Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Once we do away with essence and nature, which again
transhumanism is part of this general posthuman anti human line
is that you get to redefine everything how you want.
And so as we're witnessing the death of Christendom, we're
witnessing the death of Western civilization, which is really a
spiritual death due to us moving away from God's intended
(00:21):
te los of creation.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
The natural law of the natural order.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
That this is all part of a Satanic agenda. And
(00:47):
so one of the first and central points of today's
stream is the metaphysical undercutting of Christianity through existentialism. So
we've talked a little bit about existentialism and John Paul
Sartre and some of the French intellectuals, and of course
his compatriate in some of their sexual fiascos, Simonde bevore.
(01:13):
She's going to be front and center in today's conversation
because what's central to their philosophical program is what they
refer to as existence precedes essence. So you guys are
higher IQ than the average bird, right, and so you
guys understand human nature, human essence. Things have essences, substance, natures,
(01:38):
and this is essential to our orthodox or just any
Christian understanding about humanity, because we can't have God incarnate
unless there's a God nature, a divine nature, divine essence.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
And we can't have the incarnation of God and.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
The sanctification of humanity and the redemption of us through
the Crucifixion, the resurrection and the ascension without human nature.
And so throughout Greek philosophy, throughout obviously Christian history, we
all sort of took the presupposition that there is essences, natures,
(02:13):
and substance in reality and that these precede existence.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
Right, And we've talked about theologically.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
With the logos and the logie and the divine principles
of creation as some of the Church fathers refer them to,
and so what happens with existentialism and just intellectually take
you on a little bit of a historical, intellectual historical journey.
Here is when we've I did a whole stream with Father, Deacon,
doctor and an iis on metaphysics.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
I think it was almost four hours.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
So if you're not familiar with metaphysics, you think I'm
talking about the book section in Barnes and Nobles that
tells you about crystals. We have a different understanding metaphysics
philosophically speaking, has to do with the discussions on the
nature of being, its being, and that's a very big
concept when you first hear about it talking about philosophy,
(03:05):
what we're talking about, what is being? That is really
what metaphysics was trying to on Earth. And we've talked
about before with some of the early Greeks thinking it
was water, it was air, it was fire. Then we
get the Plato talking about the divine forms, and certainly
as Christians were you can't categorize us as essentially Aristotilian
(03:26):
or Platonic. We disagree with different attributes of both of
those philosophical systems, and they're going to come up today.
But for Christians and Platonists in general, there are forms,
there are essences, There are natures that undergird our existence,
and this is tied with our understanding of being. This
is tied with metaphysics and how there is shid zoos
(03:49):
and wolves and pit bulls and all this different. But
there's dog nature. There's a category that pre exists the
dog itself, that connects chihuahuas and wolfs. There is a nature,
there's an essence there, and so in the metaphysical stream
that we did with Father Deacon Doctor and Nights, we
kind of talked about Renee de Karte and what really
(04:11):
becomes the continental and the analytic philosophical traditions. And this
is a split on some of the founding presuppositions of
how we obtain knowledge. And so when we get to
em Manual Kant and his critique of pure reason, what
he's doing is really calling into question much of the
metaphysical legacy of Western civilization. And Kant himself was Christian.
(04:35):
He kind of made an argument for God based on
his deontological ethical approach of ethics and morals. But what
he did is Renee to Cart begins his sort of
metaphysical his his idealism, his rationalism from the point that
he's a thinking entity. Right, so he doesn't know about
the external world. We can't know anything about external systems
(04:58):
or external reality, but he can know that he's a
thinking self. And then we have on the other side
Francis Bacon, who really is the sort of progenitor of
empiricism and the inductive method of science and all this
different stuff. Well, then Kant he undermines both these two
lines of philosophical inquiry by saying, well, is the exterior
(05:18):
world really totally knowable? And this is essentially the critique
of pure reason. We're not going to get in all
the details here, but what happens is philosophy has to
rethink its program on how it comes to knowledge claims.
And so you have what becomes the phenomenological methodology, which
turns into German idealism after Kant and leads into phenomenology
(05:41):
with hears Rol and Heidegger and obviously Sartra and he
then is part of a system that he develops called existentialism.
And this phenomenology is arguing that really we don't know
the exterior world. All we know is our subjective personal experience,
and therefore, why don't we begin philosoph with the study
(06:01):
of phenomenology, the study of phenomena as experienced, And this
where we get into intentionality and consciousness and really subjective forms.
And this is generally called continental philosophy. On the other end,
what's part of the Anglo American tradition is analytic philosophy,
and that comes out of nineteenth century British empiricism. So
(06:22):
in response to Kant, some of the British, the more
scientifically minded say, okay, maybe we don't know the exterior
world in and of itself, but what we can do
is use the scientific method and come as close as
we can to what is knowable. And this leads into
logical positivism and all this different stuff, which both ultimately
(06:43):
collapse in the twentieth century.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
Now do they really collapse.
Speaker 1 (06:46):
No, we're Christians. We believe that there's a telos, there's
an order to nature. You can use science, we can
know the exterior world. These are our essences in nature's
in creation. So we're part of this historical tradition that
through centuries of philosoph if he has essentially been undermined.
But once we get to the mid twentieth century with Sartre,
(07:06):
he posits a revolutionary statement that existence precedes essence. And
this is where Simon de Bevore, in her second Sex Book,
which was huge considered really the founding tome of modern feminism,
says that a woman is not born but a woman,
but one becomes a woman, right, so you're not born
(07:27):
a woman, you become a woman. Why is this significant, Well,
because they're arguing that a woman is not rooted in
some type of metaphysical essence or nature. But it's through
existential exercise of the will that you gain your essence,
you gain your identity. And this documentary that we're going
to be looking at today is really moving us through
(07:49):
the intellectual importance of these ideas and how once we
do away with essence and nature, which again transhumanism is
part of this general posthuman anti human line, is that
you get to redefine everything how you want. And the
existentialism of Sartra and Simonde before leads into the work
(08:11):
of somebody like Alfred Kinsey. And if you're not familiar
with Alfred Kinsey, you will be after today's stream. And
he was an absolute degenerate. He was the father of
what's referred to as sexology. And I am ashamed that
he taught at the University of or Indiana University here
in Bloomington, Indiana, and this is where he held his
(08:33):
sex department, in which he did atrocious things. And he
was a married man, and this was more of a
what's referred to as a beard, it's a covering. He
was actually a degenerate homosexual and pedophile. We can say that.
And a lot of the work that he did was
trying to normalize these sexual orientations, moving from a sort
(08:56):
of Freudian base, so that sex is a sort of
repressed cycle logical dimension, and that we in society need
to sort of normalize these abbarant forms of sexuality so
that people can become more free. And this is where
existentialism kind of doves tails into cultural Marxism, because when
we look at our our or our documentary today, they're
(09:19):
going to be talking about some of these Marxist roots. Now,
existentialism is not the same thing as critical theory. It's
not the same thing as cultural Marxism, even though in
the documentary those are going to be used kind of synonymously.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
But I put together a document that I again will.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
Be up on the website for all the website members
for five dollars a month, in which it really provides,
in a detailed overview of Simonde before John Paul Sartra,
what is existentialism, what is cultural Marxism or critical theory?
How do the things relate? And it really centers on
the oppression, right, So Marxism, as you understand Karl Marx,
(09:58):
the whole thing was about economic oppression, right, So the
bourgeoisie against the proletariat, the working class. Well, this structure
of power dynamics and looking at the oppress versus the oppressor.
This framework is essential because for existentialism and for the
gender agenda, which we're going to be trying to uncover
(10:20):
and discuss today, it is all about this idea that
they have to undermine, specifically Christianity, specifically the patriarchy, and
specifically the nuclear family, so that humanity can liberate itself
into a new orientation, a new man right because essence
is in nature and all this theological stuff is all
(10:42):
bunk for them.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
So this is really the.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Thrust of There's a lot of things that have led
to the collapse in the death of Christendom, but we're
witnessing it and at the same time we're witnessing its revival.
As I said, multiple streams you know, die or shared
an article it's probably now about three weeks ago or
so on X highlighting that Orthodox Christianity in America has
moved from like seven hundred thousand to about seven million.
(11:07):
That's a phenomenal increase just since twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
That's in the four years.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
And so as we're witnessing the death of Christendom, witnessing
the death of Western civilization, which is really a spiritual
death due to us moving away from God's intended t
los of creation, the natural law, the natural order. That
this is all part of a Satanic agenda, and it's
ultimately led and fueled by a sort of sexual revolution
(11:34):
that re understands and reforms anthropology as an entity that
exists on a Darwinian evolutionary spectrum. And therefore you have
no nature, you have no essence. You currently reside in
your historical contexts, your evolutionary context But we can then
change these things, and that's what is the gender agenda.
(11:55):
It ultimately is demonic It ultimately is a trick by
the devil, and the nucular family is front and center
of the attack. And we've already seen this stuff the
Democrats within obviously, you guys know that the election is
November fifth. You can't get away from it in American
culture right now. But the recent ads by the Democrats
(12:16):
is a guy masturbating in bed talking about how they
want to take away your pornography, him sleeping with the
white of course, it's a white male, a white male
and a white female are having intercourse premarital intercourse, she claimed,
he claims the condom broke, and then the Democrat ad
is about plan be an abortion so that they don't
have children. And you may think that these are sort
(12:39):
of just modern sentiments, that these things are just you know,
not as pernicious as maybe I'm going to make them
to be, but they really are. And the whole point,
as what the documentary is going to uncover today, is
that this is all rooted in a deep, deep hatred
for Christianity and Christian metaphysics and the legacy of Christianity
(13:03):
and its normalization of societal structure.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
And the nuclear family.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
And so what we're discussing, as I said, is a
flip on Christian metaphysics, and that it's ultimately a sexual
revolution against the Mother of God. Because when you when
we listen to Simonde, before we listened to Sartre, we
listened to Alfred Kinsey, which we're going to see today,
what is that one of the common denominators of all
(13:28):
them is that they hate everything that the Mother of
God are, theotokos and bodies, purity, piety, virginity, chastity, and
of course family. So we look at the modern woman
and we see the only fans.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
We see the biggest thing.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
That women want to vote for in America right now,
typically single women, is for their reproductive rights.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
But what rights? These aren't rights, because what are you know?
This is something that Andrew Wisdom has.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Talked about, but they used the rhetoric of rights, and
it's not about reproduction. It's about the lack of reproduction
because again, there is no human nature, there is no
ontology to who you are, and so the unique qualities
of women, their sexuality, their ability to give birth, their
ability to be caretakers and mothers and stewards of life,
(14:22):
these things are annihilated in the face of the gender agenda,
and so we can see the demonizing of motherhood, the
demonizing of marriage. I recently just saw that Time magazine,
which we're going to see, was a major promoter of
Alfred Kinsey's pedophilic research where they would literally masturbate children
(14:43):
at like five months old. They were doing this in
a laboratory. They were masturbating children. And we're going to
find in the documentary one example of a girl who
was being molested by her father and Alfred Kinsey was
paying him for the research on how quickly she could
orgasm as a child, as like an eight year old girl.
This is the type of stuff that Alfred Kinsey was
involved with. And so Time magazine just posted at least
(15:08):
I saw an X. The front cover of it was
about how true freedom is not having children, and it
shows two white well a white couple, a white male
and a white female laying on the beach, childless, enjoying
their lives, enjoying the fruits of what consumerism, materialism, which
is going to be a feature that roots existentialism and
(15:28):
cultural Marxism together. And so it's undermining and there's specific
about it, especially when they start talking about these feminist
meetings they had in the mid twentieth century, that they
have to undermine the Christian patriarchy, and the way that
they want to undermine the patriarchy is through the nuclear family.
They literally state this that the ways in which you
(15:49):
take away man's collective power in society is to take
away his importance within the family. So we see the
attack on fatherhood, we see the no fault divorce in
America and really Western civilization. This isn't by accident. These
people are infiltrating institutions. This is part of the Graham sheet.
(16:11):
Marxist method is that you infiltrate so that you can
coordinate and then maneuver the institutions to fit your ideology.
And that's exactly what's occurring. And so this is literally
rooted in a spiritual war against God's creation. That's the
whole intensive purpose here. And we can see the archetype
(16:32):
of Baphomet right, the half animal, half man, half male,
half female.
Speaker 2 (16:39):
This is part of.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
Both Simone Before and John Paul Sartre and Alfred Kinsey.
Speaker 2 (16:45):
They're all pro.
Speaker 1 (16:46):
For minor attracted persons, beast reality. Simonde Before even made
the point that there's nothing wrong with beastiality because man himself,
collective entity with no essence, is only an animal. And
therefore they make film philosophical arguments in their radical feminists
existentialist school that really there's nothing wrong with having sex
(17:09):
with animals everything. Again that's an opposition to our tradition.
But we can see something of the archetype of the Baphomet,
the Jezebel, the Harlot, the Lilith figure that this is
the attack and the way that the evil one is
going at man is really the attack on women.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
And so we've talked about this before.
Speaker 1 (17:30):
Obviously, the pornography, the sexual gratification through social media. The
only fans these girls making millions of dollars a month
by selling themselves online.
Speaker 2 (17:40):
This is a selling of your soul. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
That's what we all do when we're committing these sins
over and over and over again. But we're living in
a time in which these people in the early twentieth
century literally said the only way that they can destroy
the Christian patriarchy of America, which really just symbolic of
the whole West world, is by promoting sexual promiscuity, premarital sex, homosexuality,
(18:08):
and abbarant forms of sexual expression. That by doing this
the women will follow suit, which we've seen obviously has
played that course out.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
The men will be led, especially.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
In a world with no meaning, a world with no
orientation through the Church, a culture that's divorced from God,
that the men will then follow their sexual desires. And
this really is my argument here, is that culture, what
we're witnessing the Western world really is a sexual magic.
Ritual sex magic is happening in our face. Whether it
(18:41):
be we talked about the symbolism of the lady got
gods and the Beyonces and all these pop stars in
the world right, But the whole thing is about inflaming sexuality,
getting women to create their identities based off their sex,
and getting men to be so lustful and gluttonous that
they will fall into this magical self destruction of our
(19:03):
own societies, our own communities, and our own families through
sex and sex is according to Freud and according to
Alfred Kinzie, sex is this sort of ultimate energy that's
butting up within men and women and for them has
to be released from the oppressive confines of Christian morality.
But really, for what I'm arguing, and the documentary makes
(19:25):
a point of how Aleister Crowley and various people working
in the occult were part and parcel of this movement
because it is a magical ritual of us getting to
destroy ourselves, because sin is death. It quite literally is
when we sin, we are dissipating the uncreate energies of God,
and we literally are killing ourselves. And when we look
(19:47):
at Western civilization, the whole thing is self destructive. The
whole thing is about killing itself, whether it be look
at whatever you want, could be the food, look at
the medicine, big pharma, look at the military industrial complex,
look at the economy and the US dollar. Everything is
self destructive, everything is inverted. And the inversion of God,
(20:11):
the inversion of justice, and the inversion of morality is
one of the things that is going to be mentioned
this documentary that is explicitly part of Satanism and part
of their agenda.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
And so.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
This is all a blurring of distinction, This is all
blurring of boundaries. And this is why metaphysics really is
the central battleground of how Christendom is being deconstructed and
is dying before our eyes, and it takes men and
women to fight against it by getting buried, having families
(20:45):
and living Christian values. And that is a generative effect.
Right when we talk about generation and generosity in the
Book of Genesis, it all relates to creation, It all
relates to something growing. And ironically, the gender agenda, we
see that that prefix that point that all these words
(21:09):
connect to, that gender is being weaponized and verted and
is literally leading to the death of people through the
gender of gender. It has nothing to do with pro
creative processes, it has nothing to do with the promotion
of life. It is literally satanic and that's what we're
going to be talking about today, so smash that. Like, guys,
(21:30):
I want to show you a little bit of my
document before we get going here, and then we're going
to be watching the rest of this documentary called a
Wolf's in Sheep Clothing the gender Agenda, and it's again
a Catholic documentary, but it is very good and well
done when it even brings up the kof We may
have to skip a few sections of the documentary, but
(21:52):
here's the document that I put together, and we're not
going to read the whole thing. This will be up
with the website again for members for five dollars a month.
So if you want access to this, please go to
my website become a website member. It's five dollars a month.
Here's the link right here, and i'll promote that in
just a second. But this kind of gives an overview
of the philosophies of Simonde Bevoor and John Paul Sartre
(22:14):
the key tenets of existentialism. Existentialism is a philosophy focused
on individuals experience of freedom, choice and responsibility, right, which
is there couching in this agent again, that's why existentialism
is actually subversive, not that we don't have free will
and liberty and choice, and not, of course we believe that,
but that's part of our amago day, that's part of
(22:35):
being made in the image of God. For these people,
this is a way in which they can talk about
any sort of moral confine, any moral restriction our society
places on them as something that needs to be liberated from.
So it emerged in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries primarily
through thinkers like Kureker, Guard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and then later
(22:56):
John Paul Sartra and Simone Bevoor. Is deeply concerned with
the subjective nature of human experience and the challenges individual
face and creating meaning in a world without inherent purpose.
Existence precedes essence. We just highlighted that this is a
central metaphysical doctrine of existentialism, and you could point out
(23:17):
Marxism anything that is based in the sort of relativity.
In this new anthropology posits that there is no essence,
there is no nature, there is no substance to the world,
and that existence is a chaotic expression of biology and matter,
and therefore essence is something that we create. There is
no essence, radical freedom and responsibility, alienation and authenticity, absurdity,
(23:42):
in search of meaning, death, infinitude. And then here's Marxist
cultural theory how those things relate. And then these are
the points in which they really come together, freedom and alienation,
authenticity and class consciousness, critique of bourgeois culture, which really
was a critique of crit morality, the role of culture,
(24:02):
and then revolutionary potential. And so the existentialist Marxism and
critical theory have a little bit of an overview.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Here.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Here's a little bit about how again, the gender agenda
plays into Sartra and Simone de Bevoor's work. So homosexuality.
De Bevore and Sartra's perspectives on homosexuality aligned with their
existential belief and freedom and individual choice. De Bevore herself
experienced relationship with both men and women, advocating for the
(24:31):
legitimacy of same sex relationships at a time when such
topics were largely taboo. Sartra, why he did not focus
on homosexuality specifically, viewed all sexual relationships as part of
an individual's right to express their freedom and autonomy unconstrained
by societal norms. These views, especially Bivar's encouragement of same
(24:51):
sex relationships as an expression of personal identity.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
I e.
Speaker 1 (24:55):
Again, this sexual magical ritual is getting people to to
create their identity to through their sexual proclivities. Right We've
talked about how trans identity, furry identity, homosexuality minor attractive persons.
That what's happening in our culture right now. The gender
agenda is getting people to identify who they are, their
(25:19):
quote unquote the essence of who they are, divorced from
being made in the image of God, but tied with
their sexual proclivities. And this was at the core of
what their goal was. And so same sexual relation as
expression of personal identity and freedom are at odds with
traditional Christian teachings, with few homosexualities, incompatible with biblical teachings
(25:41):
on sexuality and marriage, what about pedos and bestiality and
a controversial light to Bevore and Sartra's legacy is complicated
by their permissive attitudes towards certain practices that are broadly
condemned in society. Oh really, what are those? In the
nineteen seventies, they were among a group of French and
intellectuals who signed petitions calling for the decriminalization of certain
(26:05):
sexual behaviors petos, including with miners, under the assertion that
such laws restricted personal freedom and we're repressed. If you
see how the game works here, anything that butts up
against this degeneracy is viewed as oppressive. Therefore they're the oppressed,
and the oppressed soor the Christian hegemony of our culture
(26:27):
that needs to be deconstructed. This has been widely criticized,
with many arguing that it contradicts contemporary values around consent
and the protection of vulnerable individuals. From a Christian perspective,
these permissive views stand in opposition to the sanctity of
the person and the concept of moral responsibility, as Christian
ethics hold that sexual activity should respect the dignity and
(26:52):
well being of all individuals, particularly minors within the context
of marriage.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
I should have added that. And then here's my little.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Discussion on existence seeds essence and why that is so
important and how it contrasts with Christian metaphysics. Again, this
whole document will be up at my website for anybody
who's interested, so smash that like and if you want
to get access to all these notes that I've been
creating they're up at my website for five dollars a month.
Speaker 2 (27:16):
So a few of them.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
Is the origin of meaning and purpose, human freedom and responsibility.
What is freedom? Freedom is our free will to align
with God's will, essence of human nature, ethic, some morality,
view of the soul. These are a few things that
are at odds. And then I have a little overview
of the sexologist Alfred Kinsey, a total total degenerate that
(27:40):
was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, if you're not aware,
of course, was backed by the Huxley brothers, the Eugenesis
and them being Fabian socialists, all that different stuff. And
so Kinsey's work, Who's going to be a very prominent
feature in today's video. It comes out of the positivism
(28:03):
and empiricism. So Kinsey approached sex from a strictly empirical standpoint,
although really it was a cover for his own degeneracy
and that he could probably participate in these things. He
forged his evidence. So like one of the things on
his work right here, sexual behavior in the Human Male
(28:23):
in nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Again, this is.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
Right after World War two, guys, this is very early
before the counterculture and all that different stuff in the sixties,
although it was the catalyst for it. This is again
an underdiscussed dimention of the trans fiasco and the gender
agenda and these LGBTQ movement within our current society. But
(28:47):
Kenzy basically got like three hundred people from prisons that
already were like sexual devians to do his research on.
So the pool of which he built his entire work
on how homice sexuality was natural, and that people had
these repressed sexual feelings for children and all this different stuff,
and that children can have orgasms as early as five
(29:08):
months old. This is what he was doing in his laboratory,
and he was choosing a pool, a sample pool of
participants for his research that were already sexual psychopaths in
many different ways. So all his books, the evidence that
even he produces is called into question because he forged
the numbers and he created all this different stuff. So
(29:32):
it comes out of empiricism, sexual as empirically studied, right,
And then it's tied with Freudian theory. So while Kinsey
wasn't strictly a Freudian, his parallels freud because of its
emphasis on sexuality as a fundamental aspect of human life
and personality. Freud's theories of repressed sexuality and the importance
(29:52):
of understanding the unconscious may have provided I mean it did.
Being generous here Kinsey with a Phyllis offul framework for
destigmatizing and normalizing diverse sexual expressions. And then of course
social dorminism and the concept of natural behavior. Kinsy viewed
sexual behaviors as natural biological impulses. This is again, existence
(30:15):
precedes essence. This is the message today. If you can
take anything away from this stream, remember that these people
believe that existence precedes essence, which is totally contrary to
our Christian metaphysics. And so they are free from inherent
moral constraints. Because there is no nature, there is no
objective moral law. His research aimed to demonstrate that many
(30:37):
sexual behaviors considered taboo were actually natural and part of
a broad spectrum of human sexual diversity, similar to variations
found in other species. Yeah, and so the controversial aspects
of his research. The date on sexual experiences of children
so like in Table thirty four and sexual Behavior of
(30:58):
the male details data on the sexual experiences of children,
including infants. The table includes information about children as young
as five months old. As I said, documenting their reactions
to various sexual stimuli, meaning in a laboratory setting. These people,
in the name of science, masturbated five year old children
(31:20):
or five month old children. Absolutely horrendous and heinous, and
so guys,