THE MONTAUK MONSTER

None

Episode Transcript

(00:07):
The Montauk Monster. Montauk It's anurban legend that emerged in two thousand and
eight after a series of photographs ofa bizarre creature washed up on a beach
in Montauk, New York. Thephotographs, of course, quickly gained attention
and sparks speculation in theories about theorigin and nature of the creature. The
creature that picked it in the photographsappeared to have a hairless body, sharp

(00:28):
teeth, and clawed hands and feet. Some would argue it could have been
the chupacambodas that has always talked aboutdown in southwest US. It's a physical
appearance was described as a resembling amix of different animals, including a dog,
a raccoon, a pig. Thephotos circulated widely on the Internet,
fueling debates and speculations. Now possibleexplanations it could be decomposed animals. Some

(00:51):
experts believe that the creature was adecomposed raccoon or some other small animal.
Decomposition, especially exposure to water,can alter the physical features of an animal,
making it difficult to identify a hoax, or it could be just a
misentification. Skeptics argue that the photographsor either stage, or that people misidentify
a known animal due to the poorquality of the images and in interpretation can

(01:14):
be influenced by widening and angles,genetic mutations or experiment too. Another theory
proposed the island of Doctor Moreau,the creature was a result of a genetic
mutation or experimentation. Some suggest thatit could have escaped from a nearby research
facility, but there's no evidence supported. Of course, why would there be.
White cryptozoologists who study hidden or unknownanimals will suggest that the creature could

(01:36):
be an undiscovered species or a highbred animal. However, no conclusive evidence
is either presented to support this.But remember, the absence of evidence is
not the evidence of absence, Soagain, the absence of evidence is not
the evidence of absence. The exactidentity and origin of the Montauk Monster remains
unknown. There are several theories andexplanations, but no scientific analysis or investigation

(02:00):
is definitively determined the creature's true nature. It is worth noting urban legends and
hoaxes, as we talk about here, sometimes can capture public imagination, and
this serves as a notable example ofsuch phenomenon. But in today's world of
deep fakes and all the things youcan do instantaneously on your phone. Now
you can do photoshopping and whatnot,and an incredible degree of accuracy with AI

(02:22):
technology as well. Now this wasfifteen years ago, but still the photos
are difficult to assess authenticity. Andagain, if you had some understanding of
lighting and angles, you can doa lot with that. Who knows what
it is, so in this caseit remains unexplained