it was it was harmless entertainment. Something the
parents felt comfortable leaving the kid in the room long
enough to go do chores or whatever else they needed
to do. Those days are gone because Disney for some

(38:58):
time has been slipping into the programming pro this and
tie that, and we've all seen it for years and
it's not just Disney. Don't get me wrong. It's not
just Disney, not at all. A lot of other people
are doing it too. You can't just safely PLoP your
kid in front of the TV anymore. Not saying you
should be doing that anyway, you should be more proactive

(39:20):
in it, but anyway, it just I get it. I
get it. I really do. No condemnation whatsoever. It's not
about that. It's just the fact that where you used
to have safe things that you could turn on and
let your kids watch it, you don't have that anymore

(39:41):
because Disney, among others, fill their lineup with propaganda bullshit
that not everybody's comfortable letting their children watch. I mean,
I don't think my four year old, not that I
have one, just saying if I did, I wouldn't want
my four year old to be learning about the Birds

(40:02):
and the Bees from Disney unless it's snow White, the
original cartoon, because then birds were funny. The Bee's in
a b movie. Okay, fine, you know, but now what
you have is Disney putting a lot of propaganda bullshit
in their programming. And this has been something that has

(40:25):
been very problematic for conservatives for quite some time. Conservatives
a lot of Republicans out there. We don't like what
Disney's doing, and Disney profits have been falling for quite
some time. It's kind of funny, and now we have
hilarious I mean, this is this is democrat on democrat

(40:48):
crime right here. This headline from Obsessed or The Daily
Beast or whatever the hell it is stars boycott Disney
premiere in free speech protest. This is great. This is hilarious.
I mean, it was only a matter of time. And
we've seen this before. I mean, this isn't the first
time we've seen democrat on democrat crime. They've been doing

(41:11):
it quite a bit. You know, they run out of
targets on the right and then they start punching themselves.
And this is what we're seeing here. This is great.
This is absolutely hilarious. It does not get any better
than this, I tell you. And while we're talking about
stupid stuff, all right, let me get into this headline.

(41:32):
And I wasn't surprised whenever I read this, I really wasn't.
This headline comes from Parade headline shock jock Howard Stern
makes a move After Jimmy Kimmel's suspension, The iconic radio
host spoke out about what's going on at ABC, and

(41:55):
he's you know, he's upset, he really is. But just
like as I was talking with, you know, Stephen Colbert
being canceled at the end of his contract early next year,
with Jimmy Kimmel's contract being close to being up, and
with his the cancelation of his show after his comments

(42:17):
he made about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Howard Stern
has said some pretty stupid stuff back in the day too.
He has said some really stupid stuff. He was once
like the biggest talk show you Okay, Now, look, I'm

(42:39):
I've never really been a fan of Howard Stern. I'm
just gonna be honest with you. I never have been,
never been a fan a huge fan of Howard Stern.
I've listened to his stuff a little bit. You know,
I may catch some stuff, you know, I've I've listened
to a few interviews that he's done with people. They're
not horrible interviews, but I mean, all in all, I'm
just I'm not a huge fan. You know, It's just

(43:02):
not He's not my cup of tea. But regardless of that,
I have a huge respect for what the man did.
You know, as an entertainer as a as a talk
show host. I have mad respect for what he's done.
You know, he's a gifted individual. He knows his way
around the microphone. You know, he he does pretty good interviews.

(43:24):
The man. He he stood up against censorship in a
time you know that that was, you know, like right
at the onset of whenever satellite radio was beginning to
be big and he no longer wanted to be restricted anymore.
You know, I've got mad. He pushed the envelope he
really did. I got mad respect for what he's accomplished.

(43:47):
I really do a lot of respect for him as
a professional. But where he screwed up and his show
has taken a huge hit because of it, is because
he decided to go on to Mike one day. And
it wasn't that terribly long ago, don't remember when, doesn't matter,

(44:07):
but he decided to go out and basically tell every
single Trump supporter, every single Republican, Hey, if you voted
for Trump, I don't want you listening to my show.
I don't want you here. I mean, dude, you're talking
over half the country that voted for Trump during the
twenty twenty four election, and you just told potentially half

(44:31):
of your audience to scoop his numbers plummeted. Now, look,
I want to let you in on a little secret.
All right, Okay, First, Howard Stern is on serious ExM.
That's where he That's where he's at, right, because you

(44:51):
can say whatever you want to, and satellite radio is
not governed by that SCC. All right, he doesn't have
to by those I'm going to go out on a
limb and say that the serious satellite radio, serious XM
satellite radio would not be a thing if it wasn't
for truck drivers and quite a few truck drivers, the

(45:12):
majority of us in the industry, we're Republicans. There's way
more Republicans than there are Democrats out there on the
road in a semi and without people like that, people
that live their life driving in a vehicle, or at
least you know, you don't have access to other type

(45:34):
of programming because I mean, like dude, as a truck driver,
it sucks trying to listen to celestial radio. It just does.
It sucks. I mean, you have areas where you can't
get nothing but a little bit of and that's all
you got. You get some places where all you've got
is you know, it's like you need a fork and

(45:56):
all you have is a drawer full of spoons and
that's it. You know, you want hip hop, all you
God's country. You want some country, all you got some
hip hop? You want some rock and roll, and all
you got's classical. I mean, that's that's sometimes what it's like,
depending on where you're at in the United States, programming
differs from area to area, but it is so nice

(46:19):
just to have your serious satellite radio. You can turn
on one channel, the one that you want to listen to,
and you can basically listen to it all day without
having to change the dial. Or you know, you want
to listen to hip hop, and I mean, you can
listen to whatever you want to because for truck drivers,
for people that are on the road, for people that

(46:40):
you know, travel, it's nice to have programming we can
rely on. We don't have to worry about celestial radio.
He didn't do a lot of research before he decided
to open up up his mouth, and then whenever he's

(47:03):
seen his numbers start to plummet, instead of going, oh shit,
maybe I should walk this back a little bit, he
doubled down ridiculous. I mean Howard Stern has been. I mean, dude,
it's I mean, he went from like five million down

(47:24):
to like couple hundred thousand in a short amount of time.
I mean, his numbers plummeted. I heard what the numbers were,
and I'm spitballing the numbers I told you. But as
bad as that may sound, the numbers, the actual numbers

(47:45):
are probably worse just throwing out out there. I mean,
his numbers plummeted. Why because he decided to attack Republicans
on a platform serious XM satellite radio that is dominated
by Republicans, by conservatives. Know your audience. It's not to

(48:08):
say that there's not Democrats out there to listen to
serious satellite radio. Not saying that there's not Democrats out
there that listen to you know that are truck drivers.
I'm not saying that whatsoever. But it's pretty obvious that
the people that listen to his program were primarily Republicans.
I mean, how else would you lose like, what, eighty

(48:30):
ninety percent of your audience? I mean, holy crap, that's huge.
Let me see how let me see if I can
ask how much did how words turns? Okay? Here we go.

(48:54):
How were their number of listeners? Because it I mean,
and it dropped, it dropped a lot. Yeah, here we go.
His peak in two thousands, twenty million, in twenty twenty five,

(49:14):
one hundred and twenty five thousand. Yeah, that's how much
it plummeted. I mean, holy cow, that's a lot people.

(49:37):
And you know from the time that they were really
keeping track of this, because that was at his peak
was the twenty million. And I think whenever, you know,
before this this whole thing took place where he started
speaking out against that and telling Trump supporters, don't listen
to my program, I think it was around the five million,
and then he dropped to one hundred and something thousands,

(50:00):
and you know, not that long ago. So yeah, no,
know your audience, dude, know your audience. All right, So
we are going to take another quick break. And when
I returned, there's a wow, there's still like quite a

(50:21):
few days to talk about. Holy crap. I ain't going
to get to all that. I ain't going to get
to all that at all. We're going to talk a
little bit about the uh well, no that we'll do
that now, the H one B, the H one B
versus because apparently Trump is looking to just redo that

(50:46):
entire thing. I guess with H one B versus. Now, look,
I mean here, here's part of my thing whenever it
comes to visus, when it comes to immigration period. Okay,
there is absolutely nothing wrong with the nation that looks
to protect its citizenry. And that's what it should be, right,

(51:09):
you know, because first and foremost, first and foremost, the
government of Canada, their number one priority is to is
for their people, Canadian citizens. That's their priority. The number
one priority of Italian is Italians. It's the number one priority.

(51:31):
That's the way it should be. Benefit yourself first, right,
benefit yourself first. That's how it's supposed to be. Why
doesn't America understand that? Why doesn't the politicians, Why doesn't
Washington DC? Why don't they understand that their number one

(51:54):
priority is Americans, to represent us, to prioritize us over
other nations. Now, look, I'm not saying that we shouldn't
be helping other people whenever they need it. But the
bottom line is this. We are over thirty seven trillion
dollars in debt. We have a housing problem, we have

(52:17):
a lot of homeless in this country. We have a
lot of problems. Right, we can't be looking out for
the interest of everybody else on the planet and ignoring
our own. It's only a matter of time before this
shit really gets bad. Just saying, just throwing out out there.
We need to learn to prioritize Americans. We need to

(52:39):
learn to prioritize America, period. And there was a time
whenever we were way more selective with the people that
we just let in our country with visa programs, because
I mean, look, you know, nothing has changed in the
education system. Okay, You've only got so many classrooms, you

(53:00):
only have so many teachers, you only have so many
seats available in those classrooms. You only have so many
people you can put in there, run through a program.
That's it. That's it. It's not like it's an endless
array of people you can just bring in.

Speaker 7 (53:20):
In.

Speaker 2 (53:20):
The farther away you get from a classroom, the lower
your the quality of your education is going to get.
In other words, online courses only go so far, right,
Online courses only go so far. It's just the way
that it is. It is high time that politicians in

(53:47):
government start looking out for American interests, because what we
should be doing whenever it comes to immigration, is what
most every other nation out there does. Now, look, I'm
not comparing America to all these other countries, but you
know what, here's what our founding fathers did. Whenever they
had this dream about making this place. They took everything

(54:12):
good that everybody else was doing. They put it all together,
and then they there you go, that's what we got.
That's more or less what it amount of do as
they've seen it. They took everything good and they put
it together. They left out the junk, the crap, the
stuff that made no sense, the stuff that they didn't like,
and the stuff that was an infringement and an overage.

(54:33):
They wanted self governance. That's what they wanted. Okay. So
it's not fair to say, or it's not fair to
say that there shouldn't be any correlation between America and
any other nations. Sometimes other people gets it right too.
We got what we got by looking at the best
of what they had. That's what we got. That's why

(54:54):
they all come here, because we got something they don't.
That's what everybody wants to come here. We took the
best of the best. I mean, this is the all
star team right here, baby, Yeah, y're we need to

(55:14):
be more selective. Other nations are because they understand it.
Their first priority is to their own people. How does
it benefit American citizens if we fill up the classroom
with foreign students? How does it benefit America if they

(55:39):
aren't able to get the high paying jobs because they
can't fit into a classroom because we've brought many too
many other people in with H one B visus and
now there's no seat to be available for them. How
is that helping American citizens? How's that helping? How does

(56:02):
that benefit us? And then we tell him what, get
a job, get a better job, go to school. How
when the job he has a passion to do, he
can't he can't get in the class. He can't do
it because you gave his seat to a student from

(56:24):
another country. Now, if you have the availability, sure, fine, okay,
let him sit in the chair. That's fine. But that's
not what we're talking about. I mean, the number of
foreigners that are in our education system is ridiculous. I mean,
it's holy crap ridiculous. I mean, it's been a while

(56:52):
since I've looked at the actual numbers. It's been a while.
I ain't going to lie, but like the percentage of
foreign students in our colleges and universities is unreal, absolutely ridiculous.
And here's the thing too, man, you want to lower
the cost of education, you want to do it, you

(57:15):
can do it and it wouldn't take a whole heck
of a lot. One get rid of the illegals. Well
not no, no, no, no, not not illegals. Just just get
rid of the foreigners. Okay, get rid of the foreigners.
Get rid of them. Shut it down for a little while.
You'll see prices drop. And if loaning places, you know,

(57:45):
you go. And I mean, it's is it. It's unbelievable to
me that it is easier for an eighteen year old
to get one hundred thousand dollars student loan than what
it is for him to get a fifteen thousand dollars
business loan. I mean that. I mean he has a

(58:08):
good idea, he wants to do something, he wants to
advance himself, regardless of whether he actually succeeds or really
doesn't matter. I mean, you have more of a chance
of succeeding in a business than what you do going
to college as an eighteen year old. You just do.
But it's easier for you know, somebody who wants to
go to college you get one hundred thousand dollars student
loan than what it is for that for his twin

(58:29):
brother to get a business loan for fifteen thousand bucks.
How ridiculous is that. It doesn't matter what the business
loan is for. It's just easier, you know, site unseen.
As far as what it is that they're trying to do.
You know, what degree the student's going for and what
kind of business the other kids want to open Site unseen,

(58:51):
it doesn't matter. It's easier for the student to go
into debt than what it is somebody who's actually trying
to get a business loan. It's ridiculous. I'm all about
fixing the system, I really am. We need to look
after Americans, we do. We got to. I mean, some

(59:18):
of these people ain't got no loyalty to their own country.
And I mean, granted, I understand why. You know, when
you're in business, you're in business to make money, right,
I mean you are. You may not like it, but
you are. And if you ain't making money, then you
really ain't in business anymore. So, I mean, I get it.

(59:45):
They're after the money. You know, China dishes out a
lot of money. Korea dishes out a lot of money
to bring their students over here. Anyway, we are going

(01:00:05):
to take another quick break. What am I going to play?
Let's let's look at Nope, not that one. Here we go,
We'll play this one whenever I return. We are going
to be talking about the possible next candidate for the
Democrats for the twenty twenty eight election. I'm kind of
curious that this one actually ends up happening, because it

(01:00:27):
does seem like this person is, you know, making a
bid to run for president. Anyway, that coming up right after.

Speaker 7 (01:00:36):
This Sun's beating down on the track or seat, dusty
road rising, no shade or retreat. Worked up sweat, Lord,
it ain't fair. Now there's a swamp brewing under there.

(01:01:02):
Boots are dragging through the mud, off it from all
this work. The sweat starts to stick, cheapen and burn
and got a real high cost. Feels like a milk
lost in the salt swamp. Fast blues. Oh it's tough,
too bad, sweat soaking through my underwar. I take a.

Speaker 2 (01:01:24):
Cool breeze over this damn heat.

Speaker 4 (01:01:28):
But it's a lie about here.

Speaker 7 (01:01:30):
In the farmacy. I'm my sure to dry on the
old fence post, try to cool down with the sun
still roast every steps of battle. This swamp won't quit
losing the fight in this summer grit. Neighbor's wave. Ain't've

(01:02:00):
lost my mind, but it's the heat that's made to
me crime. Buckets of ice won't even come close the
drying of this southern coast of swam past blues.

Speaker 2 (01:02:11):
I can't take much more.

Speaker 4 (01:02:14):
My jump in the creatures to restore. Wish for that
rain on and all of bridge to dry these blues
and fine some peace.

Speaker 7 (01:02:50):
A neighbor's wave think I've lost my mind, but it's
the heat that's making meat grime. The buckets of ice
won't even come close to drying up this southern.

Speaker 2 (01:03:00):
Coach sounds blues.

Speaker 4 (01:03:05):
I can't take much more. My job and created joke
to raise store. Wish for that rain and all brings
to dry these booze and find some things.

Speaker 2 (01:03:37):
Do you work at any of the myriad of jobs
where you might have to set on your bum all day? Well,
if so, maybe you know what it's like to suffer
from the condition known as swamp ass. Well, if so,
have I got the solution for you. It's high monkey
buck powder. That's right, it's high monkey buck powder.

Speaker 1 (01:03:57):
You can use an indoors, outdoors, work or play, or
on any occasion when you sit on your bum all day.
Don't let your buns get read. Use anti monkey butt
powder instead, available wherever anti friction powder is sold.

Speaker 2 (01:04:11):
All right, and we are back. That's right, Anti monkey
butt powder the perfect fix for swamp ass. Yeah, strowing
that out there, public service announcement of the day. There
you go. All right, So what I thought was a
headline is an actually headline. It's a video. I ain't
going to play it because it doesn't really matter. It's

(01:04:32):
the headline that I landed on. And this is interesting.
It's from Fox News. AOC should not be dismissed as
a viable candidate for twenty twenty eight expert warrens Now
Real Real Clear Politics co founder Tom Bevin joins Fox

(01:04:53):
and Friends Weekend to discuss Alexandri Cascio Cortez's polarizing political
career and how it could lead to a genuine attempt
at the twenty twenty eight presidential election. Yeah, you heard
that right now. She's basically been talking about becoming president

(01:05:13):
since she was thirty three, thirty four. I mean, it
wasn't very long after she got into Congress because she's like,
I'm going to be the next president, and I know
that that. You know, there's a lot of us out

(01:05:33):
there that are like, no, I mean, she's too radical,
she's too much of a nut job that there ain't
no way in hell that she has any chance whatsoever
of becoming the next candidate on the Democrat ticket. There

(01:05:56):
ain't no way in hell, right, I get it. I
feel the same way. But look, people, I want you
to remember back in twenty sixteen, Okay, if it wasn't
for the Shenanigans out of the Democrats with their super

(01:06:18):
super delegates and whatnot, it was Bernie Sanders that actually
won the nomination on the Democrat ticket. It was him,
a straight up socialist, won the Democrat nominee. And if,
like I said, if it wasn't for the super delegates
that all went to Clinton, it would have been Bernie Sanders.

(01:06:43):
We're not talking about JFK Era Democrats here, We're not
talking about that. I mean, you seem to have very
few moderate Democrats out there in the Democrat Party. Most
of them seem to fall under the camp of the

(01:07:07):
squad AOC. She's her popularity on the Democrat Party is
actually surprisingly high. I mean, yeah, she's a little ridiculous,
but she looks good in a dress stowing that out there.

(01:07:34):
I mean, now, look, do I think she has a
chance of winning against Oh, let's say JD. Vance. I mean,
he's pretty much the one who most every Republican looks
at as he's in the batter's box, right, he is
on deck to be, you know, to pick up the

(01:07:55):
mantle of Maga. Right, everybody pretty well is It's like, yeah,
it's it's his if he wants it, as long as
he doesn't do something radically stupid, and as long as
he doesn't just completely bow out of it, that it's
his to lose. It belongs to Jdvans. Now, I don't
think for a second the AOC stands a chance against Jdvans. No,

(01:08:22):
I don't think so. But don't underestimate the stupidity of
AOC and and Democrats that. I mean, let's face it,
that don't do anything to listen to CNN, MSNBC, LSD, whatever.
I mean, it's that's what a lot of these people
listen to a lot of them just don't understand that

(01:08:45):
if you want news and information, you don't get it
from legacy news sources. You don't, you can't. I mean,
there are far too many Democrats out there that still
don't know that the Hunter Biden laptop is real. As
sad as that is, it's a true statement, they just

(01:09:07):
don't know. I mean I classified as wilful ignorance. I
really do, because these people, you would think that they
would know better, you know, critical thinking man, Learn to
think for yourself. Look at the information that you're getting
from these sources. Listen to the words coming out of

(01:09:28):
the mouth. I mean, do you really not remember what
they said a week ago? I mean, it's ridiculous, isn't it.
But it's that level of wilful ignorance, wilful stupidity that
really leads me to believe that, yeah, AOC's got a chance.

(01:09:52):
I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if il hann Omar's
up there right along with her. I mean, granted she
wasn't born in the US, but at this point, who
gets why would the Democrat Party even care? I mean,
there's a lot of people that were like, oh, they're
going to redo the rules so that this way Elon
Musk can run for president. Now, it wouldn't be the

(01:10:13):
Republicans that did that, just saying more Republicans are way
more principled than to allow something like that. But I
wouldn't put it past the Democrats at all. And I mean, really,
with how they feel about immigration illegals, I really wouldn't

(01:10:35):
be surprised when we had somebody who was a congresswoman
who actually came out and said that they were an
illegal alien and they weren't automatically removed. I don't remember
who that was. I wish, I wish I remembered. I don't.
I don't remember who that was. But the Democrats are
freaking nuts, right. I've seen this headline out of the

(01:11:00):
The Atlantic headline, Democrats don't seem willing to follow their
own advice. Party leaders know that they need to moderate
on cultural issues to win back working class voters. So
why don't they? That's a dark good question, isn't it.
Why don't they? Why don't they moderate what it is

(01:11:22):
that they've seen? And there are so many issues out
there that the Democrats are on the losing side of
an eighty twenty issue, the eighty percent of the people
feel like this. Twenty percent of the people feel like that,
and instead of you know, pulling back, instead of moderating themselves,

(01:11:47):
they double down. I mean, that's what we see time
and time again out of the Democrat Party. And you know,
sex changes, transgenderism and whatnot. That's just one of the
issues that we're talking about. I've seen this headline from

(01:12:07):
the Daily Wire, just piggybacking on the last article Jasmine
Crockett calling Trump hitler is accurate language. And this article
came out earlier today. Actually, this headline was a holy crap.
Let me go ahead and get into it. Hard left

(01:12:29):
representative Jasmine Crockett, Democrat out of Texas, once again showed
the country just how unhinged her rhetoric has become, doubling
down on the claim that President Donald Trump is a
wanna be hitler, defending her word choice as accurate in

(01:12:50):
a CNN interview on Sunday. Crockett, a darling of the
progressive left and a fixture of MSNBC, first made the
comparison on July twentieth during an appearance on Alex whit Reports.
In that statement, She accused a GOP of being complicit
in shielding Trump, declaring, we have someone that is occupying

(01:13:10):
the White House and as far as I'm concerned, he
is an enemy to the United States. I have called
him so many things, but this want to be Hitler
for sure. The left is unwilling. I mean, you would
think that after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, you would

(01:13:33):
think that when the facts came out that he was
a far left member of the Rainbow community, that you
would think that for a time at least, they would
be willing to tone down the rhetic, that they would
at least be willing to admit that, you know what,

(01:13:55):
this isn't good for our country and this makes us
look bad. You would think that they would have the
wherewithal to do that, but they haven't. And Jasmin Krackett
is just another example of just how far removed they
really are from cultural issues. They've lost They've lost their

(01:14:24):
ever loving mind. Holy crap. I mean, dude, it's clear
you would think that they would tone it down a bit,
that they would learn. I mean, the Democrats are so

(01:14:46):
used to and what you know, I'm using this. You know,
Democrats generic as you know, the politicians, the party as
a whole. I'm not necessarily speaking about the voters. It's
the leadership, right, That's who I'm talking to or talking
about rather. But they're so used to being able to

(01:15:10):
do whatever it is that they want to and mainstream media,
legacy media, that they would carry their water, that they
would spread their lives. They're so used to dissenting voices
being silenced on social media. They're so used to.

Speaker 8 (01:15:31):
People only knowing their side of the argument that in
this new era, this new age of the information age,
they're not used to actually getting pushedback from people that
may actually know what they're talking about.

Speaker 2 (01:15:46):
And the Democrat Party is struggling. I mean, come on,
AOC being a I mean, I don't want to say
the top choice, but like, yeah, I mean she's a contender.
I could have been a contender. I know. I'm so ridiculous.
I don't care. Yeah, the Democrat Party is so used

(01:16:16):
to not having opposition they have no idea what to
do when that's what they're faced with. It's true, anyway,
That's all I got for y'alls today. That is it.
If you want to support the Channel, head on over
to the ho Ho No wait, head on over to
stinkpickle dot com and pick yourself up some merch over there.

(01:16:38):
If you see something that you like but just not
on a product you want let me know, send me
an email ho Ho at the Ho Hoshow dot com
and I'll go ahead and see if I can't get
that done for you. And if you want to check
out all the articles that I used in the show,
head on over to the Ho Ho Show dot com.
Click on the newsfeed tab and you'll see my magazine
over there on Flipboard. It might go to by one

(01:17:01):
stop shop for anything everything in all things news. That's
what I use. I like them, I've been using them
for a while. Anyway, you also have yourself a great
one and I will see you and the next one.
This has been the Ho Ho Show. For more information,
you can head to the Ho Hoshow dot com and
for the merchandise store, you can head on over to

(01:17:22):
Stinkpickle dot com. That is s T I N K
P I k l E dot com. Until next time,