March 13, 2013 • 20 mins
What does the theory of relativity have to do with time? Why would it be hard to synchronize time between Earth and space travelers? Is it even possible to have a standard time once you leave Earth? Learn more about time with Joe, Jonathan and Lauren.
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to
forward Thinking. Welcome to forward Thinking. Everybody, it's time for
another podcast. My name is Jonathan Strickland, and I am
joined by Lauren Vock Obama, who is shaking her head
(00:21):
at you, and Joe McCormick, who I made some horrible
noise when you never mind. All right, well, you know,
I make a time joke. They both grown. Because we
are talking about time today, and we're talking about time
and relativity and sort of the challenges that we're going
to have in keeping time in the future. And you
might think, well, the thought we'd got pretty good at
(00:43):
keeping time by now. I mean, we've got a long
history of keeping time, centuries of keeping time, and uh,
and it's true. We have gotten very good at keeping
local time, particularly things like, oh, I don't know, making
sure that we are seconds match up every single second
of the day, like, for instance, the quantum clock, which
(01:03):
is keeping time so accurately that it won't lose a
second for three point seven billion years, as opposed to
the old standard, which is one second every hundred million years,
which is just you know, acceptable. We can't live like that, right,
But but so so from a local perspective, we are
very good at keeping time. But that local perspective is
all based on the fact that we're all pretty much
(01:26):
stuck here on this big old rock we call the Earth,
traveling around the Sun together, more or less moving at
the same speed, although depending upon where you want are
on Earth, that actually changes just a little bit. But
it turns out that time is not something that's universally standard, right, Joe,
what I didn't know this was news to you. You
wrote a whole episode of forward thinking about time. You
(01:48):
don't remember that, No, maybe it was in the future. Anyway,
time is not standing a second, all right. So you're
telling me, you're telling me what that that time is
not a real thing. What about all of the physical
laws we think of that are based on time, Like
light takes this long to cross this amount of distance,
(02:11):
all right? So time is time is relative, Joe. Time
is relative depending upon a few things like gravity or mass,
or the speed at which at which you travel and
uh for us, for human beings, time is a very
subjective experience where we experience time the way most of
(02:31):
us are familiar. You know, a second takes a second,
a minute, It is sixty seconds, an hour or sixty minutes,
unless you're sitting in a doctor's office, or you know,
attending a really boring lecture, in which case a second
is much longer than or you're having fun, in which
case a second is much smaller than. That kind of
goes back to the subjective part. But well, I mean
we we don't even know how long a second takes
for somebody else, right, I mean, I know what a
(02:53):
second feels like to me. What if your second feels
a lot longer than mine does? Okay? Yeah, and what
if the color blue looks different to you than us
to me. That's beside the point here, Joe. What I'm
trying to get at is that depending upon how fast you, Joe,
are traveling, time will pass at a different rate for
you than it would for someone who is not traveling
at that same speed. This gets really complicated because we're
(03:14):
technically all traveling already. We're on a planet that is moving.
That planet is not stationary. Now, if we had gone
back to pre Copernican times, where we all had just
assumed the Earth is a fixed location that is static
and is not moving, and if that were in fact true,
time would be a pretty simple thing for us to
(03:34):
keep track of. But it's not true. We are on
a planet that's moving around, and that is part of
what determines how time passes for us. Now, if you, Joe,
we're to get into say, I don't know, a spaceship
that has a really fast propulsion system on it, like
close to the speed of light, and you were to
just do a quick joy ride around the Solar System
(03:56):
and come back. For arguments sake, we'll say that you
you spent one hour according to your experience, your your
watch says one hour has passed, and you land back
on Earth. Now, you were to compare your watch with
my watch, which we had synchronized before you've gotten that
space ship, you would see that more time had passed
on my watch than on your watch. That's true, isn't it. Yeah? So, uh,
(04:19):
I actually did a little research on this, Joe, you
were pulling my legs. I'm I'm not that well, Okay,
I'm pretty misinformed. But so I I say, what if
what if you start watching a movie when you get
on your spaceship, and then somebody back on Earth starts
watching a movie at the same time, how much time
(04:41):
do you have to finish a movie. If say you're
going at nine percent of the speed of light, and
I looked up the Lorenz transformation ratio on this and
it says, if you're going about nine of the speed
of light, the transformation is effect is at a ratio
of I think like it was two point two nine.
And that works out that the per some on the
ship who leaves in time to watch a movie comes
(05:03):
back when it's over, has time to watch The Little
Mermaid back on Earth. At the same time that the
Little Mermaid viewer arrives home, you have just finished watching
The Godfather Part two, two hundred minutes long, the full
thing that you know, the sadness at the end. So
you get you get some pacino in de Niro while
(05:24):
the other person's singing part of your world. Right. So
so the person on the space ship, it feels like
only ninety minutes have passed. The person on Earth. It's
much longer, or minutes only have passed for the person
on this that's true. That's true. It doesn't it doesn't
feel like it, but it is. Yeah, because that's the
way time we're subjective. It's a subjective experience. That's the
thing subjective in the sense that it feels normal for
(05:45):
everybody right right you on the spaceship. It doesn't feel
to you like your time is going any slower. Everything
seems totally normal. Your watch, the second hand takes a
second to tick. The movie looks like it's playing at
a regular speed. But if somehow the people on the
Earth were able to peer in the window of your spaceship,
(06:06):
obviously they wouldn't be able to, but if we could
just imagine that it would seem to them like you
were watching the movie in slow motion, right, and that
that everything was going in slow motion, not just you
watching the movie, but you're watch the second hand would
be ticking away at a slower rate than it should
from that other observer. This is also tricky because we
(06:26):
often talk about from a stationary observer. Well, we don't
really have any stationary observers because we're on a planet.
It's a giant spaceship, essentially, isn't Isn't it even like
just just theoretically a rule that there's no such thing
as a stationary observer's I think you can only sort
you can sort of posit one, but there's no way
of actually confirming. Maybe you are stationary, you're technically in
(06:49):
a universe that's expanding. So I mean, it's it's it's
a complicated thing, right because if you're if you are
part of whatever system you are in, then you are
moving right so that this gets really this gets to
be a mind bender and you might think, oh, well,
this is kind of crazy. We're talking about near speed
of light travel. We have to contend with this. Right now,
there are satellites in orbit there in geosynchronous orbit over
(07:11):
the Earth that are keeping track things like like your
GPS stuff, which isn't necessarily geosynchronous orbit, but you've got
satellites up there that that are sending down information and
our GPS systems, which I'm sorry I just said GPS system.
I'll have to go to the A T M machine
and use my pin number. Um. But but let's say
you've got a GPS and it's getting information. It's technically
(07:34):
getting information from multiple satellites, and that information includes when
the satellite sent down a packet of information and by
using this this data, the GPS can determine where you
are on the surface of the Earth. It triangulates all
that data and it's all in the one of the
important things in that is when was the data sent
(07:56):
by the satellite supertime sensitive? Right exactly, because that's what
determines where you you know, how it how it figures
out where you are on the surface of the Earth.
Those those seconds matter, right. And the thing is, those
satellites that are in orbit are tracking time to us,
it seems like at a different rate because their clocks
over the course of a good span of time start
(08:18):
to lose time and due to the distance from the
center of gravity of the Earth and due to the
speed at which they're they're moving. Right. To be fair,
that change is so tiny. It is like if if
we were just to you know, be aboard this satellite
or something, we wouldn't even notice it. It's we're talking
about the tiny, tiny fractions of a second. Now it
matters if you're doing really precise calculations, like I assumed
(08:41):
the kind of the GPS on matter. But but those
kinds of speeds, it doesn't become a really noticeable problem
the same way it was when we talked about, you know,
watching The Godfather, right that that's much more. It's it's
like an instant realization. Whereas with the satellite it's an
accute lative thing as well. It would take months before
(09:02):
people would even start to notice something' hinky here. I
know that we synchronize them and they're all tomic clocks.
Why would why is this happening? But we have to
contend with that that macro dilation reality too, don't we.
I mean, if we're talking about the future and we're
talking about expanding into space, I mean, assuming we really
are going to explore the cosmos, right, which you know
(09:25):
I'm going to, I don't know about the rest of humanity,
so that everyone else better catch at Lawrence like sia,
I just call our major Tom from I'm out right.
But yeah, if we want to do that, I mean,
for instance, if we want to try and find another
planet to colonize, most of the most of the plants
that would be even remotely possible for that are hundreds
(09:49):
of light years away. I mean, I mean the nearest
systems period are hundreds of light years away. But you know,
talking sing of Kepler twenty two. You know, that was
the one that the Kepler found and they were like, oh,
this one looks pretty cool. Six light years away, Yeah,
six hundred light years away. That that's light years. I mean, technically,
(10:11):
according to relativity, you cannot travel at that speed, right,
you can't go at light speed. The closest we could
hope to do if we if we accept the universal
speed limit of of light speed, is getting you know,
close to light speed, like we were talking about earlier.
It's possible. Maybe we could someday get a craft that
goes the speed of light and then traveling to these
(10:34):
places becomes a lot more feasible. Right, but you're still
talking about the descendants of the people who got on
board the ship. Are the ones who are there or
some kind of cryogenic sort of we managed to find
some way of turning off the aging gene, and so
we're perpetually the same age as whenever we got that
(10:55):
treatment done. I wish that they would hurry up with
that because my time is running out. People. I've heard
you're very old, Jonathan. That's what I hear, Lauren. I
don't trust the cryogenic freezing, by the way, because every
time you do that, mother wakes you up halfway there
and there's some beacon you've got to go check out
on some weird blasted rock in the middle of space.
(11:15):
This this kind of brings me to mind of another
science fiction, beloved science fiction franchise, and I'm talking specifically
about Star Trek, where they've established the idea of the
star date. Right. Yeah, star date is is essentially it's
it's well, I guess they do it in quadrants in
Star Trek, but they have an established time that everyone
(11:38):
can magically work on. And that way, when you refer
to a star date, everyone else that you encounter knows
exactly when you're you know what time you're talking about,
because they're all keeping that same star date. Something. I
can only assume that they either have a computer on
some planet, probably Earth, because Earth is clearly the center
of the entire universe, or or something else that is
(11:58):
keeping time and is so technologically advanced lee that it
seems like magic to us transmitting that signal simultaneously to
every clock in the rest of the universe. Or I
don't know that the quantum logic has has advanced to
a state that that the computers can handle the log room.
Maybe they've they've got the they've got the entangled electrons,
and the spin of the electron tells the onboard ship clock. Okay, yeah,
(12:20):
ship time, because you would have to have ship time.
Ship time would be what it would feel like to
the people who are on board the ship, right, and
that time would feel like just like on any other service,
that the second is a second, a minutism, etcetera. The
star date is supposed to be outside of that, it's
supposed to be this universal time. And again I agree,
I think it's probably something that's supposed to be said
(12:41):
on Earth because starf Lead is that's where Earth is.
And I can't believe we're having this discussion this in depth.
But they didn't even keep it consistent on the show. No, no, no, no,
the early days, they just had a shorthand you know,
back back before like the first if you watch that
the original series and uh and you watch those first
few episodes there, they aren't consistent. In fact, there are
later episodes that have earlier star dates because they were
(13:02):
just kind of they thought it sounded cool. They were
just spitting out numbers. Yeah, they were like like number
forty seven, etcetera. Yeah, yeah, that is a cool number.
And in the Star Trek University seven is pretty big.
But anyway, that's the thing is that you would have
to have some sort of really complex computer to be
able to take in that information and take your onboard
(13:24):
ship's clock, and it was just ridiculous. Wait a second,
let's break this down. Okay, let's talk about what's really
the problem here. Okay, Now, in Star Trek, they're going
faster than the speed of light. So let's just maybe
that's possible. You know, maybe everything we know is wrong.
But let's let's just say right for right now that
that that's not actually what we're gonna be doing. Okay, Okay,
(13:46):
we're just we're ignore test or as entirely. Just skip
over that. That's cool. Let's imagine that that we can
go the speed of light. Okay, like we were talking
about before, break it down. What what's the actual problem.
Why can't we keep clocks synchronized? Well, because again time
is from from a stationary observer, which again from the
(14:08):
observer down here, time is is literally moving differently. You know,
it's it's it's it's all the theory of relativity by
by Einstein. It says that that time is part of
the fabric of space, and that the fabric of space
time is is warped by both gravity and speed, and
so so you're you're changing, you are intrinsically changing the
nature of this imaginary thing. You're changing your experience. Well,
(14:32):
it sounds like it sounds like essentially, what we're saying
is that time is an experience. It's not something that
you can track in any kind of standard or universal way.
It's also a magazine. Yeah, I just didn't want you
to pigeonhole. It's also a print side project. That's true, Yeah,
Morris Day. Yeah, anyway, Yeah, that's Joe and I are
(14:55):
bonding over terrible references. Uh, yeah, I mean it's it is.
It's totally subjective and really the the to me, one
of the interesting things is that, uh, from the perspective
of any one individual, whether that person is aboard a
spaceship or on a planet or drifting out into the dark,
cold clutches of space itself, time is passing at a
(15:19):
very at that normal rate, normal being like, this is
this is what I'm used to. It's not until you
meet up with someone else who has been traveling at
a different speed and you compare notes that you even
have the moment where you're like, wow, that's that's weird.
So maybe we would just have to give up the
fact that Okay, if you're traveling it is, you know,
(15:41):
very significant fraction of the speed of light. Everything's gonna
get messed up. Actually, no matter how fast you're traveling, right,
it's going to get messed up a little bit. It's
just a question of the faster you travel, the more
messed up it gets. Right in a in an exponential way, yes, okay,
so we understand that traveling in the spaceships at a
near fraction the speed of light will will make keeping
(16:01):
track of time across distances completely pointless. You just can't
really do it. Maybe you could, I'd imagine have different
sort of galactic time zones, right, like each planet keeps
its own time. Solar System keeps its own time in
a way that is useful locally, and when you get
(16:24):
somewhere new you just have to adapt to their time.
But that introduces another idea to me. So, if we're
traveling beyond Earth, aren't we going to get messed up
real bad? Just our bodies, our brains. I mean, we
are so deeply programmed to work on this planet that
has an essentially twenty four hour day in particular circadian Right,
(16:45):
what happens to us when suddenly we just do not
have day and night anymore. Well, if if you're a
board a ship, I assume, I mean, we're talking about
far enough in the future where we have these propulsion systems.
It's it's far enough to say that I think we
would be able to simulate not day cycles aboard the ship.
So at least on on ship, your night day cycles
to you would seem normal. They would seem to be
(17:07):
transpiring at the same rate as they would if you
were back on Earth. Now. Meanwhile, so when back on
Earth would be uh, if they were able to see
what your night day cycles would look like, they would say, wow,
that's nothing like what it is on Earth, because again,
you're traveling at near the speed of light. So it's
you know, from the two different from the two different perspectives,
it's gonna seem totally different, but from each individual it's
(17:29):
going to seem perfectly normal. That would allow you to
at least maintain some sense of balance from a normal
day night cycle while you're on the ship on another
planet totally different story, you're pretty much you know, I mean,
unless you're living inside all the time with no windows
out to the outside world, or you're on a planet
that has a day night cycle. It's so near to
(17:49):
Earth's that it doesn't really matter, which is possible, Like
Mars is really close, yeah, like three something something ours. Yeah,
it's really it's it's not it's very similar. It's similar
enough where I think it would be fairly easy to
adapt to the day night cycle. Uh. Not a whole
lot to see outside on Mars though, So I mean
(18:10):
you'll be like, is it a nice day, Well, it's dusty.
It's kind of kind of dusty. It's a little less
rusty today than it was yesterday. It's not true, it's
all oxidized. Yeah, So I mean that's just what does
night even look like on Mars? I feel like all
the pictures I've seen were taken during the day, and
well that night it's pretty dark. They don't have any
street lamps out there, all right, you know, you know, guys,
(18:33):
I mean, this is incredibly interesting conversation. But as it
turns out, I mean, it's it's going to be really hard,
if not impossible, to manage time across both Earth and
UH interstellar traveling UH spaceships that are moving at near
the speed of light or really any significant speed significant
enough to get out of our solar system and perhaps
(18:53):
into another one, just because that's the way time works.
And it's, uh, it's pretty hard to wrap your head around.
I mean, it's it's weird to think that the second
hand on my watch would be moving to me the
same amount as it with on Earth if I were
on a really fast ship, but from an outside observer
who somehow is magically able to see this, it was
like it's moving in slow motion. That's that seems crazy
(19:16):
and counterintuitive to us, but that's the way time works.
I actually don't wear a watch, so I don't even
know why I bothered doing this show. Yeah, me neither
are we are we three non latch wears. So, as
the Great Douglas Adams once said, time is an illusion,
lunchtime doubly so. And I think that pretty much sums
(19:38):
it up. Guys, Uh, we hear it. Forward thinking. Are
really excited to have a conversation with you, our audience,
and to really make this an interactive experience, not just
us gathering around and chatting into microphones and being silly,
but to really have conversations about the future and things
that are going to play a role in our future.
(19:59):
So we highly recommends you go check out the website.
It's fw thinking dot com. We're on Facebook, we're on Twitter,
we're on Google Plus. If there's any place else you
think we should be, let us know. We're gonna be
there and we look forward to having a conversation with
you and finding out what you think about the future
and why gets you excited. Let us know and we'll
talk to you again really soon. We're more on this
(20:21):
topic and the future of technology. Visit forward thinking dot Com,
brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places
Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to
forward Thinking. Welcome to forward Thinking. Everybody, it's time for
another podcast. My name is Jonathan Strickland, and I am
joined by Lauren Vock Obama, who is shaking her head
(00:21):
at you, and Joe McCormick, who I made some horrible
noise when you never mind. All right, well, you know,
I make a time joke. They both grown. Because we
are talking about time today, and we're talking about time
and relativity and sort of the challenges that we're going
to have in keeping time in the future. And you
might think, well, the thought we'd got pretty good at
(00:43):
keeping time by now. I mean, we've got a long
history of keeping time, centuries of keeping time, and uh,
and it's true. We have gotten very good at keeping
local time, particularly things like, oh, I don't know, making
sure that we are seconds match up every single second
of the day, like, for instance, the quantum clock, which
(01:03):
is keeping time so accurately that it won't lose a
second for three point seven billion years, as opposed to
the old standard, which is one second every hundred million years,
which is just you know, acceptable. We can't live like that, right,
But but so so from a local perspective, we are
very good at keeping time. But that local perspective is
all based on the fact that we're all pretty much
(01:26):
stuck here on this big old rock we call the Earth,
traveling around the Sun together, more or less moving at
the same speed, although depending upon where you want are
on Earth, that actually changes just a little bit. But
it turns out that time is not something that's universally standard, right, Joe,
what I didn't know this was news to you. You
wrote a whole episode of forward thinking about time. You
(01:48):
don't remember that, No, maybe it was in the future. Anyway,
time is not standing a second, all right. So you're
telling me, you're telling me what that that time is
not a real thing. What about all of the physical
laws we think of that are based on time, Like
light takes this long to cross this amount of distance,
(02:11):
all right? So time is time is relative, Joe. Time
is relative depending upon a few things like gravity or mass,
or the speed at which at which you travel and
uh for us, for human beings, time is a very
subjective experience where we experience time the way most of
(02:31):
us are familiar. You know, a second takes a second,
a minute, It is sixty seconds, an hour or sixty minutes,
unless you're sitting in a doctor's office, or you know,
attending a really boring lecture, in which case a second
is much longer than or you're having fun, in which
case a second is much smaller than. That kind of
goes back to the subjective part. But well, I mean
we we don't even know how long a second takes
for somebody else, right, I mean, I know what a
(02:53):
second feels like to me. What if your second feels
a lot longer than mine does? Okay? Yeah, and what
if the color blue looks different to you than us
to me. That's beside the point here, Joe. What I'm
trying to get at is that depending upon how fast you, Joe,
are traveling, time will pass at a different rate for
you than it would for someone who is not traveling
at that same speed. This gets really complicated because we're
(03:14):
technically all traveling already. We're on a planet that is moving.
That planet is not stationary. Now, if we had gone
back to pre Copernican times, where we all had just
assumed the Earth is a fixed location that is static
and is not moving, and if that were in fact true,
time would be a pretty simple thing for us to
(03:34):
keep track of. But it's not true. We are on
a planet that's moving around, and that is part of
what determines how time passes for us. Now, if you, Joe,
we're to get into say, I don't know, a spaceship
that has a really fast propulsion system on it, like
close to the speed of light, and you were to
just do a quick joy ride around the Solar System
(03:56):
and come back. For arguments sake, we'll say that you
you spent one hour according to your experience, your your
watch says one hour has passed, and you land back
on Earth. Now, you were to compare your watch with
my watch, which we had synchronized before you've gotten that
space ship, you would see that more time had passed
on my watch than on your watch. That's true, isn't it. Yeah? So, uh,
(04:19):
I actually did a little research on this, Joe, you
were pulling my legs. I'm I'm not that well, Okay,
I'm pretty misinformed. But so I I say, what if
what if you start watching a movie when you get
on your spaceship, and then somebody back on Earth starts
watching a movie at the same time, how much time
(04:41):
do you have to finish a movie. If say you're
going at nine percent of the speed of light, and
I looked up the Lorenz transformation ratio on this and
it says, if you're going about nine of the speed
of light, the transformation is effect is at a ratio
of I think like it was two point two nine.
And that works out that the per some on the
ship who leaves in time to watch a movie comes
(05:03):
back when it's over, has time to watch The Little
Mermaid back on Earth. At the same time that the
Little Mermaid viewer arrives home, you have just finished watching
The Godfather Part two, two hundred minutes long, the full
thing that you know, the sadness at the end. So
you get you get some pacino in de Niro while
(05:24):
the other person's singing part of your world. Right. So
so the person on the space ship, it feels like
only ninety minutes have passed. The person on Earth. It's
much longer, or minutes only have passed for the person
on this that's true. That's true. It doesn't it doesn't
feel like it, but it is. Yeah, because that's the
way time we're subjective. It's a subjective experience. That's the
thing subjective in the sense that it feels normal for
(05:45):
everybody right right you on the spaceship. It doesn't feel
to you like your time is going any slower. Everything
seems totally normal. Your watch, the second hand takes a
second to tick. The movie looks like it's playing at
a regular speed. But if somehow the people on the
Earth were able to peer in the window of your spaceship,
(06:06):
obviously they wouldn't be able to, but if we could
just imagine that it would seem to them like you
were watching the movie in slow motion, right, and that
that everything was going in slow motion, not just you
watching the movie, but you're watch the second hand would
be ticking away at a slower rate than it should
from that other observer. This is also tricky because we
(06:26):
often talk about from a stationary observer. Well, we don't
really have any stationary observers because we're on a planet.
It's a giant spaceship, essentially, isn't Isn't it even like
just just theoretically a rule that there's no such thing
as a stationary observer's I think you can only sort
you can sort of posit one, but there's no way
of actually confirming. Maybe you are stationary, you're technically in
(06:49):
a universe that's expanding. So I mean, it's it's it's
a complicated thing, right because if you're if you are
part of whatever system you are in, then you are
moving right so that this gets really this gets to
be a mind bender and you might think, oh, well,
this is kind of crazy. We're talking about near speed
of light travel. We have to contend with this. Right now,
there are satellites in orbit there in geosynchronous orbit over
(07:11):
the Earth that are keeping track things like like your
GPS stuff, which isn't necessarily geosynchronous orbit, but you've got
satellites up there that that are sending down information and
our GPS systems, which I'm sorry I just said GPS system.
I'll have to go to the A T M machine
and use my pin number. Um. But but let's say
you've got a GPS and it's getting information. It's technically
(07:34):
getting information from multiple satellites, and that information includes when
the satellite sent down a packet of information and by
using this this data, the GPS can determine where you
are on the surface of the Earth. It triangulates all
that data and it's all in the one of the
important things in that is when was the data sent
(07:56):
by the satellite supertime sensitive? Right exactly, because that's what
determines where you you know, how it how it figures
out where you are on the surface of the Earth.
Those those seconds matter, right. And the thing is, those
satellites that are in orbit are tracking time to us,
it seems like at a different rate because their clocks
over the course of a good span of time start
(08:18):
to lose time and due to the distance from the
center of gravity of the Earth and due to the
speed at which they're they're moving. Right. To be fair,
that change is so tiny. It is like if if
we were just to you know, be aboard this satellite
or something, we wouldn't even notice it. It's we're talking
about the tiny, tiny fractions of a second. Now it
matters if you're doing really precise calculations, like I assumed
(08:41):
the kind of the GPS on matter. But but those
kinds of speeds, it doesn't become a really noticeable problem
the same way it was when we talked about, you know,
watching The Godfather, right that that's much more. It's it's
like an instant realization. Whereas with the satellite it's an
accute lative thing as well. It would take months before
(09:02):
people would even start to notice something' hinky here. I
know that we synchronize them and they're all tomic clocks.
Why would why is this happening? But we have to
contend with that that macro dilation reality too, don't we.
I mean, if we're talking about the future and we're
talking about expanding into space, I mean, assuming we really
are going to explore the cosmos, right, which you know
(09:25):
I'm going to, I don't know about the rest of humanity,
so that everyone else better catch at Lawrence like sia,
I just call our major Tom from I'm out right.
But yeah, if we want to do that, I mean,
for instance, if we want to try and find another
planet to colonize, most of the most of the plants
that would be even remotely possible for that are hundreds
(09:49):
of light years away. I mean, I mean the nearest
systems period are hundreds of light years away. But you know,
talking sing of Kepler twenty two. You know, that was
the one that the Kepler found and they were like, oh,
this one looks pretty cool. Six light years away, Yeah,
six hundred light years away. That that's light years. I mean, technically,
(10:11):
according to relativity, you cannot travel at that speed, right,
you can't go at light speed. The closest we could
hope to do if we if we accept the universal
speed limit of of light speed, is getting you know,
close to light speed, like we were talking about earlier.
It's possible. Maybe we could someday get a craft that
goes the speed of light and then traveling to these
(10:34):
places becomes a lot more feasible. Right, but you're still
talking about the descendants of the people who got on
board the ship. Are the ones who are there or
some kind of cryogenic sort of we managed to find
some way of turning off the aging gene, and so
we're perpetually the same age as whenever we got that
(10:55):
treatment done. I wish that they would hurry up with
that because my time is running out. People. I've heard
you're very old, Jonathan. That's what I hear, Lauren. I
don't trust the cryogenic freezing, by the way, because every
time you do that, mother wakes you up halfway there
and there's some beacon you've got to go check out
on some weird blasted rock in the middle of space.
(11:15):
This this kind of brings me to mind of another
science fiction, beloved science fiction franchise, and I'm talking specifically
about Star Trek, where they've established the idea of the
star date. Right. Yeah, star date is is essentially it's
it's well, I guess they do it in quadrants in
Star Trek, but they have an established time that everyone
(11:38):
can magically work on. And that way, when you refer
to a star date, everyone else that you encounter knows
exactly when you're you know what time you're talking about,
because they're all keeping that same star date. Something. I
can only assume that they either have a computer on
some planet, probably Earth, because Earth is clearly the center
of the entire universe, or or something else that is
(11:58):
keeping time and is so technologically advanced lee that it
seems like magic to us transmitting that signal simultaneously to
every clock in the rest of the universe. Or I
don't know that the quantum logic has has advanced to
a state that that the computers can handle the log room.
Maybe they've they've got the they've got the entangled electrons,
and the spin of the electron tells the onboard ship clock. Okay, yeah,
(12:20):
ship time, because you would have to have ship time.
Ship time would be what it would feel like to
the people who are on board the ship, right, and
that time would feel like just like on any other service,
that the second is a second, a minutism, etcetera. The
star date is supposed to be outside of that, it's
supposed to be this universal time. And again I agree,
I think it's probably something that's supposed to be said
(12:41):
on Earth because starf Lead is that's where Earth is.
And I can't believe we're having this discussion this in depth.
But they didn't even keep it consistent on the show. No, no, no, no,
the early days, they just had a shorthand you know,
back back before like the first if you watch that
the original series and uh and you watch those first
few episodes there, they aren't consistent. In fact, there are
later episodes that have earlier star dates because they were
(13:02):
just kind of they thought it sounded cool. They were
just spitting out numbers. Yeah, they were like like number
forty seven, etcetera. Yeah, yeah, that is a cool number.
And in the Star Trek University seven is pretty big.
But anyway, that's the thing is that you would have
to have some sort of really complex computer to be
able to take in that information and take your onboard
(13:24):
ship's clock, and it was just ridiculous. Wait a second,
let's break this down. Okay, let's talk about what's really
the problem here. Okay, Now, in Star Trek, they're going
faster than the speed of light. So let's just maybe
that's possible. You know, maybe everything we know is wrong.
But let's let's just say right for right now that
that that's not actually what we're gonna be doing. Okay, Okay,
(13:46):
we're just we're ignore test or as entirely. Just skip
over that. That's cool. Let's imagine that that we can
go the speed of light. Okay, like we were talking
about before, break it down. What what's the actual problem.
Why can't we keep clocks synchronized? Well, because again time
is from from a stationary observer, which again from the
(14:08):
observer down here, time is is literally moving differently. You know,
it's it's it's it's all the theory of relativity by
by Einstein. It says that that time is part of
the fabric of space, and that the fabric of space
time is is warped by both gravity and speed, and
so so you're you're changing, you are intrinsically changing the
nature of this imaginary thing. You're changing your experience. Well,
(14:32):
it sounds like it sounds like essentially, what we're saying
is that time is an experience. It's not something that
you can track in any kind of standard or universal way.
It's also a magazine. Yeah, I just didn't want you
to pigeonhole. It's also a print side project. That's true, Yeah,
Morris Day. Yeah, anyway, Yeah, that's Joe and I are
(14:55):
bonding over terrible references. Uh, yeah, I mean it's it is.
It's totally subjective and really the the to me, one
of the interesting things is that, uh, from the perspective
of any one individual, whether that person is aboard a
spaceship or on a planet or drifting out into the dark,
cold clutches of space itself, time is passing at a
(15:19):
very at that normal rate, normal being like, this is
this is what I'm used to. It's not until you
meet up with someone else who has been traveling at
a different speed and you compare notes that you even
have the moment where you're like, wow, that's that's weird.
So maybe we would just have to give up the
fact that Okay, if you're traveling it is, you know,
(15:41):
very significant fraction of the speed of light. Everything's gonna
get messed up. Actually, no matter how fast you're traveling, right,
it's going to get messed up a little bit. It's
just a question of the faster you travel, the more
messed up it gets. Right in a in an exponential way, yes, okay,
so we understand that traveling in the spaceships at a
near fraction the speed of light will will make keeping
(16:01):
track of time across distances completely pointless. You just can't
really do it. Maybe you could, I'd imagine have different
sort of galactic time zones, right, like each planet keeps
its own time. Solar System keeps its own time in
a way that is useful locally, and when you get
(16:24):
somewhere new you just have to adapt to their time.
But that introduces another idea to me. So, if we're
traveling beyond Earth, aren't we going to get messed up
real bad? Just our bodies, our brains. I mean, we
are so deeply programmed to work on this planet that
has an essentially twenty four hour day in particular circadian Right,
(16:45):
what happens to us when suddenly we just do not
have day and night anymore. Well, if if you're a
board a ship, I assume, I mean, we're talking about
far enough in the future where we have these propulsion systems.
It's it's far enough to say that I think we
would be able to simulate not day cycles aboard the ship.
So at least on on ship, your night day cycles
to you would seem normal. They would seem to be
(17:07):
transpiring at the same rate as they would if you
were back on Earth. Now. Meanwhile, so when back on
Earth would be uh, if they were able to see
what your night day cycles would look like, they would say, wow,
that's nothing like what it is on Earth, because again,
you're traveling at near the speed of light. So it's
you know, from the two different from the two different perspectives,
it's gonna seem totally different, but from each individual it's
(17:29):
going to seem perfectly normal. That would allow you to
at least maintain some sense of balance from a normal
day night cycle while you're on the ship on another
planet totally different story, you're pretty much you know, I mean,
unless you're living inside all the time with no windows
out to the outside world, or you're on a planet
that has a day night cycle. It's so near to
(17:49):
Earth's that it doesn't really matter, which is possible, Like
Mars is really close, yeah, like three something something ours. Yeah,
it's really it's it's not it's very similar. It's similar
enough where I think it would be fairly easy to
adapt to the day night cycle. Uh. Not a whole
lot to see outside on Mars though, So I mean
(18:10):
you'll be like, is it a nice day, Well, it's dusty.
It's kind of kind of dusty. It's a little less
rusty today than it was yesterday. It's not true, it's
all oxidized. Yeah, So I mean that's just what does
night even look like on Mars? I feel like all
the pictures I've seen were taken during the day, and
well that night it's pretty dark. They don't have any
street lamps out there, all right, you know, you know, guys,
(18:33):
I mean, this is incredibly interesting conversation. But as it
turns out, I mean, it's it's going to be really hard,
if not impossible, to manage time across both Earth and
UH interstellar traveling UH spaceships that are moving at near
the speed of light or really any significant speed significant
enough to get out of our solar system and perhaps
(18:53):
into another one, just because that's the way time works.
And it's, uh, it's pretty hard to wrap your head around.
I mean, it's it's weird to think that the second
hand on my watch would be moving to me the
same amount as it with on Earth if I were
on a really fast ship, but from an outside observer
who somehow is magically able to see this, it was
like it's moving in slow motion. That's that seems crazy
(19:16):
and counterintuitive to us, but that's the way time works.
I actually don't wear a watch, so I don't even
know why I bothered doing this show. Yeah, me neither
are we are we three non latch wears. So, as
the Great Douglas Adams once said, time is an illusion,
lunchtime doubly so. And I think that pretty much sums
(19:38):
it up. Guys, Uh, we hear it. Forward thinking. Are
really excited to have a conversation with you, our audience,
and to really make this an interactive experience, not just
us gathering around and chatting into microphones and being silly,
but to really have conversations about the future and things
that are going to play a role in our future.
(19:59):
So we highly recommends you go check out the website.
It's fw thinking dot com. We're on Facebook, we're on Twitter,
we're on Google Plus. If there's any place else you
think we should be, let us know. We're gonna be
there and we look forward to having a conversation with
you and finding out what you think about the future
and why gets you excited. Let us know and we'll
talk to you again really soon. We're more on this
(20:21):
topic and the future of technology. Visit forward thinking dot Com,
brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places
Fw:Thinking News
Hosts And Creators
Jonathan Strickland
Joe McCormick
Lauren Vogelbaum
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.