Ltg Michael Flynn - Sidney Powell SPECIAL JULY ENCORE

Ltg Michael Flynn - Sidney Powell SPECIAL JULY ENCORE

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:09):
We're very, very fortunate tap back with the Sydney Palell Service,
Department of Justice for ten years, last twenty years private practice,
federal Appeals. One of the top super lawyers, named as
one of the best lawyers in America. Her best selling book,
Licensed to Lie is incredible. It tells about fraud, it
tells about deception, It tells about abuse of the legal system,

(00:32):
a system that she dedicated her life to studying and working.
In her latest book, Conviction Machine, standing up for prosecutorial abuse.
We're going to learn the truth about twenty twenty election,
what it means to be America. We're really going to
get into it today, Sydney Pale. Wonderful having you with us,
and thank you for joining us. Scotus on February twenty second,

(00:53):
refused to hear election fraud cases, including cases from Pennsylvania.
You had to read Judges only three and Clarence Thomas,
Alito and I believe it was Neo Gorsich and they said, yes,
there were abuses. As a matter of fact, Judge Thomas
was extremely frustrated with the situation. Tell us, tell us

(01:17):
what's going on. What is wrong with the Supreme Court,
what's going on right now. I have no idea. This
doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 2 (01:27):
Lurs can. From my perspective, it looks like a complete
breakdown of every institution of law enforcement and the rule
of law that we have trusted in this country since
its inception to protect the law and the citizens from
abuses by the government. I can't tell you how disappointed

(01:47):
and upset I am that the Court did not take
action on any of those cases. And it makes one
wonder if they're going to take action on any of
the cases that are ill pending there. It causes extreme
doubt for that, and I'm certainly not expecting them to
do anything other than what they've just done, which is

(02:09):
stick their heads in the sand on the most egregious
abuse of law and authority and power ever witnessed probably
in this country.

Speaker 1 (02:22):
It's a little bit odd to me that we had
Gore v. Bush in Florida and they said, we have
to act because the future of the country is dependent
on this. We've got to have a fair election, we've
got to determine it. When they had the hanging chads
and everything else down in Florida. Now you've got in
six different states. It's much more broader. It is abuse.
You've had hundreds, if not, you've had thousands of witnesses

(02:46):
coming forward and they refuse to hear it. What is
going on? Who is somebody controlling the Supreme Court? They
have something on the people. Are they afraid? Are they
afraid if they rule the wrong way they're going to
expand the court? Is that what they're worried about, and
they're going to pack the court?

Speaker 2 (03:05):
Well, they're planning to pack the court as it is
right now. So I don't it's incomprehensible. There is no
rational explanation for not applying the law the way it's stood.
There's all kinds of precedent for fixing what happened in
this election, from Bush versus Gore to other cases as well.

(03:29):
I mean this way back, the Supreme Court said there's
language about one man, one vote, one person, one vote,
and how important it is that votes not be fractionalized.
When that's exactly excuse me, I'm losing my voice. And
that's exactly what we have here, by a computer algorithm
that we can prove in multiple counties and could prove

(03:52):
across the country if anybody would issue an order allowing
inspection of the machines. The very fact that the and
other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines.
How to tell everybody all they need to know. Federal
law requires that election records be kept for twenty two months.

(04:12):
The very purpose of that is to make sure to
ensure to the people of this country that elections are
fair and open and there no hanky panky going on
at all. Well, there's no point in having the law
that requires preservation of records if you're not going to
allow citizens to inspect what happened. Oh and in this case,

(04:33):
it requires forensic evaluation of the machines and looking at
all the actual paper ballots. We already know that's not
going to match up. There were counterfeit ballots. People say, oh, well,
they did a full audit in Georgia. Well, if you
just run the same counterfeit dollar bills through the same
counting machine, you're going to get the same result.

Speaker 1 (04:56):
Oh yeah, absolutely, keep running through you're expecting something different.
You had declaration from doctor Navid Keshev you know who
I'm talking about, Nia. I mean, this was incredible the
work that he did. Some of the details and things
that you have done are just absolutely incredible. You've got

(05:19):
probably over a thousand people who are willing to testify
about the abuses, aren't you.

Speaker 3 (05:25):
Oh?

Speaker 2 (05:25):
Yes, I think overall more than five thousand American citizens
stepped forward to do affidavits at great risk to themselves
because people have been harassed and threatened and everything else.
As a result of this, we had to get security
for some people, which again should tell you that the

(05:45):
problem is not on the side of the people coming forward.
The problem is that and look at the media and
the social media. They're suppressing any sort of conversation about this.
I think our last interview got thrown off YouTube if
I remember correctly, because I was talking about the masts. Yeah,

(06:06):
because I was talking about the massive election fraud. Well,
I mean, what happened to the First Amendment? For four
years we had to listen to their lies, their abject
lies about Russia collusion. And it's the same people essentially
that have pulled off this massive election fraud, funded by
incredible evil interests around the world.

Speaker 1 (06:29):
Probably absolutely, Clarence Thomas said, this is not a prescription
for confidence. He added, changing the rules in the middle
of the games bad enough. The decision that rewrites the
rules seem to affect the too few ballots to change
the outcome of the federal election, but that may not
be the case in the future. These cases provised and
I the opportunity to address what authority, non legislative officials

(06:51):
have to set election rules. Now, that was a very good,
very coaching statement. Why the others not figuring along with that?
Because base the election is to be done by the
state legislature, not by the courts, and not by some
voting official.

Speaker 2 (07:10):
Well, actually, Erskine I thought that statement was weak. There
is enough evidence in the cases before them, or enough
evidence in the public now to more than reverse the
election in at least five states. One state I can't
remember which one right now already took one hundred and

(07:31):
seventy seven thousand people off the voter rolls that shouldn't
have been there when the margin of Biden victory in
that state was less than that.

Speaker 1 (07:41):
Wow.

Speaker 2 (07:43):
Wow, just people taken off the voter rolls. That doesn't
include the algorithm that was run to fractionalize votes and
give one point twenty sixth weight to Biden and only
seven three weights to or seven four weight to Trump.
That doesn't include the boats that were flipped, that we
we're gathering more evidence of every day. That doesn't include

(08:07):
the counterfeit ballots. It just leaves me virtually speechless that
this flat out coup has been allowed to happen in
the United States of America. That affects not only the
greatest country in the free world, but the greatest country
in the world that every freedom loving human being around

(08:31):
the world looks to as a beacon of hope and
an example of how things should be.

Speaker 1 (08:38):
Now. Smart Makes chairman is Lord Mark Malick Brown. He
is George Soros's partner. He serves on the Open Society Board.
Peter Neffinger is the Atlanta Council president of Smart Make.
He's on Biden's transition team. All of that is showing
you who is behind this and who's working with this.

(08:59):
And I'm I want to mention this. We've got the
General Flynn with us, and General Flynn when we're looking
at this on election. If we don't have a valid election,
we no longer have a country. And the other problem
is everyone you took Sydney took most people in America
took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution not

(09:22):
the government in power, but the constitution. This is being
thrown out the window our constitution, and without laws, without
a constitution, we no longer have freedom, We no longer
are a free country. Your comment on that, General Flynn.

Speaker 3 (09:39):
Well, what I would just say is that what we
definitely need to examine, and we need to examine it
very hard, is election integrity in our entire election system
and process. So I think that what we the people
need to be looking at, and I think that I
see our governments probably in the process of forming some
type of commission or something like that that to look

(10:00):
at all the aspects of that. I think I think
that there needs to be some type of citizens commission,
maybe just people from all walks of life that come
together and maybe form our own commission to study the
and to take a look at and then make some
decisions on how we should run our elections in this country.

(10:22):
Because our election system just broke down, and the lack
of confidence in our election system and process and not
only these machines, but the mail and boots, all that
sort of stuff that we are continuing the experience. You know,
it's just people have no confidence in it any longer.
And I think that's one of the greatest privileges, the

(10:42):
greatest rights. We certainly have to be able to vote
in a free, fair and transparent system that we have
to be able to believe in. And right now many
people in this country, across the country, just don't believe
in our election systems.

Speaker 1 (10:56):
Well, what happened with you? What happened with city of
one point three billion dollar lawsuit? They just did one
on Michael Lindell, and I love what he said. He
said he wanted Dominion to file a lawsuit because he
could obtain evidence via discovery And Rudy Julie I said,
dominions lawsuits and act of intimidation to censor the exercise

(11:18):
of free speech. What are your feelings, Sydney on the
lawsuits that you've had from Dominion? Oh?

Speaker 2 (11:26):
Yes, I agree, And I want to say right now
that the articles that have been published against me and
the issue of me being served by Dominion are completely false.
I mean, the way the press is spinning everything is
such a lie. It's inexplicable, and it's like we're living

(11:50):
in a different world.

Speaker 1 (11:51):
Ors can would they take took our interview down? How
can we get the truth out?

Speaker 3 (11:59):
Well, Mike just gut on the line because I think
the censorship, well, yeah, I'm sorry, I'm just going to
say I got a couple more minutes, but I would
just say just to jump on this issue of censorship.
I mean, what we're seeing in the United States of America,
our right to free speech and to be able to
truly address the kinds of things that we've always been
able to do in this country being censored by the

(12:21):
tech titans and by you know, frankly with support out
of likely places in our government. It's just outrageous. I mean,
we should be able to have the debates that we've
always said we want to have in this country, to
be able to talk about the things that we need
to talk about, to be able to shape form this
experiment and democracy that we have. And for those of

(12:42):
us who are who have made you know, let's say,
conservative views, generally conservative views on the political spectrum, but
we're being censored because of those views. That's just outrageous
and it's un American.

Speaker 1 (12:56):
Jerald Flynn, I want to ask you two real quick
questions before you go, because I know you're very very short.
Number one, and we'll have to do this right after
the break. Number one, I want to ask you about
the troops in Washington, d C. Can we have a
standing army in Washington, D C? Of National Guard troops?
And secondly, around the world, especially are we going to

(13:20):
be able to save Taiwan? Are we going to be
effective with the military that we currently have and with
the new objectives, especially in the Middle East. It sounds
looks to me like we're in serious trouble with all
of the programs that were put in where mister President
Trump put in this program to where we had all
the people in the Middle East together against Iran. Now

(13:43):
it's going the other way. So we get back. We'll
bring up both of those questions with you. Remember Erskine
Radio dot com and also remember Defending the Republic dot org.

(15:56):
Defending the Republic dot org. That's a website you want
to go to. Defen Ending to Republic dot org. That's
something we all can do now. General Flynn on this
uh number one about the troops in Washington, d C.
What do you think and what does Sydney think about that?
Go for it? Please, well, I.

Speaker 3 (16:14):
Mean for real, real quick, I think that uh, you
know that the military will do what it's asked to do,
and they'll do it in a professional way. And I
so I have flawed our our military forces, wherever they're
serving around the world or here in the United States.
I do know that at a certain point in time,
you know, things like boredom begin to set in, and
I know that some of the you know, the small

(16:35):
unit commanders will try to do what they need to
do leadership wise to keep the troops you know, occupied.
But I mean, I think the fact that they are
speaking of occupying, they're occupying Washington, DC right now, it's
really got to be examined by the you know, by
our political leadership is to see what's the real purpose
of it. And I just think that at a certain
point in time, that purpose runs its course and they

(16:57):
need to be uh, they probably need to be sent
back home, allowed to go do what they're supposed to
be able to do. And those are I think most
National Guard troops of their citizen soldiers, and they likely
have families and jobs back home that they need to
return to, and they should.

Speaker 4 (17:11):
You know, in general, we appreciate your thoughts so much
on so many of these things, and we hope to
have you back for a full hour when you're not pressed,
and we've got so many issues to talk about about
the military and America and intelligence in America and so
many things happening. So we look forward to having you back.

Speaker 3 (17:27):
Appreciate you promoting defending the Republic out or. It's a
real great organization and we definitely need to help the
help with the American people.

Speaker 1 (17:34):
Thank you real real quickly before you go. The other
question I watch you to answer is what around the
world have we lost our respect? It seems like we
are losing our respect and we're countailing to uh to China.

Speaker 3 (17:46):
Your comments on it, Yeah, China kinda represents a major
adversary right now. And I would say that my h
my expert judgment on what we need to be looking
at is you need to be paying very very close
attention to every aspect of the Chinese government, military, their
political ideology, their economic strength, all these things, what they're

(18:11):
doing on this one Belt, one Road initiative. So China
is a threat to this country and we need to
pay very close attention to it.

Speaker 1 (18:20):
They've taken over Hong Kong and they want Taiwan, and
they are certainly saber radlink as is Iran under the
same thing. We're watching the peace deal that was put
together by President Trump being torn asunder, and he is
going more to Iran than Israel. I've never seen anything
like this. I mean, it's like anything that Trump did
was bad. He wants to just throw out the baby

(18:41):
with the bathwater, right.

Speaker 3 (18:45):
So again, I'll come back at another point in time.
I appreciate the you know what you're raising because it's
probably one of the greatest topics that we're gonna have
to deal with in the next few years here because
of the threat that they do. So thank you very
much for having me on and I appreciate it. Look
forward to coming back on. God bless thank you.

Speaker 1 (19:06):
Let's end General Michael Flynn now talking about Sidney Powell
and one of the things if we do not uphold
the Constitution, if we do not have rule of law,
then we do not have freedom in this country now.
And one of the things that I listened to was
the Merrick Garland. I've never heard anybody him haw and
go around so many different bushes as he did. It

(19:27):
was almost incoherent, incoherent. The man could not put a
thing together. Your comment on that, please, Sidney Powell.

Speaker 2 (19:37):
I only know to say it was absolutely terrifying. It's terrified.
It's terrifying to think of an attorney general who thinks
domestic terrorism is defined as to whether it's daylight or
dark and how many people are in a building.

Speaker 1 (19:57):
If you do it in daylight, it's bad because there
are people in the building, they're doing business. But at night,
it's not terrorism at night. No, it's just the freedom
of expression. I'm looking at that.

Speaker 2 (20:09):
And I'm pretty sure somebody was in that building even
at night, even.

Speaker 1 (20:13):
The janitor cleaning up, and their job and their work
is just as important as anyone else. So we'll be
right back on our skin Radio. That's insanity. Remember the
website to go to and we'll talk more about this
way return is defending the Republic dot org and Telegram
at Sydney Powell. Those are two websites to go to,

(20:35):
Defending the Republic dot org. We'll talk a little more
about that way return, and remember all of our programs
are archive twenty four to seven of their skin radio
dot com. Thank you for going there and freedommail dot us.

(22:55):
If we do not get the election taken care of
at it, people are not aware of what went on
and If we can't get a court ruling on this
election twenty twenty, what makes people think that twenty twenty
two or twenty twenty four will be any different. It
emboldens people if you break the law and get away
with it, emboldens people to do it again, doesn't it, Sydney.

Speaker 2 (23:20):
Yes, it does. In fact, the way I look at
the Supreme Court's rejection of the Pennsylvania case, in other cases,
they just licensed exactly what happened and made it clear.
The Court's not willing to do its job.

Speaker 1 (23:36):
Absolutely, and we have only one choice as far as
I can see, and that's to go to the state
legislatures and let them, let them determine what should be done.
But is that even going to be enough.

Speaker 2 (23:54):
Every good American needs to get involved in their local
government right now. If you can't do anything but take
a car load of friends with you to every county
commissioner's meeting and speak up with the voice of American
citizens who care about this country. I'm talking about the
citizens who are the engine of this country, who make

(24:16):
it work, who go to work every day, whether it's
driving a truck or plowing the fields on a farm.
Who are the people that really make this country work.
Their voices have got to be heard. They are the
eighty million people that voted for freedom this November, only
to see their votes wiped away by abject fraud of

(24:39):
every means conceivable or frankly inconceivable. And that's why we've
also we're also starting Defending the Republic pack at dtrpac
dot com and we're asking for people to join as
low as ten dollars each with an annual membership. It's

(25:00):
intended to be a grassroots pack. My understanding is if
you contribute less than two hundred dollars annually, your contribution
doesn't have to be disclosed. Your name is not disclosed anywhere,
and we want the American people to think of this
as their voice. We're going to start organizing in every

(25:21):
state to help people become more active in their local
and state governments, county, everything.

Speaker 1 (25:30):
And that's defending the Republic. Fact we'll put that up
on your on my website, Defending the republicpac dot com.
And what is exactly defending the Republic doing now? One
of the things that I noticed is even if it's
the school board, and especially now with the school still

(25:50):
shut down, it is certainly incumbent upon all of us
to pay attention to what's happening, because if you don't,
you're going to have liberals running roughshot for what over
the educational system. That's where it's really big. Gay, We've
got to change the educational system in this country.

Speaker 3 (26:08):
Oh we do.

Speaker 2 (26:08):
I mean, I think citizens are going to have to
start organizing their own schools. Forget the public school system, right,
Hire a couple of teachers, Hire a couple of teachers
that want to work and find somebody's home or whatever,
and start bringing kids together for school. We've got to
take everything back. The government has completely failed its citizens.

(26:31):
It has come to exist only for itself, only for
the importance and the support of the corruption that exists
across the government in every branch, apparently in every aspect
of it. And the citizens are going to have to
take it back by lawful means and using the freedoms

(26:55):
that we have left to reclaim the rest of our freedom.
We're supposed to have a government of the people, by
the people, and for the people, and instead the government
has come to exist for itself, to grow itself, to
enrich those in power, to further public corruption.

Speaker 3 (27:15):
It's hideous.

Speaker 1 (27:17):
It is absolutely hideous. I thought you wrote about the
very worst part of the government in Licensed to Lie,
but this is even worse. This is even worse. I
didn't think I could get any worse than Licensed to Lie,
but this is worse. That affected people a few people,
This affects the entire country.

Speaker 2 (27:36):
Yes, what I wrote about in Licensed to Lie was
just the tip of the iceberg. And because nothing was
done to correct it then, and it started back in
two thousand and one, it has only gotten worse now
and it's going to do nothing but get worse until
we stop it. And we have to stop it with
what happened in this election, because if we can't have

(27:58):
a transparent, fair election that everybody can trust, we're done right.

Speaker 1 (28:06):
Just as Thomas said, we again failed to provide clear
rules for future elections. That's what it's about. It's about
future elections. Forget the past election. We really shouldn't, but
you can almost forget the past. But if we don't
get something done with this, they've got a free reign
to absolutely steal the every election from here on now.
One of the things that you that I have noticed

(28:28):
throughout society throughout America, we have corruption at almost every level.
It has to be routed out corruption. It has to
start with the churches, with the schools, with the fraternal organizations,
with the nonprofits. We've got corruption every institution in America
right now. I've never seen anything like it. What happened

(28:49):
to our system of right and wrong? This is what
it's all about, isn't it, Sydney.

Speaker 3 (28:55):
It is.

Speaker 2 (28:56):
It's about our fundamental rights. We've got to get back
to the fundamental rights that each of us is entitled
to under our constitution. Over the years, the Supreme Court
and the government have eroded and just eroded and corroded
our constitution from every angle. We've got to reclaim the

(29:16):
original meaning of our constitution and get back to a
citizen government instead of all this political elitism. We've got
to reclaim our right to free speech, our right to worship.
Months ago, I urged every church in the country to
open and people to go, just go. Churches have been

(29:37):
hospitals in the past. The only rety stands under which
I think a church should be closed is if there's
radioactive contamination in it. I mean, I just can't think
of any reason that a church should ever be closed
for whatever the people want to do in it that's lawful,
and this whole mask thing is meant to isolate and

(30:00):
divide us. True, that should allowed.

Speaker 1 (30:04):
Churches more than ever. We need churches more than we
do it right.

Speaker 2 (30:07):
Now, right, and we need to be able to gather
in churches. We have freedom of association in the Constitution,
not just freedom of religion. The founders gathered in taverns.
They were packed in taverns, and that is important too.
Here we have you know, any means of association has

(30:29):
been destroyed over a virus with a ninety nine point
eight percent survival rate.

Speaker 1 (30:35):
Absolutely, absolutely, and a lot of us are aware of
this now. My producer wanted to ask you a question,
Ron Bowed Sydney. I just wanted to ask you.

Speaker 4 (30:44):
Touched on it briefly about local people getting involved locally.
And we've seen governors now that are starting to put
out orders and create laws that will fight back against
the administration's overreach. And we've also seen the past that
local share of so's declined to enforce gun laws and
so forth. Where is the law in terms of what's

(31:06):
allowed with the local people. You know, we've got to
get the schools open, the hospitals open, we've got to
get businesses open, we have to get people back to
living their lives, and unfortunately it's come to something legal
at some point in time. So where are we at
in terms of that.

Speaker 2 (31:23):
Well, our litigation arm of defending the Republic dot Org
is we're still of course, we're going to have to
raise a lot of money, but we are stapping up
with lawyers to help on these very issues. We want
to assist governors and counties and others that want to
protect our freedoms. We're prepared to start bringing additional cases.

(31:49):
The election cases that the four election cases, three of
which were or in the Supreme Court. One was just
rejected yesterday, but we've got two more of them that
are there, and we will be bringing additional cases to
protect our freedoms and try and reinstate our freedoms, curb
the abuse of executive power in different places, and litigate

(32:12):
what is happening now so people can both know the
truth and we can continue to try to make the
law work or expose the corruption in the process.

Speaker 1 (32:23):
Great great, at least something's being accomplished now. I've noticed
where Judge Judge EMMITTT. Sulivan the hero of your book,
and hardly the hero of your last encounter with him,
has retired. I'm wondering what's going on with some of
these judges.

Speaker 2 (32:39):
What do you think, Well, he hasn't really retired. He's
taken senior status, which means he can continue to have cases.
He continues to keep his chambers. I think he loses
one law clerk, but that opens up a position for
mister Biden to appoint another judge. So the retirement or

(33:01):
senior status of all those judges is simply an opportunity
for Biden to appoint more judges who have no regard
for the rule of law and seek to create or
promote a socialist or communist or fascist agenda. Apparently it's
what this administration is interested in instead of protecting the

(33:23):
Constitution and the republic.

Speaker 1 (33:26):
Wow. Now, Litigan's point out that legislative power is plenary,
meaning unqualified and absolute in the Constitution. State officials say
they aren't allowed to modify election procedures without the concern
of the legislature. This is the bulk argument as to

(33:46):
what went on with the election, isn't it.

Speaker 2 (33:49):
Yes, it is. That's a very important one that just
got completely ignored by the majority of the Supreme Court,
including this is Barrett and Kavanaugh and Roberts. I don't
understand what they could possibly be thinking. And it's not
just about future elections, Erskine. This was a coup of

(34:14):
the presidency of the United States of America and of
any number of seats in Congress and in the Senate.
It wasn't just the presidency. There were down ballot offices
that were affected by the machine fraud too. We don't know.
I mean, we've got still a lot of work to
do to uncover all the election fraud that happened here.

(34:39):
And we certainly can't fix anything going forward until we
know exactly what happened here. And we certainly should the
people should have the people in government that they actually
voted for. Any notion that we would allow fraudulently elected
people to serve in any office in this country is

(35:00):
abhorrent to the rule of law and to everything our
constitution in this country stands for. Absolutely, abhorrent, absolutely absolutely,
And that's a major problem that we have.

Speaker 1 (35:15):
When you're putting out ads saying every vote counts, and
do this and do that, Why vote? A lot of
people are saying I'm not even going to vote next time.
That's the wrong attitude to take. But why vote, Sidney?
If the voting is rigged, why do it? Why participate
in something rigged?

Speaker 2 (35:33):
Well, you're right, I mean, they're right. That's why we've
been so adamant that we've got to return to paper
ballots and no computerized processing of it at all.

Speaker 1 (35:46):
Good they're doing in other countries, they're doing in Canada,
they're doing it elsewhere. And we also need to have
voter ID. We need to have ID for voters. I mean,
to do away with that and to do everything with
mail and voting. That's a terrible mistake. And we knew
it at the beginning. Should have stopped it when it
first started, shouldn't we Yes.

Speaker 2 (36:08):
We certainly should have stopped it when it first started.
The government we had for the last four years did
not exercise the lawful power it had to protect the Constitution.

Speaker 1 (36:21):
Do you think if mister Trump, President Trump had to
do over again, he'd still keep Robert Ray? And do
you think are mister Ray is Christopher Ray? And do
you still think he would keep a bar in there
as a jury general? I don't think so. They did
not support him.

Speaker 2 (36:41):
No, they didn't support him. They well, it wasn't about
to me. It wasn't about supporting him. Forget who was president.

Speaker 3 (36:49):
What are what the.

Speaker 2 (36:50):
People voted for, eighty million people voted for was freedom.
It was a concept of freedom and America first versus fascism,
which is what we have now. People don't understand what
fascism is. It's a merger of corporate and corporations and
the left to suppress rights and to establish an authoritarian regime,

(37:14):
which is exactly what we are experiencing.

Speaker 1 (37:17):
That's exactly what we have. It's a merger, and that's fascism.

Speaker 2 (37:23):
And Facebook, right, and all the social media companies and
the massive media companies, all of which have global interests
and are heavily interested in the in the mass market
they have in China, if not partially owned by China
or blackmailed by China or threatened by China, China owns
like thirty million acres in this country. They own the

(37:46):
Waldorf Astoria, they own AMC Theaters, They own Smithfield's Foods,
the largest ham distributor, you know, pork distributor and product
makes in the country. And I'll tell you what's miss
Field foods went down the tube as soon as China
bought it. It ist Field Ham used to be a

(38:08):
staple of our family's Christmas. It was the best ham
on the face of the earth. And now I wouldn't
take it if somebody gave.

Speaker 1 (38:17):
It to me, the very best picnic Hams out of Surrey, Virginia,
and they took it over. And the same thing with
a lot of different things that they're taking over. So
this is about America. It's about our future, it's about
our children's future, and we are so thankful that you
are fighting for us. We come back, tell us a
little bit more about what we can do and what

(38:39):
we can do with defending the Republic and defending the Republic.
Pack would be right back with Sydney Powell. Final segment. Signey, Sydney,

(40:51):
anything you want to talk about, go for it, because
I want to talk a little bit about defending the
Republic and defending the Republic back because this is where
we the people come out make a difference. So tell
us what we can do.

Speaker 3 (41:04):
Well.

Speaker 2 (41:04):
We obviously need contributions. As I mentioned earlier, we want
this to be a grassroots organization, especially the PACK, and
people can join annually for as little as ten dollars each.
The website is dtr pac dot com and it should

(41:24):
be up, if not today, tomorrow. We're going to have
a page for every state. We're looking for email names
and addresses of people who want to help. We want
to help organize efforts in every state at the community
level and on up to restore freedoms and claim our

(41:45):
constitutional rights, to re elect or elect people who are
willing to fight for our rights, to stand up for
the invoice, the American dream and constitutional and we want
you start. We're going to start recall efforts and probably
in every state of different offices than people where people

(42:08):
we can identify that people were fraudulently elected. Defending the
Republic dot org is the litigation arm right now that
is going to continue to litigate to get the truth
out about what happened and to identify the fraud everywhere
we can find it. You're not giving up on that,
and there will be more to come in the not

(42:30):
very distant future.

Speaker 1 (42:32):
Well, you've got the situation in California where they are big,
they have got enough signatures to get the governor out,
and they're going to be doing the same thing in
New York. I can't believe watching that man standing up
and lying and writing a book about how wonderful he
was and everything else. He defines the word hutzpo. I've

(42:54):
never seen anything like.

Speaker 2 (42:55):
Cuomo he does. And of note, in California, they're applying
a totally different standard for signature of verification on the
recall petition than they did in the general election. I
think point six yeah, I think point six of signatures
were rejected in the general election. According to Newsom, he's rejecting.

(43:18):
They're somehow rejecting fifty percent already of the recall petition signatures.
So New Slash America. The same signature of verification procedure
needs to be followed on the original vote as on
the recall petition or vice versa.

Speaker 1 (43:35):
Right, Right, let's see good for the goose law, isn't it?

Speaker 3 (43:40):
Yes?

Speaker 2 (43:40):
What sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

Speaker 1 (43:43):
Right. Absolutely, we demand fairness in this country. That is
what we demand. We demand that the country, if they
take an oath to defend the constitution, that at least
know what the constitution is and at least let's hope
of our lawmaker. Not a democracy We're a constitutional republic.

Speaker 2 (44:04):
That's very critical to me, and we need honesty and transparency.
That's not too much to ask.

Speaker 1 (44:12):
For, No, it isn't. So we're you're looking for a
better election in twenty twenty two and the best in
twenty twenty four, aren't you?

Speaker 2 (44:21):
And frankly, we're still looking to make sure of what
happened in twenty twenty and correct whatever needs to be
corrected there, whether it's congressional seats or Senate seats or
the presidency. We cannot allow a coup to happen in
the United States of America.

Speaker 1 (44:42):
Well, since the Supreme Court has refused to listen to anything,
where do you go?

Speaker 2 (44:48):
There are still cases pending and there are going to
be more to come.

Speaker 1 (44:54):
All right, go for it, Go for it. Sitting You
are fighting for America. You are fighting for and I
want to tell you on behalf of so many people
across this country. So many people have become disillusioned years
of light. You are someone who is fighting for us
and we need to fight beside you.

Speaker 2 (45:17):
Thank you so much, Erskine.

Speaker 1 (45:19):
And God bless you for all the work that you're doing.
This is so critical and a lot of people get
down and a lot of people are becoming discouraged with
what's been going on, but you are making us feel
a lot better knowing that we can get behind you
and actually get something accomplished. God bless you for everything
you're doing.

Speaker 2 (45:38):
Thank you Erskine really appreciated in your listeners.

Speaker 1 (45:41):
Remember Defending the Republic dot org and we're also going
to put up on the website of dtrpack all at
Erskineradio dot com. All these programs are available twenty four
to seven Erskine Radio dot com and also at freedommail
dot us. Thanks for listening. We'll be right back