Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Show, America's home
for conservative not bitter talking education. Be advised. The content
of this program has been talcumented to prevents and even
cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to
the right. And now coming to you from the full
(00:29):
suite Wealth Studios, here is your conservative but not bitter host,
Todd Huff.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
That is right, my friends, you have tuned in evers
so successful and wisely to America's home for conservative not
better talk.
Speaker 3 (00:41):
I'm your host, the one, the only.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
The very conservative, not bitter Todd Huff. It's my pleasure
to be here today. My friends are showing new evidence
out there. The alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk texted his
room in. This roommate is reportedly his transgender.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
Lover boyfriend lover.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
I don't know the right words to say here, And
today we're gonna walk through these messages. We're going to
talk about what they reveal. You know, I listen to
people on social media tell me all sorts of things
that I was wrong, that this was a maga conservative
and everything else. And now again this is there are
so many things to that you could learn from this.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
So many things.
Speaker 2 (01:33):
Number One, something I've said on this program from the
very early stages is to withhold, withhold your opinion until
you have enough evidence. Some people want the shooter and
I don't understand this, I truly don't. I've encountered people
on social media who want the shooter to have been MAGA,
(01:55):
or want the shooter to have been a conservative Republican
or whatever, and I don't know what they think that proves.
It doesn't prove the validity of their ideas, their values.
If the shooter is a conservative Republican, it doesn't prove
that at all. It doesn't prove anything other than other
(02:17):
than detecting patterns. I've said before on this program, there
are people in any group of people that are going
to do incredibly wicked and atrocious things. The real question
is the real question is to ask ourselves, is that
group promoting an ideology or a belief system that encourages
(02:37):
that behavior, or is this just the response of some individual,
some behavior of an individual who has hell bent on
doing evil perpetrating evil, which we've clearly seen that is
the case in this particular instance, with the assassination of
Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
So that's where we're going to go today.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
I've also got sound bite, a SoundBite I want to
get to with Cash Battel. You might have seen him
yesterday before a Senate committee hearing the fireworks were erupting
all over the place. I've got a clip between Spartacus, Yes,
that's right, Senator Spartacus, Cory Booker, and Cash Battel. There's
(03:17):
also something I addressed it in today's Todd Talk, which
you can get the Todd Talks if you sign up
for our free newsletter Todd of Show dot com slash Truth.
All you gotta do is enter your email address and
you'll get these each and every day. But we have
a lot of content in the newsletter, some supplemental things
(03:38):
that we've talked about here, but I always include the
Todd Talk. But in the Todd Talk, I'm just gonna
briefly mention this here off the top. The mayor of Dearborn,
Michigan told a resident who took to the podium at
a city council meeting. And this individual, who was a Christian,
and he was speaking very respect to the mayor, he
(04:02):
had a problem with some of the recognition that was
going out to well people who were supporting Islamic terrorism
groups like Hezbolah. He made this known and the mayor
lost his mind. The mayor called him as an islamophobe.
The mayor told him basically to move out of the city.
He told him, I'm paraphrasing here, but you will be
(04:24):
I'm going to have.
Speaker 3 (04:25):
A parade when you move out of the city. I
kid you not.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
And he told him that you're not welcome here. So
I can't get into that. That's a todd talk that's
in the newsletter for today. But we're going to hit
these top two issues, as I promise friends. Off the top,
have you ever noticed how some families seem to have
a plan that lasts for generations and you might think
that that's what you need, and you very well, maybe
(04:49):
to the point where you need that intergenerational plan that's
not by accident. When folks do this, my friends, Full
Sweet Wealth works with people who want their wealth to
make a difference for years to come. Their team brings
together high level investment strategies like private equity, private credit,
and options strategies. All this is tied together with expert
(05:13):
legal advice. Legal guidance. It's all about making sure that
your vision becomes a reality, both for today and into
the future generations to come. So if you're looking for
more than just a way to manage your money, if
you want to leave a mark and build something lasting,
take a look at full Sweet Wealth.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
Jason and his team there will take good care of you.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
Very qualified, good people at full sweet Wealth fullsweetwealth dot com.
Build your legacy, secure your future. Okay, let's talk here
about what we know about this alleged shooter. Prosecutors yesterday
released a series of text messages between the assassin, the
(05:57):
alleged assassin whose name I'm not going to repeat on
this program, and his roommate slash partner. We know through
reports that this roommate partner is a trans woman. This
is a biological male who is trying to undergo the
process of becoming a female.
Speaker 3 (06:18):
And that's who.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
This alleged assassin is living with, is having a relationship with.
I just would say, off the top, that does not
sound like something that is common amongst conservatives. I'm not
saying it doesn't happen. I'm just saying that that's a
big If we're looking for pieces of evidence as to
what this alleged shooter believes.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
If that's what we're.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
Trying to determine here, then that's a pretty big indicator.
Now I've got the full exchange of these text message
text messages below, let's see. Sorry here, here we go,
scroll down to where I've got the text messages. The
I'm gonna have to I'm gonna have to say the
(07:05):
name I think because I've got messages coming from each roommate.
I'm gonna say shooter and roommate. And let me just
say this for legal purposes, anytime I say shooter in
this section, I am this refers to the alleged shooter.
I might say alleged shooter whatever. But in case I don't,
(07:27):
this is a blanket statement. I am human and I'm
prone to error, but this is These are all allegations.
But this is the evidence that's been presented, excuse me,
presented by law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (07:39):
So here we go.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
The alleged shooter texts his roommate and says, this, drop
what you are doing. Look under my keyboard. Now, the
roommate does this under the keyboard at his residence that
he shared with the roommate. There are there's a note,
a handwritten note that says I had the opportunity to
(08:01):
take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it.
Roommate texts back, what a bunch of question marks? You're joking, right,
The alleged shooter responds, I am still okay, my love,
but stuck in orum a little while, a little while
longer yet, shouldn't be long until I can come home.
Speaker 3 (08:22):
But I gotta grab my rifle. Still.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret
till I died of old age. I am sorry to
involve you. Roommate responded, you weren't the one who did it, right.
The alleged shooter says, I am, I'm sorry, roommate. I
thought they caught the person. You'll remember there was in
the immediate aftermath, there was an individual that was on
(08:48):
social media that was being handcuffed and so forth. They
thought that they had captured the shooter. I think this
happened twice. There were two people. I mean, you got
a picture that it's pandemonium, it's it's it's insanity, it's bedlam.
You've got a bunch of people who gather to hear
Charlie Kirk and the people that are asking him questions,
debating him that sort of thing on a college campus,
(09:09):
just like he's done many many other times.
Speaker 3 (09:13):
They're there, shot a shot rings out.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Charlie Kirk immediately collapses, falls over. Everyone realizes he's struck,
and they don't know what's going to happen. People are
running everywhere. It's just there's lots of people in a
small area, people running, just all sorts of things that
are that are happening. And so they grabbed an individual
who's clothing matched the alleged shooter's clothing at least in general,
(09:42):
so they thought that they had him.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
They thought they had him a couple of times. Anyway,
all this is.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
To say he the shooter had left his rifle. He
had dropped it, but he didn't have time to get it,
and you'll find that through this through this text exchange here.
So the roommates that I thought they caught someone the
alleged shooter said no, they grabbed some crazy old dude,
then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to
(10:08):
grab my rifle from my drop point short shortly after,
but most of that side of town got locked down.
It's quiet almost enough to get out, but there's one
vehicle lingering.
Speaker 3 (10:20):
So he's texting.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
He's kind of watching, watching the point where he had
dropped his rifle.
Speaker 3 (10:25):
He can't retrieve it.
Speaker 2 (10:26):
He thinks he's close to being able to retrieve it,
and that's what's going on. During this conversation. The roommate
says why. The alleged shooter says, why.
Speaker 3 (10:38):
Did I do it?
Speaker 2 (10:40):
Roommate, Yeah, Rob, the alleged shooter. I had enough of
this hatred. This is this is critical right here. What
I'm about to read. You listen up. He writes this.
I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be
negotiated with. If I'm able to grab my rifle, I
(11:00):
will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve
it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven't seen
anything about them finding it. So let's pause there. Well,
let's finish this. This isn't too much longer. The roommate says,
how long have you been planning this? The alleged shooter says,
(11:21):
a bit over a week. I believe I can get
close to it again, talking about the gun, fixated on
picking up the evidence his firearm, I can get close
to it, but there's a squad car parked right by it.
I think they already swept that spot, but I don't
want to chance it. Then the alleged shooter says this,
I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as
(11:42):
soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried about
what my old man would do if I didn't bring
back grandpa's rifle. So this is his grandfather's rifle that
had been handed down to his father.
Speaker 3 (11:55):
I don't know if the Sun just had access.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
I don't know if the Sun was given the rifle
or how what the circumstances are. But he had taken
this rifle, I don't I think this is supposed to
be idk idk if it had I don't know if
it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me,
basically saying that gun doesn't. There's not paperwork that ties
that gun to me. It's tied to my to my family.
(12:19):
I worry about prints. I had to leave it in
a bush where I changed outfits, didn't have the ability
or time to bring it with I might have to
abandon it and hope they don't find prints. How the
blank will I explain losing it to my old man.
The only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in
(12:41):
a towel. Remember how I was engraving bullets. The blanking
messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notices
bulges uwu, you might remember that we talked about this
on the program earlier, earlier this week or last week,
whenever we talked about the inscriptions on the bullets on
(13:03):
the shell casings. He says, if I see notices bulge uwu,
this was one of the things that was engraved on
the bullets on Fox News, I might have a stroke.
All Right, I gotta leave it. That really blanking sucks.
Judging from the day, I'd say Grandpa's gun does just fine.
Speaker 3 (13:23):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
I think it was a two thousand dollars scope. Yes,
some version of a smiley face. Then he tells his
roommate delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle.
This is another text. A little bit later, he says,
Grandpa wants to know who has what. The Feds released
a photo of the rifle and it is very unique.
(13:46):
He's calling me right now, not answering. So they've released
photos of the rifle. I don't know if his parents
look to have seen the rifle. If you see the
whole the full exchange. I can't go through all of this,
but the mother saw some of those early pictures, you know,
you would have seen these images, the videos of the
alleged gunman, and she she thought, man, that looks a
(14:07):
lot like my son. She talked to her husband about this.
The husband, the father of the of the alleged shooter,
said the same thing. They begin to get suspicious. They
know that he's within, you know, the vicinity, he could
get there. They asked the mother, I believe text are
called and asked where he was. He said he was
home sick and had been for the past two days.
(14:29):
This was the day after the assassination, and so forth,
and so basically there's now there's pictures of the firearm.
The father and the grandfather know, hey, this firearm looks
a lot like my gun have and it's a rare gun.
It's not just a common gun. It's pretty unique. It's
got some unique characteristics. So they begin to wonder. Now,
(14:50):
I mean, they have high suspicions. By that point, he
thinks he's just going to ignore the phone call. I mean,
what did he think was gonna happen? Right he the
parents respected him immediately, I mean within within twenty four hours.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
That he has a gun.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
It would be traced back to either the grandfather or
his father, and everyone would say, well, there's one of
the people in our family has gotten much more political.
As they have said, by the way, he's gotten much
more political, He's gotten much further left than his politics.
This is a family who's I guess you could say
a Magi family, a conservative family, conservative Republican family. But
(15:30):
the son the alleged shooter in the past, I don't know,
with some period of time year or two, had been
reportedly gone way to the left, even to the point
where he's now living with a transgender roommate who's also
his boyfriend slash lover. Anyway, so he continues here, the
(15:52):
alleged shooter says this, since Trump got into office, my
dad has been pretty diehard.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Magan.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
I'm going to turn myself in willingly. One of my
neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, this
was all under the pressure of his family. You are
all I worry about love again, texting his roommate, the
roommate says, I'm much more worried about you, the alleged shooter.
Speaker 3 (16:17):
Don't talk to the media.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
Please, don't take any interviews or make any comments. If
any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer, and
stay silent. This is all as reported by Fox thirteen Utah.
Fox thirteen Utah. Yes, it's a transcript of the charging documents.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
So that is what we know.
Speaker 2 (16:43):
That's that exchange. I want to zero in here. I
want to zero in on this particular part of his
of his what I want to say his text messages
he said this, I had enough of his hatred when
he was asked why he did it, And I want
to say this from the mountaintops. I want to say
(17:05):
this to all the people out there, and I've heard
from them. I've heard from them on social media. They're
self just self righteous. They think they're so smart, they
think they've got it all figured out. They thought that
because this guy's family was Republican, that he was Republican,
because he was because his family was maga, that he
(17:25):
was maga. I don't know why you would conclude this.
There are plenty of examples in this country where kids
have the exact opposite political beliefs of their families. In fact,
it's one of the major concerns. You know, Charlie Kirk said,
college as a scam, one of the major concerns that parents.
And if you don't have this concern, I'm telling you
(17:47):
you should have it, I think you should have it.
But when you send your kids off to college, there
are professors. I had some of these people twenty what
was it, twenty five, even thirty, oh Gie, almost thirty
years ago. But I had some of these professors who
really believed it was their job.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
I kid you not.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
I'm not saying every professor, And yes, it depends on
the sort of thing you're studying.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
I don't want to keep you up at night.
Speaker 2 (18:11):
But listen, there are people there who believe it is
their job to re educate your child. They believe if
you've taught them to be a conservative, a conservative Christian,
if you've given them a faith, you know, taught them
about a faith in God, if they were raised in church,
if they believe in Republican political ideas, they believe these professors,
(18:32):
these radical professors, believe it is their job, their responsibility,
to re educate, to deprogram them from what you taught them,
and to teach them radical radical things. And there's lots
of ways that they've gotten savvy. They've gotten savvy. But then,
you know, at the same time, I say that we
sometimes give these folks too much credit. They're not perfect.
(18:52):
They're not without fault. They're not some just.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
Well oiled and very slick machine. They are.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
They're they're far from from perfect, but they've they've gotten
pretty good at it. And so he goes away, you know,
after his teenage year's early twenties, and he's flipped. He
slipped the switch. And if you're a parent, I'm not
saying please don't misunderstand. There are kids that can get
through that environment. I got through it just fine. But
(19:24):
I had a support system in place.
Speaker 3 (19:26):
I had. I had a very close relationship with my pastor, and.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
I would on the regular, I mean virtually at least weekly,
sometimes daily, would be talking with him. I interned int
a place called the Christian Defense Food. I went in
knowing that this was the tactic, that these folks were
radical leftists, and that they didn't like people who believe
conservative believe in God probably the most the number one
(19:52):
thing believe in God, but then also to have conservative
principles and values.
Speaker 3 (19:55):
They did not like that. They took it. I think
some of them took it personally.
Speaker 2 (19:59):
If you can't through an apartment liberal arts and sciences,
political science, which is which is what I studied at Butler.
Some of these folks, I think took it personally if
you came through their program and didn't adopt their way
of thinking. Now, not all professors were like that, but
there were a lot, and they were in a lot
of fields that sometimes you wouldn't even suspect. So, but
(20:22):
some of them were there.
Speaker 3 (20:23):
Listen.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
I remember I had a math professor. She certainly was
there just for the math.
Speaker 3 (20:29):
She told me. She told me once in class, I
kid you not.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
I had a question. It was calculus. I think it
was calculus. And I raised my hand and I asked
a question. And I said, Professor so and so, doctor
I think doctor so and so. And I asked my
question and she told me, I kid you not. She said,
if you don't know that, you probably shouldn't be in here.
(20:52):
And I said, you know what, probably the last question
I asked for the semester. Thanks for humiliating me in
front of my classmates, But anyway, some people that focus
just on the subject. But it is a real thing,
a very very real thing, my friends, that kids are
subjected to. And so for all those people who are
out there, where are you now? Where are you now?
(21:12):
Can you admit that you were wrong? Can you admit
that this person, by his own alleged text messages here
had hatred for Donald Trump thought that Charlie Kirk deserved
to die. You can't negotiate, he said, with his brand
of hatred, his type of hatred, some things you just
can't negotiate with. He thought he was justified. Where does
(21:33):
he get these things? You tell me that, Where does
he hear these things?
Speaker 3 (21:36):
My friends? Just say it, Just say he was a leftist.
Just say he is a.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Leftist who thinks he's justified. Sounds like destiny if you
watch destiny on social media. I saw him as a
guest being interviewed somewhere the other day. Just reprehensible, just
scummy things to say, pathetic, pathetic behavior from this clown
who's a leftist on social media, who thinks he's so
(22:02):
much smarter and better than the rest of us. Anyway,
I've got more to say about this, but I've got
to take a break. Friends, My Pillow's excited to announce
they're bringing back there. Well, they're starting their three to
one sale. It is their biggest sale that they've ever had,
and they have a limited edition product. They have bed
sheets starting at twenty nine ninety eight, any color, any size,
(22:25):
even king sheets. They've got these are regular one nineteen
ninety eight. Those are only twenty nine ninety eight. Once
they're gone, they're gone. My towels, they're back in stock.
You can get a six piece towel set for thirty
nine ninety eight, Regular sixty nine ninety eight, and for
the first time and the only time, you can get
a limited edition Premium MyPillow made with Giza cotton and
(22:48):
design with a designer guess at Queen's at seventeen ninety eight,
kings at nineteen ninety eight. MyPillow dot Com promo code
Todd MyPillow dot com promo code Todd. I end ay Brink,
Quick time out, My friends back in just a minute,
my friends.
Speaker 3 (23:05):
Remind me who the fascists are?
Speaker 4 (23:07):
Again?
Speaker 2 (23:07):
Remind me who the fascist are again? Let me give
you a definition here of fascism. The left throws this
around as though they're the anti fascist.
Speaker 3 (23:16):
This is incredible to me.
Speaker 2 (23:17):
Just listen to the definition and ask yourself, who is
the one who is demonstrating this sort of behavior. Here's
a definition of fascism, a form of authoritarian ultra nationalism
characterized by dictatorial power forcible suppression of opposition. Hello, if
(23:40):
that's not what this is, they literally are silencing their
political opposition. This particular individual who again, listen to me,
I am clear on this. There are people that are
capable of doing reprehensible evil in any group. Candidly our
capacity as human beings, this is just biblical. We all
(24:00):
have the capacity to do atrocious things to rebel and dissent.
But there are people in any group that are capable
of incredibly wicked things. Every group can have murderers involved
in everything else. But does the ideology fuel this. That's
an important distinction to make is what your group teaching
(24:25):
its followers. Are those things actually leading people to take
violent actions? And I would maintain that the rhetoric of
the left is in fact I even't seen I've even
seen tweets posts on x from Biden back when he
was president. You go back and you look at some
of this rhetoric. They positioned Trump as Hitler. They positioned
(24:49):
Trump as a Nazi, who was an authoritarian, who was
a threat to our democracy, who was if he was elected,
was going to cause the downfall of the.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
United States of America. You think that has.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
Anything to do with this, This isn't complicated. But anyway,
the forcible suppression of the opposition, forcing them to shut up.
You've seen them do this, even I saw I didn't
see the clip, but I've seen tactics that people have
tried to employ against Charlie Kirk at college campuses to
(25:22):
try to get his YouTube videos taken down. Remember was
it Riley Gaines who had was was basically kidnapped by
leftists on a university campus. This wasn't the first time
that this violence has that violence against conservatives on campuses
has has happened. Now, this was the first time that
(25:45):
one had been killed, murdered, assassinated. But who's the one
stirring these things up? It continues here, It says control
of society and the economy. Who wants control? Who listen?
You can, you can make your arguments, you can say
whatever you want to say. Now, there could be repercussions
for what you say as some of these folks have
found out who are out there praising the death of
(26:06):
Charlie Kirk and then find that they don't have a
job come Monday morning.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
And to that, I say, good. I listen.
Speaker 1 (26:12):
I I.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
Take no pleasure in some of the stuff that we
see happening, but listen, they've done this to themselves. The
only way through this, my friends, the only way through
this is to defeat evil.
Speaker 3 (26:26):
You cannot you cannot negotiate. We have to.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
And when I say this, I don't mean it like
this alleged assassin means that he said, in order to
you had to shoot your opponents and kill them. That's
what he's claiming. Now I'm saying, we have to beat
them at the ballot box. We have to use every
legal and lawful and moral tool at our disposal. We
have to make arguments, we have to stand strong. We
(26:50):
have to oppose our school boards. We have to oppose
and expose teachers who are abusing things. I don't listen.
We don't need to be going after people because we
don't like it. But when we see these things that
are dangerous, when we see things that fuel this sort
of hatred, it needs to be exposed, and it needs
to be stopped in the appropriate legal ways. And by
(27:11):
the way, there are laws against these things. There are
laws against defamation. I shared with you that there's a
teacher here in my school district to defamed President Trump
in a post on social media, probably one of many
that this teacher or others have done.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
And the the the.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Point here is that there are laws, there are there
are guidelines for certain behavior that you can be terminated,
you could be disciplined. It needs to be stopped. This
sort of thing needs to be stopped. You talk about
toning down the rhetoric, This needs to be stopped. You
can want to defeat me politically, but let's do so legal.
(27:55):
Let's do something out that. Let's do it out here
in the public square. Let's have debates and discussions. Tell
me your best ideas. That's what I'm saying. I've said today.
Those who said that this was a MAGA shooter should
be embarrassed of themselves today. If they had any integrity,
they would come out and apologize to people.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
They would admit that they were wrong.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
But they won't do this because they are Listen, one
of the requirements to be a leftist is to have
a very very high opinion of yourself. This is an
anti God state of mind. And the anti God state
of mind is the includes includes at its core, pride C. S.
Lewis says, pride is the great sin. Pride is what
(28:37):
caused Lucifer to challenge God and to fall. That's what happened.
He wanted what God had. He wanted to be inserted
into the place of God. And I'm telling you these
godless radical leftists who don't have God, they have to
assert someone or insert someone into that space. And guess
what it's gonna be them. It's gonna be their ideology.
(28:58):
It's going to be their error against That's at its
core what it is. It's in the heart of what
it means to be a leftist, a radical, godless leftist.
Speaker 3 (29:07):
I'm not saying liberals. I am very selective with my language.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
I don't mean every democrat, but I mean every radical leftist.
The people who are out there cheering this on, by definition,
are godless leftists, my friends. This is inexcusable behavior. So
are they trying to take control of society? Propaganda? How
(29:31):
much propaganda has been perpetrated, has been pushed upon us
by these dangerous radical leftists, and violence used to silence opponents. Again,
I ask you to and answer the question, who out
here are the real fascists. I'm going to read it
without my own commentary. This one sentence definition of form
fascism is a form of authoritarian ultnationalism characterized by dictatorial power,
(29:56):
forcible suppression of opposition, control of society and the economy, propaganda,
and violence used to silence opponents.
Speaker 3 (30:04):
It's what we are.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
Dealing with on the left, My friends, they are the
real fascists. They're the ones that are trying to use
violence to silence their opponents, meanwhile telling us in the
next breath that silence is violence. They can't admit that
violence is violence. In fact, they cheer violence on social media.
It's pathetic stuff. They're trying to suppress the opposition. They're
trying to silence them through the use of force. Now
(30:27):
you can say, well, they're not alternationalists, Well I think
they are.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
I think that they're.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
Ulteranationalists and what they would consider their own national identity.
They hate America. They're not identifying with the country of America.
They are identifying with the ideals of marx and Communism.
That's what their beliefs are. They want free stuff, they
want you to pay for it. That's what these folks
believe in. And if you don't want to agree with them,
(30:52):
they will do whatever they have to do to get
you to comply. This is imperative that we stand firmly against. This,
be strong and rageous. To quote the Bible, which that's
a verse that you'll read over and over, especially in
the Book of Joshua. In fact, I mean in a way,
I mean there's there's similarities here. Metaphorically, Joshua was trying
(31:12):
to regain or to take control of the Promised Land.
Speaker 3 (31:18):
We need to regain control of this land.
Speaker 2 (31:21):
And we are opposing absolutely evil, morally bankrupt forces here,
my friends. So that's what I'm going to say about
that today. I want to get to this. I told
you we would play at least a SoundBite of cash Bettel.
I'm arguing back with Senator Spartacus. I want to play
(31:44):
a bit of that, which I will do that here
in just a moment, my friends. Let's talk about something
that is pretty important, and that's of course, your money.
And there are a lot of companies out there that
do not share our Christian values, so why are we
investing It's listen. I'm not saying there has to be
some sort of a litmus test, but if there are
(32:06):
people who are out there actively promoting values that are antithetical,
the opposite of Christian values, why are we investing with
them when there are other good options. The good news
is we don't have to do that. For eight Financial
specializes in biblically responsible investing. They can help us screen
out companies that go against our faith, go against our values,
(32:28):
create a plan that's tailored to our goals, and they'll
handle that heavy lifting for us so that we can
focus on what really matters to us. Want to see
if your current investments, your current investments which you have
right now, if you want to see if they align
with your values or to what degree they do align
with your values, go to for eightfinancial dot com slash todd.
(32:51):
That's for eight financial dot com slash todd. You can
take an assessment. It will help you determine to what
degree your investments align with your values. I took the assessments.
It is quick, easy, painless. I encourage you to do
the same. Four eight Financial because our values matter, and
so my friends, does your money?
Speaker 3 (33:10):
All right? So after the break here.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
Which we're going to take here in just a few seconds,
I want to talk a little bit about Cash Ptel.
Cash Ptel was called in to you know, the Senate
has oversight of the executive branch, and so from time
to time they'll call folks in to give reports. And
you know, a lot of this stuff is political. Sometimes
(33:33):
we're trying to get to the truth. And of course
one of the things that we're we've been talking about
on this program and in culture, society, politics and everything
else is the Epstein files.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
What's going on with that? And I want to talk
about that.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
I don't want to talk about some fireworks to play
the SoundBite for you of Cash Pateel versus Senator Spartacus.
So we'll do that, my friends on the other side
of the break and the meantime sit down listening here
to conservative not better talk. I am your host, Todd
huff Back in just a minute.
Speaker 3 (34:05):
Welcome back, my friends.
Speaker 2 (34:07):
Let's face it, every dollar we spend as a vote
for the kind of America that we want to live in.
Speaker 3 (34:13):
That's what has been created here by the left.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
They have used what I call the seven pillars of
propaganda to push their radical agenda on the American people.
One of those is woke business. They take profits from
money that you have given to them, and then they
fund causes with which you tremendously strongly disagree with, vehemently
disagree with. And so this is why we launched Freedom Marketplace.
(34:39):
Freedom Marketplace is a free directory of businesses that align
with your conservative values. These businesses have made a promise
no support for leftist candidates or causes, and if they
break that call of that promise, boom, we kick them out.
I haven't had to do that, but I absolutely will.
So if you're tired of funding the woke agenda, visit
Freedom Marketplace dot net. That's Freedom Marketplace dot net, Liberty
(35:01):
and business for all. I shared with you off the top,
and I got to get right into this because I
don't have a lot of time here. In the final segment,
this is the shortest of the three segments of our program,
Corey Spartacus is interviewing, well, I guess you could say interviewing.
He's questioning cash paateel FBI director. This is a Senate
Oversight hearing. Of course, you know that the Senate has
(35:24):
oversight of the executive branch. They bring in folks from
time to time to give updates. Cash Battel during this
hearing basically gave an update on the Epstein files, which
I know that this is.
Speaker 3 (35:37):
This is a whole entire episode in and of itself.
Speaker 2 (35:41):
So I can't get into this now because I promised
you i'd play this clip for you to give you
give you a feel for this exchange between Spartacus and
cash Battel. But cash Battel told the people in that
committee and the camera's watching, that there is no credible
evidence that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked any of his victims to anyone.
Speaker 3 (36:06):
Other than himself. That was cash Battel's statement.
Speaker 2 (36:09):
That's I know that that opens up a whole whole
bunch of questions regarding that this of course is not
going away, but that's what's currently being said. Cash Battel says,
there's no credible evidence and notice the word credible, just
for f y, I know credible evidence that this that
Epstein was trafficking anyone to anyone but himself. So that's
(36:32):
where that stands. So but Cash Bttel of course is
facing uh, you know a bunch of leftists on this
on this committee.
Speaker 3 (36:41):
Corey Spartacus is one of them.
Speaker 2 (36:44):
I think Corey Spartacus is a political actor. He's engaging
in political theater.
Speaker 3 (36:50):
His ideas.
Speaker 2 (36:53):
He used to be taken seriously because of his political power,
and people apparently find this sort of behavior I guess
attractive on the left. I don't know, but his his
ideas on their own should not be taken seriously. This
guy is a clown. He's he's trying to make a spectacle,
you know, the the remember the make Believe filibuster. He
(37:16):
had the longest filibuster in history. He thought he was
a hero for that. I remember talking about that on
this program. His I Am Spartacus moment. He got up
and walked out of one of the hearings I think
it was the Kavanaugh hearing when Kavanaugh was being considered
and ultimately confirmed as a United States Supreme Court justice.
(37:38):
He's he's big on the theatrics. So he's gonna sit
down here and he's gonna question Cash Batil, and I
want you to listen to the anger of the rage,
the rage bait, whatever you want to call this. And
he's lecturing Cash Batil here's what he has to say.
Speaker 5 (37:57):
I think this might be your last oversight hearing because
as much as you supplicate yourself to the will of
Donald Trump and not the constitution of the United States
of America, Donald Trump has shown us in his first
term and in this term, he is not loyal to
people like you. He will cut you loose. This may
be the last time I have a hearing with you,
because I don't think you're long for your job. But
(38:20):
I'm going to tell you this. I pray for you.
I pray for you that you can step up and
defend your oath, defend the Constitution, and do a much
better job of defending this country. Thank you, mister chairman.
Speaker 3 (38:38):
Oh sorry, had it meted there? Also?
Speaker 2 (38:39):
I think I missed a couple seconds of his You
get the idea of his statement there. But Spartacus says,
I pray for you.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
I pray for you. Listen.
Speaker 2 (38:47):
Prayer is a weapon for the believer, not because we
can use it.
Speaker 3 (38:52):
To say I'm better than you. I'm going to pray
for you.
Speaker 2 (38:55):
I'm morally superior to you, if that's your motivation, as
I suspect it was. Here for Spartacus at least that's
what it looks like to me, then you're you're using
it wrong. In fact, I wouldn't doubt that Spartacus has
some posts out there on X that says enough of
the thoughts and prayers and so forth. When it comes
to some of these tragedies that happen, it reminds me
(39:17):
actually of the arrogant man. Jesus told a parable the
religious leader who was praying, Dear God. He was praying
next to an individual who was saying, God, forgive me,
I'm a sinner, and this other man was praying, Dear Lord,
thank you that I'm not like this poor pathetic man
beside me. That is not the way we're supposed to
(39:38):
use prayer. Prayer is a weapon, but it's not a
weapon to use as some sort of a I'm better
than you gesture. It's a weapon if we believe in
the power of God, that if we ask him, our
God hears us, and our God helps us.
Speaker 3 (39:51):
That's what Spartacus did. Let's listen to.
Speaker 5 (39:56):
Here.
Speaker 4 (39:58):
Yes, in response, that rant of false information does not
bring this country together. If you want to work on
bringing this country, it's my time, not yours.
Speaker 5 (40:10):
My God, my God.
Speaker 3 (40:12):
If you want to talk about this country.
Speaker 5 (40:14):
It is follow you on your social media posts.
Speaker 4 (40:17):
That is my time to you. Try all you in
this country for your time over this committee.
Speaker 5 (40:30):
Sir, you don't tell me my time is over. You know,
belong tell me what my time is.
Speaker 3 (40:35):
You can't you get the idea. That's what went on.
Speaker 2 (40:38):
But I find it interesting that has been as a
lectured cash Betel. He was taking the Lord's name in
vain by saying, my god, my god, folks, I gotta
go SDG