November 9, 2025 • 21 mins
The 30th UN climate conference will begin this week.
Nations will gather in Belem, Brazil for COP30 – and while the Trump administration isn’t intending to send anyone, the US could still become the thorn in any deals side.
So, as the world’s brightest climate minds converge on the city that sits on the outskirts of the Amazon rainforest – experts are asking whether anything substantial will come from these negotiations.
Today on The Front Page, University of Otago associate professor Daniel Kingston is with us to discuss how important COP is, and why we should care.
Follow The Front Page on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can read more about this and other stories in the New Zealand Herald, online at nzherald.co.nz, or tune in to news bulletins across the NZME network.
Host: Chelsea Daniels
Editor/Producer: Richard Martin
Producer: Jane Yee
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Kiyota.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a
daily podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:10):
Presented by The New Zealand Herald.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
The thirtieth UN Climate Conference begins this week.
Speaker 3 (00:21):
Nations will gather in Belem, Brazil for COP thirty. And
while the.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Trump administration isn't intending to send anyone, the US could
still become the thorn in any deals side. So as
the world's brightest climate mines converge on the city that
sits just on the outskirts of the Amazon rainforest, experts
asking whether anything substantial will come from these negotiations. Today
(00:49):
on the Front Page, University of Otago Associate Professor Daniel
Kingston is with us to discuss how important COP is.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
And why we should care.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
So, Daniel, tell me what is COP thirty.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
So cop COP stands for Conference of the Parties. So
just to back up a bit about what that means.
In nineteen ninety two, at the Earth Summit in Rio,
most of the world's countries got together and signed a
climate agreement called the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,
(01:30):
and so all countries in the world signed up to
that and since that, since that treaty was signed, the
signatories to that treaty have met every year since, and
so that's a conference of the party who has been
COP one, COP two, COP three and so on, and
we're at thirty. The aim of that initial treaty back
in nineteen ninety two was to prevent dangerous human interference
(01:55):
with the climate system. That sounds great, but was just
an intention. They didn't actually define what dangerous climate change
was or how to prevent it. So the meetings since
have been about trying to kind of, you know, make
those definitions. What is dangerous climate change? How ambitious should
(02:16):
we be, who should take the lead, who should should
people some countries do more, do less? You know, how
can we prevent dangerous climate change? So that's what these
these meetings are all about.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
Given we've been concerned, at least a little bit concern
for decades now about the effects of climate change on
our earth. Does it worry you that the UN has
now said it's virtually impossible to keep the international target
of limiting global warming of one point five degrees celsius.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Yeah, it's pretty concerning. There are about kind of five
or six or seven years go now. There was a
special report by the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, looking
at kind of what dangerous climate change might be, and
in particular looking at the threshold of one point five
(03:14):
degree warming and two degree warming, and when we start
to get above that one point five degree level is
when we start to see some of the more serious
impacts of climate change. So, according to the Paris Agreement
which resulted from COP twenty one in twenty fifteen, I
(03:35):
think there was an agreement from the world's countries that
we would try to limit climate change to below two
degrees or preferably at one point five degrees. So for
now this report to come out to say that basically
we've just about missed the boat, it's hugely concerning, Yes, is.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
There any way of backtracking or do you reckon that's it?
Speaker 4 (04:00):
To meet this goal our emissions as they were in
twenty nineteen, would we need to cut by more than
half to stop us reaching that one point five threshold
by twenty thirty five That if you kind of think
about the way the world's set up at the moment,
the kind of the political environment, it's really not going
(04:23):
to happen, almost certainly. And so that's that's kind of
the conclusions of this report. But then you know, thinking
after that, it is possible to kind of pull things
back on track. Okay, just because we've you know, we
may end up breaching that threshold, it doesn't mean that
we can't pull it back to below that threshold at
(04:45):
some point in the future. Right, The key thing is
how far we're going to overshoot and how long that
overshoot is going to last. For the more action we take,
the quicker we take it, the less that overshoot is
going to be, and.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
What kind of things can be down I guess from
a larger governmental level to a smaller level. I mean,
is me washing my yogurt caps before putting them in
the recycling bin, doing anything to get us below that level.
Speaker 4 (05:13):
Yeah, so there's pretty much a linear relationship between more
carbon in the atmosphere and more global warming. So from
that sense, yeah, everything really does make a difference, you know,
whether it's just like turning off a light, you know,
when you leave a room, whether that's driving your car less,
(05:34):
taking one fewer international flight, you know, right up to
the kind of the top of government decisions around you know,
national level emissions. It all makes a difference, and no
one's powerless even if it might seem kind of trivial,
you know, like recycling versus chucking out your yogurt pots.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
Yeah, what's the significance of COP thirty being held in Brazil?
Speaker 4 (06:00):
There's some symbolism from it, I suppose, So as I
mentioned that first global climate treaty, the UNFCCC, was signed
in Rio in Brazil, So there's some history of hosting
successful major international conferences in Brazil. And obviously it's home
to the Amazon rainforest and majority of that rainforest, which
(06:23):
is the biggest rainforest rainforest area in the planet, and
it's hugely important from you know, from a biodiversity perspective,
but also from the climate system. It's so big that
it effectively generates its own climate and also has an
influence on the global climate system. So when we think
(06:47):
about tropical rainforest loss, we're actually influencing the global climate
system as that system kind of shrinks and becomes degraded.
So there's a lot of yeah, I guess, symbolism from
holding it there.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
And that information that we know about the Amazon is
that while we were planting so many trees a few
years back, wasn't it something like we were going to
plant like a million trees or something.
Speaker 4 (07:12):
Yeah, it's not unrelated. So as a plant grows, it
sucks out carbon from the atmosphere. So in theory, right,
the more trees you plant, the more carbon you get
out of the atmosphere. And so this country and others
do use that sort of kind of a forestation process
(07:32):
to meet some of their climate goals. It's not as
simple as that, you know. It depends what happens once
that tree is finished growing, right, if you chop it
up and burn it, then you're just putting that carbon
back into the atmosphere, so that there's kind of not
so much of an overall wind there. Old old growth,
(07:56):
existing forests, you know, and native trees are often much
more important kind of preserving what we've got. There's a
huge amount of carbon locked up in the Amazon rainforest,
and the system as a whole sucks out carbon from
the atmosphere at the moment, so it's holding back the
(08:16):
level of climate change that has happened. But as it
starts to shrink and as it starts to get degraded,
it has the potential to switch to a carbon source.
Right when you chop down those trees, when you change land,
use that area starts being a net emitter of carbon
instead of a net absorber. So yeah, dancing trees is good,
(08:38):
but it's not quite that simple.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
Looking around the world, what other governments have weakened existing
legislated domestic climate targets?
Speaker 5 (08:53):
The reality is is that you know, we are reasssing
on all countries are continually reassissing the target. So this
specific So meny to your question because every country has
different mixes. And again, as I see New Zealand's mix
is very different.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
I appreciate that our missions profile is very different to
countries that aren't is relying on agriculture and don't have
the renewable energy source.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
Sorry sorry, just let me.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Ask that minister that can you name a single country?
Can you name a single country that has weakened existing
legislated domestic climate targets?
Speaker 5 (09:24):
As I said, I'm not aware of that point. But
what I am aware of the world leading in that sense.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
What are New Zealand's updated emissions targets for COP thirty
and how significant are they do you think?
Speaker 4 (09:40):
Yeah? So, just to back up slightly, under the Paris Agreement,
each country that signed up to that has to submit
emission reduction plans periodically and so the latest round of
these has been happening this year. And so New Zealand
did submit an updated emissions reduction plan. Their previous one
(10:05):
was a fifty percent reduction in what our emissions were
in two thousand and five, and we'd achieved that fifty
percent reduction by twenty thirty, so that upgraded plan isn't
much of an upgrade. It's kind of from fifty percent
by twenty thirty to fifty one to fifty five percent
(10:26):
by twenty thirty five, so it's kind of it's met
those goals from Paris, but it's a it's a pretty
small increase really, and that compares with the UK, which
has committed to an more than an eighty percent reduction
from their nineteen ninety levels. Even rapidly industrializing countries like
(10:48):
Brazil have submitted more more ambitious targets than New Zealand have.
And I guess you might think, you know, fifty percent
is a pretty hefty reduction, right, and it would be
great if we could, you know, if we actually achieved that,
that's great, But in the bigger context of what's going
(11:08):
on in that one point five degree threshold, that we're
going to miss No one's taking enough action, enough major
action right now. Everyone needs to be more ambitious. So
to see such a small kind of ratcheting up from
the New Zealand government was pretty disappointing. I suppose Do.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
You think it's disappointing or realistic? Could we actually bump
that up to eighty.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
Well or is that just posturing?
Speaker 4 (11:38):
Yeah? I guess that's an important point, right Promises need
to be kind of followed up by action. We have
seen a kind of what's the the I guess we
might say backsliding. Maybe I don't think of the more
polite term than that right now. You know, in terms
(11:58):
of climate policy the last few years, there are a
number of emission reduction plans in place from the previous
government and they've been mostly kind of let go by
the current government without any replacement, you know, by alternative ideas.
If you know, you might not have liked the kind
of the clean car rebate, the UTAX, but if you're
(12:22):
going to get rid of that, then what are you
going to replace it with? And I don't think we've
seen kind of enough ambition from the current government to
kind of well, okay, if we're not going to do that,
then then what are we going to do? You know,
and then the idea, well, you know, drilling for you know,
allowing more drilling for oil in the context in this
(12:44):
current context again kind of it doesn't match the urgency
of the situation.
Speaker 3 (12:49):
Because the situation is urgent.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
You mentioned the UK there, UK Prime Minister Kirs Darma
has told world leaders that the consensus is gone on
fighting climate change.
Speaker 3 (13:00):
Would you agree with him?
Speaker 4 (13:01):
Yeah, I certainly think we're in a different position to
where we were, you know when the Paris Agreement site
was signed, you know, or maybe even four or five
years ago. Right, Governments change, and government priorities change, and
the extent to which they can bring along their populations
with them change. We're certainly not in the same position
(13:22):
that we were before. And you know, at the present moment,
those kind of that international community isn't as aligned as
it has been.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
How difficult is it to have a big conference like this,
obviously the biggest climate change conference in the world. We're
talking about moving forward, we're talking about or getting onto
the same page and not having the US at the table.
Speaker 4 (13:44):
Well, the you know, the second I think the second
biggest emitter globally at the moment. So it's obviously a
big hole, right if they're pulling out of the whole system.
I guess there's a timescale issue here in this. You know,
the political cycle in the US last for five years
(14:05):
in terms of a presidential term. But what we're looking
at here is something that's carrying on for decades, you know,
through to and beyond the end of the century. So
there will be kind of, you know, variations in how
much different countries can commit to this, but that you know,
there is a sense of kind of following the pack here, right.
(14:26):
If everyone's doing it, then you become the kind of
the odd ball, the standout if you're not doing it.
Speaker 3 (14:33):
Even China's getting on board, aren't.
Speaker 4 (14:35):
They, Yeah, exactly exactly. So, like China is the biggest
emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, but they're also
they have the most renewable electricity generation installed in the world.
They're installing more than anywhere else, and that the cost
of renewable energy is cheaper and cheaper all the time,
(14:55):
to the point where you know, in many situations it's
cheaper to generate electricity renewably than it is from fossil fuels.
So things keep turning and there are kind of bumped
along the way, you know, associated with political cycles, but
it's going one way in the end, and so I
guess it's up to the rest of the international community
(15:16):
to kind of stick with it.
Speaker 6 (15:24):
But global warming not happening. You know, it used to
be global cooling. If you look back years ago, in
the nineteen twenties and the nineteen thirties, they said global
cooling will kill the world. We have to do something.
Then they said global warming will kill the world. But
then it started getting cooler, so now they could just
(15:46):
call a climate change because that way they can't miss
climate change, because if it goes higher or lower, whatever
the hell happens, is climate change. It's the greatest con
job ever perpetrated in the world, in my opinion.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
What would you like to see come out of COP.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
Thirty Recognition of the urgency of the situation? Really, you know,
there are lots of kind of you know, big picture
and also technical things that are going to be discussed there,
from just kind of the general kind of feel of
the room around the urgency to some much more specific actions,
you know, around energy generation, finance, tropical rainforests and so on.
(16:31):
But just that sort of that combined will to do
something that came out of the Paris Agreement, just to
kind of see that bolstered.
Speaker 2 (16:40):
I guess do you reckon that when they signed the
Paris Agreement all those years ago that they actually thought
that it was going to be this bad.
Speaker 4 (16:49):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (16:51):
I don't know, you know what I mean though, it's
just like imagine I can imagine all of them.
Speaker 3 (16:56):
But you know, there's some some media about it.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
People are saying all the earth is warming, and you know,
they go and sign this document and go haha, like
look at this document, and then we get up to
it right up to Cop thirty and everyone's.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
Like, guys, yeah, I mean Paris was a huge, kind
of a huge achievement, right. It was a big step forward.
But at the same time, it was only words, right,
and they probably knew that when it came to actually
kind of dealing with the nitty gritty of it actually
doing stuff, that it was going to get more difficult. Yeah,
the way it always is.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
I guess what concrete impacts of climate change are already
being observed in New Zealand.
Speaker 4 (17:42):
Well, it's getting warmer. If you look at the temperature records,
you can see that. Maybe you can't feel it kind
of day to day, but we see it in other
aspects of the environment, you know, in terms of our
snowcover shrinking, our glaciers shrinking year on year. We see
it around extreme of e So you know, floods are
a particularly obvious one. The Auckland Anniversary weekend floods and
(18:06):
Cyclone Gabrielle. They were all worse because of climate change
because they occurred in a warmer atmosphere.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
And.
Speaker 4 (18:14):
You know, there's some scientific uncertainty around just how much
worse they were, but they were definitely worse. So you know,
that means they're kind of the flooding that came with it,
infrastructure damage, the loss of life, you know, impacts on
kind of you know, food production as well. There are
you know, quite substantial impacts you know, associated with those
(18:37):
events that were worse because of climate change. And we
see droughts as well becoming more intense internationally as well.
Just you know, the past kind of week or so,
Hurrican Melissa in the Caribbean, there was sixteen percent more
rainfall in that because of climate change. Winds were seven
percent stronger because you know, it was happening in a
(19:00):
warmer atmosphere, So yeah, we don't have to look too
far to see those sort of concrete impacts.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
And what climate solutions or innovations would you like to
see the most in New Zealand. What can we really
harness and make our own and really lead the world in.
Speaker 4 (19:19):
We're going kind of slightly into my kind of personal
opinion now rather than my kind of professional expertise for
current scientist. But look, we've got most of the technology
available to deal with this, right. Electric cars are pretty
good and they're getting better. Rooftop solar is cheap, right,
it's just an upfront cost, just as there's an upfront
(19:41):
cost to buying a new car. We need help to
kind of make those initial steps and a lot of
that has to come from kind of from a government level.
But the technology, a lot of the technology is there
to make a huge impact on our emissions. There's amazing
new kind of innovations going on in agriculture as well,
(20:03):
in terms of kind of the methane that gets emitted
from dairying, for instance. We just need more of a
push and to kind of to make it easier to change,
but also the kind of the messaging around it. There
are huge opportunities around kind of reducing greenhouse gases. It
(20:24):
doesn't have to be seen as a cost and negative
thing when it can actually lead to a kind of,
you know, huge additional beneficial changes as well as just
limiting climate change.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
It's not enough anymore just to be cleaning out your
yoga caps.
Speaker 4 (20:40):
Yeah, just recycling by itself isn't going to cut it.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
No, thanks for joining us, Daniel.
Speaker 4 (20:46):
No problem, Nice to talk to you.
Speaker 2 (20:52):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at endzed hair dot nz. The Front Page is produced
by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who is also our editor.
I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page on iHeartRadio
(21:12):
or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow
for another look behind the headlines.
Kiyota.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a
daily podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:10):
Presented by The New Zealand Herald.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
The thirtieth UN Climate Conference begins this week.
Speaker 3 (00:21):
Nations will gather in Belem, Brazil for COP thirty. And
while the.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Trump administration isn't intending to send anyone, the US could
still become the thorn in any deals side. So as
the world's brightest climate mines converge on the city that
sits just on the outskirts of the Amazon rainforest, experts
asking whether anything substantial will come from these negotiations. Today
(00:49):
on the Front Page, University of Otago Associate Professor Daniel
Kingston is with us to discuss how important COP is.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
And why we should care.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
So, Daniel, tell me what is COP thirty.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
So cop COP stands for Conference of the Parties. So
just to back up a bit about what that means.
In nineteen ninety two, at the Earth Summit in Rio,
most of the world's countries got together and signed a
climate agreement called the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,
(01:30):
and so all countries in the world signed up to
that and since that, since that treaty was signed, the
signatories to that treaty have met every year since, and
so that's a conference of the party who has been
COP one, COP two, COP three and so on, and
we're at thirty. The aim of that initial treaty back
in nineteen ninety two was to prevent dangerous human interference
(01:55):
with the climate system. That sounds great, but was just
an intention. They didn't actually define what dangerous climate change
was or how to prevent it. So the meetings since
have been about trying to kind of, you know, make
those definitions. What is dangerous climate change? How ambitious should
(02:16):
we be, who should take the lead, who should should
people some countries do more, do less? You know, how
can we prevent dangerous climate change? So that's what these
these meetings are all about.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
Given we've been concerned, at least a little bit concern
for decades now about the effects of climate change on
our earth. Does it worry you that the UN has
now said it's virtually impossible to keep the international target
of limiting global warming of one point five degrees celsius.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Yeah, it's pretty concerning. There are about kind of five
or six or seven years go now. There was a
special report by the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, looking
at kind of what dangerous climate change might be, and
in particular looking at the threshold of one point five
(03:14):
degree warming and two degree warming, and when we start
to get above that one point five degree level is
when we start to see some of the more serious
impacts of climate change. So, according to the Paris Agreement
which resulted from COP twenty one in twenty fifteen, I
(03:35):
think there was an agreement from the world's countries that
we would try to limit climate change to below two
degrees or preferably at one point five degrees. So for
now this report to come out to say that basically
we've just about missed the boat, it's hugely concerning, Yes, is.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
There any way of backtracking or do you reckon that's it?
Speaker 4 (04:00):
To meet this goal our emissions as they were in
twenty nineteen, would we need to cut by more than
half to stop us reaching that one point five threshold
by twenty thirty five That if you kind of think
about the way the world's set up at the moment,
the kind of the political environment, it's really not going
(04:23):
to happen, almost certainly. And so that's that's kind of
the conclusions of this report. But then you know, thinking
after that, it is possible to kind of pull things
back on track. Okay, just because we've you know, we
may end up breaching that threshold, it doesn't mean that
we can't pull it back to below that threshold at
(04:45):
some point in the future. Right, The key thing is
how far we're going to overshoot and how long that
overshoot is going to last. For the more action we take,
the quicker we take it, the less that overshoot is
going to be, and.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
What kind of things can be down I guess from
a larger governmental level to a smaller level. I mean,
is me washing my yogurt caps before putting them in
the recycling bin, doing anything to get us below that level.
Speaker 4 (05:13):
Yeah, so there's pretty much a linear relationship between more
carbon in the atmosphere and more global warming. So from
that sense, yeah, everything really does make a difference, you know,
whether it's just like turning off a light, you know,
when you leave a room, whether that's driving your car less,
(05:34):
taking one fewer international flight, you know, right up to
the kind of the top of government decisions around you know,
national level emissions. It all makes a difference, and no
one's powerless even if it might seem kind of trivial,
you know, like recycling versus chucking out your yogurt pots.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
Yeah, what's the significance of COP thirty being held in Brazil?
Speaker 4 (06:00):
There's some symbolism from it, I suppose, So as I
mentioned that first global climate treaty, the UNFCCC, was signed
in Rio in Brazil, So there's some history of hosting
successful major international conferences in Brazil. And obviously it's home
to the Amazon rainforest and majority of that rainforest, which
(06:23):
is the biggest rainforest rainforest area in the planet, and
it's hugely important from you know, from a biodiversity perspective,
but also from the climate system. It's so big that
it effectively generates its own climate and also has an
influence on the global climate system. So when we think
(06:47):
about tropical rainforest loss, we're actually influencing the global climate
system as that system kind of shrinks and becomes degraded.
So there's a lot of yeah, I guess, symbolism from
holding it there.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
And that information that we know about the Amazon is
that while we were planting so many trees a few
years back, wasn't it something like we were going to
plant like a million trees or something.
Speaker 4 (07:12):
Yeah, it's not unrelated. So as a plant grows, it
sucks out carbon from the atmosphere. So in theory, right,
the more trees you plant, the more carbon you get
out of the atmosphere. And so this country and others
do use that sort of kind of a forestation process
(07:32):
to meet some of their climate goals. It's not as
simple as that, you know. It depends what happens once
that tree is finished growing, right, if you chop it
up and burn it, then you're just putting that carbon
back into the atmosphere, so that there's kind of not
so much of an overall wind there. Old old growth,
(07:56):
existing forests, you know, and native trees are often much
more important kind of preserving what we've got. There's a
huge amount of carbon locked up in the Amazon rainforest,
and the system as a whole sucks out carbon from
the atmosphere at the moment, so it's holding back the
(08:16):
level of climate change that has happened. But as it
starts to shrink and as it starts to get degraded,
it has the potential to switch to a carbon source.
Right when you chop down those trees, when you change land,
use that area starts being a net emitter of carbon
instead of a net absorber. So yeah, dancing trees is good,
(08:38):
but it's not quite that simple.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
Looking around the world, what other governments have weakened existing
legislated domestic climate targets?
Speaker 5 (08:53):
The reality is is that you know, we are reasssing
on all countries are continually reassissing the target. So this
specific So meny to your question because every country has
different mixes. And again, as I see New Zealand's mix
is very different.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
I appreciate that our missions profile is very different to
countries that aren't is relying on agriculture and don't have
the renewable energy source.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
Sorry sorry, just let me.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Ask that minister that can you name a single country?
Can you name a single country that has weakened existing
legislated domestic climate targets?
Speaker 5 (09:24):
As I said, I'm not aware of that point. But
what I am aware of the world leading in that sense.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
What are New Zealand's updated emissions targets for COP thirty
and how significant are they do you think?
Speaker 4 (09:40):
Yeah? So, just to back up slightly, under the Paris Agreement,
each country that signed up to that has to submit
emission reduction plans periodically and so the latest round of
these has been happening this year. And so New Zealand
did submit an updated emissions reduction plan. Their previous one
(10:05):
was a fifty percent reduction in what our emissions were
in two thousand and five, and we'd achieved that fifty
percent reduction by twenty thirty, so that upgraded plan isn't
much of an upgrade. It's kind of from fifty percent
by twenty thirty to fifty one to fifty five percent
(10:26):
by twenty thirty five, so it's kind of it's met
those goals from Paris, but it's a it's a pretty
small increase really, and that compares with the UK, which
has committed to an more than an eighty percent reduction
from their nineteen ninety levels. Even rapidly industrializing countries like
(10:48):
Brazil have submitted more more ambitious targets than New Zealand have.
And I guess you might think, you know, fifty percent
is a pretty hefty reduction, right, and it would be
great if we could, you know, if we actually achieved that,
that's great, But in the bigger context of what's going
(11:08):
on in that one point five degree threshold, that we're
going to miss No one's taking enough action, enough major
action right now. Everyone needs to be more ambitious. So
to see such a small kind of ratcheting up from
the New Zealand government was pretty disappointing. I suppose Do.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
You think it's disappointing or realistic? Could we actually bump
that up to eighty.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
Well or is that just posturing?
Speaker 4 (11:38):
Yeah? I guess that's an important point, right Promises need
to be kind of followed up by action. We have
seen a kind of what's the the I guess we
might say backsliding. Maybe I don't think of the more
polite term than that right now. You know, in terms
(11:58):
of climate policy the last few years, there are a
number of emission reduction plans in place from the previous
government and they've been mostly kind of let go by
the current government without any replacement, you know, by alternative ideas.
If you know, you might not have liked the kind
of the clean car rebate, the UTAX, but if you're
(12:22):
going to get rid of that, then what are you
going to replace it with? And I don't think we've
seen kind of enough ambition from the current government to
kind of well, okay, if we're not going to do that,
then then what are we going to do? You know,
and then the idea, well, you know, drilling for you know,
allowing more drilling for oil in the context in this
(12:44):
current context again kind of it doesn't match the urgency
of the situation.
Speaker 3 (12:49):
Because the situation is urgent.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
You mentioned the UK there, UK Prime Minister Kirs Darma
has told world leaders that the consensus is gone on
fighting climate change.
Speaker 3 (13:00):
Would you agree with him?
Speaker 4 (13:01):
Yeah, I certainly think we're in a different position to
where we were, you know when the Paris Agreement site
was signed, you know, or maybe even four or five
years ago. Right, Governments change, and government priorities change, and
the extent to which they can bring along their populations
with them change. We're certainly not in the same position
(13:22):
that we were before. And you know, at the present moment,
those kind of that international community isn't as aligned as
it has been.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
How difficult is it to have a big conference like this,
obviously the biggest climate change conference in the world. We're
talking about moving forward, we're talking about or getting onto
the same page and not having the US at the table.
Speaker 4 (13:44):
Well, the you know, the second I think the second
biggest emitter globally at the moment. So it's obviously a
big hole, right if they're pulling out of the whole system.
I guess there's a timescale issue here in this. You know,
the political cycle in the US last for five years
(14:05):
in terms of a presidential term. But what we're looking
at here is something that's carrying on for decades, you know,
through to and beyond the end of the century. So
there will be kind of, you know, variations in how
much different countries can commit to this, but that you know,
there is a sense of kind of following the pack here, right.
(14:26):
If everyone's doing it, then you become the kind of
the odd ball, the standout if you're not doing it.
Speaker 3 (14:33):
Even China's getting on board, aren't.
Speaker 4 (14:35):
They, Yeah, exactly exactly. So, like China is the biggest
emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, but they're also
they have the most renewable electricity generation installed in the world.
They're installing more than anywhere else, and that the cost
of renewable energy is cheaper and cheaper all the time,
(14:55):
to the point where you know, in many situations it's
cheaper to generate electricity renewably than it is from fossil fuels.
So things keep turning and there are kind of bumped
along the way, you know, associated with political cycles, but
it's going one way in the end, and so I
guess it's up to the rest of the international community
(15:16):
to kind of stick with it.
Speaker 6 (15:24):
But global warming not happening. You know, it used to
be global cooling. If you look back years ago, in
the nineteen twenties and the nineteen thirties, they said global
cooling will kill the world. We have to do something.
Then they said global warming will kill the world. But
then it started getting cooler, so now they could just
(15:46):
call a climate change because that way they can't miss
climate change, because if it goes higher or lower, whatever
the hell happens, is climate change. It's the greatest con
job ever perpetrated in the world, in my opinion.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
What would you like to see come out of COP.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
Thirty Recognition of the urgency of the situation? Really, you know,
there are lots of kind of you know, big picture
and also technical things that are going to be discussed there,
from just kind of the general kind of feel of
the room around the urgency to some much more specific actions,
you know, around energy generation, finance, tropical rainforests and so on.
(16:31):
But just that sort of that combined will to do
something that came out of the Paris Agreement, just to
kind of see that bolstered.
Speaker 2 (16:40):
I guess do you reckon that when they signed the
Paris Agreement all those years ago that they actually thought
that it was going to be this bad.
Speaker 4 (16:49):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (16:51):
I don't know, you know what I mean though, it's
just like imagine I can imagine all of them.
Speaker 3 (16:56):
But you know, there's some some media about it.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
People are saying all the earth is warming, and you know,
they go and sign this document and go haha, like
look at this document, and then we get up to
it right up to Cop thirty and everyone's.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
Like, guys, yeah, I mean Paris was a huge, kind
of a huge achievement, right. It was a big step forward.
But at the same time, it was only words, right,
and they probably knew that when it came to actually
kind of dealing with the nitty gritty of it actually
doing stuff, that it was going to get more difficult. Yeah,
the way it always is.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
I guess what concrete impacts of climate change are already
being observed in New Zealand.
Speaker 4 (17:42):
Well, it's getting warmer. If you look at the temperature records,
you can see that. Maybe you can't feel it kind
of day to day, but we see it in other
aspects of the environment, you know, in terms of our
snowcover shrinking, our glaciers shrinking year on year. We see
it around extreme of e So you know, floods are
a particularly obvious one. The Auckland Anniversary weekend floods and
(18:06):
Cyclone Gabrielle. They were all worse because of climate change
because they occurred in a warmer atmosphere.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
And.
Speaker 4 (18:14):
You know, there's some scientific uncertainty around just how much
worse they were, but they were definitely worse. So you know,
that means they're kind of the flooding that came with it,
infrastructure damage, the loss of life, you know, impacts on
kind of you know, food production as well. There are
you know, quite substantial impacts you know, associated with those
(18:37):
events that were worse because of climate change. And we
see droughts as well becoming more intense internationally as well.
Just you know, the past kind of week or so,
Hurrican Melissa in the Caribbean, there was sixteen percent more
rainfall in that because of climate change. Winds were seven
percent stronger because you know, it was happening in a
(19:00):
warmer atmosphere, So yeah, we don't have to look too
far to see those sort of concrete impacts.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
And what climate solutions or innovations would you like to
see the most in New Zealand. What can we really
harness and make our own and really lead the world in.
Speaker 4 (19:19):
We're going kind of slightly into my kind of personal
opinion now rather than my kind of professional expertise for
current scientist. But look, we've got most of the technology
available to deal with this, right. Electric cars are pretty
good and they're getting better. Rooftop solar is cheap, right,
it's just an upfront cost, just as there's an upfront
(19:41):
cost to buying a new car. We need help to
kind of make those initial steps and a lot of
that has to come from kind of from a government level.
But the technology, a lot of the technology is there
to make a huge impact on our emissions. There's amazing
new kind of innovations going on in agriculture as well,
(20:03):
in terms of kind of the methane that gets emitted
from dairying, for instance. We just need more of a
push and to kind of to make it easier to change,
but also the kind of the messaging around it. There
are huge opportunities around kind of reducing greenhouse gases. It
(20:24):
doesn't have to be seen as a cost and negative
thing when it can actually lead to a kind of,
you know, huge additional beneficial changes as well as just
limiting climate change.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
It's not enough anymore just to be cleaning out your
yoga caps.
Speaker 4 (20:40):
Yeah, just recycling by itself isn't going to cut it.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
No, thanks for joining us, Daniel.
Speaker 4 (20:46):
No problem, Nice to talk to you.
Speaker 2 (20:52):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at endzed hair dot nz. The Front Page is produced
by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who is also our editor.
I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page on iHeartRadio
(21:12):
or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow
for another look behind the headlines.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.