November 20, 2025 • 40 mins
Washington is getting ready to dump thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein related documents, and Todd explains why this so-called transparency could quickly turn into a political circus. We walk through the Epstein Files Transparency Act, what the DOJ’s 30-day clock really means, and how both the media and political opportunists will try to weaponize whatever Trump’s name is attached to while ignoring context, nuance, and truth. Todd also breaks down Rep Jasmine Crockett’s embarrassing FEC “Jeffrey Epstein” stunt, talks about low information voters, abortion talking points, and why conservatives need to stay skeptical, think for themselves, and refuse to join the hysteria when the headlines and hot takes start flying.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Show, America's home
for conservative not bitter talking education. Be advised. The content
of this program has been talking about it to prevents
and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to
lean to the right. And now coming to you from
(00:29):
the full suite Wealth Studios, here is your conservative but
not bitter host, Todd Huff.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
All right, my friends, Washington is about to dump thousands
of new Epstein related documents into the public square. And
while transparency is a good thing, we're also about to
be treated to an absolute political circus here because you
know what's about to happen. In fact, it's already kind
(00:56):
of happened with an interview with Jasmin Crockett, the leftist
lunatic in Texas. She was on CNN with Caitlin Collins,
and I've got that clip that I'm going to play
later in the program. But this has the recipe for
an absolute political circus, and I'll get into that today,
(01:20):
my friends, as the program unfolds. Thank you for joining
us today. If you want to be part of the conversation,
show your thoughts, questions, feedback. Always, always always make sure
you include the appropriate amounts of adoration and praise. You
can send those to Todd at todd haveshow dot com. Kidding,
my friends, not kidding, just a little bit kidding, But
(01:42):
that's how you can communicate. And it's my pleasure to
be here with you today, my friends. Maybe you've reached
that stage where managing your money feels more like juggling
than it's just simple numbers. You've got things like tax planning, planning,
a state, work and estimate choices, a whole lot more.
That's when Family Office Services can really make a difference.
(02:06):
Full Sweet Wealth brings all those pieces together into one
cohesive strategy. Their Family office Services give you access to
a coordinated team, and that team has advanced option strategies,
private equity, private credit, legal expertise, all of that under
(02:27):
one roof. Jason and his team at Full Sweet Wealth
will take wonderful care of you, my friends. So this
is about simplifying your financial life, planning for the future,
making sure your legacy stays strong for generations to come.
Are you ready for that next level of support? If so,
visit fullsweetwealth dot com. That's full sweetwealth dot com. Build
(02:51):
your legacy, secure your future, all right, my friends and
the Senate have passed the law releasing the Epstein files.
This is the Epstein Files Transparency Act. It passed the
House four hundred and twenty seven to one unanimously. In
(03:16):
the US Senate, Trump has signed that bill, and now
the Department of Justice has thirty days to release thousands
of pages of files in the well of Epstein's files,
whatever that means. And we're about to figure out what
that means. We're about to be misled about what some
(03:36):
of this means. You can guarantee there will be redactions,
there will be confusion, there will be speculation, there will
be viral misinformation. And I know it might sound like
I'm against this. I'm not against this. I just in
my world. In my world, I want people who understand
(04:00):
what's going on in my world and candidly in the world.
That was I guess in the minds of our founders
when they created and framed this great nation. They wanted
people who were engaged, who were informed, who had the
(04:20):
ability to think. And the thing is, we don't have
that today. And I know, listen, it pains me to
say that I'm not here to just bad mouth and
to put people down. I'm not naming anybody in particular,
but we have a ton of people out there who
have abdicated their personal responsibility when it comes to thinking.
(04:41):
They tune in to MSNBC or CNN or NBC or
ABC or CBS. They read things online in some of
these radical places, and they just regurgitate what's being said.
I spend some time, not a lot of time, but
there's a group of what's called abortion abolitionists, and I
(05:05):
will watch some of the conversations and debates these folks
have on the streets. And if you don't know, an
abortion abolitionist is someone who's not simply pro life, although
they are pro life, although they'll tell you they're not
pro life because of some of the connotations that come
with that as far as where they think the lines
should be drawn. These are people who believe that abortion
(05:28):
is murder. By the way I agree with this, abortion
is murder. In fact, I would say to you, I
would say I'm an abortion abolitionist, but set that aside
for a moment. It is remarkable to me when they
have conversations with people on the street. They'll hold up signs,
(05:51):
they'll go to, you know, busy places on the streets
and they they'll have a team of camera people that
are filming this he's miked up or the people that
are holding the signs or my up, and then they're
engaging people in respectful debate. But there's a shock factor, right.
They're showing pictures that are sometimes pretty gruesome. But again,
if you're bothered by the picture, why are you're not
(06:12):
bothered by the real thing taking place when the picture
was taken. So they'll have these conversations, and it's remarkable
to me how people default to just repoint, repeating I
should say the talking points, and that is what the
pro choice crowd does. I don't want to make this
show we're talking about Epstein here, but I'm just for
(06:33):
the sake of explaining our society as a whole and
how they're going to respond to this. A lot of
people are just looking to find Trump's name in here.
When this stuff is dump, Believe me, they are going
to be people that all they're going to be doing
is searching these files for Donald Trump. That's what they're
going to be doing. They think that this these files,
(06:54):
the purpose of these files being released is for them
to somehow incriminate or just target Donald Trump, and there's
something wrong with that mentality. Listen. I think Bill Clinton
is a really bad guy. I think Bill Clinton has
(07:16):
been involved in some incredibly immoral and sketchy things. Some
of these things we know about. Some of these things
we can speculate about, but I don't. I'm not looking
for these files to take him down. I'm looking for
justice and truth, and there's going to be a race.
There's going to be a race here to get this
(07:38):
information out the quickest, and when that happens, there are
absolutely going to be problems because when you race to
get this information out, you end up making you end
up moving forward with things shouldn't be moved forward with you.
(08:02):
You'll find out that what you first thought was the
case is not actually the case at all. Once there's
more context and information or whatever, once you read other
parts of the document or whatever. Reminds me the days
of when the Obamacare decision, the Supreme Court's Obamacare ruling,
(08:24):
I remember. I'm not going to mention names, because I'm
not here to put down people, but I remember people
who talk about politics, people who have conservative programs, who
were sitting out, you know, outside the Supreme Court or
whatever broadcasting, and they the they got the ruling and
(08:44):
they started flipping in. It was it was a race
to figure out who was what the decision was, and
so there were people that got it wrong. And there's
good reasons they got it wrong because it looks like justice.
John Robert, it's changed his vote along the way he
voted to overrule that, the tax that was in there,
(09:09):
the way that that was worded and everything, but he
later changed his vote back to where he found a
way for this to be allowed. And it's understandable how
they got there, but they got there ultimately because of sloppiness,
and sloppiness was the result of rushing. That's why we
don't listen. I don't ever break news on here. It
(09:29):
is not what we do. I'm not a journalist. I've
told you that repeatedly. Some of you refuse to accept
that I'm not a journal I'm not a journalist. I'm
a guy who has opinions on things that other journalists
tell us about. I have questions about the things they
tell us about. I'm skeptical about a lot of the
things they tell us about. But it's not a race
(09:49):
for me to be the first to tell you something.
I think it's more important to develop the correct viewpoint
on an issue, and some of those things take a
little bit of time. They all take longer than the
media and the people in politics want you to develop
your opinion on something because they want the immediate result.
(10:10):
But the truth is some of this this stuff just
takes a while to understand. And so when you factor
that in, and there's going to be people that rush,
rush to get this information out, there are going to
be people who, again I mentioned off the top, and
I'm going to talk a little bit more about this.
They they don't have the capacity to think for themselves.
(10:31):
And I was referencing these people who get in debates,
into debates with these abortion abolitionists, and they fall back
to the talking point. It's it's remarkable. You know, these
abortion abolitionists will be showing a picture of an unborn child,
you know, in the womb, and people will say, well,
(10:52):
that's her body, her choice. Well, what what body am
I pointing to? Is this is her body? Yeah, that's
just a clump of cells. Well it has an arm
in a hand and a nose. Well that's not it's
not sentient yet, it's not aware of its surroundings. It
can't feel pain, it's not you know. They'll say things
like the Bible says you're not a person, you're not
(11:14):
a human. Life doesn't begin until you draw first breath,
all this stuff, which is just absolutely incorrect. But they
it's like you default. I've heard people say in times
of crisis, you don't necessarily rise to the occasion. You
default to your highest level of training. And it's like,
this is all the thought that these people have put
(11:35):
into this, and so they default back to the talking points.
My body, my choice. Why does some you know, men
don't have uterus is therefore they can't have an opinion
on the slaughter of unborn children, which is preposterous of
course as well. But they just repeat these things as
though these things are self evident, thinking nothing about it,
(11:58):
and they don't think about it. There's different reasons why
people don't think about it. But you have some people
who have who want things like abortion to be the
law of the land because it gives them a well
as bad as it sounds, a free pass for living
(12:19):
and a moral lifestyle. And I'm not talking about obviously,
people who have been raped and incests things like that.
I'm talking about people who decide to live a promiscuous lifestyle,
who don't want the responsibility of having a child because
they're too young. They're you know, interfere with them going
to college or making money or living their lives, and
so they want to make this sound like it's you know,
(12:43):
just just like clipping your fingernails or cutting your hair.
My body, my choice. If I can get a tattoo,
surely I can just remove a clump of sales cells
from my body. And that's how this has talked about.
And I've been telling you this not to get into
that whole issue today, although I think it's it's one
of the most important things that we can talk about
(13:05):
in society today. I'm saying that this exact sort of
situation is going to be repeated when these Epstein files
are released. If Trump's name is in there in any capacity,
it's going to be obviously spoken of or framed in
a negative way. If Trump was, you know, at an
(13:29):
event with Epstein and there was an email about it,
You're going to start getting factoids like Trump's names Trump's
name was mentioned thirty nine times in these documents or
whatever it is. Right, It's like it's just like when
they did the whole they stopped doing this, by the way,
or at least I haven't seen it in a while.
They used to say Trump has lied ten thousand, three
(13:52):
hundred and forty two times, and then they had kind
of a running tally during his first term in office,
and the idea was. The idea was to say, if
you said, well, what has trumpled about them? They say,
what are you talking about? There's ten four hundred and
seventy six lives or whatever number I said. It doesn't
(14:12):
matter because no human being can respond to this massive
number of allegations. And you say, fine, give me the
best examples, and they give you examples, and listen. I'm
not here to say Trump's never lied, but a lot
of the things they say that are lies are not
lies at all. It's actually lies. It's misrepresentations of what
Trump actually said, things like suckers and losers, things like
(14:36):
good people on both sides, those things. Listen, and those
are the ones they go to first. Those are their
top tier examples, and they are made up. A reasonable
person might then conclude, well, maybe this list is not accurate.
Maybe this list is a gross distortion of reality. But
I don't have the time, nor the information, nor the
(14:58):
effort to go through this and re refute every one
of these. That's impossible for someone to do. Reminds me
a little bit a couple of Oh I guess a
month or so ago on this program, I interviewed an
individual she's running for Congress in Detroit. I think it's
the thirteenth districtor named Shelby Campbell, and during our conversation,
(15:22):
she mentioned we were talking about Charlie Kirk. She's the
one that said some reprehensible things about Charlie Kirk. She
kind of apologized, sort of. She said she was just
making a joke and she's a fan of dark humor. Whatever.
You can decide for yourself, but the bottom line is
the bottom line is she during that conversation, she made
(15:44):
reference to something and she accused Charlie Kirk of saying
somebody in the audience who was Asian. She said that
Charlie Kirk referred used a derogatory term, calling him a
chi in k And at the time, this is the point,
(16:05):
like I knew at the time, I knew that. Again,
you can't I can't say I knew, but I was
very confident that Charlie Kirk didn't say that. I was
very confident of that, and I thought there has to
be other contexts. Something else is going on here, and
I just didn't know it at the time, But after
the interview that day or the next day, soon thereafter
(16:28):
a day or two later, I came to realize that
she was referencing a conversation that Charlie Kirk had had
with Jank Yuger, and he was talking to Shank Yuger,
and she thought that he was saying, or it was
reported that he was using a derogatory term targeting Asians
or whatever, but in reality, he was saying Jank Huger.
(16:51):
It's spelled cean K. So the point is, how can
you possibly know if they have examples of ten thousand,
which of course that's inflated as well, in ten thousand lies,
ten thousand, whatever it is, ten thousand times Trump's name
is going to be in these documents. There's no way
to know all of the examples and have a ready
(17:17):
at the hand response for all of these things. At
some point, though, we have to say, well, let's just
give me the best the pest two, three, four or five,
and let's go through those and see what actually see
what the evidence suggests. This is going to be a
clown show. Be prepared. This is going to be an
(17:39):
absolute clown show. And again I'm for transparency, but I
also know that they're political opportunists. It's the perfect recipe.
You've got political opportunists mixed with people who are well
low information voters, as Rush used to call them. So
(18:00):
you've got people who are going to distort reality and
people who are prepared to consume it. And it is
a recipe for disaster. So just prepare yourself for this. Again,
there's nothing wrong with transparency. In fact, transparency is a
good thing. But if you have if you focus just
on transparency and then you say we're going to have
(18:21):
the experts tell us what this stuff means, you're going
to have chaos. It's going to happen. And I don't
know what's going to happen specifically, but I can assure
you whatever they tell us at the beginning, at some
point along this process, it's going to be incorrect. It's
going to be incorrect, and there are going to be
people that are going to believe whatever the initial lie
(18:43):
is for the rest of eternity. I don't know who
said it, but somebody has once said the lie. I'm
going to paraphrase, but a lie can be spread around
the world before the truth even wakes up. That's a
very generous paraphrase, but basically, lies spread rapidly. Truth takes
(19:03):
time and it can't catch up. And there are going
to be some people who like to live in their ignorance,
who don't really care about truth, who won't even be
open to the idea that Donald Trump is not some
creepy pedophile as some people are claiming. Some people are claiming.
I mean, I've got a school teacher, a public school
teacher in my district, who makes allegations of that on Facebook.
(19:29):
It's wild, wild times. I mean that is that is defamation.
That is what libel, slander or whatever. That this without evidence,
if it can't be proven, and you're making these statements
as facts, and it can be proven that. Of course
he's he's a public figure, so it's a little bit different.
But this is this is not how you do these
(19:51):
things at all, but it's how it's done in politics today.
So just buckle up for what we're about ready to
part take in here are my friends with the release
of these files. Friends, if you're dealing with discomfort, or
you're tired of living off prescriptions, tired of managing those
side effects, you're not alone. A lot of folks are
(20:13):
looking for something natural that they can trust. That's why
you should check out Christopher's Organic Botanicals, a family run
natural creative company rooted in truth, tradition, and transparency. They
partner directly with farmers in Indonesia. They lab test everything
before it ever reaches your hands. No hype, no synthetic,
(20:37):
no funny business. This is just the real thing, done
right and real creatim and you should. I encourage you
to research it. I encourage you to research it on
their website or wherever, not just their website, wherever, you
can research real creatim and see that the examples of
some of the horror stories you might have heard about
(20:58):
creatom comes from the synthetic garbage, the shady sellers out
there promoting selling producing stuff that's not real creatim at all.
That's the horror story. Check out their website. You can
get their product or you can research there, but you
can start with their creative Starter pack. Use coupon code
(21:19):
Todd Hof you'll save ten percent during the checkout process.
Visit Christopher's Organic Botanicals dot com. That's Christopher's Organic Botanicals
dot com. Truth tradition, transparency. All right, So, getting near
the end here of this our first segment of today's program, again,
(21:43):
it is good to have transparency. In fact, for those
of you who for those of you who have listened
to this program recently, you'll know that I've had problems
with transparency with one of our state senators who refuses
here in Indiana to even explain why he didn't well,
(22:06):
why he refused to convene the Senate for the special
session to consider redistricting that was requested by Senator exculd
Be by Governor Mike Brown. And there's no transparency. They've
hidden it from us. It's behind these deals that are
made behind closed doors. They've counted the votes for something
(22:27):
that we don't even know what it is yet apparently
they're just against it. They don't want to go through it.
It's not transparent. So I'm a fan of transparency. But
being a nation that is, being a people that should
be focused on getting transparency from their government. We have
an obligation and a responsibility to know what to do
(22:49):
with that information, and unfortunately a lot of people don't.
So more about this on the other side of the
break of my friend sit tight, you're listening any conservative
not being to talk? I'm your host, Todd Huff back
in at just a minute. I'll come back, my friends,
I want to continue this conversation about the Epstein files.
(23:11):
I also want to get to I alluded to a
SoundBite that came from an interview between Jasmine Crockett, representative
from the state of Texas, a leftist, lunatic in Congress,
someone who is there for the political drama. She's a
(23:31):
dramacrat in the truest sense of the word, engaging in
political theater constantly. This is what politics has become, unfortunately
in twenty first century America. I've got a sound bite
of her. It's an example of what we're going to
see more of. We're going to see more of this
(23:53):
as more information is released. And I'm going to set
this up here in just a moment what this conversation
was about that she had with Caitlin Collins of CNN.
But before I do that, my friends need to pause here,
remind you and ask you Are you tired of spending
your hard earned money at businesses that turn around and
(24:15):
then support leftist causes. That's exactly why we created Freedom Marketplace.
It's a searchable directory of businesses that share your conservative values,
businesses that have vowed not to support leftist candidates, leftist causes.
There's no it's free for you to use, no strings attached,
just good patriotic businesses that are pushing in the same
(24:39):
direction you're pushing. You can check it out today at
Freedom Marketplace dot net. This is something we built. You know,
the full history is we as we grew to program
and we got enough, you know, we got a significant
amount of advertisers. We ran out of space. We used
to put those folks on our websites, and there got
to be enough people, logos and things on the way
(25:00):
website that it wasn't good, It didn't look good. I
wasn't proud of my work. It just got too convoluted,
and so we had to build a searchable directory and
that's where this started. And businesses who not everybody has
a listing there, but most many do. And there's also
people that you don't hear on this program that are
(25:20):
also on that directory and it's free for you to use.
We try to find businesses they sign a pledge by
the way that says they're not going to support leftist
candidates or leftist causes. So Freedom Marketplace dot net is
where you would go for that. You can find out
information about it on our website todd haveshow dot com
as well wherever you want to go, however you want
to get there. But this is a place where you
(25:41):
can find businesses that you can work with that are
pushing in the same direction that you are. Freedom Marketplace
dot net. Okay, sorry, I'm having a little bit of
a voice problem here today. I've told it's come out
of the blue. I know the winter fall in wintertime.
This hits me every year, and I thought I dodged
(26:01):
the bullets because it normally hits late September and October
and it'll take my vocals down. And I'm fighting it
today and I don't Then there's I don't feel bad.
I don't know if I sound different to you, but
I can tell you I sound different to myself and
I can feel it, and I just can't quite get
my voice to where it needs to be. So hear
me hitting that mute button. That's I'm trying to keep
(26:22):
my voice from bogging down. So that being said, let's play.
Let me set the scene first, Jasmine Crockett comes on
to talk with Caitlin Collins on CNN. Now, Jasmine Crockett
took to the floor of the House of Representatives, her
and her team to prove a point I guess, did
(26:46):
a did a search, did a search in the FEC
database FEC Federal Elections Commissioned database to see who had
received funding from Jeffrey Epstein. And again, because this is
all everything's political, right, everything is listening, I understand, I understand.
If you take money from Jeffrey Epstein, you might be
(27:09):
someone who's part of the problem. He might. In theory,
if all these things, these allegations are true, we can
connect the dots and say, Wow, that person is being
controlled by Jeffrey Epstein. Or if you really want to
dig deep, is Jeffrey Epstein an asset to somebody who's
being controlled by another foreign country or what this could
(27:29):
It's a problem, right if you've got someone who has
been involved with Jeffrey Epstein and what he was doing
on his little private island that debakriy and wickedness and
pure evil and sin. If you were involved in that
and he has audio video evidence that can put you
(27:51):
there in some really compromising positions, then suddenly you are
You're very blackmailable, You're someone who's career up. You're you've
been compromised. And if you're in office and you want
to stay in office, like you depend upon Jeffrey Epstein
to keep you there, you're going to follow, you know,
toe the line with how he wants you to vote
(28:13):
or the people who have used him as an asset
that this is a potential explanation for this sole This
is a potential of where of what could actually have
been going on at Epstein Islands, just the potential. It
doesn't mean it's the only explanation, but it's certainly an
explanation as to what could have been going on. So
if that's the case, obviously, if you're taking money from Epstein,
(28:34):
if you're you know, spending a lot of time with him,
it raises a lot of these questions and they're absolutely
one percent, they are absolutely legitimate questions. Now that being said,
it's also possible in the world of politics, you're out
raising money and you know, Jeffrey Epstein was was wealthy.
(28:58):
Jeffrey Epstein, probably like many other people with large amounts
of wealth, gives to lots of politicians. It's theoretically possible
that Jeffrey Epstein gave money to people that didn't know
anything about what Jeffrey Epstein was up to. I can
leave it up to you. I'm just saying that there's
context matters. Just because you have a picture with the
(29:20):
guy that might be in these files, just because he
emailed you and responded, doesn't mean that you are on
the list, so to speak. It could mean that, It
absolutely could mean that, but it doesn't necessarily mean that.
I feel like we've lost this ability to have this
conversation about context and nuance along the way. But nonetheless, nonetheless,
(29:42):
what Jasmine Krackett did she went and did a search
in the FEC database where she found the name Jeffrey Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein as a donor for people like Mitt Romney
and Lee Zelden and others. However, however, we have since
found out that the jet there's not just one Jeffrey
(30:02):
Epstein in the world. Have you paused and thought about this,
I can tell you this as somebody you know. I
used to a long time ago, long long time ago.
I had to Todd Huff dot com and I'm talking
twenty some years ago, and I it expired or something
I didn't know, I didn't have it on auto renew
(30:22):
or something happened, and I lost it in somebody else
who's a politician. And I think Baltimore got it. So
I don't have that anymore. Wish that I did. I don't.
It's fine, but we're the only many of us are
not the only person with our name. I would say
most of us. It's probably rare for someone to only
(30:42):
be the only example of a name. So just imagine
being a person named Jeffrey Epstein. Again, this makes me
think of a Seinfeld of a Seinfeld. When Elaine was
dating a guy with the name of a serial killer,
she went to a New York Giants football game with him,
and they announced the guy's name over the PA PA system,
(31:04):
and of course he gets up to go respond to
whatever the PA addresser was requesting him for, and Elaine's
telling everybody he's not the serial he's not a serial killer.
He's a nice guy, right, I mean, as only Seinfeld
can do, but just imagine being another Jeffrey Epstein. Well,
Jeffrey Epstein gave money to the campaigns of other Republicans.
(31:28):
Jasmine Crockett found it, but it wasn't the Jeffrey Epstein
of Epstein Island. It was another Jeffrey Epstein. And I
just want you to listen to this exchange. I play
it simply to say prepare for more of this as
these files.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
Jeffrey Epstein, here's what you said.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
The pause in the broadcast, who also took money from
somebody named Jeffrey Epstein? As I had my team dig
in very quickly. Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zelden, George
bush Win, Ray McCain, palin Rick Lazio.
Speaker 3 (32:04):
You mentioned to Lee Zelden there he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually doctor Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex trucker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is
who do it in to a prior campaign of his.
Do you want to correct the record on the people
that I.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
Want to pause that real quick So in other words,
Jasmine Crockett, she had her team do a quick search
find people who took money from Jeffrey Epstein. They found
the Republican Party, Sarah Palin, you know McCain Palin campaign,
Lee Zelden met Romney. But it's not the same guy.
And Leezelden says, it's a different guy. It's a doctor,
an ey doctor or some such thing. And I want
(32:40):
you to listen to her response, say, did it was.
Speaker 4 (32:42):
That Jeffrey Epstein? Just so that people understand, when you
make a donation, your picture is not there. And because
they decided to spring this on us in real time,
I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially
happen because I knew that they didn't even try to
go through the FEC. So my team what they did
is they googled. And that is specifically why I said
a Jeffrey Epstein like Republicans, I at least don't go
(33:02):
out and just tell lies. Really because it was not
the same one, that's fine. But when lee Zeldn had
something to say, all he had to say was it
was a different jeff Jeffrey Epstein. He admitted that he
did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein, so at least
I wasn't trying to mislead people. Talk now, have I
dug in to find out who this doctor is? I
have not, so I will trust and take What he
says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But I
(33:25):
was not attempting to mislead anybody. I surely had maybe
twenty minutes before I had to do.
Speaker 3 (33:31):
That dig to say, well, you're trying to make it
tell him like he took money from I did not
registered test defender.
Speaker 4 (33:37):
No, but I literally did not know when you search
FEC files, and that's what I had my team to do.
I texted and I say, listen, we're going up there
saying that she took donations, right.
Speaker 3 (33:46):
But someone might say, well, your team should have done
the homework to make sure it wasn't then.
Speaker 4 (33:49):
Within twenty minutes you could not find that out, not
from just doing a quick search on FEC. So number one,
I made sure I.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
Got to take your break, my friends, correct time out
back in just a minute and welcome back my friends.
Sorry for jumping off so quickly.
Speaker 3 (34:06):
There.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
I looked at the clock and realized I had not
accountant for the time I had available. I didn't have
any time left there and I had to jump off quickly.
So basically Jasmine Crockett was trying to make some point
that this I only play this AA it's it's ridiculous.
(34:27):
It's ridiculous what goes on in our Congress. Sometimes because
of dramacrats like this, and sometimes because of Republicans too,
but it's it's ridiculous what goes on there. It's not
it's not serious business. Many times. It's it's they're looking
for sound bites to send out to their donors to
(34:49):
to get you know, to do fundraising, uh, to show
people that they're down for the cause. They just want
their you know, a video of themselves from the floor
of the house else talking about whatever it is that
they want to talk about in their latest newsletter or
podcast or whatever. And in rushing it and doing this,
(35:13):
doing it this way, what they did. What she did
was ended up finding out that the hard way that
the Jeffrey Epstein they found as a donor for McCain, Palin,
for the Republican Party, for Lee Zelden, for Mitt Romney,
it wasn't this Jeffrey Epstein. Now she says, look, I'm
(35:36):
trying to say, you know, point out that just because
someone's name's there, it's not necessarily you know, there's other context.
She's saying that she's doing the responsible thing here, but
in reality, what she's doing is just feeding the narrative
and feeding the people who are low information voters, feeding
(35:58):
them stuff that sounds like at first glance, or at
first at first hearing, anyway, that what is being that
Republicans are taking money from Epstein. That's what she wanted
the point to be. And there are people who are
never going to be convinced otherwise. They heard that clip,
(36:21):
they don't care about context. They're going to tell you
maybe today at work that Mitt Romney's campaign took money
from Jeffrey Epstein, or that Lee well, they won't know Lee, Zelden, McCain, Palin.
That's probably that's too far back for a lot of people,
so they won't mention that. They might mention Mitt Romney.
If Trump's name is somehow pulled up onto this into
(36:43):
this mess, they absolutely would remember that. But when read
a Republican group, the Republican Party, they took money, I'm
sure someone out there today is going to say Jeffrey
Epstein was given to the Republicans because of course they're all.
According to these people that exchange in this sort of
conversation and so forth, they're going to say that these
(37:05):
folks are all are all engaged in pedophilia, which is
sick and disgusting. But that's where this goes. And I
bring this up to say, we're going to see this
multiplied by a pretty big factor over the next thirty days.
People are going to claim that something in the Epstein
files means something it doesn't mean. And I'm going to
(37:27):
say up front, to make sure make sure that you
withhold making a final judgment. Make sure you withhold making
a final judgment. I mean, obviously, if it's it's it's real,
incriminating and very straightforward, you know it's it's I'm not
saying there's not degrees of this, but if it's someone
(37:49):
who you suspect is doing some nefarious things, a Democrat
named Bill Clinton, for example, it's just we should just
be a little slow to confirm these things. And what's
so wrong about that. I don't want people to be
unjustly accused, even if I disagree with them politically. I
(38:09):
feel like a member of a shrinking minority when I
say that everything is so political these days, and so
we're about to see a whole lot more of this
over the course of the next thirty days and of
course even after that. Friends. You know, one of the
biggest challenges that we have as conservatives is finding ways
(38:32):
to ensure our values align with the things that we
do the way that we live our lives, including how
we invest in what we invest in. That's why I
like to see what the team at four to eight
financial is doing. They specialize in biblically responsible investing. That
means they screen out companies that do not align with
(38:53):
your faith and your values, so that we're not funding
things that go completely against what we believe in. This
is important. This has not always been possible. It is
possible with some of these tools today, and that's what
for eight Financial is trying to help you do. They'll
do that heavy lifting for you, helping align your investments
with your purpose, with your goals, with your values. The
(39:15):
best part is you can simply start by where you
are today. You can do a quick assessment at four
eight financial dot com slash todd that's for eight financial
dot com slash todd, and they are going to help
you determine to what degree or if your current investments
align or reflect your align with or reflector your values. Again,
(39:39):
that's for eight financial dot com slash Todd for eight financial,
because your money should be working for your values. My friends,
all right, reach the end of the program today. I
just want to reiterate what I said here a moment ago.
There's there's going to be There is absolutely going to
(40:00):
be a bunch of hysteria. Transparency works. Transparency is important,
but it only works when we stay rooted in truth,
when we think for ourselves, when we don't just accept
whatever's told us because it fits the political narrative or
even our political preferences. What matters is that we are
(40:25):
critical thinkers who question what we're told and who look
for content context. I should say in nuance, we've got
to resist this circus. It's about to unfold, and we've
got to demand honesty over the hysteria and the hype
and the headlines. So, folks, thank you so much for
joining me today. I hope you have a wonderful day.
(40:47):
Say tomorrow. SDG
Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Show, America's home
for conservative not bitter talking education. Be advised. The content
of this program has been talking about it to prevents
and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to
lean to the right. And now coming to you from
(00:29):
the full suite Wealth Studios, here is your conservative but
not bitter host, Todd Huff.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
All right, my friends, Washington is about to dump thousands
of new Epstein related documents into the public square. And
while transparency is a good thing, we're also about to
be treated to an absolute political circus here because you
know what's about to happen. In fact, it's already kind
(00:56):
of happened with an interview with Jasmin Crockett, the leftist
lunatic in Texas. She was on CNN with Caitlin Collins,
and I've got that clip that I'm going to play
later in the program. But this has the recipe for
an absolute political circus, and I'll get into that today,
(01:20):
my friends, as the program unfolds. Thank you for joining
us today. If you want to be part of the conversation,
show your thoughts, questions, feedback. Always, always always make sure
you include the appropriate amounts of adoration and praise. You
can send those to Todd at todd haveshow dot com. Kidding,
my friends, not kidding, just a little bit kidding, But
(01:42):
that's how you can communicate. And it's my pleasure to
be here with you today, my friends. Maybe you've reached
that stage where managing your money feels more like juggling
than it's just simple numbers. You've got things like tax planning, planning,
a state, work and estimate choices, a whole lot more.
That's when Family Office Services can really make a difference.
(02:06):
Full Sweet Wealth brings all those pieces together into one
cohesive strategy. Their Family office Services give you access to
a coordinated team, and that team has advanced option strategies,
private equity, private credit, legal expertise, all of that under
(02:27):
one roof. Jason and his team at Full Sweet Wealth
will take wonderful care of you, my friends. So this
is about simplifying your financial life, planning for the future,
making sure your legacy stays strong for generations to come.
Are you ready for that next level of support? If so,
visit fullsweetwealth dot com. That's full sweetwealth dot com. Build
(02:51):
your legacy, secure your future, all right, my friends and
the Senate have passed the law releasing the Epstein files.
This is the Epstein Files Transparency Act. It passed the
House four hundred and twenty seven to one unanimously. In
(03:16):
the US Senate, Trump has signed that bill, and now
the Department of Justice has thirty days to release thousands
of pages of files in the well of Epstein's files,
whatever that means. And we're about to figure out what
that means. We're about to be misled about what some
(03:36):
of this means. You can guarantee there will be redactions,
there will be confusion, there will be speculation, there will
be viral misinformation. And I know it might sound like
I'm against this. I'm not against this. I just in
my world. In my world, I want people who understand
(04:00):
what's going on in my world and candidly in the world.
That was I guess in the minds of our founders
when they created and framed this great nation. They wanted
people who were engaged, who were informed, who had the
(04:20):
ability to think. And the thing is, we don't have
that today. And I know, listen, it pains me to
say that I'm not here to just bad mouth and
to put people down. I'm not naming anybody in particular,
but we have a ton of people out there who
have abdicated their personal responsibility when it comes to thinking.
(04:41):
They tune in to MSNBC or CNN or NBC or
ABC or CBS. They read things online in some of
these radical places, and they just regurgitate what's being said.
I spend some time, not a lot of time, but
there's a group of what's called abortion abolitionists, and I
(05:05):
will watch some of the conversations and debates these folks
have on the streets. And if you don't know, an
abortion abolitionist is someone who's not simply pro life, although
they are pro life, although they'll tell you they're not
pro life because of some of the connotations that come
with that as far as where they think the lines
should be drawn. These are people who believe that abortion
(05:28):
is murder. By the way I agree with this, abortion
is murder. In fact, I would say to you, I
would say I'm an abortion abolitionist, but set that aside
for a moment. It is remarkable to me when they
have conversations with people on the street. They'll hold up signs,
(05:51):
they'll go to, you know, busy places on the streets
and they they'll have a team of camera people that
are filming this he's miked up or the people that
are holding the signs or my up, and then they're
engaging people in respectful debate. But there's a shock factor, right.
They're showing pictures that are sometimes pretty gruesome. But again,
if you're bothered by the picture, why are you're not
(06:12):
bothered by the real thing taking place when the picture
was taken. So they'll have these conversations, and it's remarkable
to me how people default to just repoint, repeating I
should say the talking points, and that is what the
pro choice crowd does. I don't want to make this
show we're talking about Epstein here, but I'm just for
(06:33):
the sake of explaining our society as a whole and
how they're going to respond to this. A lot of
people are just looking to find Trump's name in here.
When this stuff is dump, Believe me, they are going
to be people that all they're going to be doing
is searching these files for Donald Trump. That's what they're
going to be doing. They think that this these files,
(06:54):
the purpose of these files being released is for them
to somehow incriminate or just target Donald Trump, and there's
something wrong with that mentality. Listen. I think Bill Clinton
is a really bad guy. I think Bill Clinton has
(07:16):
been involved in some incredibly immoral and sketchy things. Some
of these things we know about. Some of these things
we can speculate about, but I don't. I'm not looking
for these files to take him down. I'm looking for
justice and truth, and there's going to be a race.
There's going to be a race here to get this
(07:38):
information out the quickest, and when that happens, there are
absolutely going to be problems because when you race to
get this information out, you end up making you end
up moving forward with things shouldn't be moved forward with you.
(08:02):
You'll find out that what you first thought was the
case is not actually the case at all. Once there's
more context and information or whatever, once you read other
parts of the document or whatever. Reminds me the days
of when the Obamacare decision, the Supreme Court's Obamacare ruling,
(08:24):
I remember. I'm not going to mention names, because I'm
not here to put down people, but I remember people
who talk about politics, people who have conservative programs, who
were sitting out, you know, outside the Supreme Court or
whatever broadcasting, and they the they got the ruling and
(08:44):
they started flipping in. It was it was a race
to figure out who was what the decision was, and
so there were people that got it wrong. And there's
good reasons they got it wrong because it looks like justice.
John Robert, it's changed his vote along the way he
voted to overrule that, the tax that was in there,
(09:09):
the way that that was worded and everything, but he
later changed his vote back to where he found a
way for this to be allowed. And it's understandable how
they got there, but they got there ultimately because of sloppiness,
and sloppiness was the result of rushing. That's why we
don't listen. I don't ever break news on here. It
(09:29):
is not what we do. I'm not a journalist. I've
told you that repeatedly. Some of you refuse to accept
that I'm not a journal I'm not a journalist. I'm
a guy who has opinions on things that other journalists
tell us about. I have questions about the things they
tell us about. I'm skeptical about a lot of the
things they tell us about. But it's not a race
(09:49):
for me to be the first to tell you something.
I think it's more important to develop the correct viewpoint
on an issue, and some of those things take a
little bit of time. They all take longer than the
media and the people in politics want you to develop
your opinion on something because they want the immediate result.
(10:10):
But the truth is some of this this stuff just
takes a while to understand. And so when you factor
that in, and there's going to be people that rush,
rush to get this information out, there are going to
be people who, again I mentioned off the top, and
I'm going to talk a little bit more about this.
They they don't have the capacity to think for themselves.
(10:31):
And I was referencing these people who get in debates,
into debates with these abortion abolitionists, and they fall back
to the talking point. It's it's remarkable. You know, these
abortion abolitionists will be showing a picture of an unborn child,
you know, in the womb, and people will say, well,
(10:52):
that's her body, her choice. Well, what what body am
I pointing to? Is this is her body? Yeah, that's
just a clump of cells. Well it has an arm
in a hand and a nose. Well that's not it's
not sentient yet, it's not aware of its surroundings. It
can't feel pain, it's not you know. They'll say things
like the Bible says you're not a person, you're not
(11:14):
a human. Life doesn't begin until you draw first breath,
all this stuff, which is just absolutely incorrect. But they
it's like you default. I've heard people say in times
of crisis, you don't necessarily rise to the occasion. You
default to your highest level of training. And it's like,
this is all the thought that these people have put
(11:35):
into this, and so they default back to the talking points.
My body, my choice. Why does some you know, men
don't have uterus is therefore they can't have an opinion
on the slaughter of unborn children, which is preposterous of
course as well. But they just repeat these things as
though these things are self evident, thinking nothing about it,
(11:58):
and they don't think about it. There's different reasons why
people don't think about it. But you have some people
who have who want things like abortion to be the
law of the land because it gives them a well
as bad as it sounds, a free pass for living
(12:19):
and a moral lifestyle. And I'm not talking about obviously,
people who have been raped and incests things like that.
I'm talking about people who decide to live a promiscuous lifestyle,
who don't want the responsibility of having a child because
they're too young. They're you know, interfere with them going
to college or making money or living their lives, and
so they want to make this sound like it's you know,
(12:43):
just just like clipping your fingernails or cutting your hair.
My body, my choice. If I can get a tattoo,
surely I can just remove a clump of sales cells
from my body. And that's how this has talked about.
And I've been telling you this not to get into
that whole issue today, although I think it's it's one
of the most important things that we can talk about
(13:05):
in society today. I'm saying that this exact sort of
situation is going to be repeated when these Epstein files
are released. If Trump's name is in there in any capacity,
it's going to be obviously spoken of or framed in
a negative way. If Trump was, you know, at an
(13:29):
event with Epstein and there was an email about it,
You're going to start getting factoids like Trump's names Trump's
name was mentioned thirty nine times in these documents or
whatever it is. Right, It's like it's just like when
they did the whole they stopped doing this, by the way,
or at least I haven't seen it in a while.
They used to say Trump has lied ten thousand, three
(13:52):
hundred and forty two times, and then they had kind
of a running tally during his first term in office,
and the idea was. The idea was to say, if
you said, well, what has trumpled about them? They say,
what are you talking about? There's ten four hundred and
seventy six lives or whatever number I said. It doesn't
(14:12):
matter because no human being can respond to this massive
number of allegations. And you say, fine, give me the
best examples, and they give you examples, and listen. I'm
not here to say Trump's never lied, but a lot
of the things they say that are lies are not
lies at all. It's actually lies. It's misrepresentations of what
Trump actually said, things like suckers and losers, things like
(14:36):
good people on both sides, those things. Listen, and those
are the ones they go to first. Those are their
top tier examples, and they are made up. A reasonable
person might then conclude, well, maybe this list is not accurate.
Maybe this list is a gross distortion of reality. But
I don't have the time, nor the information, nor the
(14:58):
effort to go through this and re refute every one
of these. That's impossible for someone to do. Reminds me
a little bit a couple of Oh I guess a
month or so ago on this program, I interviewed an
individual she's running for Congress in Detroit. I think it's
the thirteenth districtor named Shelby Campbell, and during our conversation,
(15:22):
she mentioned we were talking about Charlie Kirk. She's the
one that said some reprehensible things about Charlie Kirk. She
kind of apologized, sort of. She said she was just
making a joke and she's a fan of dark humor. Whatever.
You can decide for yourself, but the bottom line is
the bottom line is she during that conversation, she made
(15:44):
reference to something and she accused Charlie Kirk of saying
somebody in the audience who was Asian. She said that
Charlie Kirk referred used a derogatory term, calling him a
chi in k And at the time, this is the point,
(16:05):
like I knew at the time, I knew that. Again,
you can't I can't say I knew, but I was
very confident that Charlie Kirk didn't say that. I was
very confident of that, and I thought there has to
be other contexts. Something else is going on here, and
I just didn't know it at the time, But after
the interview that day or the next day, soon thereafter
(16:28):
a day or two later, I came to realize that
she was referencing a conversation that Charlie Kirk had had
with Jank Yuger, and he was talking to Shank Yuger,
and she thought that he was saying, or it was
reported that he was using a derogatory term targeting Asians
or whatever, but in reality, he was saying Jank Huger.
(16:51):
It's spelled cean K. So the point is, how can
you possibly know if they have examples of ten thousand,
which of course that's inflated as well, in ten thousand lies,
ten thousand, whatever it is, ten thousand times Trump's name
is going to be in these documents. There's no way
to know all of the examples and have a ready
(17:17):
at the hand response for all of these things. At
some point, though, we have to say, well, let's just
give me the best the pest two, three, four or five,
and let's go through those and see what actually see
what the evidence suggests. This is going to be a
clown show. Be prepared. This is going to be an
(17:39):
absolute clown show. And again I'm for transparency, but I
also know that they're political opportunists. It's the perfect recipe.
You've got political opportunists mixed with people who are well
low information voters, as Rush used to call them. So
(18:00):
you've got people who are going to distort reality and
people who are prepared to consume it. And it is
a recipe for disaster. So just prepare yourself for this. Again,
there's nothing wrong with transparency. In fact, transparency is a
good thing. But if you have if you focus just
on transparency and then you say we're going to have
(18:21):
the experts tell us what this stuff means, you're going
to have chaos. It's going to happen. And I don't
know what's going to happen specifically, but I can assure
you whatever they tell us at the beginning, at some
point along this process, it's going to be incorrect. It's
going to be incorrect, and there are going to be
people that are going to believe whatever the initial lie
(18:43):
is for the rest of eternity. I don't know who
said it, but somebody has once said the lie. I'm
going to paraphrase, but a lie can be spread around
the world before the truth even wakes up. That's a
very generous paraphrase, but basically, lies spread rapidly. Truth takes
(19:03):
time and it can't catch up. And there are going
to be some people who like to live in their ignorance,
who don't really care about truth, who won't even be
open to the idea that Donald Trump is not some
creepy pedophile as some people are claiming. Some people are claiming.
I mean, I've got a school teacher, a public school
teacher in my district, who makes allegations of that on Facebook.
(19:29):
It's wild, wild times. I mean that is that is defamation.
That is what libel, slander or whatever. That this without evidence,
if it can't be proven, and you're making these statements
as facts, and it can be proven that. Of course
he's he's a public figure, so it's a little bit different.
But this is this is not how you do these
(19:51):
things at all, but it's how it's done in politics today.
So just buckle up for what we're about ready to
part take in here are my friends with the release
of these files. Friends, if you're dealing with discomfort, or
you're tired of living off prescriptions, tired of managing those
side effects, you're not alone. A lot of folks are
(20:13):
looking for something natural that they can trust. That's why
you should check out Christopher's Organic Botanicals, a family run
natural creative company rooted in truth, tradition, and transparency. They
partner directly with farmers in Indonesia. They lab test everything
before it ever reaches your hands. No hype, no synthetic,
(20:37):
no funny business. This is just the real thing, done
right and real creatim and you should. I encourage you
to research it. I encourage you to research it on
their website or wherever, not just their website, wherever, you
can research real creatim and see that the examples of
some of the horror stories you might have heard about
(20:58):
creatom comes from the synthetic garbage, the shady sellers out
there promoting selling producing stuff that's not real creatim at all.
That's the horror story. Check out their website. You can
get their product or you can research there, but you
can start with their creative Starter pack. Use coupon code
(21:19):
Todd Hof you'll save ten percent during the checkout process.
Visit Christopher's Organic Botanicals dot com. That's Christopher's Organic Botanicals
dot com. Truth tradition, transparency. All right, So, getting near
the end here of this our first segment of today's program, again,
(21:43):
it is good to have transparency. In fact, for those
of you who for those of you who have listened
to this program recently, you'll know that I've had problems
with transparency with one of our state senators who refuses
here in Indiana to even explain why he didn't well,
(22:06):
why he refused to convene the Senate for the special
session to consider redistricting that was requested by Senator exculd
Be by Governor Mike Brown. And there's no transparency. They've
hidden it from us. It's behind these deals that are
made behind closed doors. They've counted the votes for something
(22:27):
that we don't even know what it is yet apparently
they're just against it. They don't want to go through it.
It's not transparent. So I'm a fan of transparency. But
being a nation that is, being a people that should
be focused on getting transparency from their government. We have
an obligation and a responsibility to know what to do
(22:49):
with that information, and unfortunately a lot of people don't.
So more about this on the other side of the
break of my friend sit tight, you're listening any conservative
not being to talk? I'm your host, Todd Huff back
in at just a minute. I'll come back, my friends,
I want to continue this conversation about the Epstein files.
(23:11):
I also want to get to I alluded to a
SoundBite that came from an interview between Jasmine Crockett, representative
from the state of Texas, a leftist, lunatic in Congress,
someone who is there for the political drama. She's a
(23:31):
dramacrat in the truest sense of the word, engaging in
political theater constantly. This is what politics has become, unfortunately
in twenty first century America. I've got a sound bite
of her. It's an example of what we're going to
see more of. We're going to see more of this
(23:53):
as more information is released. And I'm going to set
this up here in just a moment what this conversation
was about that she had with Caitlin Collins of CNN.
But before I do that, my friends need to pause here,
remind you and ask you Are you tired of spending
your hard earned money at businesses that turn around and
(24:15):
then support leftist causes. That's exactly why we created Freedom Marketplace.
It's a searchable directory of businesses that share your conservative values,
businesses that have vowed not to support leftist candidates, leftist causes.
There's no it's free for you to use, no strings attached,
just good patriotic businesses that are pushing in the same
(24:39):
direction you're pushing. You can check it out today at
Freedom Marketplace dot net. This is something we built. You know,
the full history is we as we grew to program
and we got enough, you know, we got a significant
amount of advertisers. We ran out of space. We used
to put those folks on our websites, and there got
to be enough people, logos and things on the way
(25:00):
website that it wasn't good, It didn't look good. I
wasn't proud of my work. It just got too convoluted,
and so we had to build a searchable directory and
that's where this started. And businesses who not everybody has
a listing there, but most many do. And there's also
people that you don't hear on this program that are
(25:20):
also on that directory and it's free for you to use.
We try to find businesses they sign a pledge by
the way that says they're not going to support leftist
candidates or leftist causes. So Freedom Marketplace dot net is
where you would go for that. You can find out
information about it on our website todd haveshow dot com
as well wherever you want to go, however you want
to get there. But this is a place where you
(25:41):
can find businesses that you can work with that are
pushing in the same direction that you are. Freedom Marketplace
dot net. Okay, sorry, I'm having a little bit of
a voice problem here today. I've told it's come out
of the blue. I know the winter fall in wintertime.
This hits me every year, and I thought I dodged
(26:01):
the bullets because it normally hits late September and October
and it'll take my vocals down. And I'm fighting it
today and I don't Then there's I don't feel bad.
I don't know if I sound different to you, but
I can tell you I sound different to myself and
I can feel it, and I just can't quite get
my voice to where it needs to be. So hear
me hitting that mute button. That's I'm trying to keep
(26:22):
my voice from bogging down. So that being said, let's play.
Let me set the scene first, Jasmine Crockett comes on
to talk with Caitlin Collins on CNN. Now, Jasmine Crockett
took to the floor of the House of Representatives, her
and her team to prove a point I guess, did
(26:46):
a did a search, did a search in the FEC
database FEC Federal Elections Commissioned database to see who had
received funding from Jeffrey Epstein. And again, because this is
all everything's political, right, everything is listening, I understand, I understand.
If you take money from Jeffrey Epstein, you might be
(27:09):
someone who's part of the problem. He might. In theory,
if all these things, these allegations are true, we can
connect the dots and say, Wow, that person is being
controlled by Jeffrey Epstein. Or if you really want to
dig deep, is Jeffrey Epstein an asset to somebody who's
being controlled by another foreign country or what this could
(27:29):
It's a problem, right if you've got someone who has
been involved with Jeffrey Epstein and what he was doing
on his little private island that debakriy and wickedness and
pure evil and sin. If you were involved in that
and he has audio video evidence that can put you
(27:51):
there in some really compromising positions, then suddenly you are
You're very blackmailable, You're someone who's career up. You're you've
been compromised. And if you're in office and you want
to stay in office, like you depend upon Jeffrey Epstein
to keep you there, you're going to follow, you know,
toe the line with how he wants you to vote
(28:13):
or the people who have used him as an asset
that this is a potential explanation for this sole This
is a potential of where of what could actually have
been going on at Epstein Islands, just the potential. It
doesn't mean it's the only explanation, but it's certainly an
explanation as to what could have been going on. So
if that's the case, obviously, if you're taking money from Epstein,
(28:34):
if you're you know, spending a lot of time with him,
it raises a lot of these questions and they're absolutely
one percent, they are absolutely legitimate questions. Now that being said,
it's also possible in the world of politics, you're out
raising money and you know, Jeffrey Epstein was was wealthy.
(28:58):
Jeffrey Epstein, probably like many other people with large amounts
of wealth, gives to lots of politicians. It's theoretically possible
that Jeffrey Epstein gave money to people that didn't know
anything about what Jeffrey Epstein was up to. I can
leave it up to you. I'm just saying that there's
context matters. Just because you have a picture with the
(29:20):
guy that might be in these files, just because he
emailed you and responded, doesn't mean that you are on
the list, so to speak. It could mean that, It
absolutely could mean that, but it doesn't necessarily mean that.
I feel like we've lost this ability to have this
conversation about context and nuance along the way. But nonetheless, nonetheless,
(29:42):
what Jasmine Krackett did she went and did a search
in the FEC database where she found the name Jeffrey Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein as a donor for people like Mitt Romney
and Lee Zelden and others. However, however, we have since
found out that the jet there's not just one Jeffrey
(30:02):
Epstein in the world. Have you paused and thought about this,
I can tell you this as somebody you know. I
used to a long time ago, long long time ago.
I had to Todd Huff dot com and I'm talking
twenty some years ago, and I it expired or something
I didn't know, I didn't have it on auto renew
(30:22):
or something happened, and I lost it in somebody else
who's a politician. And I think Baltimore got it. So
I don't have that anymore. Wish that I did. I don't.
It's fine, but we're the only many of us are
not the only person with our name. I would say
most of us. It's probably rare for someone to only
(30:42):
be the only example of a name. So just imagine
being a person named Jeffrey Epstein. Again, this makes me
think of a Seinfeld of a Seinfeld. When Elaine was
dating a guy with the name of a serial killer,
she went to a New York Giants football game with him,
and they announced the guy's name over the PA PA system,
(31:04):
and of course he gets up to go respond to
whatever the PA addresser was requesting him for, and Elaine's
telling everybody he's not the serial he's not a serial killer.
He's a nice guy, right, I mean, as only Seinfeld
can do, but just imagine being another Jeffrey Epstein. Well,
Jeffrey Epstein gave money to the campaigns of other Republicans.
(31:28):
Jasmine Crockett found it, but it wasn't the Jeffrey Epstein
of Epstein Island. It was another Jeffrey Epstein. And I
just want you to listen to this exchange. I play
it simply to say prepare for more of this as
these files.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
Jeffrey Epstein, here's what you said.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
The pause in the broadcast, who also took money from
somebody named Jeffrey Epstein? As I had my team dig
in very quickly. Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zelden, George
bush Win, Ray McCain, palin Rick Lazio.
Speaker 3 (32:04):
You mentioned to Lee Zelden there he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually doctor Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex trucker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is
who do it in to a prior campaign of his.
Do you want to correct the record on the people
that I.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
Want to pause that real quick So in other words,
Jasmine Crockett, she had her team do a quick search
find people who took money from Jeffrey Epstein. They found
the Republican Party, Sarah Palin, you know McCain Palin campaign,
Lee Zelden met Romney. But it's not the same guy.
And Leezelden says, it's a different guy. It's a doctor,
an ey doctor or some such thing. And I want
(32:40):
you to listen to her response, say, did it was.
Speaker 4 (32:42):
That Jeffrey Epstein? Just so that people understand, when you
make a donation, your picture is not there. And because
they decided to spring this on us in real time,
I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially
happen because I knew that they didn't even try to
go through the FEC. So my team what they did
is they googled. And that is specifically why I said
a Jeffrey Epstein like Republicans, I at least don't go
(33:02):
out and just tell lies. Really because it was not
the same one, that's fine. But when lee Zeldn had
something to say, all he had to say was it
was a different jeff Jeffrey Epstein. He admitted that he
did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein, so at least
I wasn't trying to mislead people. Talk now, have I
dug in to find out who this doctor is? I
have not, so I will trust and take What he
says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But I
(33:25):
was not attempting to mislead anybody. I surely had maybe
twenty minutes before I had to do.
Speaker 3 (33:31):
That dig to say, well, you're trying to make it
tell him like he took money from I did not
registered test defender.
Speaker 4 (33:37):
No, but I literally did not know when you search
FEC files, and that's what I had my team to do.
I texted and I say, listen, we're going up there
saying that she took donations, right.
Speaker 3 (33:46):
But someone might say, well, your team should have done
the homework to make sure it wasn't then.
Speaker 4 (33:49):
Within twenty minutes you could not find that out, not
from just doing a quick search on FEC. So number one,
I made sure I.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
Got to take your break, my friends, correct time out
back in just a minute and welcome back my friends.
Sorry for jumping off so quickly.
Speaker 3 (34:06):
There.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
I looked at the clock and realized I had not
accountant for the time I had available. I didn't have
any time left there and I had to jump off quickly.
So basically Jasmine Crockett was trying to make some point
that this I only play this AA it's it's ridiculous.
(34:27):
It's ridiculous what goes on in our Congress. Sometimes because
of dramacrats like this, and sometimes because of Republicans too,
but it's it's ridiculous what goes on there. It's not
it's not serious business. Many times. It's it's they're looking
for sound bites to send out to their donors to
(34:49):
to get you know, to do fundraising, uh, to show
people that they're down for the cause. They just want
their you know, a video of themselves from the floor
of the house else talking about whatever it is that
they want to talk about in their latest newsletter or
podcast or whatever. And in rushing it and doing this,
(35:13):
doing it this way, what they did. What she did
was ended up finding out that the hard way that
the Jeffrey Epstein they found as a donor for McCain, Palin,
for the Republican Party, for Lee Zelden, for Mitt Romney,
it wasn't this Jeffrey Epstein. Now she says, look, I'm
(35:36):
trying to say, you know, point out that just because
someone's name's there, it's not necessarily you know, there's other context.
She's saying that she's doing the responsible thing here, but
in reality, what she's doing is just feeding the narrative
and feeding the people who are low information voters, feeding
(35:58):
them stuff that sounds like at first glance, or at
first at first hearing, anyway, that what is being that
Republicans are taking money from Epstein. That's what she wanted
the point to be. And there are people who are
never going to be convinced otherwise. They heard that clip,
(36:21):
they don't care about context. They're going to tell you
maybe today at work that Mitt Romney's campaign took money
from Jeffrey Epstein, or that Lee well, they won't know Lee, Zelden, McCain, Palin.
That's probably that's too far back for a lot of people,
so they won't mention that. They might mention Mitt Romney.
If Trump's name is somehow pulled up onto this into
(36:43):
this mess, they absolutely would remember that. But when read
a Republican group, the Republican Party, they took money, I'm
sure someone out there today is going to say Jeffrey
Epstein was given to the Republicans because of course they're all.
According to these people that exchange in this sort of
conversation and so forth, they're going to say that these
(37:05):
folks are all are all engaged in pedophilia, which is
sick and disgusting. But that's where this goes. And I
bring this up to say, we're going to see this
multiplied by a pretty big factor over the next thirty days.
People are going to claim that something in the Epstein
files means something it doesn't mean. And I'm going to
(37:27):
say up front, to make sure make sure that you
withhold making a final judgment. Make sure you withhold making
a final judgment. I mean, obviously, if it's it's it's real,
incriminating and very straightforward, you know it's it's I'm not
saying there's not degrees of this, but if it's someone
(37:49):
who you suspect is doing some nefarious things, a Democrat
named Bill Clinton, for example, it's just we should just
be a little slow to confirm these things. And what's
so wrong about that. I don't want people to be
unjustly accused, even if I disagree with them politically. I
(38:09):
feel like a member of a shrinking minority when I
say that everything is so political these days, and so
we're about to see a whole lot more of this
over the course of the next thirty days and of
course even after that. Friends. You know, one of the
biggest challenges that we have as conservatives is finding ways
(38:32):
to ensure our values align with the things that we
do the way that we live our lives, including how
we invest in what we invest in. That's why I
like to see what the team at four to eight
financial is doing. They specialize in biblically responsible investing. That
means they screen out companies that do not align with
(38:53):
your faith and your values, so that we're not funding
things that go completely against what we believe in. This
is important. This has not always been possible. It is
possible with some of these tools today, and that's what
for eight Financial is trying to help you do. They'll
do that heavy lifting for you, helping align your investments
with your purpose, with your goals, with your values. The
(39:15):
best part is you can simply start by where you
are today. You can do a quick assessment at four
eight financial dot com slash todd that's for eight financial
dot com slash todd, and they are going to help
you determine to what degree or if your current investments
align or reflect your align with or reflector your values. Again,
(39:39):
that's for eight financial dot com slash Todd for eight financial,
because your money should be working for your values. My friends,
all right, reach the end of the program today. I
just want to reiterate what I said here a moment ago.
There's there's going to be There is absolutely going to
(40:00):
be a bunch of hysteria. Transparency works. Transparency is important,
but it only works when we stay rooted in truth,
when we think for ourselves, when we don't just accept
whatever's told us because it fits the political narrative or
even our political preferences. What matters is that we are
(40:25):
critical thinkers who question what we're told and who look
for content context. I should say in nuance, we've got
to resist this circus. It's about to unfold, and we've
got to demand honesty over the hysteria and the hype
and the headlines. So, folks, thank you so much for
joining me today. I hope you have a wonderful day.
(40:47):
Say tomorrow. SDG
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.