Truth Wanted 08.31 08-01-2025 with ObjectivelyDan and @blitzphd

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Did you know that Project Bluebeam is a conspiracy theory
which claims that NASA is attempting to implement a new
age for religion with the Antichrist and its head and
start a new world order via a uh synchronogologically simulated
second Coming. Does any of this sound real to you?
If it does, you should call in because the show
is starting right now. Hello everybody, I'm objectively Dan. Welcome

(00:28):
back to another episode of Truth Wanted. I said synchronically,
it said technologically. I don't know why I can't read today.
I seem to be having issues and I just made
up a word, which is really cool. Anyway, I'm objectively Dan.
This is truth one of the live calling show that
happens every single week Fridays at seven am Central Time.
We talk to people about what they believe and why.
And if you'd like to call us, you can do

(00:50):
that at five one two nine nine two, or you
can call through your computer at tiny dot c c
slash call tw and has always Truth Wanted is a
product of the atheist and you have austin if I
have a one C three nonprofit organization dedicades to the
promotion of atheism, critical thinking secular humanism, separation of religion
and government. Ever single week, folks, I always try to
have a special guest. This week is no different. Joining

(01:12):
us back again is doctor Blitz. Doctor. Let's welcome back
to Truth Wanting. How any How's it going pretty good?
I appreciate you coming back onto the show. How has
life been for you since last time we talked? That
was back in March. We just figured that out.

Speaker 2 (01:27):
Oh, I've been in five different countries in the last
four months.

Speaker 1 (01:31):
Five wow, five.

Speaker 2 (01:33):
Yeah, I did some traveling before I moved, but now
I'm back in the good old US of a you know,
buyer beware.

Speaker 1 (01:39):
I guess, yeah, that's certainly a choice. I would say
to be back, but you know, to each their own,
I guess on that one. Good. Good to see that you're,
you know, making your roots somewhere.

Speaker 3 (01:51):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:52):
And yeah, I've been traveling too. Last week, I just
went to New York. That was pretty cool. First time
went to New York. I saw a Book of Mormon,
which is pretty fine. Also, I went there with some
people who were Christian and had never even heard of
the Book of Mormon, didn't know what it was about.
And seeing their reactions to that was pretty awesome and
pretty funny. Uh So, yeah, life's been pretty good for
me too. But folks, you know, this is a Collin show,

(02:15):
so if you haven't yet, you should definitely call in
because we do have open lines, uh and we want
to talk to you about what's going on. Doctor Blitz.
I wanted to start the show because well, I was
going to start originally with our question, which was asking
about you know, are we inside of the black hole?
And you had an immediate visceral reaction to this and

(02:35):
said absolutely not, no way, Jose. And then we finally,
like with a crowbar, you know, kind of pried you
open on this. So I guess you've been talking about
this on your on your own channel recently.

Speaker 2 (02:47):
Yeah, so this started making the rounds again, like I
don't know, a few months ago or something like this,
when this fellow was a computer scientist, le Or Shamir
published a paper, a physics paper, a little suspect because
it's computer scientists, but maybe that way you will, saying
something like, oh, well, some galaxies, it seems like more
galaxies are rotating one way than another. And then at

(03:08):
some point in the discussion section of this paper, he
says maybe it's because we're in a black hole, and
he offered like six other potential explanations, and the media,
for some reason latched onto scientists says, we're in a
black hole. And I've been battling people because like, there's
there's no data supporting that. Yeah, there's not a viable
hypothesis of us being in a black hole. It's it's

(03:29):
not it's not a thing. So yeah, I have to
tell people that that we're not well, maybe we are
in a black hole, but there's certainly no evidence for it,
because it's not even a working theory.

Speaker 1 (03:38):
Yeah, like what would that even mean if we were
in a black hole? Because you know, when I think
of black hole, I think of you know, like oh,
spaghetification and you know, everybody kind of going into a
little mass and then it's like Interstellar where you get
to time travel and Matthew McConaughey's your dad, and like
a bunch of stuff happens.

Speaker 2 (03:56):
Yeah, So that I mean, that's that's actually the main problem.
As far as I know, nobody has worked out what
it would be. Like the relevant thing is a spinning
black hole, because if the galaxies are all preferentially spinning
one way, then maybe it's spinning. Nobody has worked out
what it would be like to be inside a spinning
black hole. Nobody knows what that would look like, so
we don't even know if it would look like everything's spinning.

(04:18):
We don't know what the consequences would be. So how
do we compare that with observation? It doesn't work.

Speaker 1 (04:22):
Yeah, Yeah, I guess that's kind of a problem with
a lot of stuff in like astrophysics, is that you
have like observations of stuff, but then you kind of
have to figure out like like what that looks like
in relation to everything else, and then also like how
common some of the examples are when you only have
you know, so much of space mapped out. Yeah, a
lot of complicated stuff. Glad I don't get paid to
figure out that kind of stuff, you know, because you

(04:44):
wouldn't want me to try to answer some of this stuff.

Speaker 2 (04:46):
These are fun questions to ask, right.

Speaker 1 (04:48):
They're fun questions, but like you know, whenever they come up,
it's always like I feel like, you know, somebody like
you is going to know about it, like the real answer,
and then just like the pop science sort of you know,
YouTubers going to make some hour long video where they
just take all the you know, the glory for all
these great scientific discoveries from progress. Right, I don't know
it is.

Speaker 2 (05:08):
True that more people watch YouTube than read scientific papers. Yeah,
that's right, that's true and sad. Oh and did you
hear about the potential alien invaders in November? Surely you've
heard us.

Speaker 1 (05:18):
Oh wait, hold on, tell me about that.

Speaker 2 (05:20):
Do you know who Avi Lobe is?

Speaker 1 (05:22):
Yes?

Speaker 2 (05:22):
Oh my god, yes, should talk about him before I
did it again? Oh great, last week there was a
new thing that passed through the solar system and he's like,
it's aliens this time, guys, I promise you with aliens.

Speaker 1 (05:33):
Oh, where's our Avi Lobe caller? He needs to call
in tonight and tell us about how this is real.
So wait, so he saw media or whatever and he's like, yeah,
that's aliens for sure.

Speaker 2 (05:41):
He's like, yeah, there's like another So you know, occasionally,
like you'll have some debris or some asteroid come in
from outside the solar system and it'll swing through and
he's like, ah, this time, and that's what that's what
he got famous for for Omuamua in twenty twenty. Right,
he said, ah, yeah, it's aliens. It's definitely an alien spaceship.
And this time he's like, well, from the traject I'm
doing a nerd voice now, from the trajectory and from

(06:03):
the analysis of the deviations and the anomalies, it seems
like it has hostile intention and it's going to arrive
in November.

Speaker 1 (06:08):
Like that's awesome.

Speaker 2 (06:11):
Here's the worst part. So that's what he said to
the media. And then if you go actually read the paper,
he says at the end, you know, this was just
for fun. You know, it almost certainly is just a
natural interstellar object. You know, there's it's very unlikely this,
it's very likely. This can just be explained as a coincidence.
But then he goes and he tells the media, oh,
it's it's probably aliens.

Speaker 1 (06:32):
Like aang. Yeah, course, that's like his whole thing. He
loves that attention. That's so funny.

Speaker 2 (06:37):
Yeah he does.

Speaker 1 (06:38):
Now, Yeah, we had that call a caller call in
about Avy Lobe and it was about you know, with
the one of the meteors that I guess you know,
turns to a metea righte what it gets to ear
They claim that, you know, they I don't know, sent
like little robots out under the ocean to try to
collect some of the rocks from this meteor or whatever,
and that was proof that it was extra terrestrial because

(06:58):
of the age of it or whatever, and the composition. Yeah,
it's really good stuff.

Speaker 2 (07:02):
Always aliens, It's always aliens.

Speaker 1 (07:04):
Yeah, always aliens. That's what makes or the Antichrist. Apparently
going back to Project Bluebeam here, because I was actually
reading more about this before the show started. I didn't
realize that they actually had a set prediction on these
events happening. Do you know about this? No, about when
the Antichrist was supposed to, you know, be simulated via NASA,
it happened a couple times. First time was nineteen eighty three,

(07:26):
and that didn't happen, right, and then nineteen ninety five,
and then ninety six, and then finally two thousand and
then at that point they just gave up, you know,
because like, if it doesn't have by two thousand, what
what do you got after that?

Speaker 2 (07:39):
Yeah, I mean I got to be like the multi
or what is it, the second millennium, I don't know if.

Speaker 1 (07:44):
That's right, right, Well, yeah, that's smacking.

Speaker 2 (07:48):
So just nobody believes it now or surely Well, it.

Speaker 1 (07:51):
Was always kind of niche. It was basically just this
one guy that like posted about and like he has
like a Geocity site. I need to show this to you.
It's really awesome. When I when I tried to connect
to it, my computer warned me about it not being securely.
So that's how you know this shit's good. Let me
tell you what's on this page. We got current news, introduction,
colonial silver camtrails, sylphs, emerging diseases, ozone. There's a lot

(08:17):
of different categories on this page. So this this guy's
site has it all. You know, really run the game.

Speaker 2 (08:24):
One guy is this like are we are we talking
like timecube here?

Speaker 1 (08:27):
This is one guy that started his name is uh
serge monest monasted maybe and he's a Quebec KOI believe
it or not, non American, which you think it would be,
but no, it's the Canadians this time. And you also
said that, uh, the Canadian government kidnapped his daughter in
effort to dissuade him from investigating Project Bluebe.

Speaker 2 (08:50):
Which all things considered, wouldn't be the first time the
Canadian government has kidnapped children.

Speaker 1 (08:54):
But that's all. You know, what there is precedent. You
are right about that. Unfortunately, I don't think that's the
case here. I think he just, like, you know, had
something going on. But hey, you know, it's a fun idea.
I like NASA is always kind of the villain and
a lot of these conspiracy theories, which is kind of sad.
You know.

Speaker 2 (09:12):
Yeah, it's never it's never like the It's never like
the e p A. Right, Well, it could be, I guess.

Speaker 1 (09:18):
I mean, if they would be the ones that promote
like global warming, right, so maybe there's some maybe there's
some stuff with that, some deep cuts, you know.

Speaker 2 (09:25):
I mean, it's it's got to be right, It's it's.

Speaker 1 (09:28):
Never like the internal like Homeland Security. Well know, I
guess there are some with that too. Never mind, what's
one that they have what the FDA, No, the FDA,
they definitely got some on that. How about the Department
of the Department of the Interior. There you go, as
I was thinking of Apartment of the Interior. Yeah, the
one with like the buffalo on the logo. Yeah, that

(09:48):
one probably Okay, there, I think that's great.

Speaker 2 (09:53):
Probably nothing there, Yeah.

Speaker 1 (09:54):
Yeah, I would hope. So I don't know, Yeah, it
seems like anything not related to National Secure or food
or drugs orlogy or taxes or yeah, I don't know,
so very small list, but yeah, those guys are fine.
That'd be awesome if, like they should do a show
where there's a federal government employee and he works at
like the Department of Interior or some shit, right, and

(10:16):
he figures out, like all the other departments, there's stuff
going on and he just has to figure it out,
like through his desk job, like how he's going to
take him all down. I guess that.

Speaker 2 (10:25):
It feels like a show that's already been made.

Speaker 1 (10:27):
Maybe this is not that original, but you know, I
don't know. Assue me on that note, we should talk
about our question of the week, because every single week
we're asking you guys a question. Our segment is called
do we want the Truth segment. This week's segment or
last week's prompt is going to be old to you
by our backup host, Kelly. Kelly's going to be coming

(10:48):
back on the stage. Here you go. What's up, Kelly?
How you doing? You are muted? My friend, classic, classic, classic,
We love it. He's still muted.

Speaker 4 (10:56):
Yeah, I still do it, still do it, you know,
because I don't want to make any noise while you
guys are doing the show. So I do it every time.

Speaker 1 (11:03):
Appreciate Kelly, I appreciate it.

Speaker 4 (11:05):
Yeah, I appreciate being here. Thanks for letting me keep
doing that same mistake and happens anyway today.

Speaker 1 (11:12):
By the way, you always you always seem to like
I always think I've seen it all, but I never have.
You always got something new. It's really good.

Speaker 4 (11:20):
So what do we do? We're doing the question of
the week last week.

Speaker 1 (11:23):
That's why wet on stage.

Speaker 4 (11:25):
Yeah, right, I was gonna talk. I thought we were
tie talking last week. We had a lot of fun
last week talking about Annabelle, and we asked why is it?
What is Annabelle so mad about? And here are our
favor our favorite answers number three from Arthur Treachers Z
five Z. Annabelle was pissed, but not as pissed as
when she was a Haunted real doll.

Speaker 1 (11:47):
Nice nice, nice, very good, very good. I like that one.

Speaker 4 (11:51):
Did Dan? Did you know that the guy who has
taking annabel around, the real annabel around on a tour
ended up dying in his hotel room.

Speaker 1 (11:59):
Really tour from from Haunted.

Speaker 4 (12:01):
That's exactly why we were tired it happened just like
a week and a half before the show. So and
number two from Chuck Katos, Annabella is mad because all
the other toy haunting spooks have been promoted to possessing
homeschooled kids.

Speaker 1 (12:14):
Ooh ooh, that's extra spooky. And then you do it
like you go to school the next day and you
have nobody else to talk to about it because it's
just your family. So that makes it really scary.

Speaker 4 (12:24):
That's right there, just you know, just the just the
own being only only having your family to talk to
the scary to me, at least.

Speaker 1 (12:31):
My family, depending on your family. Yeah, that's true.

Speaker 4 (12:35):
And our number one answer from know what, No what?
Annabella is mad because she keeps being left alone with
the priest who is trying to bless her.

Speaker 1 (12:44):
No, no, no call. Did you pick this one? No?
No for next week? No, that's no, that's terrible. That's terrible.
I don't approve of that one. Come on, come on,
that's that's really bad.

Speaker 4 (12:58):
The cruster for next week you talking about?

Speaker 1 (13:00):
No, talk about that answer that answer.

Speaker 4 (13:03):
No, I did not approve these. I'm not These were
either our These were either Katie or Johnny approved.

Speaker 1 (13:09):
Somebody later Oh, well, it's already out there in the world.
I can't take you back now.

Speaker 4 (13:14):
Okay, well there you go. You know what my answer was,
what was real? Annabo was mad because she got there
some other dollar got the player in the movies.

Speaker 1 (13:22):
Oh yeah, that would pake me off too. Imagine you, uh,
you do something crazy and then you get played by
uh that you don't think is attractive, right, less attractive
version be awful? Yeah, it would suck, be really bad.
So what's our what's our problem for this next weekend?

Speaker 4 (13:38):
I thought it's a pretty good one. What do demons
do when they're not torturing or tempting us?

Speaker 1 (13:43):
Hmmm? I like that? I like that? Yeah, what do
you think, Kelly?

Speaker 4 (13:48):
What do I think?

Speaker 3 (13:48):
Oh?

Speaker 4 (13:49):
Yash, I didn't even think I was supposed to ask
you that.

Speaker 1 (13:52):
Yeah, you're supposed to ask me that, but I asked you. So, now,
what are you gonna do?

Speaker 4 (13:55):
Trip me up?

Speaker 2 (13:57):
Reverse?

Speaker 1 (13:58):
I think probably posted on TikTok is what I would say,
you know.

Speaker 4 (14:03):
Or talking on chet GPT because I had a Christian
told me that that was demons.

Speaker 2 (14:07):
Really Superman movie, they could just be the monkey is
doing the thing.

Speaker 1 (14:11):
I haven't seen it, but I will take your word
for it that monkeys could be okay, all right, makes
sense to me, you know, I can see it. Well,
I think, go ahead, go ahead, go no, you go ahead.

Speaker 5 (14:24):
No.

Speaker 1 (14:24):
I was just gonna say that everybody watching from home
should leave a comment in the comments section to give
us your answer about what demons are doing when they're
not torturing or tempting us. And I'm sure you can
come up with better answers than what we've provided, but
sounds like you had one more.

Speaker 4 (14:38):
Well I about to say, damn, that's that's incredible because
that's almost exactly what I was going to say.

Speaker 1 (14:43):
Okay, great, we're just extra coordinated today. It's really good.
It's a really good look on our show, in our professionalism.

Speaker 4 (14:52):
It's really almost I didn't unmute myself so well that
it was a bit of one professionalism.

Speaker 1 (14:58):
In you did, but you had you had yourself muted before,
and that's you know, that's a good thing, you know, possible.
It's all about reframing, you know.

Speaker 4 (15:05):
Yeah, there you go, there you go.

Speaker 1 (15:06):
Yeah, Kelly, thanks for for bringing up the question, and
we'll see you at the end of the show. Unless
something crazy happens and we'll bring you up sooner, but for.

Speaker 4 (15:15):
Now, hopefully that won't happen. Hopefully I'll see you at
the end of the show.

Speaker 1 (15:18):
All right, sounds good, Kelly. We'll catch you later. And
on that note, we're going back to you, doctor, blitz, doctor.
Butit's what else have you been doing, you know, on
the on the internet, what kind of subjects you've been
talking about recently?

Speaker 2 (15:31):
Well, yeah, this is so this is a new one
for me, and unfortunately it's a little politically charged, but
that's the world we live in. So I don't know
if you guys know, you guys being done. And then
also everybody watching, right, But in May there were proposed
budgets for various organizations in the US government, NASA, National
Science Foundation, CDC, and I h these kinds of places,

(15:53):
and what I found that was quite disturbing is that,
for example, the budget, the proposed budget for NASA's science
division was cut in half.

Speaker 1 (16:00):
Half in half.

Speaker 2 (16:01):
Yeah, okay, so we're talking billions of dollars not being
used for NASA science budget. And so unfortunately, because that
made me very upsetty Spaghetti, I've been doing live streams
where I talk about how anti science the UH the
right wing has become. So that's that's been a new
thing that I wasn't doing before and I am doing now.

(16:22):
And unfortunately, it is the world that we live in
that you know, this continues to be the case. In fact,
as of yesterday, if I recall correctly, the world's best mathematician,
his name is Terence Tawe. He works at UCLA. He
is a professor, very very famous guy. He had his
NSF grant cut completely defunded. Wow, you're going to try
to fund only the smart people. Why are you cutting

(16:44):
this funding anyway? So I've been frustrated a lot.

Speaker 1 (16:46):
Ten to your question, that makes sense why you would
be frustrated. I used to think that, you know, anti
science sort of sentiment was sort of a minority position.
You know. It used to be guy that you heard
in somebody's basement, you know, you old the guy, your
friend's older brother that just like smoked weed and like
watch show Rogan or whatever, you know, or before we're
Joe Rogan, listen to alley shows or something you know

(17:07):
like and and that you know, that was that person.
But it has become a pretty mainstream sort of thing.
There's there's a there's a larger sort of anti science
sentiment that has definitely taken over I think us politics.
I think that's that's undeniable at this point, and we
are seeing, of course, the ramifications of that. So yeah,
that's not great, not a good time, And I regret

(17:29):
that people have to get all their science information from,
you know, sources like YouTube and TikTok, like I was
joking about it earlier, but that does seem to be
a legitimate I mean, it always has been a legitimate
platform for people to communicate you know, great topics about science.
But at the same time, you are competing with every
other grifter that's out there in the space that wants

(17:49):
you to get away from those things and maybe promote
their own products while they're at it. So yeah, it's
not great, not great.

Speaker 2 (17:55):
Not great. But you know, on the bright side, you
can pay ninety seven dollars a month to subscribe to
their coaching session, So.

Speaker 1 (18:00):
Right, get your coaching sessions. You know, we're worrying about
ozone therapy. Get get some get some dental work done
with some ozone therapy. You know, I'm supposed to work.
I don't know either, because like what do you get
like a feeling with ozone in it.

Speaker 2 (18:14):
I don't know, do you just like hold it in
your mouth?

Speaker 1 (18:17):
I guess, like, yeah, it doesn't sound very pleasant. It's
always like it's either stuff that doesn't like do anything
for you at all, or it's always like the worst
possible thing you could put into your body.

Speaker 2 (18:29):
Right, try injecting mercury. It'll cure rheumatoid arthritis in misledmath.

Speaker 1 (18:34):
It's going to be really good for your cognitive health
in like twenty years, you know. So it's really great,
it's really cool. So you know, you're obviously finding this
misinformation by putting your own content out there, you know,
as you do. Is there any other hope for folks
like you and me who are just you know, more
casual sort of science goers, sort of science enthusiasts. Would

(18:56):
you suggest for people who are you know, enthusiastic about science?
But I'm are just as worried.

Speaker 2 (19:01):
As you are hope for what I mean, Like, look,
YouTube will still exist. Science communicators will still exist because
at least as far as we're concerned, we get paid
by YouTube, by TikTok by those are the two major
platforms right now, and so those people will still exist
so it's just a matter of finding the right people.
In my humble opinion, if you're interested in like weird

(19:23):
space stuff and you're watching on YouTube, there is a
great creator who goes by the name PBS space Time,
funded by PBS, who's actually going to be making less
content now because PBS is getting defunded.

Speaker 1 (19:34):
I've heard about that too.

Speaker 2 (19:35):
Yeah, arguably one of the better ones on YouTube. So
would recommend following along to, you know, find some trusted science,
like science, actual scientists, sources, people who have PhDs in
their respective fields. Listen to them. They'll give you cool
information and hopefully they'll do a good job of that. Otherwise, Yeah,
we're it's not looking good.

Speaker 1 (19:53):
Yeah, yeah, I've seen that PBS Space Time guys' like
the guy with the big long hair and stuff. Right, Yeah, yeah,
really good stuff. PBS. We man, we used to be
excited about our public you know, science platforms and stuff.
Now everybody's just really mad about it. I don't know,
they really see it as a waste of money, even
though it doesn't seem like it's the biggest line item

(20:14):
on the budget by any real metric.

Speaker 2 (20:16):
But I did some calculation and so look, I'm just
gonna dump some facts on you. I hope that's okay.

Speaker 1 (20:21):
Well.

Speaker 2 (20:21):
Yeah, So one of the things that was cut or
one of the things that it's still you know, they're
still fighting about it. But one of the things that
was proposed to be cut in the twenty twenty six
NASA Science budget was the Chandra X ray Observatory. Now,
that's a telescope that's in space. It's been in space
for twenty five years or a little bit more than
twenty five years. It's the best X ray telescope that
we have. You know, you usually see in the visible
part of the electromagnetic spectrum, but you can build a

(20:42):
telescope to see X rays and it's the best one
in the world, best telescope, highest resolution, best telescope. It's
been in space since nineteen ninety eight. It's an American telescope.
And the budget just cuts completely cuts funding for it,
just shuts it down, kills the project, can't do it anymore.
It was about twenty million dollars a year and essentially
maintaining all of the equipment that's necessary to communicate with it,

(21:03):
and then funding researchers to use the data to make
observations and things like that. Twenty million dollars a years,
not much. Put it in perspective, that's one fifth the
cost of a new f thirty five. Okay, yeah, for
one for one jet plane, you can fund five years
of science right right.

Speaker 1 (21:18):
When you put it that way, it seems like a
good deal. So, like they shout a program like that down,
So does the satellite just kind of float out there
just like not doing anything? Huh? Okay, that seems like
a good thing for the environment and everybody around it. Yeah. Really,
and by good I mean bad obviously. Yeah. Wow, Yeah, okay,
well that sucks. That sucks, docta Balit's I don't like that,

(21:41):
you know, And I'm sure you have more way. Yeah,
I'm sure you have more terrible terrible effects that you
can really upon me. But instead of doing that right now,
how about we take some calls. What do you think
that sounds more pleasant? Okay, let's do that. Before we
take our first calls of the day, I have to
think the folks that donate on the Patreon. Thank you
to everybody that donates on that Patreon. As you know,

(22:03):
every single week we're giving a shout out to the
folks who are the patrons of the week. This week's
patron of the Week is going to be waiting for it.
It's got Talk. Thank you so much Got Talk, and
thank you to everybody who donates on the Truth Wanted Patreon.
You guys are amazing and as always, we are doing
super chats as well. So as long as it's YouTube

(22:24):
appropriate and you want us to say something funny, at
least I'll do it. Maybe Doctor Bliss to do it too,
if he's a good support about it.

Speaker 5 (22:30):
We'll see.

Speaker 1 (22:31):
But with that out of the way, we got who
We got some calls here. I guess we'll start with
what do we start with? I'm gonna start with this
one first, even though they're the more recent callers, so
other callers, you know, just wait on the line. Here.
We do have Steve calling in from Nebraska. Steve, you

(22:53):
are alive on Truth Wanted. What's going on?

Speaker 2 (22:55):
Steve?

Speaker 1 (22:56):
Hello, Steve, can you hear us? All right, Steve, I'm
putting you back into to the queue to see if
you could talk to our call screeners to see what's
going on there. For now, we're going to talk to
John from California. John, you are live on Truth Wanted.
Can you hear us, John, Hello, can you hear us?
All right? Not sure what's going on. We might be
having a little bit of technical difficulties right now. So

(23:19):
I'm going to have the crew figure it out. So
while the crew is figuring out, they're gonna tell me
what's gonna happen next. I don't know, Dr Blitz. Maybe
you can't tell me some more about dressing science facts.

Speaker 2 (23:31):
Yeah, so here's another one, so you may or made
I remember in twenty fifteen, I think it was there
was a big deal because we observed gravitational waves for
the first time. Yeah, we saw two colliding black holes, right,
and that was done with two with two laboratories in
the United States. One is in Washington, one is in Alabama.

Speaker 1 (23:48):
I want to say.

Speaker 2 (23:50):
It's called ligo laser interfromatory gravitational wave observatory. And one
of the things that makes this such an effective way
of detecting growth, I should back up. They detect gravitational
waves by basically combining lasers and then seeing it. Like anyway,
it's complicated, but the point is is that they're really
really sensitive because the gravitational waves you have two colliding
black holes a billion light years away, they're really really weak,

(24:12):
and so like even just a car driving buy can
like cause a fake signal. Right, right, So there's a
lot of serious, serious science that goes into building them,
that goes into maintaining them and making sure that they
are as sensitive as they need to be. And one
of the reasons why they're so sensitive is because they
basically built two identical ones, one in Washington, one in Alabama,
and then they can compare the signal because if there's

(24:33):
a car driving buy in Washington, they're not going to
pick up the signal in Alabama. I think it's Alabama.
And then they can throw that out and only if
they get the signal in both places where they say, aha,
this is actually something. So this is to say that
one of the reasons why it's so sensitive and why
it's so successful is because we have two identical machines
that are a few thousand or fifteen hundred two thousand
miles apart. Now, as part of the proposed budget for

(24:55):
the National Science Foundation, which is way.

Speaker 1 (24:56):
Way way wait wait wait, wait, don't tell me, don't
tell me, they cut off one but not the other.
They're just gonna have one. Oh my gosh, there's one
of them. No, that's so it's so stupid, that's so lame.
I should we should support any kind of science research
that involves combining lasers. I'm just pro that whatever.

Speaker 2 (25:20):
That tail is right, absolutely, even even like lasers that
cause forest fires.

Speaker 1 (25:25):
Absolutely, even lasers that caused forest fires, we should know.
We should know the effects and how much forest fires
they cost. I think, you know, I'm about it because
like when we have our own Independence Day, the situation,
you know, and Will Smith's going to like guide us
and you know, stop the aliens. We need to be prepared,
you know.

Speaker 2 (25:43):
So I mean, okay, you need If the lasers can
cause forest fires, then surely they can also blow up aliens, right.

Speaker 1 (25:49):
Right, That's what I would think. So it looks like
chrus town as they need just a few more minutes
before we get to call. So we're in the free
zone here, can I go? Let me go back to
this website I was telling you about educator dash yourself
dot org, by the way, is the name of it,
which is a great your that's an early nineties sort
of pick that you just like sit on forever. And

(26:12):
it looks like it. God, let me tell you some
of the other categories that are on this site, because
it's really really it's it's just amazing. Let's see, I
think I was on ozone. Yeah, they got bioelectrification, so
that's interesting. Cancer, New World Order. Of course, some names
that I don't recognize, mind control, global warming, the CIA,

(26:36):
gang stalking. That's a classic. We all know about gang stalking, right.

Speaker 2 (26:40):
Yeah, yeah, of course, right, right right.

Speaker 1 (26:42):
The protocols of Zion got to have that in there.
They always do cambusters and orgone generators. I don't know
what that is.

Speaker 2 (26:51):
What's orgone?

Speaker 1 (26:52):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (26:53):
I would want to know, you know, orgone? Yeah, orgon
was a it was like a Okay, so I pulled
up the wick the article I knew that.

Speaker 5 (27:00):
I had heard.

Speaker 1 (27:01):
It sounds like a character from Star Trek. It doesn't
sound like a real thing.

Speaker 2 (27:05):
Close. Brezona is a pseudo scientific concept variously described as
an esoteric energy or hypothetical universal life force. Hell, I
guess it was proposed in the early night the early
early nineteen hundreds. Okay, it's obviously not true. Well, it
sounds like it's super true. Actually, I'm all for it. Well,
need I need to learn more about this Esertaric concept.

(27:26):
I think it was proposed by a guy named bill
Helm Reisch, who I don't know, look not to be
the kind of guy that judges Austrians from the late
eighteen hundreds early nineteen hundreds, but it's right.

Speaker 1 (27:38):
With Reich as part of part of your name. Yeah, yeah,
maybe he just had bad luck.

Speaker 3 (27:43):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (27:45):
The Nazis were on something. When it came to the science,
it seemed meth yeah, that's yeah, that's definitely, yeah, a
big part of it. But it's like it seems like
a history channel. But every other time they aren't talking
about Hitler, they are talking about Nazi science, and it's
always like, oh, here's a gun that uses sound waves
to knock, you know, airplanes out of the sky or whatever.

(28:07):
Or here's a time machine that we may or may
not have, you know.

Speaker 2 (28:11):
Yeah, you know, it was a real bummer for them
because not to say that, like the vast majority of
scientists in Germany at the time were Jewish, but a
lot of them were or friends with Jews, right, And
when you start saying that they can't do their science
because it's Jewish science, you end up with all this nonsense.

(28:31):
So much so that I think. I think what might
have happened is the History Channel, the owner of the
History Channel went back in time fed this to the
Nazis so that they can make good content.

Speaker 1 (28:41):
It's the only Yeah that's gonna be what it is.
If you really think about History Channel, was they were
on that early TikTok grind. I feel like because they
absolutely they kind of hid the same stuff in the
nineties that current TikTok trends are doing today. They really
were prescient in that sense, which is pretty cool. I
guess I don't know.

Speaker 2 (29:01):
There was a time when there was a time when
it would be you know, it's it's eleven thirty at night,
twelve year old doctor Blitzer. I guess at the time
it was just regular Blitz, you know, just couldn't sleep,
So flicks on the History Channel and I get to
learn about the giant cannons that the Nazis built.

Speaker 1 (29:15):
And that was cool. Yeah, that was cool.

Speaker 2 (29:17):
That was cool as the time.

Speaker 1 (29:18):
But yeah, not anymore, folks, I gotta tell you. So,
it looks like Crew says that they did fix our problem,
but the problem is, it looks like they had to
reset some stuff. So if you were in the queue.
You were kicked off of the queue, so we need
you to call in again so that we can talk
to you. Apologies again for the technical difficulties we're experiencing tonight.

(29:39):
I'm seeing some folks calling. It will give you a
couple more minutes just to get you back in the queue,
and we'll talk to you in just a second. For now,
I'll keep reading on some of these because again there's
so many on here. Treat parasites, Okay, swine flu, hoax
slash vaccine. I hadn't heard about that, but there has.
I guess every single like major viral disease, there's always

(30:00):
some guy that's like, yeah, that's not real though, right,
Like AIDS denial was kind of a thing, and you
know that's probably. Oh, reverse polarity colonial silver generator. Now
that's interesting because we got some like pseudoscience stuff with
the reverse generator and it's being powered by one of
the most popular pseudo scientific materials to being colodial silver.

(30:23):
So that's cool.

Speaker 2 (30:24):
It was watching Star Trek last night. I'm pretty sure
they mentioned that at some point.

Speaker 1 (30:28):
Reverse polarity silver generator. Yeah, I could see that. Oh man,
a FEMA, remember all the FEMA stuff. You don't hear
about FEMA as much anymore, I feel like.

Speaker 2 (30:38):
But yeah, that was definitely like circa two thousand and
six with Katrina.

Speaker 1 (30:42):
That was a Bush era sort of thing. Yeah, I agree,
Alex Jones was all over that. I guess they stopped.
They don't want to put people in the camps anymore.
They kind of, you know, just forgot about that. I
guess smartphone Wi Fi dangers, that's a classic. Oh man,
there's still more on here. There's so many, but I
think we have people back in the queue. So we're
going to go talk to our folks in the queue.

(31:04):
See if this works. Steve from Nebraska, you are live
on truth wanted. Can you hear us?

Speaker 3 (31:10):
Yes? Hi, Dan and doctor Blitz hopefully you can hear me,
Yes we can.

Speaker 1 (31:16):
All right, we are working again. We got those reverse
polarity colaudial silver generators operating, and we are clear to go.
How can we help you, Steve?

Speaker 6 (31:25):
Yeah, So I was calling in regards to evidence Mars
was nuked as evident by enhanced amounts of Martian atmospheric
xenon one twenty nine, a byproduct of thermonuclear explosions and
the isotopic spectrum of Mars, particularly the xeno spectrum, shows

(31:46):
a strong resentment resemblance to that of first nuclear testing events,
and Mars.

Speaker 3 (31:52):
Has a few uranium hotspots from radioactive follouts, specifically at Galaxius,
FiOS and mayor acidonium, along with the spot's antipod invictive
of a planetary wide shock wave emanating from marsdelium, and
the descriptive amounts of peter uranium or theoryum presently on
Mars compared to the amounts of these radioactive elopments found

(32:14):
in Martian meteorites can very well be explained and only
be explained by Mars winding up getting nuked and on
isotopic analysis of the Martian atmosphere. This March nuclear apocalypse
scure roughs three hundred million years ago according to NASA,
JPL rocket scientists and Harvard astrophysicist John Brandenburg, and this

(32:36):
smoking evidence of technological aliens having margins.

Speaker 1 (32:40):
Pause. Let's pause. Let's pause because I think you're reading
off of something here. I want to have a conversation
with you. Go ahead, doctor Blitz.

Speaker 2 (32:47):
What Yeah, So just a quick question, is he still
NASA scientist Harvard grud is he still NASA scientists and
Harvard afiliated?

Speaker 3 (32:55):
He's a former NASA JPO rocket scientist. And I believe
and I could be wrong on this, but last I said,
I thought he was still a Harvard astrophysicist, and it's
John Brandenburg at him.

Speaker 2 (33:07):
I actually don't think that, AILI. I don't think that
he's affiliated with Harvard at all.

Speaker 1 (33:11):
I saw I see one thing here saying he worked
at Harvard him mixed up with Bobby Lobe.

Speaker 3 (33:18):
Maybe maybe I have him mixed up.

Speaker 2 (33:19):
Bobby Lobe is the Harvard was the Harvard guy?

Speaker 5 (33:21):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (33:23):
Okay, great scientist.

Speaker 2 (33:25):
What's the value in saying he's a former NASA whatever?

Speaker 3 (33:28):
Yeah, he's an answer rocket scientist, so he knows all
about you know, radio after fallout.

Speaker 2 (33:33):
But he's not anymore right, And so.

Speaker 1 (33:35):
Here's I found his credentials right here, doctor Plitz, if
you want me to read it to you. Here He's
got the BA in physics from Southern Oregon University. He
has an MS and applied science at University California, and
his PhD in theoretical plasma physics at UC Davis. Okay,
so you know plasma physics that sounds rad that sounds

(33:55):
cool as hell. It don but yeah, sonke nuke's on Mars.
I guess he's all about those nukes on Mars. And
I'm guessing. I'm guessing he has a book about it.
Am I wrong about that?

Speaker 5 (34:07):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (34:07):
Yeah, that's where we're at. Can I order it on Amazon?

Speaker 1 (34:10):
I don't know. I'm asking you because you know these types.
According to this, it says he does have a book. Actually, oh,
here's an interesting thing. He's got uh nonfiction books and
science fiction books that he wrote using a non diplume.
So that's always good, you know, when the they're they're
doing the science fiction along with the nonfiction. That's great.

Speaker 3 (34:33):
So now this is non fiction, this is actual, this
is actually.

Speaker 1 (34:39):
So.

Speaker 2 (34:39):
So what I would suggest this is a question that
you should answer you for your health, is why isn't
anyone else taking this seriously in the scientific community.

Speaker 3 (34:47):
Well, I I'm you know, that's that's a good question.
I haven't seen the peer that's you know, I probably
see what the criticisms is on this, but I haven't
hurt anybody. Just prove his hypothesis. I haven't seen anybody
seen on.

Speaker 2 (34:58):
UK, right, have you looked?

Speaker 6 (35:00):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (35:01):
I haven't. Yeah, I haven't seen anybody above him.

Speaker 1 (35:04):
Well, I'm seeing here that his submissions have not been
accepted by peer reviewed journals, So.

Speaker 3 (35:09):
It doesn't mean he's wrong.

Speaker 1 (35:11):
Well, but well, if it's not accepted by peer reviewed journals,
doesn't that kind of mean that maybe there's something up
with what he's doing.

Speaker 3 (35:18):
What's the reason why they haven't accepted his hypothesis and
his find So when.

Speaker 2 (35:23):
I so, typically typically when you submit something for peer review,
it gets reviewed by your peers. And when that happens,
if it gets rejected, it's either because you made a
methodological error, because it's not novel enough, or because you know,
perhaps it's not interesting. Now, it certainly probably isn't the
one that it's not interesting, because if true, it'd be

(35:44):
super interesting.

Speaker 1 (35:45):
Right.

Speaker 2 (35:46):
On the other hand, I suspect that there were probably
methodological errors, if only because you know what else could
be the reason why it was rejected. I mean, it's
surely interesting. So if it was rejected. Problem rejects on
the grounds the science is bad.

Speaker 3 (36:03):
But it's it's a scientific fact that Mars has enhanced
amounts of atmospheric zerine one nine, and it's a scientific
fact that that is a byproduct of thermonuclear explosions.

Speaker 2 (36:14):
Well no, no, according to whom does is that a
scientific fact that it has this elevated ratio?

Speaker 3 (36:18):
Well, they have some probes up there that that have
measured this, So.

Speaker 2 (36:22):
There are other sources that make this claim. Can you
tell me about these sources?

Speaker 3 (36:26):
Yeah, there is elevated amounts of atmosphere you know what
AI chat. But according to aix holme on, let me
check my AI chat, Well.

Speaker 1 (36:37):
May on, mayon, that might that might be a bit
of the problem because I don't know if we should
be relying on AI chats to kind of tell you, like,
what's what on this?

Speaker 5 (36:47):
Right?

Speaker 1 (36:47):
Like I I you know, if if you're gonna call
it you the show, I would expect that you would
be the one to tell me that information yourself, right,
because I want you to be You don't have to
be like an expert. You don't have to have a
PhD in blast of physics. But like, you know, how
are we supposed to debate the merits of it if
we don't even know the basic facts?

Speaker 3 (37:03):
Right? Okay, this is what AIO overuses. The atmosphere of
Mars does exhibit elevated amounts. There's certain xenon isotopes, particularly
xenon one nine relative to first atmosphere.

Speaker 1 (37:15):
Okay, all right, so I mean we can accept that
as true just for the sake of argument. I can't
verify that. You know, I'm live on the air. I
don't know anything about you know, what particles exist on Mars.

Speaker 3 (37:27):
But like Harvard University paper evidence for large natural.

Speaker 2 (37:31):
Oh well, this say, isn't you know that was that
wasn't published by harvard'sitory?

Speaker 3 (37:35):
Hold on, Okay, that that looks like the same thing.

Speaker 2 (37:37):
It wasn't published by Harvard. It's a it's just a repository.

Speaker 1 (37:40):
Okay. We need we need to we need to slow
our role here, Steve, because again I don't want I
don't want you to do live fact checking on yourself,
like while you're talking to me. It's not a good sign,
because I want to be able to talk to you
about stuff that you know. If you don't know, that's fine,
But I just want to think about this. Right. Let's
say that this is true, there's higher than average levels
of xenon on Mars. Okay, is thermonuclear war the best

(38:03):
explanation or is it like one possible explanation? Because I
would be if this was an actually scientifically uh you know,
accepted fact, if this was from a NASA probe or whatever,
and they got this information, I'm willing to bet that
some other folks have different ideas about why that is
besides nuclear war right there.

Speaker 3 (38:23):
There could be a naturalistic explanation for this. Okay, But
but when we look at Mott, but a natural reactor
would would would leave a deep prayer ing and they're not,
you know, they're not finding any anything on the surface
of these nuclear hotspots that that indicate and that we
would bind these natural reactors if they were if they
were present, this was a naturalistic event, would we if

(38:46):
it was ethical the naturalistic event, And I'm going with
the it was new by Well.

Speaker 1 (38:52):
Wait you're saying, wait a minute, you're saying we would
find evidence of it being naturalistic. Where's the evidence that
it was like aliens, Like, what do you mean, where's
the evidence of that? Where's the nuclear bomb bits? Like,
I don't know why you're leading the other way on this.

Speaker 3 (39:06):
Well, it was probably an explosion that occurred about above
the surface in the atmosphere, so a lot of creator
and elect there was evidence that it was all destroyed
and the explosion.

Speaker 1 (39:18):
That we would find zero evidence of alien life on Mars,
because that's where we're at right now, right we don't
have any evidence of civilization. This would be the only
one so far. Don't you think we would at least
find they were new something.

Speaker 3 (39:32):
To that effect three hundred million years ago? Yeah, I
mean three hundred million years ago. That's a lot of
time to destroy evidence.

Speaker 2 (39:39):
I know why this isn't being she got he's using
the face of Sidonia as further evidence. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
he's using the face of Sidonia as further evidence that
this was aliens. Like so, while you guys have been talking,
I've just been looking at this at this paper in
big air quotes because it wasn't accepted for peer review,

(40:02):
and it's just kind of like a whole lot of claims.
I mean, he taught he cites his sources with regard
to the the xenon abundance, so like that's that's plausibly true.
But there's there's not really a whole lot going on here.
It seems like it's mostly speculation. And then pictures of rocks,
which there are a lot of, oh, and also pictures
of the face in Sidonia. Like this is this is

(40:25):
not like a serious scientific work, is what it looks like?
It definitely for someone He also has a picture of
the sphinx in the paper, so like this like, of
course this wasn't accepted for peer review. This is probably
desk rejected because it's not It doesn't look like a
serious scientific work. Now if you, if you aren't familiar
with scientific publications, you may very well think that, oh, look,

(40:46):
this looks so official and scientific. But as somebody who's
you know, been involved in this, it this screams hoax
or not hoax. This screams somebody who's off their rocker
to me. M And the worst part, the worst part
about some who has a PhD kind of going off
the deep end is that they know how to like
they use the language and they will use the formulas,

(41:07):
so it will make it appear to people who are
not familiar with it. You'll make it a peer legit.
So I can understand why this why this could fool
some people. But yeah, I wouldn't. I wouldn't really take
it seriously.

Speaker 1 (41:17):
Well that's doctor Blitz's thoughts.

Speaker 3 (41:20):
Yeah, okay, I'll have to look into this some more
and see what other people other than this, Brandenburg say
say about his exclaiming, I know that that that base
on Mars that was just an optical illusion, that really was,
and he's.

Speaker 2 (41:33):
Citing it as evidence of aliens. So that should paint
your understanding of what's happening here.

Speaker 3 (41:37):
As far as the spirits on Mars go, I'm not
sure sure sure how those got there, but but but
I think that face was just a rock formation that
just looked look, you know.

Speaker 1 (41:46):
So that's people have this.

Speaker 3 (41:47):
They see patterns, you know, they see what they want
to see.

Speaker 1 (41:49):
You know. They we're on the same page.

Speaker 3 (41:51):
They are still there more.

Speaker 1 (41:52):
Yeah, well we're on the same page. There was there
anything else you want to talk to us about before we.

Speaker 5 (41:57):
Let you go?

Speaker 3 (41:58):
No, you guys have a good weekend, and thanks for
hiv me. I'll looking at this to morns see what
I can find about this subject. So you guys have
a good right Steve, thank you.

Speaker 1 (42:06):
Too, have a great one has been here before. I
think Steve has called into the show before. Yeah, because
I think I think he called last time I was here.
I was gonna say, I think I think he did
call last time you were here, So he was interested
in maybe what you have to say, I guess maybe
he watched your work. I did find the book by
Johnny Brandenburg Death on Mars colon the Discovery of a

(42:28):
Planetary nuclear Massacre. By the way, Yes, got to read
the colon because that's important. It's there, it's part of
the text. Some glowing reviews on this, I gotta say, so,
don't know how I feel about that.

Speaker 2 (42:43):
But he also wrote behind Beyond Einstein's Unified a Field,
Gravity and Electromagnetism Redefined. I see that it's really good.
Here's a paragraph from one of the Amazon reviews. I
agree with the author. We must go to Mars and
investigate the murder of our neighbors, which is surely a
holocaust that is difficult to even demand, and if for
no other reason to than to protect our own hides.

(43:04):
So that's that's cool. We gotta we gotta go check
it out. So I'm looking at the cover of Beyond
Einstein's Unified Field. Yeah, Nikola Tesla's on the cover.

Speaker 1 (43:14):
That's how you know. That's how you know this guy
is an innovator. Okay, he's outside the system, all right.
He doesn't care about your peer review and your academic criteria.
Nonsense and you're your valid mathematical frameworks. Yeah, get that
out of here. We're trying to we're trying to investigate
the Holocaust on March. You understand we're doing serious work here,

(43:37):
not whatever, right right? We gotta we gotta, we gotta
figure that out. That's awesome. That's another name to add
to my list of cranks. I guess to look at later.
Good good call from Steve. At least we got somewhere
with Steve. Maybe he'll look into it more and maybe
see that, Hey, maybe this isn't this isn't the best
route to go down. But until that time, we have

(43:59):
another caller that wants you talk to us. We do
have John from California. John, you are live, untruth wanted
what's going on?

Speaker 5 (44:06):
Hey, how's it going going?

Speaker 1 (44:07):
Good?

Speaker 3 (44:07):
John?

Speaker 1 (44:08):
How can we help you?

Speaker 5 (44:09):
Oh? I think I called it on the right day.
We were talking about the Antichrist before. Now, there haven't
been enough Antichrist conspiracies in a while.

Speaker 1 (44:16):
That's right. We were talking about the Antichrist at the
beginning of the show. Are you telling me that you're
gonna talk to me about the Antichrist? You got some ideas?

Speaker 5 (44:23):
Oh? Yeah, as long as it's okay, I think this
will be one of the most unique calls you've gotten
in a while.

Speaker 1 (44:28):
All right, John, that's a scary thing, because I've gotten
a lot of unique calls on this show. But we'll
see what.

Speaker 2 (44:34):
Happens to me.

Speaker 5 (44:36):
So I called in last week with the prophecy, and
I wasn't able to get through the entire prophecy. So
I was hoping that I could do that. But basically
the gist of this is my grandfather, who passed away
in twenty fifteen, was able to correctly predict the entire
future in twenty twelve based on the following three assumption

(44:56):
that my mom is the Antichrist, that guy that my
mom likes a little too much from the show my
mom likes a little too much is anti Peter, and
that Lebron James is anti Judas.

Speaker 7 (45:08):
And you know, as a twelve year old, I really
didn't put all.

Speaker 5 (45:11):
That much credence into that, you know, I didn't take
it all that seriously, like an eighty two year old
of Alzheimer's saying it. But then every single thing that
this guy told me was going to happen happen, So
like now, now I'm calling the atheist experience. I don't
know what to do. This is like this, I've seen
it before my very eyes.

Speaker 1 (45:26):
What's an example of something that happened that they predicted?

Speaker 5 (45:29):
Can I give you the full theory? Can I give
you a whole prophecy? And it's not too long?

Speaker 1 (45:34):
I'm tell you right now, you know probably not. It's
probably too long. Can you give me a cliffs notes?
Can you give me a paragraph?

Speaker 5 (45:41):
The most lebron James would go back to Cleveland, which
in and of itself seemed pretty ridiculous, and help win,
help end the Cleveland championship curse. The same year that
the British decided that they weren't European anymore.

Speaker 1 (45:55):
Wait, what does that mean that the British were you? Oh,
you mean like leaving to eat? Well, okay, see you
almost gotta be there, John.

Speaker 7 (46:01):
Because I was thinking when I first heard it, well.

Speaker 1 (46:04):
That's the thing, right, You you make these things vague
and then you fill in your interpretations. Right, I was
about to fill that in with brexit, right, But that
doesn't mean that they're not European. That doesn't mean that
they're still they're just leaving the European meaning which is
an economic you know, sort of packed. Doesn't mean that
they're not like part of Europe. I guess. So I
don't know what to tell you.

Speaker 5 (46:24):
On that giving it to them. I've been giving it
to them because that was a very specific thing to say, I.

Speaker 1 (46:29):
Guess with Cleveland, But like that, you could make it.
There's probably an option for that on like sports betting sites,
you know what I mean, Like that's still within the
realm of like predictability. I don't know. I think i'd
have to hear more than just a lucky guess or two.

Speaker 5 (46:42):
Right.

Speaker 2 (46:43):
Wait, was that the whole thing?

Speaker 7 (46:44):
That's why I was saying, Can I do the whole No,
of course not.

Speaker 5 (46:46):
I got to do the whole prophecy for it's able
to for it to be able to sink in.

Speaker 1 (46:50):
I think, what do you think darkness is wrong?

Speaker 5 (46:51):
I promise?

Speaker 2 (46:52):
Do you have anything better going on down?

Speaker 1 (46:54):
I don't know. I mean, like, like when I hear
somebody say I want to give you my full prophecy,
I'm not gonna lie, John. That sounds like the most
boring thing in the world. It doesn't sound like it's
gonna be a good time.

Speaker 5 (47:05):
It's like if you can pretty entertain it.

Speaker 1 (47:07):
It's okay, all right, all right.

Speaker 2 (47:09):
Reserve the right to cut him off down, I'm reserving.

Speaker 1 (47:12):
That's that's a good point. I'll reserve the right to
cut you off, John, But you know, go ahead, just
take the take the wheel for a second, okay.

Speaker 5 (47:18):
So the full prophecy was Lebron James would go back
to Cleveland help and the Cleveland Championship curse the same
year that the British decided they weren't European anymore. That
year that happened, the Cubs would break their world series
throughout the same year that the guy from the show

(47:38):
My Mom Liked beat Hillary Clinton for president. After that
guy became president, all heck would break the group. People
be coming out of the woodwork running the exact same
playbook that they ran against Mayor Dink. Nobody would realize it,
but it would be exactly what they did against Mayor Dank.
Eventually they would resort to biological warfare, which one of
the main impacts, and nobody would see it. Cominger even

(48:01):
really appreciate it would be that Lebron James would win
a championship with the Los Angeles Lakers, who were my
favorite team back then that guy from the show My
Mom Likes you know that guy, the guy who's President
would lose to Obama's VP, but then come back four
years later and beat Obama's VP's VP. Also that the

(48:22):
Bible would happen. This is where it's personal. The Bible
would happen to me twice.

Speaker 7 (48:26):
Before I turned twenty three, so before while.

Speaker 5 (48:29):
I was still twenty two, it would have completed first
forwards and then backwards, and all of those things happened.

Speaker 1 (48:35):
Okay, I don't know what that last part means, but
I don't know. Do you have this like written down?

Speaker 5 (48:41):
I wanted to get it short.

Speaker 1 (48:42):
No, that's why did they Did they just tell you
this in like in rants? Or do you have this
because if you have this written down and we could
like verify the like metadata, you know, like, oh this
was before this date, that might be some problem.

Speaker 5 (48:56):
Okay, that's the only problem is I can't verify that
he said it, but his method, which is something you
could believe, and even if I made this up in hindsight,
it would still be pretty impressive that it worked. I
promised you I didn't do that, but his his assumption
it was just three assumptions or my mom is the
anti Christ. That guy from the show that my mom
likes too much is anti Peter, and Lebron James is

(49:19):
anti Judas and it predicted hold on, So.

Speaker 2 (49:23):
Just a question here, Let's say all of that prediction,
all of that was like a legit prophecy. How do
you get there from thinking that your mom is the
Antichrist and Lebron is the anti Judas? Like they don't
seem like they're playing a role here at all in
relationship to Antichrist.

Speaker 5 (49:39):
I think you have to pick up.

Speaker 7 (49:40):
You have to you have to see what's going on.

Speaker 2 (49:42):
It might help to have it in writing into your
mom related to you an example like working Lebron, like
working against wait, is the anti Judas supposed to be
a good guy.

Speaker 1 (49:51):
That's a good question too, because if he's anti Judas, so.

Speaker 2 (49:54):
Then how is Lebron James writing against that?

Speaker 5 (49:57):
Then he helped him?

Speaker 7 (49:58):
And then like what's the what the anti version of
a field of blood? A lake of angel? Right, so
there's a lot of there's a lot.

Speaker 2 (50:06):
Of little lake of angels. It would be a lake
of like I don't know what's the opposite of blood?
Definitely not angels. Angels are I.

Speaker 1 (50:12):
Don't know if blood has an opposite. I don't know
if you water waters are Yeah, like.

Speaker 5 (50:20):
A lake, like a lake like the Los Angeles Lake ocean.

Speaker 1 (50:25):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (50:25):
I get.

Speaker 1 (50:25):
I get you're trying to do like a Lakers thing.
It's just like, like, here's the thing, John, I can't
verify any of this.

Speaker 2 (50:31):
You could just be saying, also, how does this make
your mom the Antichrist?

Speaker 1 (50:34):
Like, okay, let's talk about that. Why is your mom?
Did your dad just not like your mom? Because like
some people say that she's the Antichrist, and they don't
mean that grandpa loved them your grandpa, Sorry you grandpa.

Speaker 5 (50:46):
My grandpa loved my My grandpa loved my mom. And
the only reason that he could put up with the
Shenanigans was because he was religiously convinced that she's the
anti rit we get to it.

Speaker 1 (50:55):
I feel like, so, John, that's a really interesting thing
because I feel like if she was the Antichrist, that'd
be the exact reason he would not put up with her.
Shenani Against Like that gives you license to actually not
put up with it, right.

Speaker 5 (51:08):
You got to hear the christ part. You got to
hear the christ part rationalized her shenanigans with the idea
that she's the Antichrist. Basically, we're pretty sure she did
nine to eleven. We're pretty sure she planned the assassination
of Ronald Reagan.

Speaker 2 (51:19):
So you were Ronald Reagan was one of this.

Speaker 5 (51:21):
You're bringing up some dates before. Yeah, the first Antichrist
prediction was in nineteen eighty three, Right.

Speaker 2 (51:28):
Ronald Reagan wasn't assassinated.

Speaker 1 (51:29):
That very interesting, I mean, he he there was an
attempt at assassination.

Speaker 5 (51:34):
There was somebody who planned, They absolutely planned his assassination.

Speaker 2 (51:38):
Do you think your mom did nine to eleven thankfully
didn't go through?

Speaker 5 (51:41):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (51:41):
You do?

Speaker 7 (51:41):
You do?

Speaker 1 (51:41):
You I ironically think your mom did nine to eleven?

Speaker 2 (51:44):
Or is this a bit? It's got to be a bit.

Speaker 5 (51:45):
No, this is real. I genuinely I believe this at
this point. I've dealt with her enough. She drove Bin
Laden over the edge, and Laden was originally a good
guy working for the CIA, trying to talk my mom
out of nine to eleven, and then she just drove
them over the edge and he ended up doing But
there's a lot of evidence between her and there.

Speaker 2 (52:03):
Have you spoken about this with any professionals.

Speaker 7 (52:05):
Yeah, actually I have.

Speaker 5 (52:07):
Right now, we're investigating the idea that she might be
responsible for the murder of Odin Lloyd.

Speaker 2 (52:12):
Sorry, you might be talking about different professionals than I
am right, we're talking.

Speaker 1 (52:16):
About mental health professionals.

Speaker 5 (52:17):
Here's no and I am too. He's kind of taking
me seriously. This goes back to back in the day.
So my grandfather, when he was a cop, he got obviously,
he got sent to the shrink, right obviously they you know,
he's going around telling people that his daughter is the Antichrist.
People have the same have the same reaction when he
talked to the shrink. The shrink ended up quitting their

(52:39):
job and turning in a resignation letter with the exact
words saying, well, what the heck kind of therapists would
I be if I can look one of my patients
dead in the eyes and go, you know what, Bill,
You're right, I think your daughter is the anti Christ,
Believe it or not. That started off with the chain
of events that led to the movie die Hard.

Speaker 1 (53:00):
I don't know what to do with you, man, You can't, okay,
But like I don't know, I'm tempted to just end
this call because I know you've called into the show
before and you had some other similarly outlandish claims. But
I feel like you're just trolling, just a troll at
this point, Like there's just no way that you know.
I mean, if you do believe this, I you know
this is not a joke. I seriously suggest you talk

(53:22):
to somebody because this isn't normal right.

Speaker 2 (53:24):
As on a side, if you you think your mom
was responsible for Diehard?

Speaker 5 (53:27):
What was that? Oh, she wrote the original man manuscript
of a kid. That was one of the things.

Speaker 2 (53:33):
Why would she make a Christmas movie?

Speaker 1 (53:35):
The anti Yeah, that's a good point.

Speaker 5 (53:36):
Originally it was her answer to hey, Maura, have you
ever thought about getting married when you get older? And
her answer as like a twelve year old? Was the
script of Diehard? Trying to what set them over the edge. Like,
she's not normal. This is an anti right situation.

Speaker 1 (53:51):
John, I'm gonna have to stop this call because I
don't feel comfortable at this point talking to you about
this anymore. I really feel like you either are trolling
or you need to talk to somebody that's not me, right,
It's not just a callin show hosts. Okay, So I
don't know what else to tell you at this point.
I wish you well and I hope you you talk

(54:11):
to somebody, uh, you know, whoever you need to talk to.
But this isn't gonna be it. You know, if you
do have like something really serious you want to talk
to me about, or you know, other ideas, I'm more
than happy to talk to you. I won't, you know, discriminate.
But at this point we're kind of losing the plot. Man,
We're just kind of going all over the place. So
I'm gonna have to call it here. But thank you, John,

(54:32):
thanks for calling in, and hope you hope you do
well for yourself. That was a little bizarre. I think, uh,
don't know what to make you then, don't know if
there's anything to say really Nope. Yeah, very strange, but uh,
we'll just move on. We have other people in the
queue who want to talk to us anyway. We do

(54:52):
have one of them, a Fizz who's calling in from California. Fizz,
you are live on truth wanted, what's going on?

Speaker 8 (54:59):
What's going on on? How's it going guys?

Speaker 5 (55:01):
Uh, pleasure to be on the call. That last one
was pretty fun.

Speaker 8 (55:04):
Huh A long long time come again.

Speaker 1 (55:10):
I was saying, Yeah, that was definitely something, but go ahead, Fizz.

Speaker 8 (55:14):
So I've been thinking a lot about what it means
to live a good, happy life, and you know, part
of that discovery involves like free will and if I
actually have that, And I just wanted to like get
your guys' take on, like what evidence there is in
support of or against free will? And like, if I

(55:37):
think Blitz have been following you for a long time,
I think you lead deterministic if I'm not mistaken, But like,
how do you live a happy life? You know and enjoy?

Speaker 5 (55:46):
You know?

Speaker 8 (55:47):
How do you how do you like, how do you
live a happy life in general? If you know, if
one doesn't have like if their decisions aren't actually their
decisions interesting?

Speaker 1 (55:58):
Yeah, why don't you start with this, dog Blates because
I would like to hear your take as well.

Speaker 2 (56:02):
I mean, practically speaking, if determinism is true, then all
that says is that you don't choose your will, that
your will the things that you desire, the things your goals,
et cetera. That these things are in some sense determined
by you know, your environment or your brain or whatever
it might be, and then you act upon your will
because that's what agents do. Agents act upon their will.

(56:23):
But if being happy is just achieving your goals, you know,
fulfilling your will, then there's no issue with potentially being
a happy person even in the deterministic universe, because you
will still act upon your will. You just don't choose it.
Just you know, it's fine.

Speaker 1 (56:39):
Yeah, I'm of the same mind as you. Actually, I
definitely am a hard determinist at this point in my life.
But I haven't found that incompatible with the idea of
being happy, right because even though I don't get to
choose my will, as you said, I can still fulfill it. Right,
I'm still part of a bigger system that interacts with
other people, and like my motivations can change and other

(57:00):
things about me can change. And while parts that may
be outside of my control, that doesn't mean that there
isn't a self that enjoys that know, whether or not
there even is like a self to begin with, and
what that means is a whole other conversation. But in
terms of being happy, I can still find comfort and
still find happiness in that. That's that's definitely not the
stumbling block I think. But yeah, I don't know, I

(57:23):
just leave it at that.

Speaker 8 (57:24):
What is the stumbling block for you, if I may ask.

Speaker 1 (57:28):
Like questions, Well, yeah, like you know, like it's just
kind of weird just waking up every day and living
in the world that we live in, right, like looking
back and seeing the human history and like where we've
gotten to and where we're going, and knowing that I'm
just a very very very tiny part of that. That's
what's kind of kind of weird to me, I guess,

(57:49):
and knowing like what what's my role in all that?
I'm I'm freaking lucky. I get to do some podcasting
stuff here and there, and you know, that's kind of cool.
But other than that, I you know, I live a
normal life with a with a normal wife and have
a normal job and do everything else like most of
society does. So there is sort of an existential sort
of draw for me there that that does give me pause,
and I wonder how to reconcile myself with that. I

(58:13):
like Victor Frankel's book, you know, man Search for Meeting,
and I take his approach to it, which is just
kind of like, I don't know, find the humor in
it all, find something that you can grasp onto and
just like enjoy the connections that you have with other people,
because that's all that we get, and so I can
be happy that I have that at least, But like
whether or not I have a will or not, like

(58:35):
I'm still going to have the sort of issue right
of like what we're doing here, you know, and how
I manage that. But anyway, that's that's sort of the
thing that keeps me up at night. I guess what
about you, doctor Blitz?

Speaker 2 (58:47):
What keeps me up at night? Usually it's my tat Yeah,
there's that.

Speaker 1 (58:50):
I mean, just like you know, free will's the stuff
that doesn't seem to be a problem for you, right
and for.

Speaker 2 (58:56):
What it's worth, and I'm no philosopher, but for what
it's worth, the notion of free will. Will is like
there's like the notion of libertarian free will, which is
spoken about by philosophers, and it's kind of like the
put bluntly, it's something like the ability to have done otherwise.
But like everybody knows that that's not a real thing,
at least anybody who thinks about this seriously. And I
should say not really anybody, but most people. But there's
other notions of free will, like you know, is there

(59:18):
in some sense that you can like act upon your
own internal desires external from or you know, avoiding external
influences And in that sense, yeah, we do have free will.
Like this is just kind of redefining the term in
a sense that we can usefully use and so like
it just depends on the how you define the terms.
But yeah, I mean, as far as I'm concerned, the
actions that we take, the desires that we have are

(59:40):
governed by both external and internal phenomenon. Now as to
whether or not the self exists, I don't know, Dan,
that's on you.

Speaker 1 (59:48):
Yeah, I have a lot of thoughts about that. But
that's why I don't want to.

Speaker 8 (59:51):
Go there too much. Dan, Yeah either, And I didn't
want to go too much into depth about that. But
how to follow up question for you guys on the
subject of free will? So, like, if nobody is like
if like the way society is structured, right, we still
hold people accountable. For example, Jeffrey Dahmer does obscene things,
he has to go to jail, he has to be
held accountable for that. But like, how do we how

(01:00:13):
do we rationalize this if nobody is really like if
if nobody's really choosing right, and they they kind of
had to do what they had to do, if you will,
So how do we kind of like, how do we
how do we ration that? How do we you know,
think about forgiveness, about blame or even self improvement in
a world where people are not really acting with like

(01:00:35):
I wouldn't like if they had to do it.

Speaker 1 (01:00:37):
You know, Well, this is kind of what I was
talking about earlier in that I'm a person that exists
within a larger system, right, and so that system is
still going to influence me in my motivations and my
desires and my actions. Right. So living in a society
that has laws and has the fulfillment of those laws
and these ideas of justice, whether or not they're like
objectively real or not, they still do effect people and

(01:01:00):
the lives that they live.

Speaker 4 (01:01:01):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:01:02):
So, Like I am not affected as far as I
know by like lead poisoning or whatever. Right, but like
we still take lead paint out of communities that have
it because we know about the negative consequences of that,
and we want people to have like, you know, better
lives and stuff. That doesn't mean that somebody whose actions
are you know, what we would consider to be bad,

(01:01:22):
and maybe should be prosecuted for even if they're affected
by you know, lead poisoning or whatever. It doesn't mean
that they can't be held accountable for that, right, Like,
I think still having that system of accountability still makes
sense even in a system that you know, might be
largely happening around us rather than what's happening internally, because

(01:01:43):
it's that system that helps keep us getting better and better. Right,
So in other words, we kind of have to have
that system in order to live better lives, even if
it means holding people accountable for stuff that they're going
to have, you know, maybe not as much control as
we think. Hopefully that makes sense. I have a hard
time explaining that concept, But I don't know, what do

(01:02:04):
you think, doctor Blitz?

Speaker 2 (01:02:06):
So, I mean, there's certainly a practical aspect to it that,
you know, in some sense you would expect even like
a system of robots, right, like, you know, just robots.
You would expect them if if you tell them that
their goal is to develop a society that does XYZ,
you would expect them to develop a set of rules
to reinforce their society, right, whether they have free will
or not, just because rules help for uniformity and you know,

(01:02:27):
to achieve whatever ends. There's also a notion in which
you can just like redefine what it means for someone
to be responsible.

Speaker 6 (01:02:33):
Right.

Speaker 2 (01:02:33):
Yeah, When we say responsible, like whether or not you
believe in free will, typically what is that's understood to
be is some sense of like the cause was inside
of them rather than external. Like you wouldn't say that
if somebody told you, hey, if you don't rob this
convenience store, I'm going to blow your head off, and
then the person robs the convenience store, they probably wouldn't

(01:02:53):
be held liable for robbing the convenience store, right because
the cause of them doing that, the direct cause of
them doing that, was some external force. And so if
you just define responsibility to be something like, you know,
you're responsible for your action if your action is directly
caused by something internal to you, well, then now you
have a good explanation of what responsibility is and you

(01:03:16):
can have a useful justice system.

Speaker 1 (01:03:18):
M hm yeah, what are your thoughts on that? See?

Speaker 8 (01:03:20):
Uh No, I mean I think I think I think
you guys really, I think you guys like are like
rationalizing as pretty well. I think it's it's just such
a challenging topic to grapple with. And I think, uh,
if you if you define free will as like, you know,
as something that you know you have that was externally
like forced upon you to act upon a certain way,
that's one thing. But it sounds like, you know, free

(01:03:41):
will is you know, is kind of like something that's
internally determined, but so you're therefore you still have responsibility
for it. I don't know if I summarize that accurately.

Speaker 2 (01:03:51):
But yeah, I mean, look, the idea is that just
a lot of a lot of human actions. I mean, like,
you know, if free will doesn't exist, then surely at
least a lot of our human behavior is based off
of memories that we have that influence the way that
we developed. It's based off of genetics that influenced perhaps
are like brain structure and hence our temperament. It's based
off of you know, certain chemicals that we may have

(01:04:14):
been exposed to at certain times, like various hormones and
things like this. And then it will also be based
partially on external external factors like you know, are you
not making a lot of money right now, and so
that that might drive you to be more risk taking
because you know, you're you're desperate for whatever. So, yeah,
there are going to be a lot of influences on
your actions that are both external. But I mean, you

(01:04:34):
could probably argue that in most cases the causes for
your actions are almost entirely internal. And so if that's
a good enough definition of free will, that you know
whatever caused your action was internal to you, then you
can use that as a definition and just say we
have free will. It's just not what people mean when
they're talking about like this ability to have chosen otherwise, right, Right.

Speaker 1 (01:04:51):
We can't confuse the map for the territory. When I
used to work in education, one of the most prescient
things that I learned was that child's zip code is
going to be their greatest determinant of success in the
school system. And that held true in my experience. And
it's a sad thing to realize that your circumstances of
birth are going to be will largely determined your success there,

(01:05:14):
but it helped be true. Besides that, though, that doesn't
mean that I treat the kids from one zip code
differently than I treat the kids from another zip code, right,
because every kid still deserves a chance at success in
school and That's what I tried to help them with,
and you know, help them with other things in life
too when it was relevant. So, like, you know, just
because we have some predetermined ideas about what could make

(01:05:36):
someone's personality or behaviors, be it their genetic makeup, environment, whatever,
doesn't mean that we still have to go with this
idea of oh, well it's hopeless or it's pointless because
it doesn't matter. I think, you know, human beings have
proven themselves to be more than exceptional sometimes when it
comes to these things. And if we just give up now,

(01:05:56):
we fail to see the potential that people can bring
to the tape in a way. So I don't know, yeah,
justin thoughts.

Speaker 8 (01:06:04):
Question, So question for you guys, kind of a two
pronged question there. Number one, what does the scientific evidence
say about free will? Is there an overwhelming amount of
evidence saying that free will doesn't exist? And then secondly,
would you guys say that if you if we lived
in a world where free will did exist and we
could confirm that we had free will, would that be

(01:06:26):
an objectively better world?

Speaker 5 (01:06:28):
Or no?

Speaker 1 (01:06:28):
Okay, I don't know if science says free will exists
or not. I think a lot of people have opinions
on it. I know they've done surveys of philosophers in
what they think of this, and the last time they
did like a fill paper survey on this. Most philosophers
are in the compatibilist camp, actually believe.

Speaker 5 (01:06:46):
It or not.

Speaker 1 (01:06:47):
Only a minority of them are in the It was
something like eleven percent or something. We're in the hard determinists,
I think last time myself, but I don't know if
this was phil papers or somewhere else. And then like,
of course, the libertarian idea of free will is was
the smallest minority most most folks were in. I think
I might be I'm going off memory here, I might
be correct, but but compatiblism, I know, for sures was

(01:07:08):
the most popular idea. Right, So this idea that, yeah,
there's some stuff that we can't control, but maybe there's
an idea of free will that can kind of work.

Speaker 6 (01:07:16):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:07:17):
The second part to your question, I'm trying to remember
now what you just what you were asking. But that's
what I know about.

Speaker 2 (01:07:23):
The first, the world a better place if there was free.

Speaker 1 (01:07:24):
Will, right, Okay, make the world a better place? So
does it make the world a better place? I mean,
I guess if people self esteem relies on the fact
that you know they have free will or not, maybe right,
that might affect somebody's like personal outlook. But I don't
accept the fact that I have free will and I'm
doing okay. I don't know if that would actually change
me in any way. I think that's kind of a
personal question whether that does anything for anybody. I don't

(01:07:47):
think it should change you. I think you're going to
do what you're doing, gonna do anyway, right, But I
don't know. That's my take. What do you think, doctor
blitz so to be to be two?

Speaker 2 (01:07:57):
I don't know why I can't talk. So, if we're
defining free will, is libertarian free will meaning that there
is some immutable aspect of the human mental experience that
is allowed to just make decisions in an uncaused way.
For talking about libertarian free will in that sense, there's
not really any room for it when you're thinking about
things scientifically. Essentially, what that would require is that there's

(01:08:19):
stuff in the brain that violates the laws of physics basically,
and you know, we have basically the entirety of the
physics of the brain is fully understood. There's nothing really happening.
That's smaller scale that we don't have access to. Like,
you don't need strength theory to understand the brain. Quantum mechanics, atom,
atomic physics, and molecular physics is enough, and we understand
those things very well. So yeah, I mean, at least

(01:08:41):
as far as like the physics of the brain is concerned. Yeah,
there's not really room for free will in a libertarian sense.
If by free will you just mean the ability to
act upon your will in a way that is unrestricted.
Absolutely that exists. I mean, so long as you're not
like tied up in a basement somewhere, then yeah, you
have the ability to act upon your will in an
unrestricted way. And so I mean as far as i'm

(01:09:01):
as far as I'm aware, Like that's what compatibilists typically
mean when they talk about, oh, yeah, there's there's a
sense of free will that's compatible with determinism, namely the
ability to act upon your will and restricted. Now, I
don't think that whether libertarian free will existed or not,
I don't think that would affect the world at all
because people already act as if they have free will,
So I don't think anything would change.

Speaker 1 (01:09:19):
Yeah, maybe maybe the legal system would would change a
bit differently. Maybe maybe some people would be harsher and punishment.
I don't know. That's the first thing that comes to mind.
But I don't think it can ever be verified that
free will is an objective fact either. So unless we
find the free will particle, free will, if you will,
it's it's the next next to the Haggs boson, I think,
don't you mean the God particle right right? It's a.

(01:09:42):
It's like A's second cousin. I think they couldn't find
it because you know, God has to leave us alone
in order to have free will. So the God particle
has to say, separate from the free will particle in
order for the free will particle to have free will,
I think, yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:09:56):
Yeah, And and the God particle being omniprescent means that
you can never find to the free will particle.

Speaker 1 (01:10:01):
That's right, that's right. So see theology can inform your
understanding of physics, I think totally.

Speaker 2 (01:10:07):
But it can.

Speaker 1 (01:10:08):
Yeah, really great stuff, all right, Faz, I think that's
all the time that we have for your questions. But
thanks so much for calling in great questions. I love it.
I hope to hear from you again with some more
great thinkers. But for now I will let you go
and I hope you have a great rest of your weekend. Folks.
I've been neglecting to do some announcements. I should probably
do that really quick before we move on to the

(01:10:29):
next thing. Here one is talking about the back crews.
We are having our backwards. It's coming up in two
weeks August sixteenth, seven pm. Tickets are selling quickly if
you want to join, folks like myself and others who
are regular hosts of the ACA shows, we're going to
be there and if you aren't, aren't going to be
able to attend. But you still want to help out,

(01:10:50):
you can donate in the live chat to purchase a
ticket for one of our hosts or members to be
able to fly in and be able to come as well.
So that would be pretty sick of you if you
could do that. Another thing, of course, we have the
merch go Tiny out CC slashed merch a THEA for
T shirts, hoodies, muggs, hats, swag. You already know, guy,
Get your stuff in and of course we are still
accepting super chats.

Speaker 2 (01:11:11):
Get them in and we.

Speaker 1 (01:11:12):
Will read as many as we can on that. If
you want to become a member, you can hit the
joined button below the video gives you access to special
chat emojis and early access to YouTube shorts and clips.
And last but not least, I need to thank the awesome,
amazing crew to help make the show happen every single week.
And there's our crew cam, several things being held. We
got a dog and a chia pet going on, so

(01:11:35):
that's really cool and just really fun stuff from the crew.
So thanks for that. And also we have a super
chat that was donated earlier that I neglected to read
from Luke Riley who gave two pounds and didn't leave
a message for that, but thank you Luke for donating anyway,
you are great for that and we're going to take
like it's a twenty here Central. We got a call
from John from Canada. I think this is going to

(01:11:56):
be a really quick one. Doctor wizz you cool for
a real quick on one. Yeah, I'm fine, all right, Cool,
let's do it. John from Canada your Live Untruth wanted.
What's going on?

Speaker 2 (01:12:06):
Okay, Dad? How are you doing great?

Speaker 1 (01:12:08):
John? How can we help you?

Speaker 4 (01:12:09):
Okay, I'm not gonna I'm not going to take long.

Speaker 3 (01:12:12):
I would like to say that I'll let to thank
you for enlightening here. I know we had we had
our battles that were fierce. In the end it came
down to a positive result.

Speaker 1 (01:12:22):
Well, thanks, Sean. Is this you saying, are you are
you calling yourself? I know I think you called in
two Eastgo saying you're starting to call yourself an atheist? Now?
Is that what this is in reference to? Yeah, okay,
that's great man. Like I said, I'm I'm happy for you,
you know, like you know doctor Blitz for context, John's
been calling to the show for what at least two years,

(01:12:43):
at least ad something like that, maybe longer. I can't
even keep track of anymore. But uh, you're very striding
Christian and says he's a Christian no longer. So uh,
you know, love that for you, John. All I want
for you again I've said this before, is I just
want you to live your best life. Okay, So if
that means being if you're helping others and doing your thing,
you know, it is what it is. But hey, being

(01:13:04):
an atheist of school too, you know, I think that
you get to, you know, have a better view of
the world. But you know it's up to you to
figure that out. Man, So congrats to you, I guess.

Speaker 3 (01:13:14):
Okay, Well that's all I wanted to say.

Speaker 1 (01:13:16):
Night all right, John? Well great, do you have a
good one? Man? That was like real short and sweet.
But there you go. John, just like I said, it's
been calm for a long time, says We've convinced him.

Speaker 2 (01:13:26):
So well, you know, hopefully you have a good coming
out party, John.

Speaker 1 (01:13:30):
Yeah, that's true. You need to have a party, finds
people you can trust, and you don't have a good
time with that. I say because I think it's worth celebrating.
On that note, though, folks, we are getting to the
tail end of tonight's program, I want to thank special
guest doctor Blitz for being on for today. Doctor Blitz
amazing as usual, fantastic, well done, love having you on here.

(01:13:52):
If people want to find you, where should they go?

Speaker 2 (01:13:54):
Well, technically I do have a YouTube account. However, I
post more regularly on my TikTok count So if you
like using Chinese apps that will shortly not be Chinese anymore,
go follow me their same name there as it is here.
But I do live stream on both YouTube and TikTok simultaneously,
So if you don't like TikTok, you can still catch
me on YouTube same name here as.

Speaker 1 (01:14:13):
Here fantastic, And we're gonna let Kelly come back on
to the stage here so that he can tell us, Hey, Kelly,
how's it going, So he can tell us about our
prompt for this week again.

Speaker 4 (01:14:23):
The prompt for this week again is what do demons
do when they aren't tormenting or torturing us?

Speaker 1 (01:14:30):
I love that question, That's awesome. Did you come up
with another answer while uh, you know, while you.

Speaker 4 (01:14:35):
Were I was going crazy behind the scenes with First off,
I know a whole lot about Oregon and Wilhelm Reich.
Willhelmsike is like the great grandfather of WU and they
still and the whole like Newidge community still believes in
Orgo and generators, even though give are not the same
thing that he was using.

Speaker 1 (01:14:55):
So Kelly, Ah, you should have messaged just we should have.
We could have brought you in for that.

Speaker 4 (01:15:00):
And then I also happen to know a whole lot
about Brandenburg too, so I was like going nutsbag here right,
And he really based his speculation on the fact that
there is two places in Mars where there's a heavy
concentration of these geranium minerals. And he claims that there
is glass like rock around the area, similar to trin trite, trinotite,

(01:15:23):
which is named after Trinity, New Mexico, where they blew
off the nuclear bombs, and it's basically vitrified sand, saying
it was turned to glass by the nuclear blast. But
you can also get glass from a volcanic activity. It's
called obsidian. Anybody who's ever played Minecraft knows what obsidian is.
And so geologists say that the glass that has been

(01:15:45):
seen on Mars is in fact obsidian, and this whole
area is volcanic. Now, volcanoes create pegmatites, and pegmatites often
have radioactive minerals in them.

Speaker 5 (01:15:59):
So there's a.

Speaker 4 (01:15:59):
Complete market theological explanation for his whole Brandenburg's whole theory.

Speaker 1 (01:16:06):
This is what you're saying. You're saying that the aliens
cooked up the volcanoes. There you go, they put nukes
in the volcanoes and made the volcanoes go off.

Speaker 4 (01:16:16):
Yeah, and that's how they destroyed Mars and the survivors
and you I don't know if you've heard this theory,
but a few of the survivors of Mars were able
to get on spaceships and go to the third planet
and colonize it.

Speaker 1 (01:16:29):
Oh planet X.

Speaker 4 (01:16:30):
So you're telling me he was, No, that would be us.
We would be the survival where the survivors.

Speaker 2 (01:16:35):
Okay, okay, So are you telling me that they were
the fish people?

Speaker 1 (01:16:37):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:16:38):
Maybe yeah, the Jana nak right maybe maybe got it.

Speaker 1 (01:16:42):
Kelly, where were you, like, like an hour ago we
should have had.

Speaker 4 (01:16:45):
Coming out going crazy back your I was like, well.

Speaker 1 (01:16:51):
Kelly was talking earlier about like having ox on here.
You kind of had Einstein moment just then. That would
have been great. You could go with Einstein for Halloween.
That'd be awesome. You were thought about.

Speaker 4 (01:17:00):
That'd be fun.

Speaker 1 (01:17:01):
Yeah, all right, we'll put a pin in that, dude.

Speaker 4 (01:17:03):
But why not Einstein?

Speaker 1 (01:17:04):
I like it?

Speaker 5 (01:17:05):
I like it?

Speaker 2 (01:17:06):
All right?

Speaker 1 (01:17:07):
So, folks, prompt this week, what do you evens do
when they're not torturing or telling us? Leave your comment below.
We'd love to hear it. Be sure to like subscribe
if you enjoyed today's episode, and some of us are
going to be in the discord after show in Justice
second here, So if you want to keep hanging out
with us for just a little bit. You can go
to the fan run Discord server, which is a link
to that is in the description if you want to

(01:17:27):
check that out. This is the end of Truth Wanted.
Doctor Blitz any words of wisdom before we close out
tonight's program.

Speaker 2 (01:17:34):
Yeah, make sure that the toilet paper rolls this way.

Speaker 1 (01:17:38):
Make sure the toilet paper rolls that way.

Speaker 5 (01:17:40):
I like it.

Speaker 7 (01:17:41):
I like it.

Speaker 1 (01:17:42):
Okay, folks, this has been another great episode of Truth Wanted.
I'm objectively dan Or. Remember to always keep on the
truth and I'll see you next time. Watch the non

(01:18:12):
profits and join the hosts in the live chart. Visit
tiny dot c c slash yt n b

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Truth Wanted 08.31 08-01-2025 with ObjectivelyDan and @blitzphd

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Truth Wanted 08.31 08-01-2025 with ObjectivelyDan and @blitzphd

Stuff You Should Know