Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hey, this is avert producer of the Scalpel with Doctor
Keith Rose. A new week, a new visit with Blake
Farenthald on The Blake Farenthalt Show, former South Texas congressman
who does a radio show, and when he and doctor
Rose get together, they usually discuss things that are current
(00:24):
in the news, things that people are talking about. This
time around, we discuss a little bit about the corruption
within the US intelligence community. You know, one of the
things that has led to all the concealment of the
Epstein files. Why don't we know what's going on? What
(00:48):
is happening with people? There are people dying? Yeah, nothing
to see here. Blake and doctor Rose also discuss human
trafficking corruption within the Trump administration. Doesn't seem like those
two phrases fit together, corruption and Trump administration, but there's well,
(01:08):
there's corruption everywhere. It's got to be rooted out, and
with the leadership of Donald Trump and the people he's
putting in important positions, hopefully that'll happen. So glad you're here.
This is going to be at least two parts, So
part one today and we'll bring you more in the next.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
Couple of days. The next couple of episodes.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
You can listen to this and every episode of The
Scalpel and its entirety at scalpel edge dot com and
visit scalpel edge dot com slash brick house. When you
want to feel better, you want to be healthier, all
they got the stuff to help you do it, and
you'll find the link in the show notes. Any purchase
(01:53):
you make there helps us out here at the Scalpel.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
Just a little bit, Let's go.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
The Scalpel with doctor Keith Rose, cutting down to the
truth through history and experience. Subscribe to the Scalpel wherever
you listen to podcasts, follow us on Instagram at the
Scalpel podcast, on x at the scalpel Edge, or the
website scalpeledge dot com. The next episode of The Scalpel
(02:23):
starts now.
Speaker 4 (02:27):
Charlie is He's not an influencer. He is much more
than that. He is a young man that is living
the American dream and showing others how to get there.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
He is someone that believes in truth.
Speaker 4 (02:42):
He believes in the United States and the goodness of
the United States when it's based on Judeo Christian principles.
He's someone that's speaking out against corruption and government.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
I saw some.
Speaker 5 (02:54):
Clips of him at Texas Fan and he owned several people.
Speaker 4 (03:00):
Was it was, I don't know if you've seen that
one clip about Charlie, and I would encourage your audience
to go and look at it. But a lot of
these people that go up and disagree with Charlie are
literally fed talking points. And this one girl got up
and she was going, I know you're not gonna let
me speak, Please quit interrupting me. You always talk over
(03:23):
me when I speak. She's saying this, Charlie hasn't said
a word yet, She's literally reading her talking points, and
he's not. He's just he's just making this expression like
you know what he next, next?
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Next?
Speaker 4 (03:37):
I mean, the thing is this they don't have original thought.
And part of it is the subversion that Ury Besmanoff,
the former KGB agent in the eighties who defected to
the Canada, talked about is it takes a generation of
indoctrination of people to subvert a culture and a nation.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
And what they calls a demoralization.
Speaker 4 (04:02):
You you basically take teachers and teach very divisive propaganda,
very divisive ideology.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
I don't know, like.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
Put alphabets against each other, LBG, t Q, R S,
t U, v w x y Z group against everyone else.
Tell people that, you know, if you're black, you've been oppressed.
Tell people it's all about the division. You know, they
should be teaching reading, writing, arithmetic, and mathematic division. Instead
(04:34):
we have a mainstream teaching group of Yeah, I.
Speaker 5 (04:40):
Think there needs to be some history taught, because if
you don't learn from history, you're damned or repeated. But
our revision is history is worse than no history.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
Oh it is. It's one, it's lives.
Speaker 4 (04:53):
It's not truth, it's it's designed again to cause de
If if you're teaching something to young minds and the
whole goal of your teaching is to divide your classroom
into ideal into an ideological spectrum.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
You're not doing it correctly.
Speaker 5 (05:14):
Well, I mean that's the way the Democrats have been
running the country.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
For as long as I can remember.
Speaker 6 (05:21):
You divide people into groups based on you pick it, ethnicity, lb, TQ,
whatever whatever.
Speaker 7 (05:31):
And yeah, you you divide them into groups, and then
you pander to each individual group.
Speaker 4 (05:39):
And let me let me say this, what you choose
to do with your life as an adult is you're
you're right and I'm not. I'm not making fun of it.
I'm not making a judgment on it. What I am
saying is that when you have educators from elementary school,
junior high, high school, in college that take up the
(06:03):
banner of a quote aggrieved small interest group.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
And use it to.
Speaker 4 (06:11):
Divide people along an ideological spectrum, you're no longer teaching.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
You're no longer educating.
Speaker 4 (06:20):
What you're doing is you're indoctrinating and creating the conditions
for people to have unrest and division. You know, the
job of school should be reading, writing, and arithmetic, history.
You should come away with the STEM skill, the STEM classes,
and the skill sets that you need.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
Today.
Speaker 4 (06:42):
I mean, they're putting pride flags over American flags. No
flags should be over the American flag, and they're saying
that America was never great, nor was she good. Well,
they can say anything they want, but history shows us different.
Just go read Alec Detefield's Democracy in America that he
wrote when we visited this nation. I mean, we have
(07:03):
good historical evidence of a country that is not perfect,
but as course corrected over its arc of history. And
I think that our teachers do an injustice to the students,
an injustice to the parents and injustice to themselves by
being lined up with an aggrieved organization over the fact
(07:25):
that they have the opportunity and they have the honor
or the responsibility of.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
Teaching young people. I mean, Blake. When I was in.
Speaker 4 (07:39):
Grade school, I went to public I'm a product of
public school. I went to public school all during you know,
elementary school, junior high, and high school. In elementary school,
my parents would have my teachers over for dinner just
to get to know them. I still remember the names
of my elementary school teachers. I remember the names of
my coaches. I remember the names of the teachers influence me,
(08:01):
and I will tell you, looking back, a lot of
them would have a liberal ideology. But you know what
they taught me. They taught me history, true history. They
taught me math, they taught me English, they taught me
all the classes that I had, and they gave me
an appreciation for living in this country. And people in
my generation I believe, have that appreciation. And I think
(08:24):
because of the work Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA
is doing, the people of the new generations are coming up, going, Hey,
I want.
Speaker 7 (08:33):
That Scott text in Charlie is spreading the good word
and educating the uneducated people trying to challenge the unchallengeable
with him in judge rather than ration or rationalizing the truth.
Love the guy. Thinking is difficult. That's why most people judge.
(08:55):
That's a carl Jung quote.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
I can make a comment on that. Charlie was on
Bill Maher's podcast.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
He's been on.
Speaker 4 (09:05):
He was on Gavin Newsom's podcast, and Charlie is truly
a brilliant young man. But he had a conversation with
both of them. He looked for common ground in a
very realistic way without giving up any of his principles,
which are solid. And what we need in this nation
(09:26):
is not more division. We need more conversations, but conversations
around the truth.
Speaker 7 (09:33):
And when you start a conversation in division, you don't
get anywhere.
Speaker 4 (09:38):
No, or when you start a conversation in a lie.
It's interesting, Blake. This nation was founded on Judeo Christian
principles and in the New Testament and the Bible, the
word for truth is a lithia in the Greek, which
means reality.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
Think about that. Yeah, truth is not.
Speaker 7 (10:01):
An individual's belief. If you if if you're a biological male,
and you say you're a female. That's not the truth.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
No, I mean, well it's and people have and again
the left has counterfeited and co opted the language, so
it's no longer truth.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
It's my truth.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
This is my truth, you know, people's my truth is
I'm a dog or I'm a cat. I mean, if
I went by what my child thought he was when
he was younger, my son would have been Thomas to
train and I would have to turn him into a
train engine.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
It's it's it's it's ridiculous.
Speaker 7 (10:40):
I had a employee whose son, uh, I guess he
was four or.
Speaker 5 (10:47):
Five years old.
Speaker 7 (10:49):
She'd bring him to work from time to time when
her daycare failed, and he thought he was a cat,
and he'd crawl around under people's desks.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Knock yourself out, kid.
Speaker 4 (10:59):
Well, the thing is this, when children are young, they're
you know, they're still.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
Their minds are developing.
Speaker 4 (11:07):
In fact, the mind is still developing to you're twenty
five years old.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
And what the liberals have found is they.
Speaker 4 (11:13):
Go in and they attack the family at the earliest
point they can, in grade school.
Speaker 2 (11:21):
They'll get them as early as possible.
Speaker 4 (11:23):
And the overall goal of this Marxist ideology, and that's
what it is. Basically, this Gramsyan ideology is to drive
the father out of the home, destroy the family unit,
and then it's easy to control people. If you look
at silent weapons for Quiet Wars. It was a document
(11:48):
and you can google it and your audience can't go
out and look at it. It was found inadvertently when
someone bought a Xerox copier, one of those big Xerox
copiers out of government surplus sale and it was still
in the copier and it made its way to the Internet,
and it shows that there was a group inside the
government working to subvert the government. And it talks about
(12:09):
the family or people being basically units of commerce, and
it talked about driving the father out of the home
because you can't have any cohesive ideological stance in Marxism, socialism,
communism if there is a strong father in the home.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
And it makes sense. Back again, I'm going to go
back to the Bible.
Speaker 4 (12:33):
In the Old Testament, in Hebrew, the word father means restrainer.
And this is even more interesting. Break you know what
the word for anger is in Paleo Hebrew. It's a
picture of where is the father? And so the father
is so important. Mother means nurturer. Fear is a picture
(12:55):
of where is the mother. And so the design of
the family is father the restrainer, mother the nurturer, and
they develop their children and good kids aren't an accident.
Now you can be great parents and still have kids
that have free will, but at the same time a
strong family unit. And this is in all the treatise
(13:17):
of communism, Marxism, socialism, they talk about you have to
get the father out of the family. You have to
indoctrinate the children as early as possible, because they have
to look at the state as God and not God.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
It we're creating a welfare system and I don't know
if it was well intended to help single moms or
if it was a vicious communist boy, but to this
day you're financially better off as a single mom.
Speaker 7 (13:45):
Than you are.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
I think it was intentional.
Speaker 4 (13:47):
I mean, look at we have a system that rewards
single mothers.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
Now should we support single mothers, but welfare.
Speaker 4 (14:01):
Social services should be a stepping stone to getting off
social services. We should not have generational welfare. But you
know what generational welfare produces Democrat politicians.
Speaker 7 (14:18):
No, I was.
Speaker 5 (14:20):
I think I've told you this story before, Keith. I
was in a stairwell talking to one of my Democrat
colleagues when I was in Congress, and he was talking
about this government program and how successful it was because
of how many people.
Speaker 7 (14:36):
Were on it, and then it was growing, and I said,
shouldn't the metric be that it's shrinking? Would be the
good thing unless people needed the government assistance program. But
it's just a complete mindset difference.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
Well, it's a mindset difference, but it also is what
this This is a nice window into what the two
parties overall look at as their goals and ambitions. Democrats
look at government as an efficient government is a government
(15:16):
that grows at an exponential rate, creates problems that can't
be solved, to throw more money at the unsolvable program.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
The more you have programs that.
Speaker 4 (15:27):
Don't work, the larger the money you can allocate for
the program to work.
Speaker 2 (15:33):
The larger government grows.
Speaker 4 (15:34):
And you would say, well, that's kind of the antithesis
of what our founders wanted.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Well, of course it is.
Speaker 4 (15:39):
But again it goes back to virtue that the founders
wrote about. If you don't have virtue and you're not
taking office to make the nation better, then you're only
taking office for one thing, and that's to make your
life better. And look, I was working in the White
House in twenty seventeen, you were still in Congress. I
believe I remember seeing you in Washington, DC, and I'm
(16:03):
never and you were great. But I've never seen so
many politicians talk out of both sides of their mouths.
And they go to they go to Congress, most of them, unfortunately,
are a lot of them. They go for the right reasons,
that's great, but as soon as they get there, they're
completely in the intelligence world. We call it mushroomed, and
that's put in the dark and fed poop, and they're
(16:24):
told who they're going to have for their chief of staff.
That chief of staff becomes the managing agent of that congressman.
He tells them, well, you need to hire this person,
you need to hire that person, and you want to
get anything done, you have to do this, and we're
going to put you on this committee, but we need.
Speaker 2 (16:38):
You to vote.
Speaker 4 (16:38):
And pretty soon the guy's up there and he's schizophrenic.
He doesn't have any identity to his district. He has
an allegiance to a new club, and the American people
aren't in that club.
Speaker 5 (16:52):
And believe me, they like the whining and dining they
get from the lobbyists.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
And yeah, they they liked the stroking they get from
the different lobbyists.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
And it's become k Street is not a great place.
Speaker 3 (17:11):
Now.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
I'm sure there's a place for lobbying for certain things,
but again without virtue and morality. When you become unhinged
from morality, then you're no longer lobbying for the greater good.
You're lobbying for the bottom line, and the bottom line
may not be aligned with the greater good of the nation.
(17:34):
And a lot of people say, well, we don't care
because it's about money. I mean, look at Ukraine. Look
at the money that's gone out there early on.
Speaker 7 (17:40):
Weren't you a supporter of the US involvement in Ukraine.
Speaker 2 (17:46):
The next this time around, not at all, Not at all.
Speaker 4 (17:50):
When we when we said we're going into Ukraine, I
thought it was crazy because.
Speaker 5 (17:55):
I mean, we basically let them have CRIMEA.
Speaker 4 (17:58):
Okay, they had CRIMEA back when Obama was there. Okay,
that was the time we should have gotten in and
if we were going to do anything. But here's the
thing blake again, You're not getting accurate information. The majority
of people in Crimeria Crimea are ethnic Russians. The Crimea
is where Russian has a sub base on the black seat.
(18:21):
They're not going to give it up, So that is
what it is. More importantly, you should be looking at
yourself and saying, why did Ukraine.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
As soon as.
Speaker 4 (18:30):
Afghanistan fell, Ukrainian flags started popping out in social media.
Congress started waving Ukrainian flags. I mean, let me tell
you what Commongress was waving Instead of Ukrainian flags, they
were waving flags that said give me money, because we
have given hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine, and
I'm going to put to you that it hasn't all
(18:52):
gone to Ukraine. Ukraine is the Swiss Army knife of
money laundering for different groups. Ukraine is the birthplace of
a lot of color revolutions. It's where people are trained.
You have the Azov Brigade, which is a neo Nazi
group in Ukraine that, from the reporting that I'm getting,
(19:16):
has been armed and used by Zelensky to attack his
own people. This is breaking news for you to blame Russia.
And they were using Russian arms procured from Venezuela and
other places that are that don't align with the US,
(19:40):
and they're being sent to Ukraine to arm certain neo
Nazi group to attack Ukrainian targets to continue this fight. Now,
Zelensky's not a serious person. This guy is a clown.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
This was a comedian.
Speaker 4 (19:57):
Before he was a comedian, he was a dancer. He
was anything but a serious politician. He's an actor and
he's acting. He was stood up in Ukraine for a reason. Again,
if I was running an operation, I would have to
(20:17):
have the president as a quote controlled asset, someone that
I could control and who would do the dictates that
I wanted to. Look, Ukraine is not aligned with American interests.
People are like, well, we're degrading Russia.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
Look in Russia.
Speaker 4 (20:33):
If we were serious about degrading Russia, we could do
it on the world stage. Economically, we're not serious about
any of that. Alls we're doing is we're losing. It's
a humanitarian it's a true humanitarian crisis. We're losing generations
of Ukrainian youth where Russia is losing their young men.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
And it is truly a war.
Speaker 4 (20:58):
That I believe is being funded so that the funds
can be moved to other places. There is nothing good
about this, and we should not be supporting Ukraine. And
the fact that Biden was so pro Ukraine should tell
you everything. And that's not an ideological difference, that's just understand.
Speaker 5 (21:17):
I mean, if the numbers, a lot of money from
the Ukraine came back into the vital Biden family, it.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
Came into the Biden family.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
I think what you will see over time, this is
my supposition, but what I think you're going to find
out over time is that money that was sent to
Ukraine and supplies that were sent to Ukraine will find
their way back in to the cartels, to nefarious groups
in South America, and possibly to groups that don't have
(21:51):
the US best interest at heart, funneling back into the
United States. I mean, Ukraine has been an utter disaster
and it was a war that we were.
Speaker 2 (22:01):
Told had to be fought.
Speaker 4 (22:03):
Anytime politicians who've never served line up and tell me
to fight in a war, I have questions. And then
you have politicians that have served that are beholding to
the large military industrial complex. So I think that these
are alternative motives designed to build the American taxpayer, and
(22:24):
that's a problem. You have to look at nothing happens
without what Blake money.
Speaker 7 (22:30):
Yep, And what's going to happen. What would happen to
all of.
Speaker 5 (22:34):
These military contractors if we were at peace.
Speaker 4 (22:40):
I mean, it's been a long time, right and then
what's what's the strategic goal of Ukraine? I mean, I
remember back last year when the communication lines were cut
to Finland and we blamed the Russians.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
I don't think that happened that way.
Speaker 4 (22:57):
I remember when the pipeline, the gas pipeline, the Russian
pipeline was blown.
Speaker 2 (23:01):
Up, and I think we might have been involved in that.
We're doing things that are.
Speaker 4 (23:09):
Not in the best interests of the United States of America,
but they are in the best interest of the United
conglomerate of military contractors. They are in the best interest
of politicians that are using Ukraine to launder money and Blake,
I go back to what I said it's last week
on your show. We have to look at root cause
of the problems that we're seeing, the problems that President Trump,
(23:32):
the overwhelmingly popular elected president of the United States, President
Trump is being undermined by the intelligence community writ large
and the way they do that is they spread him
thin on issues both foreign and domestic, using propaganda, using
(23:55):
foreign wars, using liaison relationships in other countries to create
multiple brushfires that will keep him busy and distracted. And
it's all coordinated by only one group, the intelligence community,
because no one else has the relationships with foreign governments,
no one else has the access to black funds or
(24:16):
money in different places that has been set aside, and
no one else can hide what they're doing by saying
that's classified. Just the intelligence community. And I think President
Trump intuitively knows this and wants to deal with it.
But you got to realize you have the intelligence community
gets Congress on board, either by coercion, either by just
(24:40):
buying them outright, it's comission or omission.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
You know they're going to get them one way or another.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
And I think you're seeing that with the lack of
information coming out about the Epstein tapes. I think you're
going to see a lot more things that are going
to shock the conscience of the American people. But for
this MAGA agenda to take root and continue, they're going
to have to pull out the roots of a corrupt
intelligence community and start putting the people in place, and
(25:12):
they're out there that know what's going on, that will
do the right job and will get the president in
Congress the information they need to govern.
Speaker 7 (25:21):
You think Cash Pattel is gonna get is the right
guy for FBI job.
Speaker 4 (25:30):
I think that Cash is a good guy. I think
Cash knows the problem. They answer your question. I think
Dan Bongino's the right deputy. I think Cash and Dan
can work well together. But again, I would say this
about myself or anyone else. You know them by their fruit.
They're in there. Let's see what happens now. People are
(25:50):
upset because they're not seeing a lot happening right away.
In defense of Cash, Dan and a lot of other people.
It takes time. But at the same time, I have
a view kind of on the inside, and I see
a lot of blocking moves coming from staff close to
the president. I see a lot of blocking mooves coming
from people in the intelligence community. You have good people
(26:13):
at the top, but you don't execute from the top.
You lead from the top, and you execute from the
middle in the bottom. And if you don't have people
that are executing what I see in you think Trump.
Speaker 7 (26:24):
Sees he's being blocked up by his own people.
Speaker 4 (26:27):
I think he intuitively understands it, not all of them.
It's not as bad as the first time, but it's
still happening. And here's the problem. They have leaks in
the White House. They have some severe leaks in the
White House. Now I'm not nostradamis, but I think they're
going to figure out who these are pretty quick.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
I'm just saying probably really soon. Who knows.
Speaker 4 (26:45):
But again, you have an insurgency and a guerrilla warfare
being run by rogue former leaders and elements in the
intelligence community that are working against the president. And they
have a large tool chest, they have black money they have.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
So what's their goal.
Speaker 2 (27:03):
What's their goal?
Speaker 4 (27:07):
Their goal, Yeah, clearly is too is power for power's sake,
to enrich themselves. I mean, why wouldn't they want America
to do great. President Trump's policies always lift everyone in America.
But that's not what they want. They want blake anyone
in intelligence. Their overriding goal is control. Now, I worked
in the intelligence communities, maybe I'm a part of it.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Mine isn't that type of control.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
But what happens is when you have no moral foundation,
you want control for controls sake, you want to make
the decisions.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
I mean, look at the news clip.
Speaker 4 (27:43):
I mean you can find it of Chuck Schumer when
President Trump came into office, chastising the president and telling
the president that the intelligence community has sixteen ways to
Sunday to get back at you. So talking about the
intelligence community is quote really dumb. Well, he's the boss,
he's head of the executive branch, and he is over
(28:04):
Title fifty, which is wait for it, foreign intelligence. Yeah,
he has every right, has the boss to criticize poor performance.
And Chuckie Schmucky was just out there trying to and
what it was is it was a threat to the
president of the United States. And I think my personal
opinion is John Brenner, James Clapper, Michael Hayden are working
(28:28):
against this president.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
That's what I think.
Speaker 4 (28:30):
I think they're using intermediaries like I don't know, Victoria Newlan,
him Abadeen to go out and cause dissension. And I
think that what's really telling is the Epstein files.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
What you're not seeing now, we.
Speaker 7 (28:47):
Can't get our hands on those to save our law.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
Well, you got to go to the Clinton Library to
look Blake. You need to know where to look yeah,
I said it. I mean, if most of those files
are tucked away at the Clinton in Library, they might
be I don't know. I mean I've heard they might be.
I don't know, but it might be a good place
to look. The other thing to do is recognize the
fact that they must be getting nervous because someone just
(29:12):
suicided themselves.
Speaker 7 (29:13):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (29:14):
And I will tell you that there are a lot
of living young women out there that have a lot
of information that people on both sides of.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
The aisle do not want to see come to light.
Speaker 4 (29:26):
But if they get this information to the right people,
it will reveal the people that are co opted and controlled.
Speaker 2 (29:35):
And remember intelligence, you have to control.
Speaker 4 (29:39):
The asset, and they use they have an acronym EMSI
ego money sex ideology, and that's how they control assets
and get them to do what they want. So potentially
we have people in our government in positions of power
that are completely.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Controlled by roague members of the intelligence community. And that
should cause everyone pause.
Speaker 5 (30:03):
So we're doing the same thing to ourselves that we
should be doing to foreign governments.
Speaker 4 (30:09):
Well, I'm not saying we should be doing it, but
we should beget here's the thing. Foreign intelligence is designed
to find out the information so that the policy makers,
the President and Congress can have accurate information to make
major decisions both domestic and throughout the world. What the
intelligence community has become is gotten away from operations that
(30:33):
protect this nation and has strictly become a growing group
of insiders that want to control the political process and
are making war not on the nation's enemies, but on
their political enemies.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
And you saw that with Crossfire Hurricane.
Speaker 4 (30:52):
Now, the interesting thing Blake and people should be asking
them is how do they get the money for that? Well,
I will tell you there's several different pillars. One that's
been hit hard as USAID and black contracts. Another pillar
they get is from trafficking. And when it comes out
about all the human trafficking that's gone on, I don't
know how the American people are going to respond.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
Because it is so insidious.
Speaker 7 (31:18):
Yeah, I mean, do you think the US intelligence community
is actively engaged in trafficking or do you think they're I.
Speaker 4 (31:27):
Think former members of the US intelligence community, and I
won't speak to active members, are one hundred percent engaged
in this. Because you can't move people from country to
country without the intelligence community.
Speaker 2 (31:43):
You can't doesn't happen. It's it's too frought. Now.
Speaker 4 (31:48):
Can you imagine if the intelligence community was in bed
with I don't know, cartels, maybe one big cartel, and
that they were moving people and using that money from it.
Speaker 2 (31:59):
I mean, Blake, look.
Speaker 4 (31:59):
At if someone should google a yl I Loo or
Ethical Partners, and it's basically the conglomerate that owns all
the porn sites and they are out there making war
against anyone that would speak out about trafficking.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
That's my personal understanding. And if they are are doing.
Speaker 7 (32:23):
That, that's your dog.
Speaker 4 (32:29):
Okay, are we on the air, Yeah, Okay, we just
had a dog attack, probably sent in by Ethical Partners.
Sent that puppy straight in And I love dogs, so Blake,
so it's okay. So look, it's a convoluted mess. But
I believe there are women out there with information that
(32:49):
would shake the core of this nation. And someone is
out there going after these women. And the key is, oh,
when you just had that suicide. These women need to
be protected, their information needs to be gathered, and it
needs to be revealed to the American public what's going
on Because as my boss used to say, sunlight is
the best disinfected and I do believe President Trump wants
(33:11):
the truth. I think I couldn't be a stronger supporter
of President Trump. I think the man is absolutely brilliant
and he knows what's going on.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
President Trump needs a small.
Speaker 4 (33:22):
Group what I would call the same thing President Reagan
had a kitchen cabinet that will get him the information
that he can make decisions on. And more importantly, ask
questions and ask the right question to the right person
and then get an answer. And the thing about the
intelligence community is when you sign up to say join
(33:42):
the CIA, you signed a document saying that you can
be single subject polygraphed anytime for any reason, and if
you refuse it, you're terminated. So he has the tools
to find leaks, he has the tools to find sedition,
He has the tools to find this the people that
are formenting a guerrilla war against him and his administration.
(34:04):
And I would just encourage the president, don't take your
foot off the pedal. There's good people out there. Find them.
And I pray that in the next several weeks that
the leakers are more leakers are exposed. There's there's seditious
conspiracy going on. Just it's not President Trump it's people
working against him, and that's just my opinion.
Speaker 2 (34:25):
That's what I think. I mean, I could be wrong,
but I'm.
Speaker 3 (34:28):
Not cutting down to the truth through history and experience.
This is the Scalpel with doctor Keith Rose. Consider giving
us a five star rating on Apple Podcasts. Connect with
the Scalpel on x at the Scalpel Edge, on Instagram
and Facebook, at the Scalpel Podcast, or the website scalpel
(34:51):
edge dot com. Another episode is coming soon.
Speaker 1 (34:55):
Subscribe and share today wherever you listen to podcasts, and
let's keep freedom rolling.