What’s Going On?

In today’s episode we are going to discuss Newsom’s Gerrymandering and the No Kings protest over the weekend. We will also talk a little about the shutdown, and the unlawful acts of several Governors.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-hoho-show--2639419/support.

Thank You for Listening, 

For All Things "The HohO Show"
Email, Website & Other Links

[e-mail]
WSPRadio.com 
TheHohOShow.com
The HohO Show / Rumble
WSPChronicles
StinkPikle.com / Merch Store

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:06):
Yes, Welcome to the Hoo, rated the number one most
listened to podcast on Fluida.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
So join us now as we discuss news, politics, current events,
made so much more so through the airwaves and strapped
in as we do the constitution because three Burr broadcasting

(00:35):
from Weapini SAWT Production Studio B. Welcome to the Host
Show and as always I'm your host, Ho ho say hey,
y'all's doing I hope you're doing good? I really do. So.
Today we've got quite a few different things to talk about.
Boy howdy. We are going to be talking about oh well,

(00:55):
boy howdy, it just slipped right out of my mind,
all right. So we're gonna be talking a little bit
about what's going on in various cities regarding ice enforcement.
We are going to be talking about why ain't that connecting?
I have no idea. We are going to be talking
about to do some stuff with the shutdown, and we

(01:22):
are going to be touching base on the uh the
the no Kings protest that was going on in various
cities around But first we got just a little splattering
of different topics to go over. But first, before we
get into all that, I'm going to start off with

(01:45):
this one from Science Alert. Now, this one isn't exactly
a like, well, y'all's know how I like to start
the show. I like to start off with a little
bit of satire, a little bit of ha ha, a
little bit of you know, funny. Definitely, there we go.

(02:09):
Now it's connected. Isn't that awesome? A little bit yeah,
a little bit funny, ha ha. And I apologize that,
you know, being a little sidetracked at the moment, because
this it didn't want to connect and I really have

(02:31):
no idea why. But everything seems to be perfectly fine now,
so that's very good, all right anyway, But I'd like
to start off with a little bit of humor, a
little bit of ha ha. And generally my go to
source is, you know, the Babylon Bee satire with a purpose,
That's how I use it. Now, this one doesn't come
from Babylon Bee. This one was just a weird article

(02:55):
that ended up popping up on my feed, and I'm like,
it made me laugh because I immediately knew what this was
talking about. Let me go ahead and show you the
headline and the article. So, like I said, this is
from Science Alert, headline World's most expensive coffee is chemically
different because it's literally poop. Yep, you heard that one correctly.

(03:27):
This coffee is literally poop. It's crapally it's expensive. It
really is. Now, Like I said, as soon as I
seen this article, as soon as I read that headline,
I knew exactly what coffee they were talking about. I mean,
how could you not, especially if you've seen the movie
that I seen. Now this, I gotta be honest with you. This,

(03:49):
this movie where I know what this coffee is. It
holds a special place in my heart because whenever this
was about ready to get released, my dad and I
was like, you know, we you know, we were going
to go see this movie, and he unfortunately passed away
before it ended up getting released. It was twenty years ago.

(04:11):
It is what it is, right, So I watched the
movie anyway because I you know, it was like I
figured it'd be funny. I figured to be hilarious, and
it really was. The movie did not disappoint. And I
am talking about bucket List starring Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman,
and there was a part well, okay, so the Jack

(04:35):
Nicholson's character, you know, he was a rich guy. You
know he owned several, you know, hospitals, and his his
coffee of choice was a coffee by the name of
Kapi luec And I'm probably mispronouncing that. I don't care,
but that's what it was called. And there's this part

(04:58):
in the movie, and it was towards the end of it,
you know, Morgan Freeman was like, you know that he
gave him, He gave Jack Nicholson's character the print up
of you know how this coffee is made. You know
that it's it gets its unique flavor from passing through
the intestines of this tree cat. And Jack Nicholson was like,

(05:19):
you gotta be shitting me, And Morgan Freeman goes, no,
the tree cats beat me to it, and I'm like,
oh my god, oh dude. I Like, I was laughing
so hard. I'm pretty sure I laughed until I cried.
It was absolutely hilarious. It cracked me up. But I
was like, there ain't no way that this coffee actually
is it exists. I mean, who in their right mind

(05:42):
we're drinking coffee that gets its flavor from passing through
intestines and you know comes out the other side, right,
I mean, this can't be a thing. So I looked
it up and I was like, holy crat, this actually
is a thing. And I mean this, this article talks about,
you know, the difference I guess between domesticated or not

(06:02):
really domesticated. But you know, these tree cats that are
used in order to make this expensive coffee versus those
that are actually out in the wild, and you know,
YadA YadA, blah blah. Anyway, I I thought the article
was hilarious. Take a read if you're interested. This again
is from Science Alert. Coffee that is literally poop. And

(06:27):
of which case, you can check out every article that
I will be using in the show by heading over
to theho Hotshow dot com and just click on that
newsfeed tab and there that'll take you over to the
magazine over on flipboard, which is my go to hub
where I put all of the articles that I use
in the shows. Anyway, let's go ahead and move on. Now.

(06:51):
This headline from Missus Institute. It had a couple interesting
things in here that you know, it got my attention,
you know, it really did. It got my attention. I
read the I read the headline, and you know, immediately

(07:12):
I'm like, okay, now they got me curious I'm going
to click on it, regardless of whether it's clickbait or not.
I'm going to click on and see what it says. Right,
So that's what I did. So headline said how progressives
broke the Constitution and praised themselves for it. And upon
reading this headline, I'm like, yeah, you know, I mean

(07:33):
that that's the thing. You know, this is a huge
part of the Democrat playbook. Is they just redefine things
in order to make it mean whatever they're actually wanting
it to mean. I mean, that's that's how they do things.

(07:54):
That's that's been part of the Democrat playbook for quite
some time, you know, I mean, come on, think about it.
I'll give you a prime example. Second Amendment. Right, Democrats
have been trying to truth be told downright, eliminate the
Second Amendment or you know, using things and arguments that

(08:15):
are completely ridiculous that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. And
you know, theories that you don't use anywhere else in
the Constitution at all. You know, like, oh, they only
meant that, you know, the Second Amendment would apply to

(08:35):
muskets and stuff like that, which that argument makes no
sense whatsoever, because nowhere in the history of the Democrat Party.
Have they used such ridiculous argument regarding the Constitution at all?
Let me think about it, you know, because if that
argument holds true, which one, that's ignoring the fact that

(08:57):
they did have advancements during the Revolutionary War regarding you know, weapons, arms.
But that's also ignoring or at least you know, an
aspect where they never take it any further in the
same steaking document. And that's like the First Amendment, because

(09:18):
by that argument, then you know, using a blog, you
can't do that because obviously the First Amendment applies only
to parchment, ink and quill. It doesn't apply to a blog, keyboard, computer,

(09:41):
interwebs The freedom of speech doesn't apply in this instance
because the freedom of speech would only apply on a
soapbox in the town square. They don't use these type
of arguments anywhere else, trying to squad somebody's freedom. But

(10:01):
yet when it comes to the Second Amendment, even though
it's pretty clear what it means, they they tried to
bring up stupid arguments like this, trying to redefine what
the Amendment actually says. But like I said, this has

(10:23):
been part of the progressive playbook for quite some time.
All you got to do is look at the name itself.
I don't remember who it was that said it, but
it was basically whenever the communists tried to take over
our government, because during that timeframe, communism and communists, well,

(10:51):
it was a bad word, you know, it was worse
than any other word out there. I mean, it was bad.
It was a horrible word. And is what the is.
What they ended up doing was changing their name. Instead

(11:11):
of calling it communism, instead of calling it fascism, instead
of calling it socialism, they decided to use the name
of progressivism. That, oh, this is progress Progress is a
good thing, you know, even though it's the you know,

(11:32):
even though it spits in the face, spits in the
eye of everything that we hold true here in America,
as far as our founding freedom, limited government, keep my
own money, self governan, it's all this other kind of
good stuff.

Speaker 3 (11:48):
You know.

Speaker 2 (11:48):
The power resides in the hand of the people in
the States, respectively. They decided to redefine the world words
in order to get the outcome they desired. That is progressivism.
And yes, they broke the Constitution. I mean, I'm not

(12:12):
sure if you're aware of this, but we don't this
is not the country our founding fathers made. It really isn't.
I remember a while back ago, I was having a
conversation with somebody and it was a fantastic conversation, it

(12:33):
really was. It was a great conversation, and we were
talking about, you know, our government because he you know,
he was a borderline anarchist, but he liked, you know,
he had certain beliefs. And I was like, dude, your
problem isn't with the Constitution. Because he was initially like, oh,
I hate the Constitution, you know, all this other kind

(12:54):
of Bravo Sierra. And I was like, dude, you don't
hate the Constitution. It's like you really don't. You hate
how different things have been applied over the years. Because
I'm like, here's some core facts about the Constitution. I'm like,
do you agree with this, and he's like, yes, I do.
I go, well, that's in the Constitution. And his argument was, well,

(13:15):
that's not how it is now. I go, no, it isn't.
You're right, and I disagree with how it is now,
but that's not how it was in the Constitution. Over
the past two hundred and fifty years, things have been
perverted to the to the point to where our country
is no longer recognizable from the country that it originally was.

(13:40):
And that same thing happened in quite a few different
you know, arguments that he had different things that he
had a problem with. It wasn't with the Constitution, it
was with how different things have been applied over the years,
different things have been changed over the years, and I
completely agree with them. I'm like, dude, we're not the

(14:00):
country we were designed to be. Why do you think
things are broken? The government was never intended to do.
The federal government was never intended to do the things
that they are trying to do now, and they do
it poorly, and they focus so much time and energy

(14:21):
on these other things that they don't even have enough
time left over to do the things they're supposed to
be doing. I mean, think about it. We're going through
a government shutdown right now, all because the government couldn't
do basically the one thing they're supposed to do, and
that's right, twelve appropriation bills every single year. They can't

(14:44):
do it. Why Because they're focused on all kinds of
other craft that they ain't supposed to be focused on.
Tend Amendment, you know, the powers allowed to the government.
And I use that word intentionally, but the powers that
the federal government was allowed to have are numbered. That's

(15:07):
why they're called enumerated powers. That means that they are numbered,
they are restricted. And if it wasn't powers that were
specifically given to the federal government, and if it wasn't
power that was restricted from the state, then it belongs

(15:33):
in the hand of the states and in the people.
I mean, that's what the Constitution says. But unfortunately, in
practice throughout the years, Washington has just been seizing more
and more power, more and more control from the states
and from the people, power that doesn't belong to them. So,

(16:01):
I mean, he was right to be angry with how
that thanks have been perverted over the years. But my
problem has never been with the Constitution. My problem is
in not just progressives, but those people in DC that

(16:22):
wish to hoard all the power that doesn't actually belong
to them and basically force it out of the hands
of the people whom it does belong to. I mean,
that's what's been going on. So moving on, and while
we're talking about it, we're going to segue just a

(16:47):
little bit into this article from the Daily Signal headline flip.
Your opponents of Newsom's jerry mandering agenda have advice for
California voters. Now, this is in reference to California's response
to the redistricting that took place not that long ago

(17:09):
in Texas. Because see, here's the thing, this is more
or less what happened. Well, let me take it to
my home state as as an example. All Right, Democrats
like Gavin Newsom, they demonize jerry mandering whenever it poorly

(17:32):
negatively effects the Democrats. They don't necessarily have a problem
with jerry mandering. They just have a problem with jerry
mandering whenever it negatively affects them. Illinois district map is ridiculous,
it really is. I've talked about this in the past.
I'm not going to, you know, reiterate old shows, but

(17:58):
our map is absolutely ridiculous. In Texas's map, it wasn't
near as bad as Illinois, but there was still some
shenanig as. It ended up happening, and Texas was ordered
by the Supreme Court to redraw their district maps. They

(18:20):
didn't do it all willy nilly just because they actually
were told to do it by the US Supreme Court.
I think it was a US Supreme Court. It was
a Supreme Court. Whether it was a Texas Supreme Court
or the US Supreme Court, I'm not one hundred percent sure.
It doesn't really matter. I'm pretty sure it was a
US Supreme Court. But anyway, they were directed to do

(18:41):
it by the Supreme Court. It wasn't necessarily something that
they did all willy nilly. They were ordered to do
so by the Supreme Court. And the reasoning was pretty simple.
It's like, look, you guys drew your district apps based
off of something that is unconstitutional. You're not supposed to

(19:05):
be doing it like that. It's supposed to be a
representation of the people, not something that is supposed to
benefit one person or another based off of their race, creed, gender, sexuality,
what have you. Because that would be discrimination, and we

(19:30):
have anti discrimination laws here in America, of which case,
you can't do that. So they were ordered to redraw
the district lines to line up better with the population
of the state as a whole. All of it not
to benefit one party or another, not to benefit one

(19:51):
race or another. It was to be a reflection, a
mirror representation of everybody. And in redrawing the district maps,
Democrats lost five seats in Texas. Now, this really didn't
sit well with numerous different Democrats, especially those that were

(20:14):
you know, the Democrats that were in the Congress down
in Texas. But it really didn't sit well with Gavin
Newsom either. And is what Gavin Newsom decided to do.
In response to Texas being ordered to redraw the district lines,
he said, I'm going to redraw California's district lines and

(20:38):
I'm going to eliminate the district of five different Republicans
so that this way they go to Democrats. Gavin Newsom is,
you know, unlike Texas that did it so that this
way the population of Texas was better represented in Congress.

(21:00):
Gavin Newsom did it to stick it to Republicans. He
did it because he was afraid that Democrats would lose
power in DC. That's the only reason why Gavin Newsom
did it. Gavin Newsom made a political decision because he

(21:23):
wasn't going to stand it that Democrats were losing seats.
He didn't want to give up power. That's what I'm
not to do. It was it was a Democrats did
not want to give up power. That's all in the
mouse do. And he already knows the things are going
to be getting bad, really bad in the next election,

(21:45):
and he doesn't want to make it worse. Why do
I say it's going to get bad? Why do I
say it's going to get really, really bad. Well, because
a lot of the voting base for the Democrat Party
is getting deported right now as we speak. I mean,
I don't know that numbers. I don't remember the numbers
of how many people have been deported. Let me go
ahead and ask the Googles how many legal they have

(22:14):
been deported in twenty twenty five question mark and there
we go. So giving a rough guestimation that ain't right.

(22:36):
See as of October says six hundred thousand are expected
to be deported by end of the year, approximately five
hundred and forty eight thousand. And that's that's low actually,
because I know there's been a lot of illegal aliens
that have self deported, not just those that have been
forcibly removed from the country. So I'm not this doesn't

(23:02):
that doesn't sound right. Just going to be honest with you,
that six hundred thousand doesn't sound right. There's a lot
more than that. Because I've been hearing numbers and that
one just doesn't sound right. But the point is the
Democrat Party is losing a lot of voters because the
illegal aliens that have been allowed to vote, especially in California.

(23:23):
I mean there's numerous states besides that, but especially in
California they've been allowed to vote. So they know they're
losing already a voting block, and they don't want to
lose any more power. That's another reason why Gavin Newsom
was doing what he was doing. Let's move on. Oh crap,

(23:45):
I didn't mean to hit that button. All right, there
we go. Now this article, since we're talking about democracy,
since we're talking about the Second Amendment, I stumbled upon
this article from Foundation for Economic Education. Now, I know,

(24:05):
based off of where this article came from, you may
be thinking I'm want to be talking economics, which is
exactly why I was. You know, I don't do economics
on this show. I mean, I may talk, you know,
with some stuff, but that's more of a overall type
of a thing. I don't get into the nitty gritty,
into the specifics any of that kind of thing. I

(24:26):
don't do it. I'm not qualified. I don't know what
the hell I'm talking about. But this headline, it caught
me off guard, caught me by surprise because I was
really wondering after I read this headline where they were
going with it. What were they going to say? Because
I knew what the truth was, so I was kind

(24:47):
of curious as to how the fee Foundation for Economic
Education was going to spend this, And to be honest
with you, it it really didn't. So we go ahead
and read the headline for you, democracy and capitalism are
mutually reinforcing.

Speaker 1 (25:06):
Yeah, absolutely it is.

Speaker 2 (25:16):
And I was getting into this article and basically there
was some people in here, and even Karl Marx was
one of the people that were specifically mentioned that basically
had an argument that either capitalism will destroy democracy or
democracy will destroy capitalism. And whenever I read that, I

(25:40):
was like, no, I mean, that's that's stupid, because capitalism
and democracy are complementary. You know, I'm not going to
go so far as to say that you can't have

(26:01):
one without the other, but in a matter of speaking,
you definitely can't have capitalism without a democracy. I mean,
you can't have it under a dictatorship, you can't have
it under a monarch, you can't have it under communism.
I mean, that's what communism is. And when I refer

(26:28):
to capitalism, what I am really referring to, and I
got to be clear on this one, is free market
capitalism because it's not. I mean, is it really capitalism
if it's not free market capitalism? I mean, it really isn't.
And just so you know, for my entire life, the

(26:50):
United States of America has not operated purely by free
market capitalism. It hasn't. Just being honest with you, I
mean a lot of people may claim that America's free
market capitalism, but it really isn't. I remember that there
was an interview, well several years ago, I'm sure now,

(27:15):
but it was an interview with Bill Gates and he
was talking about, you know, he was talking about he
would never be able to form windows and get that
business started in today's environment. And this is something that

(27:35):
is actually directly talked about in this article. Not necessarily
that example, but it is, you know, governments feel, Congress
feel from time to time that they have to do
something instead of allowing the free market to take care
of the problem, and you end up having or at
least what ends up happening is those companies and business

(28:00):
is that we're front runners in an industry like Apple,
like windows, you know, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. What
ends up happening is they end up spending a lot
of money on lobbyists, and they get in tight with
government in order to make regulation to stop you know,

(28:20):
regulations in red tape, in order to stop the next
guy from coming up and doing what they did. They
end up acting as gatekeepers. That's not free market capitalism, people,
It really isn't, because free market capitalism is the majority
of people decide. Oh yeah, and by the way, point, no,

(28:44):
we are not a democracy. We are a constitutional republic.
But for the sake of this article, we'll just use
that parlance. Okay, But free market capitalism is democracy because
it is the majority rules. I mean, think about it.

(29:06):
Free market capitalism gives you choice, It gives you options.
There is competition. It is a buyer's market because, let
mean think about it. If it wasn't free market capitalism,
do you really think there would be a butt ton

(29:29):
of different you know, brands of vehicles out there, makes
and models. No, you would get one, maybe two different manufacturers.
You'd get one make or model. Yeah, one model. You

(29:53):
would get a type of truck, a type of car,
and it would be a strip down base model, no extras,
no amenities, and it would cost you an armattal lake
to get one. Why would they be able to do that?

(30:15):
If you want a car, you'll spend what they tell
you are going to spend, and you will get what
they tell you are going to get. But in free
market capitalism, you know, it's a buyer's market. In communism,
it's a seller's market where the government holds all the strings.

(30:38):
They hold all the cars. They tell you what is
and what isn't. They tell you what you're going to get,
they tell you how much you're going to pay for it,
and they tell you if you don't like it, then
you can do without, period and the story. That's how
it is. Free market capitalism, however, is a buyer's market
because you're going to get what you want in time,

(31:01):
and you're going to get it at a price that
the market will bear. I mean, think about it. Let's
say this pin. Let's say it costs one hundred dollars
to manufacture. That's from you know, ingredients, all the stuff
they got to put together to make it. And then
to get it on the shelf and put it in

(31:22):
a box for you in order to buy a package whatever.
Let's say it cost a dollar, they sell it for
two bucks and it's a piece of crap pin. It
doesn't last but a couple of days that they breaks
so falls apart and then you're forced to have to
go and buy another one for two dollars. They're making
one hundred percent profit. It's absolutely amazing. All it takes

(31:45):
is one company to go in and say we're going
to do it cheaper, and we're going to do it better.
You get a better quality pin and it doesn't cost
as much. Now, what does the manufacture of the piece
of crap expensive pin have to do? Well? Either they
have to lower the price to reflect the quality of
the product, or they're just going to keep on selling

(32:10):
it at the price they always have. It's the quality
they always have, you know, lower price, raise quality. Or
the third option is they go out of business, because
that's how it happens all the time, because capitalism breeds choice.

(32:31):
When you have choice, you make things happen. It may
not be as quickly as you want it to, but
the original pin manufacturer that has an expensive product that
really sucks. Whenever there's competition that does it cheaper and better,
the market is going to decide who wins and who loses.

(32:56):
In free market capitalism, it's not the job of government
to to decide winners and losers. It isn't. That's how
we have the problem with health care with medication costs.
That's why we have that problem because the government has
stepped in and they decided what it's going to be

(33:18):
based off of what they think should happen, and it
isn't about free market capitalism. Health Care is just the
easiest example of what to throw out there because my
entire life, health care has not been run by free
market capitalism. Democracy is free market capitalism. Free market capitalism
is democracy because not necessarily that you can't have one

(33:40):
without the other. But you cannot have free market capitalism
without democracy. How do I know we're not in a
democracy anymore. We don't have free market capitalism. Now, there's
other industries out there that are a good and a
prime exit example of that, but free market capitalism is

(34:02):
a pretty easy one. You know. Cell Phones and or
at least cell phone carriers is another one, you know,
because there's that gatekeeper type of thing that not anybody
can just get in and do the job and get

(34:25):
one going. It's not free market capitalism anymore. We would
be a lot better off if we were free market capitalism,
if they got rid of a lot of the regulations
and the red tape, the you know, if the gatekeepers
were forced out the door, things would be a heck

(34:49):
of a lot better. All right, So that is that
is all on that. So we're going to go take
a quick break. When I return, we are going to
talk about uh oh yeah, we'll play that song. We're

(35:09):
going to talk about this, this No King's protest that
happened over the weekend on Saturday eighteenth. We'll talk about
that right on the other side of this. Just a
couple of minutes, a few minutes, and I'll be right back.

Speaker 3 (35:31):
We'll go this morning, Son in mines, Reach for my soda,
tell you no lie, sorta sorta where you go my
last can now, I'm slow.

Speaker 2 (35:47):
Sorta sorta feeling blue. What's a man supposed to do?
It is empty while it's thing.

Speaker 4 (36:05):
This saint living, this is a sin sorta sorta where.

Speaker 2 (36:11):
You go, my last can now, I'm slow?

Speaker 4 (36:15):
Soa soda feeling lout.

Speaker 2 (36:18):
What's a man supposed to do?

Speaker 5 (36:22):
Gotta get myself together, Gotta find a way. This ain't right,
Gotta make you do today. Soa sorda where you go?

Speaker 2 (36:38):
My last car? Now I'm slow?

Speaker 1 (36:40):
So the SA.

Speaker 2 (36:43):
What's some man supposed.

Speaker 6 (36:45):
To do at.

Speaker 2 (37:51):
M Do you work at any of the myriad of

(38:16):
jobs where you might have to sit on your bum
all day? Well?

Speaker 1 (38:19):
If so, maybe you know what it's like to suffer
from the condition known as swamp ass.

Speaker 2 (38:23):
Well, if so, have I got the solution for you.
It's high monkey butt powder. That's right, it's high monkey
butt powder.

Speaker 1 (38:34):
You can use an indoors outdoors work or play, or
on any occasion when you sit on your bum all day.
Don't let your buns get read. Use anti monkey butt
powder instead, available wherever anti friction powder is sold.

Speaker 2 (38:48):
All right, and we are back. So we're going to
be talking about the no Kings protest that took place
October eighteenth, just this past Saturday. And I'm going to
start off with an article from the Washington Examiner. And
whenever I read this headline, I had to laugh. It

(39:09):
made me chuckle. I thought it was kind of funny
because I understood the reference, right, I understood the reference.
I can't say as if I seen the episode, but
I most definitely seen the clip headline No Kings is
the Seinfeld of protests, A show about nothing, And it

(39:31):
absolutely was because, just so you know, for those of
you that are unaware, for those of you that have
been under a rock for your entire life, we already
had a No King's protest, and we even fought a
revolution over it. It was called the Revolutionary War. The No
King's Protest was the Tea Party, the Boston Tea Party,

(39:54):
That's what it was. Seeah, I understood the reference, and
I very much remember the clip. You know, you had
Seinfeld and I don't even remember the name of the
other guy, but they were, you know, pitching a show idea,
and it's like, what's the show about about nothing? The
show's literally about nothing. I thought it was funny because

(40:15):
the No King's Protest is exactly about that, and it
cracks me up to because it really doesn't make any
sense whatsoever. It really doesn't. Now I'm going to pivot
slightly because I want to talk about this article from Yellowhammer.

(40:37):
Headline says that Gary Palmer on it No Kings protests,
government shut down. A very small minority of radical people
are running the Democrat Party. And there's a lot of
truth to that. There really is, because I really do
believe in the past election of twenty twenty four is

(41:01):
a prime example of this. But the Democrat Party, or
at least the leadership of the Democrat Party, doesn't represent
the party as a whole. It doesn't represent the constituents.
It really doesn't. And this last election of twenty twenty

(41:24):
four it very much indicates this. It very much illustrates it,
that highlights it. It makes it as obvious as the
nose on my face. Yeah, it's pretty obvious. I can
see it. Yeah, yeah, there's something wrong with me. Anyway,

(41:48):
I very much do believe in Oh, holy crap, what
in the hell the light just decided to go like
full blast on me. I had to get that back
down to where it's supposed to be. Anyway, the party
has been taken over by a bunch of radicals, and

(42:10):
even though they are the loudest group in the bunch,
they're not the majority of the group. They're really not.
But unfortunately, you've got the leadership that consists of people
like ilhan Omar Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, you know, Hakim Jefferies,

(42:31):
a handful of others, and it's just they're the loudest voice,
but they don't represent the party unfortunately. And you know,
I've said this once, I've said it a million times.
You know, I would have had no problem, no qualms,
no issues whatsoever, actually voting for a JFK Democrat. And

(42:55):
I think a lot of the party fall under that
type of category. They don't want the stupidity in the party.
I mean, these are people that I don't think like
the idea of their tax dollars being spent on things
that has absolutely no reason. To be spending the money
on gender studies in Pakistan. Really, that's what You're going

(43:19):
to spend my tax dollars on healthcare for illegal aliens.
To use the federal taxpayer as a charitable you know,
to use the taxpayer funds as charitable contributions, to go

(43:41):
to all kinds of things, to fund all kinds of
different projects in all kinds of different countries. It's ridiculous.
And I truly do feel that the majority of Democrats
aren't really for that, and I mean, think about it.
Of course they're not because President Trump won the popular vote,

(44:04):
he won every single swing state. It's kind of clear
that the Democrat Party doesn't even have their own constituents
in mind whenever they do some of the things that
they do. So this is no King's protest. It's a

(44:28):
protest about absolutely nothing. I seen this article from just
a News and there's really not a whole heck of
a lot in here. I was actually kind of disappointed
on how little information was in here, because I figured
that with the headline like this, then you know, the

(44:51):
author of it from just anews dot com would have
provided some examples, and they didn't. And I was actually
kind of disappointed in this. But the headline you vote
in light of the no kings protests? Which president acted
more king like? Trump or Biden? Now obviously the answer

(45:17):
is Biden. Yes, he's acted more king like. I mean,
think about it. You know, does a king go after
his political opponents purely to keep them from running in
the next election, to keep them from finding the information
to try to force him to get out of the
spotlight and shut the hell up. Is that something that

(45:39):
a king does? Yeah, And that's exactly what happened under
Biden's presidency. Under Obama's presidency, they went after Trump. And
I mean, what did Trump do? He could have directed

(46:01):
the Department of Justice. Whether they would have not, you know,
is a different story. But he could have directed the
Department of Justice to go after Hillary Clinton for the
mishandling of classified information. And it would have been justified
to do that. Why, because she broke the damn law.
She was caught red handed. All the evidence was there.

(46:24):
She was guilty of sin. I'm not even going to
use allegedly because she was guilty of sin. She was
caught red handed. And in no place in the laws
regarding the handling of classified information does it even say
anything about intent or ignorance doesn't matter. It's not a factor.

(46:45):
You know, just ask a cop. Whenever you get caught,
whenever you get caught speeding, doesn't matter that you were
unaware of the law. No, it don't, because it doesn't
change the law, and it doesn't change the fact that
you got caught. They don't care, They don't give a shit.
Hillary Clinton was caught red handed. You look at the

(47:08):
things that Trump did versus the things that Biden did,
and it is extremely obvious. Who is the king or
at least who has been acting as a king or
at least you know which administration was more authoritarian. It

(47:29):
is not Trump. I mean, Trump's doing nothing more. I
mean you look at what is going on with Ice,
for instance, He's enforcing the law. If these knucklehead Democrats
don't like the fact that the law is being enforced,

(47:49):
then shouldn't they change the law, change the punishments of
said law. Yeah, they should. The fact that they're not
isn't on Trump. I mean, they were much more happy
whenever the former president Biden ignored the law and let

(48:17):
him stay here all willy nilly. They liked that idea.
But Biden, he violated his oath of office. He failed
to do his job, which is enforced the law. President
Trump is doing that. He didn't make the law, he

(48:41):
didn't write how that law is supposed to be enforced.
He didn't do it at all. But yet they're demonizing
him because he isn't making these car vouts for people
they want him to make carvouts. Four. They're demonizing him
because he's actually doing his job. But is that being

(49:06):
a king or is that being a president? Because a
president is supposed to enforce the laws fulfill the office
of the president. That's what he is supposed to do.
And guess what, like it or not, that's what President
Trump is doing. I, for one, I love it. Yes,

(49:29):
this is what I voted for. Moving on, because you know,
I was hearing about this being talked on another program.
I was listening to the Dilly Show over there on Rumble,
and you know, they were talking about President Trump bombing
another drug vote from Venezuela. I guess is where it

(49:49):
was from. And I guess President Trump's response was, you know, well,
it was asked to him. It's like, hey, you know,
are you going to you know, stop doing Are you
going to go to Congress to declare war on you know,
these drug cartels? And he's like, nah, I don't think
I want to do that. I just I just take
I want to kill him, That's what I think I

(50:12):
want to do. I have no need to go to Congress,
you know. And is that king Like I would actually
argue and say no, because we've had a war on
drugs since the nineteen seventies, a war on drugs that

(50:34):
has been accepted and supported by people on both sides
of the political aisle, both Democrats and Republicans. You listen
to a Democrat, they support the war on drugs. So
considering you know, this war on drugs has been going

(50:57):
on since nineteen seventies, the you know, why would Trump
have to go and get permission from Congress on a
position on drugs coming into our country since the seventies
doesn't really make much sense to me. Again, he's doing

(51:19):
the things that the president is supposed to be doing.
He's protecting our borders from drug traffickers, sex traffickers, child traffickers,
illegal aliens flooding across the border. He's doing his job.
And again, if anybody has a problem with it, especially

(51:42):
damned Democrats, then is what they need to do is one,
quit your Bitchin two, if you don't like the law,
and if you don't like how the law is being enforced,
your Congress for crying out loud, it's your job to
change the law you don't like it. Don't demonize the
president because he's doing his job. Demonize yourself because you're

(52:05):
failing to do your own job. I mean, who are
these Democrats really mad at? I mean, to me, that
seems like a damn good question. Who are they actually
mad at? Are they mad at Donald Trump? Or are
they mad because he's doing the job he's supposed to do.

(52:26):
You see, this is how the Democrats generally are, though.
You see, they like the laws being made the way
that they are. They really do, because if there is
no law, then they don't have any power. But when

(52:52):
there is a law, when they have the power and
authority in order to determine through metrics that they themselves
make up on who's going to be subject to said
law and how the punishment is going to be dealt out,
then they're they're more than happy to.

Speaker 4 (53:12):
Do that.

Speaker 2 (53:15):
Because then if somebody they don't like violates the law,
then they can throw the book at him. Otherwise, if
it's one of their you know, somebody in their protected class,
then they could just ignore the law and say, eh,
we're not going to do anything. Yeah. Biden mishandled classified information.

(53:38):
Yeah he you know, he did something he shouldn't have done. Yeah,
he's as guilty as sin. But you know, he's just
a crazy old man that he's not competent enough in
order to stay on trial. Yeah. Hillary Clinton, she's as
guilty as sin. Yeah, she did the things that she's
being accused of. Doing Yeah, we we found all kinds

(53:59):
of classes information onto hard drives, you know, the ones
that we were able to recover. But nobody in the
right mind would actually go after and prosecute Hillary Clinton. Yeah,
she broke the law. But you know, what were their
attitudes whenever they accused other people of doing the same thing.

(54:21):
What was their attitude whenever they were like, oh, we
found classified information at Trump's home, They threw the book
at him. They fabricated lies and information in order to
make him appear guilty. They broke the law to go
after President Trump. They went after a handful of other people,

(54:46):
fabricated stuff, made up lies to go after them. Whenever
the law didn't work in their favor, they had to
fabricate the law. They had to change the law and
then retroactively go after some for breaking the law even
though it wasn't even a crime whenever they did it.
But that's the playbook of the left, that's what they do.

(55:23):
This kind of goes hand in hand with this, uh
with this topic. Article from news article from Newsmax headline,
John Stewart calls Trump most socialist president of all time,
and of which case do I want? You know my
first question about this, and to me, it's a it's

(55:46):
a pretty obvious question. Does John Stewart know the definition
of a socialist? And yeah, I know this. This goes
hand in hand with talking about the democracy and capitalism thing,
but and it really does. It goes hand in hand

(56:06):
with that, with that conversation, but it also has to
do with the the no kings aspect, because you know,
did did President Trump enact wartime power in order to
force various companies to produce things that would have been
beneficial for fighting the covids? No, he didn't. He didn't

(56:28):
do that. Instead, he talked to these business owners and said, hey,
you know, we've got this pandemic going on, We're in
the early stages of it, and I could really use
your help. We need your assistance. Can I count on
you to take care of business? And their response was absolutely,

(56:53):
mister President, he didn't have to enact wartime powers to
accomplish this. He didn't have to act like a dictator
a penis potato. He didn't have to do that. He
didn't act like a penis potato. Whenever they were outright

(57:14):
angry that he didn't do it, they were asking him
to do it. There you go. And then there's this
headline from Real Clear Politics. Oh shit, I don't care,
get off of there anyway. Headline is Democrats exhibit amnesia

(57:39):
about Biden era a lawfair because yeah, you know, they
seem to forgive what they did in the past and
justify things they're doing now. Again, this is a playbook

(57:59):
of the left. They're counting on we the people not
having any memory whatsoever. And you know, it requires that
the American people are too stupid to do a Google search.
I mean, isn't that really what it amounts to. I mean,

(58:20):
they act like Google doesn't exist. They act like YouTube
isn't a thing, you know. They act like x as
just some weird hypothetical social media platform. That's what they
act like. They act like the American people are too
stupid to remember anything. Now. I mean, granted, I mean

(58:42):
you pay attention to how things have happened in the past,
and yeah, okay, I can see how they would have
that frame of mind. But the problem is it isn't
really working anymore. People's eyes are starting to open up.
They're starting to get a hint. They're starting to realize that, hey,
the Democrats don't have my best. They don't have what's

(59:04):
best for me in their thought process. Whenever they do
the things that they do best intentions in mind, they
don't have that. They want to complain about this, that,
and the other, all while they forget what they did

(59:28):
in the past. That's what it amounts to. Democrats have
amnesia over things. I heard a Chris Cuomo I told

(59:51):
you all about the other story from I think it
was last week sometime that he got into well not
last week. I mean, maybe it was a couple of
weeks ago. But he got indicted over some lying to Congress,
you know, perjury under oath, and his lawyer cooked up

(01:00:16):
an argument demanding that the case be thrown out under
the grounds of the prosecutor does not have the the
ability to bring forth such charges because he is, you know,
not a permanent appointee. And it's like, wait a second,

(01:00:43):
do these Democrats actually have amnesia? Because that wasn't an
argument that ever came out by mainstream media by the
legal team whenever Trump was being prosecuted and charges were
brought forth against him, whenever the special prosecutor was not

(01:01:05):
appointed by Congress, because Democrats didn't want to hear anything
about that then, And my question is this because I
don't I honestly, I don't think this argument even holds water,
because you know, it's it's an aspect of if nothing

(01:01:29):
they do, if it's a temporary appointment, if nothing they
do is right is acceptable, if they can't actually do
their job, then why does a temporary appointee? Why does
that position even exist? I mean, if that person can't
do anything, if there's going to be no legal recourse

(01:01:53):
for anything they do, if they can't actually enforce and
go after people for breaking the law, then why do
they have such an appointment in the first place. Their
entire argument does not hold water at all. Their entire
argument just it falls by the wayside. Anyway, We're gonna

(01:02:22):
go ahead and take a quick break. What do I
want to play this time? Let's go with let's do
this one? Why not? All right, just a few minutes
and I will be right back.

Speaker 7 (01:02:54):
Rolled into Monday. The engine just quick spend all now
week leaning under that good of it, knuckles orgusted, grease
stains on my jeans. The truck won't starting and mocks
my dreams. I checked the butts, I checked the plug,

(01:03:21):
prayed the song got in the motors guns a week's
worth of sweat. Nothing turns out right, this hunk of
jump stealing all my nights. So and something dumb. I
knew it inside, But the answer keeps running, and it

(01:03:41):
loves I had turned the keen. Nothing moves your sound.
The South got the heavy hearted broken down.

Speaker 4 (01:03:50):
Blue brought a buddy over, said he'd take a look.

Speaker 7 (01:04:05):
He shook his head side and cursed the book. We've
tried every trick under the sun, but we're losing this battle.
The truck is won.

Speaker 4 (01:04:19):
Treaming over always wat open Andy got him sucking my
heart just standing at trees, this driveway prison gotten out
there a proof care's bodies broken down. Oh it's something

(01:04:59):
dum doing inside answer side, No sound soon? Heavy?

Speaker 1 (01:05:42):
Do you love your occasional Mexican dish or your musical fruit?
Are you tired of walking by family members.

Speaker 2 (01:05:48):
And crop dusting them?

Speaker 1 (01:05:49):
Well, if this has ever happened to you, might I
introduce you to Tampon's brand butt plugs.

Speaker 2 (01:05:54):
Tampon's brand butt.

Speaker 1 (01:05:55):
Plugs is that particular type of butt plug that allows
you to walk in in confidence, knowing that you're not
going to accidentally crop Does somebody Tampa's brand butt plugs
now with the plastic applicator.

Speaker 2 (01:06:08):
Not just for women anymore, Tampa's brand butt plugs. No,
all right, and we are back. So we're going to
go ahead and dive right into it and get into
the next topic of conversation. We are talking the government
shut down. How long has the government shut down been
going on? I don't even know. I mean, we're I'm

(01:06:30):
pretty sure we're well passed three weeks. How long has
the government been shut down? Oh? That was stupid of me.
I don't know why I asked the question. I really
don't because all I had to do instead of typing
on the Googles, all I had to do is look

(01:06:52):
at the calendar. Is the twenty fourth of October has
been shut down for twenty four days. Shut down on
the first because the end of last month is whenever
the budget expired. We didn't have a new budget. The
government shut down on the first of October. And what's

(01:07:12):
funny is this? This is actually hilarious. This is funny.
I had to laugh because the answer to the question
that I got of how long has the government been
shut down? Says the US government has been shut down
since October first, making it currently twenty three days long

(01:07:33):
as of October twenty fourth, that's today, but this is
the twenty fourth day, not the twenty third day, because
it was shut down at midnight of October first, so
October one was the first day. Anyway, I forgot it

(01:07:58):
happens sometimes my brain don't mind, or my mind don't brain,
or whatever something like that. Anyway, let's go ahead and
get into it, because there's been some stuff that's kind
of been happening, and you know, it's yeah, things really

(01:08:23):
aren't looking good for the Democrats now. In times past,
because the Democrats had social media, because they had, you know,
all of the news organizations out there, or at least
the ones that most people went to, because they all
carried the water for the Democrat Party and was nothing

(01:08:44):
more than the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party. Then
they were really able to do virtually whatever they wanted
to spin it however they wanted to tell whatever they
wanted to about it, spend the lies there way, and
that's all people talked about because that was all the

(01:09:04):
information most people got. No. Granted, some Democrats still fall
under that same trap because they don't realize that there
there's a thing called Google out there and that you
can search things. The AI is out there, and you know,
the thing that the Democrats were afraid of is that
AI would start telling people the truth, which is why

(01:09:27):
they want to regulate it and force it not to
and force the uh you know, AI in order to
get only to get information from places that they wanted
to get information, so that this way they can control
the flow of information. That's what it a mouse to do.
But anyway, I digress. They they're not looking so good

(01:09:52):
in this So not that terribly long ago, now what
the uh? One? One of the first articles that I
that I got on this is actually from the New
York Times, And of which case I apologize because the
New York Times doesn't just let you read their articles.
They'll let you look at a headline, but that's about

(01:10:12):
the extent of it. Otherwise they want you to subscribe,
and of which case, why would I want to spend
money on it? Anyway? But this, however, this headline is
worth mentioning. Democrats block federal worker pay bill as shut
down drags on, it goes in here and I can

(01:10:32):
only read so much of this because that's all this
there oh, I got the hiccups. That's been Yeah, I
can't do that because then you can't even see it.
Here we go, let's do this one. I got the hiccups.
I apologize. A Republican measure that would pay essential government

(01:10:52):
employees faltered in the Senate, and the GOP blocked a
pair of Democratic bills to pay a broader swath of workers.
Senate Democrats on Thursday blocked legislation to pay federal and
there it cuts off. That's all. It'll let me read
because whenever I click on the article, well I have

(01:11:14):
to subscribe. I got to pay money in order to
read the article, and that just sucks. I ain't going
to do that. I ain't going to pay money to
read articles from people that are going to lie to
mean But anyway, I digress. Democrats blocked a bill that
would have funded different areas of government, you know, like

(01:11:39):
the military, allowing them to get paid in various other places.
But the Democrats blocked it because they wanted other things
to be paid, and of which case, they also wanted
like a trillion dollars to you know, be paid out
for health care, going to illegal aliens, and to pay

(01:12:00):
out more additional fraud and to pay out a bunch
of other things that would have done nothing more than
go into the coffers of the Democrat Party and Republicans said, no,
you're not. We're not doing this because we're in control,

(01:12:20):
not you. And this time, thankfully, the Democrats don't have
control over the flow of information. They don't have flat

(01:12:41):
out control over the narrative because there are way too
many places that you can get information. They don't have
a monopoly on it anymore, especially whenever Democrats come out
and say stupid stuff on interviews, saying things like, yeah,

(01:13:05):
we know it hurts, but this is the only thing
that we can do in order to get the things
that we want. And well, the GOP has and a
very good thing that they did this, but they came
out and made it public exactly, you know, bringing receipts,

(01:13:27):
exactly what the Democrats were fighting for. And these are
things that don't make the Democrats look good. That's what
this whole thing amounts to. They're fighting for fraud, they're
fighting for illegal aliens to get taxpayer funded medical care,
things that the American people on the whole don't want,

(01:13:50):
things that we don't want to be funding. We don't
want to be giving away our money whenever. We have
so many other things. Not to mention, what thirty eight
trillion dollars in debt. Why are we spending our money
on this? We need to pay down this debt we needed.
Our credit cards are maxed out. We need to do
something about it. Holy crap. When are they going to

(01:14:11):
wake up? And so far Democrats still have yet to
learn their lesson this headline from the Daily Signal. Yeah,
they've not learned their lesson. They're acting like they have
the power now. I'm gonna be honest with you. I

(01:14:36):
really did not think the shutdown was going to last
this long. I really didn't. I thought it would last,
you know, just under two weeks. That's what I was figuring,
because I figured the Republicans would do what the Republicans
have always done. I figured they would cave. I figured

(01:14:58):
the pressure would get to them. I figured that Democrats
would control the narrative and that would be all. She
wrote that there would be enough Republicans out there that
would agree with the Democrats give them the supermajority that
they need in order to pass this bill, you know,

(01:15:20):
any bills that they wanted, and that would be all
she wrote. That's what I figured. I mean, that's what
the Republicans usually do, so of course that's what I
thought they were going to do. I was wrong. It's
been twelve days twice, and according to what people say,
I mean, because there's a couple of different things I'm hearing.

(01:15:42):
I'm hearing that this shutdown could be over. Well, actually
I heard it could be over by the end of
the week, and that didn't actually end up happening, but
I heard that it would it would be over soon.
But I've also heard that this thing may end up
up dragging on because the Democrats don't seem like they

(01:16:05):
are backing down at all, and Republicans, or at least
there's enough of them so far that they aren't giving in,
and they're not backing down either, So at the moment,
we're kind of at a stalemate unfortunately fortunately. I guess

(01:16:26):
maybe it just depends on you know, how you look
at it. I guess, you know, so, yeah, the Democrats
aren't looking very good because they've basically flat said that
they know people are hurting because of this, they know

(01:16:46):
that this is having unintended consequences, but They've also said
during the same interview that they don't care. This is
leverage that they are going to exploit to make it
hurt as much as possible in hopes that the Republicans
will give in and give the Democrats what they want.

(01:17:07):
That's what it amounts to. They know this is hurting
American people, but they don't care because they have an
agenda and they're not going to stop. And what it
boils down to is pretty simple. They shut down the
government to make it hurt for the American people because,

(01:17:33):
among other things, and this one is a pretty big one,
they want to give taxpayer funded healthcare to illegal aliens,
people that are not supposed to be here in the
first place. And since we're talking about illegal aliens, there's
a perfect segue to this. Now, I've got a couple

(01:17:57):
different articles on here. One from Axios, went from CBS News.
It's it's talking about the same story, just putting it
in a couple different ways. Prescer launched his plan to
track federal forces. That one was from Axios. This one
from CBS News. Pritsker signs executive order to document unlawful

(01:18:22):
attacks by federal immigration enforcement agencies. Now here's the thing,
and I want to be clear with you on this one.
Going to this article from CBS News, Presker signs executive
order to document unlawful attacks by federal Immigration enforcement agents.
Here's the thing. These ICE agents, they're not violating the

(01:18:49):
law that they are subject to. They're not violating constitutional law.
They may be violating a local law, but if you
know anything about the supremacy clause that local law that
they pass to try to give themselves some type of

(01:19:12):
ability to arrest, go after, shut down legally what ICE
is doing, then well you don't quite understand the supremacy clause.
Because these governors and mayors that are operating in opposition

(01:19:35):
to federal immigration laws and are failing to support help
defend ICE and the execution of said federal law, then
they are in the wrong. JB. Pritzker is in the wrong.
He is violating federal law. He is aiding and abetting criminals.

(01:20:00):
I mean, let's be clear, let's be honest, because that's
what's going down. You can argue with me all day long,
but that does not change the fact JB. Pritzker, among
other governors, different mayors, they are violating federal law. They
are aiding in a betting criminal activity by allowing these

(01:20:26):
illegal aliens to stay in their jurisdiction. That is aiding
in a betting. No different than if you let a
criminal stay in your house knowingly and wilfully, you would
be arrested for aiding and a betting because you can't
do that. That in and among itself is a law.
It's a crime. You can't do that. You can get arrested,

(01:20:48):
and you can face jail. Sign it is what it is.
Like it or not, doesn't really matter. They're violating the law.
And I got a couple other things in here. One
of them is from just A News Appeals court allows
Trump to send National Guard to Portland, and of which case, yay,

(01:21:11):
I'm excited about that. But in the same article, or
maybe it was this one from PBS News that said
US appeals court says Trump can take command of Oregon
National Guard troops, though deployment blocked for now. Wait what

(01:21:35):
you know? This reminds me of you know, the whole
Dreamers and deceivers, the whole DAKA thing, you know, because
Obama during his administration said we're going to make DACA,
you know, the Whatever and Child Act I don't remember

(01:21:55):
what DACA stands for, it doesn't matter. Basically, it was
turning people into protected class so that this way the
law would not negatively affect them, and you know, they
could walk around the country free of not having any
risk of being deported. And that was an unconstitutional executive

(01:22:19):
order that President Obama wrote because his job, as I've
already said, is to enforce the law, faithfully execute the
you know what he supposed to do. That's what his
job is. And then Trump came in during his first
term and said, yeah, we're going to do away with that,

(01:22:42):
because all it takes to get rid of one executive
order is to write another one to say this executive
order is gone, its being deleted, is no longer in effect.
That's all it takes. That's why you use Congress whenever
you're going to change immigration law. The president has no
rights nor authority to unilaterally change immigration law. And the

(01:23:10):
courts interceded and said, yes, we know it was an
unlawful constitution or unlawful executive order that Obama made whenever
he wrote DACA. We know this, we're aware of this.
We know that you're doing the right thing. And overturning DACA. However,
we're not going to let you do it because we're

(01:23:31):
Democrats and party politics means more to us than the
constitution itself. So we're just we're going to step in
and we're not going to allow you to do that.
They acknowledged that an unconstitutional executive order cannot be overturned
by a president acting under his constitutional authority and enforcing

(01:23:53):
the law. This reminds me of that. Oh, you can
take you know, take command, take control of the organ
national Guard troops. However, we're not going to let you
do it. How does that make sense. Yeah, you have

(01:24:17):
the power, Yeah, you have the authority. Yeah, you're doing
the right thing. Yes, it's the constitutional right thing to do. Yes,
these people are violating immigration laws by not allowing you to,
you know, enforce the immigration law. However, we're not going
to let you do it. We're going to step in,
We're going to block you. Even though we acknowledge you're

(01:24:39):
doing the right thing. That doesn't really matter because it's
not the political thing that we want to do. And
people wonder why Democrats are losing face. People wonder why
they don't have the support of the American people. Anymore.

(01:25:00):
Don't make sense people, They just don't make sense. Anyway.
That's all I got for y'all today. That's is it.
Do me a great big favorite. Head on over to
stinkpickle dot com. That is s t I n k
p i k l e dot com. Pick yourself up
some merch That is the best way to support the channel. Anyway,
you'll have yourself for great one and I will see

(01:25:21):
you and the next one. This has been the ho
Host Show.

Speaker 1 (01:25:25):
For more information, you can head to the ho Host
Show dot com. And for the merchandise store, you can
head on over to Stinkpickle dot com. That is s
t I n K p I k l e dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:25:37):
Until next time, y