Shifting Political Landscape

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Yes, welcome to the rated the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as we
discuss news, politics, current events, had so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do.

Speaker 2 (00:25):
Because three.

Speaker 3 (00:33):
Burr broadcasting live from Weapini Soft Production Studio. Be Welcome
to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm your host,
Ho Ho. So hew y'all's doing I hope you're doing good?
I really do it. Hello Dave over there in Rumbleland.
Good to see us, sir. Yeah, I figured i'd give
you a text, let you know, just in case Rumble
didn't quite give you that notification. But anyway, we got

(00:58):
quite a few things to talk about today, well not
really quite a few, I mean, you know, we definitely
got a few things to talk about. Some things are
going to bring up and as far as the title
of the show goes, definitely relevant for this episode because
a shifting of the political landscape, because that's what we're

(01:20):
going to be seeing hopefully very soon. And the Democrats
are absolutely terrified about this. They really are, I mean
they are. They're quaking in their shoes. Boy howdy, And
you know, it's it's kind of nice. It really is.
And some of the arguments that I've heard are just absurd.

(01:43):
I mean, they are really absurd. We will get into
that the first article that I'm wanting to get into,
and of which case you can follow along if you
want to, head on over to the ho Hotshow dot
com and just click on that newspeedtab. You'll see the
magazine over there on flipboard, my go to hobe. That's
where I put everything. So let's go ahead and start

(02:06):
right here with this one and Dave put in here,
he goes. The only notification I got was from you,
thank you well, you are welcome, sir. That's unfortunate that
Rumble isn't giving out the notifications. I can't tell you
as to why. It's kind of weird, but anyway, let's
go ahead and get into it. So this first article
is from the Daily Caller. No appetite among Democrat voters

(02:28):
to give in Carville warns GOP of a reckoning on
shutdown and elections. And that's what we're actually going to
start first, is elections, because as I said, there is
a hopefully an upcoming shift to the political landscape and

(02:49):
this could affect numerous states. It really has it really can.
So y'alls are aware of the claims of jerry mander
that happened from the Democrats to Texas, and you know,
it's kind of one of the things that cracks me

(03:09):
up to hear. You have these people that are talking
about jerrymandering and they are ignoring all the different times
when Democrats have done just that. I don't need to
take you any further than my own home state of Illinois.
Illinois is absolutely ridiculous whenever it comes to jerrymandering. I mean,

(03:31):
you look at the electoral map and it's I mean,
the only way you can explain it is jerrymandering. Because
what's interesting is, and this is in the case of Illinois,
but you have Republicans that consist of like over forty

(03:51):
two percent of the population, and that number will will
definitely grow in coming money and actually have been just
for the simple fact is you know, with getting rid
of a lot of the illegals that we all know
are allowed to vote because Heaven forbid, we take away
their ability to vote. Oh my god, we're taking away

(04:13):
their voice. But you know, they're ignoring the fact that
these illegal aliens do not have the right, the legal
right to vote in our elections. They shouldn't be doing that, period.
So you take away the illegal aliens, and then the

(04:35):
amount of Republicans are going to be going up in
these states. So that's one. But Republicans represent forty two
percent of the population in Illinois. However, whenever it comes
to representation, because of the jerrymandering, they only have like

(05:00):
less than seventeen percent of the seats in state Congress.
How is that even possible? I mean, I know I've
said it before. Whenever it comes to how these lines
should be drawn, it should be based off of And
this is my opinion. You know, you may disagree with

(05:22):
me if you want to, and that's fine, But I'm
basing this off of national I mean, that's what I'm
basing it off of. Absolutely. Because you have some states
that have a huge population, you have other states that
don't have as big of a population, and that's how
those things are done on the federal level. Why isn't
that mirrored in a state because states have already pre

(05:51):
existing lines called counties, So why don't they do that
type of a thing instead of drawing an elect choral
map just based off of what they want to whatever
metric they want to use. Why don't they just use
on the state level the same thing that they use
on the federal level and use the lines that are

(06:12):
already there county lines. I mean, it's already a jurisdictional line,
is it not. I don't understand why they don't do that,
and in all honesty, they really should. I mean, they're
supposed to because one of the things that the Constitution
United States of America, one of the things that it

(06:33):
guarantees for every state is a republican form of government,
as in a representative republic, constitutional representative republic. That's what
it guarantees in every state. And if that's how it
is on the federal level, it really should be mirrored
that way on a state level. Again, that's my opinion.

(06:55):
I know that there are many out there that may
not agree, and especially the Democrats because they love the
jerrymander and they do that for a reason. Let's go
ahead and continue. So if you don't know, this very
discussion is going on right now in the Supreme Court.
This is things that they are arguing, This is things
that they are debating. This headline again from the Daily Caller.

(07:20):
Let's go ahead and dive right into that one Supreme
Court signals Democrats days of drawing up congressional districts by
race might be over, because that's one of the things
that they're talking about right now in the Supreme Court,
getting rid of race based voting district lines. That's what

(07:47):
they're talking about doing. Now, look, people, I know now
this is again. I know that there are those of
you out there that may not agree with this to
think that this is something that should be staying. But
in all honesty, and here's my fundamental view on this, Okay,

(08:08):
Racism is racism, and racism, simply put is defined by
discrimination based off of somebody's race, not based off of
the individual, not based off of you know, their merit,

(08:29):
not based off of their character. It's simply based on race.
And there are quite a few different anti racism laws
out there. They're already in existence. I mean, there's no
arguing that it's very prevalent. But whenever you're looking at

(08:54):
various things like oh, good grief, the name just went
right out in my head, Holy crap, I hate it
whenever that happens. But like anti discrimination laws and different
things like that, you know, those are measures that's called
basically anti racism. Anti racism is still racism. It is

(09:16):
because you are favoring one race over another. And here's
another thing. I'm not for that either, I'm really not.
I mean, I understand why they may have done it
in the day. I mean I very much. I do
understand why they did that in the day. But if

(09:38):
you look at how things have been going over the
past several decades, you have quite a few anti racism
laws out there to where you cannot discriminate, and if
you are found to discriminate, then you're held to account
for that. You have to change things, you have to
change your policies. There's already a lot of laws in

(09:59):
play that keep companies from discriminating, you know, new hires,
you know how they enact different rules, all this other
kind of stuff. There's a lot of laws that are
already out there, and anti discrimination laws, anti racism laws.
It is still racism because what you end up having,

(10:19):
what you end up happening, Holy crap, what you end
up having is things like DEI I mean's this is
just another layer, another level of this very same thing,
because what you are doing is you are pushing somebody

(10:41):
to be hired based off of their race, their gender,
their sexual identity, or whatever they want to do in
the bedroom instead of merit. I am all for and
I don't know if you are, but I am all
for merit based, merit based promotion period. That's the way

(11:03):
it should be done in America.

Speaker 2 (11:07):
Now.

Speaker 3 (11:07):
I mean Democrats aren't all for this in every avenue.
I mean, you look at you know, NBA. This is
one of the prime examples. You know, you look at NBA,
and you know what you see is a vast majority
of the players are black. I'm all for it. Let

(11:28):
it happen. Why are they black? Because of the best players,
they're better. I mean, if it was DEI in there,
you would see far more white players, you would see
Asian players, you would see all kinds of different nationalities,
you know. And this type of thing when done not organically,

(11:49):
when it's forced, you end up having unattended consequences. But
whenever it happens organically, you usually see the best results,
the best people moving forward, the best people getting hired,
the best people getting promoted. That's how these things end

(12:11):
up happening. I despise the racial quotas and the DEI
crap and I mean, in all honesty, you really want
to stop and think about it.

Speaker 2 (12:26):
So do you.

Speaker 3 (12:30):
One of the biggest things thrown out there examples if
you will, that are thrown out there. You know, two
different examples. If you jump into a plane, not jump
into a planet. You know, you go into a plane.
You want your pilot to be qualified. You don't have to.

(12:53):
You don't want to question whether the pilot that is
flying the plane was a DEI higher as in he
got hired just to you know, fulfill a racial quota
in LGBTQ quota. You want them to be merit based
higher merit based promotion. You want to make sure, you
want to ensure. You want to know that that person

(13:17):
can fly the plane. You want to know that that
person was the best person for the job, and that's
why they got their job, not because of their color,
not because of their you know, their race, their gender,
their sexuality. You want to know that they can do
the job, period, because that's what matters to you, because

(13:38):
you know that if it's a DEI hire, you may
or may not make it to your destination safely. Here's
another example. Doctors, surgeons, you have a a life, a
critical you know something critical happens in your life. You're

(14:00):
going to have open heart surgery. Do you want your
doctor that's going to be cutting you open, that is
literally going to have your heart in their hands. Do
you want that person to be a DEI Higher that
may not be qualified to do the job, that only
got hired because of their race, their gender, their sexuality,

(14:23):
or do you want the best person for the job.
I don't know about you, but I want the best
person for the job. I don't want the dei Higher,
not because I have anything against not because I'm going
to discriminate or I do discriminate based off of race, gender, sexuality.

(14:46):
But I want the best person for the job, period.
And everybody wants that. I mean, when it comes to
that kind of thing, everybody wants a Democrats, Republicans. I
don't care who you are. I don't care what class
you're in. I don't care how much money you make.
You want the best person for the job when it's

(15:07):
going to have a personal impact on your life. Everybody
has the exact same frame of mind. For somebody else,
they don't care why because it doesn't affect them, but
for themselves, every single one of them believes the same
thing they put in and he goes. I understand as well,
it was well intended. Ultimately, it's racism to correct racism, absolutely,

(15:30):
and that's where I'm going with this. I think I
know we're past that now. We need to be one
hundred percent merit based and absolutely, and that's where I'm
going because I understand the validity. In its time. It
was to force people, force employers, force businesses to not
just pick the white guy because they were racist. It

(15:52):
was to pick the best person for the job. I mean,
that's what the intention was, and I understand that. I'm
not stupid, I'm not ignorant, but most people out there
today they're not racist. Now look, I'm not saying that
racism doesn't exist in some way, shape or form. I'm

(16:13):
not saying that whatsoever. Okay, Yeah, I'm sure that there
are people out there that are still racists, I have
no doubt, But the vast majority of people we've grown
beyond that. And in some places it may be different

(16:38):
than others. I mean, granted, I you know, I live
in small town central Illinois. You know there's not a
lot of people Okay, I may not have in the
town that I live. I may not have a you know,
a huge it is not a huge population of people.
But I tell you what for as small as we

(17:00):
which we are a city where a small city, a
baby city, but we're still a city. As weird as
that is, day put in her, he goes that goes
for pilots, doctors, police and vice presidents abse. Frequently you
want the right person for the job, you know. And
that's the thing, I mean, the the biggest smear against

(17:21):
you know, Kamala Harris was the fact that she was
the DEI Higher And Joe Biden was very clear about that.
He only, uh, you know, he only put her on
the ticket underneath him as vice president because she was
a woman and she was black. It wasn't because she
was qualified, and lord knows that she wasn't. But he

(17:43):
was opening up, open and honest about that she was
the DEI Higher. How disgraceful is that? I mean, think
about that. And this is the thing that you know,
I'll tell you what. If you are somebody who is black,
if you're somebody whom is you know, named the person
the group of people that benefits from DEI. If you

(18:04):
are that and you get any type of promotion you get,
any type of job you get, any type of race,
you will always ask the question, did I get this
job raise promotion because of my race, because of my gender,
because of my sexuality? Or did I get it because

(18:25):
I actually earned it? Now, I don't know about you,
but I wouldn't ever want to ask that question. I
never would, But how can you not in the current

(18:45):
landscape that we're in right now? Of DEI I mean,
you're going to always ask that question. Did I get
this job because I'm qualified, because I was the best
person for the job, because I worked harder than everybody else,
Or did I get it simply because of my race,
my gender, or my sexuality. That's a hard pital swallow

(19:09):
for somebody that actually cares about that kind of thing.
I mean, for somebody like Kamal La Harris that doesn't care,
then it wouldn't matter, of course, But to a lot
of people out there it would actually matter. I know
that would matter to me, and I'm sure most of
you out there would matter to you too. But as

(19:38):
a nation overall, we have moved away from the racism
to where it's no longer you know, it's really no
longer a thing. I mean, like I was saying before,
you know, yes, I live in a small city. I do.
But even though I live in a small city, there

(19:59):
is still quite a bit of racial diversity in my city.
I mean, every one of them, in some way, shape
or form, are represented, even in my own home city,
on the police force, business owners, aldermen, you know. I mean,

(20:22):
they're all represented. But I mean in some places where
there may not be a lot of black people, I
can understand why somebody may be hesitant because you know, oh,
this is all I hear about black people, And yeah,
I mean that's definitely going to sway how you think
of different groups. Of course it is. How can it not.

(20:44):
If that's what you're bombarded with, then yeah, it's going
to influence you. But at least if you have an
open mind knowing a thing or two about a thing
or two, you know, like like okay, I'll take I'll
take my own experience and I'll tell you about it,
you know, becoming a truck driver going into various places.

(21:07):
I mean, dude, yeah, I was, you know, growing growing
up in a smaller town that even though we had diversity,
there still wasn't a lot of different races around and
so yeah, whenever I entered into the real world, going
into major cities and you know, becoming a truck driver,

(21:27):
especially going to all kinds of different areas, I was
confronted with whether or not I was a racist. And
I'll tell you what, No, I'm not. I absolutely know
I'm not a racist. I mean, in a lot of ways,
I'll be quite honest with you, I absolutely don't mind
having conversation with people of other races. In fact, I

(21:49):
find it entertaining. I find it fun. I find it
a lot of you know, it's it's beneficial to me
in a matter of speaking. You know, I enjoy it.
I like talking to people. I enjoy talking to people,
getting points of view from other people. It's awesome. Playing

(22:10):
cards with various people is fun, and I think a
lot of people out there feel the same way. It's
merit based. And just as Martin Luther King Jr. Used
to say, you know, judge them not, or judge me
not by my race, but you know the color of

(22:31):
my skin, but by the quality of my character. I'm
paraphrasing that. I don't remember the quote exactly, but you
understand what I'm saying. That's what he was all about
day put in here, he goes Harris should have refused
a job based on Biden's criteria for hiring her.

Speaker 4 (22:48):
You know.

Speaker 3 (22:48):
But that's the thing. If it was somebody who actually
cared about merit versus the DEI hire, she would have
the fact that she didn't because the fact that she
just looked at this as another rung on the ladder
and it didn't matter to her how she got to position.

(23:08):
She benefited from the DEI hire, that's what she wanted
part of her goal. She didn't care. And for some people, yeah,
you're not going to care whether you're the DEI higher.
But for others out there, oh yeah, they're going to care.
But back to this article, talking about the Supreme Court

(23:31):
signaling the Democrats day of drawing up congressional districts by
race might be over. I'm excited about this because one
of the things they're talking about doing is doing away
with these race based district lines. And if this actually happens, Okay,

(23:53):
here's the reality of it. If this actually happens. Because
I don't remember what state it was I heard about it.
I don't rememb remember what state it was in, but
they were actually talking about drawing up another electoral district
based off of race to give black people more voting power.

(24:13):
And of which case, It's like why, but it's a
Supreme Court goes by way of how they normally rule
on different things. It looks like this type of thing.
Maybe it or because again, anti discrimination is still discrimination. Like, dude,

(24:34):
I'll tell you what. You know, here's kind of the
thing based off of my town, and I'm sure that
there's a lot of other towns out there that have
you know, a lot of people in a lot of
various places have the same experience and in a lot
of ways, and based off of my own experience, it's
not about race per se. It's about where you live

(25:01):
that is primarily based off of how much money you make.
You know. I remember listening to Ralphie May, awesome comedian,
loved watching him. You know, he was a heavy set
white guy, and he spoke quite often on this exact

(25:21):
subject that it wasn't about racism, it was about, you know,
how much money you make your class per se. I mean, granted,
I'm not all for you know, separating and dividing people
based off of class, but class warfare is a thing.

(25:43):
But people that live in the same area, you know,
from how much money they make, they're going to have
the same experience. Doesn't matter about their color, doesn't matter
about their gender or their sexuality. It's about where they live.
It doesn't matter about your race. Your race isn't a factor,

(26:10):
you know. He joked, Ralph, he made joke that you know,
it's what color are you? I'm Poe. That's what color
I am. I'm Poe. You know, he's living there just
like everybody else is. It wasn't about race. It was
about how much money he made. He's having the same
struggles that everybody else is it lives in that area,
because he's having those problems too, because he was Poe.

(26:36):
It wasn't about how much money he made. It was
about his economic class. That's where the voter districts. I
don't want to say where they should be drawn, but
if you're going to take anything into consideration, then maybe
that's one of the things you should take into the consideration.

(26:59):
Now again, you should discriminate, so it still wouldn't be
constitutional put those lines there anyway, but there you go.
They put in He goes, I must admit I'm my
small town and village in upstate New York. The non
white representation is between small and non existent. Yeah, you know,

(27:20):
but they're not on the police force or government. See,
I got you, you know, And like I said, you know,
various different places have various different you know experiences. There
we go. That's the word I'm looking for, you know.
And I know that there's a town relatively close to me.

(27:41):
It's a retirement town, small village, doesn't have all that
many people, and like five hundred people I think is
the population of it. I don't know as if there's
any black people in that town. So I mean it's
all based off of what you are, you know, what
you experience in your own life. Sure of course. But

(28:02):
just because you are from a small town that doesn't
have a lot of diversity still does not mean that
you are racist. Just means that not a lot of
people like going there and living in that town, living
in that area. That's something different. He said. They're represented

(28:24):
in restaurants and the kitchens. Hopefully their kids will do better. Yeah. Absolutely.
So I'm not saying that racism is dead in America.
But what I am going to say that racism isn't
the driving factor that the left would have you believe

(28:46):
that it is. It's about economic standing. That's where the
division is. That's where the differences in experiences in your
life actually takes place. That's it. And if the Supreme

(29:16):
Court actually decides consistently with how they have in the past,
then what we are going to see is race based
voting districts being dissolved and something that more resembles what
the constitution, what voting districts should look like based off

(29:39):
of the Constitution, not based off of race, but based
off of where you live. And in my opinion, the
fairest way to do that would be to make it
county line instead of just arbitrarily drawing a line somewhere.
Because it doesn't matter who you are, what party you represent,
and le you use a concrete, a non arbitrary, arbitrarily

(30:07):
drawn line, somebody's going to accuse you of something regardless that,
oh you're doing this to benefit your party and to
hell with us, and there you go. But no, if
you actually draw it based off of a non arbitrary
line like county lines, then who in the right who
can actually say that you're jerrymandering. It just makes sense

(30:32):
to me. But here's the thing, and here's the reality
of it. And this is why the Democrats are so
against this being done because they know if that, if
this happens, that you're talking between that and deporting illegal aliens,

(30:58):
You're talking like thirty seats that the Democrats are going to,
well forty to fifty seats overall both houses of Congress
that would be lost to the Democrats and that the
Republicans would pick up. That's the reality, and Democrats know it,

(31:24):
like twenty seats in the Senate and thirty plus seats
in the House of Representatives if they actually redraw these
voting district lines. Democrats are terrified because they like power,

(31:45):
they like to control. But if the Supreme Courts actually
rules on this in a way that better represents the public,
better represents the people, better represents the constant, the Democrats
are in trouble and they know it. I'm excited because

(32:09):
maybe then we will have something that more resembles the
democratic process, because I mean, that's how we are supposed
to hire our representatives. It's through the democratic process. No,
we are not a democracy, but we still use the
democratic process in order to elect our representatives and whenever

(32:33):
you gerrymander, whenever you pigeonhole, whenever you arbitrarily draw these
voting districts, is it really representative of the republic of
the population. No, it isn't. That's a cold heart simple truth.
It's not representative of the people. Whenever you arbitrarily draw

(32:53):
lines in places, it doesn't mean anything, just to where
you can get a better electoral outcome. It doesn't benefit
the people. All it benefits is the people who want
to stay in power. Look at Illinois as a prime example,
prime example. Who benefits from this Governor J. B. Pritsker,
That's who benefits from this in Illinois. Dave put in

(33:19):
here he goes, by the way, how many white people
are living and working in the Congo, China, India, Haiti,
Puerto Rico and so on. It's a good question, you know,
like I was saying, I mean like it's it's not
about race, you know, it's economic standing, because I mean,

(33:40):
you know, the more money you make, regardless of race,
regardless of gender, regardless of sexuality, how much money you
make determines where you're able to live, and the higher
you are on the economic on the economic rungs, determines

(34:02):
where you can move. You know, the more expensive the
area is that you live in, the less likely you're
going to have crime, the safer you are. I mean,
think about it. These congressmen and women they live in,
you know a lot of the times, gated communities, high

(34:25):
end communities. They don't have to worry about the crime
like you do. In these poverished areas. They don't have
to worry about it. They don't care. Black, white, red,
doesn't matter. They're all the same. Why because of their race, No,
it's because of their economic standing, how much money they make,

(34:50):
that determines whether you can move out of an impoverished
area and move into a more upper class area or
whether you're stuck there having to deal with it. It's
not about race, And in all honesty and modern history,
my entire lifetime, it's never been about race. I'm forty

(35:16):
six years old, almost forty seven. I you know, I'm
still a young pup. I acknowledge that. Don I'll tell
you what. I'm starting to feel old, I really am. Anyway,
Let's move on. So Scotus appears skeptical of maintaining race
based districts. This is from Just the News so during
oral arguments, Associate Justice Neil Gorsich appears skeptical of allowing

(35:42):
stakes to states to explicitly use race as a criteria
for drawing such maps. You know, I want to move
on from this because one of the other arguments that
I heard, and this was actually coming out of Kintanji Brown.
So this headline from the Daily Caller, and I want

(36:03):
you to pay attention to this. I really do, because
this is how Democrats feel about you, two black people.
This is how the Democrats feel about you. Because I
want you to remember, Okay, they didn't want you know,
they don't want voter ID because from the Democrats, black
people aren't smart enough to get a driver's license. Yeah,

(36:31):
they want the DEI because black people aren't good enough
to get a job. They suck, they can't read, they
can't use again, you know, and this is according to Democrats.
Black people can't ready, they suck at doing everything. They're
too stupid to get a driver's license. They're too stupid
to get a car, they're too stupid to drive. That's
according to the Democrats. Black people suck at doing everything.

(36:54):
And if not for DEI, if not for racial quotas,
then black people people would be nowhere. That's according to
the Democrats. Okay, now this headline from the Daily Carlo.
Let me go ahead and read this for you. Supreme
Court Justice Katanji Brown makes insane comparison in court belittles

(37:16):
her people and one fell SWI because this is a
claim that Katanji Brown made in arguing to keep race
based districts. Because Katanji Brown she compared black people to

(37:41):
handicap people in handicap accessible places. Because not having a
business that is handicap accessible is discrimination against handicap people.

(38:03):
Regardless of whether it was intentional or not, that is
still the result. That was still the outcome. And by
not having race based districts, then that's the same thing
as not having a wheelchair accessible or handicap accessible business
or a building. That's what she claims. And here's my

(38:26):
argument to this, because I've seen some of the district
maps in Illinois. You know, if you actually draw a
line based off of something that isn't arbitrary, because have
you looked at some of the district lines in Illinois,
They are ridiculous. But here's the thing, No, how are
you going to go to a voting district that is

(38:47):
close to you if it's arbitrarily drawn, if it's only
based off of race, you know, because this redrawn district
map may actually put you farther away from your polling
place than where it would be drawn if it was
actually drawn by something that made more sense. Because having

(39:12):
these racial divided voting districts actually is racist against all
these people that they claim are not racist actions at all.
But that was her insane comparison that black people are
the same as handicapped people. Are you kidding me? Are

(39:38):
you serious right now? Because yeah, that's what her argument was.
Being black is the same as being handicapped in America,
and we have to have these voting district maps that
benefit black people that are drawn strictly based off of

(40:01):
because it's the same. You know, not having it would
be the same as not having a wheelchair accessible building.
How ridiculous is that Dayanario goes New York Governor Hulkel
thinks kids in Harlem have no idea what a computer

(40:22):
is exactly, he said, I'll send you a video about
it that's hilarious. Unless you've already seen it. I've I
can't say as if I've ever seen the video, but
I remember hearing about it, that black kids are too
stupid to use a computer. I remember hearing about it,

(40:43):
and I know I've talked about it on this show
at least I'm pretty sure I have, you know, but
that's one of the things I was talking about though,
you know, with with Democrats say that black people are
too stupid, too stupid to use a computer, that they're
too dumb to go and get an ID. They don't
know what one is. They're too dumb to get a

(41:03):
hotel room because you need ID. They're too stupid to
buy alcohol, because you need an ID to buy alcohol.
They're too stupid to get an ID in order to
buy you know, get on the plane, buy cigarettes, buy alcohol.
You know, I'll do all this other kind of stuff.
I mean, and it's absolutely ridiculous, But that's what black
people think about or I'm sorry, that's what democrats think

(41:25):
about black people. They're too stupid. Thank you for that link, Dave.
I appreciate that. So I'm going to go ahead and
take a quick break, and when I return, I'm going
to talk about six Wait, no, let's let's go ahead
and put this in here. We'll go ahead and do
that now. So here are six key moments from Scotis

(41:49):
Arguments and landmark race based redistricting case. Let's see. Yeah, okay,
never mind, there's not really anything I mean, granted, it's
still a good article to read, definitely recommend it, but no,

(42:14):
So we're going to go ahead and take a quick break,
like I was saying before, and when I return, we're
going to talk a little bit about the shutdown, a
little bit about you know, where we're at with it,
what they're trying to do, how long it's been going on,
and some unintended consequences of the shutdown. That's what we

(42:35):
are going to get into right after this quick break.
Where are we going for the song? Let's go ahead
and play this one. I like this one, So just
a few minutes and I will be right back.

Speaker 2 (43:00):
UN's beating down on my track or seat, Dusty road rising,
no shade over tree, worked up, sweat, Lord, it ain't fair.
Now there's a swamp brewing under there. Boots are dragging through.

Speaker 3 (43:17):
The mud off it from all this work.

Speaker 2 (43:19):
The sweat starts to stick, cheapen and burn and got
a real high cost. Feels like a milk lost in
the salt swamp fast blues. Oh it's tough, too bad,
sweat soaking through my underwar.

Speaker 3 (43:36):
I take a cool breeze over.

Speaker 5 (43:40):
This damn heat.

Speaker 3 (43:42):
But it's a light about here in the farmer seat.

Speaker 2 (43:50):
On my shirt to dry on the old fence post.
Try to cool down with the sun still roast every
steps of battle, this swamp won't quit losing the fire
out in this summer grit. Neighbor's waves think I've lost

(44:14):
my mind, but it's the heat that's making me crying.
Buckets of ice won't even come close to drying of
this Southern Coast swam fast blues.

Speaker 3 (44:25):
I can't take much more.

Speaker 6 (44:28):
My jump in the creatus to restore wish for that
rainin all ubridge, to dry these blues and find some peace.

Speaker 2 (45:03):
A neighbor's way. You think I've lost my mind, but
it's the heat that's making meat grind.

Speaker 7 (45:09):
Puckets of ice won't even come close to drying up
this Southern coat.

Speaker 3 (45:16):
Sound fast blues. I can't take much more.

Speaker 6 (45:22):
My job and the creator just to raise store wish
for that rain.

Speaker 3 (45:30):
And all of brings to dry these blues and.

Speaker 2 (45:35):
Find some peace.

Speaker 3 (45:51):
Do you work at any of the myriad of jobs
where you might have to sell on your bum all day. Well,
if so, maybe you know what it's like to suffer
from the condition known as swamp ass. Well, if so,
have I got the solution for you. It's high monkey
buck powder. That's right, it's high monkey butt powder. You
can use an indoors, outdoors work or play, or on

(46:14):
any occasion when you sit on your bum all day.
Don't let your buns get read. Use anti monkey butt
powder instead, available wherever anti friction powder is sold. Ah. Right,
and we are backs. So we're going to move the
conversation over to a different arena. We're going to be
talking a little bit about the shutdown and some unintended consequences.

(46:37):
This article from the from huff Post. The Huffington Post headline,
there's about to be an awful new consequence of the shutdown.
It's a hard pillow swallow, and it may be the
only thing some kids get to eat. So this article
says that, thankfully for millions of families, one piece of

(46:59):
the puzzle at Wait, Nope, I started that in the
wrong place. So as the government shut down continues, government
agencies like the Social Security Administration and programs like Medicaid,
have been fielding questions about whether the money that Americans
rely on will continue to flow. Thankfully, for many families,
one piece of the puzzle has so far not been

(47:21):
in question. School districts around the country have put out
messages reassuring families that the National School Lunch Program, which
provide low cost or free nutritious meals to school children,
will continue for now. November will be a different story.
It continues with some other I don't really care about. Typically,

(47:43):
school districts pay for school lunches and then are reimbursed
by the government. But without a funding agreement, the government
isn't able to spend money on programs and normally I'm sorry,
programs it funds normally like school unches. Now here's the thing,
Contrary to what a lot of people may believe, the

(48:06):
school lunch program isn't actually funded through the Department of Education.
It is actually it is actually funded through the Department
of War. And I know it doesn't make a lot
of sense, but here's actually where the you know, where

(48:27):
the whole thing actually came from. Because you had, you know,
military families living in various areas across the country living
on military bases that weren't paying property taxes, and the
majority of funding for schools comes from property taxes, and
since they were missing out on funding for these children,

(48:52):
that's where this whole school lunch program came from in
the first place. And so it was the Department of
War that funded these lunch program So that's where the
money comes from. And as I you know, spoke before
about this, yeah, I will definitely agree that it's something

(49:14):
that should be done, you know, but in all lotest
I mean, here's my thing, Okay, if you are going
to have you know, especially if it's going to be
one of the things that you are forcing kids to
go to school period, all right, because there's this thing
called truancy. You're forcing children to go to school. If

(49:36):
you're going to do that, especially for as long as
you're forcing them to go to school, I don't remember,
I don't know what the hours of school where you
live is. But if that's going to be a thing
and you're going to keep them through lunch, then the
school should pay for their lunch. I mean, you're already

(49:58):
paying the taxes for them to go go to school.
You're keeping them through lunch. Children should not have to
pay for their own lunches period. I mean, I don't
care if that is a you know, I don't care
if they're going to public school. I don't care if
they're going to private school. I don't care if they're

(50:18):
going to a church school. I don't care if they're
going to a charter school. It doesn't matter to me.
If you're paying tuition, which is expensive, especially when you're
talking about private schools, you shouldn't have to pay individually
for your own lunches. I mean, that should be included
with the tuition. I mean, it really should be. Okay,

(50:40):
that's just my personal opinion on that. I think it's
wrong for a school to charge this child for lunch
whenever they're paying tuition to be there in the first place,
and that tuition in most cases isn't cheap. Proper taxes

(51:00):
in all cases isn't cheap. I mean, every single person
who lives in my town pays property taxes. Regardless of
whether you have any children or not, you're still paying
property taxes. So if those taxes are getting paid regardless

(51:26):
of whether you have children, and regardless of what school
those children are going to, with the amount of money
that it costs to pay your property taxes. No child
or parent of child should have to pay for their meals,
especially whenever they are forced to stay in school to

(51:47):
eat it. And regardless of whether they have, you know,
an open campus policy at that school or not, doesn't
matter to me. I really don't care. I don't think
anybody should have to pay for lunch whenever you're at
school period in a story. So yeah, this is most

(52:11):
definitely a an unintended consequence, very much. So I wish
this wasn't the case, but you know, I mean, here's
kind of what it amounts to. Whenever we're talking about
the the shutdown, Okay, because you have Chuck Schumer, various

(52:36):
other people and the Democrat Party, they are refusing to
fund the government because they want to take care of
illegal aliens. That's what it amounts to. Okay, that's the
bottom line. Because everything that they are fighting for, everything

(52:56):
that they want, is designed to benefit illegal aliens and
to give them free stuff. I mean, that's the truth.
You boil it all down, that's what it amounts to.
They don't care that children may go hungry. They don't care.
They want illegal aliens to be able to benefit from

(53:21):
government funded, taxpayer funded programs. That's what they want. How
sad is that. You know, just recently, President Donald Trump
was able to negotiate peace in the Middle East once again.

(53:49):
And an analogy that I heard regarding this was absolutely hilarious.
It really was, because Donald Trump just proved that it
is easier to negotiate with actual terrorist organizations than what
it is to negotiate with Democrats. That's what President Trump

(54:20):
just proved. It's easier to negotiate with terrorists, actual legitimate
terrorists than what it is to negotiate with Democrats. That's
what Donald Trump just showed people. I mean, how pathetic
is that? Right, But that's what the Democrats are. They

(54:45):
want these illegal aliens to be taken care of, because
these illegal aliens are going to know that they're being
taken care of by the Democrat Party. And considering there's
a lot of districts out there, voting districts that allow
anybody to vote, so that they know that they're going
to vote for Democrats even though they're not supposed to
be voting in federal elections, not at all. That's actually

(55:07):
a violation of you know, voting laws. Democrats don't care
why Because it benefits them, That's what they want. This
article from the Daily Wire, I follow Country, then party
Fetterman blows the whistle and missed. The Dems wanted the shutdown.

(55:31):
They did. Democrat Party wanted the shutdown. And I'll tell
you what, you know, I never really paid all that
much attention to Federman until, you know, right before when
he got elected, right before he had a stroke. I
never really paid much attention to him. I'm just going

(55:51):
to be honest with you. But from what the overall
tone was about him, his stands, his voting habits. He
was more left before he had the stroke than what
he is now. You listen to him now and he
sounds a lot like a moderate and less like a

(56:15):
whack adoudal Democrat and that type of thing right there.
I support Country before I do party says it all,
you know, and in a honesty, I mean, if you
want to go back two hundred and fifty years, almost
two hundred and fifty years. One of the things that

(56:37):
our founding fathers were were fearful of, mindful of, was
you know. They they feared that eventually there would come
a point political parties would develop, and unfortunately the people
would vote for a representative not based off of their character,
not based off of who they are, not based off

(56:59):
of their platform, what they have done, what they intended
on doing. That they would only vote based off of
political party. And boy howdy, you look at what's going
on today, and they were so right in fearing that,
because that's what we have. There are far too many

(57:20):
people out there that only votes for somebody, not based
off of what they've done in the past, not based
off of their platform, not based off of, you know,
whether they are a good person, right for the job,
what have you. They only vote based off of whether
they have a D or an R behind their name,

(57:41):
and that's it. That's all they care about. I mean, dude,
I want to be honest with you. I am a
registered Republican absolutely, but whenever it comes to my political position,
I guess I can't really say party affiliate, but my
political position, I am a constitutional conservative with libertarian leanings

(58:07):
because I'm all about the Constitution. I am an originalist
at my core and also a live and let live
mindset whenever it comes to being all up in somebody's business.
The federal government was never designed to be all up
in somebody's business. It never was. It's ill equipped to
handle it. But I am a constitutional conservative absolutely. I'm

(58:35):
not Democrat, I'm not Republican, and I have voted for
people on both sides of the aisle. I have voted
for Democrats, I've voted for Republicans. And I've done this
not because of their party affiliation. But I've done this
on the local level because I knew them. I knew
who they were, I knew what they stood for, and

(58:59):
I vote for them because I believe that they would
represent me. I'm not ashamed to admit that. Yeah, I've
voted for people on both sides of the aisle, especially
in a local election, because I knew then It's not
about nor should it ever be about party affiliation. I mean,

(59:21):
that's just how hard is that to understand? Again, you know,
going back to the race argument. Merit, Judge me not
by my political affiliation. Judge me by my character. Judge
me by by merit, Judge me by my voting habits.

(59:45):
When was the last time you actually heard any representative
say something like that? I never have. But as time goes,
Fetterman is really sounding, I don't want to say, more
like a Republican than he is a Democrat, but he's
definitely going more moderate on a lot of different issues

(01:00:14):
they put in and goes. I voted for Bill Clinton
and Obama back in the day. And you know, honestly, dude, Okay,
so like, okay, I would have voted for JFK. I
absolutely would have. I don't remember who he was. You
know who he was running against. You know what the

(01:00:37):
Republican nominee was. I have no idea, I do not remember.
But based off of his tax plan, based off of
his you know, lower taxes, based off of a lot
of different things, you know, I would have voted for JFK.
Absolutely he was a Democrat. I don't care. And you know,

(01:01:02):
Bill Clinton, I honestly respected a lot of how he
chose to govern. I really did. There was several things
that you know, the several things that Bill Clinton did
that I respected. I'm just going to be honest with you.
I'm not a fan of Hillary Clinton, not by any

(01:01:22):
stretch of the imagination. But Bill Clinton did you know,
just how he chose to govern was pretty staking awesome
in a lot of different ways. As sue me, because

(01:01:47):
one of the things that I respected about Bill Clinton
is that you know, before he did and this happened
several times during his administration, but before he made major
decisions and major things, he got it, he asked the people.
You know, he didn't just make an arbitrary decision. He

(01:02:09):
would ask the people. I mean, he was very You know,
there's a lot of Democrats that are out there that
you know that base their positions based off of the
political wins is not necessary, you know where that you know,
the political wins have change. You know a lot of
them out there that they do that type of thing.
But you know, Bill Clinton didn't exactly do that, but

(01:02:31):
he would base his opinion based off of what the
people wanted because he understood that he was a representative
of the people, not of the party. You see the difference.
Bill Clinton understood that he wasn't a representative. He didn't

(01:02:52):
represent in his position the party. He represented the people.
And that's something I infected out of him a lot.
He would ask the people on a lot of meaningful
decisions that he made, what do you think I should
do in this What do you think would be the

(01:03:14):
right path forward? Bill Clinton did that several times during
his administration. I respected that it's not about party anyway.
Let's move on this next article I want to get

(01:03:35):
into because since we have touched based on immigration, illegal immigration,
this article from the Daily Signal, and I've talked about
this previously on the program. I've talked about the birthright citizenship,
my position on that, what the fourteenth Amendment actually means.

(01:03:59):
I've talked about that before, but to kind of not
really get into that more, but just another article to
kind of highlight the point a little bit. This headline
from the Daily Signal immigrants should assimilate, not change the constitution.

(01:04:19):
And I also seen this article. Let me go into
my flipboard. Maybe I got rid of that article actually
ooh yeah, yeah, yeah, I got rid of that article.
Never mind, it was an article that I seen that

(01:04:41):
you know, basically said like I don't remember the country,
Oh what was the country? I don't remember, but it was,
you know, our country is for us, not for immigrants.
That's how I've and these immigrants to come here illegal

(01:05:08):
or not assimilate. Don't come in here to try to
change the constitution, don't come in here to try to
benefit you. You guys hear that that's thunder going on.
We got a storm rolling in. We really do shouldn't

(01:05:29):
affect us on the show, but we got a storm
moving in, got some thunder going on in the background,
a little bit of rumbling. I felt that too. That
was that was a deep one. That was awesome. Anyway, assimilate,
don't try to change the constitution, because America is for Americans,
not for you know, illegals. You know, there's two different

(01:05:52):
comparisons that I've heard, you know, the salad bull and
the melting pot. You know, and and in a matter
of speaking, I'm going to tell you that I'm for
both whenever it comes to assimilation, because yes, I believe
that you should assimilate everybody who comes here and wishes
to come here legally, and we shouldn't have illegal immigration.

(01:06:14):
But if you want to come here, then you are
wanting to come here because you don't like where you
came from. If you did, you would have stayed there instead.
You want something better, which is why you came here.
Opportunity right, And part of doing that, you should educate

(01:06:34):
yourself on America. If you're going to come here, educate yourself,
assimilate into the culture. You know, And like I said,
you know, I'm I understand the melting pot aspect, and
I also understand the salad bull and in a matter
of speaking, I'm about both. I really am. Whenever it

(01:06:56):
comes to certain things of culture, I'm about the melting pot.
Whenever it comes to others, I'm about the salad bowl.
In some instances, it doesn't belong here, period. Like with
sharia law. I talked about that on a previous episode.
Sharia law has no place and is not compatible with

(01:07:18):
the constitution of the United States of America.

Speaker 1 (01:07:20):
It is not.

Speaker 3 (01:07:23):
Does sharia law belong in the United States of America.
Absolutely not. We should resist that at all costs. Whenever
it comes to other things in a culture, does it
belong here? Not at all. They've put in here in

(01:07:43):
a very good analogy. Actually, he said, I assimilate every
day at every job I've ever had. Absolutely assimilate whenever
it comes to certain aspects of culture. If it is
compatible with the culture in the United States, then okay,

(01:08:05):
assimilate melting pod. Let's bring it all together. You know,
I'm all about the melting pot. But you know, one
of the things I really love to different cultural food.
Oh yeah, dude, it is an American not to like
Chinese food. Yeah, you heard me, I have had in America.

(01:08:34):
I've had Chinese food. I've had Japanese food. I've had
Indian food, you know, from India. You are here now,
you know I've had that. I've had Mexican food. I've
had a lot of different types of food. And in

(01:08:55):
all honesty, I would never want somebody to not to
totally drop their heritage. Some of the things that are
great about where they came from, you know, Italian food,
French food, some of it, you know. Yeah, and those

(01:09:21):
are things that are welcome in America. Cuisine some cultures,
you know, they how they take care of their own relatives,
their loyalty to their own family, keep it. We welcome

(01:09:47):
that those type of cultural things here in America because
it's compatible with the culture here in America. But other
things like re law, like just you know, wiping your hand,
you know, wiping your butt with your hand instead of

(01:10:07):
using toilet paper and then you know, not washing it.
You know, that's why you don't wave with your left
hand in some countries because that's offensive because that's the
hand they use to wipe their butt with. And you
basically just called them a piece of crap. You know,
some people just you know, they they drop a deuce,

(01:10:29):
shake their leg, let it shake onto the ground, and
that's that. Then move on. Some of them don't don't
have toilets, and they just crap wherever. Those are things
that don't belong here. So, dude, we have running water

(01:10:51):
and toilets here in America. You don't need to act
like you're in your own country where you don't have
those modern amenities. You know, learn how to use a
toilet for crying out loud, wor'sh your hands. Those are
type of cultural differences we don't need here in America.

(01:11:23):
I talked about birthright citizenship in the past. They put
in he goes other than sushi, I eat almost every
other food, and dude, you have I mean I I've
had sushi from There's there's a Japanese restaurant. What's the

(01:11:45):
place called. I don't remember. It's a local cuisine. It's
not a U or a local restaurant. It's not a
national chain. It's it's very local. And you know they've
got they've actually got some sushi rolls that ooh man.
I'm not a huge fan of sushi. I'm really not
It's just it's not me, you know. But there are

(01:12:07):
quite a few different sushi roles that they have that
are amazing, absolutely amazing.

Speaker 2 (01:12:17):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:12:17):
It was funny. I got asked, all right, yeah, you
always know me whenever it comes to pronouncing certain words, right,
I say issues, I say winder, I say things like that.
I say jeloppino, and I had a buddy mine ask me,
not that long ago, he goes, do you call them
eros or do you call them guiros? I'm like, well, honestly,

(01:12:43):
that depends on where I'm buying it from, because if
I am going to Arby's, I say giros. Why because
it's an American version of food. Basically just using the name,

(01:13:05):
it's it's it's guyros. But there is a place not
far from me in Springfield, a place called Yanni's that
ERMI gerr them things are called Euros because this gentleman
is a He is Greek immigrated here legally. I don't

(01:13:25):
remember if he was like born in the US or
or what, but like his his parents or Greek from there,
and the recipes that he uses in his store are
authentic recipes. Those are Euros apse freako lutely and a

(01:13:50):
buddy of mine who you know. I mean, he's the
one who introduced me to Yanni's. He goes, I'm so
proud of you. I'm like, I know, I just I
thought that was hilarious, you know. But it's like, dude,
if it's all authentic, I call them Euros. If it's not,
I call them guy Rose, you know. And that's the
thing though too. It's like, you know, with Chinese food,

(01:14:11):
I mean a lot of times, or like especially when
we're talking Indian food and some other foods like that.
You know, some Mexican foods even. You know, if you
go to Taco Bell, you're not having Mexican food. You're not.
I mean, it's an American version, right, That's what it is.
You go to Taco Greeno, You're not having you know,
like actual Mexican tacos. I mean it's an American version.

(01:14:33):
That's that's what it is. You know, that's that's just
just simply puts, that's what it is. I remember watching
the TV series Landman and you Have. You know, this
guy got invited to eat some food and it was spicy,
like holy crap, it was spicy, and he was like,

(01:14:55):
holy cow, you know, he was having a hard time
eating it. Why because he's used to American food, dude,
not all that spice in it, and he was not
accustomed to it. He wasn't ready for the spice, he
wasn't ready for the heat. He was sweating. Holy crap, man.
I had a taste of India a while back ago,
and it was awesome stuff. It really was amazing food.

(01:15:16):
Loved it. And there was this little bitty you know,
like the miniature ice cream scoop of food of stuff
that smelled pretty good, and I thought it was, you know,
kind of a delicacy, which is why I didn't get
all that much of it. And I took this this
spoonful of it, Dave put in, He goes, it's fast food. Crap.

(01:15:41):
You're absolutely right. It's not exactly cultural food. It's fast food.
It's a fast food version. Absolutely. But I took this
scoop of this, you know, the spoonful of it. I
put it in my mouth and it tasted good there
for a few seconds, and then my face up. I
started sweating. My entire face turned red, and it was

(01:16:04):
a holy crap. What I come to find out was
that little scoop was something that was extremely hot and
was made to mix in a little bit with the
entirety of your dish. It wasn't made to be eaten
by itself. I was an idiot because that was the
hot stuff that they would normally put into it made

(01:16:27):
separate so that this way the poor weak American can
actually eat it. It's pretty much what it amounted to. Anyway.
Let's move on. But this, uh, this headline from Fox News.
I'm me go ahead and get back into this why

(01:16:47):
Scotis must affirm Trump's birthright citizenship order, because here's the thing.
Oh wait, sorry, that was wrong. There we go. Here's
the thing. I talked about this on previous episodes, and
I really do hope that this ends up happening. I
really do, because our founding fathers never intended birthright citizenship

(01:17:11):
to be used the way that it has been in
our nation. The Fourteenth Amendment does put a very clear
separation in there about under the jurisdiction thereof. It's a

(01:17:31):
very important distinction. And what that distinction means is if
you are not a legal resident, then when you have
a child, your child is not an American citizen. If
you are under the jurisdiction of another country, as in

(01:17:54):
not loyal to the United States, then you don't. Your
children are not automatically granted citizenship here in the US.
And that's one of the things about Trump's birthright Citizenship
Order that he is trying to change is to make
it more constitutional. I don't really understand the argument on this.

(01:18:18):
I just don't, but that's what this amounts to. And
with me, I mean, this is interesting because you know,
my grandmother was an alien. She was a citizen from Canada.

(01:18:39):
She was never a naturalized citizen. She was here legally,
she had a visa. She married my grandpa, whom was
a US citizen, naturalized US citizen, born here, no question,
And I've had the question asked to me. It's like, well,
if you're a great then you know, would she be

(01:19:06):
or would her children be considered citizens? Well, here's the thing.
My grandmother was a legal permanent resident. So according to
the Fourteenth Amendments and the arguments that they had whenever
they were, you know, arguing about the Fourteenth Amendment, according
to the Constitution, the fourteenth Amendment, yes, my mother and

(01:19:30):
her siblings American citizens. Besides that, my grandfather was an
American citizen period, not an immigrant. He was an American citizen. Now,
if my grandmother was an illegal, and if my grandfather
were illegally here, then no, my mother wouldn't be considered

(01:19:55):
an American citizen, not by the fourteenth Amendment and not
by me, and in all honesty, if that was the case,
that would take my own citizenship into question. But here's
the thing though, too. Trump isn't saying in this order

(01:20:16):
that this is going to retroactively affect everybody. That is
actually illegal to do that. There's a word for that.
I don't remember what the spiffy diffy legal term is,
but you can't say that this is illegal and then

(01:20:39):
retroactively go back in time and arrest somebody on a
new law. And President Trump is saying the same thing
that this is only going to affect people within thirty
days of when the executive order got written, so it

(01:21:00):
wouldn't affect you, it wouldn't affect me, because you can't
retroactively go back and say that something is illegal even
though when it was done, when the action took place,
it was legal. And like I said, there's a spiffy

(01:21:23):
dify you know, legal term for that. I don't remember
what it is, but you can't do that. That's wrong.
And this order that Trump is making is saying just that.
It doesn't retroactively go back throughout the course of the
entire human you know, American history with immigration. It doesn't

(01:21:47):
do that. It only affects the immediately in surrounding the
immediate people that are here, period. And even though I
don't necessarily agree with that, because people have used anchor
babies to gain access to the system, they've been doing
that for quite a while. And I don't like that.

(01:22:09):
I mean, I'm just going to be honest with you.
I don't like that. I don't like my money, my
tax payer money, to be stolen from me from people
that are on purpose coming here just to benefit from
the American way of life. I don't like that. And
they're doing it on purpose. If you want to be here,

(01:22:30):
be here legally absolutely Otherwise it just stay home. They
put in here. He goes Double Jeopardy, not exactly, actually
not at all, because Double Jeopardy good movie, by the way,
but double Jeopardy is trying somebody for the same crime twice.

(01:22:54):
That's double jeopardy. But it's a oh man, Okay, and
maybe let me look it up. What does it mean
to make a law then hold to law that bro Okay,

(01:23:20):
A while, I'm not wording that very well, do do
do do?

Speaker 6 (01:23:31):
Do?

Speaker 2 (01:23:32):
Do?

Speaker 6 (01:23:32):
Do?

Speaker 2 (01:23:32):
Do do do?

Speaker 3 (01:23:41):
Nope? All right, So I did not word that very
well at all, and it didn't bring up what it
was because it's it's post post something. I don't remember it.

(01:24:02):
It's post something. But it basically just amounts to somebody,
you know, somebody did something. You don't like that this
person did it, and so you write a law after
the fact saying that it's illegal, and then you'll hold
that person accountable for the law that they committed, the
law that they broke, even though when they did it

(01:24:26):
it wasn't illegal. That's what it amounts to do. But
I don't actually remember what that you know that you know,
it's it's post something again, I just I don't post
post facto. Maybe that's it post facto. I would have
looked that up, and I think that's what it is.

(01:24:47):
I think that's it post post facto, meaning I think
that's what that is. Post facto refers to actions or
laws that are applied retro so actively, meaning they take
effect after the event has occurred. In legal terms, it
often relates to ex post facto laws, yes, which charged

(01:25:09):
the legal consequences of actions that were committed before the
law was enacted. Yes, ex post facto. Bam wo wow,
I'm surprised I actually got that. That's awesome. I came
up with it. I remembered.

Speaker 2 (01:25:26):
Yay.

Speaker 3 (01:25:27):
Anyway, let's go ahead and get into or get back
into do some stuff that's the wrong. That's wrong, that's wrong.
So there we go. So this isn't going to just
retroactively affect everybody. This is only going to affect a
you know, the people that were born here within a

(01:25:48):
certain window. And according to the according to the executive order,
it's a thirty day window. I don't remember if that's
thirty you know, thirty days before or thirty days after.
But there you go. So it's not retroactively. Okay, So
it says it only applies to children born thirty days

(01:26:09):
after the order takes effect. So there you go. So
that's what the you know, that's what the executive Order
says specifically, So there you go. All right, let me
get into ex post facto. Yeah, yes it is. I'll
put it in the chat for you X post Okay, yeah,

(01:26:35):
you that's post facto. There we go, X post facto facto.
So yeah, that's how you, uh right for a law
that is written after on act is already committed, an
ex post facto law. This is a Latin term that

(01:26:56):
means after the fact. Eh is Latin that means after
the fact. All right, cool, learn something new every day.
I appreciate that, Dave. Awesome, So yes, ex post factor
I did not realize that was Latin, not at all.
You know, it's actually amazing how many different words, phrases,

(01:27:16):
terminologies that we use that actually do come from the Latin.
I mean, there's people out there that will try to
claim that, oh, Latin is a dead language. Not really,
it is a life and well and a lot of
different languages out there, English being one of them, a
lot of Latin words part of common parlance. There we go.

(01:27:40):
All right, So let me go ahead and look in here.
See if there is anything else I was wanting to
get to. Oh yeah, there is, because I still got
to talk about ice, what is going on in California,
some things that are going on here in Illinois. I
definitely still have to get to that. So just a

(01:28:00):
couple of moments and I will be right.

Speaker 4 (01:28:05):
Back rolled into Monday. The engine just quick. Spent all

(01:28:27):
my week leaning under that heard of it knuckles or busted,
grease stains on my jeans. The truck won't starting and
mocks my dreams. I checked the butts, I checked, plus prayed.

Speaker 7 (01:28:49):
The song got in the motors guns a week's worth
of sweat.

Speaker 4 (01:28:55):
Nothing turns out right, this honk of jump steal in all.

Speaker 5 (01:29:00):
Man night so that something dumb.

Speaker 7 (01:29:04):
I do it in side, but the answer keeps running,
and it loves to hat turned keen, nothing more your sound.
The South got the heavy heart and broken down.

Speaker 5 (01:29:18):
Blooey brought a buddy over, said he'd take a look.

Speaker 3 (01:29:33):
He shook his head side and.

Speaker 5 (01:29:36):
Cursed the book.

Speaker 7 (01:29:38):
We've tried every trick under the sun, but we're losing
this battle. The truck is won, clean it and over,
always wide open, Andy put. I'm sucking my heart just
staring at trees this drive. Wait. PRIs got nothing to

(01:29:59):
proof case body is broken down. Only something dom I

(01:30:27):
know it is side, but the answer keep but then
sids came nothing moost no sound soon got the heavy
arden bokeing down.

Speaker 3 (01:31:06):
Have you ever sat down in the throne. Just to
find out that you are dangerously low on shift tickets
making a tohe you have to make a mad dash
to the store just to pick yourself up. Some if
this has ever happened to you, pick up the number
one most rated toilet paper found in Uranus and use
what the professionals use, angel Soft. See, I'm just not
a fan of sum toilet paper. Some of us like

(01:31:26):
putting a pedal between your nice rosine. Others like John
Wayne toilet paper. It's like using sandpaper. But do what
the professionals use. Use the type of toilet paper that
is the goldilocks of brands. Angel Soft available wherever toilet
paper is sold. All right, and we are back, so
we are going to go ahead and dive right into it.
I do have a handful of things to cover, and

(01:31:47):
then I got some articles that I would invite you
to head over to the hooshow dot com. Click on
that news feed tab, check out the magazine over their
en flipboard and check out these articles because they are,
you know, some good information in here to You know
that that is important. But you know, we're running out
of time, so I don't really want to talk about
him today. So here we go. Let's go ahead and

(01:32:09):
get into this first article from Washington Examiner headline Chicago
and New York set up legal clash over where ICE
can arrest illegal immigrants. Now, whenever I seen this, I
was I kind of had a chuckle because what they

(01:32:32):
are arguing is, or what they are using to argue
their point, is the Third Amendment. And where they are
talking about saying that ICE can't go to arrest illegal
aliens is in courthouses, regardless of whether they are state, county, federal, whatever.

(01:33:12):
And I knew what the Third Amendment said, and whenever
I read it, I was confused because, like I said,
they are using the Third Amendment to say that they
can't go to courthouses to arrest ICE agents, that oh,

(01:33:34):
this is illegal to do.

Speaker 2 (01:33:35):
So.

Speaker 3 (01:33:35):
Now the Third Amendment, for those of you that don't know,
let me go ahead and get out my handed dandy
pocket Constitution. The Third Amendment says that no soldier shall,
and time of peace, be quartered in any house without
the consent of the owner, nor in time of war,
but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Uh huh,

(01:34:01):
How how does that relate to law enforcement? Officers, because
that's what ice is. They're enforcement officers. And how do

(01:34:22):
you equate a courthouse to one's private property, somebody's home.
I'm confused, I really am. I don't I don't get it.

(01:34:45):
I don't understand the argument. It makes no sense. It's
not it's not logically nor legally sound. You can't claim
that just because you don't want them there, that they
shouldn't be able to like, dude, that this is a
you know, regardless of the courthouse that is paid with
taxpayer money, period. Okay, now, I mean the only I

(01:35:11):
guess would be, you know, like a state that wants
to say that you can do this, but it's still
violating federal law. I mean, that's the thing.

Speaker 6 (01:35:29):
I mean.

Speaker 3 (01:35:30):
We have what is known as the supremacy Clause whenever
it comes to what a state wants to do if
it violates the Constitution and federal law. And this is
a prime example of that. Because we have federal immigration laws,
they're supposed to be followed. You have some states, like Illinois,

(01:35:51):
and specifically in some cities like Chicago, that wish to
ignore federal law and to really try to make it
hard for the president in order to enforce federal law.
And you have the mayor of Chicago, you have the
governor of Illinois. They are they are encouraging their population

(01:36:15):
illegal and legal citizens alike, to illegal aliens and citizens
alike to go after ICE in riots and other things.
But I you know, I just I don't see how

(01:36:36):
the Third Amendment is even relevant in this at all.
I mean, they are violating federal law by stopping ICE
agents from doing their job. I mean that's called obstruction
of justice. That is a crime already. And I mean,

(01:37:00):
in all honesty, if the President truly wanted to supremacy
clause and that whole obstruction of justice, you know, stopping
law enforcement from doing their job, these people should be
arrested at very least. JB. Pritzker should be arrested for

(01:37:28):
conspiracy to commit at very least. I mean, these are
already crimes, enforced them for crying out loud enforce them.
And you know, here you have, you know, some chuck
wagon of a federal judge rules the Trump violated military
law by activating National Guard in California. No, he didn't,

(01:37:55):
because in these type of situations the law military law
is actually clear. He has the ability to do this.
He has the right to do this. It's not a question.
They may not like it, but it's not a question.
This next headline, let's go ahead and get into this one.

(01:38:18):
Associated Press, Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow deployment
of National Guard in Chicago area, as they should and
if they actually go by historical precedents. This headline from
Fox News long held Scotis precedents could undercut Portland Chicago

(01:38:40):
National Guard lawsuits. Why because the precedence has already been
set by Democrats, by Democrat controlled Supreme Court rulings. That
and by the way, the supremacy clause that they have
the right and the ability to do this. That's what

(01:39:03):
the left is wanting to ignore, you know, because if
you remember during oh, I believe this happened during Obama's administration.
This also happened during Trump's administration. And I believe the
two states that you know were were accused of this
was Arizona and Texas. Now they're the cases were a

(01:39:28):
little bit different because in Arizona you had, yeah, you
had Arizona that was enforcing immigration laws and deep you know,
arresting and deporting illegal aliens. And the Democrat controlled well

(01:39:57):
the government, And I don't rememb remember whether this technically
happened under Biden or whether it happened under Obama. I
really don't remember. Doesn't matter, it really doesn't for the
sake of the discussion, for the sake of the argument,
for the sake of the case, it doesn't. Actually it
doesn't matter. But it was put into question whether they

(01:40:19):
had the right to do it, and the Supreme Court
ruled that supremacy clause, or at least I believe it
was a Supreme Court that ruled on this. But either
way you look at it, this was the government stance,
the Democrat controlled government stance was supremacy clause. You don't
have the right to enforce federal law. This is a

(01:40:42):
federal thing, not a state thing. Know your role, stay
in your lane, but out stand down. That's what it
amounted to. And I believe Scotis did get involved and
they upheld what the federal government went ahead and did,

(01:41:07):
or what the federal government said that No, Arizona can't
enforce immigration laws unilaterally because they are federal laws and
they can't enforce them if the federal government chooses not
to enforce immigration law, which which I believe is bullshit.
Just going to flat say because a federal law is

(01:41:28):
a federal law, or at least a law is a law,
regardless of whether it's a state law or a federal law.
If you are a law enforcement officer, then you are
supposed to be enforcing these laws. Just throwing that out there,

(01:41:48):
So that was a precedent that has already been set. Therefore,
Chicago has no standing to say, no, we are refusing
to enforce federal law regardless of what the federal government
wants us to do, because you know that, would you know,
violate the Tenth Amendment in state sovereignty. No, no, no, no,

(01:42:09):
no no. You can't have it both ways, which is
what democrats want. They want to hold the power regardless
of who is in power. That's what the democrats want.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You
can't have it both ways. The decision has already been made.
Federal laws, federal jurisdictions, the court, the state court, state

(01:42:35):
jurisdictions cannot overrule federal law. Again, this is not only supremacy,
you know the supremacy clause, but this is more than that.
I mean, this is part of what it meant whenever
Illinois joined the Union, this is one of the things
that it acknowledged that federal law, we're going to abide

(01:42:59):
by the constant, we're going to do this. They can't
arbitrarily just determine what laws they are not and are
going to follow, and who has to follow them or
doesn't have to follow them, because that's what Democrats like
to do. And then the other case was in regards

(01:43:23):
to securing the border down in Texas during the Biden administration,
and of which case there was precedents that in the
absence of action by the federal government, an individual state
can defend its border, regardless whether it's also a federal border,

(01:43:45):
it is still a state border, and they can defend
their border from invasion by foreign entity. But we're talking
about two different things. One was about law enforcement, the
other was about border security. So Scotis has already ruled

(01:44:11):
on immigration enforcement. The precedent has already been set in Chicago.
Portland has no leg to stand on, And in all honesty,
this is what I would like to see happen. These cities,

(01:44:35):
these states that are openly in rebellion against the federal
government by failing to support the federal government and enforcing
federal law. That is open rebellion against the government. I mean,

(01:44:56):
that's what it is. I mean, that's really what it is.
In essence, that's that's what it is. More than just
a federal government. They are in open rebellion against federal law.
They should no longer be receiving federal funding. If you're
not going to play by the rules of the federal government,

(01:45:18):
then you shouldn't be receiving funds by the federal government.
And the sad thing is most of these Democrat controlled
states are operating on a budget deficit severely, and they
rely on federal funding in order to pay for the
programs that they that they use for everybody. I mean,

(01:45:43):
where would Chicago be if it wasn't for the money
they get from the federal government. You want to put
an end to this, cut off the funding period, end
of story. You want to put down the rebellion. You
want to get these people like Chicago to step in
line and do what it is they're supposed to be doing.

(01:46:06):
Cut off the money. To me, that just that's common sense.
It does, I mean, that's just that's common sense. You
want to stop it. You want to put an end
to it. Okay, let's do that absolutely. Moving on. This

(01:46:28):
next article is from the New York Times, and unfortunately
all I have is a headline on this, which doesn't
really matter because the headline is pretty clear on what
it is that they're saying. So headline judge says immigration
agents must wear body cameras In Chicago, the federal judge
said that she was profoundly concerned that federal agents might

(01:46:52):
have violated earlier limits that she had set as the
Trump administration has carried out and immigration cracked out. And
can I be honest with you, Can I be honest
with you on something? I am all for it? Apse
of freako lutely think think back, Think back, because it

(01:47:16):
wasn't that long ago that police officers, law enforcement officers
were forced to wear body cams. And you know, because
they were afraid that law enforcement officers, regardless of the race,
gender of the officer, that they were acting in ways

(01:47:39):
that they shouldn't be. That it was discrimination, that it
was racism, that it was sexism, that it was all
these different things. That's what the claim was, and the
belief was that their concerns would be vindicated by body cams,
that oh, all these officers is just you know, systemic racism,
and it's all about the blue all this other kind

(01:48:02):
of stuff. And what ended up happening was that what
these body what the bodycam footage ended up showing and proving,
is that it wasn't racism at all, that you had
some people that were more prone to respond violently to
a law enforcement officer simply trying to enforce the law,

(01:48:26):
that they weren't acting out of hand, that the police
were actually doing their job and doing what they were
supposed to be, and that it was a lot of
bad actors that were really the source of the problem.
And then all of a sudden you stopped hearing about
bodycam footage from police officers because the claim, the narrative

(01:48:51):
didn't actually fit the truth what was actually going on.
Because you had a lot of shit heads out there
that didn't like law enforcement officers and thought that they
shouldn't be held to account for the crimes they committed.
That's what happened. And so whenever I seen this article,

(01:49:15):
I was like, oh boy, how do let's have it.
Let's do it, I mean, let's show firsthand from an
immigration officer's point of view what they are forced to
put up with on a regular basis. Let's show that.
Let's show how they are targeted. Let's show how people

(01:49:39):
resist the law and then bitch Moon to complain whenever
the handcuffs get put on, and what actually ends up happening.
Let's put it out there. I'm off for I want
to see this happen. Then maybe people will see. Then
maybe Democrats will be forced to shut the hell up,
But maybe then we'll see what actually is taking place

(01:50:02):
that these ice agents are just doing their job trying
to enforce the immigration laws that was passed by Congress.
These immigration laws weren't passed by Trump. This wasn't a
dictatorship kind of a thing. I mean, that's not what's

(01:50:22):
going on here. This isn't a dictatorship at all. This
isn't a king type of action. This was a law
that was passed by Congress, and the president is supposed
to be enforcing this law, and that's exactly what he's doing.
If I've said it once, I said it a million times.

(01:50:45):
If Congress wanted the law to be different, if they
want the law to change, if they wanted to be relaxed,
then maybe they should pass a different law and then
Chicago wouldn't have to worry about law enforcement being all
up in their business. I mean, that's where the change starts. Congress.

(01:51:09):
If they really had a problem with it, then AOC
instead of going after Trump for how ICE agents are acting,
instead of going after Home and for how ICE agents
are enforcing the law, then maybe this idiotic, dumb person
should instead talk to her colleagues on both sides of

(01:51:31):
the aisle about maybe if we want things to change,
we should write a different law on how immigration is
enforced and who was allowed to be over here. Until then,
they have no leg to stand on. They have no
argument that is even worth the paper or the ink
is printed with. The papers printed on and the ink

(01:51:53):
is printed with it ain't worth it because they're full
of crap. That's what it amounts to do, all right.
So I got some good news for you, I really do.
I am excited to let you know about this headline
from bright bart News. Former NSA John Bolton indicted over

(01:52:14):
mishandling of classified documents. Hallelujah. That is amazing. It's about
staking time, dude, I tell you what. I am excited
to actually see something happen. I really am, because we're
not just seeing investigations, We're not just seeing hearings. Finally
we are seeing indictments. I'm excited now. Granted I don't

(01:52:41):
want these to stop there. I wanted to continue. I
would much rather have seen as soon as the indictment
went out, for you know, for agents to show up
at John Bolton's house and slap the handcuffs on the man.
I would have actually liked to have seen that. Let's
see his mugshot and see if it compares to Trumps.

(01:53:02):
I bet it don't, but I'm happy to see at
least something is happening. Don't stop there, keep going more indictments,
more indictments, more indictments. But then we need to see

(01:53:23):
court cases, and we need to see juries judges, not
you know, political hacks, but people that actually care about
the law, the constitution and right and wrong. Is it enough?

(01:53:44):
Not yet? But we're getting there, and I'm excited about that.
I really am. So let me see here. Uh okay, yeah,
so that actually covers it for today. Let me go
ahead and get into here and just bring up a
couple articles that I think y'alls will like, and just

(01:54:05):
do a quick reading of a few headlines here. So
this headline is from just thenews dot com. That's the
wrong one. Justice Department files first Antifa related terrorism charges
with Texas is attack. Ptel says an FBI found more

(01:54:27):
weaponization crimes close to solving command and funding for Antifa.
That's awesome. And talking about Antifa, this one is also cool.
From the Blaze Media Dead Ass series, FBI goes to
Glenn Beck's home after he helped expose Antifa's terror networks.

(01:54:47):
That's awesome. So they may actually get to the bottom
of some of the things that's going on by calling
Antifa a terrorist organization some of the things that goes
along with it. Oh yeah, I'm excited about it. Anyway.
That is all I got for you today. That is it.

(01:55:09):
Do me a great big favorite. Head on over to
stinkpickle dot com. That is s T I N K
P I k l E dot com, stinkpickle dot com,
pick yourself up sumerks. That is the best way to
support the channel. There's all kinds of different things over there.
One of the designs that I have that I like,
I'm a fan of. I do have this shirt myself.

(01:55:29):
It is America, love it or leave it. We were
talking earlier about assimilating into the culture. Whenever you come
over here to be a citizen, I'm all about that.
And if you don't like America, then by golly, you
should get the hell out. Ain't nothing stopping you. You
have the freedom to do it. That is the heart

(01:55:52):
that was behind the shirt whenever I designed it, America,
love it or leave it, So check it out. Head
on over stinkpickle dot com pick yourself up one. If
you do see a design that you like, but you
don't see it on a product that you're wanting it on,
then send me an email ho Ho at the ho
host Show dot com just let me know anyway. That

(01:56:14):
is all I got. Y'alls have yourself a great one
and I will see you in the next one. This
has been the ho Ho Show. For more information, you
can head to the Hoo Hooshow dot com and for
the merchandise store, you can head on over to stinkpickle
dot com. That is s T I N K P
I k l E dot com. Until next time,

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Crime Junkie

The Brothers Ortiz

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Shifting Political Landscape

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Crime Junkie

The Brothers Ortiz

All Episodes

Shifting Political Landscape

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang