Slow-motion video is often used to show jurors how a possibly criminal event took place, but is this practice fair to the accused?
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Episode Transcript
Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works. Hi There,
brain Stuff, Lauren Vogel bomb here. Slow motion video can
make the boring seem exciting and the extraordinary even more incredible.
I'm thinking of everything from Wonder Woman's fight scenes to
epic t Time here. But it turns out that slowing
videos not only amps up the drama of a scene,
(00:23):
it also creates bias in viewers, specifically when it comes
to jury members. In court cases, video footage of crimes
often plays an important role in determining a perpetrator's punishment.
In some trials, jurors may watch slow motion video of
the criminal acting question, supposedly to better analyze the events
that took place, But a group of researchers, writing that
(00:44):
any benefit of video replay should be weighed against its
potentially biasing effects, conducted a study that suggests slow mo
video doesn't always help jurors make well informed decisions. Instead,
the elongated time of the video makes it seem like
the crime took longer to unfold, so jurors are more
likely to perceive the action as intentional. Whether a jury
(01:04):
thinks the crime was premeditated can be the difference between
the second and first degree murder charge, so it's literally
a matter of life and death. This was the case
in the two thousand nine murder trial of John Lewis,
which the researchers used as the basis for the study.
In the trial, the prosecution showed a slow motion video
of Lewis shooting a Philadelphia police officer, and the defense
argued that the stretched time made the act seem premeditated.
(01:27):
The prosecution rebutted by pointing out that the jurors also
saw the video at regular speed. To test whether sloma
video actually increases perception of time and intent, the researchers
conducted for studies. In the first, participants acting as jurors
saw either the video of Lewis slowed down or at
normal speed. In the second, the researchers tested perceived intention
(01:48):
in another scenario an NFL video of a prohibited helmet
to helmet tackle, as well as the effect of video
duration by pausing the video instead of slowing it at
crucial moments. In the third, they tested whether displaying and
mentioning the video's speed decreased bias, and in the fourth,
they had participants watched either the SlowMo version or the
regular video or both to test whether the group's perceptions
(02:11):
would be different. Confirming the researchers hypothesis, showing slowed down
video quadruple to the odds that participants would believe the
shooter guilty of intentional murder before deliberation, partially because of
the increased amount of time that the jurors felt the
dependant had to act. Also, viewers who watched the slow
motion tackle the second study were more likely to think
(02:32):
it was premeditated as well, and pausing the video didn't
change that. For the third study, even though viewers were
repeatedly reminded that it was a slow motion video, that
didn't change the results. They were the same as in
the first study, and the final studies showed that the
viewers who saw only the SloMo version of events were
three point four times more likely to convict than viewers
(02:52):
who only saw the regular version. Viewers who saw both
speeds were one point five times more likely to convict.
This demonstrates that showing both speeds lessons bias, but doesn't
completely eliminate it. The authors admit that the study doesn't
determine the effect of slowed video on the accuracy of
viewers judgment but considering the fact that the Supreme Court
of Pennsylvania ruled the slow MO in Lewis's case admissible
(03:16):
and that Lewis is now on death row despite his appeals,
the results of this study could change how we view
the role of videos in determining criminal sentences, and with
the explosion of police body cameras, surveillance cameras, and smartphone video,
the effective video replaced speed on jurors could have even
more importance in the coming years. Today's episode was written
(03:40):
by Eve's Jeffcote and produced by Tristan McNeil. For more
on this end lots of other criminal topics, visit our
home planet, how stuff Works dot com.
BrainStuff News
Host
Lauren Vogelbaum
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Burden
The Burden is a documentary series that takes listeners into the hidden places where justice is done (and undone). It dives deep into the lives of heroes and villains. And it focuses a spotlight on those who triumph even when the odds are against them. Season 5 - The Burden: Death & Deceit in Alliance On April Fools Day 1999, 26-year-old Yvonne Layne was found murdered in her Alliance, Ohio home. David Thorne, her ex-boyfriend and father of one of her children, was instantly a suspect. Another young man admitted to the murder, and David breathed a sigh of relief, until the confessed murderer fingered David; “He paid me to do it.” David was sentenced to life without parole. Two decades later, Pulitzer winner and podcast host, Maggie Freleng (Bone Valley Season 3: Graves County, Wrongful Conviction, Suave) launched a “live” investigation into David's conviction alongside Jason Baldwin (himself wrongfully convicted as a member of the West Memphis Three). Maggie had come to believe that the entire investigation of David was botched by the tiny local police department, or worse, covered up the real killer. Was Maggie correct? Was David’s claim of innocence credible? In Death and Deceit in Alliance, Maggie recounts the case that launched her career, and ultimately, “broke” her.” The results will shock the listener and reduce Maggie to tears and self-doubt. This is not your typical wrongful conviction story. In fact, it turns the genre on its head. It asks the question: What if our champions are foolish? Season 4 - The Burden: Get the Money and Run “Trying to murder my father, this was the thing that put me on the path.” That’s Joe Loya and that path was bank robbery. Bank, bank, bank, bank, bank. In season 4 of The Burden: Get the Money and Run, we hear from Joe who was once the most prolific bank robber in Southern California, and beyond. He used disguises, body doubles, proxies. He leaped over counters, grabbed the money and ran. Even as the FBI was closing in. It was a showdown between a daring bank robber, and a patient FBI agent. Joe was no ordinary bank robber. He was bright, articulate, charismatic, and driven by a dark rage that he summoned up at will. In seven episodes, Joe tells all: the what, the how… and the why. Including why he tried to murder his father. Season 3 - The Burden: Avenger Miriam Lewin is one of Argentina’s leading journalists today. At 19 years old, she was kidnapped off the streets of Buenos Aires for her political activism and thrown into a concentration camp. Thousands of her fellow inmates were executed, tossed alive from a cargo plane into the ocean. Miriam, along with a handful of others, will survive the camp. Then as a journalist, she will wage a decades long campaign to bring her tormentors to justice. Avenger is about one woman’s triumphant battle against unbelievable odds to survive torture, claim justice for the crimes done against her and others like her, and change the future of her country. Season 2 - The Burden: Empire on Blood Empire on Blood is set in the Bronx, NY, in the early 90s, when two young drug dealers ruled an intersection known as “The Corner on Blood.” The boss, Calvin Buari, lived large. He and a protege swore they would build an empire on blood. Then the relationship frayed and the protege accused Calvin of a double homicide which he claimed he didn’t do. But did he? Award-winning journalist Steve Fishman spent seven years to answer that question. This is the story of one man’s last chance to overturn his life sentence. He may prevail, but someone’s gotta pay. The Burden: Empire on Blood is the director’s cut of the true crime classic which reached #1 on the charts when it was first released half a dozen years ago. Season 1 - The Burden In the 1990s, Detective Louis N. Scarcella was legendary. In a city overrun by violent crime, he cracked the toughest cases and put away the worst criminals. “The Hulk” was his nickname. Then the story changed. Scarcella ran into a group of convicted murderers who all say they are innocent. They turned themselves into jailhouse-lawyers and in prison founded a lway firm. When they realized Scarcella helped put many of them away, they set their sights on taking him down. And with the help of a NY Times reporter they have a chance. For years, Scarcella insisted he did nothing wrong. But that’s all he’d say. Until we tracked Scarcella to a sauna in a Russian bathhouse, where he started to talk..and talk and talk. “The guilty have gone free,” he whispered. And then agreed to take us into the belly of the beast. Welcome to The Burden.