December 15, 2021 • 13 mins
RUSH: So I’m here (in a sporadic way) able to catch some of the Democrat impeachment filing against President Trump — and that he threatened the constitutional system, and the fact that he did this in the month of January is no reason to forget about it, that he threatened and almost destroyed the U.S. constitutional system.
Now, all of that is an abject lie.
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
So I'm I'm here in a sporadic way able to
catch some of the Democrats impeachment filing against against President Trump,
and that he threatened the constitutional system, and the fact
that he did this in the month of January is
no reason to forget about it. That he threatened and
(00:22):
almost destroyed the U s constitutional system. Now, all of
that is an abject line. None of that is true.
They are lying about his role in the January sixth
uprising or whatever you want to call it, at the
at the US Capital, and they know they are, and
they've got no guardrails. There's no reason for them not to.
(00:44):
They don't have a media that's going to call him
out on it. So they're literally all of this is
about making sure that Donald Trump can never ever again
have any role in American public life. There is a
column today in the Washington Post. In fact, I intended
to get to this a little later, but let me
(01:05):
let me get down to this here. I've brought it
up um and it's actually it's in the entertainment section.
Trump wants a library, he must never have one. That's
the headline of the story. It's a long story, it
(01:26):
goes on. It's filled with blah blah blah blah blah,
and they are abject. They're deathly afraid that Trump is
going to triumphantly return to public life. And I'm not
saying triumphally returned to the presidency, but they they're not
going to be able to stop this. They're not gonna
be able to stop Trump from having a public life
(01:48):
if he wants it and when that happens, and they
are waiting an abject fear for that. They don't know
how it's gonna manifest. They don't know if it's going
to be a press conference from Marilago or a golf club.
They don't have the slightest idea. So they're trying to
ram through this impeachment business so that they can discredit
(02:09):
anything he says any time he says it because they're worried.
You know what they're worried about. Here? Trump wants a library.
He must never have. Who are these people to decide
whether an ex president deserves a library or not. If
he can raise the money for it, then he can
do a library. That's how it happens. Do you know
who bankrolled much I should say many ex president's libraries
(02:35):
in Leeg I always say two thousand's in the nineties.
You know who did it? You know who? You know
who the primary funders or bank rolles were. No, it
was not Mr. Soros. It was Prince Bandar l Sultan
and his friends from Saudi Arabia. Do I need to
(02:56):
remind you that the King of sort of the late
king King of the Uh, Abdullah Aziz l Saud whatever,
came over and visited George W. Bush for barbecue and
stuff at the Texas Ranch. And while he was here,
he know, the ambassador to the United States and Saudi
(03:16):
Saudi Arabia was banned Aarbin Saltan I think that was name.
He had homes all over the place, and the Saudis
were worried the guy is becoming too Americanized and wouldn't
go back to the uh home country Saudi Arabia. I
don't know if he did or not, but no, the
the King of Saudi Arabia was for Clinton. I think.
(03:39):
I don't know if it was major, but I know
he was a participating fundraiser donor, and the same thing
for George W. Bush and maybe George H. W. Bush
that that's one of the reasons for the alliance that
we've had with with Saudi. The point is, if you
can raise the money for your library, then it's not
up to the Washington Post. Where do you get one
(03:59):
an what they're worried about. Can you imagine a Trump
presidential library. We have the Clinton Library massage parlor. Can
you imagine what the traffic is to the Clinton Library
massage parlor? Not much because you have to have a
special admission ticket for the massage parlor part that's not
open to the public. You get it's a special little buzzer.
(04:24):
You know, you're putting the palm of your hand and
you have to tell the right person I'm here for
the visit the massage parlor, and if it buzzes, you
get in. If it doesn't buzz you don't get in.
And no, I'm making that up, But it wouldn't that
be funny. I mean, I'm here for the I don't
(04:46):
think there's an Epstein Epstein Wing Jeffrey Epstein Wing the
Clinton Library and said, no, no, not not here. There
may be a Clinton Wing at some Epstein property somewhere,
but I doubt I doubt that it's Clinton Library. No,
they're worried that it would become the biggest tourist attraction
in the country. That's what they're worried about, and it
(05:08):
would it would be that they are scared to death
of any picture, any video, any any image that would
confirm or testify to Trump's popularity, because that's what they're
really trying to destroy, and they don't know that all
(05:30):
they're doing is really cementing it. Seventy four seventy five
million people voted for Donald Trump. The Democrats may think
that they have the ability to convince seventy four people
that the guy they voted for is a reprobate and
that they shouldn't have voted for him. But they tried
(05:51):
that for four years, didn't they And how did that
work out for him? They've been trying. They tried for
four years. We talked about it yesterday. There was no
truth to it whatsoever. They had a free reign. They
could make up anything they want about Donald Trump's Think
of it this way. Here, you are the Democrat Party.
You have the FBI, you have the c i A
(06:12):
at least you have members of both that are sympathetic
to the Washington establishment, and you have basically the knowledge
that for the next four years. You can make up
anything you want about Donald Trump, and the media will
amplify it. In other words, you don't have any limits.
(06:35):
So your objective is to destroy Donald Trump. You want
to reverse if you can, the election results of two
thousand and sixteen. You want him out of there because
you're scared to depth what he represents. He represents an
uprising of the people of this country against Washington, against
(06:59):
the established and it had been building for a long time,
had been building since Perole. Oh yeah, it predated Trump.
It was the Tea Party was part of this. Trump
was just the first guy to come along and actually
weaponize it in a political sense. But the Trump movement
(07:21):
existed before there was Trump, and then he built it
and grew it to the point of seventy five seventy
four million voters. But Stopford, think these Democrats going in
the FBI, C I A, all these conspirators M I five,
AM I six in the UK, the intelligence here from
(07:41):
Oxford and Cambridge in the UK, they had a free run.
They could make up anything they wanted about Donald Trump.
All it had to have was some link to credibility
that they could make up and thing they wanted in
the mainstream media would not only amplify it, the mainstream
(08:06):
media would act as members of the team. And they
chose Russian collusion. They thought they had set it up,
They thought they had built a believable case about it,
and they spent four years, even after the No Choice
(08:26):
Mueller Report, the Muller Report, had to report no collusion.
That was the That was the magical line, if you will.
They couldn't go beyond that. This was always an effort
to sway public opinion, and that's what they hoped they
(08:46):
had done by the time Mueller Report was filed and
came out. But they couldn't actually conclude that Trump had
colluded because he hadn't and there wasn't any evidence for it.
So all they could do is get close, get close
in the effort of shaping public opinion, and more and
more people believed it. Mission accomplished in their minds. So
(09:14):
four years of this, folks, and they remain scared to
death of the Guide. They are very much aware of
his popularity. They're very much aware that he beat them back,
so they're doing everything they can. They Now, it's the
same cabal, it's the same kind of people, same bunch
of people with the same mindset. We're now in this
(09:36):
second impeachment and doing what they can to maneuver and
manipulate public opinion against Trump because they are scared to
death of a public reemergence. They're trying to destroy whatever
credibility he has remaining. And this library business, they're deathly
(09:59):
a afraid that it would become the biggest tourist attraction
in the country. We're gonna start on the phones and
we say hi to Darnley and Parker Colorado. Great to
have you with us. Hello, Hi, speak to you. Well
he got through. Hey, I have a quick question for you.
So let can't really think about this whole scam Hoxie impeachment.
(10:21):
And if they know the Democrats to know that this
isn't going nowhere, why and they're so afraid of Donald
Trump and you know everything he comes out of his mouth, son,
why would they give him such a grand platform. I mean,
the whole world is gonna be watching this because they
think their platform is going to be bigger. Mhmm. Interesting.
I even though they think they they know they're gonna
(10:42):
lose and they're gonna be able to get to say
what they're going to say, but it doesn't definitely give No,
they don't. They don't look at the no no, no, no no.
Wait an, why do you think they're looking at this
as a lose lose thing. Well, I think that they're
just simply because he's not going to be convicted. Well,
I think he think, do we lose her connection to him?
(11:04):
I guess that. But Trump tump Trump, You, Darlene, we're
having all kinds of trouble with your with your connection. Uh,
let me try one more time. Why do you think
the Democrats know that they're going to lose this? Right?
I think they were because they're going to lose it.
They can't acquit him, right, that's been pretty much okay,
(11:27):
So that okay, So they don't have the votes to
acquit convict. They don't have the votes to convict him,
so he is going to be acquitted. But that's not
why they're doing this. They're not doing this to actually
convict him. They're doing this to continue the smear. They're
running the show, they determine all of the rules, and
(11:53):
they're looking at this as an opportunity. Look at their
their first impeachment was a joke and they still went
through with it. They had no idea how that boomeranged
on him. They think they won that. They think they
won with Adam Schiff and his committee analyst garbage on
(12:15):
the phone quality of Ukraine. They're looking at this as
an opportunity to shape public opinion even more against Trump.
They have an opportunity here to continue to impugne, to criticize,
to make up whatever they want about the guy. They've
(12:36):
got the mainstream media in their back pocket to amplify
whatever they say. So this is just an ongoing and
by the way, there's another thing here besides that. It's
all about sending messages to anybody that might be thinking
of doing what Trump did. Don't try it. Don't think
that you can get away with it. Will treat you
just like we're treating Trump. There's all kinds of reason
(13:00):
for them doing this, and the fact that that they're
not going to get a conviction is that is way
down on the list now. They're doing this to continue
the smear
So I'm I'm here in a sporadic way able to
catch some of the Democrats impeachment filing against against President Trump,
and that he threatened the constitutional system, and the fact
that he did this in the month of January is
no reason to forget about it. That he threatened and
(00:22):
almost destroyed the U s constitutional system. Now, all of
that is an abject line. None of that is true.
They are lying about his role in the January sixth
uprising or whatever you want to call it, at the
at the US Capital, and they know they are, and
they've got no guardrails. There's no reason for them not to.
(00:44):
They don't have a media that's going to call him
out on it. So they're literally all of this is
about making sure that Donald Trump can never ever again
have any role in American public life. There is a
column today in the Washington Post. In fact, I intended
to get to this a little later, but let me
(01:05):
let me get down to this here. I've brought it
up um and it's actually it's in the entertainment section.
Trump wants a library, he must never have one. That's
the headline of the story. It's a long story, it
(01:26):
goes on. It's filled with blah blah blah blah blah,
and they are abject. They're deathly afraid that Trump is
going to triumphantly return to public life. And I'm not
saying triumphally returned to the presidency, but they they're not
going to be able to stop this. They're not gonna
be able to stop Trump from having a public life
(01:48):
if he wants it and when that happens, and they
are waiting an abject fear for that. They don't know
how it's gonna manifest. They don't know if it's going
to be a press conference from Marilago or a golf club.
They don't have the slightest idea. So they're trying to
ram through this impeachment business so that they can discredit
(02:09):
anything he says any time he says it because they're worried.
You know what they're worried about. Here? Trump wants a library.
He must never have. Who are these people to decide
whether an ex president deserves a library or not. If
he can raise the money for it, then he can
do a library. That's how it happens. Do you know
who bankrolled much I should say many ex president's libraries
(02:35):
in Leeg I always say two thousand's in the nineties.
You know who did it? You know who? You know
who the primary funders or bank rolles were. No, it
was not Mr. Soros. It was Prince Bandar l Sultan
and his friends from Saudi Arabia. Do I need to
(02:56):
remind you that the King of sort of the late
king King of the Uh, Abdullah Aziz l Saud whatever,
came over and visited George W. Bush for barbecue and
stuff at the Texas Ranch. And while he was here,
he know, the ambassador to the United States and Saudi
(03:16):
Saudi Arabia was banned Aarbin Saltan I think that was name.
He had homes all over the place, and the Saudis
were worried the guy is becoming too Americanized and wouldn't
go back to the uh home country Saudi Arabia. I
don't know if he did or not, but no, the
the King of Saudi Arabia was for Clinton. I think.
(03:39):
I don't know if it was major, but I know
he was a participating fundraiser donor, and the same thing
for George W. Bush and maybe George H. W. Bush
that that's one of the reasons for the alliance that
we've had with with Saudi. The point is, if you
can raise the money for your library, then it's not
up to the Washington Post. Where do you get one
(03:59):
an what they're worried about. Can you imagine a Trump
presidential library. We have the Clinton Library massage parlor. Can
you imagine what the traffic is to the Clinton Library
massage parlor? Not much because you have to have a
special admission ticket for the massage parlor part that's not
open to the public. You get it's a special little buzzer.
(04:24):
You know, you're putting the palm of your hand and
you have to tell the right person I'm here for
the visit the massage parlor, and if it buzzes, you
get in. If it doesn't buzz you don't get in.
And no, I'm making that up, But it wouldn't that
be funny. I mean, I'm here for the I don't
(04:46):
think there's an Epstein Epstein Wing Jeffrey Epstein Wing the
Clinton Library and said, no, no, not not here. There
may be a Clinton Wing at some Epstein property somewhere,
but I doubt I doubt that it's Clinton Library. No,
they're worried that it would become the biggest tourist attraction
in the country. That's what they're worried about, and it
(05:08):
would it would be that they are scared to death
of any picture, any video, any any image that would
confirm or testify to Trump's popularity, because that's what they're
really trying to destroy, and they don't know that all
(05:30):
they're doing is really cementing it. Seventy four seventy five
million people voted for Donald Trump. The Democrats may think
that they have the ability to convince seventy four people
that the guy they voted for is a reprobate and
that they shouldn't have voted for him. But they tried
(05:51):
that for four years, didn't they And how did that
work out for him? They've been trying. They tried for
four years. We talked about it yesterday. There was no
truth to it whatsoever. They had a free reign. They
could make up anything they want about Donald Trump's Think
of it this way. Here, you are the Democrat Party.
You have the FBI, you have the c i A
(06:12):
at least you have members of both that are sympathetic
to the Washington establishment, and you have basically the knowledge
that for the next four years. You can make up
anything you want about Donald Trump, and the media will
amplify it. In other words, you don't have any limits.
(06:35):
So your objective is to destroy Donald Trump. You want
to reverse if you can, the election results of two
thousand and sixteen. You want him out of there because
you're scared to depth what he represents. He represents an
uprising of the people of this country against Washington, against
(06:59):
the established and it had been building for a long time,
had been building since Perole. Oh yeah, it predated Trump.
It was the Tea Party was part of this. Trump
was just the first guy to come along and actually
weaponize it in a political sense. But the Trump movement
(07:21):
existed before there was Trump, and then he built it
and grew it to the point of seventy five seventy
four million voters. But Stopford, think these Democrats going in
the FBI, C I A, all these conspirators M I five,
AM I six in the UK, the intelligence here from
(07:41):
Oxford and Cambridge in the UK, they had a free run.
They could make up anything they wanted about Donald Trump.
All it had to have was some link to credibility
that they could make up and thing they wanted in
the mainstream media would not only amplify it, the mainstream
(08:06):
media would act as members of the team. And they
chose Russian collusion. They thought they had set it up,
They thought they had built a believable case about it,
and they spent four years, even after the No Choice
(08:26):
Mueller Report, the Muller Report, had to report no collusion.
That was the That was the magical line, if you will.
They couldn't go beyond that. This was always an effort
to sway public opinion, and that's what they hoped they
(08:46):
had done by the time Mueller Report was filed and
came out. But they couldn't actually conclude that Trump had
colluded because he hadn't and there wasn't any evidence for it.
So all they could do is get close, get close
in the effort of shaping public opinion, and more and
more people believed it. Mission accomplished in their minds. So
(09:14):
four years of this, folks, and they remain scared to
death of the Guide. They are very much aware of
his popularity. They're very much aware that he beat them back,
so they're doing everything they can. They Now, it's the
same cabal, it's the same kind of people, same bunch
of people with the same mindset. We're now in this
(09:36):
second impeachment and doing what they can to maneuver and
manipulate public opinion against Trump because they are scared to
death of a public reemergence. They're trying to destroy whatever
credibility he has remaining. And this library business, they're deathly
(09:59):
a afraid that it would become the biggest tourist attraction
in the country. We're gonna start on the phones and
we say hi to Darnley and Parker Colorado. Great to
have you with us. Hello, Hi, speak to you. Well
he got through. Hey, I have a quick question for you.
So let can't really think about this whole scam Hoxie impeachment.
(10:21):
And if they know the Democrats to know that this
isn't going nowhere, why and they're so afraid of Donald
Trump and you know everything he comes out of his mouth, son,
why would they give him such a grand platform. I mean,
the whole world is gonna be watching this because they
think their platform is going to be bigger. Mhmm. Interesting.
I even though they think they they know they're gonna
(10:42):
lose and they're gonna be able to get to say
what they're going to say, but it doesn't definitely give No,
they don't. They don't look at the no no, no, no no.
Wait an, why do you think they're looking at this
as a lose lose thing. Well, I think that they're
just simply because he's not going to be convicted. Well,
I think he think, do we lose her connection to him?
(11:04):
I guess that. But Trump tump Trump, You, Darlene, we're
having all kinds of trouble with your with your connection. Uh,
let me try one more time. Why do you think
the Democrats know that they're going to lose this? Right?
I think they were because they're going to lose it.
They can't acquit him, right, that's been pretty much okay,
(11:27):
So that okay, So they don't have the votes to
acquit convict. They don't have the votes to convict him,
so he is going to be acquitted. But that's not
why they're doing this. They're not doing this to actually
convict him. They're doing this to continue the smear. They're
running the show, they determine all of the rules, and
(11:53):
they're looking at this as an opportunity. Look at their
their first impeachment was a joke and they still went
through with it. They had no idea how that boomeranged
on him. They think they won that. They think they
won with Adam Schiff and his committee analyst garbage on
(12:15):
the phone quality of Ukraine. They're looking at this as
an opportunity to shape public opinion even more against Trump.
They have an opportunity here to continue to impugne, to criticize,
to make up whatever they want about the guy. They've
(12:36):
got the mainstream media in their back pocket to amplify
whatever they say. So this is just an ongoing and
by the way, there's another thing here besides that. It's
all about sending messages to anybody that might be thinking
of doing what Trump did. Don't try it. Don't think
that you can get away with it. Will treat you
just like we're treating Trump. There's all kinds of reason
(13:00):
for them doing this, and the fact that that they're
not going to get a conviction is that is way
down on the list now. They're doing this to continue
the smear
Rush Limbaugh - Timeless Wisdom News
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!