Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Oh hnriy. Welcome to the X Zone, a place where
fact is fiction and fiction is reality.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Now here's your host, Rob McConnell.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
A loona.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
Wait this Sember back in sixty three.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
What a recession tamphone? Sorry remember.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
All, and welcome back every one. This is the X Zone.
(01:16):
I am Rob McConnell, coming to you from our broadcast
center at studios in Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada, and you're
listening to us around the world on the X Zone
Broadcast Network, Voice of Canada Broadcast Network, and let me see,
we have the talk Star Radio Network, Mutual Broadcast Network
and throughout the province of Ontario, the northern part of
the states of New York and Pennsylvania on your hometown
(01:37):
radio Classic twelve twenty c FAJ based right here in
Saint Catherines, just down the street from our studios, and
they stream us on Classic twelve twenty dot CA. My
guest is sour exonation is Marty Rosenblatt, and we're going
to be talking about consciousness, precognition and retro call causality,
(01:59):
right correct, Okay. First of all, Marty, thanks very much
for joining us. And I was wondering if you could
let our listeners know a little bit about yourself.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
I'm a trained as a physicist from UCLA with a
master's degree. I've always been interested in consciousness psychic phenomenon.
When I was young, I used to hear all these
fantastic stories that were sort of unbelievable at the time,
(02:31):
but they were capturing to me. I read Isaac Asthmov
Stranger in a Strange Land. So I was reading books
like that, and then after I graduated with my master's
I was on a PhD program, but I got a
(02:52):
job at a company that was using these advanced computers
at the time. Now my cell phone is is advanced
as what was going on back there in nineteen sixty,
but they were doing computational physics, and so I got
(03:14):
involved as a physicist in predicting high impact work for NASA,
where they were worried about impacts on their vehicles and
also nuclear weapon effects. And then I got into when
I actually a little before I retired, I started a
(03:38):
company called Applied Precognition Project, and I've been doing this
work ever since, involving consciousness remote viewing and associative remote viewing,
which involves that retrocausality.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Now, you mentioned an organization that you started.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Tell us about it, Well, it was p I a
p DAH dot com Physics Intuition Applications. I was always,
as I said, interested in this sort of thing, so
I actually started an organization which was focused on consciousness,
(04:24):
had precognition. This happened after I went to a place
called the Monroe Institute. Some of your listeners may have
heard about that row right out of bodywork, and I
met Skip at Water there and others, and you know,
still becoming one hundred percent convinced it was real. I
(04:47):
knew I had to do things, but I had to
do it as a physicist where.
Speaker 4 (04:52):
Things can be measured.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
And that's where the leap from remote viewing, which gives
you these good targets and you can match them, but
how well do you match them? We're associative remote viewing,
and let's just talk binary. We've done more than binary
up to twenty but in binary you have two choices.
(05:19):
So right now we're focused on sports and we're doing
the over under in NBA sports right now, and so
that's very nearly binary. The bookmakers are really very good
at it. So that's a fifty to fifty proposition. And
the way that works are there are two photos, one
(05:42):
associated with over, one associated with under the remote viewers
who are asked to describe what they will see after
the outcome after the game, and then as a judge
you look at their transcript well, and then it gets
compared to the two possibilities, and if there's a good match,
(06:04):
you can make a prediction.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
I bet you the bookkeepers just love you. Guys.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
Well, we haven't made it big enough splash yet, but
we actually hope to because one of my objectives is
to get over this thing where most people still don't
believe it, most scientists do not believe it. So I've
got a project going now where for the last three
(06:33):
months we've got a hit rate of sixty five percent,
and that's actually using an approach which we got from
doctor red May, which I don't know. I'm sort of
going fast. I don't know if people know this, but
when the judging was done by a person like when
(06:55):
I used to do the judging for twenty years, we
would get so many hits and then we'd get missus
and we would never understand why. And ed May really
proved that it was something called displacement. There are two
possible pictures. The viewer sees one, but the judge used
(07:20):
to see both. And you know, in this crazy what
we call nonlocality, where you can see the future, you
can read people's minds subconsciously, viewers were getting a very
good description of the wrong picture. Now that would lead
(07:41):
to a miss that's called displacement, and it was very
upsetting to so many people, unbelievable. Ed May then came
up with an approach where the judge is now a computer,
so no human being sees both photos, and then the
(08:01):
viewer only sees the correct one, and that is working
much better. We no longer get these long streaks. And
we've had this three months sixty five percent hit rate going,
and we intend to continue it. In fact, they've laid
out what I've called my impossible dream to do this
(08:23):
for a thousand, So we're going to do a thousand predictions.
It'll take a few years, and we expect to keep
up our sixty five percent for that period of time,
and then the odds against chance of that'll be phenomenal
and it will not be able to be denied.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
Marty, how would you describe consciousness, you know.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
We say the phrase and it is so true. Consciousness
is fundamental, So any just description of it lacks things
because you bring in non fundamental things. Yet every sentient being,
every human being, every animal, every extraterrestrial, any centian being
(09:16):
knows consciousness because they experience it in the now, this
now moment. Right you just heard me clapping.
Speaker 4 (09:25):
Yes, you heard it.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
In your now moment, and that's consciousness. So you know it,
you experience it, and you can try to define it,
but you know, it's just what I said, it's awareness.
It's the very awareness of this conscious moment.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
So where does precognition fit into this picture? And how
does precognition work? Because if you have this, if something
that you are receiving hasn't happened yet, how does that work?
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Isn't that amazing?
Speaker 5 (10:07):
It's you would not think that that's possible based on
the way most of us learn and are taught not learn,
because a lot of people have precognition when they're young
and it gets turned off.
Speaker 3 (10:25):
But we are taught that the world is linear, that
there's a cause and that leads to effect. Well, the
real world has sometimes the future can communicate with the past.
That's retro causality. In other words, when I ask a
(10:51):
remote viewer to describe and sketch what he's going to
see in the future, and he gives me a transcript
where she kiss me your transcript, and then in the future,
when that transcript is matched with the actual target and
there's a good match, they really are retro causing that
(11:15):
match to go back to the time.
Speaker 4 (11:17):
When they did their remote viewing session.
Speaker 5 (11:21):
Wow, Okay, we know it works, and how it works.
Speaker 4 (11:26):
I don't know how to tell you how it works.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
The universe is put together so that precognition, retrocausality, and
you know, most of the other psychic phenomena PK, psychokineses,
mental telepathy. The universe permits all those.
Speaker 2 (11:47):
The universe permits all those, and there are those who
believe that all those happen at the same time simultaneously.
Speaker 3 (11:55):
That's a very good model, rob. We call that outside
of space time. You know, some people refer to those
as other dimensions. But yes, the image of when you
get in a deep meditative state and I call it
(12:16):
the spiritual state. This stuff, ultimately, and it seems like
most of us have been in it for a while.
We may not use the same words, but ultimately you
get the feeling of this is spiritual because there's something
going on which is so much greater than our day
to day ego intellectual selves, which are wonderful, nothing wrong
(12:40):
with that, but there's something even deeper than that, something
higher than that, and that's the spiritual. And when you
can set aside your intellect, your ego and set an intention,
say to get information from the future, you'll get information
(13:01):
from the future. Intention seems to be the key element
you need, I believe to eventually get down to this
deep place. And then with intention, you're operating outside of
space and time.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
Marty stand by you and I have to take our
first break into explanation. Our guests this hour is Marty Rosenblatt.
His website is applied precog dot com. That's a P
P L I E D p R E co o
G dot com. And Marty and I will be back
on the other side of this very short break as
the xone continues with your STRELLI, Rob McConnell and the
(13:37):
XON Broadcast Network, and you're on your hometown radio Classic
twelve twenty c FAJ Here in Saint Catherine's streaming I
said Classic twelve twenty dot CA.
Speaker 5 (14:09):
You wander around on your own little club when you
don't see.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
The why all the rail fall.
Speaker 1 (14:23):
You walk out of me when we all disagreed, close
theories as.
Speaker 5 (14:32):
Of what you care for.
Speaker 6 (14:40):
Millions sleeves and welcome back, Martyr Rosenblad.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
It's our special guest. This our exhanation and Marty's folks
us at APP is to attract more people and groups
to work with APP and act as group manager for
several APP groups. He is both an assistant I'm sorry,
associate remote viewer that's aar veer and analyst judge applying
(15:17):
the one AARV protocol. Marty is an authority on all
things related to precognition. Marty is also president of Physics
International Applications, which he founded in nineteen ninety eight to
apply remote viewing to predicting stock market and sporting event outcomes.
He writes the online magazine Connections through Time. Marty teaches
(15:41):
financial and sports precognition application workshops with other experienced experts
from the remote viewing community, including Russell tag, skip Outwater,
Stephen Schwartz, and Paul Elder Marty has an MS in
physics from UCLA, and individuals that are drawn to non
conventional applications such as remote viewing, dowsing and precognition are
(16:05):
just the right people to assist their society in moving
through the consciousness paradigm shift. Once again, if you'd like
more information about Marty and the work that they do,
visit www dot applied precog dot com. And it's funny.
I was reading the people that you work with, Marty,
and I've had Russell targ on the show a couple
(16:28):
of times, skip out Water on the show, Steven Schwartz
on the show, and of course Paul Elder. I find
I'm remote viewing and the areas that you investigate and
dwell in very interesting.
Speaker 3 (16:46):
Absolutely, and I'd like to add one more thing to
your asking how it works?
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Okay, please do not know.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
In detail, But the closest we can come is quantum mechanics,
because quantumcanx has this feature called nonlocality, where we know
if you set a photon out in one direction, set
another one out in the other direction, and they're entangled
(17:14):
to tweak one and the other one knows it instantly.
That's non locality. So that's different to when we're taught
about cause and effect. So quantum mechanics has I think
the basis of.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
A lot of what we're doing.
Speaker 3 (17:31):
Is also called the zero point energy field, which is
a quantum mechanical type field that is not questioned by science.
We all agree, even the ones that won't agree, in
psychic phenomenon, the precognition that there's this thing called the
zero point energy field that we're all embedded in, and
(17:56):
that's the thing which is maybe outside space in time
includes past, present, and future, and in my opinion, the
energy that's coming into that and going out to that
is connected to the spiritual reality.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
So are we talking about the mechanism behind psychic phenomenon?
Speaker 3 (18:22):
Yes, I mean yes, all of it is connected to
things like the zero point energy field and the non
physical reality which I sometimes called spirituality.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
What is a retrocausality See retro causality normal cause and effect.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
You do something now and information in ways, say, goes
forward in time. Retro Causality is when you do something
in what you would in linear time think of as
the future, and ways go backward in time and information
(19:13):
is picked up earlier than when you actually did your
retrocausality event.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
Once? I'm sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 3 (19:26):
This is getting into mainstream. There have been several physics
conferences on retro causality. That is the title of the conference.
So we're trying to understand this, and the very small
group of physicists that are investigating this are doing it.
(19:47):
They keep doing experiments that confirm it. But I got
well past that many many many years ago and said,
let's not try to keep understanding it. We know it's real.
Let's apply it.
Speaker 2 (20:02):
All right. Once we understand and we can prove that
it is real, what applications can we use it for?
Speaker 3 (20:13):
Well, I mean, okay, funny you should ask, because I'm
just getting you know, besides the wagering and all that
sort of thing. It can obviously be used to that,
and that's going to make a major change to financial
institutions when it becomes very well established. But I have
(20:36):
one that I am just getting involved in and which
I think can be very very important to society, and
that is predicting earthquakes. Now, Stephen Schwartz, who if you
interviewed you probably remember, one of his claims appropriate claims
(20:58):
to fame is that he's able to predict, not predict, fine,
predict the location of lost civilizations. He found the city
of Alexandria that was buried and lost. He's got a
whole book on it. He's found other things. And he
does this with I'm going to call it map dousings,
(21:21):
but it's a little you know, he gets the really
best viewers and on a map, they will indicate where
do they think, let's say the city of Alexandria, the
lost city of Alexandria is, and they'll make a point
on the map. Now, imagine if you have ten of
them and their points are all sort of clustered. This
(21:45):
clustering is what he found that the good psychics seem
to go to want to go to a similar place.
And then once he got that area, he have them
again do it and he got very specific and by golly,
he went down there and found it. And he's done
that with other things. So that's clustering on a map. Now,
(22:08):
for an earthquake, if I tell you there's going to
be an earthquake you know in San Francisco, who cares
if I can't give you the date the day as well?
And I've talked to Steven and he thinks it's a
good idea.
Speaker 4 (22:25):
He's more than willing to do it.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
He needs money, though, to fund his good remote viewers
and himself, so he tells me he wants fifty thousand dollars,
and I am trying now to actually get that. The
fun me program is not around, but there's another one
(22:51):
who I've just made contact with. Hold done.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Let me get the name.
Speaker 3 (22:59):
Surely, people, if I get to set up there, I'd
love people to go to it.
Speaker 4 (23:05):
You know, give us money. Two thousand dollars is a lot.
Speaker 2 (23:09):
Now, what will you be getting for fifty thousand dollars?
Speaker 3 (23:13):
Okay, Kickstarter is the name of it. What would be
getting for it is he would bring in a group
of probably five to ten really good remote viewers, like
the ones he used to find the buried city of
Alexandria the other thing, and get them.
Speaker 4 (23:33):
To do two map.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
Dowsing sources of things. The first would be a map
thousing of the location. The second would be I don't
know what you were going to call a timeline dowsing
of when that earthquake of say, greater than magnitude six
is to occur.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Yeah, I mean, I've had a lady on the show before.
Her name is Charlotte King. I don't know if you've
heard about her, but she is dead on when it
comes to the predictions of earthquakes.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
I'd love to get in touch with it.
Speaker 2 (24:14):
I will send you the information.
Speaker 3 (24:17):
Please please do that.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
I certainly will say.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
You know, I'd love her to make a prediction going
along with Stephen's work. Why does she do this often
enough that she has credibility? Is she on accurate?
Speaker 2 (24:32):
I don't know what the percentage is that over the
years that she's done it, but I know the three
that she gave me over the years were dead on.
Speaker 3 (24:42):
Wow. Yeah, and you shared that with your viewers, who
could then leave. You know. The whole point about this
is if it gets credibility, then people will leave before
the quake and it could say lies.
Speaker 2 (24:57):
Exactly, especially since President Trump has defunding a lot of
the different agencies that used to work on you know,
these kind of things, including FEMA and NOAH and the
list goes on and on. So I guess an independent
now is very valuable, That's right.
Speaker 3 (25:15):
And I'd love making to bring her into a group
by trying to put together I have another person that
makes predictions and will feel active, you know, and they
make the prediction, but it's always for months away, and
I don't know if this person is it is accurate.
I will tell you he channels. He's a heat channels information.
(25:39):
I don't know how she gets her information. Do you
know that she channel it from somebody?
Speaker 2 (25:46):
I have to be totally honest with you, Marty. I
can't remember, because over the years I've done over five
thousand interviews.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
You can't remember them ball.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
That, eh now, But I do remember. There are those
guests that that hit things dead on that that you remember,
and I do remember. In fact, she's going to be
on the show in a couple of weeks. My producer
just told me. So I will certainly let you give
you the contact information, Marty, because I you know, I
(26:21):
truly believe, Marty, that we all have the piece to
the Mysteries of life jigsaw puzzle in our pockets, and
all we need to do is get to the big table.
Everybody takes out their little jigsaw puzzle piece and they
work together and they come up with the finished product.
And I think that this is what we need to do,
especially in today's age where there's so much disinformation out there.
(26:44):
There's so much in uh, there's so many Charlatans out
there that hardcore research like you are doing. And I
know that Skip and Paul Elder do is legitimate. So
anything to help you work with you on this, You've
got my full support.
Speaker 3 (27:05):
Well that's that's wonderful. And I will be setting this
up and the fact maybe when I get it all
set up and there's a place people would go to donate.
I've never asked for money for any of my work,
but this earthquakes and Steven Schwartz is the only one
(27:25):
that's done this map dowsing, which one hundred percent accuracy
mean one hundred percent accuracy is tough.
Speaker 2 (27:32):
All right, we have to take our break here. I'm
sorry I got so involved in our conversation that my
producer just threw a piece of orange peel at me
to get my attention. That's why the glasses between the
two of us. We'll be back on the other side
of this break as Marty Rosenblatt and I continue talking
here on the X Zone, on the Talk Star Radio Network,
Mutual Broadcast Network, and on your hometown radio Classic twelve
(27:53):
twenty Classic twelve twenty dot CA.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Can look amos. That's the way you're doing you play
(28:33):
the kids.
Speaker 5 (28:34):
Out on you.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
GeV money working, that's the way you do money. One
of nothing working, that's the way you do it. I'm excite, guys,
don't maybe get.
Speaker 2 (28:51):
Up the ston Welcome back everyone. Marty Rosenblat is our
special guest. His website is applied precog dot com. That's
a P P L E ed p R co o
G dot com. Marty, it seems that precognition and the
work that you're doing with with the folks that you know,
(29:14):
like like skip out Water and Paul Elder and of
course Russell Tark, the the information that you're able to
come back with, do you have a fear that it
would be weaponized?
Speaker 3 (29:29):
Well, yes, weaponized in the sense that the who we
consider enemies might use it to spy on us. We
know that there the remote viewers spied on them, the
Russians of the Chinese. I'm sure they were spying on us,
(29:51):
So in that sense it to be used. But I'm
also a very positive person. Somehow I'm hoping as we
open this reality up to more and more people, they
will recognize the spiritual aspect of it and again, you know,
based on what we see in the world now it's
(30:12):
hard to believe, but that's the hope that if we
can get more and more people to really be tuned
in to the fact that we are ultimately spiritual beings.
We are spiritual beings having a physical experience to learn
in many ways I think about the spiritual and so
(30:36):
hopefully as.
Speaker 4 (30:38):
We learn more and more about.
Speaker 3 (30:41):
This consciousness and precognition, retrocorality p K. Metal telepathy, metal
telepathy is you know, is another big one. It's it's
a psychic skill. And I'm hoping as these more and
more accepted, first by science. Scientists do not accept it,
(31:05):
but imagine that scienceists accepted, and then we can really
start getting it doing more analysis and experiments on it.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
All Right, once you run the scientific analysis and science
comes up and says, yep, we're dead on there's the proof.
They do their studies, they call you up. Then what
do you do with this information?
Speaker 5 (31:32):
Marty Well?
Speaker 3 (31:34):
Earthquake predictions, Okay, I think it's very important one, you know,
and there are other catastrophes.
Speaker 4 (31:41):
You know.
Speaker 3 (31:42):
We're now getting very good at knowing where the hurricanes
are hitting because we can follow that, But how about tornadoes.
Those tornadoes, they'll seem to be very random. And I
would say, because I believe we are the good guys,
how about finding the guy who's going to do the
(32:04):
next terrorist attack. Wouldn't that be a valuable thing to do?
Speaker 2 (32:10):
It would be. But here here's a question. By interfering
with free will, by taking this person out of the system,
are you not changing the future?
Speaker 3 (32:25):
You absolutely are, but be careful about that. You're not
changing it, you're making it. You are creating the future.
With the terrorists being knocked out the way you put it,
you've created that. There was no future that actually happened,
(32:46):
at least in this universe. You know, they had this
multi universe theory. I'm still struggling with it. But in
the one universe where that terrorist might have caused major
terrorist attack and killed lots and lots of people, you
took him out and you helped create the actual future.
(33:09):
So you changed I guess, one potential future into a
better future, and you created that. And you can see
lots of ways precognition.
Speaker 4 (33:23):
Can do that.
Speaker 3 (33:25):
But this is making judgments again. You know other people
are going to consider them, unfortunately, to be the good guys.
But I think the United States, you know, I hope
we're the ones who in fact developed this and apply
it for good things like stocking terrorists, notifying people about earthquakes, tornadoes.
(33:50):
You know, there's another one that's actually being done now
as far as I know. Some good remote viewers have
been asked the question of industrial organizations, what is my
next best product to develop? Think about that? So there, yes,
(34:13):
what would be the product for me developed that will
be a financial success a year from that?
Speaker 2 (34:22):
But let me look at the other side of the
coin on this one, Marty. What happens to the remote
viewer that is a that is brought on board by
a competitor, and the the remote viewer then remote views
and gathers trade secrets using his ability.
Speaker 3 (34:45):
How do you bring up the very very important issue
of ethics? And again, as remote viewers get into this
and get the sense of the spiritual, I hope they
will become more and more ethical and refuse to do
(35:06):
that no matter how much money they're offered. And guess why,
what's that some won't And that's an issue. You know,
I can't deny that that's an issue.
Speaker 2 (35:18):
So how do we put safeguards in place to ensure,
to the best of our abilities that this will not happen,
that the ability and the great work that are being
done by scientists like yourself and Skip and Paul do
not get into the wrong hands. Once the total concept
(35:39):
turns from an idea into a reality.
Speaker 3 (35:44):
Well, I think we have to think about that as
we're developing this. It's a lot like AI. People are
very worried about what's going to happen with this artificial intelligence,
and some people are thinking about how to safeguard it.
But I mean, I think that's all you can do,
and this failed. Nobody is thinking about how to safeguarded.
(36:08):
But it's not far enough along. But as it does
get far enough along, I do think that's going to
be important. We'll need groups of people who focus on
ethics and maybe use remote viewing to find instances where
non ethical things are being done. But who gets to
(36:33):
define ethical?
Speaker 2 (36:36):
Yeah, there's a lot to consider.
Speaker 5 (36:39):
Yes, absolutely, is the world moving into though I understand
that it's the world is getting more and more complicated.
Speaker 2 (36:48):
As we're told by those who want to call themselves
gurus that technology is making it easier for us. Bull crap.
Speaker 3 (36:58):
You know, but you can't stop it.
Speaker 2 (37:02):
That's right, you can't.
Speaker 3 (37:03):
That's over history, people, and that's sort of sad because
people have not changed. You know, we're all.
Speaker 4 (37:11):
Shitty, not all.
Speaker 3 (37:14):
But you know, there's a bunch of shitty people around
all the time that want to start wars over other
people's countries. That's been the same as far back as
been any recorded history. The only thing that's changed is
technology has gotten better and better and better, and that's
going to continue.
Speaker 2 (37:33):
You know, you were talking, you were talking about how
people are unethical. A lot of people are. You know,
we just seeing what happened over the past week with
the falling of the stock market and you know, the
different the bonds, the dollar, and so on the on
(37:55):
the financial side. Anyone that has truly developed the ability
to use precognition in a way that I hope you
and your group do finally get it to the point
where it's like pushing a button in there it is,
they will use it, in my opinion, for nefarious reasons.
Speaker 3 (38:20):
Well, you have to define that. If making a lot
of money is nefarious, then what you said is the farious. Yeah,
I think making money is not necessarily a bad thing.
Speaker 2 (38:36):
Oh I agree with you. I agree with you, But
what I'm saying is, if person A has the ability
to use remote viewing and person B doesn't, why should
how do we protect be who does not have the
(38:56):
ability to do remote viewing from you know, playing on
any equal ground.
Speaker 3 (39:05):
They're not. It's a little bit like AI. Some of
the AI programs apparently are the best predictors of the
stock market. I don't know if any of them predicted this,
you know, two thousand point drop and now it's rising.
But there have always been some people that have been
(39:25):
better at some stuff than other stuff, and we have
to live with that period. I think that's reality. We
do have to face up to reality.
Speaker 2 (39:36):
I agree with you one hundred percent. But when it
comes to using an ability that is not accessible across
the board, I don't think that that is fair. You know,
if if A, B, C, D, E, F G all
have the ability to use remote viewing in order to
see the stock market and and make money, that's one thing.
(39:59):
But if you've only one person with the ability and
you've got the BCDEFG, who are going to suffer financially
because of the upper hand of A, I don't think
that's fair.
Speaker 3 (40:13):
Well, right, I understand what you're saying. Now, Notice everybody.
Speaker 4 (40:20):
Has the ability to learn remote doing.
Speaker 3 (40:24):
I'll tell you something else. I'm not sure anybody can
be one hundred percent as you're talking about. You know,
we're doing sixty five percent. And I love that in
a way because people that are and the only people
who get access to our predictions are people who submit transcripts,
so they're the only ones who get to see the
(40:48):
group prediction. And the sixty five percent is an interesting number,
you know, it's not like the sure thing. It's putting
precognition in an appropriate place where usually when people first
hear about it, they talk about it. If it ought
to be one hundred percent, If you can do it,
why can't you.
Speaker 4 (41:07):
Do it all over?
Speaker 2 (41:08):
But sixty five percent is a very impressive number as well.
And you and I have to take our final break,
so please stand by Marty explanation. A very interesting conversation
with our guests this hour. Marty Rosenblatt and his website
is www dot precog. No wait a minute, hold on
where to go? Where did I go? Where did I go? Oh?
(41:29):
That's right here, Rob applied precog dot com www dot
applied precog dot com. And we'll be back on the
other side as we wrap up this hour here in
the X Zone with Here'streley Rob McConnell. So don't go away,
(42:12):
turn and turn again at see I love that seem strong.
Speaker 1 (42:19):
It's not meant to be broken. Hearts, don't always bend
love to shore.
Speaker 4 (42:31):
To try on a game.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
Just between you and me, baby, and.
Speaker 4 (42:47):
Just be dream.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
Always.
Speaker 2 (42:57):
Wow, what a great band that was April Wine. Just
between you and me. And this is the X Zone.
You're listening to us on your hometown radio Classic twelve
twenty CFAJ here in St. Catharines and streaming on Classic
twelfth twenty dot CA. And you're also listening to us
on the Xzone Broadcast Network, Talkstar Radio Network, Mutual Broadcast Network,
and a couple of new ones including Canada First Broadcast
(43:20):
Network and Voice of Canada Broadcast Network. Now, before we
get back to our guest, I just like to remind
everyone listening that if you would like to listen to
any of the shows that we have produced here at
Relmar McConnell Media Company, and you would like to listen
to them in the past archives that we have, there's
(43:40):
one place to go. It's one hundred percent free. We
don't charge one hundred percent free. All you need to
do is go to www dot xzbn dot net. That's
www dot xedbn dot net. All the shows are there,
including a Different Perspective with Kevin Randall, Paranormal Stakeout with
(44:02):
Larry Lawson, Mission Evolution with Guldaweka, and of course you're
truly Rob McConnell and the x own. So once again,
that's www dot x zbn dot net. I guess this
hour is Marty Rosenblatt and his website is applied precog
dot com. First of all, Marty, thanks very much for
(44:24):
joining us, and you were telling us just before we
went to the break that remote viewing is not very
hard to learn.
Speaker 3 (44:33):
That's correct. The hardest part is allowing your doubts to
go away and realizing you can do it. People have
blocks that go back many, many, many years, and working
through those blocks is what actually gets you more and
(44:54):
more spiritual. I use that word a lot because I
think it's fundamental to this. But everybody can learn to
do it now, not everybody is going.
Speaker 4 (45:03):
To be good.
Speaker 3 (45:04):
As I said, Joe mcmonaco, you know the superstars, though,
I think if you worked hard enough at it, maybe
you could be. You know, how do you really know?
Most people do a little, they get a few successes
and then they stop. But yeah, it's accessible to everybody.
There are plenty of classes out there. We give classes,
(45:28):
we give workshops. We have two webinar workshops a year
with interesting people who have people like Dean Raiden.
Speaker 4 (45:39):
Stephen Schwartz is going.
Speaker 3 (45:41):
To be on our next workshop, which is May sixteenth
to eighteenth. So you know, if people go to our
website they can get all the information. But there are
plenty of people out there who are willing to teach
you remote viewing.
Speaker 2 (46:00):
You said that the hardest part is basically, you know,
getting rid of the doubts. And is this where meditation
would come in.
Speaker 3 (46:11):
You're obviously leading me and answer it. Yes, meditation is
the key to this. One of the few common elements
with people who do well with remote viewing versus the
others that are more sporadic, is meditation. And that's because
(46:33):
in meditation you can set aside the ego intellectual part
of you and just allow information to come in from
the deeper parts of you that get in touch with
what I call is selb conscious right right below with
consciousness and that gets passed on to your conscious mind
(46:54):
and meditation and meditators know how to do that, and
in many ways, when you do your remote viewing on
the first stage is to get into a meditative state.
Not everybody believes that. Some people have these long strategies,
but I think those strategies are getting you deeper and
(47:17):
deeper into a type of meditation state.
Speaker 2 (47:21):
Where do you see the best use for remote viewing
in the future.
Speaker 3 (47:31):
Well, I am now working on earthquakes. The addition to
I do think predicting markets in a way which is public.
See that's sort of the difference. You were sort of
talking about a person who is I'll do it in
private and make a lot of personal money if they
(47:54):
want to do that. You know, people have their own
free will. I think that's right on diverge of maybe
being unethical because it's only for money. But I don't
see anything necessarily wrong with that. But like what I'm
doing is I'm doing it publicly. Every month in one
(48:15):
of my webinars, I give my statistics, and I hope
more and more people do that. And in financial markets
because that's going to get society's attention, just like earthquakes
will get society's attention if we can demonstrate that we
can predict them the location and the day reliably.
Speaker 2 (48:40):
How close do you think where we are at getting
to that point with remote viewing?
Speaker 3 (48:47):
Well, in terms of being able to get sixty five percent,
I think we're there three months. My odds against chance
now last time I look for like three hundred to one,
but I've done more since then, so the odds against
chance of what I'm doing is probably up near one
(49:09):
thousand and one. Is that going to convince people? Well,
in many ways it should if they're open minded, and
I'm hoping that it'll bring more people into this world
of consciousness and remobuer but begin to realize that the
real universe is non local. It allows for precognition, it
(49:34):
allows for retrocausality, so the data is out there. I
think the earthquake one will hit a lot of people
closer to home, and so I think that'll bring people.
And other people are doing stuff too, which is out
there in public. So we are slowly heading in that direction,
(49:57):
but it's pretty slow. Hopefully it'll accelerate.
Speaker 2 (50:03):
I would imagine that after nine to eleven, that there
were a number of agencies as well as private individuals
who were using remote viewing to try and find bin Laden.
Have you had any dealings with the alphabet soup agencies
trying to recruit members of your organization or yourself to
(50:23):
help them with projects.
Speaker 3 (50:28):
I came close to some people who were talking to
those agencies and we did some work with them, And
I know that that has to be going on. You know,
sometime my government is very stupid, But I don't think
there's that stupid. They have the evidence from all the
(50:51):
years that they were doing this under the various programs
like Stargate, which everybody's heard about, but sure there are
a lots very successful. The Three Letter agencies used these
programs and then it was cut off. And apparently I'm
(51:12):
going to oversimplify it, but I think it was cut
off by people who thought it was the work of
the devil. You know, you can't do this, It's impossible,
and anybody can can there might be the work of
the devil, and some congress people, some senators actually said that,
and so the programers was cut off. But I think
(51:35):
some of the agencies, the Dark agencies are probably subcontracting
out to good relow viers. I do not know that.
Speaker 4 (51:45):
I do not know that.
Speaker 3 (51:47):
But so many companies, so many countries were involved in this.
I mean China, Russia was clearly involved in this. We
had lots of meetings and May went and talked to
counterparts over there. Joe mcmonaical with him to talk with
remote viewers. China was clearly doing it. Israel is doing it.
(52:10):
So it's hard to believe that it's not being used
now someplace. I hope we're using it.
Speaker 2 (52:18):
I hope we're using it for the right reasons. Yes,
Marty is when it comes to learning remote viewing or
someone who is well seasoned as remote viewer, does age
or sex matter as far as the capabilities or the
ability to become a more proficient remote viewer? Then let's
(52:41):
say a male to female or female to male or
is it right across the board?
Speaker 3 (52:46):
It's right across the board, except for those that are
open and do meditation. In fact, if you like, there's
been a controversy on te can you really teach it?
Does that help versus the very simple approach I'm about
to give you now, And I believe this very simple
(53:09):
approach is really all you need, okay, including Russell Tark.
Russell Tark was one who is on this side of
the argument. Get quiet, quiet down, open up your mind right,
be open to receiving information from your subconscious, have the
(53:34):
intention to see what has been designated as your target.
Look for information, the prizes. Whatever you get, put on
your transcript.
Speaker 4 (53:55):
Period.
Speaker 2 (53:55):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (53:57):
That's it. You get quiet, you get open to get
information from your deep cellf and you put it on
your transfer.
Speaker 2 (54:06):
We've got about a minute left before you and I
have to say, so long for tonight, Marty. But but
the question that I'm going to ask is a little long.
But I hope you can give me an answer with
all the with all the technology that's out there now
in the airwaves. You have five G, you have microwave,
(54:26):
you have digital transmissions, you have let me see Wi Fi.
I said that bluetooth. Does this interfere with the ability
of someone to to find their target easier?
Speaker 4 (54:43):
I don't think.
Speaker 5 (54:44):
So.
Speaker 3 (54:45):
You're going deep down into yourself, and one of the
things you do is you set aside all that crap.
Speaker 4 (54:53):
You might too.
Speaker 3 (54:55):
Let me just add one other things to your list,
which I think is the most important.
Speaker 2 (55:00):
We've got fifteen seconds, Marty.
Speaker 3 (55:03):
Quantum computers. I think there's a slight chance that quantum computers,
remember you're getting down that to the quantum WORL might
learn how to do precognition.
Speaker 2 (55:15):
Interesting, Marty Rosenbladam. Want to thank you so much for
joining us tonight, and I look forward to the next
time you join us back here in the X All, Marty,
but I will get you the information of Charlotte Kane,
and we'll also check to see if we've had any
other remote yours on. I'll also share that information with you.
Speaker 4 (55:32):
Thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (55:33):
Take care of yourself, Marty, and that's it for tonight.
I'll be back tomorrow night as once again we cross
the time space continuum to this place that I call
the X Zone. So from everyone here at Roal Mar
McConnell Media Company, the xone Broadcast Network, and of course
our good friends as your hometown radio Classic twelve twenty
CFAJ to what and I'll have a safe evening, and
remember keep your eyes to the sky and your heart
(55:55):
to the light. Good Night, everyone,