Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Show, America's Home poor,
Conservative not bitter Talk and education. Be advised. The content
of this program has been talking about it two prevents
and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to
lean to the right. And now coming to you from
(00:29):
the full suite Wealth Studios, here is your conservative but
not bitter host, Todd Huff.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
Well, that is right, my friends, you have successfully and
very wisely, my my dad tuned into America's own for
conservative not bitter Talk. I'm your host, the one, the only,
the ever so beloved, benevolent dictator here behind the microphone,
Todd Huff. It is good to be here today.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
I hope you had a.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Great weekend as well. We had a nice weekend, my friends.
I'll tell you here off the top. We will be
out Friday and next week. I think I'll be returning
late next Friday, or excuse me, late next week, probably
the following Friday, but we'll be out for about a week. Here.
We've got guest hosts lined up, Chris Dunham, Gary Varvil,
(01:15):
Senator John Crane, Micah Micah Clark. So lots of folks
lined up to phil In. While we are gone, you
will be in good hands.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
I'll tell you.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
I know it's you know, looking ahead here, but it's
a good time to think about, to think about stay
in contact her well, just getting additional content when we
are out. The best way to do that is to
subscribe to our absolutely free daily newsletter called The Daily Truth.
Just go to Toddevshow dot com slash truth to sign
(01:49):
up for the email newsletter. All Right, today, what I
want to get to I want to talk about what
we know about the alleged shooter assassin of Charlie Kirk.
I want to talk about some of the information we
have found out just about him, some of the evidence
that exists, some of the narratives, the storylines, and so forth.
(02:13):
I also want to talk a little bit, as the
program unfolds, about something that's happening on social media. You
might have seen this, and I want your thoughts on this.
I want your opinions on this. There's several people who
are going online who are looking for people who cheered
the murder, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and they are
(02:36):
finding out who these people are. They're not doxing them
in the sense that they're providing their personal information. In fact,
they're making it abundantly clear they don't want to see
any harm.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
Before these individuals.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Instead, what they're doing is they're tracking down where these
people are working, and they're sharing these videos, these posts
with the employers of these individuals.
Speaker 3 (02:57):
A lot of these.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
Folks have been fired or some of them are. In
the cases in the case of being a public teacher,
for example, some of them have been put on administrative leave,
paid leave, that sort of thing. So I've got that
to talk about free speech and listen, there's a lot
to get to with this issue, and I don't I
want to make sure that we don't forget what's initiated
(03:23):
this entire discussion here, because at its core, we have
the heinous, vile, wicked, evil assassination of a young man
who was sharing his viewpoints, his opinion, sharing the Gospel
of Jesus Christ as well. He's being maligned. He of
course was murdered, and there's been a lot of disrespect
(03:46):
and just reprehensible things said about his wife and his children.
That's what started all of this. And of course this
goes back, This goes back that this didn't start last week,
that heinous event.
Speaker 3 (03:59):
Had been last week.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
But what fuels this the hatred that has been spewed,
the things that people have been taught and believe that
goes way way back into and to our culture here.
This has been going on for decades. This is again
just didn't happen last week. So I want to talk
about this, provide a little perspective here. And before I
(04:25):
do that, my friends, you know, one of the biggest
challenges that we as conservative have is finding ways to
ensure our values are aligned with the things that we do,
and that includes how we invest our money. That's why
I love what the team at four to eight Financial
is doing. They specialize in biblically responsible investing. That means
(04:48):
they screen out companies that don't align with our faith,
that don't align with our values. So there we're not
funding things that go completely against the things that we
believe in. The themes are the things that we proclaim
as true and good, especially from a Biblical Christian worldview. Plus,
the folks at four eight Financial will do all the
(05:09):
heavy lifting for us, helping us align our values and
our investments, our purpose, our goals. And the best part
is you don't have to do any of that yourself.
All you have to do is go to four eight
financial dot com just as a starting point slash tie.
Do you gotta put the slash tie to get to
the assessment. There's a tool that they have online where
you can go and you can explain your values and
(05:32):
you can they'll compare those against your current investments and
you can see to what degree, if any, or completely
your investments aligned with your values. Folks, this is listen,
this is a big part of this. I'm not a
fan of cancel culture. Anytime we just wait until someone
says something with which we disagree, we go and stop
(05:53):
doing business.
Speaker 3 (05:53):
But that is one thing, but it's another.
Speaker 2 (05:56):
To support businesses or invest in comempanies who are doing
the things that are antithetical, the exact opposite of living
out our faith. And so for eight financial gives you
a tool, gives you a path by which you can
figure out how your investments are aligned.
Speaker 3 (06:15):
With your values or if they are so.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
For eightfinancial dot com slash todd for eight financial because
our money should work.
Speaker 3 (06:22):
For our values. All right, let's talk a little bit here.
Let's talk a.
Speaker 2 (06:26):
Little bit here about what we have learned. Excuse me,
about the assassination, about the shooter, the shooter's name again,
I don't like to do this. In fact, if you
listen to this program for any length of time, you
will know when there are these heinous, heinous acts of violence,
school shootings, mass murders, things like that, and people have
(06:48):
manifestos in that sort of thing. You'll find that I
don't like to say the names of these folks, because
that's part of what they like, is the attention of
the limelight. That being said, I'm going to say the
name once here. If I say it again, it will
just be in in passing. I don't want to give
this lunatic, alleged lunatic, an idiot here, perpetrator of evil,
(07:12):
any more attention and glory than he's already gotten here,
even though of course it's completely again, it's been completely
turned upon its head.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
What is good here?
Speaker 2 (07:22):
But he's getting attention, which of course has to be
part of this. But Tyler Robinson is his name. He's
twenty two years old from Utah. He was arrested after
a thirty three hour man hunt, and according to reports,
he's currently not investigator excuse me, not cooperating, I should
say with investigators.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
His dad turned.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Him in after recognizing the photos. Family and friends are cooperating.
In fact, some media reports have some information from family
and friends. This individual, this alleged gunman, was apparently, according
to reports, once a top student at a high GPA,
(08:07):
did well in school, dropped out of Utah State, and
is now an apprentice, an electrical apprentice again, according to reports,
He personally has no party affiliation political party affiliation. He's
an inactive voter. According again to reports, his parents, as
(08:30):
you may have heard, are Republicans. Are conservative Republicans, but
it appears that there is a major divergence in ideology
between the shooter and his family. So it's also been
reported that this alleged gunman, this alleged assassin is has
(08:54):
been living with a transgender partner, a trans woman. Listen,
this will upset some people, but it's the easiest way.
I did this with my uh, well, with the relative
of mine. You know, you have older relatives who grew
up in a world where there were boys and girls
as there are, and they start hearing trans this and
(09:19):
cyst that they don't know anything.
Speaker 3 (09:21):
I didn't know any of this.
Speaker 2 (09:22):
I had to, I mean I had to learn just
to discuss it with people who have this warped worldview.
But anytime I think the simple explanation of the simple
way of remembering this transgender culture, the nomenclature and the
terms and so forth, anytime you hear their word trans,
(09:44):
just put. And this is gonna upset some people. I'm
not trying to be provocative. I'm trying to provide something
that is absolutely true and easy to remember. When you
hear the word trans, just think fake, Just think fake, fictitious,
think make believes. So when you hear trans woman, it's
a fake woman, which means he's biologically a man. So
(10:05):
this alleged gunman's partner is a transwoman, meaning he's a
biological male who is trying to become a female, which
of course is genetically impossible. It contradicts the nature and
Nature's God, the way that creation and the order of
(10:27):
creation was made. Again, just for the record, I.
Speaker 3 (10:32):
Don't have hard feelings.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
I don't want to keep insult or injury upon people
who struggle with these things, but I also don't want
to normalize them.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
I also don't want.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
To have a world where I have to explain to
my children things that are incredibly simple to understand, until
the world gets them and twists them and then demands
that if you don't view them the way that the
world views them, and this very twisted and distorted way
that you or the problem. Truth actually matters, Science actually matters.
(11:05):
God's design actually matters. And so that's the world that he,
this alleged sheoter was living in, which is evidence that
he's rebelling or has an opposite worldview of his parents.
I think gets clear to say, it's clear to say
(11:28):
at this point that this guy wasn't living as a
conservative person. That seems pretty obvious to me. There's evidence
here that that.
Speaker 3 (11:38):
He was involved.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
There's evidence in discord chats, there's a digital trail. They're
still piecing together, you know, the motive, but it's clear
that he didn't like, he hated what Charlie Cook's Kirk
stood for and what he said. Now, it's likely very
that's a big part of it. It's likely the case
(12:01):
that it's ideological. It's likely that it's something to do
with rage and hatred, and there's likely some component of
some type of radicalization. I mean, this is not something
that normal people do. As I said off the top,
this is not something that happened. It did happen just
(12:22):
last week, but this stuff didn't start last week. In fact,
I've thought about doing a program. This just takes a
different type of the way I prepare for programs is
certain types of programs.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Can be different.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
You know.
Speaker 2 (12:34):
Typically what we do is we come on here and
we talk about the news of the day, We talk
about the issues, We talk about things at the intersection
of politics, faith and culture, and I talk about those
things and then we use those oftentimes to springboard into
a deeper conversation about the issue. Teachable moments, you know, truth,
(12:55):
just things like that. But every once in a while,
there's something that's so painous or so important, I'll try
to have a set aside episode where we just talk
about that. The problem is, I'm so wired to want
to talk about the news of the day because that's
what we do typically that I sometimes I push those
(13:18):
episodes off because you never know what's going to happen
the next day. I mean, if I plan to do
an episode about this and do a deep dive into
how we as a nation have gotten to this point,
and we trace back the things that were being taught
in schools, the things that were being condoned in public,
and that sort of thing over the course of history,
(13:40):
and then a big event happens that I'm not ready
to discuss. That's the I guess the risk here that
I don't want to get into anyway. But I do
think that it's important to understand how we got here,
how we got here, not necessarily to blame to point fingers,
though that's important. We have to understand who the culprits are.
We have to understand who the people are that are
(14:00):
teaching these sorts of things, who are radicalizing people's beliefs,
who have dehumanized people. You know, I remember during the COVID,
the COVID, the way that COVID was handled and everything happening.
I remember saying on this program that we have we
have desensitized people. We have taken you know, you had
a mask on, you weren't allowed to get within six
(14:22):
feet of a person. You were basically being told that
that person wasn't another human being, that person was a
spreader of a humunicable disease, and that they were a
spreader of germs that was a potential super spreader. And
we dehumanized people There's been other ways that we've dehumanized
people in our culture as well. The abhorrence practices of
(14:43):
abortion is another one of those that I don't want
to get into all that now, But there are a
lot of things that fueled us and got us to
this particular point. And we're going to find out more
about the shooter. But it's obvious that there's an ideological
component to this. It's obvious that the shooter hated Charlie Kirk,
and I would probably felt some level of justification, which
(15:06):
even makes this worse, right, some level of justification for
murdering Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 3 (15:12):
And you go back and there's.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
Archives, excuse me, montages, and there's archives of things that
some of these politicians have said, Remember that Detroit. I
don't know if it was Detroit or just someone in Michigan.
I just saw this the other day. It was something
we had talked about a year or two ago. But
there was like a city councilman or maybe a state congressman,
I can't remember. It was a female who basically was,
(15:38):
I mean, telling people to fight back in a violent way.
I remember this. It was very creepy. I've got that
it's not in the stack. But that's something that we
could talk about as well. But you go back to
the way that the left is basically called Trump hitler.
Speaker 3 (15:52):
They've called.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
Trump and people like Charlie Kirk and to a lesser
degree people like me, fascist.
Speaker 3 (15:59):
And homophobes and racists and everything else.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Of course, stirring people up to hatred, and you basically
created this scenario whereby people think they're the modern day
equivalent of the people who freed the slaves or making
a moral stand like Rosa Parks. Except that's not at
all what's happening here. The people who are on the
side of maligning people like me or Charlie Kirk, more
(16:26):
importantly the President that are justified. I mean, they've maligned
them so much that they have in the minds of
the people who have enacted violence, they have created a
mindset that justifies, justifies the violence, which of course is
reprehensible and wicked. There's no justification for it. I'm not
saying that there's any objective justification, but in the minds
(16:49):
of these folks, I believe that they think that there is.
And you only get to that point when you have
abject rage and just NonStop maln misrepresentation of what's going on.
I saw a clip of Senator Fetterman, who's a Democrat
from Pennsylvania, who actually was on I forget what he
(17:12):
was on, but he was on CBS or something saying
that Trump is not Trump is not this fascist. That
that's miss characterizing what's going on. He has different politics,
Fetterman said, politics with which I don't agree with. Fetterman said,
but he said he's not He's not this totalitarian. That's
(17:34):
a misrepresentation and that sort of thing fuels this. So
we'll find out, hopefully, hopefully we'll find out more about this.
You never know what the media, what their spin is
going to be on this. There were also there's also
allegedly been some messages that have been found on the
on the ammunition, on the shell casings of the bullets
(17:59):
that were used, one bullet that was used in the
unspent rounds that were there that they found with the
shooter or whatever, some messages, and I'm gonna read you
a couple of those. One of them says, hey, fascist,
catch and it's got arrows pointing up, arrows pointing to
(18:21):
the right, and three arrows pointing down. That's apparently some
sort of a reference to video game controls. Another one said, oh,
belli chow bellichow, bella chow chow chow, which is a
reference to an anti fascist anthem that dates back to
(18:42):
World War Two, which I want to get into that
in the next segment. Another one that said another one
that read, if you read this, you are gay lmao,
which is an insult of course, from trolls online. If
you want to see what some of these comments are,
just go to the TikTok on my videos on TikTok.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
But you get the idea. These trolls, these.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
I mean, these were written on the on the shellcasings
of bullets that were intended for Charlie Kirk. Now the
one that was used, the spent the shell casing from
the round that was fired.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Where did that go? That that actually had a reference.
Where did it go?
Speaker 2 (19:28):
I had it in my stack here, but it was
some sort of reference to a furry meme, which is
again just demonstrating the mental and spiritual unwellness of this
particular individual. I had it here somewhere. It's not here
in my list, but oh here it is. It says
(19:49):
notices bulges capital o small w capital O.
Speaker 3 (19:55):
What's this?
Speaker 2 (19:55):
That's a meme from furry not Safe for Work online
subculture mocking cringe humor. I mean, just really really sick
and twisted stuff. Pure evil is what we're talking about here.
So that was what was the messages that were carved
into the shell casings that were found on the shooter.
(20:16):
The one spent shell casing was of course the last
message that I had there. So this wasn't just you know,
I've seen some people afforded me stuff.
Speaker 3 (20:28):
You know.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
One commentator said, Charlie Kirk wasn't assassinated because he was conservative.
He was assassinated because he was effective. But he was
assassinated because of his ideas, because of his conservative values,
because of his belief in Jesus Christ. That's why some
(20:51):
people out there have said he's a martyr for Christianity
because he spread the gospel of Jesus Christ. You don't
have to watch many of his events to know that.
I mean, that's obviously what he believed. That he shared
this message. We shared this message as well on the program.
The hope, the only hope that we have, my friends,
ultimately is found in Jesus Christ. Charlie Kirk spread that
(21:14):
message as well, so it was his beliefs. But to
the point of some of these commentators, it wasn't just
that if he wasn't effective in what he was doing,
he wouldn't have been targeted. There's truth obviously in that
as well. But it says also some things about the culture.
What about nihilism?
Speaker 3 (21:34):
Right?
Speaker 2 (21:35):
What about just this disconnected generation, this generation of hopelessness,
this generation and not every kid falls into this category, right,
but there's a generation of people out there, young people
who have been taught that there is no God, life
has no meaning. I can't help but wonder to what
(21:57):
degree that had in this as well. We dehumanized people
when people live only online. And listen, you can have
good things happen online. You can have some reprehensible things
happen online. But one of the things we have to
guard against is the reality that living simply online prevents
(22:18):
us from really understanding the humanity of people. I have
more to say about this, my friends. I want to
remind you here program brought to you in part by
Red White and Brand get your logo on almost anything,
whether it's T shirts, hats, apparel, promotional products, you name it.
Red Whiteenbrand dot Com owned and operated here by those
(22:39):
of us at the Todd Huff Show. Red white and
brand your logo on almost anything. Red whiteenbrand dot Com
is the website. Use promo code Todd. You'll save ten
percent on your first purchase, and if you complete your
order online, you'll get free shipping to boot Redwhitenbrand dot Com.
Promo code Todd. I have to take your break, my friends.
Sit tight back here in just a minute. Welcome back,
(23:08):
my friends. Segment two of today's program. It's good to
be here talking about some heavy things trying to piece together.
Really what was going on in the heart and mind
of the shooter when he assassinated Charlie Kirk last week.
By the way, I want to mention this I did.
I got a message on our Facebook page. I you know,
(23:32):
I'm I'm unoffendable.
Speaker 3 (23:35):
I think I am.
Speaker 2 (23:36):
There's things that get me fired up, but I think
I'm I think I'm unoffendable.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
You have to be in this line of work.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
You have to be if you want to have any
online presence today and talk about politics, culture, faith, if
you want to have a podcast, radio show, if you
if you just want to stand up for truth, have
a blog, whatever, you better have some thick skin, or
at least a trust in the one who you care,
whose opinion his opinion. For you've got almighty more than
(24:09):
you care about what other people think. But I had
someone common and I just thought it was peculiar. It's
just fascinating to me, I commented. We posted every day
so on Facebook. Now we haven't done this in a while.
We're kind of revamping and rebuilding the ways that we've
We've had so many problems on social media.
Speaker 3 (24:27):
Shadow Band in some places.
Speaker 2 (24:29):
I mean, we got never fully canceled, but we had
plenty of YouTube videos taken down. That's why you'll only
find clips on there now and not the full program.
There's just a lot of stuff that goes on with that,
and it's a priority, but not my top priority at
the moment. But we're trying to improve the way that
we connect with people online. It's not bad. I prefer
(24:51):
this podcast platform. I prefer communicating through email, like when
folks subscribe or messages on the email newsletter. I like
that more other than social media. But your reach is
of course amplified dramatically, and there's a lot of good
people that you can meet out there, and I love that,
but I had a guy, So we started posting on
Facebook a summary of the day's program, a link to
(25:14):
the stack of stuff, which of course you know about
if you've listened to this program, which has a link
to listen to the show. It's got articles that you
can reference that you know, it's just kind of background
as to what we might have been talking about on
the day's program. It has a full transcript of the show.
Some people prefer to read that it's it's AI generated.
So this program is being transcribed right now with an AI,
(25:37):
well just a recording program it. Then it transcribes the
audio into text and then we try to clean it
with additional AI. But the bottom line is it's not
going to be one hundred percent correct.
Speaker 3 (25:50):
It's very high.
Speaker 2 (25:51):
It's ninety five ninety seven percent, I believe anyway. So
those are the sorts of things we post on the
website and we just basically put it out there every
day if you want to click and listen to the
show if you can't listen on it as a podcast
or some people just prefer that method of communication. And
one of these individuals made a response that said that
we were grifting off of Charlie Kirk, which listen. I
(26:15):
I don't care if someone makes a comment like that,
I think pretty lowly of them as a as a person.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
But you know, you can shit.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
You can ask a question, man, why are you doing
this if you have a genuine question, but to make
a statement about me like you don't you haven't listened
to the program. You want to sound like a tough
guy on the internet. I don't care, and your comment
is just meaningless to me. But it also I I
don't know what people expect, you know, grifting basically meaning
(26:46):
you're trying to profit off. That's not the case. What
did What did people expect? I talk about politics and
culture and faith on this program every day for ten years.
I talked about the passing of Rush Limbaugh, which was
an incredibly difficult program for me. We still refer to things.
We call it the Stack in memory of him. Every
(27:10):
Thanksgiving we do a program that's something Rush did, the
true story, the real story of Thanksgiving, and we'll do
that again this year. It's not distill this thunder. In fact,
I reference on the program this is in honor of him.
You can have any opinion you want about that, have
at it, but to make a demonstrative claim, a truth claim,
(27:32):
that I'm doing it for some nefarious purposes other than
just I want to recognize and remember the people who
have had an impact in this movement. And there's some
things that I've actually been thinking about implementing into the
program or some of the stuff we do on social
media that I think Charlie Kirk did incredibly well. Not
(27:53):
because I'm trying to profit off of what he did,
but because I'm trying to do two things. One and
if something works well, then we should probably try to
emulate it, and he should get the credit for that.
Speaker 3 (28:06):
He did some things incredibly well number one. Number Two,
it keeps his honor and memory alive. I mean this think.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
I think that it's important that we remember the people
who have taken great steps to save this nation, and
Charlie Kirk did that. I don't know what people expect.
I don't have any interest in ignoring this. Should that
have been the course of action, see to me, that
would have seemed more like I was self absorbed if
(28:37):
I just ignored the story. What type of a person
does that? Anyway, If you make comments like that and
you want to be taken seriously, don't make.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Them on our page anyway. But let's get to.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
Let's get to I told you we were going to
talk about this Belichow, which is a.
Speaker 3 (28:57):
It's an anthem. It's an anthem that was a World
War two.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
Partisan anthem against Mussolini and Nazis, which, of course, in
today's world, you have to say, because you're told by
the left every day, people who have PhD tacked onto
their name, that Trump is a Nazi. And then if
you don't see that, you're just an idiot.
Speaker 3 (29:22):
You're too stupid.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
Let the smart people tell you, and you ask them why,
explain to me why, Well, they can't tell you. But
if you can't, if they can't tell you why, it's
because you're too stupid to understand. This is how these
clowns operate the opposite of how I operate. I think
if I can't explain something clearly enough, I didn't do
my job. They think if you don't agree wholeheartedly with them,
you're the idiot. They're never the problem. Absolutely backwards and
(29:47):
upside down. If you can't communicate your idea clearly, if
you can't break it down to the simplest level. If
you can't put the cookies, so to speak, on the
bottom shelf, then something's wrong with your idea if it
can't be broken down into something that's simple. I mean
outside of like theoretical physics or something. But really, the
more you understand a topic or an issue, the easier
(30:07):
it is to explain in simple terms that everybody can understand.
Speaker 3 (30:10):
And that should be the objective.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
But it's not the objective because they don't want you
to understand, because they don't. It's not built on truths,
so it doesn't make any sense. And so then the
only way that they can save face is to basically say, look,
I got a PhD.
Speaker 3 (30:23):
On the end of my name. You don't. You're an idiot.
Speaker 2 (30:26):
You're just a laborer that works with your hands. That's
how they look at folks, I'm telling you right now,
that's how they look at folks. And so in today's
world they I'm talking about the elitist leftists. Many times
their professors. Sometimes they're public school teachers. Sometimes they're I mean,
they're they're leftists. They're they're they're in you know, they
(30:46):
have jobs where they have a gender studies degree.
Speaker 3 (30:48):
That sort of stuff anyway.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
So Bellichow Belichow was an anthem in World War one,
World War two anti fascist. It's since then become a
globe protest anthem. And there was a Netflix program called
money Heist where this was basically I guess reintroduced to
(31:11):
pop culture. So the maniacal lunatic shooter, the evildoer, the
alleged shooter engraved some I told you that he referenced
Bella bella chow. On here, I want to read you
the English translated versions of Belli Chow. One morning I awakened,
(31:31):
Oh belli chow Belachow, bella chow chout show. One morning
I awakened and I found the invader. Oh partisan, take
me with you, Oh Bellichow, Belichow, bella chow chow show,
Oh partisan, take me with you, for I feel death approaching.
And if I die as a partisan, Obella chow belachow,
bella chow chow chow. And if I die as a partisan,
(31:54):
then you must bury me, Bury me up in the mountain,
Obela chow belachow, bella chow chow chow. Bury me up
in the mountain. Under the shadow of a beautiful flower.
And all those who shall pass by Obella Chow Belachow,
Bella Chow chow Chow, and all those who shall pass
by will say, what a beautiful flower. This is the
flower of the partisan Obella Chow Belachow, Bella chow Chow show.
(32:17):
This is the flower of the partisan who died for freedom.
So remember he in Gray Bellichow on the bullets. This
is not just I mean, there's a there's deeper meaning here.
There's deeper meaning that's pushed by these radicals. I mean
this again. I remember last week some lunatics trying to
(32:39):
tell me that this guy was a conservative, that he
shot Charlie Kirk. I guess because he was conservative anyway.
I just none of this stuff makes sense. They want
to deny truth when it's starring them right in the face.
But this is what this guy. This guy thinks he's
the martyr here. This guy thinks that he's dying for it. Well,
he didn't. He wasn't murder, he wasn't killed, and wouldn't
(33:01):
have been murdered. He wasn't killed in the response to
the shooting. He's been captured. He's not apparently cooperating, but
he appears to think that he is fighting a greater battle.
My friends, I've got to take a break here, get
a squared away for the last segment. Before I do that,
my friends, take care of your heart health. One easy
way to do that. One great first step is to
(33:24):
go to Salty dot com sol Tea and you can
get a three month supply of this all natural product
which has been proven by science. Science has spoken on
this to reduce in lower cholesterol. It's done this for
a lot of folks that can possibly do the same
for you. I take the product. You can too. You
can get a fifty percent discount with promo code Todd.
(33:44):
By the way, Salty dot com sol Tea promo code Todd.
This is a great first step. It's not you know,
it doesn't involve medication. It's not a drug. But check
it out. It's a great way to stay proactively healthy.
I've gotta take a time about that, my friends, sit
tight back in just a minute.
Speaker 3 (34:08):
Welcome back, my friends.
Speaker 2 (34:10):
You've worked hard, you've made smart choices, and now it's
about making sure that effort counts not just today, but
in the future as well. Full sweet wealth helps forward
thinking people with a coordinated approach to wealth, legacy and
(34:30):
legal planning. This includes private equity, private credit options strategies.
They'll help you see the big picture, plan ahead and
make sure your success truly matters for the people you
care about the most. My friends, this is about leaving
a legacy. This is about establishing a plan that stands
(34:54):
the test of time. Visit full sweetwealth dot com. Build
your legacy, secure your future, full sweet wealth dot com.
All Right, so I mentioned off the top, there's one
other thing I want to get to here today. Well,
there's many other things I want to get to. I
(35:15):
just don't have the time.
Speaker 3 (35:17):
But one other thing I want to.
Speaker 2 (35:18):
Get to today is something that I've seen on social
media that's a bit of a phenomenon. And after Charlie
Kirk's assassination, his murder, his death, there were a lot
of people. We've documented some of this here on this program,
but we've documented some of this online. You've seen it,
probably yourself yourself, if you've been online, you've read them,
(35:40):
if you've subscribed to our newsletter, because I put screenshots
in there.
Speaker 3 (35:43):
Of those last week.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
But after his death, there were people that were celebrating online. Right,
they were celebrating, I mean mocking him mockingly saying thoughts
and prayers. I mean, one of these ladies was a
pat some sort of a pastor at a church in
southern California, I believe in San Diego, a pastor. It's
(36:08):
incomprehensible to me. By the way, if you go to church,
be prepared. There are more and more people that are
seeking roles well in clergy, if you want to say
it that way, in inside of being a staff member,
someone who's gone to seminary school, a minister, a pastor,
(36:30):
those sorts of things. I'm not saying all of them.
Please don't misunderstand me. But there's a high percentage of
a higher percentage of people who are using who are
trying to infiltrate the church that way and make church
more woke and more I guess anti guide, which woe
to those people who do that. But we've got an
obligation to prevent those people from having any position in
(36:54):
our churches. But they exist out there, and listen. I
get people are human, they make mistakes, but to have
this level of hatred and to think that you're on
the correct side of this, to think that you're doing
the work of God Almighty by mocking the death of
Charlie Kirk is unfathomable to me. But there are people
(37:15):
on social media now who are basically digging into these
accounts because, look, you can have an account on social
media that doesn't have to be you don't have to
prove who you are. There's anonymous, faceless cowards out there,
and that's one thing you have to remember when you
get so much hate from these folks. But there's anonymous,
(37:36):
hateful cowards out there who are tough guys behind their keyboards. Well,
some of these people on social media are digging into
who these folks are. They've got some pretty sophisticated ways
of determining how to what I want to say, how
to reveal these people, not to dos them, but to
(37:58):
take what they've been saying and to share that with
their employers, to use that information to dig and say, oh,
this person lives here. Look they've posted on another social
media platform where they work. I can confirm this is
the person. I'm going to send this to their employer.
And so they've done this, they've done this, and they
are getting people fired. You know, free speech, my friends,
(38:23):
protect you from censorship of the government. Free speech means
the government can't shut you up. Free speech does not
mean that there are no other consequences, you know, when
you sign up. I looked into our local schools policy
on social media for because of some idiotic comment I
got from a teacher. And I'll maybe share more about
(38:44):
this over time.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
We'll see. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (38:47):
There's so many things to talk about, but an idiotic
comment from a public teacher here in our district who
accused Trump of being a pedophile, not as an opinion,
not you know that this is this is textbook defamation.
Now Trump is a public figure, so there's a different
(39:07):
level of proof. You've got to prove malice and all
this sort of stuff. But that's not the point here,
is that there's other consequences. You know. Just because the
government doesn't censor you doesn't mean that there can't be
consequences for free For free speech, your employer can certainly
discipline you. Your employer can say that breaks our policy.
(39:29):
I don't want people out there who are saying atrocious
things and celebrating the death of another human being.
Speaker 3 (39:35):
What is wrong with people?
Speaker 2 (39:36):
And they can discipline you, fire you, especially if you
live in an at will employment state.
Speaker 3 (39:45):
But that's what's going on.
Speaker 2 (39:46):
I'm curious, though, what your opinions are, because I've got
I understand, I understand. I'm just trying to present both
sides fairly here. You got the one side who says, Look,
these people say this in a public form. It's gross,
it's reprehensible, it's a clear violation in most cases of
most reasonable employers. They wouldn't want these sorts of people
(40:06):
representing their company, and so they should absolutely know what
these folks are out there saying. Because if they're saying
these things in public, what are they doing internally in
your business? That's a real question I think that people
should should have and should ask. The other side is, man,
is this really the path we want to go down?
Is this becoming too you know, I don't know too
(40:30):
much like a cancel culture. I'm just curious what your
thoughts are because I'm not entirely sure what I think
about it. I do think it's justice that these folks
are held accountable for what they're saying. They're hiding behind nameless,
faceless accounts. Anyway, music's here telling me it's time.
Speaker 3 (40:45):
To wrap up. I gotta go, friends, have a great day.
Thanks for Listening SDG