What Happens Next?

Today we’re discussing Russiagate and asking the very important question of: What Happens Next? Will anybody go to jail? The Strike Force seems to point in that direction! We’ll also be talking about Joe’s decline and Hunters rant. It is clear how the Left views Illegals. Finally, we’ll talk about the Epstein Files and the possible pardon of Maxwell.

Email, Website & Other Links
[e-mail]
https://WSPRadio.com
https://TheHohOShow.com
https://link.thehohoshow.com/Rumble
https://link.thehohoshow.com/WSPChronicles

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, Welcome to the show, grated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida. So join us now as
we discuss news, politics, current events. Had so much more,
but through the airwaves and strapped in as we do.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
Because the three.

Speaker 1 (00:34):
B broadcasting live from Weapinar Slough Production Studio B. Welcome
to the Ho Host Show and as always I'm your host,
Ho Ho. So, how y'all's doing. I hope you're doing good?
I really do, man, I tell you what, things have
just been going strong, haven't they. I mean, there's been
a lot going on. Things that we've been learning, things

(00:54):
that we kind of already knew in a matter of speaking,
but we're just learning more. And it is just some
of the things that have come to light, you know,
on on several different fronts. So today we're going to
be talking about a possible pardon for Maxwell. That that's

(01:16):
kind of interesting.

Speaker 3 (01:17):
I don't.

Speaker 1 (01:19):
I don't know how I feel about that. I'm going
to be completely honest with you. I mean, there's there's good,
there's bad, But either way you look at it, I
think it's ugly, right, good bad ugly. There you go.
We're going to be talking a little bit about Hunter
Biden and his rant that he had. We're going to
be touching base on Joe Biden with his deteriorating deteriorated

(01:40):
you know mind stuff. Wow, that's fitting in it, you know,
me having mind problems and talking about anyway, We're also
going to be talking about and spending most of our
time with Russia Gate because I've gotten some stuff kind
of filtering through a little bit of information. And of

(02:02):
which case, everything is available over there on flipboard. So
if you head on over to the Hot show dot Com,
click on the news feed tab, you will see the
magazine over there on flipboard, and you know there's you know,
I'm gonna be honest with you about something I like flipboard.
I've been using flipboard for some time. Like there's like

(02:23):
two hundred some I think magazines over there on flipboard.
So yeah, I've been using it for a while. The
only thing I don't like about flipboard is in order
to even view a magazine, you gotta sign up for it.
You know, you can't just use it anonymously. That's the

(02:46):
only bad thing about it. And that's the only thing
I don't like. Other than that, I like flipboard. I
really do all kinds of stuff. Yeah, awesome. Not a sponsor.
I just like what they do. I like how they
do it, and I like the fact that you're bombarded
with stuff that you don't want to see. I mean,
if you don't want to see something in a particular area,

(03:07):
you don't have to. You can very much customize it
for whatever it is that you're interested in, whether it
be games, books, what have you. I mean, it's it's
very versatile. I definitely recommend it. Check it out flipboard
dot com. And there's an app for that that's awesome too, right,
apps are amazing. Anyway, let's go ahead and dive into it.

Speaker 4 (03:27):
Now.

Speaker 1 (03:28):
Normally, you know, I'll throw in a satire something from
you know, uh uh, you know, the the Babylon Bee.
Normally that's what I do. But we're not going to
do that this one because there's a there's a lot
to get to there really is. So we're just going
to go ahead and dive into it. And again, all
of the references are available the host show at dot com.

(03:50):
Just click on the newsfeed tab. Now, there's been a
lot of declassified stuff going on, and of which case,
you know, the first two articles that I'm going to
be touching base on is actually available over at WSP
chronicles dot substack dot com. If you want to head
over there, check that out, go ahead and subscribe. Do

(04:11):
me a great, big favor and do that. That would
be awesome. Not just me over there. There's a lot
of you know, there's a lot of good articles over there.
Check it out WSP Chronicles dot substack dot com. And
of which case, you can find that link over at
the hoh Show dot com. Just scroll out a little bit.
There you go. But this first one is is mainly

(04:33):
just a placeholder to go to the link for the
declassified evidence. That's really all this one amounts to. Let
me go ahead and pull this up. For those of
you that are over on Rumble, which is the only
place that the video actually streams to, I'm not on
you know X, I'm not over on Facebook anymore. I'm

(04:54):
not even on YouTube. I don't see the point of
doing that. I am only on Rumble. So if you
want to catch out, if you want to catch the
v video, that's where you gotta go. I do use
visual aids, So there you go, and subscribe over there too. Anyway,
so this is nothing more than really a placeholder just
to get to this link declassified evidence, and this one

(05:17):
is like absolutely huge. There's a lot of stuff in here.
This was approved for release by the d and I
Director of National Intelligence on the seventeenth of July twenty
twenty five. Excuse me, I had to cough and scrolling

(05:37):
through this, and I've looked at, you know, a bunch
of stuff in here. I mean I didn't really go
in depth. I mean it's one hundred and fourteen pages.
I mean, holy crap, there's a there's a lot of
info in here. And this first one that's on here
was sent this is this is email stuff that was
sent Friday, September second, twenty sixteen, seven thirty one a m.

(06:00):
And there's a lot of redactions in here. I mean,
scrolling through this, there's a lot of reactions and they
do name people by name. You can see the you know,
all kinds of different people that were you know, included
into this, including the d n I at that time,
and I don't remember who that was, but at ain't
rate doesn't really matter. So yeah, a lot of information

(06:22):
in here. I kind of recommend perusing this. I really
do But the article that I want to touch base
on that is even more telling than that is this
article that I also put up and made available over
at WSP chronicles dot substack dot com, the Russia hoax.

(06:43):
This is the memo and the timeline of what happened,
where the orders came from, the whole nine yards. Check
this out and let me let me get rid of
some of this because I got a full tab on me.
I mean, oh, holy crap, I got a lot of
stuff open. But anyway, this memo and timeline eleven pages

(07:08):
and it really does line out, you know it very much.
Lets you know where this information came from, who authorized it,
what briefings were made before the you know before then
President Obama said no, we're going to do it different.

(07:31):
And there is one thing that I did talk that
I I didn't talk about, and I'm going to be
honest with you on this one. This wasn't even a
you know that, This wasn't something that I figured out myself.
This was something that was pointed out for me watching
another you know, another podcast. But there's a reason why

(07:57):
this information was left out of the of the intelligence briefing,
the Presidential Daily Briefing, on dece was it December, Yeah,
December ninth of twenty sixteen. There's a reason for this,
and I know I talked about this previously, you know,

(08:17):
the past two episodes. Actually I brought this up. But beforehand,
you know, there was a briefing, uh, you know, information
that was put out there by one of the intelligence agencies.
I don't exactly remember which one, but it basically said

(08:37):
that Russia had neither the ability or the inclination based
I'm paraphrasing, but you know that's what it said, not
the ability or the inclination to actually affect the twenty
sixteen election. They didn't have the ability, they didn't have

(08:58):
the desire. That's more or less what it said. And
that was the information that was going to be put
out there on the Presidential Daily Briefing on December ninth,
twenty seventeen, twenty sixteen. My apologies, that's what was getting that.

(09:20):
That's what was going to be put out there, but
Obama said no, leave it out. Instead, he directed them
to say or describe how they would do it, not
that the information was credible of what they were coming

(09:41):
up with. It was a this is what I want
you to do And the reason why this is important
the timing of everything is because December ninth, twenty sixteen,
the president elect was Donald J. Trump, and he was
also getting these presidential daily briefings. So if he would
have received a daily briefingess said that hey, Russia didn't

(10:05):
have the ability nor the to desire to, you know,
to try to direct the the election any in any way,
shape or form, that he would have had evidence right
there in his hands saying no, this whole thing is Bravosierra. Instead,

(10:27):
they use these Steele dossier we all know about that,
even though you know, all the intelligence agencies were like, look, dude,
there's holes in this thing everywhere. We can't use this
is it's unaccredited, it's unverifiable, you know as in, it's
it's a lie from start to finish. We can't use this.

(10:50):
But instead Obama's like, no, no, no, no, You're going to
use this. And of which case, that Stee dossier was
bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton her campaign, so
all of this looks really really bad, and basically said
that this entire Russia gate, this entire you know, Trump
is involved in Russia collusion, that this whole thing came

(11:14):
right from Barack Obama. Yes, Hillary Clinton had a hand
in the two I'm not going to say that she didn't,
but this whole hoax came from him. And I would
recommend going ahead and checking out this. It's only eleven pages.
You know, there is a good and extensive timeline in

(11:34):
here that will let you know what happened and when
that very much says that. Yes, President, former President Barack
Obama was the one who started this whole thing. He's
the guilty party. He actively participated in a coup to

(12:00):
render the incoming President Donald J. Trump impotent in his authority,
cut the legs out from underneath him. That's what they
were wanting to do. They were terrified of him from
the word go, and they tried to make it to

(12:22):
where he would be unaffected. And also I want to
point out this that the first impeachment was actually based
off of this lie, the Russia hooks, the Russia collusion.
The first impeachment of Donald Trump was based off of this.

(12:43):
They tried to remove him from office based off of
false information and a you know what Barack Obama actually
started on. You know, this whole thing was treason, That's
what it was it was treason. And even even Donald
Trump was like, you know, he had He did not
mix words, he did not stutter when he said it.

(13:04):
He said, Barack Obama participated in treason his activities, he
was the start of this whole thing. It's treason. He
even came out and said it. He didn't even use
the word allegedly. He said, no, what he did and
the facts that we have are clear treason. That's what

(13:26):
he said. S Yeah. Declassified information memo and timeline that
came from Tulsi Gabbard d and I Department of National
Intelligence points to the fact that, yes, Barack Obama instigated
this whole thing. He told the intelligence agencies, this is

(13:51):
what I want you to do, and they did it.
They did it. They knew the whole thing was false,
knew the whole thing was Bravo Sierra, and they chose
to do it anyway. So all this information you can
find with the with both the U the declassified information

(14:16):
and also with the memo and timeline, you can head
on over to WSB Chronicles dot substack dot com, and
at this particular point in time, they are the first
two articles over there. There you go, moving on to
this article from Newsmax representative Zinky. I'm probably mispronouncing that,

(14:44):
but two Newsmax gabberd confirmed what we all knew on Obama.
And this is, you know, this is the thing. We
all knew this. Okay, we all knew that the Russia,
you know, Russia collusion was false. We all knew that
it was it was a huge nothing burger. We all
knew that this was made up, funded by Hillary Clinton.

(15:05):
We all already knew this, that it came from the top,
that Barack Obama has something to do with it. A
lot of people say that all roads lead to Barack Obama.
We already knew this, and the only thing this does
is confirm the information that we already knew. That's all
this really does. And there's a good stuff in here,

(15:29):
don't get me wrong. But this article from oh of course,
all right, so I guess I'm skipping that and yeah, okay,
so here is a something well, hold on, let me

(15:50):
let me make sure that I'm not wait now, we're
not watching that.

Speaker 2 (15:55):
Now.

Speaker 1 (15:58):
Okay, here we go. My biggest question on a lot
of this, And if you've been listening to the show
for any amount of time, you know that. This is
a question I ask quite often, what's going to happen next?
It's basically the title of today's show. What's going to
happen next? Are we going to see accountability? Are we

(16:21):
going to see arrests? Are we going to see anything
actually happen? We already know the information and it's very damning.
Might I add, but what's going to happen from this? Well,
it doesn't appear as though they're messing around. It really doesn't.

(16:45):
This article from Public exclusive intelligence analyst who authored Wait, nope,
that's not hold on, let me go to Apparently I
had a different direction in minded this. So you know,
the the problem that we all see far too often
whenever it comes to people in DC, people on the hill,

(17:07):
the people that work in various departments. Far too often
in DC, what we see happen isn't people who get
punished for bad behavior. It seems as though they get
rewarded for it. This article from Public, now I can
go into it. Intelligence analysts who authored fraudulent Russia Gate

(17:30):
report is still at the CIA, and we already know
that the key piece of intelligence came from Ukrainian agency
under influence of Obama and Biden. Evidence suggests this. So, yeah,

(17:50):
they get rewarded, they don't get punished. This isn't something
that they feel as though they need to correct. This
isn't behavior that they feel as though is is something
that they should change, because far too often bad behavior

(18:10):
gets rewarded. They just shuffle people around a little bit.
They may promote them into a different agency, but they
still keep a government job. How ridiculous is that? How
ridiculous is that? I mean, if you work for a company,
name the company doesn't matter what company do you work for.

(18:32):
If you did something you wasn't supposed to do, if
you light on your application, if you if you falsified information,
if you just flat out was not good at your job,
Are you going to get shuffled around? Are you going
to get promoted into a different department or you know,
or is anything really going to happen to you? Probably? Yeah,

(18:58):
you don't do your job, they're going to Are you
gonna bring somebody else in? Who will? In the real
world there are consequences for your actions in government. We
don't see that, which is why the question gets raised
of what's next, what's going to happen? Is anybody actually

(19:21):
going to get in trouble for this. Is anybody going
to get handcuffed? Is anybody going to go to jail?
So this headlined from the Daily Wire Justice Department to
form strike force to access weaponization of intel community, because
that's exactly what this was. It was a weaponization of

(19:46):
the intel community. Other presidents has gotten in trouble for
weaponizing the irs, and this Russia Gate makes Watergate look
like a warm up. It makes it look like nothing.
That's how bad this is. Now. I know I've said

(20:07):
this kind of thing in the past, but this is
the biggest scandal in American history, not just modern history.
This is the biggest scandal in US history. A sitting
president at the time. Of course, sitting president actively committed

(20:33):
treason against an incoming president. Because that's what happened. It
wasn't just the party. It wasn't just news media, mainstream media,
legacy news media. It wasn't just them. It wasn't just

(20:55):
congressman and senators. It wasn't just them, It wasn't just
the social media people. This came from the highest level
of government, arguably the President of the United States of America.
He started this, he instigated it. This is what he

(21:17):
wanted to hinder Trump's ability to be president, and the
first impeachment was based off of this hoax. This is treason.

(21:39):
So the strike force being formed, do I know what's
going to happen? No? I have no idea. How could
I write? But this strikeforce seems as though they are
at least haking it seriously. It seems as though they

(22:04):
are going to get to the bottom of it. It
seems as though people may end up going to jail.
But the question is, is the person who really should
end up going to jail? Is he actually going to
go to jail? You know? And Obama actually did release
a statement regarding this and basically saying that it's complete horsecrap.

(22:27):
But you know, may I refer you over to what
I talked about at the beginning of the show with
the declassified intelligence information, because that right there made it
pretty clear the evidence is there. I mean, this isn't
just evidence. This is smoking gun evidence, as in, yeah,
he's there, He's caught red handed, and this some he

(22:52):
can't deny it. We've got the goods, we've got the proof.
He can't deny it. It's pretty stick and clear he can't.
He can't deny it. And even that's uh, you know,
the headline of an article from Just the News, Obama

(23:16):
tries to extract himself from Russia Gate, but documents put
him at the heart of it. Absolutely, Yes, it does. Absolutely,
it puts him at the at the absolute center of
this entire thing. But what's going to happen is anybody

(23:36):
going to go to jail? Who may end up going
to jail. I'm skipping over that article. Oh yeah, And
by the way, Legacy media is in absolute free fall
over this whole thing. They really are, because might I

(23:59):
remind you from the beginning of what they've been saying
is you know, you have no proof, there's no evidence.
I'm not going to report on this because there's no evidence.
I'm not gonna waste the listener's time. I'm not gonna
waste the viewer's time in talking about something that is unverifiable,

(24:21):
that you have no proof on and is just you
trying to, you know, say, save your own hindquarters in
a matter of speaking. But they're they're in panic mode.
They're in free fall. This article from the Daily Wire
Legacy media in panic over Russia Gates implosion, and of

(24:41):
course they are why because we've got the good They've
been saying for some time that oh, hey, you know,
if if you had proof, then maybe we would talk
about it. That's basically what they were saying. Right now
there's proof, Now there's evidence. Now there's declassified information. And
you know, just what were kind of on the subject.

(25:04):
This is something else that really irritates me, takes me off,
and I find absolutely infuriating. Is this something that really
deserves to be classified this information?

Speaker 2 (25:23):
No?

Speaker 1 (25:25):
Was it classified to protect America's interests. Was it classified
to protect you know, movements of you know, things of
what was coming. Was it classified to protect American boots
on the ground in you know, wherever they may be. No,

(25:47):
this information was made classified to protect the hind quarters
of Obama and other people that were involved in this.
That's what it was mark classified for. It was a
CMA over my ass. That's why they classified this. This
type of information will be like, dude, I would I
really wish they would. I really wish they would have

(26:16):
better direction and actual actionable guidelines for what could be
made classified versus what cannot be made classified. Because we
are the American people, we are in control of government.

(26:39):
Right to the Democrat process. We're in control of government.
We have the right to know what the hell is
going on in DC. We absolutely do. We have the
right to know. It's our tax dollars that is paying
for all of this. We have the right to know
what the hell is going on. This right here is

(26:59):
the deep state. Is government protecting itself to keep them
in power. Because if we don't know, then how can
we do anything about it. We have the right to know.
We have the right to know what's going on so
we can clean house and get rid of the bad actors.
We have a right to know. This, That's what all
of this is predicated on. We have the right to

(27:24):
know what's going on. Why the hell are they marking
things classified just to save their own ass, to keep
them from getting unelected. We have the right to know.
The fact that they keep on classifying information just to
keep them out of the hot seat is an overreach.

(27:50):
It's an abusive power. Let's call it what it is.
It's an abusive power and it shouldn't be tolerated. It
really shouldn't be I mean, I don't know what you
would do about it. I don't know what any president
can do about it to try to you know, coheresi,
coherci cohert. It's a hard word in order to force

(28:14):
another president to do something like that, in order to
force intelligence agencies to actually operate in the light. I
don't know what could be done about it. I'm just
being honest. I don't know. I mean, if you have
any ideas, let me know. Email me hoh at theho
Ho show dot com. I'd like to know what your
input is, because I don't know how you fix this.

(28:40):
I mean, it is the president that has the ability
to classify and declassify things. I mean, he is the
head of the intelligence agencies. And oh yeah, that this
gives Let me see if there's another Okay, so there's

(29:00):
also another angle on this. Something that I have heard
that they are trying to do in Congress, and I've
heard there's even Republicans that are behind this as well.
That one of the things that they are trying to
do is take Tulsi Gabbert's authority to not just declassify

(29:27):
certain information, but make it to where she can't even
view it in the first place. They're trying to take
her power and authority away from her. This is coming
out of Congress. This is one of the things that
they are trying to do now. First of all, I
want to point out that the DNI, Department of National Intelligence,

(29:49):
they are Tulsi Gabbard is head of these intelligence agencies,
the CIA, Homeland Security, they all answer to her, and
the Director of National Intelligence is a cabinet level position,

(30:10):
and that person answers directly to the President of the
United States of America, separate equal branches. Congress has no
authority over the Director of National Intelligence none. Congress has
no authority over Tulsi Gabbard what she's doing, the information

(30:35):
that she's reading. The Director of National Intelligence has all
authority to do what it is that she's doing. Congress
has no authority in this whatsoever. And here's the thing.
I you know, in a matter of speaking, I would
almost like just beg these stupid idiot actors to try

(30:58):
to take the power away from Tulsia Gabar to do
what it is she's doing. I'd almost love it to happen.
I really would, because two things would come out of this,
you know. One, we would be able to see who
it is that doesn't want Tulci Gabbert to get this
information and make it public. We would know the bad

(31:18):
actors of food to get rid of. That's number one.
Number two. You know, immediately once this thing ends up,
you know, passing, I mean not like the president would
actually sign an endo law, but regardless, as soon as
it happened, you know you're talking about a constitutional argument, right.

(31:41):
You know that this is going to go straight to
the Supreme Court. You know that they're going to view
this with some sort of urgency. They're going to have
to make a decision on it. And in cases of
actual constitutional questions, usually what we usually what we see

(32:02):
out of the Supreme Court is they go by way
of the constitution. It's less partisan. I mean not always granted,
mind you, but we see that a lot. Why because
even the these left activist judges ask the question is

(32:22):
what happens if the tables are turned? You know what
happens if it is a Democrat president trying to uncover
what a former Republican president has done and we have
a Republican controlled house, they could stonewall and make it
to where they can't find anything. We normally see out

(32:48):
of the Supreme Court, especially in these type of cases,
they generally asked the question what if the tables are turned? So, yeah,
I would like to see this happen. I can't with
you know, any amount of certainty that we know how
this would end up playing out, because we don't. I

(33:09):
mean they you know, uh, the Supreme Court has surprised
us in the past with how they've ruled on various things.
We don't know how it would play out. But I mean, hey,
if you're going by way of the Constitution, then that
would make it seem pretty freaking clear. It really would.

(33:31):
But there is one more question that has been brought
up about this, and this is actually a question that
President Trump brought up himself, and that is presidential immunity.
Would he be would it be to where they couldn't

(33:53):
go after him at all, or would they be able
to So this a couple of minutes, and I'll be
right back and we will talk about that very issue.

Speaker 2 (34:07):
I woke up this morning putting my foods on tight
reads for my jeans. They were faded just right.

Speaker 3 (34:16):
But when I bend down to grab my fishing pole,
I noticed something about my favorite bear with a hole holsing.
My underbreeches freezy and torn worn out in places where
the fabrics are worn, but they make me feel.

Speaker 2 (34:35):
Freezing like a country's song.

Speaker 3 (34:42):
Holsing my underbreeches, I'm wearing them strong. Saturday night out
at the county, dancing with Sally, without a single care.

Speaker 1 (35:05):
But when she spawned me in the moonlight.

Speaker 2 (35:08):
Showed who she laughed and whispered, that's a mighty.

Speaker 5 (35:12):
Big holes in line.

Speaker 3 (35:15):
Underbreeches freezey and torn, worn out in places where the
fabrics worn, but.

Speaker 2 (35:23):
They made me feel free like a country's song.

Speaker 3 (35:28):
Holding my underbreeches, I'm wearing them strong.

Speaker 2 (35:45):
Sunday morning, hidding off to church. Mama loved at me,
left me in alert.

Speaker 3 (35:53):
She said, boy, you need some new breeches to wear.
But I just mown and said, Mama, I don't care.

Speaker 5 (36:04):
Grandpa always told me where with five every tears rip
of memory inside a life well live?

Speaker 2 (36:16):
The story is to tell.

Speaker 3 (36:18):
Holding my underbreeches all they serve me. Well?

Speaker 1 (37:24):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit?
Are you tired of walking by family members and crop
dusting them? Well? If this has ever happened to you,
might I introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs Tampon's
brand butt plugs. Is that particular type of butt plug
that allows you to walk in public in confidence no
one that you're not going to accidentally crop does somebody

(37:46):
Tampon's brand butt plugs now with the plastic applicator. Not
just for women anymore, Tampon's brand butt plugs. No, All right,
and we are back. So let's just go ahead and
dive right into this because, as I stated before, the

(38:09):
question is about immunity. This headline from Newsmax, and Trump
even pointed this out or at least brought this up.
Obama has immunity, probably helped him a lot. This is
something that Trump even brought up because if you remember,

(38:29):
the Supreme Court already ruled that a president cannot be
prosecuted for doing presidential stuff, carrying out official acts of
the president. They can't be prosecuted for that kind of thing.
You can't do it. But there's but I also seen it,

(38:51):
and I immediately whenever I heard that, I'm like, this
is a horse hit. This is complete bravosier. It is
because my question is, how is committing treason? You know,
they're supposed to be the peaceful transfer of power, right,
did that happen in this case. No, it absolutely did not.
The evidence is pretty clear. How is reason an official

(39:15):
presidential act? So right from the get go, I'm like, no,
this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. This article from the
Daily Caller even points out he even points this very
thing out, and this is something that Ted Cruz said,
let me get into it headline. Ted Cruz explains why
Obama's immunity as president is an absolute. Ted Cruz being

(39:43):
somebody whom you know, he's argued in front of the
Supreme Court, somebody whom is very versed in the Constitution.
You would think somebody like this would actually know. But
he points out that you know that this covers immunity

(40:05):
for like presidential acts. In other words, what he said
is like, you know, you can't go after oh, let
me let me get into this portion of it. You know,
you can't go after Obama for the you know, for
bombing that that one, dude. You can't go after Truman

(40:26):
for you know, the internment camps. You can't go after
whoever it was for you know, bombing Japan. You can't
go after then because that was official presidential acts. So
you can't do that. However, this isn't absolute. There are

(40:52):
little nuggets in here that are important that you have
to keep in mind before saying that, oh, this isn't
a you know, this is an official President Act. There's
nothing in the constitution. And in fact, i'd even say
the opposite, but there's nothing in the constitution that says
that the president can participate in treasonous activities. Mind you,

(41:14):
they tried to go after Trump for January sixth. He
wasn't protected over that. They tried to go after him.
You know, they're a family member, you know. He he
even did this stupid He even brought that up with

(41:36):
me one time, you know, about oh President Trump was responsible.
It's like, really, how you know? And he wanted to
bring up the tweet. He wanted to bring up what
he said, and it's like, oh yeah, because I mean,
you know, peaceful, you know, go to the capital peaceably
to let your voices be heard. Yeah, that absolutely sounds

(41:57):
like he was promoting violence, right, because that's what he said.
You know, he called out the bad actors from January
sixth and say no, you shouldn't be do this. You know,
let's support the police. That's what he said in the tweet.
A lot of people may not know that because they
took it down, know most immediately, but nowhere, at no

(42:17):
time did the left say the president Trump was protected
for presidential acts because they classified that as treasonous activity,
that he wasn't protected. And now what you have coming
out of mainstream media, what you have coming out of
all these other people saying that, oh, well, you know

(42:39):
this is in the past. Now we just need to
overlook this. We can't go after Obama for you know,
what he did. And it's like, dude, look are you
even listening to yourself? Because you go after Trump for everything,

(43:00):
you criminalize something that shouldn't be criminalized. I mean, you
go after him for things that the people of authority
organizations of authority has already looked at evidence and said, no,
there's nothing here. He didn't do anything wrong, and they
choose to go after him anyway. Talking about the election thing,

(43:24):
you know, with with the thirty four felonies that weren't
actually felonies, but you know, that's what their claim was.
Do they even listen to themselves on this? They want
to be the arbiters of truth. They're trying to sweep
this under the rug. That's what they're trying to do.

(43:54):
The left has already made a stance. They've already made
the precedent that this type of activity is not protected,
regardless of whether it's from the president or not. You

(44:20):
see what I'm saying here. They can make the claim
all they want to. It's hypocritical. But we see this
all the time out of the left. You know, forget yesterday,
let's focus on this, and they want to control the
narrative and say that, oh no, you can't go after him.

(44:41):
We just need to ignore it. Let's move on. You
know Hillary Clinton's famous words talking about Benghazi at what
you know, what difference at this point would it make?
I'm paraphrasing because I don't remember exactly what he said
or what she said, But what difference at this point
would it make?

Speaker 3 (45:00):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (45:00):
Well, people died right. One of my favorite shows that
I listened to that I watch listen to that I
watch n cis good episode and a JAG officer was like,
what's the statute of limitations on murder? There isn't one.

(45:26):
There isn't one, And I don't recall seeing any type
of statute of limitations on treason. So we get in
the question what can we expect to see next? I mean,

(45:46):
I like the idea that they have formed a task
force's that's very helpful. I like that. But if you're
not actually going to put any body in handcuffs, and
you know, I've said this once, I've said it a
thousand times. If you're not going to put anybody in handcuffs,
all you're doing is wasting taxpayer dollars and doing an investigation,

(46:09):
putting on a show, right, I mean, where are we
are we at the circus? That is that all we're
interested in? Is that all we care about? No, we
care about results, we care about arrest, we care about accountability.
We have seen what the Democrats do when they are
in charge, when they are in power. We see how

(46:30):
they go after their political rivals. We see what they
do defamation, making up lies, to go after, to prosecute,
to render Trump's presidency useless, take away his power, impeach him.

(47:00):
We see what the left does and how they operate.
Turn About is fair play? Isn't that one of the
things a principle that we learned pretty early off in life.
Turn About is fair play was good for the gooses,
good for the gander. There you go. I want to
see m let me put it like this, I want

(47:31):
to see justice, as the Constitution says, there should be
justice for committing treason. That's what I want to see.

(47:54):
Treason carries the death penalty. Obama committed treason. The various
heads of these intelligence agencies, they committed treason. They knew

(48:15):
that it was a lie. They knew they were using
falsified information in order to do what it is that
they did. They knew that what they were doing was wrong.
The problem is these people on the left. They have
this mindset that the ends justify the means, that because

(48:39):
they view President Trump as Hitler or Hitler esque, that
anything they do to remove him from office and to
take away his power is justified, up to and including
attempted assassination, committing treason. They believe as though they're in

(49:04):
the right. And more importantly, they believe that they're untouchable.
Why do they believe they're untouchable because at this point
they have been They have been completely untouchable. I mean,
we've seen the left go after President Trump. We've seen

(49:25):
him go after many in his cabinet, all kinds of people,
people that did the same thing or just got accused
of doing the same thing of things that the people
on the left has done. And we've seen people on

(49:50):
the left that absolutely has done the things that they
have accused people on the right of doing, and they
want to pretend like it doesn't matter. They want to
pretend as though and that's in the past. They want
to make you believe that you're pain, you're suffering, the

(50:11):
things that you are going through, the things that you
have had to endure mean nothing. I want to see accountability,
and I think you do too. I think many Americans
want to see accountability. I know that's what I want

(50:33):
to see. Absolutely, I do.

Speaker 2 (50:39):
This.

Speaker 1 (50:41):
Puppy's gonna. I didn't intend on spending you know, almost
an hour on this subject. But there's a lot here.
This is important. Like I said, this is the biggest thing,
the biggest scandal in American history. I mean, when was
the last time that a president has committed treason? Oh? Yeah,

(51:06):
they may have accused Trump, but Trump didn't do anything wrong.
Peacefully and patriotically, go to the Capitol and let your
voices be heard. That doesn't sound like inciting violence to me.
The left can say what the hell they want to,
it doesn't matter. The language is clear. Words matter. There
was nothing inside of about what it is that he said.

(51:28):
In fact, he even told him, uh, don't do that.
We need to support the men and women in law enforcement.
Quit doing what you're doing. Behave people. But instead they
took this as an opportunity to take away his power

(51:54):
as president. They committed treason, That's what they did. The
information is out there, it has been declassified. You can
look at it. Head on over to WSP chronicles dot
substack dot com. Check out those articles that are there

(52:17):
see for yourself. I definitely recommend checking out the one
that's you know, memo and timeline. See eleven pages. You
can see it all for yourself. They committed treason. They
want you to forget that they did it. Now. This

(52:42):
is something that I brought up on the last episode
as well, that regardless of what happens, regardless of whether
they actually do go after Obama for this, he's not
going to spend any time in prison, nor do I

(53:02):
think he should. I know that that's hard for me
to say, right, but I am a principled conservative. What
did I say about them throwing Trump in prison? He
can't do it. He's got secret Service protection. If you

(53:27):
are going to try to remove his Secret Service protection,
you're trying to ignore the fact that he knows things
that would be very bad. If our enemies were to
capture him, torture him and bring those things to light,
that would be bad. I think we all could agree

(53:50):
with that as principled conservatives. Well, the same thing holds
true for Barack Obama, former president. He knows things. We
don't want him captured. We don't want him interrogated, we
don't want him tortured just for our enemies to get

(54:13):
information that they shouldn't be getting. So what would I
like to see instead? Well, house arrest. Okay, you can't
throw him in prison. You can't do that. House arrest.
Of course, I wouldn't put him in his own house,

(54:38):
any of his own houses. You see what I would
do instead? Because the Secret Service has the authority to, like, oh,
let's say, shut down the entire wing of a prison
that holds the president, you shouldn't. Whether you can or not,

(54:59):
you you should not remove somebody's Secret Service presidential detail.
You shouldn't do that. I think we can agree if
we're principled conservatives Republicans, you can't do that we shouldn't
even advocate for something like that. And considering the Secret
Service has the ability to empty out an entire wing

(55:20):
of a prison, why not just give the President and
all of those that were involved in this their own present.
Let's send their ass to Alcatraz. When my mind thought
of that, I was like, ooh, that's nice, that's very nice.

(55:40):
Send them to Alcatraz. It's a shut down prison right now. Anyway.
Send them to Alcatraz. You don't have to worry about
emptying out an entire wing. You have an entire prison
island that is already emptied out. Use it. Are doing
some renovations, or at least build a couple, you know,

(56:03):
buildings there. There's a lot of open spaces. Put a
couple of buildings out there, give you some military tent stuff,
prep it. There you go. Secret Service can have the
reign of the entire island. There you go. It's going
to be honest with you, that's what I would like

(56:25):
to see happen. That'd be awesome, curdling unusual punishment. Eh,
It's better than him being put to death, isn't it,
Because that's what the Constitution says that should be done
to somebody who commits treason, you put him to death.

(56:48):
Sending him to a prison island seems like you're letting
him off easy, right, Isn't that what that? That sounds
like that to me. You're letting them off easy. Send
him out there with all his bud is that helped
them in this treson this activity, every one of them,
Joe Biden included, sin, Hillary Clinton. Hell, yes, treason, that's

(57:15):
what they all participated in. And if you don't like
the conditions out there at Alcatraz, well then maybe we
should think about renovation, bringing it up to par He

(57:35):
ain't got to send them to Alligator Alcatraz, send them
to actual Alcatraz. Right, that's what I'd like to see.
Just throwing that out there, I think that sounds like
a damn good idea. What do y'all think? Let me
know down in the comments below, if you are over
there on Rumble, or if you are listening in Spreaker,
let me know down in the comments, or of course,
you can always send me an email ho Ho at

(57:55):
the ho Ho show dot com. So we're going to
go ahead and transition over into Joe Biden's deteroration mental deteroration.
And we're also going to be talking about the Hunter
Biden tirade during his interview, and we'll get into that

(58:16):
right after this, just a couple of minutes. I'll be
right back.

Speaker 2 (58:22):
Oscar walk these dusty trails with a stride so full
of pride. A man built tough from him to toe.

Speaker 1 (58:30):
Nothing he had to hide below his knee.

Speaker 2 (58:34):
He'd had some strife, a leg nod of his own.
But every step he took in life, you'd never see
him on leather boots and iron wheel. His spirits never
flag or fields and farms. He'd till the ground beside

(58:58):
an old plows drag. Folks would whisper on the street.
How does he stand so tall? But Oscar just grin
ear to ear. I'm stronger than you all ostar boots
keep moving on, no matter what comes down through the

(59:21):
night so dark and cold, or the sun baked golden ground.
He's got a hard, solid bronze and a mine, sharp
and vast. Oscar shows us every day the future.

Speaker 4 (59:36):
Is not the past.

Speaker 1 (59:42):
He drove an old Ford.

Speaker 2 (59:43):
Pickup truck, rusty butted, ran hauling every loading dream.

Speaker 1 (59:51):
This mighty simple man.

Speaker 2 (59:54):
Kids would gather around his feet, just to hear him
talk about the day.

Speaker 4 (01:00:00):
He fought in one the life within his walks. He's
leg gonna slow his spirit down.

Speaker 2 (01:00:12):
Can't keep a good man still every morning, up at dawn,
flowing through sheer will, worn out jeans and calloused hands,
an emblem of pure grit. Oscar's story traveled far, a
fire that never quit. Oscar boots cheap, moving on, no

(01:00:39):
matter what comes down through the night so dark and cold,
or the sun baked golden ground. He's got a hard
a solid bronze.

Speaker 1 (01:00:49):
And a mine that's sharp and vast.

Speaker 2 (01:00:53):
Oscar shows us every day.

Speaker 1 (01:00:55):
The future is not the past.

Speaker 2 (01:01:00):
Future is not the past.

Speaker 1 (01:01:14):
Have you ever had an ailment that a normal over
the counter remedy just couldn't fight? If this is the case,
then boy, have I got the solution for you. It's Tousin.
That's right. Tousin cough, Tousin, cold, Tousin, running nose, Tousin, itchy,
watery ice, Toussin, broken leg, Toussin. Tussin is the ultimate cure,

(01:01:36):
all guaranteed to stop anything that ails you. Toussin available
wherever OTC's are sold. Not alright, and we are back,
So we're going to go ahead and close out the
show talking about the bidens Huctor Biden, Joe Biden. That's

(01:01:57):
where we're going to start. But let's go ahead and
get into this article from Newsmax. Let me make sure
I turned that off. There we go. Headline comer to
Newsmax Aid admitted Biden had deteriorated if you always remember correctly,
there's been you know that they've been subpoenaing people trying

(01:02:22):
to get them to testify, House Oversight or send it
whatever that trying to get people to testify. There's been
several that have been doing nothing more than pleading the
Fifth which that right there is a red flag, at
least in my opinion it is. But I mean, you know,
here's the thing though, Okay, as citizens of the United

(01:02:44):
States from Murky, you have the Fifth Amendment right to
protect yourself in open court or just anywhere from self incrimination.
You have that right, and you can't use somebody pleading
the Fifth as grounds of further investigation that they are

(01:03:08):
guilty of something that they should have done. You have
the right to remain silent, to keep your mouth shut,
you do. You can't use somebody pleading the Fifth you
can't even use that as as an indicator of his guilt.
You can't do that, at least not in the court
of law. You can't do that. All right, Are we

(01:03:30):
all on agreement? I hope we are, so that alone,
we can't say, yeah, he's guilty. I mean, granted, I
mean it looks suspicious. Absolutely it does. Because if oh,
let's say Biden's doctor wasn't guilty of doing something that

(01:03:52):
he shouldn't have done, then why wouldn't he have testified?
But there's a a very logical answer to that though, too,
because you know, whenever he was originally subpoena and told
to go and testify, he refused to go at first

(01:04:13):
because he had seen how somebody else had been treated
and he's like, ooh, I don't want to be subject
to that. He refused to go. He's like, no, no, no, no.
Whenever he was originally told that he needed to testify,
he had plenty of time to talk to somebody, to
get marching orders, to lawyer up if you will, and

(01:04:36):
that's very much what he did. I'm lawyering up. I've
been directed by counsel not to only respond by pleading
the Fifth Amendment that I am not going to give
any answers because I don't want to incriminate myself in
any criminal activity. That's what that means. But he may

(01:05:00):
have been directed to do so, not because he was
technically guilty of doing anything wrong. He may have been
directed to do that because he was told to because
of the constitutional questions about the Biden administration and what

(01:05:26):
had happened from executive orders that were signed, from bills
that may have been signed, from pardons that were signed,
because it could give credence two a constitutional question of one,

(01:05:53):
who was actually in charge at the White House, and
if Biden wasn't, who was, and does that person have
the authority to operate as president of the United States
of America even though they were never elected as the
people and did not hold that office. One of the

(01:06:13):
things that I have heard as a accounter to this
was that, oh, well, everybody knows that when you elect
somebody as a president, you're also electing their staff. No,
I didn't vote for President Trump because I wanted his staff.

(01:06:44):
Oh that was horrible. That could be taken so many
different ways, and all of them are wrong. Still funny,
That's not why I voted for President Trump. I voted
for President Trump because I felt confident in who he
would have assisting him and advising him as president. But

(01:07:08):
I didn't elect You know, it wasn't understood, nor is
it understood in anywhere in the Constitution whatsoever, that when
you elect the president you also elect his staff. That's
not even implied anywhere in the constitution. No ruling that
I have ever heard of, doesn't even hint as such

(01:07:29):
a thing. It's ridiculous, right, No, when these Democrats voted
for Biden, they did not vote for Biden's aides that
actually were the ones that were in control of the
auto pen. That's just not the case. It's a fabricated lie.
They did that to try to shut people up, to
try to give a logical reason as to why it

(01:07:51):
happened the way that they did, even though there's no
there's no truth behind it. It was just something that
they came up with to make us sound good, to
make us sound logical. Are you ready to get offended?
I'm gonna offend you real quick. I was over to

(01:08:17):
Buddy Mine's house, and for those of you that don't know,
I mean, I'm I'm full of it. There are times
whenever I am surprised that my eyes are not brown.
I mean, I'm full of it. It doesn't matter how
many ten, two hundreds I take. It doesn't matter how
many times I answer the call of nature and sit

(01:08:37):
on the porcelain throne. It doesn't matter. I'm full of it.
So I was talking with a buddy of mine, and
there were several other people that were around listening to
this conversation because you know, as it unfolded, it was
rather entertaining. It was even entertaining to me. And we
got to talking about, you know, we got to talking

(01:08:57):
about you know, not you know, necessarily that it's a
good thing to use soap and water shower every single day.
I mean, granted, if you're out and about, if you're
you know, sweaty and and and stinky and smelly and
all this other kind of stuff, then yes you should. However,
you know, showering just to shower, you know, your body

(01:09:18):
produces pheromones and that's a bad thing to just completely
get rid of them. And one of the things that
he brought up was that, well, you know, there's you know,
they put pheromones in everything. And I countered that with, yeah,
I know, but the problem is they use a generic
pheromone that is meant to attract everybody, you know, not

(01:09:39):
just one that's meant to attract the opposite sex, but
one that's meant to attract everybody. That's why there's so
many gays and lesbians out there. I told you you'd
be offended, and he was like, dude, that makes sense, right.
And another friend of mine was standing there and she
was like, you are so full of shit, and I'm like,

(01:10:02):
I know, but it's logical though, I mean, it makes sense, right,
I mean, that's a logical argument that makes sense. It
doesn't hold water. I have no no research that has
been done to validate the claim. But I thought it
was absolutely hilarious. I told you you'd be offended. Now,

(01:10:23):
this was something that I mean, this was a conversation
that goes back like, oh, good grief, at least ten years.
I mean, this was a while ago, right, absolutely hilarious. Yes,
I'm full of shit, and so are these guys. So
are these people in mainstream media social media that are

(01:10:44):
going to try to gaslight you into making you believe
that what happened is acceptable. And it was the way
that our founding fathers intended it to be. But that's
that's what they do. Gaslight you into thinking that you're

(01:11:04):
the problem because you demand better, making you think that
you're the problem, because you think the Constitution actually means
something should be honored, should be followed, that the restrictions
that were good back then are still good for today,
and in fact we think that they are more important,

(01:11:30):
that they should be followed more strenuously. I know, I
believe that, I absolutely believe that recent much recent months
has only pointed out so many different things, just how

(01:11:53):
full of crap a lot of these people are. There's
a a report that I had that I had looked
into and read and heard about, I don't know a
few days ago, but it was talking about the you know,

(01:12:14):
how much money the uh the DNC has, you know,
cash on hand, and you know there there what their
last quarter earnings from donations and whatnot. Isn't it very
telling that the d n C is broke Now, Previously,

(01:12:48):
what the d n C rays and what the r
n C rays is usually pretty freaking close, maybe you
know a million or whatever that separates the two. But
the last quarter, if I remember correctly, they didn't even
raise half as much as the RNC did. And the

(01:13:09):
cash on hand is even more telling, because like the
RNC has like eighty some one million dollars cash on
hand and the DNC has like fifteen million. It's amazing
how after USAID is shut down that we're no longer

(01:13:33):
sending government money to these various NGOs, non government organizations,
that all of a sudden you have Stephen Colbert getting fired,
a bunch of other people getting fired, NPR, PBS now

(01:13:55):
getting defunded with Planned Parenthood, you know, they're closing a
bunch of you know, Planned Parenthood locations. You know they
told us in the past that oh this, you know,
this accounts for you know, government funding only accounts for
like one percent, and it's not a big deal. We're

(01:14:15):
never going to miss the money. And now that the
money has dried up, the faucet has been turned off
that oh, now all of a sudden, they're firing people,
they're closing down locations, and now the DNC has broke

(01:14:39):
The fact of the matter is that Democrats are not
as popular as they want you to believe that they are.

Speaker 5 (01:14:49):
Now.

Speaker 1 (01:14:49):
Don't get me wrong, they have some pretty loud voices
in there they really do. They have some extremely loud voices,
but that's not to say that they are the majority.
I mean, if you pay attention, it's pretty clear right,

(01:15:14):
they're not a majority. They're not as strong as is
what they would want you to believe that they are.
The Democrat Party is in free fall. They can't get
their head out of their ass. They can't come up
with a concise argument to help their position. They want
to take a twenty percent stance on a big item

(01:15:38):
where the majority of the people do not agree with them.
And instead of actually trying to center themselves, instead of
trying to you know, bring on board and get more
people into their frame of mind as moderates or even
as you know, more sent people. You know, there's a term,

(01:16:02):
there's a word I'm looking for, uh independence, there we go.
Instead of trying to get them on board, they are
it seems like they are promoting the more radicals in
their party. The aocs, the ilhan Omars, the Bernie Sanders.

(01:16:22):
These are the people that they seem to be putting
out there and promoting their ideas instead of trying to
bring somebody on board and promote the idea of somebody
whom may be a JFK Democrat, somebody who is more center,

(01:16:43):
you know, say what you want to about. You know,
former President Bill Clinton, he wasn't radical. I mean he
had views that I very much disagreed with. Absolutely, but
even his position on a lot of things would not

(01:17:05):
be accepted, tolerated in the Democrat Party of today. That
is to say, he would be booted out of the party.
So a JFK actually, I mean JFK is actually a
type of president that I could see myself voting for.

(01:17:26):
I mean, he had views that I very much agree with.
There were some things that, yeah, I disagreed with wholeheartedly,
but at the same time, there was a lot I
agreed with him about. Even he would not be accepted
in the Democrat Party today. And while I'm on the subject,
let's go ahead and get into Hunter Biden, because this

(01:17:52):
is interesting. Hunter Biden had a meltdown. You know, after
all of this information became public with the release of
the declassified information from Tolci Gabbard, the first person who
they sent out to talk to the media to have
an interview was Hunter Biden. What the hell were they thinking?

(01:18:16):
It wasn't Barack It wasn't Joe, it was Hunter Biden.
And this thing was a holy crap. I mean, this
thing was just ridiculous, right. I think this interview was
like three hours long. If I'm not mistaken, I think
that's about what it is. And by the way, here's
the headline from the Daily Signal, Hunter's melt down exposes

(01:18:38):
the Biden machine. But the first person they bring out
to talk about this was Hunter Biden. And like I said,
this was like a three hour interview if I'm not mistaken,
at least two and a half hour interview. I mean
it was a long interview, right, he was talking for
a while. But one of the things that I really

(01:19:02):
want to point out, and that is what Hunter Biden
believes about illegal aliens. And this is not an outlier, Okay,
his view is not one that's unique to him. This
is how the Democrats view illegal aliens. Because if you

(01:19:22):
if you've heard any of this, and I do recommend
listening to some clips. I'm not going to play those today.
You can find them online all kinds of different places.
I'm sure you can easily find various clips over on
the youtubess. But this is how the Democrat party views
illegal aliens, because one of the things that he says
is like, you know, uh, we can't remove all these people.

(01:19:46):
We can't get rid of I mean, who's going to
you know, uh pick the crops, who's going to clean
your house, who's going to you know, be the janitors
and the custodians, who's going to do all these things?
If we get rid of the illegals, there goes our
slave labor, because that's how they view illegals. I mean,

(01:20:07):
this is modern day slavery. And just so you know,
there are more slaves today than in any other point
in history. Slavery isn't dead, it really isn't. It's alive
and well. And yes, one of the places where slavery
is is right here in the United States of America.

(01:20:31):
Who perpetrated this, of the Democrats through their open border policies.
I'm not saying that the US has more slaves than
any other country. I'm not saying that that's not true,
or at least I don't think it's true. I can't
validate that, but it's here because of the Democrat Party.

(01:20:57):
We're talking about a party that wants to bring illegals
across the border as cheap labor because they do not
want to force corporations and other businesses to have to
pay the higher wages of American citizens because we demand more,

(01:21:18):
and not just we demand more, legally, they have to
pay us more. They have to provide us more. Oh
you want to work here, that's you know. Oh you
want to hire as a citizen in the United States
as you are legally supposed to be doing. And yeah,
you have to pay me more than what you would
an illegal alien. Not to mention, they want to give

(01:21:41):
them access to free health care, free education, free housing,
food stamps, all these other social amenities, and they want
you and me, the American citizen to be forced to
pay for it through tax dollars. But this is modern

(01:22:07):
day slavery. And another reason why they do not want
them to be deported is because they have used illegal
aliens to oh, what's the word I'm looking for, puff

(01:22:29):
their numbers, to inflate their numbers. That's what I was
looking for, inflate. They use illegal aliens to inflate their numbers.
They don't have the backing of American citizens, and they
know that by bringing these illegal aliens over here, allowing
them to break the law and go unpunished. That they

(01:22:55):
would be beholden to the Democrat Party and they would
be a permanent voting base. That's why they want to
keep them here. They want them to be counted in
the census so that this way they do not lose
seats in the House, so they don't lose power. But
they view them as cheap labor, They view them as slaves,

(01:23:19):
and they see them as a people that are only
here to do the things that they don't want to
pay the inflated cost of labor to an American citizen.
But that's what it's that's what it amounts to. That's
the bottom line. Because Ho Ho said, so, you know,

(01:23:43):
I did hear some bad news this past week, and
I'm sure everybody has has heard this. I'm not going
to be the first person since I brought up the whole,
you know, Ho Ho said, So, you know, Stone Cold,
Steve Austin, the gen Xers are are in mourning this week.

(01:24:09):
We've lost a trio of people that were cornerstones of
our childhood and early adulthood. Theo from The Cosby Show
passed away, Hulk Hogan passed away, and Ozzy Osbourne passed away.

(01:24:40):
I was like, holy crap, what has happened? I mean
this is this was Yeah, yeah gen xers in morning
all over the place. My heart goes out to the
families they really do you know. Yeah, anyway, moving on
this the only thing this tiree goes, which he is

(01:25:05):
a talking head of the Democrat Party. This is how
the Democrats view illegal aliens, nothing more than a dedicated
voting block to keep them in power and cheap labor
because they don't want to pay the price to actually
employ a US citizen. And we already know that in

(01:25:30):
numerous cases, because we have seen this play out. They
can't deny it that when Ice came in and raided
a facility and arrested all of the illegal aliens that
they had working there, they had a job fare and

(01:25:50):
oh my god, the amount of Americans that showed up
the fill out application was astonishing, astonishing, astounding, astonishing. There
we go. Their claim is illegals are doing jobs that
Americans don't do. But yet when the illegals got removed
and was no longer working those jobs, Americans showed up.

(01:26:18):
But this is what the Democrats think about illegal aliens.
They don't care about them. The only thing they care
about is what these illegal aliens will do for the Democrats.
That's it. And as a form, absolutely a form of
modern day slavery, that's what it amounts to. The Democrat

(01:26:42):
Party hasn't changed much. They really haven't. The Democrat Party
was the party of internment camps. The Democrat Party was
the party of the KKK. Jim Crow held Joe Biden
himself off even said that I don't want my kids

(01:27:02):
to go to a jungle of a school that has
mixed races in it. That's what he said. There's no
other context that you can do to make that sound
any better. The Democrats' view of slavery has not changed ever.

(01:27:39):
They are the party of slavery. They are still not
just then, but they are now still the party of slavery.
That's all I got for y'all's today. That is it.
Thank you very much for stopping by. I do greatly
appreciate it. Head on over to the Host Show dot com.
Check out flip board, check out uh WSP chronicles, all

(01:28:03):
those good things. Links are available over there in the
ho host Show dot com. You also have yourself a
great one, and I will see you in the next one.
This has been the Ho Ho Show. For more information,
you can head to the Ho Hosshow dot com and
for the merchandise store, you can head on over to
stink pickle dot com. That is s t I n

(01:28:25):
k p i k l e dot com. Until next time,