KingOfPodcasts Roasted in Royal Rumble Fallout and WrestleMania Debate (ep.907)

The Wrestling is Real Podcast got a massive mix of reasoned arguments, passionate defenses of Triple H's booking, and outright negativity, highlighting the strong opinions and invested interest of the WWE fanbase in the lead-up to WrestleMania 41.

Yours truly got a lot of feedback regarding the potential booking of WrestleMania 41, starting with this past weekend's Royal Rumble, is highly polarized and centers around several key points. A significant portion of the audience believes that Triple H's booking, exemplified by the Rumble results, isn't drastically different from what Vince McMahon would have done.

This perspective often argues that certain outcomes, like a particular Rumble winner, feel predictable and reminiscent of past booking patterns under McMahon. Some even suggest that this is precisely the reaction Triple H intends to evoke, perhaps as part of a larger narrative strategy.

However, this view is heavily contested by a larger and more vocal group who vehemently disagree. They argue that Triple H's leadership has demonstrably revitalized WWE, creating new stars and fostering more engaging storylines than the company saw in its later McMahon era.

This group points to several wrestlers whose careers have flourished under Triple H, suggesting that McMahon would have either misused them or failed to recognize their potential. They cite specific examples, claiming that these individuals wouldn't be in their current prominent positions if McMahon were still in charge. These fans see the Rumble winner as a prime example of Triple H's vision, arguing that McMahon would have favored established stars or part-timers, potentially even burying the Rumble winner in the process.


The debate also touches upon the perceived predictability of McMahon-era booking versus the current direction. While some acknowledge that the Rumble winner's victory might have been predictable, they contrast this with past Rumbles where the outcome felt virtually guaranteed.

They appreciate the current sense of uncertainty and the potential for long-term storytelling, urging patience and trust in the unfolding narrative. This group believes that judging the booking based on one event is premature and that the full picture will become clearer as WrestleMania approaches.


A recurring theme in the feedback is the treatment of certain wrestlers. The Rumble winner's push is a major talking point, with some questioning whether McMahon would have given them such a prominent role. Others argue that this wrestler is a fresh talent in the singles scene and deserves the opportunity, highlighting their recent successes. There's also discussion about other rising stars and how their trajectories might differ under different leadership. The general sentiment is that Triple H is more willing to take risks and elevate newer talent, while McMahon would have relied more heavily on established names.


Beyond specific wrestlers, the criticism also addresses the overall creative direction. Some believe that McMahon's booking had become stale and was driving fans away, while Triple H has brought a renewed sense of excitement and unpredictability. They see the current product as more dynamic and engaging, with a greater emphasis on storytelling and character development.


Finally, some comments are simply dismissive or negative, ranging from simple expressions of boredom to accusations of clickbait and calls for the podcast host to stop talking. These comments often lack specific arguments but contribute to the overall negative sentiment surrounding the podcast's take.


Jey Uso's emotional Royal Rumble win is a huge moment, but his WrestleMania choice is critical. While he deserves this spotlight, a rematch with Gunther after already losing to him could diminish the victory and undervalue Gunther's dominant IC title reign. It also ma