The Precipice

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, Welcome to THEO rated the number one most listened
to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as we
discuss news, politics, current events, name so much more, but
through the airwaves and strapped in as we do the
constitution because they're broadcasting live from Weapini SAFT Production Studio B.

(00:38):
Welcome to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm
your host, Ho Ho. So how you doing? I hope
you're doing good. I really do. We've got a lot
of stuff to talk about today. We're going to be
talking about the covids and answering the question what they knew,
or at least what the government knew and when they
knew it. Some information has been released about that. We

(01:02):
are going to also be talking about the uh, the
La riots. Of course, We're going to be talking a
little bit about, uh, the arrest of Padilla Padilla Padilia.
I don't know how you pronounce that. We're going to
be talking about the the the parade of course, and
and like I said, the you know, the riots, but

(01:22):
you know the how the fire is spreading and that's
kind of going to start taking place this weekend. Today.
We are also going to be talking about well, oh yeah, yeah, Yeah,
we're also going to be talking about the the war

(01:46):
that has started between Iran and Israel, and that's actually
going to be starting today. Of which case, if you
want to check out the articles that I would be
using for the show, you can head on over to
the Hot Show dot com. Just click on that newsfeed
tab and there you'll see my magazine over there on flipboard,
which is my go to hub for news. That's where

(02:06):
I put everything. Now, there's more articles that I'm wanting
to put in there regarding the israel I ran war
that is going on, that is kicked off, and you know,
kind of to provide a little bit of backstory. I
found an article I think it was earlier today, and
it even gave a timeline of a lot of different

(02:28):
things in there. I try to flip it into the magazine,
you know, put it in there to where it would
be available for y'alls to look at and see. But unfortunately,
flipboards acting kind of wonky at the moment. I don't
know why, so I wasn't able to put that in there,
But as soon as I find it, I will most
definitely put that in there. This way, y'alls can check
that out. But like I said, we are going to

(02:50):
be talking about that. But before I kind of get
into the articles on there's let's dive a little bit
into the history regarding Iran's nuclear capability, which is how
this whole entire thing kicked off in the first place.
So if you remember, going back to the wayback machine,
if you remember back during Obama's presidency, they had a

(03:17):
you know, the the Iran Deal. Okay, and just to
be fair, it was a joke. I mean it really was.
It was a complete joke. It was a you know, hey,
we're we're going to have you know, we don't want
you getting nuclear capabilities, or at least we want to
you know, slow your pace as far as getting nuclear capabilities.

(03:42):
We don't really like that. We don't feel comfortable about that.
A lot of other people don't feel comfortable like that.
But for the most part, this was just a stance
that they were taking to appease Israel, and that's more
or less what it, you know, really seemed like. But
it was a you know, we're going to have people
go in there inspect different sites that we think you
may be doing something in, but we're going to let

(04:03):
you know exactly what we are going to inspect and
win basically giving them a month's notice, And that to
me just sounds completely ridiculous. I mean, imagine, if you will,
if the DEA actually operated like this, right, you know,
they suspect somebody of cooking meth, they give them a
phone call and say, hey, we think you're doing something

(04:25):
you're not supposed to be doing. We've heard reports and
that y'alls are cooking meth over there. So next month,
we are going to investigate and inspect this facility. And
if you're doing anything bad, it's it's it's you know,
you're going to get in trouble.

Speaker 2 (04:42):
You know.

Speaker 1 (04:43):
Do you think that the people cooking meth are just
going to continue business as usual for that entire month,
or do you think they're going to, you know, take
that time to invest or, to you know, clean it up,
to you know, move their facilit somewhere else, maybe do
a different type of a lab if they can't clean

(05:04):
it up one percent? I mean, how many people do
you think that they would actually arrest in cooking meth
if that's how they chose to do business, right, I Mean,
it seems kind of ridiculous. So during Trump's first administration,
he shut that whole thing down. It's like, no, we're
not We're not doing this type of a deal. It's ridiculous,

(05:26):
it's a bad deal. We want to keep you from
nuclear arms. We don't want to help the process along, right,
And that worked, you know, I mean, it wasn't perfect,
but it was way better than the deal that was
you know, that that was put place by the by

(05:48):
the Obama administration. It was a much better deal. And
during Biden's administration, it was just nothing was inforced. The
whole thing was really just kind of ignored, to be
perfectly honest with you. And during Trump's second administration, he

(06:08):
was like, you know, we were not going to allow
Iran nuclear weapons. We're not going to do it, you know.
And it's not so much of them just having nuclear weapons,
it was their willingness to use them. I mean, there's

(06:33):
a lot of countries out there that have nuclear capabilities,
you know, and it's not just you know, it's it's weapons, great, right,
it's the ability to fire a nuclear warheaded somebody and
you know, destruction there you go. I mean, it's it's
not even so much using them in like energy with
a nuclear power plant, that wasn't what they were trying

(06:55):
to limit them from being able to do. It was
their you know, weaponizing weapons grade and that's what they
were wanting to stop. And Trump was like, you know,
we can't be heaven this. You know, it wasn't that
they were getting it, is that we knew that they
would use it. And that's really what it amounted to,

(07:19):
because I mean, you have a culture that shouts things
like death to Israel, death to America. You know, they
consider us to be the the enemy. I mean they
really do. You know, you have their you know, their
ties to terrorism, and you know, them supporting other terrorist regimes.

(07:41):
And it was just it was a bad idea to
allow Iran to become nuclear, to have that capabilities, because
if they did, who knows how they would use it? Well,
I mean, we knew how they would use it. I
mean we we know darn good well. And sometime last

(08:03):
week I don't remember when, I mean I really don't,
but you know, Trump did try to re enter into
some type of negotiation with Iran, and Iran said, no,
they're not doing it. You know, they're not going to
enter into the same type of an agreement that they
had during his last administration. We're not doing that. They

(08:29):
did not agree. And the clock, if y'alls are aware,
you know they have a clock. You know, however many
minutes to midnight and midnight is bad kabluey, right, I
mean you're talking what was that? What movie was that?
Judgment Day? You know, the terminator to Judgment Day? You know,

(08:51):
Sarah Connor at the you know, at the play play
a park arena thing, you know, the thing where kids
play on playground to quit playground. Yeah, there you go.
You know, you've got that, and then the nuclear bomb
goes off and then destruction, people turn into ash everything
bad deal, right, And that's what midnight is. And after

(09:16):
this this, you know, after the peace negotiations fell apart,
the clock went to like one minute to midnight, basically
saying that it's imminent, definitely imminent. And at the time,

(09:36):
if Iran hurried, they would have weapons grade a warhead
like the capabilities within a week. And Israel took this
threat seriously. They're like, we know that when they're able to,

(10:00):
especially considering the tensions that's been going on with you know,
the Gaza strip, with everything else, with the attacks that
has been happening against Israeli citizens abroad. They knew that
this was a bad idea, This was bad, This is
not going to end well for Israel. This is bad,
and once it happens to Israel, it really is only

(10:23):
a matter of time or at least this is what
the fear is, that it's only a matter of time
before this spreads and America is at risk of getting
attacked as well. And so Israel did a preemptive strike
against Iran, destroying several of their different facilities. Apparently there

(10:46):
were some major Iranian leaders, military leaders that were killed
as well. And according to well, okay, yeah, before or
this even happened, you know, once you know, the Iran
walked away from the peace deal. American embassies in various

(11:08):
places in the Middle East, they were basically telling their
people to, you know, the ambassadors and people that were
there that you know, get out, you know, pulling back,
bringing their people home or moving to moving them to
other areas. You know, it's almost like they knew something
was going to happen. You know that because Iran being

(11:31):
so close to being nuclear capable of firing and attacking somebody,
being so close and who knows at that time, they
may have even actually been there. I mean, the problem
was we didn't know because we didn't actually have the
ability to go into various places firsthand and you know,

(11:52):
inspect their facilities. So I mean we we don't even
really know how far away they were at the time.
It was just that this is bad. Once they they
actually get there, and who knows how long that's going
to be, will know it, right, I mean, that's really
what the fear was. And so Israel, not wanting to
take any chances, they struck preemptive attack on Iran. And yeah,

(12:25):
I mean, let me ask you a question. Can you
really blame Israel knowing what Iran, knowing what Iran stands for,
knowing that they chant things like from the river to
the sea, you know, knowing that they look at Israel,
how they look at Israel, they want to eliminate every

(12:50):
one of them, that they don't even recognize Israel as
a you know, free and sovereign nation, with them funding terrorism,
with them funding strikes against Israel, can you blame them
for a preemptive tax?

Speaker 3 (13:08):
You know?

Speaker 1 (13:08):
And in all honesty, you know, I'm going to take
it a little step further. I don't see it as
a preemptive strike. I'm just going to be honest with you,
you know, because Iran has participated for quite some time
in attempts to destroy Israel. I mean, is it really
a retaliation or you know, is it really a preemptive strike?

(13:28):
Considering we know where Iran stands, we know what they
would do if they were capable of doing more, is
it really a preemptive strike at this point? I mean,
tensions has been high for quite some time. President Trump granted,
during his first administration, he was able to do something

(13:51):
that no other president has ever been able to do,
the Lincoln Accord or whatever it was called, and I
don't remember, but it was peace the Middle East. And
one thing that many nations like that are known for

(14:12):
is peace when they're not in power, Peace when they
don't really have much of a much of an option, right,
I Mean, that's kind of what they're known for. But
once they are in power, once they do have the weapons,
the capabilities, that's whenever you start seeing the attacks, that's

(14:37):
whenever you start seeing these different terrorist organizations and everything
really stepping up their efforts. But is it really a
preemptive strike? Whenever Iran has been working so hard funding terrorism.

(14:57):
Can you can you still at that point call it
a preemptive attack? I mean, I can't really say as
if he can, I mean to me, I mean, it's just,
you know, they've basically said that, hey, if we get
the capability of doing it, we've already attacked you in
the past. If we get the capability of launching a
nuclear weapon over to you, we're going to do it.
All Israel did was take them seriously. It's like, look,

(15:19):
we're not entering into this piece deal. We're not doing that.
We're not going to hinder our progression of getting a
nuclear warhead put together and launching it at you. We're
not going to stop us from doing it. I mean,
I ran. The only thing they did was tell them
what they were going to do, and then they have
the audacity to be surprised whenever they backed out of

(15:41):
the peace deal, wouldn't enter into another one at all,
and basically just told them that you know, hey, we're
pretty darn close and once we get there, then you'll
know it cause we're going to launch a nuclear warhead
at you. That's what I ran. In essence, that's what
they did. That's what they said. How can you be surprised.

(16:02):
And so Israel did that print of attack in response
to the the clock being one minute to midnight, saying
that it is completely imminent, it is going to happen,
and from everything that we knew, it was going to
be like a week. There, you go. I can't blame him.
A lot of people ended up dying leaders in you know,

(16:27):
from Iran, you know they Yeah, and a headline that
I had read I believe I was. I seen it
yesterday reporting was that oh wait, let me let me
go on this one. Okay, so this headline, let me

(16:48):
go ahead and pull it up for you. This is
from Oh, crap, I gotta, I gotta into Actually I
don't remember if this headline was okay, yeah, yeah, So
this is a subscriber only headline. I apology.

Speaker 4 (17:08):
You know.

Speaker 1 (17:08):
I hate articles like that, I really do. I gotta,
I gotta find it again so I can close the
page down. I really do hate whenever they do that.
You know, you get stuff and it's like, oh, I
want to look at this and subscriber only and it's
like crap. So let me go ahead and just show
you what the headline is. Report Israeli strikes and Iran
stop the regime from retaliating with up to one thousand

(17:32):
ballistic missiles. See this is this is something else. That's
that second one by the way from Heart's h A
A R E t Z. But this is something that Israeli.
Israel is known for. This is something that they are
very much known for because they you know, they don't
just attack for the sake of attacking, right, I mean,

(17:52):
it's it's military, it's precision. You know, they're attacking with
a purpose. They know what they're looking for, they know
what they want to attack, and they make sure that's
what they do. They you know, it's maximum damage that
the things that they're actually wanting to attack, and it's
not just needless killing, you know, I mean, I really

(18:14):
do it. It's man, I'll tell you what you know,
Israel or is much better about being Israeli than what
I would ever be. Yeah, okay, so that sounded ridiculous
in my head, but I hope you know what I mean, right,
I mean, they are. I mean, dude, how many times

(18:38):
do you got to get smacked in the face before
it's like, you know, I'm just sick and tired of
turning the other cheek. I mean, how many times you
got to be smacked in the face? Right? How many
times can somebody you know, I'm sorry and you just
let it be before it's just you put them down,

(19:00):
them down hard, you make sure they don't ever get
back up again. I mean how many times? In Israel,
it seems like for a long time, most of my
life really, that they've always had to defend themselves against
people who claim to be their friends, but never steps in,
never allows them to be them, never allows them to

(19:22):
actually retaliate, you know, proportional response.

Speaker 3 (19:27):
Right.

Speaker 1 (19:28):
I'm a fan of the Fat Electrician, I really am, right.
You know, there's one of his I think it was
like the first video that he did that went viral
was about the whenever the US destroyed like three quarters
of the Iran Navy. Have y'all seen that video? Go

(19:50):
to YouTube, look up the Fat Electrician. I mean, normally
I would not tell people to head over to YouTube.
I'm not a fan, you know, I'm no longer over there.
That's why my you know, video streams are live exclusively
to rumble. That's the only place I put it. I
don't go to YouTube, but there's still some good content
to be had over on YouTube, the Fat Electrician, the
first video that he did that went viral. It was

(20:12):
proportional and it was hilarious. It really is a good video.
I definitely recommend checking that one out. But you know,
Israel gets attacked like on a regular basis. I can't
even imagine being in ISRAELI living over there in Israel.

(20:33):
I mean you you're constantly, you're constantly in fear of
something to happen on a granted, they have the the
Iron Dome, right, which which helps out a lot. You know,
they you know, any incoming missile and whatnot, they more
or less determine where it's going to land. Is it
going to be a populated area, is it not. If

(20:55):
it is going to be a populated area, it takes
care of it. And that's all good finding. And its
success rate is very high and thankfully so, right, But
they're constantly in fear of attack from you know, in
one way, shape or form. I couldn't even imagine being

(21:15):
in ISRAELI couldn't even imagine. I mean, it's just it's
it's ridiculous, right, But you have a nation who has
constantly had to defend them defending themselves against lethal attacks
that if they didn't have the iron dome system, there

(21:37):
would be no more Israel. And that's more or less
what the point is on this, because if Iran, if
several other nations have their choice, there would be no Iran.
And that's kind of the trope that some people says, right,
you know, if if if I okay, let's just go
to Iran in Israel. If Iran stands down, so all Israel, right,

(22:05):
you know, if they stop fighting, if they no longer
have the drive to destroy Israel, they they don't do
the capabilities, they don't do that, you know, they stop
funding terrorism, if they if they do all that, Israel
will stop and both will be able to live happily
ever after. But if Israel stops, there is no more Israel.

(22:28):
And that's the difference, you know, with with their you know,
the the attack that was on November what day was
that the attack from you know, Palestine from the Gayza

(22:51):
strip where they killed a lot of people, and that
whole thing ensued, and it's like, dude, if they were
to stand down, if the you know, if the people
from the Gaza strip stood down, then there would be peace.
If Israel stood down, there'd be no more Israel. And
that's just that's the common thing, right there. Israel's not

(23:14):
the problem. Israel is just trying to defend their land.
So I heard, I think it was yesterday. I was
seeing reports on this that Iran struck back and apparently
there was attack on Tel Aviv. Yeah, missile strike on

(23:37):
Tel Aviv. And let's see, yeah, this was from yesterday.
Let me go ahead and bring up this article news
radio WFLA breaking news, missiles strike Tel Aviv and let's
see here happening now, there is an incoming Iranian attack
on central Israel and idef official old ABC news And

(24:03):
this headline came out June thirteenth. That was yesterday, Friday
the thirteenth. How many people were excited about Friday the
thirteenth on a normal basis, I always say yes, But
considering everything that's going on, maybe not quite you know,
right now, but at any rate, Yeah, June thirteenth, and
this I'm not seeing a time. Oh there we go,

(24:24):
there you go one eighteen pm, June thirteenth, twenty twenty three.
So yeah, attacks on them. Now, there's been a lot
of talk about this. There really has been a lot
of people are even saying things that this could be

(24:46):
the you know, the start of World War three, you know,
moving into a hot war kind of the same thing,
like what they were saying between Russia and Ukraine. You know,
I mean, a lot of the same type of things happening.
I'm not going to say that it is. I'm not
going to say that it isn't. There seems to be

(25:07):
quite a few people out there that are, you know,
fear mongering, that are saying absolutely some that are saying that, no,
it's it's not going to escalate to that. You know,
it'll it won't end in the in the start, or
at least it won't continue into the start of World
War three. And I don't I don't know. I mean,

(25:29):
I really don't. I would like to say, and I
would like to agree with the people that say, no,
it's it's not going to result in starting attentions in
World War three. It's not going to do that. I
can't really say starting attentions, but you know, escalate to
World War three. I can't. I can't say that. I
would like to believe those that do. I just don't know.

(25:54):
I mean, you look at everything that's going on in
the world you look at, you know, how tensions are
so high right now, and it's just I don't know.
I mean, does it have that potential? I don't know.
I'm not the right person to ask on that. You know,
I don't have the insider information. I don't you know,

(26:15):
know anybody that does have any insider information. I don't,
you know, outside of what I am able to read
in the news, I don't know a whole heck of
a lot about what's going on over there. I mean,
you know, living in America, you're kind of shielded, right
because the information age, we have access to all kinds
of information. But at the same time, it's it's the

(26:38):
it's having that information readily available to view without this
information getting shut down, without having people that are you know,
part of the mainstream media or part of legacy media
that just doesn't want you to know about things going on,
saying oh no, this isn't a thing, nothing to worry about,

(26:59):
nothing to see. You're mostly peaceful protests, right, I mean,
that's what we have all the time. So I would
like to believe that this isn't going to escalate to
the point of World War three. But I don't really
have any idea, I would definitely recommend doing what you can,

(27:21):
prepare the best you can for some type of a
scenario where if the power grid goes down, you're protected,
you have what you need, you have enough supplies that
will last until either the lights come on or you're

(27:44):
able to get someplace safe hunker down maybe, you know.
I mean, there's a lot of things you can do,
and I hope that's what you do. I hope you're prepared.
I really do. There's a lot of good places out
there to get prepared, a lot of good you know
websites out there, you know, pay Oh good grief. The

(28:08):
name just flew right out of my head. It started
to roll off my tongue and then it went like
you I'm not sure where it went. I have no idea,
but it left, it went bye bye. But I mean,
there's all kinds of sources out there to get you know,
good gear, food, thirty days supplies of you know. And

(28:31):
right now the company that I'm thinking of has like
a buy one thirty day supply, I get the second
one free. That's amazing. Nope. I was really hoping the
name would come to my head and it didn't. But
at any rate. Definitely pay attention in the in the
days to come about what's going on over there between
Iran in Israel. That's all you can do, right, pay attention.

(28:55):
I hope that the strategic attack that I the Israel
did again against Iran, hopefully that it had the intended
you know, the intended result to set their nuclear program
back to where they don't have to worry about it.
It's not as eminent, is not one minute to midnight anymore.
I hope at least that it had its attended effect.

(29:16):
I really do. That's where my hope is Israel should
not have to defend on the world stage every single
time they get attacked, any type of retaliation. I mean,
everybody knows, and we've seen other nations do it. We've
done it. When we get attacked, we retaliate proportional response.

(29:38):
As Americas, he's a proportional response. How can you blame them?
Why should they be forced to justify their actions against
people that literally want them destroyed. I don't get it. Hey,

(30:00):
we're gonna go ahead and take a quick break. When
I return, we're going to be getting into the riots,
the LA riots and what's been going on some of
the reporting that I have seen. I have, you know,
seen some stuff on the ground of what's out there,
what's been going on, And a report that I haven't

(30:20):
been able to actually verify, even though I've heard it
from a lot of different places, from like two maybe
three different sources voices that I've heard doing it. But
the information is out there. I just don't quite know
how true it is. But we'll get into that on
the other side. So just a couple of minutes and

(30:41):
I'll be right back.

Speaker 5 (30:44):
Oscar walk these dusty trails with a.

Speaker 6 (30:47):
Stride so full of pride, A man built tough from
head to toe. Nothing he had to hide below his knee.
He'd had some stride, a leg nod of on. But
every step he took in life, you'd never see him.

Speaker 5 (31:05):
On leather boots and iron will his spirits never flag,
or fields and farms heat till the.

Speaker 6 (31:19):
Ground beside an old plaus drag. Folks would whispered on
the street, how does he stand so tall?

Speaker 5 (31:28):
But Oscar just grin ear to ear.

Speaker 6 (31:31):
I'm stronger than you all.

Speaker 7 (31:38):
Ofter boots keep moving on, no matter what comes down
through the night so dark and cold, or the sun
baked golden ground.

Speaker 4 (31:49):
He's got a harder, solid bronze and a mine.

Speaker 1 (31:53):
Sharp and vast Oscar.

Speaker 6 (31:55):
Shows us every day the future is not the past.

Speaker 1 (32:04):
He drove an old.

Speaker 6 (32:05):
Ford pickup truck, a rusty butted ram, hauling every loading dream.
This mighty simple man.

Speaker 3 (32:16):
Kids would gather.

Speaker 5 (32:17):
Around his feet just to hear him talk.

Speaker 6 (32:21):
About the days he fought in one, the life within
his walks. He's let gonna slow his spirit down. Can't
keep a good man still every morning, up at dawn,
flowing through sheer will, worn out jeans and callous hands,

(32:45):
an emblem of pure grit. Oscars, story traveled far, a
fire that never.

Speaker 4 (32:53):
Quit, oscar boots, cheap, moving all, no matter what comes
down through the night so dark and cold, or the
sun baked golden ground. He's got a hard a solid bronze.

Speaker 3 (33:12):
And a mine.

Speaker 1 (33:13):
The sharp and vast.

Speaker 6 (33:15):
Oscar shows us every day the future is not the past.

Speaker 3 (33:22):
Futures not the past.

Speaker 1 (33:37):
Have you ever had an ailment that a normal over
the counter remedy just couldn't fight? If this is the case,
then boy, have I got the solution for you.

Speaker 8 (33:45):
It's Tousin, that's right, Tousin, cough, tousing cold, tousing, running nose, tousin, itchy,
watery ice, tousing, broken leg toussin.

Speaker 1 (33:57):
Tussing is the ultimate cure, all guaranteed to stop anything
that ails you to available wherever OTC's are sold. Ah right,
and we are back. So we're going to be talking
about the la riots, are going to be talking about
how things seem to be spreading across the US. But first,

(34:20):
let's rewind a little bit, right. Let's do that, because
on the campaign trail, one of the things that Donald Trump,
Donald Trump, Donald Trump ran on was deporting the illegal aliens,
starting first with the criminal element, you know, the rapists,

(34:46):
the sex traffickers, the murderers, the thieves, the robbers, you know,
starting with the illegal criminal element, and then just moving
on into that. That's what he campaigned on, and he
garnered a lot of support from Americans. In fact, he

(35:07):
garnered like the majority I mean he did, I mean,
he won the majority vote. And he even made the
most headway, the biggest swing actually according to polling, that
was done with not only American citizens, natural born American citizens,

(35:29):
but with naturalized legal Mexican you know, former Mexican citizens.
I made way more sense in my head. But y'all
know what I'm saying. You know, with people from Mexico
that didn't naturalize and become a United States citizen, they

(35:50):
even have their support. I mean, think about it, you know,
imagine if you will. You know, you go to work,
you work hard, you do your job, you get a paycheck,
You go to the store, you go to buy something
that you're needing or wanting, however the case may be,
doesn't matter which because the story is still the same.
You go there, you can't buy it. Why because the
shelf is empty. Why because a pack of looters came

(36:11):
in who think they're entitled and stole everything. And that's
what we see playing out right now, right, isn't it.
You know, because these naturalized citizens, they spent the time,
they paid the money, they learned what they needed to learn,

(36:37):
and they did it the right way. And here you
have these people just jumping across the border, jumping to
the front of the line, you know, wanting all of
the benefits of being a US citizen. But yet they
don't want to spend the money, they don't want to
take the time. They want to break immigration laws, break
the sovereignty of the United States and the legal immigrants

(37:04):
aren't having it. They're like, look, this isn't right, this
isn't right at all. But like I said, this is
one of the things that you know, President Trump campaigned
on the campaign trailers, like look, this is what I'm
going to do. Deport the illegal aliens, build the border wall,

(37:25):
lower taxes, cut spending. These are the things that he
ran on and these are the things he's trying to accomplish.
So Tom Homan, the whole you know, I'm not going
to or you know, I'm not going to worry so
much about red cities, red states. Why because we have
their cooperation. They do what they're supposed to do. You know,

(37:48):
they arrest somebody, they check their immigration status, they checked
the paperwork on him. They're like, oh, well you're you're
supposed to be deported. You know, there's a deport you know,
deport order on you. So we're going to notify Ice,
let them know that you're here. They're going to come
and pick you up while you're already in our custody,

(38:11):
and then they're going to put you on a plane.
You know, you're going to be leaving on a jet plane.
Don't know when you're going to be back again, and
there you go. That's how it's supposed to work. But
instead you have, you know, some states, some cities that
are sanctuary cities that just don't do that. And so
Tom Homan from the get go, he's like, look, I'm

(38:33):
going to focus on these sanctuary cities. That's what I'm
going to do. In California, isn't you know, La just
isn't a sanctuary city. California is a sanctuary state. And
that's where Tom Homan flat said that he's going to

(38:59):
focus with the raids. And so whenever they came in,
that's what they did. They focused on La. They went
in there, they did some raids, They arrested people, some
pretty bad people, right, murders, rapists, sex traffickers, that's what

(39:21):
they did. And a lot of people I forget the
number of how many people they got they raided, but
it was a lot, and it was people that, dude,
why are you you know, And this is what I
don't understand about the Left, because this is what they're doing.
You know, they're fighting for these people as if they're
just otherwise law abiding citizens, that they're not pieces of

(39:43):
crap that have no business being here. In the first place.
They're fighting for sex traffickers, for rapers, for murderers. I mean,
that's what you're doing for people that come in and
terrorize citizens, civilians, people that are just trying to live
their life and and go to work. It's like, why,

(40:04):
why are they defending these pieces of trash, illegal criminal aliens?
Why are they? I just I don't understand. But this
apparently is the hill that the Democrats are willing to
die on. And people on the left have even gone

(40:30):
out and been like, hey, if you see something, say something,
and we will let you know. And this way we
can mobilize rioters. And that's what happened. They even opened
up a hotline to say, hey, you know, let us
know where there's an ICE raid and and we can

(40:51):
deploy the troops the rioters and and get try to
push them out. And so in order to defend the
the ICE enforcement officers, because that's what they are, they

(41:12):
are federal officers enforcement officers, in order to defend them
because the police weren't doing anything, state police, county police,
local police, they weren't doing Jack Dittley squad. Because here's
the thing, here's the kicker, right according to California law.

(41:36):
According to LA law, their police officers can't not that
they have no legal right, they have no ability to.
I mean, that's part of California law. Let make it

(41:57):
make sense to me, right, make it make sense? I mean,
how is this not insurrection? That's what I want to know.
How is this not insurrection? I mean one of the

(42:18):
definitions of insurrection is, you know, ignoring the laws of
the land, trying to prohibit federal officers from arresting criminals.

(42:38):
That's what they're doing out there. Make it make sense.
By law, they can't enforce federal law. How is this
not an insurrection? Make it make sense? I don't understand.

(43:01):
If you know, let me know down in the comments.
Send me an email ho Ho at the ho Ho
show dot com. I want to know, because this to
me makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I don't get it.
They're violating federal law and as being a something. Here's
the thing, people, I mean, I want you, I want
you to understand something. Okay, Obama, yes he did enforce,

(43:25):
Yes he did deport He deported a lot of people,
but he still also did things to decriminalize certain areas
of it. Right, I mean he did you know DACA,
you know, deferred something, child something whatever. You know, the

(43:48):
Dreamers in whatever. Okay, you know, the protecting the children whatever.
You always know what I'm trying to say, you know
that whole thing under I mean, it was just just
the border. I can't even say was porous. I mean,
that's what some people like to say. It was basically
non existing. So many people across the border. It was

(44:09):
ridiculous they allowed it. You know, part of the oath
of office for the president is to support and defend
the constitution, enforce the laws of the land. And did
he enforce the laws of the land?

Speaker 3 (44:23):
Know?

Speaker 1 (44:24):
And then you have actors and you know, like Newsom
and Bass that totally ignore and you know, it's worse
than ignoring the federal law of enforcing immigration, right, It's
worse than that. What they're doing out in California with
that is so much worse than just ignoring the law,
because they're not ignoring the law per se, they're criminalizing

(44:48):
the enforcement of the law. And that's really what's taking place.
They're criminalizing the enforcement of federal law. How is this
not an insurrection? And so in order to detect the
ice enforcement officers Trump first deployed two thousand National Guard
he you know, federalized the National Guard, which he has

(45:14):
every right to do. And then because it just wasn't enough,
he ended up deploying, deploying, deploying, deploying two thousand more
so about four thousand, and then because that wasn't even enough. Yeah,

(45:43):
here's a little timeline on this one, and this is
an article from CNBC. President Donald Trump has authorized deploying
another two thousand National Guard troops to Los Angeles, US
officials told the Associated Press on Monday. Sorry, another federalizing

(46:08):
the first two thousand California National troops. National Guard troops.
There you go. There's other points in here, I know,
it says, so, oh yeah, well nope, nope, nope. Okay,
well we'll get into that here in a minute. We
ain't there yet. So in order to help them out,
he also ended up deploying seven hundred. First I'd heard

(46:30):
five hundred, but apparently the number is seven hundred marines
to protect federal buildings and to you know, protect the
law enforcement officers they messed around. Now we have reached

(46:54):
the finding out stage of this process. Now here I
gotta talk about this, and yeah, I did a show
about this the other day, you know, laying out some
of this, talking about the Marines showing up and whatnot,
and it's a you know, definitely check that one out.

(47:15):
But one of the things that I have heard, and
I've heard it from multiple sources, but I think there
are basically two like actual sources from this, but apparently
from what the report had said, was that some ice officers,

(47:36):
I think there were ice officers, there might have been
that might have been police officers, but they had been
fired upon from somebody with a shotgun. And one of
the officers shouted to the Marines that were there, cover me.

(48:01):
And here you have a you know, not quite understanding
the order that they were giving, because the Marines instead
of just hey, you know, uh will will cover you
and we'll we'll do this if necessary, what what they

(48:24):
heard was, I'm not I'm not gonna say, but what
they ended up doing was laying down suppressive fire and
fired roughly two hundred rounds. Now, I don't know what happened.
I really don't. And this is assuming it's true. Okay,

(48:46):
we're going to assume for a second that this that
this report was true. I don't know I haven't been
able to confirm these were audio reports that I had heard,
and it sounded like it came from two different sources
even though, or two different original sources, but it was
quite a few different sources that i'd heard it from
talking about the same thing. So again, I don't know

(49:07):
if this is necessarily true. But I wouldn't be surprised.
Let me say that one. I wouldn't be surprised. Yeah,
I wouldn't be surprised at all. But I don't And
this is kind of why I'm like hesitant to say
this is true, because I haven't seen any aftermath, any fallout.

(49:31):
I don't know if anybody, you know, if there was
a loss of life. I don't know if anybody was injured.
I don't know. I don't have any other details besides
cover me two hundred rounds down range as suppression fire.
I don't know what happened. I haven't heard anything else

(49:55):
about it, just the initial report, So I don't know.
I don't know if it's true. I'm not surprised, but
I don't know if it's true. And you have even
Gavin Newsom that came out and this this was before
this report, but you have Gavin Newsom that is like,
you know, he sued the administration wanting to control of

(50:19):
the National Guard back, and the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals was like, well, okay, we're going to hear you out. However,
we're not going to give you control of the National
Guard just yet. And even even former GOP California Governor

(50:43):
Arnold Schwarzenegger came out about the riots and even said
that this wouldn't have happened if politicians actually did their work,
did their job, if these people did what they were
supposed to do, you know. And here's the thing, you know,
it wouldn't even be so bad, the outrage against the left,

(51:09):
against Gavin Newsom, against Bass, It wouldn't be so bad
if they actually didn't decriminalize so many things, you know,
I mean, if it wasn't for the fact that these
you know, it's bad enough they're illegal aliens that are
not supposed to be here, but it's the criminal element
that they just don't want to do anything about. You know,

(51:34):
they rape somebody, they rape a fourteen year old, so
what they may get arrested, they may get processed, but
then they're back out on the street, able to do
it again, and this happens all the freaking time. I mean,
if they actually kept these people in jail, if they

(51:58):
actually protected this citizens from the criminal element in their society,
maybe the uproar wouldn't be so bad. I mean, it's
bad enough that they are a sanctuary city, a sanctuary state,
but they are choosing to do nothing. Not just trying
to curb the illegal immigration, but they're doing nothing whenever

(52:21):
it comes to taking care of the criminal element in
their society. And they wonder why people are outraged. They
wonder why people are upset. Child sex traffickers, child rapists, murderers,
people who commit violent assault. They get arrested, maybe they

(52:46):
get processed, Okay, then they get led out to do
it again. Where's the punishment. I mean, that's why Gavin
Newsom and Bass are just they have no leg to
stand on. They really don't. And Gavin Newsom is wanting
to make a you know, he's wanting to make a
bid to be the Democrat nominee for President of the

(53:07):
United States of America. Are you kidding me? I mean,
I would ask every Democrat, is what's going on in
LA is what's going on out in California. Is this
what you want for the rest of the United States?
Is it? Is that what you want? Do you want
this nation to burn every several years? Do you want

(53:30):
it to be commonplace? Do you want there to be
no justice at all? I mean, dude, I on one hand,

(53:50):
let him run, boy howdy. I really hope he does,
because they have gotten no shot at winning. But on
the other hand, is it's like, what if he were
actually win, right? I mean, how terrifying is that? What
if he ran and actually won, this nation would be unrecognizable.

(54:20):
I mean, dude, it's crazy. But that's why Gavin Newsom,
that's why these politicians out there in California. They have
no leg to stand on, and they're losing support left,
right and center. Quite literally, They're losing support from the Democrats,
They're losing support from the Republicans as if they ever

(54:40):
had any, and they're absolutely losing support from those that
are in the center because they are failing to protect
the civilians, law abiding citizens from the criminal element in
their society. It's ridiculous, it's shameful, and it's their fault.

(55:04):
I mean, like I said, it wouldn't be so bad
if they actually took care of the criminals, it wouldn't
be as bad. They wouldn't have lost the support that
they have. I mean, they may actually have people standing
on their side and like, look, you know, we do
understand that this is kind of ridiculous. Maybe he shouldn't
go in there and do it the way he is,
but that's not the case. Instead, criminal activity by anybody

(55:34):
is accepted and protected activity. Let me say that again,
it's accepted and protected. How messed up is that? That's

(55:55):
pretty messed up. I really hope this ends quickly. I
really do. I don't like I don't like seeing cities burn,
you know, the the people that are there in LA

(56:17):
in California, and I mean I have people listen to
the show that are out there in California, of which case,
thank you, I really do. You know, I appreciate you
being here. I really do. And I've heard other people
talk about this as far as you know, how do

(56:42):
I want to word this. I was listening to Andrew Wilcove,
the Willcom Majority, and I believe this was no, it
couldn't have been Friday. It might have been Thursday, a
couple of days ago. It was when ever, I was
listening to this, and it's like, you know how many
this happens at least out there in LA. You know,

(57:03):
this happens well California in general, this happens every couple
of years, right, I mean that's whether it be from
incompetence or whether it be from some type of riot,
you know, the citizens being upset about something. It happens
every couple of years due to mismanagement, whether it be

(57:27):
forest mismanagement, whether it be you know, their policies that
just make people mad. Something happening. George Floyd, Oh, this
is a this we can protest on this next thing.
You know, you know they're protesting, you know, Floyd getting
getting Yeah, and you know, oh that means I can

(57:50):
steal these shoes from foot locker or this phone from
you know, from the Apple store. And I'm justified because
people just don't pay attention to me. Criminal, you behind
you belong behind bars. I mean, the First Amendment gives
you the right to peaceably protest. That doesn't that's not

(58:12):
equivalent to that does not mean the same as it's
not a synonym for riot. I mean, if I were
to look up in a fasaurus as for a synonym
to peaceable protest. I wouldn't see riot. They're not the same.

(58:32):
It's not equal to not at all. You don't have
the right to riot, you just don't. And what does
stealing an apple, you know, in an Apple phone from
the Apple store have anything to do with illegals being

(58:55):
forced to answer for their crimes. I mean, it really
is ridiculous, it really is. The Left have no leg
to stand on. They really don't. They're making it acceptable,

(59:17):
and they're even protecting these people from answering to their crime,
whether it be their own you know, their their own laws.
Of which case, why does California, why does La even
have laws in the first place, considering they don't enforce
jack shit. I don't understand that one either. If you're
not going to enforce any law, why do why do

(59:39):
you even have laws in the first place. I mean,
I just I don't get it. It makes no sense to me.
It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. And you know, and
and they get they get told that, you know, if
I just were to stop, you know, stop and for

(01:00:00):
federal law, then these riots would subside, there would be
no more riots. Uh huh. You can't even enforce your
own laws, and you want the federal government, you want
Ice to stop enforcing federal laws. You know, they cry
and they whine about, you know, sovereignty. That's one of

(01:00:22):
the things that you know, Gavin Newsom was bringing up
whenever he was talking about, you know, or whenever he
sued the administration wanting to reclaim control of the National Guard,
he said, look, state sovereignty. No, it doesn't work like that.

(01:00:47):
It doesn't work like that at all. California is ignoring
federal law. It's a federal crime. What they're doing, you know,
blocking their own officers from enforcing immigration law. They have
actually gone as far as violating the law. They themselves
are criminals. Gavin Newsom is a criminal. He's guilty of

(01:01:12):
an insurrection. Look at the statutes, read the law textbook definition.
The administration has every right to arrest Gavenussom, Bess, any
one of these people that passed that bill, even because

(01:01:33):
that too was an active insurrection against the federal government.
It's a law that directly violates federal law. It's a
state and local law that directly violates federal law. That's
a crime. There is a recognized supremacy club within the

(01:02:01):
Constitution there is, the fact of the matter is the
federal government has the right, has the ability to enforce
federal law, and it is a precedent that was even

(01:02:24):
ironed out during oh whose administration was, I don't remember
if it was Obama's administration or Biden's administration, and I
think it was Arizona actually that tried to, you know,
because the administration failed them. They tried to arrest, detain,
and deport illegal aliens, and of which case the administration said, no,

(01:02:46):
you can't do that. Immigration is a federal matter. You
don't have the authority to enforce these laws. You don't
have the authority to deport illegal aliens. And that's what
the argument was. And it's like, okay, wait a second,
wait a second, wait to say you can't have it
both ways, dude, you can't have it. But you can't. No,

(01:03:09):
it's either one or the other. When it was convenient
for you, you argued on behalf of federal supremacy in
handling federal law. Now you're saying, oh, no, tenth Amendment,
we have the right to violate federal law, state sovereignty,

(01:03:30):
we can do that. No, no, you can't have it
both ways. What did the Republicans do we ceased. We
were like, well, you got a point. I mean, even
though in the grand scheme of things, in the failure
of a federal administration to enforce the laws, the states
have every right to enforce federal immigration laws, that's part

(01:03:52):
of it. They ignored that part of the statute though.
Oh but yeah, they want to have their cake and
eat it too. The tenth Amendment only applies whenever it
is convenient for them to make it apply. I keep
sliding down in this chair. I don't know why I
decided to bring this chair back into the studio and

(01:04:14):
start using it again, because it annoys the crap out
of me. It really does. I mean, it works, it
does the job right, but it annoys me. And that's
why I keep, you know, I keep sliding down, having
to pick myself back up again. And Hi, how you doing.
Hope you're well anyway. Sovereignty, that's what they're talking about,

(01:04:39):
and it's it's ridiculous. But what we have heard is
that things seem to be spreading. This is one of
the things that was coming out earlier in the week,
starting Monday or Tuesday, is that there were talks Flag
Day the parade. I'll bring that up a little bit
later President Trump's birthday. There were going to be why

(01:05:00):
spread riots throughout the US, and we're gonna be talking
about that next Just a couple of minutes when.

Speaker 9 (01:05:05):
I brought back, walking down the street with a smile,
so cooy, feeling like a king, not a single decoy.
But then it slips out, silent but deadly. Everyone around
just looks at me dreadfully in the elevator with a

(01:05:25):
loaded mask, silent escape. Sure it was in first class,
trying to act cool like nothing's wrong, but everyone knows.
It's a stinky.

Speaker 4 (01:05:34):
Song, silent but deadly, creeping.

Speaker 9 (01:05:37):
Through the people holding roses everywhere, Moments of peace, torn
of heart, all from the art of the silent far

(01:05:58):
in a crowded room, I let one go, hoping no
one notice, But it's the show. Faces start to twist
and turn. Maybe next time I'll be more concerned. Oh
the shame, the awkward dance, playing with fate in the
fart romance. Wish and I could just disappear, But laughter
it breaks out, conquering the fear, Silent but deadly creeping

(01:06:28):
through the air, people holding noses everywherehere, moments of peace
torn apart.

Speaker 3 (01:06:41):
All from the art of a silent fart.

Speaker 4 (01:06:54):
Of a silent part.

Speaker 7 (01:06:59):
Of a.

Speaker 1 (01:07:10):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit?
Are you tired of walking by family members and crop
dusting them? Well, if this has ever happened to you,
might I introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs. Tampon's
brand butt plugs is that particular type of butt plug
that allows you to walk in public in confidence no one,
You're not going to accidentally crop does somebody? Tampa's brand

(01:07:33):
butt plugs now with the plastic applicator, not just for
women anymore. Tampa's brand butt plugs. All right. You know
that was a toss up as the which promo I
was going to do on that one, because it was
either Tampon's brand butt plugs, which is very fitting, don't
get me wrong, or it was Angelsoft. I mean, it

(01:07:54):
really was a toss up. I could have gone either way.
Both of them worked, both of them fit, I mean
after silent but deadly. It really could have gone either way.
It was a split second decision. Tampon brand butt plug
ended up winning by virtue. It was virtuous. Those things

(01:08:20):
make me laugh. I enjoy them, I really do. So
let's go ahead and get back into this. So sometime
during the week, you know, reports were coming out that
these protests were going to become more widespread, that they
were going to spread to every major city all across

(01:08:41):
the US, including in Illinois. No surprise at Chicago, and
I guess tensions has already been rising in Chicago, in
New York, and I think Atlanta and in Florida. Actually

(01:09:02):
there was a And let me go ahead and see
if I can't find this one. I didn't pull it up.
I apologize there was even I gotta find it. I
know it's in here to Nope, dash not it, Dash
not it, that's not it. Hm, oh yeah, here it is.

(01:09:25):
Here it is. This article is actually from the Daily
Beast pulling this up. And how long is this? How
long is that? You know what? Let's just you know,
kind of a why not. Let's just let's just play
this video.

Speaker 2 (01:09:44):
If you resist lawful orders, you're going to jail. Let
me be very clear about that. If you block an
intersection or a roadway and Brevarc counted, you are going
to jail. If you flee your rest, you're going to
go to jail type because we are going to run
you down and put you in jail. If you try
to mob rule a car in Brevard County gathering around

(01:10:06):
it refusing to let the driver leave in our county,
you're most likely going to get run over and dragged.

Speaker 1 (01:10:12):
Across the street.

Speaker 2 (01:10:14):
If you spit on us, you're going to the hospital
and in jail. If you hit one of us, you're
going to the hospital and jail and most likely get
bitten by one of our big, beautiful dogs that we
have here. If throw a brick, a fire bomb, or
pointed gun at one of our deputies, we will be
notifying your family where to collect your remains at because

(01:10:36):
we will kill you graveyard dead. We're not going to play.

Speaker 1 (01:10:42):
Hold on. Sorry, So yeah, that I apologize about that.
That was a little low. If you want to check
out that video, and it was only on the left
channel as well, you know it was a little If
we want to check out that video, head on over
to the host Show dot com. Click on that newsfeed tab.
You'll see the magazine and it is the the article

(01:11:03):
from The Daily Beast. Maga Sheriff issues chilling warning to protesters.
We will kill you. That wasn't actually the video I
was thinking about. I was thinking about the one from
that that it had the sheriff talking and you know,
I've seen this sheriff, you know, numerous different times talking

(01:11:25):
about things. He is a no nonsense sheriff, he really is.
And it had Ron DeSantis that was behind him in
the background in this video, the one that I'm thinking of. So, yeah,

(01:11:46):
reaching the find out portion of the fa FO, that's
kind of what it amounts to. But yeah, they're talking about,
you know, these these riots spreading all across the US.
That was well, according to the reports that I heard,
supposed to kick off Saturday the fourteenth, going into this

(01:12:07):
weekend of Flag Day, the President's birthday, and kind of
what the scuttle but is on this is that these
raids are you know, not just associated with the I'm sorry,
these riots, I'm sorry, the riots are you know, not
just associated with the ice raids. But it is also

(01:12:31):
about Flag Day, Trump's birthday, and the military parade that
is supposed to be going on. This headline from the week,
excuse me, had acup. This headline from the week is

(01:12:52):
Trump's military parade just a parade? And this is supposed
to go on uh to do on Trump's seventy ninth birthday.
There you go, I'm not saying crap. That's today though,
you know, happy birthday, President Trump. He is now seventy

(01:13:12):
nine at flag Day on the Army's two hundred and
fiftieth birthday. So that's what the that's what the parade is.
Let's see, the procession will include at least fifty eight
Abram tanks thundering up Constitution Avenue, as well as the
fifty military helicopters the thumping overhead. Though that'd be awesome.

(01:13:36):
All of this happens incidentally on Trump's seventy ninth birthday.
It's an amazing No, it is amazing the way things
work out. Trump said last month. That's actually kind of cool.
But here, okay, I want to be Can I be
honest for a second. You know, I've heard several different

(01:13:58):
people talking about this military parade, talking about the optics.
The optics don't look good, you know. And this wouldn't
be the first time that we have seen military parades.
We normally see them in countries like North Korea, in
other regimes of that nature. You know, they are trying

(01:14:25):
to show the world of their prowess, their military might.
But this is something that you don't generally see out
of the United States of America because, you know, speak quietly,
carry a big stick, peace through strength. You know, the

(01:14:46):
biggest dog in the fight doesn't have to have the
loudest bark because everybody knows who top dog is. You
don't have to. And that's kind of been the thing, right,
you know. So, I mean, I got look, I'm a
Trump fan, I'm a Trump supporter, I really am. I

(01:15:10):
love what he's doing. He is the most conservative president
that I have seen in my lifetime, including even Ronald Reagan.
Both of them have similar backgrounds, they really do. You know,
former Democrats. The party left them and then they became
the biggest supporter and somebody who carried out the conservative

(01:15:33):
agenda more than anybody else in their time, any other
politician in their time. So they both have similar backgrounds.
They both have had very similar struggles. I mean, not
necessarily the lawfair on Reagan, but a lot of the
pushback from members of their own party that go along

(01:15:54):
to get along people, and they all have had to
defend their position even though their position was right for America.
Trying to stop the illegal flow, deport the illegal aliens,
make it to where these people weren't able to come
back by building a freaking wall. And the reason I say,

(01:16:18):
or at least one of the reasons I say that,
you know, President Trump is the you know, biggest conservative
and modern history, including Ronald Reagan, is because whenever they
were faced with the same issue as in, you won
a wall, you give us amnesty, Trump said no, We're

(01:16:38):
not doing that. Ronald Reagan said yes. Trump looked at history,
learned a lesson and said, no, we've had this dance
before Ronald Reagan gave you amnesty. You never gave Ronald
Reagan a wall. I'm not doing it because I don't

(01:17:02):
trust you to operate in good faith. I don't trust
you to carry out and actually build the wall once
you get amnesty. President Trump said, no, we ain't having this.
We ain't doing this dance. I'm not going to fall
victim to your agenda the way Ronald Reagan did. I'm
not doing this. So, I mean, I do view President
Trump as the most conservative president in modern history because

(01:17:25):
he didn't fall to the trap that others have had.
Others have fallen to, but that being said, I really
I don't. I can't say as if I agree with
the military parade. I can't really say as I do.
And other people have made this argument. Other people have

(01:17:48):
I mean, there's a lot of other you know, conservative
talk radio hosts out there that you know, are completely like, oh, yeah,
this is awesome, this is great, you know what, who cares?

Speaker 3 (01:17:58):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:17:59):
But when you think think back about the different regimes
and nations that has done military parades, what did every
one of them have in common? Tyranny, oppression, oppression of
the people. It's not a good It's not necessarily a

(01:18:27):
good thing, you know. I mean, that's one of the
things that every authoritarian regime has done, is they flaunt
their prowess, their military capability. But in the United States,
we've never had to do that. Before everybody knew where

(01:18:51):
we stood, and for the most part, people didn't really
mess with us. They've read his books too. They know
what happens when you mess with American boats. They know
that it doesn't end well. They have heard the stories

(01:19:11):
of retaliation. How people who have tried and messed around,
you know, have their name in the credits. Is Blooney
missed Number one and Bolooney missed number two. They have
seen history play out, and it's like, we better not
do that. But on the other hand, you take a

(01:19:35):
look at what it happened under Obama, what had happened
obviously under Biden's administration, and you know, I understand why
he would want to do it, you know, and I
really do think that in a lot of ways, what
President Trump is doing is you know, he's not doing

(01:19:57):
this to flaunt military prowess. I think he's doing it
as a thank you and acknowledging the military, the servicemen
and women, those who you know, sign their name on
the dotted line to join the greatest military the world
has ever seen. I think that's really what it amounts to.

(01:20:19):
But at the same time, I mean, the optics just
aren't really all that great. I mean, it's just it's
just not I really I can't. I I just I
can't get behind this one. I just can't. I mean,
I'm sure that there are people out there that have
all kinds of varying views, and in which case that's fine.
It really is. It's totally okay. If you support Trump

(01:20:40):
in is great let me know, send me an email.

Speaker 5 (01:20:42):
Hoho.

Speaker 1 (01:20:42):
At the ho Ho show dot com. If you're over
on spreak er, let me know in the comments. I
just can't back this move. I can't back this play.
I'm not seen it. I don't I can't even tell
you when this parade is supposed to take place. I
have no idea. You know, I was really hope that
this article about it would say, but I don't. Oh, nope, nope,

(01:21:13):
celebrating the RV's Army's achievements. RV's achievements. Really, what is
an RV. I mean, I know what an RV is. Whatever,
I just can't speak. That's all in the mouse too.
You know, you would think somebody that does a podcast,
several of them, almost eight years of experience behind the microphone,

(01:21:36):
almost five hundred episodes that I have done that I
have aired are publicly available, you think that I would
know how to speak, right, I mean, that's what you
would think. But apparently not. I screw up all the
freaking time. It's horrible. But anyway, I was hoping that
i'd be able to see in this article you know
when this is supposed to take place? Like, I know

(01:21:58):
it's today, I don't know what time. Maybe I'm missing
and I have no idea, but anyway, it doesn't matter.
How do you feel about this? Let me know any
comments below, Send me an email ho Ho at Thehoho
Show dot com. Don't forget to like and subscribe to
me that great, big favor. I would definitely appreciate it,
and I do. I appreciate y'alls being here. I appreciate
you checking out the show. Give me a like, give

(01:22:19):
me a follow up comment. Increase engagement. It helps, it
really does. Moving on, let's get to the next article.
Recision bill. This is huge. I heard about this. I
didn't really get a lot of information about it at
the time, but I checked out this article from Just

(01:22:39):
the News. The headline says recision recision, recision, recisions bill.
There we go, headed to US Senate. Nevada GOP congressman
pushes back on public media cuts. So apparently, only four
Republican House members vote against the nine point four billion

(01:23:02):
recisions package, including Nevada's US Representative, Mark Emodia and whatever
and a Republican Carson City. Oh, Republican from Carson City.
Wow wow, So only four? So cool? It did pass

(01:23:23):
the The recisions bill did pass the Yeah, the House
so that's awesome, amazing, and this recisions bill only has
and this is this is a sad thing. Okay. So
we talked about this the other day. You know that
there was you know, the Elon Musk in Douge, the
Department of Government Efficiency. You know, they claimed that they

(01:23:45):
would be able to and Elon Musk was adamant about this.
They he'd easily be able to get rid of, you know,
one trillion dollars worth of waist fraud and abuse, and
of which case that sounds great. But as of whenever,
you know, as of the end of his tenure, they
had only found one hundred and eighty billion, and of

(01:24:06):
which case, only thirty percent of that roughly fifty four billion,
if my math is mathing correctly, is all they were
able to actually find thirty percent with receipts. One hundred
and eighty billion is what they discovered. Okay, that's it.
I mean, don't get me wrong. It's a great start.
And I don't want the efforts of DOZE to just

(01:24:28):
go by the wayside, to completely be shut down. I
want them to continue. I want them to find every
ounce of waste, fraud and abuse that they can. I
want them to go through every single one of these
organizations with a fine tooth comb and see it for
what it is. And I also want the administration to
enforce laws and regulations on these various departments to make

(01:24:51):
it easier to track where the money's going, how it's
being spent. They owe the American people that because it's
not their money that they're spending. It's out money. That's
the cold, hard truth of this whole entire thing. They're
not spending their money. They're spending and they're wasting our money.

(01:25:12):
And as an American, a taxpayer whose relationship with government
every single year is a net negative, I pay more
than I get back. This year, my federal tax return
was one fucking dollar. I pay more than I receive.

(01:25:34):
I have the right to know where my money is
going and how it's being spent. That really is that simple.
I mean, I have the right to know where it's going,
every last penny and how it's being spent. I really do.

(01:25:59):
That's my right as an American citizen, as a taxpayer,
I had the right to know where my money's going.
And I don't want to see whenever you know I'm
whenever you have so many people in this country live
in paycheck to paycheck, using their credit cards just to
make ends meet with inflation, everything the way it's been,

(01:26:20):
the state of the economy, and even at the state
of the economy was great. Everybody had huge savings, and
you know, we weren't at risk of Social Security being
bankrupt within the next ten years. Even if everything was good,
I wouldn't care. I still have the right to know
where every one of my pennies is going and how
it's being spent. I have the right to know, period

(01:26:46):
in the story. And these people just don't care. These
people who spend the money don't care. They don't care
what you want. They view it as their money, not
yours at any rate. Sorry, I got on a tirade

(01:27:08):
right there, but you know, I hope you understand my point,
and I hope your passion equals mine. I really do.
I hope it does, because if we don't get serious
about holding these people accountable for what they're doing and
how they're doing it, we're never going to see a change.
We might as well give up the whole thing, you know,
I mean we might as well. You know, there was

(01:27:29):
a thing I was talking about, or a thing that
somebody else was talking about, and it was regarding taxes,
and it's like, okay, so if the tax is zero,
how much tax money will will government get. Obviously, zero taxes,

(01:27:50):
the government's going to get zero. It's like, okay, so
if taxes are one, how much taxes will government receive? Well,
the answer to that question is is also pretty clear.
U zero. Put the square in the square hole. If

(01:28:16):
you know the reference on that one, just little smiley
face emoji somewhere do that. That'd be awesome. I watched
that video. I've watched that video numerous times, laughing, Ermiger,
that is hilarious. Anyway, what was that talking about. I

(01:28:40):
don't remember. Anyway, we have the right to know how
the money is being spent. I'm trying to walk myself
back into that. We have the right to know how
the money is being spent, where it's going. And if
we don't actually enforce this then and it's just it's ridiculous.

(01:29:01):
You know, we have the right. Oh yeah, that's what
I was talking about. The zero percent taxes, government gets
zero percent. If it's one hundred percent taxes, government also
receives zero percent because of the fact of the matter
is Why would you go to work, work hard, sacrifice
your time, your energy, your livelihood, your happiness for government

(01:29:28):
to take everything from you. The answer is you wouldn't.
I mean, you're not. I mean, dude, Okay, I'm a
truck driver. I've got nineteen years almost nineteen years. This
August will be nineteen years having my class acd yel Yes,
I'm that old. Nineteen years. Wow. I guarantee you that

(01:29:55):
if every dollar I earned, I earned went to government,
one hundred percent of my paycheck went to government, and
my paycheck was nothing more than a stub of we
took all your money. I believe me when I tell
you I wouldn't go to work. Why go to work?

(01:30:21):
Why sacrifice my sanity, my happiness, my time, my energy?
Why would I sacrifice that for nothing? Anyway, there's a point,
you know, there's a place in the middle where you
get you know, maximum production and maximum income or maximum

(01:30:42):
revenue to the government. All that to say this is
so ridiculous. All that to say that, you know, we
have the right to know where the tax money went.
We absolutely do, and hopefully you know they get to
the bottom of things in doge. But at any rate,

(01:31:08):
with everything that they found, the one trillion promised, the
one hundred and eighty billion that they provided, only thirty
percent that they had receiveds for. This recisions package is
only nine point four billion dollars and of which case
two billion of that is just to stop funding going
to NPR and PBS. This should be a no brainer.

(01:31:35):
It really should. This should be the easiest bill they
have ever passed in the history of Congress. It really
should be. I mean, one hundred and eighty billion that
they found of waste, fraud and abuse out of the
one trillion that they promised, and only thirty percent they
have receives, but they still have receipts for it. Equally,

(01:31:56):
roughly fifty four billion dollars worth of savings that they
have receipts for. And this recisions package is only nine
billion of the one hundred and eighty billion dollars worth
of ways, fraud and abuse that they have found, and
it basically consists of two billion of funding two NPR

(01:32:18):
and PBS. Also, USAID is in here as well, if
I remember correctly. Let me see if that's in this
uh in this article? Okay, so let me go ahead
and just kind of read some you know, a quick
highlight reel as I you know, as I read through
this for the first time, so it starts off with

(01:32:38):
the center square. The US Senate will vote on a
recisions package that will cut one point one billion from
public broadcasting after the measure narrowly passed the House two
fourteen to two twelve. Oh boy, howdy, that was a
narrow pass. Wow. Continue one. The recisions package, worth a

(01:32:59):
total of nine point four billion, would also make major
cuts to foreign aid focused on climate change prevention. Only
four Republican members of the House voted against the package,
including Nevada's US Rep. Mark Emodi, Republican Carson City. Okay,
before we trigger major consequences for our local public broadcasting

(01:33:21):
stations throughout the West and other rural areas, we need
more discussion rather than railroading folks over the east, over
the East coasts, editorial and indiscretions. Let me stop there.

(01:33:42):
I'm completely against state run media because let's be clear,
that's what this is, NPRPBS, it's state run media. I
mean everybody, especially if you take into consideration what the
news is actually intended for is to ensure a well

(01:34:05):
informed voter, a well informed civilian, a well informed individual.
That's what it is intended to do. It is to
let everybody know the when, the where, the what, the why,
the how, so that this way they know what's going on,
no bs, so that this way they can make decisions

(01:34:31):
on how things are run. As a voter, so we
can be engaged. If you remain ignorant to everything going on,
how can you make an informed decision. You're not informed,
You can't make an informed decision. That's the whole point
of news in the first place. So I am against
especially state run news. State run broadcasting is bad enough

(01:34:58):
because you have stuff that could be in I betted
in there that is meant to normalize government overreach and inefficiencies.
We don't want that either, absolutely, I don't want that.
The whole point of the First Amendment is to make

(01:35:20):
it to where the people have the freedom that it
can't be taken away from government. And whenever you have
things like this NPR, PBS that is receiving government money

(01:35:43):
to do their thing to promote propaganda, do you realize
how hard it is to compete against government? I mean,
do you understand, like the pocketbook is huge and regardless

(01:36:05):
of how money they actually have, they have the ability
to print more. It's to lose lose, isn't it. I've
always been against state run media, especially state run news organizations,

(01:36:26):
because you're never going to get unbiased news. You don't
have unbiased news in the mainstream media and legacy media
and that as it is anyway, you don't have that
because they are controlled virtually from top to bottom by
the left. You don't get good honest journalism in reporting.

(01:36:47):
They're not concerned about the window, where the what, the
why the how? As Dan Bongino has said in the
past numerous times, hat tip to him. You know, they
want to tell you a story, not the story. I'm
against it. So this whole thing should be a complete

(01:37:10):
no brainer, shouldn't it. It passed in the House of
Representatives by a two vote margin. Holy crap, two fourteen
to two twelve. If that ain't a narrow majority, I
don't know what it is. I mean, granted, they can
always get more narrow. Two thirteen to two oh wow, yeah.

(01:37:34):
I mean if two people just would have voted president present,
if one person would have switched, it would have been
a tied vote to fourteen two fourteen. How many is it. Okay,
so four seventy so three seventy right, No, that ain't
that can't be right? Two four thirty how many? Never mind,

(01:38:05):
my brain is braining and it doesn't always brain with
my brain, and you know things I'm add It's not
an excuse. I mean, it's just a reality. Just don't
add out there to you, you know. But anyway, nine
point four billion dollars, two of which NPR, PBS another

(01:38:26):
you know the rest of it is basically usaid this
should be the easiest slam dunk ever in American history.
I really do hope they're able to get this done,
get this passed, and you know, we can move on.
And one of the things that I had heard regarding
these recision packages is, you know, yes, we need to
do this, we absolutely do. And if they okay, so

(01:38:53):
this recisions package, and they did it like this for
a reason. Okay, So before you start yelling at Trump
and the administration, as far as you know, hey, you
had Elon Musk here doing all this work. You know,
one hundred and eighty billion dollars that they actually did find.
Why didn't you just throw everything in there and get
the whole thing done at once? Right. I mean, that's

(01:39:14):
the question that a lot of people are asking, And
don't get me wrong, I've actually asked that question to myself.
I'm like, dude, one hundred and eighty billion, and you
only put up like one percent or is that ten percent?
One percent? Any rate, that's all you put up there.
Of one hundred and eighty billion that they that they

(01:39:35):
found thirty percent. They have receipts for fifty four billion
dollars worth of receipts on things you can cut, and
you're only going to do a recisions package for nine
billion dollars? Are you kidding me? But whenever I found
out the why, because the why is important, it made

(01:39:55):
sense because if Congress it fails to act, okay, then
this recisions package is done. The cuts that he wants
to make, he cannot make it. This fiscal year. It's done.
It's over with the left wins, the establishment wins. That's

(01:40:25):
the reality. So if this fails over, he can't do
another recisions package including the same things he can't do.
I mean, he can do another recisions package, don't get
me wrong, but it can't include the same cuts that

(01:40:47):
didn't pass the first time. So this being a complete.
There you go. Should be easy. Why is there even
a question? How come is it that it was such
a narrow victory? Still a victory. You did what you
were supposed to do. Congratulations. But if they're not able

(01:41:12):
to get a past and this, they can't do it again.
They can't do another recisions package containing the same cuts.
It's done, it's over with. But you know, this is
kind of a testing the water of what they are
actually going to be able to do, because if they
are able to get this one through, then they're going

(01:41:35):
to do another recisions package and then another recisions package
and keep it going and hopefully be able to get
rid of all of this. But here's the thing. If
they're not able to make it through, and regardless of
what actually ends up happening, I think this is something
that Trump is going to do. I mean, he's going
to keep the recision packages small because okay, this is great,

(01:42:02):
by the way, Okay, this is amazing. This is awesome
because with this recisions package, he sends it in and
as soon as it as soon as it goes, as
soon as the House of Representative gets it, that starts
a forty five day clock. That's what happens, they have

(01:42:27):
forty five days to vote on it, to vote yes
on this. After that forty five days is over, then
it's done. It's done. There's nothing the president can do.
And if it doesn't go through, then on this recision package,

(01:42:49):
he can't reintroduce it. He's got to focus on something else. However,
as we go closer to the end of the fisc year,
once we are within forty five days from the end
of the fiscal year, which I believe the end of
the fiscal year is sometime in September, so in August,

(01:43:17):
what Trump can do is send a recisions package to
Congress with the complete remainder of the recisions package that
he wants to do. And there's nothing Congress can do
about it. There's really nothing lawyers and judges can do

(01:43:41):
about it, nothing at all. And it goes back to
the people, it goes back into the coffers. It's unspent money,
it goes back to that you know that saying the
black side of the Ledger. There you go, and we
can use that money to pay down the national debt.

(01:44:05):
That's what Trump's plan is, regardless of what Congress does,
regardless if they pass it, or if they don't, it
doesn't matter. All that means if Congress doesn't end up
passing this recision bill, then the next recision bill that
he does, assuming they don't do anything, he just has

(01:44:28):
to wait till they're within the forty five day mark
between you know, at being the end of the fiscal year,
and then put the entire recision package together, send it
to Congress, and there you're done. Nine billion is easy.
If they don't want to do anything, fine, Trump still
has options. Trump wins. So I know there's a lot

(01:44:53):
of people out there that are scoffing that it's only
nine billion. That's kind of ridiculous with all the money,
shouldn't he do more? No, because if Congress fails to
do it, then there's no reintroducing that recisions package. And
Trump has an endgame. Trump has an ace in the

(01:45:13):
hole that he can play if Congress fails to do
their job, which is to reclaim unspent money that shouldn't
be spent in that way. Anyway. I find that absolutely awesome,
I really do.

Speaker 8 (01:45:33):
So.

Speaker 1 (01:45:34):
I know there's been a lot of negative nannies out
there that are scoffing about the nine billion. It should
be more. But this is a slam dunk. If he
can't do that, If if Congress fails to do this,
Congress ain't going to do anything. And make no mistake

(01:45:54):
about it. They don't want to do anything anyway. I
mean they really don't. They don't want to stop the
money flowing. You know, they all get kicksbacks from this,
Republicans and Democrats alike. It's not like Republicans are you know,
out there being you know, just halo's around their head.
Oh no, they got horns holding them halo's up. Okay,
believe me, these people don't have our best interests in mind.

(01:46:18):
They just don't. So he's got an endgame. He's got
a plan. I don't know how it's going to play out.
I'm not going to be surprised either way. I'm really not.
Either way it ends up happening, I'm not going to
be surprised. That's just all there is to it, all Right,

(01:46:38):
So we have a couple of things that we are
going to talk about. But first we're going to take
another quick break. We're gonna be talking about the Trump
revoking California's ev rules. That is awesome. This was a
bill that was signed in throughout last week, we're also
going to be talking about the apology, holy crap. And
we're going to be talking about Padilla, the arresting of

(01:47:01):
a congress person that was just absolutely hilarious. And let's
see what else we want to throw in here. Oh yeah,
the COVID stuff. All that coming up right at the
other side of this break, just a couple of minutes.
I'll be right back.

Speaker 10 (01:47:22):
Sun's beating down on the trackor seat, dusty road rising,
no shade or treat.

Speaker 1 (01:47:28):
Worked up.

Speaker 10 (01:47:28):
Sweat, Lord, it ain't fair.

Speaker 1 (01:47:31):
Now there's a swamp.

Speaker 10 (01:47:31):
Brewing under there. Boots are dragging through the mud, off
fig from all this work.

Speaker 1 (01:47:42):
The sweat starts to stick.

Speaker 10 (01:47:44):
Cheaping and burning got a real high cost. Feels like
a milk lost in the.

Speaker 3 (01:47:49):
Salt swamp past blues.

Speaker 11 (01:47:51):
Oh it's tough, too bad, sweat soaking through my under
areca cool breeze over this damn heat.

Speaker 10 (01:48:05):
But it's a lie about here in the pharmacy. I'm
my sure to dry on the old fence post, try
to cool.

Speaker 3 (01:48:17):
Down with the sun still roast.

Speaker 10 (01:48:19):
Every steps of battle. This swamp won't quit losing the
fight in this summer.

Speaker 12 (01:48:23):
Grit neighbor's waves think I've lost my mind, but it's
the heat that's making me crying.

Speaker 5 (01:48:40):
Buckets of ice won't.

Speaker 4 (01:48:42):
Even come close to drying of this southern coast of
swam fast blues.

Speaker 1 (01:48:48):
I can't take much more my jump in the cree
just to restore.

Speaker 3 (01:48:56):
Wish for that rain on and off on the bridge,
to dry these blues and find some peace. A neighbor's wave.

Speaker 10 (01:49:27):
Think I've lost my mind, But it's to eat that's
making meat grind Hoockets of ice won't even come close.

Speaker 6 (01:49:35):
To drying up this southern coat.

Speaker 3 (01:49:39):
Sound fast blues.

Speaker 4 (01:49:42):
I can't take much more my jump, and the creatus
tore store.

Speaker 3 (01:49:50):
Wish for that rain and all the bredes to dry
these blues.

Speaker 1 (01:49:58):
And find some peace. Do you work at any of
the myriad of jobs where you might have to sit
on your bum all day? Well? If so, maybe you
know what it's like to suffer from the condition known

(01:50:20):
as swamp ass. Well, if so, have I got the
solution for you. It's high monkey butt powder. That's right,
it's high monkey butt powder. You can use an indoors
outdoors work or play, or on any occasion when you
sit on your bum all day don't let your buns
get read. Use anti monkey butt powder instead, available wherever

(01:50:43):
anti friction powder is sold. All right, and we are back.
We are on the final stretch.

Speaker 5 (01:50:51):
We really are.

Speaker 1 (01:50:51):
I've got like five one, two, three, four, five articles
I wanted to talk about right quick, got ten minutes
left in the show. Nine can I do it? That's
like less than two minutes and a headline an article?
Holy crap, let's get into it. I don't want to
take it up any more of your time than necessary.
First one we got. Trump just revoked California's ev rules.

(01:51:13):
How much is California to blame? That's the headline. Posing
an interesting question because, as you all know, California had
an EVY mandate that gas powered cars would no longer
be available in twenty thirty five, ten short years away.

(01:51:39):
No gas power vehicles. Now, I don't know how that
would affect like I know that that affects like new
car ownership. You know that there would be no gas
powered vehicles available to buy new after twenty thirty five,
But I don't know how that was going to affect
those who already had a gas powered or diesel powered vehicle.

(01:52:01):
I really don't know I didn't read all that much
into the you know, into the law that California had
on that. I really don't, you know, I don't know.
So if you're out there in California and you know,
definitely send me an email Hoho at the ho hoshow
dot com because I am interested. But the adage is
as California goes, so does the rest of the nation.

(01:52:23):
I'm paraphrasing hips, I'm paraphrasing that, but you get what
I'm saying. So this is something that was very much
because you know, California is a is a big state.
There's a lot of people out there, a lot of
business and companies want to they want to do business

(01:52:46):
out in California for obvious reasons, right. You know, Look,
I'm a truck driver. Okay, y'alls know that nineteen years
experience behind the wheel. You have to be regardless of
where you're at, Okay, there are certain rules that you
have to abide by as a truck driver, or at

(01:53:09):
least that your truck. You know, manufacturers have to abide by.
You know, certain things that has to be on the truck.
You know, you've got your skirt, you've got your fins,
you've got other things to help, you know, make you
more streamlined, aerodynamic, to reduce or to increase fuel mileage.

(01:53:31):
You know, there are certain things that manufacturers have to
abide by in order to be California legal. Now I'm
in Illinois, there are things that they still do to
the trucks to ensure that they are California legal. We
don't go to California, And to be honest with you,

(01:53:56):
this is one of the things that actually does affect,
at least in some way, performed the California economy. It
really does because instead of somebody, instead of somebody buying
something that is from oh, well, let's just say Illinois,

(01:54:20):
then Illinois has to abide by or whatever truck goes
and gets it has to abide by California emissions, California
everything clean, idle, you know, the the other requirements that
California has. And if you don't, if you're using a
carrier that doesn't abide by that, then what ends up

(01:54:42):
happening is, you know, depending on you know, where the
shipment is actually going, you may you know, you may
take it from Illinois to Nevada and some other company
has to pick it up from there. To take it
the rest of the way home, to take it into
California to wherever it's actually going distribution, warehouse or otherwise.

(01:55:05):
That's how it happens. Now. Those type of handoffs cost money,
increasing the cost of shipment, forcing prices higher. It does
you know, the rest of the country doesn't have to

(01:55:25):
abide by those California rules and regulations. If you don't
do business in California, you don't have to abide by
those things. I mean, just the other day, I had
to answer a question, you know, it was something to
do with, you know, a California rule with our trucks,
and it's like, do we don't go to California. We
never go to California. We're not going to do it.
You know, we don't do that. We don't do business

(01:55:47):
in California. It's not something that we're subject to. Feel
free to do what you want to to make sure
that we can operate how.

Speaker 3 (01:55:56):
We need to.

Speaker 1 (01:55:59):
I'm not going to get in any greater detail than that.
It was just it really was that simple, you know.
So I know, as far as new car sales goes no,
I'm assuming new or even used car sales goes no.
But I don't know as far as being grandfathered in
whether it was something that you can do or not.
So what ended up happening was it was the other day,

(01:56:20):
maybe it was. Was it Thursday? I think it was
Thursday that President Trump signed into law a bill that
ended California's ev rules, making it to where it would
not affect the rest of the country and even kind

(01:56:41):
of Okay, look, it's based off of commerce, interstate commerce,
because California, after everything is all said and done, now, granted, okay,
California has the right to make whatever'll they want to. However,

(01:57:01):
California does not have the right to impose their rules
on every place else. And that's really what this whole
thing amounts to. If California wants to have their ridiculous rules,
ridiculous laws, regulations that they want to pass inhibiting you know,
free market trade, you know, if they want to inhibit that, fine,

(01:57:23):
but the rest of the nation doesn't have to be
subject to that at the same time. And that's really
what this thing amounts to. I don't know just how
much that's going to stop California from really enacting that,
but I mean, if they still want to have that
rule that every vehicle has to be an EV after
twenty thirty five. It's like, okay, well you're going to

(01:57:45):
be really limited and you're going to restrict people's ability
to do. Yeah, how is this going to affect California trade?
That's what I'm kind of curious about. So if you
are one of the people that do live out there
in California and you know, let me know. I'm interested.

(01:58:06):
I really am. Anyway, moving on, since we're kind of
talking about EV's we all know that the king of
ev is Elon Musk, owning Tesla, and we all know
about the what are you doing? Oh holy crap, I

(01:58:26):
was already on the article. Didn't realize it, but we
all heard the feud between Musk and Trump. We all
heard that well early earlier in the week. There was

(01:58:48):
earlier in the week over on x Elon Musk. He
regrets some of the posts. So this is from a
headline from just the News. Musk regrets to some posts
about Trump. He says they went too far. You know,
he was a fewud regarding the the President's one big

(01:59:10):
beautiful bill, you know, and and dude, I mean, the
whole thing really came to a head whenever, whenever Musk
put a tweet saying that President Trump's name is in
the Epstein files. That's why they're never going to be released.

(01:59:32):
And it's like, you know, here you have an apology
for me, Elon Musk. It's like, dude, I mean, screw you.
I there it is. Oh shit, my bed, I'm sorry.
Shouldn't have done that. There are some bells you can't

(01:59:54):
unring for whatever reason. And it you know, and you
look at the big beautiful bill ending the some evy mandates,
you know, taking funding away and subsidies away from Tesla
and other vehicle elect other battery powered vehicles out there.

Speaker 3 (02:00:16):
Ending that.

Speaker 1 (02:00:16):
You know, Elon Musk does stand to lose a significant
amount of money by no longer having these government contracts,
getting these subsidies, getting his money. Excuse me, Hold on second,
excuse me. Holy crap, that snuck up on me. But
Elon Musk could lose a lot, you know. He he's

(02:00:38):
somebody whom supported Trump during the final days of the
campaign and at least helped helped them over the finish line,
whether it was just him or whether it was just
everything that was going on in general, he helped him

(02:01:00):
over the finish line. Okay, I'm not going to take
that away from him. And apparently what Elon Musk expected
was to get certain considerations. And of which case President
Trump is like, no, you're not getting considerations. You knew
my stance on evs, on these regulations, on these mandates,
on government subsidies in general. You knew my stance on

(02:01:23):
this when you decided to throw your hat into the
ring and be on my side, stand on my corner.
You chose your ground. You knew where I stood. I'm
not going to change my position just because you don't
want me to. And of which case, bravo President Trump. Right,
I mean somebody who can't be bought, somebody who can't

(02:01:46):
be swayed. Even though the left likes to say that, oh,
yes he can, I think this is a pretty clear
indication that no, he cannot. He's not a stooge of
corporate America. He's not a stooge of the wealthiest man
on the planet. Elon Musk. He didn't just put somebody

(02:02:15):
that Elon Musk told him to put in a government position.
He didn't do that. And Elon Musk, I mean, he's
you know, he was acting like a child that had
never heard the word no and didn't know how to react,
and he lashed out. He threw a temper tantrum. That's
what it amounted to do. So the whole thing amounted
to brilliant. Yes he is. Do I give Musk a

(02:02:39):
butt ton of credit? Yes I do.

Speaker 6 (02:02:41):
Do.

Speaker 1 (02:02:41):
I thank him for his service in doge aps fucking lutely.
But the fact of the matter is he threw a
temper tantrum because he heard the word no and he
just couldn't handle it. So instead of acting like an
adult in the room, what did he do? He lashed out.
He basically said President Trump is a pedophile. He targets

(02:03:08):
young children. He's evil, He's despicable. That's what he said.
That's what Musk accused Donald Trump of being, like I said,
there's just some bells you can't unring. I mean if

(02:03:31):
I was Trump, And it kind of seems as though
he's taking much the same approach in this as I would.
But Okay, gracefully accept the apology. I appreciate it, but

(02:03:52):
at this point I would never welcome him back in,
back into the administration, back in even as an advisor.
You know, he threw it temper tantrum. He's shown the
American people who he is, and there's quite a few
people that just didn't react very well to it. That's

(02:04:15):
not to say that he still can't do great things,
that he can't help out the administration, but as far
as letting him into the inner circle of the president's
administration an advisor at the same level that he was before, no,
I would never let him back in. Absolutely not. You

(02:04:35):
want to help, sure find you can help from Afar.
You know, there were things that you know, reports that
I had heard that Elon Musk was even wanting to
be in the room during negotiations between Trump and Ggping.
It's like why, I mean, obviously, Elon Usk has an

(02:05:00):
invested interest. He does business with China, a lot of
business with China. He's the only foreign business owner allowed
to do business in absolutely do business in as of
manufacturing and selling in otherwise in China. Eli Musk has

(02:05:21):
invested interest in the China United States negotiations. President Trump
didn't want him in the room because he didn't want
to be viewed a pound, viewed upon as being biased
in the pocket of a corporate donor. And yeah, I

(02:05:44):
believe Trump made the right decision. Elon Musk had no
business being there. So yeah, he threw a fit, He
threw a temper tantrum, he accused something that was just despicable,
and then wants to be back in the good graces

(02:06:06):
apologize as if nothing happened. Okay, except the apology. That's fine.
I got no problem with that. But there's just some
bells you can't unring. If that's how childish you want
to be, then okay, fine, I accept your apology, but

(02:06:27):
be a child over there. You're not coming back in here.
That's my take on it. You may have another and
that's fine, but that's my take. Moving on to this
headline from Tri City Harold and I'm sure y'alls has
seen this. I watched a video. I'm not going to
play it here, but the headline is Padilla Padilla whatever.

(02:06:47):
Arrest was a grave mistake by Christy Num. An opinion
piece that was written by David Mastillo, and he updated
this article June fourteenth, twenty twenty five, or four forty
four pm. This whole thing was ridiculous. It really was

(02:07:10):
in a government facility DHS. Christy Nom was doing a
you know, talking with the press. And he just barged
into the room, didn't announce who he was, just expected
people by sheer by the look on his face that
he was a congressman and deserved and had the right

(02:07:31):
to be there, and expected everybody to just be okay
with it. He barged in, asking questions, yelling whatever, did
not identify himself. Whenever he had security approach him, he
was resisting, well officers, actually he was resisting, and the

(02:07:54):
officers did as officers do, detained, arrested, dragged him out
of the room. And it was only while they were
doing this, only after he was basically outside the room,
only after he messed around did he say, I am

(02:08:17):
this person, I am a congressman. Only then did he
identify himself. And what are they just supposed to let
him go? I mean, isn't it the left to always
says that nobody is above the law. He had no
right to be there, he barged in, He wasn't invited,
and he was being belligerent, he really was. And the

(02:08:39):
sad thing is, and this is what other people in
the space has said, and I'm kind of apt to
believe then this is something that even Matt Locke voice
of The Workingman podcast has talked about check out him
over VOTWM dot com. Yeah, votwm dot com, check him out.

(02:09:00):
But he even said that, you know, especially when we
take into consideration everything that they have been saying, it's like,
I think this was kind of staged. I think this
was done on purpose, that they had their talking points
set up and ready to go, everybody getting all their

(02:09:22):
stories straight way too soon, that this whole thing was planned.
And I'm actually, yeah, I mean it does, really, I mean,
the optics very much look like that. It really does.

(02:09:42):
I get sick and tired of government officials, of officials
really in general. I mean, I don't care if you're
a congressman. I don't care. If you're a president, I
don't care. If you're a governor, a mayor, whatever. I
don't care, state local, I don't care. You are not

(02:10:04):
exempt from the law. I mean, I can't make that
any more clear whatsoever. You're not exempted to the law.
Police officers are not exempt of the law. They are
especially as somebody who is a congress person. You know
you are, you know your job and government is to
write the law. You're the example of the law. Right,

(02:10:33):
You're an example of it. You're not exempt, You're not
the exception, you're the example. The bar is set much
higher for you. You know, as a as a truck driver,
the general rule of thumb is anytime there's an accident
where a truck is involved, the rule of thumb is

(02:10:57):
it's the trucker's fault. We are held as professionals to
a higher standard. The automatic assumption is it's our fault.
We did something wrong, we screwed up. It takes an
investigation of the accident to fetter out what happened to

(02:11:19):
clear our names. We are guilty until proven innocent. That's
how it is right, right or wrong. That's how it
is held to a higher standard. Right, we're the professionals.

(02:11:40):
We're out there making our living on the road. We're
supposed to know what the heck we're doing. So yeah,
we're held to a higher standard when we screw when
we screw around, when we mess up, there's a greater
chance of something bad happened. Right that aside. These congressmen,

(02:12:04):
these officials, they should be held to a higher standard.
They're the ones who right the laws. They're at least
the ones who vote on them, passed them. Sent him
to the President's desk. It's Congress's job to legislate. They

(02:12:26):
are held and should be held to a higher standard.
This type of behavior is not okay. They're not above
the law. Any government official, state, federal, local, doesn't matter.
We're all held to the same law. That's what equality

(02:12:47):
under the law amounts to. That's what equal justice is.
This is what it looks like. I'm glad he got arrested.
He should be arrested, he should be forced to do whatever.
In fact, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent
of the law. Let his lawyers fight it out. If

(02:13:09):
he's found guilty, pay the fine, do the time. I
don't care if he's a congressman or not. That does
not give him the right to act a fool. It doesn't.
None of these people do they have the right. I
don't care. You're not going to convince me otherwise. You're
not going to show me a line of texts in
the Constitution that gives them special privilege and special access

(02:13:33):
just because they're a congressman. Actually, no, that's not how
it is, because in the Constitution, you have no special privilege,
no special access whatsoever. You are an American citizen and
will be treated as such. Equality under the law actually
means something. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent

(02:13:55):
of the law, all of them. Gavin Newsom, Bess Padilla,
whatever his name is, I don't know, I don't care.

(02:14:20):
You're not the exception to the law. You're the example
of it. Grow up, do your damn job. Okay, moving on.
Oh let's see here. Oh we're going to go over

(02:14:40):
this one kind of quickly. I thought this was again.
I thought this was hilarious. Headline from the Washington Times.
Democrats deportation martyr back in the US to face charges
in migrants smuggling. See this thing is okay. Remember that guy,
that Maryland's citizen that was mistakenly deported to h wherever

(02:15:06):
it was he was, Yeah, the the Kilmar Abrigo Garcia
to Salvador, to the south, the Salvadorian immigrant who was
deported and everybody was all up in arms. You need
to bring him back. It was a mistaken thing. They
wasn't supposed to ship him off. YadA YadA, blah blah whatever.
And well he's back because basically what it amounts to

(02:15:30):
what it looks like at least is that they deported
him over to prison, over to Salvador to be held
in the Salvadorian prison, and then they got the order
to bring him back. Right, you know that that judge,
we all know him, that federal judge, totally overstepping his authority,

(02:15:52):
demanded that the administration bring him back, effectively changing to
where presidents no longer in Georgia foreign policy. Now apparently
federal judges are in charge of foreign policy, even though
they don't have that authority in the constitution. But whatever.
But instead of bringing him back, is what the administration

(02:16:16):
basically did was they launched an investigation into Kilmar Abrigo
Garcia sex trafficking. There's other thing. Let me let me
see in here if there is, Okay, So let me
just get into the article. Because this is great. I mean,

(02:16:38):
this is this is awesome. Okay, it really is. So
the headline reader, I'm sorry. The article reads, top Trump
officials had been worn for weeks that kill Mar Abrigo Garcia,
the Salvadorian illegal migrant whom Democrats turned into a deportation martyr,
was a bad guy. Now they have delivered the goods.

(02:17:00):
Documents filed last week in criminal case against mister Abrigo Garcia,
the Justice Department said that he spent nine years as
a migrant smuggler, part of a ring that helped thousands
of illegal immigrants, including gang members and un accompanied children,
get into the US. He also trafficked guns and drugs,

(02:17:21):
and solicited child pornography, including asking a juvenile to provide
nude photos and video, The government said. Armed with an
indictment and those accusations, the Trump administration reversed its insistence
that mister Abrigo Garcia would never set foot in the
US again. Of Brigo Garcia has atlanted in the United

(02:17:43):
States to face justice. Attorney General Pambondi announced, how freaking
awesome is that the martyr of the left, the illegal
cause that they were were all rallying behind. Oh, it
was a mistake that you deported them. They got their

(02:18:05):
wish because what the administration did is okay, you want
us to bring it back. Fine, They brought him back
on their terms. The administration did an investigation into Garcia,
and yes, you heard that correctly. Smuggling child sex, sex, trafficking,

(02:18:29):
possession of child pornography, trafficking guns and drugs not a
good guy only brought him back to face federal charges.
That's freaking hilarious. That cracks me up. All Right, last
thing I want to talk about today this headline from

(02:18:53):
justthnews dot com. COVID cover up probes focus on early
military intel. The virus was man made and escaped the
wu Han lab. And yes, everything in that headline is
absolutely true. We knew about it and they did nothing
because yes, the investu the Trump administration has been investigating

(02:19:20):
this egregious. I mean, come on, everything that happened regarding
COVID unprecedented. It really was. I mean, I can't say
that never in American history has okay, yeah, well no, no, no, no,
wait a second, I can't say that, never in American
history has the government acted this way to anything. I

(02:19:43):
know people are thinking back, oh, the Spanish flu and
the vaccine that was came out. Yeah, okay, and there
was some measures that was taken by you know, by
the government back then. But even still they didn't go
as far as to say that, you know, once you survived,
you still had to get the vaccine that you know,
immunity immunity, Yeah, that your immune system didn't work. I mean,

(02:20:08):
that's what we had going on today. I mean during
the COVID vaccine was oh, I don't care if you've
had it, I don't care if you have natural immunity,
you still have to take the vaccine. The government back
during the Spanish fluid didn't do that. They said, hey,
you have natural immunity, great, you don't need a vaccine.
Why would you. Did the government have the same stance, know,

(02:20:32):
they did not. They forced everybody as best they could
to subject themselves to this experimental and yes it wasn't
experimental vaccine if you want to call it a vaccine.

(02:20:59):
And basically the FBI that they're you know, intelligence watchdogs
are interviewing whistleblowers after explosive revelations emerged because basically what
ended up happening, okay, is in the early days, they

(02:21:23):
they started investigating this. Okay, they had people smart bio people,
you know, whenever this was first coming out, and whenever,
you know, there were first signs of it, they were
getting a hold of the virus, they looked at it,

(02:21:44):
they researched it. They were like, okay, this is definitely
man made. This was not something that happened by nature.
And they figured out not only what the COVID nineteen
stars virus was spliced with. You know, with the gain

(02:22:06):
of function research, they didn't just figure out what it
was spliced with, but they figured out, due to some
of the markers in the virus itself, where it came from.
They knew it came from the wu Han lab in China.
They figured this out very early on. Let me see

(02:22:27):
if I can give you a date on this. Uh,
to do, to do, to do. I'm not seeing a
day on this at all. At any rate. You can
find the article by going over to the host show
dot com, click on the news feed tab at the
right side of the page, and you'll see the magazine
over there on flipboard under the headline, Oh crap, what

(02:22:53):
is the headline? The precip precipice. So there you go.
You can find this information. Now. It came about very
very early, and once they discovered what they found and
they they presented their findings to their you know, to

(02:23:15):
their bosses, they were basically told, shut the hell up,
set the hell down, don't talk about it with nothing,
decline interviews, do not talk to the FBI, don't talk
to the CIA, because already by that point the administration

(02:23:36):
had a planned narrative that they wanted to do. And yes,
this was back during President Trump's administration. I understand that.
But there was a lot of people that were not
working for the president in his administration, Okay, that hijacked

(02:23:56):
his administration, that weren't giving him briefings and the information
that he needed in order to do the job that
he was elected to do. Okay. So yes, I know
that it was President Trump that was it was his administration.
It happened under his watch, but he wasn't responsible for

(02:24:19):
that stuff. It wasn't him. I mean, hell, he even
came out and was like, you know, look, I mean, yes,
I you know, let's do the vaccine. That's awesome, but
I'm not going to mandate it. I'm not going to
force American citizens to take it against their will. That's
not the right thing to do. This is America. We're

(02:24:40):
supposed to be free, right. So, in the very early
days of COVID nineteen, like weeks after it hit, after
they discovered it, they knew what it was a SARS virus.

(02:25:01):
They knew that it was gain a function research what
the virus was spliced with to make it what it was.
And where it happened, and that information was hidden to
the American people. The information's out. Check the article. Head

(02:25:22):
on over to the Host Show dot com. Click on
that news feed link. You'll see the magazine over on
flipboard the precipice. That's all I got for y'all today.

Speaker 7 (02:25:33):
That is it.

Speaker 1 (02:25:35):
I greatly appreciate you being here. I really do agree.
Do me a favor, Hit the like, hit the subscribe,
follow all that other kind of stuff wherever you're at.
Head on over to the Ho host Show dot com.
Click on the subscribe to the newsletter, which I barely
do anything on the newsletter, but you can still subscribe
to the newsletter. Find me wherever I can be found.

(02:25:59):
That's it. Y'alls, have yourself a great one and I
will see you in the next one. This has been
the Ho Ho Show. For more information, you can head
to the Ho Ho Show dot com. And for the
merchandise store, you can head on over to stink pickle
dot com. That is s T I N K P
I k l E dot com. Until next time,

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Precipice

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

The Precipice

Stuff You Should Know