Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, welcome to the rated the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now. As we
discussed news, politics, current events, hated so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do because
(00:33):
b' broadcasting alive from WEAPONI I saw production studio B.
Welcome to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm
your host, Ho Ho. So hey, y'all's doing I hope
you're doing good? I really do. We've got a few
things to talk about today. We're going to be talking
about oh, let me bring that up. I hate it
when of my mouse is all the way over on
(00:53):
the other screen. We're going to be talking about the uh,
the delusional left in regards to transgenderism. We're going to
try to bring a little bit of common sense into
that discussion. We're going to be talking about crime, of course,
(01:15):
and how the left has actually been called out by Grock.
I thought that was rather entertaining. We're also going to
be talking about the how the left, you know, defends crime.
And we are going to start off by talking about
(01:35):
something that I honestly I don't get it. I really don't,
but insider trading in Congress. I don't even understand how
this is allowed. I really don't because it's already illegal,
so why is it allowed to happen in Congress? I
just don't get it. I really don't. But first, I
(01:59):
am wearing the stink Pickle T shirt. I also have
a Stinkpickle hat. Those came in the mail earlier this week.
I was excited about it. The thing is phenomenally stinkpickle.
So if you would head on over to Stinkpickle dot
com s t I n k P I k l
(02:20):
E and see if there's anything in there that that
you want. And of course, if there is a design
that you see that you like but you're just not
seeing it on a product that you are wanting, send
me an email ho Ho at the Hoh Show dot
com and I'll see if I can't make that happen.
Stinkpickle dot com s t I N K P I
(02:41):
k l e dot com. Honestly, I got I gotta
let you in on something, because you know, at first,
I was really wanting Stinkpickle dot com to be spelled correctly.
I really did, you know, So I went in, I searched.
I'm like Stinkpickle dot com and I found that it
was already taken by somebody, and what was kind of
(03:05):
irritating to me was that they weren't even using it.
They weren't even using the dot com. I mean, it
was it was a placeholder, you know. I was like, hey,
this website is for sale. There you go. And the
amount of money they were wanting for it was like, oh,
holy crap, Yeah no, I'm not No, I'm not spending
that kind of money. I'm like, it was a large
dollar amount that they wanted for that dot com, and
(03:28):
I'm like, yeah, no. But then it was kind of like, well,
I have an issue with saying things properly. I have
an issue sometimes with spelling things. I kind of like
to use phonetics, even though you know you can't even
use phonetics to spell the word phonetics. How crazy is that?
Hooking on pahonics working for me? You know? So I
(03:51):
was like, okay, well fine, I mean using a the
wrong spelling of something kind of coincides with how I
operate anyway. I mean, that's kind of how I roll, right,
So I'm like, yeah, okay, I'll do pick well, I'll
spell it my own way. That's fine. P I k
l E. It made me laugh, It really did. So
(04:11):
let's go ahead and get into the first topic of conversation.
This headline is from Just the News Luna to Learn,
Luna to launch discharge petition to stop insider trading in Congress.
Now again, I don't even understand how this is allowed.
(04:35):
I really don't, because insider trading is already illegal, you know,
insider trading is you know, let me, let me just
go ahead and do this, because it's like, yeah, of
course I know what insider trading is. There we go,
(05:03):
of course, we all know what insider trading is. So
let I'm just going to pull it up. So, insider
trading the illegal buying or selling of securities on the
basis of information that is unavailable to the public. That's
insider trading, buying or selling based off of information unavailable
(05:26):
to the public. And you know, if this is not allowed, right,
if it's not allowed on any level, you know, because
even if there is you know, a spouse or whatever,
a girlfriend that you know finds some information out and
then does some stuff in the market based off of
that information, that also is considered insider trading, and that
(05:49):
is illegal. So why is it illegal in any portion
of the market. Why is it allowed in Congress? Especially
whenever you're take into consideration these people have the ability
to write different laws, regulations, They do government contracts to
benefit one company or another, changing what company they're going
(06:12):
to use for different things. This is a very definition
of insider trading. Information that is not public now And
because here's the thing though, too, I mean you may
throw that little you know to do in here is like, well,
you know, this stuff that's going on is done in
(06:32):
front of a camera, and that camera access to its public.
So I mean, I guess you can, you know, consider
that not actually true, that it's not insider trading considering
these you know, these things are done in the open
of the public, but are they really? Are they really?
(06:53):
Because a lot of these decisions are made behind closed doors,
not necessarcessarily in secret sessions, but they're generally done by committee,
and that is where all this stuff takes place. Is
not until after a bill has passed, and that's you know,
(07:14):
assuming that different bills or regulations are made public. But
by then, the information because of what has taken place
in these closed door, you know, committee meetings, it's not public.
I mean look at Pelosi's husband. That man has made
(07:40):
his fortune insider trading, making decisions in the marketplace based
off of information that he had access to before it
went public. Like I said, the very definition of insider trading.
So whenever I read this article, I was like, how
(08:01):
is this even allowed in the first place? And I've
been saying this for years. It shouldn't be allowed. If
insider trading is illegal, using information that you have that
isn't public information in order to make a dollar on
the stock market is illegal, why is it allowed in Washington?
This is the thing that infuriates me. I got to
(08:23):
be completely honest with you, but the reason is pretty simple.
Our founding fathers never intended for there to be a
special class of lawmakers, of aristocrats, of you know, whatever
(08:44):
decision makers that affected what happens in our day to
day lives. They never anticipated, they never wanted, In fact,
they even wrote against it, a special political class. Everybody
is supposed to be held accountable to these same laws,
period in a story. That's how our nation was founded.
(09:07):
That's one of the reasons why we broke apart from
Great Britain because we didn't like the Bravo Sierra that
was going on. That's why the first three words of
the Constitution of the United States of America is we
the people, not we the aristocrats, not we the political
political class. It's we the people. Pretty freaking simple, right.
(09:36):
It infuriates me how in so many different ways Obamacare
included that these lawmakers decided to write themselves out of
the very law that they passed. It's like, dude, if
it's so bad that you don't want yourself to be
held accountable to that rule, to that law, to that program,
(09:59):
then why is is it you're making me en forcing
me to be subject to it. It's a double standard,
and it's not constitutional. It's not right. It's not how
America was founded. It's not a foundational belief in our country.
(10:22):
No one is above the law, and everyone is supposed
to be held to account to the same law. What's
good for the goose is good for the gander, right,
That's what America was founded upon. That's why it makes
no sense to me how it's illegal for somebody in
the company to be you know, for insider trading. That's illegal.
(10:50):
You know, somebody in this company is knowingly going to
be you know, part of a vote where they know
something is going to change, it is either going to
hurt or benefit people that are trading in the stock market.
But yet somebody in DC it's okay that they do that. No,
it isn't okay. It's fundamentally and foundationally wrong. So I'm
(11:18):
happy about this, I really am. When I read this,
I was like about Dan time. We're not supposed to
be a nation of double standards. That's not what we
were built upon. That's not what we represent, that's not
what America. Is irritating how it's just been accepted for
(11:38):
the political class to do whatever the hell they want to,
and somehow whenever we call them out on that, we're
the bad guys. How the hell did that happen? I mean,
we're classified as the bad guys. We're classified as the
(11:59):
radical if we call out the Bravo Sierra of the
political class and this goes you know, this isn't just
a Republican Democrat thing. This is a right and wrong thing,
because you have people on both sides of the aisle
that do the same damn thing, Democrats and Republicans alike.
I mean, there's really not a lot of separation between
(12:21):
the two parties, right, I mean, there really isn't. I mean,
why do you think Trump is having so much problems
getting some of his agenda to go through? Why do
you think the Senate is moving slower than a snail's
pace whenever it comes to confirming Trump's appointees. I mean,
(12:43):
that's ridiculous. At at Congress's current pace, it will take
five freaking years in order for them to confirm every
appointee in there. Five freaking years. How ridiculous is that
Trump still does not have his full working government. He
is hamstrung by Congress because they refuse to actually confirm them.
(13:07):
They refuse to do their damn job, and it's hamstringing
the president. And you look at all of that, and
everything the President Trump has been able to do astounds me.
It's like, holy crap. And whenever people, you know, try
(13:27):
to condemn Trump about not going further, about not doing more,
it's like, dude, he can't. He's being hamstrung by Congress.
They're not allowing him to actually do the job that
we the people elected him to do. President Trump won
(13:49):
every swing state. President Trump won the popular vote, a
clear mandate of the people to do what he campaigned
on hold criminals accountable, close the border, build a wall,
(14:15):
and force immigration laws, deport these sons of bitches that
came over here illegally clear mandate of the people. And
yet Congress, Senators and Republicans alike are dragging their feet
every step of the way, claiming that, oh, we're doing
(14:35):
the best we can. Armager, are you are you really
doing the best that you can? No, you're not. And
the problem is there are far too many Republicans who
just fly the flag of conservatism just to get elected.
(14:56):
But yet they go up to Washington and then it's
just go long to get along. Why because they are
no different than Democrats. That's what it amounts to. They're
no different, they're no better. And the sad thing is
they are hindering progress. They are dragging down the rest
(15:20):
of the party, and they're really making it to where
Republicans like you who really hate the you know the
label anyway. I mean, I don't consider myself a Republican,
I really don't. I'm not. I'm a constitutional conservative with
libertarian leanings, That's what I am. But these people fly
(15:43):
the flag just to get re elected, and they're really
making it hard on the rest of us to have
any assurances, to have any faith in Congress, to have
any faith in them, and a psych due. We're trying
to get stuff done right. We're trying to get people
to actually participate in government and vote, let their voices
(16:06):
be heard. But every step of the way, you know,
we're asked a question, why why vote for a Republican again?
What the hell have they done for me lately? Go
along to get along, keep on whining and crying how
they don't have enough power in Washington. It's like, dude, look,
(16:27):
I mean, the Democrats fight tooth and nail for every
single inch, even whenever they are in the minority, they
hold power. Why because the right has this we have
to go across the aisle and link hands in doing something.
We can't just strong arm it. We can't do that.
That's not the way this thing is supposed to be done.
(16:49):
Although I am in agreement with you on that, but
that's not how the left operates. The left doesn't give
a shit if it's a partisan issue. They don't care
what Republicans want. Whenever they have an agenda, they fight
for it tooth and nail, and they don't give two
(17:10):
shits about what the Republican wants. They don't care. The
only time they go across the aisle to make it
a bipartisan issue, they go to a rhino. They don't
go to a Republican. They don't go to a conservative.
They go to a rhino. And then they have the
gall the audacity to say, oh, this is a bipartisan issue.
(17:32):
No the hell it ain't. If all you're getting is
a rhino and not an actual Republican, then it's not
a bipartisan issue. Sorry, hate to burst your bubble, but
it is what it is. It's not bipartisan. If the
only people on the Republican side that you can get
to agree with you and to vote with you is
to use a rhino, a Republican in name only. That
(17:57):
doesn't actually help your case with Republicans and Conservatives. It doesn't,
because we all see what's going on. We all know
what happened is not bipartisan. You're forcing your agenda down
the throats of the American people, and you're claiming bipartisan,
hoping that it's going to give you some type of
a smokescreen, when in reality, we know what's up. We do.
(18:25):
We know what's going on? How I went from that
to this? I have absolutely no idea. Doesn't matter anyway,
We're going to go ahead and take a quick interlude,
and when I return, we are going to be talking
about I, yes, the delusional left, because we're going to
(18:49):
talk about this Minneapolis shooting, and yes, this person was
a transgender. We're going to try to bring a little
bit of common sense into the discussion. I know this
is hard, but that's what we're gonna do. We got
a couple of articles that I want to look into
to really bring home the point that really does a
(19:14):
good job in talking about this. It really does. So
just a couple of minutes and I will be right back.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
The acoustics smooth on my hands, all wrong, line it up,
and the game feels long.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
The balls just laugh as they roll away. I guess
the pool.
Speaker 3 (19:51):
Gods ain't with me today.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
No balls in the pocket.
Speaker 4 (19:58):
No matter of the queue, king of the table till today.
Speaker 5 (20:01):
It's all true.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
I bring LA like thunder, but this Cadilac array, each
shot of disaster red.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
Is driving me insane. The eight ball winks like a
nose my dread. The nine just spins and shakes its head.
Speaker 5 (20:26):
My buddy's grinning while it's sweating chalk. It feels like
I'm stuck in a cruel trick shot talk.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
The felts the.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
Desert and I'm try it's dust. The breaks are broken.
Speaker 4 (20:42):
The angles all rush, the wreck was ready, but my
name's off course and awhere.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
This table feels cursed.
Speaker 4 (20:48):
Of course, don't falls in the pocket, no matter the
que I'm.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
The king of the table till today, it's all true.
Speaker 3 (20:55):
I break lack thunder, but the scatterli.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Like rays, each shot of disaster, and it's.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Driving me insane. The jukebox arms of melody off key.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
Like it's mocking this misery.
Speaker 5 (21:20):
And me, my swagger's gone, My rifle's got it all.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
I just can't get a single ball to fall. No
balls in.
Speaker 3 (21:37):
The pocket, No matter you.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
I'm the king of the table till.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
Today it's all true.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
I bring black thunder, bucket.
Speaker 6 (21:43):
Scatter like rain, each shut a disaster, and it's driving
me insane.
Speaker 1 (22:01):
Do you work at any of the meriat of jobs
where you might have to sit on your bum all day? Well,
if so, maybe you know what it's like to suffer
from the condition known as swamp ass. Well, if so
have I got the solution for you. It's high monkey
buck powder. That's right, it's high monkey buck powder. You
can use an indoors, outdoors, work or play, or on
(22:23):
any occasion when you sit on your bum all day,
don't let your bus get read. Use anti monkey butt
powder instead, available wherever anti friction powder is sold. No,
all right, and we are back. So I am going
to operate under the assumption. And I know what to
(22:44):
say about assuming, but I don't care. I'm going to
operate under the assumption that you have already heard about
this shooting that happened in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the school shooting.
I'm going to assume that you've already heard about it,
because you already know that it was a transgender indivisible
(23:05):
I'm going to assume that you already kind of know
a little of the ins and outs. Maybe you've even
heard that there was a a oh, what's that word,
I'm looking for, a h holy crap, a manifesto, that
the individual had a YouTube channel, and there was some
(23:27):
videos that was published, and that YouTube channel, from what
I can remember, was actually taken down before really people
can go into it to find out what the hell
I'm sure that you have already heard a lot of
the you know, political people, a lot of the you
know so called journalists that are saying, oh, we don't
(23:49):
know the person's ideology, or even throwing misinformation and disinformation
in there about what the person believed and what the
gender ideology everything else was about this. I'm going to
assume that you already know all of that stuff. That's
(24:11):
where my assumption is going to go. I mean, it's
been a few days, right, and most of what I'm
going to talk about, even some of the other articles
that I'm going to bring up, a lot of that
information can be found in this article. All right, So
(24:31):
this article from the New York Post headline after the
deadly Minneapolish school shooting, it's time to stop indulging delusions
and talk truth about transgenderism. What a novel idea? Right,
what a novel idea? Here's the thing? Okay, now again,
(25:02):
And I hate the idea that I have to premise
this the way that I'm going to, I really do.
I hate it. I despise it in all honesty. But
I don't care what you do in the privacy of
your own home, in your own bedroom. It doesn't matter
to me. Who you are sexually attracted to, doesn't affect
(25:23):
me one bit. I don't care, all right, that's between
you and God. I don't care. Doesn't matter to me.
You can be straight, you can be homosexual, you can
be bisexual. You can be a man who wishes to
dress up like a woman, you can be a woman
(25:45):
who wishes to dress up like a man. Any form
of gay, it doesn't really matter. But the fact of
the matter is there are two genders, male and female.
Either you got a penis or you got a vagina.
Either you got xx chromosomes or x y chromosomes. There's
no other option, There is no c right, it's one
(26:08):
or the other. Either you are a plug or you
are an outlet. That's it. That's your only options, right.
And again I don't care. I don't care your preference.
I don't care how you want to present yourself. I mean,
(26:31):
if you feel comfortable as a man in female clothing,
then okay, fine, whatever. But to say that you are
a man trapped in a woman's body or vice versa,
well that's delusional. And for me, the infuriating part of
(26:51):
this is you know you have people with that delusion,
that are trying to force people like me to participate
in their delusion. Oh, I identify as she hers zims
are what the fuck ever? That to me is wrong.
Why are you expecting me to participate in your delusion? No,
(27:16):
I'm not going to do that. I refuse. And it's
unhealthy because until recently, as a political statement, this type
of thing was considered to be a mental illness, and
in all honesty, it still is. It really is, because
(27:38):
they actually never rewrote the book. They just put out
an article to say, oh, well, we're not going to
call this a mental illness anymore, but it is in
the book of medicine or book of health. I forget
what the hell it was, you know, the book of
mental shit going on in your head. You know, in
that book, ender dysphoria was considered a mental illness. They
(28:04):
changed their stance as a political thing for political reasons,
but they you know, they never officially did it. It
was never a peer or nothing more than a peer
reviewed article where they're like, oh, yeah, well we'll change
our stance based on politics because some people feel uncomfortable
about it, you know whatever, But here's my thing, and
(28:28):
this is kind of what they're talking about in this article.
In no other place in mental illness do you affirm
somebody's mental illness. They don't do that. You know, if
you're somebody that hears voices, a doctor isn't going to
affirm that, Oh yeah, those voices in your head are real.
I just unfortunately can't hear them because there's something wrong
(28:51):
with me. No, that's not how this happens. If your
schizophrenic and you see things, you see people that are
not real, you're you're not I'm told that, oh there's
you know, there's not anything wrong with you. There's something
wrong with me because I don't perceive your reality. That's
not how it works. If you don't think the way
(29:15):
they think you should think, then they give you pills
to try to alter that. They don't affirm what it
is that's going on because it doesn't help because in
(29:36):
most cases, especially in this, they are ignoring underlying issues
and instead just saying, oh, well, we if we affirm
your delusion, it'll make you better and it'll solve all
the other problems that's going in. They ignore any underlying
issue you may have. That's the reality about it. In
(30:05):
no other situation in no other case regarding any other
mental disorder do doctors do society feel as though it
is appropriate to affirm your wrong thinking, But for some reason,
as a transgender, they think that that's the best course
of action. You see, how messed up that is. It's
(30:32):
no wonder why children today, one they're being confused. They
really are, forcibly being confused because of politics, because of
some type of a stance that you know, one side
wishes to make over another side. You know, they are
(30:52):
trying to brainwash your children, confuse them, and they're making
it the cool thing to do. It really is messed up.
(31:14):
I mean, why do you think that the amount of
transgenders and you know, gender dysphoria and things of that
nature has spiked? I mean, holy crap. I mean, I'm
pretty sure we get into numbers at this point, and
some in some aspects of this article. But let me
go ahead and get into this because this really is
(31:34):
a well written article. There's a lot of information in here,
and we're going to go ahead and talk about it.
Let's get into the article. It was published, by the way,
the twenty eighth, so this isn't that old of an article.
So the heartbreaking mass shooting at the Annunciation Catholic Church
(31:56):
on Wednesday has brought the issue of transgenderism once again
to the forefront of American conversations. Robert Westman was an
unwell boy who in twenty nineteen decided that he was
a girl and officially changed his name to Robin Westman
was a minor at the time, so his mother, Mary
(32:17):
Grace Weston signed the application. This is the second such
attack by a transgender person in a Christian or I'm sorry,
on a Christian school. In March twenty twenty three, Audrey
Hale killed six people, including three children, at the Covenant
School in Nashville. If any other mental condition produced a
(32:38):
pattern of murder, we would collectively discuss and decide on
strategies to help those ailing. But there's no discussion allowed
about what to do when a child declares themselves transgender.
No one may point out that gender dysphoria is often
a symptom of a much larger mental health problem. And
(33:00):
medical association that was the name that I was trying
to think of before but couldn't. A professional group of
physicians that has become a holy political entity in the
last few years. Only suggests one path, that of gender
affirming care, and urges that foregoing gender affirming care can
(33:20):
have tragic health consequences, both mental and physical. I see
inn special from twenty fifteen had a parent of one
trans kid asked do I want a living son or
a dead daughter? That formulation either except your children's gender
(33:41):
transition or they'll die has coerce parents into punishing the
hormone blockers and surgeries that are banned in most Western
countries but not in the USA. Here, I want to pause,
because it's not just that question do you want a
(34:01):
living son or a dead daughter? There are states out
there that if you don't affirm your child's desire to
change their sex, their gender, then you are demonized. You
can have your children ripped from your arms by the government.
(34:32):
There are some states in this nation that will go
behind the parents back for social transitioning and then in
some extreme cases even do transition surgery without telling you.
(34:53):
And if you refuse, I mean, if you even want
to try to move, to go to a different state,
or even try to say that, oh, we're going to
take my child out of public school and put them
into a private school. You can't do that. The state says, no,
you're a bad parent by telling us that we can't
(35:13):
transition your kids. How messed up is that. I'll get
into it later. I'll get into it later. Let's go
(35:35):
back into the article. There's an incredible amount of pressure
on parents to take the only path considered acceptable and
to lean into their child's gender dysphoria. Parents have lost
custody of kids if they chose not to affirm their
(35:55):
gender delusions. It's madness. We don't know yet what kind
of gender affirming Cara Westman has or was receiving, or
whether brain altering hormones were involved, but we do know
he was having regrets and yes, that's one of the
things they don't like to talk about, you know. Okay, Look,
(36:15):
Guys are supposed to have more testosterone than estrogen. Women
are supposed to have more estrogen than testosterone. They are
genetically chromosonally, they are not the same. Men are not
the same as women a period. They're not to ignore that.
I mean, that's the thing. I mean, you know, are
(36:36):
you really going to think and the people who want to,
you know, spread this lie, The people who have these
type of stances on it are totally ignoring biology. And
that's what the left has been doing for quite some time, ignoring,
absolutely ignoring biology that they know. They are going to
(37:02):
change somebody's body chemistry, introducing hormones that are not supposed
to be they're in levels they're not supposed to have them.
And then whenever there's some type of chemical imbalancing their
brain and they don't quite feel right and something happens,
they want to blame people like me. They want to
blame people in a church that has a different point
(37:25):
of view that they do instead of possibly, you know,
instead of ignoring the fact that, hey, you know, maybe
doing this kind of thing is going to have negative consequences.
They don't live in reality. They just don't. When you
(37:50):
change somebody's body chemistry, introduce things into their body that
is not supposed to be there, you're going to cause
more harm. The article continues In a YouTube video. Westman
shared a journal entry, I'm tired of being trans I
(38:15):
wish I never brainwashed myself. But no doctor will be
held accountable. No therapist who encouraged an impossible transition will
lose their license because their mentality or I'm sorry, because
their mentally unstable patients killed themself and took two children
with him. The rest of us are left to piece
(38:37):
the story together and pick up the pieces that the
doctors who helped Westman transition know he would walk around
saying Hyle Hitler and middle school rattling the other students.
Was the underlying depression even treated? Or did everyone assume
that letting Westman pretend to be a girl would be enough?
(39:08):
On numerous levels, this type of thing is infuriating to me,
it really is. You had somebody who was crying for help,
people knew, and nothing was done. You had somebody whom
(39:36):
you know, the mother, Different teachers possibly tried to force
their child into something that the child didn't want. Oh, look,
(40:02):
I'm not about politicizing different things for the sake of
one party or another. It's not about right and left. Again,
this is about right and wrong. So this whole thing
is about right and wrong. Children are supposed to be protected,
(40:27):
they're not supposed to be used for political reasons. What
happened in Minneapolis, Minnesota is a tragedy, not just because
of the people that this mentally ill person went in
and shot, but because of that person as well, because
(40:48):
he was a victim. Right along with the people he
ended up shooting. And I know some people aren't going
to like that point of view, but he was. He
was a victim too. It's a tragedy what happened, and
it never should have taken place. But we need to stop.
(41:13):
We need to change how these type of tragedies are narrated,
how they're talked about, how they're referred to. I mean,
you see and you hear by different political figures and
(41:33):
by people in the media that oh, we don't know
what was going on in this person's head. We can't
claim to know you know their reasoning behind doing this,
And it's like, no, bullshit, yeah you do. But the
problem is acknowledging what happened really is going to change,
(41:57):
and it has to how we talk about transgenderism, how
we talk about gender dysphoria. This is something we need
to bring common sense into the conversation and take out
the political bullshit that doesn't help anybody. And if we
fail our children two, this is just going to keep
(42:21):
happening and it needs to stop. It does. It needs
to stop. They are attacking the victims, they are attacking
(42:43):
the school, claiming the somehow they're at fault for this,
Are you kidding me? Instead of placing the blame solely
where it belongs, they're gaslighting it into trying to make
(43:06):
us believe that we are the messed up ones, that
there's something wrong with us for even thinking or considering
that we need to change the discussion. It baffles the mind,
(43:30):
it really does. This article from Newsmax Transgender Politics. Good
intentions have consequences. You know, I'm sure you've heard of said,
you know, the you know, get the Road to Hell
was paid with good intentions. Yeah, well, these type of
(43:55):
things have consequence. There is a reason why other nations
are backpedaling this type of stance, political, medical, or otherwise,
you know, call it whatever you want to, It doesn't
really matter. But there is a reason why other nations
(44:19):
across the world. In Europe are backtracking away from this
that they are they've stopped allowing this type of care
to be done on children. There is a reason why
they are backpedaling from this, and they're not allowing it.
(44:40):
They're not entertaining this anymore. In America for some reason,
you know, you have the left that are just held
bent on pushing this and pushing this even though the
rest of the world is starting to take note, and
they're like, you know, maybe this wasn't such a good idea.
Why the hell democrats hearing the United States of America
(45:01):
are failing and still trying to hold on to this
idea that gender affirming care is the right way to
go in most every place else they are acknowledging truth
that this was never a good idea. How long is
(45:27):
it going to take for the left to wake up?
How many more school shootings do there need to be?
How many more shootings in general? How many more times
is somebody going to have to unalive themselves before they
figured out that maybe we need to quit politicizing things
and leave our children alone to make their own damn decisions.
(45:52):
Maybe leave parenting up to the parents. Stop politicizing this bullshit,
you know? I mean, I love it. How in the
case of oh, gun control that if it saves yet
one's child's life, then it's worth it whatever we have
(46:14):
to do, right, Why don't they use that elsewhere? And one,
guns don't kill people. People kill people, period into story.
I don't care how you feel about it, it is
what it is. We've had guns in this country for
two hundred and fifty freaking years. It was guns that
(46:34):
you know, protected us from still being a you know,
UK colony. There was a time in our nation's history,
not that long ago, where whenever you went to school
you can go out in the parking lot and see
a butt ton of guns in a gun rack in
(46:55):
the back of the truck. Guns weren't the problem. Mental
illness is. Good intentions has consequences. We need to stop
(47:19):
politicizing shit. We need to stop using our children for
their own agenda. Either way that may be right, either
way that may be, it needs to happen. It does
absolutely needs to happen. There's other articles that I put
(47:41):
in here, and of course you can head on over
to the hoo hotshow dot com. Just click on that
news feed tab and you can see the magazine of
you know over there on flipboard, which has all the
articles that I am using in the show today. And
there's several others in here that I would definitely recommend
checking out, you know, And there's also Okay, there's another
(48:05):
point in here that I'm wanting to make, and this
one is there was a case a murder that took
(48:28):
place and immediately after the child was found investigations happened,
autopsies were performed, and it was like the family immediately
shut down, went to an attorney and refused to cooperate
with police. Now, look, this murders, as far as I know,
(48:54):
is still classified as unsolved. They never once brought the
killer to justice. And here's kind of the thing. Right,
if you are the victim of a crime, whatever that
may be, you want to in general, talk to police,
(49:20):
talk to investigators, talk to the FBI to find the
guilty party and bring them to justice. That's what you
want to do, right, You're up front. You give all
the information that you possibly can to point law enforcement
(49:45):
at a suspect, to investigate, to bring to justice. That's
what you do. That's what you see out of victims.
What you see out of criminals is lawyering. Up. I'm
not helping in the investigation because I don't want the
(50:08):
hands of justice to be pointed my direction. Now look,
don't get me wrong, I'm not necessarily advocating for talking
to the police, because let's be honest, the police are
not your friend. They wish to talk to you in
a buddy type of a way in order to get
(50:28):
you to admit to some crime. There's a reason why
the Miranda rights are. You have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say can and will be used against you
in the court of law. It isn't a you know,
might be used against you. It is a can and
will be used against you, and only against you, because
(50:49):
if you try to, you know, put the police officer
on the stand and and you know back up a
positive thing. Nope, that's considered hearsay because what you say
to the cops can only be used against you, it
can't be used for you, which I think is Bravosierra,
But whatever, That's how it's written. Criminals seek lawyers, victims
(51:15):
seek justice. So whenever I read that the the mother,
instead of helping out with the investigation, went and hid
behind lawyers, I was like, hmm, I'm not saying the
(51:43):
mother had anything to do with it, not at all.
I understand you have the right to remain silent. I do.
And just because the mother is not wanting to cooperate
with police and his hiding behind a lawyer, that doesn't
necessarily mean that they did anything wrong. But what it
(52:07):
does mean, or what I see, is that she thinks
she somehow had a part to play in this shooting,
that there was something that she feels she did wrong.
(52:30):
That's what that tells me. Now, obviously I can't confirm
any of this. This is purely speculation on my part.
This is not an accusation by any stretch of the imagination.
But however it does, it is telling about the frame
of mind of the mother. And I'll leave it at that.
(52:57):
I'll leave it at that. I'm going to take another
quick and elude, and when I return, we're going to
be talking about crime. Not so much crime. We're going
to be talking about Chicago. We're going to be talking
about a little bit with the with the d C stuff,
but we are going to be talking about, you know,
(53:20):
is Trump going to Chicago? Is he Is he going
to do for Chicago and for other major US cities
the same thing that he did for Washington, d C. Guse,
we're gonna be talking about right on the other side
of this just a couple of minutes and I'll be right.
Speaker 7 (53:41):
Back rolled into Monday. The engine just quick. Spent all
(54:03):
my week leaning under that good of it, knuckles or
busted grease stains on my jeans, the truck won't starting
and marks my dreams. I checked the bets, I checked
(54:23):
the plug, prayed to song, got in the motors, guns
a week's worth of sweat. Nothing turns out right, this
hunk of jump stealing all.
Speaker 4 (54:36):
My nights sold and something dumb. I know it inside,
but the answer keeps running, and it loves I had
turned the keen.
Speaker 8 (54:47):
Nothing moves your sound.
Speaker 7 (54:50):
The South got the heavy heart and broken down.
Speaker 4 (54:54):
Blue brought a buddy over, said he'd take a look.
He shook his head side and cursed the book.
Speaker 7 (55:13):
We've tried every trick under the sun, but we're losing
this battle. The truck is won.
Speaker 2 (55:23):
Dreaming over always wad open Andy got him sucking my heart,
just standing.
Speaker 1 (55:30):
At trees, this drive.
Speaker 8 (55:32):
Wait prison, gotten out there to proof case's bodies broken down?
Speaker 4 (56:00):
Oh something any side?
Speaker 8 (56:05):
The answer keep buying, side turns no sound.
Speaker 1 (56:13):
Soon got the heavy Do you love your occasional Mexican
(56:46):
dish or your musical fruit? Are you tired of walking
by family members and crop dusting them? Well, if this
has ever happened to you, might I introduce you to
Tampon's brand butt plugs. Tampon's brand butt plugs is that
particular type of butt plug that allows you to walk
in public in confidence, knowing that you're not going to
accidentally crop does somebody Tampa's brand butt plugs now with
(57:09):
the plastic applicator, not just for women anymore, Tampa's brand
butt plugs. All right, and we are back. So you
all know what happened. Three weeks ago, President Trump seized
control of DC police, brought in the National Guard to
assist in cleaning up crime in DC, removed the sanctuary
(57:33):
city status of DC, and also ended cashless bail, actually
making it to where criminals were held to account for
their crimes, no longer allowing them to commit a crime
violent or otherwise and just go back out on the
streets and do it again. And who would have thunk it?
This policy change has been a huge success in lowering
(57:57):
crime in DC. In fact, in that timeframe, there has
only been one murder in what used to be the
murder capital of the United States. Holy crap, or at
least that will get it that. We all know the story,
(58:18):
We all know what happened, and we all know that.
And this is to me very very telling, because you know,
DC is no bastion of Republicans. Republicanism. Conservatism is not
like ninety plus percent of the residents of DC are Democrats,
(58:43):
and even though this is a very much of a
Democrat controlled city, these Democrats are extremely happy with the
results of this change in policy. They absolutely are. You know,
you even have the homeless people whom have had their
you know, their their camps removed, thrown away, trash cleaned up,
(59:06):
and people actually being put into shelters to where they
can get the care and the help that they need.
Instead of being abandoned by the Democrat Party, they're finally
getting helped. That's amazing. We all know what's been going on.
(59:27):
We have all seen this happen. And as I've said before,
what President Trump is doing and the administration is doing
is they are broadcasting to the world that the only
thing you need to do to clean up crime, to
(59:49):
lower crime is to hold criminals accountable. That's all you
need to do. He's giving him the blueprint. That's what
President Trump is doing, giving the blueprint to all these
other cities that are having crime problems. You don't need
(01:00:10):
to write more laws. All you need to do is
actually enforced the laws that you already have and stop
these stupid policies that puts criminals back on the street
right after committing a crime. That's all you need to do.
And one of the things that President Trump has said
(01:00:31):
is I'm going to take what I've learned in DC
and I'm going to take it to other cities out
there and clean up these cities as well. This headline
from Politico Chicago prepares for National Guarden to come in.
(01:00:51):
Oh no, heaven forbid that the president comes in. It
cleans up the streets because the incompetent mayors and governor
of Illinois can't do it themselves. They refuse to do
it themselves. And JB. Pritsker, this one I loved. This
(01:01:12):
headline is from Daily Wire. But JB. Prinsker tries to
fact check Trump and he gets his ass handed to
him by Groc instead, And and yes, I used the
actual language. I mean, you know, the headline says he
gets his backside handed to him. But I think we
all know was implied there. And I read this and
(01:01:32):
I was like, yeah, of course, because you know what
what this article said, what Groc had pointed out is
something that the Democrats really don't want you to know
in the first place. So this, uh, okay, let's just
let's just go lit put it like this basically, you know, uh. JB.
(01:01:52):
Pritsker was like, oh, well, things aren't so bad. Hey,
you know there's you know, the these crime cities. Why
isn't press and Trump talking about going into Republican controlled
states and cleaning up the mess and YadA YadA blah blah.
And he's saying that these, you know, Republican controlled areas
are much worse than Chicago. Chicago's not all that bad.
(01:02:14):
And somebody goes, hey, uh, Groc, uh what's up here? Right?
That's what they said, And you see JB. Pritsker said,
According to federal data, thirteen of the top twenty cities
and homicide rates have Republican governors. None of those cities
(01:02:37):
are Chicago. Eight of the top ten cities and homicide
rates are led by Republicans. None of those cities are Illinois.
And yet Trump is sending troops here. And of which case,
somebody said, hey, Groc's what's the truth here? And Groc
replied with Based on twenty twenty four data, are tea
(01:03:00):
study top twenty US cities by homicide rate per one
hundred thousand, with mayors and parties where de equals Democrat,
are equals Republican, and even with nonpartisan races. But you know,
we'll throw in affiliation here. Number one and I'm only
going to do the top ten here, but number one
(01:03:20):
is Saint Louis, Missouri, Democrat. Mayor New Orleans Democrat, Detroit,
Michigan Democrat. Washington, d C. Is actually number four Democrat, Atlanta, Georgia,
(01:03:44):
number five Democrat, Indianapolis Democrat, Richmond, Virginia, number seven Democrat.
Chicago is number eight Democrat. Are you seeing a pattern here?
(01:04:06):
Number nine Campton, California, Democrat. Number ten Oakland, California, Democrat.
The top ten of the worst homicide rates in the
United States, The top ten cities so far, from top
to bottom are Democrat controlled cities. And yes, Chicago was
(01:04:34):
number eight. A Republican doesn't even enter into the fold
until number what is it fifteen? Yeah, Dallas, Texas is
number fifteen with Eric Johnson, even though he is a Republican,
he is a former Democrat. What does that freaking tell you?
And all the rest of them are Democrat. So you
(01:04:54):
could arguably say that the top twenty list of most
violent cities in the United States, or at least the
highest murder rates per capita, all of them Democrat controlled cities.
The only one that's even in there is a former
(01:05:17):
Democrat turned Republican, probably because he's actually a Democrat, but
he just won a greater chance of getting elected as mayor. Now,
I mean, I can't say that with the utmost certainty
because honestly, I don't pay that much attention to, you know,
the voting habits of Eric Johnson. I don't know a
(01:05:38):
lot about his stances. I'm just going to be honest
with you. So let's let's take that one out. Then. Fine.
Nineteen of the twenty top murder per capita cities, nineteen
of them are run by Democrats. Calling out the Bravo
(01:06:02):
Sierra that JB. Pritzker tried to say, And here is
some audio from JB. Pritzker this when I had to
laugh on this, I really did. Let me go ahead
and have you listen to it. Mister President, do not
come to Chicago.
Speaker 9 (01:06:19):
Over the weekend, we learned from the media that Donald
Trump has been planning for quite a while now to
deploy armed military personnel to the streets of Chicago. This
is exactly the type of overreach that our country's founders
warned against. And it's the reason that they established a
(01:06:40):
federal system with a separation of powers built on checks
and balances. What President Trump is doing is unprecedented and unwarranted.
It is illegal, It is unconstitutional, It is un American.
Speaker 1 (01:06:59):
Mister, there you have it. Our founding fathers warned against it.
It is unconstitutional, is unwarranted. It shouldn't be happening, it
shouldn't take place. YadA YadA, blah blah. And in some
ways I agree with what Pritzker is saying. But here's
(01:07:20):
the thing, here's the crux to this. Now, look, it's
no secret that I am not a fan of JB. Pritzker.
Here at we excuse me here at weaponize law productions.
We lovingly call JB. Pritzker governor gravy sweats. I'm not
(01:07:48):
a fan, obviously not a fan. But there are some
things that the president can true. Now, the president can
do now. Look, whenever it comes to Washington, DC, the
president has a lot that he can do that is
(01:08:11):
acceptable and is constitutional and is allowed at least for
a time until Congress allows him to do more. I
don't actually agree with that sentiment, but at the same time,
it's like, you know, whatever, because I mean, when you
(01:08:34):
think about it, you know, we have three separate but
equal branches, the laws that are passed or done by Congress,
and within those laws there are ways by which you
are supposed to enforce it, and of which case the
enforcement branch is the president the executive branch. And considering
(01:08:58):
this is the federal seats of the country, you would
think that the president would have sole authority over law
enforcement in d C. Not necessarily the capital, but in
d C. I mean that seems to me, separate but
(01:09:20):
equal branches of government, that would be how it should
be done, right, I mean, that just makes sense, right,
it makes sense, It makes sense to me. So, you know,
but regardless, the president is the head of the executive branch.
And in d C, where it's not a state, you
don't have a governor. You have a mayor of the city.
(01:09:42):
And that's something that they decided to, you know, put together,
Congress did. But even still, the president has a lot more,
you know, a lot more things that he can do
directly for a time, I believe thirty days is the
maximum outside of that, unless you know, Congress okays an
(01:10:03):
extension after one month, the president has to cease and desist.
But there's still some things that the president can do
even outside of DC because I mean, here's the thing.
(01:10:26):
Crime stats are what crime stats are.
Speaker 5 (01:10:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (01:10:32):
I talked about this before, how you can't only look
at crime statistics. You got to look at victim statistics
as well, because those are numbers that they're not fudging
because they don't believe as though they have any reason
to people whom are victim of murder, of assault, of battery,
(01:10:52):
of rape, of all these other kinds of things, you know,
violent crime. They haven't done anything to change those numbers,
and those are very different from the crime stats that
are being released from all these cities. In fact, they're
really not releasing a lot of stats from these cities
because whenever they decided to redo how the FBI gets
(01:11:16):
this information, there's a lot of cities out there that
just chose not to report to the FBI and then
trying to claim that, oh, crime is down, Really, how
do you report those crimes? Do you still report those crimes? Well? No,
but and since they're not reporting the crime, the crime
obviously isn't happening. That's what they would have you believe,
(01:11:40):
but you know whatever, even based off of the information
that we do have, Illinois is number eight. But back
back to the topic hand, there are things that the
president can do. There are things that has been done
by presidents in the has both Democrat and Republican, where
(01:12:03):
nothing happened, know nothing against and it was allowed. Where
there was out of control crime uprisings that happened, where
the president is like, look, the citizens are supposed to
be protected from criminals, and if you're not going to
(01:12:27):
do it, then I will come in and do it
for you. This has happened in the past by both
Democrats and Republicans. This has happened in the past. They
can't claim that this is unprecedented when they've done it.
It has been done. Just because you may not like
(01:12:47):
President Trump doing it doesn't mean that it's unprecedented and
cannot be allowed. Irmin Gerr it's unconstitutional, No, it isn't,
because the Constitution gives the pre president the right to
do it. Limited, yes, but it does give the president
(01:13:10):
the ability to do it. JB. Pritzker was wrong in
what he said that oh, the top are Republican, No
they're not. The top fourteen are Democrats. Only number fifteen
(01:13:34):
is a Republican and that eh, but the top twenty
only one of which is of a Republican controlled city.
What does that tell you about how the Democrats feel
about crime? Moving on this next headline, I absolutely had
(01:13:56):
to laugh. This headline from Fox News, Trump's looming Chicago
takeover puts violent illegal immigrant crimes. Let me try to
read that one again. Trump's looming Chicago takeover puts violent
(01:14:18):
illegal immigrant crimes in the spotlight from incompetent mayor Yes again,
who knew that all we needed to do to lower
crime in these crime ridden cities was to actually enforce
(01:14:38):
the laws, hold criminals accountable to the crimes they commit,
and put them in jail. Like I said, Washington, d C.
No more sanctuary city status and no more cashlest bail.
There you go. But this headline is one of them
(01:14:59):
that I absolutely loved. And this is from life Z.
I don't know how to pronounce that. Just gonna be
honest with you, JD. Vance. Trump doesn't know how he
did it, but he got Democrats to defend crime. Let
(01:15:20):
me let me let me read that part again. I
don't I don't think you quite hurt me. Trump doesn't
know how he did it, but he got Democrats to
defend crime. Now, look, this is only a roundabout thing.
This is really to me, this is more about gas
(01:15:40):
lighting than anything else. It's more about gaslighting because the
Left is trying to make you believe that what you
are seeing as residents of these various cities isn't actually
what's going on. I mean, this is you know, Orwell's
nineteen eighty four. Don't believe you're lying. I they're trying
(01:16:02):
to tell you that, Oh no, the crime isn't as
bad as what is what you know is really going on. No, no, no, no, no,
it's not that bad. Even though we got crime, even
though we got rape, even though we got murder, even
though we got violent crime, assaults going on, even though
all this stuff is happening, it's not that bad. Don't
(01:16:25):
believe you're lying eyes. That's what the Democrats are doing.
They're trying to gaslight you into not believing what is
going on right in front of your face. And a
sad thing is you have some people that actually go
along with this. You know, there were people were speaking
(01:16:51):
up in DC, you know, because there was a protest
that happened in DC about you know, protesting the National
guardsan involvement in cleaning up the streets and cleaning up crime.
And you had people that were coming forward and we're like, look,
these people that are demonstrating against these are people that
have no roots. They don't belong here, they don't live here,
(01:17:13):
and they don't represent the residents of Washington, d C.
Those people, in contrast, that do live here, that do
have roots in DC, that do have you know, they work,
they live, they have houses, they send their children to school.
Those people support what Donald Trump is doing. Did you
(01:17:35):
hear that they support what Donald Trump is doing? Again,
we're talking about a city, Washington, d C. That is
over ninety percent Democrat, and they are in support of
what President Trump is doing. No more sanctuary city status,
(01:17:57):
no more soft on crime, no cashless bail, actually holding
criminals to account. They love it. They're happy with what's
going on. They're not being gas light into believing that
they are the problem. They're not being told don't believe
(01:18:20):
your lying eyes. And people across the nation are starting
to see this. I mean, I don't live in Chicago,
but I've read the headlines, I've read the articles. I
have people that I know that are in my family
that do live in Chicago. I know that it's not
as good as what JB. Pritzker. What have you believed
(01:18:43):
that it is? The people that live in these cities
are like, yeah, please, let's do something about the crime
in this coming up election. I would ask you ask
yourself a simple question, a question that Trump has made
(01:19:09):
multiple times. It's what has the Democrats done for you lately?
Because these people that are just voted Democrats their entire life,
what has that done for you? Have you benefited from
(01:19:34):
Democrat policies, the Democrat agenda? Do you feel safer in
your neighborhood, in your homes? Why not vote for a Republican? Oh?
Granted I can answer that question because what is the
What has the Republicans done for me? Well? Republican? I've
(01:20:00):
heard this from I think it was Dan Bongino, So
hat tip to Bongino. You know, Republicans may not be
the solution, but Democrats are most definitely the problem. It's
time we do away with the narrative. It's time we
(01:20:21):
do away with the agenda. It's time we bring common
sense back into our lives and into our policies. As
a resident of Illinois, I applaud what Donald Trump has
(01:20:42):
done in DC, and I really do hope people wake
up and this can be implemented. And really every Democrat
controlled city in the US, any city in the US,
I hope this gets implemented because we can make our
city safe again. We can. We can do it. It's
(01:21:05):
not that hard. It's a common sense approach that is
easy to do. We don't have to write more laws,
we don't have to change anything other than let's hold
criminals to account for their crimes. That's it. It really
is that simple. Now, Look, I'm not advocating for and
this is based off of a comment that I received.
(01:21:26):
I'm not advocating for, you know, checkpoints in the streets,
different things like that, not necessarily you know, military, you know,
occupancy within our cities. I'm not advocating for that whatsoever.
But where city police have failed, sometimes they need help,
and you can help them in the form of the
(01:21:46):
National Guard. You can. It's been done time and time again.
But you don't have to violate somebody's civil rights in
order to enforce the law, in order to enforce immigrate status,
in order to get rid of the illegal aliens that
are in our cities and in our states. You don't
(01:22:07):
need to violate somebody's rights in order to do it.
You don't have to do checkpoints in order to do it.
There's other ways. All you got to do is enforce
the rules that are already on the books. That's it. Now. Look,
I'm not a fan of checkpoints, okay, I mean even
where I'm from now, I haven't seen this recently because
(01:22:28):
I think the police department got called out on this
and they were like, well, you know, you're right, but
having duy checkpoints, I mean, look, that type of thing
is unconstitutional because in this country, you are supposed to
be treated innocent until proven guilty, and a duy checkpoint
is the opposite of that. You are guilty until you're
able to prove your innocence, which is horse hit. It's unconstitutional,
(01:22:53):
it's a violation of my rights. I would never advocate
for that type of thing. You know, the stop and
frisk policies that some cities have had, No, it's unconstitutional.
If you can't articulate reasonable suspicion of a crime, a
(01:23:14):
police officer has no ability, no authority to detain you, period.
End of story. It is what it is. YEPS didn't
(01:23:34):
mean to hit the mic. I apologize. I would never
advocate for that type of behavior to come out of
the police, to come out of the National Guard. And
as all you're doing to bring the National Guard is
(01:23:54):
in is giving assistance to the police to do their job.
And sometimes you need to do that, especially whenever you
have criminals who have zero respect for law enforcement, where
criminals has been allowed to run rampant, has been given
more powers than the police officers themselves. Sometimes in order
(01:24:18):
to get things moving in the right direction and in
order to say that yes, we're serious about this, sometimes
you got to do more than just going I'm putting
my foot down. Sometimes, unfortunately, you got to do more.
And this will help with that. And yes, this should
(01:24:44):
and can only be done as a short term solution
to this long term problem. The president may have the ability,
the presidence has been made for him to go, Okay, fine,
if you're not going to do it, then I'm very
(01:25:07):
much going to do it for you. Now here's the thing.
Do I think that the president really is going to
go in there and do it. I don't know, I
really don't. I have no idea if the President is serious.
For all I know, the President is just saying this
to call out Democrat run cities so that hopefully they
(01:25:27):
do it themselves. And like what JD. Vinn said, he's
got the Democrats to defend crime. I mean, who in
these cities, who in these neighborhoods really want crime to
be rampant? I don't know any of them that does,
except the criminals obviously. But that's what the President has
(01:25:49):
actually gone and done. He's forced these Democrats to defend
crime and criminality. That's hilarious. I mean, for all I know,
what the President is doing is trying to bring this
to the forefront of the national debate and for people
(01:26:12):
who are living in these cities to talk to people
in government and say, look, we want this fixed. We
want it fixed. Now the President has demonstrated that it
can happen. That the only thing you need are people
in positions of power that are willing to do it.
(01:26:34):
You need to do it, otherwise you may not have
a position after the next election, you may not be
able to keep your seat. Maybe Trump coming in to
do what the Democrats are refusing to do, is the
is a last ditch effort. I don't know the mind
(01:26:58):
of what's going on in president in Trump's head, I
have no idea. At the very least, He's bringing this
to the forefront of the national conversation. And Trump is winning.
He absolutely is by the Democrats by forcing the Democrats
(01:27:19):
to take the twenty side of an eighty twenty argument.
The president is winning. I absolutely love it, I really do. Anyway,
That's all I got for y'alls today. That is it.
Do me a favorite. Head on over to stinkpickle dot com.
That is s t I n K p I k
l E. Pick yourself up some merch, have some fun
(01:27:41):
with it. And again, if there is anything over there
that you you know, designed, that you see that just
isn't in a product that you want or a color
or a size that you want, let me know. Send
me an email ho Ho at the ho Ho show
dot com at any rate. Stinkpickle dot com s T
I N K P I k l e dot com
(01:28:01):
link is down in the description below. You allys, have
yourself a great one and I will see you in
the next one. This has been the ho Host Show.
For more information, you can head to the ho Hosshow
dot com and for the merchandise store, you can head
on over to stink pickle dot com. That is s
t i n k p i k l e dot com.
(01:28:23):
Until next time,