Low IQ People - WED 6.2

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
What's what's the name of this little kicky little tune
you got there? Any It's called Texas flooding. Flood Now. Now,
I don't think we're in a worry about flooding today,
but I heard there's a there's a cold front of coming.
Is it one in Blue Norther's Is it gonna come
down here and just freeze the the nipples off of
a hog?

Speaker 2 (00:18):
Or how colds are gonna get? How cold is it
gonna get? Apparently pretty chilly. We're talking it's gonna get warmer,
though I thought it was already cold now, No, this
is It's forty degrees when I got up. That's kind
of cold.

Speaker 1 (00:30):
Yeah, but then it's gonna be like in the mid
seventies later and then this week and weekend or whatever.
When's this cold front coming?

Speaker 2 (00:36):
I don't know. We hear about it. Not to confuse
everyone listening, we're describing the weather in South Texas. We're
not describing the Fort Smith, Arkansas weather where I imagine.

Speaker 1 (00:45):
If we got listeners in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and in
northern Georgia. I mean, we can't just tell you how
the weather is in every place.

Speaker 2 (00:54):
And frankly, you wouldn't need us. It's winter. You have
a phone. Just look at your app, you know, is
it winter?

Speaker 1 (01:00):
No, it's technically not winter yet, but it is that
December when people are like, wow, it got cold, Well, yeah,
it's December. By the way, I don't know why we're
talking about the weather when I have such breaking news.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
Winter starts in ten days for the record, Yeah, exactly,
go ahead, what do you got my breaking news?

Speaker 1 (01:16):
Ilhan Omar is correct about sleeping, you know, marrying her brother,
I say, sleeping with marrying her brother.

Speaker 2 (01:24):
She's right, she didn't marry her brother.

Speaker 1 (01:27):
And you guys that said she married her brother and
found all kinds of evidence in other people to back
your story up, you're right too. That's the great thing
about this news story. Everybody wins. Ilhan Omar married her brother,
her second husband, to get him papers to allow him

(01:48):
to go to school. And people that are familiar with
her and familiar with the situation back then, they said,
at the time, we thought she was just getting him
papers to allow him to stay in the country. He had,
you know, to get enrolled in school, which he then did.
Right after the marriage. A marriage certificate of sorts was
turned up by the media, and then everybody said, no,

(02:11):
we don't have that. I think it got burned up
in the war because Somalia is a very war torn
country and that's where the records might have been. Here's
the explanation, here's why they were both right. She was
married to this guy who happens to be her biological
brother in two thousand and nine. The wedding was officiated,

(02:35):
not by Kenney Webster. I don't think you were licensed
to do that in two thousand and nine.

Speaker 3 (02:39):
No.

Speaker 2 (02:39):
I only married people that are vaguely connected to Christine
Johnson somehow. I don't marry anyone else as an officiant,
that is, but I have done that a few times.

Speaker 1 (02:48):
Ilhan Omar married her second husband, slash brother, two thousand
and nine by a Christian minister, although she is Mustlim,
as she is happy to tell you. Now you get it.
She married him in a Christian ceremony because that wouldn't
be a legitimate marriage in a Muslim world, but it

(03:11):
was legitimate enough in America to get him the fraud
to stay in the country and go to the school.

Speaker 2 (03:17):
I think the thing that's in question here isn't that
she got married in two thousand and nine, because she did.
She legally married Almi, a British citizen of somalissent. The
question wise where they actually related and when she says
they're not related, but she said, there's no paperwork in
Somalia to prove that. But for the record, there's no
paperwork to prove almost anything in Somalia. They don't keep

(03:39):
records and stuff.

Speaker 1 (03:40):
It's been blown up and savaged and burned, and it's
a lack of paperwork is a normal thing. She could
have married her brother in a Christian church and in
her mind, in every Muslim's mind, they can say, well,
that wasn't real marriage, because you know that's the wrong
God of the Church of Christ. The married in the

(04:01):
eyes of the Lord. No, biggie, they don't. They don't
have the same thoughts about the Lord that you do. Well,
for whatever it's worth, whether she married a brother or not. Yesterday,
the leader of the Free World, Donald Trump, had some
thoughts oniohann Omar, and I hope he was respectful because
she she just deserves all the respect, even though she

(04:24):
doesn't ask in the outer.

Speaker 2 (04:25):
So well, since you asked the star of what was
his TV show called The apprentice pulled out all the punches,
actually pulled out no punches or however that expression goes
for the star of the film. Oh brother, where art thou? Oh?
Thank you?

Speaker 4 (04:39):
Okay, see people that contribute. I don't want to see
some Marya. I don't want to see a woman that
you know, marries a brother to get in and becomes
a congressman does nothing but complaining. All she does is complain, complain,
and yet her country is a mess. You know, it's
one of the worst in the world. Let her go
back fix up her own country. So no Somalia. Yeah,

(05:01):
and I was right about it. You know, I started
complaining about Somalia long before the scandal.

Speaker 2 (05:06):
Uh.

Speaker 4 (05:07):
The the horrible, the horrible things they're doing to Minnesota.
It's incredible they have any company governor there too. The
Democrats are running some bad ships.

Speaker 2 (05:18):
Ships with a pee. Just so we're clear, Yes, it
is what the president said there.

Speaker 1 (05:23):
According to this person that reported congress Fromanilamore told friends
years ago, the man that she married as her second
husband was in fact her brother. The people that said
that they heard her say it themselves, regardless of paperwork
to back her up. Okay, she admitted it. She's a

(05:44):
real gem, isn't she. But again they've got an out. Well,
it was just a Christian ceremony. It doesn't count.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
I think it counts. It counts in America, but it
doesn't count to Muslim world. Uh.

Speaker 1 (06:03):
That was the whole point I was trying to make
fifteen minutes ago, and it just now sunk in.

Speaker 2 (06:07):
Well, it still doesn't make any sense. But I get
her mind.

Speaker 1 (06:10):
They're saying, Okay, remember when days weren't allowed to get married,
but gay people would still go and have marriage ceremonies.

Speaker 2 (06:17):
But they're like, well, great, but it doesn't count. That's
what they're thinking.

Speaker 1 (06:22):
Muslims don't respect Christianity, so they got a Christian to
marry them.

Speaker 2 (06:27):
We have often made the point the conservative case against
the government being involved in selling marriage license, and it
never is about this conversation. It's always a conversation about
how a marriage license is really nothing more than a
shared property contract, and it shouldn't be the government's decision
who you can and can't marry, assuming that person's an adult.
I think that should be the minimum standard. And then

(06:49):
this topic comes into conversation, it's almost like, wow, another
great reason for the government to not be allowed involved
in marriage licenses. You shouldn't be allowed to sneak someone
into the country just because you had a fake marriage.

Speaker 1 (07:01):
So that's the reason she can't admit to it, because
since you would be admitting to marriage frauda, immigration frauda,
and that that could be years in.

Speaker 2 (07:08):
Prison and that it won't be will it. And the
and right just adjacent to using marriage license to get
someone into the country in a legal loophole is the
anchor baby controversy.

Speaker 1 (07:19):
That's supposed to be going away. I thought Trump was
going to get to the curb. Well, yesterday he talked
about this. Here's Donald Trump on birthright citizenship.

Speaker 4 (07:27):
The case is very interesting because that case was meant
for the babies of slaves, and if you look at
the dates on the case, it was exactly having to
do with the Civil War. That case was not meant
for some rich person coming from another country dropping putting
a foot in our country and all of a sudden,
the whole family becomes, you know, United States citizens That

(07:49):
case is all about slaves, the babies of slaves, and
it was a good reason for doing it, and that's
all it was about. And people now are understanding it.
It's been explained to him, and I think the court
understands it too. That would be a devastating decision if
we lose that case that court, because our country cannot

(08:10):
afford to house tens of millions of people that came
in through birthright citizenship. When that happened, that was meant
for the babies of slaves. And if you look at
the exact dates that it was passed, it all had
to do with the Civil War.

Speaker 2 (08:30):
And he's made in the same point we Loom went
over that. Yeah, I agree with him. I mean he's correct,
that's one accurate.

Speaker 1 (08:36):
Absolutely, And like we talked about yesterday, well, the United
States is a notion of immigrants.

Speaker 2 (08:42):
Yeah, we were.

Speaker 1 (08:43):
It's two hundred and fifty years later now, and I
think maybe you know we were a full We might
want to put up the clothes sign now. Can we
just keep letting people into your restaurant? At some point
the fire Chief's going to come along and say too
many people, get some out, or we're going to shut
you down.

Speaker 2 (08:57):
Can we do that? Yeah? I wish that would be
awesome if we could do that. I think we should.
We all have to look into that is there someone
we need to call or know? The fire chief? You
only get him on a horn. Yeah, what's his name?
The chief? Everybody just calls him chief. Yes, that's respectful.
That's a cool nickname. Today's show is sponsored by Mall Santas.

(09:17):
Want a photo of your little kid crying their head off,
take them to see a Mall Santa. Stay tuned for more.
Waltman Johnson. If you're from Hollywood and you're talented, and
you've been around for a little while, and you took
a break from being part of the red carpet scene,
at some point, you might swallow the pill of reality.
That appears to be what happened to David Spade and

(09:39):
Dana Carvey. The two of them were recently doing a
podcast together and David Spad noticed something we were talking
about on this radio show just the other day. Well, say, well,
we were talking about it in Portland, but it's not
the only place where this has happened. The tree lighting ceremonies.
N everybody got a tree fired up. I think it's

(10:01):
you should focus on not what I'm saying, but what
I'm not saying. The tree lighting ceremony. What kind of
tree are people lighting at this time of year exactly.
Dana Carvey and David Spade noticed this. They don't the
Jews don't use a tree, do they. No, it's more
about a drado and some candles. Yeah, well anyway, but

(10:25):
qualans a lot of trees in the quands of celebration.
I think it's a Molotov cocktail that they throw colored candles?
Is that what it is? Colorful? Wow? That was close.
Oh my god, I thought we were going to lose
our jobs for a second. Anyway, here's David Spade and
Dana Carvey talking about trees and tree lighting ceremonies.

Speaker 5 (10:46):
I will say Chris was taking a little bit of
a beating lately. It is December and I saw the
other day there was a tree lighting ceremony for the
Christmas tree in some dopey mall don't Yeah, sure, Portland.
But it said tree lighting ceremony and they were careful
not to say the word Christmas during the whole ceremony.

Speaker 2 (11:07):
No, no, why why can't?

Speaker 5 (11:10):
So it's just a tree, and you go, I would
understand if you said they're doing the tree lighting at
the grove or whatever. You go, Ok, But to consciously
avoid that then what is the tree for?

Speaker 2 (11:23):
I mean, this is David Spade from Saturday Night Live saying,
maybe the Left's gone a little too far.

Speaker 1 (11:28):
A lot of people are thinking that, except the Left,
they don't think they're far enough yet because we're still
not communists, one badly.

Speaker 2 (11:37):
One group of people who are definitely okay with celebrating
Christmas and calling it that is us. Yeah, what cool
would it in? If you shop around it? I love
WJ dot com for great Christmas gifts. The actual Christmas
gifts were in the store, and some of them actually
use the word Christmas. Imagine. Lord. A lot of it
has nothing to do with Christmas. It's stuff you could
enjoy year round. Check out the new Walton and Johnson's

(11:59):
Salute to Service right now. You get a veteran shirt
and another veteran shirt and a bunch of veteran shirts.
The Golf of America Bundle includes a hat, a coffee mug,
and a T shirt with all the Golf of America
insignia on it. If you will lots more, go to
I LOVEWJ dot com today stock up for the holidays.
Christmas holiday, yes, I love Christmas.

Speaker 1 (12:21):
Yeah, because holidays usually to meet me Christmas and New
Year's because it's all within like a week.

Speaker 2 (12:26):
But you don't get a lot of presents on New
Year's do you.

Speaker 3 (12:29):
No?

Speaker 2 (12:30):
You do not, So do Christmas shop and during the holidays.
If you kiss someone on New Year's I guess that'd
be a thing that's a gift. Yeah. I got some
big plans for Christmas and New Years. And then in
the New Year's I guess we're going back to Colorado
for more live broadcast. Is that right? Yeah, that's going
to be exciting. Well, Colorado agree to it. They listen.

Speaker 1 (12:49):
They're really basing this on how we act next week.
You know, if you don't act right, you might not
get to come back. Well in the meantime, a little
history lesson here for you kiddos. Did you know in
nineteen seventy one, the Supreme Court case Griggs versus Duke
Power banned IQ tests for jobs on the basis that
they were racist. Oh still can't believe that's a real
thing that happened, but it is.

Speaker 2 (13:10):
The president. The president not only ruined hiring, making degrees
credentialism the only way businesses could reliably find qualified candidates,
but it also set the stage for disparate impact, or
the idea that minorities could sue if some law or
policy disproportionately impacted them, even if that law was meant
to be neutral. Most people don't know this, that's how

(13:31):
our system works, but it does. That's the gist of it.

Speaker 1 (13:34):
So IQ tests supposedly tests how smart you are, okay,
at your intelligence level? Want to call it the il test.
Well as if you're smarter, you'd know, Thank you very much,
mister Kenneth, I hadn't glad, I didn't have to. Never mind.

Speaker 2 (13:49):
If that's not represent that remark ball Now this is
a thing you do. This is why leftists have claimed
that the criminal justice system is racist against blacks. They
say it is not in it is inequitable to require
IQ tests for people because black people don't score high
on IQ tests.

Speaker 1 (14:04):
They light there's a black people as stupid, right less intelligent.

Speaker 2 (14:09):
Now, if that sounds like.

Speaker 1 (14:10):
Us the nice way to say, maybe saying that, but
it's not true.

Speaker 2 (14:15):
If that sounds like a bunch of commy gobbledegook. It
is where it is. But it's been the standard for
the last fifty years in America. Now apparently the DOJ
is going to change that the Department of Justice rule
restore us equal protection for all. The prior disparate impact
regulations encourage people to file lawsuits challenging racially neutral laws

(14:36):
but without evidence of intentional discrimination. Our rejection of this
theory will restore true equality under the law by requiring
proof of actual discrimination rather than informing race or sex
based quotas or assumptions. In other words, the DOJ is
going to erase that. Uh huh. And for the record,
isn't that kind of what Martin Luther King Junior would
have wanted?

Speaker 1 (14:54):
But is that a circuit judge whatever he is up
there and Seattle going to allow the DOJ to do that.

Speaker 2 (15:02):
The person that's going to have a problem with it
is KBJ Katanji Brown Jackson, otherwise known as Katanji Affirmative
Action Jackson Brown.

Speaker 1 (15:11):
But he's right, some judge in some far flowng area
of the Northwest or Alaska somewhere, Well, just tell Trump
his Department of Justice can't do that, and then it
has to eventually go to the Supremes.

Speaker 2 (15:24):
Well, Katanji Brown Jackson's been all over the news this week, Supreme.

Speaker 1 (15:28):
In my world, I got to tell you that I
don't think she's earned the title Supreme judge.

Speaker 2 (15:33):
She's in the news today for a totally different reason.
She calls herself a Democrat, and yet she's upset because
unelected officials. Unelected officials can be fired by the democratically
elected president of the United States of America.

Speaker 3 (15:47):
Some issues, some matter, some areas should be handled nonpartisan experts.
That Congress is saying that expert hees matters.

Speaker 2 (16:01):
She's upset. The Dodge came in earlier this year and
fired a bunch of scientists that were getting paid to
produce not so much to do science, but to do propaganda.

Speaker 1 (16:09):
Well, like they say, and I know you've you may
have a shirt that says this. I've seen it on
bumper stickers. Everybody knows the old adage. It's just as
easy to buy a scientist as it is a politician.

Speaker 3 (16:20):
Mmm.

Speaker 2 (16:21):
They do it all the time. Yeah, perfectly stated, my man,
Thank you so much. Anyway, to some extent, the country
is healing itself. But I might remind you by this
time next year, if those midterms don't go well, and
they're not predicted to go well, why of this is
going to undo itself and we're gonna be right back
where we started.

Speaker 1 (16:39):
Talked about what happened in Florida. Florida got them? Is
it Miami got them a Democrat for the first time in.

Speaker 2 (16:44):
Thirty years, first time in thirty years.

Speaker 1 (16:46):
You know the simple math on that, And I know
math is sometimes considered racist unless I do it good point.
The math says, too many New Yorkers fled New York
now to move to Florida and then to keep voting Democrat.
Why bother leaving New York If you go start voting
Democrat in Florida, that don't make a legal sense.

Speaker 2 (17:07):
Yeah, I guess they wanted to get out of New
York after the pandemic because they didn't like what the
Democrats did with all the COVID policies. But they're voting
is what brought you socialism. It's almost like they don't
know huh and they're not really paying attention, or are they.
You can move the lemmings to a different cliff, but
they're still gonna run off the cliff. Can't make them
drink them. That sounds like comedy gobbledygook. Stay tuned for more.

(17:31):
Waltman Johnson