All Episodes

March 23, 2025 7 mins

Sometime in the 1900s, Americans began referring to themselves as consumers more often than as citizens. Learn how this mindset can make a real difference in how we take responsibility for our communities in today's episode of BrainStuff, based on this article: https://people.howstuffworks.com/american-citizens-versus-consumers.htm

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of iHeartRadio, Hey Brainstuff Lauren
Bobelbaum here. It's hard to say exactly when it started,
but in recent years there seems to be an increasing
tendency in the United States to use the term consumer
interchangeably with citizen, even when the discussion isn't taking place

(00:23):
strictly in an economic framework, and some political experts say
that this choice of words may reveal a subtle but
worrisome shift in how we see ourselves and our role
in American society, away from the notion of working together
with others toward the common good, and toward a nation
of individuals primarily motivated by self interest before. The article

(00:46):
of this episode is based on How Stuffworks. Spoke by
email back in twenty seventeen with Jason Sadowski, a senior
lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Computing at Monash University.
He said that using consumer interchangeably with citizen and a
quote has become part of our default discourse, the normal
way we viewed society and people just look at the

(01:07):
twenty sixteen presidential election. This consumer versus citizen language is
often used when analysts and pundits talk about elections of
voters are just consumers with preferences, and the election is
a marketplace of products to choose from in the store.
We vote with our dollar. We're told that elections are
functionally the same thing. You just use a ballot instead

(01:29):
of a buck to cast your vote. This understanding of
democratic processes as a marketplace is just one more place
where the citizen is overtaken by the consumer. Both words
have been around for centuries. A citizen dates back to
the thirteen hundreds, though it originally meant the inhabitant of
a city and didn't take on its present meaning a

(01:51):
person who has rights and responsibilities in the society until
around sixteen ten. The word consumer arose in the fourteen hundreds,
though back then it meant someone who squanders or wastes things.
It took on a less pejorative economic meaning, that is,
a person who purchases and uses goods and services around
seventeen forty five. If you look at the appearances of

(02:16):
each word in Google Books and gram Viewer, which isn't
always accurate, but gives us a pretty decent idea of
how often words were used in print in the English
language from eighteen hundred onward. The word consumer seldom appeared
in print until about nineteen hundred, but starting around then
it steadily rose until it passed up citizen and frequency

(02:37):
in the late nineteen twenties. The use of the word
consumer peaked in the nineteen eighties, but it's still used
more than one and a half times as often as citizen.
How stuff Works also spoke via email with Michael Munger,
director of the Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Program at Duke
University's Political Science Department. He theorizes that the shift in

(02:59):
usage had to do with the rise in the twentieth
century of progressive politics. He said the progressives primarily saw
citizens as being helpless trapped by large forces, especially corporations,
that citizens couldn't deal with. Starting in the nineteen sixties,
politicians increasing use of sophisticated marketing techniques borrowed from sellers

(03:23):
of products like breakfast, cereal, cars, and antiperspirants also may
have played a role. Today, campaigns gather and analyze mountains
of data to conduct micro targeting efforts, which look at
individual voters attitudes and behaviors and what might be the
best way to reach them. And the government itself is
being judged as if it were consumer business. The American

(03:46):
Customer Satisfaction Index rates twelve departments and agencies within the
federal government on how people feel about the accessibility and
efficiency of their services. In twenty twenty four, the federal
government overall got a sixty nine point seven out of
one hundred, a seven year high, up two point two
percent over the previous year. And this isn't just semantics.

(04:10):
The words we use can have an impact on how
we live. A twenty twelve study published in the journal
Psychological Science found that choice of words may exert a
subtle influence on how we see ourselves. In one part
of the study, people who answered a consumer response survey
but tended to express more materialistic, self centered values than

(04:31):
those who answered a citizen survey. In another part, the
researchers presented subjects with the hypothetical situation in which people
had to share water from a well and labeled them
as either consumers or citizens. The subjects who got the
consumer identity tended to distrust others more about sharing water,

(04:53):
felt less in partnership with the other subjects, and felt
less personally responsible compared with those who were labeled citizens.
How stuff Works also spoke with Josh Pasek, a professor
of communication in Media and Political science at the University
of Michigan. He explained that this shift in terminology a
quote seems to underscore a shift away from viewing Americans

(05:16):
as having responsibility in our political system and toward a
more individualist view of what it means to be American.
Your job as an American citizen requires that you fulfill
key democratic norms, such as being informed, deliberating about political issues,
and participating in civic and political life. As an American consumer,
your actions are relevant only to the extent that they

(05:38):
respond to economic incentives. The responsibility to be engaged and
participatory is not your own, but instead depends on a
system that is oriented to bring you in. How Stuff
Works also spoke via email with Frank Trentman, a professor
of history at the University of London and author of
the book Empire of Things, How he Became a World

(06:00):
of Consumers from the fifteenth century to the twenty first.
He thinks that the blurred distinction between consumer and citizen
may make it tougher for people to come together to
solve problems. He said, not all consumers see the world
in the same way, and hence concerted action is difficult.

(06:22):
All of this is why some people would like to
see us go back to viewing ourselves as active citizens,
not passive consumers. As political commentator Mark Shields wrote in
twenty twelve, maybe it's time that Americans started insisting that
leaders treat them not like consumers quote, but as citizens
who recognize that we have, in addition to rights and privileges,

(06:44):
real obligations and responsibilities. Today's episode is based on the
article when and Why did America start calling its citizens consumers?
On HowStuffWorks dot Com, written by Patrick J. Khigh. Brain
Stuff is production of iHeartRadio in partnership with ho stuffworks
dot Com and is produced by Tyler Klang. Four more

(07:06):
podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

BrainStuff News

Advertise With Us

Follow Us On

Host

Lauren Vogelbaum

Lauren Vogelbaum

Show Links

AboutStore

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

The Burden

The Burden

The Burden is a documentary series that takes listeners into the hidden places where justice is done (and undone). It dives deep into the lives of heroes and villains. And it focuses a spotlight on those who triumph even when the odds are against them. Season 5 - The Burden: Death & Deceit in Alliance On April Fools Day 1999, 26-year-old Yvonne Layne was found murdered in her Alliance, Ohio home. David Thorne, her ex-boyfriend and father of one of her children, was instantly a suspect. Another young man admitted to the murder, and David breathed a sigh of relief, until the confessed murderer fingered David; “He paid me to do it.” David was sentenced to life without parole. Two decades later, Pulitzer winner and podcast host, Maggie Freleng (Bone Valley Season 3: Graves County, Wrongful Conviction, Suave) launched a “live” investigation into David's conviction alongside Jason Baldwin (himself wrongfully convicted as a member of the West Memphis Three). Maggie had come to believe that the entire investigation of David was botched by the tiny local police department, or worse, covered up the real killer. Was Maggie correct? Was David’s claim of innocence credible? In Death and Deceit in Alliance, Maggie recounts the case that launched her career, and ultimately, “broke” her.” The results will shock the listener and reduce Maggie to tears and self-doubt. This is not your typical wrongful conviction story. In fact, it turns the genre on its head. It asks the question: What if our champions are foolish? Season 4 - The Burden: Get the Money and Run “Trying to murder my father, this was the thing that put me on the path.” That’s Joe Loya and that path was bank robbery. Bank, bank, bank, bank, bank. In season 4 of The Burden: Get the Money and Run, we hear from Joe who was once the most prolific bank robber in Southern California, and beyond. He used disguises, body doubles, proxies. He leaped over counters, grabbed the money and ran. Even as the FBI was closing in. It was a showdown between a daring bank robber, and a patient FBI agent. Joe was no ordinary bank robber. He was bright, articulate, charismatic, and driven by a dark rage that he summoned up at will. In seven episodes, Joe tells all: the what, the how… and the why. Including why he tried to murder his father. Season 3 - The Burden: Avenger Miriam Lewin is one of Argentina’s leading journalists today. At 19 years old, she was kidnapped off the streets of Buenos Aires for her political activism and thrown into a concentration camp. Thousands of her fellow inmates were executed, tossed alive from a cargo plane into the ocean. Miriam, along with a handful of others, will survive the camp. Then as a journalist, she will wage a decades long campaign to bring her tormentors to justice. Avenger is about one woman’s triumphant battle against unbelievable odds to survive torture, claim justice for the crimes done against her and others like her, and change the future of her country. Season 2 - The Burden: Empire on Blood Empire on Blood is set in the Bronx, NY, in the early 90s, when two young drug dealers ruled an intersection known as “The Corner on Blood.” The boss, Calvin Buari, lived large. He and a protege swore they would build an empire on blood. Then the relationship frayed and the protege accused Calvin of a double homicide which he claimed he didn’t do. But did he? Award-winning journalist Steve Fishman spent seven years to answer that question. This is the story of one man’s last chance to overturn his life sentence. He may prevail, but someone’s gotta pay. The Burden: Empire on Blood is the director’s cut of the true crime classic which reached #1 on the charts when it was first released half a dozen years ago. Season 1 - The Burden In the 1990s, Detective Louis N. Scarcella was legendary. In a city overrun by violent crime, he cracked the toughest cases and put away the worst criminals. “The Hulk” was his nickname. Then the story changed. Scarcella ran into a group of convicted murderers who all say they are innocent. They turned themselves into jailhouse-lawyers and in prison founded a lway firm. When they realized Scarcella helped put many of them away, they set their sights on taking him down. And with the help of a NY Times reporter they have a chance. For years, Scarcella insisted he did nothing wrong. But that’s all he’d say. Until we tracked Scarcella to a sauna in a Russian bathhouse, where he started to talk..and talk and talk. “The guilty have gone free,” he whispered. And then agreed to take us into the belly of the beast. Welcome to The Burden.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2026 iHeartMedia, Inc.